U.S. patent application number 11/192768 was filed with the patent office on 2005-12-08 for ribbon bonding in an electronic package.
Invention is credited to Luechinger, Christoph B..
Application Number | 20050269694 11/192768 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 33310553 |
Filed Date | 2005-12-08 |
United States Patent
Application |
20050269694 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Luechinger, Christoph B. |
December 8, 2005 |
Ribbon bonding in an electronic package
Abstract
A flexible conductive ribbon is ultrasonically bonded to the
surface of a die and terminals from a lead frame of a package.
Multiple ribbons and/or multiple bonded areas provide various
benefits, such as high current capability, reduced spreading
resistance, reliable bonds due to large contact areas, lower cost
and higher throughput due to less areas to bond and test.
Inventors: |
Luechinger, Christoph B.;
(Irvine, CA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MACPHERSON KWOK CHEN & HEID LLP
1762 TECHNOLOGY DRIVE, SUITE 226
SAN JOSE
CA
95110
US
|
Family ID: |
33310553 |
Appl. No.: |
11/192768 |
Filed: |
July 29, 2005 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
11192768 |
Jul 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
10429128 |
May 2, 2003 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
257/724 ;
257/E23.033 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01L 2224/45014
20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/49175 20130101; H01L
2924/00014 20130101; H01L 2924/01042 20130101; H01L 2924/01047
20130101; H01L 2924/19041 20130101; H01L 2224/48137 20130101; H01L
2224/48624 20130101; H01L 2224/49175 20130101; H01L 2924/1305
20130101; H01L 24/85 20130101; H01L 2224/4554 20130101; H01L
2224/45565 20130101; H01L 2224/85205 20130101; H01L 2924/00014
20130101; H01L 2924/01028 20130101; H01L 2924/01029 20130101; H01L
2924/3512 20130101; H01L 2224/05624 20130101; H01L 2224/45565
20130101; H01L 2224/49175 20130101; H01L 2924/181 20130101; H01L
2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45124 20130101; H01L 2224/48724
20130101; H01L 2224/48824 20130101; H01L 2224/85205 20130101; H01L
24/29 20130101; H01L 2224/291 20130101; H01L 2224/48724 20130101;
H01L 2924/01005 20130101; H01L 2924/30107 20130101; H01L 2224/85207
20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2924/19042 20130101; B23K
20/008 20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45014
20130101; H01L 2924/20304 20130101; H01L 23/4952 20130101; H01L
23/498 20130101; H01L 2224/45139 20130101; H01L 2224/48247
20130101; H01L 2924/01079 20130101; H01L 2224/45624 20130101; H01L
2224/45033 20130101; H01L 2224/49175 20130101; H01L 2224/48091
20130101; H01L 2924/01013 20130101; H01L 2224/2919 20130101; H01L
2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/48824 20130101; H01L 2224/85203
20130101; H01L 2924/10253 20130101; H01L 2924/1306 20130101; H01L
24/49 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2924/01078 20130101;
H01L 2224/85203 20130101; H01L 2224/48247 20130101; H01L 2224/45014
20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L
2224/45032 20130101; H01L 2224/45144 20130101; H01L 2224/45144
20130101; H01L 2224/05624 20130101; H01L 24/45 20130101; H01L
2224/48091 20130101; H01L 2924/01014 20130101; H01L 2224/4846
20130101; H01L 2224/45565 20130101; H01L 2224/85181 20130101; H01L
2224/85207 20130101; H01L 2924/014 20130101; H01L 2924/20755
20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L
2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/4846 20130101; H01L 2224/85205
20130101; H01L 2224/85205 20130101; H01L 2224/45124 20130101; H01L
2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45139 20130101; H01L 2224/45144
20130101; H01L 2924/00011 20130101; H01L 2224/291 20130101; H01L
2224/45565 20130101; H01L 2224/48624 20130101; H01L 2224/85205
20130101; H01L 2924/1305 20130101; H01L 24/48 20130101; B23K
2101/32 20180801; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L 2224/45015
20130101; H01L 2224/85203 20130101; B23K 2101/38 20180801; H01L
2224/85205 20130101; H01L 2224/85205 20130101; H01L 2924/00014
20130101; H01L 2924/13091 20130101; H01L 2224/45014 20130101; H01L
2224/2919 20130101; H01L 2224/48472 20130101; H01L 2924/00011
20130101; H01L 2224/45565 20130101; H01L 24/78 20130101; H01L
2224/78316 20130101; H01L 2924/01015 20130101; H01L 2924/181
20130101; H01L 2224/45015 20130101; H01L 2224/85205 20130101; H01L
2924/00011 20130101; H01L 2924/01006 20130101; H01L 2924/01019
20130101; H01L 2224/45139 20130101; H01L 2224/48472 20130101; H01L
2224/45124 20130101; H01L 2224/43848 20130101; H01L 2224/45124
20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/45644 20130101; H01L
2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00014 20130101; H01L 2924/00014
20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/48247 20130101; H01L
2224/48472 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101;
H01L 2924/20304 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/45147
20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00015 20130101; H01L
2224/45624 20130101; H01L 2224/45144 20130101; H01L 2224/45639
20130101; H01L 2924/01049 20130101; H01L 2224/45565 20130101; H01L
2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/78 20130101; H01L 2924/00015
20130101; H01L 2924/01005 20130101; H01L 2224/48247 20130101; H01L
2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00014 20130101;
H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2224/45644
20130101; H01L 2924/00015 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L
2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/45139 20130101; H01L 2224/45647
20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/206 20130101; H01L
2924/00 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2924/00014
20130101; H01L 2924/20303 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2224/45639 20130101; H01L 2224/45124 20130101; H01L 2924/00014
20130101; H01L 2924/0665 20130101; H01L 2224/45144 20130101; H01L
2924/00015 20130101; H01L 2224/45624 20130101; H01L 2924/00
20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2924/00014 20130101; H01L 2224/48137 20130101; H01L 2924/014
20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2224/48091 20130101; H01L 2224/45624
20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2924/00 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101;
H01L 2224/48472 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L 2224/45565
20130101; H01L 2224/45655 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2924/00015 20130101; H01L 2224/45624 20130101; H01L 2924/01028
20130101; H01L 2224/45647 20130101; H01L 2924/00 20130101; H01L
2924/20755 20130101; H01L 2924/00014 20130101; H01L 2924/00
20130101; H01L 2924/13091 20130101; H01L 2224/45147 20130101; H01L
2924/00014 20130101; H01L 2224/45124 20130101; H01L 2224/45565
20130101; H01L 2924/1306 20130101; H01L 2924/20303 20130101; H01L
2224/48472 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
257/724 |
International
Class: |
H01L 023/34 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An electronic package, comprising: an electronic device having a
conductive upper surface; a conductive terminal external to the
electronic device; and a conductive ribbon ultrasonically bonded to
a first portion of the conductive upper surface and bonded to the
conductive terminal, wherein the conductive ribbon comprises a
first layer contacting the conductive upper surface and a second
layer overlying the first layer.
