U.S. patent application number 10/675852 was filed with the patent office on 2005-04-21 for plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress.
This patent application is currently assigned to Mendel Biotechnology, Inc.. Invention is credited to Creelman, Robert A., Gutterson, Neal I., Heard, Jacqueline E., Jiang, Cai-Zhong, Keddie, James S., Kumimoto, Roderick W., Pineda, Omaira, Ratcliffe, Oliver, Sherman, Bradley K..
Application Number | 20050086718 10/675852 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 35006387 |
Filed Date | 2005-04-21 |
United States Patent
Application |
20050086718 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Heard, Jacqueline E. ; et
al. |
April 21, 2005 |
Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
Abstract
The invention relates to plant transcription factor
polypeptides, polynucleotides that encode them, homologs from a
variety of plant species, and methods of using the polynucleotides
and polypeptides to produce transgenic plants having advantageous
properties compared to a reference plant, including improved
abiotic stress tolerance. Sequence information related to these
polynucleotides and polypeptides can also be used in bioinformatic
search methods to identify related sequences and is also
disclosed.
Inventors: |
Heard, Jacqueline E.;
(Stonington, CT) ; Keddie, James S.; (San Mateo,
CA) ; Creelman, Robert A.; (Castro Valley, CA)
; Pineda, Omaira; (Vero Beach, FL) ; Jiang,
Cai-Zhong; (Fremont, CA) ; Ratcliffe, Oliver;
(Oakland, CA) ; Kumimoto, Roderick W.; (San Bruno,
CA) ; Gutterson, Neal I.; (Oakland, CA) ;
Sherman, Bradley K.; (Berkeley, CA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Mendel Biotechnology, Inc.
21375 Cabot Blvd.
Hayward
CA
94545
US
|
Assignee: |
Mendel Biotechnology, Inc.
Hayward
CA
|
Family ID: |
35006387 |
Appl. No.: |
10/675852 |
Filed: |
September 30, 2003 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10412699 |
Apr 10, 2003 |
|
|
|
10412699 |
Apr 10, 2003 |
|
|
|
09533030 |
Mar 22, 2000 |
|
|
|
10412699 |
Apr 10, 2003 |
|
|
|
10171468 |
Jun 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
10412699 |
Apr 10, 2003 |
|
|
|
09713994 |
Nov 16, 2000 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
09713994 |
Nov 16, 2000 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10112887 |
Mar 18, 2002 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10286264 |
Nov 1, 2002 |
|
|
|
10286264 |
Nov 1, 2002 |
|
|
|
09533030 |
Mar 22, 2000 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10225068 |
Aug 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
10225068 |
Aug 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
10171468 |
Jun 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
10171468 |
Jun 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
09837944 |
Apr 18, 2001 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10225066 |
Aug 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10374780 |
Feb 25, 2003 |
|
|
|
10374780 |
Feb 25, 2003 |
|
|
|
09837944 |
Apr 18, 2001 |
|
|
|
10675852 |
Sep 30, 2003 |
|
|
|
10666642 |
Sep 18, 2003 |
|
|
|
60166228 |
Nov 17, 1999 |
|
|
|
60166228 |
Nov 17, 1999 |
|
|
|
60125814 |
Mar 23, 1999 |
|
|
|
60310847 |
Aug 9, 2001 |
|
|
|
60336049 |
Nov 19, 2001 |
|
|
|
60336049 |
Nov 19, 2001 |
|
|
|
60434166 |
Dec 17, 2002 |
|
|
|
60411837 |
Sep 18, 2002 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
800/298 ;
536/23.6; 800/278 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C12N 15/8247 20130101;
Y02A 40/146 20180101; C12N 15/8261 20130101; C12N 15/8271 20130101;
C12N 15/8267 20130101; C07K 14/415 20130101; C12N 15/8275 20130101;
C12N 15/8216 20130101; C12N 15/8251 20130101; C12N 15/8273
20130101; C12N 15/8282 20130101; C12N 15/8214 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
800/298 ;
800/278; 536/023.6 |
International
Class: |
A01H 001/00; C12N
015/82; C12N 015/29 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A transgenic plant comprising a recombinant polynucleotide
encoding a polypeptide having a HAP3 subfamily B domain, wherein
said polypeptide has the property of SEQ ID NO: 4 of regulating
abiotic stress tolerance in a plant when said polypeptide is
overexpressed, and wherein: the HAP3 subfamily B domain is
sufficiently homologous to the B domain of SEQ ID NO: 4 that the
polypeptide binds to a transcription regulating region comprising
the motif CCAAT; and wherein said binding confers increased abiotic
stress tolerance in said transgenic plant as compared to a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the
polypeptide.
2. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein the HAP3 subfamily B
domain is at least 83% identical in amino acid sequence to the B
domain of SEQ ID NO: 4, and wherein said HAP3 subfamily B domain
comprises:
12 Asn-(Xaa).sub.4-Lys-(Xaa).sub.33-34-Asn-Gly;
where Xaa is any amino acid residue; and overexpression of said
polypeptide confers increased abiotic stress tolerance in said
transgenic plant as compared to a non-transformed plant that does
not overexpress the polypeptide.
3. The transgenic plant of claim 2, wherein said HAP3 subfamily B
domain comprises:
13 Ser-(Xaa).sub.9-Asn-(Xaa).sub.4-Lys-(Xaa).sub.33-34-Asn-Gly;
where Xaa is any amino acid residue; and overexpression of said
polypeptide confers increased abiotic stress tolerance in said
transgenic plant as compared to a non-transformed plant that does
not overexpress the polypeptide.
4. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein said polypeptide
comprises SEQ ID NO: 4.
5. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein said recombinant
polynucleotide has a nucleotide sequence that hybridizes over its
full length to the complement of SEQ ID NO:3 under stringent
conditions including two wash steps of 6.times.SSC and 65.degree.
C. for 10-30 minutes.
6. The transgenic plant of claim 5, wherein said nucleotide
sequence comprises SEQ ID NO: 3.
7. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein said abiotic stress
tolerance is selected from the group consisting of heat tolerance,
drought stress and salt stress.
8. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein said transgenic plant
is characterized by altered sugar sensing as compared to a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the recombinant
polynucleotide.
9. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein the plant is selected
from the group consisting of: soybean, wheat, corn, potato, cotton,
rice, oilseed rape, sunflower, alfalfa, clover, sugarcane, turf,
banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, raspberry, cantaloupe,
carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant, grapes, honeydew,
lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas, peppers, pineapple,
pumpkin, spinach, squash, sweet corn, tobacco, tomato, watermelon,
mint and other labiates, fruit trees, rosaceous fruits, citrus, and
brassicas.
10. The transgenic plant of claim 1, further comprising a
constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter operably
linked to said recombinant polynucleotide.
11. The transgenic plant of claim 1, wherein said HAP3 subfamily B
domain is at least 83% identical with the B domain of SEQ If) NO:
4.
12. A method for producing a transgenic plant having increased
tolerance to osmotic stress, the method steps comprising: (a)
providing an expression vector comprising (i) a nucleotide sequence
that encodes a polypeptide having a B domain that is sufficiently
homologous to the B domain of SEQ ID NO: 3 that the polypeptide
binds to a transcription regulating region comprising the motif
CCAAT and has the property of regulating abiotic stress tolerance
in a plant as compared to a non-transformed plant that does not
overexpress the polypeptide; wherein said nucleotide sequence
comprises a B domain that is at least 83% identical with the B
domain of SEQ ID NO: 4; and (ii) regulatory elements flanking the
nucleotide sequence, said regulatory elements being effective to
control expression of said nucleotide sequence in a target plant;
(b) introducing the expression vector into a plant cell; (c)
growing the plant cell into a plant and allowing the plant to
overexpress said polypeptide; and; (d) identifying one or more
abiotic stress tolerant plants so produced with increased abiotic
stress tolerance by comparing said one or more abiotic stress
tolerant plants with one or more non-transformed plants that do not
overexpress the polypeptide.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein said nucleotide sequence
hybridizes over its full length to the complement of SEQ ID NO: 3
under stringent conditions including two wash steps of 6.times.SSC
and 65.degree. C. for 10-30 minutes.
14. The method of claim 12, wherein said abiotic stress tolerance
is selected from the group consisting of heat tolerance, drought
stress and salt stress.
15. The method of claim 12, the method steps further comprising:
(e) crossing one of said abiotic stress tolerant plants with itself
or another plant; (f) selecting seed that develops as a result of
said crossing; and growing a progeny plant from the seed, thus
producing a transgenic progeny plant having increased tolerance to
abiotic stress.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein: said progeny plant expresses
mRNA that encodes a DNA-binding protein that binds to a CCAAT DNA
regulatory sequence and induces expression of a plant trait gene;
and said mRNA is expressed at a level greater than a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress said DNA-binding
protein.
17. A method for increasing a plant's tolerance to abiotic stress,
said method comprising: (a) providing a vector comprising:
regulatory elements flanking the polynucleotide sequence, said
regulatory elements being effective to control expression of said
polynucleotide sequence in a target plant; and a polynucleotide
sequence that encodes a polypeptide having a B domain sufficiently
homologous to the B domain of SEQ ID NO: 3 that the polypeptide
binds to a transcription regulating region comprising the motif
CCAAT and has the property of SEQ ID NO:4 of regulating abiotic
stress tolerance in a plant, wherein said binding confers increased
abiotic stress tolerance in said transgenic plant as compared to a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the polypeptide;
and (b) transforming the target plant with said vector to generate
a transformed plant with increased tolerance to osmotic stress.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein said polynucleotide comprises:
(i) SEQ ID NO: 3; (ii) a nucleotide sequence that encodes SEQ ID
NO: 4; (iii) a nucleotide sequence that hybridizes to the
nucleotide sequence of (i) or (ii) under stringent conditions
including two wash steps of 6.times.SSC and 65.degree. C. for 10-30
minutes; or (iv) a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide that
comprises a B domain that is at least 83% identical with the B
domain of SEQ ID NO: 4.
19. The method of claim 17, wherein said abiotic stress tolerance
is selected from the group consisting of heat tolerance, cold
germination, drought stress and salt stress.
20. A recombinant polynucleotide comprising a nucleotide sequence
at least 99.6% identical to SEQ ID NO: 3.
21. The recombinant polynucleotide of claim 20, wherein said
recombinant polynucleotide comprises SEQ ID NO: 3.
22. The recombinant polynucleotide of claim 20, wherein said
recombinant polynucleotide is incorporated into an expression
vector comprising one or more regulatory elements that are
effective to control expression of said recombinant polynucleotide
in a target plant
23. The recombinant polynucleotide of claim 22, wherein said
recombinant polynucleotide is incorporated into a cultured host
cell.
Description
RELATIONSHIP TO COPENDING APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser.
No. 10/412,699, filed Apr. 10, 2003, which in turn claims the
benefit of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 09/533,030,
filed Mar. 22, 2000, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/125,814, filed Mar. 23, 1999, U.S.
Non-provisional application Ser. No. 09/713,994, filed Nov. 16,
2000, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/166,228, filed Nov. 17, 1999, U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/197,899, filed Apr. 17, 2000, and U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/227,439, filed Aug. 22, 2000; U.S.
Non-provisional application Ser. No. 10/112,887, filed Mar. 18,
2002; U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No. 10/286,264, filed
Jan. 23, 2003; U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No.
10/225,068, filed Aug. 9, 2002; U.S. Non-provisional application
Ser. No. 10/225,066, filed Aug. 9, 2002; U.S. Non-provisional
application Ser. No. 10/374,780, filed Feb. 25, 2003, which claims
the benefit of U.S. Non-provisional application Ser. No.
09/837,944, filed Apr. 18, 2001, U.S. Non-provisional application
Ser. No. 10/171,468, filed Jun. 14, 2002, U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/310,847, filed Aug. 9, 2001, and U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/336,049, filed Nov. 19, 2001; U.S.
Non-provisional application "Polynucleotides and Polypeptides in
Plants", filed Sep. 18, 2003, claims the benefit of U.S.
Provisional Application No. 60/434,166, filed Dec. 17, 2002, and
U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/411,837, filed Sep. 18, 2002.
The entire contents of all of these applications are hereby
incorporated by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The present invention relates to compositions and methods
for modifying a plant phenotypically, said plant having altered
sugar sensing and an altered response to abiotic stresses,
including osmotic stresses, including germination in cold and heat,
increased tolerance to drought and high salt stress.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A plant's traits, such as its biochemical, developmental, or
phenotypic characteristics, may be controlled through a number of
cellular processes. One important way to manipulate that control is
through transcription factors, proteins that influence the
expression of a particular gene or sets of genes. Transformed and
transgenic plants that comprise cells having altered levels of at
least one selected transcription factor, for example, possess
advantageous or desirable traits. Strategies for manipulating
traits by altering a plant cell's transcription factor content can
therefore result in plants and crops with new and/or improved
commercially valuable properties.
[0004] Transcription factors can modulate gene expression, either
increasing or decreasing (inducing or repressing) the rate of
transcription. This modulation results in differential levels of
gene expression at various developmental stages, in different
tissues and cell types, and in response to different exogenous
(e.g., environmental) and endogenous stimuli throughout the life
cycle of the organism.
[0005] Phylogenetic relationships among organisms have been
demonstrated many times, and studies from a diversity of
prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms suggest a more or less gradual
evolution of biochemical and physiological mechanisms and metabolic
pathways. Despite different evolutionary pressures, proteins that
regulate the cell cycle in yeast, plant, nematode, fly, rat, and
man have common chemical or structural features and modulate the
same general cellular activity. Comparisons of Arabidopsis gene
sequences with those from other organisms where the structure
and/or function may be known allow researchers to draw analogies
and to develop model systems for testing hypotheses. These model
systems are of great importance in developing and testing plant
varieties with novel traits that may have an impact upon
agronomy.
[0006] Because transcription factors are key controlling elements
of biological pathways, altering the expression levels of one or
more transcription factors can change entire biological pathways in
an organism. For example, manipulation of the levels of selected
transcription factors may result in increased expression of
economically useful proteins or biomolecules in plants or
improvement in other agriculturally relevant characteristics.
Conversely, blocked or reduced expression of a transcription factor
may reduce biosynthesis of unwanted compounds or remove an
undesirable trait. Therefore, manipulating transcription factor
levels in a plant offers tremendous potential in agricultural
biotechnology for modifying a plant's traits, including traits that
improve a plant's survival and yield during periods of abiotic
stress, including germination in cold and hot conditions, and
osmotic stress, including drought, salt stress, and other abiotic
stresses, as noted below.
[0007] Problems associated with drought. A drought is a period of
abnormally dry weather that persists long enough to produce a
serious hydrologic imbalance (for example crop damage, water supply
shortage, etc.). While much of the weather that we experience is
brief and short-lived, drought is a more gradual phenomenon, slowly
taking hold of an area and tightening its grip with time. In severe
cases, drought can last for many years and can have devastating
effects on agriculture and water supplies. With burgeoning
population and chronic shortage of available fresh water, drought
is not only the number one weather related problem in agriculture,
it also ranks as one of the major natural disasters of all time,
causing not only economic damage, but also loss of human lives. For
example, losses from the US drought of 1988 exceeded $40 billion,
exceeding the losses caused by Hurricane Andrew in 1992, the
Mississippi River floods of 1993, and the San Francisco earthquake
in 1989. In some areas of the world, the effects of drought can be
far more severe. In the Horn of Africa the 1984-1985 drought led to
a famine that killed 750,000 people.
[0008] Problems for plants caused by low water availability include
mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular water.
Drought also causes plants to become more susceptible to various
diseases (Simpson (1981). "The Value of Physiological Knowledge of
Water Stress in Plants", In Water Stress on Plants, (Simpson, G.
M., ed.), Praeger, N.Y., pp. 235-265).
[0009] In addition to the many land regions of the world that are
too arid for most if not all crop plants, overuse and
over-utilization of available water is resulting in an increasing
loss of agriculturally-usable land, a process which, in the
extreme, results in desertification. The problem is further
compounded by increasing salt accumulation in soils, as described
above, which adds to the loss of available water in soils.
[0010] Problems associated with high salt levels. One in five
hectares of irrigated land is damaged by salt, an important
historical factor in the decline of ancient agrarian societies.
This condition is only expected to worsen, further reducing the
availability of arable land and crop production, since none of the
top five food crops--wheat, corn, rice, potatoes, and soybean--can
tolerate excessive salt.
[0011] Detrimental effects of salt on plants are a consequence of
both water deficit resulting in osmotic stress (similar to drought
stress) and the effects of excess sodium ions on critical
biochemical processes. As with freezing and drought, high saline
causes water deficit; the presence of high salt makes it difficult
for plant roots to extract water from their environment (Buchanan
et al. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants,
American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, Md.). Soil
salinity is thus one of the more important variables that
determines where a plant may thrive. In many parts of the world,
sizable land areas are uncultivable due to naturally high soil
salinity. To compound the problem, salination of soils that are
used for agricultural production is a significant and increasing
problem in regions that rely heavily on agriculture. The latter is
compounded by over-utilization, over-fertilization and water
shortage, typically caused by climatic change and the demands of
increasing population. Salt tolerance is of particular importance
early in a plant's lifecycle, since evaporation from the soil
surface causes upward water movement, and salt accumulates in the
upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination
normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the
mean salt level in the whole soil profile.
[0012] Problems associated with excessive heat. Germination of many
crops is very sensitive to temperature. A transcription factor that
would enhance germination in hot conditions would be useful for
crops that are planted late in the season or in hot climates.
Seedlings and mature plants that are exposed to excess heat may
experience heat shock, which may arise in various organs, including
leaves and particularly fruit, when transpiration is insufficient
to overcome heat stress. Heat also damages cellular structures,
including organelles and cytoskeleton, and impairs membrane
function (Buchanan et al. (2000) in Biochemistry and Molecular
Biology of Plants, American Society of Plant Physiologists,
Rockville, Md.).
[0013] Heat shock may produce a decrease in overall protein
synthesis, accompanied by expression of heat shock proteins. Heat
shock proteins function as chaperones and are involved in refolding
proteins denatured by heat.
[0014] Heat stress often accompanies conditions of low water
availability. Heat itself is seen as an interacting stress and adds
to the detrimental effects caused by water deficit conditions.
Evaporative demand exhibits near exponential increases with
increases in daytime temperatures and can result in high
transpiration rates and low plant water potentials (Hall et al.
(2000) Plant Physiol. 123: 1449-1458). High-temperature damage to
pollen almost always occurs in conjunction with drought stress, and
rarely occurs under well-watered conditions. Thus, separating the
effects of heat and drought stress on pollination is difficult.
Combined stress can alter plant metabolism in novel ways; therefore
understanding the interaction between different stresses may be
important for the development of strategies to enhance stress
tolerance by genetic manipulation.
[0015] Problems associated with excessive chilling conditions. The
term "chilling sensitivity" has been used to describe many types of
physiological damage produced at low, but above freezing,
temperatures. Most crops of tropical origins, such as soybean,
rice, maize and cotton are easily damaged by chilling. Typical
chilling damage includes wilting, necrosis, chlorosis or leakage of
ions from cell membranes. The underlying mechanisms of chilling
sensitivity are not completely understood yet, but probably involve
the level of membrane saturation and other physiological
deficiencies. For example, photoinhibition of photosynthesis
(disruption of photosynthesis due to high light intensities) often
occurs under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late
summer/autumn nights. For example, chilling may lead to yield
losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of
maize. Another consequence of poor growth is the rather poor ground
cover of maize fields in spring, often resulting in soil erosion,
increased occurrence of weeds, and reduced uptake of nutrients. A
retarded uptake of mineral nitrogen could also lead to increased
losses of nitrate into the ground water. By some estimates,
chilling accounts for monetary losses in the United States (US)
behind only to drought and flooding.
[0016] Desirability of altered sugar sensing. Sugars are key
regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants
including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar
metabolism and photosynthesis. Sucrose, for example, is the major
transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been
shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound
accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships). Glucose-specific
hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated
in cell division and repression of "famine" genes (photosynthetic
or glyoxylate cycles).
[0017] Water deficit is a common component of many plant stresses.
Water deficit occurs in plant cells when the whole plant
transpiration rate exceeds the water uptake. In addition to
drought, other stresses, such as salinity and low temperature,
produce cellular dehydration (McCue and Hanson (1990) Trends
Biotechnol. 8: 358-362
[0018] Salt and drought stress signal transduction consist of ionic
and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways. The ionic aspect of
salt stress is signaled via the SOS pathway where a
calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the
expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1. The
pathway regulating ion homeostasis in response to salt stress has
been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) Plant Cell Environ.
25: 131-139.
[0019] The osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant
reactions that overlap with drought and/or cold stress
responses.
[0020] Common aspects of drought, cold and salt stress response
have been reviewed recently by Xiong and Zhu (2002) supra). Those
include:
[0021] (a) transient changes in the cytoplasmic calcium levels very
early in the signaling event (Knight, (2000) Int. Rev. Cytol. 195:
269-324; Sanders et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 691-706);
[0022] (b) signal transduction via mitogen-activated and/or calcium
dependent protein kinases (CDPKs;
[0023] see Xiong et al., 2002) and protein phosphatases (Merlot et
al. (2001) Plant J. 25: 295-303; Thtiharju and Palva (2001) Plant
J. 26: 461-470);
[0024] (c) increases in abscisic acid levels in response to stress
triggering a subset of responses (Xiong et al. (2002) supra, and
references therein);
[0025] (d) inositol phosphates as signal molecules (at least for a
subset of the stress responsive transcriptional changes (Xiong et
al. (2001) Genes Dev. 15: 1971-1984);
[0026] (e) activation of phospholipases which in turn generate a
diverse array of second messenger molecules, some of which might
regulate the activity of stress responsive kinases (phospholipase D
functions in an ABA independent pathway, Frank et al. (2000) Plant
Cell 12: 111-124);
[0027] (f) induction of late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) type
genes including the CRT/DRE responsive COR/RD genes (Xiong and Zhu
(2002) supra);
[0028] (g) increased levels of antioxidants and compatible
osmolytes such as proline and soluble sugars (Hasegawa et al.
(2000) Annu. Rev. Plant Mol. Plant Physiol. 51: 463499); and
[0029] (h) accumulation of reactive oxygen species such as
superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and hydroxyl radicals (Hasegawa et
al. (2000) supra).
[0030] Abscisic acid biosynthesis is regulated by osmotic stress at
multiple steps. Both ABA-dependent and -independent osmotic stress
signaling first modify constitutively expressed transcription
factors, leading to the expression of early response
transcriptional activators, which then activate downstream stress
tolerance effector genes.
[0031] Based on the commonality of many aspects of cold, drought
and salt stress responses, it can be concluded that genes that
increase tolerance to cold or salt stress can also improve drought
stress protection. In fact this has already been demonstrated for
transcription factors (in the case of AtCBF/DREB1) and for other
genes such as OsCDPK7 (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327),
or AVP1 (a vacuolar pyrophosphatase-proton-- pump, Gaxiola et al.
(2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 11444-11449).
[0032] The present invention relates to methods and compositions
for producing transgenic plants with modified traits, particularly
traits that address agricultural and food needs. These traits,
including altered sugar sensing and tolerance to abiotic and
osmotic stress (e.g., tolerance to cold, high salt concentrations
and drought), may provide significant value in that they allow the
plant to thrive in hostile environments, where, for example, high
or low temperature, low water availability or high salinity may
limit or prevent growth of non-transgenic plants.
[0033] We have identified polynucleotides encoding transcription
factors, including G482, G481, G485, G1364, G2345, G1781 and their
equivalogs listed in the Sequence Listing, and structurally and
functionally similar sequences, developed numerous transgenic
plants using these polynucleotides, and have analyzed the plants
for their tolerance to abiotic stresses, including those associated
with heat, cold, or osmotic stresses such as drought and excessive
salt. In so doing, we have identified important polynucleotide and
polypeptide sequences for producing commercially valuable plants
and crops as well as the methods for making them and using them.
Other aspects and embodiments of the invention are described below
and can be derived from the teachings of this disclosure as a
whole.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0034] The present invention pertains to transgenic plants that
comprise a recombinant polynucleotide that includes a nucleotide
sequence encoding a CCAAT transcription factor with the ability to
regulate abiotic stress tolerance in a plant. The nucleotide
sequence is capable of hybridizing to the complement of the G482
polynucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO:3) under stringent conditions
consisting of hybridization (e.g., to filter-bound DNA, such as a
hybridization procedure that includes the use of 6.times.SSC,
65.degree. C., in two wash steps of 10-30 minutes in duration. The
resultant transgenic plant has increased tolerance to abiotic
stress as compared to a non-transformed plant.
[0035] The invention also encompasses transgenic plant that
comprise a recombinant polynucleotide that includes a nucleotide
sequence encoding a CCAAT transcription factor with the ability to
regulate abiotic stress tolerance in a plant; the transcription
factor comprising a CCAAT-box binding conserved domain that is at
least 83% identical with the conserved CCAAT-box binding or "B"
domain of the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 4). This transgenic
plant has increased tolerance to abiotic stress as compared to a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the recombinant
polynucleotide.
[0036] The present invention also relates to a method of using
transgenic plants transformed with the presently disclosed
transcription factor sequences, their complements or their variants
to grow a progeny plant by crossing the transgenic plant with
either itself or another plant, selecting seed that develops as a
result of the crossing; and then growing the progeny plant from the
seed. The progeny plant will generally express mRNA that encodes a
transcription factor: that is, a DNA-binding protein that binds to
a DNA regulatory sequence and regulates gene expression, such as
that of a plant trait gene. The mRNA will generally be expressed at
a level greater than a non-transformed plant; and the progeny plant
is characterized by a change in a plant trait compared to the
non-transformed plant.
[0037] The present invention also pertains to an expression
cassette. The expression cassette comprises at least two elements,
including: (1) a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific
promoter; and (2) a recombinant polynucleotide having a
polynucleotide sequence, or a complementary polynucleotide sequence
thereof, selected from the group consisting of
[0038] (a) the G482 polynucleotide (SEQ ID NO: 3);
[0039] (b) a polynucleotide encoding the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID
NO: 4);
[0040] (c) a nucleotide sequence that hybridizes to the
polynucleotide of (a) or (b) under the stringent conditions of
6.times.SSC and 65.degree. C.; and
[0041] (d) a nucleotide sequence that is at least 83% identical
with the B domain found in the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 4).
[0042] The invention is also characterized by a host cell that
contains the aforementioned expression cassette.
[0043] The present invention also pertains to methods for
increasing a plant's tolerance to abiotic stress. This is
accomplished through the use of a vector that comprises a
polynucleotide sequence that hybridizes over its full length to the
complement of the G482 polynucleotide (SEQ ID NO:3) under the
stringent conditions of hybridization to filter-bound DNA in
6.times.SSC at 65.degree. C. The polynucleotide sequence encodes a
CCAAT transcription factor that has the property of SEQ ID NO:4 of
regulating abiotic stress tolerance in a plant. The vector also
includes regulatory elements that control expression of the
polynucleotide sequence in a target plant. These regulatory
elements flank the polynucleotide sequence. The target plant is
then transformed with the vector, which transformation process
generates a plant with increased tolerance to osmotic stress.
[0044] The invention is also directed to a method for producing a
plant that has increased tolerance to one or more osmotic stresses.
This method is performed by selecting a polynucleotide that encodes
the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 4), inserting either this
polynucleotide or its complement into an expression cassette (for
example, the expression cassette described above), introducing the
expression cassette into a plant or plant cell in order to
overexpress the G482 polypeptide, which thereby produces a plant
having increased tolerance to osmotic stress. A plant that has this
increased tolerance relative to a control plant not so transformed
may then be identified and selected.
[0045] The invention further pertains to an isolated nucleic acid
comprising a nucleotide sequence at least 99.6% identical to G482,
SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the expression of this nucleotide sequence
results in increased abiotic stress tolerance in a plant.
[0046] Also encompassed by the invention are polypeptides encoded
by isolated nucleic acids that are at least 99.6% identical to
G482, vectors comprising isolated nucleic acid that are at least
99.6% identical to G482, and host cells and transgenic plants
transformed with these isolated nucleic acids.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEQUENCE LISTING AND FIGURES
[0047] The file of this patent contains at least one drawing
executed in color. Copies of this patent with color drawing(s) will
be provided by the Patent and Trademark Office upon request and
payment of the necessary fee.
[0048] The Sequence Listing provides exemplary polynucleotide and
polypeptide sequences of the invention. The traits associated with
the use of the sequences are included in the Examples.
[0049] CD-ROM1 is a read-only memory computer-readable compact disc
and contains a copy of the Sequence Listing in ASCII text format.
The Sequence Listing is named "MBI0022CIP.ST25.txt" and is 163
kilobytes in size. The copies of the Sequence Listing on the CD-ROM
disc are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
[0050] FIG. 1 shows a conservative estimate of phylogenetic
relationships among the orders of flowering plants (modified from
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84:
1-49). Those plants with a single cotyledon (monocots) are a
monophyletic clade nested within at least two major lineages of
dicots; the eudicots are further divided into rosids and asterids.
Arabidopsis is a rosid eudicot classified within the order
Brassicales; rice is a member of the monocot order Poales. FIG. 1
was adapted from Daly et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127:
1328-1333.
[0051] FIG. 2 shows a phylogenic dendogram depicting phylogenetic
relationships of higher plant taxa, including clades containing
tomato and Arabidopsis; adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and Chase et al. (1993) Ann. Missouri
Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
[0052] FIG. 3 is adapted from Kwong et al (2003) Plant Cell 15:
5-18, and shows crop orthologs identified through BLAST analysis of
various L1L-related sequences. A phylogeny tree was then generated
using ClustaIX based on whole protein sequences showing the
non-LEC1-like HAP3 clade of transcription factors (large box). This
clade, also contains members from other species (for example, SEQ
ID NOs: 18, 20, 24, 26, 48, 50, 52, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88,
90, 92, 94, and other sequences appearing in Table 5) are
phylogenetically distinct from the LEC 1-like proteins, some of
which are also shown in FIG. 3. The smaller box delineates the
G482-like subclade, containing transcription factors that are
structurally most closely related to G482, and in which several
members have been shown to confer improved abiotic stress tolerance
and/or altered flowering time characteristics.
[0053] Similar to FIG. 3, FIG. 4 shows the phylogenic relationship
of sequences within the G482-subclade (within the smaller box) and
the non-LEC1-like clade (larger box).
[0054] FIG. 5 shows the domain structure of HAP3 proteins. HAP3
proteins contain an amino-terminal A domain, a central B domain,
and a carboxy-terminal C domain. There may be relatively little
sequence similarity between HAP3 proteins in the A and C domains.
The A and C domains could thus provide a degree of specificity to
each member of the HAP3 family. The B domain is the conserved
region that specifies DNA binding and subunit association.
[0055] In FIGS. 6A-6F, the alignments of HAP3 polypeptides are
presented, including G481, G482, G485, G1364, G2345, G1781 and
related sequences from Arabidopsis aligned with soybean, rice and
corn sequences, showing the B domains (indicated by the line that
spans FIGS. 6B through 6D). Consensus residues within the listed
sequences are indicated by boldface. The boldfaced residues in the
consensus sequence that appears at the bottom of FIGS. 6A through
6C in their respective positions are uniquely found in the
non-LEC1-like clade. The underlined serine residue appearing in the
consensus sequence in its respective positions is uniquely found
within the G482-like subclade. As discussed in greater detail below
in Example IX, the residue positions indicated by the arrows in
FIG. 6B are associated with an alteration of flowering time when
these polypeptides are overexpressed.
[0056] FIGS. 7A-7D show the effects of water deprivation and
recovery from this treatment on Arabidopsis control and
35S::G481-overexpressing lines. After eight days of drought
treatment overexpressing plants had a darker green and less
withered appearance (FIG. 7C) than those in the control group (FIG.
7A). The differences in appearance between the control and
G481-overexpressing plants after they were rewatered was even more
striking. Most (11 of 12 plants; FIG. 7B) of this set of control
plants died after rewatering, indicating the inability to recover
following severe water deprivation, whereas all nine of the
overexpressor plants of the line shown recovered from this drought
treatment (FIG. 7D). The results shown in FIGS. 7A-7D were typical
of a number of control and 35 S::G481-overexpressing lines.
[0057] FIGS. 8A and 8B show the effects of salt stress on
Arabidopsis seed germination. The three lines of G481-and G482
overexpressors on these two plate had longer roots and showed
greater cotyledon expansion (arrows) after three days on 150 mM
NaCl than the control seedlings on the right-hand sides of the
plates.
[0058] In FIG. 9A, G481 null mutant seedlings (labeled K481) show
reduced tolerance of osmotic stress, relative to the control
seedlings in FIG. 8B, as evidenced by the reduced cotyledon
expansion and root growth in the former group. Without salt stress
tolerance on control media, (FIGS. 9C, G481 null mutants; and 9D,
control seedlings), the knocked out and control plants appear the
same.
[0059] FIGS. 10A-10D show the effects of stress-related treatments
on G485 overexpressing seedlings (35S::G485 lines) in plate assays.
In each treatment, including cold, high sucrose, high salt and ABA
germination assays, the overexpressors fared much better than the
wild-type controls exposed to the same treatments in FIGS. 10E-10H,
respectively, as evidenced by the enhanced cotyledon expansion and
root growth seen with the overexpressing seedlings.
[0060] FIGS. 11A-11C depict the effects of G485 knockout and
overexpression on flowering time and maturation. As seen in FIG.
10A, a T-DNA insertion knockout mutation containing a
SALK.sub.--062245 insertion was shown to flower several days later
than wild-type control plants. The plants in FIG. 11A are shown 44
days after germination. FIG. 11C shows that G485 primary
transformants flowered distinctly earlier than wild-type controls.
These plants are shown 24 days after germination. These effects
were observed in each of two independent T1 plantings derived from
separate transformation dates. Additionally, accelerated flowering
was also seen in plants that overexpressed G485 from a two
component system (35S::LexA;op-LexA::G485). These studies indicated
that G485 is both sufficient to act as a floral activator, and is
also necessary in that role within the plant. G485 overexpressor
plants also matured and set siliques much more rapidly than wild
type controls, as shown in FIG. 11B with plants 39 days
post-germination.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0061] In an important aspect, the present invention relates to
polynucleotides and polypeptides, for example, for modifying
phenotypes of plants, particularly those associated with osmotic
stress tolerance. Throughout this disclosure, various information
sources are referred to and/or are specifically incorporated. The
information sources include scientific journal articles, patent
documents, textbooks, and World Wide Web browser-inactive page
addresses, for example. While the reference to these information
sources clearly indicates that they can be used by one of skill in
the art, each and every one of the information sources cited herein
are specifically incorporated in their entirety, whether or not a
specific mention of "incorporation by reference" is noted. The
contents and teachings of each and every one of the information
sources can be relied on and used to make and use embodiments of
the invention.
[0062] As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular
forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural reference unless the
context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, a reference
to "a plant" includes a plurality of such plants, and a reference
to "a stress" is a reference to one or more stresses and
equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so
forth.
[0063] Definitions
[0064] "Nucleic acid molecule" refers to a oligonucleotide,
polynucleotide or any fragment thereof. It may be DNA or RNA of
genomic or synthetic origin, double-stranded or single-stranded,
and combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials
to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a
useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).
[0065] "Polynucleotide" is a nucleic acid molecule comprising a
plurality of polymerized nucleotides, e.g., at least about 15
consecutive polymerized nucleotides, optionally at least about 30
consecutive nucleotides, at least about 50 consecutive nucleotides.
A polynucleotide may be a nucleic acid, oligonucleotide,
nucleotide, or any fragment thereof. In many instances, a
polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a
polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof.
Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an
intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation
initiation site, 5' or 3' untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a
selectable marker, or the like. The polynucleotide can be single
stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA. The polynucleotide
optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone. The
polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such
as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA
or RNA, or the like. The polynucleotide can be combined with
carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a
particular activity such as transformation or form a useful
composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). The
polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense
orientations. "Oligonucleotide" is substantially equivalent to the
terms amplimer, primer, oligomer, element, target, and probe and is
preferably single stranded.
[0066] "Gene" or "gene sequence" refers to the partial or complete
coding sequence of a gene, its complement, and its 5' or 3'
untranslated regions. A gene is also a functional unit of
inheritance, and in physical terms is a particular segment or
sequence of nucleotides along a molecule of DNA (or RNA, in the
case of RNA viruses) involved in producing a polypeptide chain. The
latter may be subjected to subsequent processing such as splicing
and folding to obtain a functional protein or polypeptide. A gene
may be isolated, partially isolated, or be found with an organism's
genome. By way of example, a transcription factor gene encodes a
transcription factor polypeptide, which may be functional or
require processing to function as an initiator of
transcription.
[0067] Operationally, genes may be defined by the cis-trans test, a
genetic test that determines whether two mutations occur in the
same gene and which may be used to determine the limits of the
genetically active unit (Rieger et al. (1976) Glossary of Genetics
and Cytogenetics: Classical and Molecular, 4th ed., Springer
Verlag. Berlin). A gene generally includes regions preceding
("leaders"; upstream) and following ("trailers"; downstream) of the
coding region. A gene may also include intervening, non-coding
sequences, referred to as "introns", located between individual
coding segments, referred to as "exons". Most genes have an
associated promoter region, a regulatory sequence 5' of the
transcription initiation codon (there are some genes that do not
have an identifiable promoter). The function of a gene may also be
regulated by enhancers, operators, and other regulatory
elements.
[0068] A "recombinant polynucleotide" is a polynucleotide that is
not in its native state, e.g., the polynucleotide comprises a
nucleotide sequence not found in nature, or the polynucleotide is
in a context other than that in which it is naturally found, e.g.,
separated from nucleotide sequences with which it typically is in
proximity in nature, or adjacent (or contiguous with) nucleotide
sequences with which it typically is not in proximity. For example,
the sequence at issue can be cloned into a vector, or otherwise
recombined with one or more additional nucleic acid.
[0069] An "isolated polynucleotide" is a polynucleotide whether
naturally occurring or recombinant, that is present outside the
cell in which it is typically found in nature, whether purified or
not. Optionally, an isolated polynucleotide is subject to one or
more enrichment or purification procedures, e.g., cell lysis,
extraction, centrifugation, precipitation, or the like.
[0070] A "polypeptide" is an amino acid sequence comprising a
plurality of consecutive polymerized amino acid residues e.g., at
least about 15 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues,
optionally at least about 30 consecutive polymerized amino acid
residues, at least about 50 consecutive polymerized amino acid
residues. In many instances, a polypeptide comprises a polymerized
amino acid residue sequence that is a transcription factor or a
domain or portion or fragment thereof. Additionally, the
polypeptide may comprise 1) a localization domain, 2) an activation
domain, 3) a repression domain, 4) an oligomerization domain, or 5)
a DNA-binding domain, or the like. The polypeptide optionally
comprises modified amino acid residues, naturally occurring amino
acid residues not encoded by a codon, non-naturally occurring amino
acid residues.
[0071] "Protein" refers to an amino acid sequence, oligopeptide,
peptide, polypeptide or portions thereof whether naturally
occurring or synthetic.
[0072] "Portion", as used herein, refers to any part of a protein
used for any purpose, but especially for the screening of a library
of molecules which specifically bind to that portion or for the
production of antibodies.
[0073] A "recombinant polypeptide" is a polypeptide produced by
translation of a recombinant polynucleotide. A "synthetic
polypeptide" is a polypeptide created by consecutive polymerization
of isolated amino acid residues using methods well known in the
art. An "isolated polypeptide," whether a naturally occurring or a
recombinant polypeptide, is more enriched in (or out of) a cell
than the polypeptide in its natural state in a wild-type cell,
e.g., more than about 5% enriched, more than about 10% enriched, or
more than about 20%, or more than about 50%, or more, enriched,
i.e., alternatively denoted: 105%, 110%, 120%, 150% or more,
enriched relative to wild type standardized at 100%. Such an
enrichment is not the result of a natural response of a wild-type
plant. Alternatively, or additionally, the isolated polypeptide is
separated from other cellular components with which it is typically
associated, e.g., by any of the various protein purification
methods herein.
[0074] "Homology" refers to sequence similarity between a reference
sequence and at least a fragment of a newly sequenced clone insert
or its encoded amino acid sequence.
[0075] "Hybridization complex" refers to a complex between two
nucleic acid molecules by virtue of the formation of hydrogen bonds
between purines and pyrimidines.
[0076] "Identity" or "similarity" refers to sequence similarity
between two polynucleotide sequences or between two polypeptide
sequences, with identity being a more strict comparison. The
phrases "percent identity" and "% identity" refer to the percentage
of sequence similarity found in a comparison of two or more
polynucleotide sequences or two or more polypeptide sequences.
"Sequence similarity" refers to the percent similarity in base pair
sequence (as determined by any suitable method) between two or more
polynucleotide sequences. Two or more sequences can be anywhere
from 0-100% similar, or any integer value therebetween. Identity or
similarity can be determined by comparing a position in each
sequence that may be aligned for purposes of comparison. When a
position in the compared sequence is occupied by the same
nucleotide base or amino acid, then the molecules are identical at
that position. A degree of similarity or identity between
polynucleotide sequences is a function of the number of identical
or matching nucleotides at positions shared by the polynucleotide
sequences. A degree of identity of polypeptide sequences is a
function of the number of identical amino acids at positions shared
by the polypeptide sequences. A degree of homology or similarity of
polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of amino acids at
positions shared by the polypeptide sequences.
[0077] The term "amino acid consensus motif" refers to the portion
or subsequence of a polypeptide sequence that is substantially
conserved among the polypeptide transcription factors listed in the
Sequence Listing.
[0078] "Alignment" refers to a number of nucleotide bases or amino
acid residue sequences aligned by lengthwise comparison so that
components in common (ire., nucleotide bases or amino acid
residues) may be visually and readily identified. The fraction or
percentage of components in common is related to the homology or
identity between the sequences. Alignments such as those of FIGS.
6A-6F may be used to identify conserved domains and relatedness
within these domains. An alignment may suitably be determined by
means of computer programs known in the art, such as MACVECTOR
software (1999) (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, Calif.).
[0079] A "conserved domain" or "conserved region" as used herein
refers to a region in heterologous polynucleotide or polypeptide
sequences where there is a relatively high degree of sequence
identity between the distinct sequences. A CCAAT-box binding
conserved domain, such as one of the domains shown in Table 1, is
an example of a conserved domain.
[0080] With respect to polynucleotides encoding presently disclosed
transcription factors, a conserved domain is preferably at least 10
base pairs (bp) in length.
[0081] A "conserved domain", with respect to presently disclosed
polypeptides refers to a domain within a transcription factor
family that exhibits a higher degree of sequence homology, such as
at least 26% sequence similarity, at least 16% sequence identity,
preferably at least 40% sequence identity, preferably at least 65%
sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and more
preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and even more preferably
at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at
least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or
at least about 98% amino acid residue sequence identity of a
polypeptide of consecutive amino acid residues. A fragment or
domain can be referred to as outside a conserved domain, outside a
consensus sequence, or outside a consensus DNA-binding site that is
known to exist or that exists for a particular transcription factor
class, family, or sub-family. In this case, the fragment or domain
will not include the exact amino acids of a consensus sequence or
consensus DNA-binding site of a transcription factor class, family
or sub-family, or the exact amino acids of a particular
transcription factor consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding
site. Furthermore, a particular fragment, region, or domain of a
polypeptide, or a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide, can be
"outside a conserved domain" if all the amino acids of the
fragment, region, or domain fall outside of a defined conserved
domain(s) for a polypeptide or protein. Sequences having lesser
degrees of identity but comparable biological activity are
considered to be equivalents.
[0082] As one of ordinary skill in the art recognizes, conserved
domains may be identified as regions or domains of identity to a
specific consensus sequence (see, for example, Riechmann et al.
(2000) supra). Thus, by using alignment methods well known in the
art, the conserved domains of the plant transcription factors for
the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989)
Genes Dev. 3: 1166-1178) may be determined.
[0083] The CCAAT-box binding conserved domains or conserved domains
for SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 and similar sequences are listed
in Table 1. Also, the polypeptides of Table 1 have CCAAT-box
binding conserved domains specifically indicated by start and stop
sites. A comparison of the regions of the polypeptides in Table 1
allows one of skill in the art to identify "B" or CCAAT-box binding
conserved domains, or conserved domains for any of the polypeptides
listed or referred to in this disclosure.
[0084] "Complementary" refers to the natural hydrogen bonding by
base pairing between purines and pyrimidines. For example, the
sequence A-C-G-T (5'->3') forms hydrogen bonds with its
complements A-C-G-T (5'->3') or A-C-G-U (5'->3'). Two
single-stranded molecules may be considered partially
complementary, if only some of the nucleotides bond, or "completely
complementary" if all of the nucleotides bond. The degree of
complementarity between nucleic acid strands affects the efficiency
and strength of the hybridization and amplification reactions.
"Fully complementary" refers to the case where bonding occurs
between every base pair and its complement in a pair of sequences,
and the two sequences have the same number of nucleotides.
[0085] The terms "highly stringent" or "highly stringent condition"
refer to conditions that permit hybridization of DNA strands whose
sequences are highly complementary, wherein these same conditions
exclude hybridization of significantly mismatched DNAs.
Polynucleotide sequences capable of hybridizing under stringent
conditions with the polynucleotides of the present invention may
be, for example, variants of the disclosed polynucleotide
sequences, including allelic or splice variants, or sequences that
encode orthologs or paralogs of presently disclosed polypeptides.
Nucleic acid hybridization methods are disclosed in detail by
Kashima et al. (1985) Nature 313:402404, and Sambrook et al. (1989)
Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y ("Sambrook"); and by Haymes et
al., "Nucleic Acid Hybridization: A Practical Approach", IRL Press,
Washington, D.C. (1985), which references are incorporated herein
by reference.
[0086] In general, stringency is determined by the temperature,
ionic strength, and concentration of denaturing agents (e.g.,
formamide) used in a hybridization and washing procedure (for a
more detailed description of establishing and determining
stringency, see below). The degree to which two nucleic acids
hybridize under various conditions of stringency is correlated with
the extent of their similarity. Thus, similar nucleic acid
sequences from a variety of sources, such as within a plant's
genome (as in the case of paralogs) or from another plant (as in
the case of orthologs) that may perform similar functions can be
isolated on the basis of their ability to hybridize with known
transcription factor sequences. Numerous variations are possible in
the conditions and means by which nucleic acid hybridization can be
performed to isolate transcription factor sequences having
similarity to transcription factor sequences known in the art and
are not limited to those explicitly disclosed herein. Such an
approach may be used to isolate polynucleotide sequences having
various degrees of similarity with disclosed transcription factor
sequences, such as, for example, encoded transcription factors
having 60% or greater identity with disclosed transcription
factors, or 83% or greater identity with the B domain of disclosed
transcription factors.
[0087] Regarding the terms "paralog" and "ortholog", homologous
polynucleotide sequences and homologous polypeptide sequences may
be paralogs or orthologs of the claimed polynucleotide or
polypeptide sequence. Orthologs and paralogs are evolutionarily
related genes that have similar sequence and similar functions.
Orthologs are structurally related genes in different species that
are derived by a speciation event. Paralogs are structurally
related genes within a single species that are derived by a
duplication event. Sequences that are sufficiently similar to one
another will be appreciated by those of skill in the art and may be
based upon percentage identity of the complete sequences,
percentage identity of a conserved domain or sequence within the
complete sequence, percentage similarity to the complete sequence,
percentage similarity to a conserved domain or sequence within the
complete sequence, and/or an arrangement of contiguous nucleotides
or peptides particular to a conserved domain or complete sequence.
Sequences that are sufficiently similar to one another will also
bind in a similar manner to the same DNA binding sites of
transcriptional regulatory elements using methods well known to
those of skill in the art.
[0088] The term "equivalog" describes members of a set of
homologous proteins that are conserved with respect to function
since their last common ancestor. Related proteins are grouped into
equivalog families, and otherwise into protein families with other
hierarchically defined homology types. This definition is provided
at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) world wide web (www)
website, "tigr.org " under the heading "Terms associated with
TIGRFAMs".
[0089] The term "variant", as used herein, may refer to
polynucleotides or polypeptides, that differ from the presently
disclosed polynucleotides or polypeptides, respectively, in
sequence from each other, and as set forth below.
[0090] With regard to polynucleotide variants, differences between
presently disclosed polynucleotides and polynucleotide variants are
limited so that the nucleotide sequences of the former and the
latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical.
Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, differences between the
former and latter nucleotide sequences o may be silent (i.e., the
amino acids encoded by the polynucleotide are the same, and the
variant polynucleotide sequence encodes the same amino acid
sequence as the presently disclosed polynucleotide. Variant
nucleotide sequences may encode different amino acid sequences, in
which case such nucleotide differences will result in amino acid
substitutions, additions, deletions, insertions, truncations or
fusions with respect to the similar disclosed polynucleotide
sequences. These variations result in polynucleotide variants
encoding polypeptides that share at least one functional
characteristic. The degeneracy of the genetic code also dictates
that many different variant polynucleotides can encode identical
and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those
sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing.
[0091] Also within the scope of the invention is a variant of a
transcription factor nucleic acid listed in the Sequence Listing,
that is, one having a sequence that differs from the one of the
polynucleotide sequences in the Sequence Listing, or a
complementary sequence, that encodes a functionally equivalent
polypeptide (i.e., a polypeptide having some degree of equivalent
or similar biological activity) but differs in sequence from the
sequence in the Sequence Listing, due to degeneracy in the genetic
code. Included within this definition are polymorphisms that may or
may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide
probe of the polynucleotide encoding polypeptide, and improper or
unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other
than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence
encoding polypeptide.
[0092] "Allelic variant" or "polynucleotide allelic variant" refers
to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the
same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through
mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within
populations. Gene mutations may be "silent" or may encode
polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. "Allelic variant"
and "polypeptide allelic variant" may also be used with respect to
polypeptides, and in this case the term refer to a polypeptide
encoded by an allelic variant of a gene.
[0093] "Splice variant" or "polynucleotide splice variant" as used
herein refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene.
Splice variation naturally occurs as a result of alternative sites
being spliced within a single transcribed RNA molecule or between
separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several
different forms of mRNA transcribed from the same gene. This,
splice variants may encode polypeptides having different amino acid
sequences, which may or may not have similar functions in the
organism. "Splice variant" or "polypeptide splice variant" may also
refer to a polypeptide encoded by a splice variant of a transcribed
mRNA.
[0094] As used herein, "polynucleotide variants" may also refer to
polynucleotide sequences that encode paralogs and orthologs of the
presently disclosed polypeptide sequences. "Polypeptide variants"
may refer to polypeptide sequences that are paralogs and orthologs
of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences.
[0095] Differences between presently disclosed polypeptides and
polypeptide variants are limited so that the sequences of the
former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many
regions, identical. Presently disclosed polypeptide sequences and
similar polypeptide variants may differ in amino acid sequence by
one or more substitutions, additions, deletions, fusions and
truncations, which may be present in any combination. These
differences may produce silent changes and result in a functionally
equivalent transcription factor. Thus, it will be readily
appreciated by those of skill in the art, that any of a variety of
polynucleotide sequences is capable of encoding the transcription
factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides of the
invention. A polypeptide sequence variant may have "conservative"
changes, wherein a substituted amino acid has similar structural or
chemical properties. Deliberate amino acid substitutions may thus
be made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility,
hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of
the residues, as long as the functional or biological activity of
the transcription factor is retained. For example, negatively
charged amino acids may include aspartic acid and glutamic acid,
positively charged amino acids may include lysine and arginine, and
amino acids with uncharged polar head groups having similar
hydrophilicity values may include leucine, isoleucine, and valine;
glycine and alanine; asparagine and glutamine; serine and
threonine; and phenylalanine and tyrosine (for more detail on
conservative substitutions, see Table 3). More rarely, a variant
may have "non-conservative" changes, e.g., replacement of a glycine
with a tryptophan. Similar minor variations may also include amino
acid deletions or insertions, or both. Related polypeptides may
comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more
N-linked or 0-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a
deletion of one or more cysteine residues. Guidance in determining
which and how many amino acid residues may be substituted, inserted
or deleted without abolishing functional or biological activity may
be found using computer programs well known in the art, for
example, DNASTAR software (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,544).
[0096] "Ligand" refers to any molecule, agent, or compound that
will bind specifically to a complementary site on a nucleic acid
molecule or protein. Such ligands stabilize or modulate the
activity of nucleic acid molecules or proteins of the invention and
may be composed of at least one of the following: inorganic and
organic substances including nucleic acids, proteins,
carbohydrates, fats, and lipids.
[0097] "Modulates" refers to a change in activity (biological,
chemical, or immunological) or lifespan resulting from specific
binding between a molecule and either a nucleic acid molecule or a
protein.
[0098] The term "plant" includes whole plants, shoot vegetative
organs/structures (e.g., leaves, stems and tubers), roots, flowers
and floral organs/structures (for example, bracts, sepals, petals,
stamens, carpels, anthers and ovules), seed (including embryo,
endosperm, and seed coat) and fruit (the mature ovary), plant
tissue (for example, vascular tissue, ground tissue, and the like)
and cells (for example, guard cells, egg cells, and the like), and
progeny of same. The class of plants that can be used in the method
of the invention is generally as broad as the class of higher and
lower plants amenable to transformation techniques, including
angiosperms (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants),
gymnosperms, ferns, horsetails, psilophytes, lycophytes,
bryophytes, and multicellular algae. (See for example, FIG. 1,
adapted from Daly et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333; FIG.
2, adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97:
9121-9126; and see also Tudge in The Variety of Life, Oxford
University Press, New York, N.Y. (2000) pp. 547-606).
[0099] A "transgenic plant" refers to a plant that contains genetic
material not found in a wild-type plant of the same species,
variety or cultivar. The genetic material may include a transgene,
an insertional mutagenesis event (such as by transposon or T-DNA
insertional mutagenesis), an activation tagging sequence, a mutated
sequence, a homologous recombination event or a sequence modified
by chimeraplasty. Typically, the foreign genetic material has been
introduced into the plant by human manipulation, but any method can
be used as one of skill in the art recognizes.
[0100] A transgenic plant may contain an expression vector or
cassette. The expression cassette typically comprises a
polypeptide-encoding sequence operably linked (i.e., under
regulatory control of) to appropriate inducible or constitutive
regulatory sequences that allow for the expression of polypeptide.
The expression cassette can be introduced into a plant by
transformation or by breeding after transformation of a parent
plant. A plant refers to a whole plant as well as to a plant part,
such as seed, fruit, leaf, or root, plant tissue, plant cells or
any other plant material, e.g., a plant explant, as well as to
progeny thereof, and to in vitro systems that mimic biochemical or
cellular components or processes in a cell.
[0101] "Control plant" refers to a plant that serves as a standard
of comparison for testing the results of a treatment or genetic
alteration, or the degree of altered expression of a gene or gene
product. Examples of control plants include plants that are
untreated, or genetically unaltered (i.e., wild-type).
[0102] "Wild type", as used herein, refers to a cell, tissue or
plant that has not been genetically modified to knock out or
overexpress one or more of the presently disclosed transcription
factors. Wild-type cells, tissue or plants may be used as controls
to compare levels of expression and the extent and nature of trait
modification with cells, tissue or plants in which transcription
factor expression is altered or ectopically expressed, e.g., in
that it has been knocked out or overexpressed.
[0103] "Fragment", with respect to a polynucleotide, refers to a
clone or any part of a polynucleotide molecule that retains a
usable, functional characteristic. Useful fragments include
oligonucleotides and polynucleotides that may be used in
hybridization or amplification technologies or in the regulation of
replication, transcription or translation. A polynucleotide
fragment" refers to any subsequence of a polynucleotide, typically,
of at least about 9 consecutive nucleotides, preferably at least
about 30 nucleotides, more preferably at least about 50
nucleotides, of any of the sequences provided herein. Exemplary
polynucleotide fragments are the first sixty consecutive
nucleotides of the transcription factor polynucleotides listed in
the Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments
that comprise a region that encodes a B domain of a transcription
factor, for example, amino acid residues 26-116 of G482 (SEQ ID NO:
4), as noted in Table 1.
[0104] Fragments may also include subsequences of polypeptides and
protein molecules, or a subsequence of the polypeptide. Fragments
may have uses in that they may have antigenic potential. In some
cases, the fragment or domain is a subsequence of the polypeptide
which performs at least one biological function of the intact
polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar
extent, as does the intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide
fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional
domain such as a DNA-binding site or domain that binds to a DNA
promoter region, an activation domain, or a domain for
protein-protein interactions, and may initiate transcription.
Fragments can vary in size from as few as 3 amino acid residues to
the full length of the intact polypeptide, but are preferably at
least about 30 amino acid residues in length and more preferably at
least about 60 amino acid residues in length. Exemplary polypeptide
fragments are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of a
mammalian protein encoded by are the first twenty consecutive amino
acids of the transcription factor polypeptides listed in the
Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments that
comprise a B domain of a transcription factor, for example, amino
acid residues 26-116 of G482 (SEQ ID NO: 4), as noted in Table
1.
[0105] The invention also encompasses production of DNA sequences
that encode transcription factors and transcription factor
derivatives, or fragments thereof, entirely by synthetic chemistry.
After production, the synthetic sequence may be inserted into any
of the many available expression vectors and cell systems using
reagents well known in the art. Moreover, synthetic chemistry may
be used to introduce mutations into a sequence encoding
transcription factors or any fragment thereof.
[0106] "Derivative" refers to the chemical modification of a
nucleic acid molecule or amino acid sequence. Chemical
modifications can include replacement of hydrogen by an alkyl,
acyl, or amino group or glycosylation, pegylation, or any similar
process that retains or enhances biological activity or lifespan of
the molecule or sequence.
[0107] A "trait" refers to a physiological, morphological,
biochemical, or physical characteristic of a plant or particular
plant material or cell. In some instances, this characteristic is
visible to the human eye, such as seed or plant size, or can be
measured by biochemical techniques, such as detecting the protein,
starch, or oil content of seed or leaves, or by observation of a
metabolic or physiological process, e.g. by measuring tolerance to
water deprivation or particular salt or sugar concentrations, or by
the observation of the expression level of a gene or genes, e.g.,
by employing Northern analysis, RT-PCR, microarray gene expression
assays, or reporter gene expression systems, or by agricultural
observations such as osmotic stress tolerance or yield. Any
technique can be used to measure the amount of, comparative level
of, or difference in any selected chemical compound or
macromolecule in the transgenic plants, however.
[0108] "Trait modification" refers to a detectable difference in a
characteristic in a plant ectopically expressing a polynucleotide
or polypeptide of the present invention relative to a plant not
doing so, such as a wild-type plant. In some cases, the trait
modification can be evaluated quantitatively. For example, the
trait modification can entail at least about a 2% increase or
decrease in an observed trait (difference), at least a 5%
difference, at least about a 10% difference, at least about a 20%
difference, at least about a 30%, at least about a 50%, at least
about a 70%, or at least about a 100%, or an even greater
difference compared with a wild-type plant. It is known that there
can be a natural variation in the modified trait. Therefore, the
trait modification observed entails a change of the normal
distribution of the trait in the plants compared with the
distribution observed in wild-type plants.
[0109] The term "transcript profile" refers to the expression
levels of a set of genes in a cell in a particular state,
particularly by comparison with the expression levels of that same
set of genes in a cell of the same type in a reference state. For
example, the transcript profile of a particular transcription
factor in a suspension cell is the expression levels of a set of
genes in a cell knocking out or overexpressing that transcription
factor compared with the expression levels of that same set of
genes in a suspension cell that has normal levels of that
transcription factor. The transcript profile can be presented as a
list of those genes whose expression level is significantly
different between the two treatments, and the difference ratios.
Differences and similarities between expression levels may also be
evaluated and calculated using statistical and clustering
methods.
[0110] "Ectopic expression or altered expression" in reference to a
polynucleotide indicates that the pattern of expression in, e.g., a
transgenic plant or plant tissue, is different from the expression
pattern in a wild-type plant or a reference plant of the same
species. The pattern of expression may also be compared with a
reference expression pattern in a wild-type plant of the same
species. For example, the polynucleotide or polypeptide is
expressed in a cell or tissue type other than a cell or tissue type
in which the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by
expression at a time other than at the time the sequence is
expressed in the wild-type plant, or by a response to different
inducible agents, such as hormones or environmental signals, or at
different expression levels (either higher or lower) compared with
those found in a wild-type plant. The term also refers to altered
expression patterns that are produced by lowering the levels of
expression to below the detection level or completely abolishing
expression. The resulting expression pattern can be transient or
stable, constitutive or inducible. In reference to a polypeptide,
the term "ectopic expression or altered expression" further may
relate to altered activity levels resulting from the interactions
of the polypeptides with exogenous or endogenous modulators or from
interactions with factors or as a result of the chemical
modification of the polypeptides.
[0111] The term "overexpression" as used herein refers to a greater
expression level of a gene in a plant, plant cell or plant tissue,
compared to expression in a wild-type plant, cell or tissue, at any
developmental or temporal stage for the gene. Overexpression can
occur when, for example, the genes encoding one or more
transcription factors are under the control of a strong expression
signal, such as one of the promoters described herein (e.g., the
cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcription initiation region).
Overexpression may occur throughout a plant or in specific tissues
of the plant, depending on the promoter used, as described
below.
[0112] Overexpression may take place in plant cells normally
lacking expression of polypeptides functionally equivalent or
identical to the present transcription factors. Overexpression may
also occur in plant cells where endogenous expression of the
present transcription factors or functionally equivalent molecules
normally occurs, but such normal expression is at a lower level.
Overexpression thus results in a greater than normal production, or
"overproduction" of the transcription factor in the plant, cell or
tissue.
[0113] The term "transcription regulating region" refers to a DNA
regulatory sequence that regulates expression of one or more genes
in a plant when a transcription factor having one or more specific
binding domains binds to the DNA regulatory sequence. Transcription
factors of the present invention possess an AP2 domain, a B3
domain, or both of these binding domains. The AP2 domain of the
transcription factor binds to a transcription regulating region
comprising the motif CAACA, and the B3 domain of the same
transcription factor binds to a transcription regulating region
comprising the motif CACCTG. The transcription factors of the
invention also comprise an amino acid subsequence that forms a
transcription activation domain that regulates expression of one or
more abiotic stress tolerance genes in a plant when the
transcription factor binds to the regulating region.
[0114] The term "phase change" refers to a plant's progression from
embryo to adult, and, by some definitions, the transition wherein
flowering plants gain reproductive competency. It is believed that
phase change occurs either after a certain number of cell divisions
in the shoot apex of a developing plant, or when the shoot apex
achieves a particular distance from the roots. Thus, altering the
timing of phase changes may affect a plant's size, which, in turn,
may affect yield and biomass.
[0115] A "sample" with respect to a material containing nucleic
acid molecules may comprise a bodily fluid; an extract from a cell,
chromosome, organelle, or membrane isolated from a cell; genomic
DNA, RNA, or cDNA in solution or bound to a substrate; a cell; a
tissue; a tissue print; a forensic sample; and the like. In this
context "substrate" refers to any rigid or semi-rigid support to
which nucleic acid molecules or proteins are bound and includes
membranes, filters, chips, slides, wafers, fibers, magnetic or
nonmagnetic beads, gels, capillaries or other tubing, plates,
polymers, and microparticles with a variety of surface forms
including wells, trenches, pins, channels and pores. A substrate
may also refer to a reactant in a chemical or biological reaction,
or a substance acted upon (e.g., by an enzyme).
[0116] "Substantially purified" refers to nucleic acid molecules or
proteins that are removed from their natural environment and are
isolated or separated, and are at least about 60% free, preferably
about 75% free, and most preferably about 90% free, from other
components with which they are naturally associated.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0117] Transcription Factors Modify Expression of Endogenous
Genes
[0118] A transcription factor may include, but is not limited to,
any polypeptide that can activate or repress transcription of a
single gene or a number of genes. As one of ordinary skill in the
art recognizes, transcription factors can be identified by the
presence of a region or domain of structural similarity or identity
to a specific consensus sequence or the presence of a specific
consensus DNA-binding site or DNA-binding site motif (see, for
example, Riechmann et al. (2000) Science 290: 2105-2110). The plant
transcription factors may belong to the CAAT-element binding
protein transcription factor family (Forsburg and Guarente (1989)
supra).
[0119] Generally, the transcription factors encoded by the present
sequences are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation
and the regulation of growth. Accordingly, one skilled in the art
would recognize that by expressing the present sequences in a
plant, one may change the expression of autologous genes or induce
the expression of introduced genes. By affecting the expression of
similar autologous sequences in a plant that have the biological
activity of the present sequences, or by introducing the present
sequences into a plant, one may alter a plant's phenotype to one
with improved traits related to osmotic stresses. The sequences of
the invention may also be used to transform a plant and introduce
desirable traits not found in the wild-type cultivar or strain.
Plants may then be selected for those that produce the most
desirable degree of over- or under-expression of target genes of
interest and coincident trait improvement.
[0120] The sequences of the present invention may be from any
species, particularly plant species, in a naturally occurring form
or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or
recombinant. The sequences of the invention may also include
fragments of the present amino acid sequences. Where "amino acid
sequence" is recited to refer to an amino acid sequence of a
naturally occurring protein molecule, "amino acid sequence" and
like terms are not meant to limit the amino acid sequence to the
complete native amino acid sequence associated with the recited
protein molecule.
[0121] In addition to methods for modifying a plant phenotype by
employing one or more polynucleotides and polypeptides of the
invention described herein, the polynucleotides and polypeptides of
the invention have a variety of additional uses. These uses include
their use in the recombinant production (i.e., expression) of
proteins; as regulators of plant gene expression, as diagnostic
probes for the presence of complementary or partially complementary
nucleic acids (including for detection of natural coding nucleic
acids); as substrates for further reactions, e.g., mutation
reactions, PCR reactions, or the like; as substrates for cloning
e.g., including digestion or ligation reactions; and for
identifying exogenous or endogenous modulators of the transcription
factors. In many instances, a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide
sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or
fragment thereof. Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a
promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a
translation initiation site, 5' or 3' untranslated regions, a
reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like. The polynucleotide
can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA. The
polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified
backbone. The polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a
transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA,
a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like. The polynucleotide can
comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientations.
[0122] Expression of genes that encode transcription factors that
modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and
proteins are well known in the art. In addition, transgenic plants
comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors
may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides,
and proteins. Examples include Peng et al. (1997, Genes Development
11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999, Nature, 400: 256-261). In
addition, many others have demonstrated that an Arabidopsis
transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant species
elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See, for
example, Fu et al. (2001, Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et al.
(2000, Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995, Nature 377:
482483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).
[0123] In another example, Mandel et al. (1992, Cell 71-133-143)
and Suzuki et al.(2001, Plant J. 28: 409-418) teach that a
transcription factor expressed in another plant species elicits the
same or very similar phenotypic response of the endogenous
sequence, as often predicted in earlier studies of Arabidopsis
transcription factors in Arabidopsis (see Mandel et al. 1992,
supra; Suzuki et al. 2001, supra).
[0124] Other examples include Miller et al. (2001, Plant J. 28:
169-179); Kim et al. (2001, Plant J. 25: 247-259); Kyozuka and
Shimamoto (2002, Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 130-135); Boss and Thomas
(2002, Nature, 416: 847-850); He et al. (2000, Transgenic Res. 9:
223-227); and Robson et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 619-631).
[0125] In yet another example, Gilmour et al. (1998, Plant J. 16:
433442) teach an Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factor, CBF1 (SEQ ID
NO: 96), which, when overexpressed in transgenic plants, increases
plant freezing tolerance. Jaglo et al. ((2001) Plant Physiol. 127:
910-917) further identified sequences in Brassica napus which
encode CBF-like genes and that transcripts for these genes
accumulated rapidly in response to low temperature. Transcripts
encoding CBF-like proteins were also found to accumulate rapidly in
response to low temperature in wheat, as well as in tomato. An
alignment of the CBF proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, wheat,
rye, and tomato revealed the presence of conserved consecutive
amino acid residues, PKK/RPAGRxKFxETRHP and DSAWR, that bracket the
AP2/EREBP DNA binding domains of the proteins and distinguish them
from other members of the AP2/EREBP protein family. (See Jaglo et
al. supra.) Transcription factors mediate cellular responses and
control traits through altered expression of genes containing
cis-acting nucleotide sequences that are targets of the introduced
transcription factor. It is well appreciated in the Art that the
effect of a transcription factor on cellular responses or a
cellular trait is determined by the particular genes whose
expression is either directly or indirectly (e.g., by a cascade of
transcription factor binding events and transcriptional changes)
altered by transcription factor binding. In a global analysis of
transcription comparing a standard condition with one in which a
transcription factor is overexpressed, the resulting transcript
profile associated with transcription factor overexpression is
related to the trait or cellular process controlled by that
transcription factor. For example, the PAP2 gene (and other genes
in the MYB family) have been shown to control anthocyanin
biosynthesis through regulation of the expression of genes known to
be involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Bruce et al.
(2000) Plant Cell 12: 65-79; and Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell
12: 2383-2393). Further, global transcript profiles have been used
successfully as diagnostic tools for specific cellular states
(e.g., cancerous vs. non-cancerous; Bhattacharjee et al. (2001)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 13790-13795; and Xu et al. (2001)
Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 98: 15089-15094). Consequently, it is
evident to one skilled in the art that similarity of transcript
profile upon overexpression of different transcription factors
would indicate similarity of transcription factor function.
[0126] CCAAT-Element Binding Protein Transcription Factor
Family
[0127] The CAAT family of transcription factors, also be referred
to as the "CCAAT" or "CCAAT-box" family, are characterized by their
ability to bind to the CCAAT-box element located 80 to 300 bp 5'
from a transcription start site (Gelinas et al. (1985) Nature 313:
323-325). The CCAAT-box is a conserved cis-acting regulatory
element with the consensus sequence CCAAT that is found in the
promoters of genes from all eukaryotic species. The element can act
in either orientation, alone or as multimeric regions with possible
cooperation with other cis regulatory elements (Tasanen et al.
(1992) (J. Biol. Chem. 267: 11513-11519). It has been estimated
that 25% of eukaryotic promoters harbor this element (Bucher (1988)
J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 5: 1231-1236). CCAAT-box elements have been
shown to function in the regulation of gene expression in plants
(Rieping and Schoffl (1992) Mol. Gen. Genet. 231: 226-232; Kehoe et
al. (1994) Plant Cell 6: 1123-1134; Ito et al. (1995) Plant Cell
Physiol. 36: 1281-1289). Several reports have described the
importance of the CCAAT-binding element for regulated expression;
including the regulation of genes that are responsive to light
(Kusnetsov et al. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274: 36009-36014; Carre and
Kay (1995) Plant Cell 7: 2039-2051) as well as stress (Rieping and
Schoffl (1992) supra). Specifically, a CCAAT-box motif was shown to
be important for the light regulated expression of the CAB2
promoter in Arabidopsis, however, the proteins that bind to the
site were not identified (Carre and Kay (1995) supra). To date, no
specific Arabidopsis CCAAT-box binding protein has been
functionally associated with its corresponding target genes. In
October of 2002 at an EPSO meeting on Plant Networks, a seminar was
given by Detlef Weigel (Tuebingen) on the control of the AGAMOUS (a
floral organ identity gene) gene in Arabidopsis. In order to find
important cis-elements that regulate AGAMOUS activity, he aligned
the promoter regions from 29 different Brassicaceae species and
showed that there were two highly conserved regions; one well
characterized site that binds LEAFY/WUS heterodimers and another
putative CCAAT-box binding motif. We have discovered several
CCAAT-box genes that regulate flowering time and are candidates for
binding to the AGAMOUS promoter. One of these genes, G485, is a
HAP3-like protein that is closely related to G481. Gain of function
and loss of function studies on G485 reveal opposing effects on
flowering time, indicating that the gene is both sufficient to act
as a floral activator, and is also necessary in that role within
the plant.
[0128] The first proteins identified that bind to the CCAAT-box
element were identified in yeast. The CCAAT-box transcription
factors bind as hetero-tetrameric complex called the HAP complex
(heme activator protein complex) or the CCAAT binding factor
(Forsburg and Guarente (1988) Mol. Cell Biol. 8: 647-654). The HAP
complex in yeast is composed of at least four subunits, HAP2, HAP3,
HAP4 and HAP5. In addition, the proteins that make up the
HAP2,3,4,5 complex are represented by single genes. Their function
is specific for the activation of genes involved in mitochondrial
biogenesis and energy metabolism (Dang et al. (1996) Mol.
Microbiol. 22:681-692). In mammals, the CCAAT binding factor is a
trimeric complex consisting of NF-YA (HAP2-like), NF-YB (HAP3-like)
and NF-YC (HAP5-like) subunits (Maity and de Crombrugghe (1998)
Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 174-178). In plants, analogous members of
the CCAAT binding factor complex are represented by small gene
families, and it is likely that these genes play a more complex
role in regulating gene transcription. In Arabidopsis there are ten
members of the HAP2 subfamily, ten members of the HAP3 subfamily,
thirteen members of the HAP5 subfamily. Plants and mammals,
however, do not appear to have a protein equivalent of HAP4 of
yeast. HAP4 is not required for DNA binding in yeast although it
provides the primary activation domain for the complex (McNabb et
al. (1995) Genes Dev. 9: 47-58; Olesen and Guarente (1990) Genes
Dev. 4, 1714-1729).
[0129] In mammals, the CCAAT-box element is found in the promoters
of many genes and it is therefore been proposed that CCAAT binding
factors serve as general transcriptional regulators that influence
the frequency of transcriptional initiation (Maity and de
Crombrugghe (1998) supra). CCAAT binding factors, however, can
serve to regulate target promoters in response to environmental
cues and it has been demonstrated that assembly of CCAAT binding
factors on target promoters occurs in response to a variety signals
(Myers et al. (1986) Myers et al. (1986) Science 232: 613-618;
Maity and de Crombrugghe (1998) supra; Bezhani et al. (2001) J.
Biol. Chem. 276: 23785-23789). Mammalian CP 1 and NF-Y are both
heterotrimeric CCAAT binding factor complexes (Johnson and McKnight
(1989) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 58: 799-839. Plant CCAAT binding factors
are assumed to be trimeric, as is the case in mammals, however,
they could associate with other transcription factors on target
promoters as part of a larger complex. The CCAAT box is generally
found in close proximity of other promoter elements and it is
generally accepted that the CCAAT binding factor functions
synergistically with other transcription factors in the regulation
of transcription. In addition, it has recently been shown that a
HAP3-like protein from rice, OsNF-YB1, interacts with a MADS-box
protein OsMADS18 in vitro (Masiero et al. (2002) J. Biol. Chem.
277: 26429-26435). It was also shown that the in vitro ternary
complex between these two types of transcription factors requires
that both; OsNF-YB1 form a dimer with a HAP5-like protein, and that
OsMADS18 form a heterodimer with another MADS-box protein.
Interestingly, the OsNF-YB1/HAP5 protein dimer is incapable of
interacting with HAP2-like subunits and therefore cannot bind the
CCAAT element. The authors therefore speculate that there is a
select set of HAP3-like proteins in plants that act on non-CCAAT
promoter elements by virtue of their interaction with other
non-CCAAT transcription factors (Masiero et al. (2002) supra). In
support of this, HAP3/HAP5 subunit dimers have been shown to be
able to interact with TFIID in the absence of HAP2 subunits (Romier
et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278: 1336-1345).
[0130] The CCAAT-box motif is found in the promoters of a variety
of plant genes. In addition, the expression pattern of many of the
HAP-like genes in Arabidopsis shows developmental regulation. We
have used RT-PCR to analyze the endogenous expression of 31 of the
34 CCAAT-box proteins. Our findings suggest that while most of the
CCAAT-box gene transcripts are found ubiquitously throughout the
plant, in more than half of the cases, the genes are predominantly
expressed in flower, embryo and/or silique tissues. Cell-type
specific localization of the CCAAT genes in Arabidopsis would be
very informative and could help determine the activity of various
CCAAT genes in the plant.
[0131] Genetic analysis has determined the function of one
Arabidopsis CCAAT gene, LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC1). LEC1 is a HAP3
subunit homolog that accumulates only during seed development.
Arabidopsis plants carrying a mutation in the LEC1 gene display
embryos that are intolerant to desiccation and that show defects in
seed maturation (Lotan et al. (1998) Cell 93: 1195-1205). This
phenotype can be rescued if the embryos are allowed to grow before
the desiccation process occurs during normal seed maturation. This
result suggests LEC1 has a role in allowing the embryo to survive
desiccation during seed maturation. The mutant plants also possess
trichomes, or epidermal hairs on their cotyledons, a characteristic
that is normally restricted to adult tissues like leaves and stems.
Such an effect suggests that LEC1 also plays a role in specifying
embryonic organ identity in addition to the mutant analysis, the
ectopic expression (unregulated overexpression) of the wild type
LEC1 gene induces embryonic programs and embryo development in
vegetative cells consistent with its role in coordinating higher
plant embryo development. The ortholog of LEC1 has been identified
recently in maize. The expression pattern of ZmLEC1 in maize during
somatic embryo development is similar to that of LEC1 in
Arabidopsis during zygotic embryo development (Zhang et al. (2002)
Planta 215:191-194).
[0132] Matching the CCAAT transcription factors with target
promoters and the analysis of the knockout and overexpression
mutant phenotypes will help sort out whether these proteins act
specifically or non-specifically in the control of plant pathways.
The fact that CCAAT-box elements are not present in most plant
promoters suggests that plant CCAAT binding factors most likely do
not function as general components of the transcriptional
machinery. In addition, the very specific role of the LEC1 protein
in plant developmental processes supports the idea that CCAAT-box
binding complexes play very specific roles in plant growth and
development.
[0133] The Domain Structure of CCAAT-Element Binding Transcription
Factors and Novel Conserved Domains in Arabidopsis and Other
Species
[0134] Plant CCAAT binding factors potentially bind DNA as
heterotrimers composed of HAP2-like, HAP3-like and HAP5-like
subunits. All subunits contain regions that are required for DNA
binding and subunit association. The subunit proteins appear to
lack activation domains; therefore, that function must come from
proteins with which they interact on target promoters. No proteins
that provide the activation domain function for CCAAT binding
factors have been identified in plants. In yeast, however, the HAP4
protein provides the primary activation domain (McNabb et al.
(1995) Genes Dev. 9: 47-58; Olesen and Guarente (1990) Genes Dev.
4, 1714-1729).
[0135] HAP2-, HAP3- and HAP5-like proteins have two highly
conserved sub-domains, one that functions in subunit interaction
and the other that acts in a direct association with DNA. Outside
these two regions, non-paralogous Arabidopsis HAP-like proteins are
quite divergent in sequence and in overall length.
[0136] The general domain structure of HAP3 proteins is found in
FIG. 5. HAP3 proteins contain an amino-terminal A domain, a central
B domain and a carboxy-terminal C domain. There is very little
sequence similarity between HAP3 proteins in the A and C domains;
it is therefore reasonable to assume that the A and C domains could
provide a degree of functional specificity to each member of the
HAP3 subfamily. The B domain is the conserved region that specifies
DNA binding and subunit association.
[0137] In FIGS. 6A-6F, HAP3 proteins from Arabidopsis, soybean,
rice and corn are aligned with G48 1, with the A, B and C domains
and the DNA binding and subunit interaction domains indicated. As
can be seen in FIG. 6B-6C, the B domain of the non-LEC1-like clade
(identified in FIGS. 3 and 4) may be distinguished by the amino
acid residues:
1 Ser/Gly-Arg-Ile/Leu-Met-Lys-(Xaa).sub.2-Lys/Ile/Val-Pro-X-
aa-Asn-Ala/Gly-Lys-Ile/Val- Ser/Ala/Gly-Lys-Asp/Glu-Ala/S-
er-Lys-Glu/Asp/Gln-Thr/Ile-Xaa-Gln-Glu-Cys-Val/Ala-Ser/Thr-Glu-
Phe-Ile-Ser-Phe-Ile/Val/His-Thr/Ser-[Pro]-Gly/Ser/Cys-Glu-Ala/Leu-Se-
r/Ala-Asp/Glu/Gly-Lys/Glu- Cys-Gln/His-Arg/Lys-Glu-Lys/Asn-
-Arg-Lys-Thr-Ile/Val-Asn-Gly-Asp/Glu-Asp-Leu/Ile-Xaa-Trp/Phe-
Ala-Met/Ile/Leu-Xaa-Thr/Asn-Leu-Gly-Phe/Leu-Glu/Asp-Xaa-Tyr-(Xaa).sub.-
2-Pro/Gln/Ala-Leu/Val- Lys/Gly;
[0138] where Xaa can be any amino acid. The proline residue that
appears in brackets is an additional residue that was found in only
one sequence (not shown in FIG. 6B). The boldfaced residues that
appear here and in the consensus sequences of FIGS. 6B-6C in their
present positions are uniquely found in the non-LEC1-like clade,
and may be used to identify members of this clade. The G482-like
subclade may be delineated by the underlined serine residue in its
present position here and in the consensus sequence of FIGS. 6B-6C.
More generally, the non-LEC1-like clade is distinguished by a B
domain comprising:
2 Asn-(Xaa).sub.4-Lys-(Xaa).sub.33-34-Asn-Gly;
[0139] and the G482 subclade is distinguished by a B-domain
comprising:
3 Ser-(Xaa).sub.9-Asn-(Xaa).sub.4-Lys-(Xaa).sub.33-34-Asn-Gly.
[0140] Overexpression of these polypeptides confers increased
abiotic stress tolerance in a transgenic plant, as compared to a
non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the
polypeptide.
[0141] Table 1 shows the polypeptides identified by SEQ ID NO;
Mendel Gene ID (GID) No.; the transcription factor family to which
the polypeptide belongs, and conserved B domains of the
polypeptide. The first column shows the polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the
second column the species and identifier (GID, GenBank accession
no., or other identifier); the third column shows the conserved
domain in amino acid coordinates; the fourth column shows the B
domain; and the fifth column shows the percentage identity to G482.
The sequences are arranged in descending order of percentage
identity to G482.
4TABLE 1 Gene families and B domains CCAAT-box Species/ binding GID
No., conserved % ID to CCAAT- Accession domain in box binding
Polypeptide No., or Amino Acid conserved domain SEQ ID NO:
Identifier Coordinates B Domain of G482 4 At/G482 26-116
REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 100%
MQECVSEFISFVTGEASDKCQKEKRKTINGDD LLWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKVYLQRFRE 20
Gm/G3475 23-113 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 95%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKGYLQRFRE 86
Gm/3478 23-113 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 95%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKGYLQRFRE 6
At/G485 20-110 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 94%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKVYLQKYRE 18
Gm/G3476 26-116 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 94%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEEYVEPLKIYLQRFRE 48 Zm/
22-112 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 93% CLUSTER
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL 90408_1 LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKHYLHKFRE
48 Zm/G3435 22-112 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 93%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKHYLHKFRE 50
Zm/G3436 20-110 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 93% CLUSTER
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL 90408_2 LWAMTTLGFEDYVEPLKLYLHKFRE
92 Os/G3397 23-113 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 92% AC120529
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYVDPLKHYLHKFRE 80
Gm/G3472 25-115 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKEAKET 92%
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQKEKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEEYVEPLKVYLHKYRE 82
Gm/G3474 25-115 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKEAKET 91% CLUSTER
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQKEKRKTINGDDL 33504_1
LWAMTFITLGFEDYVDPLKIYLHKYRE 76 Os/G3398 21-111
REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKRALPANAKISKDAKET 90% AP005193
VQECVSEFISFITGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEDYIDPLKLYLHKFRE 94
Zm/G3437 54-144 KEQDRFLPIANVSRIMKRSLPANAKISKEAKET 87%
VQECVSEFISFVTGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEAYVAPLKSYLNRYRE 28 Os/
38-127 VRQDRFLPIANISRIMKKAIPANGKIAKDAKET 86% CLUSTER
VQECVSEFISFITSEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDLL 26105_1 WAMATLGFEDYIEPLKVYLQKYRE
78 Zm/G3434 18-108 REQDRFLPIANISRIMKKAVPANGKIAKDAKET 86%
LQECVSEFISFVTSEASDKCQKEKRKTINGDDL LWAMATLGFEEYVEPLKIYLQKYKE 31 Os/
57-147 KEQDRFLPIANVSRIMKRSLPANAKISKESKET 86% OSC30077
VQECVSEFISFVTGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMTTLGFEAYVGPLKSYLNRYRE 88
Os/G3394 37-127 VRQDRFLPIANISRIMKKAIPANGKIAKDAKET 86%
VQECVSEFISFITSEASDKCQREKRKTINGDDLL WAMATLGFEDYIEPLKVYLQKYRE 24
Gm/G3471 26-116 REQDRYLPIANISRIMKKALPPNGKIAKDAKDT 85%
MQECVSEFISFITSEASEKCQKEKRKTINGDDL LWAMATLGFEDYIEPLKVYLARYRE 26
Gm/G3470 27-117 REQDRYLPIANISRIMKKALPPNGKIAKDAKDT 85% CLUSTER
MQECVSEFISFITSEASEKCQKIEKRKTINGDDL 4778_3 LWAMATLGFEDYIEPLKVYLARYRE
52 Gm/G3473 23-114 REQDRFLPIANVSRIMKKALPANAKISKDAKET 85%
VQECVSEFISFHSPGGLAGECQKEKRKTINGDD LLWAMTTLGFEEYVEPLKVYLHKYRE 8
At/G1364 29-119 REQDRFLPIANISRIMKRGLPANGKIAKDAKEI 85%
VQEGVSEFISFVTSEASDKGQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMATLGFEDYMEPLKVYLMRYRE 10
At/G2345 28-118 REQDRFLPIANISRIMKRGLPLNGKIAKDAKET 85%
MQECVSEFISFVTSEASDKGQREKRKTINGDDL LWAMATLGFEDYIDPLKVYLMRYRE 86
Gm/G3477 27-117 REQDRYLPIANISRIMKKALPPNGKIAKDAKDT 85%
MQEGVSEFISFITSEASEKCQKEKRKTINGDDL LWAMATLGFEDYIEPLKVYLARYRE 2
At/G481 20-110 REQDRYLPIANISRIMKKALPPNGKIGKDAKDT 83%
VQECVSEFISFITSEASDKCQKEKRKTVNGDDL LWAMATLGFEDYLEPLKIYLARYRE 72
At/G1781 35-125 KEQDRFLPIANVGRIMKKVLPGNGKISKDAKE 83%
TVQECVSEFISFVTGEASDKCQREKRKTINGDD IIWAITTLGFEDYVAPLKVYLCKYRD 74
Os/G3395 19-109 REQDRFLPIANISRIMIKKAVPANGKIAKDAKET 83%
LQECVSEFISFVTSEASDKCQKEKRKTINGEDL LFAMGTLGFEEYVDPLKIYLHKYRE Os/
19-109 REQDRFLPIANISRIMKKAVPANGKIAKDAKET 83% AP004366
LQECVSEFISFVTSEASDKCQKEKRKTINGEDL LFAMGTLGFEEYVDPLKIYLHKYRE 70
At/G1248 50-140 KEQDRLLPIANVGRIMKNILPANAKVSKEAKE 77%
TMQECVSEFISFVTGEASDKCHKEKRKTVNGD DICWAMANLGFDDYAAQLKKYLHRYRV 90
Os/G3396 21-111 KEQDRFLPIANIGRIMRRAVPENGKIAKDSKES 75%
VQECVSEFISFITSEASDKCLKEKRKTINGDDLI WSMGTLGFEDYVEPLKLYLRLYRE 60
At/G1821 28-118 REQDRFMPIANVIRIMRRILPAHAKISDDSKETI 69% L1L
QECVSEYISFITGEANERCQREQRKTITAEDVL WAMSKLGFDDYIEPLTLYLHRYRE At/
28-118 REQDQYMPIANVIRIMRKTLPSHAKISDDAKET 67% AAC39488
IQECVSEYISFVTGEANERCQREQRKTITAEDIL LEC1 WAMSKLGFDNYVDPLTVFINRYRE
At/G486 2-92 TDEDRLLPIANVGRLMKQILPSNAKISKEAKQT 60%
VQECATEFISFVTCEASEKCHRENRKTVNGDDI WWALSTLGLDNYADAVGRHLHKYRE
Abbreviations: At Arabidopsis thaliana Gm Glycine max Os Oryza
sativa Zm Zea mays
[0142] The transcription factors of the present invention each
possess a B or conserved domain, including the orthologs of G482
found by BLAST analysis, as described below. Generally, the B
domain of the transcription factors will bind to a
transcription-regulating region comprising the motif CCAAT. As
shown in Table 1, the B domains of G481, G485 and rice G3395 are at
least 83% identical to the corresponding domains of G482, and all
four of these transcription factors, which rely on the binding
specificity of their B domains, have similar or identical functions
in plants, conferring increased abiotic, including osmotic, stress
tolerance when overexpressed.
[0143] Polypeptides and Polynucleotides of the Invention
[0144] The present invention provides, among other things,
transcription factors (TFs), and transcription factor homolog
polypeptides, and isolated or recombinant polynucleotides encoding
the polypeptides, or novel sequence variant polypeptides or
polynucleotides encoding novel variants of transcription factors
derived from the specific sequences provided here. These
polypeptides and polynucleotides may be employed to modify a
plant's characteristics.
[0145] Exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the
invention were identified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank
database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and
parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further
characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence
strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of
known transcription factors. In addition, further exemplary
polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the invention were
identified in the plant GenBank database using publicly available
sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially
identified were then further characterized to identify sequences
comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence
motifs present in families of known transcription factors.
Polynucleotide sequences meeting such criteria were confirmed as
transcription factors.
[0146] Additional polynucleotides of the invention were identified
by screening Arabidopsis thaliana and/or other plant cDNA libraries
with probes corresponding to known transcription factors under low
stringency hybridization conditions. Additional sequences,
including full length coding sequences were subsequently recovered
by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) procedure, using a
commercially available kit according to the manufacturer's
instructions. Where necessary, multiple rounds of RACE are
performed to isolate 5' and 3' ends. The full-length cDNA was then
recovered by a routine end-to-end polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
using primers specific to the isolated 5' and 3' ends. Exemplary
sequences are provided in the Sequence Listing.
[0147] The polynucleotides of the invention can be or were
ectopically expressed in overexpressor or knockout plants and the
changes in the characteristic(s) or trait(s) of the plants
observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be
employed to improve the characteristics of plants.
[0148] The polynucleotides of the invention can be or were
ectopically expressed in overexpressor plant cells and the changes
in the expression levels of a number of genes, polynucleotides,
and/or proteins of the plant cells observed. Therefore, the
polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to change
expression levels of a genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of
plants.
[0149] The CCAAT Family Members Under Study
[0150] The correct sequences for G482, and trait disclosures for
G481, G482 and G485, were first disclosed in U.S. Provisional
Patent Application 60/166,228, filed Nov. 17, 1999.
[0151] G481, G482 and G485 (polynucleotide SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3 and 5)
were chosen for study based on observations that Arabidopsis plants
overexpressing these genes had resistance to abiotic stresses, such
as osmotic stress, and including drought-related stress (see
Example VIII, below). G481, G482 and G485 are members of the CCAAT
family, proteins that act in a multi-subunit complex and are
believed to bind CCAAT boxes in promoters of target genes as
trimers or tetramers.
[0152] In Arabidopsis, three types of CCAAT binding proteins exist:
HAP2, HAP3 and HAP5. The G481, G482 and G485 polypeptides, as well
as a number of other proteins in the Arabidopsis proteome, belong
to the HAP3 class. As reported in the scientific literature thus
far, only two genes from the HAP3 class have been functionally
analyzed to a substantial degree. These are LEAFY COTYLEDON1 (LEC1)
and its most closely related subunit, LEC1-LIKE (L1L). LEC1 and L1L
are expressed primarily during seed development. Both appear to be
essential for embryo survival of desiccation during seed maturation
(Kwong et al. (2003) Plant Cell 15: 5-18). LEC1 is a critical
regulator required for normal development during the early and late
phases of embryo genesis that is sufficient to induce embryonic
development in vegetative cells. Kwong et al. showed that ten
Arabidopsis HAP3 subunits can be divided into two classes based on
sequence identity in their central, conserved B domain. LEC1 and
L1L constitute LEC1-type HAP3 subunits, whereas the remaining HAP3
subunits were designated non-LEC1-type.
[0153] Phylogenetic trees based on sequential relatedness of the
HAP3 genes are shown in FIG. 3 and 4. As can be seen in these
figures, G1364 and G2345 are closely related to G481, and G482 and
G485 are more related to G481 than either LEC1 or L1L, which are
found on somewhat more distant nodes.
[0154] Producing Polypeptides
[0155] The polynucleotides of the invention include sequences that
encode transcription factors and transcription factor homolog
polypeptides and sequences complementary thereto, as well as unique
fragments of coding sequence, or sequence complementary thereto.
Such polynucleotides can be, e.g., DNA or RNA, e.g., mRNA, cRNA,
synthetic RNA, genomic DNA, cDNA synthetic DNA, oligonucleotides,
etc. The polynucleotides are either double-stranded or
single-stranded, and include either, or both sense (i.e., coding)
sequences and antisense (i.e., non-coding, complementary)
sequences. The polynucleotides include the coding sequence of a
transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog polypeptide,
in isolation, in combination with additional coding sequences
(e.g., a purification tag, a localization signal, as a
fusion-protein, as a pre-protein, or the like), in combination with
non-coding sequences (e.g., introns or inteins, regulatory elements
such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, and the like), and/or in
a vector or host environment in which the polynucleotide encoding a
transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide is
an endogenous or exogenous gene.
[0156] A variety of methods exist for producing the polynucleotides
of the invention. Procedures for identifying and isolating DNA
clones are well known to those of skill in the art, and are
described in, e.g., Berger and Kimmel, Guide to Molecular Cloning
Techniques, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 152 Academic Press, Inc.,
San Diego, Calif. ("Berger"); Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning--A
Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.), Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor
Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., 1989 ("Sambrook") and Current
Protocols in Molecular Biology, Ausubel et al. eds., Current
Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates,
Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (supplemented through 2000)
("Ausubel").
[0157] Alternatively, polynucleotides of the invention, can be
produced by a variety of in vitro amplification methods adapted to
the present invention by appropriate selection of specific or
degenerate primers. Examples of protocols sufficient to direct
persons of skill through in vitro amplification methods, including
the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the ligase chain reaction
(LCR), Qbeta-replicase amplification and other RNA polymerase
mediated techniques (e.g., NASBA), e.g., for the production of the
homologous nucleic acids of the invention are found in Berger
(supra), Sambrook (supra), and Ausubel (supra), as well as Mullis
et al. (1987) PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods and Applications
(Innis et al. eds) Academic Press Inc. San Diego, Calif. (1990)
(Innis). Improved methods for cloning in vitro amplified nucleic
acids are described in Wallace et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,039.
Improved methods for amplifying large nucleic acids by PCR are
summarized in Cheng et al. (1994) Nature 369: 684-685 and the
references cited therein, in which PCR amplicons of up to 40 kb are
generated. One of skill will appreciate that essentially any RNA
can be converted into a double stranded DNA suitable for
restriction digestion, PCR expansion and sequencing using reverse
transcriptase and a polymerase. See, e.g., Ausubel, Sambrook and
Berger, all supra.
[0158] Alternatively, polynucleotides and oligonucleotides of the
invention can be assembled from fragments produced by solid-phase
synthesis methods. Typically, fragments of up to approximately 100
bases are individually synthesized and then enzymatically or
chemically ligated to produce a desired sequence, e.g., a
polynucleotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor. For
example, chemical synthesis using the phosphoramidite method is
described, e.g., by Beaucage et al. (1981) Tetrahedron Letters 22:
1859-1869; and Matthes et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3: 801-805. According
to such methods, oligonucleotides are synthesized, purified,
annealed to their complementary strand, ligated and then optionally
cloned into suitable vectors. And if so desired, the
polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention can be custom
ordered from any of a number of commercial suppliers.
[0159] Homologous Sequences
[0160] Sequences homologous, i.e., that share significant sequence
identity or similarity, to those provided in the Sequence Listing,
derived from Arabidopsis thaliana or from other plants of choice,
are also an aspect of the invention. Homologous sequences can be
derived from any plant including monocots and dicots and in
particular agriculturally important plant species, including but
not limited to, crops such as soybean, wheat, corn (maize), potato,
cotton, rice, rape, oilseed rape (including canola), sunflower,
alfalfa, clover, sugarcane, and turf; or fruits and vegetables,
such as banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, and raspberry,
cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant,
grapes, honeydew, lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas,
peppers, pineapple, pumpkin, spinach, squash, sweet corn, tobacco,
tomato, tomatillo, watermelon, rosaceous fruits (such as apple,
peach, pear, cherry and plum) and vegetable brassicas (such as
broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, and kohlrabi).
Other crops, including fruits and vegetables, whose phenotype can
be changed and which comprise homologous sequences include barley;
rye; millet; sorghum; currant; avocado; citrus fruits such as
oranges, lemons, grapefruit and tangerines, artichoke, cherries;
nuts such as the walnut and peanut; endive; leek; roots such as
arrowroot, beet, cassava, turnip, radish, yam, and sweet potato;
and beans. The homologous sequences may also be derived from woody
species, such pine, poplar and eucalyptus, or mint or other
labiates. In addition, homologous sequences may be derived from
plants that are evolutionarily related to crop plants, but which
may not have yet been used as crop plants. Examples include deadly
nightshade (Atropa belladona), related to tomato; jimson weed
(Datura strommium), related to peyote; and teosinte (Zea species),
related to corn (maize).
[0161] Orthologs and Paralogs
[0162] Homologous sequences as described above can comprise
orthologous or paralogous sequences. Several different methods are
known by those of skill in the art for identifying and defining
these functionally homologous sequences. Three general methods for
defining orthologs and paralogs are described; an ortholog, paralog
or homolog may be identified by one or more of the methods
described below.
[0163] Orthologs and paralogs are evolutionarily related genes that
have similar sequence and similar functions. Orthologs are
structurally related genes in different species that are derived by
a speciation event. Paralogs are structurally related genes within
a single species that are derived by a duplication event.
[0164] Within a single plant species, gene duplication may cause
two copies of a particular gene, giving rise to two or more genes
with similar sequence and often similar function known as paralogs.
A paralog is therefore a similar gene formed by duplication within
the same species. Paralogs typically cluster together or in the
same lade (a group of similar genes) when a gene family phylogeny
is analyzed using programs such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994)
Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) Methods
Enzymol. 266: 383402). Groups of similar genes can also be
identified with pair-wise BLAST analysis (Feng and Doolittle (1987)
J. Mol. Evol. 25: 351-360). For example, a clade of very similar
MADS domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis all share a
common function in flowering time (Ratcliffe et al. (2001) Plant
Physiol. 126: 122-132), and a group of very similar AP2 domain
transcription factors from Arabidopsis are involved in tolerance of
plants to freezing (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442).
Analysis of groups of similar genes with similar function that fall
within one clade can yield sub-sequences that are particular to the
lade. These sub-sequences, known as consensus sequences, can not
only be used to define the sequences within each clade, but define
the functions of these genes; genes within a clade may contain
paralogous sequences, or orthologous sequences that share the same
function (see also, for example, Mount (2001), in Bioinformatics:
Sequence and Genome Analysis Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press,
Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., page 543.)
[0165] Speciation, the production of new species from a parental
species, can also give rise to two or more genes with similar
sequence and similar function. These genes, termed orthologs, often
have an identical function within their host plants and are often
interchangeable between species without losing function. Because
plants have common ancestors, many genes in any plant species will
have a corresponding orthologous gene in another plant species.
Once a phylogenic tree for a gene family of one species has been
constructed using a program such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994)
Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) supra)
potential orthologous sequences can be placed into the phylogenetic
tree and their relationship to genes from the species of interest
can be determined. Orthologous sequences can also be identified by
a reciprocal BLAST strategy. Once an orthologous sequence has been
identified, the function of the ortholog can be deduced from the
identified function of the reference sequence.
[0166] Transcription factor gene sequences are conserved across
diverse eukaryotic species lines (Goodrich et al. (1993) Cell 75:
519-530; Lin et al. (1991) Nature 353: 569-571; Sadowski et al.
(1988) Nature 335: 563-564). Plants are no exception to this
observation; diverse plant species possess transcription factors
that have similar sequences and functions.
[0167] Orthologous genes from different organisms have highly
conserved functions, and very often essentially identical functions
(Lee et al. (2002) Genome Res. 12: 493-502; Remm et al. (2001) J.
Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052). Paralogous genes, which have diverged
through gene duplication, may retain similar functions of the
encoded proteins. In such cases, paralogs can be used
interchangeably with respect to certain embodiments of the instant
invention (for example, transgenic expression of a coding
sequence). An example of such highly related paralogs is the CBF
family, with three well-defined members in Arabidopsis and at least
one ortholog in Brassica napus (SEQ ID NOs: 96, 98, 100, and 102,
respectively), all of which control pathways involved in both
freezing and drought stress (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16:
433-442; Jaglo et al. (1998) Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917).
[0168] The following references represent a small sampling of the
many studies that demonstrate that conserved transcription factor
genes from diverse species are likely to function similarly (i.e.,
regulate similar target sequences and control the same traits), and
that transcription factors may be transformed into diverse species
to confer or improve traits.
[0169] (1) The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene regulates systemic acquired
resistance (SAR); over-expression of NPR1 leads to enhanced
resistance in Arabidopsis. When either Arabidopsis NPR1 or the rice
NPR1 ortholog was overexpressed in rice (which, as a monocot, is
diverse from Arabidopsis), challenge with the rice bacterial blight
pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae, the transgenic plants
displayed enhanced resistance (Chern et al. (2001) Plant J. 27:
101-113). NPR1 acts through activation of expression of
transcription factor genes, such as TGA2 (Fan and Dong (2002) Plant
Cell 14: 1377-1389).
[0170] (2) E2F genes are involved in transcription of plant genes
for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Plant E2Fs share a
high degree of similarity in amino acid sequence between monocots
and dicots, and are even similar to the conserved domains of the
animal E2Fs. Such conservation indicates a functional similarity
between plant and animal E2Fs. E2F transcription factors that
regulate meristem development act through common cis-elements, and
regulate related (PCNA) genes (Kosugi and Ohashi, (2002) Plant J.
29: 45-59).
[0171] (3) The ABI5 gene (ABA insensitive 5) encodes a basic
leucine zipper factor required for ABA response in the seed and
vegetative tissues. Co-transformation experiments with ABI5 cDNA
constructs in rice protoplasts resulted in specific transactivation
of the ABA-inducible wheat, Arabidopsis, bean, and barley
promoters. These results demonstrate that sequentially similar ABI5
transcription factors are key targets of a conserved ABA signaling
pathway in diverse plants. (Gampala et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem.
277: 1689-1694).
[0172] (4) Sequences of three Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes were
obtained on the basis of sequence similarity to GAMYB genes from
barley, rice, and L. temulentum. These three Arabadopsis genes were
determined to encode transcription factors (AtMYB33, AtMYB65, and
AtMYB101) and could substitute for a barley GAMYB and control
alpha-amylase expression (Gocal et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127:
1682-1693).
[0173] (5) The floral control gene LEAFY from Arabidopsis can
dramatically accelerate flowering in numerous dictoyledonous
plants. Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY also caused
early flowering in transgenic rice (a monocot), with a heading date
that was 26-34 days earlier than that of wild-type plants. These
observations indicate that floral regulatory genes from Arabidopsis
are useful tools for heading date improvement in cereal crops (He
et al. (2000) Transgenic Res. 9: 223-227).
[0174] (6) Bioactive gibberellins (GAs) are essential endogenous
regulators of plant growth. GA signaling tends to be conserved
across the plant kingdom. GA signaling is mediated via GAI, a
nuclear member of the GRAS family of plant transcription factors.
Arabidopsis GAI has been shown to function in rice to inhibit
gibberellin response pathways (Fu et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13:
1791-1802).
[0175] (7) The Arabidopsis gene SUPERMAN (SUP), encodes a putative
transcription factor that maintains the boundary between stamens
and carpels. By over-expressing Arabidopsis SUP in rice, the effect
of the gene's presence on whorl boundaries was shown to be
conserved. This demonstrated that SUP is a conserved regulator of
floral whorl boundaries and affects cell proliferation (Nandi et
al. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218).
[0176] (8) Maize, petunia and Arabidopsis myb transcription factors
that regulate flavonoid biosynthesis are very genetically similar
and affect the same trait in their native species, therefore
sequence and function of these myb transcription factors correlate
with each other in these diverse species (Borevitz et al. (2000)
Plant Cell 12: 2383-2394).
[0177] (9) Wheat reduced height-1 (Rht-B1/Rht-D1) and maize dwarf-8
(d8) genes are orthologs of the Arabidopsis gibberellin insensitive
(GAI) gene. Both of these genes have been used to produce dwarf
grain varieties that have improved grain yield. These genes encode
proteins that resemble nuclear transcription factors and contain an
SH2-like domain, indicating that phosphotyrosine may participate in
gibberellin signaling. Transgenic rice plants containing a mutant
GAI allele from Arabidopsis have been shown to produce reduced
responses to gibberellin and are dwarfed, indicating that mutant
GAI orthologs could be used to increase yield in a wide range of
crop species (Peng et al. (1999) Nature 400: 256-261).
[0178] Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed
sequences will typically share at least about 70% amino acid
sequence identity in B domain. More closely related transcription
factors can share at least about 75% or about 80% or about 90% or
about 95% or about 98% or more sequence identity with the listed
sequences, or with the listed sequences but excluding or outside a
known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or with the
listed sequences excluding one or all conserved domains. Factors
that are most closely related to the listed sequences share, e.g.,
at least about 85%, about 90% or about 95% or more % sequence
identity to the listed sequences, or to the listed sequences but
excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus
DNA-binding site or outside one or all conserved domain. At the
nucleotide level, the sequences will typically share at least about
40% nucleotide sequence identity, preferably at least about 50%,
about 60%, about 70% or about 80% sequence identity, and more
preferably about 85%, about 90%, about 95% or about 97% or more
sequence identity to one or more of the listed sequences, or to a
listed sequence but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence
or consensus DNA-binding site, or outside one or all conserved
domain. The degeneracy of the genetic code enables major variations
in the nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide while maintaining
the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. B domains within
the CCAAT-binding transcription factor family may exhibit a higher
degree of sequence homology, such as at least 70% amino acid
sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and
preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and more preferably at
least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at
least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or
at least about 98% sequence identity. Transcription factors that
are homologous to the listed sequences should share at least 30%,
or at least about 60%, or at least about 75%, or at least about
80%, or at least about 90% at least about 95% amino acid sequence
identity over the entire length of the polypeptide or the
homolog.
[0179] Percent identity can be determined electronically, e.g., by
using the MEGALIGN program (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, Wis.). The
MEGALIGN program can create alignments between two or more
sequences according to different methods, for example, the clustal
method. (See, for example, Higgins and Sharp (1988) Gene 73:
237-244.) The clustal algorithm groups sequences into clusters by
examining the distances between all pairs. The clusters are aligned
pairwise and then in groups. Other alignment algorithms or programs
may be used, including FASTA, BLAST, or ENTREZ, FASTA and BLAST,
and which may be used to calculate percent similarity. These are
available as a part of the GCG sequence analysis package
(University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.), and can be used with or
without default settings. ENTREZ is available through the National
Center for Biotechnology Information. In one embodiment, the
percent identity of two sequences can be determined by the GCG
program with a gap weight of 1, e.g., each amino acid gap is
weighted as if it were a single amino acid or nucleotide mismatch
between the two sequences (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,333).
[0180] Other techniques for alignment are described in Methods in
Enzymology, vol. 266, Computer Methods for Macromolecular Sequence
Analysis (1996), ed. Doolittle, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego,
Calif., USA. Preferably, an alignment program that permits gaps in
the sequence is utilized to align the sequences. The Smith-Waterman
is one type of algorithm that permits gaps in sequence alignments
(see Shpaer (1997) Methods Mol. Biol. 70: 173-187). Also, the GAP
program using the Needleman and Wunsch alignment method can be
utilized to align sequences. An alternative search strategy uses
MPSRCH software, which runs on a MASPAR computer. MPSRCH uses a
Smith-Waterman algorithm to score sequences on a massively parallel
computer. This approach improves ability to pick up distantly
related matches, and is especially tolerant of small gaps and
nucleotide sequence errors. Nucleic acid-encoded amino acid
sequences can be used to search both protein and DNA databases.
[0181] The percentage similarity between two polypeptide sequences,
e.g., sequence A and sequence B, is calculated by dividing the
length of sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence
A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence B, into the sum of
the residue matches between sequence A and sequence B, times one
hundred. Gaps of low or of no similarity between the two amino acid
sequences are not included in determining percentage similarity.
Percent identity between polynucleotide sequences can also be
counted or calculated by other methods known in the art, e.g., the
Jotun Hein method. (See, e.g., Hein (1990) Methods Enzymol. 183:
626-645.) Identity between sequences can also be determined by
other methods known in the art, e.g., by varying hybridization
conditions (see U.S. patent application No. 20010010913).
[0182] Thus, the invention provides methods for identifying a
sequence similar or paralogous or orthologous or homologous to one
or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target
polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted
herein and may include linking or associating a given plant
phenotype or gene function with a sequence. In the methods, a
sequence database is provided (locally or across an internet or
intranet) and a query is made against the sequence database using
the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or
gene functions.
