U.S. patent application number 12/190177 was filed with the patent office on 2008-12-11 for mercury removal sorbent.
Invention is credited to Joseph B. Cross, Glenn W. Dodwell, Marvin M. Johnson, Edward L. Sughrue, II, Jianhua Yao.
Application Number | 20080305949 12/190177 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 36944302 |
Filed Date | 2008-12-11 |
United States Patent
Application |
20080305949 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Cross; Joseph B. ; et
al. |
December 11, 2008 |
MERCURY REMOVAL SORBENT
Abstract
A sorbent composition comprising a vanadium compound and a
ZrO.sub.2 support material is disclosed. Methods of making and
using the composition to remove heavy metals or heavy metal
containing compounds from a fluid stream are also provided. Such
methods are particularly useful in the removal of mercury and
mercury compounds from flue gas streams produced from the
combustion of hydrocarbon-containing materials such as coal and
petroleum fuels.
Inventors: |
Cross; Joseph B.;
(Bartlesville, OK) ; Johnson; Marvin M.;
(Bartlesville, OK) ; Sughrue, II; Edward L.;
(Bartlesvill, OK) ; Dodwell; Glenn W.;
(Bartlesville, OK) ; Yao; Jianhua; (Bartlesville,
OK) |
Correspondence
Address: |
ConocoPhillips Company - IP Legal
P.O. Box 2443
Bartlesville
OK
74005
US
|
Family ID: |
36944302 |
Appl. No.: |
12/190177 |
Filed: |
August 12, 2008 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11071661 |
Mar 3, 2005 |
|
|
|
12190177 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
502/400 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B01D 53/64 20130101;
B01J 20/20 20130101; B01D 2257/602 20130101; Y10S 210/914 20130101;
B01D 2255/20723 20130101; B01D 2255/20715 20130101; B01D 53/8665
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
502/400 |
International
Class: |
B01J 20/06 20060101
B01J020/06 |
Claims
1-19. (canceled)
20. A method for forming a sorbent material comprising: (a)
preparing a mixture comprising a source of vanadate ions and a
solvent capable of solubilizing said source of vanadate ions; (b)
adding a quantity of an oxidizing agent to said mixture; (c)
intimately mixing said mixture with a quantity of ZrO.sub.2
particles; (d) drying said intimate mixture thereby forming a
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material; and (e) calcining said
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material.
21. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said solvent is
selected from the group consisting of oxalic acid, HNO.sub.3, HCl,
and mixtures thereof.
22. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said oxidizing
agent is different from said solvent and selected from the group
consisting of H.sub.2SO.sub.4, HNO.sub.3, permanganate, ozone,
H.sub.2O.sub.2, and mixtures thereof.
23. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said source of
vanadate ions comprises NH.sub.4VO.sub.3.
24. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said oxidizing
agent is added to said mixture in step (b) so as to provide from
about 0.01-25% of the total weight of the mixture.
25. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein step (c) includes
impregnating said ZrO.sub.2 particles with said vanadate ions.
26. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein step (d) includes
heating said mixture to a temperature of at least about 212.degree.
F.
27. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein step (b) includes
the drop wise addition of said oxidizing agent to said mixture.
28. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said oxidizing
agent is added in a sufficient quantity so as to maintain the
vanadium present in said vanadate ions in a +5 oxidation state.
29. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein step (e) includes
heating said vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material to a
temperature of between about 392-1112.degree. F.
30. A method in accordance with claim 29 wherein step (e) includes
heating said vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material to a
temperature of between about 482-842.degree. F.
31. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material comprises V.sub.2O.sub.5, a hydrate
of V.sub.2O.sub.5, a peroxo complex of vanadium oxide, or mixtures
thereof.
32. A method in accordance with claim 20 wherein said vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material comprises at least about 5% by
weight vanadium on an elemental basis.
33-60. (canceled)
Description
[0001] The invention relates to a composition and method for
removing heavy metal contaminants from fluid streams. In one
aspect, the invention relates to a composition for sorbing heavy
metal contaminants and a method of preparing such composition. In
yet another aspect, the invention relates to a process for removing
heavy metal contaminants, such as mercury and mercury compounds,
from flue gas streams produced from the combustion of
hydrocarbon-containing materials.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Heavy metals are released during the combustion process of
many fossil fuels and/or waste materials. These heavy metals
include, for example, arsenic, beryllium, lead, cadmium, chromium,
nickel, zinc, mercury, and barium. Most of these heavy metals are
toxic to humans and animals. In particular, elemental mercury and
mercury compounds such as mercury chlorides are thought to
compromise the health and mental acuity of young children and
fetuses.
[0003] Furthermore, there is every indication that the amount of
mercury, and possibly of other heavy metals, now legally allowed to
be released by those combusting various fossil fuels and/or waste
materials, including coal burning power plants and petroleum
refineries, will be reduced by future legislation. While a variety
of adsorbents are available for capture of heavy metals (in
particular mercury), these adsorbents tend to have low capacities
and are easily deactivated by other components in the gas stream,
such as sulfur oxides. Thus, there exists a need for a material
that removes elemental mercury from gas streams and has a high
capacity for retaining mercury as a nonvolatile compound.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] It is an object of the present invention to provide an
improved vanadium material with a high capacity for sorbing heavy
metals and heavy metal compounds.
[0005] A further object of this invention is to provide a method
for making an improved vanadium incorporated sorbent material by
incorporating a vanadium-containing compound with a porous support
material.
[0006] Another object of this invention is to provide a process for
removing heavy metals or heavy metal compounds from a fluid stream
by contacting the fluid stream with an improved vanadium
incorporated sorbent material.
[0007] Yet another object of this invention is to provide an
improved vanadium material which when used in the removal of heavy
metals results in the oxidation of the heavy metal to an oxidation
state greater than zero.
[0008] It should be understood that the above-listed objects are
only exemplary, and not all the objects listed above need be
accomplished by the invention described and claimed herein.
[0009] In accordance with a first embodiment of the invention, the
inventive composition comprises particles of a ZrO.sub.2 support
having incorporated onto, into, or onto and into at least one
source of vanadium selected from the group consisting of vanadate
ions, vanadium oxide, and combinations thereof, the material
comprising at least about 5% by weight vanadium. In accordance with
a second embodiment of the invention, the inventive composition is
prepared by a method comprising the steps of: (a) incorporating
into, onto, or into and onto a porous ZrO.sub.2 support a mixture
including a source of vanadate ions, and a solvent capable of
solubilizing said source of vanadate ions; (b) drying the vanadate
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material; and (c) calcining the dried
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material.
[0010] In accordance with a third embodiment of the invention, the
inventive composition is prepared by a method comprising the steps
of: (a) preparing a mixture comprising a source of vanadate ions
and a solvent capable of solubilizing the source of vanadate ions;
(b) adding a quantity of an oxidizing agent to the mixture; (c)
intimately mixing the mixture with a quantity of ZrO.sub.2
particles; (d) drying the intimate mixture thereby forming a
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material; and (e) calcining the
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material.
[0011] In accordance with a fourth embodiment of the invention, the
inventive composition can be used in the removal of at least one
heavy metal or heavy metal containing compound from a fluid stream
by a method comprising the step of: (a) contacting the fluid stream
with a porous ZrO.sub.2 support material having incorporated onto,
into, or onto and into a vanadium containing compound for sorption
of at least a portion of the at least one heavy metal or heavy
metal containing compound.
[0012] In accordance with a fifth embodiment of the invention, the
inventive composition can be used in the removal of at least one
heavy metal or heavy metal containing compound from a flue gas
stream produced by the combustion of a hydrocarbon-containing fuel,
the method comprising the steps of: (a) contacting the flue gas
stream with a first sorbent material comprising a porous ZrO.sub.2
support material having incorporated onto, into, or onto and into a
vanadium containing compound for sorbing at least a portion of the
at least one heavy metal or heavy metal containing compound present
in the flue gas stream; and (b) contacting the flue gas with a
second sorbent material different from the first sorbent material
for sorbing at least a portion of the at least one heavy
metal-containing compound not sorbed during step (a). Other objects
and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the
detailed description and the appended claims.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0013] A preferred embodiment of the present invention is described
in detail below with reference to the attached figures,
wherein:
[0014] FIG. 1 is a graph of mercury uptake versus mercury
breakthrough for a vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent compared
to a conventional activated charcoal sorbent; and
[0015] FIG. 2 is a graph of the mercury removal efficiency for a
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] Compositions according to the present invention generally
comprise a porous ZrO.sub.2 support material having incorporated
thereon, therein, or thereon and therein a vanadium-containing
compound. Preferably, the vanadium compound is any such compound
wherein the vanadium component is in a +5 oxidation state.
Preferably, the vanadium-containing compound comprises a vanadium
oxide, more preferably V.sub.2O.sub.5 or a vanadate (--VO.sub.3)
group, such as in ammonium vanadate (NH.sub.4VO.sub.3). However, it
is within the scope of the invention for the vanadium component to
have any oxidation state greater than zero.
[0017] The porous ZrO.sub.2 support material generally comprises at
least about 50% by weight of the total composition, preferably
between about 50-99% by weight, more preferably between about
75-95% by weight, and most preferably between about 80-90% by
weight. In order to maximize the sorptive capacity of the
composition, the support material preferably has a surface area of
at least about 75 m.sup.2/g, more preferably at least about 100
m.sup.2/g, and most preferably at least about 150 m.sup.2/g.
[0018] The overall composition comprises at least about 5% by
weight vanadium. Unless otherwise specified, the phrase "by weight
vanadium" is defined as the elemental weight of vanadium present in
the composition. More preferably, the composition comprises from
about 7-40% by weight vanadium, and most preferably from about
10-25% by weight.
[0019] In one embodiment, the sorbent material is formed by
incorporating into, onto, or into and onto a porous ZrO.sub.2
support a mixture including a source of vanadate ions, a solvent
capable of solubilizing the source of vanadate ions, and an
oxidizing agent. Preferably, the source of vanadate ions is
NH.sub.4VO.sub.3, however, other sources of vanadate ions such as
alkali metal vanadates may be used. As noted above, it is
preferable for the vanadium present in the vanadate ions to have a
+5 oxidation state. The selection of the solvent for solubilizing
the vanadium-containing compound is important in achieving this
objective. However, it is also preferable to add an oxidizing agent
to the mixture to ensure that the vanadium maintains a +5 oxidation
state. In this regard, preferred solvents for use with the present
invention include those selected from the group consisting of
oxalic acid, HNO.sub.3, HCl, and mixtures thereof, with oxalic acid
being particularly preferred. Preferred oxidizing agents for use
with the present invention include those selected from the group
consisting of H.sub.2SO.sub.4, HNO.sub.3, permanganate, ozone,
H.sub.2O.sub.2, and mixtures thereof, with H.sub.2O.sub.2 being
particularly preferred. Preferably, the oxidizing agent is added in
a sufficient quantity so as to maintain the vanadium present in the
vanadate ions in a +5 oxidation state, more preferably, this
involves the presence of about 0.1-25% by weight oxidizing agent
based on the weight of the vanadate solution, and most preferably
from about 1-10% by weight. It is possible for a single material to
act as both a solvent and oxidizing agent, however, it is most
preferable for the oxidizing agent to be a composition different
from the solvent. When preparing small batches of sorbent material
in accordance with the present invention, it is preferable for the
oxidizing agent to be added to the vanadate solution slowly, and
more preferably in a drop wise manner.
[0020] Next, the vanadate mixture is combined with a quantity of
ZrO.sub.2 particles thereby forming a vanadium incorporated
ZrO.sub.2 material. The ZrO.sub.2 particles can be discrete
granular particles or agglomerations of a plurality of particles.
Preferably, the ZrO.sub.2 particles or particle agglomerations have
an average particle size of between about 0.01-20 mm, more
preferably from about 0.1-10 mm, and most preferably from about
0.5-5 mm. It is preferable that the ZrO.sub.2 particles not be in
the form of a powder, however, it is possible for a powder to be
used provided that the powder can be formed into pellets or other
larger granular structures.
[0021] In preferred embodiments, the vanadate mixture is intimately
mixed with the ZrO.sub.2 particles so that at least a portion of
the vanadate ions impregnate the ZrO.sub.2 support. By impregnating
the pores of the support material, the surface area available for
heavy metal sorption is significantly increased. As used herein,
the term "impregnate" means that the vanadate ions at least
partially fill in or infuse the pores of the ZrO.sub.2 support.
[0022] The vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material is then dried
to remove the excess solvent. Preferably, this drying step involves
heating the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material to a
temperature of at least about 212.degree. F. depending upon the
solvent used. Following removal of the excess solvent, the dried
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material is calcined. As
demonstrated in the examples below, the calcination temperature
appears to impact the sorptive capacity of the sorbent material.
Therefore, it is preferable that during the calcination step the
dried vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material be heated to a
temperature of between about 392-1112.degree. F., most preferably
between about 482-842.degree. F., and most preferably between about
527-707.degree. F. During the calcination step, it is possible for
at least a portion of the vanadate ions to be converted to a
vanadium oxide compound such as V.sub.2O.sub.5, a hydrate of
V.sub.2O.sub.5, a peroxo complex of vanadium oxide, or mixtures
thereof.
[0023] The inventive sorbent material is particularly useful in the
removal of heavy metals and heavy metal containing compounds from
fluid streams, especially flue gas streams produced by the
combustion of hydrocarbon-containing materials such as coal and
petroleum fuels. As noted above, such fluid streams are often
contaminated with at least one heavy metal or compound containing a
heavy metal selected from the group consisting of arsenic,
beryllium, lead, cadmium, chromium, nickel, zinc, mercury, and
barium. In one aspect, methods of removing heavy metal and heavy
metal containing compounds from fluid streams comprise providing a
sorbent composition according to the present invention and
contacting the stream with the inventive sorbent.
[0024] Flue gas, such as that created by the combustion of
hydrocarbon-containing compounds, generally comprises at least
about 10% by weight N.sub.2, more preferably at least about 50% by
weight, and most preferably between about 75-90% by weight. Flue
gas also generally comprises less than about 10% by weight of
uncombusted hydrocarbons, more preferably less than about 5% by
weight, and most preferably less than about 1% by weight. As
described below, in a particularly preferred application, the flue
gas will have already been treated for removal of NO.sub.x and
SO.sub.x prior to any heavy metal removal process as the presence
of high levels of NO.sub.x and SO.sub.x compounds may lead to
fouling of the heavy metal removal sorbents. Generally, the flue
gas comprises less than about 800 ppm of SO.sub.x compounds such as
SO.sub.2, more preferably less than about 500 ppm, and most
preferably less than about 400 ppm. Also, the flue gas preferably
comprises less than about 400 ppm NO.sub.x such as NO and NO.sub.2,
more preferably less than about 250 ppm, and most preferably less
than about 150 ppm. Flue gas may also comprise between about
2.5-10% by weight O.sub.2, between about 1-5% by weight CO.sub.2,
and between about 5-20% by weight H.sub.2O.
[0025] Preferably, the pressure drop associated with the contacting
step should not exceed more than about 20 psia. More preferably,
the pressure drop in the fluid stream is less than about 10 psia,
and most preferably less than about 5 psia. Typically, flue gas
streams do not flow under high pressures. Therefore, if the
pressure drop is too great, back pressure is created and can affect
the combustion process by which the flue gas is created. The
arrangement of the sorbent material in the vessel in which
contacting occurs can assist in minimizing this pressure drop.
Preferably, the sorbent material comprises finely divided particles
that are suspended in the fluid stream during the contacting step.
Alternatively, the sorbent material may be positioned in a
fluidized bed, placed in a packed bed column, formed into
monoliths, or incorporated into a foam. With the latter
arrangements, pressure drop may become much more of a concern and
may require the use of fans or other equipment to increase the
pressure of the flue gas stream.
[0026] The fluid stream containing the heavy metal contaminant
preferably has a temperature of between about 50-400.degree. F.
during the contacting step, more preferably between about
100-375.degree. F., and most preferably between about
200-350.degree. F. The temperature of the fluid stream at the
contacting stage is in part affected by upstream processes such as
particulate removal systems (i.e., cyclones), other contaminant
removal systems, heat exchange systems, etc. The contacting step
results in the sorption of at least about 80% by weight of the
heavy metals contained in the fluid stream, more preferably at
least about 90% by weight, even more preferably at least about 95%
by weight, and most preferably at least about 98% by weight. As
previously stated, the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 support
material exhibits a high capacity for sorbing heavy metals and
heavy metal containing compounds. Preferably, the vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 material is capable of sorbing at least
about 1 atom of a heavy metal per every 5 atoms of vanadium. More
preferably, the ratio of heavy metal atoms sorbed to vanadium atoms
is at least about 1:3, and most preferably 1:1.
[0027] The vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent material also
exhibits the ability to oxidize the elemental heavy metal into a
heavy metal containing compound such as a heavy metal oxide or
chloride. Using mercury as an example, the sorbent material
oxidizes mercury into various oxidized species such as Hg.sup.+1,
Hg.sup.+2, or mercury compounds such as HgO, HgCl, and HgCl.sub.2.
At times, due to system inefficiencies or sorbent saturation, some
of these heavy metal containing compounds may desorb or break free
from the sorbent material. In that case, it can be particularly
useful to employ a downstream heavy metal compound removal system
in conjunction with the above-described sorbent system. In the
heavy metal compound removal system, the gaseous product stream is
contacted with a separate adsorbent in an adsorption zone. The
adsorbent can be any adsorbent capable of adsorbing a heavy metal;
however, preferred materials for removing the heavy metal compounds
include those having a hydrophobic surface with pore openings of
less than about 10 .ANG., and high pore volumes. More preferably,
the adsorbent comprises, consists of or consists essentially of a
material selected from the group consisting of a zeolite, amorphous
carbon and combinations thereof. The amorphous carbon can be an
activated carbon and/or activated charcoal. Exemplary zeolites
include those with 8-12 member ring openings, and particularly
ZSM-5 zeolite. Furthermore, the material may be in the form of
granules, pellets, monoliths, powders that are collected on
filters, or combinations thereof. A treated gaseous product stream
is withdrawn from the adsorption zone and contains less than about
20 weight %, preferably less than about 10 weight %, and more
preferably less that about 5 weight % of the heavy metal in the
gaseous feed stream.
[0028] The heavy metal compound removal system may be contained in
a separate downstream vessel from the vanadium incorporated
ZrO.sub.2 sorbent, or can be situated along with the vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent in a multiple stage contacting
vessel so that the flue gas first contacts the vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent followed by the heavy metal compound
removal sorbent.
[0029] While the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent material
exhibits a relatively high capacity for sorbing heavy metals and
heavy metal containing compounds, its cost is relatively higher
than the cost for conventional heavy metal compound sorbent
materials such as zeolite. Therefore, from an economic standpoint,
it may be desirable to employ a relatively small amount of the
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent compared to the
conventional sorbent material. Once the sorptive capacity of the
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent has sufficiently
diminished, it will not be able to sorb sufficient quantities of
the heavy metal containing compounds formed by the catalytic action
of the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent. These heavy metal
containing compounds may then be sorbed by the lesser expensive
heavy metal compound sorbent material located downstream from the
vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent.
[0030] The heavy metal compound removal system preferably results
in the sorption of at least about 80% by weight of the heavy metal
containing compounds that break through the vanadium incorporated
ZrO.sub.2 sorbent material, more preferably at least about 90% by
weight, and most preferably at least about 95% by weight.
[0031] In addition to the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent
material becoming saturated, the overall sorptive efficiency may be
effected by the presence of NO.sub.x and SO.sub.x compounds present
in the flue gas. For example, SO.sub.2 contained in the flue gas
stream may be oxidized to SO.sub.3 and then converted to
H.sub.2SO.sub.4 in the presence of water. The H.sub.2SO.sub.4 then
may fill the pores of the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent
thereby decreasing the sorptive capacity thereof and blocking
active catalyst sites. Therefore, it is preferable to employ an
upstream NO.sub.x and SO.sub.x removal process in order to avoid
fouling of the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent material.
Any conventional NO.sub.x and SO.sub.x removal process would be
suitable for use with the present invention. The NO.sub.x and
SO.sub.x removal process should preferably remove at least about
50% by weight of all NO.sub.x and SO.sub.x present in the flue gas
stream. It is preferable for the flue gas stream immediately prior
to contact with the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent to
comprise less than about 400 ppm NO.sub.x, more preferably less
than about 250 ppm, and most preferably less than about 150 ppm.
Likewise, it is preferable for the flue gas stream immediately
prior to contact with the vanadium incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent
to comprise less than about 800 ppm SO.sub.x, more preferably less
than about 500 ppm, and most preferably less than about 400
ppm.
[0032] The heavy metal compound removal system is capable of
performing effectively even at high flue gas flow rates (i.e.,
>10,000 gas hourly space velocity). The sorbent material used in
the heavy metal compound removal system may be placed in a
fluidized or packed bed vessel, however, as with the vanadium
incorporated ZrO.sub.2 sorbent material system above, the pressure
drop of the flue gas stream should be minimized to avoid requiring
the use of additional equipment to compensate for the pressure
drop.
EXAMPLE
[0033] The following example illustrates preferred sorbent
materials and methods of making the same in accordance with the
present invention. This example should not be taken as limiting the
scope of the present invention in any way.
[0034] In this example, a sorbent material according to the present
invention was prepared by first dissolving 51.4 g ammonium
metavanadate (NH.sub.4VO.sub.3) in 440 g of oxalic acid. In order
to maintain the vanadium in its +5 oxidation state (indicated by a
reddish color), hydrogen peroxide was added drop wise to the
solution (approximately 120 drops were used). The NH.sub.4VO.sub.3
solution was then mixed with 200 g of ZrO.sub.2 in four steps
thereby impregnating the NH.sub.4VO.sub.3 onto the ZrO.sub.2 by
incipient wetness. In each step, 125 g of the NH.sub.4VO.sub.3
solution was added and the material dried at 248.degree. F.
(120.degree. C.) for one hour before beginning the next step. Next,
20 g aliquots of the material were calcined at 45-degree increments
from 572-932.degree. F. (300-500.degree. C.).
[0035] Two aliquots were tested for efficacy in removing elemental
mercury entrained in an air stream at a concentration of
approximately 1000 .mu.g/m.sup.3 (ppb w/v); the first aliquot being
the material calcined at 572.degree. F. (300.degree. C.) and the
second aliquot being the material calcined at 842.degree. F.
(450.degree. C.). Portions of the sorbent were placed in a fixed
bed reactor, the temperature of which was held constant at
302.degree. F. (150.degree. C.). The air flow rate through the
fixed bed reactor was set at a gas hourly space velocity of
approximately 10,000. The air stream entering and exiting the fixed
bed reactor was periodically analyzed using a Jerome Mercury
Analyzer.
[0036] FIG. 1 shows the mercury uptake versus the mercury
breakthrough of the two sorbent materials tested. For purposes of
comparison, literature data for sulfur impregnated activated
charcoal (SIAC), a conventional sorbent for this application, is
also shown. The vanadium/ZrO.sub.2 materials demonstrated excellent
capacity for sequestering mercury when compared with the SIAC
literature data. The material calcined at 572.degree. F.
(300.degree. C.) exhibited a greater capacity over the long term
versus the material calcined at 842.degree. F. (450.degree. C.).
However, both materials performed much better than the activated
charcoal. FIG. 2 further demonstrates the effectiveness of the
sorbent materials in removing mercury from the air stream in terms
of efficiency of the sorbent versus mercury uptake. The sorbent
material calcined at 572.degree. F. (300.degree. C.) exhibited
superior efficiency in sequestering the mercury. The efficiency of
the material calcined at 842.degree. F. (450.degree. C.) initially
matched that of the material calcined at 572.degree. F.
(300.degree. C.). However, this efficiency dropped off after about
500 .mu.g/g Hg uptake. In sum, the test results indicate that the
calcine temperature effects the mercury sorbing capacity and
efficiency of the vanadium/ZrO.sub.2 materials. Furthermore, the
vanadium/ZrO.sub.2 sorbents tend to remain active even when heated
to extreme temperatures, such as those required to remove mercury
from spent sorbent material. This indicates that the sorbent is
capable of being regenerated without significant loss of
activity.
* * * * *