U.S. patent application number 12/145643 was filed with the patent office on 2009-01-22 for neutralizing antibody against hgf.
This patent application is currently assigned to National Cancer Center. Invention is credited to Junho Chung, Youngmi Hur.
Application Number | 20090023894 12/145643 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 36660022 |
Filed Date | 2009-01-22 |
United States Patent
Application |
20090023894 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Chung; Junho ; et
al. |
January 22, 2009 |
Neutralizing Antibody Against HGF
Abstract
The neutralizing antibody against HGF binding to the inventive
neutralizable epitope of HGF is capable of neutralizing HGF as a
single agent, and can be effectively used for preventing and
treating intractable diseases and cancers that are caused by
binding of HGF to its receptor Met.
Inventors: |
Chung; Junho; (Seoul,
KR) ; Hur; Youngmi; (Seoul, KR) |
Correspondence
Address: |
SUGHRUE MION, PLLC
2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, N.W., SUITE 800
WASHINGTON
DC
20037
US
|
Assignee: |
National Cancer Center
Goyang-si
KR
|
Family ID: |
36660022 |
Appl. No.: |
12/145643 |
Filed: |
June 25, 2008 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10578836 |
May 10, 2006 |
7408043 |
|
|
PCT/KR2004/002888 |
Nov 9, 2004 |
|
|
|
12145643 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
530/327 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61P 25/28 20180101;
C07K 2317/55 20130101; C07K 16/22 20130101; C07K 14/4753 20130101;
A61P 35/00 20180101; C07K 2317/24 20130101; C07K 2317/76 20130101;
C07K 2317/56 20130101; A61P 33/06 20180101 |
Class at
Publication: |
530/327 |
International
Class: |
C07K 7/08 20060101
C07K007/08 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Nov 11, 2003 |
KR |
10-2003-0079482 |
Claims
1. A polypeptide neutralizing hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) which
has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 32 wherein said
polypeptide inhibits the binding of HGF to cMet.
2-10. (canceled)
11. A polypeptide neutralizing hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) which
has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 33 wherein said
polypeptide inhibits the binding of HGF to cMet.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a neutralizable epitope of
HGF (hepatocyte growth factor) inhibiting the binding of HGF to a
receptor thereof and a neutralizing antibody against HGF which is
capable of neutralizing HGF as a single agent by binding to said
neutralizable epitope of HGF.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] HGF (hepatocyte growth factor) is a multifunctional
heterodimeric polypeptide produced by mesenchymal cells. HGF is
composed of an alpha-chain containing an N-terminal domain and four
kringle domains (NK4) covalently linked to a serine protease-like
beta-chain C-terminal domain (see FIG. 1). Human HGF is synthesized
as a biologically inactive single chain precursor consisting of 728
amino acids with a 29 amino acid signal peptide which is not
present in the mature protein. Biologically active HGF is achieved
through cleavage at the R494 residue by a specific, extracellular
serum serine protease. The active HGF thus achieved is a fully
active heterodimer which is composed of disulfide linked 69 kDa
alpha-chain and 34 kDa beta-chain. However, the overall tertiary
structure of HGF is still unknown and it has not yet been clarified
which of these domains is responsible for the specific functions of
HGF (Maulik et al., Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews 13(1):
1-59, 2002).
[0003] The binding of HGF to its receptor, Met, induces the growth
and scattering of various cell types, mediates the epithelial
mesenchymal transitions and the formation of tubules and lumens,
and promotes angiogenesis. Both Met and HGF knockout mice are
embryonic lethal and show developmental defects in placenta, fetal
liver and limb/muscle formation (Cao et al., PNAS 98(13):
7443-7448, 2001; Gmyrek et al., American Journal of Pathology
159(2): 579-590, 2001).
[0004] Met was originally isolated as a product of a human
oncogene, trp-met, which encodes a constitutively active altered
protein kinase with transforming activity. Met activation has also
been shown to remarkably enhance the metastatic spread of cancer
stemming from its stimulatory influence of processes such as
angiogenesis, cell motility, and cell surface protease regulation
(Wielenga et al., American Journal of Pathology 157(5): 1563-1573,
2000). Since Met was reported to be over-expressed in various human
cancers of liver, prostate, colon, breast, brain and skin (Maulik
et al, supra), it has been regarded as an important target factor
for the prevention and treatment of cancer. Further, it has been
reported that malaria infection depends on activation of the HGF
receptor by secreted HGF, and accordingly, HGF and its receptor are
identified as potential targets for new approaches to malaria
prevention (Carrolo M, et al., Nat. Med. 9(11): 1363-1369, 2003).
It has been also discovered the possibility that HGF may be found
in association with the pathologic changes which occur in
Alzheimer's disease (Fenton H, et al., Brain Res. 779(1-2):
262-270, 1998). Furthermore, it has been found that HGF is
definitely involved in enhancing cutaneous wound healing processes,
including re-epithelialization, neovascularization and granulation
tissue formation (Yoshida S, et al., J. Invest. Dermatol. 120(2):
335-343, 2003).
[0005] Meanwhile, selective neutralization of tumor-associated
growth factors or cytokines and their receptors, which play crucial
roles in the development and spread of cancer, has always been an
attractive strategy for the development of anti-cancer drugs.
Recently, numerous therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for
these targets, e.g., herceptin, and anti-angiopoietin human mAbs
have been developed using recombinant antibody technologies such as
phage display of combinational antibody library.
[0006] It is well known that polyclonal antibodies against HGF
block many of HGF biological functions. In addition, it has been
recently reported that mixtures of neutralizing mAbs against HGF
display anti-tumor activity in animal models (Cao et al., PNAS
198(13): 7443-7448, 2001). In particular, Cao et al. disclosed that
three or more of the epitopes, possibly two for the Met receptor
and one for heparin, need to be blocked in order to inhibit HGF
activity in vivo and in vitro, and a mixture of at least 3 mAbs is
capable of neutralizing HGF in an in vitro experiment.
[0007] However, there has been reported no monoclonal antibody that
can neutralize HGF as a single agent and inhibit cell scattering
activity in vitro.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to
provide a neutralizable epitope of HGF which inhibits the binding
of HGF to a receptor thereof.
[0009] Other objects of the present invention are to provide:
[0010] a polynucleotide encoding said neutralizable epitope;
[0011] a neutralizing antibody against HGF which is capable of
neutralizing HGF as a single agent by binding to said neutralizable
epitope;
[0012] use of said neutralizing antibody for preventing and
treating intractable diseases and cancers;
[0013] a pharmaceutical composition comprising said neutralizing
antibody and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier for preventing
and treating intractable diseases and cancers; and
[0014] a method for preventing and treating intractable diseases
and cancers, which comprises administering said neutralizing
antibody to a patient.
[0015] In accordance with one aspect of the present invention,
there is provided a neutralizable epitope of HGF having the amino
acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 32 or 33.
[0016] In accordance with another aspect of the present invention,
there is provided a neutralizing antibody against HGF binding to
said neutralizable epitope which comprises V.sub.H region having
the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 27 or 29 and V.sub.L region
having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28 or 30.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] The above and other objects and features of the present
invention will become apparent from the following description of
the invention, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying
drawings which respectively show:
[0018] FIG. 1: the structure of HGF,
[0019] FIG. 2: the genetic map of phagemid vector pComb3X used for
antibody library construction, [0020] A: the case of displaying Fab
on the surface of phagemid, and [0021] B: the case of displaying
scFv or diabody on the surface of phagemid
[0022] FIG. 3: enrichment of the phage pool displaying Fab
specifically binding to HGF through the panning during the culture
of HGF-binding clones,
[0023] FIG. 4: the result of staining the purified Fab fragments
with coomasie blue, [0024] 1: marker, [0025] 2: non-reduced clone
68 antibody (50,000 Da), and [0026] 3: reduced clone 68 antibody
(25,000 Da)
[0027] FIG. 5: the result of western blotting analysis to determine
whether the purified Fab fragments are expressed,
[0028] FIG. 6: the binding level of a phage containing the
inventive neutralizable epitope to c-MET, [0029] 1: phage
containing the peptide of SEQ ID NO: 32, [0030] 2: phage containing
the peptide of SEQ ID NO: 33, and [0031] 3 and 4: control phages
which do not contain the peptide of SEQ ID NO: 32 or 33
[0032] FIG. 7: the specific binding of clone 61 and 68 Fabs to HGF,
respectively,
[0033] FIG. 8: conformation dependency of the inventive
neutralizable epitope defined by clones 61 and 68, respectively,
[0034] A: clone 61, [0035] is B: clone 68, [0036] Lane 1:
non-reduced HGF, and [0037] Lane 2: reduced HGF
[0038] FIG. 9a: the criteria showing the cell scattering level
ranging from Grades 1 to 6,
[0039] FIG. 9b: the result of scattering assay showing that the
scattering levels of anti-HGF Fab and anti-human Fab antibodies
change with the concentrations of HGF added,
[0040] FIG. 10: the amount of clone 68 antibody bound to HGF
immobilized on CM5 sensor chip increases with the injected amount
of clone 68 antibody, [0041] I: injection of non-specific Fab,
[0042] II: injection of 50 nM clone 68 antibody, [0043] III:
injection of 100 nM clone 68 antibody, [0044] IV: injection of 200
nM clone 68 antibody, [0045] V: injection of 400 nM clone 68
antibody, and [0046] VI: injection of 600 nM clone 68 antibody
[0047] FIG. 11: clone 68 antibody inhibits the binding of HGF to
c-Met, [0048] I: injection of 50 nM HGF, [0049] II: injection of 50
nM HGF mixed with 50 nM clone 68 antibody, [0050] III: injection of
50 nM HGF mixed with 250 nM clone 68 antibody, [0051] IV: injection
of 50 nM HGF mixed with 500 nM clone 68 antibody, [0052] V:
injection of 50 nM HGF mixed with 1 .mu.M clone 68 antibody, and
[0053] VI: injection of 50 nM HGF mixed with 1.5 .mu.M clone 68
antibody
[0054] FIG. 12: soluble c-Met inhibits the binding of HGF to c-Met.
[0055] I: injection of 50 nM HGF, [0056] II: injection of 50 nM HGF
mixed with 50 nM soluble c-Met, [0057] III: injection of 50 nM HGF
mixed with 100 nM soluble c-Met, [0058] IV: injection of 50 nM HGF
mixed with 200 nM soluble c-Met, [0059] V: injection of 50 nM HGF
mixed with 400 nM soluble c-Met, and [0060] VI: injection of 50 nM
HGF mixed with 600 nM soluble c-Met
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0061] As used herein, the term "neutralizable epitope" includes
any protein determinant which is capable of inhibiting the binding
of HGF to its receptor c-Met. Epitopic determinants usually consist
of chemically active surface groupings of molecules such as amino
acids or sugar side chains and usually have specific tertiary
structural features, as well as specific charge characteristics.
Preferably, the inventive neutralizable epitope is a polypeptide
comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 32 or 33.
[0062] The term "neutralizing antibody" refers to an antibody which
is capable of specifically binding to the neutralizable epitope of
HGF and substantially inhibiting or eliminating the biologically
activity of HGF. Typically, a neutralizing antibody will inhibit
such biologically activity of HGF at least by about 50%, and
preferably by greater than 80%. The neutralizing antibody of the
invention is especially useful in therapeutic applications: to
prevent or treat intractable diseases and cancers.
[0063] The present invention provides a polypeptide having the
amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 32 or 33 which functions as a
neutralizable epitope of HGF.
[0064] In order to prepare the neutralizable epitope of HGF in
accordance with the present invention, an ELISA study is conducted
to examine whether antisera from the immunized animals with HGF
bind to a recombinant human HGF; and the study has shown that
antisera from the HGF immunized animals specifically bind to HGF.
Then, total RNA is extracted from the HGF immunized animals and
subjected to cDNA synthesis.
[0065] To amplify the variable region comprising rabbit light chain
(V.sub.L) (V.sub..kappa., V.sub..lamda.) and heavy chain (V.sub.H)
and the constant region comprising human C.sub..kappa. and
C.sub.H1, PCRs are performed by using the synthesized cDNA as a
template and primer combinations of SEQ ID NOs: 1 to 20, and then,
light and heavy chains of rabbit/human chimeric antibody are
amplified by using the PCR products obtained above as templates.
After the amplified rabbit V.sub.L and V.sub.H sequences are
combined with the amplified human C.sub..kappa. and C.sub.H1
sequences, final PCR products encoding a library of antibody
fragments (Fab) are cloned into an expression vector, and the
resulting vector is transformed into a host cell, e.g., E. coli, to
construct a chimeric rabbit/human Fab library. The vector and host
cell employable in the present invention include all expression
vectors and E. coli strains conventionally used in the art without
limit, but it is preferable to use phagemid vector pComb3X (the
Scripps Research Institute, CA, USA) as an expression vector and E.
Coli ER2537 (NEB) as a host cell.
[0066] Phage clones containing anti-HGF Fab are selected by EIA
using HGF-coated ELISA plates and anti-human goat Fab polyclonal
antibodies. Phage clones selected above are designated H61 (clone
61) and H68 (clone 68).
[0067] H61 and H68 clones are subjected to nucleotide sequencing
and their amino acid sequences are determined from the analyzed
nucleotide sequences, respectively. In a preferred embodiment of
the present invention, nucleotide sequencing is performed according
to the dye-labeled primer sequencing method (Chung et al., J.
Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 128: 641-649, 2002). As a result, it has
been found that H61 clone is composed of V.sub.H and V.sub.L
regions having the nucleotide sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 23 and 24,
respectively; and H68 clone comprises V.sub.H and V.sub.L regions
having the nucleotide sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 25 and 26,
respectively.
[0068] The amino acid sequences of the respective V.sub.H and
V.sub.L regions of H61 and H68 clones from the analyzed nucleotide
sequences suggest that H61 clone is composed of V.sub.H region
having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28 and V.sub.L region
having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 28; and H68 clone,
V.sub.H region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 29 and
V.sub.L region having the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 30.
[0069] Analysis of the framework region (FR) and complementarity
determining region (CDR) in the amino acid sequences of H61 and H68
clones has shown that each of V.sub.H and V.sub.L regions of H61
and H68 clones has 4 FRs and 3 CDRs (see Table 2).
[0070] To define a neutralizable epitope of HGF, H61 and H68 clones
are enriched through the panning by using phage display of
combinatorial peptide library, and the phage pools so amplified are
subjected to EIA using anti-HGF H61 Fab or anti-HGF H68 Fab and
anti-HGF H61 Fab- or anti-HGF H68 Fab-coated ELISA plates. Phage
clones showing the binding affinity to anti-HGF H61 and H68 Fabs
are thus selected. In a preferred embodiment of the present
invention, the PHD peptide library (New England Biolob) is employed
as a peptide library.
[0071] Selected phage clones are subjected to nucleotide
sequencing, and amino acid sequences deduced from the analyzed
nucleotide sequences have the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs:
32 and 33, which are found to bind to c-MET (see FIG. 6). These
results suggest that an antigen binding site of anti-HGF antibody
H61 or H68 mimics a HGF binding site of c-MET and the peptides of
SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33 binding to anti-HGF antibody H61 or H68 mimic
a c-MET binding site of HGF. Accordingly, the inventive peptides of
SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33 are capable of functioning as a neutralizable
epitope of HGF.
[0072] Further, the present invention provides the polynucleotide
encoding said neutralizable epitope. In particular, said
neutralizable epitope has the nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO: 34
or 35.
[0073] Furthermore, the present invention provides a neutralizing
antibody against HGF which is capable of neutralizing HGF by
binding to the peptide of SEQ ID NO: 32 or 33 as a neutralizable
epitope of HGF.
[0074] The neutralizing antibody of the present invention may be a
chimeric antibody, a monoclonal antibody or a humanized
antibody.
[0075] The chimeric antibody is an immunoglobulin molecule
comprising human and non-human portions. Specifically, the antigen
combining region (variable region) of a chimeric antibody is
derived from a non-human source (e.g. mouse, rabbit, poultry) and
the constant region of the chimeric antibody which confers the
biological effector function to the immunoglobulin is derived from
a human source. The chimeric antibody should have the antigen
binding specificity of the non-human antibody molecule and the
effector function conferred by the human antibody molecule.
[0076] In general, the procedures used to produce chimeric
antibodies involve the following steps:
[0077] (a) identifying and cloning the correct gene segment
encoding the antigen binding portion of the antibody molecule,
which (known as V.sub.DJ, variable, diversity and joining regions
for heavy chains or V.sub.J, variable, joining regions for light
chains or simply as V for variable region) may be in either the
cDNA or genomic form;
[0078] (b) cloning gene segments encoding the constant region or
desired part thereof;
[0079] (c) ligating the variable region with the constant region so
that the complete chimeric antibody is encoded in a form that can
be transcribed and translated; [0080] (d) ligating the construct
into a vector containing a selectable marker and gene control
regions such as promoters, enhancers and poly(A) addition
signals;
[0081] (e) amplifying the vector and introducing it into eukaryotic
cells (transfection), usually mammalian lymphocytes;
[0082] (f) selecting cells expressing the selectable marker;
[0083] (g) screening for cells expressing the desired chimeric
antibody; and
[0084] (h) testing the antibody for appropriate binding specificity
and effector functions.
[0085] A monoclonal antibody refers to an antibody that is derived
from a single clone, including any eukaryotic, prokaryotic, or
phage clone. The monoclonal antibody may comprise, or consist of,
two proteins, i.e., heavy and light chains. The monoclonal antibody
can be prepared using one of a wide variety of techniques known in
the art including the use of hybridoma, recombinant, and phage
display technologies, or a combination thereof.
[0086] A humanized antibody refers to a molecule that has its CDRs
(complementarily determining regions) derived from a non-human
species immunoglobulin and the remainder of the antibody molecule
derived mainly from a human immunoglobulin. The term "antibody" as
used herein, unless indicated otherwise, is used broadly to refer
to both an antibody molecule and an antibody-derived molecule. Such
an antibody-derived molecule comprises at least one variable region
(either a heavy chain or a light chain of variable region) and
includes molecules such as Fab fragments, Fab' fragments,
F(ab').sub.2 fragments, Fd fragments, Fab' fragments, Fd fragments,
Fabc fragments, Sc antibodies (single chain antibodies), diabodies,
individual antibody light chains, individual antibody heavy chains,
chimeric fusions between antibody chains and other molecules.
[0087] In particular, the present invention provides a rabbit/human
chimeric antibody as a neutralizing antibody against HGF. The
inventive neutralizing antibody comprises V.sub.H region of SEQ ID
NO: 27 and V.sub.L of SEQ ID NO: 28 or V.sub.H region of SEQ ID NO:
29 and V.sub.L of SEQ ID NO: 30.
[0088] Whether or not a neutralizing antibody exerts neutralizing
activity may be examined by MDCK2 scattering assay (Cao et al.,
PNAS 98(13): 7443-7448, 2001). In case of treating 2 ng/a of HGF
(29 pM) to MDCK2 cells, the inventive neutralizing antibody shows
the highest scattering inhibitory activity when the molar ratio of
anti-HGF Fab to HGF becomes 50:1, and the molar ratio of anti-human
Fab to HGF, ranging from 50:1 to 100:1 (see FIG. 9). These results
show for the first time that blocking of only one epitope is
sufficient for neutralizing HGF at least in vitro, different from
the Cao report that it is necessary to neutralize at least three
epitopes to inhibit MDCK2 cell scattering (Cao et al., supra).
Further, shown in the present invention is the fact that the
neutralizing antibody exerts its neutralizing activity only when
the antibody binding to the neutralizable epitope is divalent or
more, which suggests that the same neutralizable epitope may exist
at two or more sites of HGF.
[0089] The binding affinity of anti-HGF Fab for HGF, inhibitory
activity of clone 68 far binding HGF to c-Met, and inhibitory
activity of soluble c-Met for binding HGF to c-Met may also be
examined by EIA. The amount of clone 68 antibody binding to HGF
immobilized on a sensor chip increases with the injection amount of
clone 68 antibody (see FIG. 10), and the amount of HGF binding to
c-Met decreases as the concentration of clone 68 antibody increases
(see FIG. 11). Further, the amount of HGF binding to c-Met
immobilized on the sensor chip decreases with increasing the
concentration of soluble c-Met (see FIG. 12).
[0090] The above results demonstrate that the inventive
neutralizing antibody acts as a single agent which is capable of
neutralizing HGF.
[0091] Accordingly, the present invention further provides a
pharmaceutical composition comprising an effective dose of the
inventive neutralizing antibody and a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier for preventing and treating intractable diseases and
cancers caused by the binding of HGF to a receptor thereof.
Further, the present invention provides a method for preventing and
treating intractable diseases and cancers by using the inventive
neutralizable antibody. Preferably, the cancer includes, but are
not limited to, various human cancers of liver, prostate, colon,
breast, brain and skin, and the intractable diseases encompasses
those caused by binding HGF to its receptor, c-Met, and include,
not but limited to, malaria, Alzheimer's disease and so on.
[0092] The inventive pharmaceutical formulation may be prepared in
accordance with any one of the conventional procedures. In
preparing the formulation, the effective ingredient is preferably
admixed or diluted with a carrier. Examples of suitable carriers,
excipients, or diluents are lactose, dextrose, sucrose, sorbitol,
mannitol, starches, gum acacia, alginates, gelatin, calcium
phosphate, calcium silicate, cellulose, methylcellulose,
microcrystalline cellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, water,
methylhydroxybenzoates, propylhydroxybenzoates, talc, magnesium
stearate and mineral oil. The formulation may additionally include
fillers, anti-agglutinating agents, lubricating agents, wetting
agents, flavoring agents, emulsifiers, preservatives and the like.
The composition of the invention may be formulated so as to provide
a quick, sustained or delayed release of the active ingredient
after it is administrated to a patient, by employing any one of the
procedures well known in the art.
[0093] The pharmaceutical formulation of the present invention can
be administered by injection (e.g., intramuscular, intravenous,
intraperitoneal, subcutaneous), or by other methods such as
infusion that ensure its delivery to the bloodstream in an
effective form. The pharmaceutical formulation may also be
administered by intratumoral, peritumoral, intralesional or
perilesional routes, to exert local as well as systemic therapeutic
effects. Local or intravenous injection is preferred injection.
[0094] For treating a human patient, a typical daily dose of the
inventive neutralizing antibody as an effective ingredient may
range from about 0.1 to 100 mg/kg body weight, preferably 1 to 10
mg/kg body weight, and can be administered in a single dose or in
divided doses. However, it should be understood that the amount of
the active ingredient actually administered ought to be determined
in light of various relevant factors including the condition to be
treated, the chosen route of administration, the age, sex and body
weight of the individual patient, and the severity of the patient's
symptom; and, therefore, the above dose should not be intended to
limit the scope of the invention in any way.
[0095] The present invention is further illustrated in the
following Examples. It should be understood that these Examples,
while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given
by way of illustration only. From the above discussion and these
Examples, one skilled in the art can ascertain the essential
characteristics of this invention, and without departing from the
spirit and scope thereof, can make various changes and
modifications of the invention to adapt it to various usage and
conditions.
EXAMPLE 1
HGF Immunization and Antibody Library Construction
[0096] Over a period of 4 to 5 months, 2 rabbits of the New
Zealland White strain were immunized by 5 cutaneous injections of
HGF (R&D systems, USA) dispersed in an emulsion of MPL
(monophosphoryl lipid A; highly-refined non-toxic lipid A isolated
from remutants of S. minnesota)+TDM (synthetic trehalose
dicorynomycolate; an analogue of trehalose dimycolate from the cord
factor of the tubercle bacillus)+CWS (cell wall skeleton; from
deproteinized and delipidated cell walls of mycobacteria) adjuvant
(Sigma) at 3-week intervals. Antisera from the immunized animals
were analyzed for their binding to recombinant human HGF (R&D
systems or Research Diagnostics, Inc.) by ELISA using horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit Fc goat polyclonal antibodies
(Pierce). As a result, it was found that while antisera obtained
before HGF immunization almost never bind to HGF, antisera obtained
after 5 cutaneous injections specifically bound to HGF.
[0097] Seven days after the final boost, the spleen and bone marrow
were extracted from the immunized animals and used for total RNA
preparation with TRI reagent (Molecular Research Center,
Cincinnati, USA) and lithium chloride precipitation. First-strand
cDNA was synthesized using the SUPERSCRIPT Preamplification System
with oligo(dT) priming (Life Technologies, Inc.).
[0098] Rabbit/human chimeric antibody library was constructed
according to the method described by Rader et al (Rader C. et al.,
J. Biol. Chem. 275: 13668-13676, 2000).
EXAMPLE 2
Amplification of Rabbit-Derived Ab Variable Region and
Human-Derived Ab Constant Region
(2-1) Amplification of Rabbit-Derived Ab Variable Region
[0099] In order to amplify variable regions of rabbit
V.sub.L(V.sub..kappa., V.sub..lamda.) and V.sub.H, PCR was
performed by using primer combinations described in Table 1.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Variable region Forward primer Reverse
primer V.sub..kappa. SEQ ID NO: 1 SEQ ID NO: 4 SEQ ID NO: 1 SEQ ID
NO: 5 SEQ ID NO: 1 SEQ ID NO: 6 SEQ ID NO: 2 SEQ ID NO: 4 SEQ ID
NO: 2 SEQ ID NO: 5 SEQ ID NO: 2 SEQ ID NO: 6 SEQ ID NO: 3 SEQ ID
NO: 4 SEQ ID NO: 3 SEQ ID NO: 5 SEQ ID NO: 3 SEQ ID NO: 6
V.sub..lamda. SEQ ID NO: 7 SEQ ID NO: 8 V.sub.H SEQ ID NO: 8 SEQ ID
NO: 13 SEQ ID NO: 10 SEQ ID NO: 13 SEQ ID NO: 11 SEQ ID NO: 13 SEQ
ID NO: 12 SEQ ID NO: 13
[0100] A PCR reaction solution was prepared by mixing 1 .mu.l of
template cDNA (about 0.5 .mu.g) synthesized in Example 1, 60 pmol
of each primer, 10 .mu.l of 10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM
dNTP mixture and 0.5 .mu.l of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a
final volume of 100 .mu.l. The PCR condition was 30 cycles of 15
sec at 94.degree. C., 30 sec at 56.degree. C. and 90 sec at
72.degree. C. after initial denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree.
C., and final extension of 10 min at 72.degree. C. The amplified
DNA was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis and purified from
the gel by using Qiaex gel extraction kit (Qiagen).
(2-2) Amplification of Human-Derived Ab Constant Region
[0101] PCR was conducted to amplify C.sub..kappa. region of
human-derived Ab constant region as follows: A PCR reaction
solution was prepared by mixing 20 ng of pComb3XTT vector (Barbas
et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 15:88(18), 7978-82, 1991), 60
pmol of each primer (SEQ ID NOs: 14 and 15), 10 .mu.l of
10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture and 0.5 .mu.l
of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a final volume of 100 .mu.l. The
PCR condition was 20 cycles of 15 sec at 94.degree. C., 30 sec at
56.degree. C. and 90 sec at 72.degree. C. after initial
denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree. C., and final extension of 10
min at 72.degree. C.
[0102] Meanwhile, PCR was performed to amplify C.sub.H1 region of
human-derived Ab constant region as follows: A PCR reaction
solution was prepared by mixing 20 ng of pComb3XTT vector (Barbas
et al., supra), 60 pmol of each primer (SEQ ID NOs: 16 and 17), 10
.mu.l of 10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture and
0.5 .mu.l of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a final volume of 100
.mu.l. The PCR condition was 20 cycles of 15 sec at 94.degree. C.,
30 sec at 56.degree. C. and 90 sec at 72.degree. C. after initial
denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree. C., and final extension of 10
min at 72.degree. C.
[0103] The amplified DNAs were subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and purified from the gel by using Qiaex gel
extraction kit (Qiagen).
EXAMPLE 3
Amplification of Light and Heavy Chains of Chimeric Antibody
(3-1) Amplification of Light Chain
[0104] PCR was carried out to amplify the light chain as follows: A
PCR reaction solution was prepared by mixing 100 ng each of V.sub.L
(V.sub..kappa., V.sub..lamda.) PCR product purified in Example
(2-1) and C.sub..kappa. PCR product purified in Example (2-2), 60
pmol each of primers (SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 15), 10 .mu.l of
10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture and 0.5 .mu.l
of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a final volume of 100 .mu.l. The
PCR condition was 20 cycles of 15 sec at 94.degree. C., 30 sec at
56.degree. C. and 120 sec at 72.degree. C. after initial
denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree. C., and final extension of 10
min at 72.degree. C.
[0105] The amplified DNA was subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and purified from the gel by using Qiaex gel
extraction kit (Qiagen).
(3-2) Amplification of Heavy Chain
[0106] Overlap extension PCR was conducted to amplify Fd region
(V.sub.H and C.sub.H1) of a heavy chain as follows: A PCR reaction
solution was prepared by mixing 100 ng each of V.sub.H PCR product
purified in Example (2-1) and C.sub.H1 PCR product purified in
Example (2-2), 60 pmol each of primers (SEQ ID NOs: 19 and 17), 10
.mu.l of 10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture and
0.5 .mu.l of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a final volume of 100
.mu.l. The PCR condition was 20 cycles of 15 sec at 94.degree. C.,
30 sec at 56.degree. C. and 120 sec at 72.degree. C. after initial
denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree. C., and final extension of 10
min at 72.degree. C.
[0107] The amplified DNA was subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and purified from the gel by using Qiaex gel
extraction kit (Qiagen).
EXAMPLE 4
Preparation of Chimeric Fab Library
[0108] PCR was carried out to amplify chimeric rabbit/human Fab
gene as follows: A PCR reaction solution was prepared by mixing 100
ng each of chimeric light chain product purified in Example (3-1)
and the chimeric heavy chain product purified in Example (3-2), 60
pmol each of primers (SEQ ID NOs: 18 and 20), 10 .mu.l of
10.times.PCR buffer, 8 .mu.l of 2.5 mM dNTP mixture and 0.75 .mu.l
of Taq polymerase and adjusted to a final volume of 100 .mu.l. The
PCR condition was 20 cycles of 15 sec at 94.degree. C., 30 sec at
56.degree. C. and 180 sec at 72.degree. C. after initial
denaturation of 10 min at 94.degree. C., and final extension of 10
min at 72.degree. C.
[0109] The amplified DNA was subjected to agarose gel
electrophoresis and purified from the gel by using Qiaex gel
extraction kit (Qiagen).
[0110] After the PCR products encoding rabbit V.sub.L and V.sub.H
sequences were combined with the PCR products encoding human
C.sub..kappa. and C.sub.H1 sequences, final PCR fragments encoding
a library of antibody fragments were subjected to SfiI digestion
and cloned into phagemid vector pComb3X (the Scripps Research
Institute, CA, USA) (FIG. 2). Phagemid DNA was transformed into E.
coli ER2537 (NEB) by electroporation. The introduced phage
displayed Fab as a fusion protein fused on phage coat protein pIII
and its DNA formed a phage particle (gene and polypeptide as one
unit) in the phage DNA.
EXAMPLE 5
Selection of Phage Clone Containing Anti-HGF Fab
[0111] After a 96-well plate (Costar No. 3690) was coated with HGF
dissolved in 25 .mu.l of TBS solution at a concentration of 10
.mu.g/ml per well, phages displaying Fab prepared in Example 4 were
added to the well plate, the well plate was kept at room
temperature for 2 hrs, and panned against immobilized HGF antigen
at the well plate. The well plate was washed with 0.5% (v/v) Tween
20 in PBS and eluted with 0.1 M HCl-glycine (pH 2.2). The washing
steps were increased from 5 times in the first round to 10 times in
the second round and 15 times in the following rounds. Typically
seven rounds of panning were conducted. As the panning proceeded,
phage pools displaying anti-HGF Fab which specifically bind to HGF
increased, which results in increasing absorbance showing the HGF
binding to Fab in EIA using HRP-conjugated anti-M13 phage
antibodies (Pharmacia) and HGF-coated ELISA plates (FIG. 3). After
the last round of panning, the page clones containing anti-HGF Fab
were selected by EIA using the HGF-coated ELISA plates and goat
anti-human Fab polyclonal antibodies (Pierce), respectively. The
selected clones were designated H61 (clone 61) and H68 (clone 68).
H61 and H68 clones which gave strong signals above background (FIG.
7) were further analyzed by nucleotide sequencing.
EXAMPLE 6
Nucleotide Sequencing Analysis of Selected Phases
[0112] Nucleotide sequencing was carried out by the dye labeled
primer sequencing method (Chung et al., J Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol.
128: 641-649, 2002) using two sequencing primers of SEQ ID NOs: 21
and 22. As a result, it was found that H61 clone encodes the
anti-HGF Fab consisting of V.sub.H region having the nucleotide
sequence of SEQ ID NO: 23 and V.sub.L region having the nucleotide
sequence of SEQ ID NO: 24; and H68 clone, the anti-HGF Fab
consisting of V.sub.H region having the nucleotide sequence of SEQ
ID NO: 25 and V.sub.L region having the nucleotide sequence of SEQ
ID NO: 26.
[0113] The amino acid sequences of H61 and H68 clones were deduced
from the analyzed nucleotide sequences, respectively. As a result,
it was found that V.sub.H and V.sub.L regions of H61 clone had the
amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO: 27 and 28, respectively, while
V.sub.H and V.sub.L regions of H68 clone had the amino acid
sequences of SEQ ID NO: 29 and 30, respectively.
[0114] As a result of analyzing a framework region (FR) and
complementarity determining region (CDR) in the amino acid
sequences of H61 and H68 clones according to the method described
by Harris (Harris et al., Protein Science 4(2) 306-10, 1995), H61
and H68 clones had the regional constituents described in Table
2.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 H61 clone H61 clone H61 clone H61 clone
Region V.sub.H V.sub.L V.sub.H V.sub.L FR1 1-30 1-23 1-30 1-23 CDR1
31-35 24-34 31-35 24-34 FR2 36-49 35-49 36-49 35-49 CDR2 50-66
50-56 50-66 50-56 FR3 67-98 57-88 67-98 57-88 CDR3 99-105 89-97
99-105 89-97 FR4 106-116 98-109 106-116 98-109
EXAMPLE 7
Anti-HGF Fab Expression and Purification for In Vitro Assay
[0115] Phagemid DNAs of the selected clones in Example 5 were
transformed into non-suppressor E. coli strain HB2151. Clones were
grown to an A600 nm absorbance of 0.5 to 1.0 and induced the
expression of anti-HGF Fab with IPTG (1 mM) for 20 to 24 hrs.
Culture supernatants were concentrated by Labscale TFF system
(Millipore). Concentrated anti-HGF Fab was purified by affinity
chromatography using anti-HA tag mouse monoclonal antibody.
Purified Fab fragments were analyzed by Coomassie staining and
western blotting.
[0116] First, the purified H68 antibody Fab (about 1-3 .mu.g) was
subjected to electrophoresis by loading on NuPAGE Novex 4-12%
Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen). The loaded gel was soaked in a coomassie
gel staining solution (Invitrogen), stirred for 30 min, transferred
into a coomassie gel destaining solution, and stirred until
developed protein bands were observed. FIG. 4 shows the result of
coomassie staining. As shown in FIG. 4, in case of non-reduced H68
antibody (lane 2), most of Fab antibodies were detected at a
position corresponding to a molecular weight of 50,000 Da; in case
of reduced H68 antibody (lane 3), Fab antibody was separated into
the respective Fd regions of light and heavy chains, and therefore,
bands were detected at a position corresponding to 25,000 Da; and
other bands except antibody bands were not detected. In view of
facts that light and heavy chains of H68 antibody Fab are of the
size of about 25,000 Da, respectively, and Fab formed by covalently
linking between the light and heavy chains by a disulfide bond has
the size of about 50,000 Da, the H68 antibody Fab was successively
isolated and purified to a satisfiable purity. However, the weak
band detected in lane 2 at a position corresponding to 25,000 Da is
due to the presence of free Fd regions of Fab light and heavy
chains that are not linked to each other.
[0117] Meanwhile, for western blotting, the purified anti-HGF Fab
(about 1-3 .mu.g) was subjected to electrophoresis by loading on
NuPAGE Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen). The Fab separated
according to molecular weight was immobilized onto BioTrace
Nitrocellulose membrane (PALL). The membrane was treated with 5%
non-fat dry milk/TBS for 30 min to block. Horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-human goat Fab polyclonal antibody
(Pierce) was diluted with 3% non-fat dry milk/TBS in a ratio of
1:1000 and reacted with the membrane for 1 hr with stirring. The
membrane was washed with TBS for 30 min and wetted evenly with an
equal volume mixture of Supersignal West Pico stable peroxide
solution (Pierce) and Supersignal West Pico Lumninol/Enhancer
solution (Pierce). The membrane was exposed to X-ray film (Kodak)
in a darkroom.
[0118] FIG. 5 shows the result of western blotting analyzing the
expression of purified Fab fragments, wherein the left lane is a
size marker and other lanes are the purified Fabs. As shown in FIG.
5, a large quantity of Fab was detected at a position corresponding
to 50,000 Da, and free Fd regions of light and heavy chains, at a
position corresponding to 25,000 Da.
EXAMPLE 8
Analysis of Nucleotide Sequence and Features of HGF Neutralizable
Epitope
(8-1) Nucleotide Sequencing
[0119] A 96-well plate (costar No. 3690) was coated with anti-HGF
H61 Fab or anti-HGF H68 Fab dissolved in 25 .mu.l of TBS solution
at a concentration of 10 .mu.g/ml per well. PHD peptide Library.TM.
(phage display of combinatorial peptide library) (New England
Biolob.) was added to the well plate, and then, the well plate was
kept for 2 hrs at room temperature. The well plate was washed with
0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 in PBS and eluted with 0.1M HCl-glycine (pH
2.2). The washing steps were increased from 5 times in the first
round to 10 times in the second round and 15 times in the
subsequent rounds. Typically seven rounds of panning were carried
out. After the last round of panning, the phage clones containing
anti-HGF H61 Fab or anti-HGF H68 Fab were selected by EIA using
anti-HGF H61 Fab or anti-HGF H68 Fab-coated ELISA plate and
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-M13 phage goat monoclonal
antibody (Roche) The selected clones were subjected to nucleotide
sequencing and the amino acid sequences were determined from the
analyzed nucleotide sequences.
[0120] Nucleotide sequencing was performed according to the
dye-labeled primer sequencing method (Chung et al., supra) using a
sequencing primer of SEQ ID NO: 31. As a result, peptides encoding
anti-HGF H61 and H68 Fabs deduced from the analyzed nucleotide
sequences had the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33,
respectively.
[0121] Then, a 96-well plate (costar No. 3690) was coated with
c-Met dissolved in 25 .mu.l of TBS solution at a concentration of
10 .mu.g/ml per well, and clones containing the peptides of SEQ ID
NOs: 32 and 33 were each added thereto. The well plate was washed
with 0.5% (v/v) Tween 20 in PBS, and horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated anti-M13 phage goat monoclonal antibody
(Roche) was added thereto.
[0122] As shown in FIG. 6, while the phages containing the
respective peptides (1 and 2) of SEQ ID NO: 32 and 33 bound to
c-Met, two control phages (3 and 4) without said peptides did not.
These results suggest that since an antigen binding site of
anti-HGF antibody H68 mimics a HGF binding site of c-Met and the
peptides of SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33 binding to clone 68 mimic c-Met
binding site of HGF, the peptides of SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33 can
function as a neutralizable epitope of HGF.
(8-2) Characterization
[0123] In order to characterize the antigen binding site of
anti-HGF antibody, western blotting was carried out as follows. 1
to 3 .mu.g of HGF was subjected to electrophoresis by loading on
NuPAGE Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen). At this time, some
were loaded after treating with a reducing agent, and others were
loaded without such reducing agent treatment. Proteins separated
according to molecular weight were immobilized onto BioTrace
Nitrocellulose membrane (PALL). The membrane was each treated with
5% non-fat dry milk/TBS for 30 min to block. Anti-HGF H61 and H68
Fabs were added to the membrane, and the membrane was stirred for 1
hr. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-human goat Fab
polyclonal antibody (Pierce) was diluted with 3% non-fat dry
milk/TBS in a ratio of 1:1000 and reacted with the membrane for 1
hr with stirring. The membrane was washed with TBS for 30 min and
wetted evenly with an equal volume mixture of Supersignal West Pico
stable peroxide solution (Pierce) and Supersignal West Pico
Luminol/Enhancer solution (Pierce) for 30 min. The membrane was
exposed to X-ray film (Kodak) in a darkroom.
[0124] FIG. 8 shows conformation dependency of the neutralizable
epitopes defined by H61 and H68, wherein an arrow indicates a size
marker; A, clone 61; B, clone 68; lane 1, a non-reduced HGF; and
lane 2, a reduced HGF. As a result, clones 61 and 68 were found to
bind to the non-reduced HGF, but not to the reduced HGF. These
results suggest that the tertiary structure of the antigenic
determinants, e.g., epitopes, serving as binding sites of clones 61
and 68, are crucial for antigen-antibody response and the inventive
neutralizable epitopes has a non-linear structure.
EXAMPLE 9
MDCK Scattering Assay
[0125] MDCK cells (Madine Darby canine kidney cells; ATCC CCL 34)
were cultured in a DMEM medium supplemented with 5% FCS at
37.degree. C. in a humid chamber under 95% air and 5% CO.sub.2.
Cells were distributed on a 96-well plate at a concentration of
2.times.10.sup.3 cells/well and exposed to 2 ng/ml (29 pM) of HGF
in a fresh medium overnight. Then, anti-HGF Fab and anti-human Fab
antibodies were added to the well plate at different
concentrations. The scattering effect was monitored by light
microscopy, and the result is shown in FIG. 9. FIG. 9a shows the
criteria indicating the cell scattering level ranging from Grades 1
to 6, wherein Grade 6 means 100% inhibition of scattering effect by
HGF; Grade 5, inhibition ranging from 90 to 100% of scattering
effect by HGF; Grade 4, inhibition ranging from 60 to 90% of
scattering effect by HGF; Grade 3, inhibition ranging from 30 to
60% of scattering effect by HGF; Grade 2, inhibition ranging from
10 to 30% scattering effect by HGF; and Grade 1, 10% and less
inhibition of scattering effect by HGF. FIG. 9b shows that the
scattering levels of anti-HGF Fab and anti-human Fab antibodies may
differ according to the concentrations of HGF added.
[0126] As a result, it was found that the most effective scattering
effect was expected when the molar ratio of anti-HGF Fab to HGF was
50:1 and the molar ratio of anti-human Fab antibody to HGF was
ranging from 50:1 to 100:1.
EXAMPLE 10
BIAcore Assay
(10-1) Affinity Analysis of Anti-HGF Fab for HGF
[0127] The binding affinity of anti-HGF Fab for HGF was determined
by SPR (surface plasmon resonance) using the BIAcore 3000 (BIAcore
AB, Uppsala, Sweden).
[0128] Approximately, 1069 resonance units (RU) of HGF were coupled
to CM5 sensor chip (BIAcore AB) through an amine coupling method.
Binding interaction was allowed to proceed in PBS buffer containing
0.005% surfactant P20 at a flow rate of 30 .mu.l/min at 25.degree.
C. The surface was regenerated with 1 M NaCl/50 mM NaOH. The
kinetic rate constants (k.sub.on and k.sub.off) as well as the
equilibrium dissociation constant (K.sub.d) were determined. FIG.
10 shows the binding affinity of anti-HGF H68 Fab for HGF. As a
result, it was found that the amount of anti-HGF H68 Fab bound to
HGF immobilized on the sensor chip increases with the concentration
of anti-HGF H68 Fab.
(10-2) Analysis of HGF Binding Inhibitory Activity of Clone 68
Antibody Against HGF
[0129] To ascertain the fact that anti-HGF H68 Fab can inhibit the
binding of HGF to c-Met in real time, c-Met was coupled to CM5
sensor chip through an amine coupling method. Thereafter, HGF alone
was injected at a concentration of 50 nM, and premixed with
anti-HGF H68 Fab of 5 different concentrations (50 nM, 250 nM, 500
nM, 1 .mu.M and 1.5 .mu.M) and soluble c-Met of 5 different
concentrations (50 nM, 100 nM, 200 nM, 400 nM, 600 nM),
respectively. Binding interaction was allowed to proceed in PBS
buffer containing 0.005% surfactant P20 at a flow rate of 30
.mu.l/min at 25.degree. C. The surface was regenerated with 1 M
NaCl/50 mM NaOH.
[0130] FIG. 11 shows that anti-HGF H68 Fab inhibits the binding of
HGF to c-Met. As a result, in case of 50-M HGF injection, HGF was
found to bind to c-Met at 455.5 RU (I), while in case of 50 nM HGF
injection with anti-HGF H68 Fab at 5 different concentrations of 50
nM (II), 250 nM (III), 500 nM (IV), 1 .mu.M (V) and 1.5 .mu.M (VI),
HGF bound to c-Met at 406.5, 328, 260, 111.1 and 71 RU,
respectively. These results suggest that the binding of HGF to
c-Met becomes reduced as the concentrations of anti-HGF H68 Fab
increases. There was no binding of HGF in case when anti-HGF H68
Fab alone was injected.
(10-3) Analysis of HGF Binding Inhibitory Activity of Soluble c-Met
Against c-Met
[0131] Whether the binding of HGF to c-Met is inhibited by soluble
c-Met was examined as follows. 2979 RU of c-Met was immobilized on
CM5 sensor chip through an amine coupling method. Binding
interaction was allowed to proceed in PBS buffer containing 0.005%
surfactant P20 at a flow rate of 30 .mu.l/min at 25.degree. C. The
surface was regenerated with 1 M NaCl/50 mM NaOH.
[0132] FIG. 12 shows that soluble c-Met inhibits the binding of HGF
to c-Met.
[0133] As shown in FIG. 12, in case of 50 nM HGF injection, HGF was
found to bind to c-Met at 455.5 RU (I); while in case of 50 nM HGF
injection with soluble c-Met at 5 different concentrations of 50 nM
(II), 100 nM (III), 200 nM (IV), 400 nM (V) and 600 nM (VI), HGF
bound to c-Met at 310.3, 225.7, 167.4, 93.7 and 70.9 RU,
respectively. These results suggest that the amount of HGF binding
to c-Met immobilized on the sensor chip gradually decreases with
increasing concentration of soluble c-Met increases.
[0134] While the embodiments of the subject invention have been
described and illustrated, it is obvious that various changes and
modifications can be made therein without departing from the spirit
of the present invention which should be limited only by the scope
of the appended claims.
Sequence CWU 1
1
35138DNAArtificial SequenceVkappa 5' sense primer RSCVK1
1gggcccaggc ggccgagctc gtgmtgaccc agactcca 38 238DNAArtificial
SequenceVkappa 5' sense primer RSCVK2 2gggcccaggc ggccgagctc
gatmtgaccc agactcca 38 338DNAArtificial SequenceVkappa 5' sense
primer RSCVK3 3gggcccaggc ggccgagctc gtgatgaccc agactgaa 38
442DNAArtificial SequenceVkappa 3' reverse primer RHybK1-B
4agatggtgca gccacagttc gtttgatttc cacattggtg cc 42 542DNAArtificial
SequenceVkappa 3' reverse primer RHybK2-B 5agatggtgca gccacagttc
gtaggatctc cagctcggtc cc 42 642DNAArtificial SequenceVkappa 3'
reverse primer RHybK3-B 6agatggtgca gccacagttc gtttgacsac
cacctcggtc cc 42 740DNAArtificial SequenceVlambda 5' sense primer
RSClambda1 7gggcccaggc ggccgagctc gtgctgactc agtcgccctc 40
845DNAArtificial SequenceVlambda 3' reverse primer RHybL-B
8agatggtgca gccacagttc ggcctgtgac ggtcagctgg gtccc 45
942DNAArtificial SequenceVH 5' sense primer RHyVH1 9gctgcccaac
cagccatggc ccagtcggtg gaggagtccr gg 42 1042DNAArtificial SequenceVH
5' sense primer RHyVH2 10gctgcccaac cagccatggc ccagtcggtg
aaggagtccg ag 42 1142DNAArtificial SequenceVH 5' sense primer
RHyVH3 11gctgcccaac cagccatggc ccagtcgytg gaggagtccg gg 42
1244DNAArtificial SequenceVH 5' sense primer RHyVH4 12gctgcccaac
cagccatggc ccagsagcag ctgrtggagt ccgg 44 1345DNAArtificial
SequenceVH 3' reverse primer RHyIgGCH1-B 13cgatgggccc ttggtggagg
ctgargagay ggtgaccagg gtgcc 45 1424DNAArtificial SequenceSense
primer HKC-F for amplification of the human Ckappa region and the
pelB leader sequence from a cloned human Fab 14cgaactgtgg
ctgcaccatc tgtc 241521DNAArtificial SequenceReverse primer Lead-B
for amplification of the human Ckappa region and the pelB leader
sequence from a cloned human Fab 15ggccatggct ggttgggcag c
211624DNAArtificial SequenceSense primer HIgGCH1-F for
amplification of the human CH1 Chain rom a cloned human Fab
16gcctccacca agggcccatc ggtc 241721DNAArtificial SequenceReverse
primer dpseq for amplification of the human CH1 Chain from a cloned
human Fab 17agaagcgtag tccggaacgt c 211841DNAArtificial
SequenceSense primer RSC-F for PCR assembly of rabbit VL sequences
with the human Ckappa PCR Product 18gaggaggagg aggaggaggc
ggggcccagg cggccgagct c 411921DNAArtificial SequenceSense primer
LeadVH for PCR assembly of rabbit VH sequences with the human CH1
PCR product 19gctgcccaac cagccatggc c 212039DNAArtificial
SequenceReverse primer dp-EX for PCR assembly of chimeric
light-chain sequences with chimeric heavy-chain (Fd) sequences
20gaggaggagg aggaggagag aagcgtagtc cggaacgtc 392120DNAArtificial
Sequencesequencing primer 21agaaacacaa agtctacgcc 20
2220DNAArtificial Sequencesequencing primer 22gttgggcagc gagtaataac
20 23348DNAArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct 23caggagcagc
tgatggagtc cgggggtcgc ctggtcaatc ctggcgaatc cctgacactc 60
acctgcaaag cctctggatt caccttcagt agctactaca tgagctgggt ccgccaggct
120ccagggaagg ggctggagtg gatcggatac attggtacta gtagtggtac
cacttactac 180gcgaactctg tgaagggccg attcaccatc tccagcgaca
acgcccagaa taccgtattt 240ctgcgaatga ccagtctcac agactcggac
acggccacct atttctgtgc aagagggctg 300ggcagaatca acttgtgggg
cccaggcacc ctggtcaccg tctcttca 34824327DNAArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 24gagctcgtgc tgacccagac tccatcctct
atgtctgcag ctgtgggagg cacagtcacc 60 atcaattgcc aggccagtca
gagtgttagc aactacttag cctggtatca gcagaaacca 120gggcagcctc
ccaagctcct gatctacagg gcatccactc tggcatctgg ggtcccatcg
180cgtttcagcg gcagtggatc tgggacagag ttcactctca ccatcagtgg
catgaaggct 240gaagatgctg ccacttatta ctgtcaaagt ggttattata
gtgctggtgc gacttttgga 300ggtggcacca atgtggaaat caaacga
32725348DNAArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct 25cagcagcagc
tggtggagtc cgggggtcgc ctggtcaatc ctggcgaatc cctgacactc 60
acctgcaaag cctctggatt caccttcagt acctactaca tgagctgggt ccgccaggct
120ccagggaagg ggctagagtg gatcggatac attggtacta gtagtggtac
cacttactac 180gcgaactctg tgaagggccg attcaccatc tccagcgaca
acgcccagaa taccgtattt 240ctgcaaatga ccagtctgac agactcggac
acggccacct atttctgtgc aagagggctg 300ggcagaatta acttgtgggg
cccaggcacc ctggtcaccg tctcctca 34826327DNAArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 26gagctcgatc tgacccagac tccatcctct
gtgtctgcag ctgtgggagg cacagtcacc 60 atcaattgcc aggccagtca
gagtgttagc aacctcttag cctggtatca gcagaaacca 120gggcagcctc
ccaagctcct gatttatggt gcatccaatc tggaatctgg ggtcccatcg
180cgtttccgtg gcagtggatc tgggacagag ttcactctca ccatcagtgg
catgaaggct 240gaagatgctg ccacttatta ctgtcaaagt ggttattata
gtgctggtgc gacttttgga 300gctggcacca atgtggaaat caaacga
32727116PRTArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct 27Gln Glu Gln Leu
Met Glu Ser Gly Gly Arg Leu Val Asn Pro Gly Glu1 5 10 15Ser Leu Thr
Leu Thr Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Ser Ser Tyr20 25 30Tyr Met
Ser Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile35 40 45Gly
Tyr Ile Gly Thr Ser Ser Gly Thr Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asn Ser Val50 55
60Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Ser Asp Asn Ala Gln Asn Thr Val Phe65
70 75 80Leu Arg Met Thr Ser Leu Thr Asp Ser Asp Thr Ala Thr Tyr Phe
Cys85 90 95Ala Arg Gly Leu Gly Arg Ile Asn Leu Trp Gly Pro Gly Thr
Leu Val100 105 110Thr Val Ser Ser11528109PRTArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 28Glu Leu Val Leu Thr Gln Thr Pro Ser
Ser Met Ser Ala Ala Val Gly1 5 10 15Gly Thr Val Thr Ile Asn Cys Gln
Ala Ser Gln Ser Val Ser Asn Tyr20 25 30Leu Ala Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys
Pro Gly Gln Pro Pro Lys Leu Leu Ile35 40 45Tyr Arg Ala Ser Thr Leu
Ala Ser Gly Val Pro Ser Arg Phe Ser Gly50 55 60Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr
Glu Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Gly Met Lys Ala65 70 75 80Glu Asp Ala
Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Ser Gly Tyr Tyr Ser Ala Gly85 90 95Ala Thr
Phe Gly Gly Gly Thr Asn Val Glu Ile Lys Arg100
10529116PRTArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct 29Gln Gln Gln Leu
Val Glu Ser Gly Gly Arg Leu Val Asn Pro Gly Glu1 5 10 15Ser Leu Thr
Leu Thr Cys Lys Ala Ser Gly Phe Thr Phe Ser Thr Tyr20 25 30Tyr Met
Ser Trp Val Arg Gln Ala Pro Gly Lys Gly Leu Glu Trp Ile35 40 45Gly
Tyr Ile Gly Thr Ser Ser Gly Thr Thr Tyr Tyr Ala Asn Ser Val50 55
60Lys Gly Arg Phe Thr Ile Ser Ser Asp Asn Ala Gln Asn Thr Val Phe65
70 75 80Leu Gln Met Thr Ser Leu Thr Asp Ser Asp Thr Ala Thr Tyr Phe
Cys85 90 95Ala Arg Gly Leu Gly Arg Ile Asn Leu Trp Gly Pro Gly Thr
Leu Val100 105 110Thr Val Ser Ser11530109PRTArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 30Glu Leu Asp Leu Thr Gln Thr Pro Ser
Ser Val Ser Ala Ala Val Gly1 5 10 15Gly Thr Val Thr Ile Asn Cys Gln
Ala Ser Gln Ser Val Ser Asn Leu20 25 30Leu Ala Trp Tyr Gln Gln Lys
Pro Gly Gln Pro Pro Lys Leu Leu Ile35 40 45Tyr Gly Ala Ser Asn Leu
Glu Ser Gly Val Pro Ser Arg Phe Arg Gly50 55 60Ser Gly Ser Gly Thr
Glu Phe Thr Leu Thr Ile Ser Gly Met Lys Ala65 70 75 80Glu Asp Ala
Ala Thr Tyr Tyr Cys Gln Ser Gly Tyr Tyr Ser Ala Gly85 90 95Ala Thr
Phe Gly Ala Gly Thr Asn Val Glu Ile Lys Arg100 1053120DNAArtificial
Sequencesequencing primer 31ccctcatagt tagcgtaacg 20
3212PRTArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct 32His His Pro His Phe
Lys Pro Val Ser Asn Ser Arg1 5 103312PRTArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 33Lys Ser Leu Ser Arg His Asp His Ile
His His His1 5 103436DNAArtificial Sequencesynthetic construct
34catcatccgc attttaagcc tgtgtctaat agtcgt 36 3536DNAArtificial
Sequencesynthetic construct 35aagtctctta gtcggcatga tcatattcat
catcat 36
* * * * *