Active LC filtering damping circuit with galvanic isolation

Weggel; Craig R. ;   et al.

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 11/287146 was filed with the patent office on 2006-08-24 for active lc filtering damping circuit with galvanic isolation. Invention is credited to James P. Detweiler, Craig R. Weggel, Donald A. Yost.

Application Number20060186963 11/287146
Document ID /
Family ID36912048
Filed Date2006-08-24

United States Patent Application 20060186963
Kind Code A1
Weggel; Craig R. ;   et al. August 24, 2006

Active LC filtering damping circuit with galvanic isolation

Abstract

Active damping of voltage across a LC output filter includes providing a feedback signal from a feedback circuit in relation to operation substantially at a resonant frequency of the LC circuit.


Inventors: Weggel; Craig R.; (Willow Grove, PA) ; Yost; Donald A.; (Lansdale, PA) ; Detweiler; James P.; (Lansdale, PA)
Correspondence Address:
    WESTMAN CHAMPLIN & KELLY, P.A.
    SUITE 1400
    900 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH
    MINNEAPOLIS
    MN
    55402-3319
    US
Family ID: 36912048
Appl. No.: 11/287146
Filed: November 23, 2005

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number
60630888 Nov 24, 2004

Current U.S. Class: 330/291
Current CPC Class: H03F 1/38 20130101; H03F 2200/541 20130101; H03F 1/34 20130101; H03F 3/21 20130101
Class at Publication: 330/291
International Class: H03F 1/38 20060101 H03F001/38

Claims



1. A method of actively damping voltage across an electrical load coupled to or having a resonant LC output filter, the voltage being provided to the load by power amplifier electronics, the method comprising: providing a feedback circuit operably coupled to the LC output filter, the feedback circuit having a transformer-coupled voltage feedback element; sensing a condition of the LC output filter; and providing a feedback signal from the feedback circuit in relation to operation substantially at a resonant frequency of the LC circuit so as to actively damp the voltage across the load.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein sensing power comprises sensing current, and the voltage feedback element comprises a current transformer.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein providing the feedback signal comprises operation of the feedback circuit at the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the feedback circuit includes a sense capacitor operably connected to the LC output filter and a burden resistor operably connected to the current transformer, and wherein providing the feedback signal when a frequency of AC voltage across the sense capacitor substantially reaches the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

5. The method of claim 3 and further comprising combining the feedback signal with a command signal to provide a system error signal to the power electronics.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein providing the feedback signal comprises operation of the feedback circuit at the resonant frequency.

7. The method of claim 1 and further comprising combining the feedback signal with a command signal to provide a system error signal to the power electronics.

8. An apparatus for providing electrical power through terminals to a load wherein a LC filter circuit is connectable to the terminals, the apparatus comprising: power electronics configured to provide power to a load based in part on a command signal; a feedback circuit operably couplable to the LC output filter, the feedback circuit having a transformer-coupled voltage feedback element; and a circuit configured to combining the command signal with the feedback signal.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the voltage feedback element comprises a current transformer.

10. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the feedback circuit is configured to operate and provide the feedback signal at the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

11. The apparatus of claim 9 wherein the feedback circuit includes a sense capacitor operably connected to the LC output filter and a burden resistor operably connected to the current transformer, and wherein the feedback circuit is configured to provide the feedback signal when a frequency of AC voltage across the sense capacitor substantially reaches the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

12. The apparatus of claim 8 wherein the feedback circuit is configured to operate and provide the feedback signal at the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the feedback circuit is configured such that the feedback signal is proportional to current in the LC circuit at the resonant frequency.

14. An apparatus for providing electrical power, the apparatus comprising: power electronics configured to provide power to a load based in part on a command signal; a LC output filter operably connected to the power electronics; a feedback circuit operably connected to the LC output filter, the feedback circuit having a transformer-coupled voltage feedback element; and a circuit configured to combining the command signal with the feedback signal.

15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the voltage feedback element comprises a current transformer.

16. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the feedback circuit is configured to operate and provide the feedback signal at the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

17. The apparatus of claim 15 wherein the feedback circuit includes a sense capacitor operably connected to the LC output filter and a burden resistor operably connected to the current transformer, and wherein the feedback circuit is configured to provide the feedback signal when a frequency of AC voltage across the sense capacitor substantially reaches the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

18. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the feedback circuit is configured to operate and provide the feedback signal at the resonant frequency of the LC output filter.

19. The apparatus of claim 18 wherein the feedback circuit is configured such that the feedback signal is proportional to current in the LC circuit at the resonant frequency.
Description



CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/630,888, filed Nov. 24, 2004, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The discussion below is merely provided for general background information and is not intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.

[0003] It is common to provide filtering of power electronic amplifiers in order to remove high frequency elements therein. One common approach is to use a LC (inductor-capacitor) in the output stage across which the output power for the load is obtained. Although such a filter is effective in removing high frequency components, a problem arises if the resonant frequency of the LC filter is in the operational range of the power amplifier. In such cases, an undesirable large voltage can develop across the load at the resonant frequency. Thus, a method of damping the natural response of the LC filter to prevent unwanted and excessive load voltage is necessary.

[0004] Various approaches of damping have been used. In a first form, damping is provided by using a dissipative approach, generally in the form of a resistor or a combination of a resistor and a capacitor. However, this approach results in unnecessary and potentially high levels of power dissipation. In an alternative approach, active damping is used. However, active damping requires the use of a control loop and therefore, a method of sensing the output voltage.

[0005] Two known methods of sensing output voltage have been used. The first method requires the use of high impedance resistors and a differential operational amplifier. However, this method does not provide galvanic isolation, and therefore can result in limited or even prohibited use in circuits requiring a high level of electrical isolation. A second known method requires the use of relatively expensive and electrically complex Hall Effect, or a similar type close-loop current sensor. In this method, the current sensor is configured to measure the current flowing through a resistor disposed across the terminals of a voltage signal to be measured. The current measurement is proportional to the voltage of interest. Drawbacks of this second approach include high cost and complexity.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0006] This Summary and the Abstract are provided to introduce some concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. This Summary and the Abstract are not intended to identify key features or essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter. In addition, the description herein provided and the claimed subject matter should not be interpreted as being directed to addressing any of the short-comings discussed in the Background.

[0007] Generally, an aspect of the present invention includes a method of actively damping a resonant LC filter using a control loop combined with a transformer-coupled voltage feedback element. The output voltage is sensed using only a small number of non-complex and low-cost components, while offering full galvanic isolation. A voltage control loop is compensated to receive a voltage signal with a desired AC characteristic.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0008] FIG. 1 is a schematic/block diagram having an active LC damping circuit with galvanic isolation.

[0009] FIG. 2 is a schematic circuit diagram having an active LC damping circuit with galvanic isolation.

[0010] FIG. 3 illustrates plots of various signals.

[0011] FIG. 4 illustrates plots of various signals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

[0012] FIG. 1 illustrates an active LC damping circuit 10 with galvanic isolation. The schematic/block diagram is provided in FIG. 1 because as appreciated by those skilled in the art, components therein can be implemented in hardware (digital and/or analog) and or software modules as is well known in the art.

[0013] FIG. 2 is a second representation of the active LC damping circuit 10. The schematic diagram of FIG. 2 is typically used to model circuit 10 using analytical tools such as SPICE modeling techniques. Numbers have been used in FIGS. 1 and 2 to identify similar components. FIG. 2 includes additional electrical components generally used to model parasitic elements of actual components.

[0014] Referring back to FIG. 1 power amplifier electronics 12 provide output power to an LC filter indicated at 14, that in turn, provides power to the desired load 16. Power amplifier electronics 12 includes modules (hardware and/or software) for receiving a command input signal and controlling power control elements to provide output power. Power amplifier electronics 12 are well known and can take many forms, the design of which is not important for purposes of providing this description. In an aspect of the present invention, a voltage control loop or feedback circuit 18 provides feedback for active damping. The voltage control loop 18 includes an error amplifier 20 (represented herein with summer 22 and gain stage 24), a voltage sensor 30, and a compensation network 32. In particular, the voltage sensor 30 comprises a current transformer 36, which provides galvanic isolation. As illustrated, the current transformer 36 is operably coupled to sense current flowing through a sense capacitor 38 where the output terminals, or secondary terminals, of the current transformer 36 are coupled to a burden resistor 40. A voltage signal across the burden resistor 40 is in proportion to the sensed current flowing through capacitor 38.

[0015] At this point, it should be noted that capacitor 38 need not be a separate capacitor from the LC filter 14, but rather, can advantageously be one of the capacitors used therein. In this manner, no additional cost is incurred in order to provide a separate sense capacitor.

[0016] A particular advantageous feature of the present invention, in one embodiment, is that the voltage feedback of the control loop 18 becomes noticeably active at least, or only, when the frequency range of the AC voltage across the sense capacitor 38 corresponds to the resonant frequency of the LC circuit 14, which is substantially higher than the corner frequency determined by the current transformer 36 and the burden resistor 40. The corner frequency is thus selectable. When the voltage feedback becomes "active" (i.e. no longer negligible and accurate or proportional with respect to the current flowing in the LC filter 14), the voltage feedback signal leads the output voltage across load 16 by approximately 90.degree.. FIG. 3 illustrates the feedback signal at 41, the output voltage at 42 and the current in the sense capacitor 38 at 44. The feedback control loop 18 operates over a wide range, but its active influence on the output voltage 42 occurs in a narrow range of frequencies resulting from, and centered about, the resonant frequency of the LC output filter 14.

[0017] The feedback or voltage signal across burden resistor 40, is scaled by feedback compensation circuit 32 and is summed with a desired command signal provided at 50 by the error amplifier 20 in order to provide a system error signal 52. In a preferred embodiment, the gain of the error amplifier 20 is configured so as to provide unity gain in the command path. In this manner, the signal by the control loop 18 is negligible at low frequencies. With the voltage feedback provided as above, attenuation or damping of the power amplifier electronic 12 output voltage signal is achieved specifically at the point of resonance of the LC output filter 14. This is illustrated in FIG. 4 where the amplifier output voltage is indicated at 60 and the voltage across the load is indicated at 62.

[0018] It should be noted that inductor L2 70 and capacitor C6 72 are optional if the power stage output is referenced to ground. In other words, in another embodiment of the present invention, a single LC circuit would suffice. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 2, both of the terminals from the power electronics include unwanted high frequency electrical activity so in that embodiment, filtering is provided for each of the output terminals.

[0019] It should also be noted that scaling of the feedback voltage may not be necessary in some applications, for example, a simple voltage divider may be used, if desired, in combination with the burden resistor 40 to provide the desired feedback voltage. Furthermore, a low pass filter can be added to the feedback signal to compensate, or further attenuate, the feedback signal at high frequencies since the gain of the feedback signal increases with frequency due to the reduction in impedance of capacitor 38 with frequency.

[0020] A particular advantageous feature of the present invention is that the forward gain provided by the error amplifier 20 can be unity. In this manner, at low frequencies, the feedback signal has a very low amplitude and thus a negligible effect on the voltage command signal. This is due at least in part to the nature of the current transformer 36 used with the sense capacitor 38. Stated another way, the compensation network gain is adjusted such that at the desired frequency (i.e., the resonant frequency of the LC filter), or the other components of the voltage feedback signal, are adjusted so that the voltage feedback signal is strong enough to provide compensation. However, at low frequencies, it is as if the voltage feedback signal does not exist and the voltage command signal is passed with unity gain through the error amplifier 20. Thus, damping is provided for the output voltage at the resonant frequency, while allowing the power electronics to have an operable range across and including the resonant frequency.

[0021] Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not limited to the specific features or acts described above as has been held by the courts. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are disclosed as example forms of implementing the claims.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed