U.S. patent application number 12/123091 was filed with the patent office on 2008-11-13 for reversibly masked polymers.
Invention is credited to James E. Hagstrom, David B. Rozema, Darren H. Wakefield, Jon A. Wolff.
Application Number | 20080281041 12/123091 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39970113 |
Filed Date | 2008-11-13 |
United States Patent
Application |
20080281041 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Rozema; David B. ; et
al. |
November 13, 2008 |
Reversibly Masked Polymers
Abstract
The present invention is directed to reversibly inactivation of
membrane active polymers useful for cellular delivery of compounds.
Described are polyconjugates systems that incorporate targeting,
anti-opsonization, anti-aggregation, and transfection activities
into small biocompatible in vivo delivery conjugates. The use of
multiple reversible linkages connecting component parts provides
for physiologically responsive activity modulation.
Inventors: |
Rozema; David B.; (Madison,
WI) ; Wakefield; Darren H.; (Fitchburg, WI) ;
Wolff; Jon A.; (Madison, WI) ; Hagstrom; James
E.; (Middleton, WI) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MIRUS CORPORATION
505 SOUTH ROSA RD
MADISON
WI
53719
US
|
Family ID: |
39970113 |
Appl. No.: |
12/123091 |
Filed: |
May 19, 2008 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11840468 |
Aug 17, 2007 |
|
|
|
12123091 |
|
|
|
|
10444662 |
May 23, 2003 |
7019113 |
|
|
11840468 |
|
|
|
|
09589978 |
Jun 7, 2000 |
6630351 |
|
|
10444662 |
|
|
|
|
11046590 |
Jan 28, 2005 |
7098032 |
|
|
09589978 |
|
|
|
|
11840468 |
Aug 17, 2007 |
|
|
|
11046590 |
|
|
|
|
10095680 |
Mar 11, 2002 |
6919091 |
|
|
11046590 |
|
|
|
|
60988877 |
Nov 19, 2007 |
|
|
|
60915868 |
May 3, 2007 |
|
|
|
60822833 |
Aug 18, 2006 |
|
|
|
60383298 |
May 24, 2002 |
|
|
|
60137859 |
Jun 7, 1999 |
|
|
|
60172809 |
Dec 21, 1999 |
|
|
|
60167836 |
Nov 29, 1999 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
525/54.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61K 48/0041 20130101;
C12N 15/87 20130101; A61K 47/58 20170801; A01K 2217/058 20130101;
A01K 2267/0362 20130101; A61K 47/60 20170801 |
Class at
Publication: |
525/54.1 |
International
Class: |
C08G 83/00 20060101
C08G083/00 |
Claims
1. A reversibly masked membrane active polymer comprising: a
plurality of masking agents covalently linked to said membrane
active polymer via physiologically labile bonds wherein the masking
agents inhibit membrane activity of the membrane active
polymer.
2. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1 wherein
the membrane active polymer comprises a polycation.
3. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 2 wherein
membrane active polymer comprises a polyamine.
4. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 3 wherein
the plurality of masking agents are linked to amines on the
polyamine via physiologically labile bonds.
5. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 4 wherein
the physiologically labile bonds are selected from the group
consisting of: physiologically labile bond, cellular
physiologically labile bond, pH labile bond, very pH labile bond,
extremely pH labile bond, maleamate bond, enzymatically cleavable
bond, and disulfide bond.
6. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 2 wherein
the reversibly masked membrane active polymer has a net charge that
is less positively charged than the membrane active polymer.
7. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 5 wherein
the membrane active polymer comprises a heteropolymer of having
amine-containing monomers and hydrophobic pendent groups.
8. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 5 wherein
the membrane active polymer has the general structure comprising:
-(A)-(B)-(C)- wherein, A contains a pendent amine-containing group,
B contains a first hydrophobic pendant group and C contains a
second hydrophobic pendent group and B and C are different.
9. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 8 wherein
said first and second hydrophobic pendent groups are selected from
the list consisting of: alkyl group, alkenyl group, alkynyl group,
aryl group, aralkyl group, aralkenyl group, and aralkynyl group,
each of which may be linear, branched, or cyclic and may can
contain one or more substitutions or heteroatoms, sterol, steroid,
and steroid derivative.
10. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 9
wherein the first hydrophobic pendent group contains two to about
six carbon atoms.
11. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 10
wherein the second hydrophobic pendent group contains eight or more
carbon atoms.
12. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1
wherein the membrane active polymer is soluble in aqueous
solution.
13. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 12
wherein the membrane active polymer is soluble in aqueous solution
at 1 mg/ml or greater.
14. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1
wherein the masking agents are independently selected from the
group consisting of: steric stabilizers, targeting groups and
charge modifying agents.
15. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 14
wherein the masking agents inhibit non-specific interactions of the
conjugate with serum components or non-target cells.
16. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 14
wherein two or more different masking agents are reversibly linked
the membrane active polymer via labile bonds.
17. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 16
wherein at least one of the masking agents consists of a targeting
group.
18. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 17
wherein the targeting group is selected from the group consisting
of: compound with affinity to cell surface protein, cell receptor
ligand, antibody with affinity to a cell surface molecule, cell
receptor ligand, saccharide, galactose, galactose derivative,
N-acetylgalactosamine, mannose, mannose derivative, vitamins,
folate, biotin, peptide, RGD-containing peptide, insulin, aptamer,
and EGF.
19. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 14
wherein the masking agents are selected from the group consisting
of: dimethylmaleic anhydride, carboxy dimethylmaleic anhydride
(CDM), CDM-thioester, CDM derivative, CDM-steric stabilizer,
CDM-poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), CDM-PEG-PDP, CDM-PEG-ligand,
CDM-ligand, CDM-galactose, CDM-lactobionic acid (LBA), CDM-Pip-LBA,
and CDM-NAG.
20. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1
wherein the physiologically labile bonds are independently selected
from the group consisting of: physiologically labile bond, cellular
physiologically labile bond, pH labile bond, very pH labile bond,
extremely pH labile bond, a maleamate bond, enzymatically cleavable
bond, and disulfide bond.
21. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1
wherein the membrane active polymer is biodegradable.
22. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 21
wherein the membrane active polymer contains biodegradable bonds
within the backbone of the membrane active.
23. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 21
wherein the membrane active polymer contains biodegradable bonds
within sidechains of the membrane active polymer.
24. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 21
wherein cleavage of biodegradable bonds in the membrane active
polymer reduces membrane activity of the membrane active.
25. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 1
wherein the membrane active polymer is selected from the group
consisting of: poly(acrylate), modified poly(alcohol), modified
poly(vinyl alcohol), modified poly(lysine), modified poly(amine),
modified poly(allylamine), modified poly(vinyl amine), modified
poly(amino acid), poly(.beta.-aminoester) and poly(vinyl
ether).
26. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 2
wherein an siRNA is linked to said reversibly masked membrane
active polymer.
27. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 26
wherein said siRNA is linked to said reversibly masked membrane
active polymer via a physiologically labile bond.
28. The reversibly masked membrane active polymer of claim 27
wherein the siRNA and the masking agents are linked to the membrane
active polymer via orthogonal physiologically labile bonds.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The delivery of polynucleotide and other membrane
impermeable compounds into living cells is highly restricted by the
complex membrane systems of the cell. Drugs used in antisense and
gene therapies are relatively large hydrophilic polymers and are
frequently highly negatively charged as well. Both of these
physical characteristics preclude their direct diffusion across the
cell membrane. For this reason, the major barrier to polynucleotide
delivery is the delivery of the polynucleotide to the cellular
interior. Numerous transfection reagents have been developed to
deliver polynucleotides to cells in vitro. However, in vivo
delivery of polynucleotides is complicated by toxicity, serum
interactions, and poor targeting of transfection reagents that are
effective in vitro. Transfection reagents that work well in vitro,
cationic polymers and lipids, typically destabilize cell membranes
and form large particles. The cationic charge of transfection
reagent facilitates nucleic acid binding as well as cell binding.
Destabilization of membranes facilitates delivery of the membrane
impermeable polynucleotide across a cell membrane. These properties
render transfection reagents ineffective or toxic in vivo. Cationic
charge results in interaction with serum components, which causes
destabilization of the polynucleotide-transfection reagent
interaction and poor bioavailability and targeting. Cationic charge
may also lead to in vivo toxicity. Membrane activity of
transfection reagent, which can be effective in vitro, often leads
to toxicity in vivo.
[0002] For in vivo delivery, a transfection complex (transfection
reagent in association with the nucleic acid to be delivered)
should be small, less than 100 nm in diameter, and preferably less
than 50 nm. Even smaller complexes, less that 20 nm or less than 10
nm would be more useful yet. Transfection complexes larger than 100
nm have very little access to cells other than blood vessel cells
in vivo. In vitro complexes are also positively charged. This
positive charge is necessary for attachment of the complex to the
cell and for membrane fusion, destabilization or disruption.
Cationic charge on in vivo transfection complexes leads to adverse
serum interactions and therefore poor bioavailability. Near neutral
or negatively charged complexes would have better in vivo
distribution and targeting capabilities. However, in vitro
transfection complexes associate with nucleic acid via
charge-charge (electrostatic) interactions. Negatively charged
polymers and lipids do not interact with negatively charged nucleic
acids. Further, these electrostatic complexes tend to aggregate or
fall apart when exposed to physiological salt concentrations or
serum components. Finally, transfection complexes that are
effective in vitro are often toxic in vivo. Polymers and lipids
used for transfection disrupt or destabilize cell membranes.
Balancing this activity with nucleic acid delivery is more easily
attained in vitro than in vivo.
[0003] While several groups have made incremental improvements
towards improving gene delivery to cells in vivo, there remains a
need for a formulation that effectively delivers a polynucleotide
together with a delivery agent to a target cell without the
toxicity normally associated with in vivo administration of
transfection reagents. The present invention provides compositions
and methods for the delivery and release of a polynucleotide to a
cell using biologically labile conjugate delivery systems.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0004] In a preferred embodiment, the invention features a
composition for delivering a polynucleotide to a cell in vivo
comprising a reversibly masked membrane active polymer reversibly
conjugated to a polynucleotide. The polymer is attached, via one or
more first reversible covalent linkages, to one or more masking
agents and is further attached, via one or more second reversible
covalent linkages, to one or more polynucleotides. The first and
second reversible covalent linkages may comprise reversible bonds
that are cleaved under the same or similar conditions or they may
cleaved under distinct conditions, i.e. they may comprise
orthogonal reversible bonds. The polynucleotide-polymer conjugate
is administered to a mammal in a pharmaceutically acceptable
carrier or diluent.
[0005] In a preferred embodiment, are disclosed membrane active
amphipathic heteropolymers comprising: a plurality of
amine-containing monomers, a plurality of first hydrophobic
monomers, and a plurality of second hydrophobic monomers wherein
the first hydrophobic monomer is different from the second
hydrophobic monomer. The amine-containing monomers contain pendant
amine groups selected from the group consisting of: primary amine,
secondary amine, tertiary amine, quaternary amine, nitrogen
heterocycle, aldimine, hydrazide, hydrazone, and imidazole. The
hydrophobic monomers contain pendent hydrophobic groups selected
from the group consisting of: alkyl group, alkenyl group, alkynyl
group, aryl group, aralkyl group, aralkenyl group, and aralkynyl
group, each of which may be linear, branched, or cyclic and may can
contain one or more substitutions or heteroatoms, sterol, steroid,
and steroid derivative. Substitutions or heteroatoms are selected
to maintain hydrophobicity, and include, for example fluorine.
[0006] In a preferred embodiment are disclosed membrane active
cationic amphipathic polymers comprising: poly(vinyl ether) random
copolymers. The poly(vinyl ether) copolymers may be synthesized
from two, three, or more different monomers. Monomers may be
selected from the list comprising: protected amine vinyl ether such
as phthalimido-containing vinyl ethers, alkyl vinyl ether, alkenyl
vinyl ether, alkynyl vinyl ether, aryl vinyl ether, aralkyl vinyl
ether group, aralkenyl vinyl ether, and aralkynyl vinyl ether,
sterol vinyl ether, steroidal vinyl ether. The aliphatic
hydrophobic groups may be linear, branched, or cyclic and may
contain one or more substitutions of heteroatoms. A preferred
poly(vinyl ether) random copolymer comprises three monomers: an
amine containing monomer, a butyl vinyl ether, and an octadecyl
vinyl ether.
[0007] In a preferred embodiment, one or more biophysical
characteristics of the membrane active polymer are reversibly
shielded or modified by a masking agent. Masking agents may be
selected from the group comprising steric stabilizers, targeting
groups and charge modifying agents. The masking agent can improve
biodistribution or targeting of the polymer-polynucleotide
conjugate by inhibiting non-specific interactions of the polymer
with serum components or non-target cells. The masking agent can
also reduce aggregation of the polymer or polymer-polynucleotide
conjugate. Masking agents containing targeting groups can enhance
cell-specific targeting or cell internalization by targeting the
conjugate system to a cell surface receptor. The masking agent can
be conjugated to the membrane active polymer prior to or
subsequence to conjugation of the polymer to a polynucleotide.
[0008] In a preferred embodiment, the polynucleotide that may be
delivered to cells using the described conjugate systems may be
selected from the group comprising: DNA, RNA, blocking
polynucleotides, antisense oligonucleotides, plasmids, expression
vectors, oligonucleotides, siRNA, microRNA, mRNA, shRNA and
ribozymes.
[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the masking agent(s) and the
polynucleotide(s) are covalently linked to the membrane active
polymer via reversible linkages. While masking of the polymer, and
attachment of the polynucleotide to the polymer, are important,
these attachments can interfere with transfection activity of the
polymer or the activity of the polynucleotide. By attaching the
masking agent and the polynucleotide to the polymer via reversibly
linkages that are cleaved at an appropriate time, activity is
restored to the polymer and the polynucleotide is released.
Reversible covalent linkages contain reversible or labile bonds
which may be selected from the group comprising: physiologically
labile bonds, cellular physiologically labile bonds, pH labile
bonds, very pH labile bonds, extremely pH labile bonds,
enzymatically cleavable bonds, and disulfide bonds. The presence of
two reversible linkages connecting the polymer to the
polynucleotide and a masking agent provides for co-delivery of the
polynucleotide with a delivery polymer and selective targeting and
inactivation of the delivery polymer by the masking agent.
Reversibility of the linkages provides for release of
polynucleotide from the membrane active polymer and selective
activation of the membrane active polymer.
[0010] In a preferred embodiment, we describe a composition
comprising: a delivery polymer covalently linked to: a) one or more
targeting groups, steric stabilizers or charge modifiers via one or
more reversible linkages; and, b) one or more polynucleotides via
one or more reversible linkages. In one embodiment, the targeting
agent, steric stabilizer, or charge modifier reversible covalent
linkage is orthogonal to the polynucleotide reversible covalent
linkage.
[0011] In a preferred embodiment, we describe a polymer conjugate
system for delivering a polynucleotide to a cell and releasing the
polynucleotide into the cell comprising: the polynucleotide
reversibly conjugated to a membrane active polymer which is itself
reversibly conjugated to a masking agent. The conjugation bonds may
be the same or they may be different. In addition, the conjugation
bonds may be cleaved under the same or different conditions.
[0012] In a preferred embodiment, we describe a polymer conjugate
system for delivering a membrane impermeable molecule to a cell and
releasing the molecule in the cell. The polymer conjugate system
comprises the membrane impermeable molecule reversibly linked to a
membrane active polymer wherein a plurality of masking agents are
linked to the membrane active polymer via reversible covalent
bonds. Membrane active polymers may be toxic or may not be targeted
when applied in vivo. Reversible attachment of a masking agent
reversibly inhibits or alters membrane interactions, serum
interactions, cell interactions, toxicity, or charge of the
polymer. A preferred reversible covalent bond comprises: a labile
bond, a physiologically labile bond or a bond cleavable under
mammalian intracellular conditions. A preferred labile bond
comprises a pH labile bond. A preferred pH labile bond comprises a
maleamate bond. Another preferred labile bond comprises a disulfide
bond. Membrane impermeable molecules include, but are not limited
to: polynucleotides, proteins, antibodies, and membranes
impermeable drugs.
[0013] In a preferred embodiment, a polynucleotide is attached to
the polymer in the presence of an excess of polymer. The excess
polymer may aid in formulation of the polynucleotide-polymer
conjugate. The excess polymer may reduce aggregation of the
conjugate during formulation of the conjugate. The
polynucleotide-polymer conjugate may be separated from the excess
polymer prior to administration of the conjugate to the cell or
organism. Alternatively, the polynucleotide-polymer conjugate may
be co-administered with the excess polymer to the cell or organism.
The excess polymer may be the same as the polymer or it may be
different, a helper or boost polymer.
[0014] In a preferred embodiment, the described membrane active
amphipathic heteropolymers are effective for transfection of
polynucleotides into cells in vitro. For in vitro transfection, the
described membrane active amphipathic heteropolymers may be
associated either covalently or non-covalently, through
electrostatic interaction, with the polynucleotide. Also for in
vitro transfection, masking of the described membrane active
amphipathic heteropolymers is not necessary. Because there is
typically only one type of cell present in an in vitro culture, the
polymer and polynucleotide do not require the presence of a
targeting agent as described for in vivo targeting. The polymers
are combined with the polynucleotide to be delivered at an
appropriate ratio and mixed with the cells in vitro.
[0015] In a preferred embodiment, we describe a system for
delivering a polynucleotide to a cell in vivo comprising:
covalently linking a targeting group to a polynucleotide,
covalently linking a second targeting group to a membrane active
polymer, and injecting the polynucleotide and membrane active
polymer into an organism.
[0016] Further objects, features, and advantages of the invention
will be apparent from the following detailed description when taken
in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0017] FIG. 1. Reaction scheme for polymerization of poly(vinyl
ether) polymers.
[0018] FIG. 2. Drawing illustrating several embodiments of masking
agents of the invention.
[0019] FIG. 3. Diagram illustrating polynucleotide-polymer
reversible conjugates and reversible masking of the conjugate by
maleamates.
[0020] FIG. 4. Micrograph showing targeted delivery to liver
hepatocytes of PBAVE polymer masked with A) CDM-PEG (left) or B)
CDM-PEG plus CDM-Pip-LBA.
[0021] FIG. 5. Micrograph showing delivery of a masked
polynucleotide-polymer conjugate to hepatocytes in vivo.
[0022] FIG. 6. Graph illustrating target gene knockdown in vivo
following polyconjugate mediated delivery of ppara siRNA.
[0023] FIG. 7. Micrographs showing delivery of ds DNA to the liver
in vivo with (A) DNA-DW1360-CDM-PEG/NAG, (B) DNA+DW1360-CDM-PEG/NAG
(polynucleotide not conjugated to the polymer, (C)
DNA-DW1360-CDM-PEG/glucose, and (D) DNA-DW1360-CDM-PEG/Mannose.
Cy3-labeled DNA=upper left quadrant in each panel, ALEXA.RTM.-488
phalloidin stained actin=upper right quadrant, nuclei=lower left
quadrant, and composite picture=lower right quadrant.
[0024] FIG. 8. Graphs and blot illustrating knockdown of target
gene expression in livers of mice after intravenous injection of
siRNA polyconjugates. (A) Reduction of apoB mRNA levels in liver
after treatment with apoB siRNA polyconjugates. (B) Serum levels of
apoB-100 protein in apoB siRNA polyconjugate-treated mice. (C)
Reduction of ppara mRNA levels in liver after intravenous injection
of ppara siRNA polyconjugates.
[0025] FIG. 9. Graph illustrating apoB-1 siRNA polyconjugate dose
response. (A) Knockdown of apoB mRNA after injection of serial
dilutions of the apoB-1 siRNA polyconjugate. (B) Knockdown of apoB
mRNA after injection of varying amounts of siRNA.
[0026] FIG. 10. Graph illustrating cholesterol levels in apoB-1
siRNA polyconjugate treated mice.
[0027] FIG. 11. Micrographs showing lipid accumulation in mouse
liver following polyconjugate delivery of (A) ApoB siRNA or (B) GL3
negative control siRNA, or (C) saline alone.
[0028] FIG. 12. Graph illustrating inhibition of gene expression
(A), and resultant decrease in serum cholesterol (B) and day 2-15
following administration of apoB-1 siRNA conjugate in mice on day
0.
[0029] FIG. 13. Micrograph showing in vivo delivery antibodies to
hepatocytes via administration of antibody reversibly conjugated to
DW1360 and masked with CDM-PEG and CDM-NAG. Upper left quadrant
shows labeled antibodies, Upper right quadrant shows actin, lower
left quadrant shows nuclei, and lower right quadrant shows a
composite image.
[0030] FIG. 14. Graph illustrating gene knockdown in primary
hepatocytes transfected with ApoB siRNA delivered with a commercial
in vitro transfection reagent or with varying amounts of ApoB siRNA
polyconjugate.
[0031] FIG. 15. Graph illustrating transfection of siRNA-conjugates
to Hepa-1c1c7 cells in vitro: Conjugate alone=masked siRNA-PLL.
[0032] FIG. 16. Graph illustrating fluorescence of DPH in the
presence or PBAVE.
[0033] FIG. 17. Graphs illustrating A) Elution profiles of PEG
standards on Shodex SB-803 column, B) Calibration plot for Shodex
SB-803 column, and C) Molecular weight calculation for PBAVE
polymer.
[0034] FIG. 18. Graphs illustrating A) Elution profiles of
Cy3-labeled nucleic acid standards and masked
polynucleotide-polymer conjugate, B) Calibration plot for the
Sephacryl S-500 size exclusion chromatography, and C) Molecular
weight calculation for the masked polynucleotide-polymer
conjugate.
[0035] FIG. 19. Micrographs showing in vivo polynucleotide delivery
to mouse galactose receptor positive tumors (A-B) or galactose
receptor negative tumors (C-D) using
oligonucleotide-polymer-CDM/PEG/NAG conjugates (A, C) or
oligonucleotide-polymer-CDM/PEG/glucose conjugates (B, D).
[0036] FIG. 20. Graph illustrating biodegradability of poly(vinyl
alcohol)-based membrane active polymers. Graph shows DNA
condensation as measured by rhodamine fluorescence for polymers
incubated for various lengths of time in buffer.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0037] The present invention is directed to compounds,
compositions, and methods useful for delivering polynucleotides or
other cell-impermeable molecules to mammalian cells. Described
herein is a polyconjugate system for delivering polynucleotides or
other membrane impermeable molecules to cells in vivo. The
polyconjugate system incorporates targeting, anti-opsonization,
anti-aggregation, and transfection activities into a small sub 50
nanometer delivery vehicle. A key component of the system is the
reversibility of bonds connecting the component parts.
[0038] A first component of the described in vivo polynucleotide
delivery conjugates comprises a physiologically reversible covalent
linkage of the polynucleotide to a membrane active polymer.
Covalent attachment of the polynucleotide to the membrane active
polymer ensures that the polynucleotide is not readily dissociated
from the polymer when administered in vivo, or ex vivo in the
presence of serum, and thus provides for co-delivery of the
polynucleotide with the membrane active polymer to the target cell.
Covalent attachment of a polynucleotide to a polymer can, however,
render the polynucleotide inactive. Attachment of the
polynucleotide to the membrane active polymer is therefore
accomplished through a physiologically reversible linkage or bond.
By using a physiologically reversible linkage, the polynucleotide
can be cleaved from the polymer, releasing the polynucleotide to
engage in functional interactions with cell components. By choosing
an appropriate reversible linkage, it is possible to form a
conjugate that releases the polynucleotide only after it has been
delivered to a desired location, such as a cell cytoplasm.
[0039] A second component of the described in vivo polynucleotide
delivery conjugates comprises a reversible modification of the
membrane active polymer. Reversible modification of the membrane
active polymer reduces non-productive serum and non-target cell
interactions and reduces toxicity. The masking agent can also add a
desired function to the conjugate such as enhancing target cell
interaction or enhancing endocytosis of the conjugate. The polymer
is masked by covalent attachment of a masking agent to the polymer
via a physiologically reversible covalent linkage. The masking
agent can be a steric stabilizer, targeting group, or charge
modifier. The masking agents can shield the polymer from
non-specific interactions, increase circulation time, enhance
specific interactions, inhibit toxicity, or alter the charge of the
polymer. Each of these modifications may alter the membrane
activity of the polymer, rendering the modified polymer unable to
facilitate delivery of the polynucleotide. Attachment of the
masking agent to the membrane active polymer is therefore
accomplished through a physiologically reversible bond. By using a
physiologically reversible linkage, the masking agent can be
cleaved from the polymer, thereby unmasking the polymer and
restoring activity of the unmasked polymer. By choosing an
appropriate reversible linkage, it is possible to form a conjugate
that restores activity of the membrane active polymer after it has
been delivered or targeted to a desired cell type or cellular
location.
[0040] The invention includes conjugate delivery systems of the
general structure:
N-L.sup.1-P-(L.sup.2-M).sub.y,
wherein N is a polynucleotide or other cell impermeable molecule,
L.sup.1 is a reversible linkage, P is a polymer, L.sup.2 is a
second reversible linkage, and M is a masking agent. Masking agent
M shields or modifies a property or interaction of P. y is an
integer greater than 0. A preferred polymer is a membrane active
polymer. Another preferred polymer is a transfection polymer. A
plurality of masking agents may be linked to a single polymer. The
plurality of masking agents may be linked to the polymer via a
plurality of reversibly linkages. Upon cleavage of reversible
linkage L.sup.2, the masked property or interaction is restored to
polymer P. Masking agent M can add an activity, such as cell
receptor binding, to polymer P. The reversible bond of L.sup.1 may
be the same or different than (orthogonal to) the reversible bond
of L.sup.2. The reversible bond of reversible linkage L.sup.1 or
L.sup.2 is chosen such that cleavage occurs in a desired
physiological condition, such as that present in a desired tissue,
organ, and sub-cellular location or in response to the addition of
a pharmaceutically acceptable exogenous agent. Polynucleotide N and
masking agent M may be attached to polymer P anywhere along the
length of polymer P.
Polymers
[0041] A polymer is a molecule built up by repetitive bonding
together of smaller units called monomers. A polymer can be linear,
branched network, star, comb, or ladder type. The main chain of a
polymer is composed of the atoms whose bonds are required for
propagation of polymer length. For example, in poly-L-lysine, the
carbonyl carbon, .alpha.-carbon, and .alpha.-amine groups are
required for the length of the polymer and are therefore main chain
atoms. A side chain of a polymer is composed of the atoms whose
bonds are not required for propagation of polymer length.
[0042] A polymer can be a homopolymer in which a single monomer is
used or a polymer can be copolymer in which two or more different
monomers are used. Copolymers may by alternating, random
(statistical), block and graft (comb).
[0043] Alternating polymers contain monomers in a defined repeating
order, such as -[A-B].sub.n--. The monomers of alternating polymers
typically do not homopolymerize, instead reacting together to yield
the alternating copolymer.
[0044] The monomers in random copolymers have no definite order or
arrangement along any given chain, such as: -A.sub.n-B.sub.m--. The
general compositions of such polymers are reflective of the ratio
of input monomers. However, the exact ratio of one monomer to
another may differ between chains. The distribution of monomers may
also differ along the length of a single polymer. Also, the
chemical properties of a monomer may affect its rate of
incorporation into a random copolymer and its distribution within
the polymer. Thus, while the ratio of monomers in a random polymer
is dependent on the input ratio of monomer, the input ratio may not
match exactly the ratio of incorporated monomers.
[0045] A block polymer has a segment or block of one polymer
(polyA) followed by a segment or block of a second polymer (polyB):
i.e., -polyA-polyB-. The result is that different polymer chains
are joined in a head-to-tail configuration. Thus, a block polymer
is a linear arrangement of blocks of different monomer composition.
Generally, though not required, the polymer blocks are homopolymers
with polymer A being composed of a different monomer than polymer
B. A diblock copolymer is polyA-polyB, and a triblock copolymer is
polyA-polyB-polyA. If A is a hydrophilic group and B is hydrophobic
group, the resultant block copolymer can be regarded a polymeric
surfactant. A graft polymer is a type of block copolymer in which
the chains of one monomer are grafted onto side chains of the other
monomer, as in (where n, m, x, y, and z are integers):
##STR00001##
Monomers
[0046] A wide variety of monomers can be used in polymerization
processes. Monomers can be cationic, anionic, zwitterionic,
hydrophilic, hydrophobic, lipophilic, amphipathic, or amphoteric.
Monomers can themselves be polymers. Monomers can contain chemical
groups that can be modified before or after polymerization. Such
monomers may have reactive groups selected from the group
comprising: amine (primary, secondary, and tertiary), amide,
carboxylic acid, ester, hydrazine, hydrazide, hydroxylamine, alkyl
halide, aldehyde, and ketone. Preferably, the reactive group can be
modified after conjugation of the polynucleotide, or in aqueous
solution.
[0047] To those skilled in the art of polymerization, there are
several categories of polymerization processes. For example, the
polymerization can be chain or step.
Step Polymerization
[0048] In step polymerization, the polymerization occurs in a
stepwise fashion. Polymer growth occurs by reaction between
monomers, oligomers and polymers. No initiator is needed since the
same reaction occurs throughout and there is no termination step,
so that the end groups are still reactive. The polymerization rate
decreases as the functional groups are consumed.
[0049] A polymer can be created using step polymerization by using
monomers that have two reactive groups (A and B) in the same
monomer (heterobifunctional), wherein A comprises a reactive group
and B comprises an A-reactive group (a reactive group which forms a
covalently bond with A). Polymerization of A-B yields
-[A-B].sub.n--. Reactive groups A and B can be joined by a covalent
bond or a plurality of covalent bonds, thereby forming the polymer
monomer. A polymer can also be created using step polymerization by
using homobifunctional monomers such that A-A+B--B yields
-[A-A-B--B].sub.n--. Generally, these reactions can involve
acylation or alkylation. The two reactive groups of a monomer can
be joined by a single covalent bond or a plurality of covalent
bonds.
