U.S. patent application number 11/657907 was filed with the patent office on 2008-02-28 for weapon mount.
Invention is credited to Alf L. III Carroll, Donald L. Chaloupka, Katherine E. Hoffman, Paul G. Jones.
Application Number | 20080047420 11/657907 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 39112137 |
Filed Date | 2008-02-28 |
United States Patent
Application |
20080047420 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Carroll; Alf L. III ; et
al. |
February 28, 2008 |
Weapon mount
Abstract
A mount system including a tray mountable to a port and a table
translatable with respect to the tray. A mounting station is
positioned on the table. There is a support for the tray. A drive
mechanism translates the table to alternately conceal the mounting
station within the port and to deploy the mounting station through
the port.
Inventors: |
Carroll; Alf L. III;
(Marion, MA) ; Chaloupka; Donald L.; (Bristol,
RI) ; Jones; Paul G.; (Plainfield, IN) ;
Hoffman; Katherine E.; (Portsmouth, RI) |
Correspondence
Address: |
IANDIORIO & TESKA;INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ATTORNEYS
260 BEAR HILL ROAD
WALTHAM
MA
02451-1018
US
|
Family ID: |
39112137 |
Appl. No.: |
11/657907 |
Filed: |
January 25, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
60839951 |
Aug 24, 2006 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
89/37.01 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F41A 23/56 20130101;
F41A 23/12 20130101; F41A 27/06 20130101; F41A 23/20 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
089/037.01 |
International
Class: |
F41A 23/00 20060101
F41A023/00 |
Claims
1. A mount system comprising: a tray mountable to a port; a table
translatable with respect to the tray; a mounting station
positioned on the table; a support for the tray; and a drive
mechanism for translating the table to alternately conceal the
mounting station within the port and to deploy the mounting station
through the port.
2. The mount system of claim 1 in which the tray includes at least
one rail and the table rides on the rail.
3. The mount system of claim 2 in which the tray includes a pair of
spaced rails and the table includes shoes which engage the
rails.
4. The mount system of claim 1 in which the drive mechanism
includes a threaded rod extending along the tray and the table
includes a nut engaging the threaded rod.
5. The mount system of claim 4 in which the nut is positioned on an
underside of the table.
6. The mount system of claim 4 further including a handle for
rotating the threaded rod.
7. The mount system of claim 1 in which the mounting station
includes a remote operated small arms mount.
8. The mount system of claim 1 in which the support includes a
tripod.
9. The mount system of claim 8 in which the support further
includes a spacer structure between the tripod and the tray.
10. The mount system of claim 1 further including at least one
bracket for mounting the tray to a sill of the port.
11. The mount system of claim 1 further including a locking
mechanism for fixing the table with respect to the tray in the
deployed position.
12. The mount system of claim 11 in which the locking mechanism
includes a pin in the table releasably received in a channel in the
tray.
13. The mount system of claim 1 further including a universal mount
between the mounting station and the table.
14. The mount system of claim 13 in which the universal mount
includes a post and a pin and the table includes a receiver socket
for the post and a slot for the pin.
15. A mount system comprising: a tray mountable to a port and
including at least one rail; a table mounted to translate along the
rail; a mounting station positioned on the table; a support for the
tray; a bracket for mounting the tray to a sill of the port; a
drive mechanism for translating the table along the rail to
alternately conceal the mounting station within the port and to
deploy the mounting station through the port; and a locking
mechanism for releasably locking the table with respect to the
tray.
16. The mount system of claim 15 in which the tray includes a pair
of spaced rails and the table includes shoes which engage the
rails.
17. The mount system of claim 15 in which the drive mechanism
includes a threaded rod extending along the tray and the table
includes a nut engaging the threaded rod.
18. The mount system of claim 17 in which the nut is positioned on
an underside of the table.
19. The mount system of claim 17 further including a handle for
rotating the threaded rod.
20. The mount system of claim 15 in which the mounting station
includes a remote operated small arms mount.
21. The mount system of claim 15 in which the support includes a
tripod.
22. The mount system of claim 21 in which the support further
includes a spacer structure between the tripod and the tray.
23. The mount system of claim 15 in which the locking mechanism
includes a pin in the table releasably received in a channel in the
tray.
24. The mount system of claim 15 further including a universal
mount between the mounting station and the table.
25. The mount system of claim 24 in which the universal mount
includes a post and a pin and the table includes a receiver socket
for the post and a slot for the pin.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS AND PRIORITY CLAIM
[0001] This application claims benefit of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/839,951, filed Aug. 24, 2006.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This subject invention relates to mounting systems for
weapons and non-lethal devices.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A large weapon such as a 50 caliber machine gun is often
mounted in a weapon mounting station on a tripod. An example of a
weapon mounting station is a remote operated small arms mount
(ROSAM). Moving such a large and heavy weapon from a concealed
position within a port (a window, for example) to a deployed
position through the port would be difficult. The tripod would have
to be repositioned from a location distant from the port to a
location proximate the port. Given that a 50 caliber machine gun
mounted to a ROSAM style weapon mounting station can weigh in
excess of 450 lbs, the repositioning effort between a concealed and
deployed position would be cumbersome and time consuming. And, even
after the weapon is repositioned so the barrel of the weapon is now
outside the port, its spatial coverage may be limited.
[0004] There is often a need to keep a weapon concealed and/or
protected until its use is required. In but one example, it is
desirable that any weapons associated with an embassy or cruise
ship not be viewable from public spaces. The idea is a
non-threatening posture while maintaining protective capability. In
another example, it is desirable that certain weapons on a naval or
coast guard vessel be kept both protected and concealed until
needed. Often, the mere act of deploying a concealed weapon is
sufficient to prevent an act of violence. Known weapon mounts do
not lend themselves to concealment and then rapid and easy
deployment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] It is therefore an object of this invention to provide a new
more versatile weapon mount.
[0006] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which deploys the weapon easily and quickly.
[0007] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which increases the coverage of the weapon.
[0008] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which is fairly simple in design and is easy to
use.
[0009] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which can include an existing tripod and an existing
weapon station such as a ROSAM.
[0010] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which is stable and adequately supports the weapon in
both the concealed mode and the deployed mode and while firing.
[0011] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which can be set up in different locations and without
adversely affecting the port to which it is being deployed
from.
[0012] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which can be easily tailored for different
installations.
[0013] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which is reliable even in corrosive and rugged
environments.
[0014] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which meets dynamic loading and support accuracy
requirements.
[0015] It is a further object of this invention to provide such a
weapon mount which can be engineered to deploy automatically
especially in cases where sensors are used to detect potential
threats.
[0016] The subject invention results from the realization that a
versatile weapon mount which deploys a situation dependant weapon
easily and quickly and which provides full weapon coverage in a
stable manner is effected by a tray mountable to a port and
supported by tripod in combination with a table translatable with
respect to the tray to alternately conceal the weapon within the
port to provide protection and/or a non-threatening posture and
which then deploys the weapon through the port thus maintaining
protective capability.
[0017] The subject invention, however, in other embodiments, need
not achieve all these objectives and the claims hereof should not
be limited to structures or methods capable of achieving these
objectives.
[0018] The subject invention features a mount system with a tray
mountable to a port and a table translatable with respect to the
tray. The mounting station is mounted to the table. There is a
support for the tray. A drive mechanism translates the table to
alternately conceal the mounting station within the port and to
deploy the mounting station through the port.
[0019] In one example the tray includes at least one rail and the
table rides on the rail. There may be a pair of spaced rails and
the table may include shoes which engage the rails. One drive
mechanism includes a threaded rod extending along the tray. The
underside of the table includes a nut engaging the threaded rod.
This mount system includes a handle for rotating the threaded
rod.
[0020] The mounting station may include a remote operated small
arms mount. The support may include a tripod and a spacer structure
between the tripod and the tray. There is typically at least one
bracket for mounting the tray to a sill of the port. There is also
typically a locking mechanism for fixing the table with respect to
the tray in the deployed position. One locking mechanism includes a
pin in the table releasably received in a channel in the tray.
There may also be a universal mount between the mounting station
and the table. One universal mount includes a post and a pin and
the table then includes a receiver socket for the post and a slot
for the pin.
[0021] One mount system in accordance with the subject invention
includes a tray mountable to a port and including at least one
rail, a table mounted to translate along the rail, a mounting
station on the table, a support for the tray, a bracket for
mounting the tray to a sill of the port, a drive mechanism for
translating the table along the rail to alternately conceal the
mounting station within the port and to deploy the mounting station
through the port, and a locking mechanism for releasably locking
the table with respect to the tray.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
[0022] Other objects, features and advantages will occur to those
skilled in the art from the following description of a preferred
embodiment and the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0023] FIG. 1 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing a
typical prior art weapon mount;
[0024] FIG. 2 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing the
limited spatial coverage associated with the prior art weapon mount
shown in FIG. 1;
[0025] FIG. 3 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing, in one
example, the primary components associated with a weapon mount in
accordance with the subject invention;
[0026] FIG. 4 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing the
increased spatial coverage provided by the weapon mount of in FIG.
3;
[0027] FIG. 5 is a schematic three-dimensional partial view showing
the tray of the weapon mount shown in FIG. 3 supported on the sill
of a port;
[0028] FIG. 6 is a schematic three-dimensional partial view of the
weapon mount shown in FIG. 3 including brackets for mounting the
tray thereof to the sill of the port;
[0029] FIG. 7 is a schematic side view showing the bracket of FIG.
6;
[0030] FIG. 8 is a schematic three-dimensional front view of the
weapon mount shown in FIG. 3;
[0031] FIG. 9 is a schematic three-dimensional side view of the
weapon mount shown in FIG. 3 with the weapon aimed 90.degree. with
respect to the port;
[0032] FIG. 10 is a schematic three-dimensional view of the weapon
mount shown in FIG. 3 with an alternative configuration of a sill
bracket;
[0033] FIG. 11 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing one
version of a drive mechanism for the weapon mount of the subject
invention;
[0034] FIG. 12 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing the
underside of the sliding table of the weapon mount shown in FIG.
11;
[0035] FIG. 13 is a schematic three-dimensional view showing the
location of a universal mount of a weapon mount in accordance with
the subject invention;
[0036] FIG. 14 is a schematic three-dimensional front view showing
the universal mount of FIG. 13;
[0037] FIG. 15 is a schematic three-dimensional top view of the
sliding table shown in FIGS. 11-13;
[0038] FIG. 16 is a schematic three-dimensional end view showing an
example of a mechanism for locking the sliding table shown in FIG.
15 to the weapon mount tray; and
[0039] FIG. 17 is a schematic three-dimensional partial view of a
weapon mount in accordance with the subject invention showing how
the bracket is connected to the tripod.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0040] Aside from the preferred embodiment or embodiments disclosed
below, this invention is capable of other embodiments and of being
practiced or being carried out in various ways. Thus, it is to be
understood that the invention is not limited in its application to
the details of construction and the arrangements of components set
forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings.
If only one embodiment is described herein, the claims hereof are
not to be limited to that embodiment. Moreover, the claims hereof
are not to be read restrictively unless there is clear and
convincing evidence manifesting a certain exclusion, restriction,
or disclaimer.
[0041] FIG. 1 shows 50 caliber weapon 10 within weapon mounting
station 12 supported by tripod 14 in accordance with the prior art.
Tripod 14 positions weapon 10 with respect to port 16. Port 16 may
be a window in an embassy, a cruise whip, or a naval or coast guard
vessel.
[0042] As described in the Background section above, it is
difficult to provide a non-threatening posture while maintaining
protective capability in accordance with such prior art weapon
mounting systems. Tripod 14 is not easily or quickly moved. Often,
tripod 14 is bolted to the deck of the ship. Typically, tripod 14
is not positioned sufficiently rearwardly of port 16 to completely
conceal and/or protect weapon 10 and weapon mounting station 12.
Even were tripod 14 brought as close as possible to port 16 and
weapon 10 deployed as shown in FIG. 2, coverage is limited to a
total yaw angle of 17.degree.. Any repositioning effort of tripod
14 would be cumbersome and time consuming.
[0043] In one example, the new weapon mount 20, FIG. 3 of the
subject invention preferably includes tray 22 mountable with
respect to port 16. Table 24 is translatable within tray 22 in the
direction shown by arrow 26. Tray 22 is supported on deck or floor
24 preferably by prior art tripod 14 and new spacer bracket
structure 30. A drive mechanism including drive wheel 32 translates
table 24 to conceal weapon mounting station 12 mounted to table 24
within the port to provide a non-threatening posture. When desired,
however, weapon 10 and weapon mounting station 12 are deployed
through port 16 by turning drive wheel 32 either manually or
automatically which drives table 24 forward. When concealment,
protection, and/or servicing of weapon 10 is then desired, drive
wheel 32 is turned in the opposite direction to drive table 24
rearwardly. In the deployed position shown in FIG. 4, weapon 10
coverage includes a total yaw angle of 180.degree..
[0044] As shown in FIGS. 5-10, tray 22 typically rests on sill 40
of the port and bracket 42, FIG. 6 may be used to fix tray 22 in
place on sill 40. An alternative bracket design is shown at 42' in
FIG. 10. Bracket portion 44 is fixed to tray side rail 46 and
bracket portion 48 clamps bracket portion 44 to sill 40. By driving
table 24 fully forward as shown in FIG. 9, weapon mounting station
12 is fully outside of the port for 180.degree. yaw angle weapon
coverage.
[0045] The result in any embodiment is a more versatile weapon
mount which deploys a weapon easily and quickly and in a way such
that the coverage of the weapon is increased. The weapon mount is
relatively simple in design and easy to use. Existing components
like tripod 14, FIG. 3 and a ROSAM style weapon station mount 12
can be fully utilized reducing the cost of the system. The weapon
mount is stable and adequately supports the weapon in both the
concealed mode and in the deployed mode while firing. The weapon
mount can be set up in different locations and typically without
adversely affecting the port to which it is mounted. By adjusting
in configuration and dimensions of spacer structure 30, FIG. 6, the
weapon mount can be easily tailored for different installations
(e.g., ports or windows of different heights and configurations).
The weapon mount is reliable even in corrosive and rugged
environments and adequately meets dynamic loading and support
accuracy requirements. Bracket portion 42', FIG. 10 can be padded
on the bottom with heavy duty rubber to minimize sill damage.
Bracket portion 42' reduces torsion that tripod 14 would otherwise
have to absorb. The preferred embodiment of spacer structure 30 is
a weight optimized frame structure of welded construction as shown.
The height of spacer structure 30 can be varied for different port
configurations. Spacer structure 30 typically bolts to prior art
tripod mount 14 and to tray 22.
[0046] A nylon slide allows the tray to be slid out the window and
the rubber section drops into an installed position. Preferably,
the natural frequency of the weapon mount is proximate 30 Hz to
provide sufficient stiffness for vertical deflection and
torsion.
[0047] FIGS. 11-12 show an example of table 24 mounted to slide on
rails 50a and 50b via shoes 52a-52d which ride on tray portion 51.
Threaded rod 56 extends along tray portion 51 through nut 58
attached to ear 60 on the underside of table 24. Bushing 62 defines
the limit of travel of table 24. Handle 32 connects to and is used
to rotate rod 56 and thus translate table 24. Or, threaded rod 56
may be driven by a motor.
[0048] For a mounting station 12 such as a remote operated small
arms mount (a "mini-typhoon" available from General Dynamics and
Rafael, for example), universal mount 70, FIGS. 13-14 may be
provided. Universal mount 70, FIG. 14 includes central post 72 and
pin 74. The top of table 24, FIG. 15, in turn, includes central
receiver socket 76 for universal mount post 72, FIG. 14 and arcuate
slot 78, FIG. 15 for pin 74, FIG. 14. This allows universal mount
70 to rotate with respect to sliding table 24 to the limits defined
by arcuate slot 78.
[0049] There may also be a locking mechanism for releasably fixing
table 24, FIG. 16 with respect to tray portion 51 such as pin 80 in
table 24 which can be manually pushed down into channel 82 in table
portion 51. Pin 80 can also be motor driven, by a solenoid, for
example (not shown) up and down to lock table 24 to tray portion
51. Tray portion 51 can be adhered to tray portion 22 itself glued
to bracket 30, FIG. 17. Bracket 30 can be bolted to tripod 15 using
socket head cap screw 90 and/or bolts 92. The legs of tripod 14 can
be bolted to the deck of the installation.
[0050] All of the components of the weapon mount described above
can be made of corrosion resistant metals, composite materials, or
a combination of the same. Mounting station 12, FIGS. 8-9 can vary
in design to include various gun mounts and also mounts for
non-lethal weapons such as a long range acoustic device (e.g., the
"LRAD 500", American Technology Corp.). Other sensors, warning
devices, hailing devices, surveillance devices, and weapons are
known to those skilled in the art. By strategically locating
numerous such weapon mounts on a vessel, the vessel can be fully
protected. In any installation, and in any embodiment, the mount of
the subject invention, whether fitted with a weapon and/or a
non-lethal device, easily and quickly provides deployment and
better coverage in a stable manner. The table which is translatable
with respect to the tray alternately can position the weapon or
non-lethal device within the port provide protection and/or
non-threatening posture and is enabled to deploy the weapon or
non-lethal device through the port thus maintaining a protective
capability.
[0051] Although specific features of the invention are shown in
some drawings and not in others, this is for convenience only as
each feature may be combined with any or all of the other features
in accordance with the invention. The words "including",
"comprising", "having", and "with" as used herein are to be
interpreted broadly and comprehensively and are not limited to any
physical interconnection. Moreover, any embodiments disclosed in
the subject application are not to be taken as the only possible
embodiments. Other embodiments will occur to those skilled in the
art and are within the following claims.
[0052] In addition, any amendment presented during the prosecution
of the patent application for this patent is not a disclaimer of
any claim element presented in the application as filed: those
skilled in the art cannot reasonably be expected to draft a claim
that would literally encompass all possible equivalents, many
equivalents will be unforeseeable at the time of the amendment and
are beyond a fair interpretation of what is to be surrendered (if
anything), the rationale underlying the amendment may bear no more
than a tangential relation to many equivalents, and/or there are
many other reasons the applicant can not be expected to describe
certain insubstantial substitutes for any claim element
amended.
* * * * *