U.S. patent application number 12/572410 was filed with the patent office on 2010-09-30 for opsonic monoclonal and chimeric antibodies specific for lipoteichoic acid of gram positive bacteria.
This patent application is currently assigned to HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE. Invention is credited to GERALD WALTER FISCHER, RICHARD F. SCHUMAN, JEFFREY R. STINSON, HING WONG.
Application Number | 20100247546 12/572410 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 46281760 |
Filed Date | 2010-09-30 |
United States Patent
Application |
20100247546 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
FISCHER; GERALD WALTER ; et
al. |
September 30, 2010 |
OPSONIC MONOCLONAL AND CHIMERIC ANTIBODIES SPECIFIC FOR
LIPOTEICHOIC ACID OF GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA
Abstract
The present invention encompasses monoclonal antibodies that
bind to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Gram positive bacteria. The
antibodies also bind to whole bacteria and enhance phagocytosis and
killing of the bacteria in vitro. The invention also provides
antibodies having human sequences (chimeric, humanized and human
antibodies). The invention also sets forth the variable regions of
three antibodies within the invention and presents the striking
homology between them.
Inventors: |
FISCHER; GERALD WALTER;
(BETHESDA, MD) ; SCHUMAN; RICHARD F.;
(GAITHERSBURG, MD) ; WONG; HING; (WESTON, FL)
; STINSON; JEFFREY R.; (BROOKVILLE, MD) |
Correspondence
Address: |
LAHIVE & COCKFIELD, LLP;FLOOR 30, SUITE 3000
ONE POST OFFICE SQUARE
BOSTON
MA
02109
US
|
Assignee: |
HENRY M. JACKSON FOUNDATION FOR THE
ADVANCEMENT OF MILITARY MEDICINE
ROCKVILLE
MD
ALTOR BIOSCIENCE CORPORATION
MIRAMAR
FL
|
Family ID: |
46281760 |
Appl. No.: |
12/572410 |
Filed: |
October 2, 2009 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11724040 |
Mar 13, 2007 |
7777017 |
|
|
12572410 |
|
|
|
|
10323927 |
Dec 20, 2002 |
7250494 |
|
|
11724040 |
|
|
|
|
09097055 |
Jun 15, 1998 |
6610293 |
|
|
10323927 |
|
|
|
|
60049871 |
Jun 16, 1997 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
424/150.1 ;
435/320.1; 435/340; 530/387.3; 530/387.9; 530/388.15; 530/388.4;
536/23.53 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C07K 2317/56 20130101;
A61P 31/04 20180101; C07K 2317/565 20130101; A61K 39/00 20130101;
C07K 14/195 20130101; A61P 31/00 20180101; C07K 2319/00 20130101;
C07K 16/1267 20130101; C07K 2317/77 20130101; A61K 38/00 20130101;
C07K 2317/24 20130101; C07K 16/1271 20130101; C07K 2317/73
20130101; A61K 2039/505 20130101; C07K 2317/34 20130101; C07K
2317/33 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
424/150.1 ;
530/388.4; 530/388.15; 530/387.9; 530/387.3; 536/23.53; 435/320.1;
435/340 |
International
Class: |
A61K 39/40 20060101
A61K039/40; C07K 16/12 20060101 C07K016/12; C07H 21/04 20060101
C07H021/04; A61P 31/04 20060101 A61P031/04; C12N 15/85 20060101
C12N015/85; C12N 5/10 20060101 C12N005/10 |
Claims
1. An isolated monoclonal antibody, or antigen-binding fragment
thereof, that binds to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Gram positive
bacteria, wherein at least a portion of the antibody variable
region is obtained from a phage display library comprising human
antibody sequences or is obtained from a cell comprising a human
antibody sequence.
2. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1 wherein at least a
portion of the antibody variable region has been identified as
binding to a peptide mimetic of an LTA epitope, Staphylococcus, or
a Staphylococcus antigen.
3. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1 wherein the phage
display library comprising human antibody sequences is derived from
sequences from a Staphylococcus seropositive human or human
immunized with a Staphylococcus antigen or mimetic thereof.
4. (canceled)
5. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the cell is
a human B-cell or a transgenic B-cell comprising a human antibody
sequence.
6. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 5 wherein the
transgenic B-cell is obtained from a transgenic animal comprising a
human antibody sequence.
7. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 6 wherein the
transgenic animal is a mouse that has been immunized with Gram
positive bacteria, an antigen thereof, or mimetic thereof.
8. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody is a fully human antibody.
9. An isolated human monoclonal antibody or fragment thereof that
specifically binds to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Gram positive
bacteria.
10. (canceled)
11. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of Gram positive bacteria that
are coagulase positive, coagulase negative, or both coagulase
positive and coagulase negative Gram positive bacteria.
12. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of Gram positive bacteria that
are Staphylococcus epidermidis.
13. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of Gram positive bacteria that
are Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, or both
Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus.
14. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of the Gram positive bacteria
Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus.
15. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of Gram positive bacteria that
are multiple serotypes of Staphylococcus epidermidis,
Staphylococcus aureus, or both Staphylococcus epidermidis and
Staphylococcus aureus.
16. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 15, wherein the
multiple serotypes of Staphylococcus aureus are serotype 5,
serotype 8, or both serotype 5 and serotype 8.
17. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody specifically binds to LTA of Gram positive bacteria that
are Staphylococcus epidermidis and one or more Gram positive
bacteria selected from the group consisting of Staphylococcus
aureus, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus faecalis, and
Streptococcus pyogenes.
18. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody recognizes the peptide sequence WRMYFSHRHAHLRSP (SEQ ID
NO:23), the peptide sequence WHWRHRIPLQLAAGR (SEQ ID NO:24), a
peptide sequence having substantial identity to the peptide
sequence WRMYFSHRHAHLRSP (SEQ ID NO:23), a peptide sequence having
substantial identity to the peptide sequence WHWRHRIPLQLAAGR (SEQ
ID NO:24), or combination thereof.
19. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody recognizes LTA of Gram positive bacteria which are
coagulase positive, or coagulase negative, or recognizes both
coagulase positive and coagulase negative Gram positive
bacteria.
20. The isolated monoclonal antibody of claim 1, wherein the
antibody recognizes Gram positive bacteria which are Staphylococcus
epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus mutans,
Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus pyogenes, or a combination
thereof.
21.-28. (canceled)
29. The isolated antigen-binding antibody fragment of claim 1,
wherein the fragment is a Fab, Fab', F(ab')2, SFv, light chain,
heavy chain, or combination thereof.
30. A polynucleotide encoding an antibody, or fragment thereof, of
claim 1.
31. A vector comprising the polynucleotide of claim 30.
32. A cell comprising the vector of claim 31.
33. An antibody, or antigen-binding fragment thereof, produced by
the cell of claim 32.
34. A composition comprising an isolated monoclonal antibody or
antigen-binding fragment thereof, and a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier, wherein the antibody specifically binds to lipoteichoic
acid (LTA) of Gram positive bacteria and comprises a portion of a
human antibody sequence.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/724,040, which is a divisional of U.S.
patent Ser. No. 10/323,927, filed Dec. 20, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No.
7,250,494, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 09/097,055, filed Jun. 15, 1998, now U.S. Pat.
No. 6,610,293, and is further based on and claims the benefit of
U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/343,503, filed Dec. 21,
2001, now expired.
[0002] This application also relates to U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,511,
U.S. Pat. No. 5,955,074, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,293. Each of the
above-referenced applications is incorporated herein by reference
for all purposes.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0003] 1. Field of the Invention
[0004] This invention in the fields of immunology and infectious
diseases relates to antibodies that are specific for Gram positive
bacteria, particularly to bacteria that bear lipoteichoic acids on
their surfaces. The invention includes monoclonal and chimeric
antibodies, as well as fragments, regions and derivatives thereof.
This invention further relates to sequences of the variable region
that enhance the antibody's opsonic activity. The antibodies of the
invention may be used for diagnostic, prophylactic and therapeutic
applications.
[0005] 2. Background of the Invention
[0006] The search for agents to combat bacterial infections has
been long and arduous. The development of antibiotics has brought
us from the time when sepsis associated with amputation was
associated with a 50 percent mortality rate. Today's challenge,
however, is the increasing development of bacteria that are
resistant to antibiotics, such as members of the genera
Staphylococcus.
[0007] Staphylococci are particularly worrisome because they
commonly colonize humans and animals and are an important cause of
human morbidity and mortality. Because of their prevalence on the
skin and mucosal linings, staphylococci are ideally situated to
produce both localized and systemic infections. Of the
staphylococci, both S. aureus, a coagulase positive bacteria, and
S. epidermidis, a coagulase negative species, are the most
problematic. In fact, S. aureus is the most virulent
Staphylococcus, producing severe and often fatal disease in both
normal and immunocompromised hosts. S. epidermidis has become one
of the major causes of nosocomial (hospital acquired) infection in
patients with impaired immune responses or those whose treatments
involve the placement of foreign objects into the body, such as
patients who receive continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and
patients receiving parenteral nutrition through central venous
catheters (25). Indeed, S. epidermidis is now recognized as a
common cause of neonatal nosocomial sepsis, and infections
frequently occur in premature infants that have received parenteral
nutrition. Moreover, in recent years, the involvement of S.
epidermidis in neonatal infection has increased dramatically.
Indeed, for every 10 babies diagnosed with bacterial sepsis seven
or more days after birth (indicative of post-partum bacterial
exposure), six of those are infected with S. epidermidis.
Untreated, Staphylococcus infections in newborns can result in
multiple organ failure and death in two to three days. Antibiotics
are only partially effective and, unfortunately, the rise in
multiply drug resistant strains of Staphylococcus renders
antibiotic treatments less and less effective.
[0008] The problems of antibiotic resistance are so significant
that they have reached the lay press. See, e.g., The Washington
Post "Microbe in Hospital Infections Show Resistance to
Antibiotics," May 29, 1997; The Washington Times, "Deadly bacteria
outwits antibiotics," May 29, 1997. And this concern is borne out
by the scientific literature. See L. Garrett, The Coming Plague,
"The Revenge of the Germs or Just Keep Inventing New Drugs" Ch. 13,
pgs. 411-456, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, N.Y., Eds. (1994). In one
study, the majority of staphylococci isolated from blood cultures
of septic infants were resistant to multiple antibiotics (10).
Another study describes methicillin-resistant S. aureus (31). There
is no doubt that the emergence of antibiotic resistance among
clinical isolates is making treatment difficult (18).
[0009] The other possible route of treatment is the administration
of antibodies. Antibodies protect against bacterial attack by
recognizing and binding to antigens on the bacteria to thereby
facilitate the removal or "clearance" of the bacteria by a process
called phagocytosis, wherein phagocytic cells (predominantly
neutrophils and macrophages) identify, engulf, and subsequently
destroy the invading bacteria. However, bacteria have developed
mechanisms to avoid phagocytosis, such as the production of a
"capsule" to which phagocytes cannot adhere or the production of
toxins that actually poison the encroaching phagocytes. Antibodies
overcome these defenses by, for example, binding to the toxins to
thereby neutralize them. More significantly, antibodies may
themselves bind to the capsule to coat it, in a process called
opsonization, to make the bacteria extremely attractive to
phagocytes and to enhance their rate of clearance from the
bloodstream.
[0010] Confounding the use of administered antibodies, however, are
conflicting reports in the literature. For example, the
immunization studies of Fattom et al. demonstrated that
opsonization of S. epidermidis was related to the specific capsule
type, as with S. aureus and other encapsulated Gram positive
bacteria such as Streptococcus pneumonia (6). In another study,
Timmerman et al. identified a surface protein of S. epidermidis
that induced opsonic monoclonal antibodies (39). Timmerman et al.
also identified other monoclonal antibodies that bound to
non-homologous S. epidermidis strains, but only the monoclonal
antibody produced to the homologous strain was opsonic, thus
opsonization was enhanced only to the homologous strain but not to
heterologous strains. Accordingly, based on the studies of Fattom
et al., and Timmerman et al., and others in the field (and in
contrast to our own studies as set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos.
5,571,511 and 5,955,074), one would not expect that an antibody
that is broadly reactive to multiple strains of S. epidermidis and
to S. aureus would have opsonic activity against each strain. This
is particularly true for antibodies that bind to both coagulase
positive and coagulase negative staphylococci.
[0011] Further exacerbating the problem, the role of the common
surface antigens on staphylococci has been unclear. For example,
while lipoteichoic acid and teichoic acid make up the majority of
the cell wall of S. aureus, there was no prior appreciation that
antibodies to lipoteichoic acid and teichoic acid could be
protective. Indeed, anti-teichoic acid antibodies have been often
used as controls. For example, Fattom et al. examined the opsonic
activity of antibodies induced against a type-specific capsular
polysaccharide of S. epidermidis, using as controls antibodies
induced against teichoic acids and against S. hominus. While
type-specific antibodies were highly opsonic, anti-teichoic acid
antibodies were not functionally different from the anti-S. hominus
antibodies (6).
[0012] Similarly, in Kojima et al., the authors assessed the
protective effects of antibody to capsular polysaccharide/adhesion
against catheter-related bacteremia due to coagulase negative
staphylococci and specifically used a strain of S. epidermidis that
expresses teichoic acid as a control ((16); see page 436, Materials
and Methods, left column, first paragraph; right column, third
paragraph). In a later study, Takeda et al. (38), the authors
reached a more explicit conclusion against the utility of
anti-techoic antibodies: [0013] Immunization protocols designed to
elicit antibody to techoic acid but not to PS/A afforded no
protection against bacteremia or endocarditis (38).
[0014] Thus, the role of antibodies in the protection against
infections by Gram positive bacteria, particularly Staphylococci
such as S. aureus and S. epidermidis, has not been clear, and there
is a need in the art for monoclonal antibodies to both protect
against such bacterial infection and to help elucidate the role of
such antibodies against such infection. There is also a need in the
art for sequence analysis of such antibodies so that antibodies of
enhanced binding and opsonic activity can be identified and/or
produced.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0015] The present invention encompasses broadly reactive, opsonic,
and protective monoclonal and chimeric antibodies that bind to
lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Gram positive bacteria. The antibodies
also bind to whole bacteria and enhance phagocytosis and killing of
the bacteria in vitro and enhance protection from lethal infection
in vivo. The present invention further encompasses opsonic
antibodies to LTA that share a high degree of sequence homology.
The present invention also encompasses antibodies having variable
regions derived from two or more different anti-LTA antibodies.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] FIG. 1 provides a schematic representation of lipoteichoic
acid (LTA) in the Gram positive bacterial cell wall.
[0017] FIG. 2 depicts antibody regions, including the heavy chain
constant region (C.sub.H), the heavy chain variable region
(V.sub.H), the light chain constant region (C.sub.L), and the light
chain variable region (V.sub.L). The complementarity determining
regions (CDRs) within the variable regions are shown as black
bars.
[0018] FIG. 3 shows the cDNA cloning strategy for the heavy and
light chain variable regions of A120.
[0019] FIG. 4 shows the oligonucleotide primers used to amplify the
variable region fragments. (SEQ ID NOs: 1-9 and 18)
[0020] FIG. 5 shows the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 10) and the
polynucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 11) of the A120 light chain
variable region.
[0021] FIG. 6 shows the amino acid sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12) and the
polynucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 13) of the A120 heavy chain
variable region.
[0022] FIG. 7 depicts the pJSB23-1 plasmid that expresses the A120
heavy chain.
[0023] FIG. 8 depicts the pJSB24 plasmid that expresses the A120
light chain.
[0024] FIG. 9 shows an alignment of (A) the A110 light chain
variable region cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 14), the A120 light chain variable
region cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 11) and the 391.4 light chain variable
region cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 19) and (B) the A110 heavy chain variable
region cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 15), the A120 heavy chain variable region
cDNA (SEQ ID NO: 13) and the 391.4 heavy chain variable region cDNA
(SEQ ID NO: 20). The nucleotides that differ between any two
sequences are boxed.
[0025] FIG. 10A shows an alignment of the A110 light chain variable
region polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 16), the A120 light chain
variable region polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 10) and the 391.4
light chain variable region polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 21).
FIG. 10B shows an alignment of the A110 heavy chain variable region
polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 17), the A120 heavy chain variable
region polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 12) and the 391.4 heavy
chain variable region polypeptide sequence (SEQ ID NO: 22). The
complementarity determining regions (CDRs) are underlined and the
amino acids that differ between any two sequences are boxed.
[0026] FIG. 11 depicts the pJRS354 bi-cistronic plasmid that
expresses the A110 heavy chain and light chain variable
regions.
[0027] FIG. 12 depicts the pJSB25-3 bi-cistronic plasmid that
expresses the A110 heavy chain variable region and the A120 light
chain variable region.
[0028] FIG. 13 depicts the pJSB26 bi-cistronic plasmid that
expresses the A120 heavy chain and light chain variable
regions.
[0029] FIG. 14 depicts the pJSB27 bi-cistronic plasmid that
expresses the A120 heavy chain variable region and the A110 light
chain variable region.
[0030] FIG. 15 provides the results of the chimeric antibody
production ELISA. All antibodies shown are human/mouse chimeras.
A110 contains both the heavy and light chain variable regions from
A110. A120 contains both the heavy and light chain variable regions
from A120. A120a contains the heavy chain variable region from A110
and the light chain variable region from A120. A120b contains the
heavy chain variable region from A120 and the light chain variable
region from A110.
[0031] FIG. 16 provides the results of the experiment to determine
chimeric antibody binding to the S. aureus LTA. The antibodies used
are the same as in FIG. 15.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Definitions
[0032] The term "antibody", as used herein, includes full-length
antibodies and portions thereof. A full-length antibody has one
pair or, more commonly, two pairs of polypeptide chains, each pair
comprising a light and a heavy chain. Each heavy or light chain is
divided into two regions, the variable region (which confers
antigen recognition and binding) and the constant region
(associated with localization and cellular interactions). Thus, a
full-length antibody commonly contains two heavy chain constant
regions (H.sub.c, or C.sub.H), two heavy chain variable regions
(H.sub.v or V.sub.H), two light chain constant regions (Lc or Cl_),
and two light chain variable regions (L.sub.v or V.sub.L) (FIG. 2).
The light chains or chain, may be either a lambda or a kappa chain.
Thus, in an embodiment of the invention, the antibodies include at
least one heavy chain variable region and one light chain variable
region, such that the antibody binds antigen.
[0033] Another aspect of the invention involves the variable region
that comprises alternating complementarity determining regions, or
CDRs, and framework regions, or FRs. The CDRs are the sequences
within the variable region that generally confer antigen
specificity.
[0034] The invention also encompasses portions of antibodies that
comprise sufficient variable region sequence to confer antigen
binding. Portions of antibodies include, but are not limited to
Fab, Fab', F(ab').sub.2, Fv, SFv, scFv (single-chain Fv), whether
produced by proteolytic cleavage of intact antibodies, such as
papain or pepsin cleavage, or by recombinant methods, in which the
cDNAs for the intact heavy and light chains are manipulated to
produce fragments of the heavy and light chains, either separately,
or as part of the same polypeptide.
[0035] MAbs within the scope of the invention include sequences
corresponding to human antibodies, animal antibodies, and
combinations thereof. The term "chimeric antibody," as used herein,
includes antibodies that have variable regions derived from an
animal antibody, such as a rat or mouse antibody, fused to another
molecule, for example, the constant domains derived from a human
antibody. One type of chimeric antibodies, "humanized antibodies",
have had the variable regions altered (through mutagenesis or CDR
grafting) to match (as much as possible) the known sequence of
human variable regions. CDR grafting involves grafting the CDRs
from an antibody with desired specificity onto the FRs of a human
antibody, thereby replacing much of the non-human sequence with
human sequence. Humanized antibodies, therefore, more closely match
(in amino acid sequence) the sequence of known human antibodies. By
humanizing mouse monoclonal antibodies, the severity of the human
anti-mouse antibody, or HAMA, response is diminished. The invention
further includes fully human antibodies which would avoid, as much
a possible, the HAMA response.
[0036] Modified antibodies include, for example, the proteins or
peptides encoded by truncated or modified antibody-encoding genes.
Such proteins or peptides may function similarly to the antibodies
of the invention. Other modifications, such as the addition of
other sequences that may enhance the effector function, which
includes the ability to block or alleviate nasal colonization by
staphylococci, are also within the present invention. Such
modifications include, for example, the addition of amino acids to
the antibody's amino acid sequence, deletion of amino acids in the
antibody's amino acid sequence, substitution of one or more amino
acids in the antibody amino acid sequence with alternate amino
acids, isotype switching, and class switching.
[0037] In certain embodiments, an antibody may be modified in its
Fc region to prevent binding to bacterial proteins. The Fc region
normally provides binding sites for neutrophils, macrophages, other
accessory cells, complement components, and, receptors of the
immune system. As the antibodies bind to bacteria and opsonize
them, accessory cells recognize the coated bacteria and respond to
infection. When a bacterial protein binds to the Fc region near the
places where accessory cells bind, the normal function of these
cells is inhibited. For example, Protein A, a bacterial protein
found in the cell membrane of S. aureus, binds to the Fc region of
IgG near accessory cell binding sites. In doing so, Protein A
inhibits the function of these accessory cells, thus interfering
with clearance of the bacterium. To circumvent this interference
with the antibacterial immune response, the Fc portion of the
antibody of the invention may be modified to prevent nonspecific
binding of Protein A while retaining binding to accessory cells
(15).
[0038] In light of these various forms, the antibodies of the
invention include clones of full length antibodies, antibody
portions, chimeric antibodies, humanized antibodies, fully human
antibodies, and modified antibodies. Collectively, these will be
referred to as "MAbs" or monoclonal antibodies unless otherwise
indicated.
[0039] The term "epitope", as used herein, refers to a region, or
regions, of LTA that is bound by an antibody to LTA. The regions
that are bound may or may not represent a contiguous portion of the
molecule.
[0040] The term "antigen", as used herein, refers to a polypeptide
sequence, a non-proteinaceous molecule, or any molecule that can be
recognized by the immune system. An antigen may be a full-sized
staphylococcal protein or molecule, or a fragment thereof, wherein
the fragment is either produced from a recombinant cDNA encoding
less than the full-length protein or derived from the full-sized
molecule or protein. Such fragments may be produced via enzymatic
processing, such as proteolysis. An antigen may also be a
polypeptide sequence that encompasses an epitope of a
staphylococcal protein, wherein the epitope may not be contiguous
with the linear polypeptide sequence of the protein. The DNA
sequence encoding an antigen may be identified, isolated, cloned,
and transferred to a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell for expression
by procedures well-known in the art (25).
[0041] An antigen, or epitope thereof, may be 100% identical to a
region of the staphylococcal molecule or protein amino acid
sequence, or it may be at least 95% identical, or at least 90%
identical, or at least 85% identical. An antigen may also have less
than 95%, 90% or 85% identity with the staphylococcal molecule or
protein amino acid sequence, provided that it still be able to
elicit antibodies the bind to a native staphylococcal molecule or
protein. The percent identity of a peptide antigen can be
determined, for example, by comparing the sequence of the target
antigen or epitope to the analogous portion of staphylococcal
sequence using the GAP computer program, version 6.0 described by
Devereux et al. (Nucl. Acids Res. 12:387, 1984) and available from
the University of Wisconsin Genetics Computer Group (UWGCG). The
GAP program utilizes the alignment method of Needleman and Wunsch
(J. Mol. Biol. 48:443, 1970), as revised by Smith and Waterman
(Adv. Appl. Math 2:482, 1981), and is applicable to determining the
percent identity of protein or nucleotide sequences referenced
herein. The preferred default parameters for the GAP program
include: (1) a unary comparison matrix (containing a value of 1 for
identities and 0 for non-identities) for nucleotides, and the
weighted comparison matrix of Gribskov and Burgess, Nucl. Acids
Res. 14:6745, 1986, as described by Schwartz and Dayhoff, eds.,
Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, National Biomedical
Research Foundation, pp. 353-358, 1979; (2) a penalty of 3.0 for
each gap and an additional 0.10 penalty for each symbol in each
gap; and (3) no penalty for end gaps.
[0042] Alternatively, for simple comparisons over short regions up
to 10 or 20 units, or regions of relatively high homology, for
example between antibody sequences, the percent identity over a
defined region of peptide or nucleotide sequence may by determined
by dividing the number of matching amino acids or nucleotides by
the total length of the aligned sequences, multiplied by 100%.
Where an insertion or gap of one, two, or three amino acids occurs
in a MAb chain, for example in or abutting a CDR, the insertion or
gap is counted as single amino acid mismatch.
[0043] Antigens may be surface antigens and/or virulence antigens
and/or adherance antigens. Surface antigens are antigens that are
accessible to an antibody when the antigen is in the configuration
of the whole intact bacterium, i.e., the antigen is not inside the
cell cytoplasm. Virulence antigens are antigens that are involved
in the pathogenic process, causing disease in a host. Virulence
antigens include, for example, LTA, peptidoglycan, toxins, fimbria,
flagella, and adherence antigens. Adherence antigens mediate the
ability of a staphylococcal bacterium to adhere to an epithelial
surface, such as the epithelial surface of the anterior nares. An
antigen may be a non-proteinaceous component of staphylococci such
as a carbohydrate or lipid. For example, peptidoglycan and
lipoteichoic acid are two non-proteinaceous antigens found in the
cell wall of staphylococci. Antigens may comprise or include
fragments of non-proteinaceous molecules as long as they elicit an
immune response.
[0044] As used herein, antigens include molecules that can elicit
an antibody response to LTA. An antigen may be LTA itself, or a
fragment or portion thereof. An antigen may also be an unrelated
molecule, which, through some structural similarity, is able to
elicit antibodies that bind to LTA. Binding to LTA may thus be
assessed by binding to such peptide epitope mimics, as described,
for example, in U.S. Patent Application Publication No.
2002/0082395, which is incorporated herein by reference. In certain
embodiments of the invention, an antigen elicits antibodies that
bind to LTA on the surface of bacteria.
[0045] As specifically used herein, an antigen is any molecule that
can specifically bind to an antibody, including antibodies specific
for LTA. Antigens of the invention thus include antigens that bind
to any of monoclonal antibodies MAb-391.4, M110, M120, A110, A120,
A120a, and A120b, described herein.
[0046] An antibody is said to specifically bind to an antigen,
epitope, or protein, if the antibody gives a signal by an assay
such as an ELISA assay that is at least two fold, at least three
fold, at least five fold, or at least ten fold greater than the
background signal, i.e., at least two fold, at least three fold, at
least five fold, or at least ten fold greater than the signal
ascribed to non-specific binding. An antibody is said to
specifically bind to a bacterium if the antibody gives a signal by
MeOH-fixed bacteria ELISA or live bacteria ELISA, or other assay,
that is at least 1.5 fold, 2 fold, or 3 fold greater than the
background signal.
[0047] "Enhanced phagocytosis", as used herein, means an increase
in phagocytosis over a background level as assayed by the methods
in this application, or another comparable assay. The level deemed
valuable may well vary depending on the specific circumstances of
the infection, including the type of bacteria and the severity of
the infection. For example, for enhanced phagocytic activity, in
one embodiment, an enhanced response is equal to or greater than
75% over background phagocytosis. In another embodiment, an
enhanced response is equal to or greater than 80% or 85% over
background phagocytosis. In another embodiment, an enhanced
response is equal to or greater than 90% or 95% over background
phagocytosis. Enhanced phagocytosis may also be equal to or greater
than 50%, 55%, 60%, 65%, or 70% over background phagocytosis. In
another embodiment, enhanced phagocytosis comprises a statistically
significant increase in phagocytic activity as compared to
background phagocytosis or phagocytosis with a non-specific or
non-opsonic control antibody.
[0048] The specific determination or identification of a
"statistically significant" result will depend on the exact
statistical test used. One of ordinary skill in the art can readily
recognize a statistically significant result in the context of any
statistical test employed, as determined by the parameters of the
test itself. Examples of these well-known statistical tests
include, but are not limited to, X.sup.2 Test (Chi-Squared Test),
Students t Test, F Test, M test, Fisher Exact Text, Binomial Exact
Test, Poisson Exact Test one way or two way repeated measures
analysis of variance, and calculation of correlation efficient
(Pearson and Spearman).
[0049] A MAb has "opsonic activity" if it can bind to an antigen to
promote attachment of the antigen to the phagocyte and thereby
enhance phagocytosis. As used herein, opsonic activity may also be
assessed by assays that measure neutrophil mediated
opsonophagocytotic bactericidal activity.
[0050] The MAb's of the invention are useful for the treatment of
systemic and local staphylococcal infections. As used herein,
"treatment" encompasses any reduction, amelioration, or
"alleviation" of existing infection as well as "blocking" or
prophylaxis against future infection. In this respect, treatment
with a MAb of the invention is said to "alleviate" staphylococcal
nasal colonization if it is able to decrease the number of colonies
in the nares of a mammal when the MAb is administered before,
concurrently with, or after exposure to staphylococci, whether that
exposure results from the intentional instillation of
staphylococcus or from general exposure. For instance, in the nasal
colonization animal model described below, a MAb or collection of
MAbs is considered to alleviate colonization if the extent of
colonization, or the number of bacterial colonies that can be grown
from a sample of nasal tissue, is decreased after administering the
MAb or collection of MAbs. A MAb or collection of MAbs alleviates
colonization in the nasal colonization assays described herein when
it reduces the number of colonies by at least 50%, at least 60%, at
least 75%, at least 80%, or at least 90%. 100% alleviation may also
be referred to as eradication.
[0051] A MAb is said to "block" staphylococcal colonization if it
is able to prevent the nasal colonization of a human or non-human
mammal when it is administered prior to, or concurrently with,
exposure to staphylococci, whether by intentional instillation or
otherwise into the nares. A MAb blocks colonization, as in the
nasal colonization assay described herein, if no staphylococcal
colonies can be grown from a sample of nasal tissue taken from a
mammal treated with the MAb of the invention for an extended period
such as 12 hours or longer or 24 hours or longer compared to
control mammals. A MAb also blocks colonization in the nasal
colonization assay described herein if it causes a reduction in the
number of animals that are colonized relative to control animals.
For instance, a MAb is considered to block colonization if the
number of animals that are colonized after administering the
material and the Gram-positive bacteria is reduced by at least 25%,
at least 50%, and at least 75%, relative to control animals or if
no colonies can be grown from a sample taken from a treated
individual for an extended period such as 12 hours or 24 hours or
longer.
[0052] In a clinical setting, the presence or absence of nasal
colonization in a human patient is determined by culturing nasal
swabs on an appropriate bacterial medium. These cultures are scored
for the presence or absence of staphylococcal colonies. In this
type of qualitative assay system, it may be difficult to
distinguish between blocking and alleviation of staphylococcal
colonization. Thus, for the purposes of qualitative assays, such as
nasal swabs, a MAb "blocks" colonization if it prevents future
colonization in human patients who show no signs of prior
colonization for an extended period of 12 or 24 hours or longer. A
MAb "alleviates" colonization if it causes a discernable decrease
in the number of positive cultures taken from a human patient who
is already positive for staphylococci before the MAbs of the
invention are administered.
[0053] A vaccine is considered to confer a protective immune
response if it stimulates the production of opsonic antibodies to
gram-positive bacteria. Production of opsonic antibodies may be
measured by the presence of such antibodies in the serum of a test
subject that has been administered the vaccine, relative to a
control that has not received the vaccine. The presence of opsonic
antibodies in the serum may be measured by the activity assays
described herein, or by other equivalent assays. If an
opsonophagocytic bactericidal assay is used, then killing by the
test serum of at least 50% more bacteria, 75% more bacteria, and at
least 100% more bacteria, relative to the control serum, is
considered to be enhanced immunity.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0054] The present invention provides murine antibodies, including
monoclonal antibodies, and chimeric, humanized and fully human
antibodies, fragments, derivatives, and regions thereof, which bind
to lipoteichoic acid (LTA) of Gram positive staphylococci. Gram
positive bacteria, unlike Gram negative bacteria, take up the Gram
stain as a result of a difference in the structure of the cell
wall. The cell walls of Gram negative bacteria are made up of a
unique outer membrane of two opposing phospholipid-protein
leaflets, with an ordinary phospholipid in the inner leaflet but
the extremely toxic lipopolysaccharide in the outer leaflet. The
cell walls of Gram positive bacteria seem much simpler in
comparison, containing two major components, peptidoglycan and
teichoic acids plus additional carbohydrates and proteins depending
on the species.
[0055] Moreover, because the basis of the binding to Gram positive
bacteria is the presence of LTA and because LTA is a major
component of the cell walls of Gram positive bacteria and is highly
conserved, the antibodies of the claimed invention are broadly
reactive against Gram positive bacteria. This broad reactivity
permits the antibodies of the invention to block the binding of
Gram positive bacteria to epithelial cells, such as human
epithelial cells (50-54). Finally, these antibodies exhibit broad
opsonic activity and consequently enhance phagocytosis and killing
of Gram positive bacteria. Accordingly, the invention provides
broadly reactive, opsonic, and protective antibodies for the
diagnosis, prevention, and/or treatment of bacterial infections
caused by Gram positive bacteria.
[0056] Among the Gram positive Staphylococci against which the
antibodies of the invention are directed are S. aureus (a coagulase
positive bacteria) and S. epidermidis (a coagulase negative
bacteria).
[0057] Three of the monoclonal antibodies of the invention (M110,
M120, and MAb-391.4) bind strongly to LTA. M110 and M120 also
exhibit high opsonic activity for S. epidermidis, while MAb-391.4
is also opsonic for S. epidermidis, but less so. M120 is also
highly opsonic against S. aureus. M110 was derived from mice
immunized with whole S. epidermidis strain Hay as described in
detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,293, which is incorporated herein by
reference. In screening for hybridomas, the antibodies of one clone
(hybridoma line 96-105CE11 IF6, which produces antibody M110) were
found to bind very strongly to Gram positive bacteria such as
strain Hay, all three serotypes of S. epidermidis, S. hemolyticus,
S. hominus, and two serotypes of S. aureus, but not to the Gram
negative control, Haemophilus influenza (see U.S. Pat. No.
6,610,293).
[0058] M120 was derived from mice immunized with conjugates of S.
aureus LTA. The antibodies of one clone (00-107GG12 ID12, which
produces antibody M120) were found to bind strongly to LTA, and
were opsonic for S. aureus type 5 and S. epidermidis strain
Hay.
[0059] MAb-391.4 is from QED Biosciences, and was derived from mice
immunized with whole UV-killed S. aureus.
[0060] The variable regions of M110, M120, and 391.4 were sequenced
and compared, revealing a surprising 88% identity (203/230) at the
amino acid level. Further, the level of identity was found to be
96% (220/230) between the antibodies that are highly opsonic for S.
epidermidis, M110 and M120. We believe that this level of homology
between three monoclonal antibodies that were raised in three
different mice, using three different antigen preparations from two
different types of bacteria, is unprecedented. To understand how
unexpected this finding is, one need only consider how vast and
diverse is the collection of antibodies in the immune system.
[0061] The immune system is made up of a large number of B cells,
each bearing antibodies of a different specificity, but only about
1 in 10,000 to 1 in 1,000,000 B cells is specific for a particular
antigen. When a foreign antigen, such as is found on the surface of
a bacteria, enters the blood stream, the appropriate B cell
recognizes that antigen and then enters a lymph node where it
undergoes rapid division to produce many progeny bearing the
identical specificity. However, the rapidly dividing B cells also
undergo somatic hypermutation. Somatic hypermutation results in
about half of the B cells acquiring mutations in their rearranged
heavy and light chain genes, with mutation occurring preferentially
in complementarity determining regions (CDRs) of the variable
regions. Mutated B cells that retain their ability to bind antigen
continue to secrete antibody, while those that no longer bind
antigen undergo apoptosis. As the antigen is cleared from the host,
only B cells that have very high antigen affinity survive in a
process called affinity maturation. The surviving activated B cells
differentiate into plasma cells, which are short-lived and secrete
antibody, and memory B cells, which are long-lived lymphocytes
bearing membrane-bound antibody that can be rapidly stimulated when
the antigen is re-introduced.
[0062] The processes of somatic hypermutation and affinity
maturation result in progeny B cells that are of higher affinity
and have immunoglobulins of different amino acid sequence than the
original activated B cell. Therefore, a single B cell that is
activated by a foreign antigen can produce many progeny of
differing affinity and immunoglobulin amino acid sequence.
[0063] Because of these processes, it is generally believed that
two animals immunized with the same antigen will produce vastly
different antibody repertoires. Nickerson and colleagues
demonstrated this concept when they showed that a mouse monoclonal
antibody and a human monoclonal antibody that showed nearly
identical binding to the same blood group A antigen shared only 15%
and 37% identity in their heavy and light chain CDRs (55). X-ray
crystallography studies of two antibodies that both bind to
hemagglutinin of influenza virus, reveal that, although they share
only 56% sequence identity, they both bind with similar affinities
and in the same orientation to the same epitope (56).
[0064] It has been postulated that the immune system has evolved to
provide a maximum range of antigen specificities and redundancy,
rather than to bind to specific antigens (55). It follows,
therefore, that antibodies derived from the same mouse may be of
high specificity, but low homology, because any number of
progenitor B cells may be specific for the immunized antigen.
Amplification and somatic mutation of those progenitors may,
however, result in groups of antibodies that are of higher homology
within the group, although they are of very low homology between
groups. Antibodies raised against the same immunogen in two or more
different mice will necessarily be even less homologous, because
they do not share progenitor B cells.
[0065] Three specific antibodies of the present invention, M110,
M120, and MAb-391.4, were not only raised in different mice, but
with different immunogens: M110 was raised to whole S. epidermidis,
M120 was raised to purified and conjugated S. aureus LTA, and
MAb-391.4 was raised to whole UV-killed S. aureus. Yet, though
these antibodies were raised against different immunogen
preparations in different mice, they share 88% identity at the
amino acid level in both the heavy and light chain variable
regions. This high degree of homology suggests that LTA contains a
highly antigenic, and highly conserved, epitope which is bound by
the three antibodies in a very similar manner. This epitope and
mode of binding may be responsible for the high opsonic activity of
the monoclonal antibodies.
[0066] MAb-391.4 and human/mouse chimeric antibodies of M110 and
M120, designated A110 and A120, respectively, were tested for
opsonic activity. MAb-391 .4, A110, and A120 each demonstrated a
high level of opsonic activity against S. epidermidis strain Hay.
(see also U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,293).
[0067] MAb A110 is currently being manufactured under GMP
conditions in preparation for clinical trials. Additional
disclosure regarding the MAb A110 is provided in U.S. Provisional
Application Ser. No. 60/341,806, and in related application Methods
for Blocking or Alleviating Staphylococcal Nasal Colonizaton by
Intranasal Application of Monoclonal Antibodies, filed concurrently
herewith, both of which are expressly incorporated by
reference.
[0068] Thus, one aspect of the invention relates to antibodies that
bind to the LTA of Gram positive bacteria, including both coagulase
negative (S. epidermidis) and coagulase positive (S. aureus)
bacteria, and that enhance the opsonization of such bacteria. These
anti-LTA antibodies include monoclonal antibodies, such as M110,
M120, and MAb-391.4, chimeric monoclonal antibodies A110, A120,
A120a, and A120b, and other monoclonal antibodies including,
chimeric, humanized, fully human antibodies, antibody fragments,
and modified antibodies.
[0069] In a one aspect of the invention, as noted above, the
antibody is a chimeric mouse/human antibody made up of regions from
the anti-LTA antibodies of the invention together with regions of
human antibodies. Chimeric or other monoclonal antibodies are
advantageous in that they avoid the development of anti-murine
antibodies. In at least one study, patients administered murine
anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) monoclonal antibodies developed
anti-murine antibody responses to the administered antibody (5).
This type of immune response to the treatment regimen, commonly
referred to as the human anti-mouse antibody response, or the HAMA
response, decreases the effectiveness of the treatment and may even
render the treatment completely ineffective. Humanized or chimeric
human/mouse monoclonal antibodies have been shown to significantly
decrease the HAMA response and to increase the therapeutic
effectiveness (19).
[0070] Thus, in one aspect of the invention, a chimeric heavy chain
can comprise the antigen binding region of the heavy chain variable
region of the anti-LTA antibody of the invention linked to at least
a portion of a human heavy chain IgG, IgA, IgM, or IgD constant
region. This humanized or chimeric heavy chain may be combined with
a chimeric light chain that comprises the antigen binding region of
the light chain variable region of the anti-LTA antibody linked to
at least a portion of the human light chain kappa or lambda
constant region. Exemplary embodiments include, but are not limited
to, an antibody having a mouse heavy chain variable region fused to
a human IgG.sub.i constant region, and a mouse light chain variable
region fused to a human kappa light chain constant region.
[0071] The chimeric antibodies and other MAb's of the invention may
be monovalent, divalent, or polyvalent immunoglobulins. For
example, a monovalent chimeric antibody is a dimer (HL) formed by a
chimeric H chain associated through disulfide bridges with a
chimeric L chain, as noted above. A divalent chimeric antibody is a
tetramer (H2 L.sub.2) formed by two HL dimers associated through at
least one disulfide bridge. A polyvalent or multivalent chimeric
antibody may be based on an aggregation of chains, with or without
a carrier or scaffold.
[0072] The MAbs of the invention include antibodies that contain
heavy and light chain variable regions derived from two different
antibodies. In one embodiment, the heavy and light chain variable
regions are derived from two antibodies that bind to the same
molecule, e.g. LTA. Exemplary embodiments include A120a, which is a
human/mouse chimeric antibody that has a heavy chain variable
region from A110 and a light chain variable region from A120; and
A120b, which is a human/mouse chimeric antibody that has a heavy
chain variable region from A120 and a light chain variable region
from A110. Additional exemplary embodiments include antibodies that
comprise a heavy chain variable region from MAb-391.4, and a light
chain variable region from either of A110 or A120, and antibodies
that comprise a light chain variable region from MAb-391.4, and a
heavy chain variable region from either of A110 or A120.
[0073] In yet another aspect, the invention is a collection of
opsonic monoclonal antibodies that bind to LTA and that exhibit a
high degree of homology in the variable regions at either the amino
acid or nucleic acid level, or both. In one embodiment, this
collection comprises one or more of M110, M120, their human/mouse
chimeric counterparts, A110, A120, and MAb-391.4. In one aspect,
the amino acid sequences of the variable regions are at least 75%
identical, at least 80% identical, at least 85% identical, at least
88% identical, at least 90% identical, or at least 95% identical as
defined above.
[0074] In addition to the antibodies, the present invention also
encompasses the DNA sequences of the genes coding for the
antibodies (see, e.g., FIGS. 5, 6, and 9; SEQ ID NOs: 11, 13-15,
19, and 20) as well as the polypeptides encoded by the DNA (see,
e.g., FIGS. 5, 6, and 10; SEQ ID NOs: 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, and 22).
Those figures provide the variable regions of the heavy and light
chains of A110, A120, and MAb-391.4, including the complementarity
determining regions (CDRs), the hypervariable amino acid sequences
within antibody variable regions that usually interact with the
antigen. As noted above, the DNA and amino acid sequence homology
between A110 and A120 is striking. There is a 94% homology
(216/229) at the amino acid level and a 96% homology (662/687) at
the DNA level between the antibodies. This suggests that these
antibodies share a sequence and structural similarity.
[0075] The invention includes peptide sequences for, and DNA
sequences encoding, full-length antibodies and portions thereof, as
well as CDRs and FRs relating to these MAbs. The invention further
includes DNA and peptide sequences that are homologous to these
sequences. In one embodiment, these homologous DNAs and peptide
sequences are about 70% identical, although other embodiments
include sequences that are about 75%, 80%, 85%, 88%, 90%, and 95%
or more identical. As indicated above, determining levels of
identity for both the DNA and peptide sequence is well within the
routine skill of those in the art.
[0076] As shown in FIG. 10A, alignment of the A110, A120, and 391.4
light chain variable regions (Seq. ID Nos. 16, 10, and 21,
respectively) shows identical amino acids in 95 of 106 amino acids,
or more than 89% identity overall. Within the region spanning the
CDRs (amino acids 24 to 96 of the light chain variable regions) the
percent identity is about 93% (68 out of 73 amino acids). It is
predicted that light chain variable regions with a somewhat lower
overall identity would still form MAbs that specifically bind LTA,
and are therefore within the scope of the invention. The CDRs
themselves show at least 88% identity, in particular, CDR1 (amino
acids 24-33), CDR2 (amino acids 49-55), and CDR3 (amino acids
88-96), show 9/10, 7/7, and 8/9 identical amino acids. Likewise,
the framework regions (FRs) surrounding the CDRs are also highly
conserved: amino acids 1-23 of SEQ ID Nos. 16, 10, and 21 show
greater than 86% identity (20/23 matching amino acids); amino acids
34-48 show about 93% identity (14/15); amino acids 56-87 show about
93% identity (68/73); and amino acids 97-106 show 70% identity.
[0077] Similarly, in FIG. 10B, alignment of the A110, A120, and
391.4 heavy chain variable regions (Seq. ID Nos. 17, 12, and 22,
respectively) also shows a high degree of sequence identity.
Counting single amino acid gaps and insertions as single-point
mis-matches, Seq. ID Nos. 17, 12, and 22 show 86% identity overall
(108/125 identical amino acids). It is predicted that heavy chain
variable regions with a somewhat lower overall identity would still
form MAbs that specifically bind LTA, and are therefore within the
scope of the invention. The degree of identity is particularly high
in the FR region preceding CDR1 through the FR region preceding
CDR3, in particular, the 96 base region from amino acid 16 to 101
of Seq. ID Nos. 17, 12, and 22 shows 8 mismatches or approximately
91% identity. CDR1, itself, shows 90% identity over 10 amino acids
(amino acids 26-35), and CDR2 (amino acids 50-69) shows about 89%
identity over 19 amino acids. The framework regions surrounding the
CDRs are also highly conserved. Amino acids 1-25 of SEQ ID Nos. 17,
12, and 22 show 92% identity (23/25 matching amino acids); amino
acids 36-49 show 100% identity over 14 amino acids; the FR region
between CDR2 and CDR3 (amino acids 70 to about 101) shows about 87%
identity (over 31-32 amino acids); and amino acids 115-125 show 90%
identity.
[0078] Thus, in one aspect, the invention encompasses polypeptides
(including regions of larger polypeptides, such as MAbs) that 1)
exhibit high sequence homology to Seq. ID Nos. 10, 12, 16, 17, 21,
or 22, or defined regions thereof, and 2) are capable of
functioning as all or part of the variable region of a MAb that
specifically binds LTA. In one embodiment, such polypeptides
comprise, or are at least 70%, 75%, 77% 80%, 85%, 86%, 87%, 88%,
89%, 90%, 91%, 93%, 95% identical to, any of Seq. ID Nos. 10, 12,
16, 17, 21, or 22. Conversely, polypeptides within the scope of the
invention may be less than 100%, 99%, 95%, 90%, 80% or less
identical to Seq. ID Nos. 10, 12, 16, 17, 21, or 22 provided that
they are capable of functioning as all or part of the variable
region of a MAb that specifically binds to LTA.
[0079] In another embodiment, polypeptides within the scope of the
invention comprise, or are at least 70%, 75%, 77%, 80%, 85%, 86%,
87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 93%, 95% identical to, amino acids 24 to
96 of any of Seq. ID Nos. 10, 16, or 21. In another embodiment,
such polypeptides comprise, or are at least 70%, 75%, 77%, 80%,
85%, 86%, 87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 93%, 95% identical to, 1) amino
acids 24-33, 49-55, and 88-73 of Seq. ID Nos. 10, 16, or 21, or 2)
amino acids 26-35 or 50-69 of Seq. ID Nos. 12, 17, or 22; and are
capable of functioning as a CDR, or portion thereof, in a MAb that
specifically binds to LTA. In another embodiment, such polypeptides
comprise, or are at least 70%, 75%, 77%, 80%, 81%, 82%, 85%, 86%,
87%, 88%, 89%, 90%, 91%, 93%, 95% identical to, 1) amino acids
1-23, 34-48, 56-87, and 97-106 of Seq. ID Nos. 10, 12, 16, 17, 21,
or 22, or 2) amino acids 1-25, 36-49, 70-101, or 115-125 of Seq. ID
Nos. 12,17, or 22; and are capable of functioning as a framework
region, or portion thereof, in a MAb that specifically binds to
LTA.
[0080] The invention further comprises collections of a
multiplicity of any of the above sequences capable of functioning
as all or part of the variable region of a MAb that specifically
binds to LTA, as part of a larger polypeptide, MAb, collection of
MAbs or aggregation of MAbs; and the use thereof in prophylaxis,
treatment, and for the production of pharmaceutical compounds or
medicaments. The invention further comprises any non-naturally
occurring RNA, DNA, or vector thereof, encoding any of the above
sequences capable of functioning as all or part of the variable
region of a MAb that specifically binds to LTA, as well as
plasmids, viruses, bacteria, yeast, microorganisms, cell lines,
transgenic plants or animals harboring or expressing such nucleic
acids. Thus, the invention contemplates production systems for
Mabs, light chains, heavy chains, and portions thereof, comprising
1) a cell (including bacteria, yeast, microorganisms, eukaryotic
cell lines, transgenic plant or animal) in connection with 2) at
least one recombinant nucleic acid capable of directing the
expression of any of the Mabs or related polypeptides of the
invention.
[0081] The invention thus further comprises a general method of
identifying highly antigenic and highly conserved epitopes by
raising antibodies against different immunogen preparations in
different mice, sequencing the variable regions of the antibodies,
comparing the variable regions, and identifying antibodies that
share a high degree of homology in the variable regions.
[0082] The DNA sequences of the invention can be identified,
isolated, cloned, and transferred to a prokaryotic or eukaryotic
cell for expression by procedures well-known in the art. Such
procedures are generally described in Molecular Cloning: A
Laboratory Manual, as well as Current Protocols in Molecular
Biology (44, 45), which are incorporated by reference. Guidance
relating more specifically to the manipulation of sequences of the
invention may be found in Antibody Engineering, and Antibodies: A
Laboratory Manual (64, 65), both of which are incorporated by
reference in their entirety. In certain embodiments, a CDR can be
grafted onto any human antibody framework region using techniques
standard in the art, in such a manner that the CDR maintains the
same binding specificity as in the intact antibody. As noted as
above, an antibody that has its CDRs grafted onto a human framework
region is said to be "humanized". Humanized, and fully human
antibodies generally also include human constant regions, thus
maximizing the percentage of the antibody that is human-derived,
and potentially minimizing the HAMA response.
[0083] In addition, the DNA and peptide sequences of the antibodies
of the invention, including both monoclonal and chimeric
antibodies, humanized and fully human antibodies, may form the
basis of antibody "derivatives," which include, for example, the
proteins or peptides encoded by truncated or modified genes. Such
proteins or peptides may function similarly to the antibodies of
the invention. Other modifications, such as the addition of other
sequences that may enhance the effector function, which includes
phagocytosis and/or killing of the bacteria, are also within the
present invention.
[0084] The present invention also discloses a pharmaceutical
composition comprising the antibodies, whether monoclonal or
chimeric, humanized, or fully human, together with a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. The pharmaceutical
compositions of the invention may alternatively comprise the
isolated antigen, epitope, or portions thereof, together with a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
[0085] Pharmaceutically acceptable carriers can be sterile liquids,
such as water, oils, including petroleum oil, animal oil, vegetable
oil, peanut oil, soybean oil, mineral oil, sesame oil, and the
like. Saline solutions, aqueous dextrose, and glycerol solutions
can also be employed as liquid carriers, particularly for
injectable solutions. Suitable pharmaceutical carriers are
described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th Edition
(13), which is herein incorporated by reference.
[0086] Additionally, the invention may be practiced with various
delivery vehicles and/or carriers. Such vehicles may increase the
half-life of the MAbs in storage and upon administration including,
but not limited to, application to skin, wounds, eyes, lungs, or
mucus membranes of the nasal or gastrointestinal tract, or upon
inhalation or instillation into the nares. These carriers comprise
natural polymers, semi-synthetic polymers, synthetic polymers,
lipososmes, and semi-solid dosage forms (21, 29, 33, 35, 36, 46).
Natural polymers include, for example, proteins and
polysaccharides. Semi-synthetic polymers are modified natural
polymers such as chitosan, which is the deacetylated form of the
natural polysaccharide, chitin. Synthetic polymers include, for
example, polyphosphoesters, polyethylene glycol, poly(lactic acid),
polystyrene sulfonate, and poly(lactide coglycolide). Semi-solid
dosage forms include, for example, dendrimers, creams, ointments,
gels, and lotions. These carriers can also be used to
microencapsulate the MAbs or be covalently linked to the MAbs.
[0087] Finally, the present invention provides methods for treating
a patient infected with, or suspected of being infected with, a
Gram-positive bacteria such as a staphylococcal organism. The
method comprises administering a therapeutically effective amount
of a pharmaceutical composition comprising the anti-LTA
immunoglobulin (whether monoclonal, chimeric, humanized, or fully
human, including fragments, regions, and derivatives thereof) and a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. A patient can be any human or
non-human mammal in need of prophylaxis or other treatment.
Representative patients include any mammal subject to S. aureus or
other staphylococcal or Gram-positive infection or carriage,
including humans and non-human animals such as mice, rats, rabbits,
dogs, cats, pigs, sheep, goats, horses, primates, ruminants
including beef and milk cattle, buffalo, camels, as well as
fur-bearing animals, herd animals, laboratory, zoo, and farm
animals, kenneled and stabled animals, domestic pets, and
veterinary animals.
[0088] A therapeutically effective amount is an amount reasonably
believed to provide some measure of relief, assistance,
prophylaxis, or preventative effect in the treatment of the
infection. A therapeutically effective amount may be an amount
believed to be sufficient to block a bacterial infection.
Similarly, a therapeutically effective amount may be an amount
believed to be sufficient to alleviate a bacterial infection. Such
therapy as above or as described below may be primary or
supplemental to additional treatment, such as antibiotic therapy,
for a staphylococcal infection, an infection caused by a different
agent, or an unrelated disease. Indeed, combination therapy with
other antibodies is expressly contemplated within the
invention.
[0089] A further embodiment of the present invention is a method of
preventing such infections, comprising administering a
prophylactically effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition
comprising the anti-LTA antibody (whether monoclonal, chimeric,
humanized, or fully human) and a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier.
[0090] A prophylactically effective amount is an amount reasonably
believed to provide some measure of prevention of infection by Gram
positive bacteria. Such therapy as above or as described below may
be primary or supplemental to additional treatment, such as
antibiotic therapy, for a staphylococcal infection, an infection
caused by a different agent, or an unrelated disease. Indeed,
combination therapy with other antibodies is expressly contemplated
within the invention.
[0091] The antibodies and the pharmaceutical compositions of the
invention may be administered by intravenous, intraperitoneal,
intracorporeal injection, intra-articular, intraventricular,
intrathecal, intramuscular or subcutaneous injection, or
intranasally, dermally, intradermally, intravaginally, orally, or
by any other effective method of administration. The composition
may also be given locally, such as by injection to the particular
area infected, either intramuscularly or subcutaneously.
Administration can comprise administering the pharmaceutical
composition by swabbing, immersing, soaking, or wiping directly to
a patient. The treatment can also be applied to objects to be
placed within a patient, such as dwelling catheters, cardiac
valves, cerebrospinal fluid shunts, joint prostheses, other
implants into the body, or any other objects, instruments, or
appliances at risk of becoming infected with a Gram positive
bacteria, or at risk of introducing such an infection into a
patient.
[0092] As a particularly valuable corollary of treatment with the
compositions of the invention (pharmaceutical compositions
comprising anti-LTA antibodies, whether, monoclonal, chimeric,
humanized or fully human) may be the reduction in cytokine release
that results from the introduction of the LTA of a Gram positive
bacteria (49). As is now recognized in the art, LTA induces
cytokines, including, for example, tumor necrosis factor alpha,
interleukin 6, and interferon gamma (see, e.g., (37)). Accordingly,
the compositions of the invention may enhance protection at three
levels: (1) by binding to LTA on the bacteria and thereby blocking
the initial binding to epithelial cells and preventing subsequent
invasion of the bacteria; (2) by binding to LTA on bacteria and
thereby enhancing opsonization of the bacteria and clearance of the
bacteria from tissues and/or blood; and/or (3) by binding to LTA
and partially or fully blocking cytokine release and modulating the
inflammatory responses to prevent shock and tissue destruction.
[0093] Having generally described the invention, it is clear that
the invention overcomes some of the potentially serious problems
described in the Background section regarding the development of
antibiotic resistant Gram positive bacteria. As set forth above,
Staphylococci and Streptococci (such as S. faecalis) have become
increasingly resistant to antibiotics and, with the recent spread
of vancomycin resistant strains, antibiotic therapy may become
totally ineffective.
[0094] Particular aspects of the invention are now presented in the
form of the following Materials and Methods, as well as the
specific Examples. Of course, these are included only for purposes
of illustration and are not intended to be limiting of the present
invention.
Materials and Methods
Bacteria
[0095] S. aureus, type 5, is deposited at the ATCC under Accession
No. 49521.
[0096] S. epidermidis, strain Hay, was deposited at the ATCC on
Dec. 19, 1990 under Accession No. 55133.
Hybridoma
[0097] Hybridoma 96-105CE11 IF6 (M110) was deposited at the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), located at P.O. Box 1549,
Manassas, Va. 20108, U.S.A., on Jun. 13, 1997, under ATCC Accession
No. HB-12368.
[0098] Hybridoma 00-107GG12 ID12 (M120) was deposited at the
American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), located at P.O. Box 1549,
Manassas, Va. 20108, U.S.A., on Aug. 16, 2001, under ATCC Accession
No. PTA-3644.
[0099] Hybridoma 391.4 was deposited at the American Type Culture
Collection (ATCC), located at P.O. Box 1549, Manassas, Va. 20108,
U.S.A., on Dec. 18, 2001, under ATCC Accession No. PTA-3932.
Isotype Determination Assay
[0100] Isotype was determined using a mouse immunoglobulin isotype
kit obtained from Zymed Laboratories (Cat. No. 90-6550).
Binding Assays
[0101] In the binding assays of the invention, immunoglobulin is
incubated with a preparation of whole cell staphylococci or with a
preparation of bacterial cell wall components such as LTA or PepG.
The binding assay may be an agglutination assay, a coagulation
assay, a colorimetric assay, a fluorescent binding assay, or any
other suitable binding assay that is known in the art. A
particularly suitable assay is either an enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or a radio-immunoassay (RIA). Binding
is detected directly and can also be detected indirectly by using
competitive or noncompetitive binding procedures known in the
art.
[0102] The whole cell staphylococcus preparation, LTA preparation,
PepG preparation, or a combination of those preparations, may be
fixed using standard techniques to a suitable solid support,
including, but not limited to, a plate, a well, a bead, a
micro-bead, a paddle, a propeller, or a stick. Solid supports may
be comprised of, for example, glass or plastic. In certain
embodiments of the invention, the solid support is a microtiter
plate.
[0103] Generally, a binding assay requires the following steps.
First, the fixed preparation is incubated with an immunoglobulin
source. In one embodiment of the assay, the immunoglobulin source
is, for example, tissue culture supernatant or a biological sample
such as ascites, plasma, serum, whole blood, or body tissue. In
another embodiment, the immunoglobulin may be further isolated or
purified from its source by means known in the art, and the
purified or isolated immunoglobulin is subsequently used in the
assay. The amount of binding is determined by comparing the binding
in a test sample to the binding in a negative control. A negative
control is defined as any sample that does not contain
antigen-specific immunoglobulin. In the binding assay, a positive
binding reaction results when the amount of binding observed for
the test sample is greater than the amount of binding for a
negative control. Positive binding may be determined from a single
positive/negative binding reaction or from the average of a series
of binding reactions. The series of binding reactions may include
samples containing a measured amount of immunoglobulin that
specifically binds to the fixed antigen, thereby creating a
standard curve. This standard curve may be used to quantitate the
amount of antigen-specific immunoglobulin in an unknown sample.
[0104] In an alternate embodiment of the assay, antibodies are
fixed to a solid support and an unknown immunoglobulin sample is
characterized by its ability to bind a bacterial preparation. The
other aspects of the assays discussed above apply where
appropriate.
[0105] The specific binding assays used in the Examples are set
forth below:
[0106] Live Bacteria ELISA (LBE): The LBE assay was performed to
measure the ability of antibodies to bind to live bacteria. Various
types of bacteria may be used in this assay, including S. aureus
type 5, type 5-USU, type 8, S. epidermidis strain Hay, and S.
hemolyticus. Bacteria from an overnight plate culture were
transferred to 35 mis of Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) and grown with
gentle shaking for 1.5-2.0 hours at 37.degree. C. The bacteria were
then pelleted by centrifugation at 1800-2000.times.g for 15 minutes
at room temperature. The supernatant was removed and the bacteria
were resuspended in 35-45 mis of phosphate buffered saline
containing 0.1% bovine serum albumin (PBS/BSA). The bacteria were
again pelleted by centrifugation, the supernatant discarded and the
bacteria resuspended in PBS/BSA to a percent transmittance (% T) of
65%-70% at 650 nm. From this suspension the bacteria were further
diluted 15-fold in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride (Sigma cat. no.
S8776, or equivalent), and 100 .mu.l of this suspension was added
to replicate wells of a flat-bottomed, sterile 96-well plate.
[0107] Each antibody to be tested was diluted to the desired
concentration in PBS/BSA containing 0.05% Tween-20 and horse radish
peroxidase-conjugated Protein A (Protein A-HRP, Zymed Laboratories)
at a 1:8000 dilution (PBS/BSA/Tween/Prot A-HRP). The Protein A-HRP
was allowed to bind to the antibodies for 30-60 minutes at room
temperature before use, thereby generating an antibody-Protein
A-HRP complex to minimize the potential non-specific binding of the
antibodies to the Protein A found on the surface of S. aureus.
Generally, several dilutions of test antibody were used in each
assay. From each antibody dilution, 50 .mu.l of the
antibody-Protein A-HRP complex was added to replicate wells and the
mixture of bacteria and antibody-Protein A-HRP complex was
incubated at 37.degree. C. for 30-60 minutes with gentle rotation
(50-75 rpm) on an orbital shaker.
[0108] Following the incubation, the bacteria were pelleted in the
plate by centrifugation at 1800-2000.times.g for 10-15 minutes at
room temperature. The supernatant was carefully removed from the
wells and 200 .mu.l of PBS/BSA containing 0.05% Tween-20
(PBS/BSA/Tween) was added to all wells to dilute unbound reagents.
The bacteria were again pelleted by centrifugation and the
supernatant was removed. Two hundred .mu.l of PBS/BSA/Tween was
again added to all wells and the bacteria were again pelleted by
centrifugation as described above. The supernatant was removed and
100 .mu.l of TMB substrate (BioFx, Inc. cat. no. TMBW-0100-01, or
equivalent) was added to each well and the hydrolysis of the
substrate was allowed to proceed for 15 minutes at room
temperature. The reactions were stopped by adding 100 .mu.l of TMB
stop reagent (450 nm Stop Reagent; BioFx, Inc. catalog no.
STPR-0100-01, or equivalent). The absorbance of each well was
determined using a microplate reader fitted with a 450 nm
filter.
[0109] In this assay, the intensity of the color development was
directly proportional to the binding of the antibodies to the
bacteria. Control wells contained bacteria and Protein A-HRP
without antibody.
[0110] Immunoassay on Methanol-Fixed Bacteria: Heat-killed bacteria
were suspended in sterile 0.9% sodium chloride (Sigma cat. no.
S8776, or equivalent) at a % transmittance (% T) of 70-75% at 650
nm. Ten milliliters the bacterial suspension was diluted 15-fold in
sterile 0.9% sodium chloride and then pelleted by centrifugation at
1800.times.g for 15 minutes at 10-15 C. The supernatant was
discarded and the pellet was resuspended in 15 milliliters of
methanol (MeOH). One hundred microliters of the bacteria-MeOH
suspension was distributed into each well of Nunc Maxisorp
Stripwells (Nunc catalog no. 469949). The MeOH was allowed to
evaporate, fixing the bacteria to the plastic wells. The
bacteria-coated stripwells were stored in plastic bags in the dark
at room temperature and used within 2 months of preparation.
[0111] For evaluation of antibodies, the bacteria-coated plates
were washed four times with phosphate buffered saline containing
0.05% Tween-20 (PBS-T) as follows. Approximately 250 microliters of
PBS-T was added to each well. The buffer was removed by flicking
the plate over the sink and the remaining buffer removed by
inverting the plate and tapping it on absorbent paper. The antibody
was diluted in PBS-T and then added to the wells. Supernatants,
ascites, or purified antibodies were tested at the dilutions
indicated in the Examples. Control wells received PBS-T alone.
After addition of the antibody, the wells were incubated at room
temperature for 30-60 minutes in a draft-free environment. The
wells were again washed four times with PBS-T. Ninety-five
microliters of detection antibody was then added to each well. The
detection antibody was one of the following: rabbit anti-mouse
IgG3, rabbit anti-mouse IgM, or goat anti-human IgG
(gamma-specific), all conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (HRP)
and diluted 1:6000 in PBS-T (Zymed catalog numbers 61-0420, 61-6820
and 62-8420, respectively).
[0112] Following another 30-60 minute incubation at room
temperature, the wells were washed four times with PBS-T and each
well received 100 ul of TMB substrate solution (BioFx
#TMBW-0100-01). Plates were incubated in the dark at room
temperature for 15 minutes and the binding reactions were stopped
by the addition of 100 .mu.l of TMB stop solution (BioFx
#STPR-0100-01). The absorbance of each well was measured at 450 nm
using a Molecular Devices Vmax plate reader.
[0113] Immunoassay with Protein A: In order to evaluate the binding
of the MAbs to S. aureus, the immunoassay procedure was modified
for methanol-fixed bacteria, described above. Because S. aureus
expresses Protein A on its surface, and Protein A binds strongly to
the constant region of the heavy chains of gamma-globulins, it is
possible that false positive results may be obtained from
non-specific binding of the antibodies to Protein A. To overcome
this difficulty, the immunoassay wells were coated with bacteria as
described above, but prior to the addition of the antibodies to the
bacteria-coated wells, the MAbs were incubated with a solution of
recombinant Protein A conjugated to HRP (Zymed Laboratories Cat.
No. 10-1123), diluted 1:10,000 in PBS-T. The binding reaction was
allowed to proceed for 30 minutes at room temperature. The wells
were washed four times with PBS-T and 100 .mu.l of the solution of
each Protein A-HRP-MAb combination was added to the wells. The
presence of the Protein A-HRP from the pretreatment minimized the
binding of the MAbs to the Protein A on the S. aureus. Furthermore,
the binding of the Protein A-HRP to the constant region of the
heavy chain did not interfere with the antibody binding site on the
MAbs, thereby allowing evaluation of the MAbs on S. aureus and
other bacteria.
[0114] The Protein A-HRP-MAb solutions were allowed to bind in the
coated wells for 30-60 minutes at room temperature. The wells were
then washed with PBS-T and TMB substrate solution was added and the
assay completed as described above.
[0115] Immunoassay on LTA: The binding of the MAbs to LTA was
measured by immunoassay on wells coated with S. aureus LTA (Sigma
Cat. No. 2515). One hundred microliters of a 1 .mu.g/ml LTA
solution in PBS was distributed into replicate Nunc Maxisorp
Stripwells and incubated overnight at room temperature. The unbound
material was removed from the wells by washing four times with
PBS-T. Antibody, diluted in PBS-T, was then added to the wells and
the assay continued as described above for the Immunoassay on
Methanol-Fixed Bacteria.
[0116] For immunoassays on PepG, Nunc Maxisorp Stripwell plates
were coated with 100 ul of a 5-10 .mu.g/ml solution of PepG (gift
of S. Foster) in 0.1 M carbonate buffer (pH 9.2-9.6) overnight at
room temperature. Unbound antigen was removed from the plate by
washing four times with PBS-T. Antibody, diluted in PBS-T, was then
added to the wells and the assay continued as described above for
the Immunoassay on Methanol-Fixed Bacteria.
Activity Assays
[0117] Antibodies that bind to an antigen may not necessarily
enhance opsonization or enhance protection from infection.
Therefore, an opsonization assay was used to determine the
functional activities of the antibodies.
[0118] An opsonization assay can be a colorimetric assay, a
chemiluminescent assay, a fluorescent or radiolabel uptake assay, a
cell-mediated bactericidal assay, or any other appropriate assay
known in the art which measures the opsonic potential of a
substance and thereby identifies reactive immunoglobulin. In an
opsonization assay, an infectious agent, a eukaryotic cell, and the
opsonizing substance to be tested, or an opsonizing substance plus
a purported opsonizing enhancing substance, are incubated
together.
[0119] In certain embodiments, the opsonization assay is a
cell-mediated bactericidal assay. In this in vitro assay, an
infectious agent such as a bacterium, a phagocytic cell, and an
opsonizing substance such as immunoglobulin, are incubated
together. Any eukaryotic cell with phagocytic or binding ability
may be used in a cell-mediated bactericidal assay. In certain
embodiments, phagocytic cells are macrophages, monocytes,
neutrophils, or any combination of these cells. Complement proteins
may be included to promote opsonization by both the classical and
alternate pathways.
[0120] The opsonic ability of an antibody is determined by the
amount or number of infectious agents remaining after incubation.
The fewer the number of infectious agents that remain after
incubation, the greater the opsonic activity of the antibody
tested. In a cell-mediated bactericidal assay, opsonic activity is
measured by comparing the number of surviving bacteria between two
similar assays, only one of which contains the antibody being
tested. Alternatively, opsonic activity is determined by measuring
the number of viable organisms before and after incubation with a
sample antibody. A reduced number of bacteria after incubation in
the presence of antibody indicates a positive opsonizing activity.
In the cell-mediated bactericidal assay, positive opsonization is
determined by culturing the incubation mixture under appropriate
bacterial growth conditions. Any reduction in the number of viable
bacteria comparing pre-incubation and post-incubation samples, or
between samples which contain immunoglobulin and those that do not,
is a positive reaction.
[0121] Neutrophil-Mediated Opsonophagocytic Bactericidal Assay: The
assay was performed using neutrophils isolated from adult venous
blood by sedimentation using PMN Separation Medium (Robbins
Scientific catalog no. 1068-00-0). Forty microliters of antibody,
serum, or other immunoglobulin source, was added at various
dilutions to replicate wells of a round-bottom microtiter plate.
Forty microliters of neutrophils (approximately 2.times.10.sup.6
cells per well) was then added to each well, followed immediately
by approximately 3.times.10.sup.4 mid-log phase bacteria (S.
epidermidis strain Hay, ATCC 55133 or S. aureus type 5, gift from
S. Wilson, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences) in
10 ul Tryptic Soy Broth (Difco cat. no. 9063-74, or equivalent).
Finally, 10 .mu.l of immunoglobulin-depleted human serum was added
as a source of active complement. (Immunoglobulins were removed
from human serum complement by preincubating the serum with Protein
G-agarose and Protein L-agarose before use in the assay, this
depletion of immunoglobulins minimized the concentrations of
anti-staphylococcal antibodies in the complement, thereby reducing
bacterial killing caused by inherent antibodies in the complement
solution.)
[0122] The plates were incubated at 37.degree. C. with constant,
vigorous shaking. Aliquots of 10 .mu.l were taken from each well at
zero time, when the sample antibody was first added, and after 2
hours of incubation. To determine the number of viable bacteria in
each aliquot harvested from each sample well, each aliquot was
diluted 20-fold in a solution of 0.1% BSA in water (to lyse the
PMNs), mixed vigorously by rapid pipetting, and cultured on blood
agar plates (Remel, cat. no. 01-202, or equivalent) overnight at
37.degree. C. The opsonic activity was measured by comparing the
number of bacterial colonies observed from the sample taken at two
hours with the nurjnber of bacterial colonies observed from the
sample taken at time zero. Colonies were enumerated using an IPI
Minicount Colony Counter.
[0123] Nasal Colonization Assay: The mouse nasal colonization model
for S. aureus was based on the work of Kiser et al. (47). Briefly,
streptomycin resistant S. aureus type 5 is grown on high salt
Columbia agar (Difco) to promote capsule formation. The bacteria
are washed with sterile saline (0.9% NaCI in water) to remove media
components and resuspended at .about.10.sup.8 bacteria/animal dose
in saline (0.9% NaCl in water) containing various concentrations
and combinations of anti-staphylococcal or irrelevant control MAbs.
Following one hour preincubation, the bacteria are pelleted and
resuspended in a final volume of 10 .mu.l per animal dose in either
saline or saline containing antibody. Mice that have been
maintained on streptomycin-containing water for 24 hours are
sedated with anesthesia. Staphylococci are injected into the nares
of the mice by pipetting without contacting the nose.
[0124] After four to seven days, during which the animals are
maintained on streptomycin-containing water, the animals are
sacrificed and the noses removed surgically and dissected. Nasal
tissue is vortexed vigorously in saline (0.9% NaCl in water) plus
0.5% Tween-20 to release adherent bacteria and the saline is plated
on Columbia blood agar (Remel) and tryptic soy agar (Difco)
containing streptomycin to determine colonization.
[0125] The invention, having been described above, may be better
understood by reference to examples. The following examples are
intended for illustration purposes only, and should not be
construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any way.
Example 1
The Production of Hybridomas and Monoclonal Antibodies
[0126] Antibodies were raised against lipoteichoic acid (LTA) from
S. aureus by immunizing mice with an LTA conjugate. LTA conjugates
LTA/PspA, LTA/SIA/TT, and LTA/GMBS/TT, prepared as set forth below,
were used.
[0127] To prepare each conjugate, LTA was first derivatized with
thiol groups as follows. S. aureus LTA (Sigma Chemical Co.) was
purified essentially as described in Fischer et al. (9). The
purified LTA was diluted to 4 mg/ml with water. One hundred
microliters of 0.75 M HEPES, 10 mM EDTA, pH 7.5 and 100 .mu.l of
0.1 M SPDP (Pierce) were added to 1 ml of S. aureus LTA. The
reaction was incubated for 4 hours at room temperature, and then 55
.mu.l of 0.5 M DTT was added and the solution was dialyzed
overnight at 4.degree. C. against 2 mM EDTA, pH 5 (2.times.1 L).
The reaction resulted in 0.27 mM thiol (LTA-SH) in a 1.2 mL volume,
or 0.32 .mu.mol thiol, as determined by DTNB assay (2).
[0128] LTA/PspA conjugate was prepared as follows. Three milligrams
of pneumococcal surface protein A (PspA; 188 .mu.l of a 16 mg/ml
solution in PBS; prepared essentially as described in Wortham et
al. (43) was combined with 25 .mu.l of 0.75 M HEPES, 10 mM EDTA, pH
7.3 and 17 ul 0.1 M N-hydroxysuccinimidyl iodoacetate (SIA;
Bioaffinity Systems) and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature.
The volume of the solution was then made up to 2 ml with 10 mM
sodium acetate, 0.15 M NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, and then concentrated to a
final volume of about 150 .mu.l using an Ultrafree 4 device (30 kDa
cutoff; Amicon). The resulting iodoacetyl PspA was then combined
with 400 .mu.l of LTA-SH. The pH was raised to 8 with 1 M HEPES pH
8, and the reaction proceeded overnight at 4.degree. C.
[0129] The solution was then fractionated on a 1.times.60 cm
S-200HR column, which had been equilibrated with 0.1% deoxycholate
(DOC) in PBS. The void volume fractions were pooled, dialyzed into
saline (0.15 M NaCl) to remove DOC and PBS, and had an optical
density of 0.14 at 280 nm. The concentration of protein in the
conjugate solution was 0.66 mg/ml by BCA assay (Pierce Chemical
Company), and the concentration of phosphate in the conjugate
solution was 0.88 mM by phosphate assay (1).
[0130] LTA/SIA/TT conjugate was prepared as follows. Four
milligrams of tetanus toxoid (TT; 280 .mu.l of 14.5 mg/ml;
SmithKline Beecham), diluted to 4 ml with 2 M NaCl was concentrated
to 50 .mu.l using an Ultrafree 4 centrifugal filter with a 30 kD
cutoff (Millipore). The resulting solution was diluted to 250 .mu.l
with 2 M NaCl (TT/2 M NaCl). Seventy-five microliters of 0.25 M
HEPES, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.5 and 8 .mu.l N-hydroxysuccinimide
iodoacetate (SIA; Bioaffinity Systems, Roscoe, Ill.) were added to
125 .mu.l of TT/2 M NaCl. The reaction was incubated for 2 hours at
room temperature and then diluted to about 2 ml with 2 M NaCl. The
solution was then concentrated to 150 .mu.l using an Ultrafree 4
centrifugal filter.
[0131] One hundred and fifty microliters of the resulting product,
iodoacetylated TT, was combined with 400 .mu.l of LTA-SH. The
reaction is incubated overnight at 4.degree. C. The reaction was
fractionated on a 1.times.60 cm Sephacryl S-200HR column
(Pharmacia), equilibrated with 0.1% deoxycholate in PBS. The void
volume fractions, containing the LTA/SIA/TT conjugate, were pooled,
dialyzed into saline to remove DOC and PBS, and had an optical
density of 0.77 at 280 nm. The yield of TT in the conjugate was
0.77 mg/ml by BCA assay (Pierce Chemical Co.). The concentration of
phosphate in the conjugate solution was 0.77 mM by phosphate assay
(1).
[0132] LTA/GMBS/TT conjugate was prepared as follows. Four
milligrams of TT (280 .mu.l of 14.5 mg/ml; SmithKline Beecham),
diluted to 4 ml with 2 M NaCl was concentrated to 50 .mu.l using an
Ultrafree 4 centrifugal filter with a 30 kD cutoff (Millipore). The
resulting solution was diluted to 250 ul with 2 M NaCl (TT/2 M
NaCl). Seventy-five microliters of 0.15 M HEPES, 2 mM EDTA, pH 7.5
and 8 .mu.l N-hydroxysuccinimide gamma butyric maleimide (GMBS;
Bioaffinity Systems, Roscoe, Ill.) were added to 125 .mu.l of TT/2
M NaCl. The reaction was incubated for 2 hours at room temperature
and then diluted to 2 ml with 2 M NaCl. The solution was then
concentrated to 150 .mu.l using an Ultrafree 4 centrifugal
filter.
[0133] Four hundred microliters of LTA-SH was added to the
concentrated solution, and the pH was raised to 8 with 1 M HEPES pH
8. The reaction was incubated overnight at 4.degree. C. The
reaction was fractionated on a 1.times.60 cm Sephacryl S-200HR
column (Pharmacia), equilibrated with 0.1% deoxycholate in PBS. The
void volume fractions, containing the LTA/GMBS/TT conjugate, were
pooled and dialyzed into saline to remove DOC and PBS. The yield of
TT was 0.83 mg/ml by BCA assay (Pierce Chemical Co.), and the
concentration of phosphate in the conjugate solution was 1.45 mM by
phosphate assay (1).
[0134] The presence of LTA in each of the conjugates was confirmed
by Western blot following 12% SDS-PAGE electrophoresis of the
product.
[0135] Twenty-four approximately 4 month old female BALB/c mice
were separated into six groups and immunized with 10 .mu.g (groups
A, C, and E) or 1 .mu.g (groups B, D, and F) of LTA/PspA (groups A
and B), LTA/SIA/TT (groups C and D), or LTA/GMBS/TT (groups E and
F; Table 1).
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 LTA Immunization Groups Immun. Group Antigen
ug/mouse Mouse Ids A LTA/PspA 10 1375-1378 B LTA/PspA 1 1379-1382 C
LTA/SIA/TT 10 1383-1386 D LTA/SIA/TT 1 1387-1390 E LTA/GMBS/TT 10
1391-1394 F LTA/GMBS/TT 1 1395-1398
[0136] All immunizations were administered subcutaneously in 50%
RIBI adjuvant. The mice received a boost 21 days after the primary
immunization, and a second boost 79 days after the primary
immunization. Boosts were performed as described for the primary
immunizations. Eyebleeds were taken at 0 days, 21 days, 35 days, 79
days, 94 days, and 119 days after the primary immunization. Serum
collected at 21 days and 35 days was tested by ELISA for antibodies
to LTA (Table 2).
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Anti-LTA Titers of Serum Pools prebleed 21
day 35 day Group Antigen .mu.g/mouse titer* titer* titer* A
LTA/PSPA 10 77 2885 4748 B LTA/PSPA 1 57 2668 4667 C LTA/SIA/TT 10
199 51353 54085 D LTA/SIA/TT 1 2520 11525 26229 E LTA/GMBS/TT 10
783 11631 140392 F LTA/GMBS/TT 1 10 3635 85832 *titer is the serum
dilution required to obtain an absorbance of 0.5 in an anti-LTA
ELISA
[0137] Serum collected at 35 days and 79 days was also tested for
antibodies to LTA by ELISA, and serum collected at 94 days was
tested by ELISA, and in an LBE assay against S. epidermidis strain
Hay and S. aureus (Table 3).
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of Anti-LTA Titers and LBE Titers
ELISA* ELISA* ELISA* LBE** LBE*** Group Antigen .mu.g/mouse 35 day
79 day 94 day S. epi 94 S. aur 94 A LTA/PSPA 10 16053 4110 65241
531 26 B LTA/PSPA 1 23505 8806 156343 150 13 C LTA/SIA/TT 10 153227
39034 279505 520 29 D LTA/SIAAT 1 98798 20135 313256 980 50 E
LTA/GMBS/TT 10 230410 46859 299995 1903 409 F LTA/GMBS/TT 1 88756
24338 447440 2475 541 *The ELISA titer is the serum dilution
required to obtain an absorbance of 1.0 **The LBE titer for S.
epidermidis strain Hay is the serum dilution required to obtain an
absorbance of 1.0. ***The LBE titer for S. aureus is the serum
dilution required to obtain an absorbance of 0.5.
[0138] Based on the results of the ELISA assays and LBE assays, day
94 and day 119 sera from individual mice in groups E and F were
tested by ELISA, and in an opsonic assay against S. aureus (Table
4).
[0139] Mouse 1396, which had been immunized with LTA/GMBS/TT, was
selected because serum from the mouse showed a strong signal by
anti-LTA ELISA, and was opsonic against S. aureus. Mouse 1396 was
boosted one more time at day 134, and then sacrificed on day 141,
and spleen removed and used to make hybridomas.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Anti-LTA ELISA and Opsonic Assay of
Individual Mouse Sera S. aureus opsonic assay** Antigen ELISA*
ELISA* Prebleed Prebleed day day day day day ID Dose prebleed day
119 neat 1:5 94 94 119 119 119 1391 10 16364 53 20 68 0 40 14 1392
10 18142 47915 19 53 0 1 21 1393 10 18870 65 2 12 37 1394 10 22
32126 77 25 78 33 29 50 67 1395 1 29091 7 6 44 16 23 17 39 1396 1 0
90249 53 20 74 64 1397 1 0 40833 53 0 33 0 1398 1 0 16601 60 27 40
31 37 *serum dilution required to obtain an absorbance of 1.0.
**numbers are percent killing.
[0140] Hybridomas were prepared by the general methods of Shulman,
Wilde and Kohler; and Bartal and Hirshaut (34, 48). A total of
2.08.times.10.sup.8 spleenocytes from mouse 1396 were mixed with
2.00.times.10.sup.7 SP2/0 mouse myeloma cells (ATCC Catalog number
CRL1581) and pelleted by centrifugation (400.times.g, 10 minutes at
room temperature) and washed in serum free medium. The supernatant
was removed to near-dryness and fusion of the cell mixture was
accomplished in a sterile 50 ml centrifuge conical by the addition
of 1 ml of warm (37.degree. C.) polyethylene glycol (PEG; mw 1400;
Boehringer Mannheim) over a period of 60-90 seconds. The PEG was
diluted by slow addition of serum-free medium in successive volumes
of 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 19 mls. The hybridoma cell suspension was
gently resuspended into the medium and the cells pelleted by
centrifugation (500.times.g, 10 minutes at room temperature). The
supernatant was removed and the cells resuspended in medium
RPM11640, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine
serum, 0.05 mM hypoxanthine and 16 .mu.M thymidine (HT medium). One
hundred .mu.l of the hybridoma cells were planted into 952 wells of
96-well tissue culture plates. Eight wells (column 1 of plate A)
received approximately 2.5.times.10.sup.4 SP2/0 cells in 100 .mu.l.
The SP2/0 cells served as a control for killing by the selection
medium added 24 hours later.
[0141] Twenty four hours after preparation of the hybridomas, 100
.mu.l of RPMI 1640, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal
bovine serums, 0.1 mM hypoxanthine, 0.8 .mu.M aminopterin and 32
.mu.M thymidine (HAT medium) was added to each well.
[0142] Forty-eight hours after the preparation of the hybridomas,
the SP2/0 cells in plate A, column 1 appeared to be dead,
indicating that the HAT selection medium had successfully killed
the unfused SP2/0 cells.
[0143] Ten days after the preparation of the hybridomas,
supernatants from all wells were tested by ELISA for the presence
of antibodies reactive with methanol-fixed S. aureus LTA. Based on
the results of this preliminary assay, cells from 12 wells were
transferred to a 24-well culture dish. Three days later,
supernatant from these cultures were retested by ELISA for the
presence of antibodies that bind to LTA.
[0144] The absorbance values for eleven of the culture supernatants
were less than 0.100. However, the absorbance value obtained with
the supernatant from hybridoma culture 00-107GG12 was 4.000. This
culture was expanded for further evaluation and cloned into two
96-well culture dishes. Cloning was accomplished by diluting the
cell suspension into 4.5 viable cells per ml in RPM11640,
supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum, 5% Hybridoma SFM (Life
Technologies) and 100 .mu.g/ml of kanamycin.
[0145] Ten days later, the supernatants from the hybridoma clones
were tested by ELISA for binding to S. aureus LTA. Only one clone,
ID12, bound strongly to LTA, with an absorbance of 3.500). In
contrast, the absorbance values for the remaining supernatants were
less than 0.220. Hybridoma clone 00-107GG12 ID12 was expanded and
cryopreserved. Isotype determination revealed that both the
original hybridoma (00-107GG12) and its clone (00-107GG12 ID12)
were mouse IgG2a heavy chains with kappa light chains. The
monoclonal antibody produced by hybridoma 00-107GG12 ID12 was
designated M120.
Example 2
Opsonic Activity of M120
[0146] Opsonic assays were carried out substantially as described
above under the heading "Neutrophil-mediated Opsonophagocytic
Bacteriacidal Assay". M120 was purified from ascites essentially as
described by the manufacturer of MEP Hypercel gel (BiSepra).
Thirty-three ml of buffer A (50 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, pH 8) was added
to 17 ml of mouse ascites, and then centrifuged for 15 minutes at
4000 rpm in an Eppendorf model 5810R centrifuge using rotor A462.
The solution was filtered using Whatman GD/XP PES 0.45.mu. membrane
(cat. no. 6994-2504) and the volume of diluted ascites was 47 ml
after filtering. The solution was loaded onto a 1 cm.times.7 cm MEP
hypercel column that had been equilibrated with buffer A, at a rate
of 1.8 ml/min. The column was washed with buffer A, and then with
buffer A+25 mM sodium caprylate until the OD280 was <0.05. The
column was then washed with water until the OD.sub.280<0.05. The
column was eluted with buffer B (50 mM sodium acetate, 5 mM EDTA,
pH 4) and the eluent collected at a rate of 70 drops/min. The main
peak (pool A) and its trailing end (pool B) were pooled separately
and dialyzed against PBS (2.times.2 L) at 4.degree. C. The dialyzed
solution was sterile filtered using a Millex GV device (Millipore).
By OD.sub.280, pool A contained 3.2 mg/ml antibody, and pool B
contained 0.25 mg/ml antibody.
[0147] First, the opsonic activity of M120 was determined against
S. aureus Type 5 (Table 5).
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Opsonic Activity of M120 (200 .mu.g/ml)
against S. aureus Type 5 Description Assay 1 Assay 2 Assay 3 Assay
4 PMNs alone 0 0 0 0 C alone 0 9 0 0 PMNs + C 0 16 25 11 M120 alone
20 0 0 0 M120 + PMNs + C' 73 84 85 85
[0148] Next, the opsonic activity of M120 was determined against S.
epidermidis strain Hay (Table 6). This assay was also performed as
described above under the heading "Neutrophil-Mediated
Opsonophagocytic Bactericidal Assay".
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Opsonic activity of M120 against S.
epidermidis strain Hay MAb Description (.mu.g/ml) % killed PMNs
alone 0 C' alone 0 PMNs + C' 0 M120 alone 200 17 M120 + PMNs + C'
200 95 '' 100 97 '' 30 75 '' 10 87 '' 3.3 55
[0149] A similar assay was used to determine the opsonic activity
of MAb-391.4 against S. epidermidis strain Hay (Table 7). Thus,
MAb-391.4, which was raised against UV-killed S. aureus, has strong
opsonic activity against S. epidermidis strain Hay.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Opsonic activity of MAb-391.4 against S.
epidermidis strain Hay MAb Description (pg/ml) % killed PMNs alone
10.9 C' alone 0 PMNs + C' 0 M120 alone 120 24.7 M120 + PMNS + C'
120 81.9 '' 50 57.9
Example 3
Cloning of the M120 Variable Regions
[0150] Total RNA was isolated from 4.times.10.sup.6 frozen 00-107
GG12 ID12 hybridoma cells using the Midi RNA Isolation kit (Qiagen)
following the manufacturer's procedure. The RNA was dissolved in 10
mM Tris, 0.1 mM EDTA (pH 8.4) containing 0.03 U/(.mu.g Prime RNase
Inhibitor (Sigma) to a final concentration of 025 .mu.g/.mu.l.
[0151] FIG. 3 shows the strategy for cloning the variable region
genes. The total RNA (2 .mu.g) was converted to cDNA by using
Superscript II-MMLV Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies) and
mouse Kappa chain-specific primer (JSBX-18; SEQ ID NO: 5) and a
mouse heavy chain-specific primer (JSBX-25A; SEQ ID NO: 6)
according to the manufacturer's procedures (see FIG. 4 for primer
sequences). The first strand cDNA synthesis products were then
purified using a Centricon-30 concentrator device (Amicon). Of the
40 .mu.l of cDNA recovered, 5 .mu.l was used as template DNA for
PCR. Typical PCR amplification reactions (50 .mu.l) contained
template DNA, 30 pmoles of the appropriate primers (JSBX-9A, 11 A,
and 18 for light chains, SEQ ID NOs: 3-5; JSBX-1, 4 and JSBX-25A
for heavy chains, SEQ ID NOs: 1, 2, and 6), 2.5 units of ExTaq
polymerase (PanVera), 1.times.ExTaq reaction buffer, 200 .mu.M
dNTP, 2 mM MgC12. The template was denatured by an initial
incubation at 96.degree. C. for 3 min. The products were amplified
by 30 thermal cycles of 96.degree. C. for 1 min., 60.degree. C. for
30 sec, 72.degree. C. for 30 seconds. The PCR products from the
successful reactions were purified using the Nucleospin PCR
Purification system (Clontech) as per manufacturer's procedure.
[0152] The PCR products (approximately 400 base pairs each) were
then cloned into a bacterial vector, pGEM T (Promega) for DNA
sequence determination. PCR fragments were ligated into pGEM T, a
T/A style cloning vector, following the manufacturer's procedures
using a 3:1 insert to vector molar ratio. One half (5 .mu.l) of the
ligation reactions were used to transform Ultracompetent XL1 Blue
cells (Stratagene) as per the manufacturer's procedure. Bacterial
clones containing plasmids with DNA inserts were identified using
diagnostic restriction enzyme digestions with Dralll and BsiWI (for
heavy chain clones) or Dralll and EcoRV (for light chain clones)
(New England Biolabs). The DNA sequences of plasmids containing
inserts of the appropriate size (.about.400 bp) were then
determined. The plasmid containing the A120 heavy chain sequence
was designated pJSB16-6 and the plasmid containing the A120 light
chain variable region was designated pJSB17-23. The final consensus
DNA sequences of the light chain and heavy chain variable regions
are shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 6, respectively.
[0153] Having sequenced the variable regions of both M110 and M120,
we compared them. The homology was striking at both the DNA and
amino acid levels. As set forth in FIG. 9 there is a 96% homology
at the DNA level, with 662 out of 687 bases the same Further, at
the amino acid level, there is a 94% homology, with 216 amino acids
out of 225 the same, as set forth in FIG. 10. As noted above, M120
was raised agains S. aureus LTA, while M110 was raised against S.
epidermis strain Hay. Both antibodies exhibit opsonic activity
against both S. epidermis and S. aureus. The high level of homology
between the M110 and M120 variable regions may suggest a common
structural motif that contributes to the opsonic capability of the
antibodies.
Example 4
Production of Recombinant Chimeric Mouse/Human Antibody
Molecules
[0154] The heavy and light chain variable regions were then
subcloned into a mammalian expression plasmid vector for production
of recombinant chimeric mouse/human antibody molecules. The
human/mouse chimera of the M120 antibody is designated A120, and
the human/mouse chimera of the M110 antibody is designated A110
(see U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,293, filed Jun. 15, 1998).
[0155] As set forth below, vectors were designed that express
recombinant antibody molecules under the control of CMV
transcriptional promoters. The chimeric heavy chains are expressed
as a fusion of a heavy chain variable region and a human IgG1
constant domain. The chimeric light chains are expressed as a
fusion of a light chain variable region and a human kappa chain
constant region. The chimeric light chain cDNA contains a mouse
kappa intron between the variable region and the human kappa
constant region. After splicing, the variable region becomes fused
to a human Kappa constant region exon. The selectable marker for
the vector in mammalian cells is Neomycin resistance (resistance to
G418).
[0156] The variable region gene fragments of M120 were re-amplified
by PCR using primers that adapted the fragments for cloning into
the expression vector {see FIG. 4, JSBX-46 through JSBX-49, SEQ ID
NOs: 7-9 and 18). The heavy chain front primer (JSBX-46; SEQ ID NO:
7) includes a 5' tail that encodes the C-terminus of the heavy
chain leader and a Ss/WI restriction site for cloning, while the
heavy chain reverse primer (JSBX-47; SEQ ID NO: 8) adds a 3' EcoRI
restriction site for cloning. This results in the addition of two
amino acids, glutamine (E) and phenylalanine (F) between the heavy
chain variable region and the human lgG1 constant region. The light
chain front primer (JSBX-48; SEQ ID NO: 9) introduces a 5' tail
that encodes the two C-terminal amino acids of the light chain
leader and an Age/restriction site for cloning purposes. The light
chain reverse primer (JSBX-49; SEQ ID NO: 18) adds a 3' DNA
sequence for the joining region-Kappa exon splice junction followed
by a BstBI restriction site for cloning. The variable regions were
re-amplified from the plasmid DNA using vector pJSB16-6 for the
heavy chain variable region and vector pJSB17-23 for the light
chain variable region. PCR reactions were performed as described
above. Following a 3 minute incubation at 96.degree. C., the PCR
parameters were 30 thermal cycles of 58.degree. C. for 30 seconds,
70.degree. C. for 30 seconds, and 96.degree. C. for 1 minute.
[0157] The heavy chain variable region PCR product was digested
with BsiWI and EcoRI (New England Biolabs), purified using a
Nucleospin PCR Purification column (Clontech), as described by the
manufacturer, and ligated into BsiWI/EcoRI/PfIMI-digested and
gel-purified pJRS383 vector using the Takara Ligation Kit (Panvera)
following the manufacturer's procedure. The ligation mix was then
transformed into XL1Blue cells (Stratagene), resulting in plasmid
mammalian expression vector pJSB23-1 (FIG. 7). The light chain
variable region PCR product (approximately 350 bp) was digested
with AgeI and BstBI (New England Biolabs), and purified using a
Nucleospin PCR Purification column (Clontech) as described by the
manufacturer. The light chain variable region fragment was ligated
into pJRS384 that had been AgeI/BstBI/Xcml-digested and
gel-purified using the Takara Ligation Kit (Panvera) following the
manufacturer's procedure. The ligation mix was transformed into
XL1Blue cells (Stratagene), resulting in mammalian expression
plasmid pJSB24 (FIG. 8).
[0158] Because of the similarity between the A110 and the A120
antibody sequences, we decided to construct mammalian cell
expression plasmids that contained the A120 heavy and light chain
variable regions in a bi-cistronic plasmid, as well as plasmids
that combined the A110 heavy chain variable region with the A120
light chain variable region, and the A110 light chain variable
region with the A120 heavy chain variable region, in order to
investigate the binding and opsonic properties of the different
antibodies. Construction of the bi-cistronic vectors was done in a
step-wise fashion, in which the heavy and light chain variable
regions of A120 were cloned into a bi-cistonic expression plasmid
already containing the A110 light and heavy chain variable regions
(pJRS354, FIG. 11), replacing the A110 light chain variable region,
heavy chain variable region, or both. The plasmid pJRS354 was
digested with ClaI and XhoI (New England Biolabs), the digestion
products were separated on an agarose gel and the backbone fragment
was cut out and gel purified using a Nucleospin Gel Fragment DNA
Purification column (Clontech), as described by the manufacturer.
The plasmid pJSB24 was digested with ClaI and XhoI (New England
Biolabs), the digestion products were separated on an agarose gel
and the light chain variable region fragment was cut out and gel
purified using a Nucleospin Gel Fragment DNA Purification column
(Clontech), as described by the manufacturer. These fragments were
then ligated together using the Takara Ligation Kit (Panvera)
following the manufacturer's procedure. The resulting bi-cistronic
expression vector, pJSB25-3 (FIG. 12), which contained the A120
antibody light chain variable region and the A110 antibody heavy
chain variable region, was then used for antibody production in
transfected mammalian cells after sequence confirmation of the
variable regions.
[0159] The two other bi-cistronic plasmids were constructed in a
similar manner. The plasmid pJSB25-3 was digested with BspEI and
NotI (New England Biolabs), the digestion products were separated
on an agarose gel and the backbone fragment was cut out and gel
purified using a Nucleospin Gel Fragment DNA Purification column
(Clontech), as described by the manufacturer. The plasmid pJSB23-1
was digested with BspEl and NotI (New England Biolabs), the
digestion products were separated on an agarose gel and the heavy
chain variable region fragment was cut out and gel purified using a
Nucleospin Gel Fragment DNA Purification column (Clontech), as
described by the manufacturer. These fragments were ligated
together using the Takara Ligation Kit (Panvera) following the
manufacturer's procedure. The resulting bi-cistronic expression
vector, pJSB26 (FIG. 13), which contained the light and heavy chain
variable regions of the A120 antibody, was then used for antibody
production in transfected mammalian cells.
[0160] The plasmid pJRS354 was digested with BspEl and NotI (New
England Biolabs), the digestion products were separated on an
agarose gel and the backbone fragment was cut out and gel purified
using a Nucleospin Gel Fragment DNA Purification column (Clontech),
as described by the manufacturer. The plasmid pJSB23-1 was digested
with BspEl and NotI (New England Biolabs), the digestion products
were separated on an agarose gel and the heavy chain variable
region fragment was cut out and gel purified using a Nucleospin Gel
Fragment DNA Purification column (Clontech), as described by the
manufacturer. These fragments were ligated together using the
Takara Ligation Kit (Panvera) following the manufacturer's
procedure and transformed into XUBlue cells (Stratagene). The
resulting bi-cistronic expression vector, pJSB27 (FIG. 14), which
contained the heavy chain variable region of the A120 antibody and
the light chain variable region of the A110 antibody, was then used
for antibody production in transfected mammalian cells.
Example 5
Comparison of the A120 and A110 Anti-LTA Human/Mouse Chimeric
Antibodies
[0161] Anti-LTA human/mouse chimeric antibody A110 was previously
described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/097,055, now U.S.
Pat. No. 6,610,293, which is herein incorporated by reference. The
binding activities of anti-LTA human/mouse chimeric antibodies A110
and A120 were compared in ELISA assays against LTA.
[0162] Dilutions of A120 supernatant were compared to dilutions of
purified A110 antibody in an immunoassay as described above under
the heading "Binding Assays", subheading "Immunoassay on LTA".
Briefly, the wells of a 96-well plate were coated with 1 .mu.g/ml
of S. aureus LTA for three hours at room temperature. After
washing, dilutions of purified A110 antibody or A120 supernatant in
PBS-T were added to quadruplicate wells and incubated for 30 to 60
minutes at room temperature. After washing, HRP-conjugated
gamma-specific goat anti-human IgG, diluted 1:5000, was added to
each well and incubated for 30 to 60 minutes at room temperature.
After removing the secondary antibody and washing, 100 .mu.l TMB
substrate was added to each well and incubated for 15 minutes at
room temperature. One hundred microliters of TMB stop reagent was
then added to each well to stop the reaction, and the absorbance of
each well at 450 nm was determined. The results of the anti-LTA
ELISA assay are shown in Table 8.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Binding of A110 and A120 to LTA-coated
plates A120 A110 supernatant (ng/ml) A450 dilution A450 40 2.691 10
4.000 20 1.741 20 3.967 10 0.952 40 3.927 5 0.555 80 3.327 2.5
0.322 160 2.824 1.25 0.180 320 1.907 0.625 0.115 640 1.148 PBS-T
0.050 PBS-T 0.052
This assay shows that monoclonal antibody A120, like A110, binds to
LTA of S. aureus. In order to compare the binding affinity of the
two antibodies, A120 was purified using Protein G Ultralink
(Pierce) per the manufacturer's procedure, and the two antibodies
were tested for binding to LTA in a second ELISA assay.
[0163] Dilutions of purified A110 and A120 antibodies were compared
for binding to LTA in an ELISA assay, using substantially the same
protocol as above. The data for the anti-LTA ELISA using dilutions
of purified antibodies are shown in Table 9.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Binding of purified A110 and A120 to
LTA-coated plates antibody concentration A.sub.450 A.sub.450
(ng/ml) A110 A120 8000 3.921 3.566 2000 3.922 3.078 500 3.960 1.445
125 3.838 0.422 31.25 2.398 0.131 7.8125 0.903 0.068 1.953 0.276
0.054 PBS-T 0.047 0.048
These data demonstrate that A110 has a greater affinity for S.
aureus LTA than does A120. This difference is particularly striking
at an antibody concentration of 125 ng/ml, where A120 gives an
ELISA signal of 0.422, and A110 gives a signal that is nearly ten
times stronger.
Example 6
Comparison of the Opsonic Activity of Anti-LTA Antibodies A110 and
A120
[0164] Purified human/mouse chimeric A110 and A120, and mouse M120
MAbs were assayed for their opsonic activity as described above,
under the heading "Neutrophil-Mediated Opsonophagocytic
Bactericidal Assay." Briefly, dilutions of purified A110, A120, or
M120 antibodies were combined with neutrophils (PMNs) in the wells
of a microtiter plate. Mid-log phase bacteria were added to each
well, followed by immunoglobulin-depleted human serum, which serves
as a source of complement (C). Samples were incubated for 2 hours
at 37.degree. C., and were then plated on blood agar and incubated
overnight to determine the number of live bacteria remaining. The
opsonic activity is expressed as"% killed", which is determined
according to the following formula: %
killed=100%-N.sub.2hr/N.sub.0hr, where N.sub.2hr is the number of
colonies formed after a 2 hour incubation with antibody, PMNs, and
C\ and N.sub.0hr is the number of colonies formed after a 0 hour
incubation. Control reactions lacked one of the above components.
Table 10 shows the results of the opsonic activity assay for
antibodies A110, A120, and M120.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Opsonic activity of A110, A120, and M120
against S. epidermidis strain Hay MAb cone, Antibody Description
(.mu.g/ml) % killed A110 purified human/mouse 100 99 chimeric ''
anti-LTA MAb 50 96 '' '' 10 96 A120 purified human/mouse 100 100
chimeric '' anti-LTA MAb 50 99 '' '' 10 94 M120 purified mouse 100
99 anti-LTA MAb '' 50 97 '' purified mouse 10 94 anti-LTA MAb PMNs
alone purified mouse N/A 0 anti-LTA MAb C' alone purified mouse N/A
0 anti-LTA MAb PMNs + C' (no MAb) purified mouse N/A 14 anti-LTA
MAb A110 alone purified mouse 100 0 anti-LTA MAb A120 alone
purified mouse 100 0 anti-LTA MAb M120 alone purified mouse 100 8
anti-LTA MAb
[0165] These data demonstrate that MAbs A110, A120, and M120 are
equally active in the opsonic activity assay described herein.
Thus, the chimerization of M120 to make A120 has little or no
effect on the opsonic activity of the antibody, and the two
different anti-LTA chimeric antibodies, A110 and A120, are of
comparable activity.
Example 7
Transient Production of Recombinant Chimeric Mouse/Human A120
Antibodies
[0166] The plasmids pJSB25, pJSB26 and pJSB27 were transected into
COS cells grown in IMDM plus 10% fetal bovine serum, using
Superfect (Qiagen) in 6 well tissue culture wells as described by
the manufacturer. After two days the supernatant was assayed for
the production of chimeric antibody and for the capability for the
expressed antibody to bind to S. aureus LTA antigen.
[0167] Antibody production assays were preformed in 8-well strips
from 96-well microtiter plates (Maxisorp F8; Nunc, Inc.) coated at
a 1:500 dilution with a goat antihuman Fc (Pierce). The plates are
covered with pressure sensitive film and incubated overnight at
4.degree. C. Plates were then washed once with Wash solution
(Imidazole/NaCl/0.4% Tween-20). One hundred microliters of culture
supernatant dilutions were then applied to duplicate wells and
allowed to incubate for 60 minutes on a plate rotator at room
temperature. The plates were washed seven times with Wash solution.
A Goat anti-Human IgG H+L-HRP (Zymed) conjugate was diluted 1:4000
in the sample/conjugate diluent. One hundred microliters was added
to the samples, and then incubated on a plate rotator for 60
minutes at room temperature. The samples were washed as above and
then incubated with 100 (xL/well of TMB developing substrate
(BioFx) for 1 minute at room temperature. The binding reaction was
stopped with 100 .mu.Uwell of Quench buffer (BioFx) and the
absorbance value at 450 nm was determined using an automated
microtiter plate ELISA reader. This assay (see FIG. 15)
demonstrates that the transfection of cells with this plasmid
construct results in the cells producing a molecule containing both
human IgG and Kappa domains.
[0168] The supernatants were then assayed for the ability of the
expressed antibodies to bind to lipoteichoic acid. The activity
assays were preformed in 8-well strips from 96-well microtiter
plates (Maxisorp F8; Nunc, Inc.) coated at 1 .mu.g/mL with S.
aureus LTA (Sigma) using PBS. The plates were covered and incubated
overnight at 4.degree. C. Plates were then washed once with PBS.
One hundred microliters of culture supernatant dilutions were then
applied to duplicate wells and allowed to incubate for 60 minutes
on a plate rotator at room temperature. The plates were washed
seven times with Wash solution. Goat anti-Human IgG H+L-HRP (Zymed)
was diluted 1:4000 in the sample/conjugate diluent, and 100 ul were
added to the samples, and then incubated on a plate rotator for 60
minutes at room temperature. The samples were washed as above and
then incubated with 100 .mu.L/well of TMB developing substrate
(BioFx) for 10-15 minutes on a plate rotator at room temperature.
The binding reaction was stopped with 100 .mu.L/well of Quench
buffer (BioFx) and the absorbance value at 450 nm was determined
using an automated microtiter plate ELISA reader. As a positive
control, the original human/mouse chimeric antibody A110 (produced
by plasmid pJRS354) was used. This assay (FIG. 16) demonstrates
that the transfection of cells with these plasmid constructs
results in the cells producing a molecule that binds to the S.
aureus LTA antigen.
[0169] These data demonstrate that the chimeric human antibody
directed against LTA is opsonic and enhances survival against
staphylococci. In addition, the antibody promotes clearance of the
staphylococci from the blood. Thus antibody to LTA provides
prophylactic and therapeutic capabilities against staphylococcal
infections and vaccines using LTA or peptide mimeotopes of LTA that
induce anti-LTA antibodies would also have prophylactic
capabilities.
Example 8
Human Antibodies that Bind LTA
[0170] Rather than humanizing a mouse antibody to minimize the HAMA
response during treatment as described above, a skilled artisan can
isolate a protective anti-LTA antibody that is fully human. There
are a number of well-known alternative strategies one of ordinary
skill in the art may use to produce completely human recombinant
antibodies. One is the generation of antibodies using phage display
technologies (59, 63). Specifically, human RNA is used to produce a
cDNA library of antibody heavy and light chain fragments expressed
on the surface of bacteriophage. These libraries can be used to
probe against the antigen of interest (i.e., LTA) and the phage
that bind, because of the antibody expressed on the surface, are
then isolated. The DNA encoding the variable regions is sequenced
and cloned for antibody expression.
[0171] Another method of producing human antibodies employs
"humanized" mice. These transgenic mice have had their own antibody
genes replaced with a portion of the human antibody gene complex so
that upon inoculation with antigen, they produce human antibodies
(57, 59, 60, 61, 63). The antibody producing cells that result can
then be incorporated into the standard hybridoma technology for the
establishment of specific monoclonal antibody producing cell
lines.
[0172] Recombinant human antibodies are also produced by isolating
antibody-producing B cells from human volunteers that have a robust
anti-LTA response. Using fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS)
and fluorescently labeled LTA, cells producing the anti-LTA
antibodies can be separated from the other cells. The RNA can then
be extracted and the sequence of the reactive antibody variable
regions determined (58, 62). The DNA sequence of the functional
variable regions can be synthesized or cloned into mammalian
expression vectors for large-scale human recombinant antibody
production.
CONCLUSION
[0173] Monoclonal antibodies were raised in mice against S. aureus
LTA. One hybridoma that produced antibodies that bound strongly to
LTA in an ELISA assay was subcloned further. Hybridoma subclone
00-107GG12 ID12 produced an IgG.sub.2a monoclonal antibody with a
kappa light chain that bound strongly to LTA. The antibody produced
by this hybridoma was designated M120 (Example 1).
[0174] M120 was tested in an opsonophagocytic bacteriocidal assay
for opsonic activity against S. aureus type 5 and S. epidermidis
strain Hay. The antibody was mixed with PMNs and complement, which
was derived from human serum that had been depleted of anti-S.
aureus and anti-S. epidermidis antibodies, and then tested for
activity against the bacteria. M120 showed opsonic activity against
both S. aureus and S. epidermidis, killing 95% of S. epidermidis
and an average of 82% of S. aureus at 200 .mu.g/ml (Example 2,
Tables 5 and 6). MAb-391.4, which was raised to UV-killed S.
aureus, was tested for opsonic activity against S. epidermidis
strain Hay in a similar assay, and showed 81.9% killing (Table
7).
[0175] The M120 variable regions were then cloned and sequenced,
and the sequence compared to another anti-LTA antibody, M110.
Surprisingly, M110 and M120 were found to share about 94% sequence
identity at the amino acid level, and about 96% sequence identity
at the nucleotide level. A third anti-LTA antibody, MAb-391.4, was
also sequenced compared to the other two. The three antibodies
share 88% sequence identity at the amino acid level. This high
level of sequence identity may suggest that the antibodies bind to
a common epitope on LTA (Example 3, FIGS. 9 and 10). Human/mouse
chimeric antibodies were then made, fusing the heavy chain variable
region of either M120 or M110 to a human IgG1 constant region, and
the light chain variable region of either M120 or M110 to a human
kappa light chain constant region. The human/mouse chimera of M120
is referred to as A120 and the human/mouse chimera of M110 is
referred to as A110. Because of the similarity between the two
antibodies, an antibody that contained the heavy chain of A110 and
the light chain of A120, designated A120a, was made. Similarly, an
antibody that contained the light chain of A110 and the heavy chain
of A120, designated A120b, was also made (Example 4).
[0176] The human/mouse chimeric antibodies A120 and A110 were
tested for their ability to bind to LTA in an ELISA assay. Both
chimeric antibodies bound strongly to LTA, indicating that
replacing the mouse constant regions with human constant regions
had little effect on the binding properties of the antibodies
(Example 5, Tables 8 and 9). Next, the opsonic activity of chimeric
antibodies A110 and A120, and of M120, were compared in an opsonic
assay against S. epidermidis strain Hay. All three antibodies
showed at least 94% killing of S. epidermidis. These results show
that the chimeric antibodies are strongly opsonic against S.
epidermidis, and because they have a reduced HAMA response in
humans, they should be suitable therapeutic molecules for fighting
Gram-positive bacterial infections (Example 6, Table 10).
[0177] Finally, three of the chimeric antibodies, A120, A120a, and
A120b were produced in COS cells and tested for the ability to bind
to S. aureus LTA. All three chimeric antibodies bound to LTA in the
ELISA assay, with A120 and A120a showing the strongest binding.
These results suggest that M110 and M120 do bind to a similar or
overlapping epitope on LTA, because antibodies that have variable
regions from both retain the ability to bind to the antigen. These
results may indicate that a particular epitope on LTA is able to
elicit antibodies that are opsonic against S. aureus and S.
epidermidis. This epitope may be more accessible than others, or
may be positioned such that antibodies that are bound are ideally
situated to attract the factors required for opsonization of the
bacterium.
[0178] Previously, it was unclear whether a monoclonal antibody
could enhance phagocytosis, because the polyclonal sera that were
used contained many different antibodies that bound to many
different epitopes on the surface of the bacteria, and the sum of
this collective binding and activities may have accounted for the
overall activity of the serum. Here, we demonstrate that monoclonal
antibodies, which bind to a single epitope on the surface of
bacteria, can be opsonic against that bacteria. We have also
demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies raised against LTA can have
that activity, and that those antibodies may be opsonic for a
number of different types of Gram-positive bacteria.
[0179] Furthermore, we have shown that three different monoclonal
antibodies, one of which was raised to whole S. epidermidis, one to
purified and conjugated LTA from S. aureus, and one to whole
UV-killed S. aureus, share a striking degree of homology. This
Jevel of homology between monoclonal antibodies that were raised to
similar antigens in different mice has previously not been shown.
In fact, it has long been believed that antibodies have evolved the
ability to bind identical antigens using very dissimilar
determinants to provide the body with a very broad antibody
repertoire. The level of homology between the M110, M120, and
MAb-391.4 variable regions may indicate that opsonic antibodies to
LTA recognize a nearly identical epitope using nearly identical
modes of binding, and that this mode of binding is important to
their functional activity. Furthermore, the epitope to which the
antibodies bind appears to be highly conserved between S.
epidermidis and S. aureus, and may be common to most, if not all,
Gram-positive bacteria. Monoclonal antibodies to this epitope may,
therefore, be broadly opsonic against a wide range of bacteria,
allowing researchers to develop a few antibodies that will have
broad opsonic and protective activity against many Gram-positive
bacteria.
[0180] The following literature references are herein specifically
incorporated by reference: [0181] 1. Ames, B. N. 1966. Assay of
inorganic phosphate, total phosphate and phosphatase, Methods in
Enzymology 8: 115-118. [0182] 2. Ellman, G. L. 1959. Tissue
Sulfhydryl Groups, Arch. Biochem. & Biophys. 82: 70 [0183] 3.
Endl, J.; Seidl, H P.; Fiedler, F.; and Schleifer, K. H. 1983.
Chemical composition and structure of cell wall teichoic acid of
staphylococci, Arch Microbiol, 135: 215-223. [0184] 4. Espersen,
F.; Hertz, J. B.; and Hoiby, N. 1981. Cross-reactions between
Staphylococcus epidermis and 23 other bacterial species, Ada Path.
Microbial. Scand, Sect. B. 89: 253-260. [0185] 5. Exley A. R.;
Cohen J.; Buurman W.; Owen R.; Hanson G.; Lumley J.; Aulakh J. M.;
Bodmer M.; Riddell A.; Stephens S.; et al. 1990. Monoclonal
antibody to TNF in severe septic shock, Lancet 335: 1275-1277.
[0186] 6. Fattom A.; Shepherd S.; Karakawa W. 1992. Capsular
polysaccharide serotyping scheme for Staphylococcus epidermidis, J.
Clin. Micro. 30: 3270-3273. [0187] 7. Fischer, Gerald W. Broadly
reactive opsonic antibodies that react with common staphylococcal
antigens, U.S. Pat. No. 5,571,511, issued Nov. 5, 1996. [0188] 8.
Fischer, Gerald W. Directed human immune globulin for the
prevention and treatment of staphylococcal infections, U.S. Pat.
No. 5,955,074, issued Sep. 21, 1999. [0189] 9. Fischer W.; Koch H.
U.; Haas R. 1983. Improved preparation of lipoteichoic acids, Eur.
J. Biochem. 133: 523-530. [0190] 10. Fleer, A.; Senders R. C.;
Visser M. R.; Bijlmer R. P.; Gerards L. J.; Kraaijeveld C. A.;
Verhoef J. 1983. Septicemia due to coagulase-negative staphylococci
in a neonatal intensive care unit: clinical and bacteriological
features and contaminated parenteral fluids as a source of sepsis,
Pediatr. Infect Dis. 2:426-431. [0191] 11. Fournier, Jean-Michel.
1991. Staphylococcus Aureus, Vaccines and Immunotherapy, Ch. 13,
pp. 166-171. [0192] 12. Garrett, Laurie. 1994. The Revenge of the
Germs or Just Keep Inventing New Drugs, The Coming Plague, Ch. 13,
Farrar, Straus and Giroux, N.Y., (ed.), pp. 411-456. [0193] 13.
Genarro, A. (ed.) 1990. Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences,
1Sf.sup.h Edition, Mack Publishing, Easton, Pa. [0194] 14. Hancock,
I. C. 1997. Bacterial cell surface carbohydrates: Structure and
assembly, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 25: 183-187. [0195] 15. Jendeberg,
Lena; Nilsson, Peter; Larsson, Antonella; Denker, Per; Uhlen,
Mathias; Nilsson, Bjorn; Nygren, Per-Ake. 1997. Engineering of Fc1
and Fc3 from human immunoglobulin G to analyse subclass specificity
for Staphylococcal Protein A, J. Immunol. Methods 201: 25-34.
[0196] 16. Kojima Y.; Tojo M.; Goldmann D. A.; Tosteson T. D.; Pier
G. B. 1990. Antibody to the capsular polysaccharide/adhesin
protects rabbits against catheter-related bacteremia due to
coagulase-negative staphylococci, J. Infect Dis. 162: 435-441.
[0197] 17. Krieger, Monty; Joiner, Keith A. Method for treating
Gram-positive septicemia, U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,904, issued Apr. 29,
1997. [0198] 18. Lee, J. C. 1996. The prospects for developing a
vaccine against Staphylococcus aureus, Trends in Micro. 4: 162-66.
[0199] 19. LoBuglio A. F.; Wheeler R. H.; Trang J.; Haynes A.;
Rogers K.; Harvey E. B.; Sun L; Ghrayeb J.; Khazaeli M. B. 1989.
Mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody in man: kinetics and
immune response, P.N.A.S. 86: 4220-4224. [0200] 20. Nakamura, K. et
al. 1999. Uptake and release of budesonide from mucoadhesive,
pH-sensitive copolymers and their application to nasal delivery. J.
Control. Release 61:329-335. [0201] 21. Natsume, H., S. Iwata, K.
Ohtak, M. Miyamoto, M. Yamaguchi, K. Hosoya, and D. Kobayashi.
1999. Screening of cationic compounds as an absorption enhancer for
nasal drug delivery. Int. J. Pharma. 185:1-12. [0202] 22. Naumova,
I. B.; Kuznetsov, V. D.; Kudrina, K. S.; and Bezzubenkova, A. P.
1980. The Occurrence of Teichoic Acids in Streptomycetes, Arch.
Microbiol. 126:71-75. [0203] 23. Navarre, William Wiley and
Schneewind, Olaf. 1999. Surface proteins of Gram-positive bacteria
and mechanisms of their targeting to the cell wall envelope,
Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 63:174-229. [0204] 24.
Osland, Arve; Grov, Arne; and Oeding, Per. 1980. Immunochemical
analysis of the teichoic acid from Staphylococcus simulans, Acta
Path. Microbiol. Scand, Sect. B., 88:121-123. [0205] 25. Patrick,
C. C. 1990. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: Pathogens with
increasing clinical Significance, J. Pediatr. 116:497-507. [0206]
26. Peterson, Phillip K.; Verhoef, Jan; Sabath, L. D.; and Quie,
Paul G. 1977. Effect of Protein A on staphylococcal opsonization,
Infection and Immunity 15: 760-764. [0207] 27. Peterson, Phillip
K.; Wilkinson, Brian J.; Kim, Youngki; Schmeling, David; and Quie,
Paul G. 1978. Influence of Encapsulation on Staphylococcal
Opsonization and Phagocytosis by Human Polymorphonuclear
Leukocytes, Infection and Immunity 19: 943-949. [0208] 28. Quie,
Paul G.; Hill, Harry R.; and Davis, Todd A. 1974. Defective
phagocytosis of Staphylococci, Annals New York Academy of Sciences,
pp. 233-243. [0209] 29. Ramkissoon-Ganorkar, C. et al. 1999.
Modulating insulin-release profile from pH/thermosensivite
polymeric beads through polymer molecular weight. J. Contr. Release
59:287-298. [0210] 30. Raynor, Robert H.; Scott, David F.; and
Best, Gary K. 1981. Lipoteichoic acid inhibition of phagocytosis of
Staphylococcus aureus by Human Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes,
Clinical Immunology and Immunopathology 19:181-189. [0211] 31.
Romero-Vivas J.; Rubio M.; Fernandez C; Picazo J. J. 1995.
Mortality associated with nosocomial bacteremia due to
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Clin. Infect. Dis. 21:
1417-23. [0212] 32. Salton, M. R. J. 1994. The Bacterial Cell
Envelope--A Historical Perspective, in J.-M. Ghuyson and R.
Hakenbeck (ed.), Bacterial Cell Wall, Elsevier Science BV,
Amsterdam, pp. 1-22. [0213] 33. Schwab, U. E., A. E. Wold, J. L.
Carson, M. W. Leigh, P.-W. Cheng, P. H. Gilligan and T. F. Boat.
1993. Increased adherence of Staphylococcus aureus from cystic
fibrosis lungs to airway epithelial cells. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
148:365-369. [0214] 34. Shulman, M.; Wilde, C D.; Kohler, G. 1978.
A Better Cell Line for Making Hybridomas Secreting Specific
Antibodies, Nature 276: 269-270. [0215] 35. Soto, N., A. Vaghjimal,
A. Stahl-Avicolli, J. Protic, L. Lutwick and E. Chapnick. 1999.
Bacitracin versus mupirocin for Staphylococcus aureus nasal
colonization. Infect. Cont. Hosp. Epidem. 20:351-353. [0216] 36.
Suzuki, Y. and Y. Makino. 1999. Mucosal drug delivery using
cellulose derivative as a functional polymer. J. Control. Release.
62:101-107. [0217] 37. Takada H.; Kawabata Y.; Arakaki R.; Kusumoto
S.; Fukase K.; Suda Y.; Yoshimura T.; Kokeguchi S.; Kato K.; Komuro
T.; et al. 1995. Molecular and structural requirements of a
lipoteichoic acid from Enterococcus hirae ATCC 9790 for
cytokine-inducing, antitumor, and antigenic activities, Infection
and Immunity 63: 57-65. [0218] 38. Takeda S.; Pier G. B.; Kojima
Y.; Tojo M.; Muller E.; Tosteson T.; Goldmann D. A. 1991.
Protection against endocarditis due to Staphylococcus epidermidis
by immunization with capsular polysaccharide/adhesin, Circulation
86: 2539-2546. [0219] 39. Timmerman C. P.; Besnier J. M.; De Graaf
L.; Torensma R.; Verkley A. J.; Fleer A.; Verhoef J. 1991.
Characterisation and functional aspects of monoclonal antibodies
specific for surface proteins of coagulase-negative staphylococci,
J. Med. Micro. 35: 65-71. [0220] 40. Tomasz, Alexander. 2000. The
Staphylococcal Cell Wall, in V. A. Fischetti et al. (ed.)
Gram-Positive Pathogens, Ch. 36, pp. 351-355. [0221] 41. Waldvogel,
Francis A. 1990. Staphylococcus Aureus (Including Toxic Shock
Syndrome), in Mandell, G. L. et al. (ed.) Principles and Practices
of Infectious Diseases, Third Edition, Churchill Livingstone, New
York, Ch. 173, pp. 1489-1510. [0222] 42. West, Timothy E.; Cantey,
J. R.; Apicella, Michael A.; and Burdash, N. M. 1983. Detection of
anti-teichoic acid immunoglobulin G antibodies in experimental
Staphylococcus epidermidis endocarditis, Infection and Immunity 42:
1020-1026. [0223] 43. Wortham, Charles; Grinberg, Luba; Kaslow,
David C; Briles, David E.; McDaniel, Larry S.; Lees, Andrew; Flora,
Michael; Snapper, Clifford M.; and Mond, James J. 1998. Enhanced
protective antibody response to PspA after intranasal or
subcutaneous injections of PspA genetically fused to
Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor or Interleukin-2,
Infection and Immunity 66:1513-1520. [0224] 44. Sambrook, Joseph;
Russell, David W. 1989. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual,
2.sup.nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
[0225] 45. Ausubel et al. (ed.) 1989. Current Protocols in
Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons. [0226] 46. Merkus, F. W.,
J. C. Verhoef, N. G. Schipper, and E. Marttin. 1999. Cyclodextrins
in nasal drug delivery. Advan. Drug Deliv. Rev. 36:41-57. [0227]
47. Kiser, Kevin B.; Cantey-Kiser, Jean M.; Lee, Jean C. 1999.
Development and characterization of a Staphylococcus aureus nasal
colonization model in mice. Infection and Immunity 67: 5001-5006.
[0228] 48. Bartal, Arie H.; Hirshaut, Yashar. 1987. Current Methods
in Hybridoma Formation Bartal, A. H. et al. (ed.) Methods of
Hybridoma Formation, Humana Press, Clifton, N.J. [0229] 49. De
Kimpe, S. J., M. Kengatharan, C. Thiemermann, J. R. Vane. 1995. The
cell wall components peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid from S.
aureus act in synergy to cause shock and multiple organ failure.
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 92:10359-10363. [0230] 50. Carruthers,
M. M., W. J. Kabat. 1983. Mediation of staphylococcal adherence to
mucosal cells by lipoteichoic acid. Infect Immun. 40: 444-6. [0231]
51. Chugh T D, Burns G J, Shuhaiber H J, Bahr G M. 1990. Adherence
of Staphylococcus epidermidis to fibrin-platelet clots in vitro
mediated by lipoteichoic acid. Infect Immun. 58: 315-9. [0232] 52.
Granato D, Perotti F, Masserey I, Rouvet M, Golliard M, Servin A,
Brassart D. 1999. Cell surface-associated lipoteichoic acid acts as
an adhesion factor for attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 to
human enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. Appl Environ Microbiol.
65:1071-7. [0233] 53. Nealon T J, Mattingly S J. 1984. Role of
cellular lipoteichoic acids in mediating adherence of serotype III
strains of group B streptococci to human embryonic, fetal, and
adult epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 43: 523-30. [0234] 54. Teti
G, Tomasello F, Chiofalo M S, Orefici G, Mastroeni P. 1987.
Adherence of group B streptococci to adult and neonatal epithelial
cells mediated by lipoteichoic acid. Infect Immun. 55: 3057-64.
[0235] 55. Nickerson, K. G.; Tao, M.-H.; Chen, H.-T.; Larrick, J.;
Kabat, E. A. 1995. Human and mouse monoclonal antibodies to blood
group A substance, which are nearly identical immunochemically, use
radically different primary sequences. J. Biol. Chem. 270:
12457-12465. [0236] 56. Fleury, D.; Daniels, R. S.; Skehel, J. J.;
Knossow, M.; Bizebard, T. 2000. Structural evidence for recognition
of a single epitope by two distinct antibodies. Proteins 40:
572-578. [0237] 57. Green, L. L, M. C. Hardy, et al. (1994).
"Antigen-specific human monoclonal antibodies from mice engineered
with human Ig heavy and light chain YACs." Nat Genet 7(1): 13-21.
[0238] 58. Kantor, A. B., C. E. Merrill, et al. (1995).
"Development of the antibody repertoire as revealed by single-cell
PCR of FACS-sorted B-cell subsets." Ann NY Acad Sci 764: 224-7.
[0239] 59. Low, N. M., P. H. Holliger, et al. (1996). "Mimicking
somatic hypermutation: affinity maturation of antibodies displayed
on bacteriophage using a bacterial mutator strain." J Mol Biol
260(3): 359-68. [0240] 60. Wagner, S. D., A. V. Popov, et al.
(1994). "The diversity of antigen-specific monoclonal antibodies
from transgenic mice bearing human immunoglobulin gene miniloci."
Eur J Immunol 24(11): 2672-81. [0241] 61. Wagner, S. D., G. T.
Williams, et al. (1994). "Antibodies generated from human
immunoglobulin miniloci in transgenic mice." Nucleic Acids Res
22(8): 1389-93. [0242] 62. Wang, X. and B. D. Stollar (2000).
"Human immunoglobulin variable region gene analysis by single cell
RT-PCR." J Immunol Methods 244(1-2): 217-25. [0243] 63. Winter, G.,
A. D. Griffiths, et al. (1994). "Making antibodies by phage display
technology." Annu Rev Immunol 12: 433-55. [0244] 64. Borrebaeck,
Carl A. K. 1995. Antibody Engineering, 2.sup.nd Ed., Oxford
University Press, NY. [0245] 65. Harlow, Ed; Lane, David. 1988.
Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold
Spring Harbor, N.Y.
[0246] Having now fully described the invention, it will be
appreciated by those skilled in the art that the invention can be
performed within a range of equivalents and conditions without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention and without
undue experimentation. In addition, while the invention has been
described in light of certain embodiments and examples, the
inventors believe that it is capable of further modifications. This
application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or
adaptations of the invention which follow the general principles
set forth above.
[0247] Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those
skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and
practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the
specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a
true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the
following claims.
Sequence CWU 1
1
22140DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 1tgttttcgta cgtcttgtcc gargtrmagc tksakgagwc
40240DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 2tgttttcgta cgtcttgtcc gavgtgmwgc tkgtggagwc
40332DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 3taccgtaccg gtgacattgt gmtgwcmcar tc 32432DNAArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Primer 4taccgtaccg
gtgayatyma gatgacmcag wc 32523DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of
Artificial Sequence Primer 5gcacctccag atgttaactg ctc
23622DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 6ctggacaggg mtccakagtt cc 22727DNAArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Primer 7aaaaccccgt
acgtcttgtc cgaagtg 27832DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of
Artificial Sequence Primer 8atctgggaat tctgaggaga cggtgactga gg
32927DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 9atatttaccg gtgacattgt gctgtcc 2710106PRTArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Synthetic A120 light
chain antibody 10Asp Ile Val Leu Ser Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Leu Ser
Ala Ser Pro Gly1 5 10 15Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Ser
Ser Val Ser Tyr Met 20 25 30His Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser
Pro Lys Pro Trp Ile Tyr 35 40 45Ala Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val
Pro Ala Arg Phe Ser Gly Ser 50 55 60Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu
Thr Ile Ser Arg Val Glu Ala Glu65 70 75 80Asp Ala Ala Thr Tyr Tyr
Cys Gln Gln Trp Ser Ser Asn Pro Pro Thr 85 90 95Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr
Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys 100 10511318DNAArtificial SequenceDescription
of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA encoding A120 light chain
antibody 11gac att gtg ctg tcc cag tct cca gca atc ctg tct gca tct
cca ggg 48Asp Ile Val Leu Ser Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Leu Ser Ala Ser
Pro Gly1 5 10 15gag aag gtc aca atg act tgc agg gcc agc tca agt gta
agt tac atg 96Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Ser Ser Val
Ser Tyr Met 20 25 30cac tgg tac cag cag aag cca gga tcc tcc ccc aaa
ccc tgg att tat 144His Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser Pro Lys
Pro Trp Ile Tyr 35 40 45gcc aca tcc aac ctg gct tct gga gtc cct gct
cgc ttc agt ggc agt 192Ala Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala
Arg Phe Ser Gly Ser 50 55 60ggg tct ggg acc tct tac tct ctc aca atc
agc aga gtg gag gct gaa 240Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu Thr Ile
Ser Arg Val Glu Ala Glu65 70 75 80gat gct gcc act tat tac tgc cag
cag tgg agt agt aac cca ccg acg 288Asp Ala Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln
Gln Trp Ser Ser Asn Pro Pro Thr 85 90 95ttc ggt gga ggc acc aag ctg
gaa atc aaa 318Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Lys Leu Glu Ile Lys 100
10512123PRTArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Synthetic A120 heavy chain antibody 12Glu Val Met Leu Val Glu Ser
Gly Glu Gly Leu Val Gln Pro Lys Gly1 5 10 15Ser Leu Lys Leu Ser Cys
Ala Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Asn Thr Tyr 20 25 30Ala Met Asn Trp Val
Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Val 35 40 45Ala Arg Ile Arg
Ser Lys Ser Asn Asn Tyr Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asp 50 55 60Ser Val Lys
Asp Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg Asp Asp Ser Gln Ser Met65 70 75 80Leu
Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn Asn Leu Lys Thr Glu Asp Thr Ala Met Tyr 85 90
95Tyr Cys Val Arg Arg Gly Gly Lys Glu Thr Asp Tyr Ala Met Asp Tyr
100 105 110Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Ser Val Thr Val Ser Ser 115
12013369DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Synthetic DNA encoding A120 heavy chain antibody 13gaa gtg atg ctt
gtg gag tct ggt gaa gga ttg gtg cag cct aaa ggg 48Glu Val Met Leu
Val Glu Ser Gly Glu Gly Leu Val Gln Pro Lys Gly1 5 10 15tca ttg aaa
ctc tca tgt gca gcc tct gga ttc acc ttc aat acc tac 96Ser Leu Lys
Leu Ser Cys Ala Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Asn Thr Tyr 20 25 30gcc atg
aac tgg gtc cgc cag gct cca gga aag ggt ttg gaa tgg gtt 144Ala Met
Asn Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Val 35 40 45gct
cgc ata aga agt aaa agt aat aat tat gca aca tat tat gcc gat 192Ala
Arg Ile Arg Ser Lys Ser Asn Asn Tyr Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asp 50 55
60tca gtg aaa gac agg ttc acc atc tcc aga gat gat tca caa agc atg
240Ser Val Lys Asp Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg Asp Asp Ser Gln Ser
Met65 70 75 80ctc tat ctg caa atg aac aac ttg aag act gag gac aca
gcc atg tat 288Leu Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn Asn Leu Lys Thr Glu Asp Thr
Ala Met Tyr 85 90 95tac tgt gtg aga cgg ggt ggt aaa gag act gac tat
gct atg gac tac 336Tyr Cys Val Arg Arg Gly Gly Lys Glu Thr Asp Tyr
Ala Met Asp Tyr 100 105 110tgg ggt caa gga acc tca gtc acc gtc tcc
tca 369Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Ser Val Thr Val Ser Ser 115
12014318DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Synthetic DNA A110 light chain antibody 14gatatcgttc tctcccagtc
tccagcaatc ctgtctgcat ctccagggga aaaggtcaca 60atgacttgca gggccagctc
aagtgtaaat tacatgcact ggtaccagca gaagccagga 120tcctccccca
aaccctggat ttctgccaca tccaacctgg cttctggagt ccctgctcgc
180ttcagtggca gtgggtctgg gacctcttac tctctcacaa tcagcagagt
ggaggctgaa 240gatgctgcca cttattactg ccagcagtgg agtagtaacc
cacccacgtt cggagggggg 300accatgctgg aaataaaa 31815369DNAArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA A110 heavy
chain antibody 15gaagtgatgc tggtggagtc tggtggagga ttggtgcagc
ctaaagggtc attgaaactc 60tcatgtgcag cctctggatt caccttcaat aactacgcca
tgaattgggt ccgccaggct 120ccaggaaagg gtttggaatg ggttgctcgc
ataagaagta aaagtaataa ttatgcaaca 180ttttatgccg attcagtgaa
agacaggttc accatctcca gagatgattc acaaagcatg 240ctctatctgc
aaatgaacaa cttgaaaact gaggacacag ccatgtatta ctgtgtgaga
300cggggggctt cagggattga ctatgctatg gactactggg gtcaaggaac
ctcactcacc 360gtctcctca 36916106PRTArtificial SequenceDescription
of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA A110 light chain antibody
16Asp Ile Val Leu Ser Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Leu Ser Ala Ser Pro Gly1
5 10 15Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser Ser Ser Val Asn Tyr
Met 20 25 30His Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser Ser Pro Lys Pro Trp
Ile Ser 35 40 45Ala Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ala Arg Phe
Ser Gly Ser 50 55 60Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser Leu Thr Ile Ser Arg
Val Glu Ala Glu65 70 75 80Asp Ala Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Gln Trp
Ser Ser Asn Pro Pro Thr 85 90 95Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Met Leu Glu Ile
Lys 100 10517123PRTArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial
Sequence Synthetic DNA A110 heavy chain antibody 17Glu Val Met Leu
Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Leu Val Gln Pro Lys Gly1 5 10 15Ser Leu Lys
Leu Ser Cys Ala Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Asn Asn Tyr 20 25 30Ala Met
Asn Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Val 35 40 45Ala
Arg Ile Arg Ser Lys Ser Asn Asn Tyr Ala Thr Phe Tyr Ala Asp 50 55
60Ser Val Lys Asp Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Arg Asp Asp Ser Gln Ser Met65
70 75 80Leu Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn Asn Leu Lys Thr Glu Asp Thr Ala Met
Tyr 85 90 95Tyr Cys Val Arg Arg Gly Ala Ser Gly Ile Asp Tyr Ala Met
Asp Tyr 100 105 110Trp Gly Gln Gly Thr Ser Leu Thr Val Ser Ser 115
1201845DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Primer 18ataggattcg aaaagtgtac ttacgtttga tttccagctt ggtgc
4519318DNAArtificial SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence
Synthetic DNA 391.4 light chain antibody 19caaattgtgc tgactcagtc
tccagcaatc ctgtctgcat ttccagggga gaaggtcaca 60atgacttgca gggccagctc
aagtgtaagt tacatgcact ggtaccagca gaagccagga 120tcctccccca
aaccctggat ttatgccaca tccaacctgg cttctggagt ccctactcgc
180ttcagtggca gtgggtctgg gacctcttac tctctcacaa tcagcagagt
ggaggctgaa 240gatgttgcca cttattactg cctacagtgg actagtaacc
cacccacgtt cggtgctggg 300accaagctgg agctgaaa 31820372DNAArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA 391.4
heavy chain antibody 20gaagtgaagc ttcatgagtc tggtggagga tttgtgcagc
ctaaagggtc attgaaactc 60tcatgtgcag cctctggatt caccttcaat gcctacgcca
tgaactgggt ccgccaggct 120ccaggaaagg gtttggaatg ggttgctcgc
ataagaagta aaagtaataa ttatgaaaca 180tattatgccg attcagtgaa
agacaggttc accatctcca gagatgattc acaatacatg 240gtctatctgc
aaatgaacaa cctgaaaagt gaggacacag ccatgtatta ttgtgtgagg
300agagggtcga tgcggtccgc ttattatgca atggactact ggggtcaagg
aacctcagtc 360accgtctcct ca 37221106PRTArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA 391.4
light chain antibody 21Gln Ile Val Leu Thr Gln Ser Pro Ala Ile Leu
Ser Ala Phe Pro Gly1 5 10 15Glu Lys Val Thr Met Thr Cys Arg Ala Ser
Ser Ser Val Ser Tyr Met 20 25 30His Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys Pro Gly Ser
Ser Pro Lys Pro Trp Ile Tyr 35 40 45Ala Thr Ser Asn Leu Ala Ser Gly
Val Pro Thr Arg Phe Ser Gly Ser 50 55 60Gly Ser Gly Thr Ser Tyr Ser
Leu Thr Ile Ser Arg Val Glu Ala Glu65 70 75 80Asp Val Ala Thr Tyr
Tyr Cys Leu Gln Trp Ser Ser Asn Pro Pro Thr 85 90 95Phe Gly Ala Gly
Thr Lys Leu Glu Leu Lys 100 10522123PRTArtificial
SequenceDescription of Artificial Sequence Synthetic DNA 391.4
heavy chain antibody 22Glu Val Lys Leu His Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly Phe
Val Gln Pro Lys Gly1 5 10 15Ser Leu Lys Leu Ser Cys Ala Ala Ser Gly
Phe Thr Phe Asn Ala Tyr 20 25 30Ala Met Asn Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro
Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Val 35 40 45Ala Arg Ile Arg Ser Lys Ser Asn
Asn Tyr Glu Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asp 50 55 60Ser Val Lys Asp Phe Thr Ile
Ser Arg Asp Asp Ser Gln Tyr Met Val65 70 75 80Tyr Leu Gln Met Asn
Asn Leu Lys Ser Glu Asp Thr Ala Met Tyr Tyr 85 90 95Cys Val Arg Arg
Gly Ser Met Arg Ser Tyr Tyr Tyr Ala Met Asp Tyr 100 105 110Trp Gly
Gln Gly Thr Ser Val Thr Val Ser Ser 115 120
* * * * *