U.S. patent application number 11/129582 was filed with the patent office on 2006-11-16 for radiation detector having coated nanostructure and method.
Invention is credited to Adrian Paul Burden, Marian Cholewa, Xingyu Gao, Lei Huang, Shu Ping Lau, Herbert Oskar Moser, Andrew Thye Shen Wee, Gyu-Chul Yi, Jin Kyoung Yoo.
Application Number | 20060255287 11/129582 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 37418276 |
Filed Date | 2006-11-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20060255287 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Cholewa; Marian ; et
al. |
November 16, 2006 |
Radiation detector having coated nanostructure and method
Abstract
A radiation detector has an electron emitter that includes a
coated nanostructure on a support. The nanostructure can include a
plurality of nanoneedles. A nanoneedle is a shaft tapering from a
base portion toward a tip portion. The tip portion has a diameter
between about 1 nm to about 50 nm and the base portion has a
diameter between about 20 nm to about 300 nm. Each shaft has a
length between about 100 nm to about 3,000 nm and an aspect ratio
larger than 10. A coating covers at least the tip portions of the
shafts. The coating exhibits negative electron affinity and is
capable of emitting secondary electrons upon being irradiated by
radiation. The nanostructure can also include carbon nanotubes
(CNTs) coated with a material selected from the group of aluminum
nitride (AlN), gallium nitride (GaN), and zinc oxide (ZnO). The
detector further includes an electron collector positioned to
collect electrons emitted from the electron emitter and to produce
a signal indicative of the amount of electrons collected, and a
signal processor operatively connected to the electron collector
for processing the signal to determine a characteristic of the
radiation. The detector can be used to detect radiations of changed
particles or light such as X-ray.
Inventors: |
Cholewa; Marian; (Singapore,
SG) ; Lau; Shu Ping; (Singapore, SG) ; Yi;
Gyu-Chul; (Pohang, KR) ; Yoo; Jin Kyoung;
(Seongnam, KR) ; Burden; Adrian Paul; (Singapore,
SG) ; Huang; Lei; (Singapore, SG) ; Gao;
Xingyu; (Singapore, SG) ; Shen Wee; Andrew Thye;
(Singapore, SG) ; Moser; Herbert Oskar;
(Singapore, SG) |
Correspondence
Address: |
DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP;One Dayton Centre
Suite 1300
One South Main Street
Dayton
OH
45402-2023
US
|
Family ID: |
37418276 |
Appl. No.: |
11/129582 |
Filed: |
May 13, 2005 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
250/397 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01T 1/28 20130101; Y10T
428/2913 20150115 |
Class at
Publication: |
250/397 |
International
Class: |
G01K 1/08 20060101
G01K001/08 |
Claims
1. A radiation detector comprising: an electron emitter including a
support, a plurality of shafts extending from said support, each
one of said plurality of shafts tapering from a base portion toward
a tip portion, said tip portion having a diameter between about 1
nm to about 50 nm and said base portion having a diameter between
about 20 nm to about 300 nm, each one of said shafts having a
length between about 100 nm to about 3,000 nm and an aspect ratio
larger than 10, a coating covering at least said tip portions of
said plurality of shafts, said coating exhibiting negative electron
affinity and being capable of emitting secondary electrons upon
being irradiated by radiation; an electron collector positioned to
collect electrons emitted from said electron emitter and to produce
a signal indicative of the amount of electrons collected; and a
signal processor operatively connected to said electron collector
for processing said signal to determine a characteristic of said
radiation.
2. The detector of claim 1, wherein said shafts are substantially
made of zinc oxide (ZnO).
3. The detector of claim 1, wherein said coating has substantially
uniform thickness.
4. The detector of claim 1, wherein said coating covers more than
said tip portion.
5. The detector of claim 1, wherein said coating covers both said
tip portion and said base portion.
6. The detector of claim 1, wherein said coating comprises a wide
bandgap material.
7. The detector of claim 6, wherein said wide bandgap material
comprises at least one of AlN, GaN, MgO, ZnO, Al.sub.2O.sub.3, GaP,
SiO.sub.2, BeO, BaO, and CsCl.
8. The detector of claim 1, wherein said emitter has a section
having reduced thickness so as allow said radiation to transmit
through said section or emit secondary electrons from a side of
said emitter opposite said radiation.
9. The detector of claim 8, wherein said section of said emitter is
about 1 to 2 .mu.m thick.
10. The detector of claim 1, wherein said shafts are substantially
aligned.
11. The detector of claim 1, wherein said electron collector is
sensitive to emitting positions of said electrons emitted from said
electron emitter.
12. The detector of claim 11, wherein said electron collector
comprises a position-sensitive silicon electron detector or a
position-sensitive MCP electron detector.
13. The detector of claim 11, wherein said electron collector
comprises a scintillator for converting collected electrons to
light and recording an image generated by said light.
14. The detector of claim 1, wherein said electrons can be detected
at a rate higher than 10 MHz.
15. The detector of claim 14, wherein said electrons can be
detected at a rate higher than 20 MHz.
16. A radiation detector comprising: an electron emitter having a
supporting surface and a nanostructure disposed on said supporting
surface, said nanostructure comprising carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
coated with a material selected from the group of aluminum nitride
(AlN), gallium nitride (GaN), and zinc oxide (ZnO), said
nanostructure capable of emitting secondary electrons upon being
irradiated by radiation; an electron collector for collecting
electrons emitted from said electron emitter and for producing a
signal indicative of the amount of electrons collected; and a
signal processor operatively connected to said electron collector
for processing said signal to determine a characteristic of said
radiation.
17. The detector of claim 16, wherein surfaces of said CNTs are
substantially fully coated with said material.
18. The detector of claim 16, wherein said electron emitter has a
section having reduced thickness so as allow said radiation to
transmit through said section or emit secondary electrons from a
side of said emitter opposite said radiation.
19. The detector of claim 18, wherein said section of said electron
emitter is about 1 to 2 .mu.m thick.
20. A method of detecting radiation, comprising: directing
radiation to a nanostructure comprising a plurality of shafts, each
one of said plurality of shafts having a surface layer exhibiting
negative electron affinity, said surface layer having substantially
uniform thickness; and detecting secondary electrons excited by
said radiation and emitted from said nanostructure so as to detect
said radiation.
21. The method of claim 20, wherein said nanostructure comprises
one or more of nanotubes, nanoneedles, nanorods, nanowires, and
nanofibres.
22. The method of claim 20, wherein said shafts are substantially
fully covered by said layer.
23. The method of claim 20, wherein said surface layer comprises a
wide bandgap material.
24. The method of claim 23, wherein said wide bandgap material is
selected from the group of AlN, GaN, MgO, ZnO, Al.sub.2O.sub.3,
GaP, SiO.sub.2, BeO, BaO, and CsCl.
25. A radiation detector comprising: an electron emitter including
a support; a plurality of shafts extending from said support, each
one of said plurality of shafts tapering from a base portion toward
a tip portion, said tip portion having a diameter between about 1
nm to about 50 nm and said base portion having a diameter between
about 20 nm to about 300 nm, each one of said shafts having a
length between about 100 nm to about 3,000 nm and an aspect ratio
larger than 10; and a coating covering at least said tip portions
of said plurality of shafts, said coating exhibiting negative
electron affinity and being capable of emitting secondary electrons
upon being irradiated by radiation.
26. The radiation detector of claim 25, wherein said shafts are
made substantially of ZnO.
27. The radiation detector of claim 26, wherein said coating
comprises a material selected from the group of AlN, GaN, MgO, ZnO,
Al.sub.2O.sub.3, GaP, SiO.sub.2, BeO, BaO, and CsCl.
28. A radiation detector comprising: an electron emitter having a
supporting surface and a nanostructure disposed on said supporting
surface, said nanostructure comprising carbon nanotubes (CNTs)
coated with a material selected from the group of aluminum nitride
(AlN), gallium nitride (GaN), and zinc oxide (ZnO), said
nanostructure capable of emitting secondary electrons upon being
irradiated by radiation.
29. A radiation detector comprising: an electron emitter including
a support, a plurality of nanoneedles extending from said support,
a coating covering at least a tip portion of each one of said
plurality of nanoneedles, said coating exhibiting negative electron
affinity and being capable of emitting secondary electrons upon
being irradiated by radiation; an electron collector positioned to
collect electrons emitted from said electron emitter and to produce
a signal indicative of the amount of electrons collected; and a
signal processor operatively connected to said electron collector
for processing said signal to determine a characteristic of said
radiation.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates generally to radiation
detectors, and more particularly to radiation detectors having
coated nanostructures and related methods.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] It is known to use detectors that have a secondary-electron
emitter to detect radiation of charged particles or photons. The
emitter can emit secondary electrons upon being irradiated. The
emitted electrons are collected to produce a signal to indicate the
presence or a characteristic, such as energy, of the radiation.
[0003] Typically, not every radiation quanta incident on an
electron emitter causes an emission. Thus, radiation detectors have
less than 100% detection efficiency. It is desirable that a
radiation detector has high detection efficiency.
[0004] For example, PCT application publication WO 03/075299,
published on Sep. 12, 2003, entitled "Device for detecting charged
particles and photons," to Bernd Fischer and Marian Cholewa
("Fischer"); and a report authored by M. Cholewa and E. koshchiy,
"Thin Diamond film as highly efficient detector for changed
particles," Gesellschaft fur Schwerionenforschung (GSI) Scientific
Report 2003, (2004), p. 156, ("Cholewa"), each of which is
incorporated herein by reference, disclose a detector consisting of
a thin diamond layer on a supporting Si substrate and an electron
multiplier unit. The diamond film is boron-doped and has high
secondary electron emission yield. The detector is said to have
almost 100% efficiency for detecting radiation of ions. However,
detection efficiency for light radiations such as X-rays has not
been reported and is expected to be lower. Further, boron-doped
diamond film can be expensive and the production cost for radiation
detectors having boron-doped diamond film as the electron emitter
can be high. Thus, alternative or cheaper electron emitters with
similar or even higher detection efficiencies are still
desirable.
[0005] Several other techniques can be used to improve detection
efficiency. For example, increasing the energy of incident
radiation or subjecting the emitter to a high biasing voltage can
increase emission efficiency. However, these techniques have
limited applications and have limited effects. For instance, the
energy of radiation to be detected may not be controllable; the
biasing voltage cannot be increased without limit. It is desirable
that high detection efficiency can be achieved over a wide range of
radiation energy, biasing voltage, and types of radiations.
[0006] It has been reported that MgO coated on the tips of
vertically-grown multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) can produce
high secondary electron emissions by applying a high bias voltage
of 800V. See for example, Won Seok Kim, Applied Physics Letters,
(2002), vol. 81, pp. 1098-1100 ("Kim"), which is incorporated
herein by reference. However, in this approach, good quality of MgO
coating can only be produced by electron-beam evaporation, which
leads to certain drawbacks such as limited coating area and high
cost of equipment and production. Further, emitters that can
exhibit even higher emission yields at low bias are still
desirable.
