U.S. patent application number 11/325923 was filed with the patent office on 2006-06-01 for reduction in the noise produced by a rotor blade of a wind turbine.
Invention is credited to Aloys Wobben.
Application Number | 20060115362 11/325923 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 27438969 |
Filed Date | 2006-06-01 |
United States Patent
Application |
20060115362 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Wobben; Aloys |
June 1, 2006 |
Reduction in the noise produced by a rotor blade of a wind
turbine
Abstract
Rotor blades for wind power installations are known in many
different forms. In a wind power installation the rotors or the
rotor blades thereof represent the main source of sound. For
reasons relating to acceptance and noise prevention laws, the aim
should/must be that of minimizing the levels of sound emission as
wind power installations are often also set up in the proximity of
residential accommodation. The levels of sound emission which
hitherto occur with a wind power installation or a wind power
converter also mean that wind power installations are faced with
resistance from populated areas because of the sound they produce
and for that reason such installations can be accepted sometimes
with difficulty or not at all as authorities responsible for
planning permission refuse permission for wind power installations
because of the existing environmental requirements, noise also
being an environmentally polluting factor. Therefore the object of
the invention is further to improve the noise emission of wind
power installations. Wind power installation rotor blade comprising
means for reducing the sound produced by a rotor blade, wherein the
means is formed by a fluid-repellent layer and/or surface which is
provided at least on a surface portion of the rotor blade.
Inventors: |
Wobben; Aloys; (Aurich,
DE) |
Correspondence
Address: |
SEED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP PLLC
701 FIFTH AVE
SUITE 6300
SEATTLE
WA
98104-7092
US
|
Family ID: |
27438969 |
Appl. No.: |
11/325923 |
Filed: |
January 5, 2006 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10802568 |
Mar 17, 2004 |
|
|
|
11325923 |
Jan 5, 2006 |
|
|
|
09857925 |
Aug 27, 2001 |
6729846 |
|
|
PCT/EP99/09691 |
Dec 9, 1999 |
|
|
|
10802568 |
Mar 17, 2004 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
416/241A |
Current CPC
Class: |
B08B 17/065 20130101;
Y02P 70/523 20151101; F05B 2230/90 20130101; F05B 2260/96 20130101;
F03D 80/40 20160501; F03D 80/00 20160501; F03D 1/0608 20130101;
Y02E 10/72 20130101; F05D 2300/512 20130101; Y02E 10/721 20130101;
B08B 17/06 20130101; F05B 2240/30 20130101; F03D 1/0675 20130101;
F03D 1/065 20130101; Y02P 70/50 20151101; Y02E 10/722 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
416/241.00A |
International
Class: |
F04D 29/38 20060101
F04D029/38 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Oct 25, 1999 |
DE |
19951346.5 |
Oct 1, 1999 |
DE |
19947211.4 |
Jun 28, 1999 |
DE |
19929386.4 |
Dec 9, 1998 |
DE |
29822003.2 |
Claims
1. A rotor blade comprising: a surface which is at least partially
coated with an anti-erosion lacquer.
2. A rotor blade according to claim 1 wherein the anti-erosion
lacquer is embodied as a fluid-repellent structure coated on at
least a portion of said surface, said structure having a plurality
of nano-nails providing a degree of unevenness and irregularity on
said portion of the surface such that water drops do not adhere to
the rotor blade surface and rotor blade sound generation in
operation of a wind power installation is lessened.
3. Rotor blade according to claim 2, wherein the fluid-repellent
structure is coated on at least those parts of the rotor blade
where the sound is generated upon rotation of the rotor blade.
4. A wind power installation comprising a rotor blade according to
claim 1.
5. Use of an anti-erosion lacquer coating of a rotor blade of a
wind turbine for noise reduction.
6. Use of a fluid-repellent coating on a surface of a rotor blade
of a wind turbine for noise reduction.
7. A rotor blade comprising: a surface of the rotor blade that is
exposed to a wind in a manner to cause rotation of the blade; an
anti-erosion coating layer on at least a part of the surface of the
rotor blade, said anti-erosion coating layer being non-tacky.
8. The rotor blade of claim 7 wherein the anti-erosion coating
layer is coated on the part of the surface of a leading edge of the
rotor blade.
9. The rotor blade of claim 7 wherein the anti-erosion coating
layer includes a two-component polyurethane (PUR) lacquer.
10. The rotor blade of claim 7 wherein the anti-erosion coating
layer reduces a sound generated by the rotor blade.
11. A method for reducing a sound generated by a rotating rotor
blade comprising: applying to a surface of the rotor blade a
solvent-bearing two-component polyurethane lacquer; and allowing
the solvent-bearing two-component polyurethane lacquer to dry to
provide a non-tacky, anti-erosion coating layer on the surface.