[0050] If reactive group A is an amine then B is an amine-reactive
group, which can be selected from the group comprising:
isothiocyanate, isocyanate, acyl azide, N-hydroxy-succinimide,
sulfonyl chloride, aldehyde (including formaldehyde and
glutaraldehyde), ketone, epoxide, carbonate, imidoester,
carboxylate activated with a carbodiimide, alkylphosphate,
arylhalides (difluoro-dinitrobenzene), anhydride, acid halide,
p-nitrophenyl ester, o-nitrophenyl ester, pentachlorophenyl ester,
pentafluorophenyl ester, carbonyl imidazole, carbonyl pyridinium,
and carbonyl dimethylaminopyridinium. In other terms when reactive
group A is an amine then B can be acylating or alkylating agent or
amination agent.
[0051] If reactive group A is a sulfhydryl (thiol) then B is a
thiol-reactive group, which can be select from the group
comprising: iodoacetyl derivative, maleimide, aziridine derivative,
acryloyl derivative, fluorobenzene derivatives, and disulfide
derivative (such as a pyridyl disulfide or 5-thio-2-nitrobenzoic
acid (TNB) derivatives).
[0052] If reactive group A is carboxylate then reactive group B is
a carboxylate-reactive group, which can be selected from the group
comprising: diazoacetate and an amine in which a carbodiimide is
used. Other additives may be utilized such as carbonyldiimidazole,
dimethylamino pyridine (DMAP), N-hydroxysuccinimide or alcohol
using carbodiimide and DMAP.
[0053] If reactive group A is a hydroxyl then reactive group B is a
hydroxyl-reactive group, which can be selected from the group
comprising: epoxide, oxirane, an activated carbamate, activated
ester, and alkyl halide.
[0054] If reactive group A is an aldehyde or ketone then reactive
group B is a aldehyde- or ketone-reactive group, which can be
selected from the group comprising: hydrazine, hydrazide
derivative, amine (to form a Schiff Base that may or may not be
reduced by reducing agents such as NaCNBH.sub.3), and hydroxyl
compound.
[0055] A polymer can be created using step polymerization by using
bifunctional monomers and another agent, such that that A-A plus
another agent yields -[A-A].sub.n--.
[0056] If reactive group A is a sulfhydryl (thiol) group then it
can be converted to disulfide bonds by oxidizing agents such as
iodine (I.sub.2), sodium periodate (NaIO.sub.4), or oxygen
(O.sub.2). If reactive group A can is an amine, it can be converted
to a thiol by reaction with 2-Iminothiolate (Traut's reagent) which
then undergoes oxidation and disulfide formation. Disulfide
derivatives (such as a pyridyl disulfide or TNB derivatives) can
also be used to catalyze disulfide bond formation.
[0057] Reactive groups A or B in any of the above examples can also
be a photoreactive group such as aryl azide (including halogenated
aryl azide), diazo, benzophenone, alkyne, or diazirine
derivative.
[0058] Reactions of the amine, hydroxyl, sulfhydryl, or carboxylate
groups yield chemical bonds that are described as amides, amidines,
disulfides, ethers, esters, enamines, imines, ureas, isothioureas,
isoureas, sulfonamides, carbamates, alkylamine bonds (secondary
amines), and carbon-nitrogen single bonds in which the carbon
contains a hydroxyl group, thioether, diol, hydrazone, diazo, or
sulfone.
Chain Polymerization
[0059] In chain-reaction polymerization growth of the polymer
occurs by successive addition of monomer units to a limited number
of growing chains. The initiation and propagation mechanisms are
different and there is typically a chain-terminating step. Chain
polymerization reactions can be radical, anionic, or cationic.
Monomers for chain polymerization may be selected from the groups
comprising: vinyl, vinyl ether, acrylate, methacrylate, acrylamide,
and methacrylamide groups. Chain polymerization can also be
accomplished by cycle or ring opening polymerization. Several
different types of free radical initiators can be used including,
but not limited to: peroxides, hydroxy peroxides, and azo compounds
such as 2,2'-Azobis(-amidinopropane) dihydrochloride (AAP).
Transfection Activity
[0060] The term transfection refers to the transfer of a
polynucleotide or other biologically active compound from outside a
cell to inside a cell such that the polynucleotide or biologically
active compound is functional. Examples of transfection reagents
for delivery of polynucleotides to cells in vitro include, but are
not limited to: liposomes, lipids, polyamines, calcium phosphate
precipitates, histone proteins, polyethylenimine, and polyampholyte
complexes, and combinations of these. Many in vitro transfection
reagents are cationic, which to allows the reagent to associate
with, or form a complex with, negatively charged nucleic acids via
electrostatic interaction.
Membrane Active
[0061] As used herein, membrane active polymers are surface active,
amphipathic polymers that are able to induce one or more of the
following effects upon a biological membrane: an alteration or
disruption of the membrane that allows non-membrane permeable
molecules to enter a cell or cross the membrane, pore formation in
the membrane, fission of membranes, or disruption or dissolving of
the membrane. As used herein, a membrane, or cell membrane,
comprises a lipid bilayer. Membrane active polymers of the
invention include those polymers that facilitate delivery of a
polynucleotide or other membrane impermeable molecule from outside
a cell to inside the cell, and preferably to the cytoplasm of the
cell. The alteration or disruption of the membrane can be
functionally defined by the polymer's or compound's activity in at
least one the following assays: red blood cell lysis (hemolysis),
liposome leakage, liposome fusion, cell fusion, cell lysis, and
endosomal release. Membrane active polymers that can cause lysis of
cell membranes are also termed membrane lytic polymers. Membrane
active polymers that can cause disruption of endosomes or lysosomes
are considered endosomolytic. The effect of membrane active
polymers on a cell membrane may be transient. Membrane activity of
a polymer is derived from its affinity for the membrane, which
causes a denaturation or deformation of the bilayer structure.
Membrane active polymers may be synthetic or non-natural
amphipathic polymers. Membrane active polymers may have in vitro
transfection activity. Membrane active polymers may be cationic,
anionic, amphipathic, amphoteric, surface active, or combinations
of these.
[0062] Delivery of a polynucleotide, or other membrane impermeable
molecule, to a cell is mediated by the membrane active polymer
disrupting or destabilizing the plasma membrane or an internal
vesicle membrane (such as an endosome or lysosome), including
forming a pore in the membrane, or disrupting endosomal or
lysosomal function.
[0063] As used herein, membrane active polymers are distinct from a
class of polymers termed cell penetrating peptides or polymers
represented by compounds such as the arginine-rich peptide derived
from the HIV TAT protein, the antennapedia peptide, VP22 peptide,
transportan, arginine-rich artificial peptides, small
guanidinium-rich artificial polymers and the like. While cell
penetrating compounds appear to transport some molecules across a
membrane, from one side of a lipid bilayer to other side of the
lipid bilayer, apparently without requiring endocytosis and without
disturbing the integrity of the membrane, their mechanism is not
understood and the activity itself is disputed.
Endosomolytic polymers
[0064] Endosomolytic polymers are polymers that, in response to a
change in pH, are able to cause disruption or lysis of an endosome
or provide for escape of a normally membrane-impermeable compound,
such as a polynucleotide or protein, from a cellular internal
membrane-enclosed vesicle, such as an endosome or lysosome.
Endosomal release is importance for the delivery of a wide variety
of molecules which are endocytosed but incapable of diffusion
across cellular membranes. Endosomolytic polymers undergo a shift
in their physico-chemical properties over a physiologically
relevant pH range (usually pH 5.5-8). This shift can be a change in
the polymer's solubility, ability to interact with other compounds,
and a shift in hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity. Exemplary
endosomolytic polymers can have pH-titratable groups or pH-labile
groups or bonds. As used herein, pH-titratable groups reversibly
accept or donate protons in water as a function of pH under
physiological conditions, i.e. a pH range of 4-8. pH-titratable
groups have pK.sub.a's in the range of 4-8 and act as buffers
within this pH range. Thus, pH-titratable groups gain or lose
charge in the lower pH environment of an endosome. Groups
titratable at physiological pH can be determined experimentally by
conducting an acid-base titration and experimentally determining if
the group buffers within the pH-range of 4-8. Examples of groups
that can exhibit buffering within this pH range include but are not
limited to: carboxylic acids, imidazole, N-substituted imidazole,
pyridine, phenols, and polyamines. Polymers with pH-titratable
groups may disrupt internal vesicles by the so-called proton sponge
effect. A reversibly masked membrane active polymer, wherein the
masking agents are attached to the polymer via pH labile bonds, can
therefore be considered to be an endosomolytic polymer.
[0065] A subset of endosomolytic compounds is fusogenic compounds,
including fusogenic peptides. Fusogenic peptides can facilitate
endosomal release of agents such as oligomeric compounds to the
cytoplasm. It is believed that fusogenic peptides change
conformation in acidic pH, effectively destabilizing the endosomal
membrane thereby enhancing cytoplasmic delivery of endosomal
contents. Example fusogenic peptides include peptides derived from
polymyxin B, influenza HA2, GALA, KALA, EALA, melittin and
melittin-derived peptides, Alzheimer .beta.-amyloid peptide, and
the like.
Polyampholytes
[0066] A polyampholyte is a polymer containing both anionic and
cationic monomer units. More specifically, as used herein, a
polyampholyte contains a plurality of anionic monomers and a
plurality of cationic units. A polyampholyte polymer may optionally
contain non-ionic monomer units. In aqueous solutions
polyampholytes precipitate near their isoelectric points. A
polyampholyte can be formed by polymerizing anionic and cationic
monomers, including polymeric monomers. Alternatively, a
polyampholyte can be formed by modifying more than one, but not
all, of the charged groups on a polymer. If the charged groups are
reversibly modified, a reversible polyampholyte is formed.
Amphipathic
[0067] Amphipathic, or amphiphilic, polymers are well known and
recognized in the art and have both hydrophilic (polar,
water-soluble) and hydrophobic (non-polar, lipophilic,
water-insoluble) groups or parts. Hydrophilic groups indicate in
qualitative terms that the chemical moiety is water-preferring.
Typically, such chemical groups are water soluble, and are hydrogen
bond donors or acceptors with water. A hydrophilic group can be
charged or uncharged. Charged groups can be positively charged
(anionic) or negatively charged (cationic) or both. An amphipathic
compound can be a polyanion, a polycation, a zwitterion, or a
polyampholyte. Examples of hydrophilic groups include compounds
with the following chemical moieties; carbohydrates,
polyoxyethylene, certain peptides, oligonucleotides and groups
containing amines, amides, alkoxy amides, carboxylic acids,
sulfurs, or hydroxyls. Hydrophobic groups indicate in qualitative
terms that the chemical moiety is water-avoiding. Typically, such
chemical groups are not water soluble, and tend not to form
hydrogen bonds. Lipophilic groups dissolve in fats, oils, lipids,
and non-polar solvents and have little to no capacity to form
hydrogen bonds. Hydrocarbons (containing 2 or more carbon atoms),
certain substituted hydrocarbons, cholesterol, cholesterol
derivatives, and certain peptides are examples of hydrophobic
groups. As used herein, with respect to amphipathic polymers, a
part is defined as a molecule derived when one covalent bond is
broken and replaced by hydrogen. For example, in butyl amine, a
breakage between the carbon and nitrogen bonds, with replacement
with hydrogens, results in ammonia (hydrophilic) and butane
(hydrophobic). However, if 1,4-diaminobutane is cleaved at
nitrogen-carbon bonds, and replaced with hydrogens, the resulting
molecules are again ammonia (2.times.) and butane. However,
1,4,-diaminobutane is not considered amphipathic because formation
of the hydrophobic part requires breakage of two bonds.
[0068] A naturally occurring polymer is a polymer that can be found
in nature. Examples include polynucleotides, proteins, collagen,
and polysaccharides, (starches, cellulose, glycosaminoglycans,
chitin, agar, agarose). A natural polymer can be isolated from a
biologically source or it can be synthetic. A synthetic polymer is
formulated or manufactured by a chemical process "by man" and is
not created by a naturally occurring biological process. A
non-natural polymer is a synthetic polymer that is not made from
naturally occurring (animal or plant) materials or monomers (such
as: amino acids, nucleotides, and saccharides). A polymer may be
fully or partially natural, synthetic, or non-natural.
Biodegradable Polymers
[0069] A polymer may have one or more cleavable bonds. If the
cleavable bonds are naturally cleaved under physiological
conditions or cellular physiological conditions, the polymer is
biodegradable. The biodegradable bond may either be in the
main-chain or in a side chain. If the cleavable bond occurs in the
main chain, cleavage of the bond results in a decrease in polymer
length and the formation of two or more molecules. If the cleavable
bond occurs in the side chain, then cleavage of the bond results in
loss of side chain atoms from the polymer. For membrane active
polymers, biodegradation of the polymer will result in decreased
membrane activity of the polymer. As used herein, the term
biodegradable means that the polymer will degrade over time by the
action of enzymes, by hydrolytic action and/or by other similar
mechanisms in the body. Biodegradable bonds are those bonds which
are cleaved by biological processes and include, but are not
limiter to: disulfides, esters, phosphodiesters, certain peptide
bonds and combinations thereof. Disulfides are cleaved in vivo by
reducing enzymes and small molecule thiol transfer reagents. Esters
undergo hydrolysis and are also catalytically cleaved by esterases.
Phosphodiesters are cleaved by nucleases. Peptide bonds are cleaved
by peptidases. In particular the polymer backbone is degraded, or
cleaved, or side chains (pendent groups) are degraded, or cleaved,
from the polymer. Biodegradable bonds in the biodegradable polymers
may be cleaved, under physiological conditions with a half life of
less than 5 min, less than 45 min, more than 45 minutes, more than
2 hours, more than 8 hours, more than 24 hours, or more than 48
hours. In a preferred embodiment, degradation of a biodegradable
polymer occurs at a slower rate than cleavage of the masking
agents.
Membrane Active Heteropolymers
[0070] Disclosed are amphipathic membrane active copolymers and
terpolymers useful for nucleic acid delivery in vivo and in vitro.
As used herein, a copolymer (or heteropolymer) is a polymer derived
from two or more monomeric species. The two or more monomeric
species consist minimally of: a monomer containing a cationic group
and a monomer containing a hydrophobic pendent group. As used
herein, a terpolymer is a polymer having from three or more
different monomeric species. In a preferred embodiment, the three
monomer species consist minimally of: a monomer containing a
cationic group, a monomer containing a first hydrophobic pendent
group, and a monomer containing a second hydrophobic pendent group
wherein the first and second hydrophobic pendent groups are
different. In a more preferred embodiment, the three or more
monomers species consist minimally of: a monomer containing a
cationic group, a monomer containing a small hydrophobic pendent
group (having 2 to about 6 carbon atoms), and a monomer containing
a larger hydrophobic pendent group (having more than about 8 carbon
atoms).
[0071] In one embodiment, the amphipathic polymers are the product
of sequential or simultaneous polymerization of two, three or more
monomer species. The monomers may be polymerized in a defined or
random order. Structurally similar polymers (containing cationic
groups and hydrophobic pendent groups) can be synthesized by
attachment of pendent groups or side chains onto a polymer
backbone. The pendent groups may be attached to the polymer
backbone in a defined or random order. In another embodiment, the
amphipathic polymers are formed by the polymerization of shorter
polymers. The shorter polymers can each contain one, two, three or
more different monomers or pendent groups and may be polymerized in
a defined or random order.
[0072] In one embodiment, amphipathic membrane active
heteropolymers of the invention have the general structure:
-(A)-(B)-(C)-
wherein, A contains a pendent cationic functional group, B contains
a small hydrophobic pendant group (containing 2 to about 6 carbon
atoms), and C contains a larger hydrophobic pendent group
(containing 8 or more carbon atoms). Additional monomeric species
are possible. A preferred cationic functional group is selected
from the group comprising: amine (primary, secondary, tertiary, or
quaternary), nitrogen heterocycle, aldimines, hydrazide, hydrazone,
and imidazole. A preferred small hydrophobic group may be selected
from the group comprising: C.sub.2-C.sub.6 alkyl group,
C.sub.2-C.sub.6 alkenyl group, C.sub.2-C.sub.6 alkynyl group,
C.sub.2-C.sub.6 aryl group, C.sub.2-C.sub.6 aralkyl group,
C.sub.2-C.sub.6 aralkenyl group, and C.sub.2-C.sub.6 aralkynyl
group, each of which may be linear, branched, or cyclic and may can
contain one or more substitutions or heteroatoms. A preferred
larger hydrophobic pendent group may be selected from the group
comprising: C.sub.8-C.sub.30 alkyl group, C.sub.8-C.sub.30 alkenyl
group, C.sub.8-C.sub.30 alkynyl group, C.sub.8-C.sub.30 aryl group,
C.sub.8-C.sub.30 aralkyl group, C.sub.8-C.sub.30 aralkenyl group,
and C.sub.8-C.sub.30 aralkynyl group, each of which may by linear,
branched, or cyclic and may can contain one or more substitutions
or heteroatoms, sterol, and steroid. Polymers can also have
additional hydrophobic monomers (D) or reactive group monomers (E).
Reactive group monomers may be used to attach components to the
polymer following synthesis of the polymer. A, B, C monomers may be
selected such that they directly polymerize. For example, A, B, C
may be vinyl ether monomers. A, B, C monomers may also be
polymerized by reaction with a linking reagent or linking monomer.
For example, amine-containing monomers may be polymerized by
reaction with diesters. The linking monomer carries reactive groups
that form covalent bonds with the A, B, and C monomers, thereby
forming the polymeric backbone. A monomer can have a reactive group
that does not participate in the polymerization reaction. A monomer
can also have a reactive group that is protected. The protection
group prevents reaction of the reactive group during
polymerization. After removal of the protective group, the reactive
group can be modified.
[0073] The classes of monomer species or pendent groups and the
ratio of the monomers or pendent groups determines the physical
properties of the polymer. In one embodiment, the polymers are
synthesized such that they have a ratio of 6 cationic groups:3
small hydrophobic groups:1 larger hydrophobic group. In another
embodiment, the polymers are synthesized such that they have a
ratio of 75% cationic groups:20% small hydrophobic groups:5% larger
hydrophobic groups.
[0074] Charge density of the polymers is affected by the ratio of
cationic monomers, the pKa of the cationic monomers, and the
buffering capacity of the polymers. The pKa of the cationic
monomers determines the pH at which the polymer possesses the most
buffering potential. Lowering the net charge of the polymer at pH
7-8 may reduce toxicity of the polymer in the extracellular
environment. Electron withdrawing groups and electron donating
groups in proximity to an amine group affects pKa of the amine
group. The strength of the electron withdrawing or donating
group(s), the distance of the electron withdrawing or donating
group(s) from the amine, and the bonds and atoms connecting the
electron withdrawing or donating group(s) to the amine determines
the net effect on the pKa of the amine. Electron withdrawing groups
make amine less basic: H.sub.2N(CH.sub.2)CO.sub.2R pKa=9.13,
(C.sub.2H.sub.5).sub.2N(CH.sub.2).sub.2CN pKa=7.65,
C.sub.2H.sub.5N(CH.sub.2CH.sub.2CN).sub.2 pKa=4.55,
H.sub.2NCH.sub.2CN pKa=5.34, RN(C.sub.2H.sub.2CO.sub.2R).sub.2
pKa=7.5.
[0075] In one embodiment the amphipathic membrane active polymers
comprise poly(vinyl ether)s. The polyvinyl copolymers may be
synthesized from two, three, or more different monomers. Preferred
monomers may be selected from the list comprising: charged vinyl
ether, amine vinyl ether, vinyl ether containing a protected ionic
group, phthalimide-protected amine vinyl ether, acyl vinyl ether,
alkyl vinyl ether, lower alkyl vinyl ether, butyl vinyl ether,
higher alkyl vinyl ether, dodecyl vinyl ether, octadecyl vinyl
ether, alkenyl vinyl ether, lower alkenyl vinyl ether, higher
alkenyl vinyl ether, alkynyl vinyl ether, lower alkynyl vinyl
ether, higher alkynyl vinyl ether, aryl vinyl ether, aryl vinyl
ether, aryl vinyl ether, aralkyl vinyl ether, aralkenyl vinyl
ether, aralkynyl vinyl ether, and sterol or steroid vinyl ether.
The alkyl, alkenyl, and alkynyl groups may by linear, branched, or
cyclic and may can contain one or more heteroatoms provided the
group remains hydrophobic. In one embodiment, the poly(vinyl ether)
polymers contain aminoethyloxy cationic functional groups, butyl
lower alkyl groups, and octadecyl higher alkyl groups. In another
embodiment, the amino, butyl and octadecyl groups are present in a
6:3:1 molar ratio.
[0076] A class of particularly useful polymers comprise:
amine-containing poly(vinyl ether) random copolymers polymerized
with three monomers: phthalimide monomers, small (lower)
hydrophobic monomers, and large (higher) hydrophobic monomers.
De-protection of the phthalimide monomer yields an amine monomer.
Small hydrophobic monomers or groups comprise carbon-hydrogen
chains with two to six carbon atoms. Large hydrophobic monomers or
groups comprise carbon-hydrogen chains with about ten to about 30
carbon atoms, or about 12 to about 30 carbon atoms. Medium
hydrophobic monomers or groups comprise carbon-hydrogen chains with
about 6 to about 10 carbon atoms. Preferred amino poly(vinyl ether)
polymers comprise: amino/butyl/octadecyl poly(vinyl ether) or
amino/butyl/dodecyl poly(vinyl ether).
[0077] In another embodiment the terpolymers comprise
poly-.beta.-aminoesters. Amino groups at the .beta.-ethylcarboxy
(R=ethylamine) positions of poly-.beta.-aminoesters possess a lower
pKa (7.5) compared to the amino groups of poly(vinyl ether)s (pKa
about 8.8). The ester functionalities in the backbone of
poly-.beta.-aminoesters provide biodegradability properties to the
polymer.
[0078] In another embodiment the amphipathic heteropolymers
comprise modified poly(amino acids) (such as polylysines or
polyornithines), modified poly(vinyl amine)s, modified poly(allyl
amine)s, modified poly(alcohols), and modified poly(vinyl
alcohol)s. Modified poly(vinyl alcohols) include polycarbonates,
polycarbamates, polythiocarbonates, polyphosphocarbonates and
mixtures of these. These polymers are modified such that the
resulting polymer contains amine groups and hydrophobic groups an
the desired ratios.
[0079] In another embodiment, the heterpolymers may further contain
monomers having a reactive group other than an amine. The reactive
group can be used for attachment of an additional component to the
polymer, including, but not limited to: a polynucleotide, a masking
agent, a polymer, and a targeting agent.
[0080] The biophysical properties of the amphipathic polymers are
determined by the particular monomers chosen, the ratio at which
they are incorporated into the polymer, and the size of the
polymer. Different polymers can be made by altering the feed ratio
of monomers in the polymerization reaction or used to modify a
polymer backbone. While the incorporated ratio of monomers in a
polymer can be the same as the feed ratio of monomers, the ratios
can be different. Whether the monomers are incorporated at the feed
ratio or at a different ration, it is possible to alter the feed
ratio of monomers to achieve a desired monomer incorporation ratio.
A preferred amino poly(vinyl ether) is a water soluble membrane
active amine/butyl/octadecyl or amine/butyl/dodecyl random
tripolymer. It is possible to synthesize polymers with similar
amine and hydrophobic monomer content from polyamines such as:
polyethyleneimine, polylysine, poly(vinyl amine), and poly(allyl
amine), or other polymers such as poly(alcohol) through
modification of the side chains of these polymers.
[0081] Preferred membrane active polymers of the invention are
water soluble at 1 mg/ml or greater. Preferred membrane active
polymers of the invention are surface active. Membrane active
polymers of the invention are preferably in the size range of about
5 kDa to about 100 kDa, more preferably about 7.5 kDa to about 50
kDa, and more preferably about 10 kDa to about 30 kDa.
Masking Agent
[0082] Polymers capable of delivering a polynucleotide from outside
a cell to the cytoplasm of a cell are frequently toxic or have poor
bio-distribution in vivo. Therefore, it is necessary to mask
properties of the polymers that cause the toxicity or poor
bio-distribution. Because modifying the polymer to mask these
properties can also inactivate the transfection activity or
membrane activity of the polymer, masking agents are linked to the
polymer via physiologically reversible linkages. Cleavage of the
linkage restores the shielded or masked property of the
polymer.
[0083] As used herein, a masking agent comprises a molecule which,
when linked to a polymer, shields, inhibits or inactivates one or
more properties (biophysical or biochemical characteristics) of the
polymer. A masking agent can also add an activity or function to
the polymer that the polymer did not have in the absence of the
asking agent. Properties of polymers that may be masked include:
membrane activity, endosomolytic activity, charge, effective
charge, transfection activity, serum interaction, cell interaction,
and toxicity. Masking agents can also inhibit or prevent
aggregation of the polynucleotide-polymer conjugate in
physiological conditions. Masking agents of the invention may be
selected from the group consisting of: steric stabilizers,
targeting groups, and charge modifiers. Multiple masking agents can
be reversibly linked to a single polymer. To inactivate a property
of a polymer, it may be necessary to link more than one masking
agent to the polymer. A sufficient number of masking agents are
linked to the polymer to achieve the desired level of inactivation.
The desired level of modification of a polymer by attachment of
masking agent(s) is readily determined using appropriate polymer
activity assays. For example, if the polymer possesses membrane
activity in a given assay, a sufficient level of masking agent is
linked to the polymer to achieve the desired level of inhibition of
membrane activity in that assay. A sufficient number of masking
agent can be reversibly linked to the polymer to inhibit
aggregation of the polymer in physiologically conditions. More than
one species of masking agent may be used. For example, both steric
stabilizers and targeting groups may be linked to a polymer. Steric
stabilizers and targeting groups may or may not also function as
charge modifiers. The masking agents of the invention are
reversibly linked to the polymer. As used herein, a masking agent
is reversibly linked to a polymer if reversal of the linkage
results in restoration of the masked activity of the polymer.
Masking agents are linked to the polymer through the formation of
reversible covalent linkages with reactive groups on the polymer.
Reactive groups may be selected from the groups comprising: amines,
alcohols, thiols, hydrazides, aldehydes, carboxyls, etc. From one
to all of the reactive groups or charged groups on a polymer may be
reversibly modified. In one embodiment, at least two masking agents
are reversibly linked to the polymer. In another embodiment,
masking agents are reversibly linked to about 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%,
60%, 70%, or 80% of the reactive groups on the polymer. In another
embodiment, masking agents are reversibly linked to about 20%, 30%,
40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, or 80% of the charged groups on the polymer. In
another embodiment, the percentage of masking agents reversibly
linked the polymer to charged groups on the polymer is about 20%,
30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, or 80%.
[0084] As used herein, a polymer is masked if one or more
properties of the polymer is inhibited or inactivated by attachment
of one or more masking agents. A polymer is reversibly masked if
cleavage of bonds linking the masking agents to the polymer results
in restoration of the polymer's masked property.
[0085] Preferred masking agents of the invention are able to modify
the polymer (form a reversible bond with the polymer) in aqueous
solution. Of particular utility is a disubstituted maleic anhydride
derivative in which R.sup.1 is methyl (--CH.sub.3) and R.sup.2 is a
propionic acid group (--(CH.sub.2).sub.2CO.sub.2H) or esters/amides
derived from the acid.
[0086] As used herein, a steric stabilizer is a natural, synthetic,
or non-natural non-ionic hydrophilic polymer that prevents
intramolecular or intermolecular interactions of polymer to which
it is attached relative to the polymer containing no steric
stabilizer. A steric stabilizer hinders a polymer from engaging in
electrostatic interactions. Electrostatic interactions are the
non-covalent association of two or more substances due to
attractive forces between positive and negative charges. Steric
stabilizers can inhibit interaction with blood components and
therefore opsonization, phagocytosis and uptake by the
reticuloendothelial system. Steric stabilizers can thus increase
circulation time of molecules to which they are attached. Steric
stabilizers can also inhibit aggregation of a polymer. Preferred
steric stabilizers are polyethylene glycol (PEG) and PEG
derivatives. As used herein, a preferred PEG can have about 1-500
ethylene glycol monomers, 2-20 ethylene glycol monomers, 5-15
ethylene glycol monomers, or about 10 ethylene glycol monomers. As
used herein, a preferred PEG can also have a molecular weight
average of about 85-20,000 Daltons (Da), about 200-1000 Da, about
200-750 Da, or about 550 Da. Other suitable steric stabilizers may
be selected from the group comprising: polysaccharides, dextran,
cyclodextrin, poly(vinyl alcohol), polyvinylpyrrolidone,
2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA), and water soluble cellulose
ether.
[0087] Targeting groups, or ligands, are used for targeting or
delivery a polymer to target cells or tissues, or specific cells
types. Targeting groups enhance the association of molecules with a
target cell. Thus, targeting groups can enhance the pharmacokinetic
or biodistribution properties of a conjugate to which they are
attached to improve cellular distribution and cellular uptake of
the conjugate. One or more targeting groups can be linked to the
membrane active polymer either directly or via a linkage with a
spacer. Binding of a targeting group, such as a ligand, to a cell
or cell receptor may initiate endocytosis. Targeting groups may be
monovalent, divalent, trivalent, tetravalent, or have higher
valency. Targeting groups may be selected from the group
comprising: compounds with affinity to cell surface molecule, cell
receptor ligands, and antibodies, antibody fragments, and antibody
mimics with affinity to cell surface molecules. A preferred
targeting group comprises a cell receptor ligand. A variety of
ligands have been used to target drugs and genes to cells and to
specific cellular receptors. Cell receptor ligands may be selected
from the group comprising: carbohydrates, glycans, saccharides
(including, but not limited to: galactose, galactose derivatives,
mannose, and mannose derivatives), vitamins, folate, biotin,
aptamers, and peptides (including, but not limited to:
RGD-containing peptides, insulin, EGF, and transferrin). Examples
of targeting groups include those that target the
asialoglycoprotein receptor by using asialoglycoproteins or
galactose residues. For example, liver hepatocytes contain ASGP
Receptors. Therefore, galactose-containing targeting groups may be
used to target hepatocytes. Galactose containing targeting groups
include, but are not limited to: galactose, N-acetylgalactosamine,
oligosaccharides, and saccharide clusters (such as:
Tyr-Glu-Glu-(aminohexyl GalNAc).sub.3, lysine-based galactose
clusters, and cholane-based galactose clusters). Further suitable
conjugates can include oligosaccharides that can bind to
carbohydrate recognition domains (CRD) found on the
asialoglycoprotein-receptor (ASGP-R). Example conjugate moieties
containing oligosaccharides and/or carbohydrate complexes are
provided in U.S. Pat. No. 6,525,031
[0088] As used herein, a charge modifier is a group that alters the
charge of an ionic group on a polymer. The charge modifier can
neutralize a charged group on a polymer or reverse the charge, from
positive to negative or negative to positive, of a polymer ion.
Charge modification of a polyion can reduce the charge of the
polyion, form a polyion of opposite charge, or form a
polyampholyte. Charge modification can also be used to form a
polymer with a desired net charge or zeta potential. Conjugates
with near neutral net charge or zeta potential are preferred for in
vivo delivery of polynucleotides. A preferred charge modifier
reversibly modifies a charged, or ionic, group. Reversible charge
modifiers may be selected from the group comprising: CDM, DM,
CDM-thioester, CDM-masking agent, CDM-steric stabilizer,
CDM-ligand, CDM-PEG, and CDM-galactose.
[0089] Zeta potential is a physical property which is exhibited by
any particle in suspension and is closely related to surface
charge. In aqueous media, the pH of the sample is one of the most
important factors that affects zeta potential. When charge is based
upon protonated/deprotonation of bases/acids, the charge is
dependent on pH. Therefore, a zeta potential value must include the
solution conditions, especially pH, to be meaningful. For typical
particles, the magnitude of the zeta potential gives an indication
of the potential stability of the colloidal system. If all the
particles in suspension have a large negative or positive zeta
potential then they will tend to repel each other and there will be
no tendency for the particles to come together. However, if the
particles have low zeta potential values then there will be no
force to prevent the particles coming together and flocculating.
The general dividing line between stable and unstable suspensions
for typical particles is generally taken at either +30 or -30 mV.
Particles with zeta potentials more positive than +30 mV or more
negative than -30 mV are normally considered stable. We show here,
that CDM-masked polynucleotide-polymer conjugates can form small
particles, <20 nm or <10 nm (as measured by dynamic light
scattering, analytic ultracentrifugation, or atomic force
microscopy), that are stable despite having a zeta potential
between +30 and -30 mV at physiological salt and pH 9.
[0090] Net charge, or zeta potential of the polynucleotide-polymer
conjugates of the invention, can be controlled by the attachment of
masking agents or charge modifiers. Polymer charge, especially
positive charge, can result in unwanted interactions with serum
components or non-target cells. By shielding charge with steric
stabilizers or modification of charge, conjugates can be readily
made with an apparent surface charge near neutral. By modifying
charged groups on the polymer, serum stable particles can be made
in which the zeta potential, measured at pH 9, is between +30 and
-30 mV, between +20 and -20 mV, between +10 and -10 mV, or between
+5 and -5 mV. At pH 7, the net charge of the conjugate would be
expected to be more positive than at pH 9. Net charge, or surface
charge, is a significant factor in delivery of polynucleotide
complexes in vivo.
Labile Linkage
[0091] A linkage or linker is a connection between two atoms that
links one chemical group or segment of interest to another chemical
group or segment of interest via one or more covalent bonds. For
example, a linkage can connect a polynucleotide or masking agent to
a polymer. Formation of a linkage may connect two separate
molecules into a single molecule or it may connect two atoms in the
same molecule. The linkage may be charge neutral, or may bear a
positive or negative charge. A reversible or labile linkage
contains a reversible or labile bond. A linkage may optionally
include a spacer that increases the distance between the two joined
atoms. A spacer may further add flexibility and/or length to the
linkage. Spacers may include, but are not be limited to: alkyl
groups, alkenyl groups, alkynyl groups, aryl groups, aralkyl
groups, aralkenyl groups, aralkynyl groups, each of which can
contain one or more heteroatoms, heterocycles, amino acids,
nucleotides, and saccharides. Spacer groups are well known in the
art and the preceding list is not meant to limit the scope of the
invention.
[0092] A reversible or labile bond is a covalent bond other than a
covalent bond to a hydrogen atom that is capable of being
selectively broken or cleaved under conditions that will not break
or cleave other covalent bonds in the same molecule. More
specifically, a reversible or labile bond is a covalent bond that
is less stable (thermodynamically) or more rapidly broken
(kinetically) under appropriate conditions than other non-labile
covalent bonds in the same molecule. Cleavage of a labile bond
within a molecule may result in the formation of two or more
molecules. For those skilled in the art, cleavage or lability of a
bond is generally discussed in terms of half-life (t.sub.1/2) of
bond cleavage, or the time required for half of the bonds to
cleave. Orthogonal bonds are bonds that cleave under conditions
that cleave one and not the other. Two bonds are considered
orthogonal if their half-lives of cleavage in a defined environment
are 10-fold or more different from one another. Thus, reversible or
labile bonds encompass bonds that can be selectively cleaved more
rapidly than other bonds a molecule.
[0093] The presence of electron donating or withdrawing groups can
be located in a molecule sufficiently near the cleavable bond such
that the electronic effects of the electron donating or withdrawing
groups influence the rate of bond cleavage. Electron withdrawing
groups (EWG) are atoms or parts of molecules that withdraw electron
density from another atom, bond, or part of the molecule wherein
there is a decrease in electron density to the bond of interest
(donor). Electron donating groups (EDG) are atoms or parts of
molecules that donate electrons to another atom, bond, or part of
the molecule wherein there is an increased electron density to the
bond of interest (acceptor). The electron withdrawing/donating
groups need to be in close enough proximity to effect influence,
which is typically within about 3 bonds of the bond being
broken.
[0094] Another strategy for increasing the rate of bond cleavage is
to incorporate functional groups into the same molecule as the
labile bond. The proximity of functional groups to one another
within a molecule can be such that intramolecular reaction is
favored relative to an intermolecular reaction. The proximity of
functional groups to one another within the molecule can in effect
result in locally higher concentrations of the functional groups.
In general, intramolecular reactions are much more rapid than
intermolecular reactions. Reactive groups separated by 5 and 6
atoms can form particularly labile bonds due to the formation of 5
and 6-membered ring transition states. Examples include having
carboxylic acid derivatives (acids, esters, amides) and alcohols,
thiols, carboxylic acids or amines in the same molecule reacting
together to make esters, carboxylic and carbonate esters, phosphate
esters, thiol esters, acid anhydrides or amides. Steric
interactions can also change the cleavage rate for a bond.
[0095] Appropriate conditions are determined by the type of labile
bond and are well known in organic chemistry. A labile bond can be
sensitive to pH, oxidative or reductive conditions or agents,
temperature, salt concentration, the presence of an enzyme (such as
esterases, including nucleases, and proteases), or the presence of
an added agent. For example, certain peptide, ester, or saccharide
linkers may be cleaved in the presence of the appropriate enzyme.
In another example, increased or decreased pH may be the
appropriate conditions for a pH-labile bond. In yet another
example, oxidative conditions may be the appropriated conditions
for an oxidatively labile bond. In yet another example, reductive
conditions may be the appropriate conditions for a reductively
labile bond. For instance, a disulfide constructed from two alkyl
thiols is capable of being broken by reduction in the presence of
thiols, without cleavage of carbon-carbon bonds. In this example,
the carbon-carbon bonds are non-labile to the reducing
conditions.
[0096] The rate at which a labile group will undergo transformation
can be controlled by altering the chemical constituents of the
molecule containing the labile group. For example, addition of
particular chemical moieties (e.g., electron acceptors or donors)
near the labile group can affect the particular conditions (e.g.,
pH) under which chemical transformation will occur.
[0097] Molecules can contain one or more reversible or labile
bonds. If more than one reversible or labile bond is present in the
molecule, and all of the reversible or labile bonds are of the same
type (cleaved at about the same rate under the same conditions),
then the molecule contains multiple reversible or labile bonds. If
more than one reversible or labile bond is present in the molecule,
and the reversible or labile bonds are of different types (based
either on the appropriate conditions for lability, or the chemical
functional group of the labile bonds), then the molecule contains
orthogonal reversible or labile bonds. Orthogonal reversible or
labile bonds provides for the ability to cleave one type of
reversible or labile bond while leaving a second type of reversible
bond not cleaved or broken. In other words, two labile bonds are
orthogonal to each other if one can be cleaved under conditions
that leave the other intact. Orthogonal protecting groups are well
known in organic chemistry and comprise orthogonal bonds.
[0098] As used herein, a physiologically labile bond is a labile
bond that is cleavable under conditions normally encountered or
analogous to those encountered within a mammalian body.
Physiologically labile linkage groups are selected such that they
undergo a chemical transformation (e.g., cleavage) when present in
certain physiological conditions.
[0099] As used herein, a cellular physiologically labile bond is a
labile bond that is cleavable under mammalian intracellular
conditions. Mammalian intracellular conditions include chemical
conditions such as pH, temperature, oxidative or reductive
conditions or agents, and salt concentration found in or analogous
to those encountered in mammalian cells. Mammalian intracellular
conditions also include the presence of enzymatic activity normally
present in a mammalian cell such as from proteolytic or hydrolytic
enzymes. A cellular physiologically labile bond may also be cleaved
in response to administration of a pharmaceutically acceptable
exogenous agent. Physiologically labile bonds that are cleaved with
a half life of less than 45 min. are considered very labile.
Physiologically labile bonds that are cleaved with a half life of
less than 15 min are considered extremely labile.
[0100] Chemical transformation (cleavage of the labile bond) may be
initiated by the addition of a pharmaceutically acceptable agent to
the cell or may occur spontaneously when a molecule containing the
labile bond reaches an appropriate intra- and/or extra-cellular
environment. For example, a pH labile bond may be cleaved when the
molecule enters an acidified endosome. Thus, a pH labile bond may
be considered to be an endosomal cleavable bond. Enzyme cleavable
bonds may be cleaved when exposed to enzymes such as those present
in an endosome or lysosome or in the cytoplasm. A disulfide bond
may be cleaved when the molecule enters the more reducing
environment of the cell cytoplasm. Thus, a disulfide may be
considered to be a cytoplasmic cleavable bond.
[0101] pH-labile bond: As used herein, a pH-labile bonds is a
labile bond that is selectively broken under acidic conditions
(pH<7). Such bonds may also be termed endosomally labile bonds,
since cell endosomes and lysosomes have a pH less than 7. The term
pH-labile includes bonds that are pH-labile, very pH-labile, and
extremely pH-labile. pH labile bonds may be selected from the group
comprising: [0102] a) ketals that are labile in acidic environments
(pH less than 7, greater than 4) to form a diol and a ketone,
[0103] b) acetals that are labile in acidic environments (pH less
than 7, greater than 4) to form a diol and an aldehyde, [0104] c)
imines or iminiums that are labile in acidic environments (pH less
than 7, greater than 4) to form an amine and an aldehyde or a
ketone, [0105] d) silicon-oxygen-carbon linkages that are labile
under acidic conditions, [0106] e) silicon-nitrogen (silazanes)
linkages, and [0107] f) silicon-carbon linkages (arylsilanes,
vinylsilanes, and allylsilanes). [0108] g) maleamates-amide bonds
synthesized from maleic anhydride derivatives and amines [0109] h)
ortho esters [0110] i) hydrazones [0111] j) activated carboxylic
acid derivatives (esters, amides) designed to undergo acid
catalyzed hydrolysis. [0112] k) vinyl ethers
[0113] Organosilanes have long been utilized as oxygen protecting
groups in organic synthesis due to both the ease in preparation (of
the silicon-oxygen-carbon linkage) and the facile removal of the
protecting group under acidic conditions. For example, silyl ethers
and silylenolethers, both posses such a linkage.
Silicon-oxygen-carbon linkages are susceptible to hydrolysis under
acidic conditions forming silanols and an alcohol (or enol). The
substitution on both the silicon atom and the alcohol carbon can
affect the rate of hydrolysis due to steric and electronic effects.
This allows for the possibility of tuning the rate of hydrolysis of
the silicon-oxygen-carbon linkage by changing the substitution on
either the organosilane, the alcohol, or both the organosilane and
alcohol to facilitate the desired affect. In addition, charged or
reactive groups, such as amines or carboxylate, may be linked to
the silicon atom, which confers the labile compound with charge
and/or reactivity.
[0114] Hydrolysis of a silazane leads to the formation of a silanol
and an amine. Silazanes are inherently more susceptible to
hydrolysis than is the silicon-oxygen-carbon linkage, however, the
rate of hydrolysis is increased under acidic conditions. The
substitution on both the silicon atom and the amine can affect the
rate of hydrolysis due to steric and electronic effects. This
allows for the possibility of tuning the rate of hydrolysis of the
silizane by changing the substitution on either the silicon or the
amine to facilitate the desired affect.
[0115] Another example of a pH labile bond is the use of the acid
labile enol ether bond. The rate at which this labile bond is
cleaved depends on the structures of the carbonyl compound formed
and the alcohol released. For example analogs of ethyl isopropenyl
ether, which may be synthesized from .beta.-haloethers, have
half-lives of roughly 2 min at pH 5. Analogs of ethyl cyclohexenyl
ether, which may be synthesized from phenol ethers, have half-lives
of roughly 14 min at pH 5.
[0116] Reaction of an anhydride with an amine forms an amide and an
acid. Typically, the reverse reaction (formation of an anhydride
and amine) is very slow and energetically unfavorable. However, if
the anhydride is a cyclic anhydride, reaction with an amine yields
a molecule in which the amide and the acid are in the same
molecule, an amide acid. The presence of both reactive groups (the
amide and the carboxylic acid) in the same molecule accelerates the
reverse reaction. In particular, the product of primary amines with
maleic anhydride and maleic anhydride derivatives, maleamic acids,
revert back to amine and anhydride 1.times.10.sup.9 to
1.times.10.sup.13 times faster than its noncyclic analogues (Kirby
1980).
[0117] Reaction of an amine with an anhydride to form an amide and
an acid.
##STR00002##
[0118] Reaction of an amine with a cyclic anhydride to form an
amide acid.
##STR00003##
[0119] Cleavage of the amide acid to form an amine and an anhydride
is pH-dependent, and is greatly accelerated at acidic pH. This
pH-dependent reactivity can be exploited to form reversible
pH-sensitive bonds and linkers. Cis-aconitic acid has been used as
such a pH-sensitive linker molecule. The .gamma.-carboxylate is
first coupled to a molecule. In a second step, either the .alpha.
or .beta. carboxylate is coupled to a second molecule to form a
pH-sensitive coupling of the two molecules. The half life for
cleavage of this linker at pH 5 is between 8 and 24 h.
Structures of Cis-Aconitic Anhydride and Maleic Anhydride
##STR00004##
[0121] The pH at which cleavage occurs is controlled by the
addition of chemical constituents to the labile moiety. The rate of
conversion of maleamic acids to amines and maleic anhydrides is
strongly dependent on substitution (R.sup.2 and R.sup.3) of the
maleic anhydride system. When R.sup.2 is methyl, the rate of
conversion is 50-fold higher than when R.sup.2 and R.sup.3 are
hydrogen. When there are alkyl substitutions at both R.sup.2 and
R.sup.3 (e.g., 2,3-dimethylmaleicanhydride) the rate increase is
dramatic, 10.000-fold faster than non-substituted maleic anhydride.
The maleamate bond formed from the modification of an amine with
2,3-dimethylmaleic anhydride is cleaved to restore the anhydride
and amine with a half-life between 4 and 10 min at pH 5. It is
anticipated that if R.sup.2 and R.sup.3 are groups larger than
hydrogen, the rate of amide-acid conversion to amine and anhydride
will be faster than if R.sup.2 and/or R.sup.3 are hydrogen.
[0122] Very pH-labile bond: A very pH-labile bond has a half-life
for cleavage at pH 5 of less than 45 min. The construction of very
pH-labile bonds is well-known in the chemical art.
[0123] Extremely pH-labile bonds: An extremely pH-labile bond has a
half-life for cleavage at pH 5 of less than 15 min. The
construction of extremely pH-labile bonds is well-known in the
chemical art.
Linkage of Polynucleotide to Polymer
[0124] Most previous methods for delivery of polynucleotide to
cells have relied upon complexation of the anionic nucleic acid
with a cationic delivery agent such as a cationic polymer or
cationic lipid. Electrostatic complexes with larger
polynucleotides, e.g. plasmids, tend to aggregate and become large,
>500 nm, in physiological solutions. Smaller polynucleotides,
oligonucleotides, because of their small size, form unstable
electrostatic complexes with potential delivery agents. A more
effective method for packaging polynucleotides is to covalently
link the polynucleotide to the delivery vehicle. However,
attachment to the polymer can inhibit the activity of the
polynucleotide in the cell. We have found that by attaching the
polynucleotide to the polymer via a reversible linker that is
broken after the polynucleotide is delivered to the cell, it is
possible to delivery a functionally active polynucleotide to a cell
in vivo. The reversible linker is selected such that it undergoes a
chemical transformation (e.g., cleavage) when present in certain
physiological conditions, (e.g., the reducing environment of the
cell cytoplasm). Attachment of a polynucleotide to a delivery or
membrane active polymer enhances delivery of the polynucleotide to
a cell in vivo. Release of the polynucleotide from the polymer, by
cleavage of the reversible bond, facilitates interaction of the
polynucleotide with the appropriate cellular components for
activity.
[0125] In addition to polynucleotides, other membrane impermeable
molecules or molecules with low membrane permeability can be
delivered to cells in vivo using the described polyconjugate
delivery vehicles. Molecules suitable for reversible attachment to
a membrane active polymer include: proteins, antibodies, antibody
fragments, transcription factors, small molecule drugs, anticancer
drugs, and other synthetic molecules including those that affect
transcription.
[0126] Attachment of the membrane impermeable molecule to a
membrane active polymer enables the formation of an appropriately
sized in vivo delivery vehicle. The described molecular conjugates
are essentially polymeric and have similar size and targeting
propertied as that observed for other polymers. For intravascular
(system) delivery the vehicle needs to be able to cross the
endothelial barrier in order reach parenchymal cells of interest.
The largest endothelia fenestrae (holes in the endothelial barrier)
occur in the liver and have an average diameter of about 100 nm.
The trans-epithelial pores in other organs are much smaller. For
example, muscle endothelium can be described as a structure which
has a large number of small pores with a radius of 4 nm, and a low
number of large pores with a radius of 20-30 nm.
[0127] The size of the polynucleotide delivery vehicle is also
important for the cellular uptake process. Cellular internalization
through endocytosis is thought to be limited to complexes of about
100 nm in diameter, the size of endocytic vesicles. The described
conjugates are less than 100 nm, more preferably less than 50 nM,
and more preferably less than 20 nM or less than 10 nm.
[0128] Renal ultrafiltration is one of the main routes of
elimination of hydrophilic proteins, polymers and polymer-protein
conjugates from blood. Among the parameters affecting this process
are chemical composition, size, charge. Globular proteins larger
than about 70 kDa are largely excluded from clearance by renal
ultrafiltration. Conjugation of steric stabilizers such as PEG,
therefore, decreases renal clearance by increasing the effective
molecular size of polymers to which they are attached.
Ultrafiltration of PEGs with molecular weight lower than 8 kDa is
not restricted, while ultrafiltration of PEGs in the range of 8-30
kDa is governed by the molecular size. With molecular weight
exceeding 30 kDa, PEG elimination is dramatically decreased. For
this reason, masked polymer-polynucleotide conjugates in which the
overall size is larger than about 10 kDa, larger than about 20 kDa,
or larger than about 30 kDa are preferred. In addition to
decreasing kidney ultrafiltration, an increase molecule weight of a
polymer can promote accumulation into permeable tissues, such as
tumors, by the passive enhanced permeation and retention
mechanism.
Polynucleotide
[0129] The term polynucleotide, or nucleic acid or polynucleic
acid, is a term of art that refers to a polymer containing at least
two nucleotides. Nucleotides are the monomeric units of
polynucleotide polymers. Polynucleotides with less than 120
monomeric units are often called oligonucleotides. Natural nucleic
acids have a deoxyribose- or ribose-phosphate backbone. A
non-natural or synthetic polynucleotide is a polynucleotide that is
polymerized in vitro or in a cell free system and contains the same
or similar bases but may contain a backbone of a type other than
the natural ribose or deoxyribose-phosphate backbone.
Polynucleotides can be synthesized using any known technique in the
art. Polynucleotide backbones known in the art include: PNAs
(peptide nucleic acids), phosphorothioates, phosphorodiamidates,
morpholinos, and other variants of the phosphate backbone of native
nucleic acids. Bases include purines and pyrimidines, which further
include the natural compounds adenine, thymine, guanine, cytosine,
uracil, inosine, and natural analogs. Synthetic derivatives of
purines and pyrimidines include, but are not limited to,
modifications which place new reactive groups on the nucleotide
such as, but not limited to, amines, alcohols, thiols,
carboxylates, and alkylhalides. The term base encompasses any of
the known base analogs of DNA and RNA. The term polynucleotide
includes deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and ribonucleic acid (RNA) and
combinations of DNA, RNA and other natural and synthetic
nucleotides.
[0130] DNA may be in form of cDNA, in vitro polymerized DNA,
plasmid DNA, parts of a plasmid DNA, genetic material derived from
a virus, linear DNA, vectors (P1, PAC, BAC, YAC, and artificial
chromosomes), expression vectors, expression cassettes, chimeric
sequences, recombinant DNA, chromosomal DNA, an oligonucleotide,
anti-sense DNA, or derivatives of these groups. RNA may be in the
form of messenger RNA (mRNA), in vitro polymerized RNA, recombinant
RNA, oligonucleotide RNA, transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA
(snRNA), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), chimeric sequences, anti-sense RNA,
interfering RNA, small interfering RNA (siRNA), microRNA (miRNA),
ribozymes, external guide sequences, small non-messenger RNAs
(snmRNA), untranslatedRNA (utRNA), snoRNAs (24-mers, modified
snmRNA that act by an anti-sense mechanism), tiny non-coding RNAs
(tncRNAs), small hairpin RNA (shRNA), or derivatives of these
groups. In addition, DNA and RNA may be single, double, triple, or
quadruple stranded. Double, triple, and quadruple stranded
polynucleotide may contain both RNA and DNA or other combinations
of natural and/or synthetic nucleic acids.
[0131] A blocking polynucleotide is a polynucleotide that
interferes with the function or expression of DNA or RNA. Blocking
polynucleotides are not translated into protein but their presence
or expression in a cell alters the expression or function of
cellular genes or RNA. Blocking polynucleotides cause the
degradation of or inhibit the function or translation of a specific
cellular RNA, usually an mRNA, in a sequence-specific manner.
Inhibition of an RNA can thus effectively inhibit expression of a
gene from which the RNA is transcribed. As used herein, a blocking
polynucleotide may be selected from the list comprising: anti-sense
oligonucleotide, RNA interference polynucleotide, dsRNA, siRNA,
miRNA, hRNA, ribozyme, hammerhead ribozyme, external guide sequence
(U.S. Pat. No. 5,962,426), snoRNA, triple-helix forming
oligonucleotide RNA Polymerase II transcribed DNA encoding a
blocking polynucleotide, RNA Polymerase III transcribed DNAs
encoding a blocking polynucleotide. Blocking polynucleotide can be
DNA, RNA, combination of RNA and DNA, or may contain non-natural or
synthetic nucleotides.
[0132] Blocking polynucleotides may be polymerized in vitro, they
may be recombinant, contain chimeric sequences, or derivatives of
these groups. A blocking polynucleotide may contain
ribonucleotides, deoxyribonucleotides, synthetic nucleotides, or
any suitable combination such that the target RNA or gene is
inhibited.
[0133] An RNA interference (RNAi) polynucleotide is a molecule
capable inducing RNA interference through interaction with the RNA
interference pathway machinery of mammalian cells to degrade or
inhibit translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts of a
transgene in a sequence specific manner. Two primary RNAi
polynucleotides are small (or short) interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and
micro RNAs (miRNAs). However, other polynucleotides have been shown
to mediate RNA interference. RNAi polynucleotides may be selected
from the group comprising: siRNA, microRNA, double-strand RNA
(dsRNA), short hairpin RNA (shRNA), and expression cassettes
encoding RNA capable if inducing RNA interference. SiRNA comprises
a double stranded structure typically containing 15-50 base pairs
and preferably 21-25 base pairs and having a nucleotide sequence
identical (perfectly complementary) or nearly identical (partially
complementary) to a coding sequence in an expressed target gene or
RNA within the cell. An siRNA may have dinucleotide 3' overhangs.
An siRNA may be composed of two annealed polynucleotides or a
single polynucleotide that forms a hairpin structure. An siRNA
molecule of the invention comprises a sense region and an antisense
region. In one embodiment, the siRNA of the conjugate is assembled
from two oligonucleotide fragments, wherein one fragment comprises
the nucleotide sequence of the antisense strand of the siRNA
molecule and a second fragment comprises nucleotide sequence of the
sense region of the siRNA molecule. In another embodiment, the
sense strand is connected to the antisense strand via a linker
molecule, such as a polynucleotide linker or a non-nucleotide
linker. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNA gene products
about 22 nt long that direct destruction or translational
repression of their mRNA targets. If the complementarity between
the miRNA and the target mRNA is partial, then translation of the
target mRNA is repressed, whereas if complementarity is extensive,
the target mRNA is cleaved. For miRNAs, the complex binds to target
sites usually located in the 3' UTR of mRNAs that typically share
only partial homology with the miRNA. A "seed region"--a stretch of
about 7 consecutive nucleotides on the 5' end of the miRNA that
forms perfect base pairing with its target--plays a key role in
miRNA specificity. Binding of the RISC/miRNA complex to the mRNA
can lead to either the repression of protein translation or
cleavage and degradation of the mRNA. Recent data indicate that
mRNA cleavage happens preferentially if there is perfect homology
along the whole length of the miRNA and its target instead of
showing perfect base-pairing only in the seed region (Pillai et al.
2007).
[0134] Antisense oligonucleotide comprise a polynucleotide
containing sequence that is complimentary to a sequence present in
a target mRNA. The antisense oligonucleotide binds to (base pairs
with) mRNA in a sequence specific manner. This binding can prevent
other cellular enzymes from binding to the mRNA, thereby leading to
inhibition of translation of the mRNA or degradation of the mRNA.
External guide sequences are short antisense oligoribonucleotides
that induce RNase P-mediated cleavage of a target RNA by forming a
precursor tRNA-like complex (U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,824). Ribozymes
are typically RNA oligonucleotides that contain sequence
complementary to the target messenger RNA and an RNA sequence that
acts as an enzyme to cleave the messenger RNA. Cleavage of the mRNA
prevents translation.
[0135] An oligonucleotide that forms the blocking polynucleotide
can include a terminal cap moiety at the 5'-end, the 3'-end, or
both of the 5' and 3' ends. The cap moiety can be, but is not
limited to, an inverted deoxy abasic moiety, an inverted deoxy
thymidine moiety, a thymidine moiety, or 3' glyceryl
modification.
[0136] RNA polymerase II and III transcribed DNAs can be
transcribed in the cell to produce small hairpin RNAs that can
function as siRNA, separate sense and anti-sense strand linear
siRNAs, ribozymes, or linear RNAs that can function as antisense
RNA. RNA polymerase III transcribed DNAs contain promoters selected
from the list comprising: U6 promoters, H1 promoters, and tRNA
promoters. RNA polymerase II promoters include U1, U2, U4, and U5
promoters, snRNA promoters, microRNA promoters, and mRNA
promoters.
[0137] Lists of known miRNA sequences can be found in databases
maintained by research organizations such as Wellcome Trust Sanger
Institute, Penn Center for Bioinformatics, Memorial Sloan Kettering
Cancer Center, and European Molecule Biology Laboratory, among
others. Known effective siRNA sequences and cognate binding sites
are also well represented in the relevant literature. RNAi
molecules are readily designed and produced by technologies known
in the art. In addition, there are computational tools that
increase the chance of finding effective and specific sequence
motifs (Pei et al. 2006, Reynolds et al. 2004, Khvorova et al.
2003, Schwarz et al. 2003, Ui-Tei et al. 2004, Heale et al. 2005,
Chalk et al. 2004, Amarzguioui et al. 2004).
[0138] The polynucleotides of the invention can be chemically
modified. The use of chemically modified polynucleotide can improve
various properties of the polynucleotide including, but not limited
to: resistance to nuclease degradation in vivo, cellular uptake,
activity, and sequence-specific hybridization. Non-limiting
examples of such chemical modifications include: phosphorothioate
internucleotide linkages, 2'-O-methyl ribonucleotides,
2'-deoxy-2'-fluoro ribonucleotides, 2'-deoxy ribonucleotides,
"universal base" nucleotides, 5-C-methyl nucleotides, and inverted
deoxyabasic residue incorporation. These chemical modifications,
when used in various polynucleotide constructs, are shown to
preserve polynucleotide activity in cells while at the same time,
dramatically increasing the serum stability of these compounds.
Chemically modified siRNA can also minimize the possibility of
activating interferon activity in humans.
