U.S. patent application number 11/110402 was filed with the patent office on 2009-05-21 for valve prosthesis for implantation in body channels.
Invention is credited to Alain Cribier.
Application Number | 20090132032 11/110402 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 8225366 |
Filed Date | 2009-05-21 |
United States Patent
Application |
20090132032 |
Kind Code |
A9 |
Cribier; Alain |
May 21, 2009 |
Valve prosthesis for implantation in body channels
Abstract
A valve prosthesis which is especially useful in the case of
aortic stenosis and capable of resisting the powerful recoil force
and to stand the forceful balloon inflation performed to deploy the
valve and to embed it in the aortic annulus, comprises a
collapsible valvular structure and an expandable frame on which
said valvular structure is mounted. The valvular structure is
composed of physiologically compatible valvular tissue that is
sufficiently supple and resistant to allow the valvular structure
to be deformed from a closed state to an opened state. The valvular
tissue forms a continuous surface and is provided with strut
members that create stiffened zones which induce the valvular
structure to follow a patterned movement in its expansion to its
opened state and in its turning back to its closed state.
Inventors: |
Cribier; Alain; (Maromme,
FR) |
Correspondence
Address: |
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION
LEGAL DEPARTMENT
ONE EDWARDS WAY
IRVINE
CA
92614
US
|
Prior
Publication: |
|
Document Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20050203616 A1 |
September 15, 2005 |
|
|
Family ID: |
8225366 |
Appl. No.: |
11/110402 |
Filed: |
April 20, 2005 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10139741 |
May 2, 2002 |
6908481 |
|
|
11110402 |
Apr 20, 2005 |
|
|
|
09795803 |
Feb 28, 2001 |
|
|
|
10139741 |
May 2, 2002 |
|
|
|
09345824 |
Jun 30, 1999 |
|
|
|
09795803 |
Feb 28, 2001 |
|
|
|
PCT/EP97/07737 |
Dec 31, 1997 |
|
|
|
09345824 |
Jun 30, 1999 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
623/2.11 ;
623/2.14 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61F 2/2409 20130101;
A61F 2220/0008 20130101; Y10S 623/90 20130101; A61F 2230/0054
20130101; A61F 2/2433 20130101; A61F 2/2415 20130101; Y10S 623/904
20130101; A61F 2230/0069 20130101; A61F 2/2418 20130101; A61B 90/39
20160201; A61F 2/2412 20130101; A61F 2/2475 20130101; A61F 2250/006
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
623/002.11 ;
623/002.14 |
International
Class: |
A61F 2/24 20060101
A61F002/24 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Dec 31, 1996 |
EP |
96402929.2 |
Claims
1. A method for treating a native aortic valve in a human heart,
comprising: advancing an expandable member to a position within the
native aortic valve, the native aortic valve having at least two
valvular leaflets; dilating the native aortic valve by expanding
the expandable member to push aside the valvular leaflets of the
native aortic valve; collapsing the expandable member and
withdrawing the expandable member from the native aortic valve;
advancing a prosthetic valve to a position within the dilated
native aortic valve, the prosthetic valve being radially compressed
during the advancement; and radially expanding the prosthetic valve
within the dilated aortic valve, wherein the expanded prosthetic
valve maintains the native aortic valve in the dilated condition
and replaces the valvular function of the native aortic valve.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the prosthetic valve is advanced
percutaneously through the aorta in a retrograde direction.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the prosthetic valve comprises a
metallic frame and a valvular structure coupled to the frame.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the valvular structure comprises
biological tissue.
5. The method of claim 3, wherein the metallic frame is viewed
under fluoroscopy during advancement of the prosthetic valve toward
the native aortic valve.
6. The method of claim 3, wherein the metallic frame engages the
valvular leaflets of the native aortic valve.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the prosthetic valve is
positioned such that valvular leaflets provide a stable base for
fixing the metallic frame within the native aortic valve.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the valvular leaflets recoil
inward after dilatation to further contribute to the fixation of
the metallic frame.
9. The method of claim 3, wherein the metallic frame is made of
steel.
10. The method of claim 3, wherein the metallic frame has a height
between about 10 and 15 millimeters in the radially expanded
condition.
11. The method of claim 3, wherein the metallic frame has a top end
and a bottom end and wherein the top end of the frame is located
below the coronary ostia after the prosthetic valve is expanded
such that the coronary ostia remain free of obstruction from the
prosthetic valve.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the bottom end of the frame is
located above the mitral valve in the human heart after the
prosthetic valve is expanded such that the mitral valve remains
free of obstruction from the prosthetic valve.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the native aortic valve is
dilated to a diameter of at least about 20 millimeters before
advancing the prosthetic valve.
14. A method for treating a native valve in a human heart,
comprising: advancing an expandable balloon to a position within
the native valve, the native valve having at least two valvular
leaflets; dilating the native valve by inflating the balloon to
push aside the valvular leaflets; deflating the balloon and
withdrawing the balloon from the native valve; advancing an
expandable prosthetic valve to a position within the dilated native
valve, the prosthetic valve including a valvular structure coupled
to an expandable frame; and radially expanding the prosthetic valve
within the dilated native valve, wherein an outer surface of the
expandable prosthetic valve engages the leaflets of the native
valve and the expandable prosthetic valve replaces the function of
the native valve.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the valvular structure has a
truncated shape.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the valvular structure has a
hyperboloid shape.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein the frame is manufactured in an
expanded condition and the valvular structure is coupled to the
frame while the frame is in the expanded condition and further
comprising compressing the frame and valvular structure before
advancement toward the dilated native valve.
18. The method of claim 14, wherein the native valve is a mitral
valve and the prosthetic valve is advanced percutaneously using a
transseptal route.
19. The method of claim 18, wherein the prosthetic valve has an
expanded diameter of at least about 30 millimeters.
20. A method of implanting a prosthetic valve in a heart for
treating valvular aortic stenosis, comprising: providing a first
elongate catheter having an expandable balloon disposed along a
distal end portion thereof; positioning the balloon within an
aortic valve by manipulation of the first elongate catheter;
expanding the balloon to dilate the aortic valve; collapsing the
balloon and withdrawing the first elongate catheter through the
aorta; providing a second elongate catheter having an expandable
prosthetic valve disposed along a distal end portion thereof;
advancing the second elongate catheter through the aorta toward the
dilated aortic valve; deploying the prosthetic valve within the
dilated aortic valve; and withdrawing the second elongate catheter
through the aorta.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 10/139,741, filed May 2, 2002, which is a
continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No.
09/795,803, filed Feb. 28, 2001, now abandoned, which in turn is a
continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/345,824, filed
Jun. 30, 1999, now abandoned, which is a National Phase filing of
PCT patent application No. PCT/EP 97/07337, filed Dec. 31, 1997 and
designating the United States, all of which are incorporated herein
by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to a valve prosthesis for
implantation in body channels, more particularly but not only to,
cardiac valve prosthesis to be implanted by a transcutaneous
catheterization technique.
[0003] The valve prosthesis can be also applied to other body
channels provided with native valves, such as veins or in organs
(liver, intestine, urethra . . . ).
[0004] The present invention also relates to a method for
implanting a valve prosthesis, such as the valve according to the
present invention.
[0005] Implantable valves, which will be indifferently designated
hereafter as "IV", "valve prosthesis" or "prosthetic valve",
permits the reparation of a valvular defect by a less invasive
technique in place of the usual surgical valve implantation which,
in the case of valvular heart diseases, requires thoracotomy and
extracorporeal circulation. A particular use for the IV concerns
patients who cannot be operated on because of an associated disease
or because of very old age or also patients who could be operated
on but only at a very high risk.
[0006] Although the IV of the present invention and the process for
implanting said IV can be used in various heart valve diseases, the
following description will first concern the aortic orifice in
aortic stenosis, more particularly in its degenerative form in
elderly patients.
[0007] Aortic stenosis is a disease of the aortic valve in the left
ventricle of the heart. The aortic valvular orifice is normally
capable of opening during systole up to 4 to 6 cm.sup.2, therefore
allowing free ejection of the ventricular blood volume into the
aorta. This aortic valvular orifice can become tightly stenosed,
and therefore the blood cannot anymore be freely ejected from the
left ventricle. In fact, only a reduced amount of blood can be
ejected by the left ventricle which has to markedly increase the
intra-cavitary pressure to force the stenosed aortic orifice. In
such aortic diseases, the patients can have syncope, chest pain,
and mainly difficulty in breathing. The evolution of such a disease
is disastrous when symptoms of cardiac failure appear, since 50% of
the patients die in the year following the first symptoms of the
disease.
[0008] The only commonly available treatment is the replacement of
the stenosed aortic valve by a prosthetic valve via surgery: this
treatment moreover providing excellent results. If surgery is
impossible to perform, i.e., if the patient is deemed inoperable or
operable only at a too high surgical risk, an alternative
possibility is to dilate the valve with a balloon catheter to
enlarge the aortic orifice. Unfortunately, a good result is
obtained only in about half of the cases and there is a high
restenosis rate, i.e., about 80% after one year.
[0009] Aortic stenosis is a very common disease in people above
seventy years old and occurs more and more frequently as the
subject gets older. As evidenced, the present tendency of the
general evolution of the population is becoming older and older.
Also, it can be evaluated, as a crude estimation, that about 30 to
50% of the subjects who are older than 80 years and have a tight
aortic stenosis, either cannot be operated on for aortic valve
replacement with a reasonable surgical risk or even cannot be
considered at all for surgery.
[0010] It can be estimated that, about 30 to 40 persons out of a
million per year, could benefit from an implantable aortic valve
positioned by a catheterization technique. Until now, the
implantation of a valve prosthesis for the treatment of aortic
stenosis is considered unrealistic to perform since it is deemed
difficult to superpose another valve such an implantable valve on
the distorted stenosed native valve without excising the
latter.
[0011] From 1985, the technique of aortic valvuloplasty with a
balloon catheter has been introduced for the treatment of subjects
in whom surgery cannot be performed at all or which could be
performed only with a prohibitive surgical risk. Despite the
considerable deformation of the stenosed aortic valve, commonly
with marked calcification, it is often possible to enlarge
significantly the aortic orifice by balloon inflation, a procedure
which is considered as low risk.
[0012] However, this technique has been abandoned by most
physicians because of the very high restenosis rate which occurs in
about 80% of the patients within 10 to 12 months. Indeed,
immediately after deflation of the balloon, a strong recoil
phenomenon often produces a loss of half or even two thirds of the
opening area obtained by the inflated balloon. For instance,
inflation of a 20 mm diameter balloon in a stenosed aortic orifice
of 0.5 cm.sup.2 area gives, when forcefully and fully inflated, an
opening area equal to the cross sectional area of the maximally
inflated balloon, i.e., about 3 cm.sup.2. However, measurements
performed a few minutes after deflation and removal of the balloon
have only an area around 1 cm.sup.2 to 1.2 cm.sup.2. This is due to
the considerable recoil of the fibrous tissue of the diseased
valve. The drawback in this procedure has also been clearly shown
on fresh post mortem specimens.
[0013] However, it is important to note that whereas the natural
normal aortic valve is able to open with an orifice of about 5 to 6
cm.sup.2 and to accommodate a blood flow of more that 15 l/min.
during heavy exercise for instance, an opening area of about 1.5 to
2 cm.sup.2 can accept a 6 to 8 l/min blood flow without a
significant pressure gradient. Such a flow corresponds to the
cardiac output of the elderly subject with limited physical
activity.
[0014] Therefore, an IV would not have to produce a large opening
of the aortic orifice since an opening about 2 cm.sup.2 would be
sufficient in most subjects, in particular in elderly subjects,
whose cardiac output probably does not reach more than 6 to 8
l/min. during normal physical activity. For instance, the
surgically implanted mechanical valves have an opening area which
is far from the natural valve opening that ranges from 2 to 2.5
cm.sup.2, mainly because of the room taken by the large circular
structure supporting the valvular part of the device.
[0015] The prior art describes examples of cardiac valves
prosthesis that are aimed at being implanted without surgical
intervention by way of catheterization. For instance, U.S. Pat. No.
5,411,552 describes a collapsible valve able to be introduced in
the body in a compressed presentation and expanded in the right
position by balloon inflation.
[0016] Such valves, with a semi-lunar leaflet design, tend to
imitate the natural valve. However, this type of design is
inherently fragile, and such structures are not strong enough to be
used in the case of aortic stenosis because of the strong recoil
that will distort this weak structure and because they would not be
able to resist the balloon inflation performed to position the
implantable valve. Furthermore, this valvular structure is attached
to a metallic frame of thin wires that will not be able to be
tightly secured against the valve annulus. The metallic frame of
this implantable valve is made of thin wires like in stents, which
are implanted in vessels after balloon dilatation. Such a light
stent structure is too weak to allow the implantable valve to be
forcefully embedded into the aortic annulus. Moreover, there is a
high risk of massive regurgitation (during the diastolic phase)
through the spaces between the frame wires which is another
prohibitive risk that would make this implantable valve impossible
to use in clinical practice.
[0017] Furthermore, an important point in view of the development
of the IV is that it is possible to maximally inflate a balloon
placed inside the compressed implantable valve to expand it and
insert it in the stenosed aortic valve up to about 20 to 23 mm in
diameter. At the time of maximum balloon inflation, the balloon is
absolutely stiff and cylindrical without any waist. At that moment,
the implantable valve is squeezed and crushed between the strong
aortic annulus and the rigid balloon with the risk of causing
irreversible damage to the valvular structure of the implantable
valve.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0018] The invention is aimed to overcome these drawbacks and to
implant an IV which will remain reliable for years.
[0019] A particular aim of the present invention is to provide an
IV, especially aimed at being used in case of aortic stenosis,
which structure is capable of resisting the powerful recoil force
and to stand the forceful balloon inflation performed to deploy the
IV and to embed it in the aortic annulus.
[0020] Another aim of the present invention is to provide an
efficient prosthesis valve which can be implanted by a
catheterization technique, in particular in a stenosed aortic
orifice, taking advantage of the strong structure made of the
distorted stenosed valve and of the large opening area produced by
preliminary balloon inflation, performed as an initial step of the
procedure.
[0021] A further aim of the present invention is to provide an
implantable valve which would not produce any risk of fluid
regurgitation.
[0022] A further aim of the present invention is to provide a valve
prosthesis implantation technique using a two-balloon catheter and
a two-frame device.
[0023] These aims are achieved according to the present invention
which provides a valve prosthesis of the type mentioned in the
introductory part and wherein said valve prosthesis comprises a
collapsible continuous structure with guiding means providing
stiffness and a frame to which said structure is fastened, said
frame being strong enough to resist the recoil phenomenon of the
fibrous tissue of the diseased valve.
[0024] The IV, which is strongly embedded, enables the implantable
valve to be maintained in the right position without any risk of
further displacement, which would be a catastrophic event.
[0025] More precisely, this valvular structure comprises a valvular
tissue compatible with the human body and blood, which is supple
and resistant to allow said valvular structure to pass from a
closed state to an open state to allow a body fluid, more
particularly the blood, exerting pressure on said valvular
structure, to flow. The valvular tissue forms a continuous surface
and is provided with guiding means formed or incorporated within,
creating stiffened zones which induce the valvular structure to
follow a patterned movement from its open position to its closed
state and vice-versa, providing therefore a structure sufficiently
rigid to prevent diversion, in particular into the left ventricle
and thus preventing any regurgitation of blood into the left
ventricle in case of aortic implantation.
[0026] Moreover, the guided structure of the IV of the invention
allows the tissue of this structure to open and close with the same
patterned movement while occupying as little space as possible in
the closed state of the valve. Therefore, owing to these guiding
means, the valvular structure withstands the unceasing movements
under blood pressure changes during the heart beats.
[0027] More preferably, the valvular structure has a substantially
truncated hyperboloidal shape in its expanded position, with a
larger base and a growing closer neck, ending in a smaller
extremity forming the upper part of the valvular structure. The
valvular structure has a curvature at its surface that is concave
towards the aortic wall. Such a shape produces a strong and
efficient structure in view of the systolo-diastolic movement of
the valvular tissue. Such a valvular structure with its simple and
regular shape also lowers the risk of being damaged by forceful
balloon inflation at the time of IV deployment.
[0028] A trunco-hyperboloidal shape with a small diameter at the
upper extremity facilitates the closure of the valve at the
beginning of diastole in initiating the starting of the reverse
movement of the valvular tissue towards its base. Another advantage
of this truncated hyperboloidal shape is that the upper extremity
of the valvular structure, because of its smaller diameter, remains
at a distance from the coronary ostia during systole as well as
during diastole, thus offering an additional security to ensure not
to impede at all the passage of blood from the aorta to the
coronary ostia.
[0029] As another advantageous embodiment of the invention, the
guiding means of the valvular structure are inclined strips from
the base to the upper extremity of the valvular structure with
regard to the central axis of the valvular structure. This
inclination initiates and imparts a general helicoidal movement of
the valvular structure around said central axis at the time of
closure or opening of said structure, such a movement enabling to
help initiate and finalize the closure of the valvular structure.
In particular, this movement improves the collapse of the valvular
structure towards its base at the time of diastole and during the
reversal of flow at the very beginning of diastole. During
diastole, the valvular structure thus fails down, folding on itself
and collapses on its base, therefore closing the aortic orifice.
The strips can be pleats, strengthening struts or thickened
zones.
[0030] In other embodiments, said guiding means are rectilinear
strips from the base to the upper extremity of the valvular
structure. In this case, the guiding means can comprise pleats,
struts or thickened zones. In a particular embodiment, the
stiffened zones then created can be advantageously two main
portions, trapezoidal in shape, formed symmetrically one to each
other with regard to the central axis of the valvular structure,
and two less rigid portions separating said two main portions to
lead to a tight closeness in shape of a closed slot at the time of
closure of the upper extremities of the main portions of the
valvular structure. The thickened zones can be extended up to form
the stiffened zones.
[0031] More particularly, each of said main slightly rigid portions
occupy approximately one third of the circumference of the valvular
structure when this latter is in its open position. The slightly
rigid portions maintain the valvular structure closed during
diastole by firmly applying themselves on each other. The closure
of the valvular structure at the time of diastole thus does not
have any tendency to collapse too much towards the aortic
annulus.
[0032] Preferably, the guiding means are a number of pleats formed
within the tissue by folding, or formed by recesses or grooves made
in the tissue. The shape of the pleats is adapted to achieve a
global shape of the desired type for said position.
[0033] Alternatively, the guiding means are made of strengthening
struts, preferably at least three, incorporated in the tissue in
combination or not with said pleats.
[0034] The guiding means and, in particular, the strengthening
struts, help to prevent the valvular tissue from collapsing back
too much and to reverse inside the left ventricle through the base
of the frame, preventing the risk of blood regurgitation.
[0035] In a preferred prosthetic valve of the invention, said
valvular tissue is made of synthetic biocompatible material such as
TEFLON.RTM. or DACRON.RTM., polyethylene, polyamide, or made of
biological material such as pericardium, porcine leaflets and the
like. These materials are commonly used in cardiac surgery and are
quite resistant, particularly to folding movements due to the
increasing systolo-diastolic movements of the valvular tissue and
particularly at the junction with the frame of the implantable
valve.
[0036] The valvular structure is fastened along a substantial
portion of an expandable frame, by sewing, by molding or by gluing
to exhibit a tightness sufficiently hermetical to prevent any
regurgitation of said body fluid between the frame and the valvular
structure.
[0037] Preferably, an internal cover is coupled or is integral to
the valvular structure and placed between said valvular structure
and the internal wall of the frame to prevent any passage of the
body fluid through said frame. Therefore, there is no regurgitation
of blood as it would be the case if there were any space between
the valvular structure fastened on the frame and the zone of
application of the frame on the aortic annulus. The internal cover
makes a sort of "sleeve" at least below the fastening of the
valvular structure covering the internal surface of the frame and
thus prevents any regurgitation of blood through the frame.
[0038] In the present invention, the frame is a substantially
cylindrical structure capable of maintaining said body channel open
in its expanded state and supporting said collapsible valvular
structure.
[0039] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the frame is
made of a material which is distinguishable from biological tissue
to be easily visible by non invasive imaging techniques.
[0040] Preferably, said frame is a stainless metal structure or a
foldable plastic material, made of intercrossing, preferably with
rounded and smooth linear bars. This frame is strong enough to
resist the recoil phenomenon of the fibrous tissue of the diseased
valve. The size of the bars and their number are determined to give
both the maximal rigidity when said frame is expanded and the
smallest volume when the frame is compressed.
[0041] More preferably, the frame has projecting curved extremities
and presents a concave shape. This is aimed at reinforcing the
embedding and the locking of the implantable valve in the distorted
aortic orifice.
[0042] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the IV
is made in two parts, a first reinforced frame coupled with a
second frame which is made of thinner bars than said first frame
and which is embedded inside the second frame. This second frame to
which the valvular structure is fastened as described above, is
preferably less bulky than the first frame to occupy as little
space as possible and to be easily expanded using low pressure
balloon inflation.
[0043] The present invention also relates to a double balloon
catheter to separately position the first frame in the dilated
stenosed aortic valve and place the second frame that comprises the
valvular structure. This catheter comprises two balloons fixed on a
catheter shaft and separated by few centimeters.
[0044] The first balloon is of the type sufficiently strong to
avoid bursting even at a very high pressure inflation and is aimed
at carrying, in its deflated state, a strong frame aimed at
scaffolding the previously dilated stenosed aortic valve. The
second balloon is aimed at carrying the second frame with the
valvular structure.
[0045] An advantage of this double balloon catheter is that each
balloon has an external diameter which is smaller than known
balloons since each element to be expanded is smaller.
[0046] Moreover, such a double balloon catheter allows to enlarge
the choice for making an efficient valvular structure enabling to
overcome the following two contradictory conditions: [0047] 1)
having a soft and mobile valvular structure capable of opening and
closing freely in the blood stream, without risk of being damaged
by balloon inflation; and [0048] 2) needing a very strong structure
able to resist the recoil force of the stenosed valve and capable
of resisting, without any damage, a strong pressure inflation of
the expanding balloon.
[0049] Furthermore, the shaft of said double balloon catheter
comprises two lumens for successive and separate inflation of each
balloon. Of note, an additional lumen capable of allowing a rapid
inflation takes additional room in the shaft.
[0050] The invention also relates to a method of using a
two-balloon catheter with a first frame and second frame to which a
valve prosthesis of the type previously described is fastened.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0051] The invention will now be explained and other advantages and
features will appear with reference to the accompanying schematical
drawings wherein:
[0052] FIGS. 1a, 1b and 1c illustrate, in section views,
respectively, the normal aortic valve in systole, in diastole and a
stenosed aortic valve;
[0053] FIGS. 2a and 2b illustrate two examples of a metallic frame
which are combined to a valvular structure according to the present
invention;
[0054] FIGS. 3a and 3b illustrate a frame according to the
invention in its expanded position with an opening out of the
extremities, respectively, with a cylindrical and a concave
shape;
[0055] FIGS. 4a and 4b illustrate an IV of the invention
respectively in its compressed position and in its expanded
position in an open position as in systole;
[0056] FIGS. 5a and 5b illustrate respectively an IV of the
invention in its closed position and a sectional view according to
the central axis of such a valvular structure which is closed as in
diastole;
[0057] FIGS. 6a to 6d illustrate a sectional view according to the
central axis of an IV according to the present invention and
showing the internal cover and the external cover of the valvular
structure overlapping partially or non overlapping the frame
bars;
[0058] FIG. 7 illustrates the frontal zig-zag fastening line of the
valvular tissue on the frame;
[0059] FIGS. 8a and 8b illustrate, respectively, a perspective view
of a valvular structure and an internal cover made all of one piece
and a perspective view of the corresponding frame into which they
will be inserted and fastened;
[0060] FIGS. 9a and 9b illustrate inclined strengthening struts, an
example of a valvular structure according to the invention,
respectively in the open position and in the closed position;
[0061] FIGS. 10a and 10b illustrate an example of a valvular
structure comprising pleats, respectively in the open and in the
closed position;
[0062] FIGS. 11a and 11b illustrate a valvular structure comprising
two trapezoidal slightly rigid portions, respectively in the open
and in the closed position;
[0063] FIGS. 11c to 11e illustrate a valvular structure comprising
a rectangular stiffened zone, respectively in the open,
intermediate and closed position;
[0064] FIGS. 12a and 12b illustrate, respectively, a perspective
and cross sectional views of an implantable valve in its compressed
presentation squeezed on a balloon catheter;
[0065] FIGS. 13a to 13l illustrate views of the successive
procedure steps for the IV implantation in a stenosed aortic
orifice;
[0066] FIG. 14 illustrates an implantable valve made in two parts
in its compressed presentation squeezed on a two-balloon catheter
with a reinforced frame on a first balloon and with the implantable
valve on the second balloon; and
[0067] FIGS. 15a to 15f illustrate the successive steps of the
implantation of the implantation valve in two parts with a
two-balloon catheter.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0068] In the diastole and systole illustrations of section views
of FIGS. 1a and 1b, the arrows A indicates the general direction of
the blood flow. The semi-lunar leaflets 1 and 2 of a native aortic
valve (with only two out of three shown here) are thin, supple and
move easily from the completely open position (systole) to the
closed position (diastole). The leaflets originate from an aortic
annulus 2a.
[0069] The leaflets 1' and 2' of a stenosed valve as illustrated in
FIG. 1c, are thickened, distorted, calcified and more or less
fused, leaving only a small hole or a narrow slit 3, which makes
the ejection of blood from the left ventricle cavity 4 into the
aorta 5 difficult and limited. FIGS. 1a to 1c show also the
coronary artery ostium 6a and 6b and FIG. 1 a shows, in particular,
the mitral valve 7 of the left ventricle cavity 4.
[0070] An implantable valve according to the invention essentially
comprises a supple valvular structure supported by a strong frame.
The positioning of the implantable valve is an important point
since the expanded frame has to be positioned exactly at the level
of the native valvular leaflets 1, 2 of the native valve, the
structures of which are pushed aside by the inflated balloon.
[0071] Ideally, the implantable valve is positioned with the
fastening line of the valvular structure on the frame exactly on
the remains of the crushed stenosed valve to prevent any
regurgitation of blood. In practice, it is difficult to position
the implantable valve within less than 2 or 3 mm. However, any risk
of regurgitation of blood is eliminated with the presence of an
internal cover, as will be described below.
[0072] The upper limit of the frame should be placed below the
opening of the coronary arteries, i.e., the coronary ostia 6, or at
their level so that the frame does not impede free blood flow in
the coronary arteries. This point is a delicate part of positioning
an IV since the distance between the superior limit of the leaflets
of the natural valve and the coronary ostia 6 is only about 5 to 6
mm. However, the ostia are located in the Valsalva sinus 8 which
constitutes a hollow that are located a little out of the way. This
helps to prevent from impeding the coronary blood flow by the
IV.
[0073] At the time of implantation, the operator evaluates the
exact positioning of the coronary ostia by looking at the image
produced by a sus-valvular angiogram with contrast injection
performed before the implantation procedure. This image will be
fixed in the same projection on a satellite TV screen and will
permit the evaluation of the level of the origin of the right and
left coronary arteries. Possibly, in case the ostia are not clearly
seen by sus-valvular angiography, a thin guide wire, as those used
in coronary angioplasty, is positioned in each of the coronary
arteries to serve as a marker of the coronary ostia.
[0074] The lower part of the frame of the IV preferably extends by
2 or 3 mm inside the left ventricle 4, below the aortic annulus 2a.
However, this part of the frame should not reach the insertion of
the septal leaflet of the mitral valve 7, so that it does not
interfere with its movements, particularly during diastole.
[0075] FIGS. 2a and 2b show respectively an example of a
cylindrical frame or stent 10 comprising intercrossing linear bars
11, with two intersections I by bar 11, the bars 11 being soldered
or provided from a folded wire to constitute the frame, with for
instance a 20 mm, 15 mm or 12 mm height, and an example with only
one intersection of bars 11. Preferably, such a frame is expandable
from a size of about 4 to 5 millimeters to a size of about 20 to 25
mm in diameter, or even to about 30-35 mm (or more) in particular
cases, for instance for the mitral valve. Moreover, said frame, in
its fully expanded state, has a height of approximately between 10
and 15 mm and in its fully compressed frame, a height of
approximately 20 mm. The number and the size of the bars are
adapted to be sufficiently strong and rigid when the frame is fully
open in the aortic orifice to resist the strong recoil force
exerted by the distorted stenosed aortic orifice after deflation'
of the balloon used in the catheterization technique which has been
previously maximally inflated to enlarge the stenosed valve
orifice.
[0076] The frame may have several configurations according to the
number of bars 11 and intersections. This number, as well as the
size and the strength of the bars 11, are calculated taking into
account all the requirements described, i.e., a small size in its
compressed form, its capacity to be enlarged up to at least 20 mm
in diameter and being strong when positioned in the aortic orifice
to be able to be forcefully embedded in the remains of the diseased
aortic valve and to resist the recoil force of the aortic annulus.
The diameter of the bars is chosen, for instance, in the range of
0.1-0.6 mm.
[0077] A frame particularly advantageous presents, when deployed in
its expanded state, an opening out 12 at both extremities as shown
in FIGS. 3a and 3b, the frame having a linear profile (FIG. 3a) or
a concave shape profile (FIG. 3b). This is aimed at reinforcing the
embedding of the IV in the aortic orifice. However, the free
extremities of the openings 12 are rounded and very smooth to avoid
any traumatism of the aorta or of the myocardium.
[0078] The structure of a preferred frame used in the present
invention both maintains the aortic orifice fully open once dilated
and produces a support for the valvular structure. The frame is
also foldable. When folded by compression, the diameter of said
frame is about 4 to 5 millimeters, in view of its transcutaneous
introduction in the femoral artery through an arterial sheath of 14
to 16 F (F means French, a unit usually used in cardiology field)
i.e., about 4.5 to 5.1 mm. Also, as described below, when
positioned in the aortic orifice, the frame is able to expand under
the force of an inflated balloon up to a size of 20 to 23 mm in
diameter.
[0079] The frame is preferably a metallic frame, preferably made of
steel. It constitutes a frame with a grate type design able to
support the valvular structure and to behave as a strong scaffold
for the open stenosed aortic orifice.
[0080] When the frame is fully expanded, its intercrossing bars
push against the remains of the native stenosed valve that has been
crushed aside against the aortic annulus by the inflated balloon.
This produces a penetration and embeds the bars within the remains
of the stenosed valve, in particular owing to a concave profile of
the frame provided with an opening out, as illustrated in FIG. 3b.
This embedding of the frame on the aortic annulus, or more
precisely on the remains of the crushed distorted aortic valve,
will be determinant for the strong fixation of the IV in the right
position, without any risk of displacement.
[0081] Moreover, the fact that the valve leaflets in degenerative
aortic stenosis are grossly distorted and calcified, sometimes
leaving only a small hole or a small slit in the middle of the
orifice, has to be considered an advantage for the implantation of
the valve and for its stable positioning without risk of later
mobilization. The fibrous and calcified structure of the distorted
valve provides a strong base for the frame of the IV and the
powerful recoil phenomenon that results from elasticity of the
tissues contribute to the fixation of the metallic frame.
[0082] The height of the fully expanded frame of the illustrated
frames 10 is preferably between 10 and 15 mm. Indeed, since the
passage from the compressed state to the expanded state results in
a shortening of the metallic structure, the structure in its
compressed form is a little longer, i.e., preferably about 20 mm
length. This does not constitute a drawback for its transcutaneous
introduction and its positioning in the aortic orifice.
[0083] As mentioned above, the frame is strong enough to be able to
oppose the powerful recoil force of the distended valve and of the
aortic annulus 2a. Preferably it does not possess any flexible
properties. When the frame has reached its maximal expanded shape
under the push of a forcefully inflated balloon, it remains
substantially without any decrease in size and without any change
of shape. The size of the bars that are the basic elements of the
frame is calculated in such a way to provide a substantial rigidity
when the frame is fully expanded. The size of the bars and their
number are calculated to give both maximal rigidity when expanded
and the smallest volume when the metallic frame is its compressed
position.
[0084] At the time of making the IV, the frame is expanded by
dilatation to its broadest dimension, i.e., between 20 mm and 25 mm
in diameter, so as to be able to fasten the valvular structure on
the inside side of its surface. This fastening is performed using
the techniques in current use for the making of products such as
other prosthetic heart valves or multipolars catheters etc.
Afterwards, it is compressed in its minimal size, i.e., 4 or 5 mm,
in diameter in view of its introduction in the femoral artery. At
time of the IV positioning, the frame is expanded again by balloon
inflation to its maximal size in the aortic orifice.
[0085] If the frame is built in an expanded position, it will be
compressed, after fastening the valvular structure, by exerting a
circular force on its periphery and/or on its total height until
obtaining the smallest compressed position. If the frame is built
in its compressed position, it will be first dilated, for instance,
by inflation of a balloon and then compressed again as described
above.
[0086] To help localizing the IV, the frame being the only visible
component of the valve, the shaft of the balloon catheter on which
will be mounted the IV before introduction in the body (see below)
possesses preferentially metallic reference marks easily seen on
fluoroscopy. One mark will be at level of the upper border of the
frame and the other at the level of the lower border. The IV, when
mounted on the catheter shaft and crimpled on it, is exactly
positioned taking into account these reference marks on the
shaft.
[0087] Accordingly, the frame is visible during fluoroscopy when
introduced in the patient's body. When the frame is positioned at
the level of the aortic annulus, the upper border of the frame is
placed below the coronary ostia. Furthermore, the implanting
process during which the balloon inflation completely obstructs the
aortic orifice, as seen below, is performed within a very short
time, i.e., around 10 to 15 seconds. This also explains why the
frame is clearly and easily seen, without spending time to localize
it. More particularly, its upper and lower borders are clearly
delineated.
[0088] FIGS. 4a and 4b show an example of a preferred IV 13 of the
present invention, respectively in its compressed position, in view
of its introduction and positioning in the aortic orifice, and in
its expanded and opened (systole) position. FIGS. 5a and 5b show
the expanded position of this example closed in diastole,
respectively in perspective and in a crossed section view along the
central axis XX of the valve prosthesis.
[0089] The valvular structure 14 is compressed inside the frame 10
when this is in its compressed position (FIG. 4a), i.e., it fits
into a 4 to 5 mm diameter space. On the other hand, the valvular
structure can expand (FIG. 4b) and follow the frame expansion
produced by the inflated balloon. It will have to be able to reach
the size of the inside of the fully deployed frame.
[0090] The illustrated IV 13 is made of a combination of two main
parts: [0091] 1) the expandible but substantially rigid structure
made of the frame 10, a metallic frame in the example; and [0092]
2) a soft and mobile tissue constituting the valvular structure 14
exhibiting a continuous surface truncated between a base 15 and an
upper extremity 16; the tissue is fastened to the bars 11 of the
frame at its base 16 and is able to open in systole and to close in
diastole at its extremity 16, as the blood flows in a pulsatile way
from the left ventricle towards the aorta.
[0093] The tissue has rectilinear struts 17 incorporated in, it in
plane including the central axis XX, in order to strengthen it, in
particular, in its closed state with a minimal occupation of the
space, and to induce a patterned movement between its open and
closed state. Other examples of strengthening struts are described
below. They are formed from thicker zones of the tissue or from
strips of stiffening material incorporated in the tissue; they can
also be glued or soldered on the valvular tissue.
[0094] These strengthening struts help to prevent the valvular
tissue from collapsing back too much and to evert inside the left
ventricle through the base of the frame. These reinforcements of
the valvular tissue help maintain the folded tissue above the level
of the orifice during diastole, prevent too much folding back and
risk of inversion of the valvular structure inside the left
ventricle. By also preventing too much folding, a decrease of the
risk of thrombi formation can also be expected by reducing the
number of folds.
[0095] The truncated shape forming a continuous surface enables to
obtain a strong structure and is more efficient for the
systolo-diastolic movements of the valvular tissue during heart
beats. The truncoidal shape facilitates the closure of the valve
structure at the beginning of diastole in facilitating the start of
the reverse movement of the valvular tissue towards its base at the
time of diastole, i.e., at the time of flow reversal at the very
beginning of diastole. During diastole, the valvular structure 14
thus fails down, folding on itself, thereby collapsing on its base,
and therefore closing the aortic orifice. In fact, the valvular
structure has preferably, as illustrated, an hyperboloid shape,
with a curvature on its surface concave towards the aortic wall
that will contribute to initiating its closure.
[0096] Moreover, the basis of the truncated hyperboloid is fixed on
the lower part of a frame and the smallest extremity of the
truncated hyperboloid is free in the blood stream, during the
respected closing and opening phasis.
[0097] An important advantage of this hyperboloidal shape is that
the upper extremity 16 of the valvular structure 14 can remain at a
distance from the coronary ostia during systole as well as during
diastole, because of its smaller diameter, thus offering an
additional security to make certain that the passage of blood from
aorta to the coronary ostia is not impeded.
[0098] The base 15 of the truncated tissue is attached on the frame
10 along a line of coupling 18 disposed between the inferior fourth
and the third fourth of the frame in the example. The upper
extremity 16, with the smaller diameter, overpasses the upper part
of the frame by a few millimeters; 6 to 8 mm, for instance. This
gives the valvular structure a total height of about 12 to 15
mm.
[0099] The upper extremity 16 of the truncated tissue, i.e., the
smaller diameter of the hyperboloidal structure 14, is about 17 to
18 mm in diameter (producing a 2.3 to 2.5 cm.sup.2 area opening)
for a 20 mm diameter base of the truncated structure, or 19 to 20
mm in diameter (producing a 2.8 or a 3 cm.sup.2 area opening) for a
23 mm diameter base. An opening area around 2 cm.sup.2 or slightly
above, gives satisfactory results, particularly in elderly patients
who would not reasonably need to exert high cardiac output.
[0100] For instance, in the present example, the line of fastening
of the base of the truncated tissue on the frame will have to
expand from a 12.5 mm perimeter (for a 4 mm external diameter of
the compressed IV) to a 63 mm perimeter (for a 20 mm external
diameter of the expanded IV), or to a 72 mm perimeter (for a 23 mm
external diameter, in case a 23 mm balloon is used).
[0101] Another advantage of this truncated continuous shape is that
it is stronger and has less risk of being destroyed or distorted by
the forceful balloon inflation at the time of IV deployment. Also,
if the truncated hyperboloidal shape is marked, for instance, with
a 16 or 17 mm diameter of the upper extremity as compared to a 20
mm diameter of the base (or 18 to 20 mm for 23 mm), the smaller
upper part is compliant during balloon inflation in order to enable
the balloon to expand cylindrically to its maximal mm diameter (or
23 mm). This is made possible by using a material with some elastic
or compliant properties.
[0102] The valvular structure of the invention, as shown in the
illustrated example, includes advantageously a third part, i.e.,
the internal cover 19 to be fixed on the internal wall of the frame
10. This internal cover prevents any passage of blood through the
spaces between the bars 11 of the frame in case the implantable
valve would be positioned with the fastening line of the valvular
structure on the frame not exactly on the remains of the dilated
aortic valve, i.e., either above or below. It also strengthens the
fastening of the valvular structure 14 to the frame 10.
[0103] In the different sectional views of the different examples
of IV according to the invention, as illustrated at FIGS. 6a to 6c,
the internal cover 19 covers the totality of the internal side of
the frame 10 (FIG. 6a), only the lower part of the frame 10 (FIG.
6b), or it can additionally cover partially 3 to 5 mm as shown in
the passage of blood from aorta to the coronary ostia FIG. 6c, the
upper part defined above the coupling line 18 of the valvular
structure.
[0104] For instance, such an extension of the internal cover 19
above the fastening line 18 of the valvular structure will give
another security to avoid any risk of regurgitation through the
spaces between the bars 11 in case the IV would be positioned too
low with respect to the border of the native aortic valve.
[0105] The internal cover can also be molded to the valvular
structure or casted to it which therefore constitutes an integral
structure. The valvular structure and the internal cover are
therefore strongly locked together with minimum risk of detachment
of the valvular structure which is unceasingly in motion during
systole and diastole. in that case, only the internal cover has to
be fastened on the internal surface of the frame which renders the
making of the IV easier and makes the complete device stronger and
more resistant. In particular, the junction of the mobile part of
the valvular structure and the fixed part being molded as one piece
is stronger and capable to face the increasing movements during the
systolo-diastolic displacements without any risk of detachment.
[0106] The presence of the internal cover makes an additional layer
of plastic material that occupies the inside of the frame and
increases the final size of the IV. Therefore, in the case in which
the internal cover is limited to the inferior part of the frame
(that is, below the fastening line of the valvular structure), it
does not occupy any additional space inside the frame. Here also,
it is more convenient and safer to make the valvular structure and
this limited internal cover in one piece.
[0107] In other aspects, to prevent any regurgitation of blood from
the aorta towards the left ventricle during diastole, the base of
the valvular structure is preferably positioned exactly at the
level of the aortic annulus against the remains of distorted
stenosed valve pushed apart by the inflated balloon. Therefore,
there is no possibility of blood passage through the spaces between
the metallic frame bars 11 below the attachment of the valvular
structure.
[0108] However, to avoid any risk of leaks, the part of the frame
below the fastening of the valvular structure (about 3 to 5 mm) is
preferably covered by an internal cover which is preferably made
with the same tissue as the valvular structure. Thus, there would
be no regurgitation of blood which is a possibility when there is
any space between the valvular structure fastened on the metallic
frame and the line of application of the frame on the aortic
annulus. The internal cover makes a sort of "sleeve" below the
fastening of the valvular structure on the internal surface of the
frame, covering the spaces between the frame bars of the frame at
this level, thus preventing any regurgitation of blood through
these spaces.
[0109] The internal cover can also have another function, i.e., it
can be used to fasten the valvular structure inside the frame, as
described below.
[0110] At FIG. 6d, the internal cover 19 is extended at its lower
end 19' to an external cover 19' which is rolled up to be applied
on the external wall of the stent 10. The internal and external
cover are molded, glued or soldered to the bars of the stent
10.
[0111] The coupling process of the valvular structure on the frame
is of importance since it has to be very strong without any risk of
detachment of the valvular structure from the frame during millions
of heart beats with pulsatile blood flow alternatively opening and
closing the valvular structure.
[0112] The valvular structure of the invention folds to a very
small size inside the frame in the compressed position of the valve
and is expandable up to 20 to 23 mm diameter. Also, the valvular
structure can resist the strong force exerted by the maximally
inflated balloon that will powerfully squeeze it against the bars
of the frame or against the internal cover, this one being squeezed
directly against the bars of the frame. The junction zone is also
particularly subjected to very strong pressure exerted by the
inflated balloon. Furthermore, this junction zone must not tear or
break off during expansion of the balloon. At this time, each part
of the junction zone is squeezed against the bars but nonetheless
follows the expansion of the frame.
[0113] As shown in FIG. 7, the junction zone is, for example, a
fastening line 20 which follows the design of a "zig-zag" line
drawn by the intercrossing bars 11 of the frame on the internal
cover 19.
[0114] The fastening of the valvular structure to the frame can be
made by sewing the internal and/or the external cover to the bars.
To prevent any leakage of blood, stitches are preferably numerous
and very close to each other, either as separated stitches or as a
continuous suture line. Also, the stitches are made directly around
the bars 11. Furthermore, since the valvular structure is expanded
together with the metallic frame, the stitches, if made as a
continuous suture line, are also able to expand at the same
time.
[0115] The fastening process can also be made by molding the base
of the valvular structure on the frame. At this level, the bars 11
are imbedded in the coupling line of the valvular structure 14.
This mold way also concerns the internal cover 19, when it goes
below the coupling line 14 on the frame over few millimeters, for
example, 2 to 4 mm. As mentioned above, this is intended in order
to prevent any regurgitation of blood just below the lower part of
the valvular structure 14 in case the frame 10 would not be exactly
positioned on the aortic annulus but at few millimeters away.
[0116] The fastening process can further be made by gluing or
soldering the valvular structure on the bars with sufficiently
powerful biocompatible glues. The same remark can be made
concerning the internal cover of the frame below the coupling line
of the valvular structure.
[0117] Also, this allows the coupling line to follow the frame
changes from the compressed position to its expanded one.
[0118] The valvular structure can also be fastened on the internal
cover previously fixed at the total length of the internal surface
of the metallic frame. The internal cover constitutes therefore a
surface on which any type of valvular structure be more easily
sewed, molded or glued. Because it is a structure with a large
surface and is not involved in the movements of the valvular tissue
during systole and diastole, the internal cover is more easily
fastened to the internal surface of the frame.
[0119] In the particular embodiment shown in FIGS. 8a and 8b, the
internal cover 19 is fastened, after introduction (indicated by the
arrow B), at the upper and lower extremities of the frame 10 on the
upper and lower zig-zag lines of the intercrossing bars 11. In
fact, the fastening of the internal cover 19 on the zig-zag lines
made by the intercrossing bars 11 of the frame allows an easier
passage of blood from the aorta above the IV towards the coronary
ostia. Indeed, the blood can find more space to flow into the
coronary ostia by passing through the lowest point of each
triangular space made by two intercrossing bars 11, as indicated by
the arrows A1 (see also Figure Ib).
[0120] The fastening of the internal cover 19 on the extremities
can be reinforced by various points of attachment on various parts
of the internal surface of the frame 10. The internal cover 19 can
be fastened by sewing, molding or gluing the bars 11 onto the
frame.
[0121] Fastening the valvular tissue (and the cover tissue below)
on the inside of the frame, requires work on the frame in its
expanded position to have access to the inside of this cylindric
frame. In a preferred embodiment the frame is expanded a first time
for fastening the valvular tissue on its bars, then compressed back
to a smaller size to be able to be introduced via arterial
introducer and finally expanded again by the balloon inflation.
[0122] Since it is aimed at being positioned in the heart after
having been introduced by a catheterization technique by a
transcutaneous route in a peripheral artery, mainly the femoral
artery, the IV should preferably have the smallest possible
external diameter. Ideally, it should be able to be introduced in
the femoral artery through a 14 F (4.5 mm) size arterial introducer
which is the size of the arterial introducer commonly used to
perform an aortic dilatation. However, a 16 F (5.1 mm) or even a 18
F (5.7 mm) introducer would also be acceptable.
[0123] Above this size, the introduction of the IV in the femoral
artery should probably be done by a surgical technique. This is
still quite acceptable since the surgical procedure would be a very
light procedure which could be done by a surgeon with a simple
local anaesthesia. It has to be recalled that this technique is
used to position big metallic frames, about 24 F in size (7.64 mm
in diameter), in the abdominal aorta for the treatment of aneurysms
of the abdominal aorta. In that situation, this necessitates
surgical repair of the artery after withdrawal of the sheath (M. D.
Dake, New Engl. J. Med. 1994;331:1729-34).
[0124] Ideally, an IV should be able to last several tenths of life
years without defect, like the mechanical prosthetic valves which
are currently implanted by the surgeons. Nevertheless, an
implantable valve that would last at least ten years without risk
of deterioration would be effective for the treatment of elderly
patients.
[0125] A valvular structure according to the invention is made of a
supple and reinforced tissue which has a thickness to be thin
enough to occupy as less as possible space in the compressed form
of the valve, is pliable, and also strong enough to stand the
unceasing movements under the blood pressure changes during heart
beats. The valvular structure is capable of moving from its closed
position to its open position under the action of the force exerted
by the movements of the blood during systole and diastole, without
having any significant resistance to blood displacements.
[0126] The material used for the tissue, which exhibits the above
mentioned requirements, may be TEFLON.RTM. or DACRON.RTM., which
are quite resistant to folding movements, at least when they are
used to repair cardiac defects such as inter-atrial or
interventricular defects or when they are used to repair a valve
such as the mitral valve which is subjected to high pressure
changes and movements during heart beats. Also, a main point is the
increasing systolo-diastolic movements of the valvular tissue,
particularly at its junction with the rigid part of the IV, and it
is therefore necessary to find the most possible resistant material
tissue.
[0127] As mentioned previously, the valvular structure can also
possibly be made with biological tissue such as the pericardium, or
with porcine leaflets, which are commonly used in bioprosthetic
surgically implanted valves.
[0128] Moreover, the valvular prosthesis of the present invention
does not induce any significant thrombosis phenomenon during its
stay in the blood flow and is biologically neutral.
[0129] To prevent the risk of thrombus formation and of emboli
caused by clots, a substance with anti-thrombic properties could be
used, such as heparine, ticlopidine, phosphorylcholine, etc.,
either as a coating material or it can be incorporated into the
material used for the implantable valve, in particular, for the
valvular structure and/or for the internal cover.
[0130] The valvular structure of the invention can have several
types of designs and shapes. Besides the example illustrated in
FIGS. 4 and 5, examples of strengthened valvular structures
according to the invention are shown in FIGS. 9 to 11, respectively
in the closed (FIGS. 9a, 10a, 11a) and in the open state (FIGS. 9b,
10b, 11b) to form a prosthetic valve according to the present
invention. In those figures, the frame line is simplified to
clarify the drawings.
[0131] To help initiate and finalize the closure of the valvular
structure, four strengthening struts 14a are slightly inclined from
the base to the upper part as compared to the central axis XX of
the structure, as shown in FIGS. 9a and 9b. Accordingly, a
patterned movement of the valvular structure, during the closing
and the opening phases, is initiated. This patterned movement is,
in the present case, an helicoidal-type one, as suggested in FIGS.
9b and 10b by the circular arrow 21.
[0132] FIGS. 10a and 10b illustrate another embodiment to help the
closing of the valvular structure and which also involves an
helicoidal movement. Represented by lines 22, inclined pleats are
formed in the tissue to impart such a movement. As illustrated,
these lines have an inclination from the base to the upper part of
the valvular structure tissue 14. Pleats are formed by folding the
tissue or by alternating thinner and thicker portions. The width
and the number of those pleats are variable, and depend
particularly on the type of material used. According to another
example, these pleats 22 are combined with the above described
inclined strengthening struts.
[0133] These reinforcing pleats and/or struts, rectilinear or
inclined, have the advantage to impart a reproducible movement and,
accordingly, to avoid the valvular structure from closing to a
nonstructurized collapse on the frame base.
[0134] Another shape of the valvular structure comprises two
portions: one portion being flexible but with some rigidity, having
a rectangular shape, occupying about one third of the circumference
of the valvular structure, and the other portion being more supple,
flexible and foldable occupying the rest of the circumference at
its base as well as at its upper, free border. According to FIG.
11c, this valve is opened, during the ejection of blood, i.e.,
during systol. In FIG. 11d, a front view of the valve is closed,
during an intermediate diastole, and in FIG. 11e the same closed
valve during diastole is shown from a side view. The semi-rigid
part 24' moves little during systole and during diastole. The
foldable part 23' moves away from the rigid part during systole to
let the blood flow through the orifice thus made. This orifice, due
to the diameter of the upper part which is the same as that of the
open stent, is large, generally as large as that of the open stent.
At the time of diastole, due to the reverse of pressure, the
foldable part moves back towards the semi-rigid part and presses on
it, and thus closes the orifice and prevents any regurgitation of
blood.
[0135] The advantage of such a valve design is to allow a large
opening of the upper part of the valvular structure, not only to
permit more blood flow at time of systole after the valve has been
implanted, but also at the very time of implantation, when the
balloon is maximally inflated to expand the valve to imbed it in
the valvular annulus. The diameter of the upper part of the
valvular structure could be the same size as the balloon, so that
there would be no distension of the valvular part of the valve at
the time of implantation, and therefore no risk of deterioration of
the valvular structure by the inflated balloon.
[0136] The foldable part of the valve could be reinforced by
strengthening struts to prevent an eversion of the valve towards
the left ventricle during diastole.
[0137] Another shape of the valvular structure, as illustrated in
FIGS. 11a and 11b comprise four portions, alternatively a main
portion 23 and a more narrow portion 24. The main and the narrow
portions are facing each other. Each portion has an isosceles
trapezoidal shape. The main portions 23 are flexible but with some
slight rigidity and the more narrow portions 24 are compliant, more
supple and foldable. In this type of design, the two slightly rigid
main portions 23 maintain the valvular structure closed during
diastole by firmly applying on each other in their upper
extremities, thus forming a slot-like closure 25. This particular
embodiment needs less foldable tissue than in the previous
embodiments and the closure of the valvular structure at the time
of early diastole does not have any tendency to collapse towards
the aortic annulus.
[0138] Another design for the valvular structure is a combination
of a cylindrical shape followed by a truncated shape.
[0139] This type of valvular structure is longer that the
hyperboloidal type, for instance, 25 or 30 mm long, therefore
exceeding out of the upper part of the metallic frame, by 10 to 20
mm. The cylindrical part corresponds to the I0 metallic frame and
remains inside it. The truncated conic shape is the upper part of
the valvular structure, totally exceeding out of the upper
extremity of the metallic frame. An advantage of such a design is
that the balloon can be inflated only in the cylindrical part of
the valvular structure, therefore without risk of stretching the
truncated conical part of the upper diameter which is smaller than
that of the inflated balloon.
[0140] When the upper extremity of the cylindrical part has the
same size as the lower extremity, there is no difference during
balloon inflation in the degree of force exerted by the balloon on
the lower and on the upper extremity of the valvular structure.
Preferably, rectilinear reinforcing struts are used in this
embodiment, to strengthen the valve structure and aid in its
shutting without collapsing and inverting inside the left ventricle
through the aortic annulus under the force of the diastolic
pressure.
[0141] Two different processes for implanting a valve according to
the present invention are shown respectively in FIGS. 13a to 13l
with a unique balloon catheter, as illustrated in FIGS. 12a and 12b
and in FIGS. 15a to 15f, with a two-balloon catheter, as
illustrated in FIG. 14.
[0142] The IV positioning in the aortic orifice and its expansion
can be performed with the help of a unique substantially
cylindrical balloon catheter 26 in the so-called unique-balloon
catheterization technique.
[0143] Preparing for its introduction by transcutaneous route in
the femoral artery, the IV 13 is, as illustrated in the perspective
view of FIG. 10a in a compressed form crimpled on the balloon
catheter 26. A central sectional view of the mounted IV 13 on the
complete balloon catheter 26 is shown in FIG. 12b.
[0144] The shaft 27f of the balloon dilatation catheter 26 is as
small as possible, i.e., a 7F (2.2 mm) or a 6 F (1.9 mm) size. The
balloon 26 is mounted on the shaft 27 between two rings R.
Moreover, the shaft 27 comprises a lumen 28 (FIG. 12b) as large as
possible for inflation of the balloon 26 with diluted contrast to
allow simple and fast inflation and deflation. It has also another
lumen 29 able to accept a stiff guide wire 30, for example 0.036 to
0.038 inches (0.97 mm), to help position the implantable valve with
precision.
[0145] The balloon 26 has, for example, a 3 to 4 cm length in its
cylindrical part and the smallest possible size when completely
deflated so that it will be able to be placed inside the folded
valve having an outside diameter which ranges between about 4 and 5
mm. Therefore, the folded balloon preferably has at the most a
section diameter of about 2.5 to 3 mm.
[0146] The balloon is therefore made of a very thin plastic
material. It is inflated with saline containing a small amount of
contrast dye in such a way to remain very fluid and visible when
using X-ray.
[0147] However, the balloon 26 has to be sufficiently strong to
resist the high pressure that it has to withstand to be capable of
expanding the folded valvular structure 14 and the compressed frame
in the stenosed aortic orifice considering that, although
pre-dilated, the aortic orifice still exerts a quite strong
resistance to expansion because of the recoil phenomenon.
[0148] This procedure is shown in FIGS. 13a to 13e.
[0149] In contrast to the technique used when performing the usual
aortic dilatation (without valve implantation), i.e., inflating the
balloon maximally markedly above the nominal pressure, if possible,
up to the bursting point (which occurs always with a longitudinal
tear, without deleterious consequence, and with the advantage of
both exerting a maximal dilating force and restoring blood ejection
instantaneously), the balloon inflated for expansion of an
implantable valve should not burst in any case. Indeed, bursting of
the balloon would involve a risk of incomplete valve expansion and
wrong positioning. Therefore, the balloon should be very resistant
to a very high pressure inflation. Furthermore, the balloon is
inflated only up to the nominal pressure indicated by the maker and
the pressure is controlled during inflation by using a manometer.
Such relatively low pressure should be sufficient since prior to
positioning the IV, an efficacious dilatation of the stenosed
aortic valve according to the usual technique with a maximally
inflated balloon for example 20 mm or 25 mm in size in such a way
to soften the distorted valvular tissue and facilitate the
enlargement of the opening of the valve at time of IV implantation
is performed.
[0150] The implantation of the aortic valve 20 can be made in two
steps, as described as follows.
[0151] The first step, as shown in FIGS. 13a to 13f, consists in
introducing the shaft 27 and balloon catheter 26 along the guide
wire previously positioned in the ventricle 4 (FIGS. 13a-13b). The
dilatation of the stenosed aortic valve 1', 2' using a regular
balloon catheter, according to the commonly, performed procedure,
i.e., with the guide wire 30 introduced in the ventricle 4 (FIG.
13a) and with maximal inflation of the balloon 26 (FIGS. 13c to
13d) up to the bursting point. Dilatation is performed at least
with a balloon having about 20 mm diameter, but it can be performed
with a balloon having about 23 mm diameter so as to increase
maximally the aortic orifice opening before implantation of the
valve although the implantable valve is about 20 mm in diameter.
This preliminary dilatation of the aortic orifice helps in limiting
the force required to inflate the balloon used to expand the
implantable valve and position it in the aortic orifice, and also
in limiting the recoil of the aortic valve that occurs immediately
after balloon deflation. The balloon is deflated (FIG. 13a) and
pulled back on the wire guide 30 left inside the ventricle.
[0152] Owing to the marked recoil of the stenosed valve and also of
the strong aortic annulus, the 20 mm diameter valve is forcefully
maintained against the valvular remains at the level of the aortic
annulus. Preliminary dilatation has another advantage in that it
permits an easier expansion of the IV, having a lower pressure
balloon inflation which helps prevent damage of the valvular
structure of the IV. This also facilitates the accurate positioning
of the prosthetic valve.
[0153] The second step corresponds to the implantation of the valve
13 is shown in FIGS. 13g to 13l. The positioning of the IV needs to
be precise at a near 2 or 3 mm, since the coronary ostia 6 has to
remain absolutely free of any obstruction by the valve 13 (FIGS.
13k and 13l). As mentioned above, this is, for example, performed
with the help of the image of the sus-valvular angiogram in the
same projection fixed on an adjacent TV screen. The expansion and
the positioning of the valve prosthesis 13 is performed within a
few seconds (15 to 20 among at most) since during the maximal
balloon inflation (which has to be maintained only a very few
seconds, 3, 4,) the aortic orifice is obstructed by the inflated
balloon 31 and the cardiac output is zero (FIG. 13h). As for the
pre-dilatation act itself, the balloon 26 is immediately deflated
within less than 5 or 6 seconds (FIG. 13j) and, as soon as the
deflation has clearly begun, the closing and opening states of the
IV are active whereas the balloon is pulled back briskly in the
aorta (FIGS. 13j to 13l). In case the IV is not maximally expanded
by the first inflation, it is possible to replace the balloon
inside the IV and to reinflate it so as to reinforce the expansion
of the IV.
[0154] The IV 13 can also be used in aortic regurgitation. This
concerns more often younger patients rather than those with aortic
stenosis. The contraindication to surgical valve replacement is
often not due to the old age of the patients, but stems mainly from
particular cases where the general status of the patient is too
weak to allow surgery, or because of associated pathological
conditions. Apart from the fact that there is no need for a
preliminary dilatation, the procedure of the valve implantation
remains approximately the same. The balloon inflation inside the IV
is chosen accordingly, taking also into account the fact that it is
necessary to overdilate the aortic annulus to obtain a recoil
phenomenon of the annulus after balloon deflation to help maintain
the IV in position without any risk of displacement.
[0155] However, the size of the expanded implantable valve is
around 25 to 30 mm in diameter, or even bigger, because the aortic
annulus is usually enlarged. A preliminary measurement of the
annulus will have to be performed on the sus-valvular angiography
and by echocardiography to determine the optimal size to
choose.
[0156] The IV can be used in the mitral position, mainly in case of
mitral regurgitation, but also in case of mitral stenosis. Here
again, the IV 20 is only described when used only in cases of
contraindication to surgical valve repair or replacement. The
procedure is based on the same general principles though the route
for the valve positioning is different, using the transseptal
route, like the commonly performed mitral dilatation procedure in
mitral stenosis. The IV size is quite larger than for the aortic
localization (about 30 to 35 mm in diameter when expanded or
clearly above in case of a large mitral annulus, a frequent
occurrence in mitral insufficiency), to be capable of occupying the
mitral area. A preliminary measurement of the mitral annulus is
performed to determine the optimal implantable valve size to
choose. Since the introduction of the IV is performed through a
venous route, almost always through the femoral vein which is quite
large and distensable, the bigger the size of the IV in its
compressed position is not a drawback even if the diameter size is
about 6 or 7 mm. Moreover, the problem of protection of the
coronary ostia as encountered in the aortic position does not exist
here which therefore makes the procedure easier to be
performed.
[0157] Finally, the IV can be used to replace the tricuspid valve
in patients with a tricuspid insufficiency. This procedure is
simple to perform since the positioning of the IV is made by the
venous route, using the shortest way to place in the right position
at the level of the tricuspid orifice practically without any
danger from clot migration during the procedure. A large
implantable valve is used, with a diameter of about 40 mm or even
larger because the tricuspid annulus is often markedly dilated in
tricuspid insufficiency. Here also, as in the mitral position, the
compressed IV and the catheter used can be without inconvenience,
quite larger than that for the aortic position because of the
venous route used.
[0158] Furthermore, it has to be noted that the IV can be used also
as a first step in the treatment of patients who have
contraindication to surgery, when they are examined for the first
time, but who could improve later on after correction of the
initial hemodynamic failure. The IV procedure can be used as a
bridge towards surgery for patients in a weak general condition
which are expected to improve within the following weeks or months
after the IV procedure in such a way that they can be treated by
open heart surgery later on. In the same vein, the IV procedure can
be used as a bridge towards surgical valve replacement or repair in
patients with a profoundly altered cardiac function that can
improve secondarily owing to the hemodynamic improvement resulting
from the correction of the initial valvular disease by the IV
implantation.
[0159] Another technique for implantation of an aortic valve by
transcutaneous catheterization uses a two-balloon catheter.
[0160] An example of this technique using the two parts IV with a
two-balloon catheter 40 is shown in FIG. 14.
[0161] Two-balloons 26 and 26' are fixed on a unique catheter shaft
27, said balloons being separated by a few millimeters. The two
balloons are preferably short, i.e., about 2 to 2.5 cm long in
their cylindrical part. The first balloon 26 to be used, carries a
first frame 10 aimed at scaffolding the stenosed aortic orifice
after initial dilatation. This first balloon 26 is positioned on
the aorta side, above the second balloon 26' which is positioned on
the left ventricle side. The second balloon 26' carries the
expandable valve 13 which is of the type described above made of a
second frame 10' and a valvular structure 14 attached to said frame
10'. The difference is that the second frame does not need to be as
strong as the first frame and is easier to expand with low balloon
pressure inflation which does not risk damaging the valvular
structure 14.
[0162] This enlarges the choice for making a valvular structure
without having to face two contradictory conditions: [0163] having
a soft and mobile valvular structure 14 capable of opening and
closing freely in the blood stream without risk of being damaged by
a balloon inflation; and [0164] needing a reinforced frame strong
enough to be capable of resisting without any damage, a strong
pressure inflation of the expanding balloon.
[0165] The shaft 27 of this successive two-balloon catheter 40
comprises two lumens for successive and separate inflation of each
balloon. Indeed, an additional lumen capable of allowing a fast
inflation occupies space in the shaft and therefore an enlargement
of the shaft is necessary. However, this enlargement of the shaft
stops at the level of the first balloon 26 since, further to said
first balloon, only one lumen is necessary to inflate the second
balloon 2C, at the level of the IV which is the biggest part of the
device.
[0166] Another advantage of this two part IV with a two-balloon
catheter is that each set of implantable valve and balloon has a
smaller external diameter since each element to be expanded,
considered separately, is smaller than in combination. This allows
obtaining more easily a final device with an external diameter
14F.
[0167] The first balloon is sufficiently strong to avoid bursting
even at a very high pressure inflation. This first balloon is
mounted in the frame in its deflated position, prior to its
introduction by the strong frame which is aimed to scaffold the
dilated stenosed aortic valve. The size and shape of said frame is
comparable to what has been described previously but said frame is
calculated (in particular the material, the number and diameter of
its bars are chosen by the person skilled in the art) to make sure
that it will resist the recoil of the dilated valve and that it
will be securely embedded in the remains of the native aortic
valve.
[0168] The second balloon does not need to be as strong as the
first one and, therefore, can be thinner, occupying less space and
being easier to expand with a lower pressure for balloon inflation.
This second balloon 26' is mounted in the valve itself which, as in
the preceding description, comprises a frame to support the
valvular structure and said valvular structure.
[0169] Also, the second frame 10' does not need to be as strong as
the first one. This frame can be slightly shorter, 10 mm instead of
12 mm, and its bars can be thinner. This frame can have an external
surface which is a bit rough to allow better fixation on the first
frame when expanded. The bars may also have some hooks to fasten to
the first frame.
[0170] The valvular structure is attached on said second frame and
expanded by relatively low pressure in the second balloon called
hereafter the IV balloon. It does not need to be as strong as in
the preceding case (IV in one part and unique balloon catheter
technique) and, therefore, it occupies less space and has less risk
to be damaged at the time of expansion.
[0171] This technique is shown in FIGS. 15a to 15f.
[0172] One of the problems relevant to the IV implantation
procedure as described above, with the IV in one part, is the
expansion at the same time by the same balloon inflation of both
the frame and the valvular structure. Indeed, the frame is a solid
element and the valvular structure is a relative weak one that
could be damaged when squeezed by the inflated balloon.
[0173] Therefore, the valve implantation can be performed in two
immediately successive steps. The first step (FIGS. 15a-15b)
corresponds to the expansion and the positioning of the first frame
with the first balloon 26 wherein inflation is performed at a high
pressure. The second step (FIGS. 15d-15e) corresponds to the
expansion and the positioning of the valvular structure 14 inside
the frame 10' using the second balloon 2C. This second step follows
the first one within a few seconds because, in the time interval
between the two steps, there is a total aortic regurgitation
towards the left ventricle which is an hemodynamic condition that
cannot be maintained for more than a few heart beats, i.e., a few
seconds, without inducing a massive pulmonary edema and a drop to
zero of the cardiac output.
[0174] In another embodiment, the first frame to be introduced
comprises the valvular structure and the second frame being
stronger than the first one to scaffold the previously deleted
stenosed aortic valve.
[0175] The advantage of this two step procedure would be to allow
expansion and positioning of the frame part 10' of the R 13 using
strong pressure inflation of the balloon 26' without the risk of
damaging the valvular structure 14 which, for its own expansion,
would need only light pressure inflation.
[0176] The method is schematically detailed in FIGS. 15a to 15f. A
previous dilatation of the stenosed aortic valve is performed as an
initial step of the procedure to prepare the distorted valve to
facilitate the following steps: [0177] 1/ positioning the double
balloon catheter 40 with the first balloon 26 with the frame at the
level of the aortic annulus 2a, the second IV balloon 26' being
inside the left ventricle beyond the aortic annulus 2a (FIG. 15a);
[0178] 2/ compression of the stenosed aortic valve 1', 2' with the
first balloon 26 having a 20 mm, preferably with a 23 mm diameter,
the balloon being inflated maximally up to the bursting point, to
prepare the IV insertion (FIG. 15b). Inflation lasts a few seconds
(preferably 10 seconds at most) with powerful pressure being used
to expand the frame and forcefully embed said frame in the remains
of the dilated valve; [0179] 3/ an immediate speedy deflation of
said first balloon 26 follows (FIG. 15c); as soon as the balloon 26
is beginning to clearly deflate, the first frame 10 remaining
attached to the stenosed valve 1', 2', the catheter is withdrawn to
position the IV balloon 26' inside the previously expanded frame 26
(FIG. 15c in which the frame 10' is partially drawn for clarity
purpose); and [0180] 4/ immediately after being well positioned,
the IV balloon 26' is promptly inflated, to expand the IV 13 (FIG.
15c); and / when the IV 13 is blocked inside the first frame 10,
the IV balloon 26' is deflated (FIG. 18f).
[0181] Finally, the whole device has to be withdrawn to allow
homeostasis of the femoral artery puncture hole.
[0182] The total duration of the successive steps, particularly the
time during which the balloons are inflated, and the time during
which the frame is expanded whereas the valve has not yet been
positioned and expanded, is about 20 to 30 seconds. This is
feasible if the balloons are inflated and deflated within very a
few seconds, 6 to 8, for instance. This is permitted if the lumen
of the shaft can be sufficiently large, taking into account the
inescapable small diameter size of the shaft. This can also be
facilitated by a device producing instantaneously a strong
inflation or deflation pressure.
* * * * *