U.S. patent application number 11/939875 was filed with the patent office on 2008-11-20 for heap or dump leaching system having an air distributor.
This patent application is currently assigned to BHP Billiton Innovation Pty. Ltd.. Invention is credited to Danny Ignacio Castillo, Elliott Paul Smithson.
Application Number | 20080284068 11/939875 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 25646841 |
Filed Date | 2008-11-20 |
United States Patent
Application |
20080284068 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Castillo; Danny Ignacio ; et
al. |
November 20, 2008 |
Heap or Dump Leaching System Having an Air Distributor
Abstract
An air distributor for use in heap or dump leaching systems is
disclosed. The air distributor includes an air pipe having a series
of holes for releasing air from the pipe and one or more protective
members spaced outwardly of the air holes to shield the air
holes.
Inventors: |
Castillo; Danny Ignacio;
(Autofagasta, CL) ; Smithson; Elliott Paul;
(Santiago, CL) |
Correspondence
Address: |
BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE
P.O. BOX 10395
CHICAGO
IL
60610
US
|
Assignee: |
BHP Billiton Innovation Pty.
Ltd.
|
Family ID: |
25646841 |
Appl. No.: |
11/939875 |
Filed: |
November 14, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10849386 |
May 19, 2004 |
7314066 |
|
|
11939875 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
266/168 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22B 3/18 20130101; Y02P
10/20 20151101; Y02P 10/234 20151101; C22B 3/02 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
266/168 |
International
Class: |
C22B 61/00 20060101
C22B061/00 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Nov 13, 2001 |
AU |
PR 8851 |
Jan 16, 2002 |
AU |
PR 9989 |
Nov 13, 2002 |
AU |
PCT/AU02/01546 |
Claims
1. A heap or dump leaching system for heap or dump leaching a
material comprising: a. a heap or dump containing a metal to be
recovered; and, b. a gas distributor positioned in and supplying
gas to the heap or dump.
2. The invention of claim 1 wherein the gas distributor includes a
gas pipe having a series of gas holes for releasing gas from the
gas pipe and one or more protective members spaced outwardly of the
gas holes to shield the gas holes.
3. The invention of claim 2 wherein the gas pipe is
cylindrical.
4. The invention of claim 2 wherein the gas pipe is corrugated with
a series of circumferential crests and troughs along the length of
the gas pipe.
5. The invention of claim 4 wherein the gas holes are in the
troughs of the corrugations.
6. The invention of claim 2 comprising a single protective member
that is in the form of an outer pipe that is spaced outwardly of
the gas pipe, whereby there is a gap between the gas pipe and the
outer pipe.
7. The invention of claim 6 wherein the outer pipe does not
restrict gas flow from the gas holes in the gas pipe.
8. The invention of claim 6 wherein the outer pipe has a series of
gas holes for gas that passes from the gas pipe into the gap
between the gas pipe and the outer pipe via the gas holes in the
gas pipe.
9. The invention of claim 8 wherein the gas holes in the outer pipe
are larger than the gas holes in the gas pipe and therefore are
less susceptible to being blocked.
10. The invention of claim 2 comprising a single protective member
and the gas pipe is corrugated and the single protective member is
in the form of a sheet member that is at least partially wrapped
around the gas pipe and contacts the crests of the corrugations and
extends over and covers the troughs that include gas holes.
11. The invention of claim 2 comprising a single protective member
and the gas pipe is corrugated and the single protective member is
in the form of a corrugated member that is at least partially
wrapped around the gas pipe, with the crests and troughs of the
corrugated member overlying and spaced outwardly of the crests and
troughs respectively of the gas pipe.
12. The invention of claim 10 wherein the single protective member
does not restrict gas flow from the gas holes in the gas pipe.
13. The invention of claim 2 comprising a plurality of protective
members and each protective member is in the form of a section of
an outer pipe that is spaced outwardly of the gas pipe, whereby
there are gaps between the outer pipe sections and the outer
pipe.
14. The invention of claim 13 wherein the outer pipe sections do
not restrict gas flow from the gas holes in the gas pipe.
