U.S. patent application number 10/934056 was filed with the patent office on 2006-03-09 for shirt holder. Invention is credited to Steve Sanghoo Kim.
Application Number | 20060048266 10/934056 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 35994692 |
Filed Date | 2006-03-09 |
United States Patent Application | 20060048266 |
Kind Code | A1 |
Kim; Steve Sanghoo | March 9, 2006 |
I invented SHIRT HOLDER which is all of the ways and things to prevent shirt coming out from pants or belt to avoid odd looking and uncomfortable. There are many ways that letting the SHIRT HOLDER hold the shirt to be stayed inside of pants or belt as the same place as first worn in the morning, doing by fixing cloth, string, rubber, plastic, button etc., or stitching, altering etc. on the bottom part of shirt inside or outside by friction and/or weight.
Inventors: | Kim; Steve Sanghoo; (Des Plaines, IL) |
Correspondence Address: |
Steve S. Kim Apt 201 1480 Jefferson St Des Plaines IL 60016 US |
Family ID: | 35994692 |
Appl. No.: | 10/934056 |
Filed: | September 7, 2004 |
Current U.S. Class: | 2/117 |
Current CPC Class: | A41B 1/08 20130101; A41F 5/00 20130101 |
Class at Publication: | 002/117 |
International Class: | A41B 1/00 20060101 A41B001/00 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.