12. The method of claim 11 wherein the surface of the rotor blade
includes a surface of a leading edge of the rotor blade.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
[0002] Rotor blades for wind power installations are known in many
different forms. In a wind power installation the rotors or the
rotor blades thereof represent the main source of sound. For
reasons relating to acceptance and noise prevention laws, the aim
should/must be that of minimizing the levels of sound emission as
wind power installations are often also set up in the proximity of
residential accommodation. The levels of sound emission which
hitherto occur with a wind power installation or a wind power
converter also mean that wind power installations are faced with
resistance from populated areas because of the sound they produce
and for that reason such installations can be accepted sometimes
with difficulty or not at all as authorities responsible for
planning permission refuse permission for wind power installations
because of the existing environmental requirements, noise also
being an environmentally polluting factor.
[0003] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0004] Many proposals have already been put forward for
structurally modifying a rotor blade of a wind power installation
in such a way as to afford a reduction in noise. By way of example
reference is made here to the documentation as is disclosed in
EP-A-0 652 367 or DE 196 14 420.5.
[0005] However a reduction in noise by virtue of structural
measures on the rotor blade is possible only to a limited
extent.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] Therefore the object of the invention is further to improve
the noise emission of wind power installations.
[0007] In accordance with the invention that object is attained by
a rotor blade having the features of claim 1. Advantageous
developments are set forth in the further claims.
[0008] The invention is based on the realization that, if the
surface of a rotor blade is at least partially provided with a
fluid- and/or ice-repellent layer, the rotor blade also becomes
rougher. Therefore, instead of providing the rotor blade with a
coating comprising a coat of paint which imparts to the rotor blade
on the top thereof a maximum degree of smoothness, it is precisely
the opposite that is done, namely it is given a surface which is
rough in respect of microstructure. Such surfaces are also known
for example from lacquers or coatings which perform the
functionality of the so-called "lotus effect", so that water/ice
adheres only weakly to the surface. In that respect the coating
which is produced from a coat of paint comprises a kind of bed of
nails of nano size. Those nano-nails of the bed not only roughen up
the surface of the rotor blade but also impart a lower level of
hardness to the surface because the individual nano-nails are also
deformable in their longitudinal direction or are considerably
softer in respect of their structure, than the glass fiber coating
of a rotor blade.
[0009] Thus the "lotus" coating on the rotor blade provides that
the eddies which are formed on the top side of the rotor blade are
restrained or checked by the soft structure of the surface or
energy is taken from the eddies of air so that overall--as has been
noted--the sound which is produced upon rotation of the rotor blade
is reduced.
[0010] The micro-silicone paint "Lotusan" (trade mark of ispo GmbH,
a company of the Dyckerhoff Group) may be mentioned as a
self-cleaning coating or paint with which a considerable reduction
in noise of a rotor blade can be achieved in operation. That
micro-silicone paint is marketed by the company under the article
designation No 1950 and is described as being dirt- and
water-repellent. It is also possible for the coating to be formed
by a sheet or foil, the surface structure of which forms a
water-repellent layer. Self-cleaning surfaces (and the production
thereof) are also known from EP 0 772 514.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] FIG. 1 is a front view of a wind power installation
including a rotor.
[0012] FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an enlarged portion of a
surface of a rotor blade from FIG. 1.
[0013] FIG. 3 shows a rotor blade 10 having shark skin pattern
thereon according to principles of the present invention.
[0014] FIG. 4 shows a cross-sectional view of the enlarged shark
skin pattern of FIG. 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] FIG. 1 is a front view of a wind power installation
comprising a rotor which carries three rotor blades 10. FIG. 1
shows a wind power installation of type E-40 from Enercon.
[0016] FIG. 2 shows a view in cross-section of a part of a rotor
blade. It can be seen in this respect that disposed on the surface
is a coating 1 or a covering which forms a bed of nails 2
comprising "nano-nails" 3. The spacing A between the nano-nails is
in the range of between about 2 and 250 .mu.m and the height H of
the nano-nails is in the range of between about 2 and 250 .mu.m.
The nano-nails comprise for example hydrophobic polymers or durably
hydrophobized materials. Particularly good results for reducing the
sound produced by the rotor blade are achieved if the nano-nails
are of a height of between 5 and 60 .mu.m and their mutual spacing
is approximately in the range of between 5 and 110 .mu.m.
[0017] The coating of the rotor blade with a micro-silicone paint
(for example "Lotusan") also has the consequence that water
(H.sub.2O) or other fluids do not remain clinging to the rotor
blade surface. This therefore also takes away from the outset the
basis for any icing on the blade.
[0018] Preferably the coating is not applied entirely to the rotor
blade but only in the last third (as viewed from the rotor) of the
rotor blade and there preferably in the region of the rotor blade
tip or at the rotor blade trailing and leading edges.
[0019] Due to the formation of the nano-nails 3 the surface of the
rotor blade is of very great irregularity or roughness so that the
mass attraction of water drops 4 (molecules) and the rotor blade
surface is not sufficient for the water molecules to remain
clinging thereto. The nano-nails therefore so-to-speak hold the
foreign water molecules at a spacing relative to the surface 6 of
the rotor blade, whereby the attraction force between the water
molecules and the surface is drastically reduced.
[0020] At the same time the nano-nails 3 have so-to-speak the
function of a "(sound) shock absorber" because eddies (not shown)
which naturally form on the surface of the rotor blade and which
are responsible for the generation of sound impinge on the
nano-nails which in turn, by virtue of their relatively great
mobility, compared to the rigid glass fiber structure of the rotor
blade, can absorb the energy of the eddies and thus take energy
away from the air eddies so that the sound is reduced.
[0021] The coating can be formed by an applied coat of paint or by
a foil or sheet secured by adhesive.
[0022] The above-mentioned coating can be applied not only to a
rotor blade or parts thereof, but also to other parts of the wind
power installation, for example to the tower 7 of the wind power
installation and/or to the casing 8. The casing 8--which is usually
also referred to as the pod--is disposed at the head end of the
tower and regularly encloses the generator of the wind power
installation or other parts of the wind power installation which
are not to be exposed directly to the environmental influences. In
that respect the coating may be provided not only externally on the
tower or rotor blade and/or the casing, but also on the inside. For
that purpose, it is advantageous if drip channels (not shown) are
provided on the inside and/or outside, by way of which for example
the water which runs off the tower and/or the casing can be caught,
collected and carried away in a controlled fashion. Such channels
preferably extend substantially perpendicularly (or slightly
inclined with respect to thereto) relatively to the longitudinal
axis of the tower on the wall of the tower and the liquid which is
caught is carried away by a down pipe connected thereto.
[0023] Alternatively or supplemental to the above-described
structure the reduction in the generation of noise can also be
achieved by the rotor blade having a special surface in the manner
of a "shark skin". That surface can be created by adding a sheet or
foil coating. Such a foil or sheet is sold for example by 3M under
the type designation 3M 8691 Drag Reduction Tape (Riblet Tape).
That foil or sheet was developed as a commission from the aviation
industry, with the aim of achieving a saving in fuel for aircraft
by virtue of that specific "shark skin" surface.
[0024] The structure of such a "shark skin foil" is known for
example from publications by Dittrich W. Bechert (Abteilung
Turbolenzforschung des Deutschen Zentrums fur Luft--and Raumfahrt
(DLR)--Turbulence Research Division of the German Aerospace
Centre). The structure of a "shark skin foil" (coating) is also
described in detail inter alia in EP fl 846 617, DE-C-36 09 541 or
DE-C-34 14 554. For the avoidance of repetition the content of all
the above-indicated publications is also to be deemed to be content
of the present application.
[0025] As the sound in the case of aircraft is essentially
determined by the engines, the sound produced by the aircraft is
not reduced, especially as the sound levels which are generated by
virtue of the dynamic events on the aircraft (aerofoil) are below
the listening threshold and therefore cannot be perceived.
[0026] A foil in accordance with the principle of the shark skin
(under a corresponding surface) was developed by an engineering
team headed by Dr. Dietrich W. Bechert of the Abteilung
Turbolenzforschung des Deutschen Zentrums fur Luft--and Raumfahrt
(DLR) (translation: Turbulence Research Division of the German
Aerospace Centre) at the Techinical University of Berlin.
[0027] FIG. 3 shows the case of such a "shark skin" foil the
surface of the foil has fine channels formed between ribs 11
extending in the flow direction on rotor blade 10. Those channels
are not continuous but are disposed on panels (scales) 12 which in
turn are arranged in mutually displaced relationship, as shown in
FIG. 3. In the illustrated example a "scale" 12 has five channels
between ribs 11 which are of different lengths and which are
oriented with their longitudinal direction perpendicular (or
parallel) to the radius r of the rotor blade of a wind power
installation.
[0028] As shown in FIG. 4, in this case the height H of the ribs 11
that form the channels is about between 30 and 70% of the channel
spacing s and the ribs are preferably of a wedge-shaped
configuration with a taper angle of between about 5 and
60.degree..
[0029] The standardized lateral rib spacing of the shark skin foil
surface in this case in accordance with the formula s.sup.+=(s/ny)*
(tau.sub.0/rho) is between 12 and 22, wherein s is the lateral rib
spacing, tau.sub.0 is the wall tension of a smooth reference
surface which is exposed to the same flow, rho is the density of
the flow medium (air) and ny is the kinematic viscosity of the flow
medium (air). In this case the standardized rib spacing s.sup.+ is
preferably adjusted to peripheral speed (or angular speed) of a
rotor blade of a wind power installation in operation at nominal
rating. Preferably in that respect it is adjusted to the peripheral
speed of the rotor blade tip or the rotor blade tip region (between
about 5 and 25% of the rotor blade length).
[0030] The channel spacings in that case is between 0.001 and 0.15
mm.
[0031] It is also possible for surface structures with a differing
channel spacing and/or scale spacing to be provided over the entire
rotor blade surface so that adjustment of the standardized channel
spacing is always to the respective peripheral speed of the rotor
in nominal operation.
[0032] Preferably the lateral attachments of the ribs also have a
radius of curvature of a maximum of 50%, preferably a maximum of
20%, of the lateral rib spacing s.
[0033] It is also advantageous if the surface of the shark skin
foil, between the ribs, has a radius of curvature of at least 200%
of the lateral rib spacing. That is shown on an enlarged view in
cross-section in FIG. 4.
[0034] Initial tests have shown that the sound emission of a rotor
with rotor blades which have the above-described shark skin foil
(and thus also the corresponding surface as described) could be
reduced by between about 0.2 and 3 dB (depending on peripheral
speed and wind conditions).
[0035] A measure as an alternative to or supplemental to the
above-described sound-reduction measures can also involve providing
portions of a rotor blade, in particular the rotor blade leading
edge, with an anti-erosion lacquer or paint. For example a
solvent-bearing 2-component PUR lacquer with Teflon-like surface
properties can be provided as such an anti-erosion lacquer.
Hitherto, anti-erosion foils or sheets have been glued onto rotor
blade leading edges in order to prevent erosion of the rotor blade
leading edge due to dirt particles/rain/hail etc. Gluing on that
foil is very complicated and troublesome and has to be carried out
with an extremely great amount of care in order to prevent it from
rapidly becoming detached in operation. In spite of the greatest
amount of care being applied, it nonetheless repeatedly happens
that the applied foils come loose, which under some circumstances
can also result in an increase in the sound level in operation, but
at any event causes high servicing costs as the detached or
protruding foil pieces (foil corners) have to be re-secured to the
rotor blade again or fresh foils have to be fitted.
[0036] A sliding or slippery sealant as is offered by Coelan under
the designation VP 1970M, is suitable as an anti-erosion lacquer
with which it is possible to eliminate the problems of the known
anti-erosion foil. That involves a solvent-bearing 2-component PUR
lacquer having Teflon-like surface properties and the following
characteristics: TABLE-US-00001 Solids content: Component A: about
60% Component B: about 5% Mixture: about 32% Flash point:
-22.degree. C. Density: Component A: 1.11 g/cm.sup.3 (20.degree.
C.) Component B: 0.83 g/cm.sup.3 (20.degree. C.) Viscosity:
Component A: about 80 s DIN 4 (23.degree. C. Component B: <10 s
DIN 4 (23.degree. C.) Processing time: about 16 h in a closed
container Skinning: about 30 min (20.degree. C.; 50% relative air
humidity) Non-tacky after: about 2 h (20.degree. C.; 50% relative
air humidity) Completely dry: about 96 h (20.degree. C.; 50%
relative air humidity) Pendulum hardness: 147 seconds (in
accordance with Konig; DIN 53157) Quick weathering: Withstood 2350
h UV-A with the Q-panel apparatus (QUV-test) Withstood 2430 h UV-B
with the Q-panel apparatus Mixture ratio: Component A: 100 parts by
weight Component B: 100 parts by weight
[0037] That lacquer was developed for boat building, but the use
thereof in relation to rotor blades for reducing the generation of
noise has hitherto never yet been proposed and is highly
advantageous because it makes it possible to replace the known
anti-erosion foil and eliminate the problems thereof.
[0038] All of the above U.S. patents, U.S. patent application
publications, 10 U.S. patent applications, foreign patents, foreign
patent applications and non-patent publications referred to in this
specification and/or listed in the Application Data Sheet, U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 10/802,568 filed Mar. 17, 2004; U.S.
patent application Ser. No. 09/857,925 filed on Aug. 27, 2001; and
International Application No. PCT/EP99/09691 filed on Dec. 9, 1999,
are incorporated herein by reference, in their entirety.
* * * * *