Process to Produce a Methane Rich Gas Mixture From Gasification Derived Sulphur Containing Synthesis Gases

Biollaz; Serge ;   et al.

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 12/668577 was filed with the patent office on 2010-08-19 for process to produce a methane rich gas mixture from gasification derived sulphur containing synthesis gases. This patent application is currently assigned to PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT. Invention is credited to Serge Biollaz, Tilman J. Schildhauer, Martin Seeman.

Application Number20100205863 12/668577
Document ID /
Family ID39745214
Filed Date2010-08-19

United States Patent Application 20100205863
Kind Code A1
Biollaz; Serge ;   et al. August 19, 2010

Process to Produce a Methane Rich Gas Mixture From Gasification Derived Sulphur Containing Synthesis Gases

Abstract

A method for converting a raw gas into a methane-rich and/or hydrogen-rich gas includes the following steps: a) providing the raw gas stemming from a coal and/or biomass gasification process, thereby the raw gas comprising beside a methane and hydrogen content carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, tar, especially benzole and naphthalene, COS, hydrogen sulfide and organic sulfur compounds, especially thiophenes; thereby the ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide ranges from 0.3 to 4; b) bringing this raw gas into contact with a catalyst in a fluidized bed reactor at temperatures above 200.degree. C. and at pressures equal or greater than 1 bar in order to convert the raw gas into a first product gas, thereby simultaneously converting organic sulfur components into hydrogen sulfide, reform tars, generate water/gas shift reaction and generate methane from the hydrogen/carbon monoxide content; c) bringing the first product gas into a sulfur absorption process to generate a second product gas, thereby reducing the content of hydrogen sulfur and COS from 100 to 1000 ppm down to 1000 ppb or less; d) optionally bringing the second product gas into a carbon dioxide removal process to generate a third product gas at least almost free of carbon dioxide; e) bringing the third product gas into a second methanation process to generate a fourth product gas having a methane content above 5 vol %; f) optionally bringing the fourth product gas into a carbon dioxide removal process to generate a fifth product gas at least almost free of carbon dioxide g) bringing the fifth product gas into an hydrogen separation process in order to separate a hydrogen rich gas from a remaining methane-rich gas, called substitute natural gas.


Inventors: Biollaz; Serge; (Waldshut, DE) ; Schildhauer; Tilman J.; (Brugg, CH) ; Seeman; Martin; (Wettingen, CH)
Correspondence Address:
    LERNER GREENBERG STEMER LLP
    P O BOX 2480
    HOLLYWOOD
    FL
    33022-2480
    US
Assignee: PAUL SCHERRER INSTITUT
Villigen PSI
CH

Family ID: 39745214
Appl. No.: 12/668577
Filed: July 3, 2008
PCT Filed: July 3, 2008
PCT NO: PCT/EP2008/005464
371 Date: January 11, 2010

Current U.S. Class: 48/127.7 ; 48/197R
Current CPC Class: C10G 67/02 20130101; C10G 45/34 20130101; C10G 2/30 20130101; C10G 2/33 20130101; C10L 3/102 20130101; C10G 47/00 20130101; C10J 3/00 20130101; C10G 67/14 20130101; C10G 45/04 20130101; C10J 2300/1807 20130101; C10G 67/06 20130101; C10J 2300/1665 20130101; C10G 47/02 20130101; C10G 45/00 20130101; C10L 3/08 20130101
Class at Publication: 48/127.7 ; 48/197.R
International Class: C10L 3/06 20060101 C10L003/06

Foreign Application Data

Date Code Application Number
Jul 10, 2007 EP 070 13 482.0

Claims



1-15. (canceled)

16. A process for producing a methane-rich gas mixture for further application in high temperature fuel cells or for manufacturing synthetic natural gas (SNG) from gasification-derived synthesis gas mixtures that contain at least some compounds problematic to conventional methanation units, the process which comprises. at least one unit allowing for methanation, water gas shift reaction, and for converting most or parts of the problematic compounds to less problematic compounds by one or more of the following. hydrodesulphurization of organic sulfur species; hydrodenitrogenation of organic nitrogen species; hydrogenation or reformation of alkanes, alkenes, and alkynes; and hydrogenation, reforming or cracking of hydrocarbons; the unit being operated at temperatures between 200.degree. C. and 900.degree. C. and at pressures between 0.8 bara and 70 bara; and the unit including a catalyst containing metals forming an active phase selected from the group consisting of molybdenum, cobalt, ruthenium, nickel, tungsten or sulfides thereof, and the active phase metals being supported on materials containing one or more materials selected from the group consisting of aluminum, silicon, titanium, zirconium, cerium, gadolinium, manganese, vanadium, lanthanum, chromium, or oxides thereof.

17. The process according to claim 16, wherein the problematic compounds are compounds selected from the group consisting of organic sulfur or nitrogen compounds, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, aromatic hydrocarbons or non-aromatic hydrocarbons

18. The process according to claim 17, wherein the aromatic hydrocarbons are selected from the group consisting of naphthalene, toluene, benzene, and phenols.

19. The process according to claim 16, which comprises carrying out the process in a fluidized bed reactor with catalyst particles having a size in a range from 20 to 2000 .mu.m.

20. The process according to claim 19, which comprises controlling a temperature with heat transfer means.

21. The process according to claim 19, which comprises controlling a temperature of the process with heat transfer means in the fluidized bed reactor.

22. The process according to claim 16, which comprises feeding additional hydrogen into the process.

23. The process according to claim 22, which comprises feeding the additional hydrogen from a recycle stream at the top of the reactor, at the bottom of the reactor, and/or in between.

24. The process according to claim 22, which comprises feeding the additional hydrogen into the process as secondary injection into a fluidized bed.

25. The process according to claim 16, which comprises feeding additional steam into the process, by feeding at the top of the reactor, at the bottom of the reactor, and/or in between.

26. The process according to claim 25, which comprises feeding the additional steam into the process as secondary injection into a fluidized bed.

27. The process according to claim 16, which comprises processing in an additional bed of active carbon, ZnO, or other metal oxides for removing undesired species including H.sub.2S and COS.

28. The process according to claim 27, which comprises effecting a water removal process prior to the bed of active carbon, ZnO or other metal oxides to enhance a separation efficiency (e.g., by means of a membrane).

29. The process according to claim 16, which comprises additionally removing carbon dioxide.

30. The process according to claim 16, which comprises additionally feeding in steam, followed by a second methanation step.

31. The process according to claim 16, which comprises additionally feeding in steam, followed by a second methanation step carried out in a fluidized bed reactor.

32. The process according to claim 30, which comprises additionally removing carbon dioxide.

33. The process according to claim 16, which comprises additionally removing water.

34. The process according to claim 16, which comprises additionally removing hydrogen.

35. The process according to claim 34, which comprises returning the hydrogen removed in the additional removal step in a recycle stream fed into the first methanation unit.

36. A method for converting a raw gas into a methane-rich and/or hydrogen-rich gas, which comprises the following steps. a) providing raw gas originating from a coal and/or biomass gasification process, the raw gas including a content of methane and hydrogen and a content of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, tar, COS, hydrogen sulfide, and organic sulfur compounds; wherein a ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide ranges from 0.2 to 5; b) bringing the raw gas into contact with a catalyst arranged as a fluidized bed reactor at temperatures above 200.degree. C. and at pressures equal or larger than 1 bar in order to convert the raw gas into a first product gas, thereby simultaneously converting organic sulfur components into hydrogen sulfide, reform tars, generating water/gas shift reaction, and generating methane from the hydrogen/carbon monoxide content; c) introducing the first product gas into a sulfur absorption process to generate a second product gas, thereby reducing a content of hydrogen sulfur and COS from 100 to 1000 ppm down to 1000 ppb or less; d) optionally bringing the second product gas into a carbon dioxide removal process to generate a third product gas substantially or completely free of carbon dioxide; e) introducing the third product gas into a second methanation process to generate a fourth product gas having a methane content above 5 vol %; f) optionally bringing the fourth product gas into a carbon dioxide removal process to generate a fifth product gas substantially or completely free of carbon dioxide; and g) introducing the fifth product gas into an hydrogen separation process in order to separate a hydrogen rich gas from a remaining methane-rich gas (substitute natural gas).

37. The method according to claim 36, wherein the raw gas contains at least one of benzole, naphthalene, and thiophenes.
Description



[0001] The present invention relates to a method for converting coal or biomass to at least almost sulfur-free substitute natural gas. Further, the invention relates to a process to produce a methane rich gas mixture from gasification derived sulphur containing synthesis gases.

[0002] In particular, the present invention relates to a continuous production process of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from biomass, coal or naphta. More specifically, the present invention relates to the production of clean gaseous heating fuels from these less valuable sulphur containing hydrocarbonaceous materials.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART

[0003] The production of SNG from biomass is the conversion of a "dirty/difficult" fuel into a clean burning well known commodity. The costumer has the freedom to use the SNG for power generation, heating or mobility. A big plus is the already existing infrastructure such as pipelines and compressed natural gas (NG) cars. To insert the product gas of the methanation into the grid it has to be cleaned of CO.sub.2 and compressed to 5 to 70 bars to meet the standards of average natural gas.

[0004] The conversion of biomass to SNG is a complex process, which can be structured roughly into four main units; gasification, raw gas cleaning, fuel synthesis and gas sweetening. A solid feed is thermally converted to a raw gas and subsequently cleaned of particles, tars and sulphur. In the fuel synthesis, the raw gas is converted into raw SNG (a CH.sub.4/CO.sub.2 mixture) that is cleaned from CO.sub.2 and optionally H.sub.2 (gas sweetening) before injection into the natural gas grid.

[0005] The presence of sulphur in the feedstocks leads to the formation of H.sub.2S, COS or organic sulphur species, depending on the temperature of the gasification. Low temperature (LT) gasification promotes the formation of organic sulphur species such like thiophenes, mercaptanes and thio-ethers, whereas high temperature (HT) gasification leads to the formation of exclusively H.sub.2S and COS.

[0006] The typical raw gas composition of HT and LT gasification is shown in table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Low Temperature gasification High Temperature (600-1000.degree. C.) gasification (1000-2000.degree. C.) H.sub.2, CO, CO.sub.2, H.sub.2O H.sub.2, CO, CO.sub.2, H.sub.2O CH.sub.4 a few ppm alkanes, alkenes, alkynes nil (especially ethylene) Tars (Naphtalene, . . . ) nil H.sub.2S, COS H.sub.2S, COS Org. S-species (mercaptanes, thio- nil ethers, thiophenes HCN, NH.sub.3 HCN, NH.sub.3 Org. N-species (e.g. pyridine) nil

[0007] For the synthesis of SNG, LT-gasification is advantageous (higher overall cold-gas efficiency), as the raw gas contains already substantial amounts of CH.sub.4. Drawbacks of this kind of raw gas are the high amount of poisonous components, such as alkenes, alkynes, H.sub.2S, COS, organic S-species, HCN, NH.sub.3, organic N-species.

[0008] For that reason, an efficient gas cleaning is required to protect the catalysts applied in the fuel synthesis. An example of a state of the art to produce synthesis gas for applications such as Fischer-Tropsch-Synthesis or production of Methanol, DME, and SNG is shown in FIG. 1a.

[0009] A scrubber at low temperatures is used to remove the tars and the organic S-species and N-species. H.sub.2S, COS are absorbed on solid absorbers available for this duty (active carbon, ZnO or other metal oxides . . . ). In general, the gas cleaning is followed by a Water-Gas-Shift reactor, CO.sub.2-seperation and multiple methanation units. To increase the calorific value of the gas to the quality limits of the gas grid, CO.sub.2 and H.sub.2 is removed. The order of units 4-9 can be different.

[0010] Disadvantage of this process scheme is the high number of operation units and the different temperature levels of the units (especially cooling down to the scrubber temperature). To avoid this kind of temperature gradients in the process, the use of raw gas from a HT-gasification is common, an example of such process is shown in FIG. 1b (U.S. Pat. No. 3,928,000, EP 0,120,590). The different gas composition enables S-resistant Water-Gas-Shift (WGS) and S-resistant Methanation and lowers the amount of operation units. However, the raw gas composition is less favorable for the SNG synthesis as the SNG composition results in higher energetic losses.

[0011] First, the energetic effort in the gasification unit is higher for the production of pure H.sub.2, CO, CO.sub.2-mixtures; secondly the pure H.sub.2, CO, CO.sub.2-mixtures result in higher thermal losses in the synthesis due to the exothermic enthalpy of the methanation reaction.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0012] By means of the subject process, the unfortunate temperature level sequence and the number of operation units of the process shown in FIG. 1a as well as the energetic losses of the process shown in FIG. 1b can be avoided. A methane-rich stream can be produced from sulphur containing feedstocks containing 10 to 95 mol % of methane.

[0013] The first step following the Low-Temperature-gasification is a multifunctional process unit featuring hydrodesulphurization/denitrogenation, methanation, WGS, tar reforming and cracking and the hydrogenation/reforming of alkenes and alkynes simultaneously. The H.sub.2S produced from the organic sulphur species by hydrolysis and the COS are removed by absorption on common absorber materials such like ZnO, CuO. CO.sub.2 can be removed before or after the 2.sup.nd methanation step. For the adjustment of the calorific value excess H.sub.2 is separated and may be recycled to unit 2.

[0014] The hydrodesulphurization unit (HDS) is a common process step for the desulphurisation of feedstocks in the petrochemical industry or of natural gas before steam reforming. The applied catalysts for these units tend to catalyse both methanation and watergas shift reaction which is unwanted as these exothermic reactions may lead to a thermal runaway of the reactor. In the subject process, however, the methanation and WGS-reactions are desired.

[0015] To control the temperature rise due to exothermic reactions, a fluidised bed reactor equipped with means for heat removal can be applied. The catalyst fluidisation offers additionally the potential for internal regeneration of the catalyst from carbon deposits caused by compounds like ethylene or tars in the LT-gasifier producer gas. Such an internal regeneration can be found for fluidised bed methanation and can be enhanced by staged addition of recycle H.sub.2 and/or steam in the upper part of the fluidised bed.

[0016] Moreover, the raw gas stream leaving the unit can be tailored to the requirements of a 2.sup.nd methanation unit to minimise the total number of process units by the addition of steam, H.sub.2 from the recycle and the proper choice of temperature and pressure. alkenes and alkynes simultaneously. The H.sub.2S produced from the organic sulphur species by hydrolysis and the COS are removed by absorption on common absorber materials such like ZnO, CuO. CO.sub.2 can be removed before or after the 2.sup.nd methanation step. For the adjustment of the calorific value excess H.sub.2 is separated and may be recycled to unit 2.

[0017] The hydrodesulphurization unit (HDS) is a common process step for the desulphurisation of feedstocks in the petrochemical industry or of natural gas before steam reforming. The applied catalysts for these units tend to catalyse both methanation and watergas shift reaction which is unwanted as these exothermic reactions may lead to a thermal runaway of the reactor. In the subject process, however, the methanation and WGS-reactions are desired.

[0018] To control the temperature rise due to exothermic reactions, a fluidised bed reactor equipped with means for heat removal can be applied. The catalyst fluidisation offers additionally the potential for internal regeneration of the catalyst from carbon deposits caused by compounds like ethylene or tars in the LT-gasifier producer gas. Such an internal regeneration can be found for fluidised bed methanation and can be enhanced by staged addition of recycle H.sub.2 and/or steam in the upper part of the fluidised bed.

[0019] Moreover, the raw gas stream leaving the unit can be tailored to the requirements of a 2.sup.nd methanation unit to minimise the total number of process units by the addition of steam, H.sub.2 from the recycle and the proper choice of temperature and pressure.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed