U.S. patent application number 10/934808 was filed with the patent office on 2006-03-09 for golf club head.
Invention is credited to Rea Tower Chang.
Application Number | 20060052180 10/934808 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 35996936 |
Filed Date | 2006-03-09 |
United States Patent
Application |
20060052180 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Chang; Rea Tower |
March 9, 2006 |
Golf club head
Abstract
An oversize golf club driver head has the maximum legal face
dimensions, a loft of at least 17 degrees and a ratio of club depth
to face depth that is less than 1.5. This unconventional
combination of driver parameters is designed to make it easier for
beginning golfers and less skilled golfers to reliably hit a golf
ball from a golf tee and thereby give such golfers more confidence
in their ability to hit a golf driver. Nevertheless, it results in
a golf club driver head configuration which complies with USGA
rules and is not peculiar in appearance.
Inventors: |
Chang; Rea Tower; (Irvine,
CA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
LEONARD TACHNER, A PROFESSIONAL LAW;CORPORATION
17961 SKY PARK CIRCLE, SUITE 38-E
IRVINE
CA
92614
US
|
Family ID: |
35996936 |
Appl. No.: |
10/934808 |
Filed: |
September 3, 2004 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/345 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B 53/0412 20200801;
A63B 53/0466 20130101; A63B 53/0408 20200801 |
Class at
Publication: |
473/345 |
International
Class: |
A63B 53/04 20060101
A63B053/04 |
Claims
1. A golf club driver head for improving the probability of golf
ball impact with the hitting surface thereof while complying with
rules regarding maximum head dimensions and volume; the head
comprising: a hitting surface defined by a crown, a sole, a toe and
a heel, the hitting surface residing in opposition to a rear end
and enclosing a substantially hollow interior having a volume; said
volume being in the range of 350 cc. to 460 cc; said head having an
overall depth defined by the distance between said hitting surface
and said rear end and having a face depth defined by the distance
between said crown and said sole along said hitting surface about
halfway between said toe and said heel; the ratio of said overall
depth to said face depth being no greater than 1.5.
2. The golf club driver head recited in claim 1 wherein said ratio
is about 1.2.
3. The golf club driver recited in claim 1 wherein said overall
depth is less than 3.5 inches and said face depth is greater than
2.5 inches.
4. The golf club driver recited in claim 1 wherein said face depth
is about 2.6 inches.
5. The golf club driver recited in claim 1 wherein said hitting
surface is further characterized by a width defined as the distance
along said hitting surface between said toe and said heel about
half way between said crown and said sole, and wherein said width
is greater than 3.5 inches.
6. The golf club driver recited in claim 5 wherein said width is
about 3.75 inches.
7. The golf club head driver recited in claim 1 wherein said head
has a loft angle of at least 17 degrees.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] 1. Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates generally to golf club heads
and more specifically to a golf club driver head which is designed
for use by less skilled golfers.
[0003] 2. Background Art
[0004] Most manufacturers offer a big titanium driver. However,
most want to abide by the rules set by USGA regarding the size
limit of a driver. The volume limit for drivers is currently 460
cc. Therefore, there is a limitation as to how big the driver can
be. The biggest club head on the market to date is a 650 cc driver,
but it does not conform to USGA rules. There is also a limitation
as to how deep the driver can be, which is 2.8 inches from the top
of crown to the sole. This makes the maximum clubface depth about
2.6 (65 mm) inches taking the curve of the crown plate into
consideration. The width is also limited to 5 inches from heel to
toe.
[0005] No manufacturer has been able to achieve this maximum face
size without exceeding the 460 cc volume limit. Their design
intentions are that the driver has to have a deep C.G. (center of
gravity) so that it will give the ball more moment of inertia to
drive the golf ball a greater distance.
[0006] Golf club manufacturers are preoccupied with offering a
driver that gives a golfer the most "potential distance".
Therefore, they put depth of center of gravity as a priority in the
design of a driver club head. From a marketing stand-point it is
unimaginable for a manufacturer not to put "more distance" as a
priority of features to make the driver more attractive: As a
result, driver manufacturers design drivers that have deep centers
of gravity, which means the distance from the front of the crown to
the back of the head is as long as possible. A deeper C.G. allows
manufacturers to achieve "high launch, low spin" on the ball and
achieves more distance.
[0007] However, what if one looks at driver design from a totally
different standpoint? While golf club companies want to sell
drivers based on distance first and forgiveness second, we want to
be totally different and provide a driver configuration based on
forgiveness (easy-to-hit) first and distance second.
[0008] Most of the major golf equipment companies tend to cater
mostly to established golfers. By that, we mean golfers who already
know how to play the game and are considered intermediate to
advanced golfers. Very rarely do they design clubs especially for
beginning golfers and unskillful golfers.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The driver of the present invention is designed specifically
with beginning golfers and unskillful golfers in mind. This group
of golfers lacks the skill and the speed to hit a conventional
driver well. For them, distance is not really an issue. Their main
concern is whether they can hit the ball at all. Therefore, when
designing a driver for this group of golfers, the size of the
clubface is the principal concern. A bigger clubface means more
opportunity to hit the ball on the clubface. To achieve this, the
present invention provides a driver that has a club face size that
fully realizes the USGA limit on dimensions, which is 2.8 inches
deep and 5 inches from heel to toe.
[0010] The problem with making a driver with that big a face is the
volume. For a conventional shape driver to have a face the maximum
USGA permitted size, it would have to be at least 600 cc in volume.
Although it would then look like a conventional shape driver just
proportionally bigger, it would look very clumsy when the club
length is not proportionally longer.
[0011] With the USGA ruling on size limitation and the intentions
of most manufacturers to move the CG back, no manufacturer has
designed a driver in the shape of the driver of the present
invention.
[0012] The preferred embodiment hereof offers the high handicap
golfer or less skillful golfer a driver with a clubface that is as
big as allowable by USGA rules.
[0013] The invention also addresses the desire for the driver to
have a normal appearance. The invention achieves both criteria by
reducing the distance from front to back as compared to the
conventional design, which has a head depth to face depth ratio of
about 1.8 to 2.
[0014] It is believed that no manufacturer has offered a driver
that has a head depth to face depth ratio less than 1.5 for drivers
over 350 cc.
[0015] Although the CG is not as far back from the clubface because
of its narrower depth design, the advantage of a much bigger
clubface and high loft gives the less skillful golfer the highest
probability of hitting the golf ball well.
[0016] The driver of the present invention is believed to be the
first oversize titanium driver over 400 cc to have at least 17
degrees of loft. Compared to other drivers that typically have 8 to
12 degrees of loft, 17 degrees of loft is equivalent to the loft of
a 4 wood, which makes it very easy for the unskillful golfer to
launch the ball higher. The ball may not travel far as compared to
a shot hit by an intermediate to advanced golfer, but it becomes
airborne and travels a reasonable distance to give the unskillful
golfer confidence in his or her ability to hit the golf ball with
some regularity.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] The aforementioned objects and advantages of the present
invention, as well as additional objects and advantages thereof,
will be more fully understood herein after as a result of a
detailed description of a preferred embodiment when taken in
conjunction with the following drawings in which:
[0018] FIG. 1 is a face-end view of a golf club driver having a
preferred embodiment of the present invention;
[0019] FIG. 2 is a face-end view of the driver head of the driver
of FIG.1;
[0020] FIG. 3 is rear view of the head of FIG. 2;
[0021] FIG. 4 is a top view of the head of FIG. 2;
[0022] FIG. 5 is a bottom view of the head of FIG. 2;
[0023] FIG. 6 is a toe-side view of the head of FIG. 2;
[0024] FIG. 7 is a heel-side view of the head of FIG. 2; and
[0025] FIG. 8 is a face-end view illustrating comparable face
configurations.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0026] Referring to the accompanying drawings, it will be seen that
a golf club driver 10 comprises a driver head 12 having hosel 14
and being affixed to a shaft 16 terminating in a grip end 18. Head
12 has a very large face or hitting surface 20, a crown 22, a toe
24, a heel 26, a sole 28 and a rear surface 30. Face 20 preferably
has a pattern of score lines 25 as is well known in the art of golf
clubs. The preferred head shape may be readily discerned from FIGS.
2-7 which show head 12 from all six standard directions including
face-end view (FIG. 2), rear-end view (FIG. 3), crown view (FIG.
4), sole view (FIG. 5), toe view (FIG. 6) and heel view (FIG.
7).
[0027] In the preferred embodiment shown herein, the face is about
25/8 inches deep ("X" in FIG. 6) and about 3% inches wide at the
sweet spot. The total volume of the head 12 is over 400 cc. The
club head depth is about 31/8 inches ("Y" in FIG. 5). The ratio of
club head depth "Y" to club face depth "X" is about 1.2. As
described above, it is a characteristic of the present invention
that the ratio of y/x be less than 1.5, despite having a head
volume exceeding 350 cc. It is preferable that the ratio of y/x be
no greater than about 1.2.
[0028] It is also desirable to provide a high loft driver to make
it easier for the less skillful golfer to hit the ball into the
air. The preferred embodiment has a loft of at least 170. The
material is preferably titanium alloy to make the head light in
weight despite its large volume. However, it will be understood
that the invention hereof may be made of any conventional golf club
head material.
[0029] FIG. 8 illustrates the hitting surface of the preferred
embodiment hereof as compared to other well-known manufacturer's
drivers. "A" represents the club face of the preferred embodiment.
"B" is a face representation of a King Cobra.RTM. model 440 SZ
driver. "C" is a face representation of a Taylor Made.RTM. model
R580XD driver and "D" is a face representation of a Callaway.RTM.
model ERC Fusion.TM. driver. The relative hitting areas based upon
"A"=100% is B=87%, C=79% and D=60%.
[0030] Having thus disclosed a preferred embodiment of the present
invention, it will be apparent that many variations may be made to
the golf club head hereof without departing from the scope of
protection herein. Accordingly, the invention should be accorded
its full range of interpretation based solely on the scope of the
appended claims and their equivalents.
* * * * *