U.S. patent application number 11/977511 was filed with the patent office on 2008-03-13 for liverstock management systems and methods.
This patent application is currently assigned to Micro Beef Technologies, Ltd.. Invention is credited to Khurshid A. Afimiwala, Philip C. Brink, Scott L. Crain, James B. Gibb, Timothy G. Niedecken, Richard D. Stroman.
Application Number | 20080065444 11/977511 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39153091 |
Filed Date | 2008-03-13 |
United States Patent
Application |
20080065444 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Stroman; Richard D. ; et
al. |
March 13, 2008 |
Liverstock management systems and methods
Abstract
This invention relates to systems and methods for managing
livestock, such as cattle, from conception to consumption. More
particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods in
which users, such as producers, feedlot managers, packers, buyers,
sellers, and consumers, are brought together through shared
information and improved communication. Users may access one or
more applications, tools, and/or systems to increase the value of
each animal, monitor and track each animal, and improve the
efficiency of their operation.
Inventors: |
Stroman; Richard D.;
(Indialantic, FL) ; Afimiwala; Khurshid A.;
(Shelton, CT) ; Gibb; James B.; (Louisville,
CO) ; Brink; Philip C.; (Erie, CO) ; Crain;
Scott L.; (Meade, KS) ; Niedecken; Timothy G.;
(Sebastian, FL) |
Correspondence
Address: |
KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP
121 SW SALMON STREET
SUITE 1600
PORTLAND
OR
97204
US
|
Assignee: |
Micro Beef Technologies,
Ltd.
|
Family ID: |
39153091 |
Appl. No.: |
11/977511 |
Filed: |
October 25, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10071437 |
Feb 7, 2002 |
|
|
|
11977511 |
Oct 25, 2007 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
705/7.12 ;
705/7.41 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06Q 40/00 20130101;
G06Q 10/08 20130101; G06Q 10/06375 20130101; G06Q 40/04 20130101;
G06Q 30/0201 20130101; G06Q 10/087 20130101; G06Q 10/0635 20130101;
G06Q 30/018 20130101; G06Q 30/00 20130101; G06Q 10/06395 20130101;
G06Q 10/063 20130101; G06Q 10/0631 20130101; G06Q 10/06315
20130101; G06Q 30/0203 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
705/007 |
International
Class: |
G06Q 10/00 20060101
G06Q010/00 |
Claims
1. A method of enabling a user to manage source materials related
to a livestock operation, said method comprising: enabling said
user to input information related to said operation into a central
database; storing said input information in said central database;
calculating the value of said source materials; and determining a
plurality of options to utilize said source materials with said
operation.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said source materials are
selected from the group consisting of: stormwater, wastewater,
manure, irrigation water, soil, compost, milling by-products,
animal carcasses, and fertilizer.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising: presenting said user
with a plurality of tests for determining the quality of said
source materials.
4. The method of claim 3 further comprising: selecting a test from
said plurality of test; and inputting results from said selected
test.
5. The method of claim 1 further comprising: presenting the user
with maintenance practices relating to said source materials.
6. A system of enabling a user to manage source materials related
to a livestock operation, said system comprising: a server; a
plurality of computers coupled to said server; and a central
database coupled to said server; wherein said server is configured
to: enable said user to input information related to said operation
into said central database; store said input information in said
central database; calculate the value of said source materials; and
determine a plurality of options to utilize said source materials
with said operation.
7. The system of claim 6, wherein said source materials are
selected from the group consisting of: stormwater, wastewater,
manure, irrigation water, soil, compost, milling by-products,
animal carcasses, and fertilizer.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein said server is further configured
to: present said user with a plurality of tests for determining the
quality of said source materials.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein said server is further configured
to: select a test from said plurality of test; and input results
from said selected test.
10. The system of claim 6, wherein said server is configured to:
present the user with maintenance practices relating to said source
materials.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This is application is a divisional of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 10/071,437, filed Feb. 7, 2002, and
incorporated herein by reference.
BACKGROUND
[0002] This invention relates to systems and methods for managing
livestock, such as cattle, from conception to consumption. More
particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods in
which members of the livestock production chain, such as producers,
feedlot managers, packers, and retailers, are brought together
through an Internet-based platform which integrates information,
technology-based tools, and electronic commerce designed to improve
communication throughout the livestock industry and to provide
systems and methods for tracking animal performance, creating
increased value, and improving overall operational efficiency and
quality.
[0003] The livestock industry is a multi-billion dollar business.
Beginning at the producer or ranch level, owners typically raise
animals until they are a certain age and weight. Livestock owners
sell a majority of their animals via local auction sale barns or
through order buyers. Sometimes the livestock are purchased by
buyers acting on behalf of feedlots or stocker operations. After
sorting and commingling the animals, which may occur several times,
the animals are sold to the feedlots or stocker operations.
Typically, all animals eventually end up at feedlots (sold or under
retained ownership) where they are grown to selling weight.
Finally, the livestock are sold to packers (e.g., a slaughterhouse)
for harvesting and delivery to retail and food service
distributors. Throughout this process, the livestock industry must
meet consumer demands for quality, consistency, animal welfare,
cost, and convenience.
[0004] Typically, producers, such as ranchers, may enroll in
branded beef or marketing programs to increase their livestock's
revenue potential. A branded beef or marketing program typically
requires that the animals are processed according to specific
guidelines. However, there is no standard method for verifying that
a rancher has complied with the program's guidelines. Typically,
branded beef programs are verified by verbal acknowledgment, which
at times may cause distrust amongst producers and buyers.
[0005] In conjunction with the lack of verification capabilities,
there is a need for monitoring and tracking animals as they move
through the supply chain. For example, during the auctioning phase,
it is typical for the animals to commingle. The animals may be
commingled at assimilation sites and then later sorted for shipment
to customers as a truckload. Once the animals commingle, they lose
their identity, and with each subsequent commingling, owners and
buyers possess less information about each individual animal.
Therefore, due to commingling and other practices of conventional
livestock marketing, even the healthiest animal becomes an
anonymous commodity. This creates a need for more efficient and
more humane sorting, transportation, handling, monitoring, and
tracking methods.
[0006] As a result of losing information on each animal, such as a
calf's vaccination and health history, the cost of healthcare for
animals increases. For example, without vaccination histories on
individual animals, feedlot managers may vaccinate all the animals
upon arrival to their facility to minimize sickness and death. With
vaccination and health histories for each animal along with current
status such as weight and temperature, feedlot managers may more
appropriately treat each animal with a specific health
regiment.
[0007] Typically, feedlot managers feed the animals until the
animals are at their optimal selling weight. The feedlot typically
includes a multitude of pens that are utilized to confine the
animals during their final growth phase. During the final growth
phase, each pen is provided with a given amount of feed per day.
The animals gain weight at different rates and there is a need for
identifying the optimal time for selling them to packers. It is
also difficult to access performance records of various feedlots.
Feedlot managers may desire to compare operational and performance
parameters of their feedlots with other feedlots.
[0008] In addition, many people, such as cowhands and feedlot
personnel, are required to attend to the animals at ranches and
feedlots. These people provide valuable insight by relying on
personal experiences, visual observations, and measurements.
However, there is a growing shortage of these people in the
industry.
[0009] Information is as critical to the livestock industry as it
is to any other business. Members of the livestock production chain
need information such as complete weather reports, commodity and
futures prices, performance data on each animal, breaking industry
news, and in-depth analyses by industry experts. They also require
recommendations and insight from experts, such as veterinarians,
processing crews, etc. Unfortunately, most livestock owners lose
valuable time consulting multiple sources to obtain the necessary
information and recommendations.
[0010] Other individuals have attempted to solve these problems.
For example, Pratt U.S. Pat. No. 5,673,647 and Pratt U.S. Pat. No.
6,000,361 describe an automated method and system for providing
individual animal electronic identification, measurement and value
based management of cattle in a large cattle feedlot. In the '647
and '361 patents, Pratt describes a process wherein a computer
stores individual animal measurement, performance and location
data, which is used by management to select animals for shipment
from the feedlot for slaughter at the optimum time.
[0011] As a result, livestock management systems and methods have
been developed in which members of the livestock production chain
may access a central database and application-specific programs via
the Internet.
[0012] These livestock management systems and methods provide
communication and integration between specific applications and
tools, such as a certification system, a tracking system, a
compliance enforcement system, an adaptive reasoning system, a
sorting system, a genetics improvement system, an environmental
management system, an adaptive logistics system, a supply and
demand management system, an electronic commerce system, an
integrated risk management system, and a consumer value system.
These systems improve communication, provide means to track animal
performance, create incremental value, and improve overall
efficiency that results in a safer and more economical meat
supply.
SUMMARY
[0013] This and other objects of the invention are accomplished in
accordance with the principles of the present invention by
providing systems and methods for managing livestock.
[0014] This invention relates to systems and methods for managing
livestock, such as cattle, from conception to consumption. More
particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods in
which users, such as producers, feedlot managers, packers, buyers,
sellers, and consumers, are brought together through shared
information and improved communication. Users may access one or
more applications, tools, and/or systems to increase the value of
each animal, monitor and track each animal, and improve the
efficiency of their operation.
[0015] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a certification system to differentiate animals by collecting
certification information on animals from conception to
consumption. Collecting certification information may allow users
to participate in beef marketing programs, which may increase the
revenue potential of an animal. Beef marketing programs may include
branded beef programs or any other marketing programs. The
certification system may assist a user in selecting a beef
marketing program best suited to the user's operation. Upon
selecting a beef marketing program, the user may be provided with
the program's requirements and may be instructed on how to meet the
requirements. Upon completion of a program, the user may receive a
notification. The notification may include a valuation or rating
for the user's animal. The notification may also qualify the value
of recommended procedures and treatments through valuation of a
seller's costs and a buyer's benefits.
[0016] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a tracking system to monitor the growth and performance of an
animal from conception to consumption. By implementing various
devices and equipment, the tracking system may be used to document
any processes and treatments performed, medical history, average
daily weight gain, and any other suitable tracking information in
different environments (e.g., feedlots, ranches, backgrounders,
etc.). The tracking system may promote the sharing of information
and building of relationships between users. The tracking system
may provide a safer and thorough approach for tracking the supply
of animal products.
[0017] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a compliance enforcement system to ensure that a user is
following specific requirements for a branded beef or marketing
program. The compliance enforcement system may acquire information
from one or more sources, such as other systems, to verify the
compliance of the user. Distributors, experts, or any other
suitable person may enter compliance information. For example, a
veterinarian may notify the compliance enforcement system when a
user has purchased a vaccine. The entry of the purchase may
indirectly confirm participation in a program where that vaccine is
a prerequisite.
[0018] Compliance may also be determined by corresponding the
purchases of products and services with the program requirements of
the program (e.g., marketing, branded beef, etc.) that the user has
selected. Upon passing a compliance screening and meeting the
program requirements, the user may be entitled to incentives. The
compliance enforcement system may provide the user with a
compliance rating. In some embodiments, the compliance enforcement
system may evaluate the performance of the expert, such as a
veterinarian.
[0019] Some embodiments may provide a user with a data transactions
system to ensure the communication of livestock-related
information. In some embodiments, the data transactions system may
differentiate information into such groups as privileged and
private to share information with other users of the supply chain.
The data transactions system may assign an access indicator to
information entered or to be entered into the central database. The
data transactions system may also differentiate information to
protect the identity of the owner. In some embodiments, the data
transactions system may provide users with an opportunity to log
in. In approaches where users log in, the data transactions system
may use the log in information to retrieve the user's status and
accessibility during the data transaction process. The data
transactions system may use user names or access codes (e.g., CiN
numbers or any other suitable identification) to allow data service
providers, veterinarians, organizations, and other affiliated data
entry personnel to input data without compromising the security of
the animal owner.
[0020] In some embodiments, data transactions system may also
provide users with a notification feature. In some embodiments,
data transactions system may allow the user to select particular
information to be delivered to other users, such as buyers,
veterinarians, organization, or any other suitable user.
[0021] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with an adaptive reasoning system to simulate logic, rules, and/or
good practices used by experts in the livestock industry. The
adaptive reasoning system may collect adaptive reasoning
information using, for example, a data acquisition system. Adaptive
reasoning information may include animal observations, sensor
measurements, or any other suitable information relating to
adaptive reasoning. The adaptive reasoning system may retrieve
historical data from the central database (obtained from other
systems and applications) and compare the data with the collect
adaptive reasoning information.
[0022] Based on the rules, logic, and good practices, the adaptive
reasoning system may provide the user with one or more
recommendations and assess the risks associated with each
recommendation. When the user performs the action as recommended,
the actual outcome may be compared to the expected outcome. The
difference between the outcomes may be used to improve the rules,
logic, and good practices maintained by the adaptive reasoning
system.
[0023] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a sorting system to sort animals based on physical attributes,
process attributes, any other attributes, and/or any combinations
thereof. In some embodiments, the sorting system may physically
sort animals based on sorting criteria inputted by the user. The
sorting system may consist of one or more devices which obtain
sorting information on each animal passing through the sorting
system. As sorting information is obtained, the sorting system
compares the sorting information to the user's sorting criteria and
guides the animal into the appropriate pen. In some embodiments,
the sorting system may virtually sort the animals by sending
instructions to a user to, for example, notch an identification tag
on an animal.
[0024] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a genetics improvement system to improve the quality of
animals through genetics. The genetics improvement system may
determine herd performance factors important to a user's operation.
The genetics improvement system may obtain herd performance
information from other operations (e.g., an operation with highly
profitable performance ratings). The user may access the herd
performance information to improve the user's operation.
[0025] The genetics improvement system may allow the user to input
herd specification or objectives. Upon indicating the objectives of
the user, the genetics improvement system may provide the user with
genetic traits that influence the user's herd specifications and/or
objectives. The genetics improvements system presents the user with
an improvement strategy, which may include replacement bulls,
planned mating, or any other suitable strategy. Upon performing the
improvement strategy, the user may be provided with further goals
and improvement strategies for future production cycles.
[0026] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with an environmental management system to manage the environmental
aspects of the user's operation so that the user complies with
government regulations and protects the environment. The
environmental management system may collect environmental
information, which may include source material quality and
quantity, land information, mapping information, and other suitable
information. The environmental management system may provide the
user with environmental options, such as "since the field has X
pounds of phosphorus per area, the user should not apply more than
Y pounds of manure." The user may be provided with the steps needed
to complete the environmental options.
[0027] The environmental management system may also provide
reminders to complete required activities (e.g., monitoring lagoon
levels, testing air quality, etc.). The collected environmental
information may assist the user in complying with government
regulations. For example, the environmental management system may
provide checklists for periodic environmental testing and report
the environmental information to the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
[0028] In some embodiments, the environmental management system may
provide the user with guidelines to manage contingencies, cleanups,
and nuisances. The environmental management system may also provide
geographical information and land application management tools for
mapping and managing byproducts, such as manure. The environmental
management system may also correspond the environmental information
with an animal's identification tag, such as an EID tag. The user
may use this information for health and performance analyses.
[0029] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with an adaptive logistics system to manage the shipping
arrangements of animals and/or other commodities efficiently. The
adaptive logistics system may monitor shipping patterns, which may
include monitoring the performance, various routes, the mortality
rate, the animal handling skills, and the cleanliness of one or
more truckers. Upon making a transaction with another user, the
adaptive logistics system may obtain shipping details from the
user. The adaptive logistics system may determine the shipping
availability by identifying the available truckers based on their
proximity to the pick-up and drop-off locations and past
performance record. Adaptive logistics system may determine the
shipping arrangement by suggesting one of the available
truckers.
[0030] Upon delivery, the adaptive logistics system may allow the
user to provide feedback, which may be provided in terms of the
condition of the animals, animal shrinkage during shipment,
mortality rate, morbidity rate, transportation time, on-time pickup
and delivery, and any other suitable feedback. Adaptive logistics
system 135 may further identify suitable locations for new
facilities, such as eMerge facilities, assimilation sites, or any
other facility, based on transportation data and committed
transactions for future livestock purchases and deliveries.
[0031] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a supply and demand management system to provide the user with
a real-time inventory of animals and future orders. The supply and
demand management system may provide the user with trading
information on the animals and assist in making a transaction to
better manage their inventory. The supply and demand management
system may provide the used with the flexibility to fill an order
from one or more facilities (e.g., fulfill one order from three
ranches).
[0032] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a electronic commerce system to manage the sales and
acquisitions of the user. The electronic commerce system may be a
catalog auction, a marketplace, an online brokerage, a real-time
sale barn, an auction, a product catalog, an online commodity
futures trading, etc. In some embodiments, the electronic commerce
system may be an online catalog auction, which may solicit bids on
animals. In some embodiment, the electronic commerce system may be
a sale barn auction where the user may bid on an animal auctioned
at a local sale barn.
[0033] The electronic commerce system may also serve as a
repository of product catalogs and technical data. For example, the
user may access the electronic commerce system to order spare parts
and obtain information to configure newly acquired equipment. In
some embodiments, the electronic commerce system may be a
marketplace, where the electronic commerce system acts as a
purchasing agent.
[0034] In some embodiments, the electronic commerce system may
provide the user with a content management system, which provides
agricultural- and livestock-related information (e.g., news). The
content management system may also provide chat sites and links to
facilitate education and communication between users. For example,
users may be provided with online education sessions on topics,
such as good management practices, risk management, and advances in
genetics.
[0035] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide users
with a integrated risk management system to determine risk levels
and provide the user with advice on offsetting risk in the user's
operation. The user must plan his or her production in advance and
may consider factors, such as a downturn in the economy, a decline
in exports, the cost of fuel, weather conditions, etc. The user may
input material inputs to begin estimating the user's costs. The
integrated risk management system may compare the user's operation
against other operations. This may identify opportunities for
improvement and cost reduction strategies.
[0036] The integrated risk management system may determine when the
user should sell his or her product. This determination may require
the user to restructure the user's operation depending on market
conditions, costs, and other factors. In some embodiments, the
integrated risk management system may broker relationship between
users in order to minimize risks. For example, a manufacturer may
reduce a user's farm equipment costs through a long-term lease.
[0037] Some embodiments of the present invention may provide a user
with a consumer value system to evaluate the user's product and
provide the user with feedback. The user may enter attributes or
any other suitable product information. Attributes may include
genetics information, completed program information, etc. The
consumer value system may obtain marketing information and
determine the user's consumer value. The user's consumer value may
be a quality or performance rating. The user may decide to make
changes to the user's operation based on the ratings. In some
embodiments, the consumer value system may identify other products,
which may be compatible with the user's operation. In some
embodiments, the consumer value system may analyze collected
attribute from other users (e.g., feedback) using an expert system.
The consumer value system may provide the user with the analysis,
thereby assisting the user in managing multiple animals.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0038] Further features of the invention, its nature and various
advantages will be more apparent from the following detailed
description of the preferred embodiments taken in conjunction with
the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer
to like parts throughout, and in which:
[0039] FIG. 1 illustrates an arrangement for the livestock
management system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0040] FIG. 2 is a generalized of illustrative steps for providing
users with features relating to livestock management, in accordance
with the present invention.
[0041] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
certifying animals for a branded beef or a marketing program using
the certification system, in accordance with the present
invention.
[0042] FIG. 4 is an illustrative block diagram of certification
information collected at various locations, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0043] FIGS. 5-6 are illustrative displays that may be displayed
for providing certification information and program requirements,
in accordance with the present invention.
[0044] FIG. 7 is an illustrative notification that may be provided
to the user upon completion of a branded beef or marketing program,
in accordance with the present invention.
[0045] FIG. 8 shows illustrative arrangements for the equipment and
devices used to obtain tracking information, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0046] FIG. 9 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
monitoring and verifying animals using the tracking system, in
accordance with the present invention.
[0047] FIGS. 10-12 are flowcharts of illustrative steps involved in
enforcing compliance using the compliance enforcement system, in
accordance with the present invention.
[0048] FIG. 13 is an illustrative display that may be displayed
when verifying the user's compliance information, in accordance
with the present invention.
[0049] FIG. 14 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
ensuring the communication of information using the data
transactions system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0050] FIG. 15 shows a block flow diagram of the adaptive reasoning
system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0051] FIG. 16 illustrates an arrangement for the equipment and
devices used in the sorting system, in accordance with the present
invention.
[0052] FIG. 17 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
sorting animals using the sorting system, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0053] FIG. 18 is an illustrative block diagram of sorting
information that may be collected for endpoint management, in
accordance with the present invention.
[0054] FIG. 19 shows a block flow diagram of the genetics
improvement system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0055] FIG. 20 is an illustrative block diagram of environmental
information that may be collected by the environmental management
system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0056] FIG. 21 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
providing environmental management options using the environmental
management system, in accordance with the present invention.
[0057] FIG. 22 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
receiving adaptive logistics information, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0058] FIG. 23 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
shipping animals using adaptive logistics system, in accordance
with the present invention.
[0059] FIG. 24 is an illustrative flow diagram showing the
transport of animals between various locations, in accordance with
the present invention.
[0060] FIG. 25 is an illustrative display that may be displayed for
providing the user with access to inventory or ordering
information, in accordance with the present invention.
[0061] FIG. 26 is an illustrative block diagram of the features of
the electronic commerce system, in accordance with the present
invention.
[0062] FIG. 27 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
providing the user with an assessment of the user's operation using
the integrated risk management system, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0063] FIG. 28 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
providing the user with consumer value information and product
alternatives using the consumer value system, in accordance with
the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0064] This invention relates to systems and methods for managing
livestock, such as cattle, from conception to consumption. More
particularly, this invention relates to systems and methods in
which users, such as producers, feedlot managers, packers, buyers,
sellers, and consumers, are brought together through shared
information and improved communication.
[0065] The systems and methods may allow a user to manage one or
more animals from birth to death. In some embodiments, one or more
animals may be electronically detected and identified (e.g., by
using RFID tags or any other suitable approach for identifying
animals). By collecting and processing information relating to each
animal, a user may manage the requirements of each animal. Multiple
users may access information relating to each animal. For example,
when a user sells an animal to a buyer, the buyer may obtain
information relating to the purchased animal. The buyer may then
collect information on the purchased animal and pass the
information onto the next buyer, such as a packer. Users may also
access one or more applications, tools, and/or systems to increase
the value of each animal, monitor and track each animal, and
improve the efficiency of their operation. It should be noted that
the system may be implemented for the entire life cycle of an
animal (e.g., from birth to death) or at multiple stages of the
life of an animal (e.g., from the feedlot to the packer).
[0066] The present invention is primarily described herein in terms
of "the system" and its associated subsystems (e.g., sorting
system, genetics improvement system, etc.). It will be understood
that the system may be any suitable, software, hardware, or both
configured to implement the features of the present invention. The
system may be located at a central location (e.g., a central
server). In another suitable approach, the system may reside among
different locations (e.g., a network).
[0067] In one particular embodiment, the system may include
client-side software, hardware, or both. For example, the system
may encompass one or more Web-pages or Web-page portions (e.g., via
any suitable encoding, such as XML, Cold Fusion, etc.).
[0068] Although the livestock management system is described herein
as being implemented on client computers, this is only
illustrative. The livestock management system may be implemented on
any suitable platform (e.g., personal computer, palmtop computer,
laptop computer, personal digital assistant, cellular phone, etc.)
to provide such features.
[0069] One suitable arrangement of such a livestock management
system is shown in FIG. 1, which shows illustrative livestock
management system 100 constructed in accordance with the present
invention. The livestock management system of the present invention
may be implemented using any suitable communications network. In
the illustrative arrangement of FIG. 1, client computers 110 may be
connected via links 115 to a communication network 120. Client
computer 110 may include any device or combination of devices
suitable for providing communications to a user of the system.
Client computer 110 may include, for example, any suitable personal
computer, portable computer, palmtop computer, handheld personal
computer, personal digital assistant, combined cellular phone and
personal digital assistant, set-top box (e.g., a Web TV enabled
set-top box), or other suitable device.
[0070] Main facility 105 contains a central database 109 for
storing information, such as electronic identification numbers,
vaccination history, genetic information, drug efficacy,
certification history, feedlot performance, and any other suitable
information. Main facility 105 also contains a server 107. Server
107 may be any server suitable for transmitting and receiving data
over communication network 120. The server may provide one or more
web pages to client computers using one or more suitable protocols
(e.g., HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) and Transmission Control
Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP)). The pages may be defined
using any suitable programming language (e.g., HyperText Markup
Language (HTML), Dynamic HyperText Markup Language (DHTML),
Extensible Markup Language (XML), etc.). The pages may include
scripts, computer code, or subsets of computer code that define
mini-programs (e.g., Perl scripts, Java applets, etc.). The servers
may also run a database engine suitable for maintaining a database
of consumer, transaction, offer, incentive, and fee information,
such as Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle 8i, or any other suitable
database engine. In practice, one or more functions of server 107
may be distributed across multiple servers, or may be integrated
into a single server.
[0071] Although database 109 is primarily described as a central
database, database 109 may be any suitable facility of obtaining
data. Database 109 may be one or more local databases that provide
the data to a central database. Database 109 may be a single
database even if all the information in the database is
distributed.
[0072] Information from database 109 may be transmitted to a
certification system 160, a tracking system 145, a compliance
enforcement system 155, an adaptive reasoning system 140, a sorting
system 130, a genetics improvement system 180, an environmental
management system 150, an adaptive logistics system 135, a supply
and demand management system 170, an electronic commerce system
190, an integrated risk management system 125, a consumer value
system 195, any other suitable systems, or any suitable combination
thereof, via link 115.
[0073] Link 115 may include any transmission medium suitable for
communicating data to and from communication network 120. Link 115
may include, for example, a dial-up telephone line, a computer
network, an Internet link, an infrared link, a radio frequency
link, a wireless link, a satellite link, a digital subscriber line
link (e.g., a DSL link), a cable TV link, a Data Over Cable Service
Interface Specification (DOCSIS) link, or any other suitable
transmission link, or suitable combination of such links. Different
links may be of different types depending on, for example, the
particular type of access device or server used.
[0074] Any protocol or protocol stack suitable for supporting
communications between client computers 110 and server 107 may be
used. For example, Ethernet, Token Group, Fiber Distributed Data
Interface (FDDI), Circuit-Switched Cellular (CSC), Cellular Digital
Packet Data (CDPD), RAM mobile data, Global System for Mobile
communications (GSM), time division multiple access (TDMA), code
division multiple access (CDMA), wireless application protocol
(WAP), serial line Internet protocol (SLIP), point to point
protocol (PPP), Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol
(TCP/IP), Sequenced Packet Exchange and Internetwork Packet
Exchange (SPX/FPX) protocols, or any other suitable protocol or
combination of protocols may be used.
[0075] Any suitable communication network 120 may be used in the
communication system in accordance with the present invention. For
example, communication network 120 may be comprised in whole or in
part of the Internet, an intranet, a public data network, a private
data network, a wireless network, a cable network, or any other
suitable data network or combination of networks.
[0076] The system may be implemented using application software
that runs primarily on client computer 110, server 107, or any
suitable combination thereof. However, regardless of the type of
system architecture or platform used, the application software that
supports the livestock management features described herein may be
referred to as the system.
[0077] In a computer-based system, the user may access the system
by browsing to an Internet Web site or a site on a private network.
In another embodiment, system based on cellular telephones or the
like may be launched by selecting an appropriate on-screen menu
option presented on the display of the cellular telephone.
[0078] For purposes of brevity and clarity, and not by way of
limitation, the system is primarily described herein in conjunction
with the use of a computer-based system. It will be understood that
this is merely an illustrative embodiment of the present invention,
and that any other suitable device or combination of devices may be
used.
[0079] For purposes of brevity and clarity, and not by way of
limitation, the present invention is primarily described herein as
using the system to perform all of the functions of the present
invention.
[0080] The system may provide a user with an interface having
suitable displays that may be used by the user to benefit from the
features of the livestock management system. For example, the
system may provide the user with the ability to access lists of
available information.
[0081] FIG. 2 shows a generalized flowchart of illustrative steps
involved in providing features for livestock management. At step
210, the system may electronically detect one or more animals. For
example, the system may detect multiple animals using RFID tags or
any other suitable animal identification approach. In response to
detecting one or more animals, the system may electronically
identify the one or more animals at step 215. At step 220, the
system may collect information on the one or more animals. The
system may store the collected information in a database. In some
embodiments, the system may automatically collect information based
at least in part on the detection of the one or more animals. At
step 225, the system may process at least a portion of the
collected information. At step 230, the system may provide the user
with access to the collected and processed information. For
example, the system may provide a user that has purchased an animal
with access to information relating to the animal.
[0082] Certification system 160, tracking system 145, compliance
enforcement system 155, data transactions system 165, adaptive
reasoning system 140, sorting system 130, genetic improvement
system 180, environmental management system 150, adaptive logistics
system 135, supply and demand management system 170, electronic
commerce system 190, integrated risk management system 125, and
consumer value system 195 may be any computer-based system and may
run a database engine suitable for maintaining a database of
information such as, Microsoft SQL Server, Oracle 8i, or any other
suitable database engine. These systems are shown as being
connected to server 1076 via communication network 120. However,
the features of these systems may be provided using a single
server, distributed across multiple servers, or integrated into
server 107. Any other suitable approach may also be used.
Certification System
[0083] In order for users, such as the members of the livestock
production chain, to lower production costs, create incremental
value, and track animal performance, livestock must be
differentiated. With the advent of electronic identification tags,
the Internet, and other new technologies, animals may be
differentiated by, for example, collecting and sharing
certification information using certification system 180.
Certification system 180 may be standalone or may be included as
part of the system. Any other suitable approach may also be
used.
[0084] In the examples of FIGS. 5-7, certification system 180 is
provided through a series of interactive web pages. Although the
present invention is described primarily in the context of user
interfaces on web pages, user interfaces may be part of any other
suitable application. For example, user interfaces may be provided
with certification software. In another example, user interfaces
may be accessed over the Internet. Any other suitable approach may
also be used.
[0085] Certification system 180 may be used to differentiate
livestock. Certification system 180 may require users to collect
information in order to participate in a beef marketing program,
wherein the beef marketing program may include a branded beef
program, a marketing program, or any other suitable program. These
programs may require that the animals are produced and processed
according to specific requirements for health (e.g., immunity
building, health improvement, etc.), management, genetics, and
nutrition. Such program requirements may aid in producing animals
with above average growth rates, more consistent carcass quality
(e.g., Choice), and/or improved yield grade. Participation in a
beef marketing program may substantially improve the overall
revenue potential of the animals. In some embodiments,
certification system 180 may assist such programs with the data
collection, verification, analysis, feedback, and/or dissemination
of information via the Internet. In some embodiments, certification
system 180 may assist a user (e.g., a producer or feedlot manager)
with evaluating the requirements of one or more beef marketing
programs and selecting the program most appropriate for his or her
operation.
[0086] The information collected by certification system 180 may
provide users (e.g., buyers) with insight into an animal's health
immunity, genetics, history, growth potential, and/or future
carcass performance. Users may pay a fee for this information and
may prefer to purchase certified livestock. Typically, buyers may
pay more for certified livestock, and hence certification system
180 may increase the overall value of these animals. In some
embodiments, certification, system 180 may provide the seller with
broader market coverage for the seller's livestock because of
industry-wide recognition of beef marketing programs, their
promotions, and sponsorships of special Internet auctions of these
certified animals.
[0087] FIG. 3 is an illustrative flowchart of steps involved in
certifying animals for a branded beef or a marketing program. At
step 1200, the user may be provided with an opportunity to
participate in a beef marketing program by selecting the beef
marketing program on a certification display. The user may select
at least one beef marketing program. When the user selects a
program, the user may be presented with program requirements at
step 1210. Multiple program requirements may be presented to the
user as a list. These program requirements may include rules for
health, management, nutrition, and/or any other suitable rules. At
step 1220, users may be instructed on how to meet the program
requirements. This may require documenting procedures performed on
the animals from birth to slaughter (step 1230). Such procedures
may include medical treatments, weight or other physical attribute
measurements, vaccinations, or any other suitable procedures. An
example of the type of data, procedures, and information that may
be recorded during a calf's life by certification system 180 is
shown in FIG. 4. As shown in area 1270, packer 1275 may collect
certification information 1280, which may include hot carcass
weight, quality grade, yield grade, backfat thickness, and carcass
value. When packer 1275 collects certification information 1280,
packer 1275 may transmit information 1280 to the central
database.
[0088] Referring back to FIG. 3, at step 1240, the documented
procedures may be stored (e.g., uploaded) in the central database.
At step 1250, users may access all of the certification information
available on a group of animals or an individual animal via the
Internet. For example, a beef marketing program may query the
central database to verify that one or more animals came from a
specific ranch, were finished at a specific feedlot, and were
processed at the program's packing plant. That is, a user may query
the database to verify that multiple animals are certifiable under
one or more beef marketing programs.
[0089] In some embodiments, users may receive a notification
indicating that the user has met all the requirements of the
branded beef program (step 1260). The notification may also include
the status of each program requirement. Notifications may be
provided electronically, as for example, e-mail, pop-up messages,
or other suitable electronic messages, or as printed certificates,
that are delivered to the users. Notifications may also qualify the
value of recommended procedures and treatments through valuation of
a seller's costs and a buyer's benefits. The seller's costs may
include vaccinations, labor, feed, calf morbidity and mortality
during weaning, market price volatility, etc. The buyer's benefits
may include reduction in calf morbidity and mortality rates, weight
gain performance, conversion efficiency, carcass performance,
medicine, veterinary charges, labor, etc. Such information may be
used to determine a fair market value for certified animals and may
provide data to other programs or applications (e.g., sorting
system 130, tracking system 145, etc.) within the system.
[0090] Certification system 180 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may make
modifications without departing form the scope and spirit of the
invention.
[0091] FIG. 5 shows an illustrative display 1300, such as a web
page, for providing a user with an opportunity to select a branded
beef and/or marketing program. Illustrative display 1300, as well
as other displays described herein, may include header portion
1305. Header portion 1305 may include, for example, the name of the
system provider (e.g., Company A), a description of the display,
and link 1310. Link 1310 may provide a user with opportunities to
access information about the system or access any other suitable
information. Link 1310 may include any suitable passive or
interactive text, graphics, video, audio, animation, and/or any
other suitable content. Illustrative display 1300 may provide the
user with opportunities to select the appropriate branded beef
program by inputting criteria (e.g., filter 1317, filter 1319,
etc.). Users may, for example, select criteria using searching
interface 1315.
[0092] Display 1300 may provide program menu 1350 listing one or
more of the branded beef programs offered by Company A. Program
menu 1350 includes program indicators (e.g., indicator 1320,
indicator 1325, indicator 1330, etc.) for one or more of the
branded beef programs offered by Company A. Program indicators may
include any suitable passive or interactive text, graphics, video,
audio, animations, a combination thereof, and/or any other suitable
content. In this example, the user indicates a desire to
participate in "Branded Beef 3" by selecting indicator 1330. Upon
selecting indicator 1330, the user may be directed to illustrative
display 1400. FIG. 6 shows an illustrative display 1400 for the
program requirements the user must follow for the user's animal to
be certified by "Branded Beef 3." Display 1400 may include
checklists, check boxes, lists, forms, or any other suitable
on-screen elements.
[0093] The user may receive a notification upon completion of the
program requirements and upon verification of the user's actions.
An illustrative notification is shown in FIG. 7. A notification
1500 may include a message to the user and a valuation or rating of
the user's animal. For example, the valuation may be in terms of
the user's costs, buyer's benefits, and comparisons relative to
other participants in the program on an average basis either at a
local, state, or national level.
[0094] Certification system 130 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention and various modifications may be made
by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and
spirit of the invention.
Tracking System
[0095] Using certification system 130, users may differentiate
animals. Some embodiments may use the certification information or
any other suitable information stored in the central database to
aid in tracking animals. The system may provide, for example,
tracking system 145 that uses information to assist in monitoring
the growth and performance of each animal. Tracking system 145 may
be standalone or may be included as part of the system. Any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0096] Tracking system 145 may monitor the growth and performance
of each animal from conception to harvest. Tracking system 145 may
require users (e.g., owners of animals) to document, for example,
all processes and treatments performed, medical history, average
daily weight gain in different environments. Buyers desiring to
purchase animals through branded beef programs or other marketing
programs may use the tracking information to verify the source
and/or condition of the animals. Since the ownership of the animal
may change several times throughout its life, each user (e.g.,
stakeholder) in the supply chain may be required to acquire
relevant data and enter the data into the central database. For
example, tracking system 145 may generate a medical record in a
database documenting the diagnosis of any illness and specific
medication dispensed any time an animal becomes sick. Each user in
the supply chain may access the central database through
applications programs and data acquisition systems, such as
compliance programs, certification programs, adaptive reasoning
programs, adaptive logistics programs, and other applications
within the livestock management system. In an alternate embodiment,
when a buyer purchases one or more animals, tracking system 145 may
provide the buyer with tracking information in the central database
relating to the purchased animals.
[0097] One example of multiple embodiments of tracking system is
shown in FIG. 8. As shown, tracking system 145 may consist of
multiple devices unique to its own environment. At feedlot 360,
tracking system 145 may consist of a stationary antenna, a radio
frequency reader, a chute-side data acquisition system, a global
positioning satellite receiver, and a desktop computer that may
connect to the central database via the Internet. Multiple devices,
such as a weight scale, a rectal thermometer, or any other suitable
device may be connected to tracking system 145 via the chute-side
data acquisition system.
[0098] Tracking system 145 may require animals to have radio
frequency identification tags (hereinafter referred to as "RFID
tags"). The degree of automation of tracking system 145 may depend
on the size and sophistication of each user's operation. For
example, a smaller operation (e.g., ranch, background, etc.) may
desire the least amount of instrumentation and automation. In
another embodiment, tracking system 145 may consist of a handheld
computer and a desktop computer, which may connect to the central
database via the Internet. The handheld computer may connect to
multiple devices, such as a weight scale or any other suitable
devices. In these embodiments, tracking information may be entered
manually or may be entered automatically into the tracking system.
Tracking information, such as medical records, may be uploaded to
the central database.
[0099] FIG. 9 is an illustrative flowchart of steps involved in
monitoring and verifying animals using tracking system 145 in
accordance with the present invention. Animals may have RFID tags,
barcode tags, or other identification tags attached to their ear or
any other suitable location. At step 300, when animal walks or runs
by a station, the animal may be identified by, for example, using a
radio frequency reader to read the animal's tag. However, any other
suitable approach may be used. After identifying the animal, the
station may execute a plurality of devices and/or applications to
obtain tracking information from the animal. For example, the
station may capture a static or dynamic image of the animal with a
digital camera or any other suitable image-capturing device. The
station may also use rectal thermometers and weight scales for
temperature and weight measurements. The station may be used to
collect tracking information, such as weight, temperature, color,
location, etc. Tracking information may be manually or
automatically entered depending on, for example, the size and
sophistication of the user's operation. At step 310, tracking
system 145 may provide the user (e.g., a rancher) with an
opportunity to manually input tracking information. In another
suitable approach, tracking system 145 may automatically enter the
tracking information at step 320. At step 330, tracking system 145
may periodically (e.g., a time predetermined by tracking system 145
and/or the user) store the tracking information acquired on animals
in the central database. When the tracking information acquired is
deemed incomplete, the central database may generate an electronic
(e.g., an e-mail, pop-up, or any other electronic message) or
printed notification and send it to the user. Tracking system 145
may allow the user to access tracking information from the central
database, tracking system 145, or any other suitable system.
[0100] Tracking system 145 may promote sharing of information
building of relationships between users (e.g., buyers and sellers)
in the supply chain. At step 340, the tracking information stored
in the central database may be available to one or more users in
the supply chain. Tracking system 145 may also aid in benchmarking
and predicting future trends. For example, tracking system 145 may
provide tracking information to adaptive reasoning system 140,
adaptive logistics system 135, and other applications within the
livestock management system.
[0101] At step 350, tracking system 145 may also analyze the
tracking information and feedback from other users in the supply
chain to assist a user in making improvements in his or her
operation, quality, and overall profitability. Additionally,
tracking system 145 may track animals from conception to
consumption. This may inherently provide a safer method and
mechanism for tracking the supply of meat.
[0102] Tracking system 145 is merely illustrative of the principles
of this invention and various modifications may be made by those
skilled, in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of
the invention.
Compliance Enforcement System
[0103] Certification system 180, tracking system 145, and other
systems may store their respective data into the central database.
The system may provide a method for enforcing compliance that uses
the information stored in the central database. The system may
provide, for example, compliance enforcement system 155 that looks
to corroborate the information in the central database. Compliance
system 180 may be standalone or may be included as part of the
system. Any other suitable approach may also be used.
[0104] Compliance enforcement system 155 may be used to ensure that
a user (e.g., sellers, ranchers, stocker operators, backgrounders,
feedlot managers, etc.) is following specific requirements for a
livestock program. For example, a branded beef program may not
allow the use of hormone growth promoters, antibiotics, certain
genetics and/or animal proteins in the feed. Compliance enforcement
system 155 may use information acquired from one or more sources to
ensure compliance by the user. For example, compliance enforcement
system 155 may obtain tracking information from tracking system 145
and certification information from certification system 160.
[0105] Using the Internet or the central database, users may
selectively share and compare compliance information with buyers.
Compliance information such as medical records, process records,
nutrition records, genetic test results and any other suitable
information may be shared to determine whether a user has complied
with the buyer's requirements. Compliance enforcement system 155
may rely on feedback mechanisms and facilitation from
veterinarians, nutritionists, animal science professionals, and/or
any other suitable experts. Experts may be used to monitor for
compliance and provide feedback and advice to sellers for improving
compliance and livestock quality.
[0106] In an alternate embodiment, an authorized user may inspect
an animal for compliance. Authorized users may include beef
marketing representatives, authorized personnel, or any other
suitable user. Compliance enforcement system 155 may provide the
authorized user with access to information in the central database,
review records, and inspect the animal, thereby ensuring compliance
with the branded beef program or beef marketing program.
[0107] In some embodiments, compliance enforcement system 155 may
monitor communications from multiple computers concerning an
individual animal. For example, compliance enforcement system 155
may monitor a communication (e.g., an e-mail, a data entry, etc.).
Compliance enforcement system 155 may compare that communication
with compliance enforcement criteria stored in the central
database. In some embodiments, compliance enforcement system 155
may verify that an individual animal complies with the program
requirements of, for example, a beef marketing program based on the
comparison.
[0108] FIG. 10 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
enforcing compliance in the livestock management system. At step
1355, the user may purchase a product or service, such as a vaccine
from a veterinarian, a distributor, an Internet marketplace, or any
other suitable distributor. At step 1360, compliance enforcement
system 155 may detect when a product or service is used on an
animal. For example, when a user purchases a product or service
from a distributor, the distributor (e.g., veterinarian or any
other suitable expert) may send a message to the central database
at step 1360. The entry of the purchase in the central database may
indirectly confirm participation in a preconditioning program where
that product or service (e.g., vaccine) is a prerequisite.
Compliance may also be determined by correlating or comparing the
purchases of specific vaccines or other purchased products or
services over the Internet to multiple requirements of a beef
marketing or other marketing program that the user desires to
market their animals through. At step 1365, the compliance
information from the distributor may be stored in the central
database.
[0109] FIG. 11 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
providing users with incentives upon selling their animals. When
the user desires to sell his livestock, compliance information may
be accessed from the central database at step 1370. Compliance
information may include medical records, process records, nutrition
records, source, genetic test results, and any other suitable data.
Compliance enforcement system 155 may determine whether the user
has complied with the buyer's requirements at step 1375. For
example, for a user to receive Angus beef certification the cow
must undergo specific preconditioning programs and other
requirements. To determine whether the user has met the buyer's
requirements, the central database may be queried to determine if
the user has met the buyer's program requirements. The compliance
information may be subjected to a compliance screen or checklist.
An illustrative compliance screen 1399 is shown in FIG. 13.
Compliance screen 1399 may include a summary of the user's actions
and an analysis of the user's actions.
[0110] When the user meets the buyer's requirements, the user may
be entitled to incentives at step 1380. Incentives may include
financial rewards and/or financial premiums commensurate to quality
requirements. These incentives may also include reimbursement for
the costs incurred for following the buyer's requirements or
discounts on offered products, etc.
[0111] Compliance enforcement system 155 may also be used for
verifying the performance of the user. FIG. 12 is a flowchart of
illustrative steps involved in provide feedback to the user from
the buyer. For example, carcass quality may be the endpoint
criterion for the buyer. By obtaining carcass data, the feedback
may be based on, for example, a comparison of the expected
performance of the animal to the actual performance. At step 1385,
the buyer may obtain the livestock and pay a packer for the carcass
data. At step 1386, the buyer may compare the actual performance of
the animal (e.g., from the carcass data) to the expected
performance of the animal. The comparison may by stored in the
central database at step 1387. At step 1388, the user may receive
feedback from one or more buyers based on the comparison.
[0112] Based on the feedback from one or more buyers, the user may
receive a compliance rating. The compliance rating may be a quality
score for the user in the supply chain on a per order basis. The
score may aid in identifying the user's shortcomings and initiate
the necessary corrective actions to improve the quality of the
livestock. Compliance enforcement system 155 may also set a minimum
rating that must be met by any user participating in the buyer's
program.
[0113] Veterinarians may be involved with the treatment of calves
and the sale and distribution of vaccines and medicine. Some
embodiments may be used to monitor the performance of the
veterinarian. The actions of the veterinarian may be recorded in
the central database. When one or more users associated with a
veterinarian performs consistently below a program's accepted
standards, the veterinarian may be placed on probation and at a
time predetermined by compliance enforcement system 155, the
veterinarian may be excluded from participation in the buyer's
program.
[0114] Compliance enforcement system 155 is merely illustrative of
the principles of this invention and various modifications may be
made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope
and spirit of the invention.
Data Transactions System
[0115] As the central database accumulates information through
automatic or manual collection processes, the system may determine
the accessibility of such information. The system may categorize
the information into groups, such as privileged and private.
[0116] Privileged information may, for example, include data that
may be transferred to a user that purchases the animal, such as
breed, sex, weight, vaccination information, or any other suitable
privileged information. Veterinarians, consultants, or other
service providers may also access such privileged information.
[0117] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may allow
a user to store private information. In some embodiments, data
transactions system 165 may provide access to private information
to a user that has entered the private information. Private
information may include, for example, origin, location, pen number,
lending officer, inspection location, and any other suitable
information that may reveal the ownership of the animal.
[0118] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may
differentiate information into such groups as privileged and
private to share information to other users of the supply chain.
Data transactions system 165 may also differentiate information to
protect the identity of the owner.
[0119] FIG. 14 is a flowchart of illustrative steps for providing
users with access to information. At step 250, data transactions
system 165 may receive a communication from a user. The
communication may be a request to enter animal attribute
information into the central database. In response to the
communication, data transactions system 165 may assign an access
indicator to the animal attribute information (step 252). Data
transactions system 165 may enter the information into the central
database (step 254). In some embodiments, data transactions system
165 may assign an access indicator to the animal attribute
information before the information is entered into the central
database. In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may
search through the central database for entered animal attribute
information without an assigned access indicator. Upon locating an
entered animal attribute in the central database without an access
indicator, data transactions system 165 may assign an access
indicator to the entered information.
[0120] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may sort
the entered information into categories, such as privileged and
private. However, data transactions system 165 may categorize the
information into any other suitable group.
[0121] At step 258, data transactions system 165 system may receive
a communication from another user that requests access to the
entered information. In some embodiments, each user may have an
access code. Such an access code may include user information
(e.g., name, address, type of user, etc.). Upon receiving the
communication, data transactions system 165 may determine which
access indicator is associated with the requested information. At
step 260, data transactions system 165 may limit the quantity of
requested information to be provided to the user based on the
associated access indicator and the access code of the user.
[0122] For example, if a user has purchased an animal, data
transactions system 165 may provide the user with access to
privileged information on the animal. Privileged information may
include, for example, vaccination information, medical history,
weight history, etc. In another example, if a user has entered
information on an animal, the system may provide the user with
access to the information that the user has inputted (e.g., private
information). In response to determining the status of the user,
data transactions system 165 may provide the user with access to
the appropriate information.
[0123] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may
provide users that have entered information for a particular animal
(e.g., an animal with an RFID) with access to privileged
information (e.g., information inputted by other users) and private
information (e.g., information that the user has inputted). In some
embodiments, data transactions system 165 may provide users that
have purchased an animal with privileged information.
[0124] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may
provide users with an opportunity to log in. In some embodiments,
users may be required to log in by, for example, entering a user
name and password. In other embodiments, users may not be required
to log in to access the features of the system. In approaches where
users log in, data transactions system 165 may use the log in
information to retrieve the user's status and accessibility during
the data transaction process. Data transactions system 165 may use
user names (e.g., CiN numbers or any other suitable identification)
to allow data service providers, veterinarians, organizations, and
other affiliated data entry personnel to input data without
compromising the security of the animal owner.
[0125] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may
provide users with a notification feature. When the user requests
to input information, data transactions system 165 may use a
"first-in-first-out" approach to enter inputted information into
the central database. Data transactions system 165 may detect when
information that the user has inputted has been entered into the
central database. In response to the detection, data transactions
system 165 may provide the user with a notification notifying the
user of that the information has been entered into the database.
For example, data transactions system 165 may automatically send a
printed or electronic (e.g., an e-mail, pop-up message, etc.)
notification.
[0126] In some embodiments, data transactions system 165 may allow
the user to select particular information to be delivered to other
users, such as buyers, veterinarians, organization, or any other
suitable user. For example, data transactions system 165 may
automatically send a printed or electronic (e.g., an e-mail, pop-up
message, etc.) notification.
[0127] Data transactions system 165 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention and various modifications may be made
by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and
spirit of the invention.
Adaptive Reasoning System
[0128] As the central database accumulates the information, the
system may be adaptive and may have learning capabilities. Specific
health regimens and their causes and effects may be entered into,
for example, adaptive reasoning system 140, which allows the system
to learn and pass the information on to the users. Adaptive
reasoning system 140 may simulate an array of experts overlooking
an operation. Adaptive reasoning system 140 may be standalone or
may be included as part of the system. Any other suitable approach
may also be used.
[0129] Adaptive reasoning system 140 simulates logic, rules, and/or
good practices used by experts for livestock management. Adaptive
reasoning system 140 may recommend actions to be taken based on
criteria, such as observations, measurements, and historical
information archived in the central database. The outcome of these
actions may be compared with expected results and trends
established. The actual outcome may be used to continuously refine,
improve, and/or recalibrate analytical and empirical models. In
some embodiments, adaptive reasoning system 140 may create
web-enabled expert systems and/or knowledge-based tools available
at, for example, ranches and feedlots and may be part of an overall
livestock management system.
[0130] Adaptive reasoning system 140 may include a library of
expert programs (e.g., modules). Each program may focus on a
subject matter of importance to a livestock segment. For example,
an expert system may be used for early detection of sickness in
calves at a feedlot. The expert system may guide one or more users
at the feedlot through a process of making observations, taking
physical measurements, reviewing medical records, and making a
correct diagnosis and selecting an appropriate treatment. For
example, the expert system may use RFID tags to determine the
number of times an animal has approached the feeding bunk. If an
animal does not approach the feeding bunk the average number of
times, adaptive reasoning system 140 may trigger a tracking device
on the animal (e.g., place a flag) and notify the user. In some
embodiments, adaptive reasoning system 140 at, for example, a
feedlot may periodically (e.g., a time predetermined by adaptive
reasoning system 140) look at the weight history and medical
records of animals and may identify calves that are potential
railers (i.e., calves that may not meet their potential for growth
and/or performance) and may be sold at the earliest opportunity. In
yet another approach, adaptive reasoning system 140 at, for
example, a ranch may be used to systematically cull cows based on
information stored in the database, such as calf weight gain data,
dam breeding data, carcass data, and any other suitable data.
[0131] FIG. 15 shows a block flow diagram of adaptive reasoning
system 140 in accordance with the present invention. At step 1005,
adaptive reasoning system 140 may collect adaptive reasoning
information from the animal. The adaptive reasoning information may
be collected using a data acquisition station or using any other
suitable approach. Collecting information may be automated or may
require a user to manually enter data into the database.
Information may include animal observations, sensor measurements,
or any other suitable information. Animal observations may refer to
ocular or nasal discharges, coughing, posture, movement, feeding
pattern, and social behavior. Sensor measurements may refer to
monitoring a calf's RFID, core body temperature, digital images,
vaginal mucous conductance, or any other parameter deemed important
for an application. Information may also be obtained from the
central database (e.g., stored tracking information from tracking
system 145).
[0132] In some embodiments, adaptive reasoning system 140 may
typically use information and data from other systems within the
overall livestock management system depending on the type, size and
complexity of the operation. The adaptive reasoning system may use
artificial intelligence methods or models, such as neural networks,
or any other suitable intelligence methods for training or, for
example, for assisting in interpreting the information.
[0133] In some embodiments, adaptive reasoning system 140 may be a
closed loop feedback system. The information collected at step 1005
may be analyzed by an expert system and/or a knowledge-based tool
at step 1010. The user may desire to retrieve historical data from
the database via the Internet at step 1015. Based on the collected
information and the rules of adaptive reasoning system 140, the
expert system may make one or more recommendations to the user. The
rules may also include logic and good practices used by experts.
The recommendations from adaptive reasoning system 140 may be
reviewed by the user at step 1020. The user may assess the risks
associated with the actions recommended by adaptive reasoning
system 140 at step 1025.
[0134] At step 1030, the user may decide on a particular course of
action based on the recommendation from adaptive reasoning system
140. Upon selecting a recommendation, adaptive reasoning system 140
may provide the user with a list of steps to perform the selected
recommendation. When the user performs the recommendation, the
actual outcome may be monitored and may be compared with the
expected results at step 1035. The difference between the expected
result and the actual result may be reconciled and used to improve
the rules used by adaptive reasoning system 140 and to improve the
performance of other systems within the livestock management
system. Therefore, adaptive reasoning system 140 may be used to
improve the management of the operation so that the overall
commercial value of the livestock is improved and that the business
is more efficient and profitable. Adaptive reasoning system 146 may
also be used to predict futures trends based on, for example, the
information in the central database and the compared results.
[0135] Adaptive reasoning system 140 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention and various modifications may be made
by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and
spirit of the invention.
Sorting System
[0136] Typically, livestock is sold by the truckload. Compliance
enforcement system 155, adaptive reasoning system 140, and other
systems may be used to generate additional value from livestock. In
order to generate additional value, the livestock must be sorted.
The system may provide, for example, sorting system 130 to aid
users with sorting livestock. Sorting system 130 may obtain any
suitable information from the central database (e.g., certification
information, tracking information, etc.). Sorting system 130 may be
standalone or may be included as part of the system. Any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0137] Sorting system 130 may sort animals so that additional value
is generated. Animals may be sorted into groups based on physical
attributes, process attributes, any other attributes, and/or any
combinations thereof. Physical attributes may be used as indicators
of growth rate and carcass performance. Physical attributes may
include gender (e.g., steer, bull, heifer, etc.), breed mix (e.g.,
Angus, Charolais, Brahman, etc.), ear size, hip height, age,
muscle, color, eye color, weight, or any other suitable physical
attribute. Process attributes may identify treatments and
procedures administered to the animals, which may improve animal
performance and/or save time, labor, and cost to a buyer in the
supply chain. Process attributes may include de-horned, castrated,
weaned, bunk-broke, preconditioned as per a program such as market
preferred, market plus, etc., open heifers (i.e., checked for
pregnancy), DNA tested, ultrasound measurements, or any other
suitable process attribute. Animals may also be sorted based on
other attributes, such as source (e.g., geographic region). Sorting
system 130 may allow a user to differentiate animals using one or
more criteria based on physical and/or process attributes. For
example, the criteria may be modified to meet the market demand or
a buyer's needs (e.g., sales order requirements). A buyer may
desire only calves weighing between 400 to 450 pounds, only steers,
black colored, de-horned, castrated, and preconditioned to a Vac45
health program.
[0138] Preferably, sorting is performed at assimilation sites, sale
barns, feedlots, and/or any other suitable location. One embodiment
of sorting system 130 implemented at an assimilation site is shown
in FIG. 16. Sorting system 130 may consist of one or more devices
unique to its own environment. However, the degree of automation
and the types of devices may depend on the size and sophistication
of each user's operation. As shown in FIG. 16, sorting system 130
may consist of an antenna 320, a reader 325 (e.g., a radio
frequency reader), a controller 305, and a data acquisition system
330. Client computer 115 may connect to the central database, for
example, via the Internet. Multiple devices, such as a weighing
device 335 (e.g., a weight scale), a temperature sensing device 336
(e.g., a rectal thermometer), an image-capturing device 337, a
height sensing device 338 (e.g., a light curtain), or an ultrasound
device 339 may be connected to the data acquisition system of
sorting system 130. Image-capturing device 337 may be used to sort
animals by color. In another approach, image-capturing device 337
may be combined with a laser to obtain a three-dimensional image of
the animal. Any other suitable sensors or devices may be connected
to sorting system 130.
[0139] Sorting system 130 may physically sort animals into pens.
The pens may have the capacity to hold a truckload or a any other
suitable amount of animals. Client computer 115 may guide one or
more animals into specific pens by instructing controller 305 to
extend or retract movement mechanisms 310, which may open or close
one or more gates 315. Controller 305 may control movement
mechanism 310 by a person operating movement devices and equipment,
client computer 115, or any other suitable approach. Movement
mechanism 310 may be an electrical actuator, a hydraulic actuator,
or any other suitable mechanism. Preferably, movement mechanism 310
is a low noise actuator.
[0140] FIG. 17 is an illustrative flowchart of steps involved in
sorting animals in accordance with the present invention. At step
400, sorting system 130 may provide a user with an opportunity to
select sorting criteria (e.g., physical sorting attributes, process
sorting attributes, etc.). For example, sorting system 130 may
allow the user to enter sorting criteria into the central
database.
[0141] Animals may have identification tags (e.g., RFID tags,
barcode tags, etc.) attached to their ear or any other suitable
location. At step 410, sorting system 130 may electronically detect
and identify an animal. For example, when the animal walks or runs
by a station, a reader may read the animal's tag or identification
data may be manually entered into a computer, handheld computer, or
any other suitable device. After identifying the animal, the
station may execute a variety of devices and/or applications. For
example, the station may capture, a static or dynamic image of the
animal with a digital camera or any other suitable image-capturing
device. As another example, the station may use temperature sensing
devices (e.g., rectal thermometers) and weight scales to obtain
temperature and weight measurements. Data may be manually or
automatically entered depending on, for example, the size and
sophistication of the user's operation. At step 420, sorting system
130 may provide the user (e.g., a rancher) with an opportunity to
manually input sorting information. In another suitable approach,
sorting system 130 may automatically enter the sorting information
at step 430. For example, as each device obtains data, sorting
system 130 may create a record, such as a medical record, or a
process record, and record the newly obtained information.
[0142] At step 440, upon collecting the sorting information on the
animal, sorting system 130 may store the sorting information in the
central database. Sorting information may be saved in the central
database such that one or more users (e.g., ranchers, interested
parties, etc.) may access the information. For example, when a user
purchases an animal, sorting system 130 may provide the user with
access to sorting information related to that animal. At step 450,
sorting system 130 may compare the user's selected sorting criteria
with the stored sorting information. The comparison may occur, for
example, when sorting system 130 identifies an animal. Upon reading
the identification tag, the controller may receive instructions
from, for example, client computer 115 (step 460). The set of
instructions may include opening and closing one or more gates
leading into specific pens. At step 470, the controller may then
operate the movement mechanism to lead the animals into their pens.
Any other suitable approach for sorting may also be used.
[0143] FIG. 18 is an illustrative block diagram of the measurements
and criteria that may be used to group animals at a feedlot for
endpoint management. In one example, ultrasound 475 may be used to
obtain ultrasound information 480. Ultrasound information may
include backfat thickness, marbling score, and muscle thickness.
Any other suitable approach may be used or any other information
may be obtained.
[0144] It is well known in the art that end point management may be
used to determine the length of time animals should be fed and the
strategy for selling the animals. In this embodiment, along with
the animal's weight, hip height, age, and muscle, ultrasonic
measurements may be taken to estimate the animal's backfat
thickness, muscle depth, and marbling in the longissimus muscle.
Such information may be used to determine the number of days the
animal should be fed before harvesting, and expected yield and
quality grades. Animals may also be sorted by marketing options
such as value-based grids, market prices, choice/select quality
grade spreads, and/or any other marketing options. With these
sorting techniques, a feedlot may sell animals based on their
harvest date. These animals may be commingled for shipment to a
packing plant.
[0145] In yet another embodiment of the present invention, users
may virtually sort animals using sorting system 135. For example,
if the user does not have the space or a large enough operation to
physically sort the animals, sorting system 130 may virtually sort
the animals. If a particular grouping of animals is required for a
process or harvesting, the information is available for each
animal. Instead of sending instructions to the controller and
leading animals into a series of pens, sorting system 130 may send
instructions to a user, such as a cowhand, to notch the visual
identification tag.
[0146] Sorting system 130 is merely illustrative of the principles
of this invention and various modifications may be made by those
skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of
the invention.
Genetics Improvement System
[0147] Some embodiments may provide users with alternate methods
for improving their operation. Through the information stored in
the central database, users, such as producers and feedlot
managers, may benchmark their operations against other operations
(local or national). Users may analyze the information to make
better decisions. In one approach, the system may provide the user
with genetics improvement system 180. Genetics improvement system
180 enables users to improve the herd genetics. Genetics
improvement system 180 may be standalone or may be included as part
of the system. Any other suitable approach may also be used.
[0148] Genetics improvement system 180 may be used to improve the
quality of animals through genetics. Users, such as cow-calf
producers, require accurate, timely information to assure that
their operation's productivity will yield maximum return on
investment. Return on investment is affected by calf breakeven
price, which is influenced by the ratio of pounds of calf weaned
per cow exposed. The ratio of pounds of calf weaned per cow exposed
consists of both reproductive and growth components that must be
balanced. Genetics, and more specifically, the adaptability of the
genetics to the specific environment (e.g., farm, ranch, etc.) are
critical components of financial viability. Genetic traits may be
grouped into reproductive performance, growth, disease resistance,
and carcass characteristics. Although reproduction has been the
most significant of the economically important traits, emphasis on
value-based marketing has elevated the need for specific enhanced
carcass characteristics.
[0149] The optimum ratio of pounds of calf weaned per cow exposed
for a specific ranch begins by obtaining a high weaning rate (i.e.,
the percentage of live calves at weaning). Higher weaning rates
result from elevated pregnancy rates combined with low levels of
calving difficulty and low calf mortality. A user, such as a
rancher, may desire to use bulls with lower birth weight EPDs
(minimal dystocia) and high pre-weaning growth EPDs in order to
enhance the ratio of pounds of calf weaned per cow exposed. A user
concerned about calving ease will likely select replacement heifers
with higher maternal calving ease EPDs and eliminate those with
small pelvic areas. Monitoring such factors may lower veterinary
costs and improve overall profitability.
[0150] Turning to FIG. 19, a block flow diagram of one example of
genetics improvement system 180 of the present invention is
illustrated. As shown, at step 1205, genetics improvement system
180 may identify herd performance factors important to, for
example, ranch profitability. Herd performance factors may include
length of calving season, calving distribution, pregnancy rate,
calf weaning weight, dam weight at weaning, weaning rate, and the
ratio of pounds of calf weaned per cow exposed. At step 1210,
genetics improvement system 180 may access a database and compare
the herd performance with performance information of other herds
stored in a database. In some embodiments, genetics improvement
system 180 may compare the herd performance to those of a ranch
with highly profitable performance ratings. Genetics improvement
system 180 may also develop one or more benchmarks based on
averages of the herd performance information in the central
database. A user, such as a rancher, may access genetic information
of other ranches to improve his or her ranch. For example, a user
may compare his or her operation against other operations in the
same geographical area with desirable herd performance ratings.
[0151] At step 1215, genetics improvement system 180 may provide
the user (e.g., a rancher) with an opportunity to create herd
specifications. Herd specifications may include objectives of the
user. Genetics improvement system 180 may aid the user in
identifying the desirable traits in which genetics play an
important roll for ranch production. The user may use the data to
identify weaknesses in certain areas of herd performance that may
be restricting return on investment. For example, if a calf's
growth potential exceeds the ability of its dam to produce milk
there may be a need to enhance the milk production of the cowherd
through the use of bulls with higher milk genetics. Conversely,
cows with the genetic ability for higher milk production may have
inadequate nutritional resources in some environments and may be
unable to consistently rebreed to maintain a twelve-month calving
interval. Genetics improvement system 180 may identify the issues
and assist with assuring an optimum match of genetics to ranch
resources.
[0152] Genetics improvement system 180 may also compare the herd
specifications to expected differences in the correlation between
traits at step 1220. Genetics improvement system 180 may access the
database for rules and empirical relationships determined by
ranchers, veterinarians and animal science experts, or any other
suitable experts. Genetics improvement system 180 may also
determine if the specifications are conflicting. For example, birth
weight and calving ease are inversely related. While birth weight
and weaning weight are positively correlated. Therefore, selection
for increased growth may result in higher birth weights and more
calving difficulty. Too much emphasis on growth without regard for
calving ease may elevate dystocia and compromise the health of the
calf and dam's ability to rebreed.
[0153] At step 1225, genetics improvement system 180 may present
the user with an improvement strategy. The improvement strategy may
include replacement heifers, replacement bulls, sires for
artificial insemination, a planned mating system and any other
suitable strategy. In another embodiment, specific gene-based
testing may be performed on individual animals to test for specific
attributes such as tenderness, marbling, disease resistance,
calving ease, feed to gain performance and other performance
attributes. As these gene-based tests become available, they may be
incorporated into genetic improvement system 180 and/or the system.
These gene-based tests may be used as additional attributes in
basing breeding decisions from as well as the screening or testing
of general populations of cattle for specific attributes such as
tenderness, marbling, or any other attributes. These genetic tests
may be performed at nearly any time in the animal's lifetime or
even after harvest at the packing plant.
[0154] In some embodiments, genetics improvement system 180 may
search the database for suitable sires available for the artificial
insemination with semen for sale. These sires may be used to
enhance overall herd productively through an optimum combination of
calving ease, calf growth and replacement heifer production. In
another approach, genetics improvement system 180 may make
suggestions of breed combinations that will enhance hybrid vigor,
thus increasing fertility, and calf vigor along with enhancing the
longevity and optimum performance of the cowherd.
[0155] Genetics improvement system 180 may determine the results of
the genetic improvement process based on carcass data at step 1230.
Carcass data may include yield grade, quality grade, carcass
weight, marbling score, etc. Genetics improvement system 180 may
up-load the carcass data to the database. Based on the carcass data
and potentially a value-based marketing grid, genetics improvement
system 180 may evaluate the financial performance of the user at
step 1235. This system may further provide goals and improvement
strategies for future production cycles. Thus, the user may
continuously improve herd quality through genetics. This may result
in a significant long-term enhancement of the productivity and
overall profitability of the ranch.
[0156] In some embodiments, genetics improvement system 180 may
enable a user to utilize genetics to improve the quality of an
animal that has experienced a genetics test. For example, genetics
improvement system 180 may receive the results of a genetics test
(e.g., a genetics test may be performed by an authorized user and
the results may be communicated to genetics improvement system
180). Genetics improvement system 180 may obtain attributes of the
animal from the results. Attributes may include, for example,
health information, disease information, or any other suitable
information.
[0157] The attributes obtained from the results of the genetics
test may be compared to multiple genetics rules stored in the
central database. Based on the comparison, genetics improvement
system 180 may select a genetics rule. Genetics improvement system
180 may present the user with a genetics improvement strategy based
on the selected genetics rule. The improvement strategy may include
replacement heifers, replacement bulls, sires for artificial
insemination, a planned mating system and any other suitable
strategy.
[0158] Genetics improvement system 180 is merely illustrative of
the principles of this invention and various modifications may be
made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope
and spirit of the invention.
Environmental Management System
[0159] In another suitable approach, the system may provide users
with alternate methods for improving their operation, such as
environmental management system 150. The system may include
environmental management system 150 enabling users to manage waste
byproducts, monitor the quality of the environment, plan growth,
access safety margins, take appropriate corrective actions, and
other suitable environmental plans. Environmental system 150 may be
standalone or may be included as part of the system. Any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0160] In some embodiments of the present invention, environmental
management system 150 may provide users, such as operators of
animal feeding operations, crop growers, consultants, or any other
suitable personnel, with tools for managing the environmental
aspects of their operation so that the users comply with government
regulations and protect the environment.
[0161] FIG. 20 shows one embodiment of the environmental
information collected in environmental management system. As shown
in FIG. 20, category 2200 shows a typical example of the
environmental information collected by environmental management
system 150. Category 2250 may be "source material quality and
quantity" and may include data 2250 about source materials, such as
manure, that contains nutrients. Nutrients such as nitrogen,
phosphorus, and potassium may be present in source materials.
[0162] A user's livestock and operation may generate, receive,
and/or handle nutrient-containing materials and by-products such as
stormwater, wastewater, manure, compost, milling by-products,
carcasses, irrigation water, fertilizer, precipitation, and other
materials, as shown in area 2255. The user's operation may also
generate air emissions from milling processes and lagoon microbial
activity that must be monitored and managed. People skilled in the
art will appreciate that other types of environmental information
may also be taken.
[0163] FIG. 21 shows a generalized flowchart of steps involved in a
user collecting environmental information with environmental
management system 150. At step 2005, the user may input
environmental information. Environmental information may include
the size of the user's land, the distance to nearby bodies of
water, the amount of manure and urine the user has collected,
analysis from laboratory work, historical land data, and any other
suitable information. When a user enters incorrect data values
(e.g., out-of-range data values, missing data values, impossible
data values, etc.) for a given parameter may be provided with a
message requesting verification of the data value to ensure
accuracy. Environmental information may be stored in the central
database at step 2010.
[0164] At step 2015, the system may, for example, access market
valuation information, which may be located in the central
database. Market valuation information may be used to determine the
environmental options for the user. Environmental options may
include converting dead carcasses to animal feed, using x amount of
manure on the user's fields, etc. Market valuation information may
be processed by, for example, adaptive reasoning system 140 or any
other knowledge-based tool. Environmental management system 150 may
access other systems (e.g., adaptive reasoning system 140,
integrated risk management system 125, etc.) to aid in identifying
patterns, trends, or causes, and recommending actions.
[0165] The user is provided with environmental options at step
2020. The system may present the user with a list, checklist, or
any other suitable approach for providing environmental options.
The user may select one or more environmental options at step 2025.
In response to the user selecting one or more environmental
options, the user may be provided with the steps needed to complete
the selected options (step 2030). Such steps may include tests that
may be required at a predetermined time (e.g., once a week, once a
month, periodically, etc.) for monitoring resources and the
environment. For example, the user may be instructed to
periodically monitor the quality of air, water, and soil on the
premises and in the surrounding areas. Such tests may depend on the
user's region, surrounding area, and the type of operation.
[0166] In some embodiments, environmental management system 150 may
provide the process for taking the samples, conducting the tests,
and/or the analyzing the results. In another suitable approach,
environmental management system 150 may recommend a certified
laboratory for conducting such tests. Upon receiving the results
from the laboratory, the results may be stored in the central
database. On-screen guidance may be provided to assist the user and
to answer the user's questions, such as how and when to conduct
required environmental testing (e.g., mandated by a regulatory
agency).
[0167] The system may provide reminders to users' about the need to
complete a required activity, such as inspecting and recording
lagoon liquid levels, servicing equipment, sampling a well or
collecting an air quality sample. Upon entering the environmental
information, the user may access the database, for example, via the
Internet and store the data. The user may also print; and/or send
completed forms to others and query the database. When the user
does not comply with a regulation or a required corrective action,
the system may provide the user with a warning and/or remedial
actions.
[0168] In some embodiments, source materials may need to be
collected, stored, transported, and removed or utilized properly
without polluting groundwater, surface water, or other natural
resources. These source materials may have a nutrient value and may
be used as fertilizer for crops or forage, or any other suitable
use. In some embodiments, laboratory testing and analysis may be
required for determining the nutrient value (quality) of the source
materials. The environmental information gained from the analysis
of source materials may be stored in the central database. In
another suitable approach, users may input environmental
information regarding the amount (quantity) of source materials
that are collected, stored, transported, removed, and utilized.
Upon collecting environmental information, users (e.g., operators,
consultants, etc.) may query the central database via the Internet:
to access the environment information, such as the nutrient value
(quality) of source material and the information about the quantity
of source material that has been collected, stored, transported and
removed or land applied.
[0169] In some embodiments, source materials may be applied on land
application areas to provide nutrients for crops or forage. The
land may be or may not be owned or controlled by the user.
Environmental information on source material quality and quantity
data may be integrated with environmental information on land
application areas to determine the amount of nutrients spread on
fields, and ensure nutrients are appropriately applied. However,
any other suitable approach or other integration of information may
also be performed.
[0170] Some embodiments may provide an application for land
application area management, as shown in category 2260 of FIG. 20.
Information about land application areas may be generated and
inputted by a user. Environmental information, such as soil and
plant nutrient levels and recommended nutrient application rates,
may be received and retrieved from laboratories, the user, and
other suitable person or facility. The user may input environmental
information regarding land application area characteristics, such
as location and yield history of the land. The user may also input
environmental information associated with the type of crop or
forage being grown, the yield goal, the timing, amount, and quality
of nutrient source material(s) that have been applied, and other
characteristics. Environmental information associated with land
application area management may be integrated with environmental
information associated with source material quality and quantity to
determine nutrient information. In some embodiments of the
invention, users may select specific parameters (e.g., yield goal,
etc.) and view integrated information, utilizing comparisons
between the chosen parameters. Users may be provided with
guidelines. For example, users may be provided with explanations of
regulations governing aspects of the operation, such as "since soil
in land application area no. 1 has an average of X pounds of
phosphorus per acre, you should not apply more than Y pounds of
manure."
[0171] Some embodiments may aid a user to comply with government
regulations. The user may complete and send required forms to
regulatory agencies, such as nutrient management on land
application areas. The forms may be stored in the central database,
sorted, and utilized to verify past compliance and future plans. In
some embodiments, government agencies may utilize environmental
management system 150 and/or the central database to receive,
store, sort, and compile information from one or more users.
[0172] Some embodiments of environmental management system 150 may
provide a user with a mapping feature 2270. Mapping feature 2270
may include electronically displayed maps relating to the physical
characteristics of the user's operation. Maps may represent one or
more aspects of the user's operation, such as locations of lagoons,
and allow the user to modify (e.g., add, change, remove) items on a
map and the environmental information associated with the
items.
[0173] In some embodiments, the mapping feature 2270 of
environmental management system 150 may utilize a geographic
information system (GIS), as shown in area 2275. This system
consists of layers of category-specific data represented spatially.
Environmental management system 150 may access, for example,
publicly available spatial geographic data via the Internet, as
well as privately derived data. Layers may include facility layout,
land application areas, waste transport infrastructure, manure
stockpiles, and any data associated with physical characteristics
represented on maps, including laboratory analysis results. For
example, a layer may include land application fields associated
with the operation that were spread with nutrients, together with
data on nutrient concentration levels, crop type and yield goal,
soil and plant nutrient levels, the nutrient threshold for the
crop, and other information. In this embodiment, the user may be
enabled to monitor the cumulative amount of inputs, such as
nutrients and water, applied to fields and the remaining amounts
needed to achieve production and environmental goals.
[0174] Map data may be represented in numeric and graphic format.
The user may view data associated with a physical point of interest
graphically and sort based on specific criteria to create a map
that displays and compares points of interest and their affiliated
data properties.
[0175] Environmental management system 150 may access other systems
(e.g., adaptive reasoning system 140, integrated risk management
system 125, compliance enforcement system 155, etc.) to aid in
identifying patterns, trends, or causes, and recommending specific
actions. The system may, for example, communicate with an
accounting system to compare the value of nutrients in manure
versus the market price of commercial fertilizer to determine which
product is most economical to use at the current time.
[0176] As shown in FIG. 20, category 2280 is a typical example of
the categories of operational maintenance practices that may be
stored and utilized in environmental management system 150. In some
embodiments, the user may be provided with maintenance practices,
as shown in area 2285. Practices may include approaches for
controlling flies, dust, pests, odor, and other nuisances.
Environmental management system 150 may provide messages (e.g.,
on-screen messages) to prompt the user into filling out a
prescribed maintenance form and completing an action item. For
example, if source materials are transported from the user's
operation to another location, the system may prompt the user to
complete a form describing the amount of time, the date, the amount
of material hauled, the name of the person receiving it, the
location where it was applied, and other suitable information. At a
predetermined time (e.g., at the end of the year), the user may
then utilize environmental management system 150 to compile and
summarize this information, and send it to the appropriate
regulatory agencies.
[0177] Maintenance records may also include emergency plan
templates and guidance to be completed by the user to plan for
contingencies, such as a lagoon breach or a fuel spills. In another
approach, the user may complete the proper forms to be utilized by
management and the appropriate regulatory agencies. Completed forms
may be sent (e.g., electronically or physically) to government
agencies to provide documentation that required activities have
been executed. Information contained in these forms may be stored
in the database. In some embodiments, government agencies may
utilize environmental management system 150 and the central
database to receive, archive, sort, and manage environmental
information and other suitable information from users.
[0178] In another suitable approach, when a user's operation
closes, the user may be responsible for cleanup of any material on
the property subject to regulation. The present invention may
provide for a template and guidance to assist the user in
developing a closure plan. The system may provide archiving of the
completed plan, and occasional reminders to verify that the plan is
current.
[0179] The system may also allow the user's environmental
information to be included with other information stored on
individual animal's EID tag. For example, weather data associated
with an animal's stay at a given user's facility or transport
conditions such as time and mileage transported may be included on
the EID. The user may use this information for health and
performance analyses purposes.
[0180] In some embodiments, environmental management system 150 may
provide the user with quality assurance and quality control
information pertaining to collecting, handling, storing,
transporting and testing environmental options. Such options may
include all of the source materials shown in Category 2200, as well
as air, groundwater, surface water, and soil quality. The system
may describe the specific equipment and procedures needed to insure
that the final test results are valid. This may include a list of
the collection supplies needed, the steps that must be followed to
obtain a representative sample, sample storage and transportation
issues, and testing procedures. The system may recommend that some
parameters be tested by a certified laboratory. In some
embodiments, the system may provide government-specified regulatory
quality assurance/quality control measures to be taken by the
user.
[0181] Environmental management system 150 is merely illustrative
of the principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may
make modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of
the invention.
Adaptive Logistics System
[0182] In another suitable approach, the system may include, for
example, adaptive logistics system 135 to enable users with
efficient managing of shipping and logistics upon purchasing
animals. Adaptive logistics system 135 may obtain information from
the central database to deliver animals from multiple sales locals
and facilities. Adaptive logistics system 135 may be standalone or
may be included as part of the system. Any other suitable approach
may also be used.
[0183] Typically, feedlots, ranchers, backgrounders, and other
members of the supply chain must manage their own shipping
transactions. For example, a rancher may sell a truckload of
animals to a feedlot, and the rancher and feedlot manager must
determine how to ship the animals. Typically, the shipping
transactions are not integrated into the other management systems
within their overall operation.
[0184] FIG. 22 is an illustrative flowchart of steps involved in
obtaining adaptive logistics information. At step 900, adaptive
logistics system 135 may provide a user (e.g., a rancher) with an
opportunity to make a transaction with another user (e.g., a buyer
on "Cattleinfonet" or any other buyer). For example, a rancher may
desire to sell one or more animals to a buyer. "Cattleinfonet" or
any other suitable marketplace may send a communication to adaptive
logistics system 135. At step 910, adaptive logistics system 135
may receive the communication from the marketplace. The
communication may include shipping details, which may include
pick-up location, drop-off locations, number of animals to be
picked up, total weight, time of pick-up, expected weather
conditions, and/or any other suitable shipping details.
[0185] FIG. 23 is a flowchart of illustrative steps involved in
shipping animals using adaptive logistics system 135. At step 920,
adaptive logistics system 135 may monitor shipping patterns.
Monitoring shipping patterns may include monitoring the
performance, various routes, the mortality rate, the animal
handling skills, and the cleanliness of various truckers.
[0186] Upon making a transaction, adaptive logistics system 135 may
determine the shipping availability by identifying available
truckers based on their proximity to the pick-up and drop-off
locations and past performance record at step 930. That is,
adaptive logistics system 135 may allow the user to view one or
more shipping arrangements. At step 940, adaptive logistics system
135 may determine the shipping arrangement by suggesting one of the
available truckers based on minimum transportation cost, minimum
animal stress, minimum mortality rate, maximum truck revenue miles,
etc. Adaptive logistics system 135 may also optimize the transport
of animals between, for example, eMerge facilities or assimilation
sites, suppliers, and/or customers as shown in FIG. 24. The
criteria for optimization may change with different customers and
business needs.
[0187] Adaptive logistics system 135 may also provide the user with
a notification of the selected shipping arrangement. In some
embodiments, adaptive logistics system 135 may allow the user to
view the status of the shipment. For example, the user may track
the shipment and view the approximate location of the shipment.
[0188] At step 950, the animals and/or commodities may be
transported. Adaptive logistics system 135 may allow users (e.g.,
customers) to provide feedback at step 960. Feedback may be
provided in terms of condition of animals, animal shrinkage during
shipment, mortality rate, morbidity rate, transportation time,
on-time pickup and delivery, and any other suitable feedback.
Feedback may be entered and stored in the central database, which
may share this adaptive logistics information with the other
systems and/or users.
[0189] Adaptive logistics system 135 may further determine a
shipping arrangement for the return trip. Typically, a trucker may
ship an animal or commodity to the user and return with an empty
truck. Adaptive logistics system 135 may optimize the trip by
determining animals and/or commodities that may be delivered on a
return trip.
[0190] Adaptive logistics system 135 may further identify suitable
locations for new facilities, such as eMerge facilities,
assimilation sites, or any other facility, based on transportation
data and committed transactions for future livestock purchases and
deliveries at step 970. Based on future orders and projections,
adaptive logistics system 135 may forecast future trucking needs so
that fleet adjustments may be made. These adjustments may be made
on a route, regional, and/or state basis. Users may also be
provided with opportunities to track the progress of any shipment
by, for example, accessing a web page via the Internet, via a
wireless PDA system, or using any other suitable approach.
[0191] In FIG. 24, eMerge facility 980 may be an intermediary. As
an intermediary, eMerge facility 980 may track transactions
completed by users (e.g., buyers, consumers, etc.). For example, a
transaction may occur when rancher 982 sells cattle to backgrounder
986. In another example, rancher 982 may transport his or her
cattle to feedlot 988. eMerge facility 980 may receive revenue from
rancher 982, backgrounder 986, and/or feedlot 988. eMerge facility
980 may contact available trucker 984 to perform the transfer of
animals. eMerge facility 980 may maintain a list of available
truckers for transporting animals and any other suitable
commodities.
[0192] In some embodiments of the present invention, adaptive
logistics system 135 may provide users with opportunities to design
trailers suitable for transporting a variety of commodities. For
example, a user may desire to design a trailer that transports
livestock on outbound trips and haul feed (e.g., hay, corn, silage,
or any other suitable commodity) on the return trip. Thus, adaptive
logistics system 135 may increase truck revenue miles and thereby
lower overall livestock shipping costs.
[0193] Although this embodiment uses the example of shipping from a
rancher to a feedlot, adaptive logistics system 135 may also manage
transactions such as shipments from a ranch to an assimilation
facility, shipments from a background to an assimilation facility,
drop shipments from a backgrounder to a feedlot, shipments from an
assimilation facility to a feedlot, shipments from an assimilation
facility to a backgrounder, or any other suitable transaction.
Adaptive logistics system 135 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may make
modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of the
invention.
Supply and Demand Management System
[0194] Users, such as buyers and sellers of animals, may desire to
manage their sales and acquisitions. The system may include supply
and demand management system 170, which provides a user with the
capability of viewing supply and demand orders, filling orders,
searching for animals with specific criteria, and managing future
purchase agreements. Supply and demand management system 170 may be
standalone or may be included as part of the system. Any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0195] In some embodiments of the present invention, supply and
demand management system 170 may provide users with a real-time
inventory of animals (supply) along with current and future orders
(demand). For example, this may include animals at assimilation
sites, auctions barns, and ranches committed to supply animals
under long-term purchase agreements. One or more buyers and/or
sellers may access supply and demand system via the Internet,
through a virtual private network system, or using any other
suitable approach. Orders may be placed on supply and demand
management system 170 for future requirements and may be viewed by
prospective sellers.
[0196] In some embodiments, supply and demand management system 170
may guide the user (e.g., a buyer or a seller) through a series of
interactive displays designed to share trading information on the
animals and assist in making a transaction and to better manage
their inventory. Trading information may include price, cost and
desired sale price (markup) for a particular day as well as future
requirements. Other information on the specific animal or lot of
animals may also be made available such as genetic, health,
process, age, and any other suitable information. Access to trading
information may be limited to users with proper security
clearance.
[0197] In some embodiments, supply and demand management system 170
may allow a user to manage orders for multiple animals. Supply and
demand management system 170 may allow a user to enter attributes
of each of the multiple animals into the central database. In some
embodiments, supply and demand management system 170 may access
beef marketing program requirements in the central database. To
determine which animals comply with the program requirements,
supply and demand management system 170 may compare the entered
attributes to the program requirements.
[0198] Based at least in part on the comparison, supply and demand
management system 170 may automatically facilitate at least one
transaction between multiple users. In some embodiments, the
multiple users may be at different locations. For example, when a
user desires to purchase twenty cattle, supply and demand
management system 170 may determine which cattle meet the user's
requirements and may purchase the cattle from multiple users (e.g.,
ten cattle from one user and ten cattle from another). When a
transaction has been completed, supply and demand management system
170 may update the inventory of animals.
[0199] Illustrative user interface approaches are described below.
While the approaches are described separately, their features may
be combined in any suitable way, modified in accordance with the
other approaches, or performed instead of or in addition to the
features described. The categories may be interchanged where
suitable. Any other suitable combination, substitution or exchange
of features between the interface approaches described herein, or
with any other suitable interface approach, may also be used.
[0200] FIG. 25 is an illustrative display screen 2400 that the
present invention may display when providing access to inventory or
order information. In this example, display 2400 shows the animals
at each facility and sorted into weight categories 2405. Categories
2410, such as heifers and steers, may be used to further segment
each weight category. For each inventory area 2415, display 2400
may provide users with the average animal cost 2420, number of
animals available 2425, and the expected sale price for the day
2430. The selling price may be updated, for example, daily by local
sales management or be controlled via an adaptive reasoning system
as described herein. The markup price may reflect the market demand
and may also reflect the appropriate futures or commodity prices
for the livestock. The invention presents the user with markup
price 2430 and average animal cost 2420 to provide the user with
the revenue potential for a transaction. Display 2400 may also
include date 2401 and time 2402 and location.
[0201] In some embodiments, supply and demand management system 170
may provide the user with flexibility to fill an order from one or
more facilities. For example, for a large order, a user may pool
the animals from different facilities and coordinate their
deliveries to the customer. In another approach, a user (e.g., a
seller) may be able to satisfy another user's (e.g., customer's,
buyer's, etc.) price constraint with animals from another facility
(e.g., a sister facility) that may have a lower average cost or
markup price than the user's facility.
[0202] In some embodiments, supply and demand management system 170
may determine the average cost of the animals in an inventory
category. For example, supply and demand management system 170 may
implement a recursive relationship to compute the average cost of
the animals in an inventory category. In a purchase transaction,
the animals in weight category 2405 may be bought as a group. As
new animals are added to inventory category 2415, the average
animal cost is adjusted as per the following equations:
C.sub.avgnew=(C.sub.avgold*N.sub.old+C.sub.add)/(N.sub.old+N.sub.add)N.su-
b.new=N.sub.old+N.sub.add where: C.sub.avgnew is the new average
cost; [0203] C.sub.avgold is the old average cost; [0204] N.sub.old
is the number of animals in the group before additions; [0205]
N.sub.add is the number of animals added to the group; [0206]
N.sub.new is the number of animals in the group after additions;
and [0207] C.sub.add is the cost of animals added to the group.
However, when a group of animals is sold, the average cost of the
remaining animals in the inventory category does not change. The
number of animals in the group is adjusted using the following
equations: C.sub.avgnew=C.sub.avgold N.sub.new=N.sub.old-N.sub.sold
where N.sub.sold is the number of animals sold from the group. When
an order is booked, the animals may be reserved, and the data as
shown in FIG. 25 may be updated at a predetermined time (e.g.,
immediately, periodically, every hour, every day, etc.).
Preferably, display 2400 is updated immediately to prevent over
committing to other users (customers).
[0208] Although display 2400 is illustrated with the same inventory
group nomenclature for itemizing animals, this is merely
illustrative of the principles of this invention and various
modifications may be made by those skilled in the art without
departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. In some
embodiments, the present invention may require that all facilities
within supply and demand management system 170 group animals in a
standard manner as shown in FIG. 25. In order to simplify costing
and minimize administrative tasks, the present invention may desire
that purchase orders and sale orders also use the same inventory
group nomenclature as the facilities for itemizing animals.
[0209] In some embodiments of the present invention, the user may
customize display 2400. In one suitable approach, a user (a seller)
may desire to only deal with feedlots. The user's customers may
desire to buy animals between 650 and 750 lbs. and animals that are
raised in a specific part of the country. In such a case, the user
may choose to display animals in the weight categories 651-700 and
701-750 and from facilities from that geographical area.
[0210] In another approach, supply and demand management system 170
may provide the user with an interface for viewing demand orders,
similar to the interface shown in FIG. 25. For example, a display
(not shown) may present the animals needed at each facility and
purchasing criteria. A user (e.g., buyer) may post on the display
the number of animals needed by weight, the desired number of
heifers and steers, and the expected price to pay for an animal. As
in display 2400, the expected price may be updates. Allowing users
to view demand orders may, for example, enable users (e.g.,
producers) to observe market projections and adjust their
operations accordingly.
[0211] In response to submitting demand orders, supply and demand
management system 170 may search for facilities that produce
animals matching the user's purchasing criteria. Users may be
notified when their demand orders are matched. Upon receiving a
notification, users may place future purchase agreements. These
future purchase agreements may be entered and stored in the central
database.
[0212] Some embodiments may include a real-time online display of
future purchase agreements entered by supply and demand management
system 170. The real-time display may show the agreed price, the
expected weight categories, the number of animals per weight
category, the time of arrival of each batch of animals, the deposit
paid to the rancher, and the amount of payment due upon receipt of
all the animals. In another suitable approach, the real-time
display may show future deliveries committed to customers by supply
and demand management system 170. The display may show the agreed
price, the weight categories of animals to be delivered, the number
of animals per weight category, the deposit received from customer,
the delivery date, and the amount of payment expected upon shipment
of animals to the customer.
[0213] In some embodiments, the real-time displays may be used to
manage cash flow and control inventory proactively on a system wide
basis. For example, limits may be placed on total number of animals
per weight category at each facility. Once this limit is reached
for a category then no user may be permitted to buy any more
animals in that weight category for that facility. Also, the
company may have a cap on the total inventory value of all animals
in supply and demand management system 170 for a facility. Once
this limit is reached, management at the facility may be required
to reassess the market conditions, stop all purchase transactions,
and adjust markup prices. The real-time on-line displays may also
be used to assess the cash flow from cattle transactions on a daily
basis, keep track of interest rates, and secure better financing
terms from agricultural banks or other financial institutions.
[0214] In some embodiments, the present invention may also be used
to determine the shipping requirements, shipping costs, and
determine the necessary adjustments or arrangements with trucking
companies. This may be on a regional, county, state, or national
level. The shipping requirements determined by the present
invention may be, for example, uploaded to adaptive logistics
system 153 or any other suitable logistics system.
[0215] In some embodiments, the user may be provided with one or
more programs (e.g., software) and information via the Internet to
allow users to present the data in the form of charts, tables, and
customized reports. Such programs may enable the user to make
timely and informed decisions on inventory related matters.
[0216] Supply and demand management system 170 is merely
illustrative of the principles of this invention. Those skilled in
the art may make modifications without departing from the scope and
spirit of the invention.
Electronic Commerce System
[0217] In another approach, the system may provide users with
additional methods of managing their sales and acquisitions. The
system may include electronic commerce system 190 which may provide
a user with the capability of purchasing, selling, and viewing
animals over the Internet. Electronic commerce system 190 may be
standalone or may be included as part of the system. Any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0218] The livestock management system creates an information
infrastructure for monitoring livestock and related transactions
throughout the supply chain. This information may assist users
desiring to trade livestock, products, commodities, and services on
the Internet. For example, the animals in the Livestock Management
System may be sold on the Internet through portals like
"Cattleinfonet." Pharmaceuticals, feed, spare parts, and other
materials may also be ordered through web sites on the Internet.
Electronic commerce system 190 may lower cost, reduce transactions,
trim lead times, increase product availability, identify new
sources and options, and improve the overall efficiency of a user's
operation in the livestock supply chain. FIG. 26 shows one
embodiment of electronic commerce system 190.
[0219] Electronic commerce system 190 may be a catalog auction, a
marketplace, an online brokerage, a real-time sale barn, auction, a
product catalog, an online commodity futures trading, etc.
Electronic commerce system 190 may be part of or communicate with
other systems, such as adaptive reasoning system 140, adaptive
logistics system 135, environmental management system 150, sorting
system 130, tracking system 145, integrated risk management system
125, or any other suitable system.
[0220] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may be
an online catalog auctions 2610, which may, for example, solicit
bids on animal lots available for immediate or future deliveries.
Catalog auctions 2610 may provide global market coverage for a
user, such as a seller. Animal lots may be listed to provide
information, such as animal weight, breed mix, preconditioning,
quantity and breakdown by sex, slide, expected delivery date,
pickup location, and any other information to a user (e.g., a
buyer). Pictures (e.g., taken by a digital camera) and video
footage may be provided for browsing. A time limit may be set
(e.g., by a seller, by electronic commerce system 190, etc.) for
accepting a bid. In one suitable approach, the user's asking price
and the current highest bidding price may be listed and
continuously updated. The user may change the asking price at any
time during the auction time limit. At the end of the time limit,
the user may accept the highest bid or opt to auction his or her
animals later at the same or different web site. Electronic
commerce system 190 may charge a fee for hosting the auction and
may collect a commission fee if a lot is sold. Manufacturers and
service providers may also advertise or auction their products and
services on electronic commerce system 190. However, any other
suitable approach may also be used.
[0221] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may be a
sale barn auction system 2615. Sale barn auction system 2615 may be
a real-time sale barn auction. Sale barn auction system 2615 may,
for example, provide a national audience for auctions at local sale
barns. A user may bid for animals via the Internet in real-time for
animals being auctioned at a local sale barn. As shown in FIG. 26,
barn 2617, barn 2618, and barn 2619 are sale barns that may be
connected to sale barn auction system 2615 for real-time
auctioning. For real-time auctioning, live video and voice data may
be provided to the user by streaming them over the Internet. One or
more sale barn auctions (e.g., several real-time sale barn
auctions) may be in progress at one time. For example, a user
(e.g., a buyer) may attend an auction from the user's location and
change channels to observe another location or venue.
[0222] Sale barn auction system 2615 may also provide a larger
audience of buyers to a sale barn. For example, for the local
producer, the real-time sale barn auction may have more buyers
bidding on his animals versus being limited to few buyers
physically present at the sale barn. Sale barn auction system 2615
may provide a local sale barn to use sale barn auction system 2615
to create a national reputation for selling specific type of
cattle. For example, a sale barn may have real-time auctions for
animals certified to a high quality health, nutrition, and
management program. Animals raised under these programs may have a
proven track record for superior performance at feedlots. A larger
audience of buyers for these special auctions may bring a higher
price for these animals. As a result, a producer may prefer to sell
his animals through a sale barn with real-time auction capability.
Sale barn auctions system 2615 may require users to install
additional hardware and software on their computer systems. They
may also require a direct high-speed satellite link or any suitable
communications link.
[0223] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may
serve as a repository of supplier product catalogs and technical
data. Users may access these catalogs to gain product information,
make purchase decisions, order spare parts, use technical data for
problem solving, configuring new equipment, and/or designing and
developing new systems. Suppliers may pay a fee for hosting their
catalogs on electronic commerce system 190. In another approach,
suppliers may also pay a commission on products and services
purchased by a user through electronic commerce system 190.
[0224] In some embodiments, electronic commerce, system 190 may be
a marketplace 2620. Marketplace 2620 may provide products and
services to users and serve as the purchasing agent. For example,
marketplace 2620 may be a one-stop storefront for products and
services used by ranches and feedlots. For example, marketplace
2620 may offer lower prices than some local sellers. Marketplace
2620 may also consolidate the purchases for manufacturers and
provide them a wider sales reach. Marketplace 2620 may offer
several competing brands. A user may receive a volume discount
based on the user's total purchase as compared to a discount from
the volume purchase of one specific item. For example, marketplace
2620 may require the user to have a credit approval to purchase
items that may be needed for the user's operation as opposed to
several credit agreements with sellers and vendors. Marketplace
2620 may also assist in financing the purchases at a lower rate
through a special arrangement with financial institutions, farm
cooperatives, credit unions, or agricultural banks.
[0225] Marketplace 2620 may offer services for veterinarian
clinics, processing crews, pest control, nutrition analysis, or
ultrasound at feedlots for endpoint management. In another
approach, marketplace 2620 may assist in identifying service
providers near a user. Marketplace 2620 may have a network of
preferred providers of veterinary services (veterinarians and
clinics) for providing services such as spaying, pregnancy
checking, fertility testing, or calls for treating a sick animal.
These preferred providers may be under contract with marketplace
2620. In response to contracting a service from a service provider,
marketplace 2620 may, for example, assist in scheduling service
calls and may dispatch a service provider under contract with
marketplace 2620. The provided service may be at rates lower than
local commercial rates. Marketplace 2620 may have a franchise
network of service providers in order to promote practices and
products, and control consistency and quality of service provided.
For example, the franchise ultrasound service may assist a feedlot
manager in endpoint management. This may include sorting the
animals on the basis of days on feed determined from measurements
for back-fat thickness and marbling, corn prices, and market
conditions. This service may recommend the market grid for selling
these animals and their expected quality and yield grades. The days
on feed information may assist the feedlot manager in scheduling
shipments to a packer and avoid haggling with the packer order
buyer on how much longer to feed the animals before shipping.
[0226] Electronic commerce system 190 may include content
management system 2625, which may provide agricultural- and
livestock-related news and summaries necessary for making
operational decisions consistent with market conditions. News and
summaries may include cattle and crop news, commodity prices at
various mercantile exchanges like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange,
commentaries from veterinarians, animal scientists,
epidemiologists, nutritionist, and extension people on a current
topic, legislation in progress at state and federal governments,
weather, and export markets. Content management system 2625 may
provide users with links such as the "hot agricultural topics of
the day" like Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), beef
check-off, grazing rights on federal lands, etc. Content management
system 2625 may also provide chat sites to facilitate education and
communication between producers and industry experts. Content
management system 2625 may host online education sessions on topics
like risk management, ranch management, genetics, good management
practices, etc.
[0227] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may
include commodities futures system 2605. Commodities futures system
2605, integrated risk management system 125, a combination of the
two, or any other suitable risk management system may provide risk
management options to the users (e.g., farmers, ranchers, etc.) in
the livestock industry. For example, a rancher may enter futures
contracts on several commodities such that the combined package is
optimal for the rancher's operation. Commodities futures system
2605 may identify commodity traders (e.g., by proximity, by cost,
etc.). In another approach, commodities futures system 2605 may
compile a network of preferred commodity traders and/or brokers
that may offer futures trading for one or more commodities used in
the livestock industry. The commodities may include cattle, corn,
soy, milo, alfalfa, silage, fuel (diesel, natural gas, propane, and
distillate), and transportation (rail or truck).
[0228] As discussed above, electronic commerce system 190 may also
be a part of or communicate with (e.g., be linked to) supply and
demand management system 170, integrated risk management system
125, and/or any other suitable system. For example, a user may
access supply and demand management system 170 or any other
suitable system to obtain a user's inventory of animals. This may
assist users in the livestock industry with, for example, assessing
the availability of animals, and planning production and marketing
strategies. Users may desire to access to integrated risk
management system 125 through electronic commerce system 190.
Integrated risk management system 125 may provide users with, for
example, an interface with an online expert (e.g., via voice, text,
etc.) or an expert system (knowledge-based tool) to determine a
strategy for minimizing financial risks of the users (e.g., a
breakeven analysis). For example, the strategy may include a mix of
forward contracting, futures contracts, call/put options, private
treaties, and leasing.
[0229] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may
assist a user in purchasing livestock relating to a selected beef
marketing program (e.g., Angus beef) based on information collected
in the central database. Electronic commerce system 190 may access
beef marketing program requirements from the central database. The
information collected on an animal may be compared with the program
requirements. Electronic commerce system 190 may provide the user
with livestock purchase decision information. Purchase decision
information may include, for example, compliance with specific beef
marketing programs, weight information, health information, or any
other suitable information. Such purchase decision information may
assist the user to purchase the livestock and may allow the user to
ensure that the purchase livestock complies with the selected beef
marketing program.
[0230] In some embodiments, electronic commerce system 190 may
assist a user in selling livestock relating to a selected beef
marketing program (e.g., Angus beef) based on information collected
in the central database. Electronic commerce system 190 may access
beef marketing program requirements from the central database. The
information collected on an animal may be compared with the program
requirements. Electronic commerce system 190 may provide the user
with livestock sale decision information. Purchase sale information
may include, for example, compliance with specific beef marketing
programs, weight information, health information, or any other
suitable information. Such purchase sale information may assist the
user to sell livestock and may allow the user to ensure that the
sold or to be sold livestock complies with the selected beef
marketing program.
[0231] Electronic commerce system 190 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may make
modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of the
invention.
[0232] In another approach, the system may provide users with
additional methods for managing their operation. Based on
information, such as information stored in the central database,
the system may include integrated risk management system 125 which
may determine risk levels and provide users with advice on
offsetting risk in their operations. Integrated risk management
system 125 may be standalone or may be included as part of the
system. Any other suitable approach may also be used.
Integrated Risk Management System
[0233] Producers in the agricultural industry may need to plan
their production almost a year and half in advance before their
products (livestock, crops, etc.) reach the market. Typically,
demand for the producer's products is seasonal and subject to
fierce competition from alternative food supplies. Prices for
agricultural production may be affected by several factors beyond a
producer's control. For example, livestock demand may decline
rapidly due to a change in consumer dietary habits, health
warnings, a surge in imports, a decline in exports due to new
tariffs, or a downturn in the domestic economy. In addition cost of
feed, fuel, and other raw materials needed for agricultural
production may be subject to seasonal price fluctuations and
weather conditions. For example, drought conditions may increase
cost of feed beyond what producers can afford. This may force
producers to sell off their livestock to minimize loss. As another
example, high fuel prices may erode their profit margin. Integrated
risk management system 125 may provide tools for ranchers, farmers,
feedlots, and others in the agricultural industry (herein referred
to as "users") to plan for these contingencies. Integrated risk
management system 125 may result in a substantial gain in
cost-effectiveness so that the overall financial gain of the user's
operation is improved.
[0234] In some embodiments, the user may be provided with a tool
for evaluating a user's operation. Evaluating the user's operation
may involve, for example, examining operating costs, material
requirements, and/or profit goals. FIG. 27 is a generalized
flowchart illustrating the steps involved in process 2500 for
providing the user with integrated risk management tools. As shown,
at step 2505, the user may be presented with an initial display
(e.g., an information display, a heading screen, etc.). At step
2510, the user may be provided with an opportunity to enter one or
more of the user's material inputs. This may require the user to
itemize the user's material inputs. The material inputs may include
feed grains, hay, alfalfa, silage, farm equipment, pasture leases,
livestock, veterinary services, and any another suitable materials.
At substep 2515, the user may be provided with lists to aid with
estimating the user's costs. In some embodiments, integrated risk
management system 125 may provide the user with checklists and/or
spreadsheets. For example, a user (e.g., a producer) may grow corn
or other feed grains. The user may be required to treat this
production activity (growing corn) as a separate business unit and
may consider in detail the production cost of the user's corn. The
production cost may be compared with the corn price in the spot
market, the current basis, or in the commodities futures market.
Subsequently, the user may decide to either buy or sell corn in the
futures market or use it internally for feed. In some embodiments,
the cost of products sold (outputs) may be evaluated. The products
sold may include, for example, surplus grain, hay, cattle,
replacement heifers, replacement bulls, culled cows or other
livestock.
[0235] At step 2520, integrated risk management system 125 may
benchmark a user's cost for inputs and outputs against others
(e.g., in the local area, etc.) using information in the central
database. In some embodiments, benchmarking may include identifying
opportunities for improvements and cost reduction. At step 2525,
the user may be provided with an assessment on the user's
operation. That is, once all the input and output costs are
estimated, integrated risk management system 125 may aid the user
in, for example, breakeven analysis and assess the effect of a
price variation of any input or output on the user's profit margin.
Integrated risk management system 125 may also identify commodities
for which the user may need price protection.
[0236] In some embodiments, upon assessment of the user's
operation, integrated risk management system 125 may assist a user
in determining when to sell his production. For example, a user may
have the option of selling calves after they are weaned,
backgrounded, or as fat cattle. Integrated risk management system
125 may determine when the user should make a tradeoff between a
user's incremental costs, additional revenue potential from weight
gain, risk of illness and associated veterinary costs, risk of
death, price volatility, and interest income. This determination
may require the user to restructure his operation depending on
market conditions and cost. For example, at some time, it may be
more profitable to sell the calves after they are weaned. However,
in other years, it may be more profitable to retain ownership of
calves at a custom feedlot.
[0237] In some embodiments, integrated risk management system 125
may broker relationships between users in order to minimize risks.
However, brokering relationships may involve the users' consent to
share financial data and any other data. The data may be archived
and accessed via the central database. In some embodiments, the
central database may be searched to find another user (e.g., a
partner) with matching needs so that both parties can lower their
risks. For example, it may be possible to negotiate a multi-year
purchase agreement between a rancher and a marketing company with
commitments to a retailer. This may result in minimizing the price
volatility for the rancher and supply uncertainty for the marketer.
In another case, a manufacturer (e.g., John Deere, Kawasaki, etc.)
may reduce a user's farm equipment costs through a long-term lease.
Manufacturers may offer their services through, for example, the
marketplace feature of electronic commerce system 190. However, any
other suitable electronic commerce system may also be used. The
online brokerage feature of electronic commerce system 190 may also
be used to aid in, for example, arranging a long-term private
treaty between a rancher and a feedlot or a grain producer and a
grain processor.
[0238] In some embodiments, integrated risk management system 125
may work in combination with electronic commerce system 190 or any
other suitable electronic commerce system. For example, integrated
risk management system 125 may link users to the content management
system of electronic management system 190. The user may be
provided with agricultural- and livestock-related news and
summaries necessary for making operational decisions consistent
with market conditions. The news and summaries may include cattle
and crop news, commodity prices at various mercantile exchanges
like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, commentaries from
veterinarians, animal scientists, epidemiologists, nutritionists,
and extension people on a current topic, legislation in progress at
state and federal governments, weather reports, and export markets.
Integrated risk management system 125 may also provide the user
with links to other related topics, such as the "hot agricultural
topics of the day" like Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE),
beef check-off, grazing rights on federal lands, etc. In some
embodiments, integrated risk management system 125 may provide chat
sites to facilitate education and communication between users, for
example, producers and industry experts. In some embodiments, users
may be provided with educational resources on topics like risk
management, ranch management, genetics, good management practices,
etc. The educational resources may include on-line educational
sessions, broadcast lectures, etc.
[0239] In some embodiments, integrated risk management system 125
may be linked to commodity exchanges and brokerage services.
Integrated risk management system 125 may also provide the user
with an opportunity to buy and sell futures contracts and commodity
options (calls/puts) for one or more of the commodities used in a
livestock industry. The commodities may include cattle, feed
grains, soy, alfalfa, silage, fuel (diesel, natural gas, propane,
and distillate), and transportation (rail or truck). In some
embodiments, the user may interface with, for example, a commodity
expert online (via voice, text, etc.) or an expert system/knowledge
based tool. Integrated risk management system 125 may also provide
historical data on commodity prices and any regression models
developed. Integrated risk management system 125 may also assist
the user in developing a financial model for his operation.
Financial models may be used to evaluate one or more financial
options in terms of net present value and return on investment.
Subsequently, the user may decide to buy or sell futures contracts
or options on various commodities such that the investment package
is optimal for the user's operation.
[0240] Integrated risk management system 125 is merely illustrative
of the principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may
make modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of
the invention.
[0241] In some embodiments, the system may provide users with
methods for obtaining feedback. Based on information, such as
information stored in the central database, the system may provide
consumer value system 195 which may determine marketing information
and provide feedback to users, such as ranchers. Consumer value
system 195 may be standalone or may be included as part of the
system. Any other suitable approach may also be used.
Consumer Value System
[0242] Producers in the agricultural industry may need to plan
their production based on the demands of the consumer and the
future markets for their products. The demand for a producer's
products is subject to competition from other products as well as
changes in the demands and desires of the consumers and the
marketplace. For example, the number of consumers purchasing a
particular type of livestock may decline when news about a
particular disease begins to spread, potentially negatively
impacting the consumption of that particular livestock protein. In
some embodiments, producers may need to plan their production based
on other producers or users (e.g., ranchers). For example, a
feedlot may want to stop buying a specific breed of cow from the
producer when the producer's cows do not meet performance
expectations (e.g., underperforms). The system may provide consumer
value system 195, which may result in a substantial gain in
cost-effectiveness so that the overall financial gain of the user's
operation is improved by the use of information. Such information
may include specific time and location product demands, past
performance of animals a user is considering to purchase,
benchmarked performance of animals as they flow through the supply
chain, etc.
[0243] In some embodiments, the user may be provided with a tool
for evaluating a user's product. Such tools may include software
(e.g., enabled by the Internet), hardware, or any other suitable
tool for evaluating the user's product. Evaluating the user's
product may involve, for example, examining feedback from buyers,
feedback from consumers, marketing and sales information, etc. FIG.
28 is a generalized flowchart illustrating the steps involved in
providing the user with consumer value information. As shown, at
step 2705, the user may be provided with an opportunity to enter
attributes relating to an individual animal. Attribute information
may include the branded beef program that the user has complied or
enrolled with, genetics information, marbling score, and any other
suitable attribute or product information. Attribute information
may be entered into the system by the user (e.g., producer). At
substep 2710, attribute information may be entered by accessing and
obtaining the relevant attribute information from the central
database. For example, consumer value system 195 may obtain
genetics information from genetics improvement system 180, the
central database, or other applicable systems within the overall
management system. Consumer value system 195 may access information
stored in the central database or may link to other existing
applications or systems (e.g., certification system 160, genetic
improvement system 180, environmental management system 150,
tracking system 145, etc.) in the system.
[0244] In some embodiments, consumer value system 195 may allow
other users (e.g., ranchers, consumers, branded beef programs,
retail buyers, etc.) to provide attributes (e.g., feedback) on an
individual animal (step 2715). Users may provide a rating for the
product. For example, when a retail outlet purchases a specific
branded beef product (e.g. Angus beef) from a packer or
distributor, the user may access consumer value system 195 and
input the location where the user purchased the product and rate
the product (e.g., rate the quality, tenderness, marbling, flavor).
This information may be available to any user of the system, such
as a packer, a feedlot manager, a rancher, a veterinarian, etc. In
another example, consumer value system 195 may allow users, such as
animal buyers, to enter attributes. Those users may also provide a
rating for the product. In this example, users may provide feedback
by rating the product based on, for example, yield expectations.
Consumer value system 195 may collect the entered attributes in the
central database at step 2720.
[0245] In some embodiments, consumer value system 195 may analyze
the collected attributes using an expert system (step 2725). Upon
analyzing the collected attributed, consumer value system 195 may
provide the user with access to the analysis, thereby assisting the
user in managing the multiple animals based at least in part on the
analysis (step 2735).
[0246] In another approach, consumer value system 195 may obtain
marketing information. Marketing information may include consumer
research on the products that consumers are buying, the products
that consumers are not buying, seasonal fluctuations (e.g., an
increase in ham purchases during the holidays), diseases currently
affecting animals and its correlation with sales (e.g., Foot and
Mouth, Mad Cow Disease, etc.), and any other suitable marketing
information.
[0247] In some embodiments, consumer value system 195 may analyze
the consumer value information and determine the user's consumer
value. Users may be provided with one or more ratings for their
product. For example, the user may receive a quality rating, a
performance rating (e.g., how their animal performed compared with
the expected performance), flavor rating, cost rating, etc. The
user may receive the consumer value information for their
particular animal and make decisions and improvements to their
operation. For example, if a particular product continues to
underperform and there is a diminishing market for the product, the
user (producer) may decide to discontinue producing that product.
In some embodiments, consumer value system 195 may identify other
products for the user, (e.g. product alternatives). Upon deciding
to produce other products, the user may be provided with consumer
value information on more promising products. For example, if the
ratings for Angus beef are high and the user's operation is
compatible for producing Angus beef, the user may decide to raise
that product. The user may decide to enroll the user's animals in a
branded beef program which may create a higher value for these
animals.
[0248] In some embodiments, consumer value system 195 may operate
in combination with electronic commerce system 190, integrated risk
management system 125, or any other suitable system. For example,
integrated risk management system 125 may provide the consumer
value system with agricultural- and livestock-related news and
summaries necessary for making operational decisions consistent
with market conditions. In some embodiments, consumer value system
195 may obtain previously entered feedback information stored in
the central database or any other suitable system.
[0249] Consumer value system 195 is merely illustrative of the
principles of this invention. Those skilled in the art may make
modifications without departing from the scope and spirit of the
invention.
[0250] Thus, livestock management systems and methods are provided.
It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of
the principles of the invention and that various modifications can
be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the
scope and spirit of the invention, which is limited only by the
claims that follow.
* * * * *