[0139] In one embodiment, the chemically-modified RNAi
polynucleotide of the invention comprises a duplex having two
strands, one or both of which can be chemically-modified, wherein
each strand is about 19 to about 29 (e.g., about 19, 20, 21, 22,
23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, or 29) nucleotides. In one embodiment, an
RNAi polynucleotide of the invention comprises one or more modified
nucleotides while maintaining the ability to mediate RNAi inside a
cell or reconstituted in vitro system. An RNAi polynucleotide can
be modified wherein the chemical modification comprises one or more
(e.g., about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or more) of the
nucleotides. An RNAi polynucleotide of the invention can comprise
modified nucleotides as a percentage of the total number of
nucleotides present in the RNAi polynucleotide. As such, an RNAi
polynucleotide of the invention can generally comprise modified
nucleotides from about 5 to about 100% of the nucleotide positions
(e.g., 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40%, 45%, 50%, 55%, 60%,
65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 95% or 100% of the nucleotide
positions). The actual percentage of modified nucleotides present
in a given RNAi polynucleotide depends on the total number of
nucleotides present in the RNAi polynucleotide. If the RNAi
polynucleotide is single stranded, the percent modification can be
based upon the total number of nucleotides present in the single
stranded RNAi polynucleotide. Likewise, if the RNAi polynucleotide
is double stranded, the percent modification can be based upon the
total number of nucleotides present in the sense strand, antisense
strand, or both the sense and antisense strands. In addition, the
actual percentage of modified nucleotides present in a given RNAi
polynucleotide can also depend on the total number of purine and
pyrimidine nucleotides present in the RNAi polynucleotide. For
example, wherein all pyrimidine nucleotides and/or all purine
nucleotides present in the RNAi polynucleotide are modified.
[0140] An RNAi polynucleotide modulates expression of RNA encoded
by a gene. Because multiple genes can share some degree of sequence
homology with each other, an RNAi polynucleotide can be designed to
target a class of genes with sufficient sequence homology. Thus an
RNAi polynucleotide can contain sequence that has complementarity
to sequences that are shared amongst different gene targets or are
unique for a specific gene target. Therefore the RNAi
polynucleotide can be designed to target conserved regions of a RNA
sequence having homology between several genes thereby targeting
several genes in a gene families (e.g., different gene isoforms,
splice variants, mutant genes etc.). In another embodiment, the
RNAi polynucleotide can be designed to target a sequence that is
unique to a specific RNA sequence of a single gene.
[0141] The term complementarity refers to the ability of a
polynucleotide to form hydrogen bond(s) with another polynucleotide
sequence by either traditional Watson-Crick or other
non-traditional types. In reference to the polynucleotide molecules
of the present invention, the binding free energy for a
polynucleotide molecule with its target (effector binding site) or
complementary sequence is sufficient to allow the relevant function
of the polynucleotide to proceed, e.g., enzymatic mRNA cleavage or
translation inhibition. Determination of binding free energies for
nucleic acid molecules is well known in the art (Frier et al. 1986,
Turner et al. 1987). A percent complementarity indicates the
percentage of bases, in a contiguous strand, in a first
polynucleotide molecule which can form hydrogen bonds (e.g.,
Watson-Crick base pairing) with a second polynucleotide sequence
(e.g., 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 out of 10 being 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%,
and 100% complementary). Perfectly complementary means that all the
bases, in a contiguous strand of a polynucleotide sequence will
hydrogen bond with the same number of contiguous bases in a second
polynucleotide sequence.
[0142] By inhibit, down-regulate, or knockdown gene expression, it
is meant that the expression of the gene, as measured by the level
of RNA transcribed from the gene, or the level of polypeptide,
protein or protein subunit translated from the RNA, is reduced
below that observed in the absence of the blocking
polynucleotide-conjugates of the invention. Inhibition,
down-regulation, or knockdown of gene expression, with a
polynucleotide delivered by the compositions of the invention, is
preferably below that level observed in the presence of a control
inactive nucleic acid, a nucleic acid with scrambled sequence or
with inactivating mismatches, or in absence of conjugation of the
polynucleotide to the masked polymer.
[0143] A delivered polynucleotide can stay within the cytoplasm or
nucleus apart from the endogenous genetic material. Alternatively,
DNA can recombine with (become a part of) the endogenous genetic
material. Recombination can cause DNA to be inserted into
chromosomal DNA by either homologous or non-homologous
recombination.
[0144] A polynucleotide can be delivered to a cell to express an
exogenous nucleotide sequence, to inhibit, eliminate, augment, or
alter expression of an endogenous nucleotide sequence, or to affect
a specific physiological characteristic not naturally associated
with the cell.
[0145] Polynucleotides may contain an expression cassette coded to
express a whole or partial protein, or RNA. An expression cassette
refers to a natural or recombinantly produced polynucleotide that
is capable of expressing a sequence. The term recombinant as used
herein refers to a polynucleotide molecule that is comprised of
segments of polynucleotide joined together by means of molecular
biological techniques. The cassette contains the coding region of
the gene of interest along with any other sequences that affect
expression of the sequence of interest. An expression cassette
typically includes a promoter (allowing transcription initiation),
and a transcribed sequence. Optionally, the expression cassette may
include, but is not limited to: transcriptional enhancers,
non-coding sequences, splicing signals, transcription termination
signals, and polyadenylation signals. An RNA expression cassette
typically includes a translation initiation codon (allowing
translation initiation), and a sequence encoding one or more
proteins. Optionally, the expression cassette may include, but is
not limited to, translation termination signals, a polyadenosine
sequence, internal ribosome entry sites (IRES), and non-coding
sequences.
[0146] The polynucleotide may contain sequences that do not serve a
specific function in the target cell but are used in the generation
of the polynucleotide. Such sequences include, but are not limited
to, sequences required for replication or selection of the
polynucleotide in a host organism.
[0147] The term gene generally refers to a polynucleotide sequence
that comprises coding sequences necessary for the production of a
therapeutic polynucleotide (e.g., ribozyme) or a polypeptide or
precursor. The polypeptide can be encoded by a full length coding
sequence or by any portion of the coding sequence so long as the
desired activity or functional properties (e.g., enzymatic
activity, ligand binding, signal transduction) of the full-length
polypeptide or fragment are retained. The term also encompasses the
coding region of a gene and the including sequences located
adjacent to the coding region on both the 5' and 3' ends for a
distance of about 1 kb or more on either end such that the gene
corresponds to the length of the full-length mRNA. The sequences
that are located 5' of the coding region and which are present on
the mRNA are referred to as 5' untranslated sequences. The
sequences that are located 3' or downstream of the coding region
and which are present on the mRNA are referred to as 3'
untranslated sequences. The term gene encompasses both cDNA and
genomic forms of a gene. A genomic form or clone of a gene contains
the coding region interrupted with non-coding sequences termed
introns, intervening regions or intervening sequences. Introns are
segments of a gene which are transcribed into nuclear RNA. Introns
may contain regulatory elements such as enhancers. Introns are
removed or spliced out from the nuclear or primary transcript;
introns therefore are absent in the mature RNA transcript. The
messenger RNA (mRNA) functions during translation to specify the
sequence or order of amino acids in a nascent polypeptide. A gene
may also includes other regions or sequences including, but not
limited to, promoters, enhancers, transcription factor binding
sites, polyadenylation signals, internal ribosome entry sites,
silencers, insulating sequences, matrix attachment regions. These
sequences may be present close to the coding region of the gene
(within 10,000 nucleotides) or at distant sites (more than 10,000
nucleotides). These non-coding sequences influence the level or
rate of transcription and/or translation of the gene. Covalent
modification of a gene may influence the rate of transcription
(e.g., methylation of genomic DNA), the stability of mRNA (e.g.,
length of the 3' polyadenosine tail), rate of translation (e.g., 5'
cap), nucleic acid repair, nuclear transport, and immunogenicity.
One example of covalent modification of nucleic acid involves the
action of LABELIT.TM. reagents (Mirus Corporation, Madison,
Wis.).
[0148] As used herein, the term gene expression refers to the
process of converting genetic information encoded in a gene into
RNA (e.g., small RNA, siRNA, mRNA, rRNA, tRNA, or snRNA) through
transcription of a deoxyribonucleic gene (e.g., via the enzymatic
action of an RNA polymerase), and for protein encoding genes, into
protein through translation of mRNA. Gene expression can be
regulated at many stages in the process. Up-regulation or
activation refers to regulation that increases the production of
gene expression products (i.e., RNA or protein), while
down-regulation or repression refers to regulation that decrease
production. Molecules (e.g., transcription factors) that are
involved in up-regulation or down-regulation are often called
activators and repressors, respectively.
[0149] The polynucleotide may be used for research purposes or to
produce a change in a cell that can be therapeutic. The delivery of
a polynucleotide for therapeutic purposes is commonly called gene
therapy. The delivery of a polynucleotide can lead to modification
of the genetic material present in the target cell. The term stable
transfection or stably transfected generally refers to the
introduction and integration of an exogenous polynucleotide into
the genome of the transfected cell. The term stable transfectant
refers to a cell which has stably integrated the polynucleotide
into the genomic DNA. Stable transfection can also be obtained by
using episomal vectors that are replicated during the eukaryotic
cell division (e.g., plasmid DNA vectors containing a papilloma
virus origin of replication, artificial chromosomes). The term
transient transfection or transiently transfected refers to the
introduction of a polynucleotide into a cell where the
polynucleotide does not integrate into the genome of the
transfected cell. If the polynucleotide contains an expressible
gene, then the expression cassette is subject to the regulatory
controls that govern the expression of endogenous genes in the
chromosomes. The term transient transfectant refers to a cell which
has taken up a polynucleotide but has not integrated the
polynucleotide into its genomic DNA.
Formulation
[0150] The polynucleotide-polymer conjugate is formed by covalently
linking the polynucleotide to the polymer. The polymer is
polymerized or modified such that it contains a reactive group A.
The polynucleotide is also polymerized or modified such that it
contains a reactive group B. Reactive groups A and B are chosen
such that they can be linked via a reversible covalent linkage
using methods known in the art.
[0151] Conjugation of the polynucleotide to the polymer can be
performed in the presence of an excess of polymer. Because the
polynucleotide and the polymer may be of opposite charge during
conjugation, the presence of excess polymer can reduce or eliminate
aggregation of the conjugate. Alternatively, an excess of a carrier
polymer, such as a polycation, can be used. The excess polymer can
be removed from the conjugated polymer prior to administration of
the conjugate to the animal or cell culture. Alternatively, the
excess polymer can be co-administered with the conjugate to the
animal or cell culture.
[0152] Similarly, the polymer can be conjugated to the masking
agent in the presence of an excess of polymer or masking agent.
Because the polynucleotide and the polymer may be of opposite
charge during conjugation, the presence of excess polymer can
reduce or eliminate aggregation of the conjugate. Alternatively, an
excess of a carrier polymer can be used. The excess polymer can be
removed from the conjugated polymer prior to administration of the
conjugate to the animal or cell culture. Alternatively, the excess
polymer can be co-administered with the conjugate to the animal or
cell culture. The polymer can be modified prior to or subsequent to
conjugation of the polynucleotide to the polymer.
Transfection Reagent
[0153] The term transfection refers to the transfer of a
polynucleotide or other biologically active compound from outside a
cell to inside a cell such that the polynucleotide or biologically
active compound is functional. The term transfecting as used herein
refers to the introduction of a polynucleotide or other
biologically active compound from outside a cell to inside cell
such the polynucleotide has biologically activity. Transfection
reagents, or delivery vehicles, are compounds or compositions of
compounds that bind to or complex with oligonucleotides and
polynucleotides and mediate their entry into cells. Cationic
transfection agents may condense large nucleic acids. Transfection
agents may also be used to associate functional groups with a
polynucleotide. Functional groups include cell targeting signals,
nuclear localization signals, compounds that enhance release of
contents from endosomes or other intracellular vesicles (such as
membrane active compounds), and other compounds that alter the
behavior or interactions of the compound or complex to which they
are attached (interaction modifiers).
[0154] The conjugated polynucleotides of the instant invention
provide useful reagents and methods for a variety of therapeutic,
diagnostic, target validation, genomic discovery, genetic
engineering and pharmacogenomic applications. The conjugated
polynucleotide has improved cellular uptake properties compared
with the same unconjugated polynucleotide.
[0155] Parenteral routes of administration include intravascular
(intravenous, intraarterial), intramuscular, intraparenchymal,
intradermal, subdermal, subcutaneous, intratumor, intraperitoneal,
intrathecal, subdural, epidural, and intralymphatic injections that
use a syringe and a needle or catheter. Intravascular herein means
within a tubular structure called a vessel that is connected to a
tissue or organ within the body. Within the cavity of the tubular
structure, a bodily fluid flows to or from the body part. Examples
of bodily fluid include blood, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lymphatic
fluid, or bile. Examples of vessels include arteries, arterioles,
capillaries, venules, sinusoids, veins, lymphatics, bile ducts, and
ducts of the salivary or other exocrine glands. The intravascular
route includes delivery through the blood vessels such as an artery
or a vein. The blood circulatory system provides systemic spread of
the pharmaceutical. An administration route involving the mucosal
membranes is meant to include nasal, bronchial, inhalation into the
lungs, or via the eyes. Intraparenchymal includes direct injection
into a tissue such as liver, lung, heart, muscle (skeletal muscle
or diaphragm), spleen, pancreas, brain (including
intraventricular), spinal cord, ganglion, lymph nodes, adipose
tissues, thyroid tissue, adrenal glands, kidneys, prostate, and
tumors. Transdermal routes of administration have been affected by
patches and iontophoresis. Other epithelial routes include oral,
nasal, respiratory, rectum, and vaginal routes of
administration.
[0156] The conjugates can be injected in a pharmaceutically
acceptable carrier solution. Pharmaceutically acceptable refers to
those properties and/or substances which are acceptable to the
mammal from a pharmacological/toxicological point of view. The
phrase pharmaceutically acceptable refers to molecular entities,
compositions, and properties that are physiologically tolerable and
do not typically produce an allergic or other untoward or toxic
reaction when administered to a mammal. Preferably, as used herein,
the term pharmaceutically acceptable means approved by a regulatory
agency of the Federal or a state government or listed in the U.S.
Pharmacopeia or other generally recognized pharmacopeia for use in
animals, and more particularly in humans.
Therapeutic effect
[0157] We have disclosed polynucleotide delivery, resulting in gene
expression or inhibition of gene expression of reporter genes and
endogenous genes in specific tissues. Levels of a reporter (marker)
gene expression measured following delivery of a polynucleotide
indicate a reasonable expectation of similar levels of gene
expression following delivery of other polynucleotides. Levels of
treatment considered beneficial by a person having ordinary skill
in the art differ from disease to disease, for example: Hemophilia
A and B are caused by deficiencies of the X-linked clotting factors
VIII and IX, respectively. Their clinical course is greatly
influenced by the percentage of normal serum levels of factor VIII
or IX: <2%, severe; 2-5%, moderate; and 5-30% mild. Thus, an
increase from 1% to 2% of the normal level of circulating factor in
severe patients can be considered beneficial. Levels greater than
6% prevent spontaneous bleeds but not those secondary to surgery or
injury. Similarly inhibition of a gene need not be 100% to provide
a therapeutic benefit. A person having ordinary skill in the art of
gene therapy would reasonably anticipate beneficial levels of
expression of a gene specific for a disease based upon sufficient
levels of marker gene results. In the hemophilia example, if marker
genes were expressed to yield a protein at a level comparable in
volume to 2% of the normal level of factor VIII, it can be
reasonably expected that the gene coding for factor VIII would also
be expressed at similar levels. Thus, reporter or marker genes such
as the genes for luciferase and .beta.-galactosidase serve as
useful paradigms for expression of intracellular proteins in
general. Similarly, reporter or marker genes secreted alkaline
phosphatase (SEAP) serve as useful paradigms for secreted proteins
in general.
[0158] A therapeutic effect of the protein expressed from a
delivered polynucleotide in attenuating or preventing a disease,
condition, or symptom can be accomplished by the protein either
staying within the cell, remaining attached to the cell in the
membrane or being secreted and dissociating from the cell where it
can enter the general circulation and blood. Secreted proteins that
can be therapeutic include hormones, cytokines, growth factors,
clotting factors, anti-protease proteins (e.g. alpha-antitrypsin)
and other proteins that are present in the blood. Proteins on the
membrane can have a therapeutic effect by providing a receptor for
the cell to take up a protein or lipoprotein. For example, the low
density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor could be expressed in
hepatocytes and lower blood cholesterol levels and thereby prevent
atherosclerotic lesions that can cause strokes or myocardial
infarction. Therapeutic proteins that stay within the cell can be
enzymes that clear a circulating toxic metabolite as in
phenylketonuria. They can also cause a cancer cell to be less
proliferative or cancerous (e.g. less metastatic). A protein within
a cell could also interfere with the replication of a virus.
[0159] The liver is one of the most important target tissues for
gene therapy given its central role in metabolism (e.g.,
lipoprotein metabolism in various hypercholesterolemias) and the
secretion of circulating proteins (e.g., clotting factors in
hemophilia). At least one hundred different genetic disorders could
potentially be corrected by liver-directed gene therapy. In
addition, acquired disorders such as chronic hepatitis and
cirrhosis are common and could also be treated by
polynucleotide-based liver therapies. Gene therapies involving
heterotropic gene expression would further enlarge the number of
disorders treatable by liver-directed gene transfer. For example,
diabetes mellitus could be treated by expressing the insulin gene
within hepatocytes whose physiology may enable glucose-regulated
insulin secretion.
[0160] In addition to increasing or decreasing genes involved in
metabolism or disease, delivery of polynucleotides to cell in vivo
can also be used to stimulate the immune system, stimulate the
immune system to destroy the cancer cells, inactive oncogenes, or
activate or deliver tumor suppressor genes. Polynucleotides can
also be delivered to induce immunity to pathogens or to block
expression of pathogenic genes.
DEFINITIONS
[0161] As used herein, in vivo means that which takes place inside
an organism and more specifically to a process performed in or on
the living tissue of a whole, living multicellular organism
(animal), such as a mammal, as opposed to a partial or dead
one.
[0162] As used herein, in vitro refers to a process performed in an
artificial environment created outside a living multicellular
organism (e.g., a test tube or culture plate) used in experimental
research to study a disease or process. As used herein, in vitro
includes processes performed in intact cells growing in
culture.
[0163] As used herein, in situ refers to processes carried out in
intact tissue. However, the tissue can be in a living organism or
removed from the organism.
[0164] As used herein, ex vivo refers to a process performed in an
artificial environment outside the organism on living cells or
tissue which are removed from an organism and subsequently returned
to an organism.
[0165] Crosslinkers are bifunctional molecules used to connect two
molecules together, i.e. form a linkage between two molecules.
Bifunctional molecules can contain homo or
heterobifunctionality.
[0166] As used herein, a surface active polymer lowers the surface
tension of water and/or the interfacial tension with other phases,
and, accordingly, is positively adsorbed at the liquid/vapor
interface. The property of surface activity is usually due to the
fact that the molecules of the substance are amphipathic or
amphiphilic.
[0167] An antibody is any immunoglobulin, including antibodies and
fragments thereof, that binds a specific epitope. The term
encompasses polyclonal, monoclonal, and chimeric antibodies. An
antibody combining site is that structural portion of an antibody
molecule comprised of heavy and light chain variable and
hypervariable regions that specifically binds antigen. The phrase
antibody molecule in its various grammatical forms as used herein
contemplates both an intact immunoglobulin molecule and an
immunologically active portion of an immunoglobulin molecule.
Exemplary antibody molecules are intact immunoglobulin molecules,
substantially intact immunoglobulin molecules and those portions of
an immunoglobulin molecule that contains the paratope, including
those portions known in the art as Fab, Fab', F(ab').sub.2 and
F(v), which portions are preferred for use in the therapeutic
methods described herein. Fab and F(ab').sub.2 portions of antibody
molecules are prepared by the proteolytic reaction of papain and
pepsin, respectively, on substantially intact antibody molecules by
methods that are well-known. The phrase monoclonal antibody in its
various grammatical forms refers to an antibody having only one
species of antibody combining site capable of immunoreacting with a
particular antigen. A monoclonal antibody thus typically displays a
single binding affinity for any antigen with which it immunoreacts.
A monoclonal antibody may therefore contain an antibody molecule
having a plurality of antibody combining sites, each immunospecific
for a different antigen; e.g., a bispecific (chimeric) monoclonal
antibody.
EXAMPLES
Example 1
Polynucleotide Synthesis and Assembly
[0168] The following synthetic RNA oligonucleotides (Dharmacon,
Lafayette Colo.) were used. Sense strand RNAs contained a primary
amine with a six carbon spacer at the 5' to allow conjugation to
the delivery vehicle. The 2'ACE protected RNA oligonucleotides were
deprotected prior to the annealing step according to the
manufacturer's instructions. The siRNAs had the following
sequences:
TABLE-US-00001 apoB (Ensembl# ENSMUST00000037520); apoB-1 siRNA
sense SEQ ID 1 5'-NH.sub.4-GAAmUGmUGGGmUGGmCAAmCmUmUmUmA*G,,
antisense SEQ ID 2 5'-P-AmAAGUUGCCACCCACAUUCmA*G,; apoB-2 siRNA
sense SEQ ID 3 5'-NH.sub.4-GGAmCAmUGGGmUmUCCAAAmUmUAmC*G,,
antisense SEQ ID 4 5'-P-UmAAUUUGGAACCCAUGUCCmC*G,; ppara (GenBank#
NM_011144); ppara-1 siRNA, sense SEQ ID 5
5'-NH.sub.4-mUmCAmCGGAGmCmUmCAmCAGAAmUmUmC*U-3',, antisense SEQ ID
6 5'-P-AmAUUCUGUGAGCUCCGUGAmC*U-3',; ppara-2 siRNA sense SEQ ID 7
5'-NH.sub.4-mUmCCCAAAGCmUCCmUmUmCAAAAmU*U-3',, antisense SEQ ID 8
5'-P-mUmUUUGAAGGAGCUUUGGGAmA*G-3',; Control siRNA (GL-3 luciferase
reporter gene), sense SEQ ID 9
5'-NH.sub.4-mCmUmUAmCGmCmUGAGmUAmCmUmUmCGAmU*U-3';, antisense SEQ
ID 10 5'-P-UmCGAAGUACUCAGCGUAAGmU*U;; m = 2'-O-CH.sub.3
substitution, * = phosphorothioate linkage, and P = PO.sub.4.
[0169] Sense and antisense oligonucleotides for each target
sequence were annealed by mixing equimolar amounts of each and
heating to 94.degree. C. for 5 min, cooling to 90.degree. C. for 3
min, then decreasing the temperature in 0.3.degree. C. steps 250
times, holding at each step for 3 sec.
Example 2
Poly(Vinyl Ether) Random Copolymers
[0170] A. Synthesis of a vinyl ether monomer. 2-Vinyloxy Ethyl
Phthalimide was prepared via reacting 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (25
g, 0.24 mol) and potassium phthalimide (25 g, 0.135 mol) in
100.degree. C. DMF(75 ml) using tetra n-butyl ammonium bromide (0.5
g) as the phase transfer catalyst. This solution was heated for 6 h
and then crashed out in water and filtered. This solid was then
recrystallized twice from methanol to give white crystals. B.
Amine+lower alkyl poly(vinyl ether) polymers. A series of
copolymers was synthesized from vinylether monomers with varying
alkyl to amine group ratios and with alkyl groups having from one
to four carbons (FIG. 1, R and R' may be the same or different).
Membrane activity was dependent on the size (alkyl chain length)
and ratio of hydrophobic monomers (Wakefield 2005). Propyl and
butyl-derived polymers were found to be membrane lytic using model
liposomes while methyl and ethyl containing polymers were not. We
termed these polymers methyl, ethyl, propyl, or butyl-aminovinyl
ethers or (PMAVE, PEAVE, PPAVE, or PBAVE respectively). These
polymers possess sufficient charge to complex with DNA in
physiological concentrations of salt. In contrast, small membrane
lytic cationic peptides such as melittin are too weak and cannot
condense DNA in isotonic saline solutions. The larger size of the
synthetic amphipathic polymers not only enhances their DNA binding
ability, but also makes them more lytic on a molar basis than
melittin. The ability to lyse membranes with less number of polymer
molecules will facilitate in vivo nucleic acid delivery. Using
fluorophore-labeled DNA, we determined the charge density of the
synthesized polymers and confirmed their stability in saline. C.
Synthesis of water-soluble, amphipathic, membrane active poly(vinyl
ether) polyamine terpolymers. X mol % amine-protected vinylether
(e.g., 2-Vinyloxy Ethyl Phthalimide) was added to an oven dried
round bottom flask under a blanket of nitrogen in anhydrous
dichloromethane. To this solution Y mol % alkyl (e.g., ethyl,
propyl, or butyl) vinylether was added, followed by Z mol % alkyl
(dodecyl, octadecyl) vinylether (FIG. 1). While the polymers
detailed are derived from 2-3 different monomers, the invention is
not limited to a specific composition of vinyl ether monomers.
Polymers comprising more monomers or different monomers were
readily envisioned. The solution was brought to -78.degree. C. in a
dry ice acetone bath. To this solution 10 mol % BF.sub.3EtOEt was
added and the reaction was allowed to proceed for 2-3 h at
-78.degree. C., and then quenched with a methanol ammonium
hydroxide solution. The polymer was brought to dryness under
reduced pressure and then brought up in 30 ml of
1,4-dioxane/methanol (2/1). 20 mol eq. of hydrazine per phthalimide
was added to remove the protecting group from the amine. The
solution was refluxed for 3 h, then brought to dryness under
reduced pressure. The solid was brought up in 20 ml 0.5 M HCl,
refluxed for 15 min, diluted with 20 ml distilled water, and
refluxed for additional hour. The solution was then neutralized
with NaOH, cooled to room temperature, transferred to 3,500
molecular cellulose tubing, dialyzed for 24 h (2.times.20 L)
against distilled water, and freeze dried. The molecular weight of
the polymers was estimated using analytical size exclusion columns
according to standard procedures. While polymers containing the
indicated vinyl ether monomers are described in these examples, the
invention is not limited to these particular monomers.
[0171] After removal of the phthalimide groups by sequential
treatment with hydrazine and HCl, the polymers were transfer to
3,500 molecular cellulose tubing and dialyzed for 24 h (2.times.20
L) against distilled water, and freeze dried. The polymers were
then dissolved in water and placed onto a sephadex G-15 column. The
polymers that were excluded from sephadex G-15 were isolated and
concentrated by lyophilization. The molecular weights of the
polymers were then determined by GPC using Eprogen Inc. CATSEC100,
CATSEC300, and CATSEC1000 columns in series. The running buffer was
50 mM NaCl, 0.1% TFA, and 10% MeOH. Polyvinylpyridine standards
were used as the calibration curve. The molecular weights of the
polymers were in the range 10,000-100,000 Da, with the majority of
polymer preparations over 20,000 Da.
D. Synthesis of DW1360. An amine/butyl/octadecyl poly(vinyl ether)
terpolymer, was synthesized from 2-Vinyloxy Ethyl Phthalimide (3.27
g, 15 mmol), butyl vinylether (0.40 g, 4 mmol), and
octadecylvinylether (0.29 g, 1 mmol) monomers. The monomers were
dissolved in 30 ml anhydrous dichloromethane. These solutions were
then added to a -78.degree. C. dry ice/acetone bath. 2 min later,
BF.sub.3.OEt.sub.2 (0.042 g, 0.3 mmol) was added and the reaction
was allowed to proceed for 3 h at -78.degree. C. The polymerization
was then stopped by the addition of 50/50 mixture of ammonium
hydroxide in methanol or a solution of lithium borohydride. The
solvents were then removed by rotary evaporation. The polymer was
then dissolved in 30 ml of 1,4-dioxane/methanol (2/1). To this
solution was added hydrazine (0.44 g, 138 mmol) and the mixture was
heated to reflux for 3 h. The solvents were then removed by rotary
evaporation and the resulting solid was then brought up in 20 ml of
0.5 M HCl and refluxed for 15 min, diluted with 20 ml distilled
water, and refluxed for additional hour. This solution was then
neutralized with NaOH, cooled to RT, transferred to 3,500 molecular
cellulose tubing, and dialyzed for 24 h (2.times.20 L) against
distilled water, and lyophilized.
[0172] Similarly, other polymers containing various ratios of
amine, butyl and octadecyl groups may be synthesized. Also other
monomers may be incorporated. In particular, t-butyl vinyl ether,
dodecyl vinylether, and oleic vinylether have been incorporated
into polymers.
[0173] In one embodiment, the amine/lower alkyl/higher alkyl
poly(vinyl ether) terpolymers can be synthesized using monomers at
a feed ratio of 15 amine monomer:4 lower alkyl monomer:1 higher
alkyl monomer. Under the conditions described above, the
incorporation ratio was determined to be about 5.4-7.5 amine
monomer:3-3.5 lower alkyl monomer:1 higher alkyl monomer. In
another embodiment, the amine/lower alkyl/higher alkyl poly(vinyl
ether) terpolymers are synthesized using monomers at a feed ratio
of 4-8 amine monomer:3-5 lower alkyl monomer:1 higher alkyl
monomer. In a preferred embodiment, the polymers are water soluble
(about 1 mg/ml or greater at 25.degree. C.) and surface active.
[0174] In one embodiment, the polymers are fractionated to yield
polymers of molecule weight of about 5 kDa to about 50 kDa, and
more preferably about 10 kDa to about 30 kDa.
E. Other terpolymers. Similar polymers can be synthesized of
modification of different base polymers, including, but not limited
to: poly-L-lysine (PLL), poly(vinyl amine) (PVA), and poly(allyl
amine) (PAA). By attachment of alkyl groups to different the main
chain of these polymers, terpolymers can by made with a ratio of
amine:lower alkyl:higher alkyl of about 6:3:1. F. Liposome lysis.
10 mg of egg phosphatidylcholine was hydrated with 1 ml of buffer
containing 100 mM carboxyfluorescein (CF) and 10 mM HEPES pH 7.5.
Liposomes were then be extruded through 100-nm pores polycarbonate
filters (Nucleopore, Pleasanton, Calif.). Unentrapped CF was
removed by size exclusion chromatography using Sepharose 4B-200
eluting with 10 mM HEPES pH 8. 0.1 M NaCl. A 200 .mu.L aliquot of
the CF-loaded liposomes were added to 1.8 ml of isotonic buffer.
Fluorescence (.lamda..sub.ex=488, .lamda..sub.em=540) was measured
30 min after addition of 0.25 .mu.g of polymers or melittin to
vesicle suspensions. At the end of each experiment, vesicles were
disrupted by the addition of 40 .mu.l of a 1% Triton X-100 solution
to determine maximal lysis.
Example 3
Masking Agents
[0175] A. Synthesis of 2-propionic-3-methylmaleic anhydride
(carboxydimethylmaleic anhydride or CDM). To a suspension of sodium
hydride (0.58 g, 25 mmol) in 50 ml anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was
added triethyl-2-phosphonopropionate (7.1 g, 30 mmol). After
evolution of hydrogen gas had stopped, dimethyl-2-oxoglutarate (3.5
g, 20 mmol) in 10 ml anhydrous tetrahydrofuran was added and
stirred for 30 min. Water, 10 ml, was then added and the
tetrahydrofuran was removed by rotary evaporation. The resulting
solid and water mixture was extracted with 3.times.50 ml ethyl
ether. The ether extractions were combined, dried with magnesium
sulfate, and concentrated to a light yellow oil. The oil was
purified by silica gel chromatography elution with 2:1 ether:hexane
to yield 4 g (82% yield) of pure triester. The
2-propionic-3-methylmaleic anhydride was then formed by dissolving
of this triester into 50 ml of a 50/50 mixture of water and ethanol
containing 4.5 g (5 equivalents) of potassium hydroxide. This
solution was heated to reflux for 1 h. The ethanol was then removed
by rotary evaporation and the solution was acidified to pH 2 with
hydrochloric acid. This aqueous solution was then extracted with
200 ml ethyl acetate, which was isolated, dried with magnesium
sulfate, and concentrated to a white solid. This solid was then
recrystallized from dichloromethane and hexane to yield 2 g (80%
yield) of 2-propionic-3-methylmaleic anhydride.
[0176] Thioesters, esters and amides may be synthesized from CDM by
conversion of CDM to its acid chloride with oxalyl chloride
followed by the addition of a thiol, ester or amine and pyridine.
CDM and its derivatives are readily modified by methods standard in
the art, to add targeting ligands, steric stabilizers, charged
groups, and other reactive groups. The resultant molecules can be
used to reversibly modify amines.
B. Galactose-containing targeting groups. The most widely-studied
hepatocyte targeting ligands are based on galactose, which is bound
by the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPr) on hepatocytes.
Attachment of galactose has been shown to facilitate hepatocyte
targeting of a few highly water soluble, uncharged polymers,
including: the oligosaccharide chitosan, a polystyrene derivative,
and a polyacrylamide HPMA. Galactose targeting groups are readily
generated using lactose, a galactose-glucose disaccharide, via
modification of the glucose residue. Lactobionic acid (LBA, a
lactose derivative in which the glucose has been oxidized to
gluconic acid) is readily incorporated into a maleic anhydride
derivative using standard amide coupling techniques. FIG. 2 shows
the structure of two LBA derivatives that couple galactose to the
maleic anhydride CDM.
[0177] Maleamate modification converts a positively-charged amine
group into a negatively charged one. This charge modification can
reduce non-specific interaction of the polymer with negatively
charged cells and serum components. However, too much negative
charge can enhance interaction with scavenger receptors. A net
neutral galactose-containing maleic anhydride derivative can be
generated by inserted a positively charged tertiary amine group
into the masking agent, creating a zwitterion. Such a compound,
CDM-Pip-LBA, was generated from the components: CDM,
propylaminopiperazine, and lactobionic acid (FIG. 2).
C. Steric stabilizer CDM-PEG and targeting group CDM-NAG (N-acetyl
galactosamine) syntheses (FIG. 2). To a solution of CDM (Rozema
2003) (300 mg, 0.16 mmol) in 50 ml methylene chloride was added
oxalyl chloride (2 g, 10 wt. eq.) and dimethylformamide (5 .mu.l).
The reaction was allowed to proceed overnight at which time the
excess oxalyl chloride and methylene chloride were removed by
rotary evaporation to yield the CDM acid chloride. The acid
chloride was dissolved in 1 ml of methylene chloride. To this
solution was added 1.1 molar equivalents polyethylene glycol
monomethyl ether (MW average 450) for CDM-PEG or
(aminoethoxy)ethoxy-2-(acetylamino)-2-deoxy-.beta.-D-glucopyranoside
(i.e. amino bisethoxylethyl NAG) for CDM-NAG, and pyridine (200
.mu.l, 1.5 eq) in 10 ml of methylene chloride. The solution was
then stirred 1.5 h. The solvent was then removed and the resulting
solid was dissolved into 5 ml of water and purified using
reverse-phase HPLC using a 0.1% TFA water/acetonitrile gradient
(FIG. 2).
Example 4
Reversible Attachment of Polynucleotide to Polymer
[0178] Modification of amino siRNA oligos with S-acetyl groups
resulted in stable protected thiols that could be released in a
basic solution (pH.gtoreq.9) in the presence of an amine-containing
polycation. Standard deprotection conditions in the art for removal
of a thioester group require incubation with a highly reactive
amine, such as hydroxylamine or hydrazine. This highly reactive
amine removes the acetyl protecting group from the thiol. Removal
of the protecting group is required to attach the siRNA to a
polymer, however, these deprotection conditions result in
significant siRNA disulfide dimer formation. Because the goal is to
attach the siRNA to the polymer, siRNA disulfide dimer formation is
undesirable. We have no found that in the presence of a
polycationic amine, such as the described polymers, omission of the
highly reactive amine results in efficient attachment of the
polynucleotide to the polymer with significantly reduces
polynucleotide disulfide dimmer formation. While the reaction
between an alkyl amine and thioester is typically relatively slow,
in a complex between polyanionic siRNA and a polycationic amine,
the nucleophilic amine groups of the polymer are forced into close
proximity to the acetyl group of the thioester and the reaction
between functional groups became essentially intramolecular and
greatly accelerated (see Step 2a in FIG. 3). In addition to
accelerating the deprotection, the released thiol's reaction with
activated disulfide groups on the polycation was greatly enhanced
(Step 2b). The activated disulfide pyridyldithiol (PD) insured
selective disulfide formation, and was easily attached to the
polycation using commercially available reagents. The result of
these intra-particle reactions was >90% conjugation of disulfide
to polycation.
Example 5
Reversible Conjugation of Polynucleotide to Polymer
[0179] A. SATA modified polynucleotide.
N-succinimidyl-5-acetylthioacetate (SATA)-modified polynucleotides
were synthesized by reaction of 5' amine-modified siRNA with 1
weight equivalents (wt. eq.) of SATA reagent (Pierce) and 0.36 wt.
eq. of NaHCO.sub.3 in water at 4.degree. C. for 16 h. The protected
thiol modified siRNAs were precipitated by the addition of 9
volumes of ethanol and incubation at -78.degree. C. for 2 h. The
precipitate was isolated, dissolved in 1.times. siRNA buffer
(Dharmacon), and quantitated by measuring absorbance at the 260 nm
wavelength.
[0180] Polymer, in this example PBAVE or DW1360 (30 mg/ml in 5 mM
TAPS pH 9), was modified by addition of 1.5 wt %
4-succinimidyloxycarbonyl-.alpha.-methyl-.alpha.-[2-pyridyldithio]-toluen-
e (SMPT, Pierce). 1 h after addition of SMPT, 0.8 mg of
SMPT-polymer was added to 400 .mu.l isotonic glucose solution
containing 5 mM TAPS pH 9. To this solution was added 50 .mu.g of
SATA-modified siRNA. For the dose response experiments where PBAVE
concentration was constant, different amounts of siRNA were added.
The mixture was then incubated for 16 h. In this way, the
polynucleotide was conjugated to the polymer via a reversible
disulfide bone. A disulfide bond for conjugation between the
polymer and siRNA provides for reversibility in the reducing
environment of the cytoplasm. The siRNA-polymer conjugate was
masked by adding to the solution 5.6 mg of HEPES free base followed
by a mixture of 3.7 mg CDM-NAG and 1.9 mg CDM-PEG. The solution was
then incubated 1 h at room temperature (RT) before injection.
B. Quantitation of conjugated polynucleotide. To quantify the
amount of conjugated siRNA, 10 .mu.l aliquots of siRNA-polymer
conjugate containing 1 .mu.g siRNA were treated with 2 .mu.l of 1 M
DTT or with no additive at RT for 16 h. 100 .mu.g polyacrylic acid
and 300 .mu.g NaCl were added to the samples to neutralize
electrostatic interactions. After a 2 h incubation, the samples
were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel and the siRNA visualized
by staining with ethidium bromide. The siRNA bands were quantified
using Kodak Molecular Imaging Software v4.0. The amount of siRNA
unconjugated was normalized to the amount released upon DTT
treatment to determine percent conjugated. The amount of conjugated
siRNA was typically 70-90%.
[0181] Other disulfide conjugation chemistry may be used wherein
the thiol is protected as a disulfide or not protected at all.
Additionally, the polymer may be modified with other activated
disulfide groups, thiol groups, or protected thiol groups.
Example 6
Reversible Attachment of CDM-Masking Agents to
Polynucleotide-Polymers Conjugates
[0182] The polynucleotide-polymer conjugates may be modified, such
as with maleic acid derivatives, to reversibly modify the polymer
(FIG. 3, Step 4.). The siRNA-polymer conjugate was masked by adding
to the solution 5.6 mg of HEPES free base followed by a mixture of
3.7 mg CDM-NAG and 1.9 mg CDM-PEG. The solution was then incubated
1 h at room temperature (RT) before in vivo injection.
Example 7
Targeting Activity of Masked Conjugates
[0183] To demonstrate the ability of CDM-PIP-LBA
(galactose-containing) agents to enable liver targeting of the
amphipathic poly(vinyl ether) 25/75 (25:75 butyl:amine) PBAVE, the
polymer was labeled with the fluorophore Cy3 followed by
modification with CDM-PEG and with or without CDM-Pip-LBA. 100
.mu.g masked polymer in 400 .mu.l isotonic glucose was injected
into the tail vein of mice. Liver samples were removed 1 h after
injection and frozen liver sections were prepared and processed for
immunohistochemistry (FIG. 4). As shown in FIG. 4, CDM-Pip-LBA
targeted polymer was extensively located within hepatocytes (B)
whereas the untargeted polymer was localized primarily with
macrophages of the liver (A).
[0184] CDM-LBA modified PBAVE is highly anionic and was found
primarily with macrophages (not shown). CDM-Pip-LBA (zwitterionic
masking agent) modified polymers were near neutral and exhibited an
increase in the amount of polymer targeted to the liver as a whole
and, more importantly, to hepatocytes in particular (FIG. 4B). It
is also possible to shield charge, such as negative charge, with
steric stabilizers, including CDM-PEG masking agents.
Example 8
Targeting of Polynucleotide to Hepatocytes
[0185] An oligonucleotide-polymer conjugate was made as described
above and masked with CDM-Pip-LBA. 20 .mu.g of SATA/Cy3 modified
siRNA was conjugated to 1.8 mg of PD-modified PLL and modified with
CDM-Pip-LBA. The masked conjugate was injected in 400 .mu.L of
saline into the tail vein of a mouse. In the same injection
solution was 100 .mu.g of CDM-Pip-LBA-modified 25/75-PBAVE labeled
with Oregon Green. The conjugates were soluble and nonaggregating
in physiological conditions. 1 h postinjection, the liver was
harvested and frozen liver sections were prepared and processed for
immunohistochemistry. TO-PRO-3 was used to stain cell nuclei. After
injection of into the tail vein of mice, labeled oligonucleotide
and PBAVE were observed in hepatocytes (top left panel of FIG.
5).
Example 9
In Vivo Activity of Conjugate
[0186] The ability of the masked polynucleotide-polymer conjugates
to deliver siRNA for the inhibition of an endogenous gene in mouse
liver, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARa),
was assessed. C57B mice (n=4) were injected with CDM-Pip-LBA
modified PPARa siRNA-PLL conjugate (20 .mu.g siRNA, 1.8 mg PD-PLL)
and 25/75-PBAVE (100 .mu.g) in 400 .mu.L of isotonic glucose via
the tail vein. RNA was prepared from liver 48 h after injection.
PPARa mRNA levels were determined using a quantitative real-time
PCR (qRT-PCR). mRNA levels were normalized to animals injected with
anti-luciferase siRNA. Changes to mRNA levels were normalized to
endogenous GAPDH. Three independent experiments were performed. As
shown in FIG. 6, a 20% inhibition of PPARa mRNA levels was
obtained.
Example 10
In Vivo Delivery/Activity of Conjugate
[0187] Six to eight week old male mice (strain C57BL/6, 20-25 g)
were obtained from Harlan Sprague Dawley (Indianapolis, Ind.). Mice
were housed at least 10 days prior to injection. Feeding was
performed ad libitu with Harlan Teklad Rodent Diet (Harlan, Madison
Wis.). Mice were infused with into the tail vein in a total volume
of 0.4 ml injection HEPES-buffered (5 mM pH 7.5) isotonic glucose.
Mice were injected with either DNA or siRNA conjugates.
[0188] Mice were fasted for 4 h prior to serum collection by
retro-orbital bleed and liver harvest. Serum for use in Western
assays was collected and added to an equal volume of Complete
Protease Inhibitor Cocktail containing EDTA (Roche, Indianapolis
Ind.) and stored at -20.degree. C. Total RNA was isolated from
liver immediately after harvest using TRI-REAGENT.RTM. according to
the manufacturer's protocol (Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati
Ohio).
[0189] For analysis of hepatocyte targeting, polyconjugate
containing 10 .mu.g of Cy3-labeled, 21-mer dsDNA was formulated as
described above in a total volume of 0.2 ml and delivered into male
ICR mice (20-25 g, Harlan Sprague Dawley) by i.v. injection. 1 h
after injection, mice were sacrificed and liver samples were
excised. In some experiments, tissue samples from lung, kidney,
spleen, brain and pancreas were also excised. Tissue samples were
fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 6 h and then placed into a 30%
sucrose/PBS solution overnight at 4.degree. C. Fixed tissue samples
were then placed into block holders containing OCT freezing medium
(Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pa.) and snap frozen in liquid
nitrogen. Frozen tissue sections (8-10 .mu.m) were prepared using a
Microm HM 505N cryostat (Carl Zeiss, Thornwood, N.Y.) and placed
onto Superfrost-Plus microscope slides (Fisher Scientific). Tissue
sections were counterstained with ALEXA.RTM.-488 phalloidin (13 nM,
Invitrogen, Carlsbad Calif.) and TO-PRO-3 (40 nM, Invitrogen) in
PBS for 20 min. The slides were mounted in Vectashield (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame Calif.) and analyzed by a LSM510 confocal
microscope (Carl Zeiss).
[0190] Confocal micrographs of liver sections taken from mice 1 h
after injection with polynucleotide-polymer conjugate containing a
Cy3-labeled, 21-mer double stranded DNA are shown in FIG. 7 (upper
left quadrant in each panel). Actin is shown in the upper right
quadrants to indicate cell outlines. Nuclei are shown in the lower
left quadrants. Merged pictures are shown in the lower right
quadrants. Accumulation of the Cy3-labeled dsDNA in hepatocytes was
observed when the polymer contained the NAG targeting moiety, with
minimal uptake by Kupffer cells or accumulation in liver sinusoids
(FIG. 7A). Distribution was nearly homogenous throughout the
different lobes of the liver. Inspection of other organs revealed
minor Cy3-fluorescence in spleen and kidney, at levels estimated to
be at least 20-fold lower than in liver. Injection of unconjugated
polynucleotide+polymer or replacement of CDM-NAG on the delivery
vehicle with CDM-glucose resulted in markedly reduced hepatocyte
uptake and increased uptake by spleen and kidney (FIGS. 7B and 7C,
respectively), which is consistent with glucose's low affinity for
the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Replacement of CDM-NAG on the
delivery vehicle with CDM-mannose resulted in increased macrophage
and liver endothelial cell targeting (FIG. 7D).
Quantitative PCR and Invader Assays. In preparation for
quantitative PCR, total RNA (500 ng) was reverse transcribed using
SUPERSCRIPT III.RTM. (Invitrogen) and oligo-dT primers according to
the manufacturer's protocol. Quantitative PCR was performed by
using a Model 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems,
Foster City Calif.). TAQMAN.RTM. Gene Expression Assays for apoB
and ppara were used in biplex reactions in triplicate with GAPDH
mRNA primers and probe using TAQMAN.RTM. Universal PCR Master Mix
(Applied Biosystems). The sequence of the GAPDH primers and probe
(IDT, Coralville Iowa) were:
TABLE-US-00002 GAPDH-forward 5'-AAATGGTGAAGGTCGGTGTG-3',; SEQ ID 11
GAPDH-reverse 5'-CATGTAGTTGAGGTCAATGAAGG-3',; SEQ ID 12 GAPDH-probe
5'-Hex/CGTGCCGCCTGGAGAAACCTGCC/BHQ-3',. SEQ ID 13
[0191] Direct measurements of ppara mRNA levels were performed
using a custom designed INVADER.RTM. mRNA assay according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Third Wave Technologies, Madison
Wis.). Biplex reactions were performed in triplicate using the
probe set for ubiquitin according to the manufacturer's
instructions.
ApoB western, cytokine assays and liver toxicity and metabolic
panels. Separation of serum proteins (0.1 .mu.l) was accomplished
by electrophoresis on 3-8% polyacrylamide/SDS gels. The separated
proteins were electrophoretically transferred to PVDF membrane
followed by incubation with a 1:5000 dilution of a rabbit
polyclonal anti-ApoB antibody (Biodesign International, Saco Me.).
The blot was then incubated with a 1:80,000 dilution of goat
anti-rabbit antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma),
and antibody binding was detected using enhanced chemiluminescent
detection kit (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway N.J.). Serum levels
of the mouse cytokines TNF-.alpha. and IL-6 were measured by
sandwich ELISA using reagents according to the manufacturer's
instructions (R&D Systems, Minneapolis Minn.). Serum levels of
mouse IFN-.alpha. were measured using a sandwich ELISA kit
according to the manufacturer's instructions (PBL Biomedical,
Piscataway N.J.). Serum levels of ALT, AST, cholesterol, and
triglycerides were measured using automated systems at the
Marshfield Clinic Laboratories Veterinary Diagnostic Division
(Marshfield Wis.).
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 1 Serum Levels of Cytokines and Liver Enzymes
in siRNA Conjugate-Treated Mice. TNF-.alpha. IL-6 IFN-.alpha. ALT
AST Treatment (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (U/L) (U/L) Saline 6 h <6
<2 206 .+-. 51 48 h <6 <2 321 .+-. 77 60 .+-. 21 149 .+-.
21 Control 6 h 7.9 .+-. 2.9 60.2 .+-. 2.4 207 .+-. 86 siRNA 48 h
<6 4.0 .+-. 1.3 211 .+-. 16 97 .+-. 26 176 .+-. 62 apoB-1 6 h
57.9 .+-. 7.2 48.6 .+-. 2.5 494 .+-. 165 siRNA 48 h <6 <2 257
.+-. 70 71 .+-. 30 144 .+-. 34 n = 5, data are shown as mean .+-.
s.d.
Example 11
Knockdown of Target Genes in Liver of Mice
[0192] To demonstrate the ability of the system to deliver siRNA
and knockdown target gene expression in vivo, conjugate containing
apoB-1 siRNA (800 .mu.g polymer, 50 .mu.g siRNA) was injected into
C57B1/6 mice. As in the in vivo targeting studies, the siRNA
conjugate was administered by tail vein infusion. Livers from
injected mice were harvested two days after injection and assayed
for apoB mRNA levels using reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR
(RT-qPCR). The apoB mRNA levels were measured relative to the level
of GAPDH mRNA and .mu.g total input RNA, in order to reduce the
possibility that any differences in relative apoB mRNA levels were
due to nonspecific effects on housekeeping gene expression. As
shown in FIG. 8A, mice treated with apoB-1 siRNA conjugate had
significantly reduced apoB mRNA levels compared to mice receiving a
non-apoB control siRNA or mice injected with saline only (n=5,
p<0.00001), as measured two days after injection. Specifically,
the mean apoB mRNA level in mice receiving apoB-1 siRNA conjugate
was reduced by 76.+-.14% compared to the saline treated group
relative to GAPDH mRNA levels, whereas apoB mRNA levels in mice
injected with the control siRNA were unaffected. Similar results
were obtained if apoB mRNA levels were measured relative to total
RNA. Western blot analysis of apoB-100 protein levels in serum
reflected the reduction in liver apoB mRNA levels (FIG. 8B).
[0193] To confirm the specificity of the apoB knockdown, a separate
group of mice was treated with an siRNA targeting a different
region of the apoB mRNA. Mice receiving apoB-2 siRNA conjugate also
exhibited a significant reduction in apoB mRNA levels (60.+-.6%
reduction, n=5, p<0.00001, FIG. 8A). Western blot analysis of
apoB-100 protein levels in serum reflected the reduction in liver
apoB mRNA levels (FIG. 8B). ApoB mRNA expression was not reduced in
the jejunum, another tissue that expresses the apoB gene,
suggesting that the conjugate did not target this tissue. This
tissue-specific activity is consistent with hepatocyte
targeting.
[0194] We also prepared conjugates containing siRNAs targeting
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (ppara), a gene
important in controlling fatty acid metabolism in liver (Kersten
1999, Schoonjans 1996). Delivery of two different siRNAs targeting
ppara resulted in significant knockdown of ppara mRNA levels, as
assayed by two independent methods for quantifying mRNA levels
(FIG. 8C). Relative to mice receiving a control siRNA, ppara mRNA
levels in mice receiving ppara-1 siRNA were reduced by between
40.+-.9% and 64.+-.9%, as assayed by IINVADER.RTM. or RT-qPCR,
respectively. A similar reduction in ppara mRNA levels was observed
in mice injected with delivery vehicle containing ppara-2 siRNA,
which targets a separate region of the ppara mRNA sequence.
[0195] The potential toxicity of the delivery system was assessed
by measuring serum levels of liver enzymes and cytokines. Slight
elevations of ALT and AST levels were detected in mice receiving
control siRNA or apoB-1 siRNA conjugates as compared to
saline-treated mice, 48 h after injection. However, the increased
levels were not significant (p<0.05) and histological
examination of liver sections did not reveal signs of liver
toxicity. Similarly, analysis of TNF-.alpha. and IL-6 levels in
serum using ELISA revealed that both were slightly elevated 6 h
after injection of siRNA-polymer conjugate, but returned to
baseline by 48 h. The increases observed at 6 h would not be
expected to cause significant immune stimulation and are at least
four orders of magnitude lower than those observed upon stimulation
with lipopolysaccharide (Matsumoto 1998, Matsuzaki 2001) and one to
three orders of magnitude lower than after injection of adenovirus
(Lieber 1997, Benihoud 2007). No significant differences in serum
levels of INF-.alpha. were detected at any of the timepoints,
except for a slight increase at 6 h after injection of apoB-1 siRNA
conjugate. These results indicate the targeted delivery system is
well-tolerated.
Example 12
Dose-Response and Phenotypic Analysis
[0196] We performed dose-response studies in two ways: by
decreasing the amount of siRNA conjugate delivered to the mice or
by holding the amount of polymer constant but decreasing the amount
of conjugated siRNA. By comparing the results of these experiments,
we hoped to determine which of the two components of the delivery
vehicle was limiting for delivery: the endosomolytic polymer or the
siRNA itself.
[0197] Injection of simple serial dilutions of the apoB-1 siRNA
conjugate into mice led to a progressive decrease in the amount of
knockdown of liver apoB mRNA (FIG. 9A). At the highest injected
dose (800 .mu.g polymer, 50 .mu.g siRNA, i.e. 2.5 mg/kg), apoB mRNA
levels in the liver were reduced 84.+-.5% relative to GAPDH mRNA on
Day 2 postinjection compared to mice injected with saline only.
Similar results were obtained when apoB mRNA levels were measured
relative to total RNA. Injection of two-fold less siRNA conjugate
(400 .mu.g polymer, 25 .mu.g siRNA) resulted in a 50.+-.8%
reduction in relative apoB mRNA levels. Injection of four-fold less
resulted in no apoB knockdown as compared to the saline control
group. Holding the amount of polymer constant but decreasing the
amount of apoB-1 siRNA conjugated to the delivery vehicle led to
quantitatively similar results to those obtained from serial
dilutions (FIG. 9B). This finding suggests that the amount of
endosomolytic polymer present in the delivery vehicle is not the
limiting factor for the knockdown observed, but rather it is the
amount, or potency, of the siRNA conjugated to it.
[0198] A hallmark of apoB deficiency is decreased serum cholesterol
levels due to impairment of VLDL assembly and cholesterol transport
from the liver (Burnett Zimmermann 2006). To determine if the level
of knockdown of apoB shown in FIG. 10 was sufficient to elicit a
physiological response in these mice, we measured their total serum
cholesterol levels. At the highest delivered siRNA dose (50 .mu.g),
we observed a significant decrease in mean serum cholesterol levels
(30.+-.7%, n=5, p<0.001) relative to mice receiving a control
siRNA or saline only (FIG. 10). Similar results were obtained in
animals treated with apoB-2 siRNA conjugate. Decreasing the amount
of siRNA delivered led to a progressive decrease in the amount of
cholesterol lowering observed, consistent with decreased apoB mRNA
knockdown measured in these animals.
[0199] Impairment of VLDL assembly in the liver and the resultant
decrease in VLDL export might also be expected to alter hepatic
triglyceride levels because triglycerides are also incorporated
into VLDL particles (Gibbons 2004). Indeed, transgenic mice
expressing a truncated form of apoB, similar to the version found
in patients with familial hypobetalipoproteinemia, also display a
reduced capacity to transport hepatic triglycerides (Chen 2000). In
order to assess the effects of apoB knockdown on triglyceride
transport, we performed oil red staining of liver sections obtained
from mice injected with apoB-1 siRNA conjugate. Inspection of the
liver sections revealed dramatically increased hepatic lipid
content compared to control mice (FIG. 11). Panel A shows a mouse
treated with ApoB siRNA. Panel B shows a mouse treated with
negative control GL3 siRNA. Panel C shows a mouse injected with
saline alone. Decreased serum triglyceride levels were also
detected in these mice, providing further evidence for diminished
hepatic triglyceride export capacity. Together, these results
indicate that simple i.v. injection of apoB-1 siRNA conjugate
results in functional delivery of the polynucleotide to hepatocyte
and therefore knockdown of expression of apoB in the liver with
expected phenotypic effects.
[0200] For analysis of liver fat accumulation, liver samples from
siRNA-conjugate-treated and control mice were frozen in OCT
freezing medium and frozen tissue sections (8-10 .mu.m) were
prepared as described above. Air dried tissue sections were fixed
in 4% formaldehyde/PBS for 20 min, rinsed in several changes of
distilled water, and then rinsed briefly with 60% isopropanol. Oil
red 0 stock solution was prepared by mixing 0.5 g of oil red 0 in
100 ml of isopropanol overnight and filtered using Whatman #1
filter papers. Oil red 0 working solution was prepared by mixing 20
ml of water with 30 ml of oil red 0 stock solution and filtered
using a 0.2 .mu.m Nalgene filtration unit (Fisher Scientific). The
fixed sections were stained with freshly prepared oil red 0 working
solution for 15 min, rinsed briefly with 60% isopropanol.
Counterstaining of nuclei was performed by dipping the slides into
Harris modified hematoxylin solution (Sigma, St. Louis Mo.) 7 times
and rinsed in distilled water. Rinsed slides were then mounted with
Gel Mount (Biomedia Corp., Foster City Calif.). Stained slides were
analyzed using a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope equipped with a
digital camera (Axiocam, Carl Zeiss). Digital images were captured
using the AxioVision software (Carl Zeiss).
Example 13
Delivery of siRNA by Conjugation to Membrane Active Polymer by a
CDM or Disulfide Labile Linkage
[0201] Disulfide Conjugate: 50 ng of siRNA targeted against
luciferase that had a 5'-amino group on the sense strand was
reacted with 1 .mu.g of N-succinimidyl-S-acetylthioacetate in the
presence of HEPES base pH 7.5. Separately, 50 .mu.g of a poly(vinyl
ether) synthesized from a 50/50 mixture of amine-protected and
butyl vinyl ether monomers was reacted with 5 .mu.g of
3-(2-pyridyldithio)propionic acid N-hydroxysuccinimide ester in the
presence of HEPES pH 7.5. The modified siRNA and modified polymer
were then combined to allow covalent attachment of the siRNA to the
polymer. After 6-24 h, the polymer-siRNA conjugate was reacted with
200 .mu.g of 2-propionic-3-methylmaleic anhydride in the presence
of HEPES base. The particles were added to a mouse hepatocyte HEPA
cell line that stably expresses the luciferase gene. As a control,
samples containing CDM-modified polymer (without siRNA) were added
to cells. In cells exposed to the polymer-polynucleotide conjugate,
luciferase expression was suppressed 75% relative to cells exposed
to polymer alone, indicating delivery of functional siRNA to the
cells.
CDM Conjugate: 50 ng of siRNA targeted against luciferase that had
a 5'-amino group on the sense strand was reacted with 2 .mu.g of
CDM thioester in the presence of HEPES pH 7.9. To the siRNA was
added 50 .mu.g of a poly(vinyl ether) synthesized from a 50/50
mixture of amine-protected and butyl vinyl ether monomers. After
6-24 h, the polymer-siRNA conjugate was reacted with 200 .mu.g of
2-propionic-3-methylmaleic anhydride in the presence of HEPES base.
The particles were added to a mouse hepatocyte HEPA cell line that
stably expresses the luciferase gene. As a control, samples
containing CDM-modified polymer (without siRNA) were added to
cells. In cells exposed to the polymer-polynucleotide conjugate,
luciferase expression was suppressed 86% relative to cells exposed
to polymer alone, indicating delivery of functional siRNA to the
cells.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 2 Percent inhibition of luciferase activity
following transfection of HEPA-Luc cells using membrane active
polymer-siRNA conjugates. Disulfide Conjugation CDM Conjugation 75%
86%
Example 14
Longevity of apoB Knockdown and its Phenotypic Effect
[0202] We performed a timecourse experiment to determine the
duration of apoB knockdown and cholesterol lowering in mice after
injection of a single dose of apoB-1 siRNA conjugate. Consistent
with our results described in the previous sections, injection of
apoB-1 siRNA conjugate (800 .mu.g polymer, 50 .mu.g siRNA) resulted
in reduction of mean apoB mRNA levels by 87.+-.8% on Day 2 relative
to control mice (FIG. 12A). The reduction in apoB expression was
accompanied by a 42.+-.5% reduction in total serum cholesterol
levels (FIG. 12B). Decreases in apoB mRNA expression remained
significant through Day 10, and had returned to near control levels
by Day 15. Reduction in serum cholesterol remained significant
through Day 4 (n=5, p<0.01), and did not fully recover to
control levels until Day 10. These results indicate that sustained
apoB knockdown and the generation of the phenotype can be achieved
after a single injection of siRNA conjugate, and that the phenotype
can be reversed as apoB expression returns to normal over time.
Example 15
The Delivery of Phosphorodiamidate Morpholino Oligonucleotide (PMO)
to Cells Using Polymer-PMO Conjugates
[0203] Using the CDM-thioester based crosslinking used to link
siRNA and polymer, it is also possible to reversibly conjugate
other types of oligonucleotides to polymers. In particular, we
studied the delivery of PMO to cells. 5 nmol of amino-PMO (which
blocks a mutant splice site in the mutant Luciferase transcript)
either bare or hybridized with a complimentary strand of DNA was
reacted with nothing or with 2 .mu.g of CDM thioester in the
presence of HEPES pH 7.9. To this was added 200 .mu.g of polyvinyl
ether synthesized from 50% amino vinylether, 45% butyl vinylether
and 5% dodecylvinylether (DW550). After three or more hours the
polymer+PMO or polymer-PMO conjugate was reacted with 500 .mu.g of
CDM in the presence of HEPES to maintain pH>7.5. In addition to
CDM, the conjugates were reacted with PEG esters of CDM, which are
derived from the acid chloride of CDM and PEG monomethyl ethers of
various molecular weights.
[0204] The conjugates were then added HeLa Luc/705 cells (Gene
Tools, Philomath Oreg.) grown under conditions used for HeLa cells.
The cells were plated in 24-well culture dishes at a density of
3.times.10.sup.6 cells/well and incubated for 24 h. Media were
replaced with 1.0 ml DMEM containing 2.5 nmol amino-PMO complexes.
The cells were incubated for 4 h in a humidified, 5% CO.sub.2
incubator at 37.degree. C. The media was then replaced with DMEM
containing 10% fetal bovine serum. The cells were then incubated
for an additional 48 h. The cells were then harvested and the
lysates were then assayed for luciferase expression. The results
demonstrate enhanced delivery of the uncharged polynucleotide when
the transfection agent is a DW550 poly(vinyl ether) polymer-PMO
conjugate.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 3 Delivery of uncharged polynucleotides to
cells Fold induction Transfection vehicle of luciferase no linkage
DW550 + bare PMO 2 DW550 + PMO hybridized with DNA 2 polymer-PMO
conjugate DW550-CDM-barePMO 7.5 DW550-CDM-hybridized PMO 10
Example 16
Conjugate Delivery of siRNA to Muscle
[0205] 40 .mu.g PPARa siRNA or control (GL3) siRNA was conjugated
to PBAVE polymer and masked as described above. 250 .mu.l conjugate
was injected into the gastrocnemius muscle in mice (n=3). Injection
rate was about 25 .mu.l/sec. PPARa expression levels were
determined as described above.
TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 4 PPARa inhibition in muscle following direct
injection of masked conjugate. siRNA PPARa mRNA levels relative to:
conjugate GAPDH mRNA total mRNA GL3 1.00 .+-. 0.26 1.00 .+-. 0.15
PPARa 0.62 .+-. 0.07 0.54 .+-. 0.13
Example 17
In Vivo Delivery of siRNA Expression Cassette
[0206] 20 .mu.g of PCR-generated linear SEAP siRNA expression
cassette, which expresses SEAP siRNA under control of the U6
promoter, was complexed with 400 .mu.g membrane active polymer
DW1453 (composed of polymerization of 75 mol % amino, 21 mol %
lower alkyl (butyl) and 4 mol % higher alkyl (C18, octadecyl)
groups and modified with galactose with lactobionic acid (LBA).
Lactobionylation was performed by addition of 43 mg LBA to 60 mg
polymer followed by addition of 34 mg EDC and 24 mg NHS. As a
control, a cassette expressing luciferase siRNA (GL3) was also
formulated. The DNA was conjugated to the polymer by the addition
of 0.65 weight equivalents of glutaraldehyde. Following conjugation
overnight, the complexes were modified with 40 mole % NHS-acetate
to reduce charge on the polymer.
[0207] 500 .mu.g of lactobionylated DW1453 was modified with 7 wt
equivalents of masking agent CDM-PEG (average 10 units) in the
presence of 14 wt equivalents HEPES base and injected into the tail
vein of mice expressing secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP). 10
min after masked polymer injection, the co-targeted DNA-DW1453
polymer conjugates were injected. On days 1 and 14, blood was drawn
and assayed for SEAP levels.
TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 5 In vivo SEAP expression following injection
of masked conjugate. SEAP activity day 14 relative to siRNA
activity at day 1 SEAP siRNA 48 .+-. 13 GL3 siRNA 87 .+-. 17
Activity was the average of 4 animals .+-. standard deviation.
Example 18
Delivery of Antibodies
[0208] 35 .mu.g of rabbit IGG (Sigma) antibody was modified with 2
wt % SPDP (Pierce). DW1360 (30 mg/ml in 5 mM TAPS pH 9) was
modified by addition of 2 wt % iminothiolane. 530 .mu.g of
iminothiolane-PBAVE was added to 400 .mu.l isotonic glucose
solution containing 5 mM TAPS pH 9. To this solution was added 35
.mu.g of SPDP-modified antibody. After 16 h, the antibody-polymer
conjugate was modified with 7 wt eq of a 2:1 mixture of CDM-NAG and
CDM-PEG. The conjugate was injected into the tail vein of a mouse.
20 min post-injection, the mouse was sacrificed and the liver was
harvested and processed for microscopic analysis. Examination of
the liver tissue indicated significant accumulation of antibody in
hepatocytes (FIG. 13). Upper left quadrant shows labeled
antibodies, Upper right quadrant shows actin, lower left quadrant
shows nuclei, and lower right quadrant shows a composite image.
Example 19
Masked Polynucleotide-Polymer Conjugate as In Vitro Transfection
Reagent
[0209] Primary hepatocytes were harvested from adult mice (strain
C57BL/6) using the two-step collagenase perfusion procedure as
previously described (Klaunig 1981). Hepatocyte viability was
85-90% as determined by Trypan Blue exclusion. Hepatocytes were
plated at a density of 1.5.times.10.sup.5 cells per well in
collagen coated 12-well plates in 1 ml of media containing 10%
fetal calf serum. 24 h after plating, cells in triplicate wells
were transfected without media change with siRNA using
TRANSIT-SIQUEST.RTM. (Mirus Bio, Madison Wis.) according to the
manufacturer's protocol, or with different amounts of siRNA
conjugate. Hepatocytes were harvested 24 h after transfection and
total RNA was isolated with TRIREAGENT.RTM. Reagent (Molecular
Research Center, Cincinnati Ohio).
[0210] To demonstrate the in vitro transfection properties of the
described masked polynucleotide-polymer conjugates, apolipoprotein
B (apoB)-specific siRNA was delivered to primary hepatocytes using
commercially available siRNA transfection reagents or the described
polynucleotide conjugates. Transfection of the primary hepatocytes
with the conjugate was highly effective, resulting in nearly 80%
knockdown of apoB mRNA (FIG. 14). The level of siRNA delivery, as
measured by target gene knockdown was comparable to that achieved
with the commercial reagent SIQUEST.RTM.. As predicted, decreasing
the amount of conjugate added to the cells led to progressively
decreased apoB knockdown.
Example 20
Masked Polynucleotide-Polymer Conjugate as In Vitro Transfection
Reagent
[0211] Hepa-1c1c7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding
firefly and renilla luciferases using TRANSIT LT1.RTM. (Mirus Bio).
4 h after plasmid transfection, 100 ng luciferase siRNA conjugated
with 9 .mu.g PD-PLL followed by modification with CDM-Pip-LBA (45
g) was added to cells. For some sample, CDM-Pip-LBA modified
25/75-PBAVE (5 .mu.g) was also added to cells. 48 after addition of
siRNA, the cells were harvested and assayed for firefly and renilla
luciferase. The amount of firefly expression was normalized to
renilla for each sample and to cells not exposed to siRNA for each
group. Alone, PLL-siRNA conjugates are unable to deliver siRNA to
cells in vitro (white bar, FIG. 15). Addition of maleamate-masked,
membrane lytic polymer PBAVE results in activity equal to
commercial transfection reagent (black bar). In general, siRNA and
DNA transfections appear to require excess reagent. Excess
releasing polymer, above that needed to interact with siRNA, may
enhance in vitro and in vivo functional delivery (release from
endosomes). Due to the similar size and charge between
siRNA-polymer conjugates and polymers, they can simultaneously
target hepatocytes in vivo. In support of this expectation, we
observed that coinjection of Cy3-labeled siRNA conjugated to PLL
with Oregon Green-labeled 25/75-PBAVE did indeed colocalize to
hepatocytes (see above).
[0212] The in vitro activity of the siRNA conjugate with delivery
polymers is equal to unconjugated siRNA transfected with commercial
reagent TRANSIT TKO.RTM. (FIG. 15). Experiments in parallel with an
irreversible linkage of siRNA and polymer based upon iodoacetamide
alkylation chemistry (IA-conjugate spotted bar in FIG. 15)
demonstrated that siRNA-polymer conjugates are not active if the
conjugation is not reversible, suggesting that the disulfide bond
must be reduced in order for functional delivery of siRNA (The 20%
knockdown observed is due to the roughly 10% of oligo that was not
conjugated, as determined by gel analysis). The activity observed
for the maleamylated conjugates suggests that, even though the
polymer is no longer positively-charged and interacting with the
oligonucleotide by electrostatic forces, the siRNA-conjugate is
resistant to degradation by nucleases in the serum. Modified siRNA
analogues that are nuclease resistant may also be used.
Example 21
Labile Linkages for Attachment of Masking Agents and
Polynucleotides to a Membrane Active Polymer
[0213] A. pH labile bond with PEG spacer. One embodiment of an
ASGP-R ligand target group may be prepared as follows:
##STR00005##
(Aminoethoxy)ethyl derivatives of
2-acetamido-3,4,6-tri-O-acetyl-2-deoxy-.beta.-D-galactopyranoside
##STR00006##
[0214] N-Acetyl-galactosamine-PEG-methyl maleic anhydride
[0215] Compound I was used as a precursor to create compound II, a
galactose targeting group masking agent capable of reversibly
modifying amine-containing membrane active polymers such as PBAVE
polymers. Reaction of the maleic anhydride with an anime group on
the polymers results in formation of a pH labile linkage between
the galactose and the polymer. Modification of a PBAVE polymer with
compound II results in:
##STR00007##
[0216] Modification of PBAVE amino groups with compound III (0.75:1
compound III to polymer amine molar ratio) and CDM-PEG.sub.500
(0.25 CDM-PEG to polymer amine molar ratio) resulted in a conjugate
which exhibited targeting to hepatocytes in vivo. Varying spacer
lengths of ethylene groups (n=1, 2, 3, or 7) were all effective in
delivering siRNA to hepatocytes in vivo as evidenced by knock down
of target gene expression.
B. pH labile bond with Alkyl spacer. Alkyl spacer groups may also
be used as illustrated in compound V. Alkyl spacers may, however,
increase the hydrophobicity of the masking agent, resulting in
lower solubility of the masking agent and the conjugate.
##STR00008##
N-Acetyl-galactosamine-C.sub.6-methyl maleic anhydride masking
agent
[0217] C. Multivalent targeting groups. Targeting groups with
higher valency may also be utilized. Exemplary embodiments of a
multivalent galactose targeting groups are illustrated below.
Divalent (VI) and trivalent (VII) galactose ligands may have higher
affinity for the ASGP-R.
##STR00009##
D. Negative control targeting ligands. Related targeting groups
which have significantly lower affinity for the target cell may be
used as negative controls to determine efficacy of the preferred
targeting group. As an example, the ASGP-R of hepatocyte binds
galactose, but not glucose. Therefore, a glucose targeting groups
(VIII) may serve as a negative control in cell targeting
assays.
##STR00010##
E. Mannose targeting group. Macrophages and liver Kupffer cells are
known to have receptors which bind mannose saccharides. Therefore,
targeting groups with mannose residues (IX) may be used to target
these cells.
##STR00011##
F. Linkages with varying lability. Linkages of varying lability
(kinetics of cleavage) can be used to connect the masking agent or
polynucleotide to the membrane active polymer.
[0218] For delivery of antisense polynucleotides, it may be
possible to increase the duration of knockdown by decreasing the
rate of polynucleotide release from the conjugate. Disulfide bonds
can be made with varying kinetics of cleavage in the reducing
environment in a typical mammalian cell. A slower release of
masking agent form the polymer may increase circulation time of the
conjugate in vivo. For example, 5-methyl-2-iminothiolane (M2IT,
Linkage X) exhibits a 4.times. slower rate of cleavage than an SMTP
linkage (Compound XI).
##STR00012##
##STR00013##
[0219] The cleavage rate for Compound XII is expected to be about
30.times. slower than for disubstituted maleic anhydride
linkages.
##STR00014##
Example 22
Characterization of PBAVE and Polynucleotide-PBAVE Conjugates
[0220] A. Amphipathic analysis. 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene (DPH,
Invitrogen) fluorescence (.lamda..sub.ex=350 nm; .lamda..sub.em=452
nm) is enhanced in a hydrophobic environment. This fluorophore was
used to analyze the PBAVE (DW1360) polymer. 0.5 .mu.M (final
concentration) DPH was added to 10 .mu.g PBAVE in the presence or
absence of 40 .mu.g plasmid DNA in 0.5 ml 50 mM HEPES buffer, pH
8.0. The solution was then tested for DPH accumulation in a
hydrophobic environment by measuring fluorescence of DPH. Increase
DPH fluorescence in the presence of the conjugates indicates the
formation of a hydrophobic environment by the polymer. Addition of
excess DNA did not significantly alter DPH fluorescence (FIG.
16).
B. Molecular Weight. The molecular weight of DW1360 was determined
using HPLC size exclusion chromatography and a set of
polyethyleneglycols as standards (American Polymer Standard Corp.).
The polymers were separated on a GPC HPLC using a Shodec SB-803 HQ
column with 0.2 M LiClO.sub.4, 5% AcOH in methanol. Elution of the
PBAVE polymer from the column indicated a size average of about
12.8 kDa (FIG. 17) C. Molecular weight of polynucleotide-polymer
conjugate. The molecular weight of masked polynucleotide-polymer
conjugate was determined using FPLC size exclusion chromatography
and Cy3-labeled nucleic acids as standards. The conjugate and
standards were separated on a Shimadzu FPLC at using a 1.times.22
cm Sephacryl S-500 column and eluted with 50 mM HEPES, pH 8.0 at 1
ml/min. Elution of the conjugate from the column indicated a size
average of about 77 kDa (FIG. 18). D. Conjugate stoichiometry. The
average molecular weight of the PBAVE polymer was experimentally
determined to be about 13 kDa. The average molecular weight of the
masked polynucleotide-polymer conjugate was experimentally
determined to be about 77 kDa. The average molecule weight per
charge (amine) of the PBAVE polymer was experimentally determined
to be about 200 Da. The average molecular weight of the CDM masking
agent was calculated to be about 550 Da. The average degree of
modification of the PBAVE polymer was experimentally determined to
be about 75% of available amines. The average molecular weight of
the conjugated siRNA was calculated to be about 14 kDa. Using these
values, the average molecular weight of the CDM-masked PBAVE
polymer masking agent was calculated to be about 30 kDa. Thus, the
likely stoichiometry of siRNA to masked polymer was estimated to be
about 1:2. E. Particle Sizing and Zeta Potential. The sizes of the
conjugates injected in vivo were measured by light scattering at
532 nm using a Brookhaven Instruments Corporation, ZetaPlus
Particle Sizer, 190. Unimodal analysis of peaks varied between 100
and 30 nm. Using multimodal analysis, the peak with the largest
number (>95%) of particles were less than 50 nm and more
typically less than 20 nm. Polyconjugate size can also be measured
using analytical ultracentrifugation or atomic force microscopy. In
the same way the zeta potential of the conjugates were measured
using Brookhaven Instruments Corporation ZetaPALS. The zeta
potential of the CDM-masked conjugates varied between 0 and -30 mV
and more predominantly between 0 and -20 mV. Zeta potential was
measure in isotonic glucose buffered at pH9 with 5 mM TAPS. Stable,
non-aggregating conjugates were also formed with zeta potentials
between 0 and -10 mV and between 0 and -5 mV under the same
conditions. At pH 7, the conjugates would be expected to gain some
positive charge due to protonation of some of the amines.
Example 23
In Vivo Delivery of Conjugate to Human Hepatoma Xenograft in Nude
Mice
[0221] To demonstrate that the described conjugates can be utilized
to target tumor cells CDM-NAG modified oligonucleotide-DW1360
conjugate was injected into mice that had been implanted with human
hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells subcutaneously (SC) on the flank. Six
week old female athymic nude mice were obtained from Harlan Spraque
Dawley (Indianapolis, Ind.). Mice were inoculated with 2 million
HepG2 cells in 300 .mu.l PBS subcutaneously on the left flank.
Control colon carcinoma HT-29 cells (2 million in 300 .mu.l of PBS)
were inoculated SC on the right flank 2 weeks later. Later
injection was to compensate for faster growth rate. When SC tumors
grew to approximately 8 mm in width and length, CDM-NAG and CDM-PEG
modified conjugate containing 10 .mu.g Cy3-labeled 21-mer dsDNA in
200 .mu.l delivery buffer was injected via the tail vein.
[0222] Accumulation of NAG targeted conjugate was observed in a
large percentage of the SC hepatoma tumor mass (30-60%, n=4, FIG.
19A). Representative area of tumor cells showing uptake is shown in
FIG. 19A. A very low level of tumor targeting was observed in mice
receiving glucose targeted conjugate (FIG. 19B, <5% of tumor
mass, n=3). In control colon carcinoma tumors, without galactose
receptor, no tumor cell signal was observed with either NAG or
glucose modified conjugate (FIG. 19 C-D, n=2). Similar results were
also observed using HuH-7 hepatocarcinoma cells to establish
xenografts.
Example 24
Modification of Polymer with Reversible PEG Modification Prior to
Conjugation
[0223] 400 .mu.g of polymer DW1360 (formed from a feed ratio of
75:20:5 amine:butyl:octadecyl vinyl ethers) was modified with 1.5
wt % SMPT. 1 h later 2 wt equivalents of a 2:1 wt:wt mixture of
CDM-NAG (N-acetylgalactoseamine) and CDM-PEG(average 11 unites) was
added to the polymer in the presence of 5.6 mg of HEPES base. To
this solution was added 20 .mu.g of SATA/Cy3-modified 22-mer DNA
oligonucleotides. After overnight incubation, 5 wt equivalents of a
2:1 wt:wt mixture of CDM-NAG and CDM-PEG was added to the
conjugate. The masked conjugate was injected in 400 .mu.l of saline
into the tail vein of a mouse. It was determined that the
modification of polymer with CDM-NAG and CDM-PEG prior to
conjugation did not reduce the conjugation efficiency. 1 h
postinjection, the liver was harvested and frozen liver sections
were prepared and processed for immunohistochemistry. TO-PRO-3.RTM.
was used to stain cell nuclei. After injection of into the tail
vein of mice, labeled oligonucleotide was observed in
hepatocytes.
Example 25
Quantification of Amine Groups in Conjugate after CDM-Reagent
Modification
[0224] Oligonucleotide-DW 1360 conjugate polymer was synthesized as
described previously followed by treatment with 14 wt equivalents
HEPES base and 7 wt equivalents of a 2:1 wt:wt mixture of CDM-NAG
and CDM-PEG (average 11 units). One hour later, the amine content
of the maleic anhydride derivative treated conjugate was measured
by treatment with trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid (TNBS) in 100 mM
NaHCO.sub.3. When normalized to a conjugate that had not been
maleamate modified, it was determined that the amount of modified
amines was about 75% of total. This degree of modification may be
varied by changing the amount of added maleic anhydride.
Example 26
Electrophoresis of Oligonucleotide-Polymer Conjugate and its Maleic
Anhydride Derivatives
[0225] Oligonucleotide-polymer DW1360 conjugates were made as
described previously. The conjugate containing 1 .mu.g of
oligonucleotide was then modified with varying amounts of
CDM-PEG(11 units average) and CDM-NAG. The conjugates were then
placed into agarose gels (2 wt %) and electrophoresed. It was noted
upon staining with ethidium bromide that the conjugates' charge was
altered depending on the equivalents of maleic anhydride derivate
from positive to neutral to negative.
Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Based Polymers
Example 27
Modification of Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0226] To a solution of alcohols A, B, C, and D (varying
equivalents, see below), or amines A, B, C, and D (varying
equivalents, see below) in DMSO (8.0 mL, 70-100.degree. C.), was
added 1,1'-carbonyldiimidazole (CDI, 1 eq) or N,N'-disuccinimidyl
carbonate (DSC, 1 eq). Alternatively, to individual solutions of
alcohols or amines A, B, C, and D in DMSO (2.7 mL, 70-100.degree.
C.), was added CDI (1 eq) or DSC (1 eq). The resulting solution(s)
were stirred for 1 h at 70-100.degree. C. under Argon. In a
separate flask, poly(vinyl alcohol) E (PVAl-16 K, 1.1-1.9%
acylation, Fluka, 100 mg), F (PVAl 10 K, 9-10 K MWt, 80%
hydrolyzed, Sigma), G (PVAl-5K, American Polymer Standards
Corporation), or H (PVAl-7K, American Polymer Standards
Corporation) was dissolved in DMSO (2 mL) at 70-100.degree. C. The
resulting PVAl solution was then added drop wise to the CDI or DSC
activated alcohols or amines (or a combined solution of activated
alcohols and amines), and the resulting solution was stirred at
70-100.degree. C. for 12-16 h. The solution was cooled to ambient
temperature, and polymer was precipitated with diethyl ether (40-90
mL). The resulting solid was dissolved in TFA/TIPS (97.5%, 2.5%) to
remove BOC groups. After 1-2 h, the polymer was again precipitated
with diethyl ether (40-90 mL). The resulting crude polymer was
dissolved with water (20-40 mL) and dialyzed against NaCl in water
(16 h, 3500 MWCO) and again against water (24 h, 3500 MWCO), and
lyophilized. Other poly(alcohols), such as poly(serine) may be
similarly modified.
TABLE-US-00008 TABLE 6 Synthesis of Composition of poly(vinyl
alcohol)-based amphipathic polymers. Mol Eq Mol Ratio (A + B + C):
PVAl Polymer Number A B C D A:B:C:D OH PVAl 2008-01-23-02
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc H.sub.2NC.sub.4H.sub.9
H.sub.2NC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2 E 2008-01-23-03
H.sub.2NC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc H.sub.2NC.sub.4H.sub.9
H.sub.2NC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2 E 2008-01-28-02
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2
E 2008-02-04-01 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 E 2008-02-04-02 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-02-08-04
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
E 2008-02-08-06 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-02-26-01 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 1 F 2008-02-26-02
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2
F 2008-02-26-03 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 3 F 2008-02-26-04 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-02-26-05
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 6
F 2008-02-26-06 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 8 F 2008-02-26-07 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 1 E 2008-02-26-08
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 3
E 2008-02-26-09 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 8 E 2008-02-26-10
H.sub.2NC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37
6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-02-26-11 H.sub.2NC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 E 2008-03-04-01
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37
HOBn.sup.1 6:3:1:0.5 4 F 2008-03-04-02 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:1:1 4 F 2008-03-04-03
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn
6:3:1:1.5 4 F 2008-03-04-04 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:1:2 4 F 2008-03-10-01
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
E 2008-03-10-02 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 E 2008-03-10-03 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-03-10-04
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
F 2008-03-10-06 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2 E 2008-03-17-01 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-03-17-02
HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
F 2008-03-17-03 HOC.sub.4H.sub.8NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 2 F 2008-04-07-01 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F.sup.3 2008-04-07-02
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
F.sup.4 2008-04-07-03 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F.sup.5 2008-04-07-04
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
F.sup.6 2008-04-08-01 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3.5:0.5:0 4 F 2008-04-08-02
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 6:4:0:0 4 F 2008-04-08-03
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.10H.sub.21 6:3:1:0 4
F 2008-04-08-04 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-04-08-04-Ac
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37
6:3:1:0.sup.2 4 F 2008-04-21-01 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:1:0.5 4 G
2008-04-21-02 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:1:1 4 G 2008-04-21-03
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn
6:3:1:0.5 4 H 2008-04-21-04 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:1:1 4 H 2008-04-28-01
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4
G 2008-04-28-02 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 6:3:1:0 4 H 2008-04-28-03 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.12H.sub.25 6:3:1:0 4 F 2008-04-28-04
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.12H.sub.25 6:3:0.5:0
4 F 2008-04-28-05 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.12H.sub.25 6:3:0.5:0 4 F 2008-04-28-06
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn
6:3:0.5:0.5 4 F 2008-04-28-07 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc
HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:0.5:1 4 F
2008-04-28-08 HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9
HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn 6:3:0.25:0.5 4 F 2008-04-28-09
HOC.sub.3H.sub.6NHBoc HOC.sub.4H.sub.9 HOC.sub.18H.sub.37 HOBn
6:3:0.25:1 4 F .sup.1Benzyl alcohol .sup.2Acylation of unmodified
hydroxyl groups .sup.3Size Exclusion fractionation, fraction 1
.sup.4Size Exclusion fractionation, fraction 2 .sup.5Size Exclusion
fractionation, fraction 3 .sup.6Size Exclusion fractionation,
fraction 4
Example 28
In Vitro Knockout Testing of Polymers Derived from Poly(Vinyl
Alcohol)
[0227] Procedure A: RNA was reversibly conjugated to the polymer as
described above. All conjugated polymers were allowed to conjugate
overnight at room temp before transfection. Procedure B: RNA was
not conjugated to the polymer. All polymers were unconjugated and
prepared the morning of the experiment. Unconjugated polymers were
prepared in 5 mM HEPES pH 7.5 buffer, No TAPS solution was
added.
[0228] Hepa-1c1c7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding
firefly and renilla luciferases using TRANSIT-LT1.RTM. (Mirus Bio).
4 h after plasmid transfection, 100 ng luciferase siRNA (GL3 siRNA)
and various amounts of polymers (conjugated, procedure A;
unconjugated, procedure B) were added to the cells in 24 well
plates. 48 h after addition of siRNA, the cells were harvested and
assayed for firefly and renilla luciferase. The amount of firefly
expression was normalized to renilla for each sample and to cells
not exposed to siRNA for each group. A positive knockdown control
was prepared with SIQUEST.RTM. (2.5 .mu.L, Mirus Bio) in 5 mM HEPES
pH 7.5 buffer (47.5 .mu.L) and 100 ng GL3 siRNA. As a measure of
toxicity, the relative amount of renilla was determined for each
group. In some experiments toxicity (cell viability) was measured
by a WST assay (WST-1, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, water
soluble tetrazolium based assay), 24 h post treatment. Briefly,
WST-1 (20 ml 5 mM solution in PBS) and N-methylphenazonium methyl
sulfate (PMS, 20 ml 0.2 mM solution in PBS) were added, and the
cells were incubated for 1-4 h. After incubation, 100 ml sample was
transferred to wells on a 96-well plate, and the absorbance (438
nm) values were measured on a SPECTRAmax Plus384 microplate
spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices Corporation). Data represent
the mean A438 values of the wells, corrected for media contribution
and normalized against cells in media with no treatment. For groups
in which the WST assay was conducted, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH, a
soluble cytosolic enzyme that is released into the culture medium
following loss of membrane integrity resulting from either
apoptosis or necrosis) levels were measured in serum at 2 h post
treatment as a further measure for toxicity.
TABLE-US-00009 TABLE 7 In vitro delivery of siRNA using poly(vinyl
alcohol)-based amphipathic polymers. Toxicity .mu.g Luc:Ren Rel.
WST (24 hr) LDH Polymer ID polymer Mean st dev Ren Rel. WST st dev
Mean st dev Procedure Cell Alone none 100 0.8 100 100 3.4 100 5.4
SIQUEST 7.5 18 7.8 95 79 9.1 106 4.0 2008-01-23-02 5 86 2.1 116 93
10.0 101 1.7 A 10 63 4.5 105 102 5.4 100 3.7 A 20 39 8.4 108 90 2.0
94 2.0 A 2008-01-23-02 15 57 0.7 110 108 0.7 107 2.8 B 35 22 0.6 60
96 4.0 97 2.5 B 2008-01-23-02-d2 15 61 1.5 112 106 2.5 101 0.4 B 35
22 4.0 62 99 2.3 96 5.2 B 2008-1-23-2-C1-30-40* 10 95 8.3 86 119
4.3 104 4.9 B 20 72 2.2 93 113 3.4 108 3.9 B 2008-1-23-2-C1-40-55*
10 92 4.4 88 108 3.2 105 0.4 B 20 74 2.7 93 105 1.1 108 0.3 B
2008-1-23-2-C2-25-34* 10 91 1.2 100 111 1.1 105 1.3 B 20 84 1.8 98
95 0.2 103 0.4 B 2008-1-23-2-C2-34-44* 5 89 2.0 97 108 1.1 105 0.1
B 10 82 4.5 96 115 8.6 106 3.4 B 20 72 2.4 90 90 3.5 100 2.1 B
2008-01-23-03 5 83 5.2 99 97 9.1 102 2.7 A 10 78 0.5 113 97 3.6 102
1.7 A 20 63 23.5 9 23 2.5 88 6.8 A 2008-01-23-03 10 86 1.4 91 96
0.8 91 2.9 B 20 59 0.5 9 16 2.0 113 2.4 B 2008-01-23-03 10 75 0.4
78 91 6.2 110 6.3 B 20 65 19.4 1 0 0.3 93 7.7 B 2008-02-04-01 15 34
4.3 72 113 1.3 99 5.6 B 35 30 1.8 13 43 4.8 47 5.8 B 2008-02-04-02
15 20 2.1 59 128 11.7 80 0.4 B 35 55 8.1 4 86 5.5 12 2.5 B
2008-02-08-04 5 77 0.2 107 99 1.1 109 1.9 B 20 28 4.6 105 104 0.2
107 1.6 B 2008-02-08-04 10 34 3.8 106 103 0.8 111 0.0 B 20 16 3.9
102 108 2.5 110 0.0 B 2008-02-08-06 5 37 1.0 112 110 1.3 110 1.3 B
20 22 2.9 99 112 2.3 106 0.2 B 2008-02-08-06 10 18 3.8 103 120 3.0
103 0.4 B 20 14 0.1 100 122 0.3 106 0.4 B 2008-2-8-6-C1-30-40* 5 46
2.1 94 107 1.7 104 2.2 B 10 42 0.2 97 105 0.0 99 1.9 B 20 38 1.0
103 104 0.3 100 0.8 B 2008-2-8-6-C2-32-44* 5 103 2.0 89 109 3.4 104
0.7 B 10 102 0.9 84 105 0.9 105 1.9 B 20 105 1.4 84 97 3.0 103 1.5
B 2008-02-08-06 0.5 73 3.6 98 84 7.7 101 1.8 B 1 65 4.9 101 82 7.3
105 0.7 B 2.5 51 4.8 103 94 5.0 102 1.2 B 5 56 7.9 129 98 9.2 107
2.4 B 10 39 7.9 124 102 9.6 100 2.0 B 30 12 1.1 54 62 0.5 102 3.2 B
60 33 9.0 67 85 9.3 93 4.1 B 2008-02-26-01 5 42 11.3 92 115 10.0
103 1.1 B 10 15 0.3 91 108 1.1 93 4.1 B 20 15 3.6 53 77 2.4 64 1.5
B 2008-02-26-02 5 25 0.3 94 129 10.1 99 1.3 B 10 13 2.3 85 107 2.3
92 2.1 B 20 11 1.6 52 71 0.0 71 1.7 B 2008-02-26-03 5 25 6.4 98 125
13.8 102 2.7 B 10 16 0.5 73 109 0.8 104 7.2 B 20 11 3.1 64 82 0.3
76 3.9 B 2008-02-26-04 5 20 1.4 82 124 14.6 103 11.7 B 10 11 0.8 89
101 0.1 89 0.6 B 20 9 0.0 51 67 1.9 67 4.2 B 2008-02-26-04 0.5 96
4.4 96 87 3.7 108 1.8 B 1 93 5.8 94 88 6.3 105 1.1 B 2.5 72 4.9 93
83 6.6 107 0.8 B 5 33 3.5 101 89 7.9 103 1.5 B 10 28 1.6 92 73 3.8
90 4.4 B 30 22 4.7 14 12 0.2 14 2.1 B 2008-02-26-05 5 31 6.1 99 126
7.8 95 0.2 B 10 12 0.5 85 104 3.8 95 2.3 B 20 10 1.2 56 65 1.6 77
2.5 B 2008-02-26-06 5 25 0.5 95 110 2.1 97 0.0 B 10 13 0.3 79 102
2.7 97 1.0 B 20 11 0.9 53 66 0.8 80 5.4 B 2008-02-26-07 5 102 2.9
84 116 3.7 105 1.7 B 10 75 1.6 92 113 2.6 102 1.4 B 20 50 0.8 93
102 1.1 96 1.3 B 2008-02-26-08 10 83 6.4 88 94 0.5 107 4.6 B 20 60
3.3 85 96 1.5 103 2.4 B 2008-02-26-09 10 97 1.3 91 107 2.7 105 1.4
B 20 93 0.3 84 104 0.0 102 0.4 B 2008-02-26-10 5 106 4.4 99 121 6.9
105 3.9 B 10 105 4.0 104 125 1.8 104 1.8 B 20 111 3.3 92 120 3.0
107 0.1 B 2008-02-26-11 5 46 5.7 104 115 2.4 101 0.7 B 10 26 3.5 78
116 2.6 101 0.6 B 20 39 10.4 64 103 6.3 104 3.3 B 2008-03-04-01 10
22 1.9 100 101 2.4 101 1.8 B 20 17 3.5 88 90 3.0 99 2.2 B
2008-03-04-01 0.5 72 1.6 90 91 4.9 103 4.9 B 1 69 2.6 94 90 5.7 108
2.3 B 2.5 70 7.7 88 86 5.5 105 3.5 B 5 39 10.6 103 90 8.0 108 5.3 B
10 13 2.8 103 96 4.5 104 1.5 B 30 16 3.2 99 91 6.7 102 3.7 B 60 34
13.6 93 92 0.6 90 1.5 B 2008-03-04-02 10 26 1.7 91 94 5.9 103 2.5 B
20 28 4.8 85 98 5.9 103 10.3 B 2008-03-04-03 10 22 0.9 95 95 1.9
102 9.0 B 20 26 1.8 95 92 1.6 101 2.2 B 2008-03-04-04 10 27 5.2 107
107 4.7 106 2.1 B 20 22 2.8 96 94 1.4 107 3.5 B 2008-03-10-01 10 46
4.7 102 103 4.2 101 1.3 B 20 28 0.4 101 96 4.4 102 0.3 B
2008-03-10-02 10 42 3.8 100 94 1.7 102 2.4 B 20 30 0.1 84 101 6.3
101 0.8 B 2008-03-10-03 10 30 4.3 97 100 0.4 100 0.5 B 20 25 0.5 90
91 6.6 100 0.7 B 2008-03-10-04 10 17 1.9 110 99 10.1 101 0.1 B 20
13 0.0 102 95 3.3 100 1.3 B 2008-03-10-06 5 57 2.0 101 119 1.3 100
2.2 B 10 49 2.5 105 115 5.7 98 4.8 B 20 28 1.1 77 82 0.5 81 0.3 B
2008-03-17-01 5 18 2.8 90 113 1.8 99 0.7 B 10 28 2.5 86 109 2.7 92
0.3 B 20 23 1.7 62 71 2.7 59 11.1 B 2008-03-17-02 5 20 0.5 83 101
0.2 99 1.5 B 10 19 0.2 84 102 1.9 97 0.4 B 20 20 1.2 52 66 2.0 70
0.2 B 2008-03-17-03 5 16 1.8 86 106 0.6 98 0.4 B 10 21 2.6 79 106
4.3 95 1.6 B 20 15 1.9 60 70 0.9 59 2.4 B 2008-04-07-01 5 100 8.3
100 B 10 82 0.8 106 B 20 62 4.0 92 B 2008-04-07-02 5 70 3.8 106 B
10 35 4.6 98 B 20 23 4.4 96 B 2008-04-07-03 5 100 1.0 96 B 10 105
5.2 87 B 20 94 2.3 87 B 2008-04-07-04 5 43 1.3 94 B 10 20 0.4 94 B
20 18 5.4 81 B 2008-04-08-01 5 113 4.1 91 B 10 118 3.3 97 B 20 120
2.1 85 B 2008-04-08-02 5 23 0.8 95 B 10 12 3.4 86 B 20 9 0.4 75 B
2008-04-08-03 5 16 1.5 77 B 10 8 0.1 79 B 20 9 0.6 66 B
2008-04-08-04 5 28 2.8 90 B 10 18 1.2 84 B 20 15 3.6 64 B
2008-04-08-04-Ac 5 56 2.3 96 B 10 25 2.6 92 B 20 12 1.4 80 B
2008-04-21-01 10 12 4.3 100 B 20 10 1.8 85 B 2008-04-21-02 10 10
1.7 93 B 20 11 0.1 80 B 2008-04-21-03 5 20 0.0 103 B 10 12 4.2 98 B
20 13 3.8 79 B 2008-04-21-04 5 24 5.2 103 B 10 12 4.7 93 B 20 13
2.6 87 B 2008-04-28-01 5 23 0.7 93 B 10 14 1.2 90 B 20 14 1.7 75 B
2008-04-28-02 5 21 4.9 94 B 10 13 1.2 91 B 20 14 4.8 82 B
2008-04-28-03 5 13 4.9 97 B 10 11 0.4 87 B 20 12 3.6 75 B
2008-04-28-04 5 29 12.0 94 B 10 11 0.2 80 B 20 19 7.4 73 B
2008-04-28-05 5 18 4.5 94 B 10 12 1.3 84 B 20 16 4.9 65 B
2008-04-28-06 5 27 2.5 92 B 10 17 0.3 83 B 20 17 1.7 68 B
2008-04-28-07 5 19 2.8 92 B 10 15 0.1 91 B 20 14 1.3 76 B
2008-04-28-08 5 43 8.5 93 B 10 17 0.9 98 B 20 16 4.9 76 B
2008-04-28-09 5 24 0.9 88 B 10 15 1.6 82 B 20 15 4.5 71 B *size
exclusion column fractions
[0229] The results indicate that polymers derived from poly(vinyl
alcohol) are able to deliver RNA to cells in vitro.
Example 29
Membrane Activity of Polymers Derived from Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0230] The following liposomes were prepared to approximate both
the plasma membrane and the endosomal membrane as previously
described (Gordon et al, Biophysical Journal, 88 (1), 305-316).
[0231] Plasma membrane mimic: 0.33 mol % sphingomyelin, 0.33 mol %
dioleoyl-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC), 0.33 mol % cholesterol, 0.1
mol % ganglioside GM1 [0232] Endosomal membrane mimic: 0.15 mol %
dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine (DPPS), 0.25 mol %
dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), 0.6 mol % DOPC.
[0233] Liposomes were prepared containing carboxyfluorescein and
purified by size exclusion chromatography (G-50). Solutions were
standardized to 1 .mu.g total lipid per 0.5 mL HBS.
[0234] To 0.5 mL of liposomal solution was added 3 .mu.g of polymer
(1 .mu.g/.mu.L in water). Release of carboxyfluorescein was
monitored (.lamda..sub.Ex=492, .lamda..sub.Em=517) and the
percentage of 100% lysis determined.
TABLE-US-00010 TABLE 8 Liposome Lysis by poly(vinyl alcohol)-based
amphipathic polymers. Percent Plasma Precent Polymer Number
Membrane Lysis Endosome Lysis 2008-01-23-02 66 78
2008-1-23-2-C1-30-40 28 31 2008-1-23-2-C1-40-55 26 24
2008-1-23-2-C2-25-34 23 16 2008-1-23-2-C2-34-44 58 46 2008-01-23-03
9 6 2008-02-04-01 79 78 2008-02-04-02 97 90 2008-02-08-04 93 82
2008-02-08-06 100 84 2008-2-8-6-C1-30-40 89 78 2008-2-8-6-C2-32-44
55 61 2008-02-26-01 98 86 2008-02-26-02 93 70 2008-02-26-03 96 86
2008-02-26-04 89 70 2008-02-26-05 85 80 2008-02-26-06 85 70
2008-02-26-07 71 68 2008-02-26-08 65 56 2008-02-26-10 66 71
2008-02-26-11 19 12 2008-03-04-01 100 81 2008-03-04-02 100 92
2008-03-04-03 100 97 2008-03-04-04 104 87
[0235] The results indicate that polymers derived from poly(vinyl
alcohol) are membrane active on liposome mimicking both cell
membranes and endosomal membranes.
Example 30
In Vivo Targeting with Poly(Vinyl Alcohol) Based Heteropolymers
[0236] Polymers 2008-01-23-02 and 2008-02-08-06 were labeled with
Cy-3 NHS ester. The polymers (4000 .mu.g, 200 .mu.L of 20 mg/mL
solution in water) were buffered with 20 .mu.L of 100 mM HEPES pH
8.5. Cy-3 NHS ester (160 .mu.g, 16 .mu.L of 10 mg/mL in DMSO, 4%
weight modification) was added and the reaction was stirred for 1
h. The labeled polymers were isolated by filtration (spin tube, A25
QAE resin).
[0237] The following complexes were prepared: [0238] Complex I
2008-01-23-02-Cy3 (99 .mu.g, 16.9 mg/mL), 7.times. wt
CDM-PEG(550)(75c)/CDM-Nac-Gal(75c)(1:2 wt ratio) in isotonic
glucose pH 9.0 (100 .mu.g/mL). [0239] Complex II 2008-02-08-06-Cy3
(99 .mu.g, 16.9 mg/mL), 7.times. wt
CDM-PEG(550)(75c)/CDM-Nac-Gal(75c)(1:2 wt ratio) in isotonic
glucose pH 9.0 (100 .mu.g/mL)
[0240] Each masked polymer was injected into the tail vein of a
mouse. 1 h post injection, the liver was harvested and fixed in
formalin/sucrose for 6 hr, sectioned, stained, and analyzed. For
each polymer, fluorescent signal was observed in hepatocytes as
detected by fluorescence microscopy of isolated liver section as
described above. Presence of labeled polymer in hepatocytes
indicates successful targeting and delivery of the labeled polymer
to the liver.
Example 31
In Vivo Particle Tracking of Particles Prepared with Polymers
Derived from Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0241] For each conjugate, 10 .mu.g of the Cy3-labeled
oligonucleotide was attached to 200 .mu.g of the indicated
targeting polymer using SATA.RTM. and SMPT.RTM. as described above.
Conjugations were carried out overnight at pH 6-7. The polymers
were masked using a 1:2 (weight:weight) ratio of
CDM-PEG.sub.550/CDM-N-acetyl-Gal at a 7:1 ratio (weight CDM-masking
agent:1 total polymer) in HEPES buffer+1 mM Myrj 59
(polyoxyethyleneglycol derivative of stearic acid) and isotonic
glucose. Particles were prepared with the following polymers:
TABLE-US-00011 Complex 1: polymer 2008-04-07-01 Complex 2: polymer
2008-04-07-02 Complex 3: polymer 2008-04-07-03 Complex 4: polymer
2008-04-07-04 Complex 5: polymer 2008-04-08-02 Complex 6: polymer
2008-04-08-03 Complex 7: polymer 2008-04-08-04 Complex 8: polymer
2008-04-08-04-Ac
[0242] Each masked conjugate was injected (in 100 .mu.L total
volume) into the tail vein of a mouse. 1 h post injection, the
liver was harvested and fixed in formalin/sucrose for 6 hr,
sectioned, stained, and analyzed. For each complex, fluorescent
signal was observed in hepatocytes as detected by fluorescence
microscopy of isolated liver section as described above. Presence
of labeled oligonucleotide in hepatocytes indicates successful
targeting and delivery of the labeled oligonucleotide to the
liver.
Example 32
In Vivo Delivery of Particles Prepared with Polymers Derived from
Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0243] For each complex, 10 .mu.g of the indicated siRNA was
attached to the indicated targeting polymer using SATA.RTM. and
SMPT.RTM. as described above. A second, helper or boost polymer was
then added to the siRNA-polymer conjugate. Both polymers were
masked using a 1:2 (weight:weight) ratio of
CDM-PEG.sub.550/CDM-N-acetyl-Gal at a 7:1 (weight CDM-masking
agent:weight total polymer) ratio in aqueous solution.
[0244] The following complexes were prepared in isotonic glucose,
pH 9, for a delivery volume of 200-400 .mu.L to the tail vein of a
mouse. At 48 h post injection, serum was collected from the mice (4
h fast prior to bleed).
TABLE-US-00012 TABLE 9 Amphipathic poly(vinyl alcohol) terpolymer
targeting of siRNA to hepatocytes. Targeting Polymer Boost Polymer
Cholesterol Complex .mu.g polymer siRNA .mu.g polymer mg/dL 1 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-1-23-2 88.33 .+-. 26.10 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 2 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-2-8-6 52.33 .+-. 14.19 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 3 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-2-4-1 83.67 .+-. 8.02 (lot 24 20.5-28.5) 4 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-2-26-4 26.00 .+-. 12.29 (lot 24 20.5-28.5) 5 50
1360 ApoB 350 2008-2-26-4 52.33 .+-. 13.65 (lot 24/26 combo) 6 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-2-8-4 55.33 .+-. 7.51 (lot 24/26 combo) 7 50
1360 ApoB 750 2008-2-26-1 (lot 24/26 combo 8 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-3-4-1 13.00 .+-. 5.20 (lot 24/26 combo 9 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-3-4-3 35.67 .+-. 9.50 (lot 24/26 combo 10 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-3-10-5 53.67 .+-. 6.66 (lot 24/26 combo 11 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-8-6 16.67 .+-. 6.11 (lot 24/26 combo) 12 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-26-5 68.00 .+-. 20.00 (lot 24/26 combo) 13 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-26-6 57.00 .+-. 26.00 (lot 24/26 combo) 14 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-26-2 50.00 .+-. 33.00 (lot 24/26 combo) 15 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-26-3 42.00 .+-. 8.00 (lot 24/26 combo) 16 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-2-26-8 85.67 .+-. 18.88 (lot 24/26 combo) 17 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-3-4-2 20.00 .+-. 6.08 (lot 24/26 combo) 19 50 1360 ApoB 350
2008-3-4-1 30.33 .+-. 9.71 (lot 24/26 combo) 20 50 1360 ApoB 350
2008-3-4-2 27.00 .+-. 15.00 (lot 24/26 combo) 21 200 2008-03-04-01
ApoB 64.67 .+-. 10.02 22 400 2008-03-04-01 ApoB 69.00 .+-. 2.00 23
50 1360 ApoB 350 2008-4-7-2 47.33 .+-. 6.35 (lot 24/26 combo) 24 50
1360 ApoB 350 2008-4-7-4 55.67 .+-. 18.61 (lot 24/26 combo) 25 800
2008-3-4-1 ApoB.sup.1 73.67 .+-. 15.04 26 800 2008-4-7-2 ApoB.sup.1
84.67 .+-. 15.63 27 800 2008-4-7-4 ApoB.sup.1 66.33 .+-. 12.66 28
800 2008-4-8-4 ApoB.sup.1 76.67 .+-. 3.06 29 800 2008-4-8-4-Ac
ApoB.sup.1 76.33 .+-. 7.64 30 50 1360 Factor 750 1360 93.00 .+-.
8.54 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) VII (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) .sup.1conjugation
at pH 6-7 in 1 mM Myrj59 buffer
[0245] Inhibition of the ApoB gene in vivo is known to cause a
reduction in serum cholesterol levels. As shown above, compositions
prepared with membrane active, amphipathic polymers derived from
poly(vinyl alcohol) facilitate siRNA delivery to liver as evidenced
by decreased average serum cholesterol levels compared to control
group with inactive siRNA (complex 30).
Example 33
Lability of Polymers Derived from Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0246] Polymer 2008-01-23-02 was taken up in 20 mM HEPES, pH 8.5.
The polymer's ability to condense rhodamine labeled pDNA (5 .mu.g),
was followed as a function of time. The polymer was characterized
for DNA condensation ability immediately (initial) or after
incubation in buffer for 1, 2, 3, 21, 23, 25, or 117 hours.
Condensation of labeled plasmid DNA causes a decrease in observed
fluorescence. The results indicate that the polymer loses the
ability to condense pDNA over time at pH 8.5. This descrease
ability to condense DNA indicates that the carbonate linked amines
on the polymer are being cleaved.
Amphipathic Poly(Allylamine) and Poly(Vinyl Amine)
Heteropolymers
Example 34
Preparation of N-hydroxysuccinimide esters of alkyl acids
[0247] Part A. Preparation of the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of
butyric acid: To a solution of butyric acid (10.0 g, 114 mmol) in
dichloromethane (150 mL) was added N-hydroxysuccinimide (14.8 g,
125 mmol) and N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (24.6 g, 119 mmol). The
resulting solution was stirred at room temperature under Argon for
24 h, filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
resulting oil was crystallized from hexane and ethyl acetate to
afford 16.8 grams (80%) of the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of
butyric acid (C4-NHS). Part B. Preparation of the
N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of stearic acid: To a solution of
stearic acid (10.0 g, 35.2 mmol) in dichloromethane (200 mL) was
added N-hydroxysuccinimide (4.46 g, 38.7 mmol) and
N,N'-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (7.63 g, 36.7 mmol). The resulting
solution was stirred at room temperature under Argon for 24 h,
filtered and concentrated under reduced pressure. The resulting
waxy solid was crystallized from hexane and ethyl acetate to afford
10.4 grams (77%) of the N-hydroxysuccinimide ester of stearic acid
(C18-NHS).
Example 35
Modification of Poly(Allylamine) Hydrochloride, and
Poly(Vinylamine) Hydrochloride
[0248] Part A. Modification of poly(allylamine) hydrochloride
(PAAm): To a stirring solution of anhydrous methanol (150 mL) and
N,N-diisoproplyethylamine (6 eq, 2.23 mL) at 45.degree. C., was
added poly(allylamine) hydrochloride (2.00 g, PAAm, 15 kDa MW,
Aldrich) portion wise. To the resulting solution was added C4-NHS
(0.6 eq, 2.170 g), C18-NHS (0.4 eq, 1.560 g), and a catalytic
amount of DMAP (dimethyl amino pyridine). The solution was stirred
at 45.degree. C., under Argon, for 48 h and concentrated under
reduced pressure to a third of its original volume. The resulting
slurry was diluted 3 fold with water, centrifuged, dialyzed against
NaCl in water (16 h) and again against water (24 h), and
lyophilized. .sup.1H NMR analysis indicated a ratio of
approximately 6 amines, 3 C4, 1 C18 in the final polymer (polymers
2008-02-04-03 and 2008-02-08-07). Part B. By similar modification,
the following polymers with the described modification ratios were
prepared:
TABLE-US-00013 TABLE 10 Composition of poly(allylamine)-based
amphipathic polymers. Number Amine C4 C18 2007-09-17-02 0.6 0.25
0.15 2007-09-21-08 1 0 0 2007-09-21-09 0.6 0.3 0.1 2007-09-21-10
0.6 0.3 0.2 2007-09-21-11 0.6 0.3 0.25 2007-09-21-12 0.6 0.3 0.15
2007-09-21-13 0.6 0.3 0.2 2007-09-21-14 0.6 0.3 0.5
Part C. By similar modification, poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride
(PVAm, 15 kDa MW, Polyscience Inc.) was modified on the amine of
the polymer side chain to afford polymers with the described
modification ratios.
TABLE-US-00014 TABLE 11 Composition of poly(vinylamine)-based
amphipathic polymers. Number Amine C4 C18 2007-09-21-01 1 0 0
2007-09-21-02 0.6 0.3 0.1 2007-09-21-03 0.6 0.3 0.2 2007-09-21-04
0.6 0.3 0.25 2007-09-21-05 0.6 0.3 0.15 2007-09-21-06 0.6 0.3 0.2
2007-09-21-07 0.6 0.3 0.5
Part D. PVAm and PAAm modification Library: To a solution of
poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride (PVAm, 15 KDa MWt, Polyscience Inc.)
or poly(allylamine) hydrochloride (PAAm, 15 kDa MW, Aldrich) in
anhydrous methanol (1 mL) and triethylamine (6 eq), at 45.degree.
C., was added C4-NHS (A), C18-NHS (B), and DMAP (catalytic amount)
under Argon. The resulting solution was stirred at 45.degree. C.
for 48 hr, concentrated with Argon and heat, washed resulting solid
with diethyl ether and reconstituted with water. .sup.1H NMR
indicated polymers with the following incorporation ratios
TABLE-US-00015 TABLE 12 Poly(allylamine)- and
poly(vinylamine)-based polymer libraries. Polymer Base Number
Polymer Rxn Scale C4 C18 2007-10-01-01 PVAm 12 mg 0.0 0.3
2007-10-01-02 PVAm 12 mg 0.1 0.2 2007-10-01-03 PVAm 12 mg 0.2 0.1
2007-10-01-04 PVAm 12 mg 0.3 0.0 2007-10-01-05 PVAm 12 mg 0.0 0.4
2007-10-01-06 PVAm 12 mg 0.1 0.3 2007-10-01-07 PVAm 12 mg 0.2 0.2
2007-10-01-08 PVAm 12 mg 0.3 0.1 2007-10-01-09 PVAm 12 mg 0.4 0.0
2007-10-01-10 PVAm 12 mg 0.0 0.5 2007-10-01-11 PVAm 12 mg 0.1 0.4
2007-10-01-12 PVAm 12 mg 0.2 0.3 2007-10-01-13 PVAm 12 mg 0.3 0.2
2007-10-01-14 PVAm 12 mg 0.4 0.1 2007-10-01-15 PVAm 12 mg 0.5 0.0
2007-10-01-16 PVAm 12 mg 0.0 0.0 2007-10-13-01 PAAm 14 mg 0.0 0.3
2007-10-13-02 PAAm 14 mg 0.1 0.2 2007-10-13-03 PAAm 14 mg 0.2 0.1
2007-10-13-04 PAAm 14 mg 0.3 0.0 2007-10-13-05 PAAm 14 mg 0.0 0.4
2007-10-13-06 PAAm 14 mg 0.1 0.3 2007-10-13-07 PAAm 14 mg 0.2 0.2
2007-10-13-08 PAAm 14 mg 0.3 0.1 2007-10-13-09 PAAm 14 mg 0.4 0.0
2007-10-13-10 PAAm 14 mg 0.0 0.5 2007-10-13-11 PAAm 14 mg 0.1 0.4
2007-10-13-12 PAAm 14 mg 0.2 0.3 2007-10-13-13 PAAm 14 mg 0.3 0.2
2007-10-13-14 PAAm 14 mg 0.4 0.1 2007-10-13-15 PAAm 14 mg 0.5 0.0
2007-10-13-16 PAAm 14 mg 0.0 0.0 2007-12-05-01 PVAm 100 mg 1.0 0.0
2007-12-05-02 PAAm 100 mg 0.6 0.0
Example 36
In Vitro Knockout Testing of Polymers Derived from Poly(Allylamine)
Hydrochloride, and Poly(Vinylamine) Hydrochloride
[0249] Procedure A: siRNA was reversibly conjugated to the polymer
(as described above). All conjugated polymers were allowed to
conjugate overnight at room temp before transfection [0250]
Procedure B: siRNA was not conjugated to the polymer. All polymers
were unconjugated and prepared the morning of the experiment.
Further, the unconjugated polymers were prepared in 5 mM HEPES pH
7.5 buffer. No TAPS solution was added.
[0251] Hepa-1c1c7 cells were transfected with plasmids encoding
firefly and renilla luciferases using TRANSIT LT1.RTM. (Mirus Bio).
4 h after plasmid transfection, 100 ng luciferase siRNA (GL3 siRNA)
and various amounts of polymers (conjugated, procedure A;
unconjugated, procedure B) were added to the cells in 24 well
plates. 48 h after addition of the siRNA, cells were harvested and
assayed for firefly and renilla luciferase. The amount of firefly
expression was normalized to renilla for each sample and to cells
not exposed to siRNA for each group. A positive knockdown control
was prepared with SIQUEST.RTM. (2.5 .mu.L, Mirus Bio) in 5 mM HEPES
pH 7.5 buffer (47.5 .mu.L) and 100 ng GL3 siRNA. As a measure of
toxicity, the relative amount of renilla was determined for each
group. In some experiments toxicity (cell viability) was measured
by a WST assay (WST-1, Dojindo Molecular Technologies, water
soluble tetrazolium based assay), 24 h post treatment. Briefly,
WST-1 (20 ml 5 mM solution in PBS) and N-methylphenazonium methyl
sulfate (PMS, 20 ml 0.2 mM solution in PBS) were added, and the
cells were incubated for 1-4 h. After incubation, 100 ml sample was
transferred to wells on a 96-well plate, and the absorbance (438
nm) values were measured on a SPECTRAmax Plus384 microplate
spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices Corporation). Data represent
the mean A438 values of the wells, corrected for media contribution
and normalized against cells in media with no treatment. For groups
in which the WST assay was conducted, Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH, a
soluble cytosolic enzyme that is released into the culture medium
following loss of membrane integrity resulting from either
apoptosis or necrosis) levels were measured in serum at 2 h post
treatment as a further measure for toxicity. Polymers with a C
following the polymer identification number have been fractionated
by size exclusion chromatography (Sephacryl S-200) and indicate
time fraction range.
TABLE-US-00016 TABLE 13 In vitro delivery of siRNA using
poly(allylamine)- and poly(vinylamine)-based amphipathic polymers.
Toxicity .mu.g Luc:Ren Rel. WST (24 hr) LDH Polymer ID polymer Mean
st dev Ren Rel. WST st dev Mean st dev Procedure 2007-09-21-08 5
73.9 3.5 69.5 1.0 79.1 24.9 A 10 65.3 3.3 13.0 3.2 64.8 7.7 A
2007-09-21-09 5 17.6 8.8 100.5 15.7 98.6 9.3 A 10 8.5 0.2 103.1 3.1
92.5 10.9 A 15 7.6 0.6 91.5 2.5 86.5 24.1 A 2007-09-21-03 10 24.3
0.7 94.2 14.5 96.5 9.1 A 20 21.0 2.7 83.8 3.1 96.0 9.6 A 40 54.1
6.7 9.5 1.0 46.2 28.4 A 2007-09-14-03 10 105.0 5.1 108.2 17.8 95.9
6.3 A 20 104.7 11.1 89.4 1.0 108.4 6.5 A 40 17.9 2.8 102.0 3.6
105.8 6.2 A 2007-09-17-02 10 14.7 1.1 109.7 23.7 99.9 0.8 A 20 12.2
0.4 93.1 2.8 101.0 7.6 A 40 17.9 2.8 50.2 1.8 69.2 10.4 A
2007-09-21-01 5 30.8 4.9 82.1 92.2 1.5 92.5 6.7 A 10 16.8 1.3 74.4
96.5 8.0 105.4 3.1 A 20 10.7 0.6 28.5 66.0 3.1 90.1 8.3 A
2007-09-17-02 10 30.8 4.9 82.1 92.2 1.5 92.5 6.7 A 20 16.8 1.3 74.4
96.5 8.0 105.4 3.1 A 40 10.7 0.6 28.5 66.0 3.1 90.1 8.3 A
2007-09-21-02 5 67.2 0.4 74.3 106.3 2.4 102.0 0.0 A 10 56.1 0.8
74.9 122.8 11.8 110.3 0.1 A 20 29.7 6.1 46.4 104.5 1.8 99.5 3.1 A
2007-09-21-03 10 19.7 0.4 68.3 98.3 10.0 111.1 2.3 A 20 19.8 1.7
31.5 75.9 10.8 111.0 4.9 A 40 41.8 2.1 3.1 26.8 11.9 83.5 3.1 A
2007-09-21-04 5 87.1 2.5 77.8 103.8 14.9 104.7 3.3 A 10 70.6 10.2
70.7 109.5 3.7 105.7 4.6 A 20 64.3 8.6 66.4 109.9 2.3 103.5 0.1 A
2007-09-21-08 5 76.1 0.9 64.9 79.9 4.6 90.6 0.4 A 10 70.7 3.2 34.3
18.2 2.6 60.9 2.9 A 20 ug 65.9 16.6 2.6 2.3 0.4 32.1 12.8 A
2007-09-21-09 5 5.4 0.4 76.8 115.0 14.8 110.3 0.8 A 10 9.9 0.7 42.3
116.6 5.8 103.7 0.6 A 20 7.5 0.3 22.4 70.3 0.3 77.8 4.9 A
2007-10-13-01 5 95.4 0.7 100.8 92.9 26.8 99.8 1.1 A 10 92.8 2.5
97.7 79.8 4.3 101.6 2.8 A 20 96.8 2.8 92.9 63.4 8.0 102.1 2.0 A
2007-10-13-02 5 104.2 4.7 106.0 77.4 17.0 95.6 4.7 A 10 104.0 2.1
104.7 78.4 5.0 101.3 2.7 A 20 105.9 0.3 106.9 60.3 11.2 101.7 3.4 A
2007-10-13-03 5 104.0 6.1 103.9 79.6 12.1 102.0 1.9 A 10 100.7 0.3
112.3 82.1 2.8 100.7 4.6 A 20 104.1 6.8 105.2 72.5 5.4 104.0 2.9 A
2007-10-13-04 5 54.1 1.7 95.8 90.2 22.0 101.5 2.0 A 10 43.6 1.0
95.7 81.9 7.0 101.7 6.1 A 20 41.2 1.3 64.9 61.0 15.7 104.9 1.7 A
2007-10-13-05 5 102.3 3.4 108.9 106.2 19.8 101.8 2.5 A 10 107.7 0.2
99.6 106.5 14.5 104.3 6.0 A 20 114.0 4.0 91.1 81.1 8.9 110.3 3.7 A
2007-10-13-06 5 106.9 3.0 93.2 103.6 19.5 105.1 3.5 A 10 108.0 0.1
99.4 98.4 6.7 106.9 4.2 A 20 107.2 2.1 103.0 95.1 3.3 107.3 4.9 A
2007-10-13-07 5 111.4 4.2 96.6 95.2 19.2 107.8 5.2 A 10 107.2 4.3
100.3 97.5 0.0 105.3 6.2 A 20 104.2 1.5 101.4 83.3 11.1 107.0 5.8 A
5 95.5 1.5 96.5 101.8 14.9 106.2 5.1 A 2007-10-13-08 10 96.5 0.5
104.2 108.7 8.4 105.8 6.0 A 20 96.0 0.4 100.2 96.5 10.0 107.9 2.0 A
5 106.5 0.7 97.1 117.2 20.2 106.7 3.7 A 2007-10-13-09 10 110.7 0.5
94.6 111.7 5.5 108.0 3.3 A 20 112.9 2.1 94.5 94.8 15.1 109.1 3.4 A
2007-10-13-10 5 108.7 5.4 95.9 108.7 34.4 105.6 3.0 A 10 106.8 2.0
99.4 101.7 4.4 107.1 4.2 A 20 113.5 1.1 99.8 84.7 12.1 105.4 4.9 A
2007-10-13-11 5 107.8 0.6 94.4 117.2 16.3 108.1 5.1 A 10 106.3 1.4
111.3 125.8 7.7 107.8 4.3 A 20 108.8 6.1 105.1 105.3 8.1 109.3 6.8
A 2007-10-13-12 5 108.6 6.6 95.4 131.8 28.0 106.2 3.9 A 10 102.2
0.3 109.1 108.7 12.3 105.4 4.2 A 20 105.8 0.3 103.4 105.1 15.3
101.8 3.9 A 2007-10-13-13 5 105.6 3.6 111.7 115.9 17.4 103.3 0.2 A
10 105.7 1.8 115.4 103.6 9.2 106.6 2.8 A 20 110.4 6.7 100.7 88.9
10.3 110.8 0.7 A 2007-10-13-14 5 100.2 2.2 101.1 115.4 21.7 105.7
3.2 A 10 105.7 0.1 107.3 110.1 4.2 107.2 4.2 A 20 106.9 1.3 108.6
97.6 17.6 106.9 3.5 A 2007-10-13-15 5 107.6 4.5 107.6 121.9 37.5
108.1 4.6 A 10 100.3 1.7 122.5 123.8 2.6 106.6 0.3 A 20 107.0 1.0
109.6 112.1 22.5 104.4 6.0 A 2007-10-13-16 5 66.4 3.5 81.2 117.9
24.5 100.0 7.1 A 10 64.3 1.2 45.9 27.1 6.3 81.0 6.6 A 20 54.6 2.1
3.2 1.1 0.3 45.9 1.6 A 2007-10-01-01 5 95.5 2.8 105.0 83.3 3.7 97.7
3.9 A 10 99.6 0.2 106.2 89.0 1.1 100.5 2.4 A 20 100.2 2.2 100.8
74.9 0.2 104.9 0.8 A 2007-10-01-02 5 96.6 0.4 102.7 89.7 3.7 98.9
2.2 A 10 101.5 2.2 99.1 92.0 1.0 105.0 4.1 A 20 104.4 3.0 90.0 83.1
4.0 108.4 0.1 A 2007-10-01-03 5 97.1 0.3 99.3 102.2 5.9 102.6 1.7 A
10 98.1 1.8 103.6 99.8 0.6 107.2 1.5 A 20 98.5 0.4 96.8 92.4 4.5
100.1 0.4 A 2007-10-01-04 5 26.2 2.4 101.0 94.5 5.3 92.8 1.2 A 10
10.3 1.2 10.7 35.4 0.9 89.9 0.7 A 20 17.2 3.1 0.6 0.0 0.6 48.0 3.8
A 2007-10-01-05 5 100.4 0.3 105.1 105.5 6.2 95.5 1.7 A 10 100.5 3.2
108.3 103.1 8.5 105.5 0.2 A 20 105.8 1.9 98.6 94.7 2.9 108.1 0.4 A
2007-10-01-06 5 100.9 0.9 98.4 104.9 2.6 101.9 1.6 A 10 101.3 0.9
106.6 107.3 9.7 101.1 1.5 A 20 106.1 4.5 98.2 92.5 4.9 99.4 0.1 A
2007-10-01-07 5 102.7 0.5 98.3 102.0 2.6 102.3 5.4 A 10 100.3 2.4
112.1 115.3 2.0 98.6 1.0 A 20 100.7 1.2 101.5 88.9 1.2 102.6 0.2 A
2007-10-01-08 5 71.8 7.7 96.7 108.6 11.6 96.9 4.1 A 10 48.7 1.7
88.6 125.8 0.7 101.8 4.9 A 20 26.9 5.7 75.3 123.1 6.7 103.3 2.9 A
2007-10-01-09 5 58.6 3.3 113.3 114.9 5.2 102.9 1.9 A 10 29.7 1.6
16.2 43.0 0.6 99.2 2.8 A 20 16.6 9.1 0.4 0.3 0.4 65.6 2.0 A
2007-10-01-10 5 101.2 1.5 105.3 117.2 1.8 106.0 1.1 A 10 102.5 2.3
111.0 108.9 3.4 101.4 3.9 A 20 103.9 1.3 108.0 100.3 5.9 106.6 1.4
A 2007-10-01-11 5 101.6 0.0 104.3 120.0 7.5 105.6 4.3 A 10 100.0
1.3 115.7 105.0 0.3 102.1 1.5 A 20 105.8 3.8 112.5 98.5 4.4 104.4
4.5 A 2007-10-01-12 5 101.7 1.1 109.1 115.5 0.2 102.6 0.1 A 10
102.4 0.7 101.5 115.7 4.5 103.6 7.3 A 20 108.1 3.2 108.3 110.4 5.4
100.6 2.0 A 2007-10-01-13 5 103.6 0.2 104.9 119.9 7.1 98.9 3.7 A 10
106.2 4.1 108.7 112.7 2.8 101.3 3.8 A 20 106.2 3.0 100.6 112.8 6.1
108.0 2.0 A 2007-10-01-14 5 64.6 2.5 66.8 129.2 3.3 106.3 0.1 A 10
54.5 0.2 63.5 133.3 2.3 106.1 1.1 A 20 37.9 5.4 57.8 117.7 0.7
104.5 4.2 A 2007-10-01-15 5 68.8 3.4 117.7 121.1 1.9 106.3 1.0 A 10
45.7 0.0 42.5 63.3 0.3 97.7 0.8 A 20 58.1 21.6 1.6 6.4 0.5 75.6 6.5
A 2007-10-01-16 5 28.4 0.9 93.9 141.5 9.6 97.9 1.5 A 10 11.3 0.0
59.2 111.0 1.0 109.9 5.0 A 20 23.1 2.7 13.1 42.9 1.9 99.8 2.9 A
2007-10-01-04 5 35.5 8.0 77.8 108.9 1.4 107.8 6.4 A 10 9.6 2.7 7.8
34.0 0.1 95.8 4.6 A 20 9.4 3.1 0.0 -3.2 1.1 47.4 1.0 A
2007-10-01-08 5 60.6 3.3 83.5 117.1 5.7 106.1 12.1 A 10 53.5 1.7
73.7 124.5 0.7 117.9 7.5 A 20 27.0 0.8 64.6 108.7 4.9 107.0 3.8 A
2007-10-01-09 5 56.2 1.0 87.9 102.7 0.3 110.2 1.3 A 10 28.7 4.1
11.9 35.3 1.1 83.2 1.5 A 20 34.3 8.2 0.2 -2.7 0.3 45.1 6.3 A
2007-10-13-04 5 46.3 1.1 99.4 100.1 2.6 104.1 4.5 A 10 32.0 2.2
91.9 103.6 6.7 110.5 10.0 A 20 32.6 6.2 52.1 54.6 16.0 104.4 0.4 A
2007-10-13-09 5 108.3 0.9 98.4 111.9 4.1 98.1 5.6 A 10 111.2 7.1
93.3 101.6 3.4 111.3 7.2 A 20 112.3 1.3 95.5 91.4 2.4 115.9 4.2 A
2008-02-04-03 5 7.0 0.9 91.0 108.0 2.1 103.0 1.8 B 10 5.0 0.1 75.0
97.0 3.4 103.0 4.1 B 20 5.0 0.1 49.0 80.0 6.6 102.0 1.6 B
2008-02-08-07 5 22.0 3.3 91.0 96.0 2.5 103.0 0.4 B 10 7.0 0.5 99.0
95.0 2.1 100.0 1.7 B 20 5.0 0.0 81.0 83.0 9.2 100.0 0.4 B
2007-09-21-09 10 5.0 0.5 64.0 83.0 0.8 102.0 1.4 B 20 6.0 1.0 11.0
34.0 3.2 78.0 5.4 B 2008-02-04-03 10 4.0 0.1 76.0 117.0 7.2 105.0
2.4 B 20 5.0 0.1 50.0 91.0 11.5 111.0 2.1 B 2008-02-08-07 10 4.0
0.1 82.0 119.0 3.5 104.0 10.5 B 20 5.0 0.0 48.0 92.0 2.7 104.0 4.7
B 2008-2-8-7-C1-frac30-40 5 40.0 0.8 83.0 78.0 0.8 103.0 2.6 B 10
20.0 1.1 65.0 66.0 0.3 105.0 1.6 B 20 13.0 0.3 63.0 56.0 0.2 103.0
1.7 B 2008-2-8-7-C1-frac40-50 5 32.0 0.1 84.0 85.0 1.5 106.0 0.1 B
10 18.0 3.1 90.0 85.0 0.3 106.0 1.6 B 20 6.0 0.5 64.0 67.0 1.4
106.0 3.3 B 2008-2-8-7-C2-frac34-44 5 25.0 0.3 99.0 87.0 3.7 104.0
2.5 B 10 8.0 0.4 90.0 75.0 0.7 102.0 1.1 B 20 6.0 0.5 63.0 69.0 1.3
104.0 0.6 B 2008-2-8-7-C2-frac44-50 5 5.0 0.3 71.0 79.0 0.3 103.0
1.9 B 10 5.0 0.0 65.0 66.0 0.2 103.0 2.3 B 20 6.0 0.4 35.0 48.0 1.4
101.0 3.6 B
[0252] The results indicate that polymers derived from
poly(allylamine) hydrochloride, and poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride
are able to deliver RNA to cells in vitro.
Example 37
Lysis Activity of Polymers Derived from Poly(Allylamine)
Hydrochloride, and Poly(Vinylamine) Hydrochloride
[0253] The following liposomes were prepared to approximate both
the plasma membrane and the endosomal membrane as previously
described (Gordon et al, Biophysical Journal, 88 (1), 305-316).
[0254] Plasma membrane mimic: 0.33 mol % sphingomyelin, 0.33 mol %
dioleoyl-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC), 0.33 mol % cholesterol, 0.1
mol % ganglioside GM1 [0255] Endosomal membrane mimic: 0.15 mol %
dipalmitoylphosphatidylserine (DPPS), 0.25 mol %
dioleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (DOPE), 0.6 mol % DOPC.
[0256] Liposomes were prepared containing carboxyfluorescein and
purified by size exclusion chromatography (G-50). Solutions were
standardized to 1 .mu.g total lipid per 0.5 mL HBS. To 0.5 mL of
liposomal solution was added 3 .mu.g of polymer (1 .mu.g/.mu.L in
water). Release of carboxyfluorescein was monitored (.lamda.Ex=492,
.lamda.Em=517) and the percentage of 100% lysis determined. The
results indicate that polymers derived from poly(allylamine)
hydrochloride, and poly(vinylamine) hydrochloride are able to lyse
membranes.
TABLE-US-00017 TABLE 14 Liposome Lysis by poly(allylamine)- and
poly(vinylamine)-based amphipathic polymers. Plasma Endosome
Membrane Lysis Polymer Number Lysis (%) (%) 2007-09-21-09 62.1 53.9
2008-02-04-03 49.6 61.4 2008-02-08-07 38.7 49.3 2008-2-8-7-C1-30-40
32.2 32.6 2008-2-8-7-C1-40-50 34.7 17.1 2008-2-8-7-C2-34-44 34.7
32.4 2008-2-8-7-C2-44-50 28.5 45.0
Example 38
In Vivo Delivery of Particles Prepared with Polymers Derived from
Poly(Vinyl Alcohol)
[0257] The following complexes were as described above, with the
following polymers. 200-400 .mu.l Complexes in 200-400 .mu.l
isotonic glucose, pH 9 were injected into the tail vain of mice. 48
h post injection, serum was collected from the mice (4 h fast prior
to bleed).
TABLE-US-00018 TABLE 15 Amphipathic poly(allylamine) and
poly(vinylamine) targeting of siRNA to hepatocytes Targeting
Polymer Boost Polymer Cholesterol Complex .mu.g polymer siRNA .mu.g
polymer mg/dL 1 50 1360 Factor VII 750 1360 93.00 .+-. 8.54 (lot
24, 20.5-28.5) (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 2 50 1360 ApoB 750 2008-02-04-03
34.33 .+-. 5.86 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 3 50 1360 ApoB 750
2008-02-08-07 49.00 .+-. 9.64 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 4 40 1360 ApoB 40
2007-09-21-09 79.00 .+-. 25.00 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 5 50 1360 ApoB
250 2007-09-21-09 40.00 .+-. 14.00 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 6 50 1360
GL3 500 2007-09-21-09 80 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5) 7 50 1360 ApoB 500
2007-09-21-09 32.00 .+-. 24.00 (lot 24, 20.5-28.5)
[0258] Results indicate that complexes prepared with polymers
derived from poly(allylamine) hydrochloride, and poly(vinylamine)
hydrochloride are able to deliver RNA to cells in vivo, resulting
in a response.
Example 39
Synthesis of poly-.beta.-aminoesters
[0259] Poly-.beta.-aminoesters can be synthesized by the following
reaction schemes.
##STR00015##
[0260] R.sup.1, and R.sup.2 are or contain a moiety independently
selected from the group comprising: [0261] a) hydrophobic group
selected from the list comprising: alkyl group, alkenyl group,
alkynyl group, aryl group, aralkyl group, aralkenyl group,
aralkynyl group, each of which may by linear, branched, or cyclic
and may can contain one or more heteroatoms provided the group
remains hydrophobic, sterol, and steroid; [0262] b) cationic group,
hydrogen, alkylamine, protected amine, protected alkylamine, and
alkyl imidazole; and, [0263] c) reactive group, protected reactive
group, thiol-containing group, and protected thiol group.
[0264] n=1-3.
[0265] m and o are integers.
[0266] Polymerization is not limited to R.sup.1NH.sub.2 or
R.sup.1NH.sub.2+R.sup.2NH.sub.2. One or more additional monomer
species (R.sup.3NH.sub.2, etc) may also be incorporated in the
polymer.
##STR00016##
[0267] R.sup.2 is or contains a moiety independently selected from
the group comprising: [0268] a) hydrophobic group, alkyl group,
alkenyl group, alkynyl group, aryl group, aralkyl group, aralkenyl
group, aralkynyl group, each of which may by linear, branched, or
cyclic and may can contain one or more heteroatoms, sterol, and
steroid; [0269] b) cationic group, hydrogen, alkylamine, protected
amine, protected alkylamine, and alkyl imidazole; and, [0270] c)
reactive group, protected reactive group, thiol-containing group,
and protected thiol group.
[0271] Pr=protective group.
[0272] Alk=alkyl, alkenyl, alkynyl, aryl, aralkyl, aralkenyl, or
aralkynyl group.
[0273] n=1-3.
[0274] m and o are integers.
[0275] One or more additional monomer species (R.sup.3NH.sub.2,
etc) may also be incorporated in the polymer.
C. Charge density of the above described polymer may be increased
by quaternizing the polymer back bone amines with methyl iodide or
other alkylating reagent. Increasing charge density decreases
micelle size of polymer-nucleic acid conjugates. This modification
is performed before the deprotection step as follows:
##STR00017##
[0276] Synthesis of an amphipathic poly-.beta.-aminoesters. A
1.2-1.3 molar excess of various combinations of RNH.sub.2 monomer
species to acrylate diesters was reacted in DMSO at 60-90.degree.
C. for 24-48 h. Mono-Boc-protected alkyldiamine was used as a
cationic monomer species. Diole diacrylate was used as a linking
monomer species. The reaction mixture was dissolved in THF and
treated with capping amine to bind all unreacted vinylogous
terminals. After solvent was removed in vacuum, the product was
precipitated from diethyl ether with petroleum ether. For
preparation of quaternized derivatives, the product was alkylated
with methyl iodide (MeI) prior to deprotection. Following
Boc-deprotetion in dichloromethane-trifluoroacetic acid mixture,
polymers were purified by titration with diethyl ether followed by
dialysis against deionized water or size exclusion
chromatography.
D. Analogous polymers can be constructed from different components
utilizing different condensations.
TABLE-US-00019 TABLE 16 Synthesis and compositions of
poly-.beta.-aminoesters. ##STR00018## ##STR00019## X Y Y-reactive
X-reactive group group Z Reaction type COX NH.sub.2 CONH acylation
Activated acids CHO NH.sub.2 CH.dbd.NH Shiff base formation CHO
NH.sub.2 CH.sub.2--NH.sub.2 Reductive amination OCN NH.sub.2 NHCONH
Urea formation OCN OH OCONH Urethane formation OCOCl NH.sub.2 OCONH
Urethane formation OCOCl OH OCO.sub.2 Carbonate formation
Nucleophile Leaving group Nucleophilic substitution
Example 40
Amphipathic Poly(Acrylates) Heteropolymers
[0277] Amphipathic poly(acrylates) can be synthesized according to
the scheme represented below:
##STR00020##
wherein: [0278] A is a boc protected ethyl (shown), propyl, or
butyl amino acrylate [0279] B is a higher hydrophobic (10-24 carbon
atoms, C18 shown) acrylate [0280] C is a lower hydrophobic (1-6
carbon atoms, C4 shown) acrylate [0281] And x, y, and z are
integers.
[0282] Removal of the boc protecting group after synthesis yields
the amine monomers.
[0283] An amine/C4/C18 poly(acrylates) were synthesized as follows.
The monomers were weighed and brought up into dioxane (DMF, DMSO)
at the indicated ratios. AIBN (azobis-isobutyronitrile) was added
and nitrogen was bubbled through the reaction at RT for 20 min. The
reaction mixture was then placed into a oil bath at 60.degree. C.
for 3 h. The solvent was then stripped off under reduced pressure.
The polymer was deprotected with 20 mL of TFA (trifluoroacetic
acid) for 1 h at RT. After 1 h 100 mL of water was added to the
reaction mixture, and the mixture was transferred into a 6-8 kDa
MWCO dialysis bag. The polymer was dialyized overnight against NaCl
and then another day against dH.sub.2O. The water was then removed
under reduced pressure, and the polymer was brought up in 50 mL of
dH.sub.2O and subjected to size exclusion chromatography to obtain
polymers of about 10 kDa to about 60 kDa.
[0284] For some polymers, in vitro transfection activity was
determined as described above. Cells were transfected with firefly
and renilla luciferase encoding plasmids and then transfected with
Firefly luciferase siRNA using the indicated polymer. Inhibition of
Firefly luciferase expression indicates functional delivery of the
siRNA to the cells.
TABLE-US-00020 TABLE 17 Amphipathic poly(acrylate) monomer
compositions and siRNA transfection activity. Percent inhibition of
luciferase polymer composition activity .mu.g polymer Polymer % A %
C % B 1.25 2.5 5 10 20 ethyl C4 C18.sup.a 50-522 75 20 5 55-522 80
15 5 14 46 76 71-522 75 20 5 81 85 89 74-522 75 20 5 12 44 85
99-522 70 25 5 0 9 31 106-522 65 30 5 46 59 114-522 80 15 .sup.
5.sup.a 13 13 23 120-522 75 20 .sup. 5.sup.a propyl C4 C18 57-522
80 15 5 17 57 73 66-522 75 20 5 58 73-522 75 20 5 76-522 80 15 5 93
81-522 80 15 5 88 95-522 70 25 5 103-522 65 30 5 110-522 70 22.5
7.5 49 84 85 117-522 80 15 .sup. 5.sup.a 118-522 75 20 .sup.
5.sup.a 123-522 80 25 5 28 68 70 127-522 80 25 5 50 78 butyl C4 C18
93-522 75 20 5 70 101-522 70 25 5 131-522 80 15 5 22 35 143-522 75
20 5 .sup.ahydrophobic groups are stearyl groups unless indicated,
indicated hydrophobic groups are oleyl groups
[0285] Further amphipathic poly(acrylate) polymers can readily be
formed with the compositions described in the following table.
TABLE-US-00021 TABLE 18 Amphipathic poly(acrylate) polymer
compositions: feed ratios. First hydrophobic Second hydrophobic
Amine monomer monomer monomer monomer % monomer % monomer %
##STR00021## 8075 C4 1520 C18 5 5 ##STR00022##
8580758080757580.sup.a80.sup.b80.sup.c80.sup.d C4 C2 C4
10152012.5102017.515151515 C18 C18 C18 5 5 7.510 5 7.5 5 5 5 5
##STR00023## 858075 C4 101520 C18 5 5 5 ##STR00024## 8075 C4 1520
C18 5 5 ##STR00025## 8075 C4 1520 C18 5 5 .sup.a,b,c,dBiodegradable
backbone: 0.25 eq. (a), 0.5 eq. (b), 1 eq. (c), or 2 eq. (d) of
##STR00026## were incorporated into the polymerization reaction
(eq. corresponds to total acrylate monomers). Incorporation into
the polymer backbone creates biodegradable ester bonds.
[0286] The number of carbon atoms linking the amine to the backbone
of the polymer and whether or not the linker is branched, affects
the pKa of the amine or steric effects near the amine. For example,
for the above polymers, ethyl amine has a pKa of about 8.1, propyl
amine has a pKa of about 9.3, and pentyl amine has a pKa of about
10.2. The pKa of the amine or steric effects near the amine affect
the lability of masking groups attached to the amine. For
reversible attachment of a maleic anhydride to an amine, a higher
pKa of the amine results is a slower rate of release of an
anhydride from the amine. Also, increased steric hindrance near the
amine, such as with an isopropyl linker,
[0287] Similar polymers can be made with C12, C14, C16, or C18
(alkyl, alkenyl, or alkynyl), cholesterol derivative, vitamin A
derivative, or vitamin D derivative hydrophobic groups.
Purification. Polymers are dialyzed in dH.sub.2O for 1-2 h,
overnight in high salt, and then 3-4.times. in dH.sub.2O for 1-24
hours each. pH is maintained at 4-5 with HCl. Some polymers may
then be filtered prior to size exclusion chromatography. Size
exclusion chromatography is used to remove small (<5000 kDa) and
very large (over 100 kDa) polymers. Biodegradability can be
determined using DNA condensation assays (as described above)
following polymer incubation a various pH's (5.0, 5.5, 6.0, 6.5,
7.0, 7.5, 8.0, 8.5) of various lengths of time (1, 3, 6, 24, 48,
72, 92 hours).
Example 41
Poly(Acrylate) and Poly(Methylacrylate) Heteropolymers
[0288] Poly(acrylate) and poly(methylacrylate) heteropolymers may
be synthesized using the general free radical reaction scheme:
##STR00027##
wherein R is a hydrogen or methyl group and Z is the desired
monomer pendent group.
[0289] For polymer syntheses, suitable monomers include, but are
not limited to:
Boc-Protected Amine-Containing Monomers (M):
##STR00028##
[0290] wherein n=1-3 and removal of the boc protecting group
exposes the amine.
Lower Hydrophobic Group Monomers (N):
##STR00029##
[0291] wherein n=1-8 and one or more carbons may be
unsaturated.
Higher Hydrophobic Group Monomers (O):
##STR00030##
[0292] wherein n=8-24 and one or more carbons may be
unsaturated.
[0293] Reactive group monomer for selective post synthetic polymer
modification (P):
##STR00031##
Shielding or Targeting Group Monomer (Q):
##STR00032##
[0294] wherein n=3-125 and R.sup.1 is --OCH3 or a cell receptor
ligand
[0295] Using the above monomers, membrane active heteropolymers can
be synthesized with the following compositions: M can be 40-100 mol
%; N can be 0-60 mol %; 0 can be 0-20 mol %; P can be 0-20 mol %;
and Q can be 0-20 mol %.
TABLE-US-00022 TABLE 19 Amphipathic poly(acrylate) and
poly(methylacrylate) heteropolymer compositions. M mol % N mol % O
mol % P mol % Q mol % 65 30 5 -- -- 70 25 5 -- -- 75 20 5 -- -- 80
15 5 -- -- 65 27.5 5 2.5 -- 65 27.5 5 -- 2.5 65 25 5 5 -- 65 25 5
-- 5 70 22.5 5 2.5 -- 70 22.5 5 -- 2.5 70 20 5 5 -- 70 20 5 -- 5 75
17.5 5 2.5 -- 75 17.5 5 -- 2.5 75 15 5 5 -- 75 15 5 -- 5 80 12.5 5
2.5 -- 80 12.5 5 -- 2.5 80 10 5 5 -- 80 10 5 -- 5
[0296] The foregoing is considered as illustrative only of the
principles of the invention. Furthermore, since numerous
modifications and changes will readily occur to those skilled in
the art, it is not desired to limit the invention to the exact
construction and operation shown and described. Therefore, all
suitable modifications and equivalents fall within the scope of the
invention.
Sequence CWU 1
1
13121RNAMus musculus 1gaaugugggu ggcaacuuua g 21221RNAMus musculus
2aaaguugcca cccacauuca g 21321RNAMus musculus 3ggacaugggu
uccaaauuac g 21421RNAMus musculus 4uaauuuggaa cccauguccc g
21521RNAMus musculus 5ucacggagcu cacagaauuc u 21621RNAMus musculus
6aauucuguga gcuccgugac u 21721RNAMus musculus 7ucccaaagcu
ccuucaaaau u 21821RNAMus musculus 8uuuugaagga gcuuugggaa g
21921RNAPhotinus pyralis 9cuuacgcuga guacuucgau u 211021RNAPhotinus
pyralis 10ucgaaguacu cagcguaagu u 211120DNAMus musculus
11aaatggtgaa ggtcggtgtg 201223DNAMus musculus 12catgtagttg
aggtcaatga agg 231323DNAMus musculus 13cgtgccgcct ggagaaacct gcc
23
* * * * *