U.S. patent application number 12/294836 was filed with the patent office on 2009-10-01 for realtime media distribution in a p2p network.
This patent application is currently assigned to RayV INC.. Invention is credited to Maxim Levy, Oleg Levy, Omer Luzzatti, Ofer Shem-Tov.
Application Number | 20090248872 12/294836 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 38236479 |
Filed Date | 2009-10-01 |
United States Patent
Application |
20090248872 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Luzzatti; Omer ; et
al. |
October 1, 2009 |
REALTIME MEDIA DISTRIBUTION IN A P2P NETWORK
Abstract
Nodes in a realtime p2p media distribution can act in the role
of `Amplifiers` to increase the total available bandwidth in the
network and thus to improve the quality of the realtime media
consumed by the viewers. Examples of such media consumptions are TV
channels over the Internet, video on demand films and files, and
media files downloaded to be consumed at a later time. Amplifiers
are added to the p2p swarm by a mechanism that discovers the need
for supplemental bandwidth in the swarm and orders nodes to join
the swarm in the role of amplifiers. The amplifiers' main goal is
to maximize the amount of bandwidth they supply (upload) to the
swarm while minimizing the amount of bandwidth they consume
(download).
Inventors: |
Luzzatti; Omer;
(Pardes-Hana, IL) ; Shem-Tov; Ofer; (Tel Aviv,
IL) ; Levy; Oleg; (Tel Aviv, IL) ; Levy;
Maxim; (Tel Aviv, IL) |
Correspondence
Address: |
OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC
P.O. BOX 320850
ALEXANDRIA
VA
22320-4850
US
|
Assignee: |
RayV INC.
Wilmington
DE
|
Family ID: |
38236479 |
Appl. No.: |
12/294836 |
Filed: |
March 27, 2007 |
PCT Filed: |
March 27, 2007 |
PCT NO: |
PCT/IL07/00392 |
371 Date: |
September 26, 2008 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
60785991 |
Mar 27, 2006 |
|
|
|
60847677 |
Sep 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
709/226 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04N 21/8456 20130101;
H04L 67/104 20130101; H04N 21/2402 20130101; H04L 65/80 20130101;
H04L 41/0896 20130101; H04N 21/632 20130101; H04L 29/06027
20130101; H04N 21/6582 20130101; H04L 65/4076 20130101; H04L
67/1093 20130101; H04L 67/1085 20130101; H04L 67/1048 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
709/226 |
International
Class: |
G06F 15/173 20060101
G06F015/173 |
Claims
1.-22. (canceled)
23. A system fog enabling a live transmission of media in a
distributed network of nodes that includes swarm nodes; the swarm
nodes include consumer nodes that are configured to process
transmitted media; the system is configured to dynamically identify
a need for additional bandwidth required for the live transmission
of said media to said consumer nodes, and in response thereto to
allocate to the swarm nodes at least one amplifier node for
providing the additional bandwidth, said at least one amplifier
node configured to download less than it uploads, and to facilitate
the additional bandwidth for the use of said consumer nodes without
consuming the live transmitted media within the swarm, thereby
enabling the live transmission of said media.
24. The system according to claim 23, wherein the system is
configured to dynamically identify the need for additional
bandwidth using centralized means.
25. The system according to claim 24, wherein said centralized
means includes at least one server node.
26. The system according to claim 23, wherein the system is
configured to dynamically identify the need for additional
bandwidth in a distributed fashion.
27. The system according to claim 24, wherein said need is
triggered by a node suffering from lack of sufficient
bandwidth.
28. The system according to claim 24, wherein said need is
triggered by said centralized means by monitoring the network of
portion thereof.
29. The system according to claim 23, further comprising means
configured to use criterion for determining the conditions for at
least one amplifier to join to the swarm network.
30. The system according to claim 23, further comprising means
configured to use criterion for determining the conditions that at
least one amplifier leaves the swarm network.
31. The system according to claim 23, further configured to
allocate at least one bootstrap amplifier provides an additional
amount of bandwidth for guaranteeing a shorter duration from
connection to actual viewing, in respect of potential media
consumers.
32. The system according to claim 23, wherein each amplifier is
capable of downloading given segments of media that are needed by
the consumers, in order to provide a qualitative service to the
consumers of the content.
33. The system according to claim 32, wherein said given segments
for downloading are decided according to at least one of the
following parameters: (i) type of the media to be retrieved, (ii)
rare segments in the network, (iii) missing parts needed by the
consumers.
34. The system according to claim 23, wherein each amplifier node
is configured to operate in order to maximize the amplifier's gain
defined as upload bandwidth minus the download bandwidth.
35. The system according to claim 23, wherein each amplifier node
is configured to maximize amplifier's gain by increasing and
decreasing downloaded bandwidth rate limit in small steps till the
maximum Gain is reached.
36. The system according to claim 23, wherein said amplifier node
is configured to maximize amplifier's gain by favoring download of
segments that are a mathematical combination of at least two actual
media segments and that can be uploaded to other nodes.
37. The system according to claim 36, wherein the mathematical
combination being the XOR function.
38. The system according to claim 24, wherein number of additional
required amplifiers complies with the following equation: missing
bandwidth for download equals to or smaller than sum of the Gains
(upload minus download) of all the additional amplifiers.
39. A method for enabling a live transmission of media in a
distributed network of nodes that includes swarm nodes; the swarm
nodes include consumer nodes that are configured to process
transmitted media; the method comprising: (a) dynamically
identifying a need for additional bandwidth required for the live
transmission of said media to said consumer nodes; (b) allocating
to the swarm nodes at least one amplifier node for providing the
additional bandwidth, said at least one amplifier node configured
to download less than it uploads, thereby facilitating the
additional bandwidth for the use of said consumer nodes, without
consuming the live transmitted media within the swarm, thereby
enabling the live transmission of said media.
40. A computer program comprising computer program code means for
performing all the steps of claim 39 when said program is run on a
computer.
41. An amplifier node being connectable to a distributed network of
nodes that includes swarm nodes; said amplifier node is configured
to download less than it uploads; in response to a command said
amplifier node is configured to supply an additional bandwidth for
live transmission of a media to at least one other node of said
swarm nodes, without consuming the live transmitted media within
the swarm, thereby said amplifier node facilitates real-time
transmission of said media in said distributed network of nodes to
said consumer nodes.
42. The amplifier node of claim 41 wherein said command is capable
of being triggered when said at least one other node is lacking
said additional bandwidth, required for the transmission of said
media.
43. The amplifier node of claim 41 wherein said other node is a
customer node.
44. The amplifier node of claim 41 wherein said other node is an
amplifier node.
Description
[0001] This application claims priority from the following
applications:
U.S. 60/785,991, filed March 27, and U.S. 60/847,677 filed Sep. 28,
2006, whose contents are herein incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THF INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates generally to the field of
network communications and media distribution. More specifically,
the present invention is related to a system and method for
improving realtime media delivery in a distributed peer-to-peer
(p2p) or grid network.
[0003] 1. Background of the Invention
[0004] The availability of the Internet enables new methods of
directly distributing multimedia files and realtime media
transmission to end-users in an electronic format The advantages
associated with electronic distribution are pushing providers of
media content to establish global distribution systems for digital
content.
[0005] The availability of new compression algorithms for
multimedia data has dramatically reduced the bandwidth and storage
space required for the electronic distribution of these data. It
enables a more efficient distribution of the data, and at a higher
definitions In the coming years, the availability of broadband will
encourage a significant part of the media industry to adopt the
Internet as a distribution channel in direct competition with
established channels such as cable or satellite TV.
[0006] Prior art systems provide various ways for transmitting
multimedia such as voice and video over the Internet, Real-time
streaming systems over the Internet, such as Microsoft,
Real-Networks, SeaChange, and Broadbus deliver systems for
real-time streaming content over the Internet. However, all of
these systems operate in a `centralistic` mode in which a server
located in one point delivers the media (realtime or to be
downloaded first and watched later) to the content consumers. One
drawback associated with such prior art systems is the need to
allocate bandwidth in the center to satisfy the needs of the
consumers.
[0007] Distributed networks enable the media to be transmitted from
one consumer to another without the need for centralistic streaming
servers. As an example, peer-to-peer file sharing systems for PCs
are well known in the industry and are a very efficient technology
that can be used to deliver media content in a legitimate manner
(such as AOL HI-Q, BBC) to complement or replace traditional
client-server download or streaming. Examples for such peer-to-peer
systems are Bittorrent and Gnutella. All of the above systems do
not distribute the files (media or software) in realtime. User can
download the files and consume them afterwards, but generally
speaking, they cannot consume the media while downloading it.
[0008] Realtime streaming over a peer-to-peer network is a new
phenomenon and examples of such systems are Coolstream (proposed in
2004 by Xinyan Zhang et "Coolstream: A Data Driver Overlay Network
for Efficient Live Media Streaming), and CollectCast: (proposed in
2003 by Hefeeda et all "PROMISE: peer-to-per media steaming using
CollectCast" in Proc, Of ACM Multimedia 2003 pages 45-54). However,
these systems do not take into consideration the asymmetric nature
of the real-world network, thus the fact that common values of
upload bandwidth from nodes in file real-world network versus the
download limits of the nodes. As an example, in ADSL network, as
well as in Cable networks, the download bandwidth supplied to the
users is lower than their available upload bandwidth.
[0009] There is, thus, a need in the art, to introduce the concept
of nodes that act in the role of Amplifiers and upload more
bandwidth to the network than the one they download.
[0010] 2. List of Related Art
U.S. Pat. No. 6,088,360: Dynamic Rate Control Technique for Video
Multiplexer
[0011] A video multiplexer is disclosed which incorporates a
dynamic rate control feature. MPEG encoded video signals for each
channel are stored in a first-in it-out (FIFO) buffer. A packetizer
for each channel detects the level in the FIFO buffer and issues a
request signal to the video multiplexer that the channel desires to
transmit the video signals on the network. The bandwidth allocation
for a channel is either preselected by the video provider or
automatically selected, and tokens are issued by a counter
associated with each channel to give greater network access to
those channels which require a higher bandwidth. A token multiplier
detects the bandwidth needs of the various channels by detecting
the rate that the FIFO buffer is being filled and automatically
multiplies the number of consecutive packets which the packetizer
may transmit over the multiplexer during a single grant.
US 2005/00883842: Method of Performing Adaptive Connection
Admission Control in Consideration of Input Call States in
Differentiated Service Network
[0012] In the adaptive connection admission control method of the
present invention, a corresponding ingress edge node performs
connection admission control for a new connection within the amount
of bandwidth initially allocated to each of paths between the
ingress and egress edge nodes. The amount of remaining bandwidth
allocated to a specific path Pr is compared wt an amount of
bandwidth required for a call requesting new connection setup input
to the corresponding ingress edge node. The amount of additional
bandwidth to be requested from the bandwidth broker is predicted
when the amount of the remaining bandwidth does not satisfy the
amount of bandwidth required for the connection setup requesting
call. The ingress edge node requests additional bandwidth from the
bandwidth broker on the basis of the predicted amount of the
additional bandwidth, changing bandwidth information of the
corresponding path Pr, and performing connection admission
control.
US 2006/0080454: System and Method for Receiver-Driven Streaming in
a Peer-to-Peer Network
[0013] A "PeerStreamer" provides receiver-driven peer-to-peer (P2P)
media steaming for loosely coupled P2P networks. Peers in the
network perform only simple operations, may cache all or part of
the streaming media, do not collaborate with other peers, may be
unreliable, and may drop offline or come online during any given
streaming session. Clients in the network operate in real-time to
coordinate peers, stream media form multiple peers, performs load
balancing, handle online/offline states of peers, and perform
decoding and rendering the streaming media. In one embodiment, the
PeerStreamer uses high rate erasure resilient coding to allow
multiple serving peers to hold partial media without conflict, such
that clients simply retrieve fixed numbers of erasure coded blocks
regardless of where and what specific blocks are retrieved. In
another embodiment the PeerStreamer uses embedded coded media to
vary streaming bitrates according to available serving bandwidths
and client queue status.
US 200610224687 A1: Method and Apparatus for Offline Cooperative
File Distribution Using Cache Nodes
[0014] Methods and apparatus are provided for cooperative file
distribution system employing one or more storage proxies to allow
an offline receiver to obtain files or pieces thereof when the
receiver comes online. A central tracker receives an indication
from the sender that the sender has the file; determines if the
receiver is online; and initiates a storage of the file on one or
more storage proxies if the receiver is not online. A proxy service
can identify one or more potential storage proxies that can store
the file and that each satisfy one or more predefined resource
criteria. The sender can send a request to one or more of the
storage proxies from the list of storage proxies to act as a
storage proxy for the communication between the sender and the
receiver. The potential storage proxies compare one or more
resource measures to predefined criteria; and provide an acceptance
if the one or more resource measures satisfy the predefined
criteria.
US 2006/0242315 A1: System and Method for Intelligent Buffering and
Bandwidth Allocation
[0015] A method comprises generating a bitrate template comprising
histogram of bitrate as a function of time for each of a plurality
of previously-encoded multimedia programs, each bitrate template
indicating actual bitrate requirements for every given point of
time within the associated multimedia program, and, prior to
transmitting one of the plurality of media programs to a multimedia
node, identifying the previously-generated bitrate template for
said multimedia program, and, during the mission of said multimedia
program, changing a bandwidth allocation for the multimedia node in
anticipation of an actual bitrate spike indicated in the bitrate
template for said multimedia pro.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] In accordance with certain embodiments, the present
invention provides a system and method to enable realtime
transmission of media in a distributed network (also known as
peer-to-peer or grid network). The system and method of the
invention dynamically discover the need for additional bandwidth
and provide the needed bandwidth by allocating resources from other
devices that are connected to the overlay network. In accordance
with certain embodiments, these additional devices that share their
bandwidth but do not consume the media (e.g. do not watch the
stream) are referred to as Amplifiers. In addition to the
amplifiers, the network and the swarm contains also Consumers which
are nodes (and usually users) that are consuming e.g. watching the
media. Note that consumers share their upload bandwidth as well as
Amplifiers.
[0017] In accordance with certain embodiments, the system and
method of the invention provide a mechanism by which the amplifiers
function, that is when and how they join and depart from the swarm
and what is the logic by which they provide the qualitative service
to the swarm and specifically to the media consumers.
[0018] In accordance with certain embodiments, the system and
network of the invention guarantee a certain number of bootstrap
amplifiers that provide an additional amount of bandwidth for
guaranteeing a faster joining time for potential media consumers.
This is especially important for newly joined consumers when there
are a very low number of consumers in the swarm. As an example of
the latter, a channel with no consumers may still have a few
amplifiers that will serve the first joining node and will provide
with a better watching experience.
[0019] In accordance with certain embodiments, additional peers are
added to the artwork and function as amplifiers for guaranteeing
high-quality realtime transmission of media.
[0020] In accordance with certain embodiments, the problem that the
invention solves can be described briefly as follows: in a network
in which the sum of the bandwidth contributed (uploaded) to the
overlay network by the devices (for the media delivery) is lower
than the bandwidth needed (downloaded) for a high-quality media
consumption, additional bandwidth has to be supplied to the
swarm.
[0021] In accordance with certain embodiments, the present
invention provides a mechanism to allocate is additional bandwidth
by using other devices that will download less bandwidth than the
bandwidth they upload to the swarm and by doing so will balance the
bandwidth shortage and will enable realtime distribution of the
media. The ability to download less than upload am be only achieved
when the Amplifiers download segments that are needed by more than
one consumer, thus they download a piece of media and distribute it
to several consumers.
[0022] As specified above, the bandwidth that the amplifiers
download should be lower than the bandwidth that they upload. In
accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention
various manners are provided to achieve this goal (thus to find the
right downloaded bandwidth (50 in the example above) so that the
Gain is maximized.
[0023] In accordance with certain embodiments, the amplifiers,
added when there is a need for additional bandwidth, have also a
mechanism to discover that they are not needed and to shut-down
their own operation in such a way, an undesired situation, in which
the amplifiers operate without a real need, and transfer bandwidth
from one to the other without real consumers in the swarm, is
avoided.
[0024] In accordance with certain embodiments, in order to supply
the best service to newly joined viewers to the swarm, especially
in the case of a media consumed by only a few consumers, and where
the system has to guarantee that some of the amplifiers never shut
down, we refer to such amplifiers as `bootstrap amplifiers`.
[0025] In accordance with certain embodiments, in order for the
amplifiers to contribute the maximum possible bandwidth to the
swarm, they need to download appropriate segments of media that are
needed by the consumers. Namely, they have to decide which segments
(pieces of the media) to download in order to provide the best
service to the consumers of the content. This decision has several
parameters such as at leas one of the following: the type of the
media to be retrieved, the distribution of the segments in the
network, the missing parts needed by the consumers, and the ability
to download pieces that can provide a service to several consumers.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, there is provided a
system for enabling a real-time transmission of media in a
distributed network of nodes that includes swarm nodes; the swarm
nodes include consumer nodes that are configured to process
transmitted media; the system is configured to dynamically identify
a need for additional bandwidth required to transmit said media and
in response thereto allocating to the swarm network at least one
amplifier node for providing the additional bandwidth, thereby
enabling the transmission of said media.
[0026] In accordance with an aspect of the invention, there is also
provided a method for enabling a real-time transmission of media in
a distributed network of nodes that includes swarm nodes; the swarm
nodes include consumer nodes that are configured to process
transmitted media; the method comprising: [0027] (a) dynamically
identifying a need for additional bandwidth required to transmit
said media; [0028] (b) allocating to the network at least one
amplifier node for providing the additional bandwidth, thereby
enabling the transmission of said media.
[0029] In accordance with an aspect of the invention, there is
further provided a computer program comprising computer program
code means for performing all the steps of Claim 18 when said
program is run on a computer.
[0030] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is provided a system which is configured to dynamically
identify the need for additional bandwidth using centralized
means.
[0031] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein said centralized means
includes at least one server node.
[0032] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is still further provided a system which is configured to
dynamically identify the need for additional bandwidth in a
distributed fashion.
[0033] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is yet ter provided a system wherein said need is triggered
by a node suffering from lack of sufficient bandwidth.
[0034] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is still further provided a system wherein said need is
triggered by said centralized mean by monitoring the network of
portion thereof.
[0035] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is still further provided a system wherein each one of said
amplifier nodes is configured to download less bandwidth than the
bandwidth it uploads.
[0036] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is still further provided a system further comprising means
configured to use criterion for determining the conditions for at
least one amplifier to join to the swarm network.
[0037] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system further comprising means
configured to use criteria for determining the conditions that at
least one amplifier leaves the swarm network.
[0038] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system further configured to allocate
at least one bootstrap amplifier that provides an additional amount
of bandwidth for guaranteeing a shorter duration from connection to
actual viewing, in respect of potential media consumers.
[0039] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein each amplifier is
capable of downloading given segments of media that is needed by
the consumers, in order to provide a qualitative service to the
consumers of the content.
[0040] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein said given segments for
downloading are decided according to at least one of the following
parameters: (i) type of the media to be retrieved, (ii) rare
segments in the network, (iii) missing parts needed by the
consumers.
[0041] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein each amplifier node is
configured to operate in order to maximize the amplifier's gab
defined as upload bandwidth minus the download bandwidth.
[0042] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein each amplifier node is
configured to maximize amplifies gain by increasing and decreasing
downloaded bandwidth rate limit in small steps till the maximum
Gain is reached.
[0043] In accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein said amplifier node is
configured to maximize amplifier's gain by favoring download of
segments that are a mathematical combination of at least two actual
media segments and that can be uploaded to other, nodes.
[0044] En accordance with certain embodiments of the invention,
there is further provided a system wherein the mathematical
combination being the XOR function.
[0045] In accordance wt certain embodiments of the invention, there
is still further provided a system wherein number of additional
required amplifiers complies with the following equation: missing
bandwidth for download equals to or smaller then sum of the Gains
(upload minus download) of all the additional amplifiers.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046] In order to understand the invention and to see how it may
be carried out in practice, embodiments will now be described, by
way of non-limiting example only, with reference to the
accompanying drawings, in which:
[0047] FIG. 1 illustrates the hardware diagram of the system, in
accordance with certain embodiment of the invention;
[0048] FIG. 2 illustrates the general architecture of the system,
in accordance with certain embodiment often invention;
[0049] FIG. 3-A illustrates exemplary operation scenarios, in
accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
[0050] FIG. 3-B illustrates exemplary operational scenarios, in
accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
[0051] FIG. 3-C illustrates an exemplary operational scenario, in
accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
[0052] FIG. 4A illustrates a general flow chart of a sequence of
operation in the system, in accordance with a certain embodiment of
the invention;
[0053] FIG. 4B illustrates a sequence of operation of a server
logic in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
[0054] FIG. 4C illustrates a sequence of operation of a server
logic in accordance with an embodiment of the invention;
[0055] FIG. 5 illustrates a flow chart of the mechanism and
parameters to add an amplifier to the swarm, in accordance with
certain embodiment of the invention;
[0056] FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C illustrate the amplifier's logic, in
accordance with a certain embodiment of the invention;
[0057] FIG. 7 illustrates a flow diagram of the amplifier's
scheduling parameters algorithm, in accordance with a certain
embodiment of the invention; and
[0058] FIG. 8 illustrates the usage of the XOR mechanism, in
accordance with a certain embodiment of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS
[0059] Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms
used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of
ordinary skill in the ad to which this invention belongs. Generally
(although not necessarily), the nomenclature used herein described
below are well known and commonly employed in the art. Conventional
methods are used for these procedures, such as those provided in
the at and various general references. Accordingly, the following
definitions are pro-vided for clarity of understanding only and are
by no means binding: "File sharing" includes: sharing and
distributing files to other users over an electronic network.
[0060] "Node" includes: an addressable device or an entity
connected to a network or connected to a group. For example, a data
download reception unit a user, a device, an operator, a portable
multimedia device, or a server can be referred to as a node, Node
may also refer to a module of a software system such as, for
example, a media player application.
[0061] `Peer` is an equivalent name for Node. However, the term
"peers" is used to refer to the group of nodes connected to a
specific node from the specific node's perspective.
[0062] "Swarm" includes: a group of many nodes all of which
participate in the same media distribution In the particular case
of electronic networks and/or peer-to-peer network, a swarm may
refer to a group of nodes participating in die data transfer of one
identified, common media object A node can be part of different
swarms when transferring multiple media objects. For example, a
peer can be part of swarm #1 (distributing TV program #A) and swarm
#2 (distributing movie #B). Sometimes this is referred toalso as
"overlay network".
[0063] "Amplifier" includes: a node in the swarm whose role is to
increase the total swarm bandwidth. The amplifier's main goal is
thus to download a given amount of bandwidth and to contribute
(upload) a larger amount of bandwidth to other nodes that are
either consumers of the media or amplifiers themselves. The
relationship of the download stream and upload strewn of the
amplifier is termed the `Gain`.
[0064] "Bootstrap amplifier" includes an amplifier that may remain
with a negative Gain in older to guarantee that to a swarm with no
consumers, newly added consumers will have enough bandwidth to
start with. Bootstrap ampler typically (although not necessary)
never shuts down even if its gain is negative. The reason for
having bootstrap amplifiers in the system is to provide newly
joined nodes with an immediate service.
[0065] "Gains" --includes: the upload bandwidth of an amplifier
minus the downloaded bandwidth by it; an Amplifier tries to
maximize its gain. An Amplifier with a negative gain will shut down
unless it is a Bootstrap Amplifier.
[0066] "Consumer" includes: a node in the swarm usually used by
users/viewers to watch the media.
[0067] "Realtime distribution of Media" also called "Streaming"
includes the following meaning: data is a continuous flow of data
that must be ultimately presented to a user in a particular
sequence in real time. Moreover the flow of data should be
presented to the user close to the time it was transmitted from the
media source. Digital samples representing an audio signal, for
example, mud be converted to a sound wave in the same sequence they
were transmitted, and at exactly the time spacing they were
generated, or some user-specified alternative. Digital data
representing video frames require assembly into the proper sequence
in the frame for presentation on a display together, and successive
frames must display at the correct real-time rate. Realtime
distribution may refer to live events and also to pre-generated
content that is consumed while being delivered. Realtime
distribution of Media (Streaming) can be realized in various known
per se techniques.
[0068] In the description herein, the term "viewer" is construed to
include a real-world user who is watching the media and the tent
"broadcaster" is construed to include the entity (user or community
or an automatic agent) transmitting the media. "Client" is
construed to include the software or hardware component to watch
the media.
[0069] In the context of the above referred to definition of node,
this term also includes, in accordance with certain embodiments, an
entity in the system that is participating in the media delivery
itself. A node can have different roles in the transmission of the
media: a consumer--whose main object is to fetch the media for the
viewer; and an amplifier--whose main objective is to help consumers
by contributing its bandwidth to the swarm.
[0070] In certain embodiments, the nodes are connected to a server
that controls the Amplifiers by allocating certain ones and
assigning tem the role of bootstrap amplifiers.
[0071] In certain embodiments, media transmission and its control
is done in a distributed way within the distributed nodes, e.g.
using known per se Mechanisms as described in Ganesh Gossip.
[0072] Bearing these definitions in mind (provided for clarity in a
non-binding fashion), it is noted at the invention is illustrated
and described in a preferred embodiment but it ray be produced in
many different configurations, forms and materials. There is
depicted in the drawings, and will herein be described in detail,
various embodiments of the invention, with the understanding that
the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of
the principles of the invention and the associated functional
specifications for its construction, and is not intended to limit
the invention to the embodiment illustrated. Those skilled in the
art will envision many other possible variations within the scope
of the present invention.
[0073] Attention is first drawn to FIG. 1 illustrating the hardware
diagram of the system, in accordance with a certain embodiment of
the invention.
[0074] Thus, the system comprises a broadcasting apparatus (101)
that has the media and can be accessed by nodes in the network that
may request the media or pieces of it. The broadcasting apparatus
can also transfer the media itself to other devices in the
electronic network. The media may be a live stream or files
accessible to the device. There are several possible ways to
implement this apparatus such as, for example, a computer, a media
center PC, a personal video recorder, a networked DVD player, a
computer with access to a website, a portable media player, a PDA,
a mobile phone, or equivalent devices. There may be one or more
apparatuses that can be used for one or more users.
[0075] The broadcasting apparatus(es) are connected to an
electronic network (103), such as the Internet or mobile network,
in order to make the content and the information about the content
available for nodes to download.
[0076] A server (102) or equivalent processing device can receive
and process the information received from one or more broadcasting
apparatuses (such as the channel's playlist the shows, the files,
and similar). In certain embodiments, the media itself may not be
distributed via the server. There may be multiple instances of
these servers in the system.
[0077] The receiving devices (104, 105) are capable of receiving
and transmitting the data forming a media content in a
broadcast/multicast transfer or a peer-to-peer transfer. When
operating in a peer-to-peer mode, each receiving device is a
potential source or sink of data for one or more other receiving
devices. Software is usually present on this device so that the
device can also operate as the media player. The receiving devices
(104, 105) are capable of rendering the content in a direct
play-back session (wherein the media player renders the content
selected by the user) or in an indirect playback session. A
computer, a media center PC, a server, a router, a television with
an electronic programming guide, a personal video recorder, a
networked DVD player, a computer with access to a website, a
portable media player, a PDA, a mobile phone, or equivalent devices
are examples of receiving devices.
[0078] Note that the invention is not bound by the system
architecture described with reference to FIG. 1.
[0079] In the description below, reference is occasionally made to
the operation of the server, in particular in the context of
determining whether there is a need to provide bandwidth support to
a given channel(s) by allocating amplifier(s) nodes, and if in the
affirmative, to identify the appropriate amplifier nodes that are
applicable. In is context, attention is drawn to US patent
application 60/847,677 dated Sep. 29, 2006 entitled "Method and
System for Real-Time Streaming Over a Grid Network" hereinafter the
architecture application) whose contents is incorporated herein by
reference, and to the non-limiting examples to FIG. 2 and FIG. 5 of
the application as well as to FIG. 4B and FIG. 4C below.
[0080] Bearing this in mind, attention is drawn to FIG. 2,
illustrating the general architecture of the system, in accordance
with a certain embodiment of the invention.
[0081] Thus, the Server (201) is connected to all devices,
including the broadcaster (202) that transmits the media or parts
of herein. The transmission of the media may be a live transmission
of live events (such as sports, news, concerts), or live
transmission of pre-generated content (such as old-movies), or
simply transmission of content that may be consumed later on and is
being stored on DVR or similar devices. In accordance with certain
embodiments, realtime transmission (streaming) of the media to the
consumers is improved. Thus, the Broadcaster (202) and the
Amplifiers (204) are helping the realtime transmission of the media
to the consumers (203) that are watching the media or saving it.
All these nodes constitute the Swarm (206) of that specific media
transmission/file sharing/TV channel. In addition to the nodes
(consumers and amplifiers and broadcasters) in the swarm (206),
other nodes (205) may be connected to the server, and are currently
neither consuming nor helping (as amplifiers) this specific swarm
and this media transmission. Note at these nodes may be parts of
other swarms by consuming, amplifying or even broadcasting another
media file or TV channels.
[0082] It should be her noted that although in certain embodiments,
the server is accessed by all nodes and has a central role in the
system, in accordance with other embodiments there is provided a
complete (or partial) distributed mechanism, using for example
Gossip protocols (by Ganesh and others). In such embodiments the
information peers management is all done by the nodes in the
network without the intervention of a server in the middle.
[0083] Note that the invention is not bound by the system
architecture described with reference to FIG. 2.
[0084] Before moving on, there follows an exemplary operational
scenario (with reference to FIG. 3) for illustrating the role of
amplifier, in accordance with au embodiment of the invention.
[0085] Thus, FIG. 3A describes a situation in which 6 viewers
(303a,b,c,d,e,f) would like to watch a transmitted show but the
broadcaster (301) does not have the required upload bandwidth to
support all of them, for example if the video stream is of 800 Kbps
(namely download rate is 800 Kbps per each one of the specified
viewers, giving rise to a total of 4.8 Mbps) and the broadcast
upload is only of 2 Mbps, it readily arises that only 2 (out of
six) viewers are supported (total of 1.6 Mbps) and only partially
the rd viewer (until the maximum 2 Mbps upload is consumed). The
amplifiers 302a,b,c (user's client that are not watching the
stream) receive parts of the media and stream it (upload it) to the
actual viewers. If every amplifier also has, say 2 Mbps upload
(toted 6 Mbps) then the total upload provided by them is sufficient
to support the group of viewers (requiring a total of 4.8 Mbps
download rate). As a result by adding Amplifiers, e.g. nodes that
do not watch the channel but help in its transmission, the system
managed to support the 6 viewers.
[0086] The invention is not bound by the specified example of FIG.
3A.
[0087] Consider the following additional non limiting example, with
reference to FIG. 3B. Assume 100 viewers (e.g. nodes 3001-3100 that
serve viewers--of which nodes 3001, 3002, 3003 . . . 3100 are
shown) who wish to watch a movie or a TV channel that requires an
average of 800 Kbits/sec (i.e. download bandwidth of 800
Kbits/sec). Further assume that the each node has an upload
bandwidth of 200 Kbits/sec. The upload link between node 3001 and
3002 is marked 3001a, the upload link between node 3002 and node
3003 is marked 3002a, and so forth. The overall bandwidth needed
for upload is 100*800 Kbits/sec but the maximum bandwidth available
for upload is only 100*200 Kbits/sec. Note incidentally, that by
this example, each node holds sufficient volume of media for
supporting the maximum upload bandwidth of 200 Kbits/sec to a
mating node (through the specified channels (3001a, 3002a . . .
3100a.)
[0088] In accordance with certain embodiments, a mechanism
discovers the lack of bandwidth and assigns additional Amplifiers
(by this example 3101, 3102 and onwards) to join the media
distribution swarm and to contribute their upload bandwidth to it.
In order to be efficient, these Amplifiers will have to download
less than they upload and to supply the supplemental bandwidth for
completing the required missing bandwidth of 100*600 Kbits/sec.
Thus, for example, if an average Amplifier uploads 200 Kbits/sec
and downloads only 50 Kbits/sec, the number of additional
Amplifiers will have to satisfy the following equation:
(The Download needed)100 viewers*800 Kbps+A*50 Kbps=(The Upload
available)100 viewers*200 Kbps+A*200 Kbps+Broadcaster upload 2
Mbps
[0089] Thus, A*(200-50) Kbits/sec+2000=100*(800-200)
Kbits/sec=>A=387 (or simplify and if it is assumed that the
broadcaster upload to be insignificant the rounded number is 400
Amplifiers).
[0090] By average, tree amplifiers will be assigned to each client
node and will feed The required supplemental bandwidth considering
that each amplifier can upload 200 Kbits/sec and that the missing
bandwidth is 600 Kbits/sec for each consumer node. Assuming, for
instance, that broadcast station 3500 can upload at least 2
Mbits/sec, it thus supports the download rate (50 Kbits/sec) of 40
amplifiers; designated in FIG. 3B as 3101 to 3140.
[0091] Since, as specified above, nearly 400 amplifiers are
required to feed the missing bandwidth, additional layer of
amplifiers (designated schematically as 3200) can be used. This
layer may include 160 amplifiers that are coupled to the 40
amplifiers 3101 to 3140. Each one of the amplifiers 3101 to 3140
has an upload rate of 200 Kbits/sec and can thus "Sport" four
amplifiers in layer 3200, each downloading 50 Kbits/sec, giving
rise to the specified 160 amplifiers at layer 3200. This however is
still not enough, since as specified above there are required
nearly 400 amplifiers altogether. Now additional level of
amplifiers can be used (designated generally as 3300) such that
each amplifier in layer 3200 can support (having upload rate of 200
Kbits/sec) up to 4 amplifiers in layer 3300 (each having download
rate of 50 Kbits/sec). Layer 3300 has thus 640 amplifiers
considerably more than the required 387 amplifiers for supporting
also the 100 consumers 3001-3100. In FIG. 3B, 3 Amplifiers in layer
3300 (not shown) upload media data to node 3001, rough channels
3301a, 3302a and 3303a giving rise to a total of 600 Kbits/sec.
Each of to Amplifiers will download its respective 50 Kbits/sec
content from amplifiers in layer 3200 Note that there are 300
amplifiers that are needed in order to support the missing
bandwidth of the 100 consumers. However, the specified analysis
showed that nearly an additional 400 amplifiers are required. The
difference in number of amplifiers (387 vs. 300) is required in
order to compensate for the limited upload bandwidth that the
broadcaster can provide (only 2 Mbits/sec) whereas the required
bandwidth that is required for download by the consumer nodes is
considerably higher, i.e. 100*800 Kbits/sec.
[0092] Note that the example of FIG. 3B is simplified for clarity
only and therefore should not be regarded as binding. For instance
the topology of the nodes does not necessarily comply with tree
data structure and accordingly any form of graph is applicable. By
way of another example, it is not mandatory to have each node
uploading another node and few amplifiers completing the required
bandwidth. Thus, by way of non-limiting example, a given node may
receive media from few uploading peers and the supplemental media
(if required) from 0 or more amplifiers, whereas another node may
receive the desired media only from amplifiers, etc. By still
another non-limiting manner it is obviously not mandatory to have
some ordered manner of providing media. Likewise, providing media
from a node to a neighboring node (e.g. 3001 to 3101, and 3101 to
3102, etc.) are provided by way of example only. Still further it
is not required that each amplifier will have the same
download/upload rate. Those versed in the art will readily
appreciate that other variants are applicable, all as required and
appropriate.
[0093] Bearing this in mind, attention is drawn to FIG. 3C
illustrating an exempla operational scenario, in accordance with an
embodiment of the invention. FIG. 3C illustrates in a more
generalized fashion a broadcast node 30000 (out of few possible
available broadcasters--not shown), and a network of plurality of
nodes 30001 that receive au upload media from broadcaster 30000
through link 30002 from among the nodes in the network a swarm
30003 includes few nodes marked as X' (30004, 30005, 30006 and
30007). The nodes have a incoming double arrow, say 30008 and 30009
and a outgoing single arrow, say 30010 and 30011, indicating that
the download rate (incoming arrow) is higher than the upload rate
(outgoing arrow), Also shown are a few amplifier nodes marked as
`0` (30012, 30013, 30014). The nodes have a incoming single arrow,
say 30015, 30016 and 30017 and a outgoing double arrow, say 30018,
30019 and 30020, indicate that the download rate (incoming arrow)
is lower than the upload rate (outgoing arrow). The drawing does
not show any specific link between the peers (and therefore does
not set a specific topology) inditing that any known per se
connection is applicable. The amplifiers will be assigned by the
server to the peers based on a need to assist in supplying the
desired bandwidth, e.g. in compliance with the specified
architecture application.
[0094] The invention is of course not bound by the specified
examples and a fortiori not to the specific architecture and
allocation of Amplifiers to nodes.
[0095] Bearing is in mind, attention is drawn to FIG. 4A,
illustrating a general flow chart of a sequence of operation in the
system, in accordance with a certain embodiment of the
invention.
[0096] Thus, all nodes 404A, 404B, 403X, and 403Y are connected to
the system either as consumers, amplifiers, or broadcasters. 404A
and 404B are part of the swarm that transmits media content such as
TV channel, a movie, or other; 403X and 403Y are connected to the
system but are not part of the same swarm (they may be part of
other swarms). All of these nodes send periodic information (1) to
the server 401. This information is of a statistical nature
regarding the node's role and several other parameters regarding
the node's status (video quality, number of peers connected). A
message can be sent for every specified time such as 10
seconds.
[0097] There follows a description of a flow in which device 402
would like to join t swarm described as a consumer. Note that an
Amplifier may also send the `joining` request, most likely after an
indication for the need to add amplifiers was received by it after
being originated by some entity in the swarm, see e.g. FIG. 2 in
Architecture application describing calling of the new amplifier,
and FIG. 5 describing the flow in which the server evaluates the
status and calls a new amplifier. Initially, the device 402 sends a
request verb (2) indicating its wish to join the media's swarm and
the role it is to take. Thus, if it is a consumer node, this is
triggered by a viewer who wishes to join the channel and if it is
an amplifier, the server has triggered the operation (see, e.g.
FIGS. 2 and 5 of the architecture application). The server sends
back an acknowledgement (response) verb (3) after authenticating
the device/user and authorizing the request in a known per se
manner, The server also sends back a list of nodes to combine the
device's group of peers. This group is a subset or equal to the
channel's swarm nodes and includes the best subgroup of the nodes
to contribute the specific device's needs. As an example, if the
device joins the swarm as a consumer, the server will send back a
group of nodes from the swarm that have enough bandwidth to
contribute to the device.
[0098] The device then (4, 5 and 4', 5') connects to the peers (or
to a subset of which) and asks them to participate in the media
transmission. The node starts then to request information about the
segments (media content pieces) acquired by the peers it is
connected with. The exchange of the information is called the
`Segment information Exchange`. The media itself is not exchanged
at this stage, but only the information about it. For instance, and
by way of non-limiting example the information may include a bit
value which, when set indicates that data is available, and when
reset, indicates that data is not available. The information may
further include data indicative of the type of data, say audio,
video etc. Accordingly the actual data will be uploaded only if the
information is processed and found satisfactory, say the specified
bit is set and the type of data (say audio) is as required. This
is, of course, only an example and the information may include
other content, all as required and appropriate depending upon the
particular application.
[0099] Afterwards, the node evaluates the Segment Information
received from the peers and schedules the fetching of the segments
from the pees. By this example, after the evaluation of the peers
acquired segments, the node decides to retrieve a certain segment
(e.g., in a random manner) from 304A (indicated at 6, 7). Other
segments may be retrieved from other peers. In a certain
embodiment, a node may be connected to 10-20 other peers and fetch
different media segments from all of them.
[0100] As explained above, the server receives periodic information
and statistics regarding the channels/media transmission status and
individual indication from the nodes (see, e.g. FIGS. 4B and 4C
below). In case the server deduces that new amplifiers are needed
in the swarm in order to maintain a good quality media
transmission, the server may address a specific node (8) to the
swarm and request its services by adding it to the swarm. This
mechanism is described, in accordance with certain embodiments, in
more detail below.
[0101] Note that the invention is not bound by the specific
sequence of operation described with reference to FIG. 4A.
[0102] Before turning to FIG. 5, attention is drawn to FIGS. 4B and
4C, illuminating a sequence of operation of a server logic in
accordance with an embodiment of the invention.
[0103] Thus, as shown in FIG. 4B in step 490 every certain amount
of time or event at triggered the evaluation process, then in step
491 the server evaluates the media distribution status of the
channel. The dynamic information module 492 will be described in
flier detail with reference to FIG. 4C.
[0104] Next, in step 493 is there a need to add bandwidth (BW), and
if yes, in step 495 peers from the pool or from other swans are
chosen, otherwise, the sequence ends (494). Moving on with step
496, orders are sent to the peers to join the channel, and then
497, where a certain amount of time is waited.
[0105] Turning to FIG. 4C, (elaborating module 492 in FIG. 4B), in
step 4001 the server gets statistical `status` information from
peers. The status includes:
[0106] a) Average uploaded bandwidth during the last few
seconds
[0107] b) Average downloaded bandwidth during the last few
seconds
[0108] c) Number of peers connected to the node and contributing
data to it
[0109] d) Number of peers connected to the node and fetching data
from it
[0110] e) Video quality (if a consumer)
[0111] f) Average frame Rate (if a consumer). [0112] Then in step
4002 the server analyzes if any of the parameters reaches a
Red-Flag. Examples of Red-Flag are if not even one peer is
connected to the node; the Video quality is below a certain flag;
or there is a very low average frame rate, and if red flag is
detected (4003) then in step 4007 more resources are needed, and
subsequently an inquiry is made at 4008 which asks whether enough
bootstrap AMPS in the channel is available, and if yes 4009 other
peers with available resources are added, otherwise (no) in step
4010 bootstrap amps are added. Revering to 4003, in the case of no,
in step 4004 the server summarizes the parameters retrieved from
peers, and thereafter 4005 the server analyzes if any of the sums
reaches a `sum` Red-Flag. Examples of this are whether the sum of
upload BW is greater than the sum of download BW, and whether the
average video quality in the channel is good enough. In step 4006
the Red-Flag is tested. In the case of no, 4011 no more resources
are needed at this stage, otherwise (yes) the procedure described
in steps 4007,4008, 4009 and 4010 is performed.
[0113] The invention is not bound by the specific examples
described with reference to FIGS. 4 and 4C.
[0114] Attention is now drawn to FIG. 5 illustrating a flow chart
of the mechanisms and parameters to add an amplifier to the swarm,
in accordance with a certain embodiment of the invention.
[0115] FIG. 5 deals with the control and management of the server
of the clients that function as amplifiers. The problem this
mechanism solves is the need to have sufficient bandwidth in the
system to support the customer and the way to add amplifiers so
that the bandwidth need is met and that newly joined consumers will
have a fast and smooth entry to the system. In accordance with
certain embodiments, the need for support in bandwidth is either
triggered by a node suffering from lack of sufficient bandwidth or
detected by a server who monitors the channel, see e.g. the
architecture application and FIGS. 4B and 4C.
[0116] The process describes the steps and operations performed by
the elements of the system, as well as the interaction between said
elements including one or more nodes. In the first step of this
process, the server is triggered (501) either by the `swarm` namely
from one of the nodes in the swarm by sending statistics, by
sending a signal indicating a problem in the media delivery, by
sending an indication about a problem in the number of peers the
node sees, (see e.g. the architecture application and FIGS. 4B and
4C), or (502) by a timer indicating the need to evaluate the media
transmission quality.
[0117] Afterwards, in (503), the server evaluates the channel
status (the media delivery status). This is done by su g-up the
entire information about the nodes in the channel. T information
includes the roles of the nodes (amplifiers, bootstrap amplifiers,
consumers), the bandwidth they download, the bandwidth they upload,
the average video quality the consumers see, and file number of
peers they have and the number of partners they work with. Other
parameters may also affect this decision, (see e.g. the
architecture application and FIGS. 4B and 4C), for instance whether
the channel (the media) is being transmitted in a good enough
quality.
[0118] The evaluation of the situation at (503) leads to the
question whether the channel (the media) is being transmitted in a
good enough quality or else additional Amplifiers should be added
(504). The quality is calculated by combining the media quality
(such as PSNR for video quality) and the `streaming` quality
calculated from several other parameters such as the percentage of
received segments out of the ordered one, the number of partners
each consumer has, and others (see e.g. FIG. 4C). In case the
quality of the service is not sufficient, the server evaluates if
the Amplifier to be added should be a Bootstrap Amplifier
(discussed in greater detail below) that never shuts down or not
(505) and decides what type of Amplifier to add (506, 507).
According to certain embodiments, some channels may have a specific
number of bootstrap amplifiers to guarantee a smooth operation of
the channel. The serve then waits and evaluates the situation
again. In case the media is being distributed at a satisfactory
level (e.g. if no more resources are needed, see 4011 at FIG. 4C,
the process ends (509)).
[0119] The decision which amplifier to add is derived from an
analysis of the list of amplifiers in the pool; amplifiers that
send periodic information (see e.g. the architecture application
and FIG. 4C), to the server regarding their status. The peers that
the servers decided to support (by allocating amplifier(s) thereto)
should contain the nodes with problems in the media distribution
(see also FIG. 7 of the architecture application). Note that in
accordance with certain embodiments, there is no need to subtract
amplifiers from the list due to the self shut-down algorithm which
is part of the amplifier's logic and that causes the Amplifiers to
shut themselves down when they do not contribute to the swarm. Note
that the invention is not bound by the specific sequence of
operations described with reference to FIG. 5.
[0120] Attention is now drawn to FIGS. 6A,6B,6C illustrating the
amplifier's logic, in accordance with a certain embodiment of the
invention.
[0121] The amplifier internal logic, in accordance with this
embodiment, is based on the requirement to maximize the bandwidth
taken from the amplifier while minimizing the bandwidth taken by
it, or, to maximize the Amplifies Gain (defined as upload bandwidth
minus the download bandwidth). Evidentially, an amplifier with a
negative gain consumes more than it supplies and thus has a
negative impact on the network's overall bandwidth. The amplifiers'
logic can be described generally as searching and reaching the
maximum Gain by increasing and decreasing the downloaded bandwidth
rate lit in small steps till the maximum Gain is reached.
[0122] This procedure is described in FIGS. 6A, 6B, and 6C. FIG. 6A
describes the algorithm's flow; FIGS. 6B and 6C depict an example
to explain the algorithm, in accordance with this embodiment.
[0123] As shown, at 600A the Amplifier is up and starts to run.
Then the amplifier adds to its original download-rate-limit 601A
the value of Step and starts to download from the other peers in
the swarm for a defined time at a rate of current
download-rate-limit plus Step. The amplifier then evaluates the
upload bandwidth and calculates the New Gain (602A--originally set
to zero or to another value based on history or default). The
amplifier then evaluates if the new Gain is better or worse than
the previous one (603A) and changes the direction of the Step
(604A) if the Gain wasn't increased possibly multiplied by a
certain value k). Thus, if the Gain has improved, the amplifier
continues in the same direction (i.e., adding Step to its currently
download rate limit--see 606A), otherwise the interval changes its
sign and the amplifier sets the download-rate-limit less than
before (604A or more if the interval was negative previously). Note
the K>1 is used in accordance with certain embodiments, to
increment more than one step in each iteration. By way of
non-limiting example, at the onset k=1, if in each one of X
consecutive iterations (X predefined) an increment in the download
rate is made by a factor of step (without reversing direction--step
604A), then an increase in download rate can be made by a factor of
k times step (k>1). If 604A is encountered, then k can be set
again to 1.
[0124] This algorithm can be explained using the example depicted
at 6B and 6C (values of 6C are presented graphically at 6B). In the
example, the initials values of the download-rate-limit and the
Gain are set to zero (iteration 0 in FIG. 6C); the Step is set to
50 Kbits/sec. As in 601A, the download rate limit is increased to
50 Kbits/see and the upload value is calculated after a certain
amount of time. As can be seen in 6C (Iteration 1) the upload value
measured is of 70 Kbits/sec, thus the Gain: is 70-50=20 Kbits/sec
as shown on the graph at 6B as well. Due to the increase of the
Gain (New Gain 20 is greater than Gain 0 [step 603 A]) and the fact
that the Gain is greater than zero, the Step is added to the
download-rate-limit which is now set to 100 Kbits/sec. The upload
rate is now calculated again and, as seen at the table at 6C
(Iteration 2), the value received is 40 Kbits/sec. Since the value
40 is again higher than the previous Gain 20, the Step is added to
the download-rate-limit which is now set to 150 Kbits/sec. In the
example 6B, 6C, the Gain increases till Interval 6 in which the
Gain decreases from 120 Kbits/sec to 110 Kbits/sec. At is point the
Step will change its direction (k=1 at 604A) and will go back to a
download-rate-limit of 250 Kbits/sec. If the upload value received
per each download-rate-limit remains constant, the amplifier will
go up and down in the graph around the points 200-300 Kbits/sec,
maximizing its Gain.
[0125] Reverting to FIG. 6A, 607A and 608A describe the amplifier
shutdown mechanism, in accordance with certain embodiments of the
invention. The amplifier shuts down after going up and down for a
few iterations (e.g. 5) and receiving a negative Gain time after
time. Bootstrap amplifiers always remain up, so the shutdown
counter in their case remains zero.
[0126] Note that the invention is not bound by the specific
sequence of operation of FIG. 6.
[0127] In accordance with certain embodiments, in order to have a
fast start-up for newly added consumers' nodes, the term of
Bootstrap Amplifiers is introduced. Bootstrap amplifiers don't shut
down themselves and `work on void`, even when there are no
consumers in the swarm, assuming that they will need the upload
bandwidth for news nodes. The reason for the bootstrap amplifiers
can be explained using the following example: consider a
broadcaster with available upload bandwidth of 1 Mbit/sec and
consider a consumer attached to it with 1bit/sec available download
bandwidth but with only 250 Kbit/sec upload. In such a case the
consumer will use the total amount of bandwidth from the
broadcaster and Other joining consumers will have bandwidth of only
250 Kbits/sec. However, if there axe available, for example, 20
bootstrap amplifiers, with available upload bandwidth of 250
Kbits/sec, the media can be divided into several pieces in such a
way that the total upload bandwidth of the system will be of
20.times.250=5 Mbits/sec, thus enabling 5 new joined consumers
(each downloading 1 Mbit/sec) to fetch a good quality media.
[0128] Attention is now drawn to FIG. 7 illustrating a flow diagram
of the amplifier's scheduling parameters algorithm in accordance
with a certain embodiment of the invention.
[0129] The segments priority algorithm role is to prioritize the
segments to be retrieved in terms of their importance. The
importance of the segments is determined, in accordance with
certain embodiments, according to one or more of the following
aspects. [0130] 1 The importance of the media segment to be
retrieved (701), for example, type of segments. For instance, audio
has priority over video, within video, the key frames (`I` frames
in H.264) have priority over motion estimation frames (such as `P`
and `B` frames in H.264). Accordingly, by this example, the
amplifier will download an audio segment before a video segment.
[0131] 2. The missing segments at the peers the amplifier serves
(702). The amplifier, knowing the segments they have and have
already requested (for instance according to the value of the bit
indicating availability or not of media data, as described above in
the context of information, will request other segments which are
useful for them. [0132] 3. The rare segments in the network (703).
In order to maintain the network in a wealthy situation, the
amplifier retrieves file segment parts with the lowest distribution
in the network. This is known as the rarest first algorithm in the
Bittorrent protocol. More specifically, in the case that there is a
segment which resides in very limited number nodes (rare segment),
it would be prudent to increase the circulation of this rare
segment (thereby rendering the network wealthy, by circulating the
segment to more nodes), in order to anticipate a situation that
this segment wilt be requested by many nodes, and now, having
sufficient copies thereof spread in the network, the likelihood of
having sufficient nodes that can upload the requested segment is
considerably improved compared to the situation that only few nodes
store the segment (whilst many request it), thereby unduly slowing
down the downloading rate of media containing the specified
segment. [0133] 4. Taking segments that are Xored from actual media
segments (704). While retrieving a segment from the peers, the
Amplifier has to prioritize Xored segments. An example of this is
illustrated in FIG. 8: [0134] Assume peer A has segments 1, 2
(801). Further assume peer B has only segment 1 and peer C only
segment 2 and that the amplifier should now decide which segment to
retrieve. Evidently if the Amplifier fetches the Xor value of
segment 1 and 2 from node A (802) it can serve both B and C (will
construct segment 2 from segment 1 it has and the Xor(1,2) (803), C
will construct segment 1 from segment 2 it has and the Xored
segment (804)). [0135] Note that the description with reference to
FIG. 8, is only one non-limiting manner of applying a mathematic
function on segments. [0136] Note also that the invention is not
bound by any one of combination of two or more of the specified 4
parameters. Note also that other parameters may be used in addition
to or instead of the specified parameters.
[0137] A system and method has been shown in the above embodiments
for the effective implementation of amplifiers in a realtime
peer-to-peer distribution of media. While various preferred
embodiments have been shown and described, it will be understood
that ere is no intent to limit invention by such disclosure, but
rater, it is intended to cover all modifications and alternate
constructions falling within the scope of the invention, as defined
is the appended claims. For example, the present invention should
not be limited by software/program, computing environment, specific
computing hardware, number of nodes, number of media types, number
of viewers, number of amplifiers, number of consumers, or number or
type of client devices.
[0138] It will also be understood that the system according to the
invention may be a suitably programmed computer. Likewise, the
invention contemplates a computer program being readable by a
computer for executing the method of the invention. The invention
flier contemplates a machine-readable memory tangibly embodying a
program of instructions executable by the machine for executing the
method of the invention.
[0139] The above enhancements and described functional elements are
implemented it various computing environments. For example, the
present invention may be implemented on a conventional IBM PC or
equivalent, multi-nodal system (e.g., LAN) or networking system
(e.g., Internet, WWW, wireless web). The programming of the present
invention may be implemented by one of skill in the art of
peer-to-peer networking, server based application, and
protocol-based network communications programming.
* * * * *