[0007] Thus, there is a need for radiation detectors with
alternative or improved electron emitters and have high detection
efficiencies. Further, there is a need for radiation detectors that
can be manufactured at reduced costs.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] According to an aspect of the invention, a radiation
detector includes an electron emitter including a support, and a
plurality of shafts extending from the support. Each one of the
plurality of shafts tapers from a base portion toward a tip
portion. The tip portion has a diameter between about 1 nm to about
50 nm and the base portion has a diameter between about 20 nm to
about 300 nm. Each shaft has a length between about 100 nm to about
3,000 nm. Each shaft has an aspect ratio larger than 10. A coating
covers at least the tip portions of the plurality of shafts. The
coating exhibits negative electron affinity and is capable of
emitting secondary electrons upon being irradiated by radiation. An
electron collector is positioned to collect electrons emitted from
the electron emitter and to produce a signal indicative of the
amount of electrons collected. A signal processor is operatively
connected to the electron collector for processing the signal to
determine a characteristic of the radiation.
[0009] According to another aspect of the invention, there is
provided a radiation detector that includes an electron emitter
having a supporting surface and a nanostructure disposed on the
supporting surface. The nanostructure comprises carbon nanotubes
(CNTs) coated with a material selected from the group of aluminum
nitride (AlN), gallium nitride (GaN), and zinc oxide (ZnO). The
nanostructure is capable of emitting secondary electrons upon being
irradiated by radiation. The radiation detector further includes an
electron collector for collecting electrons emitted from the
electron emitter and for producing a signal indicative of the
amount of electrons collected; and a signal processor operatively
connected to the electron collector for processing the signal to
determine a characteristic of the radiation.
[0010] According to another aspect of the invention, there is
provided a method of detecting radiation, by directing radiation to
a nanostructure comprising a plurality of shafts, each one of the
shafts having a surface layer exhibiting negative electron
affinity, the surface layer having substantially uniform thickness;
and detecting secondary electrons excited by the radiation and
emitted from the nanostructure so as to detect the radiation.
[0011] According to another aspect of the invention, a radiation
detector includes an electron emitter including a support and a
plurality of shafts extending from the support. Each one of the
plurality of shafts tapers from a base portion toward a tip
portion. The tip portion has a diameter between about 1 nm to about
50 nm and the base portion has a diameter between about 20 nm to
about 300 nm. Each shaft has a length between about 100 nm to about
3,000 nm. Each shaft has an aspect ratio larger than 10. A coating
covers at least the tip portions of the plurality of shafts. The
coating exhibits negative electron affinity and is capable of
emitting secondary electrons upon being irradiated by radiation.
The shafts may be made substantially of ZnO.
[0012] According to another aspect of the invention, there is
provided a radiation detector that includes an electron emitter
having a supporting surface and a nanostructure disposed on the
supporting surface. The nanostructure includes carbon nanotubes
(CNTs) coated with a material selected from the group of aluminum
nitride (AlN), gallium nitride (GaN), and zinc oxide (ZnO). The
nanostructure is capable of emitting secondary electrons upon being
irradiated by radiation.
[0013] According to an aspect of the invention, a radiation
detector includes an electron emitter including a support, and a
plurality of nanoneedles extending from the support. A coating
covers at least a tip portion of each one of the nanoneedles. The
coating exhibits negative electron affinity and is capable of
emitting secondary electrons upon being irradiated by radiation. An
electron collector is positioned to collect electrons emitted from
the electron emitter and to produce a signal indicative of the
amount of electrons collected. A signal processor is operatively
connected to the electron collector for processing the signal to
determine a characteristic of the radiation.
[0014] Other aspects and features of the present invention will
become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review
of the following description of specific embodiments of the
invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] In the figures, which illustrate exemplary embodiments of
the invention,
[0016] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating a radiation
detector, exemplary of an embodiment of the present invention;
[0017] FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of an exemplary electron
emitter for the detector of FIG. 1;
[0018] FIGS. 3A and 3B are sectional views of exemplary shafts that
can be formed on the electron emitter of FIG. 2;
[0019] FIG. 3C is a cross-sectional view of the shaft in FIG. 3A
along line 3C;
[0020] FIG. 4 is a sectional view of a thin electron emitter;
[0021] FIG. 5A shows a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of
a layer of ZnO nanoneedles formed on a Si substrate;
[0022] FIGS. 5B-5C show Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of AlN
or GaN coated ZnO nanoneedle structures;
[0023] FIG. 6A shows a SEM image of a layer of carbon nanotubes
(CNT) formed on a Si substrate; and
[0024] FIG. 6B shows a SEM image of a layer of coated CNTs.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0025] FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a radiation
detector 10, exemplary of an embodiment of the invention. Detector
10 includes an electron emitter 12, an electron collector 14 and a
signal processor 16. As used herein, a radiation detector includes
any radiation based detecting, sensing, or imaging device.
[0026] Electron emitter 12 has an emitting structure 18 formed on a
support 20, which can emit secondary electrons under radiation of
charged particles, photons or an electromagnetic wave. Charged
particles can be electrons, protons, ions, and the like. Photon
radiation can be light in UV portion of the spectrum, and the like.
Electromagnetic radiation can be X-ray radiation and the like.
[0027] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary emitter 12. Emitting
structure 18 is formed on a supporting surface 22 of substrate or
support 20. Substrate 20 can be made from any suitable material on
which emitting structure 18 can be formed, which will be described
further below. Suitable materials for substrate 20 include silicon
(Si), sapphires, gallium arsenic (GaAs), silicon carbide (SiC),
zinc oxide (ZnO), gallium nitrite (GaN), and the like, depending on
the emitting layer material and the application. Si is suitable for
use in combination with many different emitter layer materials.
Support 20 may also be made of the same material as emitting
structure 18.
[0028] As schematically depicted, emitting structure 18 includes
elongate shafts 24, which extends from supporting surface 22 of
substrate 20. Each shaft 24 has a base portion 26 and a tip portion
28. It should be understood that, for clarity, FIG. 2 shows a
simplified view of electron emitter 12 and is not to scale. In
particular, the density and number of shafts 24 are reduced and
their sizes enlarged. In an actual emitting layer, there are more
shafts more densely distributed in two dimensions on supporting
surface 22 of substrate 20, such as shown in FIGS. 5B and 5C.
Shafts 24 can be distributed regularly or randomly. Further, actual
shafts have high aspect ratios. That is, the ratio of the length
and the width or diameter of a shaft 24 can be larger than what is
shown in FIG. 2, as will be further described below. In addition,
emitting structure 18 may be supported on a support formed by
connected base portions 26 of shafts 24. Finally, it should be
understood that shafts 24 have small dimensions and are densely
distributed so that they may not be visible to the naked eye. To a
naked eye, surface 18 may appear smooth.
[0029] Shafts 24 can have any number of suitable shapes and sizes,
as will be further described below. For example, shafts 24 may have
a generally cylindrical shape, a generally conical shape, a
generally pencil shape, or a dome-shaped tip portion 28. Shafts 24
having a generally conical or pencil shape, or a dome-shaped tip
portion may be advantageous, as will become apparent below. The
average or effective diameters of shafts 24 can vary in the range
of a few nanometers to several hundred nanometers. The lengths of
shafts 24 can vary from a few hundred nanometers to several
micrometers. The aspect ratios (i.e. length/diameter) of shafts can
vary, such as from about 10 to about 200. As mentioned, an aspect
ratio of a shaft 24 is the ratio between the length (or height) of
the shaft 24 and the diameter of the shaft 24. The term "diameter"
as used herein includes an average or effective diameter when the
shaft or the portion of the shaft in question is not cylindrical.
An effective diameter of a non-circular cross-section can be
approximated as the diameter of a circular cross-section that has
the same cross-sectional area as the non-circular cross-section.
Since the diameters of shafts 24 are small, they may be measured
from microscopic images such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)
images and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of the shafts.
[0030] Shafts 24 can be nanotubes, nanoneedles, nanorods,
nanowires, or nanofibres, as they are known in the art. Shafts 24
can form a one dimensional nanostructure, as better illustrated in
FIGS. 5A and 6A, where the nanostructure extends in two
(horizontal) dimensions but not in the third (vertical) dimension.
The nanostructure or shafts 24 can be made from carbon or ZnO, or
other suitable materials that can form a similar one-dimensional
nanostructure. Suitable one-dimensional nanostructures may include
Carbon nanotubes (CNTs), ZnO nanoneedles, SnO nanotubes, and
nanowires made of Cu.sub.2O, In.sub.2O.sub.3, GaN, AlN, InP, Si,
MgO, or GaP. Suitable one-dimensional nanostructures, particularly
nanowires, are also disclosed in C. R. Rao et al., Progress in
Solid States Chemistry, (2003), vol. 31, pp. 5-147 ("Rao"), which
is incorporated herein by reference. The CNTs can be single-walled
or multi-walled. It can be advantageous if shafts 24 are in
substantial parallel alignment, meaning that they are generally
aligned vertically and stand generally upright as depicted in FIG.
2. However, it is not necessary that the nanostructure be
aligned.
[0031] The sizes and shapes of shafts 24 may vary within a certain
range. Typically, a multi-walled CNT has a length in the range of
about 500 to about 1,500 nm and a diameter in the range of about 30
to about 150 nm. A ZnO nanoneedle may have a length of about 750 nm
and an average diameter of about 40 nm. For a ZnO nanoneedle, the
base portion may have a diameter between about 20 nm to about 300
nm and the tip portion may have a diameter between about 1 nm to
about 50 nm. The aspect ratio of a nanoneedle is generally larger
than 10. In other suitable nanostructures, a shaft 24 may have a
diameter between about 1 nm to about 300 nm and a length between
about 100 nm to about 3,000 nm.
[0032] As illustrated in FIGS. 3A and 3B, the shafts can be solid
or hollow. If shafts 24 are hollow, the shaft walls should be thick
enough to allow sufficient emission of secondary electrons. For
example, a thickness of a few nanometers may be sufficient if the
radiation can penetrate only a few nanometers in depth, or when
secondary electrons can only be emitted if they are produced within
a few nanometers from the surface.
[0033] At least the tip portion 28 of each shaft 24 is covered by
an electron emitting surface layer or coating 30. Layer 30
comprises a material exhibiting negative electron affinity, such as
a wide bandgap material, and can be coated on the nanostructure
formed by the shafts 24. For example, layer 30 may be formed of
AlN, GaN, MgO, ZnO, alumina (Al.sub.2O.sub.3), GaP, SiO.sub.2, BeO,
BaO, CsCl, or the like, or any combination of these materials.
Suitable materials for layer 30 are also disclosed in H. Seiler,
Journal of Applied Physics, (1983), vol. 54, no. 11, pp. R1-R18,
which is incorporated herein by reference, and references cited
therein. AlN and GaN may be particularly advantageous for reasons
described below. ZnO may also be advantageous because it is easy to
coat ZnO on a nanostructure.
[0034] The thickness of layer 30 may vary depending on the
materials and techniques used as well as the application. For
example, the thickness may be between about 5 nm to about 100 nm.
It may be advantageous if layer 30 has substantially uniform
thickness. Layer 30 on each shaft is considered substantially
uniform in thickness even when it has some gradual variation in
thickness, such as in cases where, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3C, at
each height (h) the thickness (t(h)) of layer 30 is substantially
constant (as shown in cross-section in FIG. 3C) but t(h) decreases
towards the base portion. The variation in thickness can be, for
example, up to 10% of the median or average thickness. As can be
appreciated, it may be easier to form layers that gradually
decrease in thickness toward base portions. Coated nanostructures
in which the coating layers have substantially uniform thickness
are known in the art as coaxial structures. Coaxial
heterostructures (nanostructures including more than one material)
can be formed at relatively low temperatures. For example, coaxial
AlN layers can be formed on a nanostructure at about 500.degree. C.
Example techniques for forming coaxial heterostructures are
disclosed in US patent publication No. 2002/0172820 to Majumbdar et
al., published Nov. 21, 2002, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
[0035] Layer 30 may cover only tip portion 28 of each shaft 24 or
cover more than the tip portion. Covering the shafts 24
substantially fully, including base portion 26, can be advantageous
because of increased emitting surface.
[0036] As can be appreciated, when shafts 24 tapers from base
portion 26 towards tip portion 28, it may be easier to coat layer
30 substantially uniformly on shaft 24; it may also be easier to
cover more than tip portions 28 of shafts 28. Thus, tapered shafts
24, such as those known in the art as nanoneedles, may be
particularly advantageous. Further, as can be appreciated by
persons skilled in the art, it may be easier to coat a ZnO layer on
CNTs than it is to coat a MgO layer on CNTs. Example techniques
suitable for coating ZnO include sputtering deposition, filtered
cathodic vacuum arc, chemical vapour deposition including metal
organic chemical vapour deposition (MOCVD), molecular beam epitaxy,
pulsed laser deposition, and spray pyrolysis. For further
information, see Y. G. Wang et al, Journal of Applied Physics,
(2003), vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1597-1604 and references cited therein,
which is incorporated herein by reference. Suitable techniques for
coating AlN or GaN include ion-beam-assisted deposition, dc
reactive magnetron sputtering, pulsed laser deposition (PLD), arc
deposition and reactive molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), vapour phase
epitaxy, MOCVD, and the like. For additional information see O
Ambacher, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, (1998), vol. 31,
pp. 2653-2710, which is incorporated herein by reference, and
references cited therein.
[0037] Techniques for forming one dimensional nanostructure of
shafts 24 and coating layer 30 thereon are known. Any suitable
techniques including known techniques may be used to form electron
emitter 12. For example, techniques discussed above may be used.
Further exemplary techniques for forming nanostructures are
disclosed in the following references and the references cited
therein: M. Tanemura et al., Applied Physics Letters, (2004), vol.
84, No. 19, pp. 3831-3833; Won II Park et al., Advanced Materials,
(2002), vol. 14, p. 1841 ["Park"]; Y. B. Li et al., Applied Physics
Letters, (2004), vol. 84, pp. 3603-3605; (above for forming ZnO
nanoneedles); J. T. L. Thong et al., Applied Physics Letters,
(2001), vol. 79, pp. 2811-2813 (for forming vertically aligned
CNTs); S. M. Yoon et al., Applied Physics Letters, (2004), vol. 84,
pp. 825-827 (for forming CNTs); Y. B. Li et al., Applied Physics
Letters, (2003), vol. 82, pp. 1962-1964 (for forming MoS.sub.2
nanoflowers); U.S. patent application publication No. 2003/0213428
to Yicheng Lu, published Nov. 20, 2003 (for forming ZnO nanotip);
U.S. patent application publication No. 2002/0175408 to Arun
Majumdar, published Nov. 28, 2002 (for forming nanostructures and
nanowires); U.S. Pat. No. 6,790,426 to Takashi Ohsaki, published
Sep. 14, 2004 (for forming CNTs); U.S. Pat. No. 6,787,122 to Otto
Z. Zhou, published Sep. 7, 2004 (for forming nanotubes); U.S. Pat.
No. 6,712,864 to Kazunaga Horiuchi et al., published Mar. 30, 2004
(for forming CNTs); PCT publication WO 01/12433 to Andrew T. Hunt
et al., published Feb. 22, 2001 (for forming nanostructures); Tae
Yun Kim et al., Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, (2004),
vol. 21, pp. 733-738 (for forming ZnO nanoneedles). Example
techniques for coating nanostructures are disclosed in the
following references and references cited therein: Kim, supra; SeGi
Yu et al., Physica B, (2002), vol. 323, pp. 177-179; W. K. Yi et
al., Advanced Materials, (2002), vol. 14, pp. 1464-1468; Whikun Yi
et al., Journal of Applied Physics, (2001), vol. 89, pp. 4091-4095
(above for forming coated CNTs); Sung Jin An, Applied Physics
Letters, (2004); vol. 84, p. 3612 ["An"] (for forming GaN coated
ZnO coaxial nanorods). Each of the references listed in this
paragraph is incorporated herein by reference.
[0038] Emitter 12 can be thick or thin. A thin emitter has a thin
section which has a thickness between about 1 to about 10 microns.
The thin section can be a self-supporting nanostructure. A thick
emitter is thicker than about 10 microns and can have a supporting
substrate. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, an emitter such as
emitter 12' may include a section having reduced thickness such as
window 40 to allow a primary radiation to go through the emitter or
secondary electrons to emit from the side of the emitter 12'
opposite the incident radiation. Emitter 12' has an electron
emitting layer 42 which is backed by a substrate 44. Substrate 44
has an opening 46, which can be formed by etching after layer 42
has been deposited on backing substrate 44. Window 40 can be as
thin as about 1 to 2 .mu.m and be self-supporting. The other
portions of emitter 12' can have any suitable thickness for
mechanical strength and support, such as between about 3 to about 5
microns. Thus, emitter 12' has a thin portion 40 that is
substantially thinner than the other thick portions of emitter 12'
and thin portion 40 is formed by the electron emitting
nanostructure. Emitter 12' can be advantageous. For instance, it
can be used as both an electron emitter and a self-supporting
vacuum window at the same time, when the size of the window is
relatively small, such as being about 2.times.2 mm or less. When
not used as vacuum window, the size of the window can be larger,
such as being 10.times.10 mm.
[0039] Emitter 12 may have multiple sensing regions thereon, such
as linear or two-dimensional arrays of electron emitting
regions.
[0040] Electron collector 14 (FIG. 1) can collect secondary
electrons emitted from electron emitter 12 and produces a signal
indicative of the amount of secondary electrons collected. Any
suitable electron collectors known to person skilled in the art may
be used. Electron collector 14 may be placed, disposed or mounted
in the vicinity of electron emitter 12 in any suitable manner so as
to effectively collect emitted electrons from electron emitter. For
example, electron collectors, detectors, and multipliers described
in "Radiation Detection and Measurement," by G. E. Knoll, 3.sup.rd
ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (2000) ["Knoll"], which
is incorporated herein by reference, may be used. Electron
collector 14 may include components typically found in conventional
electron collectors or detectors such as cathode, anode, dynode,
grid, vacuum tubes and the like. It may also include
electron-multiplication components such as channel multipliers.
Suitable electron collectors include commercially available
electron multipliers or detectors, such as Channeltron.TM. or
micro-channel plate (MCP) detectors. Collector 14 should have
adequate collecting characteristics for collecting electrons
emitted from emitter 12. For example, as the emission yield of
emitter 12 is high, collector 14 should be capable of collecting,
and producing the signal, at a correspondingly high rate. In this
regard, a Channeltron having a counting rate above 1 MHz and a
signal rising time of 2 to 3 ns may be suitable. MCP detectors
having counting rates in excess of 10 MHz and signal rising time of
about 250 ps may also be suitable.
[0041] Collector 14 can include a position-sensitive detector such
as a position-sensitive silicon detector or MCP detector. As can be
appreciated, position-sensitive detection can be one dimensional or
two dimensional. In alternative embodiments, a scintillating
material may be deposited on the emitter so that light generated by
secondary electrons can be visually monitored or recorded to
determine the emission sites, such as by a charge coupled device
(CCD) camera.
[0042] Two-dimensional detectors could be formed in many
configurations. For example, a thin, self-supported layer of
electron emitting layer, such as one shown in FIG. 4, may be placed
before a two-dimensional MCP or two-dimensional surface barrier
detector. Alternatively, the electrons emitted from the front side
of the emitter, as shown in FIG. 1, may be collected by
position-sensitive collectors. Fine screens or grids may be placed
either in the path of the incident radiation or in the path of the
emitted electrons for better spatial definition. An electric or
magnetic field, or both, can be used to direct the emission
electrons from the point of emission to the point of detection in a
predicable manner such that the spatial information is persevered.
These techniques standard techniques and can be readily understood
by persons of skill in the art.
[0043] As a further example, a position-sensitive radiation
detector may include a thin emitter foil mounted at an angle, such
as 45 degrees, to the direction of the incident primary beam,
electrostatic system for secondary electron acceleration,
demagnification and focalization, which is mounted perpendicular to
the foil, and a pad or pixel silicon sensor mounted at the focal
plane parallel to the foil. Existing silicon sensors can record
2-dimensional (2D) images of the incident beam profiles with up to
20 kHz frame-rate. The sensor can be sensitive to low (about 20
keV) energy secondary electrons and has a high dynamic range (from
a few to about 10.sup.3 electron/pad/100 .mu.s) with no dead time.
A typical Si substrate can be sized 30.times.30 mm and have a
spatial resolution of about 1 mm, or sized 10.times.10 mm and have
a spatial resolution of about 200 .mu.m, for detecting low energy
(about 20 keV) electrons. Monolithic active pixel sensors can be
20.times.20 mm in size and have a spatial resolution of about 20
.mu.m.
[0044] Signal processor 16 is operatively connected to collector 14
for processing the signal produced by collector 14 for display or
further analysis. Signal processors used in conventional radiation
detectors, such as those described in Knoll, supra, may be used.
For example, signal processor 16 may include signal communication
and computing components, such as specially designed signal
coupling network, signal preamplifiers, and other data processing
components. Signal processor 16 may produce data indicating the
intensity of the primary radiation, the energy or energy
distribution of the primary radiation, the location of incidence of
the primary radiation, the time dependence of any or a combination
of the foregoing, and the like. While conventional signal processor
or signal processing systems can be adopted for use as signal
processor 16, special signal processors may be developed to take
advantage of the special properties and emission characteristics of
emitter 12, which will be discussed below.
[0045] Detector 10 may also include other optional or necessary
components, such as power supply, electronic or magnetic field
generators, beam focusing and guiding components, field or
radiation shielding components, vacuum components, electronic
timing components, control components, mechanical mounting
components, and the like. Persons skilled in the art can readily
understood and appreciate when these other components are needed
and how to install and operate them.
[0046] In operation, a radiation beam, indicated in FIG. 1 by the
large arrow, is directed to emitting structure 18 of emitter 12.
The incident radiation causes emitter 12 to emit secondary
electrons, which are subsequently collected by collector 14.
Collector 14 produces a signal dependent on and indicative of the
amount and certain physical properties, such as energy, of the
collected electrons. The signal is processed by signal processor 16
so that it can be displayed or further analysed, for example to
indicate the presence or a characteristic of the primary radiation.
Detector 10 can be generally used or operated in similar manners as
for a conventional radiation detector. Detector 10 can also be used
for the same purposes for which a conventional radiation detector
can be used. However, detector 10 has certain advantages over
conventional detectors and can be used in applications where
conventional radiation detectors are not suitable, as will become
more apparent below.
[0047] When emitter 12 and collector 14 are capable of producing
signals indicating positions of emission electrons, i.e. position
sensitive, detector 10 can be used to perform position-sensitive
detection and spatial imaging.
[0048] Detector 10 can have near 100% detection efficiency under
certain conditions for various radiations including charged
particles and light radiations. Unless expressly indicated
otherwise, "efficiency" herein refers to intrinsic peak efficiency.
Detection efficiency may be measured using techniques known to
person of skill in the art, including those described in knoll,
supra. The expected detection efficiencies of detector 10 are
compared with conventional detectors in Table I for various
incident radiations. TABLE-US-00001 TABLE I Detection Efficiencies
(in %) for Different Incident Radiations Detector Type Ions X-rays
Electrons MCP 10-40 <10 up to 100 Surface barrier up to 100 Low
Low High purity Ge Low 10-98 Low B-doped CVD 50-99 unknown Expected
>50 diamond Detector 10 Expected >99 Expected 50-100 Expected
up to 100%
[0049] As can be seen in Table I, detector 10 has high detection
efficiency for all three types of radiation. The high detection
efficiency of detector 10 is due to the high secondary electron
emission yields of emitter 12 under all types of radiation.
[0050] The electron emitter 12 has a high emission yield in
comparison to conventional electron emitters, as will be further
described below. "Emission yield" means the ratio of the number of
secondary electrons emitted per primary incident charged particle.
Thus, an emission yield of 1,000 means that, on average, the
material emits 1,000 secondary electrons in response to being
bombarded by one charged particle. Emission yield can be measured
by directing a high flux of charged particles such as protons or
electrons onto the surface of the specimen to be measured and
measuring the difference in the specimen current when negative and
positive bias voltages are applied to the specimen. Emission yields
can also be measured by detecting the secondary electrons emitted
from the specimen when irradiated with a beam of radiation with a
fixed intensity. For example, emission yield can be measured using
the techniques described in Kim, supra. An example procedure is
also described below.
[0051] Although unverified, and without being limited to any
particular theory, there may be at least three reasons for the high
electron emission yield. First, because of the surface structures
(shafts 24), the primary radiation is mostly incident on the
emitter layer 30 at a small incident angle. Consequently, the
incident energy will be dispersed close to the surface. Thus, it is
easier for the excited secondary electrons to escape and be
emitted. In this regard, within a limit the larger the aspect ratio
of shafts 24, the larger the emitting surfaces that have small
incident angles and, likely, the higher emission yield. Thus,
shafts having a conical or pencil shape or a dome-shaped tip
portion may be advantageous. Aligned shafts may also be
advantageous. Secondly, the small (nanoscale) dimensions of shafts
(diameters or widths), particularly at narrow tip portion, can
result in very high local fields being generated by incident
radiation. The high local fields can accelerate the excited
secondary electrons towards the surface. An avalanche effect may
even result: continued radiation causes increasingly large local
fields. In this regard, within a limit the smaller the diameters of
shafts, the higher the local field effect, and thus, the higher
emission yield. Thus, a thin emitting layer and aligned and tapered
shafts may be advantageous. Thirdly, when shafts 24 are thin, it is
possible that the primary radiation will penetrate one or more
shafts 24 and thus incident on multiple shafts. Further,
backscattered secondary electrons may also cause further secondary
electron emissions when they hit neighbouring shafts 24. Again, an
avalanche effect may result. In this regard, thinner shafts may be
advantageous.
[0052] As now can be appreciated, generally conical or pencil
shaped shafts, or shafts with dome-shaped tip portions, such as
nanoneedles can be particularly advantageous. Further, generally
aligned shafts can be advantageous. It is also advantageous to have
larger coating areas on the shafts.
[0053] It can also be understood that it may be difficult for
secondary electrons emitted from base portions 26 of shafts 24 to
escape from emitter 12 when shafts 24 are aligned. Therefore,
increasing the lengths of aligned shafts 24 beyond a limit may
negatively affect the emission yield of emitter 12. Further, while
increasing shaft density within a limit can increase emission
yield, increasing the density beyond the limit may negatively
affect emission yield because of reduced emission away from the tip
portions of the shafts. The distances between adjacent shafts 24,
or the density of shafts 24, can be chosen to adjust or maximize
emission yield. As can be understood, if the distances are too
large, emission yield may be low because too few shafts 24 can be
provided within a given area. On the other hand, if the distances
are too small, i.e., shafts 24 are too closely packed, the
so-called screening effect may become significant and cause
reduction in emission yield, as will become more apparent from
description below. Electrostatic calculations indicate that
emission yield can be optimized when the separation distances
between shafts 24 are between about one to two times of the average
length of shafts 24.
[0054] Detector 10 can have not only almost 100% detection
efficiency but also very high detection rate, such as more than 10
MHz or even more than 20 MHz. However, as can be appreciated,
detection efficiency can decrease when the detection rate
increases, due to characteristics of the electron collector
used.
[0055] Detector 10 can be used in various applications. For
example, detector 10 may be used to detect charged particle beams,
electromagnetic radiation, X-rays, UV radiation and the like.
Charged particles can be electrons, protons or ions. Among others,
detector 10 can be used in high speed radiation counting systems,
secondary ion mass spectroscopy systems (SIMS), time-of-flight
(TOF) systems, Rutherford backscattering systems (RBS), proton-beam
induced X-ray emission (PIXE) systems, X-ray fluorescence (XRF)
detector systems, or energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) detection
systems such as SEMs.
[0056] As discussed above, emitter 12 can have a very thin portion.
Some of the benefits of thin emitters are that emitted electrons
may also be detected from the substrate side, instead of from the
emitting layer side, and that a primary radiation can go through
the emitter, in some cases at low energies.
[0057] For emitters having larger emitting areas, a thicker
substrate may be needed. The size of a thick emitter can vary, but
may have an upper limit depending on the production process of the
coated nanostructure and the required efficiency for secondary
electron collection.
[0058] In alternative embodiments, the supporting surface of the
substrate of the emitter can be contoured and need not be generally
planar.
[0059] Several example electron emitters, listed in table II, have
been formed as described below. Samples V and VI are emitters
formed for comparison purposes. TABLE-US-00002 TABLE II Sample
Emitters and Comparison Emitters Sample Substrate Nanostructure
Emitting layer I n-type Si ZnO nanoneedles AIN II n-type Si ZnO
nanoneedles GaN III n-type Si Aligned multi-walled CNT ZnO IV
n-type Si coated Aligned multi-walled CNT ZnO with Fe--N V n-type
Si Boron-doped diamond -- VI n-type Si Aligned muti-walled CNT MgO
(latest results)
[0060] In preparation of samples I and II, ZnO nanoneedles were
formed on Si substrates using a MOCVD system. The reactants were
diethylzinc and oxygen, fed through the system at flow rates in the
range of 20 to 100 sccm and 0.5 to 5 sccm respectively. Typical
growth temperatures were in the range of 400 to 500.degree. C. No
metal catalyst was coated on the substrates during nanoneedle
growth. The typical length and diameter of nanoneedles were 750 and
40 nm respectively. Further details for preparation of these ZnO
nanoneedle can be found in Park. FIG. 5A shows an image of the
nanostructure of ZnO nanoneedles formed. A coating of AlN or GaN
was deposited on the ZnO nanoneedles directly. The deposition was
performed using low pressure metal-organic vapor phase epitaxy
(MOVPE) technique. The precursors for AlN and GaN were respectively
trimethyl-AI (TMAI) and trimethyl-Ga (TMGa). Further details on
coating AlN/ZnO and GaN/ZnO on coaxial heterostructures can be
found in An, supra. The AlN and GaN coatings were about 10 to 13 nm
and 7 to 10 nm thick, respectively. FIGS. 5B and 5C show AFM images
of emitting layers of the resulting emitters.
[0061] In preparation of sample III, a multi-walled and aligned CNT
nanostructure was formed on a Si substrate and a thin film of ZnO
was deposited on the aligned CNTs using filtered cathodic vacuum
arc (FCVA) technique. High purity (about 99.99%) zinc was used as
the cathode target and an oxygen gas was introduced into the
chamber for the formation of ZnO, under the following conditions:
oxygen gas flow rate at 70 sccm, working pressure at
4.times.10.sup.-5 torr, and arc current at 60 A. The thickness of
the ZnO film on the silicon substrate, measured by a surface
profiler, was found to be about 450 nm after 10-minute deposition
at room temperature.
[0062] For sample IV, aligned, multi-walled CNTs were synthesized
by chemical vapor deposition on Fe--N coated Si substrates. The
substrate was prepared by depositing a Fe--N film on an n-type Si
wafer with filtered cathodic vacuum arc (FCVA) technique. Iron
target of 99.99% purity was used. The deposition pressure was kept
at 5.times.10.sup.-5 torr by adjusting the nitrogen (purity 99.99%)
gas flow rate. The arc current was set to 100 A. The Fe--N film was
then placed into the centre of a tube furnace. The base pressure of
the reactor was evaluated to 10.sup.-2 torr using a rotary pump. It
took about 10 minutes to heat up the substrate from room
temperature to 600.degree. C. with the flowing gas mixture of
H.sub.2 and N.sub.2 in a ratio of 90 to 30 sccm. Acetylene
(C.sub.2H.sub.2) of 10 sccm was then introduced into the chamber
when the temperature reached 600.degree. C. The growth pressure was
maintained at 10.about.20 torr during the CVD process and the
growth time was set at 5 min. A layer of ZnO was then deposited on
the CNTs in a similar manner as in the preparation of sample
III.
[0063] The typical lengths and diameters of the formed CNTs in
samples III and IV were around 0.5.about.1.5 .mu.m and 30.about.150
nm, respectively. SEM images of uncoated and coated CNT
nanostructures are shown in FIGS. 6A and 6B.
[0064] Secondary electron emission yield (a) of each sample was
measured using a beam of primary electron, which was generated by
the electron gun of an SEM (model JEOL-JSM-5910LV). The beam
intensity was measured by a Faraday cup attached to the SEM system
and was fixed at 100 pA. The electron beam energy was varied from
0.8 to 20 keV. The samples were biased with a 45 V battery. Sample
to ground currents were measured by a low noise current
preamplifier (Stanford Research Systems, SR570). Two specimen
currents for each sample were measured when the sample was
respectively biased positively (I.sub.p) and negatively (I.sub.n).
The positive bias was adequate to ensure that the measured current
(I.sub.p) equals the incident primary electron current. The
negative bias caused the secondary electrons to move away from the
sample surface and reduced the sample-to-ground current by the
amount of secondary electrons produced. The secondary electron
emission yield was thus calculated from
.sigma.=(I.sub.p-I.sub.n)/I.sub.p. (1)
[0065] Test results showed that samples I to IV exhibited higher
secondary electron emission yields than samples V and VI when the
energy of the primary electron beam was lower than about 1 keV.
[0066] It is expected from the test results that detectors having
samples I to IV as electron emitters could exhibit better than 99%
detection efficiency for radiations of ions, electrons and X-rays.
The observed emission efficiency of secondary electrons were much
higher than conventional electron emitters, particularly when
incident primary radiation had low energies, such as an electron
beam having a kinetic energy below about 1 kev. Further, the
emission yields of the sample emitters were high even at low
biasing voltages, such as at 45 V.
[0067] Other features, benefits and advantages of the embodiments
described herein not expressly mentioned above can be understood
from this description and the drawings by those skilled in the
art.
[0068] Of course, the above described embodiments are intended to
be illustrative only and in no way limiting. The described
embodiments are susceptible to many modifications of form,
arrangement of parts, details and order of operation. The
invention, rather, is intended to encompass all such modification
within its scope, as defined by the claims.
* * * * *