15. The invention of claim 13 wherein the outer pipe sections have
a series of gas holes for gas that passes from the gas pipe into
the gaps between the gas pipe and the outer pipe sections via the
gas holes in the gas pipe.
16. The invention of claim 15 wherein the gas holes in the outer
pipe sections are larger than the gas holes in the gas pipe and
therefore are less susceptible to being blocked.
17. The invention of claim 2 comprising a plurality of protective
members and each protective member is in the form of a section of a
sheet member that is at least partially wrapped around the gas pipe
and contacts the crests of the corrugations and extends over and
covers the troughs that include gas holes.
18. The invention of claim 2 comprising a plurality of protective
members and each protective member is in the form of a section of a
corrugated member that is at least partially wrapped around the gas
pipe, with the crests and troughs of the corrugated member
overlying and spaced outwardly of the crests and troughs
respectively of the gas pipe.
19. The invention of claim 2 wherein the outer pipe is a solid pipe
with open ends, whereby gas flow from the gas pipe sections can be
released from the gas distributor via the ends of the outer pipe
sections.
20. A heap or dump leaching system for heap or dump leaching a
material comprising: a. a heap or dump containing a metal to be
recovered; and, b. a gas distributor positioned in and supplying
gas to the heap or dump, which includes an gas pipe having a series
of holes for releasing gas from the pipe; a plurality of protective
members each in the form of a section of an outer pipe spaced
outwardly of the gas holes to shield the gas holes, whereby there
are gaps between the outer pipe sections and the outer pipe; a
series of gas holes provided in the outer pipe sections, wherein
the gas holes in the outer pipe sections are larger than the gas
holes in the gas pipe.
Description
[0001] The present application is a divisional application of U.S.
application Ser. No. 10/849,386 now U.S. Pat. No. ______, which
claims priority to PCT/AU02/01546, which was published in English
on May 22, 2003 and to Australian applications PR 8851 filed Nov.
13, 2001 and PR 9989 filed Jan. 16, 2002, the contents of all above
applications are incorporated herein by reference.
[0002] The present invention relates to bioleaching.
[0003] The present invention relates particularly to an air
distributor for supplying air to a heap or dump of material being
bioleached.
BACKGROUND
[0004] The term "heap" as used herein is understood to describe
material that has been crushed and agglomerated and stacked
mechanically in a pile.
[0005] The term "air" as used herein is understood to mean
atmospheric air with or without modification of the gas
composition.
[0006] The term "dump" as used herein is understood to describe
material, such as run-of-mine material, that has been directly
discharged from a truck into a pile.
[0007] The present invention is described in the context of
bioleaching copper-bearing sulfide minerals to recover copper.
However, the present invention is not limited to bioleaching this
material and to recovering this metal and extends to bioleaching
any material in a heap/dump that requires air to be delivered to
the heap/dump.
[0008] Historically, copper was produced in the 16.sup.th century
at both the Harz Mountains in Germany and Rio Tinto in Spain using
bacteria-assisted leaching. The role played by the bacteria was not
known to the metallurgists of the time. During the 1960's Kennecott
Copper Company led a research and operational program to understand
the role of aeration, solution chemistry, dump design etc. and this
understanding expanded the application of heap and dump leaching.
Also, the need to stop acid mine drainage and the development of
biooxidation technology for refractory gold contained in sulfides
has expanded the understanding of the role of microorganisms and
this knowledge is available to the copper industry. Even with all
these advancements bioleaching technology is still in its infancy
and, to optimize it, there is a need to understand fully the
interaction of the biological, chemical, fluid, mass and heat
transfer phenomena.
[0009] Bioleaching is growing in importance for the production of
copper because of the need for environmentally friendly technology
that is simple to implement and offers both considerable capital
and/or operating cost savings. However, the application of
bioleaching has not been easy and a lack of understanding of the
key issues has caused industrial projects to fail to meet the
designed production and/or delays in reaching the design
capacity.
[0010] Ferric ions are an effective oxidizing agent at ambient
conditions for the oxidation of copper-bearing sulfides in order to
release copper into a soluble and thereafter recoverable form.
[0011] Oxidation of ferrous ions to ferric ions involves the
following reaction:
4Fe.sup.+2 (aq)+O.sub.2(g)+4H.sup.+bacteria .fwdarw.4Fe.sup.+3
(aq)+2H.sub.2O
[0012] It can be seen from the above equation that oxidation of
ferrous ions to ferric ions is not possible in the absence of acid
and oxygen.
[0013] Bacteria such as Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum
ferrooxidans, and Thiobacillus thiooxidans catalyse oxidation of
ferrous ions to ferric ions at a rate 10.sup.6 times faster than
via gaseous oxygen alone.
[0014] The bacteria are unicellular microorganisms requiring
oxygen, carbon dioxide for the synthesis of organic compounds,
traces of nutrients (ammonium, magnesium, calcium, potassium,
sulphate, and phosphate ions) for their metabolic functions, an
acidic environment, and a suitable temperature. The lack or absence
of the above parameters decreases the bacterial activity and causes
a decrease in the oxidation rate of copper sulfides resulting in
less copper dissolution.
[0015] Biological leaching of sulfides requires air.
[0016] Initially heap/dump plants relied on natural advection but
this was found to be inadequate.
[0017] In recent years plants have moved to air injection. As the
heaps/dumps are usually very big this has to be done cheaply and
the general solution has been to blow low pressure (typically 1-3
psi) air through corrugated HDPE pipes which are buried in the ore
or in inert overliner material under the ore. In a typical
industrial application the pipes are usually long, upwards of 500 m
in big plants, and have air holes every 1-4 m along the length of
the pipes in order to distribute air in the heaps/dumps. The air
holes are usually small (1-4 mm) and the experience of the
applicant is that the holes tend to become blocked very quickly.
Blocking of air holes is caused by fine solids and
precipitates/crystals which are carried to the air pipes by the
leach solutions percolating through the heap/dump.
SUMMARY
[0018] An object of the present invention is to provide an air
distributor that is considerably less susceptible to blocking than
the corrugated HDPE pipes with small air holes described in the
preceding paragraph.
[0019] According to the present invention there is provided an air
distributor which includes an air pipe having a series of holes for
releasing air from the pipe and one or more protective members
spaced outwardly of the air holes to shield the air holes.
[0020] In use, when the air distributor is embedded in a heap or
dump of material being bioleached and leaching solution is
percolating through the heap/dump, the protective member or members
prevent solution contacting the air holes and depositing material
(carried by the solution) that could block the air holes.
[0021] The air pipe may be any suitable shape.
[0022] For example, the air pipe may be cylindrical.
[0023] The air pipe may also be corrugated, with a series of
circumferential crests and troughs along the length of the
pipe.
[0024] Preferably the air holes are in the troughs of the
corrugations.
[0025] In a situation in which the air distributor includes a
single protective member as opposed to a plurality of members, the
member may be in the form of an outer pipe that is spaced outwardly
of the air pipe whereby there is a gap between the air pipe and the
outer pipe.
[0026] With this arrangement, preferably the outer pipe does not
restrict air flow from the air holes in the air pipe.
[0027] The outer pipe may have a series of air holes for air that
flows in use from the air pipe into the gap between the air pipe
and the outer pipe via the air holes in the air pipe.
[0028] Preferably, the air holes in the outer pipe are larger than
the air holes in the air pipe and therefore are less susceptible to
being blocked.
[0029] In an alternative embodiment that applies to situations in
which the air pipe is corrugated, the single protective member may
be in the form of a sheet member that is at least partially wrapped
around the air pipe and contacts the crests of the corrugations and
extends over and covers the troughs that include air holes.
[0030] In another alternative embodiment, that also applies to
situations in which the air pipe is corrugated, the single
protective member may be in the form of a corrugated member that is
at least partially wrapped around the air pipe, with the crests and
troughs of the corrugated member overlying and spaced outwardly of
the crests and troughs respectively of the air pipe.
[0031] With the above alternative embodiments, preferably the
single protective members do not restrict air flow from the air
holes in the air pipe.
[0032] In a situation in which the air distributor includes a
plurality of protective members as opposed to a single member, each
member may be in the form of a section of an outer pipe that is
spaced outwardly of the air pipe, whereby there are gaps between
the outer pipe sections and the outer pipe.
[0033] Preferably the outer pipe sections do not restrict air flow
from the air holes in the air pipe.
[0034] The outer pipe sections may have a series of air holes for
air that in use flows from the air pipe into the gaps between the
air pipe and the outer pipe sections via the air holes in the air
pipe.
[0035] Preferably, the air holes in the outer pipe sections are
larger than the air holes in the air pipe and therefore are less
susceptible to being blocked.
[0036] In alternative embodiments, each protective member of the
plurality of protective members may be in the form of a section of
the above-described sheet member or a section of the
above-described corrugated member.
[0037] The outer pipe may be a solid pipe with open ends, whereby
air flow from the air pipe sections can be released from the air
distributor via the ends of the outer pipe sections.
[0038] The air pipe and the protective member or members may be
made from any suitable material.
[0039] The air holes in the air pipe may be any suitable shape.
Specifically, the present invention is not limited to arrangements
in which the air holes are circular.
[0040] The air holes in the air pipe may be any suitable size or
spacing.
[0041] The air holes in the outer pipe or outer pipe sections may
be any suitable shape. Specifically, the present invention is not
limited to arrangements in which the air holes are circular.
Typically, the air holes are slots that are relatively long
compared to the width of the slots.
[0042] The air holes in the outer pipe or outer pipe sections may
be any suitable size or spacing. According to the present invention
there is also provided a heap or dump leaching system for heap or
dump leaching a material that includes the above-described air
distributor positioned in and supplying air to a heap or dump of
the material.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0043] FIG. 1 shows one embodiment of an air distributor according
to the present invention.
[0044] FIG. 2 shows a graph that displays the air flowrate as a
function of leaching time for eight different air distributors.
[0045] FIG. 3 is a side elevation view that illustrates two
different embodiments of the air distributor according to the
present invention.
[0046] FIG. 4 is a detailed view of one of the embodiments shown in
FIG. 3
[0047] FIG. 5 is a detailed view of one of the embodiments shown in
FIG. 3
[0048] FIG. 6 is another embodiment of an air distributor according
to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION
[0049] The present invention was made during the course of an
extensive laboratory/pilot plant program carried out by the
applicant to investigate key operating parameters of bioleaching
copper-bearing ore.
[0050] As expected, the laboratory work of the program established
that the absence of aeration significantly decreased the copper
leaching kinetics of the ore. Tests with no air reached 50% total
copper recovery whereas tests with air reached a copper recovery in
the +80% range.
[0051] The pilot plant work of the program was carried out at a
bioleaching pilot plant that included crushing, agglomeration,
leaching (in cribs and columns), solvent-extraction, and electro
winning stages. The major focus of the pilot plant work was on the
leaching process and the plant was designed to simulate industrial
heap leaching plants.
[0052] The plant included 12 concrete cribs (two cribs of 4
m.times.5 m.times.6 m high and ten cribs of 2 m.times.2.5 m.times.6
m high). Each crib had internal and external insulation in order to
simulate conditions in a rectangular section of an industrial heap.
The amount of insulation was calculated to be equivalent to that
provided by 5 m of ore around the crib.
[0053] In addition, the plant included a total of 27 columns, 24
having 0.30 m ID and 3 columns having 0.60 m ID. The 0.30 m ID
columns were 6 m high and the 0.60 m columns were 12 m high. All of
the columns were insulated on the same basis as the cribs.
[0054] The plant included a solution collection and irrigation
system. The system was similar to that used in industrial heap
leaching plants.
[0055] The plant included an aeration system. Air was added to the
sulfide heaps by blowing low-pressure (1-3 psi) air via the
aeration system. The aeration system included a plurality of air
distribution pipes. The air distribution pipes were in the form of
corrugated HDPE air pipes having circumferential crests and troughs
along the length of the pipes and holes in the troughs of the
corrugations. The air pipes were placed at the base of the heaps,
usually above the phreatic level of the heaps.
[0056] A stacker was employed to load the cribs with ore in a
similar procedure to that used in industrial heap leaching
plants.
[0057] A major problem experienced in initial crib test work at the
pilot plant was plugging of the air holes in the air pipes
inhibiting bacterial activity in the ore and therefore limiting
copper recovery.
[0058] In the initial pilot plant work the start-up air flowrate
was maintained for just 15 days and then started to decrease. At
day 57 all of the air holes were completely blocked.
[0059] XRD analysis performed on the material responsible for
plugging the air holes showed that the material was fine solids and
precipitates carried to the air pipes by the irrigation
solution.
[0060] In response to the air hole blocking problem, the applicant
designed and tested in the pilot plant several preferred
embodiments of an air distributor of the present invention, one of
which is shown in FIG. 1.
[0061] The embodiment of the air distributor shown in FIG. 1 is in
the form of the above-described corrugated HDPE air pipe located
inside another pipe of larger diameter. The outer pipe forms a
protective member that shields the air holes in the air pipe. The
outer pipe is similar to the air pipe but with a plurality of holes
(the actual pipe used was the pipe normally used for collecting
solutions, sometimes called a "drainflex" pipe). The holes in the
outer pipe were much larger than those used in the air pipe and
were sufficiently large so that the holes did not become
blocked.
[0062] The other embodiment of the air distributor tested by the
applicant included short sections of the outer pipe shown in FIG.
1--without air holes--positioned to enclose the sections of the air
pipe that have holes. The use of air pipe sections greatly reduced
the total length of the outer pipe required. It was not necessary
to provide holes in the outer pipe sections because air could flow
from the ends of the outer pipes.
[0063] Table 1 summarizes the test work carried out by the
applicant on the preferred embodiment shown in FIG. 1 and
comparative test work on the air pipe only--without the outer
pipe.
[0064] The test work was carried out in pilot plant cribs.
Distributors 1 to 3 were installed 1 m from the base of the cribs
and distributors 4 to 6 were installed 1.5 m from the base of the
cribs.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 DETAILS OF AIR DISTRIBUTOR TESTS TYPE OF AIR
LOCATION TEST # OF ORIFICES ID (MM) DISTRIBUTOR PROTECTION OF
ORIFICES 1 10 2 Corrugated No 5 in the valley line & 5 in the
top 2 10 2 Corrugated Inside a 4'' 5 in the valley line Drenaflex
line & 5 in the top 3 3 4 Corrugated No 2 in the valley line
& 1 in the top 4 3 4 Corrugated Inside a 4'' 2 in the valley
line Drenaflex line & 1 in the top 5 3 4 PVC line Inside a 4''
line Drenaflex line 6 1 6 Corrugated No Top line
[0065] The main variables investigated were the size of the air
holes, the number of air holes, the location of the air holes on
the corrugated air pipes (valley vs. top), the air distributor
material, and protection.
[0066] The results of the evaluation of the air distributors show
that only tests 2, 4, and 5 were able to maintain the set air
flowrate of about 60 L/min. These air distributors are the
distributors protected with the "drainflex" pipe.
[0067] The air distributors of the other tests plugged after only
45 operating days.
[0068] In general, the applicant believes that a key aspect of the
protection system provided by the preferred embodiment of the air
distributor shown in FIG. 1 is that the outer pipe prevents contact
of the leach solution with the air holes. Specifically, the
applicant suspects that solution percolating down through the heap
contacts the outer pipe and follows the curvature of the outer pipe
and is thus kept away from the air pipe. No solution at the air
holes in the air pipe means no plugging. In addition, the outer
pipe performed this task successfully without impeding air flow
from the air pipe. Specifically, there was a gap of about 1 cm
between the air pipe and the outer pipe and the gap was sufficient
to allow uninterrupted air flow. In an industrial application this
gap could be larger depending on the relative sizes of the pipes
used.
[0069] The applicant carried out pilot plant work to assess the
performance of the above-described preferred embodiments of the air
distributor against other protection systems, namely sock and mesh
cloth systems.
[0070] A crib was loaded with 100%-1/2'' MHE-A-CC mineral that was
agglomerated with 4.2 kg/MT of acid and 49.5 kg/MT of water. A
stacker was used to load the agglomerated ore in the crib and 8 air
distributors were installed at the bottom of the crib. Distributors
1 to 4 were installed 1 m from the base of the crib and
distributors 5 to 8 were installed 1.5 m from the base.
[0071] Table 2 summarizes the types of air distributors used.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 SUMMARY OF AIR DISTRIBUTORS LOCATION OF # OF
DIAMETER OF TYPE OF ORIFICES IN AIR TEST ORIFICES ORIFICES (mm) AIR
LINE DISTRIBUTOR PROTECTION D1 3 4 Corrugated all on top Drenaflex
line D2 3 4 Corrugated all on top Sock line D3 3 4 Corrugated all
on top Drenaflex line cuts (about 30 cm) D4 3 4 Corrugated all on
top Mesh cloth line over orifices D5 3 4 Corrugated all at the side
Sock line (top) D6 3 4 Corrugated all on top No line protection D7
3 4 Corrugated all on top Sock with line humidified D8 3 4
Corrugated all in valley Sock line
[0072] FIG. 2 shows a graph that displays the air flowrate as a
function of leaching time for the 8 air distributors.
[0073] It is evident from the figure that almost immediately on
start-up there was a decrease in the air flowrate of air
distributors D2, D5, and D7. These distributors had two things in
common, namely: the use of a sock and all the air holes were in the
top of the air pipes. Within a 7-8 day period, the air flowrate in
these air distributors was approximately 58% of the desired flow
rate.
[0074] After only 16 days of operation air distributors D7 and D6
became plugged completely.
[0075] Distributor D6 had no protection and therefore was expected
to plug in the first 30 days based on previous crib test work.
[0076] By the end of 3 months of operation it was evident that only
the air distributors D1 and D3, i.e. the preferred embodiments of
the air distributors, were able to maintain the air flowrate and it
was decided to end the evaluation.
[0077] The evaluation of the air distributors demonstrated that
only distributors D1 and D3 were able to maintain the set air
flowrate of 56.5 L/min.
[0078] A key finding was that an air distributor protected only
with short sections of outer pipe located at sections of the air
pipe having air holes performed as well as full-length protection.
This is important because it translates to savings at the
industrial stage.
[0079] The applicant has developed and has tested successfully two
other embodiments of an air distributor of the present invention.
These embodiments are shown in FIG. 3 to 6.
[0080] FIG. 3 illustrates both embodiments of the air distributor.
FIG. 4 is a detailed view of one of the embodiments and FIG. 5 is a
detailed view of the other of the embodiments. FIG. 6 is an end
view of the air distributor shown in FIG. 3.
[0081] FIG. 3 is a side elevation that illustrates a corrugated
HPDE air pipe 33 that has air holes 35 in the troughs of the
corrugations. FIG. 3 also illustrates a sheet member 37 and a
corrugated member 39 welded to the crests of the corrugations of
the air pipe 33. The sheet member 37 and the corrugated member 39
form protective members that shield the air holes 35 in the air
pipe 33. The combination of the air pipe 33 and the sheet member 37
form one embodiment and the combination of the air pipe 33 and the
corrugated member 39 form the other embodiment.
[0082] The sheet member 37 is a flat sheet that is wrapped
approximately 270.degree. around the circumference of the air pipe
33. The sheet member 37 extends across and covers the troughs that
have the air holes 35 and thereby forms a series of channels that
are defined by the sheet member 37 and the troughs. In use, the air
distributor is positioned in a heap with the sheet member 37
extending over the upper section of the air distributor so that the
sheet member 37 shields the air holes 35 from downwardly flowing
solution. Air can flow from the air pipe 33 via the air holes 35
along the channels that are defined by the sheet member 37 and the
troughs to the ends of the sheet member 37 and then into the
heap.
[0083] The corrugated member 39 is identical to the sheet member 37
in terms of location on the air pipe 33 and function. The
corrugated member 39 is arranged so that the crests overlie the
crests of the air pipe 33 and the troughs overlie the troughs of
the air pipe 33, whereby there are gaps between the crests and gaps
between the troughs.
[0084] As indicated above, both embodiments shown in FIGS. 3 to 6
have been tested successfully by the applicant.
[0085] Many modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment
of the present invention described above without departing from the
spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *