U.S. patent application number 11/047159 was filed with the patent office on 2005-11-10 for open wedge osteotomy system and surgical method.
Invention is credited to Novak, Vincent P..
Application Number | 20050251147 11/047159 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 35967829 |
Filed Date | 2005-11-10 |
United States Patent
Application |
20050251147 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Novak, Vincent P. |
November 10, 2005 |
Open wedge osteotomy system and surgical method
Abstract
An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy, the
osteotomy implant comprising: a first component for disposition in
a posterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a second component
for disposition in an anterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy;
and a connection device for selectively connecting the first
component and the second component to one another.
Inventors: |
Novak, Vincent P.; (Groton,
MA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Pandiscio & Pandiscio
470 Totten Pond Road
Waltham
MA
02451
US
|
Family ID: |
35967829 |
Appl. No.: |
11/047159 |
Filed: |
January 31, 2005 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
60569545 |
May 7, 2004 |
|
|
|
60603899 |
Aug 24, 2004 |
|
|
|
60626305 |
Nov 9, 2004 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
606/87 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61B 17/15 20130101;
A61B 17/1732 20130101; A61B 17/1764 20130101; A61B 17/02 20130101;
A61B 2090/067 20160201; A61B 17/8858 20130101; A61B 17/152
20130101; A61B 17/8866 20130101; A61B 17/8095 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
606/087 |
International
Class: |
A61F 005/00 |
Claims
1. An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy, the
osteotomy implant comprising: a first component for disposition in
a posterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a second component
for disposition in an anterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy;
and a connection device for selectively connecting the first
component and the second component to one another.
2. An osteotomy implant according to claim 1 wherein the connection
device comprises a base component having a first side and second
side in opposition to one another, wherein the first side is
configured for selective attachment with the first component, and
wherein the second side is configured for selective attachment with
the second component.
3. An osteotomy implant according to claim 2 wherein the base
component forms a fixation hole therein so as to allow placement of
a fixation device therethrough for anchoring the multi-part implant
to the tibia.
4. An osteotomy implant according to claim 1 wherein the connection
device comprises a slotted fitting between the first component and
the second component.
5. A multi-part osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge
osteotomy, the osteotomy implant comprising: a first component for
disposition in a posterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a
second component for disposition in an anterior portion of the open
wedge osteotomy; a third component for disposition in a medial
portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a first connection mechanism
for selectively connecting the first component to the third
component; and a second connection mechanism for selectively
connecting the second component to the third component.
6. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first connection mechanism comprises a first slotted fitting formed
between the first component and the third component, and wherein
the second connection mechanism comprises a second slotted fitting
formed between the second component and the third component.
7. An osteotomy implant according to claim 6 wherein the first
slotted fitting comprising a first male projection and a first
female recess configured for attachment to one another, and further
wherein the first male projection extends from one of the first
component and the third component, and the first female recess is
configured in the other one of the first component and the third
component.
8. An osteotomy implant according to claim 7 wherein the first male
projection extends from the third component, and the first female
recess is configured in the first component.
9. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 6, wherein the
second slotted fitting comprises a second male projection and a
second female recess configured for attachment to one another, and
further wherein the second male projection extends from one of the
second component and the third component, and the second female
recess is configured in the other one of the second component and
the third component.
10. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 9 wherein the
second male projection extends from the third component, and the
second female recess is configured in the second component.
11. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component, the second component and the third component form
a void therebetween when connected together, and wherein the void
corresponds substantially to a center region of the open wedge
osteotomy.
12. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 11 wherein
the first component, the second component and the third component
are configured to allow placement of graft material into the
void.
13. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 12 wherein
the first component, the second component and the third component
are configured to allow compaction of graft material in the
void.
14. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component comprises a first wall having a first set of
dimensions, the second component comprises a second wall having a
second set of dimensions, and further wherein the first set of
dimensions of the first component and the second set of dimensions
of the second component are different from one another so as to
enable accurate disposition of the AP tibial slope.
15. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component has a first surface and a second surface, the first
surface configured for placement in the mouth of the osteotomy void
and the second surface configured for placement adjacent to a bone
surface of the open wedge osteotomy, and further wherein the first
component forms a first channel therein between the first surface
and the second surface so as to allow injection of a material
through the first channel, from the first surface to the second
surface, and provide the material to a bone/implant interface
formed between the first component and the bone.
16. A multi-part implant according to claim 15 wherein the first
component forms a first injection port at the first surface into
the first channel, and further wherein the first injection port is
configured to be accessible by a surgeon subsequent to placement of
the first component adjacent to the bone.
17. A multi-part implant according to claim 16 wherein the first
component forms multiple exit ports at the second surface.
18. An osteotomy implant according to claim 15 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from a group consisting of
biocompatible adhesive glue, bone cement, biologic material, growth
factor, and grafting material.
19. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 15 wherein
the second component has a third surface and a fourth surface, the
third surface configured for placement the osteotomy void and the
fourth surface configured for placement adjacent to a bone surface
of the open wedge osteotomy, and further wherein the second
component forms a second channel therein between the third surface
and the fourth surface so as to allow injection of a material
through the second channel, from the third surface to the fourth
surface, and provide the material to the bone/implant interface
formed between the second component and the bone.
20. A multi-part implant according to claim 16 wherein the second
component forms a second injection port at the third surface into
the second channel, and further wherein the second injection port
is configured to be accessible by a surgeon subsequent to placement
of the second component adjacent to the bone.
21. A multi-part implant according to claim 20 wherein the second
component forms multiple exit ports at the fourth surface.
22. A multi-part implant according to claim 19 wherein the second
channel is configured to allow injection of one selected from a
group consisting of bone glue, cement, biologic material, and
grafting material.
23. A multi-part implant according to claim 5 wherein the first
component has a first resorption rate into bone, the second
component has a second resorption rate into the bone, the third
component has a third resorption rate into bone, wherein the first
resorption rate and the second resorption rate are substantially
the same as one another, and the third resorption rate is
substantially different from the first resorption rate and the
second resorption rate.
24. A multi-part implant according to claim 23 wherein the third
component differs from the first component and the second component
by at least one chosen from the group consisting of: different
biomaterial composition from one another; different biocomposite
composition from one another; and different formulation from one
another.
25. A multi-part implant according to claim 5 wherein the third
component forms a first fixation hole therein so as to allow
placement of a first fixation device therethrough for anchoring the
multi-part implant to the tibia.
26. A multi-part implant according to claim 25 wherein the third
component forms a second fixation hole therein so as to allow
placement of a second fixation device therethrough for anchoring
the multi-part implant to the tibia.
27. A multi-part implant according to claim 26 wherein the first
fixation hole has an entry portion and an exit portion on the third
component, the first fixation hole defines a first longitudinal
axis from the entry portion to the exit portion of the third
component, the second fixation hole has an entry portion and an
exit portion on the third component, the second fixation hole
defines a second longitudinal axis from the entry portion to the
exit portion of the third component, and the first longitudinal
axis and the second longitudinal axis are non-parallel to one
another so as to direct the first fixation device into a first
portion of the tibia and to direct the second fixation device into
a second portion of the tibia, with the first portion of the tibia
and the second portion of the tibia being on opposing sides of the
third component.
28. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component, the second component, and the third component are
each configured for assembly together with one another while within
a bone cut of the open wedge osteotomy.
29. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component, the second component and the third component are
each configured for assembly together with one another while
outside of a bone cut of the open wedge osteotomy.
30. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 5 wherein the
first component, the second component and the third component are
configured to support a bone cut of the open wedge osteotomy from
an anterior aspect thereof to a posterior aspect thereof.
31. An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy,
the osteotomy implant comprising: a leading edge having a first
height, a first width, and the first height configured for
placement into a distal portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a base
portion in opposition to the leading edge, the base portion having
a second height, a second width, and the second height configured
to substantially close a proximal end of the open wedge osteotomy;
and two opposing side walls connecting the leading edge to the base
portion, the opposing side walls having a first length equal to the
distance from the leading edge to the base portion, and the
opposing side walls having a tapered height from the first height
of the leading edge to the second height of the base portion.
32. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 further comprising a
floor portion extending between the two opposing side walls and
from the base portion to the leading edge, and wherein the floor
portion has a third height, and the first height of the base
portion is greater than the third height of the floor portion so as
to form an open portion between the two opposing sides.
33. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 wherein the base
portion forms at least one opening therethrough for insertion of a
material therethrough.
34. An osteotomy implant according to claim 33 wherein the material
is at least one selected from the group consisting of: allograft
bone; autograft bone; demineralized bone substitutes; bone graft
material; and bone cement.
35. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 wherein the two
opposing sides are substantially parallel with one another.
36. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 further comprising a
series of projections extending from bone interface surfaces of the
two opposing side walls, wherein the projections are configured to
allow insertion of the opposing side walls into the open wedge
osteotomy and prevent migration of the opposing side walls out of
the open wedge osteotomy.
37. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 wherein the two
opposing side walls define channels therein for delivering selected
material therethrough.
38. An osteotomy implant according to claim 37 further comprising a
delivery device comprising a tube having a length and a diameter,
the tube forming a series of openings along the length thereof, the
diameter configured for placement in a main portion of the channel,
and the series of openings configured to correspond with a series
of branch portions of the channel.
39. An osteotomy implant according to claim 31 wherein the two
opposing side walls define channels opening on a bone interface
surface thereof so as to allow delivery of a selected material
therethrough.
40. An osteotomy implant according to claim 39 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from the group consisting
of: biocompatible adhesive glue; bone cement; growth factor; and
grafting material.
41. An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy,
the osteotomy implant comprising: a base portion having a first
height, a first end and a second end, a width between the first end
and the second end, the first height configured to substantially
close a proximal end of the open wedge osteotomy; two opposing side
walls extending from the first end and the second end,
respectively, the two opposing side walls having a third end and a
fourth end, the third end extending from the base portion, a second
height equal to the first height of the base portion at the third
end, each one of the two opposing side walls at the fourth end
having a third height, the third height being less than the second
height so as to allow placement of the fourth end of each one of
the two opposing side walls into a distal portion of the open wedge
osteotomy.
42. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the two
opposing walls are substantially parallel with one another.
43. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the two
opposing side walls approach one another in a region between the
third end and the fourth end of each one of the opposing side
walls, respectively.
44. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the base
portion forms at least one opening therethrough for insertion of a
material therethrough.
45. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the material
is at least one selected from the group consisting of allograft
bone; autograft bone; demineralized bone substitutes; bone graft
material; and bone cement.
46. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 further comprising a
connector extending between the two opposing side walls from a
location between the third end and the fourth end of each one of
the side walls, respectively.
47. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the two side
walls are selectively separable from one another.
48. An osteotomy implant according to claim 47 wherein the base
portion is selectively separable from the two side walls.
49. An osteotomy implant according to claim 48 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from the group consisting of
biocompatible adhesive glue; bone cement; growth factor; and
grafting material.
50. An osteotomy implant according to claim 47 further comprising a
series of projections extending from bone interface surfaces of the
two opposing side walls, wherein the projections are configured to
allow insertion of the opposing side walls into the open wedge
osteotomy and prevent migration of opposing side walls out of the
open wedge osteotomy.
51. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the two
opposing side walls define channels therein for delivering selected
material therethrough.
52. An osteotomy implant according to claim 51 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from the group consisting of
biocompatible adhesive glue; bone cement; growth factor; and
grafting material.
53. An osteotomy implant according to claim 51 further comprising a
delivery device comprising a tube having a length and a diameter,
the tube forming a series of openings along the length thereof, the
diameter configured for placement in a main portion of the channel,
and the series of openings configured to correspond with a series
of branch portions of the channel.
54. An osteotomy implant according to claim 41 wherein the two
opposing side walls define channels on a bone interface surface
thereof so as to allow delivery of selected material therein.
55. An osteotomy implant according to claim 54 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from the group consisting of
biocompatible adhesive glue; bone cement; growth factor; and
grafting material.
56. An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy,
the osteotomy wedge implant comprising: two opposing side walls
having a first end and a second end in opposition to one another, a
pair of frame members extending between the first end and the
second end of each of the two opposing side walls, an expandable
material disposed between the pair of frame members of each of the
two opposing side walls, the pair of frame members in connection
with one another at the first end thereof, and the pair of frame
members selectively separable from one another to a selected height
at the second end thereof; a base member having a given height and
a given width, wherein the given height is substantially equal to
the selected height of the pair of frame member of each of the two
opposing side walls, and wherein the given width is substantially
equal to a distance between the two opposing side walls when placed
in the open wedge osteotomy; and a set of connectors for connecting
the base member to each of the two opposing side walls.
57. An osteotomy implant according to claim 56 wherein base member
defines passageways therein for disposition of the set of
connectors therethrough to connect the base member to each of the
two opposing sides.
58. An osteotomy implant according to claim 56 wherein at least one
chosen from a group consisting of the base portion and the two
opposing side walls define an opening therethrough, and the opening
is configured for inserting a selected material into the open wedge
osteotomy between the two opposing side portions.
59. An osteotomy implant according to claim 58 wherein the selected
material comprises at least one chosen from the group consisting of
biocompatible adhesive glue; bone cement; growth factor; and
grafting material.
60. An osteotomy implant according to claim 56 further comprising a
series of projections extending from bone interface surfaces of the
two opposing side walls, wherein the projections are configured to
allow insertion of the opposing side walls into the open wedge
osteotomy and prevent migration of opposing side walls out of the
open wedge osteotomy.
61. An osteotomy implant according to claim 56 further comprising
an opening wedge plate device for opening each of the two opposing
side walls at second end, the opening wedge plate having four
attachment points configured for attachment to each ones of the
pair of frame members of each of the two opposing side walls, and
two connectors for attachment to a jack mechanism, wherein the
opening wedge plate device is configured to support the two
opposing side walls as the second end of each of the side walls are
expanded relative to one another.
62. A multi-part osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge
osteotomy, the osteotomy implant comprising: a first component
configured for disposition in a posterior portion of the open wedge
osteotomy; and a second component configured for disposition in an
anterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; wherein the first
component and the second component form a U-shaped wall when
disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
63. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 62 wherein
the first component and the second component are configured for
disposition adjacent to one another in the open wedge osteotomy so
as to contact one another.
64. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 63 wherein
the first component and the second component are configured for
disposition in the open wedge osteotomy unconnected with one
another.
65. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 62 wherein
the first component and the second component are configured for
disposition in the open wedge osteotomy unconnected with one
another.
66. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 62 further
comprising a third component configured for disposition in a medial
portion of the open wedge osteotomy, wherein the first component,
the second component and the third component form the U-shaped wall
when disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
67. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 66 wherein
the first component and the second component are configured for
disposition adjacent to one another in the open wedge osteotomy so
as to contact one another, and the second component and the third
component are configured for disposition adjacent to one another in
the open wedge osteotomy so as to contact one another.
68. A multi-part osteotomy implant according to claim 67 wherein
the first component and the second component are configured for
disposition in the open wedge osteotomy without being in direct
contact with one another.
69. An osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy,
the osteotomy implant comprising: a U-shaped wall configured for
disposition in the open wedge osteotomy, an interior portion formed
on a concave side of the wall, and an exterior portion formed on a
convex side of the wall; and the U-shaped wall forming an access
port therethrough from the exterior portion into the interior
portion, wherein the access port allows passage of a material
between the exterior portion and the interior portion.
70. An osteotomy implant according to claim 69 wherein the access
port is configured in a medial portion of the U-shaped wall when
the osteotomy implant is disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
71. An osteotomy implant according to claim 69 wherein the access
port is configured in a posterior portion of the U-shaped wall when
the osteotomy implant is disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
72. An osteotomy implant according to claim 69 wherein the access
port is configured in a anterior portion of the U-shaped wall when
the osteotomy implant is disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
73. An osteotomy implant according to claim 69 wherein the U-shaped
wall forms an additional access port therethrough from the exterior
portion into the interior portion.
74. An osteotomy implant according to claim 73 wherein one of the
access port and the additional access port are configured to allow
overflow of the material to exit from the interior portion as the
material is injected through the other one thereof.
75. A multi-part osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge
osteotomy, the osteotomy implant comprising: a first component
configured for disposition in a posterior portion of the open wedge
osteotomy; and a second component configured for disposition in an
anterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; wherein the first
component comprises a first material, the second component
comprises a second material, and the first material and the second
material are different from one another.
76. A multi-part implant according to claim 75 wherein the first
component and the second component are configured for disposition
adjacent to one another in the open wedge osteotomy so as to
contact one another.
77. A multi-part implant according to claim 76 wherein the first
component and the second component form a U-shaped wall when
disposed in the open wedge osteotomy.
78. A multi-part implant according to claim 75 further comprising a
third component configured for disposition in a medical portion of
the open wedge assembly, wherein the third component comprises a
third material, and further wherein the first material, second
material, and third material are each different from one
another.
79. A multi-part implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy,
the osteotomy comprising: a first component configured for
disposition in a posterior portion of the open wedge osteotomy; a
second component configured for disposition in an anterior portion
of the open wedge osteotomy; a third component configured for
disposition in a medial portion of the open wedge osteotomy; and
wherein the first component comprises a first material, the second
component comprises a second material, the third material comprises
a third material, and one selected from the group consisting of the
first material, the second material, and the third material is
different than another one selected from the group consisting of
the first material, the second material, and the third
material.
80. A multi-part implant according to claim 79 wherein the third
material is different than the first material and the second
material.
81. A multi-part implant according to claim 79 wherein each of the
first material, the second material and the third material are
different from one another.
Description
REFERENCE TO PENDING PRIOR PATENT APPLICATIONS
[0001] This patent application claims benefit of:
[0002] (1) pending prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser.
No. 60/569,545, filed May 7, 2004 by Vincent P. Novak for OPEN
WEDGE OSTEOTOMY SYSTEM AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE (Attorney's Docket
No. NOVAK-1 PROV);
[0003] (2) pending prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser.
No. 60/603,899, filed Aug. 24, 2004 by Vincent P. Novak for OPEN
WEDGE OSTEOTOMY SYSTEM AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE (Attorney's Docket
No. NOVAK-2 PROV); and
[0004] (3) pending prior U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser.
No. 60/626,305, filed Nov. 9, 2004 by Vincent P. Novak for OPEN
WEDGE OSTEOTOMY SYSTEM AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE (Attorney's Docket
No. NOVAK-3 PROV).
[0005] The three above-identified patent applications are hereby
incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0006] This invention is related to surgical apparatus and methods
in general, and more particularly to apparatus and methods for open
wedge osteotomy surgery.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0007] Osteotomies about the knee have been an important component
of the surgical treatment in the management of knee osteoarthritis.
The ultimate goal of knee osteotomies has been to relieve pain
symptoms, slow disease progression and postpone total knee
arthroplasty in younger patients by transferring weight bearing
load to the relatively unaffected portions of the knee.
[0008] The most commonly performed knee osteotomy has been the
proximal tibial osteotomy or "high tibial" osteotomy. The first
reported tibial osteotomy was in 1958. Knee osteotomy principles
and techniques continued to evolve through the 1960s and 1970s.
Today, however, other than at a minority of leading orthopedic
centers, proximal tibial osteotomies are generally regarded
critically by the general populace of orthopedic surgeons. The
overall community holds the opinion that, first and foremost, the
surgical technique of osteotomy is challenging and cumbersome,
requiring much practice in the "art" in order to effectively
perform and reproduce the osteotomy procedure.
[0009] More particularly, current techniques generally require the
passage of hand-directed guidewires and hand-guided bone resecting
tools while requiring continual use of fluoroscopy throughout the
procedure. In such a procedure, the failure to properly execute the
required precision can lead to a lack of, or postoperative loss of,
correction and complications such as delayed union or nonunion,
unintended changes to the slope of the tibial plateau,
intraarticular fractures, and neurovascular problems. All of these
issues pose a direct risk to a successful surgical outcome. In
addition, the postoperative rehabilitation period using current
techniques may require a conservatively long duration so as to
protect the osteotomy from potential nonunion during the long
healing period. Also, currently practiced procedures often require
a second surgery to remove fixation hardware.
[0010] The reported long-term surgical outcomes of high tibial
osteotomy procedures vary considerably. Published research of these
procedures demonstrates that the relief of pain and restoration of
function is generally achieved in approximately 80% to 90% of
patients at five years, and 50% to 65% of patients at ten
years.
[0011] The methods and principles of surgically performing an
osteotomy have slowly developed over time. The two common osteotomy
methods are: (i) the lateral closing-wedge method; and (ii) the
medial opening wedge method (with either an internal fixation
device or an external fixation device). Within these two general
categories of surgical methods, there are varying nuances to the
surgical techniques purported by individual orthopedic surgeons.
For example, in discussions with individual surgeons, it is common
to hear "this is how I do it" inasmuch as no "gold standard"
surgical technique has emerged to date.
[0012] The lateral closing wedge method has been the traditional
method for osteotomy surgery. This is the most common osteotomy for
medial compartment osteoarthritis. Correction of alignment is
typically achieved by first removing a laterally-based, angled
wedge of bone, and then closing the resultant opening.
[0013] The medial opening wedge method with internal fixation has
been gaining in popularity in recent years. Correction of alignment
is typically achieved by first making a single transverse bone cut
into the medial sagittal plane of the knee, and then manually
opening the cut under fluoroscopy with a series of osteotomes, or
pre-sized wedge osteotomes. This technique generally provides the
surgeon with the intraoperative ability to more easily achieve the
required correction angle. The wedge opening is then fixated at a
given height with a small fixation plate and bone screws that
support the opening of the wedge osteotomy. The opened bony void is
then filled with bone graft material.
[0014] The medial opening wedge method with an external fixation
device is most often used when a large correction is needed in
order to achieve proper alignment. Correction of alignment is
achieved by first making a single bone cut into the medial sagittal
plane of the knee. Next, an external fixation device is applied and
then regularly adjusted, in small increments, usually on a daily
basis, so as to slowly open the wedge to a desired correction
angle. The progress of this surgical technique is usually confirmed
with weekly radiographs.
[0015] The opening wedge technique has been advocated as a faster,
simpler surgical procedure that can be more easily learned while
providing a better method for achieving the desired corrective
angle with minimal risks to surrounding neurovascular structures.
However, the various opening wedge surgical techniques, as
currently practiced, allow a wide window for the introduction of
surgical error.
[0016] All of these opening wedge osteotomy techniques, as
currently practiced, require the hand-guided placement of guide
pins to define the anterior-to-posterior tibial slope, sometimes
referred to as the AP tibial slope, and require the use of
hand-held and hand-guided osteotomes, which are all used under
fluoroscopy. The use of frequent fluoroscopic pictures is critical
to determine the work performed to that point in the procedure and
the required adjustments still to be made in the remainder of the
procedure. Errors by the surgeon in defining the AP tibial slope
can result in an inappropriately-placed osteotomy with unintended
changes to the tibial slope, which in turn may affect knee
stability. Errors in the use of hand-driven osteotomes or
hand-guided saw blades in creating the bone cut can lead to tibial
slope changes, migration of the osteotomy into the joint, and/or
injury to neurovasculature and soft tissue structures.
[0017] Recent evolutionary developments in osteotomies have focused
on two general components. One of these includes improved
wedge-shaped osteotomes which are used to form or open the bony
wedge osteotomy. The other includes low profile internal fixation
plates used during the nonweight-bearing rehabilitation phase to
rigidly maintain the wedge opening, and used during the
weight-bearing rehabilitation phase to add support to the entire
osteotomy site. While significant, these advances do not address
important issues including, but not limited to, the reduction of
the surgical learning curve to make the procedures more
reproducible, the improvement of the surgical precision of
osteotomy procedures, the reduction in the use of fluoroscopy, and
the fact that internal fixation devices used in an open wedge
osteotomy effectively stress-shield the osteotomy or fracture site.
Such stress-shielding is often a factor in complications involving
nonunion and loss of correction.
[0018] Today, the orthopedic surgeon's requirements are demanding
prior to the adoption of a new surgical procedure. The actual
demands include a predictive knee osteotomy procedure with accuracy
in determining the correction angle before surgery, and precision
in carrying out the surgical technique with reproducible results.
The ultimate surgical outcome depends upon the ability of the
surgeon to precisely execute the corrective angle and to ensure
that the correction remains long lasting.
EXAMPLE OF DEFICIENCIES OF THE PRIOR ART
[0019] In current surgical practice, if the surgeon desires to
institute a desired change in the AP slope (either a change planned
from pre-operative x-rays or a change required from intra-operative
bone cuts during a routine knee osteotomy), the surgeon is faced
with various options to help re-adjust the slope of the bone.
[0020] First, the surgeon can place additional bone graft material
or solid pieces of bone graft (i.e., allograft bone or synthetic
bone) into the osteotomy void, at a specific location within the
void, to help re-adjust the AP slope. However, this practice of
"shimming" is frequently difficult to estimate and calculate during
surgery.
[0021] Second, and referring to FIG. 1, the surgeon can use a
fixation plate 5 that provides a specific AP slope change to tibia
10. The difficulty with this approach is the fact that fixation
plate 5 only directly supports a portion of the wedge void 15. A
potential complication exists wherein even small weight-bearing
forces may act upon the slope of the bone and affect the planned
slope adjustment in the least supported areas.
[0022] Third, the surgeon may both (i) place solid pieces of bone
graft (i.e., allograft bone or synthetic bone) into the osteotomy
void, at a specific location within the void, to help re-adjust the
AP slope and, in addition, (ii) utilize a fixation plate 5. Again,
this combined approach suffers from the aforementioned shimming and
fixation plate problems.
[0023] There are also other issues with the three above-identified
options. First, although the exact measurement of an AP slope
change may be determined pre-operatively, the execution of a
planned change is generally still carried out with intra-operative
adjustments due to offset cutting planes which require subsequent
shims and perhaps re-estimation of the desired sloped fixation
plate. Second, even if the surgeon's intention is not to affect the
AP tibial slope, the current practice of knee osteotomy almost
always ensures that it will be affected somewhat. With the
antero-medial approach, this is due to the offset cutting plane and
the opening of the osteotomy void. The surgeon must then make
intra-operative adjustments with shims and a sloped fixation plate,
changes that are visually estimated and not pre-determined from
superior pre-operative radiographic means. Third, inaccuracies in
carrying out adjustments to the AP slope may result in immediate
poor results following surgery, or the eventual loss of correction
adversely affecting long-term outcomes.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
[0024] Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that is
instrument-guided and modular in fashion.
[0025] Another object of the present invention is to reduce the
overall surgeon learning curve in performing an open wedge
osteotomy procedure.
[0026] Another object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system that allows a more surgically
reproducible procedure and reduces surgical error.
[0027] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that allows the
procedure to be performed more quickly.
[0028] Another object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system that reduces or eliminates the
need for fluoroscopy during the procedure.
[0029] A further object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system that defines the
anterior-to-posterior tibial slope from visual inspection, and
enables marking of the natural anterior-to-posterior joint line
without the use of radiographic imaging.
[0030] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that accurately
executes pre-operative measurements.
[0031] A further object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system in which the natural joint
line is marked by the positioning and fixation of a guide device on
which a system of bone cutting guides is attached, whereby to
reliably provide a transverse cut through the bone according to the
physician's pre-operative calculations.
[0032] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that accurately
defines the cutting plane in relation to the AP tibial slope.
[0033] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that maintains a
consistent angled cutting plane from the posterior aspects of the
bone to the anterior aspects of the bone, and that passes through
the sagittal plane during bone resection.
[0034] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an improved open wedge osteotomy system that accurately
opens the osteotomy void to the desired angle while decreasing the
risks of changing the AP tibial slope and the risk of bone
fracture.
[0035] Another object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system that reduces or eliminates the
use of static internal fixation plates and screws.
[0036] Another object of the present invention is to provide an
improved open wedge osteotomy system that better promotes the
physiologic growth of bone across the osteotomy site.
[0037] Another object of the present invention is to provide a
multi-part implant system that rims the periphery of the osteotomy
void, allowing for the containment of various bone graft materials
while supporting the reoriented bone segments.
[0038] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system for custom assembly in-situ by
a surgeon.
[0039] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a method for creating an osteotomy in which a multi-part
implant is introduced into the osteotomy void part by part, so as
to facilitate a minimally invasive procedure, and wherein the
implant parts are subsequently assembled in-situ by the
surgeon.
[0040] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system that allows graft materials to
be optimally compacted or inserted within the osteotomy void and
contained by the multi-part implant system.
[0041] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system in which implant parts of
varying measurements are assembled together in order to enable
accurate adjustments to the AP tibial slope.
[0042] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system that accurately maintains and
supports the tibial plateau at a desired slope from its anterior
aspect to its posterior aspect.
[0043] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system in which the implant parts
support the periphery of bone and the subsequent passage of screws
or fastener devices through the implant parts and into surrounding
bone secures the multi-part implant in place.
[0044] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system in which channels lead to the
surface interface between the implant and the host bone, whereby to
facilitate the directed injection of bone glues, cements, biologic
materials or grafting materials.
[0045] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide a multi-part implant system in which two implant parts
comprise different biomaterials, biocomposites or formulations
thereof, so as to allow for different rates of selective resorption
of the implant parts.
[0046] A still further object of the present invention is to
provide an osteotomy system in which a positioning guide is
positioned on top of the skin and percutaneously fixed to the tibia
so as to provide a minimally invasive osteotomy.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0047] With the above and other objects in view, in one form of the
invention, there is provided an osteotomy implant for supporting an
open wedge osteotomy, the osteotomy implant comprising:
[0048] a first component for disposition in a posterior portion of
the open wedge osteotomy;
[0049] a second component for disposition in an anterior portion of
the open wedge osteotomy; and
[0050] a connection device for selectively connecting the first
component and the second component to one another.
[0051] In another form of the invention, there is provided a
multi-part osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge
osteotomy, the osteotomy implant comprising:
[0052] a first component for disposition in a posterior portion of
the open wedge osteotomy;
[0053] a second component for disposition in an anterior portion of
the open wedge osteotomy;
[0054] a third component for disposition in a medial portion of the
open wedge osteotomy;
[0055] a first connection mechanism for selectively connecting the
first component to the third component; and
[0056] a second connection mechanism for selectively connecting the
second component to the third component.
[0057] In another form of the invention, there is provided an
osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy, the
osteotomy implant comprising:
[0058] a leading edge having a first height, a first width, and the
first height configured for placement into a distal portion of the
open wedge osteotomy;
[0059] a base portion in opposition to the leading edge, the base
portion having a second height, a second width, and the second
height configured to substantially close a proximal end of the open
wedge osteotomy; and
[0060] two opposing side walls connecting the leading edge to the
base portion, the opposing side walls having a first length equal
to the distance from the leading edge to the base portion, and the
opposing side walls having a tapered height from the first height
of the leading edge to the second height of the base portion.
[0061] In another form of the invention, there is provided an
osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy, the
osteotomy implant comprising:
[0062] a base portion having a first height, a first end and a
second end, a width between the first end and the second end, the
first height configured to substantially close a proximal end of
the open wedge osteotomy;
[0063] two opposing side walls extending from the first end and the
second end, respectively, the two opposing side walls having a
third end and a fourth end, the third end extending from the base
portion, a second height equal to the first height of the base
portion at the third end, each one of the two opposing side walls
at the fourth end having a third height, the third height being
less than the second height so as to allow placement of the fourth
end of each one of the two opposing side walls into a distal
portion of the open wedge osteotomy.
[0064] In another form of the invention, there is provided an
osteotomy implant for supporting an open wedge osteotomy, the
osteotomy wedge implant comprising:
[0065] two opposing side walls having a first end and a second end
in opposition to one another, a pair of frame members extending
between the first end and the second end of each of the two
opposing side walls, an expandable material disposed between the
pair of frame members of each of the two opposing side walls, the
pair of frame members in connection with one another at the first
end thereof, and the pair of frame members selectively separable
from one another to a selected height at the second end
thereof;
[0066] a base member having a given height and a given width,
wherein the given height is substantially equal to the selected
height of the pair of frame member of each of the two opposing side
walls, and wherein the given width is substantially equal to a
distance between the two opposing side walls when placed in the
open wedge osteotomy; and
[0067] a set of connectors for connecting the base member to each
of the two opposing side walls.
[0068] The above and other features of the invention, including
various novel details of construction and combinations of parts and
method steps, will now be more particularly described with
reference to the accompanying drawings and pointed out in the
claims. It will be understood that the particular devices and
method steps embodying the invention are shown by way of
illustration only and not as limitations of the invention. The
principles and features of this invention may be employed in
various and numerous embodiments without departing from the scope
of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0069] These and other objects and features of the present
invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the
following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the
invention, which are to be considered together with the
accompanying drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts, and
further wherein:
[0070] FIG. 1 is a schematic view of an osteotomy system using a
prior art bone plate;
[0071] FIGS. 2-5 are schematic views of a novel positioning guide
20 which is illustrative of one component of a preferred embodiment
of the novel osteotomy system;
[0072] FIGS. 6-12 are schematic views of a novel cutting guide 45
which is illustrative of another component of a preferred
embodiment of the novel osteotomy system;
[0073] FIGS. 13-16 and 16A, are schematic views of a novel
mechanical jack 90 which is illustrative of another component of a
preferred embodiment of the novel osteotomy system;
[0074] FIGS. 17-27 are schematic views of a novel multi-part
implant 125 which is illustrative of one component of a preferred
embodiment of the novel osteotomy system;
[0075] FIGS. 28-31 are schematic views of a medial-to-lateral
approach for an osteotomy procedure;
[0076] FIGS. 32-34 are schematic views of an antero-medial approach
for an osteotomy procedure;
[0077] FIGS. 35-37 are schematic views of a method to determine the
corrective alignment to be made to a patient's femoral head to
tibial-talar joint mechanical axis;
[0078] FIGS. 38-47 are schematic views of an alternative mechanical
jack 300 which is illustrative of an alternative component of a
preferred embodiment of the novel osteotomy system;
[0079] FIGS. 48-89 are schematic views of alternative novel
implants 500 which are illustrative of alternative embodiments for
the novel multi-part implant shown in FIGS. 17-27;
[0080] FIGS. 90-110 are schematic views of a novel resection system
700, comprising a two blade positioning guide and a resection
guide, which is illustrative of an alternative embodiment for the
novel positioning guide shown in FIGS. 2-5 and for the novel
cutting guide system shown in FIGS. 6-12; and
[0081] FIGS. 111-130 are schematic views of a novel expandable
wedge implant 805 which is illustrative of an alternative
embodiment for the novel multi-part implant 125 shown in FIGS.
17-27.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Overview
[0082] The present invention comprises surgical apparatus and
methods for performing open wedge osteotomies. In one preferred
embodiment of the present invention, the system embodies several
novel devices and methods that provide for precise bone resection,
precise control in opening an osteotomy void in the bone, precise
achievement of the corrective angle for the open wedge osteotomy,
and precise maintenance of the open wedge osteotomy that provides
for the containment of bone graft or filler materials. The present
invention provides an instrumentation-guided system with a
minimally invasive approach for performing open wedge osteotomy
procedures. In addition, the present invention provides an implant
fixation system that promotes new bone growth and a strong bone
repair.
[0083] In one preferred form of the invention, the surgical system
comprises four primary components: (i) a positioning guide 20 (FIG.
2) for establishing the orientation of the system relative to the
patient's tibia; (ii) a cutting guide 45 (FIG. 7) for directing the
osteotomy cut through the bone; (iii) a mechanical jack 90 (FIG.
15) for opening the osteotomy void in the bone; and (iv) a
multi-part implant 125 (FIG. 20) for supporting the open wedge
osteotomy during bone healing.
[0084] In accordance with the present invention, the surgeon first
identifies the proper bone cut to be made in the tibia. Once
surgeon has identified the proper attributes of the bone cut, the
surgeon then uses the method and apparatus of the present invention
to effect the bone resection.
[0085] More particularly, the surgeon preferably:
[0086] (i) attaches positioning guide 20 to the proper location on
patient's tibia;
[0087] (ii) selects the proper cutting guide 45 to be attached to
positioning guide 20, whereby to define the target slope (or plane)
of the cut to be made in the tibia;
[0088] (iii) selects the proper protector members 70, 75 to be
attached to the cutting guide 45, whereby to protect the soft
tissue and neurovasculature structures surrounding the tibia;
[0089] (iv) secures the cutting guide 45 to positioning guide 20,
and then secures protector members 70, 75 to the cutting guide
45;
[0090] (v) selects the proper cutting blade 65 to be used in the
procedure, whereby to define the proper depth of the cut to be made
in the tibia;
[0091] (vi) passes cutting blade 65 through guide slot 50 formed in
cutting guide 45 and through tibia 10, following the pathway 65A
established by cutting guide 45, until the cut has been made to the
proper depth;
[0092] (vii) withdraws cutting blade 65;
[0093] (viii) uses mechanical jack 90 to open the cut in the bone
to the proper angle; and
[0094] (ix) inserts the multi-part implant 125 into the osteotomy
void 110 created in the bone, whereby to hold the resected tibia in
the proper configuration.
[0095] Preferably, bone cement or bone paste, etc. is inserted into
interior of the osteotomy void, within multi-part implant 125,
whereby to facilitate strong bone regrowth and/or bony ingrowth;
and preferably bone cement is injected into the implant/bone
interface to help further secure the multi-part implant to the
bone.
[0096] Significantly, with the present invention, the bone cut is
made easily and reliably using an antero-medial approach, while
providing excellent protection of the soft tissue and
neurovasculature structures surrounding the tibia. Furthermore,
osteotomy stabilization is achieved through the use of an implant
device that provides stability about the osteotomy site while
allowing the direct contact of bone graft material with native bone
within the open wedge osteotomy. Significantly, the present
invention also allows for the necessary physiologic compression and
stimulation required to promote new tissue and bone growth through
the bony void. This is in sharp contrast with prior art open wedge
osteotomy systems, which use fixation plates and screws to maintain
and support the corrective wedge opening; such systems do not allow
beneficial physiologic compressive forces to act on the bone/graft
interfaces. This can lead to nonunion osteotomies and failed
corrections.
Positioning Guide 20
[0097] Looking next at FIGS. 2-5, in a preferred embodiment of the
present invention, there is provided a positioning guide 20 which
is configured to be aligned along the joint line of tibia 10 (FIG.
3) and fixed in place. In particular, the top of positioning guide
20 is aligned with the tibial plateau (i.e., the AP tibial slope),
as shown in FIG. 4. Positioning guide 20 preferably includes a pair
of fixation screw passageways 25 and a threaded attachment bore
30.
[0098] Referring now to FIGS. 3-5, there is shown a pair of
fixation screws 35 extending through positioning guide 20 and into
tibia 10 so as to fix positioning guide 20 to tibia 10 after the
top of positioning guide 20 is aligned with the top of tibia 10. An
attachment screw 40 (FIGS. 4 and 5) is preferably provided for
removable attachment of various devices to positioning guide 20.
Attachment screw 40 preferably includes a threaded shaft configured
for engagement with threaded attachment bore 30.
Cutting Guide 45
[0099] Looking next at FIGS. 6-12, there is shown a cutting guide
45 configured for attachment to positioning guide 20. Cutting guide
45 is preferably secured to positioning guide 20 with attachment
screw 40. As seen in FIG. 7, a cutting guide slot 50 provides a
fixed angle by which a controlled bone resection can be
performed.
[0100] More particularly, and referring now to FIGS. 8 and 9,
cutting guide 45 comprises a throughbore 55 (FIG. 8) which receives
the attachment screw 40 (FIG. 7) so as to mount cutting guide 45 to
positioning guide 20, whereby to position the angled cutting slot
50 relative positioning guide 20 (and hence relative to the AP
tibial slope). Preferably, mounting clamps 60 (FIG. 8) are provided
at the side portions of cutting guide 45 for mounting protector
members 70, 75 (see below) to cutting guide 45. A cutting blade 65
(FIG. 9) is selectively inserted through guide slot 50 so that the
cutting blade 65 can cut along pathway 65A at a predetermined angle
relative to cutting guide 45 (and hence, relative to the AP tibial
slope).
[0101] Referring to FIG. 10-12, cutting guide 45 preferably
comprises protector members 70, 75 to protect soft tissue and
neurovascular structures during bone cutting. Protector members 70,
75 are (i) inserted into the patient through small medial surface
incisions; (ii) passed beneath the skin tissue, close to the front
and back surfaces of tibia 10; and (iii) secured to cutting guide
45 using mounting clamps 60 (see FIGS. 11 and 12). Protector member
70 is specifically contoured for the anterior aspect of tibia 10
(FIG. 11) and protector member 75 is specifically contoured for the
posterior aspect of tibia 10 (FIG. 12). Each protector member 70,
75 can be radiolucent, with a radiographic marker running the
length of its mid-section to show the direction of the bone cut,
for example, under fluoroscopy, prior to beginning the bone
resecting phase.
[0102] FIGS. 11 and 12 show cutting blade 65 passing through
cutting slot 50 (FIG. 9) in cutting guide 45 and into tibia 10. As
cutting blade 65 passes through cutting slot 50 and cuts the bone
along the desired angle, protector members 70, 75 ensure that
cutting blade 65 does not inadvertently cut soft tissue and
neurovascular structures anterior and posterior to the bone.
Mechanical Jack 90
[0103] Referring next to FIGS. 13-16 and 16A, once the bone cut is
made, cutting guide 45 and protector members 70, 75 can be removed.
A mechanical jack device 90 (FIG. 13) is then secured to
positioning guide 20. More particularly, two metal plates 95, 100
(of mechanical jack 90) are inserted into the bone cut in tibia 10,
and mechanical jack 90 is then secured to positioning guide 20.
Mechanical jack 90 may then be used to open metal plates 95, 100
relative to one another so as to create the desired osteotomy void
in tibia 10.
[0104] Alternatively, and looking now at FIG. 14, protector members
70, 75 may be left in place within the incision while mechanical
jack 90 is secured to positioning guide 20 and operated to open the
bone cut in tibia 10.
[0105] Mechanical jack 90 is opened by turning a worm gear end 115
with a screwdriver or other instrument (not shown). See FIGS. 15,
16 and 16A. Calibrations (not shown) preferably disposed on strut
120 (FIG. 15) indicate the opening or angle (or height) of void
110.
[0106] Once the osteotomy wedge has been opened to a desired
position, either (i) the entire mechanical jack 90 is removed, or
(ii) just the front portion 105 of the mechanical jack 90 is
removed, leaving blades 95, 100 within the bone so as to hold open
the osteotomy void 110 in tibia 10.
Multi-Part Implant 125
[0107] Once mechanical jack 90 has been used to open the osteotomy
void 110 in tibia 10, a multi-part implant 125 is deployed in the
void so as to support the bone in the desired position during
healing.
[0108] More particularly, and looking now at FIGS. 17-27, there is
shown a multi-part implant 125 which may be used to hold open the
osteotomy void 110. Preferably, multi-part implant 125 comprises an
anterior part 130, a posterior part 135, and a medial or base part
140 (see FIGS. 17-20). Anterior part 130, posterior part 135 and
base part 140 are preferably assembled together in-situ to form the
complete multi-part implant 125. More particularly, slotted
fittings 145 (formed by a first portion 150 on each of anterior
part 130 and posterior part 135, and a second portion 155 on each
end of base part 50) serve to connect anterior part 130 and
posterior part 135 to base part 140. While fittings 145 are shown
in the drawings to comprise a male member on base part 140 and
female member on anterior part 130 and posterior part 135, this
arrangement could be reversed, or alternative fittings or
connectors may be used. Implant 125 is preferably deployed in
osteotomy void 110 by (i) first separately positioning anterior
part 130, posterior part 135, and base part 140 in the void, and
(ii) then joining anterior part 130, posterior part 135, and base
part 140 together (using slotted fittings 145).
[0109] A set of fixation holes 160 (FIG. 23) are provided in base
part 140 to secure the assembled implant 125 to the tibia using
fixation screws 175 (FIG. 26). Base fixation holes 160 are
preferably disposed at an angle relative to one another so as to
direct at least one fixation screw 175 into tibia 10 on each side
of void 110. More particularly, bone interface surface 140A (FIG.
23) of base part 140 engages one of the bone surfaces forming void
110 of tibia 10. Fixation hole exit 160A emerges through surface
140A so as to allow a fixation screw 175 (FIG. 26) to pass into the
surrounding tibia bone 10. Fixation screw 175 enters tibia 10,
whereby to fix base 140 (and hence the entire implant 125) to tibia
10.
[0110] Anterior part 130 and posterior part 135 of implant 125
preferably include injection ports 165 (FIG. 22) leading to
channels 170. Channels 170 extend through anterior part 130 and
posterior part 135 and exit on the upper and lower surfaces of
anterior part 130 and posterior part 135, whereby to communicate
with the part/bone interface. Injection ports 165 permit material
(e.g., bone cement, bone paste, growth enhancers, etc.) to be
delivered to the part/bone interface.
[0111] Anterior part 130, posterior part 135 and/or base part 140
may be formed out of one or more resorbable materials, whereby they
may be resorbed into the host bone.
[0112] In one preferred form of the invention, anterior part 130,
posterior part 135 and base part 140 are all formed out of a
biomaterial and/or a biocomposite that resorbs into the host bone,
with anterior part 130 and posterior part 135 being formed so that
they resorb faster than base part 140. By forming base part 140 out
of a longer-lasting biomaterial and/or biocomposite, base part 140
can provide lasting strength and support for the osteotomy to
ensure optimal bone growth within void 110.
[0113] Preferably the area within osteotomy void 110 is filled with
bone cement, bone paste, growth enhancers, etc. during the
procedure, so that the osteotomy void 110 bounded by multi-part
implant 125 will create bone or bony ingrowth over time. This may
be done (i) after anterior part 130 and posterior part 135 are
deployed in the osteotomy void, and (ii) before base part 140 is
secured to parts 130 and 135. Alternatively, additional through
holes (not shown) may extend through base part 140, whereby to
permit the interior of osteotomy void 110 to be accessed even after
the multi-part implant is assembled in the osteotomy void.
Osteotomy Procedure
[0114] An osteotomy procedure may be conducted using a
medial-to-lateral approach or an antero-medial approach.
(i) Medial-To-Lateral Approach
[0115] Looking next at FIGS. 28-31, there is shown a
medial-to-lateral approach with a specified depth of an osteotomy
cut.
[0116] With prior art systems and methods, using the
medial-to-lateral approach may allow the surgeon to more easily
obtain the correct AP tibial slope, which is crucial to knee
stability. In addition, with prior art systems and methods, the
medial-to-lateral approach may allow the surgeon to more easily
control the cutting plane from posterior to anterior.
[0117] However, in practice, the medial-to-lateral approach can be
difficult to execute with prior art systems and methods due to the
presence of soft tissue structures such as the medial collateral
ligament attachment site. Therefore, with prior art systems and
methods, it may be preferred to use an antero-medial approach.
(ii) Antero-Medial Approach
[0118] Referring next at FIGS. 32-34, with prior art systems and
methods, the antero-medial approach may present difficulties in
maintaining a controlled cutting plane. With prior art systems and
methods, it is generally not possible to ensure a cutting plane
that is offset at a fixed angle to the sagittal plane so as to
maintain the existing anterior-posterior (AP) tibial slope.
Essentially, with prior art systems and methods, which are
hand-guided and directed, the actual cutting plane is made by means
of two or more angular adjustments in an oblique fashion to the
sagittal plane while the bone is being resected. Once the osteotomy
is opened and the osteotomy void is created, it is this offset and
oblique angles that make it difficult to maintain the patient's
anatomical tibial slope.
[0119] If the anatomical AP slope is not maintained or controlled,
the patient may experience postoperative knee instability. In
addition, several surgeons have begun to address knee instability
problems (due to knee ligament laxity or damaged knee ligaments) by
making planned adjustments to the patient's AP tibial slope. Such
important planned changes to the slope must be accurate and carried
out methodically.
[0120] When performing an opening wedge osteotomy, and more
specifically a high tibial osteotomy, there are a number of
important elements that need to be executed by the surgeon in order
to achieve a positive surgical outcome.
[0121] One important element is to maintain the
anterior-to-posterior (AP) tibial slope.
[0122] Another important element is to maintain and control the
plane in which the bone cut is made.
[0123] Still another important element is to provide a fixation
system that promotes physiologic healing and regeneration of new
bone in order to provide for a long lasting osteotomy.
[0124] Yet another important element is to support the osteotomy
void during healing in order to maintain the AP tibial slope and
protect the bone grafting materials used to enable new bone
growth.
[0125] In prior art systems and methods for carrying out an
antero-medial approach, the above criteria are generally not easily
met. As a result, the published literature generally teaches that
the best approach for making the bone cut is a direct
medial-to-lateral approach.
[0126] Significantly, the present invention provides an improved
system and method for an opening wedge osteotomy using an
antero-medial approach.
(iii) Preferred Method
[0127] Referring next to FIG. 31, there is shown a
medial-to-lateral approach which, as noted above, is discussed in
much of the medical literature as being the "best" approach to make
a bone cut in a sagittal plane. However, in practice, this can be a
difficult procedure due to the attachments of the medial collateral
ligaments.
[0128] Looking now at FIG. 33, the present invention preferably
uses an antero-medial approach, with the position of the bone cut
being established through the use of the positioning guide 20 and
cutting guide 45, as discussed above and as will hereinafter be
discussed in further detail below.
[0129] Referring now to FIGS. 35-37, there are a number of
documented techniques by which the surgeon may determine the
precise corrective alignment that is to be established by the
osteotomy being performed. All of the techniques commonly used
generally require full length standing AP and lateral radiographs.
Typically, a line 200 is drawn from the center of the femoral head
205 to the center of the tibial-talar joint 210 (FIG. 35). This
represents the patient's present mechanical axis. Another line 215
is drawn from the center of the femoral head 205 to a point 220
located at 62.5% of the width of the proximal tibia in the lateral
knee joint. A third line 225 is drawn from the center of the
tibial-talar joint 210 to the same point 220 in the lateral knee
joint. An angle 230, formed by the intersection of the two lines
215 and 225, determines the degree of correction required to return
the patient's mechanical axis to the point of intersection on the
lateral side.
[0130] Next, the surgeon must determine the cutting depth of the
osteotomy and the properly sized, slotted cutting guide 45 to be
used for the procedure.
[0131] Referring now to FIG. 36, on a radiograph, the surgeon first
draws a line 235 from a portion 240 of the medial cortex of the
tibia to the lateral cortex that is 1 cm below the joint line.
Next, a line 250 is then drawn that is (i) perpendicular to line
235, and (ii) equal to, or greater than, 1 cm from lateral cortex
245 of tibia 10. Point 255, where line 235 and line 250 intersect,
marks the appropriate depth of the bone cut to be made across tibia
10. A distance 260 is measured from the medial cortex 240 to the
intersecting point 255. Distance 260 is the maximum distance (or
depth) of the bone cut which is to be performed.
[0132] Next, the surgeon calculates the point of entry for the
osteotomy bone cut. A line 265 is drawn from the intersecting point
255, angled inferiorly but remaining above the anterior tibial
tubercle 270, to a point 275 which lies on the vertical line
dropped from the aforementioned portion 240 of the medial cortex.
The initial point of entry 280 (FIG. 37) for performing the
resection lies on line 265, and can be calculated as the distance
285 between point 240 and point 275.
[0133] The oblique resecting angle 290 is calculated from the
inside wedge angle formed by points 240, 255 and 275 (FIG. 36).
[0134] Through such preoperative planning, the surgeon can
calculate the required positioning of the bone cut which will be
used to form an osteotomy void which, in turn, will be used to
effect the corrective angle 230 (FIG. 35). More particularly, prior
to initiating the osteotomy, the surgeon can calculate: (i) the
point of entry 285 on the medial cortex for the bone cut; (ii) the
depth of the resection 295; and (iii) the oblique angle 290 of the
bone cut across tibia 10 to remain above anterior tibial tubercle
270.
[0135] Once the surgeon has identified the proper attributes of the
bone cut, the surgeon then uses the method and apparatus of the
present invention to effect the bone resection. More particularly,
the surgeon preferably:
[0136] (i) attaches positioning guide 20 to the proper location on
patient's tibia;
[0137] (ii) selects the proper cutting guide 45 to be attached to
positioning guide 20, whereby to define the target slope (or plane)
of the cut to be made in the tibia;
[0138] (iii) selects the proper protector members 70, 75 to be
attached to the cutting guide 45, whereby to protect the soft
tissue and neurovasculature structures surrounding the tibia;
[0139] (iv) secures the cutting guide 45 to positioning guide 20,
and then secures protector members 70, 75 to the cutting guide
45;
[0140] (v) selects the proper cutting blade 65 to be used in the
procedure, whereby to define the proper depth of the cut to be made
in the tibia;
[0141] (vi) passes cutting blade 65 through guide slot 50 formed in
cutting guide 45 and through tibia 10, following the pathway 65A
established by cutting guide 45, until the cut has been made to the
proper depth;
[0142] (vii) withdraws cutting blade 65;
[0143] (viii) uses mechanical jack 90 to open the cut in the bone
to the proper angle; and
[0144] (ix) inserts the multi-part implant 125 into the osteotomy
void 110 created in the bone, whereby to hold the resected tibia in
the proper configuration.
[0145] Preferably, bone cement or bone paste, etc. is inserted into
the interior of the osteotomy void, within multi-part implant 125,
whereby to facilitate strong bone growth and/or bony ingrowth; and
preferably bone cement is injected into the implant/bone interface
to help further secure the multi-part implant to the bone.
[0146] Significantly, with the present invention, the bone cut is
made easily and reliably using an antero-medial approach, while
providing excellent protection of the soft tissue and
neurovasculature structures surrounding the tibia. Furthermore,
osteotomy stabilization is achieved through the use of an implant
device that provides stability about the osteotomy site while
allowing the direct contact of bone graft material with native bone
within the open wedge osteotomy. Significantly, the present
invention also allows for the necessary physiologic compression and
stimulation required to promote new tissue and bone growth through
the bony void. This is in sharp contrast with prior art open wedge
osteotomy systems, which use fixation plates and screws to maintain
and support the corrective wedge opening; such systems do not allow
beneficial physiologic compressive forces to act on the bone/graft
interfaces. This can lead to nonunion osteotomies and failed
corrections.
[0147] As noted above, the bone cut typically penetrates to within
a centimeter or so of the lateral side of the tibia. In some
circumstances, the subsequent opening of the osteotomy void may
result in cracking at the far bone hinge. Therefore, and looking
now at FIG. 34, it may be desirable to pass a small bone cutting
burr along the far edge of the bone hinge, so as to remove possible
stress risers that may exist and help reduce the risk of fracture
when opening the osteotomy cut into wedge void 110. To the extent
that the method includes such a stress-riser-reduction step, it is
preferably done after making the bone cut and before opening the
osteotomy void.
Alternative Mechanical Jack 300
[0148] Referring now to FIGS. 38-47, in an alternative form of the
invention, a mechanical jack 300 may be used in place of the
aforementioned mechanical jack 90.
[0149] More particularly, mechanical jack 300 preferably comprises
two plates 305, 310. Plate 305 is disposed in the tibial bone cut
in a superior position, and plate 310 is disposed in the tibial
bone cut in an inferior position. As seen in FIG. 38, plates 305,
310 may comprise one or more varying shapes 315, 320, 325, etc. A
preferred shape for plates 305, 310 is oblong, measuring about
15-20 mm across and about 40-70 mm long. Plates 305, 310 are
preferably configured to extend substantially the entire depth of
the bone cut, in order to provide ample support when opening the
bone. Both plates 305, 310 connect or join to each other at their
distal ends 330 and allow their proximal ends 335 to open relative
to one another, whereby to form an opened wedge.
[0150] Plates 305, 310 are coupled with a mechanical device 340
(FIG. 44) that provides a deliberate degree of opening of the bone
cut. Mechanical device 340 preferably comprises a rail system 345
and an actuation device 350 (FIG. 44). At the proximal end 335 of
each plate 305, 310 is a male projection 355 that allows attachment
of the plates to actuator housing 360. Actuator housing 360
preferably comprises a rectangular shaped plate 365 that houses at
least one sliding member 370 with ratchet teeth 375. Sliding member
370 preferably comprises calibration markings 380 in specific
measurements. Calibration markings 380 may be in various units of
measurement including, for example, angle in degrees or millimeters
of opening. Actuator housing 360 preferably measures approximately
1 cm wide.times.2 cm long.times.3-5 mm deep. Actuation device 350
is rotatably fixed to housing 360 so that teeth 385 engage teeth
375 on sliding member 370. As a result of this construction, when
actuation device 350 is rotated, it effectively moves the sliding
member 370 up or down (depending on the direction of rotation),
whereby to open or close the plates 305, 310 relative to one
another. Sliding member 370 preferably measures about 5 mm
wide.times.2 cm long.times.2-4 mm thick, and has a female-type
connector 390 (FIG. 44) positioned in the center that fits with the
male-type projection 355 of inferior plate 310; correspondingly,
housing 360 preferably has a female-type connector 395 that fits
with the male-type connector 355 of superior plate 305. Preferably,
a locking pin 400 is also provided which, once pushed inward, fits
into gear teeth 375 of sliding member 370, whereby to prevent
movement of sliding member 370.
[0151] In an alternative preferred embodiment (not shown), a
circular actuator is configured to drive two sliding members in
opposing directions relative to one another so as to open up or
close down plates 305, 310 with respect one another.
[0152] Referring now to FIGS. 45-47, operation of mechanical jack
300 is illustrated. More particularly, plates 305, 310 are slid
into a previously-made bone cut 405. A hand driver tool 410 is
preferably used to rotate the actuator device 350 in a direction
that begins to open plates 305, 310 into a wedge configuration. As
the wedge is opened, the surgeon notes the position of calibration
markings 380 on sliding member 370 (FIG. 46) and opens the plates
305, 310 to the desired angle of bone reconfiguration (which was
determined preoperatively). Once the corrective angle is achieved,
locking pin 400, which is preferably located on the side of
actuator housing 360, is slid into place so as to prevent movement
of sliding member 370. Thereafter, the osteotomy may be conducted
in the manner previously discussed, i.e., the surgeon inserts the
multi-part implant 125 into the opening in the bone, whereby to
stabilize and secure the open wedge osteotomy.
Alternative Implants 500
[0153] In alternative embodiments of the present invention, and
referring now to FIGS. 48-60, 61-68, 69-74, 75-78, 79-87 and 88-89,
the osteotomy procedures described above may be practiced using an
alternative implant 500 substituted for the multi-part implant 125
described above. Preferably, the alternative implant 500 utilizes a
design that frames the perimeter of the osteotomy void 110 and acts
as a strut for supporting tibia 10 at the corrective angle 505
(FIG. 48).
[0154] As with multi-part implant 125, the overall design of
substitute implant 500 is wedge-shaped (FIG. 49), with a leading
(or distal) edge 510 that fits into the closed (or distal) portion
of the open wedge osteotomy, and a base (or proximal) side 515 that
fits into the opening (or proximal side) of the open wedge
osteotomy. Implant 500 comprises two opposing side walls 520 (FIG.
50), each preferably measuring about 2-5 mm wide, with their
surfaces framing the perimeter of the bony void with an open inside
perimeter 525, the leading side or edge 510, and the high base side
515. Base 515 preferably has a height of about 2-10 mm or greater.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, base 515 has a
slightly wider width than distal end 510, and base 515 is radiused
at its outboard sides (FIG. 51). The length of implant 500
approximates the depth of the osteotomy, typically measuring about
40-70 mm. Implant 500 is configured so that, overall, it closely
follows the perimeter of tibia 10 across the osteotomy void
110.
[0155] Implant 500 may utilize a variety of shapes and constructs
in addition to those shown in FIGS. 49-51, as will be described
below.
[0156] Referring next to FIG. 51, in a preferred embodiment of the
present invention, implant 500 comprises a solid wedge frame
implant 530. At the leading (or distal) end 510, the height of
implant 500 decreases or tapers to conform to the closed portion of
the tibial osteotomy. At base (or proximal end) 515, the implant is
taller to conform with the larger, exposed opening of the wedge
osteotomy. Implant 530 may be of the same or varying (e.g.,
widening) width as it extends from leading end 510 to base 515.
Base 515 of implant 530 preferably includes one or more holes or
openings 535 extending completely through base 515. Openings 535
allow material to be introduced into the interior of the implant,
e.g. allograft or autograft bone, demineralized bone substitutes,
other bone graft material preferably having osteoinductive or
osteoconductive properties, bone cement, or other desired
materials. Preferably, implant 530 has four continuous or joined
sides including the base 515, the two sides 520, and a floor
portion 540; the four components together define the open perimeter
525.
[0157] Referring now to FIGS. 52-55, there are shown single-piece
wedge frames 545, 550, 555, and 560, respectively. These four
frames are formed out of three (a base and two sides) continuous or
joined portions, but do not have a leading (i.e., distal) edge, and
have an open bottom (i.e., they omit the floor portion 540).
[0158] Referring now to FIGS. 56-60, in other preferred embodiments
of the invention, there are provided multi-part wedge frames 565,
570 and 575, which comprise a base 515 and two opposing side walls
520. In the case of implant 565, base 515 may be formed in two
halves, with one half connected to each side wall 520. In the case
of the wedge frames 570 (FIG. 57) and 575 (FIG. 58), base 515 may
comprise two halves, one connected to each side wall 530, and a
connecting plate connecting the two base halves together. The
various parts making up frames 565, 570 and 575 are preferably
inserted separately into the osteotomy void 110 and, in the case of
wedge frames 570 and 575, which include a connecting base member,
secured together. Preferably, the insertion takes place posterior
side first, then the anterior side and finally, in the case of
frames 570 and 575, the connecting base last. Base 515 is
preferably attached to sides 520 at 580, using screws, rods or any
other fastening means, which are preferably of the same material as
the implant.
[0159] A distinct advantage of the multi-part implant 565, 570,
and/or 575, as well as the multi-part implant 125 described
previously, is the ability to effect intended changes to the tibial
slope by inserting one wall 520 of a specific height and size, and
then inserting an opposing wall 520 of a potentially different
height and size. These changes can be calculated preoperatively or
may be a result of an intra-operative assessment by the
surgeon.
[0160] Looking next at FIGS. 61-68, any of the aforementioned
implants 500, as well as the aforementioned multi-part implant 125,
can include projections, ridges or protrusions 585 (hereinafter
sometimes collectively referred to herein as "projections 585") on
its bone interface surfaces. These projections 585 are shaped in
such a way as to allow for easy insertion of implant 500 into the
osteotomy void 110 but prevent migration of implant 500 once fitted
in place.
[0161] The various wedge shaped implants 500 may be formed out of a
metal (e.g., titanium or stainless steel) or any other
biocompatible material or polymer, absorbable or non-resorbable,
that may or may not be osteoinductive or osteoconductive.
[0162] Looking next at FIG. 68, the base 515 of implant 500 can be
further secured to tibia 10 with the placement of screws or rods
590, preferably angled through base 515 into tibia 10. Screw or
rods 590 may be directed both superiorly and inferiorly into the
tibia. Furthermore, base 515 of the implant can also function as a
secure fixation system, thereby replacing the traditional static
fixation plate and bone screws.
[0163] As noted above, base 515 can be made of a metal material, a
bioabsorbable material, a biocomposite material that may or may not
promote bony integration, or a combination of biocomposite
materials and metal in order to add strength to the eventual
loading of the osteotomy site. It may be preferable to provide a
base member that provides sufficient weight-bearing support and
strength through the natural healing period of the osteotomy site
and then begin to resorb over time, thereby preventing or reducing
the effects of stress shielding of the repair and new bone growth.
Such a resorbable base member, in conjunction with a resorbable,
solid walled implant, provides active compression across the
osteotomy site, thereby promoting faster and stronger healing of
the osteotomy site.
[0164] Looking now at FIGS. 69-74, in other preferred embodiments
of the present invention, the wedge 500 may take various
configurations which incorporate channels 595 extending through
components for delivering biocompatible adhesive glues, bone
cements, growth factors or grafting materials to the bone
contacting surfaces 600. These materials are preferably resorbable.
The provision of channels 595 in the implant is an important
feature, since (i) it may permit the implant to be better secured
within the osteotomy void 110 when glues or cement-like materials
are delivered through channels 595, and (ii) it may facilitate
formation of beneficial bony ingrowth when growth factors or
grafting materials are delivered.
[0165] When adding nonresorbable cements or glues to secure the
implant, it may be advantageous to allow natural cortical bone
growth and new bone integration into and through the surfaces of
the wedge implant; this may provide for better long-term security
and stronger healing of the osteotomy site. As such, these
adhesives and/or bone cement materials can be delivered through a
narrow tube-like device 605 (FIG. 69) that incorporates openings
610 that align with channels 595 running to surface 600 of implant
500. Once adhesive or cement-like material 612 is delivered through
tube device 605, into and through channels 595, to surface 600 of
implant 500 and native bony surface of tibia 10, tube device 605 is
withdrawn. Such a delivery approach provides for areas of adhesion
while allowing native bony contact with surface 600 of implant 500.
Also, by delivering material 612 through tube device 605, which may
run the length of implant 500, and then withdrawing tube 605, more
of implant 500 may integrate with new bone growth while using the
an efficient amount of adhesive or cement material to secure
implant 500.
[0166] Referring now to FIGS. 75-78, in a preferred embodiment of
the present invention, at least one implant/bone interface channel
615 is formed in implant 500. When using resorbable adhesives or
bone cements, it may be advantageous to have material flow or be
delivered within an open cavity that follows at least a substantial
portion of the entire contact surface between implant 500 and bone
10 (FIG. 77). This configuration generally provides increased
strength of fixation and improved attachment of implant 500 to bone
10. As such, after implant 500 is inserted and positioned, adhesive
material is injected/delivered into implant/bone interface channel
615. Base 515 is preferably attached to tibia 10 with either screws
590 (FIG. 78) or with adhesive (not shown).
Three-Part Implant and Trial Procedure
[0167] Referring next to FIGS. 79-83, with the vertical height of
actuator housing 360 fixed in place, the surgeon may insert a trial
implant 500A for the posterior side and the anterior side of wedge
frame implant 500 (FIG. 80). To this end, there are preferably
provided a number of incrementally-sized trial stabilizers that the
surgeon uses to attain the best anatomical fit for implant 500, and
to ensure proper positioning for the attachment of the base 515
that fits into osteotomy opening 110.
[0168] Once the properly sized anterior side 520 and the properly
sized posterior side 520 of implant 500 are inserted, actuator 350
is unlocked and rotated so as to slightly loosen corrective device
340 (FIG. 44). Actuator housing 360 is then removed from the
corrective plates, and each plate is removed (FIG. 81). Bone graft
and/or bone filler material can be introduced into the osteotomy,
filling much of void 110. The appropriately sized base wall 515 of
wedge implant 500 (FIG. 82) is fitted into wedge opening 110. Base
515 is then secured to side walls 520 through the use of the
threaded fasteners 580. Additional bone graft material is then
introduced through openings 535 in base 515 and the bony void is
filled.
[0169] Referring now to FIG. 83, stabilization about the osteotomy
site is achieved with the wedge-shaped implant 500 providing
stability about the osteotomy site while maintaining the desired
corrective angle. By allowing the direct contact of bone graft
material with the bony cut surface of the osteotomy, within the
perimeter of the wedge implant, the necessary physiologic
compression and stimulation required to promote new tissue and bone
growth through the bony void is provided.
[0170] FIGS. 84-87 show another depiction of the three-part
wedge-shaped implant and the trial procedure described herein and
illustrated in FIGS. 79-83.
One-Part Implant and Trial Procedure
[0171] Referring now to FIGS. 88 and 89, there is shown a one-part,
open-bottomed, wedge-shaped implant 545A. Again, the surgeon uses a
trial implant 545A and inserts the trial implant 545A into
osteotomy opening 110 to ascertain precise fit and sizing of trial
implant 545A. Trial implant 545A is removed-and the properly-sized
implant 545 (FIG. 89) is inserted into the osteotomy void 110. The
preferred bone graft material is introduced through the openings
535 of the base side 515 and the bony void is filled.
[0172] Again, stabilization is achieved with the wedge-shaped
implant 545 providing stability about the osteotomy site while
maintaining the corrective angle. By allowing the direct contact of
bone graft material with the bony cut surface of the osteotomy,
within the perimeter of the wedge implant, the necessary
physiologic compression and stimulation required to promote new
tissue and bone growth through the bony void 110 is provided.
Alternative Resection System 700 Comprising Two Blade Positioning
Guide 705 and Resection Guide 710
[0173] Referring next to FIGS. 90-109, in an alternative embodiment
of the present invention, there is shown a resection system 700
comprising a two blade positioning guide 705 and a resection guide
710 for creating a bone cut 715 (FIG. 110).
[0174] The osteotomy positioning guide 705 comprises two opposing
blades 720, 725 (FIG. 90).
[0175] A posterior blade 720 (FIG. 91) is configured for the
posterior aspect of the proximal tibia 10, and an anterior blade
725 (FIG. 92) is configured for the anterior aspect of the proximal
tibia 10. Each blade member 720, 725 has a corresponding radius of
curvature that allows it to fit closely to the surface of tibia 10
(FIGS. 91 and 92) into which the transverse resection 730 is to be
performed (FIG. 93). Each blade member 720, 725 is preferably wide
enough to protect soft tissue and neurovasculature structures
during the osteotomy procedure. Each blade member 720, 725
preferably has a small handle 735 (FIG. 90) integral with the
member itself. Handle 735 allows easier deployment and positioning
of each blade member 720, 725 around the proposed osteotomy site.
The blade members 720, 725 can vary in length, width and thickness
but, generally, will measure approximately 6-8 cm in length, 3-5 cm
in width and 1-3 mm in thickness. Each individual blade 720, 725 is
inserted through the incision site and guided around tibia 10.
Superior margins 740 of each opposing blade 720, 725 can be
adjusted in order to align blades 720, 725 with the
anterior-posterior slope 745 of the tibia (FIG. 97). Once each
blade member 720, 725 is properly positioned, the blade is secured
in place using fixation holes 750 (FIG. 96) and fixation screws or
pins 755. Fixation hole 750 on each blade member 720, 725 is
preferably located about 1-3 cm below superior margin 740. However,
each matching set of blade members 720, 725 preferably has equal
distances from superior margin 740 to fixation hole 750.
[0176] Osteotomy guide 705 is preferably radiolucent, so as to
allow the surgeon to take radiographs or use fluoroscopy with blade
members 720, 725 in place.
[0177] In one embodiment of the present invention (not shown),
osteotomy positioning guide members 720, 725 are expandable once
placed through an incision.
[0178] Resection guide 710 is shown in more detail in FIGS. 98-103.
Resection guide 710 comprises at least one oblique cutting slot
760, and is configured for attachment onto the fixation screws or
pins 755 of blade members 720, 725.
[0179] When bone resection guide 710 is attached to tibia 10 using
fixation screws 755, cutting slot 760 is properly located relative
to the anterior-posterior slope 765 of tibia 10 (FIG. 100). Desired
changes in slope 765 are preferably introduced by removing and
re-positioning one or both of the screws 755 holding blade members
720, 725 and resection guide 110 to the tibia. Resection guide 710
has a corresponding radius of curvature for its body that allows a
close fit to a bone surface 770 (FIG. 101). Preferably, the
thickness or distance from bone surface 770 to the opposing side of
resection guide 710 is such that a resecting instrument 775 (such
as a bone saw cutting blade 775) cuts uniformly across tibia 10 at
the same cutting depth. Preferably, there is provided a system of
sized resection guides 710 with cutting slots 760 that correlate to
the resection point of entry on the medial side of the knee
(distance 285 below the joint line, as obtained from a preoperative
radiograph, see FIG. 36) and to the planned oblique angle 290 of
the resection (see FIG. 36) in order for resecting instrument 775
(FIG. 101) to remain superior to anterior tibial tubercle 270 (see
FIG. 36). These resecting guides 710 preferably range in overall
size from about 2-5 cm across tibia 10 (from anterior to
posterior), about 3-5 cm in length and about 5-10 mm in thickness.
Cutting slot 760 is preferably located about 3-5 cm below the joint
line (FIG. 103), with an oblique cutting angle 290 of 20-60 degrees
(FIG. 102).
Osteotomy Procedure Using Alternative Resection System 700 (Two
Blade Positioning Guide 705 and Resection Guide 710)
[0180] A routine knee arthroscopy is generally carried out to
remove any loose bodies and to perform general joint debridement.
During the arthroscopy, other repair procedures may be carried out
such as meniscus repair, cartilage repair or tissue regeneration
procedures. Following the arthroscopy, an antero-medial skin
incision is made over the tibia 3-5 cm below the joint line from
the anterior tibial tubercle to the postero-medial border of the
tibia.
[0181] Referring now to FIGS. 104-110, a kit including resection
system 700 is preferably opened at the surgical site. System 700
comprises the blade members 720, 725 and the section guide 710 that
provide for a precise slope or plane of bone cut 715 (FIG. 110),
and the protection of surrounding neurovasculature structures
during the cutting operation. The two opposing blade members 720,
725 include the posterior blade 720 and the anterior blade 725,
which are inserted through the incision site and guided around the
bone 10 targeted for the osteotomy (FIG. 104). The pes anserinus is
retracted, allowing visualization of the superficial medial
collateral ligament (MCL). The MCL is retracted superiorly to allow
the insertion of posterior blade member 720 below the medial
collateral ligament and around the postero-medial border, hugging
the posterior aspect of the knee. Posterior blade 720 reaches
laterally to the medial border of the fibula and rests against
fibular head 780 (FIG. 105). Anterior blade member 725 is inserted
under the patella tendon and reaches to antero-lateral border 782
of the tibia 10 (FIG. 106). Each blade member 720, 725 has a
corresponding radius of curvature that allows it to fit closely to
the bone surface into which the osteotomy will be cut. These blade
members 720, 725 can vary in length, width and thickness but,
generally, will measure approximately 5-8 cm in length, 3-5 cm in
width and 1-3 mm in thickness. Superior margins 740 of each
opposing blade 720, 725 are aligned along tibial plateau 785 to
follow the natural anterior-posterior slope or plane of the
plateau. However, the surgeon can also adjust the position of
either blade 720, 725 to affect a specific desired tibial slope
change. The joint line can further be identified with the placement
of Keith needles at region 790 (FIGS. 105 and 106) through the knee
capsule and under the meniscus. This use of Keith needles aids the
surgeon in properly aligning each blade member along the joint
line. Each blade member 720, 725 is secured in place through its
respective fixation hole 750 with the provided fixation screw or
pin 755.
[0182] Next, a proper slotted cutting guide 710 is chosen.
Preferably, there is provided a system of cutting guides 710 that
correspond to overall sizing (i.e. small tibia, medium tibia, or
large tibia) with each cutting guide body having a radius of
curvature that allows it to fit closely to the bone surface. Based
upon the preoperative planning procedure, the surgeon chooses the
appropriately sized cutting guide 710, matching the preoperatively
measured distance 285 below the joint line for the point of entry
(FIG. 103) with the oblique cutting angle required to remain above
tibial tubercle 270 (FIG. 36). The surgeon attaches or connects
cutting guide 710 to the fixation screws or pins 755 of blade
members 720, 725 (FIG. 107). The exact placement of bone cut 715
(FIG. 110) is precisely defined, incorporating the planned plane or
anterior-posterior slope of the cut. Cutting guide 710 is
preferably configured with a thickness or distance from the bone
surface to the opposing side such that cutting blade 775 cuts
uniformly across tibia 10 at the same cutting depth. The surgeon
fits a blade stop 795 (FIG. 109) onto cutting saw blade 775 to mark
the required distance of cut 715 as determined preoperatively. With
protection of neurovasculature structures provided by blade members
720, 725, with the appropriate cutting guide 710 attached, and the
appropriate cutting distance measured and ensured via blade stop
790, the cutting operation can be safely performed through slot 760
of the cutting guide 710 (FIGS. 108 and 109), effectively
completing the osteotomy or bone cut through the bone cortices,
leaving a minimum 1 cm bone hinge 800 on the lateral aspect of the
proximal tibia 10 (FIG. 110). The slotted cutting guide 710 is then
removed, leaving the positioning guide blade members in place.
[0183] Preferably, and following the formation of the osteotomy cut
via a bone saw, the surgeon ensures that the bone cortices are cut
by using a thin osteotome and probing the cortices inside the bone
cut. Once assured that the bone cortices are cut, the surgeon
removes the blade members 720, 725. Next, bone cut 715 (FIG. 110)
is opened using an opening wedge device such as the mechanical jack
90 (FIGS. 13-15) or the alternative mechanical jack 300 (FIGS.
44-47). The wedge is opened until the desired angle is achieved. At
this point the surgeon preferably slowly opens the wedge another 2
mm or so to allow for easier insertion of the wedge frame
implant.
[0184] With the desired corrective angle achieved, the surgeon then
prepares to stabilize and secure the open wedge osteotomy and
insert bone graft material into the osteotomy void. This may be
done using an appropriately sized implant such as the multipart
implant 125 (FIGS. 19 and 20) or an alternative wedge osteotomy
implant 500 (FIGS. 48-60, 61-68, 69-74, 75-78, 79-87 and 88-89)
disclosed above. Each implant is sized according to the opening
height of the wedge osteotomy and the depth of the cut. From the
preoperative planning exercise, the surgeon most often has
determined the correct implant size. However, the surgeon may also
elect to use an implant trial to determine correct implant size as
well.
Expandable Wedge Implant 805
[0185] Referring now to FIGS. 111-125, in another preferred
embodiment of the present invention, there is shown an expandable
wedge implant 805 comprising two opposing sides 810 which are
coupled with an opening device such as the mechanical jack 90
(FIGS. 13-15) or alternative mechanical jack 300 (FIGS. 44-47) to
create an open wedge osteotomy.
[0186] Expandable wedge implant 805 comprises two opposing sides
810 (FIG. 112) whose surfaces frame the perimeter of the bony void
and preferably create an opening 815 within the perimeter of sides
810 (FIG. 112). A base side 820 fits into the opening of the wedge
osteotomy and is attachable to sides 810. Each one of the sides 810
is transversely split 825 along its length to form two opposing
frame members 830, 835. Opposing frame members 830, 835 of each
side 810 are connected to one other with an expandable material
840, e.g., a flexible sheet of biocompatible material. When the two
frame members 830, 835 are spread apart within a bony void (or are
separated within a bone cut to create a bony void), the expandable
material 840 forms a containment system around the perimeter of
implant 805 so as to hold graft or bone filler materials within
implant opening 815.
[0187] The transversely split sides 810 can be continuous in form
at leading end 845 (FIG. 113); or split sides 810 can be connected
or joined at leading end 845 (FIG. 114); or split sides 810 can be
connected with expandable material 850 at leading end 845 (FIG.
115); or split sides 810 can be otherwise hinged at leading end 845
(e.g., with a pivot pin), etc.
[0188] Base side 820 preferably includes passageways 855 for
attachment of base side 820 to the ends 860 of transverse split
sides 810 with screws, rods or other fastener (FIG. 116). Base 820
preferably also includes holes or openings 865 through which bone
graft or bone filler materials can be injected or introduced (FIG.
116). Once injected or introduced, the void-filling material
expands implant 805 and expandable material 840 along the perimeter
of the osteotomy with the graft material inside having direct
contact with the bony surfaces of the osteotomy.
[0189] Expandable material 805 is preferably manufactured from, or
comprised of, any expandable biocompatible material. Expandable
material 840 is preferably resorbable or osteoinductive or
osteoconductive in nature.
[0190] Referring now to FIG. 117, any of the expandable wedge
implants 805 may incorporate projections, ridges or other
protrusions 870 (hereinafter sometimes collectively referred to as
"projections 870") on its bone interface surfaces. Projections 870
are shaped in such a way as to allow for easy insertion of implant
805 into the osteotomy but prevent migration of the implant once
fitted into place.
[0191] The expandable wedge implants may comprise metal (e.g.,
titanium or stainless steel) or other biocompatible material or
polymer. The selected material may be either absorbable or
non-resorbable, which may also be either osteoinductive or
osteoconductive.
[0192] Base member 820 of expandable wedge implant 805 preferably
provides secure fixation by insertion of bone screws 875 through
the base and into the bone of the femur (not shown) or tibia 10
(FIG. 118). By allowing base member 820 of implant 805 to function
as a secure fixation system, thereby replacing the traditional
static fixation plate and bone screws, base member 820 can comprise
a metal material, a biocomposite material that preferably promotes
bony integration, or a combination of biocomposite materials or
biocomposite material with metal in order to add strength to the
eventual loading of the osteotomy site. Preferably, base member 820
is configured to provide sufficient weight bearing support and
strength through the natural healing period of the osteotomy site
and then begins to resorb over time, thereby preventing or reducing
the effects of stress shielding of the repair and new bone growth.
Such a resorbable base member 820 used in the expandable wedge
implant 805 provides for active compression across the osteotomy
site, thereby promoting faster and stronger healing of the
osteotomy site. Also, bone screws 875 used to secure the base
member may be formed of the same or similar materials as base
member 820.
[0193] Referring now to FIGS. 119 and 120, transverse split wedge
design 805 preferably also includes channels 880 through its solid
material surfaces for delivering biocompatible adhesive glues, bone
cements, growth factors or grafting materials. These materials are
preferably resorbable. The importance of adding channels 880 is to
better secure implant 805 within the osteotomy wedge void when
glues or cement-like materials are delivered; and/or, in the case
of adding growth factors or grafting materials, to promote the
formation of bony in-growth to secure the implant.
[0194] When adding nonresorbable cements or glues to secure implant
805, it may be advantageous to allow natural cortical bone growth
and new bone integration into and through the surfaces of the wedge
implant; this may provide for better long-term security and
stronger healing of the osteotomy site. As such, these adhesives
and/or bone cement materials can be delivered through a narrow
tube-like device 885 (FIG. 119) that incorporates openings 885A
that align with channels 880 running to surface 890 of implant 805.
Once the adhesive or cement-like material is delivered through tube
device 885 into and through channels 880 to the interface of
implant 805 and native bony surface of tibia 10, tube device 885 is
withdrawn. Such a delivery approach provides areas of adhesion
while allowing native bony contact with portions of surface 890.
Also, by delivering material through tube device 885, which
preferably runs the length of implant 805, and then withdrawing
tube 885, more of implant 805 is allowed to integrate with new bone
growth while using an efficient amount of adhesive or cement
material to secure implant 805.
[0195] When using resorbable adhesives or bone cements, implant 805
is alternatively configured to have the material flow or be
delivered within a cavity 900 that follows the entire contact
surface between implant 805 and the bone (FIG. 120). The provision
of cavity 900 provides increased strength of fixation and security.
As such, after implant 805 is inserted and positioned, the adhesive
material is injected/delivered into the implant/bone interface
cavity 900. Base side 820 is then attached with screws or
adhesive.
Osteotomy Technique Using Expandable Wedge Implant
[0196] Referring now to FIGS. 121-130, following the creation of a
bone cut as described above, the surgeon chooses the properly sized
expandable wedge implant trial 805A (FIG. 121), based upon the
preoperative procedure described above and shown in FIGS. 35-37.
Trial implant 805A is inserted into the osteotomy bone cut and the
proper sized implant is determined. Trial 805A is removed and the
correctly sized implant 805 (without base side 820) is inserted
(FIG. 122).
[0197] Next, the wedge opening plate 805 is assembled. An opening
wedge plate device 905 is preferably provided with four attachment
points 910 (FIGS. 123-125) that are designed to fit into fixation
holes 915 (FIG. 122) on transverse split sides 810. Attachment
points 910 provide support to allow the opening of the wedge
osteotomy with implant 805 inserted therein. Plate device 905 is
inserted into the bone cut with its four attachment points 910
inserted into the openings 915 at the ends of the wedge implant 805
(FIG. 124). The surgeon connects two connector portions 920 of
plate device 905 to actuator housing 360 (FIG. 126). The surgeon
the uses driver tool 410 to rotate actuator 350 so as to begin
opening the bony wedge (FIG. 127). As the wedge is opened, the
surgeon views calibrated markings 380 on sliding member 375. The
wedge is opened until the desired angle is reached. Locking pin 400
is then activated so as to prevent movement of sliding member 375
(FIG. 128). With the actuator housing 360 still in place, the
preferred bone graft material is then introduced into bony wedge
void 110. When void 110 is almost filled with material, actuator
350 is unlocked, and rotated so as to slightly loosen corrective
device 300. Actuator housing 360 is then removed from plate device
905, being careful not to remove the graft material. The
appropriately-sized base wall 820 for wedge implant 805 is then
chosen and fit into the wedge opening (FIG. 129). Base wall 820 is
then secured to side walls 810 through the use of threaded
fasteners 920. Additional bone graft material may then be
introduced through openings 865 of base wall 820 of wedge 805 and
the bony void is further filled (FIG. 130).
[0198] Stabilization is achieved with expandable wedge implant
device 805 at the osteotomy site while maintaining the corrective
angle. By allowing the direct contact of bone graft material with
the bony cut surface of the osteotomy, within the perimeter of the
expandable wedge implant, the necessary physiologic compression and
stimulation required to promote new tissue and bone growth through
the bony void is provided.
[0199] It is to be understood that the present invention is by no
means limited to the particular constructions herein disclosed
and/or shown in the drawings, but also comprises any modifications
or equivalents within the scope of the invention.
* * * * *