2. The electronic package of claim 1, wherein the first layer is
aluminum and the second layer is copper.
3. The electronic package of claim 2, wherein the first layer is
thinner than the second layer.
4. The electronic package of claim 1, wherein the conductive ribbon
further comprises a third layer overlying the second layer.
5. The electronic package of claim 1, wherein the first layer and
the conductive upper surface comprise the same material.
6. The electronic package of claim 1, wherein the ribbon has a
rectangular cross section.
7. An electronic package, comprising: an electronic device having a
conductive upper surface; a conductive terminal external to the
electronic device; and a conductive ribbon ultrasonically bonded to
a first portion of the conductive upper surface and bonded to the
conductive terminal, wherein the conductive ribbon comprises a
first layer contacting the conductive upper surface and a second
layer overlying the first layer, and wherein the first layer is
aluminum and the second layer is copper.
8. A conductive ribbon for ultrasonically bonding a first portion
of a conductive upper surface to a conductive terminal, the ribbon
comprising: an aluminum layer of rectangular cross section, wherein
the aluminum layer contacts the conductive upper surface; and a
copper layer of rectangular cross section formed over the aluminum
layer.
9. The conductive ribbon of claim 8, further comprising a coupling
layer formed over the copper layer.
10. The conductive ribbon of claim 8, wherein the aluminum layer is
thinner than the copper layer.
11. The conductive ribbon of claim 9, wherein the coupling layer is
aluminum.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This is a divisional application of U.S. patent application
Ser. No. 10/429,128, entitled "Ribbon Bonding", filed May 2,
2003.
BACKGROUND
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The present invention relates to semiconductor devices, and
in particular, to interconnecting a semiconductor die to a terminal
lead in a semiconductor package.
[0004] 2. Related Art
[0005] In the manufacture of semiconductor devices, active elements
in a semiconductor device, such as drain and/or source regions in a
semiconductor die, are electrically connected to other devices or
electronic components, such as on a printed circuit board. However,
since semiconductor devices can be susceptible to environmental
conditions, such as dust, moisture, and sudden impact, which can
damage or otherwise interfere with the proper operation of the
device, the device is typically protected by a die package. The die
package both protects the die and allows the die to electrically
connect to external devices. To facilitate the latter, specific
portions of the die are electrically coupled to external leads of
the package or lead frame, such as with bond wires or solder
balls.
[0006] FIG. 1 shows a side view of a typical connection between a
power semiconductor die 10 (e.g., a MOSFET) and part of a lead
frame 12. Lead frame 12 includes a lead 14 and a die pad 16. Lead
14 allows die 10 to electrically couple external elements after die
10 is connected. Die 10 is mounted on or secured to die pad 16. The
upper surface of die 10 includes a metalized portion 22, such as
aluminum, that provides contact with underlying active elements of
die 10. An electrical connection is then made between metalized
portion 22 and contact portion 18. Typically, the connection is
made by bonding, e.g. ultrasonically bonding, a conductive wire. 24
between the two portions. Materials for wire 24 include gold,
aluminum, and copper. FIG. 1 shows a single bond, connection, or
stitch 26 between wire 24 and metalized portion 22.
[0007] The amount of current flow from die 10 to lead 14 depends,
in part, on the total resistance in the current path, as shown by
the arrows in FIG. 1. This resistance is due, in part, to the
resistance of wire 24 and the spreading resistance along metalized
portion 22. The spreading resistance increases as the distance the
current has to travel from the metalized portion to the stitch
increases. The spreading resistance also increases as the thickness
of metalized portion 22 decreases. Typical metalization thickness
is in the range of approximately 3 to 5 microns (i.e., much smaller
than the wire thickness). It is desirable to lower the overall
electrical resistance of the connections, especially to keep pace
with the intrinsic resistance of the semiconductor die, which is
continuously decreasing. However, increasing the thickness of
metalized portion 22 also increases the cost by decreasing
throughput of the wafer/die manufacturing process.
[0008] Further, wires are limited by their size, typically around
20 mil in diameter, which also limits the amount of current that
can be carried in each wire. Consequently, large numbers of wires
are sometimes needed to make the desired connections in certain
applications, which can increase the cost and decrease throughput
of the interconnect process equipment (e.g., the wire bonder).
[0009] Instead of wires, other types of bonding utilize a strap to
connect the die to the lead frame. One such configuration is shown
in FIG. 2 and is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,626, entitled
"Semiconductor Package", issued to Cheah et al. A single conductive
strap 50, e.g., copper, is used to obtain an electrical connection
between metalized portion 22 on die 10 and lead 14 of the
package/module. Strap 50 can be either soldered or glued to two
contact areas 52 and 54, such as with an electrically conductive
epoxy or solder paste 56. Use of a strap provides the advantages of
reducing resistance to current flow by providing a large contact
area for coupling metalized portion 22 to lead 14, e.g., spreading
resistance is greatly reduced.
[0010] However, using a strap also has disadvantages. In order to
solder strap 50 to the surface of metalized portion 22, a
solderable metalization, e.g., copper or nickel, is required. In
general, such a metalization requires a stack of several different
metal layers (not shown), with each layer having a specific
function, e.g., adhesion, barrier, and solderability, of the
soldering process. These layers, which are different than the
standard metalization layer, e.g., aluminum, together result in
higher manufacturing cost of the metalization, and consequently of
the semiconductor die. Typically, a solder paste process is applied
to join the parts. Solder paste 56 contains some type of flux
component, which is required to (1) temporarily tack the
components, (2) protect them from oxidizing (especially if the
reflow process takes place in air), and (3) remove/reduce oxides
already present. Depending on the quality of the parts, only the
use of a strong flux provides a robust process and reliable result
of the soldering process. It is well known that flux residues cover
the surfaces after reflow. Beside other negative effects (like
corrosion in contact with humidity), their presence negatively
influences the strength and reproducibility of the adhesion of the
molding compound in a subsequent package encapsulation. This again
can result in a limited reliability of such parts. As a
consequence, parts processed with solder paste typically need to be
thoroughly cleaned after reflow and before further
processing/packaging.
[0011] However, cost effective wet chemical cleaning processes are
known to offer limited process control capability, causing an
increased yield loss potential, beside the additional costs (e.g.,
labor, floor space, equipment, consumables, and yield loss) due to
the need for this additional process step. Such a cleaning is also
difficult to automate (which would reduce labor cost) and difficult
to implement in a clean room environment. Furthermore, wet chemical
processes, as well as solder reflow using flux (fumes), may be
environmentally unfriendly. Two other disadvantages of a copper
strap interconnect are (1) limited flexibility (since the straps
are typically stamped on the die bonder, device changes which
require a different strap geometry will require exchanging the
stamping tool, which increases time and cost) and (2) the
relatively stiff copper strap can form a significant stress on the
silicon die, which can cause the die to crack, especially if the
thickness of the attachment layer (e.g., solder or epoxy) is not
well controlled above a certain minimum.
[0012] Another type of interconnect currently used is a solder ball
based interconnect, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,442,033,
entitled "Low-cost 3D Flip-chip packaging technology for integrated
power electronics modules", issued to Liu Xingsheng et al., and in
U.S. patent application publication No. U.S. 2002/0066950, entitled
"Flip chip in leaded molded package with two dice", by Rajeev
Joshi, both of which are incorporated by reference in their
entirety. Solder ball based interconnects have similar
disadvantages to those of the strap configuration with regards to
the use of solder paste and inflexibility. In high current
applications, such a configuration has the additional disadvantage
of the solder's high susceptibility to electromigration.
[0013] Thus, it is highly desirable to use a clean, environmentally
friendly process, which can be well controlled, as well as a
flexible interconnect. The ultrasonic bonding process is one such
process. However, it is also desirable to reduce the number of
connections, in order to increase the production rate of existing
equipment, and reduce the cost of manufacturing. Furthermore, it is
desirable to improve the electrical performance of connections,
which would require either reducing the electrical resistance
and/or increasing the current capability, depending on the type of
application. Especially for discrete semiconductor devices, it is
also desirable to reduce the overall size of a device, and
therefore the volume required by the connection.
[0014] Accordingly, there is a need for an improved type of
connection processed using ultrasonic bonding, which overcomes the
deficiencies in the prior art as discussed above.
SUMMARY
[0015] According to one aspect of the present invention, a flexible
conductive ribbon is used to electrically connect a die and an
external lead in a package, such as for power applications and
MOSFETs. The connection to the die is by ultrasonic bonding in one
embodiment. Bonding of the lead may also be by ultrasonic bonding.
Other embodiments may utilize thermosonic bonding. The ribbon is of
a rectangular cross-section and can be of a single layer, such as
aluminum or copper, or can be of multiple layers, such as a thin
aluminum bonding layer underlying a thicker copper conducting
layer. In some embodiments, a single ribbon is used, while in other
embodiments, multiple parallel ribbons are bonded. Further, each
ribbon can have one or more stitches or bonds on the conductive die
surface with one or more loops.
[0016] The present invention allows using the same bonding process
as with wires, i.e., an ultrasonic bonding process, increasing the
cross section and contact area for the current paths while limiting
or even reducing the overall volume occupied by the connection, and
reducing the processing steps and time to produce the connection.
Using a ribbon of the present invention allows the main loop cross
section to be maximized since gaps between wires are filled. Even
though the ribbon has a large cross section, the thickness can
still be reduced compared to a wire, which makes bonding by
ultrasonic processes less difficult. Consequently, bonding is
easier, the loop height can be lowered, which results in lower
interconnect height and a potential for reduced package height for
smaller packages, and the ability to form the loops increases,
which results in shorter loops and more stitches. Multiple stitches
allow using smaller bond areas (per stitch), which alleviates the
need for a heavy bond head to generate and apply high force and
ultrasonic power during bonding. Thus, yields higher throughput.
The use of multiple stitches, leading to shorter distances between
stitches, reduces the spreading resistance, which allows higher
current carrying capability.
[0017] In other embodiments, the ribbon can be bonded and cut at
different angles, depending on the orientation of the contacts of
the die and lead terminals. This allows optimal usage of the ribbon
contact area, maximizes ribbon width, and allows placing a large
ribbon in existing packages designed for round wire bonding (e.g.,
TO-220 packages) in an optimized manner.
[0018] This invention will be more fully understood in conjunction
with the following detailed description taken together with the
following drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0019] FIG. 1 shows a side view of a conventional connection
between a die and a lead frame using a wire with a single
stitch;
[0020] FIG. 2 shows a conventional connection between a die and a
lead frame using a strap;
[0021] FIGS. 3A and 3B show side and top views, respectively, of a
connection between a die and a lead frame according to one
embodiment of the invention;
[0022] FIG. 4A is a side view of a connection between a die and a
lead frame using a ribbon with multiple stitches according to
another embodiment;
[0023] FIG. 4B is a side view of a ribbon with multiple stitches,
showing spacing between stitches according to one embodiment;
[0024] FIGS. 5A-5C show top views of another embodiment of the
present invention using multiple parallel ribbons;
[0025] FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of a clad ribbon
according to one embodiment of the invention;
[0026] FIG. 7 shows a cross-sectional view of a clad ribbon with
three layers according to another embodiment of the invention;
[0027] FIG. 8 shows a portion of a bond tool suitable for ribbon
bonding according to one embodiment;
[0028] FIG. 9A shows a top view of a connection between a die and a
lead frame where the contacts are aligned;
[0029] FIG. 9B shows a top of a connection between a die and a lead
frame where the contacts are not aligned using a conventional
process;
[0030] FIG. 9C shows a top view of the contact alignment of FIG. 9B
using an embodiment of the present invention;
[0031] FIG. 10 shows a top view of a device with gate fingers where
a ribbon has stitches between the gate fingers according to one
embodiment; and
[0032] FIG. 11 shows a side view of stacked ribbons according to an
embodiment of the present invention.
[0033] Use of the same or similar reference numbers in different
figures indicates same or like elements.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0034] According to one aspect of the present invention, one or
more conductive flexible ribbons are used to electrically connect a
semiconductor die to a lead frame.
[0035] FIGS. 3A and 3B show a side view and top view of a
semiconductor die 400 coupled to a lead frame 402 by a conductive
flexible ribbon 404, according to one embodiment of the invention.
Die 400 includes a metalized portion 406, such as aluminum, that
provides connection to underlying elements of die 400. Die 400, in
one embodiment, is part of a power semiconductor device, such as a
power MOSFET. Lead frame 402 includes a support portion 407 to
which die 400 is secured, e.g., by solder or epoxy, and terminals
408 that allow electrical connection to external devices. An
enclosure, covering, or package protects the die from external
elements. In some embodiments, the semiconductor package is a
TO-220 or an SO-8 package.
[0036] Ribbon 404, which may have a rectangular cross section, is
aluminum, although other conductive metals, such as copper, are
also suitable. In one embodiment, the mechanical properties of
ribbon 404 are similar to that of wire. For example, a 60
mil.times.8 mil aluminum ribbon may have a tensile strength of
approximately 2000 g. The width of ribbon 404 may range from 20 mil
to 100 mil or more. In one embodiment, the width is 120 mil. Larger
width ribbons generally are able to replace larger numbers of
wires. For example, a single 120 mil ribbon may replace five 20 mil
wires. The thickness of ribbon 404 may range from 2 mil to 10 mil
or more. In one embodiment, the thickness is 12 mil. Thicknesses of
2 mil require precise cutting control so that the ribbon can be cut
while not cutting into the substrate. Note that lower thicknesses
may be possible with improved equipment and processes. Some typical
sizes of ribbon 404 are 20 mil.times.2 mil, 20 mil.times.4 mil, 30
mil.times.3 mil, 40 mil.times.4 mil, 50 mil.times.5 mil, 60
mil.times.8 mil, 80 mil.times.6 mil, 80 mil.times.8 mil, 80
mil.times.10 mil, and 100 mil.times.10 mil. Aspect ratio
(width/thickness), in one embodiment, is between 7 and 13, with a
typical ratio of approximately 10. An aspect ratio of approximately
10 has been shown to provide a good compromise between bondability
(the thinner the better) and tilt sensitivity (the thicker the
better). Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other sizes
of ribbon may also be suitable, depending on factors such as system
requirements and process technology.
[0037] Ribbon 404 is bonded to metalized portion 406 by an
ultrasonic bonding process, as is known by those skilled in the
art, and is disclosed, e.g., in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No.
4,824,005, entitled "Dual mode ultrasonic generator in a wire
bonding apparatus" to Smith, Jr. and U.S. Pat. No. 6,439,448,
entitled "Large Wire Bonder Head" to Ringler, both of which are
incorporated by reference in their entirety. Ultrasonic bonding is
more environmentally friendly, cleaner, less expensive, and easier
to control than soldering. However, ultrasonic bonding becomes more
difficult as the thickness of the wire or ribbon increases. In the
case of a wire, small diameter wires can be used, but a larger
number of wires are needed to obtain the same cross section,
thereby resulting in lower productivity and higher cost.
[0038] The relatively small thickness of ribbon 404 (e.g., 2 to 10
mil) allows ultrasonic bonding, while a large width (e.g., 20 to
100 mil) allows-a large bonding area. The small thickness of ribbon
404 also provides flexibility so that, within a given area of
metalized portion 406, the number of bonds or stitches can be
increased and the length of ribbon between bonds can be decreased.
This can be advantageous, as will be discussed in more detail
below.
[0039] Referring to FIG. 3B, ribbon 404 is ultrasonically bonded,
in one embodiment, to metalized portion 406 along an area 412,
although the actual bond may be smaller. The ultrasonic bonding is
by conventional processes, e.g., with frequencies around 60 kHz.
However, variations of current ultrasonic bonding processes are
also suitable. For example, ultrasonic bonding can be at a
frequency higher than 60 kHz, e.g., around 80 kHz, which provides
higher reproducibility of the resulting bond and requires a smaller
vibration amplitude from the bond tool. In other embodiments,
ribbon 404 is thermosonically bonded to metalization portion 406.
There are trade-offs in using thermosonic bonding, such as
additional complexities and costs associated with heating a
substrate and bonding on the heated substrate versus lower
ultrasonic power requirements and a more forgiving process.
[0040] Referring back to FIG. 3B, area 412 is approximately the
width of ribbon 404 and approximately twice the thickness of ribbon
404 in one embodiment. In other embodiments, the length of area 412
is less than twice the thickness of ribbon 404, but more than the
thickness of ribbon 404. In some embodiments, the actual bond from
the ultrasonic bonding is at least as large as the area of the
cross-sectional area of ribbon 404. A bond tool for a larger
(longer) bonded area 412 allows achieving a bond of sufficient
length (i.e., at least as long as the thickness of the ribbon) even
with less than optimal ultrasonic bonding parameters. Further, the
actual bond area is of the same magnitude as the bond area for wire
bonding, and thus, comparable force (bond) and power capability
(ultrasonic) to wire bonding can be used for ultrasonic bonding
ribbon 404. Typically, sufficient current flow is obtained when the
actual bond area is at least approximately the size of the ribbon's
cross section.
[0041] In general, performance and processability increase as the
width of ribbon 404 increases. However, the width is limited by
various factors, such as the ultrasonic bonding process,
reliability of the bond, and the type of package. For example, the
width of the ribbon and its aspect ratio must be limited depending
on the tilt of the bond surface relative to the bond tool. Stress
and strain caused by a thermal expansion mismatch between the
ribbon and the substrate increase with increasing size of the
bonded area, progressively limiting the fatigue failure lifetime of
a bond with increasing maximum linear dimension. The critical
linear dimension is the length of the diagonal of the rectangular
bond area. The severity of this limitation depends on the type of
package and the type of application. It will be less severe in a
plastic molded discrete package, but more pronounced in an
electronic module (which is typically filled with silicon gel only
to achieve protection against oxidation and corrosion). However, as
long as the maximum dimension is comparable, e.g., within .+-.50%,
with the maximum dimension of the bond area of a large wire, this
limitation is expected to be comparable to the one for a round wire
bond because the largest dimension is still of similar size.
[0042] FIG. 4A is a side view showing another embodiment of the
present invention in which multiple bonds or stitches 500 are used
to contact ribbon 404 to metalized portion 406. Stitches 500 are
formed using ultrasonic bonding in one embodiment. Multiple
stitches reduce spreading resistance along metalized portion 406.
As seen from FIG. 4, the shorter the distance between stitches 500,
the less distance current has to travel in the metalization with
high electrical resistance, resulting in less spreading resistance
and higher current flow to terminals 408 of lead frame 402. In one
embodiment, the number of stitches is between 2 and 6, although a
single stitch may also be used. The distance between stitches 500
depends on various factors, such as the size of ribbon 404, the
ribbon bonding process, and requirements of the resulting device.
For example, thinner ribbons allow the distances to be shorter, due
in part to increased flexibility. In one embodiment, the distance
between stitches (center-to-center of the stitches) for an 80
mil.times.8 mil ribbon is between approximately 1.25 mm and 2 mm,
and for a 40 mil.times.4 mil ribbon, the distance may be reduced
down to 0.6 mm.
[0043] FIG. 4B is a side view of an embodiment with multiple
stitches for illustrating stitch placement on the die. Ribbon 404
is a single wide ribbon (approximately the width of metalized
portion 406) or one of multiple parallel ribbons. Distances
x.sub.0, x.sub.1, x.sub.2, x.sub.3, and x.sub.4 are as shown, where
X.sub.0+x.sub.1+x.sub.2+x.sub.3+x.sub.4=d (the length of metalized
portion 406). Note that only four stitches 500-1 to 500-4 are
shown, although other numbers are also possible. Further, the
distances x.sub.0 to x.sub.4 are not shown to scale, as different
embodiments will yield different distances. In one embodiment, the
distances x.sub.0 and x.sub.4 (from the center of the stitches at
the ends of the die to the edge of the die) are approximately half
the distance of the center-to-center distance of the interior
stitches, i.e., x.sub.1=x.sub.2=x.sub.3=2x.sub.0=2x.sub.4.
Placement in this manner, to a first approximation, minimizes the
maximum distance between any point on metalized portion 406 and the
nearest bond or stitch 500. This approximation also assumes the
resistance of each of the small loops (between stitches 500) is
much less than the resistance of the main loop (between stitch
500-1 and terminal 408). The accuracy of the approximation
increases as the number of stitches increases, i.e., a denser
placement of stitches.
[0044] Among the stitches, resistance is lowest at stitch 500-1,
resulting in the highest current flow and highest current density
at stitch 500-1. Thus, in applications that are limited by the peak
current, damage may appear at the first stitch, e.g., in the form
of melting of die metalization and damage of the die due to too
high a current density at the bond or stitch. Consequently, it
would be desirable to place stitches 500 such that each stitch
"sees" the same resistance or current flow. Thus, according to
another embodiment, stitches 500 are placed such that the
separation between stitches increases as the stitches move farther
away from terminal 408. In one embodiment,
x.sub.0<x.sub.1/2<x.sub.- 2/2<x.sub.3/2<x.sub.4.
[0045] The distance may also be limited by the process in which
ribbon 404 is bonded to metalized portion 406. For example, during
the bonding process, ribbon 404 is fed through a bond tool, as will
be described in more detail below, to the bond area, where
ultrasonic bonding secures ribbon 404 to metalized portion 406.
Additional ribbon 404 is then fed through the bond tool to form a
loop and down to the next bond area. After the first bond, if the
ribbon is looped back from the direction of the feed, a shorter
distance to the next bond or stitch is possible. However, by
looping the ribbon back, stress is placed on the new bond, which
may damage or break the bond. Looping the ribbon forward in the
same direction as the feed greatly reduces stress, but also makes
the formation of a short loop more critical. In one embodiment, the
ribbon is directed at an approximately 90.degree. angle from
metalized portion 406, which places a limited level of undue stress
on the bond while also allowing a short distance between bonds. As
will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, however, feeding
the ribbon forward or backward at various angles may be the most
desirable depending on the various factors such as the bonding
equipment, the ribbon, and the device requirements.
[0046] There are also advantages to minimizing the height H of the
ribbon loops. A lower height allows a smaller profile package, as
well as reduced resistance for higher current flow. However, as
with the distance limitation, the height is limited by the
thickness of the ribbon as well as the bonding process. There is no
upper limit of the loop height (within the range of typical
dimensions of semiconductor packages or modules), but the lower the
target loop height, the more challenging its control, i.e., to
achieve a high reproducibility, the minimum loop height will depend
on the thickness of the ribbon (via the influence on the stiffness
with regards to bending the ribbon). In one embodiment, loop
heights are 1.00 mm (from surface of the die to top surface of the
ribbon) for 8 mil thick ribbons. However, depending on device
requirements, loop heights can have other heights, such as 0.60 mm
to achieve reproducibility or sufficient control of the loop height
or 0.40 mm for an 8 mil thick ribbon to allow filling material
(e.g., silicon gel in power modules and plastic mold in discrete
power devices) still enough space to properly fill so that
voids/bubbles do not form under the ribbon.
[0047] Factors other than device and/or process limitations may
also determine the number of and distance between stitches on
metalized portion 406. Even though shorter distances between
stitches reduce the resistance and provide higher current, the
larger number of stitches or loops also decreases throughput. For
applications in which a high current is not critical, a higher
throughput may be more desirable at the cost of lower current flow.
In such a situation, a lower number of stitches or bonds would be
formed. Therefore, the number of stitches and distance between
stitches may vary depending on the device requirements.
[0048] FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C show top views of another embodiment of
the present invention, in which multiple ribbons 404 are used to
connect metalized portion 406 to terminals 408. FIG. 5A shows four
60 mil.times.8 mil ribbons 404 with three stitches or bonds, FIG.
5B shows four 80 mil.times.8 mil ribbons with four stitches, and
FIG. 5C shows four 80 mil.times.8 mil ribbons with five stitches.
Higher current carrying capability or lower resistance is possible
with multiple ribbons since the area from which the current to the
bond is collected is reduced. In general, as the number of ribbons
increases, the resistance decreases and current flow increases.
However, as the number increases, the required width of the
individual ribbons can decrease. Narrower ribbons are desirable
when the device is subject to large temperature variations. This is
because a smaller bond experiences less stress from coefficient of
thermal expansion (CTE) effects, resulting in a more reliable bond.
Thus, tradeoffs exist between having fewer wider ribbons versus
having a larger number of narrower ribbons. As discussed above, a
typical aspect ratio is approximately 10. Lower aspect ratios may
also provide advantages over wires; however, as aspect ratios
decrease (e.g., to 3 or less), the ribbon becomes to look and
behave like a wire, thereby negating the advantages provided by
ribbons.
[0049] Typically, as for a round wire, there is a CTE mismatch
between the ribbon and the underlying silicon. For example, a
copper ribbon may be desirable because copper has a lower
resistance than aluminum and has a higher melting point. However,
when the metalization is aluminum, which is softer than copper,
bonding the copper ribbon to the aluminum layer may result in the
bond extending through the aluminum layer and damaging the
underlying silicon (this would be even worse for a round wire, due
to the higher pressure). Therefore, in one embodiment, a copper
plating or a metal plate is placed over the metalization layer. The
metal plate should be a material having a CTE between that of
silicon and the ribbon material, e.g., copper, to act as a
stress/strain buffer. In one embodiment, the material is
nickel-plated molybdenum. This eliminates the need to reduce
spreading resistance, which results in the resistance mainly
residing in the ribbon. A wide copper ribbon with one stitch
provides a large bonding contact area for a reliable bond, while
providing low resistance for current flow. Further, using a
material having a closer CTE to the bond surface (copper) reduces
the temperature effects on the strength of the bond.
[0050] FIG. 6 shows a cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a
clad ribbon 600 formed from a thin first conductive layer 602 and
an overlying second conductive layer 606. First layer 602 is made
of the same material as the underlying metalization layer 604 to
which it is to be bonded. Properties of first layer 602 or bonding
layer include increased bondability ("soft" so that underlying
structures remain undamaged and easily bondable with ultrasonic
processes), corrosion resistance, high electrical conductivity so
that current can easy travel through this layer to reach second
layer 606, and relatively low coefficient of thermal expansion (or
near to silicon). In general, the latter two properties are
somewhat less important than the first two. In one embodiment,
aluminum is used for first layer 602 having a thickness of
approximately 2 mil. Thus, two like-materials are bonded together
(when the metalization is aluminum), which results in a stronger
and more reliable bond.
[0051] Furthermore, since it is currently not possible to directly
bond copper to aluminum metalization layers which overlie active
circuitry, aluminum bond pads are typically moved to areas where
there is no active circuitry underneath. This can allow bonding of
thin (e.g., 2 mil) copper wires to aluminum metalization without
the danger of damaging active elements underneath the aluminum.
However, moving bond pads normally requires making the silicon die
larger. Size of the silicon die is still the major cost factor in a
semiconductor device. Therefore, the capability to bond copper over
active circuitry with a high yield is very desirable, which can be
accomplished using a clad ribbon with an aluminum layer between the
metalization layer and the copper ribbon.
[0052] A thicker second layer 606 having higher thermal and
electrical conductivities and lower resistance overlies first layer
602. Besides high conductivity, second layer 606 should also be
corrosion resistant and have a low coefficient of thermal
expansion. An additional property, sometimes not as important as
the above, is to limit its hardness in order to not influence loop
forming capability too much and to allow a good coupling between
the layer and the bond tool. In one embodiment, second layer 606 is
copper having a thickness of approximately 6 to 8 mil. Second layer
606 can have different thicknesses, depending, in some embodiments,
on the thickness of first layer 602 such that the aspect ratio is
within 7 and 13 (typically 10). Larger cross sections (greater
thickness) will require higher ultrasonic power for bonding and
therefore higher force to reach the necessary coupling between the
bonding tool and the copper portion. Copper provides low electrical
resistance and/or a strong/stiff and corrosion resistant loop.
Other materials that may be suitable for second layer 606 include
gold, which is much more costly, and a silver-nickel alloy.
[0053] A 2 mil aluminum bonding layer has been found to be suitable
with current processes. Aluminum is desirable for ultrasonic
bonding because it can be joined with many materials at room
temperature, is easily bondable, and protects underlying active
elements from possible damage from ultrasonic bonding. Its
"softness" enables bonding to sensitive structures with high yield.
While its electrical and thermal conductivities are high, they are
still lower compared to some other materials like copper. However,
while copper has higher electrical and thermal conductivities, it
is relatively hard and difficult to bond. Thus, forming ribbon 600
with a thin aluminum layer between the copper and the aluminum
metalization provides advantages of both the copper and the
aluminum. In other embodiments, first layer 602 can be of a metal
or bond material similar to but not exactly the same as the
underlying metalization, which will still yield benefits, although
not to the extent of using the same metal. In another embodiment,
copper is used. Other embodiments may utilize a harder bonding
layer than aluminum, such as in the case when the metalization
underlying the active elements is formed of a harder material, such
as copper.
[0054] Another design aspect of power interconnects is their
reliability. Especially in power modules, the thermal mismatch at
the bond interface, mainly caused by the large CTE difference
between silicon and aluminum is a limiting factor. Theoretically,
this could be drastically changed with the clad ribbon 600
discussed above, if the main ribbon material or thicker second
layer 606 has a CTE nearer to the one of silicon. For example,
since the CTE of copper (i.e., .about.17.times.10.sup.-6 K.sup.-1)
is nearer to the one of silicon (i.e., .about.3.times.10.sup.-6
K.sup.-1) than aluminum (i.e., .about.24.times.10.sup.-6 K.sup.-1)
so that the difference is .about.14.times.10.sup.-6 K.sup.-1
compared to .about.21.times.10.sup.-6 K.sup.-1, the reliability
should be improved. Calculations have shown an approximate factor
of two improvement. As an example, this offers the potential to
improve the reliability in industrial power modules by
approximately a factor two, a long-sought after improvement.
