U.S. patent application number 12/024701 was filed with the patent office on 2009-04-16 for gene methylation in lung cancer diagnosis.
This patent application is currently assigned to ORION GENOMICS LLC. Invention is credited to MUHAMMAD A. BUDIMAN, JEFFREY A. JEDDELOH, YULIA KORSHUNOVA, REBECCA MALONEY.
Application Number | 20090098543 12/024701 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39682307 |
Filed Date | 2009-04-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20090098543 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
BUDIMAN; MUHAMMAD A. ; et
al. |
April 16, 2009 |
GENE METHYLATION IN LUNG CANCER DIAGNOSIS
Abstract
The present invention provides DNA biomarker sequences that are
differentially methylated in samples from normal individuals and
individuals with lung cancer. The invention further provides
methods of identifying differentially methylated DNA biomarker
sequences and their use the detection and diagnosis of lung
cancer.
Inventors: |
BUDIMAN; MUHAMMAD A.;
(MANCHESTER, MO) ; JEDDELOH; JEFFREY A.;
(OAKVILLE, MO) ; MALONEY; REBECCA; (CENTREVILLE,
VA) ; KORSHUNOVA; YULIA; (CLAYTON, MO) |
Correspondence
Address: |
TOWNSEND AND TOWNSEND AND CREW, LLP
TWO EMBARCADERO CENTER, EIGHTH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO
CA
94111-3834
US
|
Assignee: |
ORION GENOMICS LLC
ST. LOUIS
MO
|
Family ID: |
39682307 |
Appl. No.: |
12/024701 |
Filed: |
February 1, 2008 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
61021840 |
Jan 17, 2008 |
|
|
|
60970322 |
Sep 6, 2007 |
|
|
|
60899218 |
Feb 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
60968690 |
Aug 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
60899137 |
Feb 2, 2007 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
435/6.12 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C12Q 2600/154 20130101;
C12Q 1/6886 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
435/6 |
International
Class: |
C12Q 1/68 20060101
C12Q001/68 |
Claims
1. A method for determining the presence or absence of lung cancer
in an individual, the method comprising: a) determining the
methylation status of at least one cytosine within a DNA region in
a sample from the individual where the DNA region is at least 90%
identical to a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ
ID NO: 436, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399,
400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412,
413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425,
426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 437, 438, 439,
440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452,
453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465,
466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478,
479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; b) comparing the methylation
status of the at least one cytosine to a threshold value for the at
least one cytosine, wherein the threshold value distinguishes
between individuals with and without lung cancer, wherein the
comparison of the methylation status to the threshold value is
predictive of the presence or absence of lung cancer in the
individual.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining step comprises
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine in the
DNA region corresponding to a nucleotide in a biomarker, wherein
the biomarker is at least 90% identical to a sequence selected from
the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 297,
298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309, 310,
311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322, 323,
324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336,
337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348, 349,
350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361, 362,
363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375,
376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387, and
388.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the determining step comprises
determining the methylation status of the DNA region corresponding
to the biomarker.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the sample is from blood serum,
blood plasma, or a biopsy.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein the methylation status of at
least one biomarker from the list is compared to the methylation
value of a control locus.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the control locus is an
endogenous control.
7. The method of claim 5, wherein the control locus is an exogenous
control.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining step comprises
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine from at
least two DNA regions.
9. A computer-implemented method for determining the presence or
absence of lung cancer in an individual, the method comprising:
receiving, at a host computer, a methylation value representing the
methylation status of at least one cytosine within a DNA region in
a sample from the individual where the DNA region is at least 90%
identical to a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ
ID NO: 436, 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399,
400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412,
413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425,
426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 437, 438, 439,
440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452,
453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465,
466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478,
479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; and comparing, in the host
computer, the methylation value to a threshold value, wherein the
threshold value distinguishes between individuals with and without
lung cancer, wherein the comparison of the methylation value to the
threshold value is predictive of the presence or absence of lung
cancer in the individual.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the receiving step comprises
receiving at least two methylation values, the two methylation
values representing the methylation status of at least one cytosine
biomarkers from two different DNA regions; and the comparing step
comprises comparing the methylation values to one or more threshold
value(s) wherein the threshold value distinguishes between
individuals with and without lung cancer, wherein the comparison of
the methylation value to the threshold value is predictive of the
presence or absence of lung cancer in the individual.
11. A computer program product for determining the presence or
absence of lung cancer in an individual, the computer readable
product comprising: a computer readable medium encoded with program
code, the program code including: program code for receiving a
methylation value representing the methylation status of at least
one cytosine within a DNA region in a sample from the individual
where the DNA region is at least 90% identical to a sequence
selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 436, 389, 390,
391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403,
404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416,
417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429,
430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443,
444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456,
457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469,
470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482,
483, 484, and 485; and program code for comparing the methylation
value to a threshold value, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without lung cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation value to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of lung cancer in
the individual.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS
[0001] The present patent application claims benefit of priority to
U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/899,218, filed Feb. 2,
2007; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/970,322, filed
Sep. 6, 2007; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/021,840,
filed Jan. 17, 2008; U.S. Provisional Patent Application No.
60/899,137, filed Feb. 2, 2007; and U.S. Provisional Patent
Application No. 60/968,690, filed Aug. 29, 2007, each of which are
incorporated by reference.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Human cancer cells typically contain somatically altered
genomes, characterized by mutation, amplification, or deletion of
critical genes. In addition, the DNA template from human cancer
cells often displays somatic changes in DNA methylation. See, e.g.,
E. R. Fearon, et al, Cell 61:759 (1990); P. A. Jones, et al.,
Cancer Res. 46:461 (1986); R. Holliday, Science 238:163 (1987); A.
De Bustros, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5693 (1988); P.
A. Jones, et al., Adv. Cancer Res. 54:1 (1990); S. B. Baylin, et
al., Cancer Cells 3:383 (1991); M. Makos, et al., Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. USA 89:1929 (1992); N. Ohtani-Fujita, et al., Oncogene 8:1063
(1993).
[0003] DNA methylases transfer methyl groups from the universal
methyl donor S-adenosyl methionine to specific sites on the DNA.
Several biological functions have been attributed to the methylated
bases in DNA. The most established biological function is the
protection of the DNA from digestion by cognate restriction
enzymes. This restriction modification phenomenon has, so far, been
observed only in bacteria.
[0004] Mammalian cells, however, possess different methylases that
exclusively methylate cytosine residues on the DNA that are 5'
neighbors of guanine (CpG). This methylation has been shown by
several lines of evidence to play a role in gene activity, cell
differentiation, tumorigenesis, X-chromosome inactivation, genomic
imprinting and other major biological processes (Razin, A., H., and
Riggs, R. D. eds. in DNA Methylation Biochemistry and Biological
Significance, Springer-Verlag, N.Y., 1984).
[0005] In eukaryotic cells, methylation of cytosine residues that
are immediately 5' to a guanosine, occurs predominantly in CpG poor
loci (Bird, A., Nature 321:209 (1986)). In contrast, discrete
regions of CG dinucleotides called CpG islands (CGi) remain
unmethylated in normal cells, except during X-chromosome
inactivation and parental specific imprinting (Li, et al., Nature
366:362 (1993)) where methylation of 5' regulatory regions can lead
to transcriptional repression. For example, de novo methylation of
the Rb gene has been demonstrated in a small fraction of
retinoblastomas (Sakai, et al., Am. J. Hum. Genet., 48:880 (1991)),
and a more detailed analysis of the VHL gene showed aberrant
methylation in a subset of sporadic renal cell carcinomas (Herman,
et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 91:9700 (1994)). Expression
of a tumor suppressor gene can also be abolished by de novo DNA
methylation of a normally unmethylated 5' CpG island. See, e.g.,
Issa, et al., Nature Genet. 7:536 (1994); Merlo, et al., Nature
Med. 1:686 (1995); Herman, et al., Cancer Res., 56:722 (1996);
Graff, et al., Cancer Res., 55:5195 (1995); Herman, et al., Cancer
Res. 55:4525 (1995).
[0006] Identification of the earliest genetic and epigenetic
changes in tumorigenesis is a major focus in molecular cancer
research. Diagnostic approaches based on identification of these
changes can allow implementation of early detection strategies,
tumor staging and novel therapeutic approaches targeting these
early changes, leading to more effective cancer treatment. The
present invention addresses these and other problems.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] The present invention provides methods for determining the
methylation status of an individual. In one aspect, the methods
comprise: [0008] obtaining a biological sample from an individual;
and [0009] determining the methylation status of at least one
cytosine within a DNA region in a sample from an individual where
the DNA region is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%,
98%, or 99% identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from
the group consisting of SEQ ID NO.: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394,
395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407,
408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420,
421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433,
434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446,
447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459,
460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472,
473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and
485.
[0010] In a further aspect, the methods comprise determining the
presence or absence of cancer, including but not limited to,
bladder, breast, cervical, colon, endometrial, esophageal, head and
neck, liver, lung, melanoma, ovarian, prostate, renal, and thyroid
cancer, in an individual.
[0011] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0012] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0013]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without cancer, wherein
the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold value is
predictive of the presence or absence of cancer in the
individual.
[0014] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0015] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0016]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without bladder cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of bladder cancer in
the individual.
[0017] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0018] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0019]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without breast cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of breast cancer in
the individual.
[0020] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0021] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0022]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without cervical cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of cervical cancer
in the individual.
[0023] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0024] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0025]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without colon cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of colon cancer in
the individual.
[0026] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0027] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0028]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without endometrial
cancer, wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the
threshold value is predictive of the presence or absence of
endometrial cancer in the individual.
[0029] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0030] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0031]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without esophageal
cancer, wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the
threshold value is predictive of the presence or absence of
esophageal cancer in the individual.
[0032] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0033] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0034]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without head and neck
cancer, wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the
threshold value is predictive of the presence or absence of head
and neck cancer in the individual.
[0035] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0036] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0037]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without liver cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of liver cancer in
the individual.
[0038] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0039] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0040]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without lung cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of lung cancer in
the individual.
[0041] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0042] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0043]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without melanoma,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of melanoma in the
individual.
[0044] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0045] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0046]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without ovarian cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of ovarian cancer in
the individual.
[0047] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0048] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0049]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without prostate cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of prostate cancer
in the individual.
[0050] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0051] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0052]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without renal cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of renal cancer in
the individual.
[0053] In some embodiments, the methods comprise: [0054] a)
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; [0055]
b) comparing the methylation status of the at least one cytosine to
a threshold value for the biomarker, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without thyroid cancer,
wherein the comparison of the methylation status to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of thyroid cancer in
the individual.
[0056] With regard to the embodiments, in some embodiments, the
determining step comprises determining the methylation status of at
least one cytosine in the DNA region corresponding to a nucleotide
in a biomarker, wherein the biomarker is at least 90%, 91%, 92%,
93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical to, or comprises, a
sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 292, 293,
294, 295, 296, 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306,
307, 308, 309, 310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319,
320, 321, 322, 323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332,
333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345,
346, 347, 348, 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358,
359, 360, 361, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371,
372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384,
385, 386, 387, and 388.
[0057] In some embodiments, the determining step comprises
determining the methylation status of the DNA region corresponding
to a biomarker.
[0058] The sample can be from any body fluid. In some embodiments,
the sample is selected from blood serum, blood plasma, fine needle
aspirate of the breast, biopsy of the breast, ductal fluid, ductal
lavage, feces, urine, sputum, saliva, semen, lavages, or tissue
biopsy, such as biopsy of the lung, bronchial lavage or bronchial
brushings in the case of lung cancer. In some embodiments, the
sample is from a tumor or polyp. In some embodiments, the sample is
a biopsy from lung, kidney, liver, ovarian, head, neck, thyroid,
bladder, cervical, colon, endometrial, esophageal, prostate or skin
tissue. In some embodiments, the sample is from cell scrapes,
washings, or resected tissues.
[0059] In some embodiments, the methylation status of at least one
cytosine is compared to the methylation status of a control locus.
In some embodiments, the control locus is an endogenous control. In
some embodiments, the control locus is an exogenous control.
[0060] In some embodiments, the determining step comprises
determining the methylation status of at least one cytosine in at
least two of the DNA regions.
[0061] In a further aspect, the invention provides computer
implemented methods for determining the presence or absence of
cancer (including but not limited to cancers of the bladder,
breast, cervix, colon, endometrium, esophagus, head and neck,
liver, lung(s), ovaries, prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and
melanoma) in an individual. In some embodiments, the methods
comprise: [0062] receiving, at a host computer, a methylation value
representing the methylation status of at least one cytosine within
a DNA region in a sample from the individual where the DNA region
is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99%
identical to, or comprises, a sequence is selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; and
[0063] comparing, in the host computer, the methylation value to a
threshold value, wherein the threshold value distinguishes between
individuals with and without cancer (including but not limited to
cancers of the bladder, breast, cervix, colon, endometrium,
esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung(s), ovaries, prostate,
rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma), wherein the comparison of the
methylation value to the threshold value is predictive of the
presence or absence of cancer (including but not limited to cancers
of the bladder, breast, cervix, colon, endometrium, esophagus, head
and neck, liver, lung(s), ovaries, prostate, rectum, and thyroid,
and melanoma) in the individual.
[0064] In some embodiments, the receiving step comprises receiving
at least two methylation values, the two methylation values
representing the methylation status of at least one cytosine
biomarkers from two different DNA regions; and [0065] the comparing
step comprises comparing the methylation values to one or more
threshold value(s) wherein the threshold value distinguishes
between individuals with and without cancer (including but not
limited to cancers of the bladder, breast, cervix, colon,
endometrium, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung(s), ovaries,
prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma), wherein the
comparison of the methylation value to the threshold value is
predictive of the presence or absence of cancer (including but not
limited to cancers of the bladder, breast, cervix, colon,
endometrium, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung(s), ovaries,
prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma) in the individual.
[0066] In another aspect, the invention provides computer program
products for determining the presence or absence of cancer
(including but not limited to cancers of the bladder, breast,
cervix, colon, endometrium, esophagus, head and neck, liver,
lung(s), ovaries, prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma) in
an individual. In some embodiments, the computer readable products
comprise: [0067] a computer readable medium encoded with program
code, the program code including: [0068] program code for receiving
a methylation value representing the methylation status of at least
one cytosine within a DNA region in a sample from the individual
where the DNA region is at least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%,
97%, 98%, or 99% identical to, or comprises, a sequence selected
from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393,
394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406,
407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419,
420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432,
433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445,
446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458,
459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471,
472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484,
and 485; and [0069] program code for comparing the methylation
value to a threshold value, wherein the threshold value
distinguishes between individuals with and without cancer
(including but not limited to cancers of the bladder, breast,
cervix, colon, endometrium, esophagus, head and neck, liver,
lung(s), ovaries, prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma),
wherein the comparison of the methylation value to the threshold
value is predictive of the presence or absence of cancer (including
but not limited to cancers of the bladder, breast, cervix, colon,
endometrium, esophagus, head and neck, liver, lung(s), ovaries,
prostate, rectum, and thyroid, and melanoma) in the individual.
[0070] In a further aspect, the invention provides kits for
determining the methylation status of at least one biomarker. In
some embodiments, the kits comprise: [0071] a pair of
polynucleotides capable of specifically amplifying at least a
portion of a DNA region where the DNA region is selected from the
group consisting of SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395,
396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408,
409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421,
422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434,
435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447,
448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460,
461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473,
474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485; and
[0072] a methylation-dependent or methylation sensitive restriction
enzyme and/or sodium bisulfite.
[0073] In some embodiments, the pair of polynucleotides are capable
of specifically amplifying a biomarker selected from the group
consisting of one or more of SEQ ID NOs: 292, 293, 294, 295, 296,
297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, 306, 307, 308, 309,
310, 311, 312, 313, 314, 315, 316, 317, 318, 319, 320, 321, 322,
323, 324, 325, 326, 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335,
336, 337, 338, 339, 340, 341, 342, 343, 344, 345, 346, 347, 348,
349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356, 357, 358, 359, 360, 361,
362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 367, 368, 369, 370, 371, 372, 373, 374,
375, 376, 377, 378, 379, 380, 381, 382, 383, 384, 385, 386, 387,
and 388.
[0074] In some embodiments, the kits comprise at least two pairs of
polynucleotides, wherein each pair is capable of specifically
amplifying at least a portion of a different DNA region.
[0075] In some embodiments, the kits further comprise a detectably
labeled polynucleotide probe that specifically detects the
amplified biomarker in a real time amplification reaction.
[0076] In a further aspect, the invention provides kits for
determining the methylation status of at least one biomarker. In
some embodiments, the kits comprise: [0077] sodium bisulfite and
polynucleotides to quantify the presence of the converted
methylated and or the converted unmethylated sequence of at least
one cytosine from a DNA region that is selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
[0078] In a further aspect, the invention provides kits for
determining the methylation status of at least one biomarker. In
some embodiments, the kits comprise: [0079] sodium bisulfite,
primers and adapters for whole genome amplification, and
polynucleotides to quantify the presence of the converted
methylated and or the converted unmethylated sequence of at least
one cytosine from a DNA region that is selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
[0080] In another aspect, the methods provide kits for determining
the methylation status of at least one biomarker. In some
embodiments, the kits comprise: [0081] a methylation sensing
restriction enzymes, primers and adapters for whole genome
amplification, and polynucleotides to quantify the number of copies
of at least a portion of a DNA region where the DNA region is at
least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical
to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399,
400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412,
413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425,
426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438,
439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451,
452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464,
465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477,
478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
[0082] In a further aspect, the invention provides kits for
determining the methylation status of at least one biomarker. In
some embodiments, the kits comprise: [0083] a methylation sensing
binding moiety and polynucleotides to quantify the number of copies
of at least a portion of a DNA region where the DNA region is at
least 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, or 99% identical
to, or comprises, a sequence selected from the group consisting of
SEQ ID NO: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399,
400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412,
413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425,
426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438,
439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451,
452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464,
465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477,
478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
DEFINITIONS
[0084] "Methylation" refers to cytosine methylation at positions C5
or N4 of cytosine, the N6 position of adenine or other types of
nucleic acid methylation. In vitro amplified DNA is unmethylated
because in vitro DNA amplification methods do not retain the
methylation pattern of the amplification template. However,
"unmethylated DNA" or "methylated DNA" can also refer to amplified
DNA whose original template was methylated or methylated,
respectively.
[0085] A "methylation profile" refers to a set of data representing
the methylation states of one or more loci within a molecule of DNA
from e.g., the genome of an individual or cells or tissues from an
individual. The profile can indicate the methylation state of every
base in an individual, can comprise information regarding a subset
of the base pairs (e.g., the methylation state of specific
restriction enzyme recognition sequence) in a genome, or can
comprise information regarding regional methylation density of each
locus.
[0086] "Methylation status" refers to the presence, absence and/or
quantity of methylation at a particular nucleotide, or nucleotides
within a portion of DNA. The methylation status of a particular DNA
sequence (e.g., a DNA biomarker or DNA region as described herein)
can indicate the methylation state of every base in the sequence or
can indicate the methylation state of a subset of the base pairs
(e.g., of cytosines or the methylation state of one or more
specific restriction enzyme recognition sequences) within the
sequence, or can indicate information regarding regional
methylation density within the sequence without providing precise
information of where in the sequence the methylation occurs. The
methylation status can optionally be represented or indicated by a
"methylation value." A methylation value can be generated, for
example, by quantifying the amount of intact DNA present following
restriction digestion with a methylation dependent restriction
enzyme. In this example, if a particular sequence in the DNA is
quantified using quantitative PCR, an amount of template DNA
approximately equal to a mock treated control indicates the
sequence is not highly methylated whereas an amount of template
substantially less than occurs in the mock treated sample indicates
the presence of methylated DNA at the sequence. Accordingly, a
value, i.e., a methylation value, for example from the above
described example, represents the methylation status and can thus
be used as a quantitative indicator of methylation status. This is
of particular use when it is desirable to compare the methylation
status of a sequence in a sample to a threshold value.
[0087] A "methylation-dependent restriction enzyme" refers to a
restriction enzyme that cleaves or digests DNA at or in proximity
to a methylated recognition sequence, but does not cleave DNA at or
near the same sequence when the recognition sequence is not
methylated. Methylation-dependent restriction enzymes include those
that cut at a methylated recognition sequence (e.g., DpnI) and
enzymes that cut at a sequence near but not at the recognition
sequence (e.g., McrBC). For example, McrBC's recognition sequence
is 5' RmC (N40-3000) RmC 3' where "R" is a purine and "mC" is a
methylated cytosine and "N40-3000" indicates the distance between
the two RmC half sites for which a restriction event has been
observed. McrBC generally cuts close to one half-site or the other,
but cleavage positions are typically distributed over several base
pairs, approximately 30 base pairs from the methylated base. McrBC
sometimes cuts 3' of both half sites, sometimes 5' of both half
sites, and sometimes between the two sites. Exemplary
methylation-dependent restriction enzymes include, e.g., McrBC
(see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,405,760), McrA, MrrA, BisI, GlaI and
DpnI. One of skill in the art will appreciate that any
methylation-dependent restriction enzyme, including homologs and
orthologs of the restriction enzymes described herein, is also
suitable for use in the present invention.
[0088] A "methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme" refers to a
restriction enzyme that cleaves DNA at or in proximity to an
unmethylated recognition sequence but does not cleave at or in
proximity to the same sequence when the recognition sequence is
methylated. Exemplary methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes are
described in, e.g., McClelland et al., Nucleic Acids Res.
22(17):3640-59 (1994) and http://rebase.neb.com. Suitable
methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes that do not cleave DNA at
or near their recognition sequence when a cytosine within the
recognition sequence is methylated at position C.sup.5 include,
e.g., Aat II, Aci I, Acl I, Age I, Alu I, Asc I, Ase I, AsiS I, Bbe
I, BsaA I, BsaH I, BsiE I, BsiW I, BsrF I, BssH II, BssK I, BstB I,
BstN I, BstU I, Cla I, Eae L, Eag L, Fau I, Fse I, Hha I, HinP1 I,
HinC II, Hpa II, Hpy99 I, HpyCH4 IV, Kas I, Mbo I, Mlu I, MapAl I,
Msp I, Nae I, Nar I, Not I, Pml I, Pst I, Pvu I, Rsr II, Sac II,
Sap I, Sau3A I, Sfl I, Sfo I, SgrA I, Sma I, SnaB I, Tsc I, Xma I,
and Zra I. Suitable methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes that
do not cleave DNA at or near their recognition sequence when an
adenosine within the recognition sequence is methylated at position
N.sup.6 include, e.g., Mbo I. One of skill in the art will
appreciate that any methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme,
including homologs and orthologs of the restriction enzymes
described herein, is also suitable for use in the present
invention. One of skill in the art will further appreciate that a
methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme that fails to cut in the
presence of methylation of a cytosine at or near its recognition
sequence may be insensitive to the presence of methylation of an
adenosine at or near its recognition sequence. Likewise, a
methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme that fails to cut in the
presence of methylation of an adenosine at or near its recognition
sequence may be insensitive to the presence of methylation of a
cytosine at or near its recognition sequence. For example, Sau3AI
is sensitive (i.e., fails to cut) to the presence of a methylated
cytosine at or near its recognition sequence, but is insensitive
(i.e., cuts) to the presence of a methylated adenosine at or near
its recognition sequence. One of skill in the art will also
appreciate that some methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes are
blocked by methylation of bases on one or both strands of DNA
encompassing of their recognition sequence, while other
methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes are blocked only by
methylation on both strands, but can cut if a recognition site is
hemi-methylated.
[0089] A "threshold value that distinguishes between individuals
with and without" a particular disease refers to a value or range
of values of a particular measurement that can be used to
distinguish between samples from individuals with the disease and
samples without the disease. Ideally, there is a threshold value or
values that absolutely distinguishes between the two groups (i.e.,
values from the diseased group are always on one side (e.g.,
higher) of the threshold value and values from the healthy,
non-diseased group are on the other side (e.g., lower) of the
threshold value). However, in many instances, threshold values do
not absolutely distinguish between diseased and non-diseased
samples (for example, when there is some overlap of values
generated from diseased and non-diseased samples).
[0090] The phrase "corresponding to a nucleotide in a biomarker"
refers to a nucleotide in a DNA region that aligns with the same
nucleotide (e.g. a cytosine) in a biomarker sequence. Generally, as
described herein, biomarker sequences are subsequences of (i.e.,
have 100% identity with) the DNA regions. Sequence comparisons can
be performed using any BLAST including BLAST 2.2 algorithm with
default parameters, described in Altschul et al., Nuc. Acids Res.
25:3389 3402 (1977) and Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403 410
(1990), respectively.
[0091] "Sensitivity" of a given biomarker refers to the percentage
of tumor samples that report a DNA methylation value above a
threshold value that distinguishes between tumor and non-tumor
samples. The percentage is calculated as follows:
Sensitivity = [ ( the number of tumor samples above the threshold )
( the total number of tumor samples tested ) ] .times. 100
##EQU00001##
The equation may also be stated as follows:
Sensitivity = [ ( the number of true positive samples ) ( the
number of true positive samples ) + ( the number of false negative
samples ) ] .times. 100 ##EQU00002##
where true positive is defined as a histology-confirmed tumor
sample that reports a DNA methylation value above the threshold
value (i.e. the range associated with disease), and false negative
is defined as a histology-confirmed tumor sample that reports a DNA
methylation value below the threshold value (i.e. the range
associated with no disease). The value of sensitivity, therefore,
reflects the probability that a DNA methylation measurement for a
given biomarker obtained from a known diseased sample will be in
the range of disease-associated measurements. As defined here, the
clinical relevance of the calculated sensitivity value represents
an estimation of the probability that a given biomarker would
detect the presence of a clinical condition when applied to a
patient with that condition.
[0092] "Specificity" of a given biomarker refers to the percentage
of non-tumor samples that report a DNA methylation value below a
threshold value that distinguishes between tumor and non-tumor
samples. The percentage is calculated as follows:
Specificity = [ ( the number of non - tumor samples below the
threshold ) ( the total number of non - tumor samples tested ) ]
.times. 100 ##EQU00003##
The equation may also be stated as follows:
Specificity = [ ( the number of true negative samples ) ( the
number of true negative samples ) + ( the number of false positive
samples ) ] .times. 100 ##EQU00004##
where true negative is defined as a histology-confirmed non-tumor
sample that reports a DNA methylation value below the threshold
value (i.e. the range associated with no disease), and false
positive is defined as a histology-confirmed non-tumor sample that
reports DNA methylation value above the threshold value (i.e. the
range associated with disease). The value of specificity,
therefore, reflects the probability that a DNA methylation
measurement for a given biomarker obtained from a known
non-diseased sample will be in the range of non-disease associated
measurements. As defined here, the clinical relevance of the
calculated specificity value represents an estimation of the
probability that a given biomarker would detect the absence of a
clinical condition when applied to a patient without that
condition.
[0093] Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available
through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This
algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs
(HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query
sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued
threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a
database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score
threshold (Altschul et al., supra). These initial neighborhood word
hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs
containing them. The word hits are extended in both directions
along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score
can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for
nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of
matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for
mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a
scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension
of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative
alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum
achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to
the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue
alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST
algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and
speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide
sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation
(E) of 10, M=5, N=-4 and a comparison of both strands. For amino
acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength of
3, and expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see
Henikoff & Henikoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915
(1989)) alignments (B) of 50, expectation (E) of 10, M=5, N=-4, and
a comparison of both strands.
[0094] As used herein, the terms "nucleic acid," "polynucleotide"
and "oligonucleotide" refer to nucleic acid regions, nucleic acid
segments, primers, probes, amplicons and oligomer fragments. The
terms are not limited by length and are generic to linear polymers
of polydeoxyribonucleotides (containing 2-deoxy-D-ribose),
polyribonucleotides (containing D-ribose), and any other
N-glycoside of a purine or pyrimidine base, or modified purine or
pyrimidine bases. These terms include double- and single-stranded
DNA, as well as double- and single-stranded RNA.
[0095] A nucleic acid, polynucleotide or oligonucleotide can
comprise, for example, phosphodiester linkages or modified linkages
including, but not limited to phosphotriester, phosphoramidate,
siloxane, carbonate, carboxymethylester, acetamidate, carbamate,
thioether, bridged phosphoramidate, bridged methylene phosphonate,
phosphorothioate, methylphosphonate, phosphorodithioate, bridged
phosphorothioate or sulfone linkages, and combinations of such
linkages.
[0096] A nucleic acid, polynucleotide or oligonucleotide can
comprise the five biologically occurring bases (adenine, guanine,
thymine, cytosine and uracil) and/or bases other than the five
biologically occurring bases. For example, a polynucleotide of the
invention can contain one or more modified, non-standard, or
derivatized base moieties, including, but not limited to,
N.sup.6-methyl-adenine, N.sup.6-tert-butyl-benzyl-adenine,
imidazole, substituted imidazoles, 5-fluorouracil, 5-bromouracil,
5-chlorouracil, 5-iodouracil, hypoxanthine, xanthine,
4-acetylcytosine, 5-(carboxyhydroxymethyl)uracil,
5-carboxymethylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine,
5-carboxymethylaminomethyluracil, dihydrouracil,
beta-D-galactosylqueosine, inosine, N.sup.6-isopentenyladenine,
1-methylguanine, 1-methylinosine, 2,2-dimethylguanine,
2-methyladenine, 2-methylguanine, 3-methylcytosine,
5-methylcytosine, N.sup.6-methyladenine, 7-methylguanine,
5-methylaminomethyluracil, 5-methoxyaminomethyl-2-thiouracil,
beta-D mannosylqueosine, 5'-methoxycarboxymethyluracil,
5-methoxyuracil, 2-methylthio-N6-isopentenyladenine,
uracil-5-oxyacetic acid (v), wybutoxosine, pseudouracil, queosine,
2-thiocytosine, 5-methyl-2-thiouracil, 2-thiouracil, 4-thiouracil,
uracil-5-oxyacetic acidmethylester, 3-(3-amino-3-N-2-carboxypropyl)
uracil, (acp3)w, 2,6-diaminopurine, and 5-propynyl pyrimidine.
Other examples of modified, non-standard, or derivatized base
moieties may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,001,611; 5,955,589;
5,844,106; 5,789,562; 5,750,343; 5,728,525; and 5,679,785.
[0097] Furthermore, a nucleic acid, polynucleotide or
oligonucleotide can comprise one or more modified sugar moieties
including, but not limited to, arabinose, 2-fluoroarabinose,
xylulose, and a hexose.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
I. Introduction
[0098] The present invention is based, in part, on the discovery
that sequences in certain DNA regions are methylated in cancer
cells, but not normal cells. Specifically, the inventors have found
that methylation of biomarkers within the DNA regions described
herein are associated with various types of cancer.
[0099] In view of this discovery, the inventors have recognized
that methods for detecting the biomarker sequences and DNA regions
comprising the biomarker sequences as well as sequences adjacent to
the biomarkers that contain a significant amount of CpG
subsequences, methylation of the DNA regions, and/or expression of
the genes regulated by the DNA regions can be used to detect cancer
cells. Detecting cancer cells allows for diagnostic tests that
detect disease, assess the risk of contracting disease, determining
a predisposition to disease, stage disease, diagnose disease,
monitor disease, and/or aid in the selection of treatment for a
person with disease.
II. Methylation Biomarkers
[0100] In some embodiments, the presence or absence or quantity of
methylation of the chromosomal DNA within a DNA region or portion
thereof (e.g., at least one cytosine) selected from SEQ ID Nos:
389-485 is detected. Portions of the DNA regions described herein
will comprise at least one potential methylation site (i.e., a
cytosine) and can in some embodiments generally comprise 2, 3, 4,
5, 10, or more potential methylation sites. In some embodiments,
the methylation status of all cytosines within at least 20, 50,
100, 200, 500 or more contiguous base pairs of the DNA region are
determined.
[0101] Some of the DNA regions overlap with each other, indicating
that methylation can be detected in a larger chromosomal region as
defined by the boundaries of the overlapping sequences. For
example, SEQ ID NO:402 overlaps with SEQ ID NO:403; SEQ ID NOs:
407, 408 and 409 overlap with each other; SEQ ID NO:425 overlaps
with SEQ ID NO:426; SEQ ID NOs:411, 427, 428, 442, 443, 444 overlap
with each other; and SEQ ID NO:429 overlaps with SEQ ID NO:445.
Thus, for example, methylation can be detected for the purposes
described herein to detect the methylation status of at least one
cytosine in a sequence from:
either SEQ ID NO: 402 or 403;
any of SEQ ID NO:403; SEQ ID NOs: 407, 408 or 409;
[0102] either SEQ ID NO:425 or SEQ ID NO:426;
any of SEQ ID NOs:411, 427, 428, 442, 443, 444;
[0103] either SEQ ID NO:429 or SEQ ID NO:445.
[0104] In some embodiments, the methylation of more than one DNA
region (or portion thereof) is detected. In some embodiments, the
methylation status of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13,
14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47,
48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64,
65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81,
82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, or 97
of the DNA regions is determined.
[0105] In some embodiments of the invention, the methylation of a
DNA region or portion thereof is determined and then normalized
(e.g., compared) to the methylation of a control locus. Typically
the control locus will have a known, relatively constant,
methylation status. For example, the control sequence can be
previously determined to have no, some or a high amount of
methylation, thereby providing a relative constant value to control
for error in detection methods, etc., unrelated to the presence or
absence of cancer. In some embodiments, the control locus is
endogenous, i.e., is part of the genome of the individual sampled.
For example, in mammalian cells, the testes-specific histone 2B
gene (hTH2B in human) gene is known to be methylated in all somatic
tissues except testes. Alternatively, the control locus can be an
exogenous locus, i.e., a DNA sequence spiked into the sample in a
known quantity and having a known methylation status.
[0106] A DNA region comprises a nucleic acid including one or more
methylation sites of interest (e.g., a cytosine, a "microarray
feature," or an amplicon amplified from select primers) and
flanking nucleic acid sequences (i.e., "wingspan") of up to 4
kilobases (kb) in either or both of the 3' or 5' direction from the
amplicon. This range corresponds to the lengths of DNA fragments
obtained by randomly fragmenting the DNA before screening for
differential methylation between DNA in two or more samples (e.g.
carrying out methods used to initially identify differentially
methylated sequences as described in the Examples, below). In some
embodiments, the wingspan of the one or more DNA regions is about
0.5 kb, 0.75 kb, 1.0 kb, 1.5 kb, 2.0 kb, 2.5 kb, 3.0 kb, 3.5 kb or
4.0 kb in both 3' and 5' directions relative to the sequence
represented by the microarray feature.
[0107] The methylation sites in a DNA region can reside in
non-coding transcriptional control sequences (e.g. promoters,
enhancers, etc.) or in coding sequences, including introns and
exons of the designated genes listed in Tables 1 and 2 and in
section "SEQUENCE LISTING." In some embodiments, the methods
comprise detecting the methylation status in the promoter regions
(e.g., comprising the nucleic acid sequence that is about 1.0 kb,
1.5 kb, 2.0 kb, 2.5 kb, 3.0 kb, 3.5 kb or 4.0 kb 5' from the
transcriptional start site through to the transcriptional start
site) of one or more of the genes identified in Tables 1 and 2 and
in section "SEQUENCE LISTING."
[0108] The DNA regions of the invention also include naturally
occurring variants, including for example, variants occurring in
different subject populations and variants arising from single
nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). SNPs encompasses insertions and
deletions of varying size and simple sequence repeats, such as
dinucleotides and trinucleotide repeats. Variants include nucleic
acid sequences from the same DNA region (e.g. as set forth in
Tables 1 and 2 and in section "SEQUENCE LISTING") sharing at least
90%, 95%, 98%, 99% sequence identity, i.e., having one or more
deletions, additions, substitutions, inverted sequences, etc.,
relative to the DNA regions described herein.
III. Methods for Determining Methylation
[0109] Any method for detecting DNA methylation can be used in the
methods of the present invention.
[0110] In some embodiments, methods for detecting methylation
include randomly shearing or randomly fragmenting the genomic DNA,
cutting the DNA with a methylation-dependent or
methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme and subsequently
selectively identifying and/or analyzing the cut or uncut DNA.
Selective identification can include, for example, separating cut
and uncut DNA (e.g., by size) and quantifying a sequence of
interest that was cut or, alternatively, that was not cut. See,
e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,186,512. Alternatively, the method can
encompass amplifying intact DNA after restriction enzyme digestion,
thereby only amplifying DNA that was not cleaved by the restriction
enzyme in the area amplified. See, e.g., U.S. patent application
Ser. Nos. 10/971,986; 11/071,013; and 10/971,339. In some
embodiments, amplification can be performed using primers that are
gene specific. Alternatively, adaptors can be added to the ends of
the randomly fragmented DNA, the DNA can be digested with a
methylation-dependent or methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme,
intact DNA can be amplified using primers that hybridize to the
adaptor sequences. In this case, a second step can be performed to
determine the presence, absence or quantity of a particular gene in
an amplified pool of DNA. In some embodiments, the DNA is amplified
using real-time, quantitative PCR.
[0111] In some embodiments, the methods comprise quantifying the
average methylation density in a target sequence within a
population of genomic DNA. In some embodiments, the method
comprises contacting genomic DNA with a methylation-dependent
restriction enzyme or methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme
under conditions that allow for at least some copies of potential
restriction enzyme cleavage sites in the locus to remain uncleaved;
quantifying intact copies of the locus; and comparing the quantity
of amplified product to a control value representing the quantity
of methylation of control DNA, thereby quantifying the average
methylation density in the locus compared to the methylation
density of the control DNA.
[0112] The quantity of methylation of a locus of DNA can be
determined by providing a sample of genomic DNA comprising the
locus, cleaving the DNA with a restriction enzyme that is either
methylation-sensitive or methylation-dependent, and then
quantifying the amount of intact DNA or quantifying the amount of
cut DNA at the DNA locus of interest. The amount of intact or cut
DNA will depend on the initial amount of genomic DNA containing the
locus, the amount of methylation in the locus, and the number
(i.e., the fraction) of nucleotides in the locus that are
methylated in the genomic DNA. The amount of methylation in a DNA
locus can be determined by comparing the quantity of intact DNA or
cut DNA to a control value representing the quantity of intact DNA
or cut DNA in a similarly-treated DNA sample. The control value can
represent a known or predicted number of methylated nucleotides.
Alternatively, the control value can represent the quantity of
intact or cut DNA from the same locus in another (e.g., normal,
non-diseased) cell or a second locus.
[0113] By using at least one methylation-sensitive or
methylation-dependent restriction enzyme under conditions that
allow for at least some copies of potential restriction enzyme
cleavage sites in the locus to remain uncleaved and subsequently
quantifying the remaining intact copies and comparing the quantity
to a control, average methylation density of a locus can be
determined. If the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme is
contacted to copies of a DNA locus under conditions that allow for
at least some copies of potential restriction enzyme cleavage sites
in the locus to remain uncleaved, then the remaining intact DNA
will be directly proportional to the methylation density, and thus
may be compared to a control to determine the relative methylation
density of the locus in the sample. Similarly, if a
methylation-dependent restriction enzyme is contacted to copies of
a DNA locus under conditions that allow for at least some copies of
potential restriction enzyme cleavage sites in the locus to remain
uncleaved, then the remaining intact DNA will be inversely
proportional to the methylation density, and thus may be compared
to a control to determine the relative methylation density of the
locus in the sample. Such assays are disclosed in, e.g., U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 10/971,986.
[0114] Kits for the above methods can include, e.g., one or more of
methylation-dependent restriction enzymes, methylation-sensitive
restriction enzymes, amplification (e.g., PCR) reagents, probes
and/or primers.
[0115] Quantitative amplification methods (e.g., quantitative PCR
or quantitative linear amplification) can be used to quantify the
amount of intact DNA within a locus flanked by amplification
primers following restriction digestion. Methods of quantitative
amplification are disclosed in, e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,180,349;
6,033,854; and 5,972,602, as well as in, e.g., Gibson et al.,
Genome Research 6:995-1001 (1996); DeGraves, et al., Biotechniques
34(1):106-10, 112-5 (2003); Deiman B, et al., Mol Biotechnol.
20(2):163-79 (2002). Amplifications may be monitored in "real
time."
[0116] Additional methods for detecting DNA methylation can involve
genomic sequencing before and after treatment of the DNA with
bisulfite. See, e.g., Frommer et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:1827-1831 (1992). When sodium bisulfite is contacted to DNA,
unmethylated cytosine is converted to uracil, while methylated
cytosine is not modified.
[0117] In some embodiments, restriction enzyme digestion of PCR
products amplified from bisulfite-converted DNA is used to detect
DNA methylation. See, e.g., Sadri & Hornsby, Nucl. Acids Res.
24:5058-5059 (1996); Xiong & Laird, Nucleic Acids Res.
25:2532-2534 (1997).
[0118] In some embodiments, a MethyLight assay is used alone or in
combination with other methods to detect DNA methylation (see, Eads
et al., Cancer Res. 59:2302-2306 (1999)). Briefly, in the
MethyLight process genomic DNA is converted in a sodium bisulfite
reaction (the bisulfite process converts unmethylated cytosine
residues to uracil). Amplification of a DNA sequence of interest is
then performed using PCR primers that hybridize to CpG
dinucleotides. By using primers that hybridize only to sequences
resulting from bisulfite conversion of unmethylated DNA, (or
alternatively to methylated sequences that are not converted)
amplification can indicate methylation status of sequences where
the primers hybridize. Similarly, the amplification product can be
detected with a probe that specifically binds to a sequence
resulting from bisulfite treatment of a unmethylated (or
methylated) DNA. If desired, both primers and probes can be used to
detect methylation status. Thus, kits for use with MethyLight can
include sodium bisulfite as well as primers or detectably-labeled
probes (including but not limited to Taqman or molecular beacon
probes) that distinguish between methylated and unmethylated DNA
that have been treated with bisulfite. Other kit components can
include, e.g., reagents necessary for amplification of DNA
including but not limited to, PCR buffers, deoxynucleotides; and a
thermostable polymerase.
[0119] In some embodiments, a Ms-SNuPE (Methylation-sensitive
Single Nucleotide Primer Extension) reaction is used alone or in
combination with other methods to detect DNA methylation (see,
Gonzalgo & Jones, Nucleic Acids Res. 25:2529-2531 (1997)). The
Ms-SNuPE technique is a quantitative method for assessing
methylation differences at specific CpG sites based on bisulfite
treatment of DNA, followed by single-nucleotide primer extension
(Gonzalgo & Jones, supra). Briefly, genomic DNA is reacted with
sodium bisulfite to convert unmethylated cytosine to uracil while
leaving 5-methylcytosine unchanged. Amplification of the desired
target sequence is then performed using PCR primers specific for
bisulfite-converted DNA, and the resulting product is isolated and
used as a template for methylation analysis at the CpG site(s) of
interest.
[0120] Typical reagents (e.g., as might be found in a typical
Ms-SNuPE-based kit) for Ms-SNuPE analysis can include, but are not
limited to: PCR primers for specific gene (or methylation-altered
DNA sequence or CpG island); optimized PCR buffers and
deoxynucleotides; gel extraction kit; positive control primers;
Ms-SNuPE primers for a specific gene; reaction buffer (for the
Ms-SNuPE reaction); and detectably-labeled nucleotides.
Additionally, bisulfite conversion reagents may include: DNA
denaturation buffer; sulfonation buffer; DNA recovery regents or
kit (e.g., precipitation, ultrafiltration, affinity column);
desulfonation buffer; and DNA recovery components.
[0121] In some embodiments, a methylation-specific PCR ("MSP")
reaction is used alone or in combination with other methods to
detect DNA methylation. An MSP assay entails initial modification
of DNA by sodium bisulfite, converting all unmethylated, but not
methylated, cytosines to uracil, and subsequent amplification with
primers specific for methylated versus unmethylated DNA. See,
Herman et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:9821-9826, (1996);
U.S. Pat. No. 5,786,146.
[0122] Additional methylation detection methods include, but are
not limited to, methylated CpG island amplification (see, Toyota et
al., Cancer Res. 59:2307-12 (1999)) and those described in, e.g.,
U.S. Patent Publication 2005/0069879; Rein, et al. Nucleic Acids
Res. 26 (10): 2255-64 (1998); Olek, et al. Nat. Genet. 17(3): 275-6
(1997); and PCT Publication No. WO 00/70090.
[0123] It is well known that methylation of genomic DNA can affect
expression (transcription and/or translation) of nearby gene
sequences. Therefore, in some embodiments, the methods include the
step of correlating the methylation status of at least one cytosine
in a DNA region with the expression of nearby coding sequences, as
described in Tables 1 and 2 and in section "SEQUENCE LISTING." For
example, expression of gene sequences within about 1.0 kb, 1.5 kb,
2.0 kb, 2.5 kb, 3.0 kb, 3.5 kb or 4.0 kb in either the 3' or 5'
direction from the cytosine of interest in the DNA region can be
detected. Methods for measuring transcription and/or translation of
a particular gene sequence are well known in the art. See, for
example, Ausubel, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology,
1987-2006, John Wiley & Sons; and Sambrook and Russell,
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd Edition, 2000, Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. In some embodiments, the gene or
protein expression of a gene in Tables 1 and 2 and in section
"SEQUENCE LISTING" is compared to a control, for example, the
methylation status in the DNA region and/or the expression of a
nearby gene sequence from a sample from an individual known to be
negative for cancer or known to be positive for cancer, or to an
expression level that distinguishes between cancer and noncancer
states. Such methods, like the methods of detecting methylation
described herein, are useful in providing diagnosis, prognosis,
etc., of cancer.
[0124] In some embodiments, the methods further comprise the step
of correlating the methylation status and expression of one or more
of the gene regions identified in Tables 1 and 2 and in section
"SEQUENCE LISTING."
IV. Cancer Detection
[0125] The present biomarkers and methods can be used in the
diagnosis, prognosis, classification, prediction of disease risk,
detection of recurrence of disease, and selection of treatment of a
number of types of cancers. A cancer at any stage of progression
can be detected, such as primary, metastatic, and recurrent
cancers. Information regarding numerous types of cancer can be
found, e.g., from the American Cancer Society (available on the
worldwide web at cancer.org), or from, e.g., Harrison's Principles
of Internal Medicine, Kaspar, et al., eds., 16th Edition, 2005,
McGraw-Hill, Inc. Exemplary cancers that can be detected include
lung, breast, renal, liver, ovarian, head and neck, thyroid,
bladder, cervical, colon, endometrial, esophageal, prostate cancer
or melanoma.
[0126] The present invention provides methods for determining
whether or not a mammal (e.g., a human) has cancer, whether or not
a biological sample taken from a mammal contains cancerous cells,
estimating the risk or likelihood of a mammal developing cancer,
classifying cancer types and stages, monitoring the efficacy of
anti-cancer treatment, or selecting the appropriate anti-cancer
treatment in a mammal with cancer. Such methods are based on the
discovery that cancer cells have a different methylation status
than normal cells in the DNA regions described in the invention.
Accordingly, by determining whether or not a cell contains
differentially methylated sequences in the DNA regions as described
herein, it is possible to determine whether or not the cell is
cancerous.
[0127] In numerous embodiments of the present invention, the
presence of methylated nucleotides in the diagnostic biomarker
sequences of the invention is detected in a biological sample,
thereby detecting the presence or absence of cancerous cells in the
biological sample.
[0128] In some embodiments, the biological sample comprises a
tissue sample from a tissue suspected of containing cancerous
cells. For example, in an individual suspected of having cancer,
breast tissue, lymph tissue, lung tissue, brain tissue, or blood
can be evaluated. Alternatively, lung, renal, liver, ovarian, head
and neck, thyroid, bladder, cervical, colon, endometrial,
esophageal, prostate, or skin tissue can be evaluated. The tissue
or cells can be obtained by any method known in the art including,
e.g., by surgery, biopsy, phlebotomy, swab, nipple discharge,
stool, etc. In other embodiments, a tissue sample known to contain
cancerous cells, e.g., from a tumor, will be analyzed for the
presence or quantity of methylation at one or more of the
diagnostic biomarkers of the invention to determine information
about the cancer, e.g., the efficacy of certain treatments, the
survival expectancy of the individual, etc. In some embodiments,
the methods will be used in conjunction with additional diagnostic
methods, e.g., detection of other cancer biomarkers, etc.
[0129] Genomic DNA samples can be obtained by any means known in
the art. In cases where a particular phenotype or disease is to be
detected, DNA samples should be prepared from a tissue of interest,
or as appropriate, from blood. For example, DNA can be prepared
from biopsy tissue to detect the methylation state of a particular
locus associated with cancer. The nucleic acid-containing specimen
used for detection of methylated loci (see, e.g. Ausubel et al.,
Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (1995 supplement)) may be
from any source and may be extracted by a variety of techniques
such as those described by Ausubel et al., Current Protocols in
Molecular Biology (1995) or Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, A
Laboratory Manual (3rd ed. 2001).
[0130] The methods of the invention can be used to evaluate
individuals known or suspected to have cancer or as a routine
clinical test, i.e., in an individual not necessarily suspected to
have cancer. Further diagnostic assays can be performed to confirm
the status of cancer in the individual.
[0131] Further, the present methods may be used to assess the
efficacy of a course of treatment. For example, the efficacy of an
anti-cancer treatment can be assessed by monitoring DNA methylation
of the biomarker sequences described herein over time in a mammal
having cancer. For example, a reduction or absence of methylation
in any of the diagnostic biomarkers of the invention in a
biological sample taken from a mammal following a treatment,
compared to a level in a sample taken from the mammal before, or
earlier in, the treatment, indicates efficacious treatment.
[0132] The methods detecting cancer can comprise the detection of
one or more other cancer-associated polynucleotide or polypeptides
sequences. Accordingly, detection of methylation of any one or more
of the diagnostic biomarkers of the invention can be used either
alone, or in combination with other biomarkers, for the diagnosis
or prognosis of cancer.
[0133] The methods of the present invention can be used to
determine the optimal course of treatment in a mammal with cancer.
For example, the presence of methylated DNA within any of the
diagnostic biomarkers of the invention or an increased quantity of
methylation within any of the diagnostic biomarkers of the
invention can indicate a reduced survival expectancy of a mammal
with cancer, thereby indicating a more aggressive treatment for the
mammal. In addition, a correlation can be readily established
between the presence, absence or quantity of methylation at a
diagnostic biomarker, as described herein, and the relative
efficacy of one or another anti-cancer agent. Such analyses can be
performed, e.g., retrospectively, i.e., by detecting methylation in
one or more of the diagnostic genes in samples taken previously
from mammals that have subsequently undergone one or more types of
anti-cancer therapy, and correlating the known efficacy of the
treatment with the presence, absence or levels of methylation of
one or more of the diagnostic biomarkers.
[0134] In making a diagnosis, prognosis, risk assessment,
classification, detection of recurrence or selection of therapy
based on the presence or absence of methylation in at least one of
the diagnostic biomarkers, the quantity of methylation may be
compared to a threshold value that distinguishes between one
diagnosis, prognosis, risk assessment, classification, etc., and
another. For example, a threshold value can represent the degree of
methylation found at a particular DNA region that adequately
distinguishes between cancer samples and normal samples with a
desired level of sensitivity and specificity. It is understood that
a threshold value will likely vary depending on the assays used to
measure methylation, but it is also understood that it is a
relatively simple matter to determine a threshold value or range by
measuring methylation of a DNA sequence in cancer samples and
normal samples using the particular desired assay and then
determining a value that distinguishes at least a majority of the
cancer samples from a majority of non-cancer samples. If
methylation of two or more DNA regions is detected, two or more
different threshold values (one for each DNA region) will often,
but not always, be used. Comparisons between a quantity of
methylation of a sequence in a sample and a threshold value can be
performed in any way known in the art. For example, a manual
comparison can be made or a computer can compare and analyze the
values to detect disease, assess the risk of contracting disease,
determining a predisposition to disease, stage disease, diagnose
disease, monitor, or aid in the selection of treatment for a person
with disease.
[0135] In some embodiments, threshold values provide at least a
specified sensitivity and specificity for detection of a particular
cancer type. In some embodiments, the threshold value allows for at
least a 50%, 60%, 70%, or 80% sensitivity and specificity for
detection of a specific cancer, e.g., breast, lung, renal, liver,
ovarian, head and neck, thyroid, bladder, cervical, colon,
endometrial, esophageal, prostate cancer or melanoma.
[0136] In embodiments involving prognosis of cancer (including, for
example, the prediction of progression of non-malignant lesions to
invasive carcinoma, prediction of metastasis, prediction of disease
recurrance or prediction of a response to a particular treatment),
in some embodiments, the threshold value is set such that there is
at least 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80% or more sensitivity and at
least 70% specificity with regard to detecting cancer.
[0137] In some embodiments, the methods comprise recording a
diagnosis, prognosis, risk assessment or classification, based on
the methylation status determined from an individual. Any type of
recordation is contemplated, including electronic recordation,
e.g., by a computer.
V. Kits
[0138] This invention also provides kits for the detection and/or
quantification of the diagnostic biomarkers of the invention, or
expression or methylation thereof using the methods described
herein.
[0139] For kits for detection of methylation, the kits of the
invention can comprise at least one polynucleotide that hybridizes
to at least one of the diagnostic biomarker sequences of the
invention and at least one reagent for detection of gene
methylation. Reagents for detection of methylation include, e.g.,
sodium bisulfite, polynucleotides designed to hybridize to sequence
that is the product of a biomarker sequence of the invention if the
biomarker sequence is not methylated (e.g., containing at least one
C.fwdarw.U conversion), and/or a methylation-sensitive or
methylation-dependent restriction enzyme. The kits can provide
solid supports in the form of an assay apparatus that is adapted to
use in the assay. The kits may further comprise detectable labels,
optionally linked to a polynucleotide, e.g., a probe, in the kit.
Other materials useful in the performance of the assays can also be
included in the kits, including test tubes, transfer pipettes, and
the like. The kits can also include written instructions for the
use of one or more of these reagents in any of the assays described
herein.
[0140] In some embodiments, the kits of the invention comprise one
or more (e.g., 1, 2, 3, 4, or more) different polynucleotides
(e.g., primers and/or probes) capable of specifically amplifying at
least a portion of a DNA region where the DNA region is a sequence
selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 389, 390, 391,
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404,
405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417,
418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430,
431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443,
444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456,
457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469,
470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482,
483, 484, and 485. Optionally, one or more detectably-labeled
polypeptide capable of hybridizing to the amplified portion can
also be included in the kit. In some embodiments, the kits comprise
sufficient primers to amplify 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more
different DNA regions or portions thereof, and optionally include
detectably-labeled polynucleotides capable of hybridizing to each
amplified DNA region or portion thereof. The kits further can
comprise a methylation-dependent or methylation sensitive
restriction enzyme and/or sodium bisulfite.
[0141] In some embodiments, the kits comprise sodium bisulfite,
primers and adapters (e.g., oligonucleotides that can be ligated or
otherwise linked to genomic fragments) for whole genome
amplification, and polynucleotides (e.g., detectably-labeled
polynucleotoides) to quantify the presence of the converted
methylated and or the converted unmethylated sequence of at least
one cytosine from a DNA region that is selected from the group
consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396,
397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409,
410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422,
423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435,
436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448,
449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461,
462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474,
475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
[0142] In some embodiments, the kits comprise a methylation sensing
restriction enzymes (e.g., a methylation-dependent restriction
enzyme and/or a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme), primers
and adapters for whole genome amplification, and polynucleotides to
quantify the number of copies of at least a portion of a DNA region
where the DNA region is selected from the group consisting of SEQ
ID NOs: 389, 390, 391, 392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400,
401, 402, 403, 404, 405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413,
414, 415, 416, 417, 418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426,
427, 428, 429, 430, 431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439,
440, 441, 442, 443, 444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452,
453, 454, 455, 456, 457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465,
466, 467, 468, 469, 470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478,
479, 480, 481, 482, 483, 484, and 485.
[0143] In some embodiments, the kits comprise a methylation binding
moiety and one or more polynucleotides to quantify the number of
copies of at least a portion of a DNA region where the DNA region
is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs: 389, 390, 391,
392, 393, 394, 395, 396, 397, 398, 399, 400, 401, 402, 403, 404,
405, 406, 407, 408, 409, 410, 411, 412, 413, 414, 415, 416, 417,
418, 419, 420, 421, 422, 423, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 429, 430,
431, 432, 433, 434, 435, 436, 437, 438, 439, 440, 441, 442, 443,
444, 445, 446, 447, 448, 449, 450, 451, 452, 453, 454, 455, 456,
457, 458, 459, 460, 461, 462, 463, 464, 465, 466, 467, 468, 469,
470, 471, 472, 473, 474, 475, 476, 477, 478, 479, 480, 481, 482,
483, 484, and 485. A methylation binding moiety refers to a
molecule (e.g., a polypeptide) that specifically binds to
methyl-cytosine. Examples include restriction enzymes or fragments
thereof that lack DNA cutting activity but retain the ability to
bind methylated DNA, antibodies that specifically bind to
methylated DNA, etc.).
VI. Computer-Based Methods
[0144] The calculations for the methods described herein can
involve computer-based calculations and tools. For example, a
methylation value for a DNA region or portion thereof can be
compared by a computer to a threshold value, as described herein.
The tools are advantageously provided in the form of computer
programs that are executable by a general purpose computer system
(referred to herein as a "host computer") of conventional design.
The host computer may be configured with many different hardware
components and can be made in many dimensions and styles (e.g.,
desktop PC, laptop, tablet PC, handheld computer, server,
workstation, mainframe). Standard components, such as monitors,
keyboards, disk drives, CD and/or DVD drives, and the like, may be
included. Where the host computer is attached to a network, the
connections may be provided via any suitable transport media (e.g.,
wired, optical, and/or wireless media) and any suitable
communication protocol (e.g., TCP/IP); the host computer may
include suitable networking hardware (e.g., modem, Ethernet card,
WiFi card). The host computer may implement any of a variety of
operating systems, including UNIX, Linux, Microsoft Windows, MacOS,
or any other operating system.
[0145] Computer code for implementing aspects of the present
invention may be written in a variety of languages, including PERL,
C, C++, Java, JavaScript, VBScript, AWK, or any other scripting or
programming language that can be executed on the host computer or
that can be compiled to execute on the host computer. Code may also
be written or distributed in low level languages such as assembler
languages or machine languages.
[0146] The host computer system advantageously provides an
interface via which the user controls operation of the tools. In
the examples described herein, software tools are implemented as
scripts (e.g., using PERL), execution of which can be initiated by
a user from a standard command line interface of an operating
system such as Linux or UNIX. Those skilled in the art will
appreciate that commands can be adapted to the operating system as
appropriate. In other embodiments, a graphical user interface may
be provided, allowing the user to control operations using a
pointing device. Thus, the present invention is not limited to any
particular user interface.
[0147] Scripts or programs incorporating various features of the
present invention may be encoded on various computer readable media
for storage and/or transmission. Examples of suitable media include
magnetic disk or tape, optical storage media such as compact disk
(CD) or DVD (digital versatile disk), flash memory, and carrier
signals adapted for transmission via wired, optical, and/or
wireless networks conforming to a variety of protocols, including
the Internet.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Identification of Cancer DNA Methylation Biomarkers
[0148] Loci that are differentially methylated in tumors relative
to matched adjacent histologically normal tissue were identified
using a DNA microarray-based technology platform that utilizes the
methylation-dependent restriction enzyme McrBC. See, e.g. U.S. Pat.
No. 7,186,512. In the discovery phase, cancer tissue and normal
tissue samples were analyzed. Purified genomic DNA from each sample
(60 .mu.g) was randomly sheared to a range of 1 to 4 kb. The
sheared DNA of each sample was then split into four equal portions
of 15 .mu.g each. Two portions were digested with McrBC under the
following conditions: 15 .mu.g sheared genomic DNA, 1.times.NEB2
buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (New
England Biolabs), 2 mM GTP (Roche) and 120 units of McrBC enzyme
(New England Biolabs) in a total volume of 600 .mu.L at 37.degree.
C. for approximately 12 hours. These two portions represent a
technical replicate of McrBC digestion (Treated 1 and Treated 2).
The remaining two 15 .mu.g portions were mock treated under
identical conditions with the exception that 12 .mu.L of sterile
50% glycerol were added instead of McrBC enzyme. These two portions
represent a technical replicate of mock treatment (Untreated 1 and
Untreated 2). All reactions were treated with 5 .mu.L proteinase K
(50 mg/mL) for 1 hour at 50.degree. C., and precipitated with EtOH
under standard conditions. Pellets were washed twice with 70% EtOH,
dried and resuspended in 30 .mu.L H2O. Samples were then resolved
on a 1% low melting point SeaPlaque GTG Agarose gel (Cambridge Bio
Sciences). Untreated 1 and Treated 1 portions were resolved
side-by-side, as were Untreated 2 and Treated 2 portions. 1 kb DNA
sizing ladder was resolved adjacent to each untreated/treated pair
to guide accurate gel slice excision. Gels were visualized with
long-wave UV, and gel slices including DNA within the modal size
range of the untreated fraction (approximately 1-4 kb) were excised
with a clean razor blade. DNA was extracted from gel slices using
gel extraction kits (Qiagen).
[0149] McrBC recognizes a pair of methylated cytosine residues in
the context 5'-Pu.sup.mC (N.sub.40-2000) Pu.sup.mC-3' (where Pu=A
or G, .sup.mC=5-methylcytosine, and N=any nucleotide), and cleaves
within approximately 30 base-pairs from one of the methylated
cytosine residues. Therefore, loci that include high local
densities of Pu .sup.mC will be cleaved to a greater extent than
loci that include low local densities of Pu .sup.mC. Since
Untreated and Treated portions were resolved by agarose gel
electrophoresis, and DNA within the modal size range of the
Untreated portions were excised and gel extracted, the Untreated
portions represent the entire fragmented genome of the sample while
the Treated portions are depleted of DNA fragments including Pu
.sup.mC. Fractions were analyzed using a duplicated dye swap
microarray hybridization paradigm. For example, equal mass (200 ng)
of Untreated 1 and Treated 1 fraction DNA were used as template for
labeling with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, and hybridized to a
microarray (described below). Equal mass (200 ng) of the same
Untreated 1 and Treated 1 fraction DNA were used as template for
labeling with Cy5 and Cy3, respectively, and hybridized to a second
microarray (these two hybridizations represent a dye swap of
Untreated 1/Treated 1 fractions). Equal mass (200 ng) of Untreated
2 and Treated 2 fraction DNA were used as template for labeling
with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, and hybridized to a third
microarray. Finally, equal mass (200 ng) of Untreated 2 and Treated
2 fraction DNA were used as template for labeling with Cy5 and Cy3,
respectively, and hybridized to a fourth microarray (the final two
hybridizations represent a technical replicate of the first dye
swap). All DNA samples (e.g., tumor samples and adjacent normal
samples) were analyzed in this way.
[0150] The microarray described in this Example consists of 380,727
features. Each 50mer oligonucleotide feature is represented by
three replicates per microarray slide, yielding a total of 124,877
unique feature probes, and 2412 control probes. Each probe was
selected to represent a 1 Kb interval of the human genome. Because
of the natural intersection of epigenetically interesting loci
(i.e. promoters, CpG Islands, etc) there are multiple probes per
genomic interval providing the capacity of supporting measurements
with adjacent feature's data. The genomic content represented by
the features represents the majority of ENSEMBL recognized human
transcriptional start sites (TSS) with two probes per TSS
(>55,000 probes). In addition there are more than 35,000 probes
designed to informatically identified CpG Islands (see, Takai and
Jones, Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99(6):3740-3745 (2002)). In
addition, more than 7000 probes are dedicated to tiling consensus
cancer genes at 1 probe kb of genomic sequence. There are high, low
and middle repetitious copy number controls (HERV, line and sine)
and the design included tiles of the mitochondrial genome and a
consensus rDNA gene.
[0151] Following statistical analysis of these datasets, loci that
were predicted to be differentially methylated in at least 70% of
tumors relative to normal tissues were identified. As described in
the Examples below, differential DNA methylation of a collection of
loci identified by a microarray discovery experiment was verified
within the discovery panel of tumor and normal samples, as well as
validated in larger panels of independent cancer tissue DNA, normal
DNA tissue samples, and normal peripheral blood samples. Tables 1
and 2 and the section "SEQUENCE LISTING" list the unique microarray
feature identifier (Feature name) for each of these loci.
[0152] The genomic region in which a given microarray feature can
report DNA methylation status is dependent upon the molecular size
of the DNA fragments that were labeled for the microarray
hybridizations. As described above, DNA in the size range of 1 to 4
kb was purified by agarose gel extraction and used as template for
cyanogen dye labeling. Therefore, a conservative estimate for the
genomic region interrogated by each microarray feature is 1 kb
(i.e., 500 bp upstream and 500 bp downstream of the sequence
represented by the microarray feature). Note that some features
represent loci in which there is no Ensembl gene ID and no
annotated transcribed gene within this 1 kb "wingspan" (e.g.,
CHR01P063154999, CHR03P027740753, CHR10P118975684, CHR11P021861414,
CHR14P093230340, ha1p.sub.--12601.sub.--150,
ha1p.sub.--42350.sub.--150, and ha1p.sub.--44897.sub.--150) and
some features have Ensembl gene IDs but no gene description (e.g.,
CHR01P043164342, CHR01P225608458, CHR02P223364582, CHR03P052525960,
CHR16P000373719, CHR19P018622408). Also note that some features
represent loci in which more than one Ensembl gene IDs within
wingspan (e.g., CHR01P204123050, CHR02P223364582, and
CHR16P066389027). DNA methylation at these loci may potentially
affect the regulation of any of these neighboring genes.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Microarray Features Reporting Differential
Methylation and Identity of Annotated Genes within 1 kb of Each
Feature Locus Number Feature Name Ensembl Gene ID Annotations 1
CHR01P001976799 ENSG00000067606 Protein kinase C, zeta type (EC
2.7.1.37) (nPKC-zeta). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q05513] 2
CHR01P026794862 ENSG00000175793 14-3-3 protein sigma (Stratifin)
(Epithelial cell marker protein 1). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: P31947] 3 CHR01P043164342 ENSG00000184157 no desc 4
CHR01P063154999 N/A N/A 5 CHR01P204123050 ENSG00000162891
Interleukin-20 precursor (IL-20) (Four alpha helix cytokine
Zcyto10). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9NYY1] ENSG00000162896
Polymeric-immunoglobulin receptor precursor (Poly-Ig receptor)
(PIGR) [Contains: Secretory component]. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: P01833] 6 CHR01P206905110 ENSG00000196878 Laminin beta-3 chain
precursor (Laminin 5 beta 3) (Laminin B1k chain) (Kalinin B1
chain). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q13751] 7 CHR01P225608458
ENSG00000198504 no desc 8 CHR02P005061785 ENSG00000171853
Tetratricopeptide repeat protein 15 (TPR repeat protein 15).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q8WVT3] 9 CHR02P042255672
ENSG00000162878 no desc 10 CHR02P223364582 ENSG00000135903 Paired
box protein Pax-3 (HUP2). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P23760]
ENSG00000163081 no desc 11 CHR03P027740753 N/A N/A 12
CHR03P052525960 ENSG00000168268 no desc 13 CHR03P069745999
ENSG00000187098 Microphthalmia-associated transcription factor.
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: O75030] 14 CHR05P059799713
ENSG00000152931 Prostate-specific and androgen regulated protein
PART-1. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9NPD0] 15 CHR05P059799813
ENSG00000152931 Prostate-specific and androgen regulated protein
PART-1. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9NPD0] 16 CHR05P177842690
ENSG00000050767 collagen, type XXIII, alpha 1 [Source:
RefSeq_peptide; Acc: NP_775736] 17 CHR06P010694062 ENSG00000111846
N-acetyllactosaminide beta-1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyl- transferase
(EC 2.4.1.150) (N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase) (I-branching
enzyme) (IGNT). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q06430] 18
CHR06P026333318 ENSG00000196966 Histone H3.1 (H3/a) (H3/c) (H3/d)
(H3/f) (H3/h) (H3/i) (H3/j) (H3/k) (H3/l). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P68431] 19 CHR08P102460854 ENSG00000083307
transcription factor CP2-like 3 [Source: RefSeq_peptide; Acc:
NP_079191] 20 CHR08P102461254 ENSG00000083307 transcription factor
CP2-like 3 [Source: RefSeq_peptide; Acc: NP_079191] 21
CHR08P102461554 ENSG00000083307 transcription factor CP2-like 3
[Source: RefSeq_peptide; Acc: NP_079191] 22 CHR09P000107988
ENSG00000184492 Forkhead box protein D4 (Forkhead-related protein
FKHL9) (Forkhead-related transcription factor 5) (FREAC-5) (Myeloid
factor-alpha). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q12950] 23
CHR09P021958839 ENSG00000147889 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor
A (CDK4I) (p16-INK4) (p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1)
(MTS1). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 24 CHR09P131048752
ENSG00000165699 Hamartin (Tuberous sclerosis 1 protein). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q92574] 25 CHR10P118975684 N/A N/A 26
CHR11P021861414 N/A N/A 27 CHR12P004359362 ENSG00000118972
Fibroblast growth factor 23 precursor (FGF-23) (Tumor- derived
hypophosphatemia-inducing factor). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc:
Q9GZV9] 28 CHR12P016001231 ENSG00000023697 Putative
deoxyribose-phosphate aldolase (EC 4.1.2.4)
(Phosphodeoxyriboaldolase) (Deoxyriboaldolase) (DERA). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9Y315] 29 CHR14P018893344 ENSG00000185271
PREDICTED: similar to RIKEN cDNA C530050O22 [Source:
RefSeq_peptide_predicted; Acc: XP_063481] 30 CHR14P093230340 N/A
N/A 31 CHR16P000373719 ENSG00000198098 no desc 32 CHR16P066389027
ENSG00000089505 Chemokine-like factor (C32). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9UBR5] ENSG00000140932 Chemokine-like
factor super family member 2. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc:
Q8TAZ6] 33 CHR16P083319654 ENSG00000140945 Cadherin-13 precursor
(Truncated-cadherin) (T-cadherin) (T- cad) (Heart-cadherin)
(H-cadherin) (P105). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P55290] 34
CHR18P019705147 ENSG00000053747 Laminin alpha-3 chain precursor
(Epiligrin 170 kDa subunit) (E170) (Nicein alpha subunit). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q16787] 35 CHR19P018622408 ENSG00000167487
no desc 36 CHR19P051892823 ENSG00000105287 Protein kinase C, D2
type (EC 2.7.1.--) (nPKC-D2) (Protein kinase D2). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9BZL6] 37 CHRXP013196410 ENSG00000046653
Neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-b (M6b). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q13491] 38 CHRXP013196870 ENSG00000046653
Neuronal membrane glycoprotein M6-b (M6b). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q13491] 39 ha1p16_00179_l50 ENSG00000147889
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I) (p16-INK4)
(p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 40 ha1p16_00182_l50 ENSG00000147889
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I) (p16-INK4)
(p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 41 ha1p16_00257_l50 ENSG00000147889
Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I) (p16-INK4)
(p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 42 ha1p_12601_l50 N/A N/A 43
ha1p_17147_l50 ENSG00000072201 Ubiquitin ligase LNX (EC 6.3.2.--)
(Numb-binding protein 1) (Ligand of Numb-protein X 1). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q8TBB1] 44 ha1p_42350_l50 N/A N/A 45
ha1p_44897_l50 N/A N/A 46 ha1p_61253_l50 ENSG00000168767
Glutathione S-transferase Mu 2 (EC 2.5.1.18) (GSTM2-2) (GST
class-mu 2). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P28161] 47
chr01p001005050 N/A N/A 48 chr16p001157479 ENSG00000196557
Voltage-dependent T-type calcium channel alpha-1H subunit
(Voltage-gated calcium channel alpha subunit Cav3.2). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: O95180] 49 ha1g_00681 ENSG00000105997
Homeobox protein Hox-A3 (Hox-1E). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc:
O43365] 50 ha1g_01966 N/A N/A 51 ha1g_02153 N/A N/A 52 ha1g_02319
ENSG00000135638 Homeobox protein EMX1 (Empty spiracles homolog 1)
(Empty spiracles-like protein 1). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc:
Q04741] 53 ha1g_02335 ENSG00000106006 Homeobox protein Hox-A6
(Hox-1B). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P31267] 54 ha1p16_00182
ENSG00000147889 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I)
(p16-INK4) (p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 55 ha1p16_00185
ENSG00000147889 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I)
(p16-INK4) (p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 56 ha1p16_00193
ENSG00000147889 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I)
(p16-INK4) (p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 57 ha1p16_00259
ENSG00000147889 Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 inhibitor A (CDK4I)
(p16-INK4) (p16-INK4a) (Multiple tumor suppressor 1) (MTS1).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P42771] 58 ha1p_02799 N/A N/A 59
ha1p_03567 ENSG00000165678 Growth hormone inducible transmembrane
protein (Dermal papilla derived protein 2) (Transmembrane BAX
inhibitor motif containing protein 5). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: Q9H3K2] 60 ha1p_03671 ENSG00000158195 Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome
protein family member 2 (WASP- family protein member 2) (WAVE-2
protein) (Verprolin homology domain-containing protein 2). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9Y6W5] 61 ha1p_05803 N/A N/A 62 ha1p_07131
N/A N/A 63 ha1p_07989 ENSG00000066032 Alpha-2 catenin
(Alpha-catenin-related protein) (Alpha N- catenin). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P26232] ENSG00000181987 no desc 64
ha1p_08588 N/A N/A 65 ha1p_09700 ENSG00000171243 Sclerostin domain
containing protein 1 precursor (Ectodermal BMP inhibitor) (Ectodin)
(Uterine sensitization-associated gene 1 protein) (USAG-1).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q6X4U4] 66 ha1p_104458 N/A N/A 67
ha1p_105287 ENSG00000089356 FXYD domain-containing ion transport
regulator 3 precursor (Chloride conductance inducer protein Mat-8)
(Mammary tumor 8 kDa protein) (Phospholemman-like). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q14802] 68 ha1p_10702 ENSG00000105996
Homeobox protein Hox-A2. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: O43364]
69 ha1p_108469 ENSG00000099337 Potassium channel subfamily K member
6 (Inward rectifying potassium channel protein TWIK-2)
(TWIK-originated similarity sequence). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: Q9Y257] 70 ha1p_108849 ENSG00000083844 Zinc finger protein
264. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: O43296] 71 ha1p_11016
ENSG00000106125 Aquaporin-1 (AQP-1) (Aquaporin-CHIP) (Water channel
protein for red blood cells and kidney proximal tubule) (Urine
water channel). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P29972] 72
ha1p_11023 ENSG00000154978 EGFR-coamplified and overexpressed
protein [Source: RefSeq_peptide; Acc: NP_110423] 73 ha1p_12974
ENSG00000154277 Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase isozyme L1
(EC 3.4.19.12) (EC 6.--.--.--) (UCH-L1) (Ubiquitin thiolesterase
L1) (Neuron cytoplasmic protein 9.5) (PGP 9.5) (PGP9.5). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P09936] 74 ha1p_16027 ENSG00000170178
Homeobox protein Hox-D12 (Hox-4H). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc:
P35452] 75 ha1p_16066 ENSG00000128709 Homeobox protein Hox-D9
(Hox-4C) (Hox-5.2). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P28356] 76
ha1p_18911 ENSG00000115306 Spectrin beta chain, brain 1 (Spectrin,
non-erythroid beta chain 1) (Beta-II spectrin) (Fodrin beta chain).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q01082] 77 ha1p_19254
ENSG00000149571 Kin of IRRE-like protein 3 precursor (Kin of
irregular chiasm- like protein 3) (Nephrin-like 2). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q8IZU9] 78 ha1p_19853 ENSG00000186960
Full-length cDNA clone CS0DF012YF04 of Fetal brain of Homo sapiens
(human) (Fragment). [Source: Uniprot/SPTREMBL; Acc: Q86U37] 79
ha1p_22257 ENSG00000001626 Cystic fibrosis transmembrane
conductance regulator (CFTR) (cAMP-dependent chloride channel).
[Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P13569] 80 ha1p_22519 N/A N/A 81
ha1p_31800 N/A N/A 82 ha1p_33290 ENSG00000147408 Chondroitin
beta-1,4-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 1 (EC 2.4.1.174)
(beta4GalNAcT-1). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q8TDX6] 83
ha1p_37635 ENSG00000066405 Claudin-18. [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: P56856] 84 ha1p_39189 ENSG00000121853 Growth hormone
secretagogue receptor type 1 (GHS-R) (GH- releasing peptide
receptor) (GHRP) (Ghrelin receptor). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: Q92847] 85 ha1p_39511 ENSG00000164035 Endomucin precursor
(Endomucin-2) (Gastric cancer antigen Ga34). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9ULC0] 86 ha1p_39752 ENSG00000169836
Neuromedin K receptor (NKR) (Neurokinin B receptor) (NK- 3
receptor) (NK-3R) (Tachykinin receptor 3). [Source:
Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: P29371]
87 ha1p_60945 ENSG00000070814 Treacle protein (Treacher Collins
syndrome protein). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q13428] 88
ha1p_62183 N/A N/A 89 ha1p_69418 ENSG00000180667 no desc 90
ha1p_71224 ENSG00000113205 Protocadherin beta 3 precursor
(PCDH-beta3). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT; Acc: Q9Y5E6] 91
ha1p_74221 ENSG00000125895 no desc 92 ha1p_76289 ENSG00000145888
Glycine receptor alpha-1 chain precursor (Glycine receptor 48 kDa
subunit) (Strychnine binding subunit). [Source: Uniprot/SWISSPROT;
Acc: P23415] 93 ha1p_81050 ENSG00000187529 PREDICTED: similar to
60S ribosomal protein L7 [Source: RefSeq_peptide_predicted; Acc:
XP_018432] 94 ha1p_81674 ENSG00000174197 MGA protein (Fragment).
[Source: Uniprot/SPTREMBL; Acc: Q81WI9] 95 ha1p_86355
ENSG00000171878 Ferritin light chain (Fragment). [Source:
Uniprot/SPTREMBL; Acc: Q6DMM8] 96 ha1p_98491 N/A N/A 97 ha1p_99426
ENSG00000198028 zinc finger protein 560 [Source: RefSeq_peptide;
Acc: NP_689689]
Example 2
Design of Independent DNA Methylation Verification and Validation
Assays
[0153] PCR primers that interrogated the loci predicted to be
differentially methylated between tumor and histologically normal
tissue were designed. Due to the functional properties of the
enzyme, DNA methylation-dependent depletion of DNA fragments by
McrBC is capable of monitoring the DNA methylation status of
sequences neighboring the genomic sequences represented by the
features on the microarray described in Example 1 (wingspan). Since
the size of DNA fragments analyzed as described in Example 1 was
approximately 1-4 kb, we selected a 1 kb region spanning the
sequence represented by the microarray feature as a conservative
estimate of the predicted region of differential methylation. For
each locus, PCR primers were selected within this approximately 1
kb region flanking the genomic sequence represented on the DNA
microarray (approximately 500 bp upstream and 500 bp downstream).
Selection of primer sequences was guided by uniqueness of the
primer sequence across the genome, as well as the distribution of
purine-CG sequences within the 1 kb region. PCR primer pairs were
selected to amplify an approximately 400-600 bp sequence within
each 1 kb region. Optimal PCR cycling conditions for the primer
pairs were empirically determined, and amplification of a specific
PCR amplicon of the correct size was verified. The sequences of the
microarray features, primer pairs and amplicons are indicated in
Table 2, and in section "SEQUENCE LISTING."
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Sequence identification numbers for all
sequences described in the application. See, section "SEQUENCE
LISTING" for actual sequences as listed by number in the table.
Locus Left Right Amplicon DNA Region Number Primer Primer Seq. Seq.
(SEQ (SEQ ID (SEQ ID Annealing (SEQ ID (SEQ ID Feature Name ID NO:)
NO:) NO:) Temp. NO:) NO:) CHR01P001976799 1 98 195 66 C. 292 389
CHR01P026794862 2 99 196 62 C. 293 390 CHR01P043164342 3 100 197 66
C. 294 391 CHR01P063154999 4 101 198 66 C. 295 392 CHR01P204123050
5 102 199 62 C. 296 393 CHR01P206905110 6 103 200 66 C. 297 394
CHR01P225608458 7 104 201 66 C. 298 395 CHR02P005061785 8 105 202
72 C. 299 396 CHR02P042255672 9 106 203 66 C. 300 397
CHR02P223364582 10 107 204 66 C. 301 398 CHR03P027740753 11 108 205
66 C. 302 399 CHR03P052525960 12 109 206 66 C. 303 400
CHR03P069745999 13 110 207 66 C. 304 401 CHR05P059799713 14 111 208
66 C. 305 402 CHR05P059799813 15 112 209 66 C. 306 403
CHR05P177842690 16 113 210 62 C. 307 404 CHR06P010694062 17 114 211
66 C. 308 405 CHR06P026333318 18 115 212 66 C. 309 406
CHR08P102460854 19 116 213 66 C. 310 407 CHR08P102461254 20 117 214
66 C. 311 408 CHR08P102461554 21 118 215 66 C. 312 409
CHR09P000107988 22 119 216 66 C. 313 410 CHR09P021958839 23 120 217
66 C. 314 411 CHR09P131048752 24 121 218 66 C. 315 412
CHR10P118975684 25 122 219 66 C. 316 413 CHR11P021861414 26 123 220
66 C. 317 414 CHR12P004359362 27 124 221 66 C. 318 415
CHR12P016001231 28 125 222 66 C. 319 416 CHR14P018893344 29 126 223
66 C. 320 417 CHR14P093230340 30 127 224 66 C. 321 418
CHR16P000373719 31 128 225 66 C. 322 419 CHR16P066389027 32 129 226
66 C. 323 420 CHR16P083319654 33 130 227 66 C. 324 421
CHR18P019705147 34 131 228 66 C. 325 422 CHR19P018622408 35 132 229
66 C. 326 423 CHR19P051892823 36 133 230 66 C. 327 424
CHRXP013196410 37 134 231 66 C. 328 425 CHRXP013196870 38 135 232
66 C. 329 426 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 136 233 66 C. 330 427
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 137 234 66 C. 331 428 ha1p16_00257_l50 41 138
235 66 C. 332 429 ha1p_12601_l50 42 139 236 66 C. 333 430
ha1p_17147_l50 43 140 237 66 C. 334 431 ha1p_42350_l50 44 141 238
66 C. 335 432 ha1p_44897_l50 45 142 239 66 C. 336 433
ha1p_61253_l50 46 143 240 72 C. 337 434 CHR01P001005050 47 144 241
72 C. 338 435 CHR16P001157479 48 145 242 72 C. 339 436 ha1g_00681
49 146 243 65 C. 340 437 ha1g_01966 50 147 244 65 C. 341 438
ha1g_02153 51 148 245 65 C. 342 439 ha1g_02319 52 149 246 65 C. 343
440 ha1g_02335 53 150 247 65 C. 344 441 ha1p16_00182 54 151 248 65
C. 345 442 ha1p16_00185 55 152 249 65 C. 346 443 ha1p16_00193 56
153 250 65 C. 347 444 ha1p16_00259 57 154 251 65 C. 348 445
ha1p_02799 58 155 252 65 C. 349 446 ha1p_03567 59 156 253 65 C. 350
447 ha1p_03671 60 157 254 65 C. 351 448 ha1p_05803 61 158 255 65 C.
352 449 ha1p_07131 62 159 256 65 C. 353 450 ha1p_07989 63 160 257
65 C. 354 451 ha1p_08588 64 161 258 65 C. 355 452 ha1p_09700 65 162
259 65 C. 356 453 ha1p_104458 66 163 260 65 C. 357 454 ha1p_105287
67 164 261 65 C. 358 455 ha1p_10702 68 165 262 65 C. 359 456
ha1p_108469 69 166 263 65 C. 360 457 ha1p_108849 70 167 264 65 C.
361 458 ha1p_11016 71 168 265 65 C. 362 459 ha1p_11023 72 169 266
65 C. 363 460 ha1p_12974 73 170 267 65 C. 364 461 ha1p_16027 74 171
268 65 C. 365 462 ha1p_16066 75 172 269 65 C. 366 463 ha1p_18911 76
173 270 65 C. 367 464 ha1p_19254 77 174 271 65 C. 368 465
ha1p_19853 78 175 272 65 C. 369 466 ha1p_22257 79 176 273 65 C. 370
467 ha1p_22519 80 177 274 65 C. 371 468 ha1p_31800 81 178 275 65 C.
372 469 ha1p_33290 82 179 276 65 C. 373 470 ha1p_37635 83 180 277
65 C. 374 471 ha1p_39189 84 181 278 65 C. 375 472 ha1p_39511 85 182
279 65 C. 376 473 ha1p_39752 86 183 280 65 C. 377 474 ha1p_60945 87
184 281 65 C. 378 475 ha1p_62183 88 185 282 65 C. 379 476
ha1p_69418 89 186 283 65 C. 380 477 ha1p_71224 90 187 284 65 C. 381
478 ha1p_74221 91 188 285 65 C. 382 479 ha1p_76289 92 189 286 65 C.
383 480 ha1p_81050 93 190 287 65 C. 384 481 ha1p_81674 94 191 288
65 C. 385 482 ha1p_86355 95 192 289 65 C. 386 483 ha1p_98491 96 193
290 65 C. 387 484 ha1p_99426 97 194 291 65 C. 388 485
Example 3
Verification of Microarray DNA Methylation Predictions
[0154] Initially, the DNA methylation state of the loci was
independently assayed in 10 ovarian carcinoma samples and the 10
histologically normal samples described above (i.e. the discovery
tissue panel used for microarray experiments). DNA methylation was
assayed by a quantitative PCR approach utilizing digestion by the
McrBC restriction enzyme to monitor DNA methylation status. Genomic
DNA purified from each sample was split into two equal portions of
9.6 .mu.g. One 9.6 .mu.g portion (Treated Portion) was digested
with McrBC in a total volume of 120 .mu.L including 1.times.NEB2
buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (New
England Biolabs), 2 mM GTP (Roche) and 80 units of McrBC enzyme
(New England Biolabs). The second 9.6 .mu.g portion (Untreated
Portion) was treated exactly the same as the Treated Portion,
except that 8 .mu.L of sterile 50% glycerol was added instead of
McrBC enzyme. Reactions were incubated at 37.degree. C. for
approximately 12 hours, followed by incubation at 60.degree. C. for
20 minutes to inactivate McrBC.
[0155] The extent of McrBC cleavage at each locus was monitored by
quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). For each assayed locus, qPCR was
performed using 20 ng of the Untreated Portion DNA as template and,
separately, using 20 ng of the Treated Portion DNA as template.
Each reaction was performed in 10 .mu.L total volume including
1.times. LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I Master mix (Roche) and 625 nM
of each primer. Reactions were run in a Roche LightCycler 480
instrument. Optimal annealing temperatures varied depending on the
primer pair. Primer sequences (Left Primer; Right Primer) and
appropriate annealing temperatures (Annealing Temp.) are shown in
Table 2. Cycling conditions were: 95.degree. C. for 5 min.; 45
cycles of 95.degree. C. for 1 min., [annealing temperature, see
Table 2] for 30 sec., 72.degree. C. for 1 min., 83.degree. C. for 2
sec. followed by a plate read. Melting curves were calculated under
the following conditions: 95.degree. C. for 5 sec., 65.degree. C.
for 1 min., 65.degree. C. to 95.degree. C. at 2.5.degree. C./sec.
ramp rate with continuous plate reads. Each Untreated/Treated qPCR
reaction pair was performed in duplicate. The difference in the
cycle number at which amplification crossed threshold (delta Ct)
was calculated for each Untreated/Treated qPCR reaction pair by
subtracting the Ct of the Untreated Portion from the Ct of the
Treated Portion. Because McrBC-mediated cleavage between the two
primers increases the Ct of the Treated Portion, increasing delta
Ct values reflect increasing measurements of local DNA methylation
densities. The average delta Ct between the two replicate
Untreated/Treated qPCR reactions was calculated, as well as the
standard deviation between the two delta Ct values.
Example 4
Validation of DNA Methylation Changes in Larger Number of
Independent Ovarian Tumor, Normal Ovarian Samples, and Normal Blood
Samples
[0156] The differential DNA methylation status of the loci was
further validated by analyzing an independent panel of 26 ovarian
carcinoma samples (17 Stage 1 and 9 Stage II), 27 normal ovarian
tissue samples, and 23 normal blood samples. The normal ovarian
tissues included in this panel were obtained from mastectomies
unrelated to ovarian cancer. Each sample was split into two equal
portions of 4 .mu.g. One portion was digested with McrBC (Treated
Portion) in a total volume of 200 .mu.L including 1.times.NEB2
buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.1 mg/mL bovine serum albumin (New
England Biolabs), 2 mM GTP (Roche) and 32 units McrBC (New England
Biolabs). The second portion was mock treated under identical
conditions, except that 3.2 .mu.L sterile 50% glycerol was added
instead of McrBC enzyme (Untreated Portion). Samples were incubated
at 37.degree. C. for approximately 12 hours, followed by incubation
at 60.degree. C. to inactivate the McrBC enzyme. qPCR reactions and
data analysis were performed as described in Example 3.
[0157] Table 3 indicates the percent sensitivity and specificity
for each locus. Gain biomarkers are biomarkers that show more
methylation in tumor samples than normal samples and loss
biomarkers show conversely. For gain biomarkers, sensitivity
reflects the frequency of scoring a known tumor sample as positive
for DNA methylation at each locus while specificity reflects the
frequency of scoring a known normal sample as negative for DNA
methylation at each locus. For loss biomarkers, sensitivity
reflects the frequency of scoring a known tumor sample as negative
for DNA methylation at each locus while specificity reflects the
frequency of scoring a known normal sample as positive for DNA
methylation at each locus. As described above, an average delta
Ct>1.0 (Treated Portion--Untreated Portion) was used as a
threshold to score a sample as positive for DNA methylation at each
locus (representing >50% depletion of amplifiable molecules in
the DNA methylation-dependent restricted population relative to the
untreated population). Percent sensitivity of gain biomarkers was
calculated as the number of tumor samples with an average delta
Ct>1.0 divided by the total number of tumor samples analyzed for
that locus (i.e. excluding any measurements with a standard
deviation between qPCR replicates>1 cycle).times.100. Percent
specificity of gain biomarkers was calculated as (1-(the number of
normal samples with an average delta Ct>1.0 divided by the total
number of normal samples analyzed for that locus)).times.100. On
the contrary percent sensitivity and specificity of loss biomarkers
was calculated vice versa. As shown in Table 3, the loci have
sensitivities>8% and specificities relative to normal ovarian
samples>40%. Notably, at least 9 of the loci have 100%
specificity relative to normal ovarian and relative to normal blood
samples. It is important to point out that the sensitivity and
specificity of the differential DNA methylation status of any given
locus may be increased by further optimization of the precise local
genetic region interrogated by a DNA methylation-sensing assay.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Sensitivity and Specificity of
Differentially Methylated Loci in a Panel of 26 Ovarian Tumor
Samples, 27 Normal Ovarian Samples, and 23 Normal Blood Samples
Specificity Locus Specificity vs Normal Feature Name No.
Sensitivity vs Normal Ovary Blood CHR01P001976799 1 96% 100% 0%
CHR01P026794862 2 43% 60% 89% CHR01P043164342 3 42% 100% 100%
CHR01P063154999 4 85% 100% 100% CHR01P204123050 5 76% 42% 5%
CHR01P206905110 6 38% 100% 100% CHR01P225608458 7 85% 63% 4%
CHR02P005061785 8 100% 89% 0% CHR02P042255672 9 81% 100% 0%
CHR02P223364582 10 92% 52% 100% CHR03P027740753 11 77% 100% 100%
CHR03P052525960 12 85% 67% 0% CHR03P069745999 13 8% 100% 100%
CHR05P059799713 14 42% 100% 100% CHR05P059799813 15 35% 100% 100%
CHR05P177842690 16 62% 96% 95% CHR06P010694062 17 88% 63% 0%
CHR06P026333318 18 96% 89% 0% CHR08P102460854 19 84% 93% 0%
CHR08P102461254 20 76% 96% 0% CHR08P102461554 21 80% 96% 0%
CHR09P000107988 22 73% 96% 91% CHR09P021958839 23 88% 92% 90%
CHR09P131048752 24 96% 96% 0% CHR10P118975684 25 35% 100% 0%
CHR11P021861414 26 19% 100% 100% CHR12P004359362 27 38% 96% 87%
CHR12P016001231 28 50% 96% 80% CHR14P018893344 29 85% 96% 0%
CHR14P093230340 30 92% 89% 100% CHR16P000373719 31 38% 100% 0%
CHR16P066389027 32 15% 96% 100% CHR16P083319654 33 38% 93% 87%
CHR18P019705147 34 31% 100% 100% CHR19P018622408 35 92% 100% 0%
CHR19P051892823 36 78% 89% 10% CHRXP013196410 37 96% 83% 14%
CHRXP013196870 38 96% 80% 9% ha1p16_00179_l50 39 88% 96% 100%
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 81% 96% 100% ha1p16_00257_l50 41 81% 86% 100%
ha1p_12601_l50 42 69% 100% 0% ha1p_17147_l50 43 56% 100% 13%
ha1p_42350_l50 44 43% 96% 0% ha1p_44897_l50 45 96% 40% 0%
ha1p_61253_l50 46 71% 95% 0% CHR01P001005050 47 76% 100% 100%
CHR16P001157479 48 29% 100% 100%
Example 5
Validation of DNA Methylation Changes in Independent Lung Tumor,
Normal Lung Samples and in Normal Peripheral Blood Samples
[0158] The differential DNA methylation status of the 49 loci was
validated by analyzing an independent panel of 4 lung non-small
adenocarcinoma samples (1 Stage I, 1 Stage II, 1 Stage III, 1 Stage
1V) and 4 matched adjacent histologically normal as well as in 23
samples of peripheral blood of normal individuals. Each sample was
split into two equal portions of 4 .mu.g. One portion was digested
with McrBC (Treated Portion) in a total volume of 200 .mu.L
including 1.times.NEB2 buffer (New England Biolabs), 0.1 mg/mL
bovine serum albumin (New England Biolabs), 2 mM GTP (Roche) and 32
units McrBC (New England Biolabs). The second portion was mock
treated under identical conditions, except that 3.2 .mu.L sterile
50% glycerol was added instead of McrBC enzyme (Untreated Portion).
Samples were incubated at 37.degree. C. for approximately 12 hours,
followed by incubation at 60.degree. C. to inactivate the McrBC
enzyme. qPCR reactions and data analysis were performed as
described in these Examples.
[0159] Table 4 indicates the percent sensitivity and specificity
for each locus. Gain biomarkers are biomarkers that show more
methylation in tumor samples than normal samples and loss
biomarkers show conversely. For gain biomarkers, sensitivity
reflects the frequency of scoring a known tumor sample as positive
for DNA methylation at each locus while specificity reflects the
frequency of scoring a known normal sample as negative for DNA
methylation at each locus. For loss biomarkers, sensitivity
reflects the frequency of scoring a known tumor sample as negative
for DNA methylation at each locus while specificity reflects the
frequency of scoring a known normal sample as positive for DNA
methylation at each locus. As described above, an average delta
Ct>1.0 (Treated Portion--Untreated Portion) was used as a
threshold to score a sample as positive for DNA methylation at each
locus (representing >50% depletion of amplifiable molecules in
the DNA methylation-dependent restricted population relative to the
untreated population). Percent sensitivity of gain biomarkers was
calculated as the number of tumor samples with an average delta
Ct>1.0 divided by the total number of tumor samples analyzed for
that locus (i.e. excluding any measurements with a standard
deviation between qPCR replicates>1 cycle).times.100. Percent
specificity of gain biomarkers was calculated as (1-(the number of
normal samples with an average delta Ct>1.0 divided by the total
number of normal samples analyzed for that locus)).times.100. On
the contrary percent sensitivity and specificity of loss biomarkers
was calculated vice versa. As shown in Table 4, the 49 loci have
sensitivities>32% up to 100% and specificities in range 8-100%
in tissues and in range 0-100% specificity in peripheral blood.
Notably, 33 of the 49 loci have 100% specificity in tissues, and 19
of the 49 loci have 100% specificity in blood. It is important to
point out that the sensitivity and specificity of the differential
DNA methylation status of any given locus may be increased by
further optimization of the precise local genetic region
interrogated by a DNA methylation-sensing assay.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Sensitivity and specificity of
Differentially Methylated Loci in a Panel Of 13 Adjacent Normal
Lung Samples, 13 Lung Tumor Samples and 23 Normal Blood Samples
Specificity Feature Name Locus Number Sensitivity Adj. normal Blood
ha1g_00681 49 58% 100% 0% ha1g_01966 50 75% 100% 95% ha1g_02153 51
67% 100% 100% ha1g_02319 52 50% 100% 100% ha1g_02335 53 64% 100% 0%
ha1p_02799 58 38% 100% 95% ha1p_03567 59 77% 85% 89% ha1p_03671 60
33% 100% 100% ha1p_05803 61 77% 92% 23% ha1p_07131 62 38% 100% 100%
ha1p_07989 63 62% 100% 100% ha1p_08588 64 54% 100% 100% ha1p_09700
65 38% 100% 94% ha1p_104458 66 100% 77% 0% ha1p_105287 67 69% 100%
100% ha1p_10702 68 62% 100% 80% ha1p_108469 69 62% 100% 100%
ha1p_108849 70 92% 31% 0% ha1p_11016 71 100% 15% 0% ha1p_11023 72
92% 8% 26% ha1p_12974 73 46% 100% 100% ha1p_16027 74 54% 100% 100%
ha1p_16066 75 85% 100% 95% ha1p_18911 76 100% 23% 95% ha1p_19254 77
77% 100% 44% ha1p_19853 78 69% 100% 100% ha1p_22257 79 64% 100% 91%
ha1p_22519 80 77% 92% 91% ha1p_31800 81 100% 31% 50% ha1p_33290 82
83% 92% 50% ha1p_37635 83 91% 100% 45% ha1p_39189 84 50% 100% 100%
ha1p_39511 85 100% 27% 31% ha1p_39752 86 75% 77% 85% ha1p_60945 87
85% 15% 21% ha1p_62183 88 50% 100% 95% ha1p_69418 89 75% 100% 100%
ha1p_71224 90 92% 83% 67% ha1p_74221 91 64% 100% 42% ha1p_76289 92
64% 100% 90% ha1p_81050 93 54% 100% 100% ha1p_81674 94 83% 92% 100%
ha1p_86355 95 69% 83% 94% ha1p_98491 96 54% 100% 100% ha1p_99426 97
62% 100% 100% ha1p16_00182 54 38% 100% 94% ha1p16_00185 55 38% 100%
100% ha1p16_00193 56 92% 77% 100% ha1p16_00259 57 82% 85% 95%
Example 6
Further Validation of Selected DNA Methylation Biomarkers in a
Larger Panel of Lung Tumor Samples and Normal Lung Samples
[0160] A panel of 37 loci were selected for further validation in a
panel of 25 additional lung carcinoma samples as well as 25
additional matched adjacent histologically normal samples, bringing
the total number of tumor and normal samples analyzed to 38. The
panel also included 22 lung samples from individuals who died from
reasons other than cancer (i.e., benign samples). Samples were
treated and analyzed as described in these Examples. As shown in
Table 5, these loci display greater than 19% sensitivity, and all
of them showed greater than 70% specificity relative to normal lung
tissue, and 30 showed greater than 90% specificity relative to
normal peripheral blood.
[0161] To address the applicability of the differential DNA
methylation events as biomarkers for additional tumor types, a
subset of claimed loci were analyzed in a panel of 10 cervical
tumor samples and 8 benign cervical samples. All tumors were
squamous cell cervical carcinomas with histology-confirmed
neoplastic cellularity ranging from 75% to 95%. Benign cervical
samples were obtained from hysterectomies of cervical cancer-free
women. Some loci listed in Table 5 were analyzed using the same
qPCR based assays as described in Example 3. Receiver-operator
characteristic analysis (Lasko, et al. (2005) Journal of Biomedical
Informatics 38(5):404-415.) was used to determine empirical
threshold values for classification of tissue samples. The analysis
was performed independently for each locus. Resulting sensitivity
and specificity calculations are shown in Table 5 (columns labeled
"cervical"). These results demonstrate that loci discovered to be
differentially methylated in lung tumors relative to normal or
benign tissue can also be relevant biomarkers of cancers other than
lung cancer.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Sensitivity and specificity of
differentially methylated loci in a panel of 22 benign lung
samples, 38 adjacent normal samples, 38 lung tumor samples and 23
normal blood samples using ROC analysis Adjacent &Benign
Adjacent Normal Benign Samples Blood Cervical FeatureName
Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity
Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity
ha1g_01966 84.21% 85.00% 84.21% 84.21% 89.47% 90.91% 84.21% 82.61%
90.00% 87.50% ha1g_02153 78.95% 78.33% 78.95% 78.95% 78.95% 77.27%
86.84% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% ha1g_02319 84.21% 85.00% 78.95%
81.58% 86.84% 86.36% 94.74% 95.65% 90.00% 87.50% ha1p_02799 60.53%
60.00% 60.53% 60.53% 60.53% 59.09% 81.58% 82.61% -- -- ha1p_03567
84.21% 85.00% 81.58% 81.58% 86.84% 86.36% 78.95% 78.26% -- --
ha1p_03671 65.79% 68.33% 65.79% 68.42% 65.79% 68.18% 78.95% 78.26%
80.00% 75.00% ha1p_07131 89.47% 88.33% 86.84% 86.84% 92.11% 90.91%
94.74% 95.65% 70.00% 75.00% ha1p_07989 84.21% 85.00% 84.21% 84.21%
86.84% 86.36% 84.21% 82.61% -- -- ha1p_08588 84.21% 85.00% 84.21%
81.58% 86.84% 86.36% 86.84% 86.96% 60.00% 62.50% ha1p_09700 68.42%
68.33% 68.42% 68.42% 68.42% 68.18% 63.16% 65.22% -- -- ha1p_105287
78.95% 80.00% 78.95% 78.95% 84.21% 86.36% 94.74% 95.65% 70.00%
75.00% ha1p_10702 63.16% 66.67% 63.16% 73.68% 63.16% 63.64% 63.16%
78.26% -- -- ha1p_108469 78.95% 78.33% 81.58% 81.58% 78.95% 77.27%
86.84% 86.96% 70.00% 62.50% ha1p_12974 57.89% 58.33% 52.63% 52.63%
65.79% 68.18% 76.32% 100.00% 80.00% 75.00% ha1p_16027 78.95% 78.33%
76.32% 76.32% 86.84% 86.36% 100.00% 100.00% 70.00% 75.00%
ha1p_16066 78.95% 80.00% 78.95% 78.95% 81.58% 81.82% 92.11% 91.30%
-- -- ha1p_18911 73.68% 73.33% 73.68% 73.68% 73.68% 72.73% 76.32%
78.26% 60.00% 62.50% ha1p_19853 86.84% 86.67% 86.84% 86.84% 86.84%
86.36% 92.11% 91.30% 90.00% 87.50% ha1p_22257 76.32% 76.67% 78.95%
78.95% 68.42% 68.18% 73.68% 73.91% -- -- ha1p_22519 84.21% 83.33%
81.58% 81.58% 84.21% 86.36% 68.42% 69.57% -- -- ha1p_31800 84.21%
83.33% 89.47% 86.84% 81.58% 81.82% 60.53% 60.87% -- -- ha1p_33290
89.47% 90.00% 89.47% 89.47% 86.84% 86.36% 52.63% 52.17% -- --
ha1p_39189 84.21% 83.33% 84.21% 84.21% 84.21% 86.36% 81.58% 78.26%
-- -- ha1p_39752 65.79% 65.00% 68.42% 68.42% 57.89% 59.09% 86.84%
86.96% -- -- ha1p_62183 84.21% 83.33% 81.58% 81.58% 86.84% 86.36%
94.74% 95.65% -- -- ha1p_69418 86.84% 86.67% 86.84% 86.84% 89.47%
90.91% 100.00% 100.00% 70.00% 75.00% ha1p_71224 76.32% 76.67%
76.32% 76.32% 76.32% 77.27% 78.95% 78.26% -- -- ha1p_76289 73.68%
73.33% 73.68% 73.68% 73.68% 72.73% 76.32% 78.26% -- -- ha1p_81050
89.47% 90.00% 84.21% 84.21% 94.74% 95.45% 94.74% 95.65% 70.00%
75.00% ha1p_81674 65.79% 68.33% 71.05% 68.42% 63.16% 63.64% 63.16%
65.22% 50.00% 50.00% ha1p_86355 57.89% 56.67% 55.26% 55.26% 60.53%
59.09% 84.21% 82.61% -- -- ha1p_98491 55.26% 55.00% 55.26% 55.26%
52.63% 54.55% 92.11% 91.30% 60.00% 62.50% ha1p_99426 86.84% 88.33%
86.84% 86.84% 86.84% 86.36% 94.74% 95.65% 100.00% 100.00%
ha1p16_00182 78.95% 78.33% 76.32% 76.32% 81.58% 81.82% 89.47%
91.30% 90.00% 87.50% ha1p16_00185 76.32% 76.67% 76.32% 76.32%
76.32% 77.27% 84.21% 86.96% 100.00% 100.00% ha1p16_00193 78.95%
78.33% 73.68% 73.68% 84.21% 86.36% 86.84% 86.96% 80.00% 75.00%
ha1p16_00259 78.95% 78.33% 78.95% 78.95% 78.95% 81.82% 78.95%
82.61% -- -- TH2B 76.32% 76.67% 73.68% 73.68% 78.95% 77.27% 86.84%
100.00% -- --
Example 7
Determination of Sensitivity and Specificity by Receiver Operating
Characteristics (ROC) Analysis
[0162] Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis (see Lasko
et al, Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38(5):404-415 (2005)) was
used to determine empirical cut-off values for classification of
tissue samples. The analysis was performed independently for each
of the forty-two loci, as well as for each of the following
comparisons: Tumor vs. Normal (non-diseased ovary) and Tumor vs.
Blood. In Table 6, the calculated sensitivity and specificity are
reported for both of the paradigms. In each case, sensitivity is
reported as the true positive rate and 1-specificity is reported as
the false positive rate. For each depicted locus, sensitivity
refers to the percentage of tumor samples that report a value above
(for a gain of DNA methylation event in tumor) or below (for a loss
of DNA methylation event in tumor) a threshold value determined by
ROC analysis. Specificity refers to the percentage of normal
samples that report a value below (for a gain of DNA methylation
event in tumor) or above (for a loss of DNA methylation event in
tumor) a threshold value determined by ROC analysis.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Sensitivity and Specificity of
Differentially Methylated Loci as Determined by ROC Analysis in a
Panel of Tumor Ovary vs. Normal Ovary (Normal), Tumor Ovary vs.
Normal Blood (Blood) and Tumor Cervix vs. Normal Cervix (Cervical)
Feature Normal Blood Cervical Feature Name Seq Sensitivity
Specificity Sensitivity Specificity Sensitivity Specificity
CHR01P001976799 1 96.15% 96.30% 73.08% 86.96% -- -- CHR01P026794862
2 46.15% 44.44% 69.23% 69.57% -- -- CHR01P043164342 3 92.31%
100.00% 88.46% 86.96% 80.00% 75.00% CHR01P063154999 4 96.15% 96.30%
100.00% 100.00% 90.00% 87.50% CHR01P204123050 5 65.38% 66.67%
65.38% 65.22% -- -- CHR01P206905110 6 92.31% 96.30% 88.46% 86.96%
80.00% 75.00% CHR01P225608458 7 80.77% 81.48% 50.00% 47.83% -- --
CHR02P005061785 8 96.15% 96.30% 80.77% 86.96% -- -- CHR02P042255672
9 92.31% 92.59% 73.08% 73.91% -- -- CHR02P223364582 10 88.46%
88.89% 92.31% 91.30% 70.00% 75.00% CHR03P027740753 11 88.46% 88.89%
88.46% 86.96% 100.00% 100.00% CHR03P052525960 12 76.92% 77.78%
84.62% 82.61% 60.00% 62.50% CHR03P069745999 13 80.77% 81.48% 69.23%
69.57% -- -- CHR05P059799713 14 69.23% 70.37% 92.31% 91.30% 60.00%
62.50% CHR05P059799813 15 73.08% 74.07% 96.15% 95.65% 80.00% 75.00%
CHR05P177842690 16 84.62% 85.19% 80.77% 78.26% -- --
CHR06P010694062 17 88.46% 88.89% 69.23% 69.57% -- --
CHR06P026333318 18 96.15% 96.30% 73.08% 73.91% -- --
CHR08P102460854 19 88.46% 88.89% 76.92% 100.00% -- --
CHR08P102461254 20 92.31% 92.59% 88.46% 100.00% 80.00% 75.00%
CHR08P102461554 21 88.46% 88.89% 92.31% 100.00% 80.00% 75.00%
CHR09P000107988 22 84.62% 85.19% 84.62% 82.61% 90.00% 87.50%
CHR09P021958839 23 88.46% 88.89% 92.31% 91.30% 90.00% 87.50%
CHR09P131048752 24 96.15% 96.30% 73.08% 73.91% -- --
CHR10P118975684 25 76.92% 77.78% 88.46% 86.96% 100.00% 100.00%
CHR11P021861414 26 65.38% 66.67% 61.54% 60.87% -- --
CHR12P004359362 27 80.77% 81.48% 65.38% 65.22% -- --
CHR12P016001231 28 73.08% 74.07% 65.38% 65.22% -- --
CHR14P018893344 29 92.31% 92.59% 88.46% 86.96% 100.00% 100.00%
CHR14P093230340 30 92.31% 92.59% 100.00% 100.00% 90.00% 87.50%
CHR16P066389027 32 73.08% 74.07% 80.77% 91.30% 60.00% 62.50%
CHR16P083319654 33 76.92% 77.78% 69.23% 69.57% -- --
CHR18P019705147 34 96.15% 96.30% 80.77% 82.61% 90.00% 87.50%
CHR19P018622408 35 92.31% 92.59% 84.62% 82.61% 100.00% 100.00%
CHRXP013196410 37 88.46% 88.89% 69.23% 69.57% -- -- CHRXP013196870
38 88.46% 88.89% 76.92% 78.26% -- -- ha1p16_00179_l50 39 88.46%
88.89% 92.31% 91.30% 90.00% 87.50% ha1p16_00182_l50 40 92.31%
92.59% 96.15% 95.65% 80.00% 75.00% ha1p_12601_l50 42 92.31% 92.59%
69.23% 69.57% -- -- ha1p_17147_l50 43 92.31% 92.59% 50.00% 47.83%
-- -- ha1p_42350_l50 44 61.54% 62.96% 96.15% 95.65% 70.00% 75.00%
ha1p_44897_l50 45 92.31% 88.89% 53.85% 52.17% -- -- CHR01P001005050
47 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 80.00% 100.00% CHR16P001157479
48 92.86% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 71.43% 100.00%
Example 8
Discriminatory Analysis to Determine which Locus or Combination of
Loci Best Differentiate Between Cancerous and Non-Cancerous
Tissue
[0163] To determine which locus or combination of loci best
differentiate between cancerous (tumor) and non-cancerous (adjacent
normal/benign disease) tissue, discriminant analysis (Fischer, R.
A. "The Statistical Utilization of Multiple Measurements." Annals
of Eugenics, 8 (1938), 376-386.; Lachenbruch, P. A. Discriminant
Analysis. New York: Hafner Press, 1975) was utilized. A training
dataset consisted of delta Ct values for forty-two loci across a
panel of ten tumor samples and ten normal samples. Discriminant
analysis on the training set identified two combinations of four
loci each that were able to correctly classify all twenty samples
(i.e., error rate=0%) as shown in Tables 7 and 8. The models
developed on the training set were validated on a test dataset of
twenty-six tumor samples and twenty-seven normal samples. Error
rates of 0% and 1.92% were achieved when classifying tumor vs.
normal using each of the two models (see Table 9 and 10).
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Discriminant analysis results from training
data, Model 1: CHR01P001976799, CHR14P093230340, ha1p_42350_l50,
ha1p_44897_l50. Overall error rate = 0%. Predicted Group Normal
Tumor Total Known Group Normal 27 0 27 100% 0% Tumor 0 26 26 0%
100% Total 27 26
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 8 Discriminant analysis results from training
data, Model 2: CHR14P093230340, ha1p_12601_l50, ha1p_42350_l50,
ha1p_44897_l50. Overall error rate = 0%. Predicted Group Normal
Tumor Total Known Group Normal 27 0 27 100% 0% Tumor 0 26 26 0%
100% Total 27 26
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 9 Discriminant analysis results from Model 1
(CHR01P001976799, CHR14P093230340, ha1p_42350_l50, ha1p_44897_l50)
on test data. Overall error rate = 0%. Predicted Group Normal Tumor
Total Known Group Normal 27 0 27 100% 0% Tumor 0 26 26 0% 100%
Total 27 26
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 10 Discriminant analysis results from Model 2
(CHR14P093230340, ha1p_12601_l50, ha1p_42350_l50, ha1p_44897_l50)
on test data. Overall error rate = 1.92%. Predicted Group Normal
Tumor Total Known Group Normal 27 0 27 100% 0% Tumor 1 25 26 3.85%
47.17% Total 27 26
Example 9
Selection of Sequence Identified as Potential Region of
Differential DNA Methylation
[0164] As described in the examples above, the loci identified as
differentially methylated were originally discovered based on DNA
methylation-dependent microarray analyses. The sequences of the
microarray features reporting this differential methylation are
indicated in Table 2 and in section "SEQUENCE LISTING." The
"wingspan" of genomic interrogation by each array feature is
proportional to the size of the sheared target at the beginning of
the experiment (e.g., 1 to 4 Kbp), therefore regions of the genome
comprising the probe participated the interrogation for
differential methylation. Because the DNA was randomly sheared the
effective genomic region scanned is roughly twice the size of the
average molecular weight. The smallest fragments in the molecular
population were 1 Kb, this suggests the minimum region size. The
largest fragments were 4 Kb in size, suggesting that each probe
cannot monitor DNA methylation that is more than 4 Kbp proximal or
distal to each probe. PCR primers that amplify an amplicon within a
1 kb region surrounding the sequence represented by each microarray
feature were selected and used for independent verification and
validation experiments. Primer sequences and amplicon sequences are
indicated in Table 2 and in section "SEQUENCE LISTING." To optimize
successful PCR amplification, these amplicons were designed to be
less than the entire 1 kb region represented by the wingspan of the
microarray feature. However, it should be noted that differential
methylation may be detectable anywhere within this 1-8 Kb sequence
window adjacent to the probe.
[0165] In addition, the local CG density surrounding each region
was calculated. Approximately 10 kb of sequence both upstream and
downstream of each feature was extracted from the human genome. For
each 20 kb portion of the genome, a sliding window of 500 bp moving
in 100 bp steps was used to calculate the CG density. CG density
was expressed as the ratio of CG dinucleotides per kb. In this
example, it is obvious that a region anywhere within the .about.4
kb peak of CG density associated with the promoter region of the
gene could be monitored for DNA methylation and could be important
in development of a clinical diagnostic assay. As an obvious
consequence, the more CG rich the DNA is adjacent to the probe, the
more likely it is that the sequence would function redundantly to
its neighboring sequences. Because of the technology platform's
ability to monitor this adjacent DNA for methylation differences,
the sequences indicated in Table 2 (DNA Region sequences) and in
section "SEQUENCE LISTING" were selected using an 8 Kb
criteria.
Example 10
Applicability of DNA Methylation-Based Biomarkers in Additional
Tumor Types
[0166] To address the applicability of the differential DNA
methylation events as biomarkers for additional tumor types, a
subset of claimed loci were analyzed in a panel of 10 cervical
tumor samples and 8 benign cervical samples. All tumors were
squamous cell cervical carcinomas with histology-confirmed
neoplastic cellularity ranging from 75% to 95%. Benign cervical
samples were obtained from hysterectomies of cervical cancer-free
women. Loci listed in Table 5 (columns labeled "cervical") were
analyzed using qPCR based assays. Receiver-operator characteristic
analysis (Lasko, et al. (2005) Journal of Biomedical Informatics
38(5):404-415) was used to determine empirical threshold values for
classification of tissue samples. The analysis was performed
independently for each locus. Resulting sensitivity [the percentage
of tumor samples above (gain biomarkers) or below (loss biomarkers)
threshold] and specificity [the percentage of benign samples below
(gain biomarkers) or above (loss biomarkers) threshold]
calculations are shown in Table 5. These results demonstrate that
loci discovered to be differentially methylated in tumors relative
to normal or benign tissue are also relevant biomarkers of
cancers.
Example 11
Bisulfite Sequencing Confirmation of Differential DNA Methylation
of Additional Loci
[0167] Confirmation of differential DNA methylation was performed
by bisulfite sequencing. Primers were designed to amplify a 400 bp
amplicon within the 500 bp region of locus
ha1p16.sub.--00182.sub.--150 analyzed by qPCR (as discussed in the
examples above) from bisulfite converted genomic DNA. Primers
sequences lack CpG dinucleotides, and therefore amplify bisulfite
converted DNA independently of DNA methylation status. Products
were amplified from one tumor sample (positive for DNA methylation)
and from one normal sample. Amplicons were purified and cloned
using TA cloning kits (Invitrogen). Ninety-six (96) independent
clones were sequenced for the tumor sample. Ninety-six (96)
independent clones were sequenced for the normal sample. Bisulfite
treatment results in conversion of unmethylated cytosines to
uracil, but does not convert methylated cytosines. The percent
methylation of each CpG dinucleotide within the region was
calculated as the number of sequence reads of C at each CpG divided
by the total number of sequence reads. All 9 CpG dinucleotides are
methylated in the tumor (occupancy ranging from 93.62 to 100%).
However, methylation occupancy of CpG dinucleotides in normal
sample was lower, ranging from 0 to 10%.
[0168] To provide further confirmation of DNA methylation
differences and to justify the qPCR based strategy for
high-throughput detection of DNA methylation, three additional loci
CHR01P043164342, CHR01P063154999, CHR03P027740753, were analyzed by
bisulfite genomic sequencing as described above. Ninety six
independent clones were sequenced per amplicon per sample. The
sequencing results were consistent with the results of qPCR. Note
that CHR01P043164342 is a DNA methylation loss marker, and this
sequence is less methylated in tumor sample relative to the normal
sample. In addition, two other loci were analyzed by bisulfite
genomic sequencing as described above. Between 10 and 24
independent clones were sequenced per amplicon per sample. The
sequencing results were in line with the qPCR results (see Table
11). Note that the CG Position column in Table 11 refers to the CG
position in the amplicons used for bisulfite sequencing.
TABLE-US-00011 TABLE 11 Examples of Bisulfite Analysis of
Differentially Methylated Loci. CG % of Methylation Feature Name
Position Tumor Benign ha1p_03671 27 85% 18% 58 90% 27% 70 90% 18%
79 85% 9% 89 80% 9% 96 85% 9% 115 85% 9% 125 83% 9% 134 83% 0% # of
clones 20 11 qPCR result (delta Ct) 2.7 0.91 CG % Methylation
position Tumor Adj. Normal ha1p_08588 35 46% 90% 67 38% 82% 182 21%
50% 200 7% 40% # of clones 24 11 qPCR result (delta Ct) 0.95 6.23
CG % Methylation position Tumor Normal CHR01P043164342 39 9.91%
90.52% 51 7.21% 75.68% 60 6.19% 70.99% 87 10.00% 92.86% 104 9.46%
83.81% 139 3.77% 32.56% 148 13.46% 86.42% 174 9.80% 61.54% 183
7.69% 48.68% 255 6.38% 67.27% # of clones 96 96 qPCR result (delta
Ct) 0.025 7.46 CHR01P063154999 32 76.40% 15.05% 34 96.63% 7.53% 55
96.63% 23.60% 66 92.13% 4.44% 73 97.70% 4.40% 89 94.32% 2.20% 91
92.13% 3.30% 94 93.18% 0.00% 100 92.13% 1.10% 110 97.73% 1.14% 118
96.59% 2.22% 128 97.73% 2.25% # of clones 96 96 qPCR result (delta
Ct) 4.14 0 CHR03P027740753 26 93.14% 11.76% 28 96.04% 17.6% 93
29.21% 6.67% 136 52.24% 0.00% 157 91.04% 0.00% 159 92.42% 0.00% 171
98.48% 13.33% 180 81.54% 14.29% # of clones 96 96 qPCR result
(delta Ct) 4.675 0
Example 12
Analysis of DNA Methylation in Various Cancer Types
[0169] To address the applicability of the claimed DNA methylation
biomarkers to cancer types other than one type of cancer, all
claimed biomarkers were analyzed in panels of bladder, breast,
cervical, colon, endometrial, esophageal, head and neck, liver,
lung, melanoma, ovarian, prostate, renal, and thyroid tumors.
Adjacent histology normal tissues were analyzed as controls. In
addition, melanoma tumors were analyzed, although no adjacent
normal tissues were available. The number of samples analyzed for
each cancer type is provided in Table 12. DNA methylation was
measured as described in these Examples. For each locus and each
cancer type, the sensitivity and specificity for discriminating
between tumor and adjacent normal tissues are reported in Tables
13-27. For melanoma tumors (Table 23), only sensitivity (the
frequency of DNA methylation detection (ie. samples that report and
average dCt.gtoreq.1.0)) is reported due to the unavailability of
adjacent normal tissues. For each locus, the optimal threshold for
discriminating between tumor and adjacent normal tissue was
calculated following ROC curve analysis. These data demonstrate
that particular biomarker loci are applicable to more than just one
cancer type.
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 12 Number of tumor and normal samples tested
for the biomarker loci. Cancer Type Tumor Normal Bladder 9 9 Breast
10 10 Cervical 10 9 Colon 10 10 Endometrial 14 9 Esophageal 9 10
Head &Neck 9 5 Liver 9 9 Lung 20 20 Melanoma 7 0 Ovarian 34 35
Prostate 9 9 Renal 10 10 Thyroid 10 10
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 13 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in bladder tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal bladder tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of
Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 6 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P026794862 2
0.52 62.50% 5 of 8 50.00% 3 of 6 CHR01P043164342 3 4.69 66.67% 6 of
9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR01P063154999 4 0.955 100.00% 9 of 9 66.67% 6 of
9 CHR01P204123050 5 1.265 50.00% 4 of 8 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR01P206905110 6 2.685 88.89% 8 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P225608458
7 1.655 100.00% 9 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR02P005061785 8 4.945 66.67%
6 of 9 75.00% 6 of 8 CHR02P042255672 9 2.5 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7
of 9 CHR02P223364582 10 1.65 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P027740753 11 1.225 100.00% 9 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8
CHR03P052525960 12 3.225 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P069745999 13 3.255 55.56% 5 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR05P059799713 14 1.13 77.78% 7 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9 CHR05P059799813
15 0.715 100.00% 8 of 8 37.50% 3 of 8 CHR05P177842690 16 2.79
77.78% 7 of 9 50.00% 4 of 8 CHR06P010694062 17 4.32 66.67% 6 of 9
100.00% 9 of 9 CHR06P026333318 18 4.31 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102460854 19 0.805 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102461254 20 1.09 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102461554 21 0.97 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR09P000107988
22 1.65 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR09P021958839 23 1.73 77.78%
7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR09P131048752 24 4.21 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00%
9 of 9 CHR10P118975684 25 1.295 77.78% 7 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR11P021861414 26 2.96 88.89% 8 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR12P004359362
27 2.25 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR12P016001231 28 0.965 25.00%
2 of 8 100.00% 8 of 8 CHR14P018893344 29 3.335 55.56% 5 of 9
100.00% 8 of 8 CHR14P093230340 30 1.91 77.78% 7 of 9 85.71% 6 of 7
CHR16P000373719 31 1.305 100.00% 8 of 8 75.00% 3 of 4
CHR16P066389027 32 1.47 55.56% 5 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR16P083319654
33 1.575 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR18P019705147 34 3.85
100.00% 9 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9 CHR19P018622408 35 2.795 100.00% 9 of
9 87.50% 7 of 8 CHR19P051892823 36 2.095 80.00% 4 of 5 100.00% 4 of
4 CHRXP013196410 37 2.63 66.67% 6 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHRXP013196870
38 2.255 55.56% 5 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9 halp16_00179_150 39 1.44
88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 halp16_00182_150 40 1.45 77.78% 7 of 9
100.00% 9 of 9 halp16_00257_150 41 1.42 66.67% 6 of 9 87.50% 7 of 8
halp_12601_150 42 1.245 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 halp_17147_150
43 1.12 75.00% 6 of 8 88.89% 8 of 9 halp_42350_150 44 5.11 62.50% 5
of 8 50.00% 4 of 8 halp_44897_150 45 1.645 100.00% 9 of 9 85.71% 6
of 7 halp_61253_150 46 2.61 75.00% 6 of 8 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR01P001005050 47 1.745 75.00% 6 of 8 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR16P001157479 48 -- -- -- -- -- halg_00681 49 1.68 44% 4 of 9
100% 9 of 9 halg_01966 50 1.99 89% 8 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halg_02153 51
1.51 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halg_02319 52 0.64 100% 9 of 9 89% 8 of
9 halg_02335 53 4.24 78% 7 of 9 33% 3 of 9 halp16_00182 54 0.73
100% 9 of 9 67% 6 of 9 halp16_00185 55 1.12 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp16_00193 56 1.94 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp16_00259 57 2.17
88% 7 of 8 78% 7 of 9 halp_02799 58 2.35 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp_03567 59 1.06 67% 6 of 9 75% 6 of 8 halp_03671 60 1.15 89% 8
of 9 89% 8 of 9 halp_05803 61 2.09 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp_07131 62 3.52 78% 7 of 9 89% 8 of 9 halp_07989 63 2.06 78% 7
of 9 88% 7 of 8 halp_08588 64 3.96 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp_09700 65 0.77 75% 6 of 8 100% 8 of 8 halp_104458 66 3.43 56% 5
of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_105287 67 2.96 100% 9 of 9 89% 8 of 9
halp_10702 68 3.06 67% 6 of 9 100% 8 of 8 halp_108469 69 1.54 33% 3
of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_108849 70 3.42 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp_11016 71 2.92 100% 9 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_11023 72 2.91 56% 5
of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_12974 73 0.53 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9
halp_16027 74 2.2 44% 4 of 9 89% 8 of 9 halp_16066 75 2.25 56% 5 of
9 78% 7 of 9 halp_18911 76 2.77 44% 4 of 9 100% 8 of 8 halp_19254
77 1.95 78% 7 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_19853 78 0.79 78% 7 of 9 89% 8
of 9 halp_22257 79 2.7 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_22519 80 1.41
89% 8 of 9 78% 7 of 9 halp_31800 81 2.65 50% 3 of 6 89% 8 of 9
halp_33290 82 2.62 89% 8 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_37635 83 6 100% 9 of
9 0% 0 of 9 halp_39189 84 0.78 100% 9 of 9 78% 7 of 9 halp_39511 85
3.02 44% 4 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_39752 86 2.51 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of
9 halp_60945 87 2 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_62183 88 4.11 22% 2
of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_69418 89 2.64 78% 7 of 9 100% 8 of 8
halp_71224 90 1.83 89% 8 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_74221 91 1.98 56% 5
of 9 89% 8 of 9 halp_76289 92 1.11 78% 7 of 9 100% 9 of 9
halp_81050 93 3.95 78% 7 of 9 89% 8 of 9 halp_81674 94 1.82 67% 6
of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_86355 95 1.18 89% 8 of 9 75% 6 of 8
halp_98491 96 3.99 33% 3 of 9 100% 9 of 9 halp_99426 97 1.34 67% 6
of 9 100% 9 of 9 Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC
curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and
adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 14 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in breast tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal breast tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of
Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 5.18 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR01P026794862 2 2.075 100.00% 8 of 8 33.33% 1 of 3
CHR01P043164342 3 1.8 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR01P063154999
4 2.295 60.00% 6 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR01P204123050 5 1.655
80.00% 8 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10 CHR01P206905110 6 2.165 70.00% 7 of
10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR01P225608458 7 1.9 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of
10 CHR02P005061785 8 2.18 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR02P042255672 9 5.895 70.00% 7 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR02P223364582 10 2.625 60.00% 6 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR03P027740753 11 1.62 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR03P052525960 12 2.4 50.00% 5 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR03P069745999 13 0.775 40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR05P059799713 14 1.43 10.00% 1 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR05P059799813 15 0.765 66.67% 6 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR05P177842690 16 1.29 70.00% 7 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR06P010694062 17 3.46 70.00% 7 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR06P026333318 18 1.155 50.00% 5 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR08P102460854 19 0.615 100.00% 10 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR08P102461254 20 0.525 100.00% 10 of 10 50.00% 5 of 10
CHR08P102461554 21 0.695 100.00% 10 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR09P000107988 22 1.97 40.00% 4 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR09P021958839 23 2.805 20.00% 2 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR09P131048752 24 2.22 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR10P118975684 25 2.695 40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR11P021861414 26 3.98 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR12P004359362 27 1.91 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR12P016001231 28 1.515 70.00% 7 of 10 62.50% 5 of 8
CHR14P018893344 29 2.585 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR14P093230340 30 3.66 30.00% 3 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR16P000373719 31 1.16 33.33% 3 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR16P066389027
32 0.935 60.00% 6 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR16P083319654 33 1.635
80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR18P019705147 34 3.435 50.00% 5 of
10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR19P018622408 35 2.595 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00%
10 of 10 CHR19P051892823 36 3.53 100.00% 4 of 4 100.00% 8 of 8
CHRXP013196410 37 1.63 66.67% 6 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHRXP013196870
38 1.71 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 halp16_00179_150 39 1.4
30.00% 3 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 halp16_00182_150 40 0.99 30.00% 3
of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 halp16_00257_150 41 2.5 30.00% 3 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 halp_12601_150 42 0.99 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8
of 10 halp_17147_150 43 0.99 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
halp_42350_150 44 5.27 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 halp_44897_150
45 2.76 40.00% 4 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 halp_61253_150 46 1.37 80.00%
8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR01P001005050 47 0.605 70.00% 7 of 10
75.00% 6 of 8 CHR16P001157479 48 -- -- -- -- -- halg_00681 49 1.66
90% 9 of 10 100% 10 of 10 halg_01966 50 3.37 60% 6 of 10 90% 9 of
10 halg_02153 51 2.72 50% 5 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halg_02319 52 2.03
50% 5 of 10 100% 10 of 10 halg_02335 53 2.4 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10
halp16_00182 54 1.55 60% 6 of 10 50% 5 of 10 halp16_00185 55 1.65
60% 6 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp16_00193 56 2.89 60% 6 of 10 80% 8 of
10 halp16_00259 57 5.08 20% 2 of 10 100% 10 of 10 halp_02799 58
4.22 80% 8 of 10 60% 6 of 10 halp_03567 59 1.46 100% 10 of 10 50% 3
of 6 halp_03671 60 0.59 40% 4 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_05803 61 2.97
67% 4 of 6 86% 6 of 7 halp_07131 62 5.55 100% 7 of 7 86% 6 of 7
halp_07989 63 2.18 100% 9 of 9 88% 7 of 8 halp_08588 64 5.9 100% 10
of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_9700 65 0.72 44% 4 of 9 89% 8 of 9
halp_104458 66 6 20% 2 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_105287 67 0.82 40% 4
of 10 80% 8 of 10 halp_10702 68 1.57 60% 6 of 10 100% 9 of 9
halp_108469 69 1.77 78% 7 of 9 90% 9 of 10 halp_108849 70 1.78 80%
8 of 10 80% 8 of 10 halp_11016 71 3.69 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10
halp_11023 72 3.02 80% 8 of 10 80% 8 of 10 halp_12974 73 0.94 60% 6
of 10 63% 5 of 8 halp_16027 74 1.81 80% 8 of 10 70% 7 of 10
halp_16066 75 2.33 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_18911 76 3.31 100%
9 of 9 30% 3 of 10 halp_19254 77 3.66 100% 10 of 10 90% 9 of 10
halp_19853 78 1.18 80% 8 of 10 80% 8 of 10 halp_22257 79 3.55 50% 5
of 10 100% 10 of 10 halp_22519 80 1.64 100% 9 of 9 90% 9 of 10
halp_31800 81 3.68 60% 6 of 10 100% 10 of 10 halp_33290 82 2.26 90%
9 of 10 100% 10 of 10 halp_37635 83 5.41 100% 10 of 10 0% 0 of 10
halp_39189 84 1.12 88% 7 of 8 89% 8 of 9 halp_39511 85 3.3 60% 6 of
10 78% 7 of 9 halp_39752 86 3.99 30% 3 of 10 100% 10 of 10
halp_60945 87 1.84 70% 7 of 10 50% 5 of 10 halp_62183 88 4.05 90% 9
of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_69418 89 2.39 60% 6 of 10 90% 9 of 10
halp_71224 90 2.01 50% 5 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_74221 91 1.12 80% 8
of 10 50% 5 of 10 halp_76289 92 1.12 89% 8 of 9 86% 6 of 7
halp_81050 93 4.34 100% 10 of 10 90% 9 of 10 halp_81674 94 1.9 90%
9 of 10 100% 8 of 8 halp_86355 95 2.08 70% 7 of 10 100% 8 of 8
halp_98491 96 4.17 70% 7 of 10 80% 8 of 10 halp_99426 97 1.2 90% 9
of 10 90% 9 of 10 Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC
curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and
adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 15 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in cervical tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal cervical tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of
Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 2.985 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR01P026794862 2 0.985 50.00% 3 of 6 87.50% 7 of 8 CHR01P043164342
3 2.535 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 8 of 8 CHR01P063154999 4 1.165
90.00% 9 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P204123050 5 1.87 60.00% 6 of 10
88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P206905110 6 2.83 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR01P225608458 7 2 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR02P005061785 8
1.99 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR02P042255672 9 2.02 80.00%
8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR02P223364582 10 2.11 70.00% 7 of 10
77.78% 7 of 9 CHR03P027740753 11 0.96 90.00% 9 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P052525960 12 1.74 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P069745999 13 2.955 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR05P059799713 14 0.89 50.00% 5 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR05P059799813 15 0.735 30.00% 3 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR05P177842690 16 1.885 40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR06P010694062 17 2.38 90.00% 9 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR06P026333318 18 1.97 90.00% 9 of 10 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR08P102460854 19 0.925 90.00% 9 of 10 75.00% 6 of 8
CHR08P102461254 20 1.305 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102461554 21 1.1 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR09P000107988 22 1.6 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR09P021958839 23 1.27 70.00% 7 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR09P131048752 24 3.68 70.00% 7 of 10 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR10P118975684 25 1.28 80.00% 8 of 10 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR11P021861414 26 5.505 80.00% 8 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR12P004359362 27 3.645 30.00% 3 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR12P016001231 28 1.56 100.00% 10 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR14P018893344 29 1.255 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR14P093230340 30 1.695 88.89% 8 of 9 85.71% 6 of 7
CHR16P000373719 31 2.135 87.50% 7 of 8 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR16P066389027 32 1.22 60.00% 6 of 10 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR16P083319654 33 2.885 100.00% 10 of 10 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR18P019705147 34 2.815 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR19P018622408 35 1.525 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR19P051892823 36 1.445 66.67% 4 of 6 100.00% 4 of 4
CHRXP013196410 37 1.545 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHRXP013196870 38 1.48 80.00% 8 of 10 85.71% 6 of 7
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.555 66.67% 6 of 9 87.50% 7 of 8
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.205 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 0.705 70.00% 7 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9
ha1p_12601_l50 42 2.245 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p_17147_l50 43 2.455 90.00% 9 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p_42350_l50 44 2.335 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p_44897_l50
45 3.755 80.00% 8 of 10 85.71% 6 of 7 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.34
100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 6 of 6 CHR01P001005050 47 2.025 80.00% 8
of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR16P001157479 48 4.045 71.43% 5 of 7 100.00%
2 of 2 ha1g_00681 49 0.91 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1g_01966 50
1.71 100% 10 of 10 67% 6 of 9 ha1g_02153 51 1.41 100% 10 of 10 100%
9 of 9 ha1g_02319 52 0.99 100% 10 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1g_02335 53
4.96 60% 6 of 10 67% 6 of 9 ha1p16_00182 54 1.13 80% 8 of 10 89% 8
of 9 ha1p16_00185 55 0.96 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p16_00193 56
1.74 80% 8 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p16_00259 57 1.84 90% 9 of 10 89% 8
of 9 ha1p_02799 58 3.12 20% 2 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_03567 59 1.89
100% 10 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_03671 60 1.14 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_05803 61 1.3 100% 10 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_07131 62 5.67 70% 7
of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_07989 63 4.72 89% 8 of 9 75% 6 of 8
ha1p_08588 64 6 70% 7 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_09700 65 0.59 70% 7 of
10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_104458 66 4.45 70% 7 of 10 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_105287 67 2.56 70% 7 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_10702 68 2.09 60%
6 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_108469 69 1.27 100% 10 of 10 44% 4 of 9
ha1p_108849 70 3.01 100% 10 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_11016 71 3.18
100% 10 of 10 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_11023 72 2.52 90% 9 of 10 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_12974 73 0.6 50% 5 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_16027 74 1.56 100% 10
of 10 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_16066 75 2.15 60% 6 of 10 88% 7 of 8
ha1p_18911 76 3.08 60% 6 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_19254 77 4.53 90% 9
of 10 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_19853 78 0.55 100% 9 of 9 67% 6 of 9
ha1p_22257 79 2.35 60% 6 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_22519 80 2.09 80% 8
of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_31800 81 2.88 90% 9 of 10 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_33290 82 1.65 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_37635 83 6 10% 1 of
10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_39189 84 0.86 100% 10 of 10 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_39511 85 3.18 63% 5 of 8 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_39752 86 2.44 88% 7
of 8 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_60945 87 1.44 80% 8 of 10 67% 6 of 9
ha1p_62183 88 5.21 60% 6 of 10 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_69418 89 3.61 100%
10 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_71224 90 1.99 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_74221 91 1.61 89% 8 of 9 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_76289 92 0.52 90% 9
of 10 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_81050 93 6 50% 5 of 10 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_81674 94 0.87 80% 8 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_86355 95 1.56 60% 6
of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_98491 96 3.3 70% 7 of 10 67% 6 of 9
ha1p_99426 97 0.76 90% 9 of 10 100% 9 of 9 Threshold: Average dCt
value established by ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for
distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of
positive (i.e., methylation score above Threshold for gain of
methylation markers or below Threshold for loss of methylation
markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive tumors relative
to the total number of tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative
(i.e., methylation score below Threshold for gain of methylation
markers or above Threshold for loss of methylation markers)
adjacent normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent
normal samples relative to the total number of adjacent normal
samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 16 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in colon tumors relative to adjacent
histological normal colon tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of Feature
Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 5.86 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR01P026794862 2 0.88 50.00% 4 of 8 87.50% 7 of 8 CHR01P043164342
3 1.78 80.00% 8 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10 CHR01P063154999 4 1.14 80.00%
8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR01P204123050 5 1.655 40.00% 4 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 CHR01P206905110 6 1.63 70.00% 7 of 10 80.00% 8 of
10 CHR01P225608458 7 1.97 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR02P005061785 8 5.51 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR02P042255672 9 2.8 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR02P223364582 10 2 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR03P027740753
11 1.26 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR03P052525960 12 2.825
100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR03P069745999 13 3.6 70.00% 7 of
10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR05P059799713 14 1.025 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8
of 10 CHR05P059799813 15 0.89 40.00% 4 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR05P177842690 16 3.58 90.00% 9 of 10 20.00% 2 of 10
CHR06P010694062 17 3.055 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR06P026333318 18 3.175 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR08P102460854 19 0.825 90.00% 9 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR08P102461254 20 0.69 80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR08P102461554 21 1.015 90.00% 9 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR09P000107988 22 0.985 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR09P021958839 23 1.46 90.00% 9 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR09P131048752 24 3.695 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR10P118975684 25 1.41 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR11P021861414 26 3.79 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR12P004359362 27 3.51 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR12P016001231 28 1.295 40.00% 4 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR14P018893344 29 2.805 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR14P093230340 30 1.66 90.00% 9 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR16P000373719 31 1.525 40.00% 2 of 5 87.50% 7 of 8
CHR16P066389027 32 0.655 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR16P083319654 33 1.79 90.00% 9 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR18P019705147 34 2.01 80.00% 8 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR19P018622408 35 3.015 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR19P051892823 36 0.6 57.14% 4 of 7 100.00% 7 of 7 CHRXP013196410
37 2.99 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 CHRXP013196870 38 2.92
60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.425 80.00% 8 of
10 90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.22 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9
of 10 ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.085 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
ha1p_12601_l50 42 0.68 80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_17147_l50
43 1.025 90.00% 9 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10 ha1p_42350_l50 44 3.865
80.00% 8 of 10 55.56% 5 of 9 ha1p_44897_l50 45 3.045 60.00% 6 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.88 100.00% 10 of 10 90.00% 9
of 10 CHR01P001005050 47 1.03 70.00% 7 of 10 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR16P001157479 48 2.055 50.00% 4 of 8 100.00% 9 of 9 ha1g_00681 49
1.61 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1g_01966 50 1.76 100% 10 of 10 90% 9
of 10 ha1g_02153 51 1.51 80% 8 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1g_02319 52 0.53
80% 8 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1g_02335 53 1.63 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p16_00182 54 1.17 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p16_00185 55 1.08
90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p16_00193 56 1.79 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of
10 ha1p16_00259 57 2.89 90% 9 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_02799 58 4.6
50% 5 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_03567 59 0.78 70% 7 of 10 30% 3 of 10
ha1p_03671 60 2.03 50% 5 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_05803 61 2.22 80% 8
of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_07131 62 4.26 100% 10 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_07989 63 2.48 67% 6 of 9 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_08588 64 4.17 90%
9 of 10 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_09700 65 0.66 33% 3 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_104458 66 4.08 80% 8 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_105287 67 1.61 70%
7 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_10702 68 1.14 50% 5 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_108469 69 1.72 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_108849 70 3.63 80%
8 of 10 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_11016 71 2.28 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_11023 72 2.04 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_12974 73 0.68 30% 3
of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_16027 74 2.03 50% 5 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_16066 75 2.09 80% 8 of 10 60% 6 of 10 ha1p_18911 76 2.52 78% 7
of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_19254 77 3.07 100% 10 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_19853 78 1.74 50% 5 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_22257 79 0.96 50%
5 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_22519 80 2.62 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_31800 81 3.8 60% 6 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_33290 82 2.56 90%
9 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_37635 83 6 100% 10 of 10 0% 0 of 10
ha1p_39189 84 1.29 100% 9 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_39511 85 1.99 70% 7
of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_39752 86 3.01 40% 4 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_60945 87 1.11 100% 10 of 10 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_62183 88 2.58 60%
6 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_69418 89 1.68 70% 7 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_71224 90 2.42 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_74221 91 0.98 88% 7
of 8 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_76289 92 1.84 80% 8 of 10 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_81050 93 5.74 60% 6 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_81674 94 2.3 60% 6
of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_86355 95 0.67 50% 5 of 10 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_98491 96 1.63 50% 5 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_99426 97 2.21 50% 5
of 10 100% 10 of 10 Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC
curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and
adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 17 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in endometrial tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal endometrial tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg.
of Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity
Total CHR01P001976799 1 2.95 78.57% 11 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR01P026794862 2 1.565 50.00% 2 of 4 100.00% 1 of 1
CHR01P043164342 3 3.105 92.86% 13 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR01P063154999 4 0.705 85.71% 12 of 14 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR01P204123050 5 2.55 40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR01P206905110 6 3.385 92.86% 13 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR01P225608458 7 2.025 57.14% 8 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR02P005061785 8 1.17 92.86% 13 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR02P042255672 9 1.175 78.57% 11 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR02P223364582 10 2.145 100.00% 14 of 14 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR03P027740753 11 0.985 85.71% 12 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P052525960 12 1.84 71.43% 10 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR03P069745999 13 1.25 85.71% 12 of 14 44.44% 4 of 9
CHR05P059799713 14 1.285 71.43% 10 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR05P059799813 15 1.28 78.57% 11 of 14 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR05P177842690 16 1.72 78.57% 11 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR06P010694062 17 3.215 50.00% 7 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR06P026333318 18 1.895 92.86% 13 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102460854 19 1.44 92.86% 13 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR08P102461254 20 1.635 100.00% 14 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR08P102461554 21 1.97 100.00% 14 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR09P000107988 22 1.52 92.86% 13 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR09P021958839 23 1.27 100.00% 14 of 14 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR09P131048752 24 2.72 71.43% 10 of 14 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR10P118975684 25 0.505 35.71% 5 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR11P021861414 26 5.925 78.57% 11 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR12P004359362 27 2.28 92.86% 13 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR12P016001231 28 1.635 100.00% 14 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR14P018893344 29 1.565 71.43% 10 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR14P093230340 30 2.235 78.57% 11 of 14 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR16P000373719 31 2.88 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR16P066389027 32 1.325 85.71% 12 of 14 50.00% 4 of 8
CHR16P083319654 33 2.49 100.00% 14 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR18P019705147 34 3.36 92.86% 13 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR19P018622408 35 1.97 71.43% 10 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR19P051892823 36 1.11 85.71% 6 of 7 100.00% 6 of 6 CHRXP013196410
37 1.205 92.31% 12 of 13 77.78% 7 of 9 CHRXP013196870 38 1.32
78.57% 11 of 14 71.43% 5 of 7 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.325 100.00% 14
of 14 77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00182_l50 40 0.985 92.86% 13 of 14
66.67% 6 of 9 ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.06 85.71% 12 of 14 77.78% 7 of
9 ha1p_12601_l50 42 3.35 100.00% 14 of 14 88.89% 8 of 9
ha1p_17147_l50 43 2.68 100.00% 14 of 14 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p_42350_l50 44 2.175 38.46% 5 of 13 100.00% 7 of 7
ha1p_44897_l50 45 4.065 78.57% 11 of 14 44.44% 4 of 9
ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.115 100.00% 6 of 6 50.00% 1 of 2
CHR01P001005050 47 1.75 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR16P001157479 48 -- -- -- -- -- ha1g_00681 49 1.74 50% 7 of 14
100% 9 of 9 ha1g_01966 50 2.26 71% 10 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1g_02153
51 0.68 93% 13 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1g_02319 52 0.62 36% 5 of 14 100%
9 of 9 ha1g_02335 53 1.77 69% 9 of 13 44% 4 of 9 ha1p16_00182 54
0.89 79% 11 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00185 55 0.86 71% 10 of 14 89%
8 of 9 ha1p16_00193 56 1.67 85% 11 of 13 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00259 57
1.94 100% 14 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_02799 58 4.32 93% 13 of 14 78% 7
of 9 ha1p_03567 59 1.79 79% 11 of 14 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_03671 60 0.83
64% 9 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_05803 61 0.66 93% 13 of 14 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_07131 62 6 86% 12 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_07989 63 3.79 36% 5
of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_08588 64 6 93% 13 of 14 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_09700 65 0.82 100% 13 of 13 25% 2 of 8 ha1p_104458 66 3.93 29%
4 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_105287 67 2.99 100% 14 of 14 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_10702 68 0.75 50% 7 of 14 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_108469 69 1.43 64%
9 of 14 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_108849 70 2.92 79% 11 of 14 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_11016 71 4.13 50% 7 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_11023 72 1.61 64% 9
of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_12974 73 0.51 0% 0 of 14 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_16027 74 1.93 64% 9 of 14 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_16066 75 0.51 79% 11
of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_18911 76 2.53 43% 6 of 14 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_19254 77 5.53 79% 11 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_19853 78 0.85 79%
11 of 14 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_22257 79 2.22 43% 6 of 14 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_22519 80 2.02 64% 9 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_31800 81 3.52 57% 8
of 14 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_33290 82 1.24 71% 10 of 14 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_37635 83 6 7% 1 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_39189 84 0.63 86% 12 of
14 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_39511 85 3.91 71% 10 of 14 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_39752
86 1.66 86% 12 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_60945 87 0.86 86% 12 of 14 33%
3 of 9 ha1p_62183 88 4.01 71% 10 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_69418 89
2.53 50% 7 of 14 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_71224 90 1.46 71% 10 of 14 78% 7
of 9 ha1p_74221 91 0.88 85% 11 of 13 63% 5 of 8 ha1p_76289 92 0.74
71% 10 of 14 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_81050 93 5.92 79% 11 of 14 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_81674 94 0.82 86% 12 of 14 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_86355 95 1.19 79%
11 of 14 75% 6 of 8 ha1p_98491 96 2.11 62% 8 of 13 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_99426 97 0.66 79% 11 of 14 89% 8 of 9 Threshold: Average dCt
value established by ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for
distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of
positive (i.e., methylation score above Threshold for gain of
methylation markers or below Threshold for loss of methylation
markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive tumors relative
to the total number of tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative
(i.e., methylation score below Threshold for gain of methylation
markers or above Threshold for loss of methylation markers)
adjacent normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent
normal samples relative to the total number of adjacent normal
samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 18 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in esophageal tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal esophageal tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg.
of Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity
Total CHR01P001976799 1 6 100.00% 9 of 9 0.00% 0 of 10
CHR01P026794862 2 1.075 12.50% 1 of 8 100.00% 6 of 6
CHR01P043164342 3 5.84 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR01P063154999 4 1.02 100.00% 9 of 9 50.00% 5 of 10
CHR01P204123050 5 1.515 62.50% 5 of 8 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR01P206905110
6 1.935 88.89% 8 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR01P225608458 7 1.52 100.00%
9 of 9 70.00% 7 of 10 CHR02P005061785 8 3.345 55.56% 5 of 9 80.00%
8 of 10 CHR02P042255672 9 3.095 88.89% 8 of 9 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR02P223364582 10 1.765 88.89% 8 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR03P027740753 11 0.97 100.00% 9 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR03P052525960 12 1.93 55.56% 5 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR03P069745999 13 3.435 77.78% 7 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR05P059799713 14 1.38 77.78% 7 of 9 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR05P059799813 15 1.57 55.56% 5 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR05P177842690 16 2.435 62.50% 5 of 8 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR06P010694062 17 2.07 77.78% 7 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR06P026333318
18 1.34 88.89% 8 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10 CHR08P102460854 19 0.555
66.67% 6 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10 CHR08P102461254 20 0.86 62.50% 5 of 8
70.00% 7 of 10 CHR08P102461554 21 0.905 88.89% 8 of 9 40.00% 4 of
10 CHR09P000107988 22 1.025 100.00% 9 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR09P021958839 23 0.965 100.00% 9 of 9 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR09P131048752 24 3.61 77.78% 7 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR10P118975684 25 1.455 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR11P021861414 26 4.49 100.00% 9 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR12P004359362 27 2.085 66.67% 6 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR12P016001231 28 0.855 50.00% 4 of 8 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR14P018893344 29 2.14 100.00% 9 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR14P093230340 30 2.035 100.00% 9 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR16P000373719 31 0.83 87.50% 7 of 8 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR16P066389027
32 0.75 100.00% 9 of 9 11.11% 1 of 9 CHR16P083319654 33 2.145
55.56% 5 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR18P019705147 34 2.245 88.89% 8 of 9
50.00% 4 of 8 CHR19P018622408 35 1.78 100.00% 9 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR19P051892823 36 2.295 25.00% 1 of 4 100.00% 5 of 5
CHRXP013196410 37 1.615 100.00% 9 of 9 40.00% 4 of 10
CHRXP013196870 38 1.945 88.89% 8 of 9 50.00% 5 of 10
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.405 44.44% 4 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 0.995 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 0.8 88.89% 8 of 9 40.00% 4 of 10 ha1p_12601_l50
42 1.125 88.89% 8 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10 ha1p_17147_l50 43 1.025
66.67% 6 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_42350_l50 44 2.885 100.00% 8 of 8
88.89% 8 of 9 ha1p_44897_l50 45 1.715 100.00% 9 of 9 50.00% 5 of 10
ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.57 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P001005050
47 1.57 55.56% 5 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR16P001157479 48 4.79 100.00%
1 of 1 66.67% 2 of 3 ha1g_00681 49 0.69 89% 8 of 9 80% 8 of 10
ha1g_01966 50 1.74 100% 9 of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1g_02153 51 1.42 78% 7
of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1g_02319 52 1.01 89% 8 of 9 80% 8 of 10
ha1g_02335 53 3.54 89% 8 of 9 40% 4 of 10 ha1p16_00182 54 0.78 89%
8 of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1p16_00185 55 0.85 89% 8 of 9 50% 5 of 10
ha1p16_00193 56 1.45 89% 8 of 9 50% 5 of 10 ha1p16_00259 57 2.28
50% 4 of 8 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_02799 58 2.63 56% 5 of 9 100% 10 of 10
ha1p_03567 59 1.09 78% 7 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_03671 60 0.91 100% 9
of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_05803 61 1.37 100% 9 of 9 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_07131 62 5.25 100% 9 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_07989 63 2.79 83% 5
of 6 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_08588 64 5.89 89% 8 of 9 70% 7 of 10
ha1p_09700 65 -- -- -- -- -- ha1p_14458 66 3.23 78% 7 of 9 70% 7 of
10 ha1p_105287 67 1.49 56% 5 of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_10702 68 0.68
56% 5 of 9 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_108469 69 1.7 33% 3 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_108849 70 2.84 89% 8 of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_11016 71 2.81 89% 8
of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_11023 72 2.33 56% 5 of 9 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_12974 73 0.79 67% 6 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_16027 74 1.15 67% 6
of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_16066 75 1.17 89% 8 of 9 100% 10 of 10
ha1p_18911 76 2.13 88% 7 of 8 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_19254 77 3.38 89% 8
of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_19853 78 0.76 100% 9 of 9 70% 7 of 10
ha1p_22257 79 1.64 89% 8 of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_22519 80 1.76 89% 8
of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_31800 81 3.47 80% 4 of 5 80% 8 of 10
ha1p_33290 82 1.26 100% 9 of 9 60% 6 of 10 ha1p_37635 83 6 100% 9
of 9 0% 0 of 10 ha1p_39189 84 1.75 100% 9 of 9 100% 10 of 10
ha1p_39511 85 3.21 11% 1 of 9 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_39752 86 2.3 100%
9 of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_60945 87 1.81 89% 8 of 9 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_62183 88 2.84 33% 3 of 9 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_69418 89 2.29 78%
7 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_71224 90 1.69 78% 7 of 9 60% 6 of 10
ha1p_74221 91 1.42 88% 7 of 8 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_76289 92 1.45 67% 6
of 9 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_81050 93 6 89% 8 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_81674
94 1.98 67% 6 of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_86355 95 2.09 33% 3 of 9 89% 8
of 9 ha1p_98491 96 2.89 44% 4 of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_99426 97 1.24
89% 8 of 9 90% 9 of 10 Threshold: Average dCt value established by
ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor
and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 19 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in head and neck tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal head and neck tissue. Locus Pos. of
Neg. of Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity
Total CHR01P001976799 1 6 87.50% 7 of 8 40.00% 2 of 5
CHR01P026794862 2 0.615 57.14% 4 of 7 100.00% 1 of 1
CHR01P043164342 3 4.85 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5 CHR01P063154999
4 0.875 100.00% 9 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR01P204123050 5 1.605 44.44%
4 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR01P206905110 6 1.92 55.56% 5 of 9 80.00% 4
of 5 CHR01P225608458 7 1.8 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR02P005061785 8 3.455 66.67% 6 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR02P042255672
9 4.075 77.78% 7 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR02P223364582 10 1.7 88.89% 8
of 9 100.00% 5 of 5 CHR03P027740753 11 1.05 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 5
of 5 CHR03P052525960 12 2.66 55.56% 5 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR03P069745999 13 4.04 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR05P059799713 14 1.595 66.67% 6 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR05P059799813 15 1.745 57.14% 4 of 7 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR05P177842690 16 1.12 100.00% 9 of 9 60.00% 3 of 5
CHR06P010694062 17 2.695 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR06P026333318 18 2.335 77.78% 7 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR08P102460854 19 0.625 55.56% 5 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR08P102461254 20 0.64 88.89% 8 of 9 40.00% 2 of 5 CHR08P102461554
21 0.77 33.33% 3 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR09P000107988 22 0.97 100.00%
9 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5 CHR09P021958839 23 1.09 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00%
5 of 5 CHR09P131048752 24 4.29 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
CHR10P118975684 25 1.405 87.50% 7 of 8 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR11P021861414 26 4.21 88.89% 8 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR12P004359362
27 1.065 77.78% 7 of 9 60.00% 3 of 5 CHR12P016001231 28 1.25 66.67%
6 of 9 60.00% 3 of 5 CHR14P018893344 29 2.43 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00%
5 of 5 CHR14P093230340 30 1.26 100.00% 9 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5
CHR16P000373719 31 1.215 100.00% 6 of 6 75.00% 3 of 4
CHR16P066389027 32 1.645 77.78% 7 of 9 60.00% 3 of 5
CHR16P083319654 33 3.81 100.00% 9 of 9 20.00% 1 of 5
CHR18P019705147 34 1.73 55.56% 5 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR19P018622408
35 2.245 88.89% 8 of 9 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR19P051892823 36 3.875
80.00% 4 of 5 100.00% 3 of 3 CHRXP013196410 37 1.72 100.00% 9 of 9
40.00% 2 of 5 CHRXP013196870 38 1.38 88.89% 8 of 9 40.00% 2 of 5
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.105 88.89% 8 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 0.735 100.00% 9 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.495 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 5 of 5
ha1p_12601_l50 42 1.035 66.67% 6 of 9 60.00% 3 of 5 ha1p_17147_l50
43 1.53 37.50% 3 of 8 100.00% 5 of 5 ha1p_42350_l50 44 4.505
100.00% 7 of 7 80.00% 4 of 5 ha1p_44897_l50 45 2.59 100.00% 8 of 8
80.00% 4 of 5 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.19 88.89% 8 of 9 75.00% 3 of 4
CHR01P001005050 47 1.205 71.43% 5 of 7 100.00% 3 of 3
CHR16P001157479 48 -- -- -- -- -- ha1g_00681 49 0.73 100% 9 of 9
40% 2 of 5 ha1g_01966 50 1.59 100% 9 of 9 50% 2 of 4 ha1g_02153 51
1.42 78% 7 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1g_02319 52 0.86 89% 8 of 9 60% 3 of
5 ha1g_02335 53 3.52 67% 6 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p16_00182 54 0.88
89% 8 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p16_00185 55 0.99 89% 8 of 9 80% 4 of 5
ha1p16_00193 56 1.75 89% 8 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p16_00259 57 2.44 67%
6 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_02799 58 2.27 100% 9 of 9 40% 2 of 5
ha1p_03567 59 1.61 89% 8 of 9 40% 2 of 5 ha1p_03671 60 0.54 100% 9
of 9 100% 4 of 4 ha1p_05803 61 1.88 78% 7 of 9 80% 4 of 5
ha1p_07131 62 3.46 78% 7 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_07989 63 2.09 83% 5
of 6 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_08588 64 5.5 67% 6 of 9 60% 3 of 5 ha1p_09700
65 0.61 50% 4 of 8 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_104458 66 4.3 78% 7 of 9 100% 5
of 5 ha1p_105287 67 1.8 67% 6 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_10702 68 1.79
33% 3 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_108469 69 1.85 22% 2 of 9 100% 5 of 5
ha1p_108849 70 2.7 67% 6 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_11016 71 3.99 100% 9
of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_11023 72 2.14 100% 9 of 9 60% 3 of 5
ha1p_12974 73 0.57 78% 7 of 9 60% 3 of 5 ha1p_16027 74 0.57 100% 9
of 9 60% 3 of 5 ha1p_16066 75 0.76 89% 8 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_18911
76 2.73 89% 8 of 9 60% 3 of 5 ha1p_19254 77 2.44 67% 6 of 9 100% 5
of 5 ha1p_19853 78 0.7 89% 8 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_22257 79 1.86
78% 7 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_22519 80 2.18 56% 5 of 9 100% 5 of 5
ha1p_31800 81 2.79 100% 7 of 7 40% 2 of 5 ha1p_33290 82 1.86 78% 7
of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_37635 83 6 100% 8 of 8 0% 0 of 5 ha1p_39189
84 0.97 86% 6 of 7 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_39511 85 1.88 89% 8 of 9 40% 2
of 5 ha1p_39752 86 3.02 56% 5 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_60945 87 2.31
78% 7 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_62183 88 4.34 67% 6 of 9 60% 3 of 5
ha1p_69418 89 2.22 43% 3 of 7 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_71224 90 1.89 78% 7
of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_74221 91 2.08 67% 6 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_76289
92 1.5 78% 7 of 9 100% 5 of 5 ha1p_81050 93 5.46 78% 7 of 9 80% 4
of 5 ha1p_81674 94 1.88 67% 6 of 9 80% 4 of 5 ha1p_86355 95 1.18
100% 9 of 9 50% 2 of 4 ha1p_98491 96 2.27 22% 2 of 9 100% 5 of 5
ha1p_99426 97 1.13 78% 7 of 9 100% 5 of 5 Threshold: Average dCt
value established by ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for
distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of
positive (i.e., methylation score above Threshold for gain of
methylation markers or below Threshold for loss of methylation
markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive tumors relative
to the total number of tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative
(i.e., methylation score below Threshold for gain of methylation
markers or above Threshold for loss of methylation markers)
adjacent normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent
normal samples relative to the total number of adjacent normal
samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 20 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in liver tumors relative to adjacent
histological normal liver tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of Feature
Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 6 100.00% 8 of 8 0.00% 0 of 9 CHR01P026794862 2
1.295 42.86% 3 of 7 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR01P043164342 3 5.27 87.50% 7
of 8 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR01P063154999 4 1.4 77.78% 7 of 9 71.43% 5 of
7 CHR01P204123050 5 2.08 33.33% 3 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR01P206905110 6 5.88 33.33% 3 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR01P225608458
7 2.62 55.56% 5 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR02P005061785 8 4.8 55.56% 5
of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR02P042255672 9 3.835 77.78% 7 of 9 75.00% 6
of 8 CHR02P223364582 10 1.73 55.56% 5 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR03P027740753 11 1.47 55.56% 5 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR03P052525960
12 4.685 44.44% 4 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR03P069745999 13 4.745
55.56% 5 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8 CHR05P059799713 14 3.63 50.00% 4 of 8
87.50% 7 of 8 CHR05P059799813 15 2.405 44.44% 4 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8
CHR05P177842690 16 2.12 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR06P010694062 17 4.24 66.67% 6 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR06P026333318
18 5.665 55.56% 5 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR08P102460854 19 1.305
87.50% 7 of 8 55.56% 5 of 9 CHR08P102461254 20 1.985 66.67% 6 of 9
77.78% 7 of 9 CHR08P102461554 21 1.545 88.89% 8 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR09P000107988 22 1.705 33.33% 3 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR09P021958839 23 2.335 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR09P131048752 24 5.305 33.33% 3 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR10P118975684 25 1.59 50.00% 3 of 6 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR11P021861414 26 4.58 33.33% 3 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR12P004359362 27 1.855 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR12P016001231 28 1.515 66.67% 6 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR14P018893344 29 3.45 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR14P093230340
30 1.58 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR16P000373719 31 4.565 60.00%
3 of 5 75.00% 3 of 4 CHR16P066389027 32 1.955 88.89% 8 of 9 55.56%
5 of 9 CHR16P083319654 33 1.24 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR18P019705147 34 3.76 100.00% 9 of 9 100.00% 6 of 6
CHR19P018622408 35 3.325 66.67% 6 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR19P051892823 36 4.08 100.00% 2 of 2 100.00% 1 of 1
CHRXP013196410 37 1.215 50.00% 4 of 8 85.71% 6 of 7 CHRXP013196870
38 1.465 75.00% 6 of 8 55.56% 5 of 9 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 2.28
75.00% 6 of 8 62.50% 5 of 8 ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.775 77.78% 7 of 9
77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00257_l50 41 0.98 88.89% 8 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
ha1p_12601_l50 42 0.915 44.44% 4 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8 ha1p_17147_l50
43 1.175 44.44% 4 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 ha1p_42350_l50 44 1.975 42.86%
3 of 7 100.00% 6 of 6 ha1p_44897_l50 45 3.59 66.67% 6 of 9 75.00% 6
of 8 ha1p_61253_l50 46 4.055 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR01P001005050 47 3.3 100.00% 9 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR16P001157479
48 6 25.00% 2 of 8 100.00% 5 of 5 ha1g_00681 49 2.66 89% 8 of 9 78%
7 of 9 ha1g_01966 50 3.07 38% 3 of 8 100% 9 of 9 ha1g_02153 51 0.72
56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1g_02319 52 2.1 56% 5 of 9 89% 8 of 9
ha1g_02335 53 2.62 50% 4 of 8 89% 8 of 9 ha1p16_00182 54 1.73 89% 8
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00185 55 1.65 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p16_00193 56 2.73 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00259 57 3.77 78%
7 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_02799 58 2.5 78% 7 of 9 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_03567 59 0.68 33% 3 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_03671 60 2.39 44% 4
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_05803 61 2.52 56% 5 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_07131
62 2.4 89% 8 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_07989 63 1.5 88% 7 of 8 56% 5 of
9 ha1p_08588 64 3.26 89% 8 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_09700 65 0.81 50% 4
of 8 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_104458 66 3.8 67% 6 of 9 56% 5 of 9
ha1p_105287 67 3.67 44% 4 of 9 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_10702 68 0.53 56% 5
of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_108469 69 2.31 44% 4 of 9 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_108849 70 3.94 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_11016 71 4.36 44% 4
of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_11023 72 2.59 33% 3 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_12974 73 0.65 89% 8 of 9 22% 2 of 9 ha1p_16027 74 1.51 63% 5
of 8 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_16066 75 1.43 67% 6 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_18911
76 2.32 56% 5 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_19254 77 1.79 100% 7 of 7 89% 8
of 9 ha1p_19853 78 0.71 50% 4 of 8 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_22257 79 2.56
67% 6 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_22519 80 2.83 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_31800 81 2.81 67% 6 of 9 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_33290 82 0.89 44% 4
of 9 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_37635 83 6 44% 4 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_39189
84 1.29 67% 6 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_39511 85 2.01 100% 9 of 9 56% 5
of 9 ha1p_39752 86 1.09 44% 4 of 9 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_60945 87 1.74
44% 4 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_62183 88 2.48 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_69418 89 6 56% 5 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_71224 90 0.96 50% 4 of 8
89% 8 of 9 ha1p_74221 91 2.22 22% 2 of 9 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_76289 92
1.55 88% 7 of 8 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_81050 93 5.95 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of
9 ha1p_81674 94 3.45 22% 2 of 9 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_86355 95 1.61 56%
5 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_98491 96 2.63 56% 5 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_99426 97 1.06 100% 9 of 9 78% 7 of 9 Threshold: Average dCt
value established by ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for
distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of
positive (i.e., methylation score above Threshold for gain of
methylation markers or below Threshold for loss of methylation
markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive tumors relative
to the total number of tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative
(i.e., methylation score below Threshold for gain of methylation
markers or above Threshold for loss of methylation markers)
adjacent normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent
normal samples relative to the total number of adjacent normal
samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 21 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in lung tumors relative to adjacent
histological normal lung tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of Feature Name
Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 6 100.00% 20 of 20 0.00% 0 of 20 CHR01P026794862
2 0.855 47.06% 8 of 17 88.24% 15 of 17 CHR01P043164342 3 2.25
80.00% 16 of 20 68.42% 13 of 19 CHR01P063154999 4 1.005 90.00% 18
of 20 90.00% 18 of 20 CHR01P204123050 5 0.835 100.00% 20 of 20
15.00% 3 of 20 CHR01P206905110 6 1.655 55.00% 11 of 20 90.00% 18 of
20 CHR01P225608458 7 1.485 90.00% 18 of 20 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR02P005061785 8 3.955 78.95% 15 of 19 57.89% 11 of 19
CHR02P042255672 9 4.045 85.00% 17 of 20 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR02P223364582 10 1.82 75.00% 15 of 20 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR03P027740753 11 1.19 90.00% 18 of 20 100.00% 18 of 18
CHR03P052525960 12 2.2 30.00% 6 of 20 95.00% 19 of 20
CHR03P069745999 13 4.23 70.00% 14 of 20 50.00% 10 of 20
CHR05P059799713 14 2.075 50.00% 10 of 20 80.00% 16 of 20
CHR05P059799813 15 2.715 30.00% 6 of 20 100.00% 18 of 18
CHR05P177842690 16 2.145 55.00% 11 of 20 70.00% 14 of 20
CHR06P010694062 17 3.31 80.00% 16 of 20 85.00% 17 of 20
CHR06P026333318 18 3.605 80.00% 16 of 20 95.00% 19 of 20
CHR08P102460854 19 0.955 5.00% 1 of 20 100.00% 20 of 20
CHR08P102461254 20 0.57 50.00% 10 of 20 75.00% 15 of 20
CHR08P102461554 21 0.53 40.00% 8 of 20 80.00% 16 of 20
CHR09P000107988 22 1.44 60.00% 12 of 20 85.00% 17 of 20
CHR09P021958839 23 1.525 75.00% 15 of 20 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR09P131048752 24 3.285 90.00% 18 of 20 70.00% 14 of 20
CHR10P118975684 25 1.14 85.00% 17 of 20 100.00% 20 of 20
CHR11P021861414 26 4.05 70.00% 14 of 20 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR12P004359362 27 2.155 70.00% 14 of 20 95.00% 19 of 20
CHR12P016001231 28 1.705 65.00% 13 of 20 68.42% 13 of 19
CHR14P018893344 29 2.5 85.00% 17 of 20 78.95% 15 of 19
CHR14P093230340 30 1.465 89.47% 17 of 19 95.00% 19 of 20
CHR16P000373719 31 1.36 62.50% 10 of 16 88.24% 15 of 17
CHR16P066389027 32 1.195 57.89% 11 of 19 66.67% 12 of 18
CHR16P083319654 33 1.895 80.00% 16 of 20 80.00% 16 of 20
CHR18P019705147 34 3.865 40.00% 8 of 20 100.00% 20 of 20
CHR19P018622408 35 2.105 84.21% 16 of 19 90.00% 18 of 20
CHR19P051892823 36 1.095 83.33% 10 of 12 76.92% 10 of 13
CHRXP013196410 37 3.725 45.00% 9 of 20 95.00% 19 of 20
CHRXP013196870 38 3.12 60.00% 12 of 20 80.00% 16 of 20
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.575 65.00% 13 of 20 100.00% 20 of 20
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.07 85.00% 17 of 20 80.00% 16 of 20
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.045 78.95% 15 of 19 90.00% 18 of 20
ha1p_12601_l50 42 0.75 50.00% 10 of 20 85.00% 17 of 20
ha1p_17147_l50 43 0.7 60.00% 12 of 20 85.00% 17 of 20
ha1p_42350_l50 44 2.205 94.12% 16 of 17 73.68% 14 of 19
ha1p_44897_l50 45 2.22 70.00% 14 of 20 65.00% 13 of 20
ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.895 77.78% 14 of 18 83.33% 15 of 18
CHR01P001005050 47 0.52 63.16% 12 of 19 64.71% 11 of 17
CHR16P001157479 48 -- -- -- -- -- ha1g_00681 49 1.5 80% 8 of 10 90%
9 of 10 ha1g_01966 50 1.37 87% 40 of 46 96% 46 of 48 ha1g_02153 51
0.62 84% 38 of 45 90% 43 of 48 ha1g_02319 52 0.73 74% 35 of 47 96%
45 of 47 ha1g_02335 53 1.68 80% 8 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p16_00182 54
1.18 65% 30 of 46 90% 43 of 48 ha1p16_00185 55 1.1 68% 30 of 44 91%
40 of 44 ha1p16_00193 56 1.76 89% 40 of 45 68% 32 of 47
ha1p16_00259 57 2.31 75% 33 of 44 93% 43 of 46 ha1p_02799 58 2.06
47% 22 of 47 88% 42 of 48 ha1p_03567 59 1.14 78% 36 of 46 83% 39 of
47 ha1p_03671 60 1.42 76% 35 of 46 65% 31 of 48 ha1p_05803 61 1.63
70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_07131 62 3.88 83% 39 of 47 93% 43 of
46 ha1p_07989 63 2.86 85% 40 of 47 90% 43 of 48 ha1p_08588 64 3.9
80% 37 of 46 88% 42 of 48 ha1p_09700 65 1.01 56% 25 of 45 93% 43 of
46 ha1p_104458 66 3.94 80% 8 of 10 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_105287 67 2.04
83% 40 of 48 73% 35 of 48 ha1p_10702 68 0.5 66% 27 of 41 87% 39 of
45 ha1p_108469 69 0.98 83% 38 of 46 89% 42 of 47 ha1p_108849 70 3.7
70% 7 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_11016 71 2.88 70% 7 of 10 100% 10 of
10 ha1p_11023 72 3.41 100% 10 of 10 20% 2 of 10 ha1p_12974 73 0.59
36% 17 of 47 90% 43 of 48 ha1p_16027 74 1.02 73% 35 of 48 92% 44 of
48 ha1p_16066 75 0.79 73% 35 of 48 85% 41 of 48 ha1p_18911 76 2.87
70% 33 of 47 96% 45 of 47 ha1p_19254 77 3.66 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of
10 ha1p_19853 78 0.75 79% 37 of 47 92% 44 of 48 ha1p_22257 79 1.12
80% 37 of 46 85% 41 of 48 ha1p_22519 80 1.84 78% 35 of 45 94% 45 of
48 ha1p_31800 81 2.33 88% 42 of 48 92% 44 of 48 ha1p_33290 82 1.71
87% 41 of 47 92% 44 of 48 ha1p_37635 83 2.99 70% 7 of 10 80% 8 of
10 ha1p_39189 84 0.89 83% 39 of 47 90% 38 of 42 ha1p_39511 85 2.36
78% 7 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_39752 86 1.79 65% 30 of 46 81% 38 of 47
ha1p_60945 87 2.11 60% 6 of 10 100% 8 of 8 ha1p_62183 88 4.23 82%
37 of 45 83% 39 of 47 ha1p_69418 89 2.36 85% 39 of 46 93% 43 of 46
ha1p_71224 90 1.98 77% 34 of 44 77% 30 of 39 ha1p_74221 91 1.51 70%
7 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_76289 92 1.13 81% 34 of 42 83% 33 of 40
ha1p_81050 93 5.6 92% 33 of 36 87% 40 of 46 ha1p_81674 94 1.81 74%
29 of 39 87% 27 of 31 ha1p_86355 95 1.95 39% 17 of 44 88% 36 of 41
ha1p_98491 96 2.13 38% 18 of 47 94% 44 of 47 ha1p_99426 97 1.02 83%
39 of 47 92% 44 of 48 Threshold: Average dCt value established by
ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor
and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 22 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in lung tumors relative to
histologically normal lung tissue. Locus Feature No. Threshold
Sensitivity Pos. of Total Specificity Neg. of Total ha1g_00681 49
-- -- -- -- -- ha1g_01966 50 1.3 89% 24 of 27 95% 20 of 21
ha1g_02153 51 0.66 81% 22 of 27 91% 20 of 22 ha1g_02319 52 0.57 83%
24 of 29 95% 21 of 22 ha1g_02335 53 -- -- -- -- -- ha1p16_00182 54
1.05 85% 23 of 27 86% 19 of 22 ha1p16_00185 55 1.13 76% 19 of 25
100% 22 of 22 ha1p16_00193 56 1.83 81% 22 of 27 90% 19 of 21
ha1p16_00259 57 2.31 77% 20 of 26 100% 21 of 21 ha1p_02799 58 1.91
50% 14 of 28 100% 21 of 21 ha1p_03567 59 1.34 81% 22 of 27 91% 20
of 22 ha1p_03671 60 1.86 46% 13 of 28 90% 19 of 21 ha1p_05803 61 --
-- -- -- -- ha1p_07131 62 3.89 82% 23 of 28 100% 22 of 22
ha1p_07989 63 3.1 86% 24 of 28 95% 21 of 22 ha1p_08588 64 4.35 86%
24 of 28 95% 20 of 21 ha1p_09700 65 1.01 64% 18 of 28 91% 20 of 22
ha1p_104458 66 -- -- -- -- -- ha1p_105287 67 1.96 79% 23 of 29 95%
20 of 21 ha1p_10702 68 1.16 41% 9 of 22 100% 19 of 19 ha1p_108469
69 0.99 78% 21 of 27 95% 20 of 21 ha1p_108849 70 -- -- -- -- --
ha1p_11016 71 -- -- -- -- -- ha1p_11023 72 -- -- -- -- --
ha1p_12974 73 0.61 21% 6 of 28 95% 21 of 22 ha1p_16027 74 0.66 86%
25 of 29 86% 19 of 22 ha1p_16066 75 0.79 72% 21 of 29 100% 20 of 20
ha1p_18911 76 2.69 66% 19 of 29 100% 22 of 22 ha1p_19254 77 -- --
-- -- -- ha1p_19853 78 0.75 86% 24 of 28 91% 20 of 22 ha1p_22257 79
1.56 54% 15 of 28 91% 20 of 22 ha1p_22519 80 1.68 89% 24 of 27 95%
21 of 22 ha1p_31800 81 2.59 76% 22 of 29 86% 19 of 22 ha1p_33290 82
1.94 86% 25 of 29 95% 21 of 22 ha1p_37635 83 -- -- -- -- --
ha1p_39189 84 0.89 86% 24 of 28 86% 19 of 22 ha1p_39511 85 -- -- --
-- -- ha1p_39752 86 1.96 56% 15 of 27 82% 18 of 22 ha1p_60945 87 --
-- -- -- -- ha1p_62183 88 3.55 81% 21 of 26 100% 22 of 22
ha1p_69418 89 2.67 85% 23 of 27 100% 21 of 21 ha1p_71224 90 2.01
84% 21 of 25 79% 15 of 19 ha1p_74221 91 -- -- -- -- -- ha1p_76289
92 1.13 80% 20 of 25 83% 15 of 18 ha1p_81050 93 6 88% 15 of 17 95%
21 of 22 ha1p_81674 94 2.4 65% 13 of 20 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_86355 95
1.7 44% 11 of 25 100% 22 of 22 ha1p_98491 96 2.14 43% 12 of 28 95%
21 of 22 ha1p_99426 97 1.02 86% 24 of 28 100% 22 of 22 Threshold:
Average dCt value established by ROC curve analysis as optimal
threshold for distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal tissues.
Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e., methylation score above Threshold
for gain of methylation markers or below Threshold for loss of
methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive
tumors relative to the total number of tumors analyzed.
Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation score below Threshold
for gain of methylation markers or above Threshold for loss of
methylation markers) benign normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number
of negative benign normal samples relative to the total number of
adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00023 TABLE 23 Frequency of methylation of each locus in
melanoma tumors. Locus Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity
Pos. of Total CHR01P001976799 1 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR01P026794862
2 1.0 33.33% 2 of 6 CHR01P043164342 3 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR01P063154999 4 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR01P204123050 5 1.0 85.71% 6
of 7 CHR01P206905110 6 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR01P225608458 7 1.0
85.71% 6 of 7 CHR02P005061785 8 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR02P042255672
9 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR02P223364582 10 1.0 42.86% 3 of 7
CHR03P027740753 11 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR03P052525960 12 1.0
100.00% 7 of 7 CHR03P069745999 13 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR05P059799713 14 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR05P059799813 15 1.0
100.00% 7 of 7 CHR05P177842690 16 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7
CHR06P010694062 17 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR06P026333318 18 1.0 85.71%
6 of 7 CHR08P102460854 19 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR08P102461254 20 1.0
100.00% 7 of 7 CHR08P102461554 21 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR09P000107988
22 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR09P021958839 23 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7
CHR09P131048752 24 1.0 57.14% 4 of 7 CHR10P118975684 25 1.0 85.71%
6 of 7 CHR11P021861414 26 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 CHR12P004359362 27 1.0
71.43% 5 of 7 CHR12P016001231 28 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR14P018893344
29 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 CHR14P093230340 30 1.0 83.33% 5 of 6
CHR16P000373719 31 1.0 50.00% 2 of 4 CHR16P066389027 32 1.0 71.43%
5 of 7 CHR16P083319654 33 1.0 71.43% 5 of 7 CHR18P019705147 34 1.0
100.00% 7 of 7 CHR19P018622408 35 1.0 66.67% 4 of 6 CHR19P051892823
36 1.0 25.00% 1 of 4 CHRXP013196410 37 1.0 100.00% 5 of 5
CHRXP013196870 38 1.0 85.71% 6 of 7 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.0 85.71%
6 of 7 ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.0 42.86% 3 of 7 ha1p16_00257_l50 41
1.0 57.14% 4 of 7 ha1p_12601_l50 42 1.0 71.43% 5 of 7
ha1p_17147_l50 43 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 ha1p_42350_l50 44 1.0 100.00%
4 of 4 ha1p_44897_l50 45 1.0 100.00% 7 of 7 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.0
57.14% 4 of 7 CHR01P001005050 47 1.0 100.00% 4 of 4 CHR16P001157479
48 1.0 100.00% 1 of 1 ha1g_00681 49 1.0 71% 5 of 7 ha1g_01966 50
1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1g_02153 51 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1g_02319 52 1.0 57% 4
of 7 ha1g_02335 53 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p16_00182 54 1.0 43% 3 of 7
ha1p16_00185 55 1.0 71% 5 of 7 ha1p16_00193 56 1.0 100% 6 of 6
ha1p16_00259 57 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_02799 58 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_03567 59 1.0 57% 4 of 7 ha1p_03671 60 1.0 0% 0 of 6 ha1p_05803
61 1.0 57% 4 of 7 ha1p_07131 62 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_07989 63 1.0
80% 4 of 5 ha1p_08588 64 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_09700 65 1.0 50% 2 of
4 ha1p_104458 66 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_105287 67 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_10702 68 1.0 71% 5 of 7 ha1p_108469 69 1.0 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_108849 70 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_11016 71 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_11023 72 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_12974 73 1.0 14% 1 of 7
ha1p_16027 74 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_16066 75 1.0 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_18911 76 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_19254 77 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_19853 78 1.0 29% 2 of 7 ha1p_22257 79 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_22519 80 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_31800 81 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_33290 82 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_37635 83 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_39189 84 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_39511 85 1.0 43% 3 of 7
ha1p_39752 86 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_60945 87 1.0 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_62183 88 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_69418 89 1.0 71% 5 of 7
ha1p_71224 90 1.0 57% 4 of 7 ha1p_74221 91 1.0 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_76289 92 1.0 57% 4 of 7 ha1p_81050 93 1.0 86% 6 of 7
ha1p_81674 94 1.0 100% 7 of 7 ha1p_86355 95 1.0 100% 7 of 7
ha1p_98491 96 1.0 86% 6 of 7 ha1p_99426 97 1.0 71% 5 of 7
Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e., methylation score above 1.0)
tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the
total number of tumors analyzed. Note that adjacent histology
normal or normal skin samples were not available for analysis.
Threshold for a positive methylation score was set at an average
dCt of 1.0.
TABLE-US-00024 TABLE 24 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in ovarian tumors relative to
histologically normal ovarian tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of Feature
Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 1.405 91.18% 31 of 34 96.97% 32 of 33
CHR01P026794862 2 1.32 25.00% 7 of 28 87.88% 29 of 33
CHR01P043164342 3 5.35 91.18% 31 of 34 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR01P063154999 4 0.8 85.29% 29 of 34 94.12% 32 of 34
CHR01P204123050 5 1.165 72.73% 24 of 33 73.53% 25 of 34
CHR01P206905110 6 5.6 88.24% 30 of 34 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR01P225608458 7 1.51 73.53% 25 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR02P005061785 8 1.565 93.94% 31 of 33 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR02P042255672 9 0.835 85.29% 29 of 34 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR02P223364582 10 1.485 85.29% 29 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR03P027740753 11 0.69 85.29% 29 of 34 96.97% 32 of 33
CHR03P052525960 12 1.985 55.88% 19 of 34 97.06% 33 of 34
CHR03P069745999 13 4.645 73.53% 25 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR05P059799713 14 1.735 64.71% 22 of 34 90.91% 30 of 33
CHR05P059799813 15 1.78 64.71% 22 of 34 88.24% 30 of 34
CHR05P177842690 16 1.545 85.29% 29 of 34 85.71% 30 of 35
CHR06P010694062 17 1.235 85.29% 29 of 34 85.71% 30 of 35
CHR06P026333318 18 1.705 94.12% 32 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR08P102460854 19 1.045 81.82% 27 of 33 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR08P102461254 20 1.835 87.88% 29 of 33 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR08P102461554 21 1.57 84.85% 28 of 33 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR09P000107988 22 0.75 88.24% 30 of 34 82.86% 29 of 35
CHR09P021958839 23 1.575 79.41% 27 of 34 96.97% 32 of 33
CHR09P131048752 24 1.055 91.18% 31 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
CHR10P118975684 25 2.51 61.76% 21 of 34 91.43% 32 of 35
CHR11P021861414 26 4.195 47.06% 16 of 34 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR12P004359362 27 2.52 67.65% 23 of 34 94.12% 32 of 34
CHR12P016001231 28 1.375 71.88% 23 of 32 84.85% 28 of 33
CHR14P018893344 29 1.185 82.35% 28 of 34 100.00% 34 of 34
CHR14P093230340 30 1.695 91.18% 31 of 34 97.14% 34 of 35
CHR16P000373719 31 2.57 84.21% 16 of 19 82.14% 23 of 28
CHR16P066389027 32 0.595 64.71% 22 of 34 88.57% 31 of 35
CHR16P083319654 33 1.355 67.65% 23 of 34 88.57% 31 of 35
CHR18P019705147 34 6 88.24% 30 of 34 97.06% 33 of 34
CHR19P018622408 35 0.87 91.18% 31 of 34 97.06% 33 of 34
CHR19P051892823 36 1.03 64.29% 9 of 14 86.67% 13 of 15
CHRXP013196410 37 0.905 96.97% 32 of 33 84.38% 27 of 32
CHRXP013196870 38 0.795 100.00% 34 of 34 75.76% 25 of 33
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.085 88.24% 30 of 34 94.29% 33 of 35
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.315 79.41% 27 of 34 100.00% 35 of 35
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.07 86.21% 25 of 29 90.00% 27 of 30
ha1p_12601_l50 42 2.915 94.12% 32 of 34 94.12% 32 of 34
ha1p_17147_l50 43 3.72 93.94% 31 of 33 94.12% 32 of 34
ha1p_42350_l50 44 0.785 62.07% 18 of 29 96.67% 29 of 30
ha1p_44897_l50 45 2.84 88.24% 30 of 34 96.97% 32 of 33
ha1p_61253_l50 46 0.905 79.31% 23 of 29 96.30% 26 of 27
CHR01P001005050 47 5.195 100.00% 28 of 28 87.50% 7 of 8
CHR16P001157479 48 3 84.21% 16 of 19 91.67% 11 of 12 ha1g_00681 49
0.75 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1g_01966 50 1.54 89% 16 of 18
100% 18 of 18 ha1g_02153 51 3.62 39% 7 of 18 94% 17 of 18
ha1g_02319 52 0.57 78% 14 of 18 94% 17 of 18 ha1g_02335 53 4.77 61%
11 of 18 83% 15 of 18 ha1p16_00182 54 0.87 83% 15 of 18 94% 17 of
18 ha1p16_00185 55 1.39 88% 15 of 17 89% 16 of 18 ha1p16_00193 56
1.96 89% 16 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p16_00259 57 1.91 83% 15 of 18
56% 10 of 18 ha1p_02799 58 5.54 61% 11 of 18 78% 14 of 18
ha1p_03567 59 1.21 56% 10 of 18 67% 12 of 18 ha1p_03671 60 0.65 78%
14 of 18 56% 10 of 18 ha1p_05803 61 1.96 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of 18
ha1p_07131 62 5.03 76% 13 of 17 89% 16 of 18 ha1p_07989 63 2.75 39%
7 of 18 100% 16 of 16 ha1p_08588 64 6 61% 11 of 18 100% 18 of 18
ha1p_09700 65 0.55 25% 4 of 16 88% 14 of 16 ha1p_104458 66 5.08 78%
14 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_105287 67 5.01 94% 17 of 18 94% 17 of
18 ha1p_10702 68 0.54 44% 8 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_108469 69 1.42
78% 14 of 18 78% 14 of 18 ha1p_108849 70 3.1 56% 10 of 18 100% 18
of 18 ha1p_11016 71 4.39 94% 17 of 18 78% 14 of 18 ha1p_11023 72
2.83 39% 7 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_12974 73 0.55 44% 8 of 18 89%
16 of 18 ha1p_16027 74 1.02 83% 15 of 18 100% 17 of 17 ha1p_16066
75 2.47 78% 14 of 18 56% 10 of 18 ha1p_18911 76 3.16 78% 14 of 18
100% 18 of 18 ha1p_19254 77 3.77 67% 12 of 18 100% 18 of 18
ha1p_19853 78 0.61 83% 15 of 18 89% 16 of 18 ha1p_22257 79 1.7 72%
13 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_22519 80 2.05 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of
18 ha1p_31800 81 2.82 82% 14 of 17 83% 15 of 18 ha1p_33290 82 1.52
72% 13 of 18 94% 17 of 18 ha1p_37635 83 6 6% 1 of 18 100% 17 of 17
ha1p_39189 84 0.86 88% 14 of 16 76% 13 of 17 ha1p_39511 85 3.87 44%
8 of 18 83% 15 of 18 ha1p_39752 86 1.73 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of 18
ha1p_60945 87 0.93 61% 11 of 18 72% 13 of 18 ha1p_62183 88 4.12 33%
6 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_69418 89 2.67 61% 11 of 18 94% 17 of 18
ha1p_71224 90 1.21 89% 16 of 18 89% 16 of 18 ha1p_74221 91 1.85 59%
10 of 17 88% 15 of 17 ha1p_76289 92 0.61 79% 11 of 14 88% 14 of 16
ha1p_81050 93 5.34 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_81674 94 0.98
89% 16 of 18 89% 16 of 18 ha1p_86355 95 1.6 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of
18 ha1p_98491 96 4.57 78% 14 of 18 100% 18 of 18 ha1p_99426 97 0.53
83% 15 of 18 89% 16 of 18 Threshold: Average dCt value established
by ROC curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor
and adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e. methylation score
below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above Threshold
for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples. Neg. of
Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative to the
total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00025 TABLE 25 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in prostate tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal prostate tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of
Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 4.025 100.00% 9 of 9 33.33% 3 of 9
CHR01P026794862 2 0.505 0.00% 0 of 3 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR01P043164342
3 1.755 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR01P063154999 4 1.535 50.00%
4 of 8 100.00% 9 of 9 CHR01P204123050 5 1.88 71.43% 5 of 7 87.50% 7
of 8 CHR01P206905110 6 2.93 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8
CHR01P225608458 7 1.785 88.89% 8 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR02P005061785
8 3.505 88.89% 8 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR02P042255672 9 1.98 100.00%
9 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR02P223364582 10 1.94 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00%
9 of 9 CHR03P027740753 11 1.3 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR03P052525960 12 2.135 77.78% 7 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR03P069745999 13 1.585 75.00% 6 of 8 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR05P059799713 14 0.685 55.56% 5 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR05P059799813 15 0.69 55.56% 5 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR05P177842690
16 2.055 55.56% 5 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR06P010694062 17 2.36 88.89%
8 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR06P026333318 18 1.825 87.50% 7 of 8 100.00%
9 of 9 CHR08P102460854 19 0.82 100.00% 9 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR08P102461254 20 0.82 88.89% 8 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 CHR08P102461554
21 0.925 100.00% 9 of 9 62.50% 5 of 8 CHR09P000107988 22 1.355
88.89% 8 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR09P021958839 23 1.565 77.78% 7 of 9
100.00% 9 of 9 CHR09P131048752 24 2.19 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8
CHR10P118975684 25 1.665 55.56% 5 of 9 87.50% 7 of 8
CHR11P021861414 26 4.785 87.50% 7 of 8 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR12P004359362 27 2.895 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR12P016001231 28 1.365 77.78% 7 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9
CHR14P018893344 29 1.48 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR14P093230340 30 1.97 77.78% 7 of 9 88.89% 8 of 9 CHR16P000373719
31 0.81 50.00% 3 of 6 100.00% 3 of 3 CHR16P066389027 32 1.31 55.56%
5 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR16P083319654 33 1.95 66.67% 6 of 9 88.89% 8
of 9 CHR18P019705147 34 2.89 85.71% 6 of 7 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR19P018622408 35 1.65 88.89% 8 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHR19P051892823
36 1.175 100.00% 3 of 3 66.67% 2 of 3 CHRXP013196410 37 3.205
100.00% 9 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 CHRXP013196870 38 4.015 77.78% 7 of 9
87.50% 7 of 8 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.55 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 8 of 8
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 1.32 55.56% 5 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 1.52 77.78% 7 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p_12601_l50 42 1.01 100.00% 9 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p_17147_l50
43 1.425 88.89% 8 of 9 66.67% 6 of 9 ha1p_42350_l50 44 3.88 66.67%
6 of 9 71.43% 5 of 7 ha1p_44897_l50 45 3.845 55.56% 5 of 9 100.00%
9 of 9 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.4 62.50% 5 of 8 85.71% 6 of 7
CHR01P001005050 47 0.69 75.00% 6 of 8 55.56% 5 of 9 CHR16P001157479
48 -- -- -- -- -- ha1g_00681 49 0.76 89% 8 of 9 89% 8 of 9
ha1g_01966 50 2.54 89% 8 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1g_02153 51 1.04 56% 5
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1g_02319 52 0.86 100% 9 of 9 56% 5 of 9
ha1g_02335 53 3.58 56% 5 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p16_00182 54 1.14 75% 6
of 8 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00185 55 1.04 78% 7 of 9 78% 7 of 9
ha1p16_00193 56 1.6 78% 7 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p16_00259 57 2.02 78%
7 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_02799 58 4.92 22% 2 of 9 100% 9 of 9
ha1p_03567 59 1.8 44% 4 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_03671 60 1.26 89% 8 of
9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_05803 61 1.67 89% 8 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_07131 62
6 67% 6 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_07989 63 2.88 75% 6 of 8 89% 8 of 9
ha1p_08588 64 5.59 44% 4 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_09700 65 0.84 86% 6
of 7 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_104458 66 3.59 100% 9 of 9 67% 6 of 9
ha1p_105287 67 1.24 67% 6 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_10702 68 2.81 78% 7
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_108469 69 1.13 100% 9 of 9 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_108849 70 2.24 56% 5 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_11016 71 3.63 100% 9
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_11023 72 1.8 78% 7 of 9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_12974
73 1.05 67% 6 of 9 100% 9 of 9 ha1p_16027 74 1.24 89% 8 of 9 50% 4
of 8 ha1p_16066 75 2.53 100% 9 of 9 44% 4 of 9 ha1p_18911 76 2.49
100% 9 of 9 75% 6 of 8 ha1p_19254 77 4.59 50% 4 of 8 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_19853 78 0.97 88% 7 of 8 88% 7 of 8 ha1p_22257 79 2.7 78% 7 of
9 67% 6 of 9 ha1p_22519 80 1.51 100% 9 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_31800
81 2.51 100% 9 of 9 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_33290 82 1.77 78% 7 of 9 78% 7
of 9 ha1p_37635 83 6 100% 9 of 9 0% 0 of 9 ha1p_39189 84 1.52 89% 8
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_39511 85 3.59 89% 8 of 9 44% 4 of 9 ha1p_39752
86 1.82 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_60945 87 1.41 78% 7 of 9 56% 5
of 9 ha1p_62183 88 4.21 67% 6 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_69418 89 3.72
63% 5 of 8 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_71224 90 1.92 56% 5 of 9 78% 7 of 9
ha1p_74221 91 1.71 78% 7 of 9 44% 4 of 9 ha1p_76289 92 0.6 100% 9
of 9 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_81050 93 6 44% 4 of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_81674 94
1.2 100% 8 of 8 63% 5 of 8 ha1p_86355 95 1.54 100% 8 of 8 56% 5 of
9 ha1p_98491 96 2.91 78% 7 of 9 56% 5 of 9 ha1p_99426 97 0.77 78% 7
of 9 78% 7 of 9 Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC
curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and
adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00026 TABLE 26 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in renal tumors relative to adjacent
histological normal renal tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of Feature
Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 4.745 66.67% 6 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR01P026794862 2 0.525 75.00% 6 of 8 80.00% 4 of 5 CHR01P043164342
3 1.555 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR01P063154999 4 1.28
90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR01P204123050 5 2.105 77.78% 7 of 9
55.56% 5 of 9 CHR01P206905110 6 4.285 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 10 of
10 CHR01P225608458 7 1.56 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR02P005061785 8 4.32 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR02P042255672 9 2.145 60.00% 6 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR02P223364582 10 1.89 66.67% 6 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR03P027740753 11 1.23 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR03P052525960 12 2.69 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR03P069745999 13 1.615 100.00% 10 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR05P059799713 14 3.425 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR05P059799813 15 3.395 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR05P177842690 16 1.685 100.00% 10 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR06P010694062 17 2.27 80.00% 8 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR06P026333318 18 2.18 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR08P102460854 19 1.06 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR08P102461254 20 1.255 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR08P102461554 21 1.375 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR09P000107988 22 1.33 100.00% 10 of 10 50.00% 5 of 10
CHR09P021958839 23 1.405 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR09P131048752 24 2.51 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR10P118975684 25 1.265 60.00% 6 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR11P021861414 26 4.58 100.00% 10 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR12P004359362 27 2.055 40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR12P016001231 28 0.72 100.00% 9 of 9 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR14P018893344 29 1.52 90.00% 9 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR14P093230340 30 1.85 70.00% 7 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR16P000373719 31 1.585 88.89% 8 of 9 50.00% 4 of 8
CHR16P066389027 32 1.945 100.00% 10 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR16P083319654 33 2.525 90.00% 9 of 10 62.50% 5 of 8
CHR18P019705147 34 4.07 70.00% 7 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
CHR19P018622408 35 1.7 90.00% 9 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR19P051892823 36 2.7 57.14% 4 of 7 100.00% 6 of 6 CHRXP013196410
37 0.68 100.00% 10 of 10 66.67% 6 of 9 CHRXP013196870 38 0.905
80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.375 90.00% 9 of
10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p16_00182_l50 40 0.92 88.89% 8 of 9 80.00% 8
of 10 ha1p16_00257_l50 41 0.95 100.00% 10 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
ha1p_12601_l50 42 0.745 100.00% 10 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9
ha1p_17147_l50 43 1.74 100.00% 9 of 9 90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_42350_l50
44 1.54 80.00% 8 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9 ha1p_44897_l50 45 4.92 40.00%
4 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.96 80.00% 8 of 10 70.00%
7 of 10 CHR01P001005050 47 2.8 100.00% 8 of 8 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR16P001157479 48 4.66 100.00% 2 of 2 100.00% 1 of 1 ha1g_00681 49
1.89 60% 6 of 10 78% 7 of 9 ha1g_01966 50 1.21 100% 10 of 10 88% 7
of 8 ha1g_02153 51 0.92 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1g_02319 52 1.04
90% 9 of 10 40% 4 of 10 ha1g_02335 53 2.11 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p16_00182 54 0.85 89% 8 of 9 90% 9 of 10 ha1p16_00185 55 0.53
100% 9 of 9 70% 7 of 10 ha1p16_00193 56 1.54 100% 7 of 7 80% 8 of
10 ha1p16_00259 57 1.79 100% 10 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_02799 58
3.52 60% 6 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_03567 59 1.82 50% 5 of 10 80% 8
of 10 ha1p_03671 60 0.79 60% 6 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_05803 61 1.82
70% 7 of 10 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_07131 62 6 80% 8 of 10 100% 10 of 10
ha1p_07989 63 3.3 90% 9 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_08588 64 5.67 60%
6 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_09700 65 0.98 13% 1 of 8 100% 8 of 8
ha1p_104458 66 4.06 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_105287 67 4.48
100% 10 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_10702 68 0.95 80% 8 of 10 40% 4 of
10 ha1p_108469 69 1.63 70% 7 of 10 40% 4 of 10 ha1p_108849 70 2.75
100% 10 of 10 70% 7 of 10 ha1p_11016 71 2.71 60% 6 of 10 90% 9 of
10 ha1p_11023 72 1.67 100% 10 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_12974 73 0.57
30% 3 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_16027 74 1.99 50% 5 of 10 100% 10 of
10 ha1p_16066 75 1.52 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_18911 76 2.16
80% 8 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_19254 77 4.53 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of
10 ha1p_19853 78 0.5 100% 10 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_22257 79 2.11
50% 5 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_22519 80 1.47 80% 8 of 10 90% 9 of 10
ha1p_31800 81 2.46 40% 4 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_33290 82 1.09 89% 8
of 9 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_37635 83 6 100% 10 of 10 0% 0 of 10
ha1p_39189 84 0.78 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_39511 85 1.87 78% 7
of 9 78% 7 of 9 ha1p_39752 86 1.35 89% 8 of 9 89% 8 of 9 ha1p_60945
87 1.97 60% 6 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_62183 88 5.06 80% 8 of 10
100% 10 of 10 ha1p_69418 89 2.15 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_71224
90 1.69 70% 7 of 10 90% 9 of 10 ha1p_74221 91 1.22 50% 5 of 10 90%
9 of 10 ha1p_76289 92 0.97 90% 9 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_81050 93 6
80% 8 of 10 100% 10 of 10 ha1p_81674 94 1.24 100% 10 of 10 30% 3 of
10 ha1p_86355 95 1.17 78% 7 of 9 50% 5 of 10 ha1p_98491 96 4.12 80%
8 of 10 80% 8 of 10 ha1p_99426 97 0.65 90% 9 of 10 90% 9 of 10
Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC curve analysis as
optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and adjacent normal
tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e., methylation score above
Threshold for gain of methylation markers or below Threshold for
loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of Total: Number of
positive tumors relative to the total number of tumors analyzed.
Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation score below Threshold
for gain of methylation markers or above Threshold for loss of
methylation markers) adjacent normal samples. Neg. of Total: Number
of negative adjacent normal samples relative to the total number of
adjacent normal samples analyzed.
TABLE-US-00027 TABLE 27 Sensitivity and Specificity of
differentially methylated loci in thyroid tumors relative to
adjacent histological normal thyroid tissue. Locus Pos. of Neg. of
Feature Name Number Threshold Sensitivity Total Specificity Total
CHR01P001976799 1 6 100.00% 10 of 10 0.00% 0 of 10 CHR01P026794862
2 1.095 66.67% 2 of 3 100.00% 1 of 1 CHR01P043164342 3 2.01 100.00%
10 of 10 10.00% 1 of 10 CHR01P063154999 4 1.205 60.00% 6 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 CHR01P204123050 5 2.795 85.71% 6 of 7 50.00% 3 of
6 CHR01P206905110 6 1.195 60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR01P225608458 7 0.62 90.00% 9 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR02P005061785 8 4.49 70.00% 7 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR02P042255672 9 3.895 100.00% 10 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10
CHR02P223364582 10 2.015 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR03P027740753 11 0.77 100.00% 10 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
CHR03P052525960 12 3.265 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR03P069745999 13 1.06 80.00% 8 of 10 50.00% 5 of 10
CHR05P059799713 14 0.55 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR05P059799813 15 0.615 70.00% 7 of 10 44.44% 4 of 9
CHR05P177842690 16 0.935 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
CHR06P010694062 17 3.58 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR06P026333318 18 2 90.00% 9 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR08P102460854
19 0.505 10.00% 1 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR08P102461254 20 0.555
40.00% 4 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR08P102461554 21 0.545 40.00% 4 of
10 70.00% 7 of 10 CHR09P000107988 22 1.255 60.00% 6 of 10 80.00% 8
of 10 CHR09P021958839 23 1.03 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR09P131048752 24 3.27 80.00% 8 of 10 88.89% 8 of 9
CHR10P118975684 25 0.975 90.00% 9 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10
CHR11P021861414 26 6 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR12P004359362
27 2.985 50.00% 5 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 CHR12P016001231 28 1.21
100.00% 9 of 9 20.00% 2 of 10 CHR14P018893344 29 1.21 70.00% 7 of
10 80.00% 8 of 10 CHR14P093230340 30 1.84 60.00% 6 of 10 90.00% 9
of 10 CHR16P000373719 31 0.965 66.67% 6 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
CHR16P066389027 32 2.62 80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR16P083319654 33 2.845 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR18P019705147 34 5.775 10.00% 1 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
CHR19P018622408 35 2.425 80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHR19P051892823 36 1.585 75.00% 6 of 8 100.00% 6 of 6
CHRXP013196410 37 1.445 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
CHRXP013196870 38 1.93 30.00% 3 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
ha1p16_00179_l50 39 1.055 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
ha1p16_00182_l50 40 0.645 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
ha1p16_00257_l50 41 0.515 88.89% 8 of 9 70.00% 7 of 10
ha1p_12601_l50 42 0.66 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10 ha1p_17147_l50
43 0.61 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10 ha1p_42350_l50 44 3.685
70.00% 7 of 10 77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p_44897_l50 45 3.565 80.00% 8 of 10
90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_61253_l50 46 1.785 70.00% 7 of 10 55.56% 5 of 9
CHR01P001005050 47 1.4 50.00% 4 of 8 75.00% 6 of 8 CHR16P001157479
48 6 100.00% 2 of 2 0.00% 0 of 2 ha1g_00681 49 1.11 100.00% 10 of
10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1g_01966 50 2.22 70.00% 7 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
ha1g_02153 51 0.59 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1g_02319 52 0.53
70.00% 7 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10 ha1g_02335 53 1.61 90.00% 9 of 10
80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p16_00182 54 0.67 100.00% 10 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
ha1p16_00185 55 0.75 90.00% 9 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p16_00193 56
2.12 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p16_00259 57 1.23 100.00%
10 of 10 70.00% 7 of 10 ha1p_02799 58 3.75 55.56% 5 of 9 70.00% 7
of 10 ha1p_03567 59 2.52 66.67% 6 of 9 70.00% 7 of 10 ha1p_03671 60
1.21 20.00% 2 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_05803 61 2.13 100.00% 10
of 10 50.00% 5 of 10 ha1p_07131 62 6 80.00% 8 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10
ha1p_07989 63 4.73 80.00% 8 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_08588 64 5.31
30.00% 3 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_09700 65 0.77 11.11% 1 of 9
100.00% 9 of 9 ha1p_104458 66 4.53 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10
ha1p_105287 67 3.69 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_10702 68
0.57 40.00% 4 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_108469 69 1.02 50.00% 5 of
10 77.78% 7 of 9 ha1p_108849 70 3.36 50.00% 5 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9
ha1p_11016 71 4.1 50.00% 5 of 10 100.00% 9 of 9 ha1p_11023 72 2.64
66.67% 6 of 9 55.56% 5 of 9 ha1p_12974 73 1.5 40.00% 4 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_16027 74 1.27 80.00% 8 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10
ha1p_16066 75 1.2 66.67% 6 of 9 100.00% 9 of 9 ha1p_18911 76 3.67
40.00% 4 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_19254 77 3.55 90.00% 9 of 10
60.00% 6 of 10 ha1p_19853 78 0.5 90.00% 9 of 10 50.00% 5 of 10
ha1p_22257 79 1.29 50.00% 5 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_22519 80 2.52
40.00% 4 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_31800 81 3.25 55.56% 5 of 9
90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_33290 82 1.68 44.44% 4 of 9 77.78% 7 of 9
ha1p_37635 83 4.19 80.00% 8 of 10 50.00% 5 of 10 ha1p_39189 84 0.9
44.44% 4 of 9 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_39511 85 0.76 80.00% 8 of 10
50.00% 5 of 10 ha1p_39752 86 3.14 80.00% 8 of 10 40.00% 4 of 10
ha1p_60945 87 1.9 70.00% 7 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10 ha1p_62183 88 4.53
60.00% 6 of 10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_69418 89 5.38 90.00% 9 of 10
100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_71224 90 0.91 90.00% 9 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10
ha1p_74221 91 1.58 100.00% 10 of 10 60.00% 6 of 10 ha1p_76289 92
1.29 40.00% 4 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_81050 93 5.86 70.00% 7 of
10 100.00% 10 of 10 ha1p_81674 94 1.36 70.00% 7 of 10 80.00% 8 of
10 ha1p_86355 95 0.9 70.00% 7 of 10 80.00% 8 of 10 ha1p_98491 96
5.45 50.00% 5 of 10 90.00% 9 of 10 ha1p_99426 97 0.66 60.00% 6 of
10 80.00% 8 of 10 Threshold: Average dCt value established by ROC
curve analysis as optimal threshold for distinguishing tumor and
adjacent normal tissues. Sensitivity: % of positive (i.e.,
methylation score above Threshold for gain of methylation markers
or below Threshold for loss of methylation markers) tumors. Pos. of
Total: Number of positive tumors relative to the total number of
tumors analyzed. Specificity: % of negative (i.e., methylation
score below Threshold for gain of methylation markers or above
Threshold for loss of methylation markers) adjacent normal samples.
Neg. of Total: Number of negative adjacent normal samples relative
to the total number of adjacent normal samples analyzed.
[0170] Although the invention has been described in some detail by
way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity of
understanding, it will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill
in the art in light of the teachings of this invention that certain
changes and modifications may be made thereto without departing
from the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
[0171] All publications, databases, Genbank sequences, patents, and
patent applications cited in this specification are herein
incorporated by reference as if each was specifically and
individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
Sequence CWU 0 SQTB SEQUENCE LISTING The patent application
contains a lengthy "Sequence Listing" section. A copy of the
"Sequence Listing" is available in electronic form from the USPTO
web site
(http://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=docDetail&DocID=US20090098543A1).
An electronic copy of the "Sequence Listing" will also be available
from the USPTO upon request and payment of the fee set forth in 37
CFR 1.19(b)(3).
0 SQTB SEQUENCE LISTING The patent application contains a lengthy
"Sequence Listing" section. A copy of the "Sequence Listing" is
available in electronic form from the USPTO web site
(http://seqdata.uspto.gov/?pageRequest=docDetail&DocID=US20090098543A1).
An electronic copy of the "Sequence Listing" will also be available
from the USPTO upon request and payment of the fee set forth in 37
CFR 1.19(b)(3).
* * * * *
References