U.S. patent application number 11/848924 was filed with the patent office on 2007-12-20 for correction of cross-component induction measurements for misalignment using comparison of the xy formation response.
This patent application is currently assigned to Baker Hughes Incorporated. Invention is credited to Bill H. Corley, Luis M. Pelegri, Michael B. Rabinovich, Leonty A. Tabarovsky.
Application Number | 20070294035 11/848924 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 38576484 |
Filed Date | 2007-12-20 |
United States Patent
Application |
20070294035 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Rabinovich; Michael B. ; et
al. |
December 20, 2007 |
Correction of Cross-Component Induction Measurements for
Misalignment Using Comparison of the XY Formation Response
Abstract
Measurements are made with a multicomponent logging tool in an
earth formation. The measurements are inverted without using a
selected cross-component measurement. The model is then used to
predict the value of the selected cross-component. A misalignment
angle of the tool is estimated from the predicted and actual values
of the selected cross-component.
Inventors: |
Rabinovich; Michael B.;
(Houston, TX) ; Tabarovsky; Leonty A.; (Cypress,
TX) ; Corley; Bill H.; (Conroe, TX) ; Pelegri;
Luis M.; (Humble, TX) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MADAN, MOSSMAN & SRIRAM, P.C.
2603 AUGUSTA DRIVE
SUITE 700
HOUSTON
TX
77057-5662
US
|
Assignee: |
Baker Hughes Incorporated
Houston
TX
|
Family ID: |
38576484 |
Appl. No.: |
11/848924 |
Filed: |
August 31, 2007 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11400536 |
Apr 6, 2006 |
|
|
|
11848924 |
Aug 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
702/7 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01V 3/28 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
702/007 |
International
Class: |
G01V 3/18 20060101
G01V003/18 |
Claims
1. A method of estimating a parameter of interest of an earth
formation, the method comprising: (a) conveying a logging tool into
a borehole in the earth formation; (b) obtaining a plurality of
multi-component resistivity measurements using the logging tool;
(c) inverting the multi-component resistivity measurements without
using a particular cross-component to give a resistivity model; (d)
using the resistivity model to provide a simulated value of the
particular cross-component; and (e) using the simulated value of
the particular cross-component and an actual value of the
particular cross-component for estimating a misalignment angle in
the logging tool.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein inverting the multi-component
measurements further comprises using a search technique.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising obtaining multi-array
induction measurements and using the multi-array induction
measurements in the inversion.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein inverting the multi-component
measurements further comprises: (i) using a first subset of the
measurements to estimate a horizontal resistivity of the formation,
and (ii) using the estimated horizontal resistivity and another
subset of the measurements to estimate a vertical resistivity of
the earth formation.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein inverting the multi-component
measurements further comprises using a separation of modes.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the particular cross-component is
selected from (i) an XY component, and (ii) an XZ component.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the misalignment angle
further comprises using an average value of the particular
cross-component and an average simulated value of the particular
cross-component.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising using the misalignment
angle and the multi-component measurements to estimate the
parameter of interest of the earth formation.
9. The method of claim 8 wherein the parameter of interest is at
least one of (i) a horizontal conductivity, (ii) a vertical
conductivity, (iii) a horizontal resistivity, (iv) a vertical
resistivity, (v) a relative dip angle, (vi) a strike angle, (vii) a
sand fraction, (viii) a shale fraction, and (ix) a water
saturation.
10. An apparatus for estimating a parameter of interest of an earth
formation, the apparatus comprising: (a) a logging tool configured
to be conveyed into a borehole in the earth formation and which is
configured to obtain a plurality of multi-component resistivity
measurements; and (b) a processor which is configured to: (A)
invert the multi-component resistivity measurements without using a
particular cross-component to give a resistivity model; (B) use the
resistivity model to provide a simulated value of the particular
cross-component; and (C) use the simulated value of the particular
cross-component and an actual value of the particular
cross-component to estimate a misalignment angle in the logging
tool.
11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured
to invert the multi-component measurements using a search
technique.
12. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured
to invert the multi-component measurements using: (i) a first
subset of the measurements to estimate a horizontal resistivity of
the formation, and (ii) the estimated horizontal resistivity and
another subset of the measurements to estimate a vertical
resistivity of the earth formation.
13. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured
to invert the multi-component measurements by using a separation of
modes.
14. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the particular
cross-component is selected from (i) an XY component, and (ii) an
XZ component.
15. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processor is configured
to estimate the misalignment using an average value of the
particular cross-component and an average simulated value of the
particular cross-component.
16. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the processor is further
configured to use the estimated misalignment angle and the
multi-component measurements to estimate the parameter of interest
of the earth formation.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 wherein the parameter of interest is
at least one of (i) a horizontal conductivity, (ii) a vertical
conductivity, (iii) a horizontal resistivity, (iv) a vertical
resistivity, (v) a relative dip angle, (vi) a strike angle, (vii) a
sand fraction, (viii) a shale fraction, and (ix) a water
saturation.
18. The apparatus of claim 10 further comprising a wireline
configured to convey the logging tool into the borehole.
19. The apparatus of claim 18 further comprising a motor configured
to rotate the logging tool to the plurality of rotational
angles.
20. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the logging tool is part of a
bottomhole assembly (BHA) configured to be conveyed into the
borehole on a drilling tubular.
21. A computer readable medium used with an apparatus for
evaluating an earth formation, the apparatus comprising: (a) a
logging tool configured to be conveyed into a borehole in the earth
formation which is configured to obtain a plurality of
multi-component resistivity measurements; the medium comprising
instructions which enable a processor to (b) invert the
multi-component resistivity measurements without using a particular
cross-component to give a resistivity model; (c) use the
resistivity model to provide a simulated value of the particular
cross-component; and (d) estimate a misalignment angle in the
logging tool by using the simulated value of the particular
cross-component and an actual value of the particular
cross-component.
22. The medium of claim 20 further comprising at least one of (i) a
ROM, (ii) an EPROM, (iii) an EAROMs, (iv) a flash memory, and (v)
an Optical disk.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/400,536, by Rabinovich et al., filed Apr.
6, 2006 which is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No.
11/398,838 to Rabinovich et al., filed Apr. 6, 2006 and U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 11/400,097 to Rabinovich et al., filed Apr. 6,
2006.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention is related to the field of apparatus
design in the field of oil exploration. In particular, the present
invention describes a method for calibrating multicomponent logging
devices used for detecting the presence of oil in boreholes
penetrating a geological formation.
[0004] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0005] Electromagnetic induction resistivity well logging
instruments are well known in the art. Electromagnetic induction
resistivity well logging instruments are used to determine the
electrical conductivity, and its converse, resistivity, of earth
formations penetrated by a borehole. Formation conductivity has
been determined based on results of measuring the magnetic field of
eddy currents that the instrument induces in the formation
adjoining the borehole. The electrical conductivity is used for,
among other reasons, inferring the fluid content of the earth
formations. Typically, lower conductivity (higher resistivity) is
associated with hydrocarbon-bearing earth formations. The physical
principles of electromagnetic induction well logging are well
described, for example, in, J. H. Moran and K. S. Kunz, Basic
Theory of Induction Logging and Application to Study of Two-Coil
Sondes, Geophysics, vol. 27, No. 6, part 1, pp. 829-858, Society of
Exploration Geophysicists, December 1962. Many improvements and
modifications to electromagnetic induction resistivity instruments
described in the Moran and Kunz reference, supra, have been
devised, some of which are described, for example, in U.S. Pat. No.
4,837,517 to Barber, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,157,605 to Chandler et al.,
and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,600,246 to Fanini et al.
[0006] The conventional geophysical induction resistivity well
logging tool is a probe suitable for lowering into the borehole and
it comprises a sensor section containing a transmitter antenna and
a receiver antenna and other, primarily electrical, equipment for
measuring data to infer the physical parameters that characterize
the formation. The sensor section, or mandrel, comprises induction
transmitters and receivers positioned along the instrument axis,
arranged in the order according to particular instrument or tool
specifications and oriented parallel with the borehole axis. The
electrical equipment generates an electrical voltage to be further
applied to a transmitter induction coil, conditions signals coming
from receiver induction coils, processes the acquired information,
stores the data or, by means of telemetry sends the data to the
earth surface through a wire line cable used to lower the tool into
the borehole.
[0007] In general, when using a conventional induction logging tool
with transmitters and receivers (induction coils) oriented only
along the borehole axis, the hydrocarbon-bearing zones are
difficult to detect when they occur in multi-layered or laminated
reservoirs. These reservoirs usually consist of thin alternating
layers of shale and sand and, oftentimes, the layers are so thin
that due to the insufficient resolution of the conventional logging
tool they cannot be detected individually. In this case the average
conductivity of the formation is evaluated.
[0008] Conventional induction well logging techniques employ coils
wound on an insulating mandrel. One or more transmitter coils are
energized by an alternating current. The oscillating magnetic field
produced by this arrangement results in the induction of currents
in the formations that are nearly proportional to the conductivity
of the formations. These currents, in turn, contribute to the
voltage induced in one or more receiver coils. By selecting only
the voltage component that is in phase with the transmitter
current, a signal is obtained that is approximately proportional to
the formation conductivity. In conventional induction logging
apparatus, the basic transmitter coil and receiver coil have axes
that are aligned with the longitudinal axis of the well logging
device. (For simplicity of explanation, it will be assumed that the
bore hole axis is aligned with the axis of the logging device, and
that these are both in the vertical direction. Also single coils
will subsequently be referred to without regard for focusing coils
or the like.) This arrangement tends to induce secondary current
loops in the formations that are concentric with the vertically
oriented transmitting and receiving coils. The resultant
conductivity measurements are indicative of the horizontal
conductivity (or resistivity) of the surrounding formations. There
are, however, various formations encountered in well logging which
have a conductivity that is anisotropic. Anisotropy results from
the manner in which formation beds were deposited by nature. For
example, "uniaxial anisotropy" is characterized by a difference
between the horizontal conductivity, in a plane parallel to the
bedding plane, and the vertical conductivity, in a direction
perpendicular to the bedding plane. When there is no bedding dip,
horizontal resistivity can be considered to be in the plane
perpendicular to the bore hole, and the vertical resistivity in the
direction parallel to the bore hole. Conventional induction logging
devices, which tend to be sensitive only to the horizontal
conductivity of the formations, do not provide a measure of
vertical conductivity or of anisotropy. Techniques have been
developed to determine formation anisotropy. See, e.g. U.S. Pat.
No. 4,302,722 to Gianzero et al.. Transverse anisotropy often
occurs such that variations in resistivity occur in the azimuthal
direction.
[0009] Thus, in a vertical borehole, a conventional induction
logging tool with transmitters and receivers (induction coils)
oriented only along the borehole axis responds to the average
horizontal conductivity that combines the conductivity of both sand
and shale. These average readings are usually dominated by the
relatively higher conductivity of the shale layers and exhibit
reduced sensitivity to the lower conductivity sand layers where
hydrocarbon reserves are produced. To address this problem, loggers
have turned to using transverse induction logging tools having
magnetic transmitters and receivers (induction coils) oriented
transversely with respect to the tool longitudinal axis. Such
instruments for transverse induction well logging have been
described in PCT Patent publication WO 98/00733 of Beard et al. and
U.S. Pat. No. 5,452,761 to Beard et al.; U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,883 to
Gupta et al.; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,781,436 to Forgang et al.
[0010] One, if not the main, difficulty in interpreting the data
acquired by a transversal induction logging tool is associated with
vulnerability of its response to borehole conditions. Among these
conditions is the presence of a conductive well fluid as well as
wellbore fluid invasion effects.
[0011] In the induction logging instruments, the acquired data
quality depends on the formation electromagnetic parameter
distribution (conductivity) in which the tool induction receivers
operate. Thus, in the ideal case, the logging tool measures
magnetic signals induced by eddy currents flowing in the formation.
Variations in the magnitude and phase of the eddy currents
occurring in response to variations in the formation conductivity
are reflected as respective variations in the output voltage of
receivers. In the conventional induction instruments, these
receiver induction coil voltages are conditioned and then processed
using analog phase sensitive detectors or digitized by
digital-to-analog converters and then processed with signal
processing algorithms. The processing allows for determining both
receiver voltage amplitude and phase with respect to the induction
transmitter current or magnetic field waveform. It has been found
convenient for further uphole geophysical interpretation to deliver
the processed receiver signal as a vector combination of two
voltage components: one being in-phase with transmitter waveform
and another out-of-phase, quadrature component. Theoretically, the
in-phase coil voltage component amplitude is the more sensitive and
noise-free indicator of the formation conductivity.
[0012] Recognizing the fact that no hardware calibration is
perfect, and may further be susceptible to changes over time, the
present invention provides methods for calibration of
multicomponent induction logging instruments in the presence of
possible hardware errors and misalignments.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0013] One embodiment of the invention is a method of estimating a
parameter of interest of an earth formation. A logging tool is
conveyed into a borehole in the earth formation. Multi-component
measurements resistivity measurements are obtained using the
logging tool. The multi-component measurements are inverted without
using a particular cross-component to give a resistivity model. The
resistivity model is used to provide a simulated value of the
particular cross-component. The simulated value and the actual
value of the particular cross-component are used for estimating a
misalignment angle in the logging tool.
[0014] Another embodiment of the invention is an apparatus for
estimating a parameter of interest of an earth formation. A logging
tool obtains a plurality of multi-component resistivity
measurements. A processor inverts the multi-component measurements
while excluding a particular cross-component to give a resistivity
model. The processor then uses the resistivity model to provide a
simulated value of the particular cross-component. The processor
than uses the simulated value and the actual value of the
particular cross-component to estimate a misalignment angle in the
logging tool.
[0015] Another embodiment of the invention is a computer readable
medium for use with an apparatus for estimating a parameter of
interest of an earth formation. The apparatus includes a logging
tool which obtains a plurality of multi-component resistivity
measurements. The instructions enable a processor to invert the
multi-component measurements while excluding a particular
cross-component to give a resistivity model. The instructions
further enable the processor to use the resistivity model to
provide a simulated value of the particular cross-component. The
instructions then enable the processor to use the simulated value
and the actual value of the particular cross-component to estimate
a misalignment angle in the logging tool.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016] The present invention is best understood with reference to
the accompanying figures in which like numerals refer to like
elements and in which:
[0017] FIG. 1 shows schematically a wellbore extending into a
laminated earth formation, into which wellbore an induction logging
tool as used according to the invention has been lowered;
[0018] FIG. 2A (prior art) illustrates a conventional resistivity
measurement in the vertical direction;
[0019] FIG. 2B (prior art) illustrates a resistivity measurement in
the horizontal direction;
[0020] FIG. 3 shows a borehole inclined to a bedding plane;
[0021] FIG. 4 shows a flow chart of one embodiment of the present
invention using quadrature signals;
[0022] FIG. 5 shows a flow chart of another embodiment of the
present invention using average signals; and
[0023] FIG. 6 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of the present
invention using inversion.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0024] The instrument structure provided by the present invention
enables increased stability and accuracy in an induction wellbore
logging tool and its operational capabilities, which, in turn,
results in better quality and utility of wellbore data acquired
during logging. The features of the present invention are
applicable to improve the accuracy of a transverse induction
tool.
[0025] The invention will now be described in more detail, and by
way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings. FIG. 1
schematically shows a wellbore 1 extending into a laminated earth
formation, into which wellbore an induction logging tool 9 as used
according to the present invention has been lowered. The wellbore
in FIG. 1 extends into an earth formation that includes a
hydrocarbon-bearing sand layer 3 located between an upper shale
layer 5 and a lower shale layer 7, both having higher conductivity
than the hydrocarbon bearing sand layer 3. An induction logging
tool 9 used in the practice of the invention has been lowered into
the wellbore 1 via a wireline 11 extending through a blowout
preventor 13 (shown schematically) located at the earth surface 15.
The surface equipment 22 includes an electric power supply to
provide electric power to the set of coils 18 and a signal
processor to receive and process electric signals from the receiver
coils 19. Alternatively, the power supply and/or signal processors
are located in the logging tool. It is to be noted that the term
"coil" is intended to include antennas made of non-circular
conductors as well as conductor arrangements (including rectangular
configurations) limited to a plane that are commonly used to
transmit and receive electromagnetic energy.
[0026] The relative orientation of the wellbore 1 and the logging
tool 9 with respect to the layers 3, 5, 7 is determined by two
angles, one of which .theta. as shown in the FIG. 1. For
determination of these angles see, for example, U.S. Pat. No.
5,999,883 to Gupta, et al. The logging tool 9 is provided with a
set of transmitter coils 18 and a set of receiver coils 19, each
set of coils 18, 19 being connected to surface equipment 22 via
suitable conductors (not shown) extending along the wireline
11.
[0027] Each set of coils 18 and 19 includes three coils (not
shown), which are arranged such that the set has three magnetic
dipole moments in mutually orthogonal directions, that is, in x, y
and z directions. The three-coil transmitter coil set transmits
T.sub.x, T.sub.y and T.sub.z. The receiver coil receives R.sub.x,
R.sub.y and R.sub.z plus the cross-components, R.sub.xy, R.sub.xz
and R.sub.zy. Thus, coil set 18 has magnetic dipole moments 26a,
26b, 26c, and coil set 19 has magnetic dipole moments 28a, 28b,
28c. In one embodiment, the transmitter coil set 18 is electrically
isolated from the receiver coil set 19 The apparatus and method
using a wireline is not intended to be a limitation of the
invention, it being possible to practice the invention with a
logging tool on a bottomhole assembly (BHA) conveyed on a drilling
tubular. For the purposes of the present invention, the BHA and the
assembly described in FIG. 1 may be referred to as a downhole
assembly.
[0028] As shown in FIG. 2A, conventional induction logging tools
provide a single transmitter coil and a receiver coil that measure
resistivity in the horizontal direction. In the conventional
horizontal mode, as shown in FIG. 2A, the resistivities of adjacent
high resistivity sand and low resistivity shale layers appear in
parallel, thus the resistivity measurement is dominated by low
resistivity shale. As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2B, in the present
invention a transverse coil is added to measure resistivity in the
vertical direction. In the vertical direction, the resistivity of
the highly resistive sand and low resistivity shale are appear in
series and thus the vertical series resistivity measurement is
dominated by the resistivity of the highly resistive sand.
[0029] For ease of reference, normal operation of the tool 9, as
shown in FIGS. 1 and 2B, will be described hereinafter only for the
coils having dipole moments in the x-direction, i.e. dipole moments
26a and 28a. During normal operation an alternating current of a
frequency f.sub.1 is supplied by the electric power supply of
surface equipment 22 to transmitter coil set 18 so that a magnetic
field with magnetic dipole moment 26a is induced in the formation.
In an alternative embodiment, the frequency is swept through a
range f.sub.1 through f.sub.2. This magnetic field extends into the
sand layer 3 and induces a number of local eddy currents in the
sand layer 3. The magnitude of the local eddy currents is dependent
upon their location relative to the transmitter coil set 18, the
conductivity of the earth formation at each location, and the
frequency at which the transmitter coil set 18 is operating. In
principle, the local eddy currents act as a source inducing new
currents, which again induce further new currents, and so on. The
currents induced into the sand layer 3 induce a response magnetic
field in the formation, which response magnetic field is not in
phase with the transmitted magnetic field, but which induces a
response current in receiver coil set 19. The magnitude of the
current induced in the sand layer 3 depends on the conductivity of
the sand layer 3 and affects the magnitude of the response current
in receiver coil set 19. The magnitude of the response current in
receiver coil 19 also depends on the conductivity of sand layer 3
and thereby provides an indication of the conductivity of the sand
layer 3. However, the magnetic field generated by transmitter coil
set 18 not only extends into sand layer 3, but also into the
wellbore fluid and into the shale layers 5 and 7 so that currents
in the wellbore fluid and the shale layers 5 and 7 are induced.
[0030] Let us consider H.sub.XY measurement, where X is orientation
of the transmitter and Y is the orientation of the receiver. This
notation where the first subscript refers to the transmitter
orientation and the second to the receiver orientation will be used
throughout the present disclosure. We assume that if the coils are
properly aligned (exactly 90.degree. between X and Y coils) the
response from the formation will be H.sub.XYtrue. If the Y receiver
is misaligned with the X transmitter by the angle .alpha., then the
magnetic field H.sub.XY measured in such array is
H.sub.XY=H.sub.XYtruecos .alpha.+H.sub.XXtruesin .alpha. (1). The
angle .alpha. is considered to be positive if the angle between the
X and Y coils is less than 90.degree.. Those skilled in the art
having the benefit of the present disclosure would recognize that
the misalignment angle could change over time for wireline
measurements and MWD applications.
[0031] A simple example shows that even when the misalignment angle
.alpha. is small (typically 1-5.degree.) there are quite a few
cases where the misalignment error becomes comparable with the true
Hxy response. In the example, R.sub.h, the horizontal resistivity
in a direction normal to the anisotropy axis is taken as 0.5
.OMEGA.-.m; R.sub.v, the vertical resistivity (in a direction
parallel to the anisotropy axis) is taken as 2 .OMEGA.-.m; the
relative dip angle .theta. (see FIG. 3) between the tool axis and
the anisotropy axis is 20.degree.. For a relative toolface rotation
of 45.degree. and a frequency of 83.3 kHz, the true response (real
voltage converted to apparent conductivities) for the XX component
is -524.3 mS/m and for the XY component is 25.4 mS/m.
[0032] For a misalignment angle of 3.degree., the measured XY
signal will be .sigma..sub.XYmeasured=25.4 mS/mcos 3.degree.-524.3
mS/msin 3.degree.=-2.1 mS/m We can see that in this case the
misalignment error exceeds 100%, having changed by an amount of
about 27.5 mS/m. If the misalignment angle .alpha. is known, Eqn. 1
can be used for correcting the measured XY signal. Unfortunately,
the misalignment angle .alpha. cannot be measured in advance
because it can change during pre-logging tool string assembly and
also while logging due to twisting and bending effects.
[0033] In one embodiment of the invention, the misalignment angle
.alpha. is estimated and the measurements are corrected using a
multi-frequency quadrature signal. The 3DEX tool has a 3-coil
configurations (two transmitter and one receiver coils) for
cross-components that are not mutually balanced. The main reason
for mutually balanced multi-coil arrays in induction measurements
(including main components of the 3DEX tool) is compensation of the
direct field in quadrature components. This direct field is large
compared to the formation response, so if it is not compensated and
the phase detection is not accurate enough, it will propagate in
the real voltage and cause undesired distortion. For
cross-components measurements, the mutual balancing is not as
important because the direct field of the X transmitter does not
contribute into the Y receiver due to orthogonality. But if the X
and Y coils are misaligned, the direct field from unbalanced X
transmitters does contribute to the Y quadrature signal. The
misalignment angle .alpha. is estimated based on the amplitude of
this signal.
[0034] Eqn. (1) is used to analyze the misaligned XY quadrature
signal. The response consists of the cosine projection of true XY
formation quadrature signal and the sine projection of true XX
signal. The true XX signal is dominated by the direct field, which
is frequency and formation independent. If we extract the constant
part of the XY quadrature signal and compare it with the total
direct field, we will be able to find the misalignment angle. For
example, let us consider the 3DEX response in the following model:
[0035] R.sub.h=1 .OMEGA.-m; [0036] R.sub.v=4 .OMEGA.-m; [0037]
Relative dip=45.degree.; [0038] Relative rotation=45.degree.;
[0039] Frequency=20.83 kHz.
[0040] The values of the XY quadrature formation response and the
direct field for a 2.degree. misalignment for this model are
presented in Table 1. It can be seen that in this case the
formation response is comparable with the direct field, meaning
that we have to separate the direct field from the formation
response to accurately estimate the misalignment angle.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of the XY formation response and
the direct field caused by 2.degree. misalignment Direct field for
2.degree. XY formation response misalignment Formation relative
Re(Hxy) (Wb/m.sup.2) (Wb/m.sup.2) contribution % 0.0474 * 10.sup.-3
-0.0903 * 10.sup.-3 52.5
[0041] The separation of the direct field from the formation
response in the quadrature signal may be achieved by applying the
Taylor expansion used in multi-frequency focusing of the real
signal. Using results from U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,227 to Rabinovich et
al., the quadrature signal is given by the Taylor series expansion:
Re(H)=b.sub.0+b.sub.1.omega..sup.3/2+b.sub.2.omega..sup.2+b.sub.3.omega..-
sup.5/2+b.sub.4.omega..sup.7/2+b.sub.5.omega..sup.4+b.sub.6.omega..sup.9/2
(2) The first term in this expansion is independent of frequency
and represents the direct field. In the present invention,
multi-frequency quadrature measurements are made and this first
term is extracted using the Taylor series expansion. Typically,
this is done using a multi-frequency focusing algorithm with the
appropriate power series. To test our invention, we generated
synthetic data for two different models: [0042] 1. R.sub.h=10
.OMEGA.-m; R.sub.v=40 .OMEGA.-m, Relative dip=45.degree., Relative
rotation=45.degree.; [0043] 2. R.sub.h=1 .OMEGA.-m; R.sub.v=4
.OMEGA.-m, Relative dip=45.degree., Relative
rotation=45.degree..
[0044] For each model we calculated responses for 5 different
misalignment angles: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 degrees. The term
"misalignment angle" when used with respect to coils that are
nominally orthogonal to each other means a difference from
90.degree. in alignment. For each misalignment angle we applied the
above-described procedure to extract the direct field from the
data, and based on this value, calculated the misalignment angle.
The results for the both models are presented in the tables below.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Calculation of the misalignment angle for
the Model 1. True Extracted direct Calculated misalignment field
Total direct field misalignment angle angle (deg) (Wb/m.sup.2)
(Wb/m.sup.2) (deg) 5 -0.225 * 10.sup.-3 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 4.99 4
-0.180 * 10.sup.-3 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 3.99 3 -0.135 * 10.sup.-3
-0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 2.99 2 -0.902 * 10.sup.-4 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2
1.999 1 -0.451 * 10.sup.-4 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 0.999 0 -0.450 *
10.sup.-6 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 0.01
[0045] TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Calculation of the misalignment angle
for the Model 2. True Extracted direct Calculated misalignment
field Total direct field misalignment angle angle (deg)
(Wb/m.sup.2) (Wb/m.sup.2) (deg) 5 -0.224 * 10.sup.-3 -0.2586 *
10.sup.-2 4.97 4 -0.179 * 10.sup.-3 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 3.97 3
-0.134 * 10.sup.-3 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 2.97 2 -0.885 * 10.sup.-4
-0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 1.96 1 -0.433 * 10.sup.-4 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2
0.96 0 -0.188 * 10.sup.-5 -0.2586 * 10.sup.-2 0.04
[0046] This embodiment of the invention may be represented by the
flow chart of FIG. 4. Data are acquired at a plurality of
frequencies 101. As a specific example, the transmitter is an X
transmitter and the receiver is a Y receiver. A multi-frequency
focusing of the quadrature magnetic signal is performed 103 using
eqn. (2) to give the direct field between the transmitter and the
receiver. This may also be done using an equivalent formulation for
the electric field using methods known to those versed in the art
having the benefit of the present disclosure. Using the estimated
direct field, the misalignment angle is estimated 105. The
estimated misalignment angle may then be used to correct the
individual single frequency measurements, including the in-phase
components 107. It should be noted that while the description above
has been made with respect to the XY component, from reciprocity
considerations, the method is equally valid for the YX
component.
[0047] Once the misalignment angle is estimated, all of the
multi-component signals can be corrected for misalignment and used
for interpreting formation resistivities and petrophysical
parameters. The principles used for this interpretation have been
discussed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,470,274 to Mollison et
al, U.S. Pat. No. 6,643,589 to Zhang et al., U.S. Pat. No.
6,636,045 to Tabarovsky et al., the contents of which are
incorporated herein by reference. Specifically, the parameters
estimated may include horizontal and vertical resistivities (or
conductivities), relative dip angles, strike angles, sand and shale
content, and water saturation.
[0048] The method described above is generally not applicable when
a co-located transmitter coil array is used in conjunction with a
co-located main receiver coil array and a co-located bucking
receiver coil array. In such a situation, the main and bucking
coils are decoupled and the misalignment is estimated separately
for the main and bucking coils.
[0049] A second embodiment of the invention is based on recognition
of the fact that for a given anisotropic formation with a
particular relative dip, the XY cross-component response will
change from a negative value at -45.degree. relative rotation to a
positive value of equal magnitude at 45.degree. relative rotation.
A zero-crossing will occur at 0.degree. relative rotation. The
actual magnitude of the positive and negative values will be
dependent on the resistivity and the relative dip properties of the
formation, but the response should always oscillate about zero for
a perfectly aligned tool rotating in a uniform anisotropic
formation.
[0050] If the X transmitters and the Y receiver are misaligned, a
portion of the direct XX signal will be introduced into the XY
response as described previously. If the tool is rotating through a
uniform formation, the deviation of the oscillations away from zero
allows this misalignment to be computed.
[0051] To apply the technique, a relatively uniform formation
(typically a thick shale interval) is chosen for making
measurements with the 3DEX tool. The tool is rotated within the
borehole. For wireline applications, this may require an auxiliary
motor for rotating the tool or may result from rotation of the
wireline and the downhole assembly as it is conveyed through the
borehole. For measurement-while-drilling (MWD) applications, the
rotation is accomplished by the rotation of the bottomhole assembly
(BHA) that carries the 3DEX tool. The average XY and XX responses
across this formation are computed. Based on the eqn. (1) and the
assumption that the average H.sub.XYtrue should be zero, where the
overbar represents an averaging, the misalignment angle may be
computed using average responses. H.sub.XY=H.sub.XXtruesin .alpha.
(3) This technique assumes that the misalignment is not changing
and will not compensate for twisting and bending while logging
unless the effect remains consistent. The estimation of bias in ZX
measurements on a rotating drillstring has been discussed in U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 11/299,053 of Chemali et al, having the
same assignee as the present invention and the contents of which
are incorporated herein by reference. Once the misalignment angle
has been estimated, measurements may be corrected using eqn.
(1).
[0052] The flow chart for this method is illustrated in FIG. 5. The
tool is lowered into a substantially homogenous interval 201. The
H.sub.xx and H.sub.xy measurements are made at a plurality of
rotational angles as the tool rotates 203. The H.sub.xy
measurements correspond to measurements made with a first receiver
antenna and the H.sub.xx measurements corresponds to measurements
made with a second receiver antenna. The measurements are averaged
and the misalignment angle estimated 205. In one embodiment of the
invention, the measurements are made at uniformly spaced angles and
a simple averaging can be done. In another embodiment of the
invention, the measurements may be made with non-uniform rotational
angles and an appropriate averaging procedure may be used. The
estimated bias provides and estimate of the misalignment angle may
then be used to correct the measurements 207 made in other portions
of the wellbore using eqn. (1) and a parameter of interest of the
earth formation estimated.
[0053] Another embodiment of the present invention uses an
inversion of 3DEX data to obtain horizontal resistivity, vertical
resistivity, and formation dip and azimuth, and requires the use of
multi-component measurements including the three primary components
(XX,YY,ZZ) plus at least one cross-component (XY or XZ). A method
for simultaneous determination of formation angles and anisotropic
resistivity using multi-component induction logging data is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,643,589 to Zhang et al., having the
same assignee as the present invention and the contents of which
are incorporated herein by reference. The inversion is performed
using a gradient technique such as a generalized
Marquardt-Levenberg method. In this generalized Marquardt-Levenberg
method, a data objective function is defined that is related to a
difference between the model output and the measured data. The
iterative procedure involves reducing a global objective function
that is the sum of the data objective function and a model
objective function related to changes in the model in successive
iterations. In an alternate embodiment of the invention, the
formation azimuth angle is excluded from the iterative process by
using derived relations between the multicomponent measurements.
The gradient technique is part of a class of techniques
collectively referred to as search techniques.
[0054] When multi-array induction measurements are also available,
an inversion method is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,885,947 to Xiao
et al., having the same assignee as the present invention and the
contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. Data are
acquired using a multi-array logging tool in a borehole having an
angle of inclination to a normal to the bedding plane of earth
formations. The multi-array measurements are filtered using angle
dependent filters to give a filtered curve corresponding to a
target one of the multi-array measurements using angle-dependent
filters. Correlation coefficients are estimated for a set of
possible dip angles and a relative dip angle is estimated from the
correlation coefficients. This dip angle estimate together with bed
boundaries obtained from the multi-array measurements are used for
inverting multi-component measurements alone or jointly with
multi-array measurements to refine the relative dip angle
interpretation and give horizontal and vertical formation
resistivity.
[0055] Yet another inversion method using a separation of modes is
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,636,045 to Tabarovsky et al having the
same assignee as the present invention and the contents of which
are incorporated herein by reference. In Tabarovsky, a combination
of principal component measurements is used to estimate the
horizontal resistivity of the earth formations. The estimated
horizontal resistivities are used in a model for inversion of other
components of the data to obtain the vertical formations
resistivities. Tabarovsky further uses multifrequency focusing when
multifrequency measurements are available.
[0056] Another inversion method is described in U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 10/867,619 of Tabarovsky et al, having the
same assignee as the present invention and the contents of which
are incorporated herein by reference. In one embodiment of the
Tabarovsky '619, using known values of the relative dip angle and
azimuth, the focused measurements are separated into two or more
fundamental modes. One of the fundamental modes is related
primarily to the horizontal conductivity (or resistivity) of the
earth formation, so that the horizontal conductivity may be
obtained from the first mode. Using the estimated horizontal
conductivity and the second mode, the vertical conductivity may be
estimated. In another embodiment of the invention, the fundamental
modes and the relative dip angle and azimuth are estimated
simultaneously using measurements made at a plurality of depths.
The simultaneous determination is done by searching over a range of
relative dip angles and azimuths. Alternatively, the search may be
done over a range of absolute dips and azimuths and using
measurements made by orientation and navigation sensors on the
tool.
[0057] One embodiment of the present invention uses an inversion
technique such as that described in Zhang et al., Xiao et al.,
Tabarovsky et al., or any other suitable inversion method. A common
characteristic of all of the methods is that a more stable and
unique solution for formation dip and azimuth is estimated when
both cross-components are included. However, if the
cross-components are perfectly aligned, the same solution for
formation dip and azimuth should be achieved if either the XY or
the XZ components are omitted. If the XY component is in error due
to misalignment, this will not be true.
[0058] The inversion technique to check for misalignment initially
inverts the data with a particular cross-component such as the XY
component omitted. Forward modeling is then used with these results
to generate a simulated (expected) XY response. The average
difference between the simulated and actual XY responses should be
zero. Any difference is attributed to misalignment.
[0059] To apply the technique, the average XX and XY responses are
estimated over the entire logging interval along with the average
simulated XY response obtained by forward modeling from the
inversion performed without the XY measurement. Based on the eqn.
(1) and the assumption that the simulated XY response represents
H.sub.XYtrue, the misalignment angle may be computed using average
responses. H.sub.xy.sup.measured- H.sub.xy.sup.simulated= H.sub.xx
sin .alpha. where the overbar represents and averaging. This
technique also assumes that the misalignment is not changing and
will not compensate for twisting and bending while logging unless
the effect remains consistent. Once the correction is estimated and
applied, a new inversion of the multi-component measurements may be
carried out using all the available components.
[0060] FIG. 6 is a flow chart of this method. Multicomponent
measurements (optionally with multiarray measurements) are acquired
and the measurements are inverted without using the XY component
301. Simulated XY measurements are generated for the model 305. The
XX and XY measurements are averaged over the interval 305. Next,
the misalignment angles is estimated 307 as discussed above.
[0061] Implicit in the control and processing of the data is the
use of a computer program on a suitable machine-readable medium
that enables the processor to perform the control and processing.
The machine-readable medium may include ROMs, EPROMs, EAROMs, Flash
Memories and Optical disks.
[0062] While the foregoing disclosure is directed to the preferred
embodiments of the invention, various modifications will be
apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended that all
variations within the scope and spirit of the appended claims be
embraced by the foregoing disclosure.
[0063] The following definitions are helpful in understanding the
scope of the invention: [0064] alignment: the proper positioning or
state of adjustment of parts in relation to each other; [0065]
calibrate: to standardize by determining the deviation from a
standard so as to ascertain the proper correction factors; [0066]
coil: one or more turns, possibly circular or cylindrical, of a
current-carrying conductor capable of producing, a magnetic field;
[0067] EAROM: electrically alterable ROM; [0068] EPROM: erasable
programmable ROM; [0069] flash memory: a nonvolatile memory that is
rewritable; [0070] machin-readable medium: something on which
information may be stored in a form that can be understood by a
computer or a processor; [0071] misalignment: the condition of
being out of line or improperly adjusted; for the cross-component,
this is measured by a deviation from orthogonality; [0072] Optical
disk: a disc-shaped medium in which optical methods are used for
storing and retrieving information; [0073] Position: an act of
placing or arranging; the point or area occupied by a physical
object [0074] Quadrature: 90.degree. out of phase; and [0075] ROM:
Read-only memory.
* * * * *