[0055] FIG. 7 shows another embodiment of a clad ribbon 700, in
which a third layer of material 702 overlies second layer 606. As
with the embodiment of FIG. 6, first layer 602 is of a bond
material, e.g., conducive to ultrasonic bonding, and second layer
606 is of a conductive material, chosen for various aspects such as
conductivity and flexibility. As the coupling between the bond tool
and ribbon 700 is another key requirement (which determines the
required force to a significant extent), it may be beneficial to
include third layer (or bonding layer) 702, which is not
necessarily identical to first layer 602 at the bottom. Third layer
702 would support an optimized coupling between the ribbon and the
bond tool. Properties of third layer 702 or coupling layer are
selected to have medium hardness, be corrosion resistant, have high
electrical conductivity, and a low coefficient of thermal
expansion, although typically the first two properties have greater
importance than the latter two. However, this may change with
different applications. In one embodiment, aluminum is used for
third layer 702. Other materials may include copper, gold, and
silver, although each has disadvantages. For example, copper is
hard and gold and silver are more costly. The thickness of third
layer 702, in one embodiment is between approximately 0.5 mil and 2
mil, with a typical thickness being 1 mil. First layer 602 and
second layer 606 are similar to that described above with respect
to the embodiment of FIG. 6.
[0056] One advantage of using a ribbon instead of a round wire in a
clad configuration is that aluminum is more effectively utilized.
For example, using a round wire with a copper core and an aluminum
cylinder surrounding the copper, only the bottom portion of the
aluminum is used for bonding when the wire is bonded and
"flattened" against the metalization. Thus, the upper and side
portions of the aluminum are not used to create the bond. However,
using a ribbon, the aluminum is fully utilized during the
ultrasonic bonding process. Accordingly, more copper (as a
percentage of the total wire cross-section) can be used, resulting
in a higher current carrying capability. The thickness of the clad
layer of a ribbon can be chosen lower than for a wire (e.g., for a
two layer or one-sided clad ribbon), because it has to deform much
less (less than 1 mil, typically approximately 0.5 mil, according
to observations/investigations).
[0057] FIG. 8 shows one embodiment of a portion (the foot) of a
bond tool for use in the present invention. The foot of the bond
tool utilizes a cross groove structure and forms a diamond pattern,
as shown. The depth of the grooves depends on the thickness of the
ribbon. In one embodiment, the depth is between approximately 1.0
mil and 1.5 mil for an 8 mil thick ribbon. This pattern type
increases the coupling surface between the tool and the ribbon
during the bond process. The edges of the grooves also improve the
immediate locking between the tool and the ribbon at the start of
the bond process, reducing the slippage between the tool and the
ribbon, and transferring the tool's motion into the ribbon and to
the interface between the ribbon and the substrate. It is also
expected that this diamond pattern slightly reduces the tilt
sensitivity of the ribbon bonding. The bond surface should be well
perpendicular to the bond tool; otherwise the load of the tool onto
the ribbon is inhomogeneous, and bonding, then actually
over-bonding, takes place only on one side of the ribbon. The
diamond pattern limits the deformation on the side where the tool
is nearer to the substrate (due to a limited perpendicularity), but
because the tool still easier sinks into the material on that side
of the ribbon, it will more likely also sink in to some extent on
the other side, and transfer at least some energy. Thus, this type
of pattern increases/maximizes contact area between the tool and
the ribbon and minimizes damage to the ribbon heel. It has also
been observed that using ribbons with aspect ratios of 10 provides
an acceptable bond quality for tilt angles up to 1.degree..
[0058] In many packages, terminals 408 and metalized portion 406
are "aligned", as shown in FIG. 9A, along a line 900. Aligned, as
used herein, means a majority of the bonding area of terminals 408
are within the area projected from the bonding area of metalized
portion 406 perpendicular to one of its sides. In these types of
packages (e.g., SO-8 packages), ribbon 404 is fed and bonded along
line 900 and cut perpendicular to line 900. Here, the maximum width
of ribbon 404 is limited by the lesser of the two widths of
metalized portion 406 and terminal 408. However, other types of
packages may have terminals 408 and metalized portion 406 that are
offset from each other, such as shown in FIG. 9B. Using
conventional ultrasonic bonding equipment and processes, ribbon 404
is bonded and cut perpendicular to the length of the ribbon, as
shown in FIG. 9B. This may reduce the bonding area and width of the
ribbon, as well as the number of stitches or bonds, since the area
on terminal 408 and metalized portion 406 is not optimally
utilized.
[0059] FIG. 9C shows one embodiment of the invention in which
ribbon 404 is cut and bonded parallel to the intended bond area of
terminal 408 and metalized portion 406. Using this configuration,
bonding areas are more fully utilized so that wider ribbons can be
used with more bonds. Conventional ultrasonic bonding equipment can
be modified so that the bond tool is rotated. This allows the
ribbon to be bonded and cut at different angles. By cutting and
bonding in parallel with the bonding areas of the die and
terminals, the ribbon width, bonding area, and/or number of
stitches can be advantageously increased. Note that orientations
other than parallel may also provide benefits over bonding with a
fixed tool.
[0060] Angle bonding can be accomplished by making modifications to
existing ultrasonic bonding equipment, such as described in
commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 4,976,392, entitled "Ultrasonic
wire bonder wire formation and cutter system", which is
incorporated by reference in its entirety. Angle bonding can be
achieved by rotating the ribbon guide and the cutter relative to
the bond tool or by rotating the bond tool alone (however then the
cut is not parallel to the bond (tool)).
[0061] One way to achieve an angle bond is by rotating the bond
foot of the tool relative to the transducer and wire guide.
Although this way the orientation of the tool and therefore the
setup is fixed and application specific, it does not mean any other
additional effort. Of course the vibration characteristics will be
different and a function of the angle, but this can be accommodated
for. Also the cutter is rotated if a cut parallel to the bond is
required. Such a setup is sufficient in most discrete power
applications, where typically only one angle is required (see FIG.
9C). In a power module application, where there may be many more
interconnects under different angles, a flexible solution may be
required. This would allow adjusting the relative angle between
bond foot and ribbon guide and cutter, thereby supporting the
flexibility, which is the major strength of ultrasonic bonding
compared to other interconnect techniques in such applications.
[0062] FIG. 10 shows another embodiment of the present invention,
in which ribbon 404 with multiple stitches 500 (of FIG. 5) is used
with a device, such as a MOSFET die, with gate fingers 1000.
Stitches 500 are bonded between gate fingers 1000. This eliminates
the need to form an additional insulating layer over fingers 1000.
One trend, also in power electronics (mainly discrete power MOSFET
for DC-DC converter applications), is to higher switching
frequencies. Higher frequency operation (e.g., >1 MHz) improves
the efficiency in DC-DC converter applications and allows keeping
passive components (e.g., inductors and capacitors) smaller.
[0063] To improve the switching behavior of a MOSFET, gate fingers
are designed into the area of the source metalization (in order to
reduce the distance between the gate and any point in the source to
reduce the switching delay). These gate fingers interrupt the
source metalization. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,040,626 describes
how these fingers need to be covered with some electrically
isolating material such that the clip attached to the source
metalization does not create a short between the gate (finger) and
the source metalization. If the gate finger arrangement is such
that the stitches of a ribbon can be placed in between, the ribbon
eliminates the need of this electrical isolation mentioned
above.
[0064] Using a ribbon in higher frequency applications also
provides advantages of the limited skin effect of ribbons compared
to round wires. For example, the skin depth at 1 MHz is 3.1 mil for
aluminum and 2.5 mil for copper. Since most of the current flows in
a layer underneath the conductor's surface of thickness equal to
the skin depth, the reduced cross section results in higher voltage
loss and higher Joule heating. For a numerical example, in a 20 mil
wire, only the outer ring of 3.1 mil thickness carries a
significant amount of current. Its cross section is 1 ( 4 ) ( 20 2
- 16.9 2 ) = 90 mil 2
[0065] or approx. 90/314.about.29% of the total wire cross section.
In contrast, for an 80 mil.times.8 mil ribbon, the cross section of
the outer ring of 3.1 mil thickness (neglecting the short sides) is
2.times.80 mil.times.3.1 mil=496 mil.sup.2 or 496/640.about.77.5%
of the total ribbon cross section.
[0066] Although ribbons have been used in other applications,
utilizing ribbons in connection with semiconductor dies and
packages, such as high power applications and MOSFETs, has not been
used for numerous reasons. For example, high frequency
applications, such as microwave and opto-electronic, use ribbons
for its improved high frequency capability. The rectangular cross
section reduces the skin effect, low loops of appropriate shape
result in low inductance of the interconnect, and the shape is more
similar to the one of strip lines, resulting in lower reflection
losses at the ends of the interconnect. High frequency applications
desire ribbons that have large surface area (reducing skin effects)
and loops with well defined geometry (small variance in
inductance). This leads to single ribbons with single bonds, since
spreading resistance is not an issue. Furthermore, ribbons used in
these high frequency applications typically use gold as the ribbon
material and processes the bonds with heating the substrate, i.e.,
it is a thermosonic process and not a pure ultrasonic process
(i.e., without application of heat).
[0067] The use of ribbon bonding of the present invention yields
numerous advantages. The extent of the productivity/throughput
improvement will depend on the application. For example, in a
medium power package (e.g., a TO-220 package), three parallel 20
mil aluminum wires with two stitches on the die each were replaced
with one 80 mil.times.10 mil aluminum ribbon with three stitches on
the die, for equal electrical performance. The productivity
improvement increased by a factor of approximately 2.5, as the
process time for such a ribbon with the design criteria (with
regards to the size of the bond area) described is comparable to
that of a single 20 mil wire. In a low power package (e.g., an
SO-12 package), four 5 mil aluminum wires with a single stitch on
the die were replaced with one 30 mil.times.3 mil aluminum ribbon
with a single stitch on the die. The productivity improvement
factor is approximately 4, as the process time for such a ribbon is
comparable to that of a single 5 mil wire.
[0068] The present invention provides other features that may be
beneficial. For example, ribbon bonding yields a higher stiffness
in the substrate plane, thereby lowering sensitivity to vibrations
in that direction. This may have advantages in automotive
applications, where silicon gel used to fill the power modules
exerts a significant force on wires under vibration. Other
advantages may result from replacing multiple wires with a single
ribbon or lower number of ribbons. For example, it is common to
pull-test wires after bonding to determine the quality of the bond.
As the number of wires on a die increases, the time to pull-test
all the wires on the die increases and/or the number of pull-test
devices needed increases. Consequently, if a single ribbon or lower
number of ribbons are used instead of wires, time and/or costs may
decrease. Also, by reducing the number of total bonds or stitches
on the die, a lower yield loss potential is possible due to lower
chances of forming a faulty or damaging bond on the die. It was
also observed that due to the lower pressure, an aluminum ribbon
does not penetrate as deep into the metalized area of a die,
generally <1 micron, compared to a round wire of comparable
hardness (>1 micron, depending on diameter and hardness). This
too reduces the risk of damage to the underlying circuitry,
offering the potential of a lower yield loss, and therefore of
lower cost of manufacturing.
[0069] Another improvement potential the rectangular ribbon
geometry offers compared to the round wire geometry is the ability
to stack several ribbons on their bonds/stitches over each other,
as shown in FIG. 11. Three ribbons 404 are shown stacked on
stitches 500. Each subsequently stacked ribbon is bonded, e.g.,
ultrasonically, to a corresponding underlying bond or stitch 500.
This allows the interconnect cross section to be further increased,
while still keeping the height comparable that of a wire. For
example, up to three 80 mil.times.8 mil ribbons can be stacked this
way in a power module application. With the trend to more efficient
power semiconductors, die size is decreasing while current
capability remains constant or even increases. This requires larger
cross section interconnects. If the width cannot be increased
and/or the aspect ratio must be kept at a specific value, stacking
will still allow to increase the interconnect cross section. With
the present cutting system, the last stitch 500-3 cannot be
stacked, as the system needs a support underneath the tool during
the cut move, and therefore there would not be sufficient space in
a discrete power package for this method. However this limitation
could be overcome with an appropriate design of the cut mechanism.
Note that this aspect of the invention does not require stacking on
ribbons with multiple stitches; stacking over ribbons with a single
bonded stitch also provides advantages, as discussed above.
[0070] The above-described embodiments of the present invention are
merely meant to be illustrative and not limiting. It will thus be
obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and
modifications may be made without departing from this invention in
its broader aspects. For example, the bonding of a semiconductor
die to a package is described above. However, ribbon bonding can
also be between two elements in an electronic module, of which one,
both, or none are a semiconductor die. Further, the bonding is
described primarily with regards to ultrasonic bonding, and to a
lesser degree, thermosonic bonding. However, other boding processes
that are suitable for use with the flexible ribbon discussed herein
may also be used, such as thermocompression. Bonding may be the of
the same or different types for both die-to-ribbon and
lead-to-ribbon. Therefore, the appended claims encompass all such
changes and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope
of this invention.
* * * * *