[0183] In addition, one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or
more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be
used to search against a BLOCKS (Bairoch et al. (1997) Nucleic
Acids Res. 25: 217-221), PFAM, and other databases which contain
previously identified and annotated motifs, sequences and gene
functions. Methods that search for primary sequence patterns with
secondary structure gap penalties (Smith et al. (1992) Protein
Engineering 5: 35-51) as well as algorithms such as Basic Local
Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul (1993) J. Mol. Evol. 36:
290-300; Altschul et al. (1990) supra), BLOCKS (Henikoff and
Henikoff (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6565-6572), Hidden Markov
Models (HMM; Eddy (1996) Curr. Opin. Str. Biol. 6: 361-365;
Sonnhammer et al. (1997) Proteins 28: 405420), and the like, can be
used to manipulate and analyze polynucleotide and polypeptide
sequences encoded by polynucleotides. These databases, algorithms
and other methods are well known in the art and are described in
Ausubel et al. (1997; Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, John
Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y., unit 7.7) and in Meyers (1995;
Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Wiley VCH, New York, N.Y., p
856-853).
[0184] A further method for identifying or confirming that specific
homologous sequences control the same function is by comparison of
the transcript profile(s) obtained upon overexpression or knockout
of two or more related transcription factors. Since transcript
profiles are diagnostic for specific cellular states, one skilled
in the art will appreciate that genes that have a highly similar
transcript profile (e.g., with greater than 50% regulated
transcripts in common, more preferably with greater than 70%
regulated transcripts in common, most preferably with greater than
90% regulated transcripts in common) will have highly similar
functions. Fowler et al. (2002, Plant Cell, 14: 1675-79) have shown
that three paralogous AP2 family genes (CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3), each
of which is induced upon cold treatment, and each of which can
condition improved freezing tolerance, have highly similar
transcript profiles. Once a transcription factor has been shown to
provide a specific function, its transcript profile becomes a
diagnostic tool to determine whether putative paralogs or orthologs
have the same function.
[0185] Furthermore, methods using manual alignment of sequences
similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotide sequences or
one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences
may be used to identify regions of similarity and B domains. Such
manual methods are well-known of those of skill in the art and can
include, for example, comparisons of tertiary structure between a
polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide which comprises a
known function with a polypeptide sequence encoded by a
polynucleotide sequence which has a function not yet determined.
Such examples of tertiary structure may comprise predicted alpha
helices, beta-sheets, amphipathic helices, leucine zipper motifs,
zinc finger motifs, proline-rich regions, cysteine repeat motifs,
and the like.
[0186] Orthologs and paralogs of presently disclosed transcription
factors may be cloned using compositions provided by the present
invention according to methods well known in the art. cDNAs can be
cloned using mRNA from a plant cell or tissue that expresses one of
the present transcription factors. Appropriate mRNA sources may be
identified by interrogating Northern blots with probes designed
from the present transcription factor sequences, after which a
library is prepared from the mRNA obtained from a positive cell or
tissue. Transcription factor-encoding cDNA is then isolated using,
for example, PCR, using primers designed from a presently disclosed
transcription factor gene sequence, or by probing with a partial or
complete cDNA or with one or more sets of degenerate probes based
on the disclosed sequences. The cDNA library may be used to
transform plant cells. Expression of the cDNAs of interest is
detected using, for example, methods disclosed herein such as
microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, or any other
technique for monitoring changes in expression. Genomic clones may
be isolated using similar techniques to those.
[0187] In addition to the Sequences listed in the Sequence Listing,
the invention encompasses isolated nucleotide sequences that are
sequentially and structurally similar to G481, G482, and G485, SEQ
ID NO: 1, 3, and 5, and function in a plant in a manner similar to
G481, G482 and G485 by regulating abiotic stress tolerance. The
nucleotide sequences of G481 and G485 are 88% and 82% identical to
the polynucleotide sequence of G482, respectively. Since all three
polynucleotide sequences are phylogenetically related, sequentially
similar, and have been shown to regulate abiotic stress tolerance,
one skilled in the art would predict that other similar,
phylogenetically related sequences would also regulate abiotic
stress tolerance. A sequence that was 99.5% identical (861 of 865
bases) to G482 has been taught by Edwards et al., ((1998) Plant
Physiol. 117: 1015-1022), but with no analysis of the function of
this gene.
[0188] The present invention is also directed to polypeptide
encoded by isolated nucleic acid that are similar tc G481, G482 and
G485, vectors comprising isolated nucleic acid that are similar to
G481, G482 and G485, and transgenic plants transformed with these
isolated nucleic acids.
[0189] Identifying Polynucleotides or Nucleic Acids by
Hybridization
[0190] Polynucleotides homologous to the sequences illustrated in
the Sequence Listing and tables can be identified, e.g., by
hybridization to each other under stringent or under highly
stringent conditions. Single stranded polynucleotides hybridize
when they associate based on a variety of well characterized
physical-chemical forces, such as hydrogen bonding, solvent
exclusion, base stacking and the like. The stringency of a
hybridization reflects the degree of sequence identity of the
nucleic acids involved, such that the higher the stringency, the
more similar are the two polynucleotide strands. Stringency is
influenced by a variety of factors, including temperature, salt
concentration and composition, organic and non-organic additives,
solvents, etc. present in both the hybridization and wash solutions
and incubations (and number thereof), as described in more detail
in the references cited above.
[0191] Encompassed by the invention are polynucleotide sequences
that are capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide
sequences, including any of the transcription factor
polynucleotides within the Sequence Listing, and fragments thereof
under various conditions of stringency (See, for example, Wahl and
Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399407; and Kimmel (1987)
Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511). In addition to the nucleotide
sequences in the Sequence Listing, full-length cDNA, orthologs, and
paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be identified and
isolated using well-known methods. The cDNA libraries, orthologs,
and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be screened
using hybridization methods to determine their utility as
hybridization target or amplification probes.
[0192] With regard to hybridization, conditions that are highly
stringent, and means for achieving them, are well known in the art.
See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) "Molecular Cloning: A
Laboratory Manual" (2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); Berger
and Kimmel, eds., (1987) "Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques",
In Methods in Enzymology: 152: 467469; and Anderson and Young
(1985) "Quantitative Filter Hybridisation. " In: Hames and Higgins,
ed., Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, A Practical Approach. Oxford, IRL
Press, 73-111.
[0193] Stability of DNA duplexes is affected by such factors as
base composition, length, and degree of base pair mismatch.
Hybridization conditions may be adjusted to allow DNAs of different
sequence relatedness to hybridize. The melting temperature
(T.sub.m) is defined as the temperature when 50% of the duplex
molecules have dissociated into their constituent single strands.
The melting temperature of a perfectly matched duplex, where the
hybridization buffer contains formamide as a denaturing agent, may
be estimated by the following equations:
[0194] (I) DNA-DNA:
T.sub.m(.degree. C.)=81.5+16.6(log [Na+])+0.41(% G+C)-0.62(%
formamide)-500/L
[0195] (II) DNA-RNA:
T.sub.m(.degree. C.)=79.8+18.5(log [Na+])+0.58(% G+C)+0.12(%
G+C).sup.2-0.5(% formamide)-820/L
[0196] (III) RNA-RNA:
T.sub.m(.degree. C.)=79.8+18.5(log [Na+])+0.58(% G+C)+0.12(%
G+C).sup.2-0.35(% formamide)-820/L
[0197] where L is the length of the duplex formed, [Na+] is the
molar concentration of the sodium ion in the hybridization or
washing solution, and % G+C is the percentage of (guanine+cytosine)
bases in the hybrid. For imperfectly matched hybrids, approximately
1.degree. C. is required to reduce the melting temperature for each
1% mismatch.
[0198] Hybridization experiments are generally conducted in a
buffer of pH between 6.8 to 7.4, although the rate of hybridization
is nearly independent of pH at ionic strengths likely to be used in
the hybridization buffer (Anderson et al. (1985) supra). In
addition, one or more of the following may be used to reduce
non-specific hybridization: sonicated salmon sperm DNA or another
non-complementary DNA, bovine serum albumin, sodium pyrophosphate,
sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), polyvinyl-pyrrolidone, ficoll and
Denhardt's solution. Dextran sulfate and polyethylene glycol 6000
act to exclude DNA from solution, thus raising the effective probe
DNA concentration and the hybridization signal within a given unit
of time. In some instances, conditions of even greater stringency
may be desirable or required to reduce non-specific and/or
background hybridization. These conditions may be created with the
use of higher temperature, lower ionic strength and higher
concentration of a denaturing agent such as formamide.
[0199] Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for
moderately similar fragments such as homologous sequences from
distantly related organisms, or to highly similar fragments such as
genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related
organisms. The stringency can be adjusted either during the
hybridization step or in the post-hybridization washes. Salt
concentration, formamide concentration, hybridization temperature
and probe lengths are variables that can be used to alter
stringency (as described by the formula above). As a general
guidelines high stringency is typically performed at
T.sub.m-5.degree. C. to T.sub.m-20.degree. C., moderate stringency
at T.sub.m-20.degree. C. to T.sub.m-35.degree. C. and low
stringency at T.sub.m-35.degree. C. to T.sub.m-50.degree. C. for
duplex >150 base pairs. Hybridization may be performed at low to
moderate stringency (25-50.degree. C. below T.sub.m), followed by
post-hybridization washes at increasing stringencies. Maximum rates
of hybridization in solution are determined empirically to occur at
T.sub.m-25.degree. C. for DNA-DNA duplex and T.sub.m-15.degree. C.
for RNA-DNA duplex. Optionally, the degree of dissociation may be
assessed after each wash step to determine the need for subsequent,
higher stringency wash steps.
[0200] High stringency conditions may be used to select for nucleic
acid sequences with high degrees of identity to the disclosed
sequences. An example of stringent hybridization conditions
obtained in a filter-based method such as a Southern or northern
blot for hybridization of complementary nucleic acids that have
more than 100 complementary residues is about 5.degree. C. to
20.degree. C. lower than the thermal melting point (T.sub.m) for
the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH.
Conditions used for hybridization may include about 0.02 M to about
0.15 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% to about 5% casein, about 0.02%
SDS or about 0.1% N-laurylsarcosine, about 0.001 M to about 0.03 M
sodium citrate, at hybridization temperatures between about
50.degree. C. and about 70.degree. C. More preferably, high
stringency conditions are about 0.02 M sodium chloride, about 0.5%
casein, about 0.02% SDS, about 0.001 M sodium citrate, at a
temperature of about 50.degree. C. Nucleic acid molecules that
hybridize under stringent conditions will typically hybridize to a
probe based on either the entire DNA molecule or selected portions,
e.g., to a unique subsequence, of the DNA.
[0201] Stringent salt concentration will ordinarily be less than
about 750 mM NaCl and 75 mM trisodium citrate. Increasingly
stringent conditions may be obtained with less than about 500 mM
NaCI and 50 mM trisodium citrate, to even greater stringency with
less than about 250 mM NaCl and 25 mM trisodium citrate. Low
stringency hybridization can be obtained in the absence of organic
solvent, e.g., formamide, whereas high stringency hybridization may
be obtained in the presence of at least about 35% formamide, and
more preferably at least about 50% formamide. Stringent temperature
conditions will ordinarily include temperatures of at least about
30.degree. C., more preferably of at least about 37.degree. C., and
most preferably of at least about 42.degree. C. with formamide
present. Varying additional parameters, such as hybridization time,
the concentration of detergent, e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)
and ionic strength, are well known to those skilled in the art.
Various levels of stringency are accomplished by combining these
various conditions as needed.
[0202] The washing steps that follow hybridization may also vary in
stringency; the post-hybridization wash steps primarily determine
hybridization specificity, with the most critical factors being
temperature and the ionic strength of the final wash solution. Wash
stringency can be increased by decreasing salt concentration or by
increasing temperature. Stringent salt concentration for the wash
steps will preferably be less than about 30 mM NaCl and 3 mM
trisodium citrate, and most preferably less than about 15 mM NaCl
and 1.5 mM trisodium citrate.
[0203] Thus, hybridization and wash conditions that may be used to
bind and remove polynucleotides with less than the desired homology
to the nucleic acid sequences or their complements that encode the
present transcription factors include, for example:
[0204] 6.times.SSC at 65.degree. C.;
[0205] 50% formamide, 4.times.SSC at 42.degree. C.; or
[0206] 0.5.times.SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65.degree. C.;
[0207] with, for example, two wash steps of 10-30 minutes each.
Useful variations on these conditions will be readily apparent to
those skilled in the art.
[0208] A person of skill in the art would not expect substantial
variation among polynucleotide species encompassed within the scope
of the present invention because the highly stringent conditions
set forth in the above formulae yield structurally similar
polynucleotides.
[0209] If desired, one may employ wash steps of even greater
stringency, including about 0.2.times.SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65.degree.
C. and washing twice, each wash step being about 30 min, or about
0.1.times.SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65.degree. C. and washing twice for 30
min. The temperature for the wash solutions will ordinarily be at
least about 25.degree. C., and for greater stringency at least
about 42.degree. C. Hybridization stringency may be increased
further by using the same conditions as in the hybridization steps,
with the wash temperature raised about 3.degree. C. to about
5.degree. C., and stringency may be increased even further by using
the same conditions except the wash temperature is raised about
6.degree. C. to about 9.degree. C. For identification of less
closely related homologs, wash steps may be performed at a lower
temperature, e.g., 50.degree. C.
[0210] An example of a low stringency wash step employs a solution
and conditions of at least 25.degree. C. in 30 mM NaCl, 3 mM
trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Greater stringency may
be obtained at 42.degree. C. in 15 mM NaCl, with 1.5 mM trisodium
citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Even higher stringency wash
conditions are obtained at 65.degree. C.-68.degree. C. in a
solution of 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS.
Wash procedures will generally employ at least two final wash
steps. Additional variations on these conditions will be readily
apparent to those skilled in the art (see, for example, U.S. patent
application No. 20010010913).
[0211] Stringency conditions can be selected such that an
oligonucleotide that is perfectly complementary to the coding
oligonucleotide hybridizes to the coding oligonucleotide with at
least about a 5-10.times. higher signal to noise ratio than the
ratio for hybridization of the perfectly complementary
oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding a transcription factor
known as of the filing date of the application. It may be desirable
to select conditions for a particular assay such that a higher
signal to noise ratio, that is, about 15.times. or more, is
obtained. Accordingly, a subject nucleic acid will hybridize to a
unique coding oligonucleotide with at least a 2.times. or greater
signal to noise ratio as compared to hybridization of the coding
oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding known polypeptide. The
particular signal will depend on the label used in the relevant
assay, e.g., a fluorescent label, a calorimetric label, a
radioactive label, or the like. Labeled hybridization or PCR probes
for detecting related polynucleotide sequences may be produced by
oligolabeling, nick translation, end-labeling, or PCR amplification
using a labeled nucleotide.
[0212] Encompassed by the invention are polynucleotide sequences
that are capable of hybridizing to the present polynucleotide
sequences, and, in particular, to SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11,
13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49,
51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83,
85, 87, 89, 91, 93, polynucleotides that encode polypeptide SEQ ID
NOs: 29-32, and fragments thereof under various conditions of
stringency. (See, e.g., Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol.
152: 399-407; Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511.)
Estimates of homology are provided by either DNA-DNA or DNA-RNA
hybridization under conditions of stringency as is well understood
by those skilled in the art (Hames and Higgins, Eds. (1985) Nucleic
Acid Hybridisation, IRL Press, Oxford, U.K.). Stringency conditions
can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments, such as
homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, to highly
similar fragments, such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes
from closely related organisms. Post-hybridization washes determine
stringency conditions.
[0213] Identifying Polynucleotides or Nucleic Acids with Expression
Libraries
[0214] In addition to hybridization methods, transcription factor
homolog polypeptides can be obtained by screening an expression
library using antibodies specific for one or more transcription
factors. With the provision herein of the disclosed transcription
factor, and transcription factor homolog nucleic acid sequences,
the encoded polypeptide(s) can be expressed and purified in a
heterologous expression system (e.g., E. coli) and used to raise
antibodies (monoclonal or polyclonal) specific for the
polypeptide(s) in question. Antibodies can also be raised against
synthetic peptides derived from transcription factor, or
transcription factor homolog, amino acid sequences. Methods of
raising antibodies are well known in the art and are described in
Harlow and Lane (1988), Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold
Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Such antibodies can then be
used to screen an expression library produced from the plant from
which it is desired to clone additional transcription factor
homologs, using the methods described above. The selected cDNAs can
be confirmed by sequencing and enzymatic activity.
[0215] Sequence Variations
[0216] It will readily be appreciated by those of skill in the art,
that any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences are capable of
encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog
polypeptides of the invention. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic
code, many different polynucleotides can encode identical and/or
substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences
illustrated in the Sequence Listing. Nucleic acids having a
sequence that differs from the sequences shown in the Sequence
Listing, or complementary sequences, that encode functionally
equivalent peptides (i.e., peptides having some degree of
equivalent or similar biological activity) but differ in sequence
from the sequence shown in the Sequence Listing due to degeneracy
in the genetic code, are also within the scope of the
invention.
[0217] Altered polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides
include those sequences with deletions, insertions, or
substitutions of different nucleotides, resulting in a
polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide with at least one functional
characteristic of the instant polypeptides. Included within this
definition are polymorphisms which may or may not be readily
detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the
polynucleotide encoding the instant polypeptides, and improper or
unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other
than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence
encoding the instant polypeptides.
[0218] Allelic variant refers to any of two or more alternative
forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic
variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in
phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations can be
silent (i.e., no change in the encoded polypeptide) or may encode
polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term allelic
variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by an
allelic variant of a gene. Splice variant refers to alternative
forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation arises
naturally through use of alternative splicing sites within a
transcribed RNA molecule, or less commonly between separately
transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several mRNAs
transcribed from the same gene. Splice variants may encode
polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term splice
variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by a splice
variant of an mRNA transcribed from a gene.
[0219] Those skilled in the art would recognize that, for example,
G482, SEQ ID NO: 4, represents a single transcription factor;
allelic variation and alternative splicing may be expected to
occur. Allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 3 can be cloned by probing
cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms
according to standard procedures. Allelic variants of the DNA
sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, including those containing silent
mutations and those in which mutations result in amino acid
sequence changes, are within the scope of the present invention, as
are proteins which are allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 4. cDNAs
generated from alternatively spliced mRNAs, which retain the
properties of the transcription factor are included within the
scope of the present invention, as are polypeptides encoded by such
cDNAs and mRNAs. Allelic variants and splice variants of these
sequences can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from
different individual organisms or tissues according to standard
procedures known in the art (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,064).
[0220] Thus, in addition to the sequences set forth in the Sequence
Listing, the invention also encompasses related nucleic acid
molecules that include allelic or splice variants SEQ ID NO: 1, 3,
5, 7, 9, 11-21, 27-52, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 75, 77,
and 79, and include sequences which are complementary to these
nucleotide sequences. Related nucleic acid molecules also include
nucleotide sequences encoding a polypeptide comprising or
consisting essentially of a substitution, modification, addition
and/or deletion of one or more amino acid residues compared to the
polypeptide as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOs: 2,4, 6, 8, 10, 12,
14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26,28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42,
44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76,
78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92 and 94. Such related polypeptides
may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or
more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition
and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues.
[0221] For example, Table 2 illustrates, e.g., that the codons AGC,
AGT, TCA, TCC, TCG, and TCT all encode the same amino acid: serine.
Accordingly, at each position in the sequence where there is a
codon encoding serine, any of the above trinucleotide sequences can
be used without altering the encoded polypeptide.
5TABLE 2 Amino acid Possible Codons Alanine Ala A GCA GCC GCG GCT
Cysteine Cys C TGC TGT Aspartic acid Asp D GAC GAT Glutamic acid
Glu E GAA GAG Phenylalanine Phe F TTC TTT Glycine Gly G GGA GGC GGG
GGT Histidine His H CAC CAT Isoleucine Ile I ATA ATC ATT Lysine Lys
K AAA AAG Leucine Leu L TTA TTG CTA CTC CTG CTT Methionine Met M
ATG Asparagine Asn N AAC AAT Proline Pro P CCA CCC CCG CCT
Glutamine Gln Q CAA CAG Arginine Arg R AGA AGG CGA CGC CGG CGT
Serine Ser S AGC AGT TCA TCC TCG TCT Threonine Thr T ACA ACC ACG
ACT Valine Val V GTA GTC GTG GTT Tryptophan Trp W TGG Tyrosine Tyr
Y TAC TAT
[0222] Sequence alterations that do not change the amino acid
sequence encoded by the polynucleotide are termed "silent"
variations. With the exception of the codons ATG and TGG, encoding
methionine and tryptophan, respectively, any of the possible codons
for the same amino acid can be substituted by a variety of
techniques, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, available in the art.
Accordingly, any and all such variations of a sequence selected
from the above table are a feature of the invention.
[0223] In addition to silent variations, other conservative
variations that alter one, or a few amino acids in the encoded
polypeptide, can be made without altering the function of the
polypeptide, these conservative variants are, likewise, a feature
of the invention.
[0224] For example, substitutions, deletions and insertions
introduced into the sequences provided in the Sequence Listing, are
also envisioned by the invention. Such sequence modifications can
be engineered into a sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Wu
(ed.) Methods Enzymol. (1993) vol. 217, Academic Press) or the
other methods noted below. Amino acid substitutions are typically
of single residues; insertions usually will be on the order of
about from I to 10 amino acid residues; and deletions will range
about from 1 to 30 residues. In preferred embodiments, deletions or
insertions are made in adjacent pairs, e.g., a deletion of two
residues or insertion of two residues. Substitutions, deletions,
insertions or any combination thereof can be combined to arrive at
a sequence. The mutations that are made in the polynucleotide
encoding the transcription factor should not place the sequence out
of reading frame and should not create complementary regions that
could produce secondary mRNA structure. Preferably, the polypeptide
encoded by the DNA performs the desired function.
[0225] Conservative substitutions are those in which at least one
residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different
residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are
made in accordance with the Table 3 when it is desired to maintain
the activity of the protein. Table 3 shows amino acids which can be
substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically
regarded as conservative substitutions.
6 TABLE 3 Conservative Residue Substitutions Ala Ser Arg Lys Asn
Gln; His Asp Glu Gln Asn Cys Ser Glu Asp Gly Pro His Asn; Gln Ile
Leu, Val Leu Ile; Val Lys Arg; Gln Met Leu; Ile Phe Met; Leu; Tyr
Ser Thr; Gly Thr Ser; Val Trp Tyr Tyr Trp; Phe Val Ile; Leu
[0226] Similar substitutions are those in which at least one
residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different
residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are
made in accordance with the Table 4 when it is desired to maintain
the activity of the protein. Table 4 shows amino acids which can be
substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically
regarded as structural and functional substitutions. For example, a
residue in column 1 of Table 4 may be substituted with a residue in
column 2; in addition, a residue in column 2 of Table 4 may be
substituted with the residue of column 1.
7 TABLE 4 Residue Similar Substitutions Ala Ser; Thr; Gly; Val;
Leu; Ile Arg Lys; His; Gly Asn Gln; His; Gly; Ser; Thr Asp Glu,
Ser; Thr Gln Asn; Ala Cys Ser; Gly Glu Asp Gly Pro; Arg His Asn;
Gln; Tyr; Phe; Lys; Arg Ile Ala; Leu; Val; Gly; Met Leu Ala; Ile;
Val; Gly; Met Lys Arg; His; Gln; Gly; Pro Met Leu; Ile; Phe Phe
Met; Leu; Tyr; Trp; His; Val; Ala Ser Thr; Gly; Asp; Ala; Val; Ile;
His Thr Ser; Val; Ala; Gly Trp Tyr; Phe; His Tyr Trp; Phe; His Val
Ala; Ile; Leu; Gly; Thr; Ser; Glu
[0227] Substitutions that are less conservative than those in Table
3 can be selected by picking residues that differ more
significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of
the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for
example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or
hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk
of the side chain. The substitutions which in general are expected
to produce the greatest changes in protein properties will be those
in which (a) a hydrophilic residue, e.g., seryl or threonyl, is
substituted for (or by) a hydrophobic residue, e.g., leucyl,
isoleucyl, phenylalanyl, valyl or alanyl; (b) a cysteine or proline
is substituted for (or by) any other residue; (c) a residue having
an electropositive side chain, e.g., lysyl, arginyl, or histidyl,
is substituted for (or by) an electronegative residue, e.g.,
glutamyl or aspartyl; or (d) a residue having a bulky side chain,
e.g., phenylalanine, is substituted for (or by) one not having a
side chain, e.g., glycine.
[0228] Further Modifying Sequences of the
Invention--Mutation/Forced Evolution
[0229] In addition to generating silent or conservative
substitutions as noted, above, the present invention optionally
includes methods of modifying the sequences of the Sequence
Listing. In the methods, nucleic acid or protein modification
methods are used to alter the given sequences to produce new
sequences and/or to chemically or enzymatically modify given
sequences to change the properties of the nucleic acids or
proteins.
[0230] Thus, in one embodiment, given nucleic acid sequences are
modified, e.g., according to standard mutagenesis or artificial
evolution methods to produce modified sequences. The modified
sequences may be created using purified natural polynucleotides
isolated from any organism or may be synthesized from purified
compositions and chemicals using chemical means well know to those
of skill in the art. For example, Ausubel, supra, provides
additional details on mutagenesis methods. Artificial forced
evolution methods are described, for example, by Stemmer (1994)
Nature 370: 389-391, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91:
10747-10751, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,811,238, 5,837,500, and
6,242,568. Methods for engineering synthetic transcription factors
and other polypeptides are described, for example, by Zhang et al.
(2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 33850-33860, Liu et al. (2001) J. Biol.
Chem. 276: 11323-11334, and Isalan et al. (2001) Nature Biotechnol.
19: 656-660. Many other mutation and evolution methods are also
available and expected to be within the skill of the
practitioner.
[0231] Similarly, chemical or enzymatic alteration of expressed
nucleic acids and polypeptides can be performed by standard
methods. For example, sequence can be modified by addition of
lipids, sugars, peptides, organic or inorganic compounds, by the
inclusion of modified nucleotides or amino acids, or the like. For
example, protein modification techniques are illustrated in
Ausubel, supra. Further details on chemical and enzymatic
modifications can be found herein. These modification methods can
be used to modify any given sequence, or to modify any sequence
produced by the various mutation and artificial evolution
modification methods noted herein.
[0232] Accordingly, the invention provides for modification of any
given nucleic acid by mutation, evolution, chemical or enzymatic
modification, or other available methods, as well as for the
products produced by practicing such methods, e.g., using the
sequences herein as a starting substrate for the various
modification approaches.
[0233] For example, optimized coding sequence containing codons
preferred by a particular prokaryotic or eukaryotic host can be
used e.g., to increase the rate of translation or to produce
recombinant RNA transcripts having desirable properties, such as a
longer half-life, as compared with transcripts produced using a
non-optimized sequence. Translation stop codons can also be
modified to reflect host preference. For example, preferred stop
codons for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals are TAA and TGA,
respectively. The preferred stop codon for monocotyledonous plants
is TGA, whereas insects and E. coli prefer to use TAA as the stop
codon.
[0234] The polynucleotide sequences of the present invention can
also be engineered in order to alter a coding sequence for a
variety of reasons, including but not limited to, alterations which
modify the sequence to facilitate cloning, processing and/or
expression of the gene product. For example, alterations are
optionally introduced using techniques which are well known in the
art, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, to insert new restriction
sites, to alter glycosylation patterns, to change codon preference,
to introduce splice sites, etc.
[0235] Furthermore, a fragment or domain derived from any of the
polypeptides of the invention can be combined with domains derived
from other transcription factors or synthetic domains to modify the
biological activity of a transcription factor. For instance, a
DNA-binding domain derived from a transcription factor of the
invention can be combined with the activation domain of another
transcription factor or with a synthetic activation domain. A
transcription activation domain assists in initiating transcription
from a DNA-binding site. Examples include the transcription
activation region of VP16 or GAL4 (Moore et al. (1998) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 95: 376-381; Aoyama et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7:
1773-1785), peptides derived from bacterial sequences (Ma and
Ptashne (1987) Cell 51: 113-119) and synthetic peptides (Giniger
and Ptashne (1987) Nature 330: 670-672).
[0236] Expression and Modification of Polypeptides
[0237] Typically, polynucleotide sequences of the invention are
incorporated into recombinant DNA (or RNA) molecules that direct
expression of polypeptides of the invention in appropriate host
cells, transgenic plants, in vitro translation systems, or the
like. Due to the inherent degeneracy of the genetic code, nucleic
acid sequences which encode substantially the same or a
functionally equivalent amino acid sequence can be substituted for
any listed sequence to provide for cloning and expressing the
relevant homolog.
[0238] The transgenic plants of the present invention comprising
recombinant polynucleotide sequences are generally derived from
parental plants, which may themselves be non-transformed (or
non-transgenic) plants. These transgenic plants may either have a
transcription factor gene "knocked out" (for example, with a
genomic insertion by homologous recombination, an antisense or
ribozyme construct) or expressed to a normal or wild-type extent.
However, overexpressing transgenic "progeny" plants will exhibit
greater mRNA levels, wherein the mRNA encodes a transcription
factor, that is, a DNA-binding protein that is capable of binding
to a DNA regulatory sequence and inducing transcription, and
preferably, expression of a plant trait gene. Preferably, the mRNA
expression level will be at least three-fold greater than that of
the parental plant, or more preferably at least ten-fold greater
mRNA levels compared to said parental plant, and most preferably at
least fifty-fold greater compared to said parental plant.
[0239] Vectors, Promoters, and Expression Systems
[0240] The present invention includes recombinant constructs
comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences herein. The
constructs typically comprise a vector, such as a plasmid, a
cosmid, a phage, a virus (e.g., a plant virus), a bacterial
artificial chromosome (BAC), a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC),
or the like, into which a nucleic acid sequence of the invention
has been inserted, in a forward or reverse orientation. In a
preferred aspect of this embodiment, the construct further
comprises regulatory sequences, including, for example, a promoter,
operably linked to the sequence. Large numbers of suitable vectors
and promoters are known to those of skill in the art, and are
commercially available.
[0241] General texts that describe molecular biological techniques
useful herein, including the use and production of vectors,
promoters and many other relevant topics, include Berger, Sambrook,
supra and Ausubel, supra. Any of the identified sequences can be
incorporated into a cassette or vector, e.g., for expression in
plants. A number of expression vectors suitable for stable
transformation of plant cells or for the establishment of
transgenic plants have been described including those described in
Weissbach and Weissbach (1989) Methods for Plant Molecular Biology,
Academic Press, and Gelvin et al. (1990) Plant Molecular Biology
Manual, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Specific examples include those
derived from a Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as well as
those disclosed by Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) Nature 303: 209,
Bevan (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 8711-8721, Klee (1985)
Bio/Technology 3: 637-642, for dicotyledonous plants.
[0242] Alternatively, non-Ti vectors can be used to transfer the
DNA into monocotyledonous plants and cells by using free DNA
delivery techniques. Such methods can involve, for example, the use
of liposomes, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment, silicon
carbide whiskers, and viruses. By using these methods transgenic
plants such as wheat, rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technology 9:
957-962) and corn (Gordon-Kamm (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618) can be
produced. An immature embryo can also be a good target tissue for
monocots for direct DNA delivery techniques by using the particle
gun (Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102: 1077-1084; Vasil
(1993) Bio/Technology 10: 667-674; Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant
Physiol. 104: 37-48, and for Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer
(Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 745-750).
[0243] Typically, plant transformation vectors include one or more
cloned plant coding sequence (genomic or cDNA) under the
transcriptional control of 5' and 3' regulatory sequences and a
dominant selectable marker. Such plant transformation vectors
typically also contain a promoter (e.g., a regulatory region
controlling inducible or constitutive, environmentally-or
developmentally-regulated, or cell- or tissue-specific expression),
a transcription initiation start site, an RNA processing signal
(such as intron splice sites), a transcription termination site,
and/or a polyadenylation signal.
[0244] A potential utility for the transcription factor
polynucleotides disclosed herein is the isolation of promoter
elements from these genes that can be used to program expression in
plants of any genes. Each transcription factor gene disclosed
herein is expressed in a unique fashion, as determined by promoter
elements located upstream of the start of translation, and
additionally within an intron of the transcription factor gene or
downstream of the termination codon of the gene. As is well known
in the art, for a significant portion of genes, the promoter
sequences are located entirely in the region directly upstream of
the start of translation. In such cases, typically the promoter
sequences are located within 2.0 kb of the start of translation, or
within 1.5 kb of the start of translation, frequently within 1.0 kb
of the start of translation, and sometimes within 0.5 kb of the
start of translation.
[0245] The promoter sequences can be isolated according to methods
known to one skilled in the art.
[0246] Examples of constitutive plant promoters which can be useful
for expressing the TF sequence include: the cauliflower mosaic
virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level
expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odell et al. (1985)
Nature 313: 810-812); the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al.
(1988) Plant Physiol. 88: 547-552); and the octopine synthase
promoter (Fromm et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 977-984).
[0247] The transcription factors of the invention may be operably
linked with a specific promoter that causes the transcription
factor to be expressed in response to environmental,
tissue-specific or temporal signals. A variety of plant gene
promoters that regulate gene expression in response to
environmental, hormonal, chemical, developmental signals, and in a
tissue-active manner can be used for expression of a TF sequence in
plants. Choice of a promoter is based largely on the phenotype of
interest and is determined by such factors as tissue (e.g., seed,
fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.),
inducibility (e.g., in response to wounding, heat, cold, drought,
light, pathogens, etc.), timing, developmental stage, and the like.
Numerous known promoters have been characterized and can favorably
be employed to promote expression of a polynucleotide of the
invention in a transgenic plant or cell of interest. For example,
tissue specific promoters include: seed-specific promoters (such as
the napin, phaseolin or DC3 promoter described in U.S. Pat. No.
5,773,697), fruit-specific promoters that are active during fruit
ripening (such as the dru 1 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,393), or
the 2A11 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,674) and the tomato
polygalacturonase promoter (Bird et al. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 11:
651-662), root-specific promoters, such as those disclosed in U.S.
Pat. Nos. 5,618,988, 5,837,848 and 5,905,186, pollen-active
promoters such as PTA29, PTA26 and PTA13 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,929),
promoters active in vascular tissue (Ringli and Keller (1998) Plant
Mol. Biol. 37: 977-988), flower-specific (Kaiser et al. (1995)
Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 231-243), pollen (Baerson et al. (1994) Plant
Mol. Biol. 26: 1947-1959), carpels (Ohl et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:
837-848), pollen and ovules (Baerson et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol.
22: 255-267), auxin-inducible promoters (such as that described in
van der Kop et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 979-990 or Baumann
et al., (1999) Plant Cell 11: 323-334), cytokinin-inducible
promoter (Guevara-Garcia (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 743-753),
promoters responsive to gibberellin (Shi et al. (1998) Plant Mol.
Biol. 38: 1053-1060, Willmott et al. (1998) Plant Molec. Biol. 38:
817-825) and the like. Additional promoters are those that elicit
expression in response to heat (Ainley et al. (1993) Plant Mol.
Biol. 22: 13-23), light (e.g., the pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier
et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 471-478, and the maize rbcS promoter,
Schafffner and Sheen (1991) Plant Cell 3: 997-1012); wounding
(e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 961-968);
pathogens (such as the PR-1 promoter described in Buchel et al.
(1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 387-396, and the PDF1.2 promoter
described in Manners et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1071-1080),
and chemicals such as methyl jasmonate or salicylic acid (Gatz
(1997) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 89-108). In
addition, the timing of the expression can be controlled by using
promoters such as those acting at senescence (Gan and Amasino
(1995) Science 270: 1986-1988); or late seed development (Odell et
al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106: 447-458).
[0248] Plant expression vectors can also include RNA processing
signals that can be positioned within, upstream or downstream of
the coding sequence. In addition, the expression vectors can
include additional regulatory sequences from the 3'-untranslated
region of plant genes, e.g., a 3' terminator region to increase
mRNA stability of the mRNA, such as the PI-II terminator region of
potato or the octopine or nopaline synthase 3' terminator
regions.
[0249] Additional Expression Elements
[0250] Specific initiation signals can aid in efficient translation
of coding sequences. These signals can include, e.g., the ATG
initiation codon and adjacent sequences. In cases where a coding
sequence, its initiation codon and upstream sequences are inserted
into the appropriate expression vector, no additional translational
control signals may be needed. However, in cases where only coding
sequence (e.g., a mature protein coding sequence), or a portion
thereof, is inserted, exogenous transcriptional control signals
including the ATG initiation codon can be separately provided. The
initiation codon is provided in the correct reading frame to
facilitate transcription. Exogenous transcriptional elements and
initiation codons can be of various origins, both natural and
synthetic. The efficiency of expression can be enhanced by the
inclusion of enhancers appropriate to the cell system in use.
[0251] Expression Hosts
[0252] The present invention also relates to host cells which are
transduced with vectors of the invention, and the production of
polypeptides of the invention (including fragments thereof) by
recombinant techniques. Host cells are genetically engineered
(i.e., nucleic acids are introduced, e.g., transduced, transformed
or transfected) with the vectors of this invention, which may be,
for example, a cloning vector or an expression vector comprising
the relevant nucleic acids herein. The vector is optionally a
plasmid, a viral particle, a phage, a naked nucleic acid, etc. The
engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient
media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting
transformants, or amplifying the relevant gene. The culture
conditions, such as temperature, pH and the like, are those
previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and
will be apparent to those skilled in the art and in the references
cited herein, including, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra.
[0253] The host cell can be a eukaryotic cell, such as a yeast
cell, or a plant cell, or the host cell can be a prokaryotic cell,
such as a bacterial cell. Plant protoplasts are also suitable for
some applications. For example, the DNA fragments are introduced
into plant tissues, cultured plant cells or plant protoplasts by
standard methods including electroporation (Fromm et al. (1985)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 5824-5828, infection by viral vectors
such as cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) (Hohn et al. (1982)
Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors Academic Press, New York, N.Y.,
pp. 549-560; U.S. Pat. No. 4,407,956), high velocity ballistic
penetration by small particles with the nucleic acid either within
the matrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (Klein et
al. (1987) Nature 327: 70-73), use of pollen as vector (WO
85/01856), or use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes
carrying a T-DNA plasmid in which DNA fragments are cloned. The
T-DNA plasmid is transmitted to plant cells upon infection by
Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and a portion is stably integrated into
the plant genome (Horsch et al. (1984) Science 233: 496-498; Fraley
et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80: 4803-4807).
[0254] The cell can include a nucleic acid of the invention that
encodes a polypeptide, wherein the cell expresses a polypeptide of
the invention. The cell can also include vector sequences, or the
like. Furthermore, cells and transgenic plants that include any
polypeptide or nucleic acid above or throughout this specification,
e.g., produced by transduction of a vector of the invention, are an
additional feature of the invention.
[0255] For long-term, high-yield production of recombinant
proteins, stable expression can be used. Host cells transformed
with a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of the invention
are optionally cultured under conditions suitable for the
expression and recovery of the encoded protein from cell culture.
The protein or fragment thereof produced by a recombinant cell may
be secreted, membrane-bound, or contained intracellularly,
depending on the sequence and/or the vector used. As will be
understood by those of skill in the art, expression vectors
containing polynucleotides encoding mature proteins of the
invention can be designed with signal sequences which direct
secretion of the mature polypeptides through a prokaryotic or
eukaryotic cell membrane.
[0256] Modified Amino Acid Residues
[0257] Polypeptides of the invention may contain one or more
modified amino acid residues. The presence of modified amino acids
may be advantageous in, for example, increasing polypeptide
half-life, reducing polypeptide antigenicity or toxicity,
increasing polypeptide storage stability, or the like.
[0258] Amino acid residue(s) are modified, for example,
co-translationally or post-translationally during recombinant
production or modified by synthetic or chemical means.
[0259] Non-limiting examples of a modified amino acid residue
include incorporation or other use of acetylated amino acids,
glycosylated amino acids, sulfated amino acids, prenylated (e.g.,
farnesylated, geranylgeranylated) amino acids, PEG modified (e.g.,
"PEGylated") amino acids, biotinylated amino acids, carboxylated
amino acids, phosphorylated amino acids, etc. References adequate
to guide one of skill in the modification of amino acid residues
are replete throughout the literature.
[0260] The modified amino acid residues may prevent or increase
affinity of the polypeptide for another molecule, including, but
not limited to, polynucleotide, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and
lipid derivatives, and other organic or synthetic compounds.
[0261] Identification of Additional Factors
[0262] A transcription factor provided by the present invention can
also be used to identify additional endogenous or exogenous
molecules that can affect a phentoype or trait of interest. On the
one hand, such molecules include organic (small or large molecules)
and/or inorganic compounds that affect expression of (i.e.,
regulate) a particular transcription factor. Alternatively, such
molecules include endogenous molecules that are acted upon either
at a transcriptional level by a transcription factor of the
invention to modify a phenotype as desired. For example, the
transcription factors can be employed to identify one or more
downstream genes that are subject to a regulatory effect of the
transcription factor. In one approach, a transcription factor or
transcription factor homolog of the invention is expressed in a
host cell, e.g., a transgenic plant cell, tissue or explant, and
expression products, either RNA or protein, of likely or random
targets are monitored, e.g., by hybridization to a microarray of
nucleic acid probes corresponding to genes expressed in a tissue or
cell type of interest, by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of
protein products, or by any other method known in the art for
assessing expression of gene products at the level of RNA or
protein. Alternatively, a transcription factor of the invention can
be used to identify promoter sequences (such as binding sites on
DNA sequences) involved in the regulation of a downstream target.
After identifying a promoter sequence, interactions between the
transcription factor and the promoter sequence can be modified by
changing specific nucleotides in the promoter sequence or specific
amino acids in the transcription factor that interact with the
promoter sequence to alter a plant trait. Typically, transcription
factor DNA-binding sites are identified by gel shift assays. After
identifying the promoter regions, the promoter region sequences can
be employed in double-stranded DNA arrays to identify molecules
that affect the interactions of the transcription factors with
their promoters (Bulyk et al. (1999) Nature Biotechnol. 17:
573-577).
[0263] The identified transcription factors are also useful to
identify proteins that modify the activity of the transcription
factor. Such modification can occur by covalent modification, such
as by phosphorylation, or by protein-protein (homo
or-heteropolymer) interactions. Any method suitable for detecting
protein-protein interactions can be employed. Among the methods
that can be employed are co-immunoprecipitation, cross-linking and
co-purification through gradients or chromatographic columns, and
the two-hybrid yeast system.
[0264] The two-hybrid system detects protein interactions in vivo
and is described in Chien et al. ((1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88:
9578-9582) and is commercially available from Clontech (Palo Alto,
Calif.). In such a system, plasmids are constructed that encode two
hybrid proteins: one consists of the DNA-binding domain of a
transcription activator protein fused to the TF polypeptide and the
other consists of the transcription activator protein's activation
domain fused to an unknown protein that is encoded by a cDNA that
has been recombined into the plasmid as part of a cDNA library. The
DNA-binding domain fusion plasmid and the cDNA library are
transformed into a strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae
that contains a reporter gene (e.g., lacZ) whose regulatory region
contains the transcription activator's binding site. Either hybrid
protein alone cannot activate transcription of the reporter gene.
Interaction of the two hybrid proteins reconstitutes the functional
activator protein and results in expression of the reporter gene,
which is detected by an assay for the reporter gene product.
[0265] Then, the library plasmids responsible for reporter gene
expression are isolated and sequenced to identify the proteins
encoded by the library plasmids. After identifying proteins that
interact with the transcription factors, assays for compounds that
interfere with the TF protein-protein interactions can be
preformed.
[0266] Identification of Modulators
[0267] In addition to the intracellular molecules described above,
extracellular molecules that alter activity or expression of a
transcription factor, either directly or indirectly, can be
identified. For example, the methods can entail first placing a
candidate molecule in contact with a plant or plant cell. The
molecule can be introduced by topical administration, such as
spraying or soaking of a plant, or incubating a plant in a solution
containing the molecule, and then the molecule's effect on the
expression or activity of the TF polypeptide or the expression of
the polynucleotide monitored. Changes in the expression of the TF
polypeptide can be monitored by use of polyclonal or monoclonal
antibodies, gel electrophoresis or the like. Changes in the
expression of the corresponding polynucleotide sequence can be
detected by use of microarrays, Northerns, quantitative PCR, or any
other technique for monitoring changes in mRNA expression. These
techniques are exemplified in Ausubel et al. (eds.) Current
Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons (1998, and
supplements through 2001). Changes in the activity of the
transcription factor can be monitored, directly or indirectly, by
assaying the function of the transcription factor, for example, by
measuring the expression of promoters known to be controlled by the
transcription factor (using promoter-reporter constructs),
measuring the levels of transcripts using microarrays, Northern
blots, quantitative PCR, etc. Such changes in the expression levels
can be correlated with modified plant traits and thus identified
molecules can be useful for soaking or spraying on fruit, vegetable
and grain crops to modify traits in plants.
[0268] Essentially any available composition can be tested for
modulatory activity of expression or activity of any nucleic acid
or polypeptide herein. Thus, available libraries of compounds such
as chemicals, polypeptides, nucleic acids and the like can be
tested for modulatory activity. Often, potential modulator
compounds can be dissolved in aqueous or organic (e.g., DMSO-based)
solutions for easy delivery to the cell or plant of interest in
which the activity of the modulator is to be tested. Optionally,
the assays are designed to screen large modulator composition
libraries by automating the assay steps and providing compounds
from any convenient source to assays, which are typically run in
parallel (e.g., in microtiter formats on micrometer plates in
robotic assays).
[0269] In one embodiment, high throughput screening methods involve
providing a combinatorial library containing a large number of
potential compounds (potential modulator compounds). Such
"combinatorial chemical libraries" are then screened in one or more
assays, as described herein, to identify those library members
(particular chemical species or subclasses) that display a desired
characteristic activity. The compounds thus identified can serve as
target compounds.
[0270] A combinatorial chemical library can be, e.g., a collection
of diverse chemical compounds generated by chemical synthesis or
biological synthesis. For example, a combinatorial chemical library
such as a polypeptide library is formed by combining a set of
chemical building blocks (e.g., in one example, amino acids) in
every possible way for a given compound length (i.e., the number of
amino acids in a polypeptide compound of a set length). Exemplary
libraries include peptide libraries, nucleic acid libraries,
antibody libraries (see, e.g., Vaughn et al. (1996) Nature
Biotechnol. 14: 309-314 and PCT/US96/10287), carbohydrate libraries
(see, e.g., Liang et al. Science (1996) 274: 1520-1522 and U.S.
Pat. No. 5,593,853), peptide nucleic acid libraries (see, e.g.,
U.S. Pat. No. 5,539,083), and small organic molecule libraries
(see, e.g., benzodiazepines, in Baum Chem. & Engineering News
Jan. 18, 1993, page 33; isoprenoids, U.S. Pat. No. 5,569,588;
thiazolidinones and metathiazanones, U.S. Pat. No. 5,549,974;
pyrrolidines, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,525,735 and 5,519,134; morpholino
compounds, U.S. Pat. No. 5,506,337) and the like.
[0271] Preparation and screening of combinatorial or other
libraries is well known to those of skill in the art. Such
combinatorial chemical libraries include, but are not limited to,
peptide libraries (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175; Furka,
(1991) Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res. 37: 487493; and Houghton et al.
(1991) Nature 354: 84-88). Other chemistries for generating
chemical diversity libraries can also be used.
[0272] In addition, as noted, compound screening equipment for
high-throughput screening is generally available, e.g., using any
of a number of well known robotic systems that have also been
developed for solution phase chemistries useful in assay systems.
These systems include automated workstations including an automated
synthesis apparatus and robotic systems utilizing robotic arms. Any
of the above devices are suitable for use with the present
invention, e.g., for high-throughput screening of potential
modulators. The nature and implementation of modifications to these
devices (if any) so that they can operate as discussed herein will
be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art.
[0273] Indeed, entire high-throughput screening systems are
commercially available. These systems typically automate entire
procedures including all sample and reagent pipetting, liquid
dispensing, timed incubations, and final readings of the microplate
in detector(s) appropriate for the assay. These configurable
systems provide high throughput and rapid start up as well as a
high degree of flexibility and customization. Similarly,
microfluidic implementations of screening are also commercially
available.
[0274] The manufacturers of such systems provide detailed protocols
the various high throughput. Thus, for example, Zymark Corp.
provides technical bulletins describing screening systems for
detecting the modulation of gene transcription, ligand binding, and
the like. The integrated systems herein, in addition to providing
for sequence alignment and, optionally, synthesis of relevant
nucleic acids, can include such screening apparatus to identify
modulators that have an effect on one or more polynucleotides or
polypeptides according to the present invention.
[0275] In some assays it is desirable to have positive controls to
ensure that the components of the assays are working properly. At
least two types of positive controls are appropriate. That is,
known transcriptional activators or inhibitors can be incubated
with cells or plants, for example, in one sample of the assay, and
the resulting increase/decrease in transcription can be detected by
measuring the resulting increase in RNA levels and/or protein
expression, for example, according to the methods herein. It will
be appreciated that modulators can also be combined with
transcriptional activators or inhibitors to find modulators that
inhibit transcriptional activation or transcriptional repression.
Either expression of the nucleic acids and proteins herein or any
additional nucleic acids or proteins activated by the nucleic acids
or proteins herein, or both, can be monitored.
[0276] In an embodiment, the invention provides a method for
identifying compositions that modulate the activity or expression
of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention. For example, a
test compound, whether a small or large molecule, is placed in
contact with a cell, plant (or plant tissue or explant), or
composition comprising the polynucleotide or polypeptide of
interest and a resulting effect on the cell, plant, (or tissue or
explant) or composition is evaluated by monitoring, either directly
or indirectly, one or more of: expression level of the
polynucleotide or polypeptide, activity (or modulation of the
activity) of the polynucleotide or polypeptide. In some cases, an
alteration in a plant phenotype can be detected following contact
of a plant (or plant cell, or tissue or explant) with the putative
modulator, e.g., by modulation of expression or activity of a
polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention. Modulation of
expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the
invention may also be caused by molecular elements in a signal
transduction second messenger pathway and such modulation can
affect similar elements in the same or another signal transduction
second messenger pathway.
[0277] Subsequences
[0278] Also contemplated are uses of polynucleotides, also referred
to herein as oligonucleotides, typically having at least 12 bases,
preferably at least 15, more preferably at least 20, 30, or 50
bases, which hybridize under at least highly stringent (or
ultra-high stringent or ultra-ultra-high stringent conditions)
conditions to a polynucleotide sequence described above. The
polynucleotides may be used as probes, primers, sense and antisense
agents, and the like, according to methods as noted supra.
[0279] Subsequences of the polynucleotides of the invention,
including polynucleotide fragments and oligonucleotides are useful
as nucleic acid probes and primers. An oligonucleotide suitable for
use as a probe or primer is at least about 15 nucleotides in
length, more often at least about 18 nucleotides, often at least
about 21 nucleotides, frequently at least about 30 nucleotides, or
about 40 nucleotides, or more in length. A nucleic acid probe is
useful in hybridization protocols, e.g., to identify additional
polypeptide homologs of the invention, including protocols for
microarray experiments. Primers can be annealed to a complementary
target DNA strand by nucleic acid hybridization to form a hybrid
between the primer and the target DNA strand, and then extended
along the target DNA strand by a DNA polymerase enzyme. Primer
pairs can be used for amplification of a nucleic acid sequence,
e.g., by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other nucleic-acid
amplification methods. See Sambrook, supra, and Ausubel, supra.
[0280] In addition, the invention includes an isolated or
recombinant polypeptide including a subsequence of at least about
15 contiguous amino acids encoded by the recombinant or isolated
polynucleotides of the invention. For example, such polypeptides,
or domains or fragments thereof, can be used as immunogens, e.g.,
to produce antibodies specific for the polypeptide sequence, or as
probes for detecting a sequence of interest. A subsequence can
range in size from about 15 amino acids in length up to and
including the full length of the polypeptide.
[0281] To be encompassed by the present invention, an expressed
polypeptide which comprises such a polypeptide subsequence performs
at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in
substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the
intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide fragment can
comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such
as a DNA binding domain that activates transcription, e.g., by
binding to a specific DNA promoter region an activation domain, or
a domain for protein-protein interactions.
[0282] Production of Transgenic Plants
[0283] Modification of Traits
[0284] The polynucleotides of the invention are favorably employed
to produce transgenic plants with various traits, or
characteristics, that have been modified in a desirable manner,
e.g., to improve the seed characteristics of a plant. For example,
alteration of expression levels or patterns (e.g., spatial or
temporal expression patterns) of one or more of the transcription
factors (or transcription factor homologs) of the invention, as
compared with the levels of the same protein found in a wild-type
plant, can be used to modify a plant's traits. An illustrative
example of trait modification, improved characteristics, by
altering expression levels of a particular transcription factor is
described further in the Examples and the Sequence Listing.
[0285] Arabidopsis as a Model System
[0286] Arabidopsis thaliana is the object of rapidly growing
attention as a model for genetics and metabolism in plants.
Arabidopsis has a small genome, and well-documented studies are
available. It is easy to grow in large numbers and mutants defining
important genetically controlled mechanisms are either available,
or can readily be obtained. Various methods to introduce and
express isolated homologous genes are available (see Koncz et al.,
eds., Methods in Arabidopsis Research (1992) World Scientific, New
Jersey, N.J., in "Preface"). Because of its small size, short life
cycle, obligate autogamy and high fertility, Arabidopsis is also a
choice organism for the isolation of mutants and studies in
morphogenetic and development pathways, and control of these
pathways by transcription factors (Koncz supra, p. 72). A number of
studies introducing transcription factors into A. thaliana have
demonstrated the utility of this plant for understanding the
mechanisms of gene regulation and trait alteration in plants. (See,
for example, Koncz supra, and U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,428).
[0287] Arabidopsis Genes in Transgenic Plants.
[0288] Expression of genes which encode transcription factors
modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and
proteins are well known in the art. In addition, transgenic plants
comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors
may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides,
and proteins. Examples include Peng et al. (1997 Genes and
Development 11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999 Nature 400:
256-261). In addition, many others have demonstrated that an
Arabidopsis transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant
species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See,
for example, Fu et al. (2001 Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et
al. (2000 Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995 Nature 377:
482-483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).
[0289] Homologous Genes Introduced Into Transgenic Plants.
[0290] Homologous genes that may be derived from any plant, or from
any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or
recombinant, and that share significant sequence identity or
similarity to those provided by the present invention, may be
introduced into plants, for example, crop plants, to confer
desirable or improved traits. Consequently, transgenic plants may
be produced that comprise a recombinant expression vector or
cassette with a promoter operably linked to one or more sequences
homologous to presently disclosed sequences. The promoter may be,
for example, a plant or viral promoter.
[0291] The invention thus provides for methods for preparing
transgenic plants, and for modifying plant traits. These methods
include introducing into a plant a recombinant expression vector or
cassette comprising a functional promoter operably linked to one or
more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. Plants
and kits for producing these plants that result from the
application of these methods are also encompassed by the present
invention.
[0292] Transcription Factors of Interest for the Modification of
Plant Traits
[0293] Currently, the existence of a series of maturity groups for
different latitudes represents a major barrier to the introduction
of new valuable traits. Any trait (e.g. disease resistance) has to
be bred into each of the different maturity groups separately, a
laborious and costly exercise. The availability of single strain,
which could be grown at any latitude, would therefore greatly
increase the potential for introducing new traits to crop species
such as soybean and cotton.
[0294] For the specific effects, traits and utilities conferred to
plants, one or more transcription factor genes of the present
invention may be used to increase or decrease, or improve or prove
deleterious to a given trait. For example, knocking out a
transcription factor gene that naturally occurs in a plant, or
suppressing the gene (with, for example, antisense suppression),
may cause decreased tolerance to an osmotic stress relative to
non-transformed or wild-type plants. By overexpressing this gene,
the plant may experience increased tolerance to the same stress.
More than one transcription factor gene may be introduced into a
plant, either by transforming the plant with one or more vectors
comprising two or more transcription factors, or by selective
breeding of plants to yield hybrid crosses that comprise more than
one introduced transcription factor.
[0295] Genes, Traits and Utilities that Affect Plant
Characteristics
[0296] Plant transcription factors can modulate gene expression,
and, in turn, be modulated by the environmental experience of a
plant. Significant alterations in a plant's environment invariably
result in a change in the plant's transcription factor gene
expression pattern. Altered transcription factor expression
patterns generally result in phenotypic changes in the plant.
Transcription factor gene product(s) in transgenic plants then
differ(s) in amounts or proportions from that found in wild-type or
non-transformed plants, and those transcription factors likely
represent polypeptides that are used to alter the response to the
environmental change. By way of example, it is well accepted in the
art that analytical methods based on altered expression patterns
may be used to screen for phenotypic changes in a plant far more
effectively than can be achieved using traditional methods.
[0297] Sugar Sensing.
[0298] In addition to their important role as an energy source and
structural component of the plant cell, sugars are central
regulatory molecules that control several aspects of plant
physiology, metabolism and development (Hsieh et al. (1998) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 13965-13970). It is thought that this control
is achieved by regulating gene expression and, in higher plants,
sugars have been shown to repress or activate plant genes involved
in many essential processes such as photosynthesis, glyoxylate
metabolism, respiration, starch and sucrose synthesis and
degradation, pathogen response, wounding response, cell cycle
regulation, pigmentation, flowering and senescence. The mechanisms
by which sugars control gene expression are not understood.
[0299] Several sugar sensing mutants have turned out to be allelic
to abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene mutants. ABA is found in all
photosynthetic organisms and acts as a key regulator of
transpiration, stress responses, embryogenesis, and seed
germination. Most ABA effects are related to the compound acting as
a signal of decreased water availability, whereby it triggers a
reduction in water loss, slows growth, and mediates adaptive
responses. However, ABA also influences plant growth and
development via interactions with other phytohormones.
Physiological and molecular studies indicate that maize and
Arabidopsis have almost identical pathways with regard to ABA
biosynthesis and signal transduction. For further review, see
Finkelstein and Rock ((2002) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and
response (In The Arabidopsis Book, Editors: Somerville and
Meyerowitz (American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville,
Md.).
[0300] This potentially implicates G481 and G482 in hormone
signaling based on the sucrose sugar sensing phenotype of 35S::G481
and 35S::G482 transgenic lines. On the other hand, under the
laboratory conditions we use at Mendel, the sucrose treatment (9.5%
w/v) could also be an osmotic stress. Therefore, one could
interpret this data to indicate that the 35S::G481 transgenic lines
are more tolerant to osmotic stress. Interestingly, the Mendel
RT-PCR expression profiling studies have shown that more than half
of the CCAAT transcription factors are up-regulated in tissues with
developing seeds. One example is the well-characterized HAP3-like
protein, LEC1, which is required for desiccation tolerance during
seed maturation. LEC1 is also ABA and drought inducible. This
information, combined with the fact that CCAAT genes are
disproportionately responsive to osmotic stress suggests that this
family of transcription factors could control pathways involved in
both ABA responses and desiccation tolerance.
[0301] Because sugars are important signaling molecules, the
ability to control either the concentration of a signaling sugar or
how the plant perceives or responds to a signaling sugar could be
used to control plant development, physiology or metabolism. For
example, the flux of sucrose (a disaccharide sugar used for
systemically transporting carbon and energy in most plants) has
been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound
accumulation in seeds. Manipulation of the sucrose-signaling
pathway in seeds may therefore cause seeds to have more protein,
oil or carbohydrate, depending on the type of manipulation.
Similarly, in tubers, sucrose is converted to starch which is used
as an energy store. It is thought that sugar-signaling pathways may
partially determine the levels of starch synthesized in the tubers.
The manipulation of sugar signaling in tubers could lead to tubers
with a higher starch content.
[0302] Thus, the presently disclosed transcription factor genes
that manipulate the sugar signal transduction pathway, including,
for example, G481, along with its equivalogs, may lead to altered
gene expression to produce plants with desirable traits. In
particular, manipulation of sugar signal transduction pathways
could be used to alter source-sink relationships in seeds, tubers,
roots and other storage organs leading to increase in yield.
[0303] Osmotic stress. Modification of the expression of a number
of presently disclosed transcription factor genes may be used to
increase germination rate or growth under adverse osmotic
conditions, which could impact survival and yield of seeds and
plants. Osmotic stresses may be regulated by specific molecular
control mechanisms that include genes controlling water and ion
movements, functional and structural stress-induced proteins,
signal perception and transduction, and free radical scavenging,
and many others (Wang et al. (2001) Acta Hort. (ISHS) 560:
285-292). Instigators of osmotic stress include freezing, drought
and high salinity, each of which is discussed in more detail
below.
[0304] In many ways, freezing, high salt and drought have similar
effects on plants, not the least of which is the induction of
common polypeptides that respond to these different stresses. For
example, freezing is similar to water deficit in that freezing
reduces the amount of water available to a plant. Exposure to
freezing temperatures may lead to cellular dehydration as water
leaves cells and forms ice crystals in intercellular spaces
(Buchanan, supra). As with high salt concentration and freezing,
the problems for plants caused by low water availability include
mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular water.
Thus, the incorporation of transcription factors that modify a
plant's response to osmotic stress into, for example, a crop or
ornamental plant, may be useful in reducing damage or loss.
Specific effects caused by freezing, high salt and drought are
addressed below.
[0305] Salt and Drought Tolerance
[0306] Plants are subject to a range of environmental challenges.
Several of these, including salt stress, general osmotic stress,
drought stress and freezing stress, have the ability to impact
whole plant and cellular water availability. Not surprisingly,
then, plant responses to this collection of stresses are related.
In a recent review, Zhu notes that "most studies on water stress
signaling have focused on salt stress primarily because plant
responses to salt and drought are closely related and the
mechanisms overlap" (Zhu (2002) Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247-273).
Many examples of similar responses and pathways to this set of
stresses have been documented. For example, the CBF transcription
factors have been shown to condition resistance to salt, freezing
and drought (Kasuga et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17: 287-291). The
Arabidopsis rd29B gene is induced in response to both salt and
dehydration stress, a process that is mediated largely through an
ABA signal transduction process (Uno et al. (2000) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11632-11637), resulting in altered activity of
transcription factors that bind to an upstream element within the
rd29B promoter. In Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (ice plant),
Patharker and Cushman have shown that a calcium-dependent protein
kinase (McCDPK1) is induced by exposure to both drought and salt
stresses (Patharker and Cushman (2000) Plant J. 24: 679-691). The
stress-induced kinase was also shown to phosphorylate a
transcription factor, presumably altering its activity, although
transcript levels of the target transcription factor are not
altered in response to salt or drought stress. Similarly, Saijo et
al. demonstrated that a rice salt/drought-induced
calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (OsCDPK7) conferred increased
salt and drought tolerance to rice when overexpressed (Saijo et al.
(2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327).
[0307] Exposure to dehydration invokes similar survival strategies
in plants as does freezing stress (see, for example, Yelenosky
(1989) Plant Physiol 89: 444-451) and drought stress induces
freezing tolerance (see, for example, Siminovitch et al. (1982)
Plant Physiol 69: 250-255; and Guy et al. (1992) Planta 188:
265-270). In addition to the induction of cold-acclimation
proteins, strategies that allow plants to survive in low water
conditions may include, for example, reduced surface area, or
surface oil or wax production.
[0308] Consequently, one skilled in the art would expect that some
pathways involved in resistance to one of these stresses, and hence
regulated by an individual transcription factor, will also be
involved in resistance to another of these stresses, regulated by
the same or homologous transcription factors. Of course, the
overall resistance pathways are related, not identical, and
therefore not all transcription factors controlling resistance to
one stress will control resistance to the other stresses.
Nonetheless, if a transcription factor conditions resistance to one
of these stresses, it would be apparent to one skilled in the art
to test for resistance to these related stresses.
[0309] Thus, modifying the expression of a number of presently
disclosed transcription factor genes, such as G481 or G482, may be
used to increase a plant's tolerance to low water conditions and
provide the benefits of improved survival, increased yield and an
extended geographic and temporal planting range.
[0310] Salt. The genes of the sequence listing, including, for
example, G482, that provide tolerance to salt may be used to
engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in soils
with high saline content or under drought conditions. In
particular, increased salt tolerance during the germination stage
of a plant enhances survival and yield. Presently disclosed
transcription factor genes that provide increased salt tolerance
during germination, the seedling stage, and throughout a plant's
life cycle, would find particular value for imparting survival and
yield in areas where a particular crop would not normally
prosper.
[0311] Increased anthocyanin level in plant organs and tissues.
Presently disclosed transcription factor genes (i.e., G481 and its
equivalogs) can be used to alter anthocyanin levels in one or more
tissues, depending on the organ in which these genes are expressed.
The potential utilities of these genes include alterations in
pigment production for horticultural purposes, and possibly
increasing stress resistance, including osmotic stress resistance.
In addition, plants with increased anthocyanin may provide
health-promoting effects such as inhibition of tumor growth,
prevention of bone loss and prevention of the oxidation of
lipids.
[0312] Summary of altered plant characteristics. A clade of
structurally and functionally related sequences that derive from a
wide range of plants, including polynucleotide SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5,
7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43,
45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77,
79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, polynucleotides that encode
polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32, fragments thereof, paralogs,
orthologs, equivalogs, and fragments thereof, is provided. These
sequences have been shown in laboratory and field experiments to
confer altered size and abiotic stress tolerance phenotypes in
plants. The invention also provides polypeptides comprising SEQ ID
NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30,
31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62,
64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, and
fragments thereof, conserved domains thereof, paralogs, orthologs,
equivalogs, and fragments thereof. Plants that overexpress these
sequences have been observed to be more tolerant to a wide variety
of abiotic stresses, including, germination in heat and cold, and
osmotic stresses such as drought and high salt levels. Many of the
orthologs of these sequences are listed in the Sequence Listing,
and due to the high degree of structural similarity to the
sequences of the invention, it is expected that these sequences may
also function to increase plant biomass and/or abiotic stress
tolerance. The invention also encompasses the complements of the
polynucleotides. The polynucleotides are useful for screening
libraries of molecules or compounds for specific binding and for
creating transgenic plants having increased biomass and/or abiotic
stress tolerance.
[0313] Antisense and Co-Suppression
[0314] In addition to expression of the nucleic acids of the
invention as gene replacement or plant phenotype modification
nucleic acids, the nucleic acids are also useful for sense and
anti-sense suppression of expression, e.g. to down-regulate
expression of a nucleic acid of the invention, e.g. as a further
mechanism for modulating plant phenotype. That is, the nucleic
acids of the invention, or subsequences or anti-sense sequences
thereof, can be used to block expression of naturally occurring
homologous nucleic acids. A variety of sense and anti-sense
technologies are known in the art, e.g. as set forth in
Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997) Antisense Technology: A Practical
Approach IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
Antisense regulation is also described in Crowley et al. (1985)
Cell 43: 633-641; Rosenberg et al. (1985) Nature 313: 703-706;
Preiss et al. (1985) Nature 313: 27-32; Melton (1985) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 82: 144-148; Izant and Weintraub (1985) Science 229:
345-352; and Kim and Wold (1985) Cell 42: 129-138. Additional
methods for antisense regulation are known in the art. Antisense
regulation has been used to reduce or inhibit expression of plant
genes in, for example in European Patent Publication No. 271988.
Antisense RNA may be used to reduce gene expression to produce a
visible or biochemical phenotypic change in a plant (Smith et al.
(1988) Nature, 334: 724-726; Smith et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol.
14: 369-379). In general, sense or anti-sense sequences are
introduced into a cell, where they are optionally amplified, e.g.
by transcription. Such sequences include both simple
oligonucleotide sequences and catalytic sequences such as
ribozymes.
[0315] For example, a reduction or elimination of expression (i.e.,
a "knock-out") of a transcription factor or transcription factor
homolog polypeptide in a transgenic plant, e.g., to modify a plant
trait, can be obtained by introducing an antisense construct
corresponding to the polypeptide of interest as a cDNA. For
antisense suppression, the transcription factor or homolog cDNA is
arranged in reverse orientation (with respect to the coding
sequence) relative to the promoter sequence in the expression
vector. The introduced sequence need not be the full-length cDNA or
gene, and need not be identical to the cDNA or gene found in the
plant type to be transformed. Typically, the antisense sequence
need only be capable of hybridizing to the target gene or RNA of
interest. Thus, where the introduced sequence is of shorter length,
a higher degree of homology to the endogenous transcription factor
sequence will be needed for effective antisense suppression. While
antisense sequences of various lengths can be utilized, preferably,
the introduced antisense sequence in the vector will be at least 30
nucleotides in length, and improved antisense suppression will
typically be observed as the length of the antisense sequence
increases. Preferably, the length of the antisense sequence in the
vector will be greater than 100 nucleotides. Transcription of an
antisense construct as described results in the production of RNA
molecules that are the reverse complement of mRNA molecules
transcribed from the endogenous transcription factor gene in the
plant cell.
[0316] Suppression of endogenous transcription factor gene
expression can also be achieved using RNA interference (RNAi) or
microRNA-based methods (Llave et al. (2002) Science 297: 2053-2056;
Tang et al. (2003) Genes Dev. 17: 49-63). RNAi is a
post-transcriptional, targeted gene-silencing technique that uses
double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to incite degradation of messenger RNA
(mRNA) containing the same sequence as the dsRNA (Constans, (2002)
The Scientist 16: 36). Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs are
produced in at least two steps: an endogenous ribonuclease cleaves
longer dsRNA into shorter, 21-23 nucleotide-long RNAs (Plasterk
(2002) Science 296: 1263-1265). The siRNA segments then mediate the
degradation of the target mRNA (Zamore, (2001) Nature Struct.
Biol., 8:746-50). RNAi has been used for gene function
determination in a manner similar to antisense oligonucleotides
(Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36). Expression vectors that
continually express siRNAs in transiently and stably transfected
have been engineered to express small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), which
get processed in vivo into siRNAs-like molecules capable of
carrying out gene-specific silencing (Brummelkamp et al., (2002)
Science 296:550-553, and Paddison, et al. (2002) Genes & Dev.
16:948-958). Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded
RNA is discussed in further detail by Hammond et al. (2001) Nature
Rev Gen 2: 110-119, Fire et al. (1998) Nature 391: 806-811 and
Timmons and Fire (1998) Nature 395: 854. Vectors in which RNA
encoded by a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog
cDNA is over-expressed can also be used to obtain co-suppression of
a corresponding endogenous gene, e.g., in the manner described in
U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020 to Jorgensen. Such co-suppression (also
termed sense suppression) does not require that the entire
transcription factor cDNA be introduced into the plant cells, nor
does it require that the introduced sequence be exactly identical
to the endogenous transcription factor gene of interest. However,
as with antisense suppression, the suppressive efficiency will be
enhanced as specificity of hybridization is increased, e.g., as the
introduced sequence is lengthened, and/or as the sequence
similarity between the introduced sequence and the endogenous
transcription factor gene is increased.
[0317] Vectors expressing an untranslatable form of the
transcription factor mRNA, e.g., sequences comprising one or more
stop codon, or nonsense mutation) can also be used to suppress
expression of an endogenous transcription factor, thereby reducing
or eliminating its activity and modifying one or more traits.
Methods for producing such constructs are described in U.S. Pat.
No. 5,583,021. Preferably, such constructs are made by introducing
a premature stop codon into the transcription factor gene.
Alternatively, a plant trait can be modified by gene silencing
using double-strand RNA (Sharp (1999) Genes and Development 13:
139-141). Another method for abolishing the expression of a gene is
by insertion mutagenesis using the T-DNA of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens. After generating the insertion mutants, the mutants
can be screened to identify those containing the insertion in a
transcription factor or transcription factor homolog gene. Plants
containing a single transgene insertion event at the desired gene
can be crossed to generate homozygous plants for the mutation. Such
methods are well known to those of skill in the art (See for
example Koncz et al. (1992) Methods in Arabidopsis Research, World
Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., River Edge, N.J.).
[0318] Alternatively, a plant phenotype can be altered by
eliminating an endogenous gene, such as a transcription factor or
transcription factor homolog, e.g., by homologous recombination
(Kempin et al. (1997) Nature 389: 802-803).
[0319] A plant trait can also be modified by using the Cre-lox
system (for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772). A
plant genome can be modified to include first and second lox sites
that are then contacted with a Cre recombinase. If the lox sites
are in the same orientation, the intervening DNA sequence between
the two sites is excised. If the lox sites are in the opposite
orientation, the intervening sequence is inverted.
[0320] The polynucleotides and polypeptides of this invention can
also be expressed in a plant in the absence of an expression
cassette by manipulating the activity or expression level of the
endogenous gene by other means, such as, for example, by
ectopically expressing a gene by T-DNA activation tagging (Ichikawa
et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science
274: 982-985). This method entails transforming a plant with a gene
tag containing multiple transcriptional enhancers and once the tag
has inserted into the genome, expression of a flanking gene coding
sequence becomes deregulated. In another example, the
transcriptional machinery in a plant can be modified so as to
increase transcription levels of a polynucleotide of the invention
(See, e.g., PCT Publications WO 96/06166 and WO 98/53057 which
describe the modification of the DNA-binding specificity of zinc
finger proteins by changing particular amino acids in the
DNA-binding motif).
[0321] The transgenic plant can also include the machinery
necessary for expressing or altering the activity of a polypeptide
encoded by an endogenous gene, for example, by altering the
phosphorylation state of the polypeptide to maintain it in an
activated state.
[0322] Transgenic plants (or plant cells, or plant explants, or
plant tissues) incorporating the polynucleotides of the invention
and/or expressing the polypeptides of the invention can be produced
by a variety of well established techniques as described above.
Following construction of a vector, most typically an expression
cassette, including a polynucleotide, e.g., encoding a
transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, of the
invention, standard techniques can be used to introduce the
polynucleotide into a plant, a plant cell, a plant explant or a
plant tissue of interest. Optionally, the plant cell, explant or
tissue can be regenerated to produce a transgenic plant.
[0323] The plant can be any higher plant, including gymnosperms,
monocotyledonous and dicotyledenous plants. Suitable protocols are
available for Leguminosae (alfalfa, soybean, clover, etc.),
Umbelliferae (carrot, celery, parsnip), Cruciferae (cabbage,
radish, rapeseed, broccoli, etc.), Curcurbitaceae (melons and
cucumber), Gramineae (wheat, corn, rice, barley, millet, etc.),
Solanaceae (potato, tomato, tobacco, peppers, etc.), and various
other crops. See protocols described in Ammirato et al., eds.,
(1984) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture--Crop Species, Macmillan
Publ. Co., New York, N.Y.; Shimamoto et al. (1989) Nature 338:
274-276; Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; and Vasil et
al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 429-434.
[0324] Transformation and regeneration of both monocotyledonous and
dicotyledonous plant cells are now routine, and the selection of
the most appropriate transformation technique will be determined by
the practitioner. The choice of method will vary with the type of
plant to be transformed; those skilled in the art will recognize
the suitability of particular methods for given plant types.
Suitable methods can include, but are not limited to:
electroporation of plant protoplasts; liposome-mediated
transformation; polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated transformation;
transformation using viruses; micro-injection of plant cells;
micro-projectile bombardment of plant cells; vacuum infiltration;
and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation.
Transformation means introducing a nucleotide sequence into a plant
in a manner to cause stable or transient expression of the
sequence.
[0325] Successful examples of the modification of plant
characteristics by transformation with cloned sequences which serve
to illustrate the current knowledge in this field of technology,
and which are herein incorporated by reference, include: U.S. Pat.
Nos. 5,571,706; 5,677,175; 5,510,471; 5,750,386; 5,597,945;
5,589,615; 5,750,871; 5,268,526; 5,780,708; 5,538,880; 5,773,269;
5,736,369 and 5,610,042.
[0326] Following transformation, plants are preferably selected
using a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the
transformation vector. Typically, such a marker will confer
antibiotic or herbicide resistance on the transformed plants, and
selection of transformants can be accomplished by exposing the
plants to appropriate concentrations of the antibiotic or
herbicide.
[0327] After transformed plants are selected and grown to maturity,
those plants showing a modified trait are identified. The modified
trait can be any of those traits described above. Additionally, to
confirm that the modified trait is due to changes in expression
levels or activity of the polypeptide or polynucleotide of the
invention can be determined by analyzing mRNA expression using
Northern blots, RT-PCR or microarrays, or protein expression using
immunoblots or Western blots or gel shift assays.
[0328] Integrated Systems--Sequence Identity
[0329] Additionally, the present invention may be an integrated
system, computer or computer readable medium that comprises an
instruction set for determining the identity of one or more
sequences in a database. In addition, the instruction set can be
used to generate or identify sequences that meet any specified
criteria. Furthermore, the instruction set may be used to associate
or link certain functional benefits, such improved characteristics,
with one or more identified sequence.
[0330] For example, the instruction set can include, e.g., a
sequence comparison or other alignment program, e.g., an available
program such as, for example, the Wisconsin Package Version 10.0,
such as BLAST, FASTA, PILEUP, FINDPATTERNS or the like (GCG,
Madison, Wis.). Public sequence databases such as GenBank, EMBL,
Swiss-Prot and PIR or private sequence databases such as PHYTOSEQ
sequence database (Incyte Genomics, Palo Alto, Calif.) can be
searched.
[0331] Alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted by
the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (1981) Adv.
Appl. Math. 2: 482489, by the homology alignment algorithm of
Needleman and Wunsch (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443-453, by the
search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman (1988) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444-2448, by computerized implementations of
these algorithms. After alignment, sequence comparisons between two
(or more) polynucleotides or polypeptides are typically performed
by comparing sequences of the two sequences over a comparison
window to identify and compare local regions of sequence
similarity. The comparison window can be a segment of at least
about 20 contiguous positions, usually about 50 to about 200, more
usually about 100 to about 150 contiguous positions. A description
of the method is provided in Ausubel et al. supra.
[0332] A variety of methods for determining sequence relationships
can be used, including manual alignment and computer assisted
sequence alignment and analysis. This later approach is a preferred
approach in the present invention, due to the increased throughput
afforded by computer assisted methods. As noted above, a variety of
computer programs for performing sequence alignment are available,
or can be produced by one of skill.
[0333] One example algorithm that is suitable for determining
percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST
algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol.
Biol. 215: 403-410. Software for performing BLAST analyses is
publicly available, e.g., through the National Library of
Medicine's National Center for Biotechnology Information
(ncbi.nlm.nih; see at world wide web (www) National Institutes of
Health US government (gov) website). This algorithm involves first
identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short
words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or
satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a
word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as
the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al. supra).
These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating
searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are
then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as
the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores
are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M
(reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N
(penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino
acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the
cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are
halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the
quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score
goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more
negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence
is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine
the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for
nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an
expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=4, and a comparison
of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses
as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and
the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff (1992) Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919). Unless otherwise indicated,
"sequence identity" here refers to the % sequence identity
generated from a tblastx using the NCBI version of the algorithm at
the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter "off"
(see, for example, NIH NLM NCBI website at ncbi.nlm.nih,
supra).
[0334] In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the
BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the
similarity between two sequences (see, e.g. Karlin and Altschul
(1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 5873-5787). One measure of
similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum
probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability
by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences
would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered
similar to a reference sequence (and, therefore, in this context,
homologous) if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the
test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about
0.1, or less than about 0.01, and or even less than about 0.001. An
additional example of a useful sequence alignment algorithm is
PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group
of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments. The
program can align, e.g., up to 300 sequences of a maximum length of
5,000 letters.
[0335] The integrated system, or computer typically includes a user
input interface allowing a user to selectively view one or more
sequence records corresponding to the one or more character
strings, as well as an instruction set which aligns the one or more
character strings with each other or with an additional character
string to identify one or more region of sequence similarity. The
system may include a link of one or more character strings with a
particular phenotype or gene function. Typically, the system
includes a user readable output element that displays an alignment
produced by the alignment instruction set.
[0336] The methods of this invention can be implemented in a
localized or distributed computing environment. In a distributed
environment, the methods may implemented on a single computer
comprising multiple processors or on a multiplicity of computers.
The computers can be linked, e.g. through a common bus, but more
preferably the computer(s) are nodes on a network. The network can
be a generalized or a dedicated local or wide-area network and, in
certain preferred embodiments, the computers may be components of
an intra-net or an internet.
[0337] Thus, the invention provides methods for identifying a
sequence similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as
noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the
polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking
or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a
sequence. In the methods, a sequence database is provided (locally
or across an inter or intra net) and a query is made against the
sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and
associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.
[0338] Any sequence herein can be entered into the database, before
or after querying the database. This provides for both expansion of
the database and, if done before the querying step, for insertion
of control sequences into the database. The control sequences can
be detected by the query to ensure the general integrity of both
the database and the query. As noted, the query can be performed
using a web browser based interface. For example, the database can
be a centralized public database such as those noted herein, and
the querying can be done from a remote terminal or computer across
an internet or intranet.
[0339] Any sequence herein can be used to identify a similar,
homologous, paralogous, or orthologous sequence in another plant.
This provides means for identifying endogenous sequences in other
plants that may be useful to alter a trait of progeny plants, which
results from crossing two plants of different strain. For example,
sequences that encode an ortholog of any of the sequences herein
that naturally occur in a plant with a desired trait can be
identified using the sequences disclosed herein. The plant is then
crossed with a second plant of the same species but which does not
have the desired trait to produce progeny which can then be used in
further crossing experiments to produce the desired trait in the
second plant. Therefore the resulting progeny plant contains no
transgenes; expression of the endogenous sequence may also be
regulated by treatment with a particular chemical or other means,
such as EMR. Some examples of such compounds well known in the art
include: ethylene; cytokinins; phenolic compounds, which stimulate
the transcription of the genes needed for infection; specific
monosaccharides and acidic environments which potentiate vir gene
induction; acidic polysaccharides which induce one or more
chromosomal genes; and opines; other mechanisms include light or
dark treatment (for a review of examples of such treatments, see,
Winans (1992) Microbiol. Rev. 56: 12-31; Eyal et al. (1992) Plant
Mol. Biol. 19: 589-599; Chrispeels et al. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol.
42: 279-290; Piazza et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128:
1077-1086).
[0340] Table 5 lists sequences discovered to be orthologous to a
number of representative transcription factors of the present
invention. The column headings include the transcription factors
listed by (a) the SEQ ID NO: of the ortholog or nucleotide encoding
the ortholog; (b) the GID sequence identifier; (c) the Sequence
Identifier or GenBank Accession Number;(d) the species from which
the orthologs to the transcription factors are derived; (e) the
smallest sum probability relationship to G482 determined by BLAST
analysis; and (f) the percent identity of the B domain of the
sequence to the same domain in G482.
8TABLE 5 Paralogs and Orthologs and Other Related Genes of
Representative Arabidopsis Transcription Factor Genes identified
using BLAST SEQ ID NO: of Ortholog or Nucleotide Smallest Sum
Percent Identity Encoding Sequence Identifier or Species from Which
Probability to of B domain to B Ortholog GID No. Accession Number
Ortholog is Derived G482 domain of G482 1 G481 Arabidopsis thaliana
83% 3 G482 Arabidopsis thaliana 0.0 100% 5 G485 Arabidopsis
thaliana 94% 7 G1364 Arabidopsis thaliana 85% 9 G2345 Arabidopsis
thaliana 85% 11 GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 5E-29 84% CLUSTER24839_1
13 GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 2E-31 85% CLUSTER31103_1 15
GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 1E-41 91% CLUSTER33504_1 17 G3476
GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 3E-58 94% CLUSTER33504_3 19 G3475
GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 6E-58 95% CLUSTER33504_5 21
GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 6E-45 92% CLUSTER33504_6 23 G3471
GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 9E-57 92% CLUSTER4778_1 81 G3472 Glycine
max 9E-57 92% 25 G3470 GLYMA-28NOV01- Glycine max 8E-9 85%
CLUSTER4778_3 87 G3394 ORYSA-22JAN02- Oryza sativa 3E-18 86%
CLUSTER26105_1 73 G3395 Oryza sativa 1E-44 83% 29 OSC12630.C1.p5.fg
Oryza sativa 2E-55 90% 30 OSC1404.C1.p3.fg Oryza sativa 4E-39 75%
31 OSC30077.C1.p6.fg Oryza sativa 3E-50 86% 32 OSC5489.C1.p2.fg
Oryza sativa 8E-44 83% 60 G3398 Oryza sativa 2E-57 90% 33
L1B3732-044-Q6-K6- Zea mays 2E-23 87% C4 35 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays
7E-19 86% CLUSTER719_1 37 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 7E-11 86%
CLUSTER719_10 39 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 6E-19 86% CLUSTER719_2 41
ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 6E-7 80% CLUSTER719_3 43 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea
mays 8E-17 86% CLUSTER719_4 45 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 4E-17 86%
CLUSTER719_5 47 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 5E-23 93% CLUSTER90408_1 49
G3436 ZEAMA-08NOV01- Zea mays 7E-55 93% CLUSTER90408_2 77 G3434 Zea
mays 2E-44 86% 79 G3435 Zea mays 1E-58 93% 51 G3473 GLYMA-28NOV01-
Glycine max 7E-17 83% CLUSTER33504_4 83 G3474 Glycine max 6E-57 91%
85 G3477 Glycine max 5E-47 85% 87 G3478 Glycine max 4E-58 95% 53
ORYSA-22JAN02- Oryza sativa 9E-21 83% CLUSTER119015_1 55
Zm_S11418173 Zea mays 3E-17 86% 57 Zm_S11434692 Zea mays 1E-19 85%
59 Ta_S45374 Triticum aestivum 2E-24 85% 61 Ta_S50443 Triticum
aestivum 9E-24 90% 63 SGN-UNIGENE-46859 Lycopersicon esculentum
2E-6 87% 65 SGN-UNIGENE-47447 Lycopersicon esculentum 3E-11 91%
BU238020 Descurainia sophia 1.00E-70 BG440251 Gossypium arboreum
3.00E-56 CB290513 Citrus sinensis 3.00E-55 BF071234 Glycine max
1.00E-54 BQ799965 Vitis vinifera 3.00E-54 AX584261 Eucalyptus
grandis 5.00E-54 AX584259 Momordica charantia 7.00E-54 CD848631
Helianthus annuus 6.00E-53 BQ488908 Beta vulgaris 6.00E-53 CD573484
Zea mays 8.00E-53 gi115840 Zea mays 2.40E-51 86% gi30409461 Oryza
sativa (japonica 3.50E-50 86% cultivar-group) AP004366 Oryza sativa
3E-50 AC120529 Oryza sativa (japonica 7E-46 cultivar-group)
gi15408794 Oryza sativa 8.70E-38 75% AC108500 Oryza sativa 2E-20
CD574709 Poncirus trifoliata 8.00E-60 BQ505706 Solanum tuberosum
9.00E-59 AC122165 Medicago truncatula 9.00E-57 AC120529 Oryza
sativa (japonica 6E-56 cultivar-group) BQ104671 Rosa hybrid
cultivar 3.00E-55 AX584271 Glycine max 6.00E-55 AX584265 Zea mays
1.00E-54 AAAA01003638 Oryza sativa (indica 2.00E-54 cultivar-group)
AP005193 Oryza sativa (japonica 2.00E-54 cultivar-group) BU880488
Populus balsamifera 2.00E-53 subsp. trichocarpa BJ248969 Triticum
aestivum 3.00E-53 gi115840 Zea mays 1.80E-46 86% gi30409461 Oryza
sativa (japonica 8.80E-45 86% cultivar-group) AP004366 Oryza sativa
4E-44 gi15408794 Oryza sativa 1.80E-37 75% AP005193 Oryza sativa
(japonica 9E-21 cultivar-group) AC108500 Oryza sativa 5E-15
CD574709 Poncirus trifoliata 9.00E-62 BQ505706 Solanum tuberosum
4.00E-60 BQ996905 Lactuca sativa 2.00E-58 AAAA01003638 Oryza sativa
(indica 3.00E-57 cultivar-group) AP005193 Oryza sativa (japonica
3.00E-57 cultivar-group) BQ592365 Beta vulgaris 9.00E-57 CD438068
Zea mays 9.00E-57 AX288144 Physcomitrella patens 3.00E-56 BU880488
Populus balsamifera 1.00E-55 subsp. trichocarpa AX584277 Glycine
max 6.00E-55 gi30409461 Oryza sativa (japonica 4.60E-48 86%
cultivar-group) gi30349365 Oryza sativa (indica 1.10E-39
cultivar-group) gi15408794 Oryza sativa 1.60E-38 75% CD823119
Brassica napus 1.00E-64 BG642751 Lycopersicon esculentum 2.00E-60
BQ629472 Glycine max 6.00E-60 BQ405785 Gossypium arboreum 6.00E-60
BQ488908 Beta vulgaris 1.00E-59 AX584261 Eucalyptus grandis
3.00E-59 BQ799965 Vitis vinifera 6.00E-59 CB290513 Citrus sinensis
3.00E-58 CD848631 Helianthus annuus 3.00E-58 CF069249 Medicago
truncatula 2.00E-57 gi115840 Zea mays 2.10E-50 86% gi30409461 Oryza
sativa (japonica 9.50E-48 82% cultivar-group) CD823119 Brassica
napus 2.00E-75 BG445358 Gossypium arboreum 1.00E-64 BG642751
Lycopersicon esculentum 2.00E-64 BQ629472 Glycine max 5.00E-63
BQ488908 Beta vulgaris 6.00E-63 AX584261 Eucalyptus grandis
7.00E-62 BQ799965 Vitis vinifera 1.00E-61 CD848631 Helianthus
annuus 2.00E-61 CF069249 Medicago truncatula 6.00E-61 BG599785
Solanum tuberosum 7.00E-61 82% gi115840 Zea mays 6.80E-54 86%
gi30409459 Oryza sativa (japonica 1.00E-50 83% cultivar-group)
[0341] Molecular Modeling
[0342] Another means that may be used to confirm the utility and
function of transcription factor sequences that are orthologous or
paralogous to presently disclosed transcription factors is through
the use of molecular modeling software. Molecular modeling is
routinely used to predict polypeptide structure, and a variety of
protein structure modeling programs, such as "Insight II"
(Accelrys, Inc.) are commercially available for this purpose.
Modeling can thus be used to predict which residues of a
polypeptide can be changed without altering function (Crameri et
al. (2003) U.S. Pat. No. 6,521,453). Thus, polypeptides that are
sequentially similar can be shown to have a high likelihood of
similar function by their structural similarity, which may, for
example, be established by comparison of regions of superstructure.
The relative tendencies of amino acids to form regions of
superstructure (for example, helixes and _-sheets) are well
established. For example, ONeil et al. ((1990) Science 250:
646-651) have discussed in detail the helix forming tendencies of
amino acids. Tables of relative structure forming activity for
amino acids can be used as substitution tables to predict which
residues can be functionally substituted in a given region, for
example, in DNA-binding domains of known transcription factors and
equivalogs. Homologs that are likely to be functionally similar can
then be identified.
[0343] Of particular interest is the structure of a transcription
factor in the region of its conserved domains, such as those
identified in Table 1. Structural analyses may be performed by
comparing the structure of the known transcription factor around
its conserved domain with those of orthologs and paralogs. Analysis
of a number of polypeptides within a transcription factor group or
lade, including the functionally or sequentially similar
polypeptides provided in the Sequence Listing, may also provide an
understanding of structural elements required to regulate
transcription within a given family.
EXAMPLES
[0344] The invention, now being generally described, will be more
readily understood by reference to the following examples, which
are included merely for purposes of illustration of certain aspects
and embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to
limit the invention. It will be recognized by one of skill in the
art that a transcription factor that is associated with a
particular first trait may also be associated with at least one
other, unrelated and inherent second trait which was not predicted
by the first trait.
[0345] The complete descriptions of the traits associated with each
polynucleotide of the invention are fully disclosed in Example
VIII. The complete description of the transcription factor gene
family and identified B domains of the polypeptide encoded by the
polynucleotide is fully disclosed in Table 1.
Example I
Full Length Gene Identification and Cloning
[0346] Putative transcription factor sequences (genomic or ESTs)
related to known transcription factors were identified in the
Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using the tblastn sequence
analysis program using default parameters and a P-value cutoff
threshold of -4 or -5 or lower, depending on the length of the
query sequence. Putative transcription factor sequence hits were
then screened to identify those containing particular sequence
strings. If the sequence hits contained such sequence strings, the
sequences were confirmed as transcription factors.
[0347] Alternatively, Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA libraries derived
from different tissues or treatments, or genomic libraries were
screened to identify novel members of a transcription family using
a low stringency hybridization approach. Probes were synthesized
using gene specific primers in a standard PCR reaction (annealing
temperature 60.degree. C.) and labeled with .sup.32P dCTP using the
High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (now Roche
Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). Purified radiolabelled
probes were added to filters immersed in Church hybridization
medium (0.5 M NaPO.sub.4 pH 7.0, 7% SDS, 1% w/v bovine serum
albumin) and hybridized overnight at 60.degree. C. with shaking.
Filters were washed two times for 45 to 60 minutes with
1.times.SCC, 1% SDS at 60.degree. C.
[0348] To identify additional sequence 5' or 3' of a partial cDNA
sequence in a cDNA library, 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA
ends (RACE) was performed using the MARATHON cDNA amplification kit
(Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.). Generally, the method entailed first
isolating poly(A) mRNA, performing first and second strand cDNA
synthesis to generate double stranded cDNA, blunting cDNA ends,
followed by ligation of the MARATHON Adaptor to the cDNA to form a
library of adaptor-ligated ds cDNA.
[0349] Gene-specific primers were designed to be used along with
adaptor specific primers for both 5' and 3' RACE reactions. Nested
primers, rather than single primers, were used to increase PCR
specificity. Using 5' and 3' RACE reactions, 5' and 3' RACE
fragments were obtained, sequenced and cloned. The process can be
repeated until 5' and 3' ends of the full-length gene were
identified. Then the full-length cDNA was generated by PCR using
primers specific to 5' and 3' ends of the gene by end-to-end
PCR.
Example II
Construction of Expression Vectors
[0350] The sequence was amplified from a genomic or cDNA library
using primers specific to sequences upstream and downstream of the
coding region. The expression vector was pMEN20 or pMEN65, which
are both derived from pMON316 (Sanders et al. (1987) Nucleic Acids
Res. 15:1543-1558) and contain the CAMV 35S promoter to express
transgenes. To clone the sequence into the vector, both pMEN20 and
the amplified DNA fragment were digested separately with SalI and
NotI restriction enzymes at 37.degree. C. for 2 hours. The
digestion products were subject to electrophoresis in a 0.8%
agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The DNA
fragments containing the sequence and the linearized plasmid were
excised and purified by using a QIAQUICK gel extraction kit
(Qiagen, Valencia Calif.). The fragments of interest were ligated
at a ratio of 3:1 (vector to insert). Ligation reactions using T4
DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly Mass.) were carried out at
16.degree. C. for 16 hours. The ligated DNAs were transformed into
competent cells of the E. coli strain DH5alpha by using the heat
shock method. The transformations were plated on LB plates
containing 50 mg/l kanamycin (Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis Mo.).
Individual colonies were grown overnight in five milliliters of LB
broth containing 50 mg/l kanamycin at 37.degree. C. Plasmid DNA was
purified by using Qiaquick Mini Prep kits (Qiagen).
Example III
Transformation of Agrobacterium with the Expression Vector
[0351] After the plasmid vector containing the gene was
constructed, the vector was used to transform Agrobacterium
tumefaciens cells expressing the gene products. The stock of
Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells for transformation was made as
described by Nagel et al. (1990) FEMS Microbiol Letts. 67: 325-328.
Agrobacterium strain ABI was grown in 250 ml LB medium (Sigma)
overnight at 28.degree. C. with shaking until an absorbance over 1
cm at 600 nm (A.sub.600) of 0.5-1.0 was reached. Cells were
harvested by centrifugation at 4,000.times.g for 15 min at
4.degree. C. Cells were then resuspended in 250 .mu.l chilled
buffer (1 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.0 with KOH). Cells were
centrifuged again as described above and resuspended in 125 .mu.l
chilled buffer. Cells were then centrifuged and resuspended two
more times in the same HEPES buffer as described above at a volume
of 100 .mu.l and 750 .mu.l respectively. Resuspended cells were
then distributed into 40 l.sup.1l aliquots, quickly frozen in
liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80.degree. C.
[0352] Agrobacterium cells were transformed with plasmids prepared
as described above following the protocol described by Nagel et al.
(supra). For each DNA construct to be transformed, 50-100 ng DNA
(generally resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) was
mixed with 40 .mu.l of Agrobacterium cells. The DNA/cell mixture
was then transferred to a chilled cuvette with a 2 mm electrode gap
and subject to a 2.5 kV charge dissipated at 25 .mu.F and 200 .mu.F
using a Gene Pulser II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.). After
electroporation, cells were immediately resuspended in 1.0 ml LB
and allowed to recover without antibiotic selection for 2-4 hours
at 28.degree. C. in a shaking incubator. After recovery, cells were
plated onto selective medium of LB broth containing 100 .mu.g/ml
spectinomycin (Sigma) and incubated for 2448 hours at 28.degree. C.
Single colonies were then picked and inoculated in fresh medium.
The presence of the plasmid construct was verified by PCR
amplification and sequence analysis.
Example IV
Transformation of Arabidopsis Plants with Agrobacteriumn
tumefaciens with Expression Vector
[0353] After transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with
plasmid vectors containing the gene, single Agrobacterium colonies
were identified, propagated, and used to transform Arabidopsis
plants. Briefly, 500 ml cultures of LB medium containing 50 mg/l
kanamycin were inoculated with the colonies and grown at 28.degree.
C. with shaking for 2 days until an optical absorbance at 600 nm
wavelength over 1 cm (A.sub.600) of >2.0 is reached. Cells were
then harvested by centrifugation at 4,000.times.g for 10 min, and
resuspended in infiltration medium (1/2.times. Murashige and Skoog
salts (Sigma), 1.times. Gamborg's B-5 vitamins (Sigma), 5.0% (w/v)
sucrose (Sigma), 0.044 JIM benzylamino purine (Sigma), 200 .mu.l/l
Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds) until an A.sub.600 of 0.8 was
reached.
[0354] Prior to transformation, Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (ecotype
Columbia) were sown at a density of .about.10 plants per 4" pot
onto Pro-Mix BX potting medium (Hummert International) covered with
fiberglass mesh (18 mm.times.16 mm). Plants were grown under
continuous illumination (50-75 .mu.E/m.sup.2/sec) at 22-23.degree.
C. with 65-70% relative humidity. After about 4 weeks, primary
inflorescence stems (bolts) are cut off to encourage growth of
multiple secondary bolts. After flowering of the mature secondary
bolts, plants were prepared for transformation by removal of all
siliques and opened flowers.
[0355] The pots were then immersed upside down in the mixture of
Agrobacterium infiltration medium as described above for 30 sec,
and placed on their sides to allow draining into a 1'.times.2' flat
surface covered with plastic wrap. After 24 h, the plastic wrap was
removed and pots are turned upright. The immersion procedure was
repeated one week later, for a total of two immersions per pot.
Seeds were then collected from each transformation pot and analyzed
following the protocol described below.
Example V
Identification of Arabidopsis Primary Transformants
[0356] Seeds collected from the transformation pots were sterilized
essentially as follows. Seeds were dispersed into in a solution
containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma) and sterile water and
washed by shaking the suspension for 20 min. The wash solution was
then drained and replaced with fresh wash solution to wash the
seeds for 20 min with shaking. After removal of the
ethanol/detergent solution, a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton
X-100 and 30% (v/v) bleach (CLOROX; Clorox Corp. Oakland Calif.)
was added to the seeds, and the suspension was shaken for 10 min.
After removal of the bleach/detergent solution, seeds were then
washed five times in sterile distilled water. The seeds were stored
in the last wash water at 4.degree. C. for 2 days in the dark
before being plated onto antibiotic selection medium (1.times.
Murashige and Skoog salts (pH adjusted to 5.7 with 1M KOH),
1.times. Gamborg's B-5 vitamins, 0.9% phytagar (Life Technologies),
and 50 mg/l kanamycin). Seeds were germinated under continuous
illumination (50-75 .mu.E/m.sup.2/sec) at 22-230 C. After 7-10 days
of growth under these conditions, kanamycin resistant primary
transformants (T1 generation) were visible and obtained. These
seedlings were transferred first to fresh selection plates where
the seedlings continued to grow for 3-5 more days, and then to soil
(Pro-Mix BX potting medium).
[0357] Primary transformants were crossed and progeny seeds
(T.sub.2) collected; kanamycin resistant seedlings were selected
and analyzed. The expression levels of the recombinant
polynucleotides in the transformants vary from about a 5%
expression level increase to a least a 100% expression level
increase. Similar observations are made with respect to polypeptide
level expression.
Example VI
Identification of Arabidopsis Plants with Transcription Factor Gene
Knockouts
[0358] The screening of insertion mutagenized Arabidopsis
collections for null mutants in a known target gene was essentially
as described in Krysan et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 2283-2290.
Briefly, gene-specific primers, nested by 5-250 base pairs to each
other, were designed from the 5' and 3' regions of a known target
gene. Similarly, nested sets of primers were also created specific
to each of the T-DNA or transposon ends (the "right" and "left"
borders). All possible combinations of gene specific and
T-DNA/transposon primers were used to detect by PCR an insertion
event within or close to the target gene. The amplified DNA
fragments were then sequenced which allows the precise
determination of the T-DNA/transposon insertion point relative to
the target gene. Insertion events within the coding or intervening
sequence of the genes were deconvoluted from a pool comprising a
plurality of insertion events to a single unique mutant plant for
functional characterization. The method is described in more detail
in Yu and Adam, U.S. application Ser. No. 09/177,733 filed Oct. 23,
1998.
Example VII
Identification of Modified Phenotypes in Overexpression or Gene
Knockout Plants
[0359] Experiments were performed to identify those transformants
or knockouts that exhibited modified biochemical
characteristics.
[0360] Calibration of NIRS response was performed using data
obtained by wet chemical analysis of a population of Arabidopsis
ecotypes that were expected to represent diversity of oil and
protein levels.
[0361] Experiments were performed to identify those transformants
or knockouts that exhibited modified sugar-sensing. For such
studies, seeds from transformants were germinated on media
containing 5% glucose or 9.4% sucrose which normally partially
restrict hypocotyl elongation. Plants with altered sugar sensing
may have either longer or shorter hypocotyls than normal plants
when grown on this media. Additionally, other plant traits may be
varied such as root mass.
[0362] In some instances, expression patterns of the stress-induced
genes may be monitored by microarray experiments. In these
experiments, cDNAs are generated by PCR and resuspended at a final
concentration of .about.100 ng/ul in 3.times.SSC or 150 mM
Na-phosphate (Eisen and Brown (1999) Methods Enzymol. 303:
179-205). The cDNAs are spotted on microscope glass slides coated
with polylysine. The prepared cDNAs are aliquoted into 384 well
plates and spotted on the slides using, for example, an x-y-z
gantry (OmniGrid) which may be purchased from GeneMachines (Menlo
Park, Calif.) outfitted with quill type pins which may be purchased
from Telechem International (Sunnyvale, Calif.). After spotting,
the arrays are cured for a minimum of one week at room temperature,
rehydrated and blocked following the protocol recommended by Eisen
and Brown (1999; supra).
[0363] Sample total RNA (10 .mu.g) samples are labeled using
fluorescent Cy3 and Cy5 dyes. Labeled samples are resuspended in
4.times.SSC/0.03% SDS/4 .mu.g salmon sperm DNA/2 .mu.g tRNA/ 50 mM
Na-pyrophosphate, heated for 95.degree. C. for 2.5 minutes, spun
down and placed on the array. The array is then covered with a
glass coverslip and placed in a sealed chamber. The chamber is then
kept in a water bath at 62.degree. C. overnight. The arrays are
washed as described in Eisen and Brown (1999, supra) and scanned on
a General Scanning 3000 laser scanner. The resulting files are
subsequently quantified using IMAGENE, software (BioDiscovery, Los
Angeles Calif.).
[0364] RT-PCR experiments may be performed to identify those genes
induced after exposure to osmotic stress. Generally, the gene
expression patterns from ground plant leaf tissue is examined.
Reverse transcriptase PCR was conducted using gene specific primers
within the coding region for each sequence identified. The primers
were designed near the 3' region of each DNA binding sequence
initially identified.
[0365] Total RNA from these ground leaf tissues was isolated using
the CTAB extraction protocol. Once extracted total RNA was
normalized in concentration across all the tissue types to ensure
that the PCR reaction for each tissue received the same amount of
cDNA template using the 28S band as reference. Poly(A+) RNA was
purified using a modified protocol from the Qiagen OLIGOTEX
purification kit batch protocol. cDNA was synthesized using
standard protocols. After the first strand cDNA synthesis, primers
for Actin 2 were used to normalize the concentration of cDNA across
the tissue types. Actin 2 is found to be constitutively expressed
in fairly equal levels across the tissue types we are
investigating.
[0366] For RT PCR, cDNA template was mixed with corresponding
primers and Taq DNA polymerase. Each reaction consisted of 0.2
.mu.l cDNA template, 2 .mu.l 10.times. Tricine buffer, 2 .mu.l
10.times. Tricine buffer and 16.8 .mu.l water, 0.05 .mu.l Primer 1,
0.05 .mu.l, Primer 2, 0.3 .mu.l Taq DNA polymerase and 8.6 .mu.l
water.
[0367] The 96 well plate is covered with microfilm and set in the
thermocycler to start the reaction cycle. By way of illustration,
the reaction cycle may comprise the following steps:
[0368] Step 1: 93.degree. C. for 3 min;
[0369] Step 2: 93.degree. C. for 30 sec;
[0370] Step 3: 650 C for 1 min;
[0371] Step 4: 72.degree. C. for 2 min;
[0372] Steps 2, 3 and 4 are repeated for 28 cycles;
[0373] Step 5: 72.degree. C. for 5 min; and
[0374] STEP 6 4.degree. C.
[0375] To amplify more products, for example, to identify genes
that have very low expression, additional steps may be performed:
The following method illustrates a method that may be used in this
regard. The PCR plate is placed back in the thermocycler for 8 more
cycles of steps 2-4.
[0376] Step 2 93.degree. C. for 30 sec;
[0377] Step 3 65.degree. C. for 1 min;
[0378] Step 4 72.degree. C. for 2 min, repeated for 8 cycles;
and
[0379] Step 5 4.degree. C.
[0380] Eight microliters of PCR product and 1.5 .mu.l of loading
dye are loaded on a 1.2% agarose gel for analysis after 28 cycles
and 36 cycles. Expression levels of specific transcripts are
considered low if they were only detectable after 36 cycles of PCR.
Expression levels are considered medium or high depending on the
levels of transcript compared with observed transcript levels for
an internal control such as actin2. Transcript levels are
determined in repeat experiments and compared to transcript levels
in control (e.g., non-transformed) plants.
[0381] Experiments were performed to identify those transformants
or knockouts that exhibited an improved environmental stress
tolerance. For such studies, the transformants were exposed to a
variety of environmental stresses.
[0382] Germination assays all followed modifications of the same
basic protocol. Sterile seeds were sown on the following
conditional media. Plates were incubated at 22.degree. C. under
24-hour light (120-130 .mu.Ein/m.sup.2/s) in a growth chamber.
Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor was conducted 3 to 15
days after planting. The basal media was 80% Murashige-Skoog medium
(MS)+vitamins.
[0383] For salt and osmotic stress experiments, the medium was
supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol.
[0384] Carbon/nitrogen sensing experiments were conducted in basal
media minus nitrogen plus 3% sucrose (--N) or in--basal media minus
nitrogen plus 3% sucrose and 1 mM glutamine (N/+Gln).
[0385] Growth regulator sensitivity assays were performed in MS
media, vitamins, and either 0.3 .mu.M ABA, 9.4% sucrose 9.4%, or 5%
glucose.
[0386] Temperature stress cold germination experiments were carried
out at 8.degree. C. Heat stress germination experiments were
conducted at 32.degree. C. to 37.degree. C. for 6 hours of
exposure.
[0387] For stress experiments conducted with more mature plants,
seeds were germinated and grown for seven days on MS+vitamins+1%
sucrose at 22.degree. C. and then transferred to chilling and heat
stress conditions. The plants were either exposed to chilling
stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8.degree. C. ), or heat stress
(32.degree. C. was applied for five days, after which the plants
were transferred back 22.degree. C. for recovery and evaluated
after 5 days relative to controls not exposed to the depressed or
elevated temperature).
[0388] high salt stress (6 hour exposure to 200 mM NaCl), drought
stress (168 hours after removing water from trays), osmotic stress
(6 hour exposure to 3 M mannitol), or nutrient limitation
(nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium) (nitrogen: all components of
MS medium remained constant except N was reduced to 20 mg/l of
NH.sub.4NO.sub.3; phosphate: all components of MS medium except
KH2PO.sub.4, which was replaced by K.sub.2SO.sub.4; potassium: all
components of MS medium except removal of KNO3 and
KH.sub.2PO.sub.4, which were replaced by NaH.sub.4PO.sub.4).
[0389] Modified phenotypes observed for particular overexpressor or
knockout plants are provided. For a particular overexpressor that
shows a less beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to
select a plant with a decreased expression of the particular
transcription factor. For a particular knockout that shows a less
beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to select a plant
with an increased expression of the particular transcription
factor.
[0390] The sequences of the Sequence Listing, can be used to
prepare transgenic plants and plants with altered osmotic stress
tolerance. The specific transgenic plants listed below are produced
from the sequences of the Sequence Listing, as noted.
Example VIII
Genes that Confer Significant Improvements to Plants
[0391] Examples of genes and homologs that confer significant
improvements to knockout or overexpressing plants are noted below.
Experimental observations made by us with regard to specific genes
whose expression has been modified in overexpressing or knock-out
plants, and potential applications based on these observations, are
also presented.
[0392] This example provides experimental evidence for increased
biomass and abiotic stress tolerance controlled by the
transcription factor polypeptides and polypeptides of the
invention.
[0393] Salt stress assays are intended to find genes that confer
better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt.
Evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement and
salt accumulation in the upper soil layer where the seeds are
placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt
concentration much higher than the mean salt concentration of in
the whole soil profile.
[0394] Plants differ in their tolerance to NaCl depending on their
stage of development, therefore seed germination, seedling vigor,
and plant growth responses are evaluated.
[0395] Osmotic stress assays (including NaCl and mannitol assays)
are intended to determine if an osmotic stress phenotype is
NaCl-specific or if it is a general osmotic stress related
phenotype. Plants tolerant to osmotic stress could also have more
tolerance to drought and/or freezing.
[0396] Drought assays are intended to find genes that mediate
better plant survival after short-term, severe water deprivation.
Ion leakage will be measured if needed. Osmotic stress tolerance
would also support a drought tolerant phenotype.
[0397] Temperature stress assays are intended to find genes that
confer better germination, seedling vigor or plant growth under
temperature stress (cold, freezing and heat).
[0398] Sugar sensing assays are intended to find genes involved in
sugar sensing by germinating seeds on high concentrations of
sucrose and glucose and looking for degrees of hypocotyl
elongation. The germination assay on mannitol controls for
responses related to osmotic stress. Sugars are key regulatory
molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including
germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and
photosynthesis. Sucrose is the major transport form of
photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect
gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds
(source-sink relationships). Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has
also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division
and repression of "famine" genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate
cycles).
[0399] Germination assays followed modifications of the same basic
protocol. Sterile seeds were sown on the conditional media listed
below. Plates were incubated at 22.degree. C. under 24-hour light
(120-130 .mu.Ein/m.sup.2/s) in a growth chamber. Evaluation of
germination and seedling vigor was conducted 3 to 15 days after
planting. The basal media was 80% Murashige-Skoog medium
(MS)+vitamins.
[0400] For salt and osmotic stress germination experiments, the
medium was supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol. Growth
regulator sensitivity assays were performed in MS media, vitamins,
and either 0.3 .mu.M ABA, 9.4% sucrose, or 5% glucose.
[0401] Temperature stress cold germination experiments were carried
out at 8.degree. C. Heat stress germination experiments were
conducted at 32.degree. C. to 37.degree. C. for 6 hours of
exposure.
[0402] For stress experiments conducted with more mature plants,
seeds were germinated and grown for seven days on MS +vitamins +1%
sucrose at 22.degree. C. and then transferred to chilling and heat
stress conditions. The plants were either exposed to chilling
stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8.degree. C. ), or heat stress
(32.degree. C. was applied for five days, after which the plants
were transferred back 22.degree. C. for recovery and evaluated
after 5 days relative to controls not exposed to the depressed or
elevated temperature).
[0403] Results:
[0404] The overexpression of A. thaliana genes G481, G482, G485 and
rice ortholog G3395 has been shown to increase osmotic stress
tolerance. As noted below, changes in the activity of the G481
clade also produce alterations in flowering time.
[0405] G481 (Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 1)
[0406] Published Information
[0407] G481 is equivalent to AtHAP3a which was identified by
Edwards et al., ((1998) Plant Physiol. 117: 1015-1022) as an EST
with extensive sequence homology to the yeast HAP3. Northern blot
data from five different tissue samples indicates that G481 is
primarily expressed in flower and/or silique, and root tissue. No
other functional data is available for G481 in Arabidopsis.
[0408] Closely Related Genes from Other Species
[0409] There are several genes in the database from higher plants
that show significant homology to G481 including, X59714 from corn,
and two ESTs from tomato, AJ486503 and A1782351.
[0410] Experimental Observations
[0411] The function of G481 was analyzed through its ectopic
overexpression in plants. Except for darker color in one line
(noted below), plants overexpressing G481 had a wild-type
morphology. G481 overexpressors were found to be more tolerant to
high sucrose and high salt (the latter is seen in FIG. 8A), having
better germination, longer radicles, and more cotyledon expansion.
There was a consistent difference in the hypocotyl and root
elongation in the overexpressor compared to wild-type controls.
These results indicated that G481 is involved in sucrose-specific
sugar sensing. Sucrose-sensing has been implicated in the
regulation of source-sink relationships in plants.
[0412] In the T2 generation, one overexpressing line was darker
green than wild-type plants, which may indicate a higher
photosynthetic rate that would be consistent with the role of G481
in sugar sensing.
[0413] 35S::G481 plants were also significantly larger and greener
in a soil-based drought assay than wild-type controls plants After
eight days of drought treatment overexpressing lines had a darker
green and less withered appearance (FIG. 7C) than those in the
control group (FIG. 7A). The differences in appearance between the
control and G481-overexpressing plants after they were rewatered
was even more striking. Eleven of twelve plants of this set of
control plants died after rewatering (FIG. 7B), indicating the
inability to recover following severe water deprivation, whereas
all nine of the overexpressor plants of the line shown recovered
from this drought treatment (FIG. 7D). The results shown in FIGS.
7A-7D were typical of a number of control and
35S::G481-overexpressing lines.
[0414] One line of plants in which G481 was overexpressed under the
control of the ARSK1 root-specific promoter was found to germinate
better under cold conditions than wild-type plants.
[0415] Interestingly, in one Arabidopsis line in which G481 was
knocked out, the plants were found to be more sensitive to high
salt in a plate-based assay than wild-type plants, which indicates
the importance of the role played by G481 in regulating osmotic
stress tolerance, and demonstrates that the gene is both necessary
and sufficient to fulfill that function.
[0416] A number of the 35S::G481 plants evaluated had a late
flowering phenotype.
[0417] Utilities
[0418] The potential utility of G481 includes altering
photosynthetic rate, which could also impact yield in vegetative
tissues as well as seed. Sugars are key regulatory molecules that
affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination,
growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis.
Sucrose is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux
through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter
storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink
relationships).
[0419] Since G481 overexpressing plants performed better than
controls in drought experiments, this gene or its equivalogs may be
used to improve seedling vigor, plant survival, as well as yield,
quality, and range.
[0420] G482 (Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 3)
[0421] Published Information
[0422] G482 is equivalent to AtHAP3b which was identified by
Edwards et al. (1998) Plant Physiol. 117: 1015-1022) as an EST with
homology to the yeast gene HAP3b. Their northern blot data suggests
that AtHAP3b is expressed primarily in roots. No other functional
information regarding G482 is publicly available.
[0423] Closely Related Genes from Other Species
[0424] The closest homology in the non-Arabidopsis plant database
is within the B domain of G482, and therefore no potentially
orthologous genes are available in the public domain.
[0425] Experimental Observations
[0426] RT-PCR analysis of endogenous levels of G482 transcripts
indicated that this gene is expressed constitutively in all tissues
tested. A cDNA array experiment supports the RT-PCR derived tissue
distribution data. G482 is not induced above basal levels in
response to any environmental stress treatments tested.
[0427] A T-DNA insertion mutant for G482 was analyzed and was found
to flower slightly later than control plants.
[0428] The function of G482 was also analyzed through its ectopic
overexpression in plants. Plants overexpressing G482 had a
wild-type morphology. Germination assays to measure salt tolerance
demonstrated increased seedling growth when germinated on the high
salt medium (FIG. 8B).
[0429] 35S::G482 transgenic plants also displayed an osmotic stress
response phenotype similar to 35S::G481 transgenic lines. Five of
ten overexpressing lines had increased seedling growth on medium
containing 80% MS plus vitamins with 300 mM mannitol.
[0430] Three of ten 35S::G482 lines also demonstrated enhanced
germination relative to controls after 6 h exposure to 32.degree.
C.
[0431] The majority of these 35S::G482 lines also demonstrated a
slightly early flowering phenotype.
[0432] Utilities
[0433] The potential utilities of this gene include the ability to
confer osmotic stress tolerance, as measured by salt, heat
tolerance and improved germination in mannitol-containing media,
during the germination stage of a crop plant. This would most
likely impact survivability and yield. Evaporation of water from
the soil surface causes upward water movement and salt accumulation
in the upper soil layer, where the seeds are placed. Thus,
germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much
higher than the mean salt concentration in the whole soil
profile.
[0434] Improved osmotic stress tolerance is also likely to result
in enhanced seedling vigor, plant survival, improved yield,
quality, and range. Osmotic stress assays, including subjecting
plants to aqueous dissolved sugars, are often used as surrogate
assays for improved water-stress (e.g., drought) response. Thus,
G482 may also be used to improve plant performance under conditions
of water deprivation, including increased seedling vigor, plant
survival, yield, quality, and range.
[0435] G485 (Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 5)
[0436] Published Information
[0437] G485 is a member of the HAP3-like subfamily of CCAAT-box
binding transcription factors. G485 corresponds to gene At4g14540,
annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The gene
corresponds to sequence 1042 from patent application W00216655
(Harper et al. (2002)) on stress-regulated genes, transgenic plants
and methods of use. In this application, G485 was reported to be
cold responsive in their microarray analysis. No information is
available about the function(s) of G485.
[0438] Experimental Observations
[0439] RT-PCR analyses of the endogenous levels of G485 indicated
that this gene is expressed in all tissues and under all conditions
tested.
[0440] A T-DNA insertion mutant for G485 was analyzed and was found
to flower several days later than control plants (FIG. 11A).
[0441] The effects of G485 overexpression were also studied.
Interestingly, the gain of function and loss of function studies on
G485 reveal opposing effects on flowering time. Under conditions of
continuous light, approximately half of the 35S::G485 primary
transformants flowered distinctly earlier than wild-type controls
(up to a week sooner in 24-hour light) (FIG. 11C). These effects
were observed in each of two independent T1 plantings derived from
separate transformation dates. Additionally, accelerated flowering
was also seen in plants that overexpressed G485 from a two
component system (35S::LexA;op-LexA::G485). These studies indicated
that G485 is both sufficient to act as a floral activator, and is
also necessary in that role within the plant. It should be noted
that overexpression of G1820 (SEQ ID NO: 68), a member of the
HAP5-like subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors had
a similar effect on flowering time as G485. It is possible that
G1820 interacts with G485 as part of a complex that binds and
regulates the promoters of target genes involved in the regulation
of flowering.
[0442] G485 overexpressor plants also matured and set siliques much
more rapidly than wild type controls (FIG. 11B ).
[0443] G485 overexpressing plants were shown to have enhanced
response to stress-related treatments in plate-based germination
assays. As seen in FIGS. 10A-10D and Table 6, 35S::G485 lines
showed enhanced cotyledon expansion and root growth seen in the
overexpressing seedlings in cold, high sucrose, high salt and ABA
treatments, as compared to wild-type controls with the same
treatments seen in FIGS. 10E-10H.
[0444] Utilities
[0445] Based on the loss of function and gain of function
phenotypes, G485 could be used to modify flowering time.
[0446] The delayed flowering displayed by G485 knockouts suggests
that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of
commercial species. In particular, an extension of vegetative
growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial
yield increases. In some species (for example sugar beet), where
the vegetative parts of the plant constitute the crop, it would be
advantageous to delay or suppress flowering in order to prevent
resources being diverted into reproductive development.
Additionally, delaying flowering beyond the normal time of harvest
could alleviate the risk of transgenic pollen escape from such
crops.
[0447] The early flowering effects see in the G485 overexpressors
could be applied to accelerate flowering, or eliminate any
requirement for vernalization. In some instances, a faster cycling
time might allow additional harvests of a crop to be made within a
given growing season. Shortening generation times could also help
speed-up breeding programs, particularly in species such as trees,
which typically grow for many years before flowering.
[0448] Table 6 provides a summary of the data collected from one
series of experiments conducted with plants overexpressing G482 or
a paralog of G482. In each case the promoter used for regulating
the introduced transcription factor was the cauliflower mosaic
virus 35 S transcription initiation region. The column headings
include the transcription factors used to transform the Arabidopsis
plants listed by Gene ID (GID) numbers, the corresponding
polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the project type indicating the nature of
the promoter-gene interaction, and the ratio of lines determine to
have one of the enhanced abiotic stress phenotypes listed over the
number of lines tested
[0449] G3395 (Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 73)
[0450] Published Information
[0451] G3395, an ortholog of G482, is a member of the HAP3-like
subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors. G3395
corresponds to polypeptide BAC76331 ("NF-YB subunit of rice").
[0452] Closely Related Genes from Other Species
[0453] The most closely related gene sequence found in GenBank
appears to be the nearly identical AB095438 ("OsNF-YB2 mRNA for
NF-YB").
[0454] Experimental Observations
[0455] The function of G3395 was analyzed through its ectopic
overexpression in plants. One of the lines of G3395 overexpressors
tested was found to be more tolerant to high salt levels, producing
larger and greener seedlings in a high salt germination assay.
[0456] Utilities
[0457] The potential utilities of this gene include the ability to
confer osmotic stress tolerance, particularly during the
germination stage of a crop plant.
9TABLE 6 Summary of Results of Physiological Assays. One or two
Overexpressor lines showing phenotype Component Improved Improved
Improved Polypeptide Transformation Heat Drought germ. in germ. in
ABA germ. in GID SEQ ID NO Promoter Type tolerance tolerance high
NaCl high sugar sens. cold G482 2 CaMV 35S 2-components- + +*
supTfn CaMV 35S Direct + promoter-fusion G481 4 CaMV 35S Direct +
++ promoter-fusion ARSK1 2-components- ++ supTfn CaMV 35S
Superactivation + CaMV 35S RNAi (GS) ++ + +** G485 6 CaMV 35S
2-components- + +** + + supTfn G3395 74 CaMV 35S Direct +
promoter-fusion *Mannitol **Sucrose Abbreviations: Sens.
Sensitivity Germ. Germination + Moderate trait manifestation in one
or more lines tested ++ Strong trait manifestation in one or more
lines tested
EXAMPLE IX
CCAAT Family Transcription Factors and Flowering Time
[0458] We have also found that overexpressed CCAAT genes also have
a highly noticeable effect on the timing of onset of flowering.
G482 (SEQ ID NO: 3), G485 (SEQ ID NO: 5), G1248 (SEQ ID NO: 69),
G1781 (SEQ ID NO: 71) and related crop orthologs G3398 (SEQ ID NO:
75), G3435 (SEQ ID NO: 47), and G3436 (SEQ ID NO: 49), accelerate
onset of flowering when overexpressed in Arabidopsis.
[0459] Conversely, overexpression of G481, G1364 and related crop
orthologs G3471 (SEQ ID NO:
[0460] 23), G3434 (SEQ ID NO: 77), and G3395 (SEQ ID NO: 73),
produce a slight but reproducible delay in flowering in
Arabidopsis. Results of knockout and RNAi studies confirm these
findings. Knocked-out G485 and G482 plants exhibit a delay in
flowering, and RNAi lines (using a construct designed to knock-out
any member of the clade) are late flowering.
[0461] Thus, it appears that genes in the node of the tree
clustered around G481 act to repress flowering, whereas those
clustered around G482 and G485 act to promote flowering.
[0462] Interestingly, the addition of an activation domain appears
to convert a floral repressor to a floral activator. Overexpression
of a fusion protein comprising G481 fused at its carboxyl end with
a GAL4 activation domain causes early flowering that is comparable
to the effects caused by G482 or G482 overexpression.
[0463] An alignment of some of these HAP3 genes, seen in FIGS.
6A-6F, shows the high degree of conservation within the B domain,
particularly in the B domain extending from FIG. 6B through FIG.
6C. These proteins are almost identical within the B domain, but
the composition of two residue positions within the B domain
correlates with effects of expression on flowering. These positions
are indicated by arrows in FIG. 6B. The residue position indicated
by the downward-pointing arrow in FIG. 6B is a serine residue in
G1364, G2345 and G481 and a glycine residue in G482 and G485. The
composition at this position correlate with flowering time when the
polypeptide is overexpressed. The former group with a serine
residue at this position induces late flowering when overexpressed,
whereas the latter group with the glycine residue is distinguished
by very early flowering upon overexpression. This study was
expanded to include other polypeptides of the HAP3 family that
compared the effects on flowering time and the relationship to the
serine/glycine residue, including orthologous soy, corn and rice
polypeptides. In each case, a glycine present at this position was
associated with early flowering, and a serine residue was
associated with a delay in flowering (G486 was found to possess a
cysteine residue at this position, and one overexpressing T2 line
appeared to have a late flowering phenotype). Similar observations
were made with respect the other residue position, as indicated by
the upward-pointing arrow in FIG. 6B) where orthologous
polypeptides that cause late flowering, including soy, corn and
rice polypeptides, possess a glycine or alanine residue at this
position, and orthologs derived these species that produce an early
flowering phenotype have a serine residue at the position. These
results suggest that these residue positions are essential for
determining whether these polypeptides are able to interact
effectively with their partners in the multi-subunit complex and
bind effectively to a promoter CCAAT box.
Example X
Identification of Homologous Sequences
[0464] This example describes identification of genes that are
orthologous to Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors from a
computer homology search.
[0465] Homologous sequences, including those of paralogs and
orthologs from Arabidopsis and other plant species, were identified
using database sequence search tools, such as the Basic Local
Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol.
215: 403-410; and Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acid Res. 25:
3389-3402). The tblastx sequence analysis programs were employed
using the BLOSUM-62 scoring matrix (Henikoff and Henikoff(1992)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919). The entire NCBI GenBank
database was filtered for sequences from all plants except
Arabidopsis thaliana by selecting all entries in the NCBI GenBank
database associated with NCBI taxonomic ID 33090 (Viridiplantae;
all plants) and excluding entries associated with taxonomic ID 3701
(Arabidopsis thaliana).
[0466] These sequences are compared to sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3,
5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41,
43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75,
77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93 or polynucleotides that encode
polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32, using the Washington University
TBLASTX algorithm (version 2.0a19MP) at the default settings using
gapped alignments with the filter "off". For each these genes,
individual comparisons were ordered by probability score (P-value),
where the score reflects the probability that a particular
alignment occurred by chance. For example, a score of 3.6e40 is
3.6.times.10-40. In addition to P-values, comparisons were also
scored by percentage identity. Percentage identity reflects the
degree to which two segments of DNA or protein are identical over a
particular length. Examples of sequences so identified are
presented in Table 5. The percent sequence identity among these
sequences can be as low as 49%, or even lower sequence
identity.
[0467] Candidate paralogous sequences were identified among
Arabidopsis transcription factors through alignment, identity, and
phylogenic relationships. Paralogs of G481 so determined include
G482, G485, G1364, and G2345. Candidate orthologous sequences were
identified from proprietary unigene sets of plant gene sequences in
Zea mays, Glycine max and Oryza sativa based on significant
homology to Arabidopsis transcription factors. These candidates
were reciprocally compared to the set of Arabidopsis transcription
factors. If the candidate showed maximal similarity in the protein
domain to the eliciting transcription factor or to a paralog of the
eliciting transcription factor, then it was considered to be an
ortholog. Identified non-Arabidopsis sequences that were shown in
this manner to be orthologous to the Arabidopsis sequences are
provided in Table 5.
Example XI
Screen of Plant cDNA Library for Sequence Encoding a Transcription
Factor DNA Binding Domain that Binds to a Transcription Factor
Binding Promoter Element and Demonstration of Protein Transcription
Regulation Activity
[0468] The "one-hybrid" strategy (Li and Herskowitz (1993) Science
262: 1870-1874) is used to screen for plant cDNA clones encoding a
polypeptide comprising a transcription factor DNA binding domain, a
conserved domain. In brief, yeast strains are constructed that
contain a lacZ reporter gene with either wild-type or mutant
transcription factor binding promoter element sequences in place of
the normal UAS (upstream activator sequence) of the GALL promoter.
Yeast reporter strains are constructed that carry transcription
factor binding promoter element sequences as UAS elements are
operably linked upstream (5') of a lacZ reporter gene with a
minimal GAL1 promoter. The strains are transformed with a plant
expression library that contains random cDNA inserts fused to the
GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-ACT) and screened for blue colony
formation on X-gal-treated filters (X-gal:
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-.beta.-D-galacto- side; Invitrogen
Corporation, Carlsbad Calif.). Alternatively, the strains are
transformed with a cDNA polynucleotide encoding a known
transcription factor DNA binding domain polypeptide sequence.
[0469] Yeast strains carrying these reporter constructs produce low
levels of beta-galactosidase and form white colonies on filters
containing X-gal. The reporter strains carrying wild-type
transcription factor binding promoter element sequences are
transformed with a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide
comprising a plant transcription factor DNA binding domain operably
linked to the acidic activator domain of the yeast GAL4
transcription factor, "GAL4-ACT". The clones that contain a
polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor DNA binding domain
operably linked to GLA4-ACT can bind upstream of the lacZ reporter
genes carrying the wild-type transcription factor binding promoter
element sequence, activate transcription of the lacZ gene and
result in yeast forming blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters.
[0470] Upon screening about 2.times.10.sup.6 yeast transformants,
positive cDNA clones are isolated; i.e., clones that cause yeast
strains carrying lacZ reporters operably linked to wild-type
transcription factor binding promoter elements to form blue
colonies on X-gal-treated filters. The cDNA clones do not cause a
yeast strain carrying a mutant type transcription factor binding
promoter elements fused to LacZ to turn blue. Thus, a
polynucleotide encoding transcription factor DNA binding domain, a
conserved domain, is shown to activate transcription of a gene.
Example XII
Gel Shift Assays
[0471] The presence of a transcription factor comprising a DNA
binding domain which binds to a DNA transcription factor binding
element is evaluated using the following gel shift assay. The
transcription factor is recombinantly expressed and isolated from
E. coli or isolated from plant material. Total soluble protein,
including transcription factor, (40 ng) is incubated at room
temperature in 10 .mu.l of 1.times. binding buffer (15 mM HEPES (pH
7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1
mM DTT) plus 50 ng poly(dl-dC):poly(dl-dC) (Pharmacia, Piscataway
N.J.) with or without 100 ng competitor DNA. After 10 minutes
incubation, probe DNA comprising a DNA transcription factor binding
element (1 ng) that has been .sup.32P-labeled by end-filling
(Sambrook et al. (1989) supra) is added and the mixture incubated
for an additional 10 minutes. Samples are loaded onto
polyacrylamide gels (4% w/v) and fractionated by electrophoresis at
150V for 2 h (Sambrook et al. supra). The degree of transcription
factor-probe DNA binding is visualized using autoradiography.
Probes and competitor DNAs are prepared from oligonucleotide
inserts ligated into the BamHI site of pUC 118 (Vieira et al.
(1987) Methods Enzymol. 153: 3-1 1). Orientation and concatenation
number of the inserts are determined by dideoxy DNA sequence
analysis (Sambrook et al. supra). Inserts are recovered after
restriction digestion with EcoRI and HindIII and fractionation on
polyacrylamide gels (12% w/v) (Sambrook et al. supra).
Example XIII
Introduction of Polynucleotides Into Dicotyledonous Plants
[0472] SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25,
27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63,
65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93,
polynucleotides that encode polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32,
paralogous, and orthologous sequences recombined into pMEN20 or
pMEN65 expression vectors are transformed into a plant for the
purpose of modifying plant traits. The cloning vector may be
introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in
the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium
tumefaciens-mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce
transgenic plants using most dicot plants (see Weissbach and
Weissbach, (1989) supra; Gelvin et al. (1990) supra;
Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) supra; Bevan (1984) supra; and Klee
(1985) supra). Methods for analysis of traits are routine in the
art and examples are disclosed above.
Example XIV
Transformation of Cereal Plants with an Expression Vector
[0473] Cereal plants such as, but not limited to, corn, wheat,
rice, sorghum, or barley, may also be transformed with the present
polynucleotide sequences in pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors for
the purpose of modifying plant traits. For example, pMEN020 may be
modified to replace the NptII coding region with the BAR gene of
Streptomyces hygroscopicus that confers resistance to
phosphinothricin. The KpnI and BgIII sites of the Bar gene are
removed by site-directed mutagenesis with silent codon changes.
[0474] The cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of
cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example,
direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated
transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants of
most cereal crops (Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937) such
as corn, wheat, rice, sorghum (Cassas et al. (1993) Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 90: 11212-11216, and barley (Wan and Lemeaux (1994)
Plant Physiol. 104:37-48. DNA transfer methods such as the
microprojectile can be used for corn (Fromm et al. (1990)
Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839); Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:
603-618; Ishida (1990) Nature Biotechnol. 14:745-750), wheat (Vasil
et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993)
Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol.
102:1077-1084), rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei
et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta
199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218).
For most cereal plants, embryogenic cells derived from immature
scutellum tissues are the preferred cellular targets for
transformation (Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218;
Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937).
[0475] Vectors according to the present invention may be
transformed into corn embryogenic cells derived from immature
scutellar tissue by using microprojectile bombardment, with the
A288XB73 genotype as the preferred genotype (Fromm et al. (1990)
Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2:
603-618). After microprojectile bombardment the tissues are
selected on phosphinothricin to identify the transgenic embryogenic
cells (Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). Transgenic
plants are regenerated by standard corn regeneration techniques
(Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al.
(1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618).
[0476] The plasmids prepared as described above can also be used to
produce transgenic wheat and rice plants (Christou (1991)
Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282;
Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al.
(1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218) that coordinately express genes
of interest by following standard transformation protocols known to
those skilled in the art for rice and wheat (Vasil et al. (1992)
Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol.
11:1553-1558; and Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol.
102:1077-1084), where the bar gene is used as the selectable
marker.
Example XV
Genes that Confer Significant Improvements to Non-Arabidopsis
Species
[0477] The function of orthologs of G481 and G482 may be analyzed
through their ectopic overexpression in plants using the CaMV 35S
or other appropriate promoter, as identified above. These genes
encode members of the HAP3 subfamily of CCAAT-box binding
transcription factors and include those found in Table 5, FIGS. 3
and 4, and, for example, polynucleotide sequences from Arabidopsis
thaliana (SEQ ID NO: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 69, and 71), Glycine max (SEQ
ID NO: 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 51, 79, 81, 83, and 85),
Solanum tuberosum (BQ505706), Medicago truncatula (AC122165),
Lycopersicon esculentum (SEQ ID NO: 63, SEQ ID NO: 65, and
BG642751), Rosa hybrid (BQ104671), Poncirus trifoliata (CD574709),
Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa (BU880488), Zea mays (SEQ ID
NO: 33, 35, 37, 39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 55, 57, 77, 93, CC429501;
and AX584265), Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO: 27, 53, 73, 75, 87, 89,
AAAA01003638, AP005193, AC108500, AP004366, AP003266, AP004179,
AC104284, and AP120529), and Triticum aestivum (SEQ ID NO: 59, 61,
and BJ248969). The function of specific HAP3 subfamily of CCAAT-box
binding transcription factor genes that may be analyzed through
ectopic overexpression in plants also includes rice nucleic acid
sequences that encode polypeptides SEQ ID NO: 29-32, corn sequence
gi115840, and wheat sequence gi16902058. These polynucleotide and
polypeptide sequences derived from monocots may be used to
transform both monocot and dicot plants, and those derived from
dicots may also be used to transform either group, although some of
these sequences will function best if the gene is transformed into
the a plant from the same group as that from which the sequence is
derived.
[0478] Seeds of these transgenic plants are subjected to
germination assays to measure sucrose sensing. Sterile monocot
seeds, including, but not limited to, corn, rice, wheat, rye and
sorghum, as well as dicots including, but not limited to soybean
and alfalfa, are sown on 80% MS medium plus vitamins with 9.4%
sucrose; control media lack sucrose. All assay plates are then
incubated at 22.degree. C. under 24-hour light, 120-130
.mu.Ein/m.sup.2/s, in a growth chamber. Evaluation of germination
and seedling vigor is then conducted three days after planting.
Overexpressors of these genes may be found to be more tolerant to
high sucrose by having better germination, longer radicles, and
more cotyledon expansion. These results would indicate that
overexpressors of G482 orthologs are involved in sucrose-specific
sugar sensing.
[0479] Plants overexpressing G482 orthologs may also be subjected
to soil-based drought assays to identify those lines that are more
tolerant to water deprivation than wild-type control plants.
Generally, 35S: G482 ortholog overexpressing plants will appear
significantly larger and greener, with less wilting or desiccation,
than wild-type controls plants, particularly after a period of
water deprivation is followed by rewatering and a subsequent
incubation period.
Example XVI
Identification of Orthologous and Paralogous Sequences
[0480] Orthologs to Arabidopsis genes may identified by several
methods, including hybridization, amplification, or
bioinformatically. This example describes how one may identify
homologs to the Arabidopsis AP2 family transcription factor CBF1
(polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 95, encoded polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 96),
which confers tolerance to abiotic stresses (Thomashow et al.
(2002) U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,428), and an example to confirm the
function of homologous sequences. In this example, orthologs to
CBF1 were found in canola (Brassica napus) using polymerase chain
reaction (PCR).
[0481] Degenerate primers were designed for regions of AP2 binding
domain and outside of the AP2 (carboxyl terminal domain):
10 Mol 368 5'- CAY CCN ATH TAY MGN (SEQ ID NO: 103) (reverse) GGN
GT -3' Mol 378 5'- GGN ARN ARC ATN CCY (SEQ ID NO: 104) (forward)
TCN GCC -3' (Y: C/T, N: A/C/G/T, H: A/C/T, M: A/C, R: A/G)
[0482] Primer Mol 368 is in the AP2 binding domain of CBF1 (amino
acid sequence: His-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Arg-Gly-Val) while primer Mol 378 is
outside the AP2 domain (carboxyl terminal domain) (amino acid
sequence: Met-Ala-Glu-Gly-Met-Leu-Leu-Pro).
[0483] The genomic DNA isolated from B. napus was PCR-amplified by
using these primers following these conditions: an initial
denaturation step of 2 min at 93.degree. C.; 35 cycles of
93.degree. C. for 1 min, 55.degree. C. for 1 min, and 72.degree. C.
for 1 min; and a final incubation of 7 min at 72.degree. C. at the
end of cycling
[0484] The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.2%
agarose gel and transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with
the AT CBF1 probe prepared from Arabidopsis genomic DNA by PCR
amplification. The hybridized products were visualized by
colorimetric detection system (Boehringer Mannheim) and the
corresponding bands from a similar agarose gel were isolated using
the Qiagen Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The DNA fragments were ligated
into the TA clone vector from TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) and
transformed into E. coli strain TOP 10 (Invitrogen).
[0485] Seven colonies were picked and the inserts were sequenced on
an ABI 377 machine from both strands of sense and antisense after
plasmid DNA isolation. The DNA sequence was edited by sequencer and
aligned with the AtCBF1 by GCG software and NCBI blast
searching.
[0486] The nucleic acid sequence and amino acid sequence of one
canola ortholog found in this manner (bnCBF1; polynucleotide SEQ ID
NO: 101 and polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 102) identified by this process
is shown in the Sequence Listing.
[0487] The aligned amino acid sequences show that the bnCBF1 gene
has 88% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence in the AP2 domain
region and 85% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence outside the
AP2 domain when aligned for two insertion sequences that are
outside the AP2 domain.
[0488] Similarly, paralogous sequences to Arabidopsis genes, such
as CBF1, may also be identified.
[0489] Two paralogs of CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana: CBF2 and
CBF3. CBF2 and CBF3 have been cloned and sequenced as described
below. The sequences of the DNA SEQ ID NO: 97 and 99 and encoded
proteins SEQ ID NO: 98 and 100 are set forth in the Sequence
Listing.
[0490] A lambda cDNA library prepared from RNA isolated from
Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Lin and Thomashow (1992)
Plant Physiol. 99: 519-525) was screened for recombinant clones
that carried inserts related to the CBF1 gene (Stockinger et al.
(1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:1035-1040). CBF1 was
.sup.32P-radiolabeled by random priming (Sambrook et al. supra) and
used to screen the library by the plaque-lift technique using
standard stringent hybridization and wash conditions (Hajela et al.
(1990) Plant Physiol. 93:1246-1252; Sambrook et al. supra)
6.times.SSPE buffer, 60.degree. C. for hybridization and
0.1.times.SSPE buffer and 60.degree. C. for washes). Twelve
positively hybridizing clones were obtained and the DNA sequences
of the cDNA inserts were determined. The results indicated that the
clones fell into three classes. One class carried inserts
corresponding to CBF1. The two other classes carried sequences
corresponding to two different homologs of CBF1, designated CBF2
and CBF3. The nucleic acid sequences and predicted protein coding
sequences for Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 are listed in the
Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs:95, 97, 99 and SEQ ID NOs: 96, 98, and
100, respectively). The nucleic acid sequences and predicted
protein coding sequence for Brassica napus CBF ortholog is listed
in the Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs: 101 and 102,
respectively).
[0491] A comparison of the nucleic acid sequences of Arabidopsis
CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicate that they are 83 to 85% identical as
shown in Table 7.
11 TABLE 7 Percent identity.sup.a DNA.sup.b Polypeptide cbf1/cbf2
85 86 cbf1/cbf3 83 84 cbf2/cbf3 84 85 .sup.aPercent identity was
determined using the Clustal algorithm from the Megalign program
(DNASTAR, Inc.). .sup.bComparisons of the nucleic acid sequences of
the open reading frames are shown.
[0492] Similarly, the amino acid sequences of the three CBF
polypeptides range from 84 to 86% identity. An alignment of the
three amino acidic sequences reveals that most of the differences
in amino acid sequence occur in the acidic C-terminal half of the
polypeptide. This region of CBF 1 serves as an activation domain in
both yeast and Arabidopsis (not shown).
[0493] Residues 47 to 106 of CBF1 correspond to the AP2 domain of
the protein, a DNA binding motif that to date, has only been found
in plant proteins. A comparison of the AP2 domains of CBF1, CBF2
and CBF3 indicates that there are a few differences in amino acid
sequence. These differences in amino acid sequence might have an
effect on DNA binding specificity.
Example XVII
Transformation of Canola with a Plasmid Containing CBF1, CBF2, or
CBF3
[0494] After identifying homologous genes to CBF 1, canola was
transformed with a plasmid containing the Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2,
or CBF3 genes cloned into the vector pGA643 (An (1987) Methods
Enzymol. 253: 292). In these constructs the CBF genes were
expressed constitutively under the CaMV 35S promoter. In addition,
the CBF1 gene was cloned under the control of the Arabidopsis COR15
promoter in the same vector pGA643. Each construct was transformed
into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Transformed Agrobacteria were
grown for 2 days in minimal AB medium containing appropriate
antibiotics.
[0495] Spring canola (B. napus cv. Westar) was transformed using
the protocol of Moloney et al. ((1989) Plant Cell Reports 8: 238)
with some modifications as described. Briefly, seeds were
sterilized and plated on half strength MS medium, containing 1%
sucrose. Plates were incubated at 24.degree. C. under 60-80
.mu.E/m.sup.2s light using a16 hour light/8 hour dark photoperiod.
Cotyledons from 4-5 day old seedlings were collected, the petioles
cut and dipped into the Agrobacterium solution. The dipped
cotyledons were placed on co-cultivation medium at a density of 20
cotyledons/plate and incubated as described above for 3 days.
Explants were transferred to the same media, but containing 300
mg/l timentin (SmithKline Beecham, Pa.) and thinned to 10
cotyledons/plate. After 7 days explants were transferred to
Selection/Regeneration medium. Transfers were continued every 2-3
weeks (2 or 3 times) until shoots had developed. Shoots were
transferred to Shoot-Elongation medium every 2-3 weeks. Healthy
looking shoots were transferred to rooting medium. Once good roots
had developed, the plants were placed into moist potting soil.
[0496] The transformed plants were analyzed for the presence of the
NPTII gene/ kanamycin resistance by ELISA, using the ELISA NPTII
kit from 5Prime-3Prime Inc. (Boulder, Colo.). Approximately 70% of
the screened plants were NPTII positive; these plants were further
analyzed.
[0497] From Northern blot analysis of the plants that were
transformed with the constitutively expressing constructs, showed
expression of the CBF genes and all CBF genes were capable of
inducing the Brassica napus cold-regulated gene BN115 (homolog of
the Arabidopsis COR15 gene). Most of the transgenic plants appear
to exhibit a normal growth phenotype. As expected, the transgenic
plants are more freezing tolerant than the wild-type plants. Using
the electrolyte leakage of leaves test, the control showed a 50%
leakage at -2 to -3.degree. C. Spring canola transformed with
either CBF1 or CBF2 showed a 50% leakage at -6 to -7.degree. C.
Spring canola transformed with CBF3 shows a 50% leakage at about
-10 to -15.degree. C. Winter canola transformed with CBF3 may show
a 50% leakage at about -16 to -20.degree. C. Furthermore, if the
spring or winter canola are cold acclimated the transformed plants
may exhibit a further increase in freezing tolerance of at least
-2.degree. C.
[0498] To test salinity tolerance of the transformed plants, plants
were watered with 150 mM NaCl. Plants overexpressing CBF1, CBF2 or
CBF3 grew better compared with plants that had not been transformed
with CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3.
[0499] These results demonstrate that homologs of Arabidopsis
transcription factors can be identified and shown to confer similar
functions in non-Arabidopsis plant species.
Example XVIII
Cloning of Transcription Factor Promoters
[0500] Promoters are isolated from transcription factor genes that
have gene expression patterns useful for a range of applications,
as determined by methods well known in the art (including
transcript profile analysis with cDNA or oligonucleotide
microarrays, Northern blot analysis, semi-quantitative or
quantitative RT-PCR). Interesting gene expression profiles are
revealed by determining transcript abundance for a selected
transcription factor gene after exposure of plants to a range of
different experimental conditions, and in a range of different
tissue or organ types, or developmental stages. Experimental
conditions to which plants are exposed for this purpose includes
cold, heat, drought, osmotic challenge, varied hormone
concentrations (ABA, GA, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid,
brassinosteroid), pathogen and pest challenge. The tissue types and
developmental stages include stem, root, flower, rosette leaves,
cauline leaves, siliques, germinating seed, and meristematic
tissue. The set of expression levels provides a pattern that is
determined by the regulatory elements of the gene promoter.
[0501] Transcription factor promoters for the genes disclosed
herein are obtained by cloning 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb of genomic sequence
immediately upstream of the translation start codon for the coding
sequence of the encoded transcription factor protein. This region
includes the 5'-UTR of the transcription factor gene, which can
comprise regulatory elements. The 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb region is cloned
through PCR methods, using primers that include one in the 3'
direction located at the translation start codon (including
appropriate adaptor sequence), and one in the 5' direction located
from 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb upstream of the translation start codon
(including appropriate adaptor sequence). The desired fragments are
PCR-amplified from Arabidopsis Col-0 genomic DNA using
high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase to minimize the incorporation of
point mutation(s). The cloning primers incorporate two rare
restriction sites, such as Not1 and Sfi1, found at low frequency
throughout the Arabidopsis genome. Additional restriction sites are
used in the instances where a Not1 or Sfi1 restriction site is
present within the promoter.
[0502] The 1.5-2.0 kb fragment upstream from the translation start
codon, including the 5'-untranslated region of the transcription
factor, is cloned in a binary transformation vector immediately
upstream of a suitable reporter gene, or a transactivator gene that
is capable of programming expression of a reporter gene in a second
gene construct. Reporter genes used include green fluorescent
protein (and related fluorescent protein color variants),
beta-glucuronidase, and luciferase. Suitable transactiivator genes
include LexA-GAL4, along with a transactivatable reporter in a
second binary plasmid (as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 09/958,131, incorporated herein by reference). The binary
plasmid(s) is transferred into Agrobacterium and the structure of
the plasmid confirmed by PCR. These strains are introduced into
Arabidopsis plants as described in other examples, and gene
expression patterns determined according to standard methods know
to one skilled in the art for monitoring GFP fluorescence,
beta-glucuronidase activity, or luminescence.
[0503] All publications and patent applications mentioned in this
specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same
extent as if each individual publication or patent application was
specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by
reference.
[0504] The present invention is not limited by the specific
embodiments described herein. The invention now being fully
described, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art
that many changes and modifications can be made thereto without
departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims.
Modifications that become apparent from the foregoing description
and accompanying figures fall within the scope of the claims.
Sequence CWU 1
1
104 1 832 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G481 1 gagcgtttcg tagaaaaatt
cgatttctct aaagccctaa aactaaaacg actatcccca 60 attccaagtt
ctagggtttc catcttcccc aatctagtat aaatggcgga tacgccttcg 120
agcccagctg gagatggcgg agaaagcggc ggttccgtta gggagcagga tcgatacctt
180 cctatagcta atatcagcag gatcatgaag aaagcgttgc ctcctaatgg
taagattgga 240 aaagatgcta aggatacagt tcaggaatgc gtctctgagt
tcatcagctt catcactagc 300 gaggccagtg ataagtgtca aaaagagaaa
aggaaaactg tgaatggtga tgatttgttg 360 tgggcaatgg caacattagg
atttgaggat tacctggaac ctctaaagat atacctagcg 420 aggtacaggg
agttggaggg tgataataag ggatcaggaa agagtggaga tggatcaaat 480
agagatgctg gtggcggtgt ttctggtgaa gaaatgccga gctggtaaaa gaagttgcaa
540 gtagtgatta agaacaatcg ccaaatgatc aagggaaatt agagatcagt
gagttgttta 600 tagttgagct gatcgacaac tatttcgggt ttactctcaa
tttcggttat gttagtttga 660 acgtttggtt tattgtttcc ggtttagttg
gttgtattta aagatttctc tgttagatgt 720 tgagaacact tgaatgaagg
aaaaatttgt ccacatcctg ttgttatttt cgattcactt 780 tcggaatttc
atagctaatt tattctcatt taataccaaa tccttaaatt aa 832 2 141 PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana G481 polypeptide 2 Met Ala Asp Thr Pro Ser Ser
Pro Ala Gly Asp Gly Gly Glu Ser Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Ser Val Arg Glu
Gln Asp Arg Tyr Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser 20 25 30 Arg Ile Met
Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Pro Asn Gly Lys Ile Gly Lys Asp 35 40 45 Ala
Lys Asp Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile 50 55
60 Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Val
65 70 75 80 Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe
Glu Asp 85 90 95 Tyr Leu Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Ala Arg Tyr
Arg Glu Leu Glu 100 105 110 Gly Asp Asn Lys Gly Ser Gly Lys Ser Gly
Asp Gly Ser Asn Arg Asp 115 120 125 Ala Gly Gly Gly Val Ser Gly Glu
Glu Met Pro Ser Trp 130 135 140 3 1065 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana
G482 3 tcgacccacg cgtccggaca cttaacaatt cacaccttct ctttttactc
ttcctaaaac 60 cctaaatttc ctcgcttcag tcttcccact caagtcaacc
accaattgaa ttcgatttcg 120 aatcattgat ggaaatgatt tgaaaaaaga
gtaaagttta tttttttatt ccttgtaatt 180 ttcagaaatg ggggattccg
acagggattc cggtggaggg caaaacggga acaaccagaa 240 cggacagtcc
tccttgtctc caagagagca agacaggttc ttgccgatcg ctaacgtcag 300
ccggatcatg aagaaggcct tgcccgccaa cgccaagatc tctaaagatg ccaaagagac
360 gatgcaggag tgtgtctccg agttcatcag cttcgtcacc ggagaagcat
ctgataagtg 420 tcagaaggag aagaggaaga cgatcaacgg agacgatttg
ctctgggcta tgactactct 480 aggttttgag gattatgttg agccattgaa
agtttacttg cagaggttta gggagatcga 540 aggggagagg actggactag
ggaggccaca gactggtggt gaggtcggag agcatcagag 600 agatgctgtc
ggagatggcg gtgggttcta cggtggtggt ggtgggatgc agtatcacca 660
acatcatcag tttcttcacc agcagaacca tatgtatgga gccacaggtg gcggtagcga
720 cagtggaggt ggagctgcct ccggtaggac aaggacttaa caaagattgg
tgaagtggat 780 ctctctctgt atatagatac ataaatacat gtatacacat
gcctattttt acgacccata 840 taaggtatct atcatgtgat agaacgaaca
ttggtgttgg tgatgtaaaa tcagatgtgc 900 attaagggtt tagattttga
ggctgtgtaa aagaagatca agtgtgcttt gttggacaat 960 aggattcact
aacgaatctg cttcattgga tcttgtatgt aactaaagcc attgtattga 1020
atgcaaatgt tttcatttgg gatgctttaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaa 1065 4 190 PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana G482 polypeptide 4 Met Gly Asp Ser Asp Arg Asp
Ser Gly Gly Gly Gln Asn Gly Asn Asn 1 5 10 15 Gln Asn Gly Gln Ser
Ser Leu Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu 20 25 30 Pro Ile Ala
Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn 35 40 45 Ala
Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Met Gln Glu Cys Val Ser 50 55
60 Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys
65 70 75 80 Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala
Met Thr 85 90 95 Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys
Val Tyr Leu Gln 100 105 110 Arg Phe Arg Glu Ile Glu Gly Glu Arg Thr
Gly Leu Gly Arg Pro Gln 115 120 125 Thr Gly Gly Glu Val Gly Glu His
Gln Arg Asp Ala Val Gly Asp Gly 130 135 140 Gly Gly Phe Tyr Gly Gly
Gly Gly Gly Met Gln Tyr His Gln His His 145 150 155 160 Gln Phe Leu
His Gln Gln Asn His Met Tyr Gly Ala Thr Gly Gly Gly 165 170 175 Ser
Asp Ser Gly Gly Gly Ala Ala Ser Gly Arg Thr Arg Thr 180 185 190 5
486 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G485 5 atggcggatt cggacaacga
ttcaggagga cacaaagacg gtggaaatgc ttcgacacgt 60 gagcaagata
ggtttctacc gatcgctaac gttagcagga tcatgaagaa agcacttcct 120
gcgaacgcaa aaatctctaa ggatgctaaa gaaacggttc aagagtgtgt atcggaattc
180 ataagtttca tcaccggtga ggcttctgac aagtgtcaga gagagaagag
gaagacaatc 240 aacggtgacg atcttctttg ggcgatgact acgctagggt
ttgaggacta cgtggagcct 300 ctcaaggttt atctgcaaaa gtatagggag
gtggaaggag agaagactac tacggcaggg 360 agacaaggcg ataaggaagg
tggaggagga ggcggtggag ctggaagtgg aagtggagga 420 gctccgatgt
acggtggtgg catggtgact acgatgggac atcaattttc ccatcatttt 480 tcttaa
486 6 161 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana G485 polypeptide 6 Met Ala Asp
Ser Asp Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly His Lys Asp Gly Gly Asn 1 5 10 15 Ala
Ser Thr Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Val Ser 20 25
30 Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp
35 40 45 Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser
Phe Ile 50 55 60 Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys
Arg Lys Thr Ile 65 70 75 80 Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr
Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp 85 90 95 Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr
Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Val Glu 100 105 110 Gly Glu Lys Thr Thr Thr
Ala Gly Arg Gln Gly Asp Lys Glu Gly Gly 115 120 125 Gly Gly Gly Gly
Gly Ala Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Gly Ala Pro Met Tyr 130 135 140 Gly Gly
Gly Met Val Thr Thr Met Gly His Gln Phe Ser His His Phe 145 150 155
160 Ser 7 537 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G1364 7 atggcggagt
cgcaggccaa gagtcccgga ggctgtggaa gccatgagag tggtggagat 60
caaagtccca ggtcgttaca tgttcgtgag caagataggt ttcttccgat tgctaacata
120 agccgtatca tgaaaagagg tcttcctgct aatgggaaaa tcgctaaaga
tgctaaggag 180 attgtgcagg aatgtgtctc tgaattcatc agtttcgtca
ccagcgaagc gagtgataaa 240 tgtcaaagag agaaaaggaa gactattaat
ggagatgatt tgctttgggc aatggctact 300 ttaggatttg aagactacat
ggaacctctc aaggtttacc tgatgagata tagagagggt 360 gacacaaagg
gatcagcaaa aggtggggat ccaaatgcaa agaaagatgg gcaatcaagc 420
caaaatggcc agttctcgca gcttgctcac caaggtcctt atgggaactc tcaagtaact
480 tttcctctct tctcttcaca ctcaagcaat acgcatcatt ctcttctaat ttgttaa
537 8 178 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana G1364 polypeptide 8 Met Ala Glu
Ser Gln Ala Lys Ser Pro Gly Gly Cys Gly Ser His Glu 1 5 10 15 Ser
Gly Gly Asp Gln Ser Pro Arg Ser Leu His Val Arg Glu Gln Asp 20 25
30 Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Arg Gly Leu
35 40 45 Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Ile Val
Gln Glu 50 55 60 Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Ser Glu
Ala Ser Asp Lys 65 70 75 80 Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn
Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp 85 90 95 Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu
Asp Tyr Met Glu Pro Leu Lys Val 100 105 110 Tyr Leu Met Arg Tyr Arg
Glu Gly Asp Thr Lys Gly Ser Ala Lys Gly 115 120 125 Gly Asp Pro Asn
Ala Lys Lys Asp Gly Gln Ser Ser Gln Asn Gly Gln 130 135 140 Phe Ser
Gln Leu Ala His Gln Gly Pro Tyr Gly Asn Ser Gln Val Thr 145 150 155
160 Phe Pro Leu Phe Ser Ser His Ser Ser Asn Thr His His Ser Leu Leu
165 170 175 Ile Cys 9 687 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G2345 9
atggccgaat cgcaaaccgg tggtggtggt ggtggaagcc atgagagtgg cggtgatcag
60 agcccgaggt ctttgaatgt tcgtgagcag gacaggtttc ttccgattgc
taacataagc 120 cgtatcatga agagaggttt acctctaaat ggcaaaatcg
ctaaagatgc taaagagact 180 atgcaggaat gtgtctctga attcatcagc
ttcgtcacca gcgaggctag tgataagtgc 240 caaagagaga aaaggaagac
catcaatgga gatgatttgc tttgggctat ggccacttta 300 ggattcgaag
attacatcga tcccctcaag gtttacctga tgcgatatag agagatggag 360
ggtgacacta aaggatcagg aaaaggcggg gaatcgagtg caaagagaga tggtcaacca
420 agccaagtgt ctcagttctc gcaggttcct caacaaggct cattctcaca
gggtccttat 480 ggaaactctc aatctctgag gttcggcaat agcatcgagc
atcttgaagt gttaatgagt 540 agtactagga cactattcat cacaatcttc
cgagactcga ctatgcctgt tgtgtctgag 600 aatctgagtg atccactttc
catagatatg gattgtgaag ctatttatca ccacttcatt 660 ggcctgttga
ttctttcatg caagtga 687 10 228 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana G2345
polypeptide 10 Met Ala Glu Ser Gln Thr Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser
His Glu Ser 1 5 10 15 Gly Gly Asp Gln Ser Pro Arg Ser Leu Asn Val
Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg 20 25 30 Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg
Ile Met Lys Arg Gly Leu Pro 35 40 45 Leu Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys
Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Met Gln Glu Cys 50 55 60 Val Ser Glu Phe Ile
Ser Phe Val Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys 65 70 75 80 Gln Arg Glu
Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala 85 90 95 Met
Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Asp Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr 100 105
110 Leu Met Arg Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly Asp Thr Lys Gly Ser Gly Lys
115 120 125 Gly Gly Glu Ser Ser Ala Lys Arg Asp Gly Gln Pro Ser Gln
Val Ser 130 135 140 Gln Phe Ser Gln Val Pro Gln Gln Gly Ser Phe Ser
Gln Gly Pro Tyr 145 150 155 160 Gly Asn Ser Gln Ser Leu Arg Phe Gly
Asn Ser Ile Glu His Leu Glu 165 170 175 Val Leu Met Ser Ser Thr Arg
Thr Leu Phe Ile Thr Ile Phe Arg Asp 180 185 190 Ser Thr Met Pro Val
Val Ser Glu Asn Leu Ser Asp Pro Leu Ser Ile 195 200 205 Asp Met Asp
Cys Glu Ala Ile Tyr His His Phe Ile Gly Leu Leu Ile 210 215 220 Leu
Ser Cys Lys 225 11 1131 DNA Glycine max
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER24839_1 11 attcggctcg agataatcca gagagaggag
agagaagtaa aaaggtggag gaagaagcga 60 aaagcgagtg agggcagtgt
tgcttaataa aagaaaacga acggtggtga taggcttcag 120 tctagatctc
aatcgtctcc accttgcttt cttctccagc gtccgattct ctcaccgatc 180
tcgcgccaaa tacaaattcg tgtcaaccca acccagggtt ccggcgagca tggccgacgg
240 tccggctagc ccaggcggcg gcagccacga gagcggcgac cacagccctc
gctctaacgt 300 gcgcgagcag gacaggtacc tccctatcgc taacataagc
cgcatcatga agaaggcact 360 tcctgccaac ggtaaaatcg caaaggacgc
caaagagacc gttcaggaat gcgtctccga 420 gttcatcagc ttcatcacca
gcgaggcctc tgataagtgt cagagagaaa agagaaagac 480 tattaacggc
gatgatttgc tctgggcgat ggccactctc ggtttcgagg attatatgga 540
tcctcttaaa atttacctca ctagataccg agagatggag ggtgatacga agggctctgc
600 caagggtgga gactcatctg ctaagagaga tgttcagcca agtcctaatg
ctcagcttgc 660 tcatcaaggt tctttctcac aaaatgttac ttacccgaat
tctcagggtc gacatatgat 720 ggttccaatg caaggcccgg agtaggtatc
aagtttatta ttgaccctct tgttgtaacg 780 tatgttttct acgccagtta
ccaagtgctc acggcatatt gaatgtcttt ttatgttatg 840 tgaatactga
caggagatgt tggttcttgt gtccgttttt ttttttaaat taaggtttgt 900
atattatctt tggattcgaa ttattatttg aaagttatta ttatattgta aatcctagag
960 ccctgttgtc tgaatccatc aggcggcttg gtaaagaccg agattttagg
actgattgta 1020 agcataaatc cgaatattct tttcctaatt tctttgcgca
ataatgtatg aaaaaggctc 1080 gagcttcttt ttaaaaaaaa aaaaaaagga
acaaaaaaaa aaaagggggg g 1131 12 171 PRT Glycine max
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER24839_1 polypeptide 12 Met Ala Asp Gly Pro Ala
Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu Ser Gly 1 5 10 15 Asp His Ser Pro
Arg Ser Asn Val Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Tyr Leu Pro 20 25 30 Ile Ala
Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Gly 35 40 45
Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu 50
55 60 Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg
Glu 65 70 75 80 Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala
Met Ala Thr 85 90 95 Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Met Asp Pro Leu Lys
Ile Tyr Leu Thr Arg 100 105 110 Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly Asp Thr Lys
Gly Ser Ala Lys Gly Gly Asp 115 120 125 Ser Ser Ala Lys Arg Asp Val
Gln Pro Ser Pro Asn Ala Gln Leu Ala 130 135 140 His Gln Gly Ser Phe
Ser Gln Asn Val Thr Tyr Pro Asn Ser Gln Gly 145 150 155 160 Arg His
Met Met Val Pro Met Gln Gly Pro Glu 165 170 13 993 DNA Glycine max
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER31103_1 13 attcggctcg ggaggaacgt gaaagtaaaa
cggacggtgg cgatagaagc gtctctcatc 60 tccatcgtct cctcactcct
ctcttctcca gcgttcattt tttctcgcgc ccaaatacaa 120 aatcacatca
caacagggtt ccggcgacca tgtccgatgc tccggcgagt ccatgcggcg 180
gcggcggcgg aggcagccac gagagcggcg agcacagtcc ccgctccaat ttccgcgagc
240 aggaccgctt cctccccatc gccaacatca gccgcatcat gaagaaagcg
cttcctccca 300 acgggaaaat cgccaaggac gccaaggaaa ccgtgcagga
atgcgtctcc gagttcatca 360 gcttcgtcac cagcgaagcg agcgataagt
gtcagagaga gaagaggaag accatcaacg 420 gcgacgattt gctttgggct
atgaccactt taggtttcga ggagtatatt gatccgctca 480 aggtttacct
cgccgcttac agagagattg agggtgattc aaagggttcg gccaagggtg 540
gagatgcatc tgctaagaga gatgtttatc agagtcctaa tggccaggtt gctcatcaag
600 gttctttctc acaaggtgtt aattatacga attcttagcc ccaggctcaa
catatgatag 660 ttccgatgca aggccaagag tagatattga tcctctcctt
cagtgtttga catgtgtgat 720 ctaaatgcca gtggaacttt tatgtcaata
tgtgcccttg gtatattgaa tgcattttat 780 gttatgtaaa cactacatgc
ggggatgttg gttcttgtga ccagatatta tttattaaga 840 cttacattta
tctttggaaa agaatcatta ttcataagtt atattgtaaa ttctggaaca 900
atgcttgtct gattccatca atcgtcctgg taacgatttt atgtacctga ttggaagcat
960 aaattggtat attctttccc ttcgttgtct gtt 993 14 162 PRT Glycine max
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER31103_1 polypeptide 14 Met Ser Asp Ala Pro Ala
Ser Pro Cys Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser 1 5 10 15 His Glu Ser Gly
Glu His Ser Pro Arg Ser Asn Phe Arg Glu Gln Asp 20 25 30 Arg Phe
Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu 35 40 45
Pro Pro Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu 50
55 60 Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp
Lys 65 70 75 80 Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp
Leu Leu Trp 85 90 95 Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Ile
Asp Pro Leu Lys Val 100 105 110 Tyr Leu Ala Ala Tyr Arg Glu Ile Glu
Gly Asp Ser Lys Gly Ser Ala 115 120 125 Lys Gly Gly Asp Ala Ser Ala
Lys Arg Asp Val Tyr Gln Ser Pro Asn 130 135 140 Gly Gln Val Ala His
Gln Gly Ser Phe Ser Gln Gly Val Asn Tyr Thr 145 150 155 160 Asn Ser
15 1000 DNA Glycine max GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_- 1 15
taataaggtt gtatatggtt tggtgggatg gctcgagagt ctttagaaaa gatatccatg
60 gctgagtccg acaacgagtc aggaggtcac acggggaacg cgagcgggag
caacgagttg 120 tccggttgca gggagcaaga caggttcctc ccaatagcaa
acgtgagcag gatcatgaag 180 aaggcgttgc cggcgaacgc gaagatatcg
aaggaggcga aggagacggt gcaggagtgc 240 gtgtcggagt tcatcagctt
cataacagga gaggcttccg ataagtgcca gaaggagaag 300 aggaagacga
tcaacggcga cgatcttctc tgggccatga ctaccctggg cttcgaggac 360
tacgtggatc ctctcaagat ttacctgcac aagtataggg agatggaggg ggagaaaacc
420 gctatgatgg gaaggccaca tgagagggat gagggttatg gccatggcca
tggtcatgca 480 actcctatga tgacgatgat gatggggcat cagccccagc
accagcacca gcaccagcac 540 cagcaccagc accagggaca cgtgtatgga
tctggatcag catcttctgc aagaactaga 600 taacatgtgt catctgttta
agcttaattg attttattat gaggatgata tgatataaga 660 tttatattcg
tatatgtttg gttttagaaa tacaccagct ccagcttgta attgcttgaa 720
acttccttgt tgagagaata tagacattat tgtggatggt gatgtggcat atgtggcata
780 cacagaattt ttgtattctt ctttctctct atggattttt gtgtaagggc
aggactatgg 840 ctttgtttgc tgatcgtata gctagtatgg tgctatctag
gttcggattt ttttcttttt 900 catgtataat gaaaaattaa cggaggaaat
tactcttacg ttactttgaa attaattaac
960 taaatcccgc ttctgccttt ttttttttct cctttctgag 1000 16 181 PRT
Glycine max GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_1 polypeptide 16 Met Ala Glu
Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly His Thr Gly Asn Ala Ser 1 5 10 15 Gly
Ser Asn Glu Leu Ser Gly Cys Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro 20 25
30 Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala
35 40 45 Lys Ile Ser Lys Glu Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val
Ser Glu 50 55 60 Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys
Cys Gln Lys Glu 65 70 75 80 Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu
Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr 85 90 95 Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Val Asp
Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu His Lys 100 105 110 Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly
Glu Lys Thr Ala Met Met Gly Arg Pro His 115 120 125 Glu Arg Asp Glu
Gly Tyr Gly His Gly His Gly His Ala Thr Pro Met 130 135 140 Met Thr
Met Met Met Gly His Gln Pro Gln His Gln His Gln His Gln 145 150 155
160 His Gln His Gln His Gln Gly His Val Tyr Gly Ser Gly Ser Ala Ser
165 170 175 Ser Ala Arg Thr Arg 180 17 620 DNA Glycine max
misc_feature (560)..(560) n is a, c, g, or t 17 tgaagaagat
tcctggattg attgtgaaga tggctgagtc ggacaacgac tcgggagggg 60
cgcagaacgc gggaaacagt ggaaacttga gcgagttgtc gcctcgggaa caggaccggt
120 ttctccccat agcgaacgtg agcaggatca tgaagaaggc cttgccggcg
aacgcgaaga 180 tctcgaagga cgcgaaggag acggtgcagg aatgcgtgtc
ggagttcatc agcttcataa 240 cgggtgaggc gtcggacaag tgccagaggg
agaagcgcaa gaccatcaac ggcgacgatc 300 ttctctgggc catgacaacc
ctgggattcg aagagtacgt ggagcctctg aagatttacc 360 tccagcgctt
ccgcgagatg gagggagaga agaccgtggc cgcccgcgac tcttctaagg 420
actcggcctc cgcctcctcc tatcatcagg gacacgtgta cggctcccct gcctaccatc
480 atcaagtgcc tgggcccact tatcctgccc ctggtagacc cagatgacgt
gctcctctat 540 tcgccactcc ctagactttn tatattatat tatttaatta
aactctcttc tccactcaac 600 ctttgcaaga tcactgggtt 620 18 165 PRT
Glycine max G3476 GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_3 polypeptide 18 Met
Ala Glu Ser Asp Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly Ala Gln Asn Ala Gly Asn 1 5 10
15 Ser Gly Asn Leu Ser Glu Leu Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu
20 25 30 Pro Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro
Ala Asn 35 40 45 Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln
Glu Cys Val Ser 50 55 60 Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala
Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg 65 70 75 80 Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly
Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr 85 90 95 Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu
Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Gln 100 105 110 Arg Phe Arg Glu
Met Glu Gly Glu Lys Thr Val Ala Ala Arg Asp Ser 115 120 125 Ser Lys
Asp Ser Ala Ser Ala Ser Ser Tyr His Gln Gly His Val Tyr 130 135 140
Gly Ser Pro Ala Tyr His His Gln Val Pro Gly Pro Thr Tyr Pro Ala 145
150 155 160 Pro Gly Arg Pro Arg 165 19 1872 DNA Glycine max G3475
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_5 19 aacataaata ataaaatatt tctttgaaca
tttcttaaaa agtatgaaca taaatttaaa 60 ttattatttt atatttaatg
tatttacatt aatttatttg tcttacatac acttgtaatg 120 ttctccttat
atttattaaa ctataatata gtatatataa agaaaagatt ttgagaattt 180
gaataaaata agagtgtcca agtcagaggc gagcacgtgc cagataccaa agcaacggtc
240 cagatcatgg agcactcacc aaatccaagg gctcctattt gtccgtgcaa
actcacactt 300 atcgcccaac aacggtccac aaagcgccac gtgttctcaa
gataaagcgt tattaaccct 360 tctgatccaa cggatcctgc tcattacctc
ccaaacaagc ccttccgttc cgtttcacct 420 ttcctcttcc cgccggagcc
gccgtcaccc gccgccggca atcgtatcag accctcccaa 480 tacaccgtct
ccgacttcca cgcagaattg cacgattcat tgatttcaat tttcaagtct 540
tgaggatttc gtttcaacag cgcttcaatt tgacgcagaa aaactgagtc aaaccaattc
600 tcccagagtt cgtgacttgg attctcaatt tatcgttcat tccgaataga
atttgaaact 660 ccgaagaaaa ctgcaccgaa cactgaatct cagttaccga
ggagcttctt ctacgaaccg 720 tgcttaattc cacacagaaa caccgagtca
aactggttcg tgctgtgttc gtggttcaga 780 ttctcaatcg aaatttgaaa
ttcagaagaa aaccgcaccg aacacagaat ttcagaatct 840 gaacaagttt
cttccgttaa cagcacttca acttcacgtg gaacaagaat caaaccgttt 900
cgtggttcgg attctcaatt cctcgtccat tcgcaatcga ttttcaaatt ccgaagaaaa
960 ccgctccgaa cactgaattt cagactctga acagcgaaca gtacttcaag
ttcacgtgga 1020 acgagtcaaa gcgattccaa tcaatttcgc gaactcctcc
acggtgaact ccgatatttt 1080 cctgcactga cttagtgatt cgtttcatat
ttctcagctt cgattatccg tttgtcgatg 1140 gcggactcgg acaacgactc
cggcggcgcg cacaacgccg ggaaggggag cgagatgtcg 1200 ccgcgggagc
aggaccggtt cctgccgatc gcgaacgtga gccgcatcat gaagaaggcg 1260
ctgccggcga acgcgaagat ctcgaaggac gcgaaggaga cggtgcagga gtgcgtgtcg
1320 gagttcatca gcttcatcac cggcgaggcc tccgacaagt gccagcggga
gaagcgcaag 1380 acgatcaacg gcgacgacct gctctgggcg atgaccactc
tcggcttcga ggactacgtc 1440 gagcctctca agggctacct ccagcgcttc
cgagaaatgg aaggagagaa gaccgtggcg 1500 gcgcgtgaca aggacgcgcc
tcctcctacc aatgctacca acagtgccta cgagagtcct 1560 agttatgctg
ctgctcctgg tggaatcatg atgcatcagg gacacgtgta cggttctgcc 1620
ggcttccatc aagtggctgg tggtgctata aagggtgggc ctgtttatcc cgggcctgga
1680 tccaatgccg gtaggcccag gtagatgggc ctatgttatt attattatta
ttattcttat 1740 tcgtaagtta aaagaaatgt gagattcaaa gtggtgatta
agtgaattag taacaaaaaa 1800 gtgcgactca gttgattaaa aatatatata
aattattata agtcttttaa tatgtttttg 1860 attctcacac at 1872 20 188 PRT
Glycine max G3475 GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_5 polypeptide 20 Met
Ala Asp Ser Asp Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly Ala His Asn Ala Gly Lys 1 5 10
15 Gly Ser Glu Met Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala
20 25 30 Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala
Lys Ile 35 40 45 Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val
Ser Glu Phe Ile 50 55 60 Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys
Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg 65 70 75 80 Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu
Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly 85 90 95 Phe Glu Asp Tyr Val Glu
Pro Leu Lys Gly Tyr Leu Gln Arg Phe Arg 100 105 110 Glu Met Glu Gly
Glu Lys Thr Val Ala Ala Arg Asp Lys Asp Ala Pro 115 120 125 Pro Pro
Thr Asn Ala Thr Asn Ser Ala Tyr Glu Ser Pro Ser Tyr Ala 130 135 140
Ala Ala Pro Gly Gly Ile Met Met His Gln Gly His Val Tyr Gly Ser 145
150 155 160 Ala Gly Phe His Gln Val Ala Gly Gly Ala Ile Lys Gly Gly
Pro Val 165 170 175 Tyr Pro Gly Pro Gly Ser Asn Ala Gly Arg Pro Arg
180 185 21 521 DNA Glycine max GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_6 21
agactttagc tttacacaac atattattgt aaggctagct agctagccat ggctgagtcg
60 gacaacgagt ccggaggtca cacggggaac gcaagcggaa gcaacgaatt
ctccggttgc 120 agggagcaag acaggttcct tccgatagcg aacgtgagca
ggatcatgaa gaaggcgttg 180 ccggcgaacg cgaagatctc gaaggaggcg
aaggagacgg tgcaggagtg cgtgtcggag 240 ttcatcagct tcataacagg
agaagcgtcc gataagtgcc agaaggagaa gaggaagacg 300 atcaacggcg
atgatctgct gtgggccatg accacgctgg ggttcgagga gtacgtggag 360
cctctcaagg tttatctgca taagtatagg gagctggaag gggagaaaac tgctatgatg
420 ggaaggccac atgagaggga tgagggttat ggtcatgcaa ctcctatgat
gatcatgatg 480 gggcatcagc agcagcagca tcagggacac gtgtatggat c 521 22
158 PRT Glycine max misc_feature (158)..(158) Xaa can be any
naturally occurring amino acid 22 Met Ala Glu Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser
Gly Gly His Thr Gly Asn Ala Ser 1 5 10 15 Gly Ser Asn Glu Phe Ser
Gly Cys Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro 20 25 30 Ile Ala Asn Val
Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala 35 40 45 Lys Ile
Ser Lys Glu Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu 50 55 60
Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu 65
70 75 80 Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met
Thr Thr 85 90 95 Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Val
Tyr Leu His Lys 100 105 110 Tyr Arg Glu Leu Glu Gly Glu Lys Thr Ala
Met Met Gly Arg Pro His 115 120 125 Glu Arg Asp Glu Gly Tyr Gly His
Ala Thr Pro Met Met Ile Met Met 130 135 140 Gly His Gln Gln Gln Gln
His Gln Gly His Val Tyr Gly Xaa 145 150 155 23 556 DNA Glycine max
G3471 GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER4778- _1 23 gtagggtttg tgagatgtcg
gatgcgccac cgagcccgac tcatgagagt gggggcgagc 60 agagcccgcg
cggttcgtcg tccggcgcga gggagcagga ccggtacctc ccgattgcca 120
acatcagccg cattatgaag aaggctctgc ctcccaacgg caagattgca aaggatgcca
180 aagacaccat gcaggaatgc gtttctgagt tcatcagctt cattaccagc
gaggcgagtg 240 agaaatgcca gaaggagaag agaaagacaa tcaatggaga
cgatttgcta tgggccatgg 300 ccactttagg atttgaagac tacatagagc
cgcttaaggt gtacctggct aggtacagag 360 aggcggaggg tgacactaaa
ggatctgcta gaagtggtga tggatctgct acaccagatc 420 aagttggcct
tgcaggtcaa aattctcagc ttgttcatca gggttcgctg aactatattg 480
gtttgcaggt gcaaccacaa catctggtta tgccttcaat gcaaagccat gaatagttta
540 gatgcttcta cgcatc 556 24 173 PRT Glycine max G3471
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER4778_1 polypeptide 24 Met Ser Asp Ala Pro Pro
Ser Pro Thr His Glu Ser Gly Gly Glu Gln 1 5 10 15 Ser Pro Arg Gly
Ser Ser Ser Gly Ala Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Tyr Leu 20 25 30 Pro Ile
Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Pro Asn 35 40 45
Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Asp Thr Met Gln Glu Cys Val Ser 50
55 60 Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Glu Lys Cys Gln
Lys 65 70 75 80 Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp
Ala Met Ala 85 90 95 Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu
Lys Val Tyr Leu Ala 100 105 110 Arg Tyr Arg Glu Ala Glu Gly Asp Thr
Lys Gly Ser Ala Arg Ser Gly 115 120 125 Asp Gly Ser Ala Thr Pro Asp
Gln Val Gly Leu Ala Gly Gln Asn Ser 130 135 140 Gln Leu Val His Gln
Gly Ser Leu Asn Tyr Ile Gly Leu Gln Val Gln 145 150 155 160 Pro Gln
His Leu Val Met Pro Ser Met Gln Ser His Glu 165 170 25 939 DNA
Glycine max misc_feature (596)..(596) n is a, c, g, or t 25
taatatagtg cggctcgagc tctgctttct gtgttattgt ctggcttttg gagccgatcc
60 aaccaatcat cgctggcgcc aaatacaaaa tctcatccct tcccctttct
cttactgact 120 ctctttgtca ccgggtttgt gagatgtcgg atgcaccggc
gagtccgagt cacgagagtg 180 gtggcgagca gagccctcgc ggctcgttgt
ccggcgcggc tagagagcag gaccggtacc 240 ttcccattgc caacatcagc
cgcatcatga agaaggctct gcctcccaat ggcaagattg 300 cgaaggatgc
aaaagacaca atgcaagaat gcgtttctga attcatcagc ttcattacca 360
gcgaggcgag tgagaaatgc cagaaggaga agagaaagac aatcaatgga gacgatttac
420 tatgggccat ggcaacttta gggtttgaag actacattga gccgcttaag
gtgtacctgg 480 ctaggtacag agaggcggag ggtgacacta aaggatctgc
tagaagtggt gatggatctg 540 ctagaccaga tcaagttggc cttgcaggtc
aaaatgctca ggtgcaacca caacantctg 600 gttatgcctt caatgcaagg
ccatgaatag tttagatgct tctacgcatc ttatttattt 660 cccttgaatg
cttgtacgca tggcatgggt ggaaccaatt gtctggtaaa aaaatggggg 720
ggctctcgtc cccccgggtg ggggggtttt gtttcggtac tngtgtngnt ttttnttaaa
780 acacgncttg tagcgggtgt ttctcttctc aagggagaga tgtgtttagg
gttatgctag 840 tgattcgaaa tgtagcttgt cagggtgaga agcacttgct
tttagagttt tctttagatt 900 attatataag agagaatatt tgcagacaaa
aagacttac 939 26 160 PRT Glycine max misc_feature (151)..(151) Xaa
can be any naturally occurring amino acid 26 Met Ser Asp Ala Pro
Ala Ser Pro Ser His Glu Ser Gly Gly Glu Gln 1 5 10 15 Ser Pro Arg
Gly Ser Leu Ser Gly Ala Ala Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Tyr 20 25 30 Leu
Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Pro 35 40
45 Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Asp Thr Met Gln Glu Cys Val
50 55 60 Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Glu Lys
Cys Gln 65 70 75 80 Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu
Leu Trp Ala Met 85 90 95 Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu
Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu 100 105 110 Ala Arg Tyr Arg Glu Ala Glu Gly
Asp Thr Lys Gly Ser Ala Arg Ser 115 120 125 Gly Asp Gly Ser Ala Arg
Pro Asp Gln Val Gly Leu Ala Gly Gln Asn 130 135 140 Ala Gln Val Gln
Pro Gln Xaa Ser Gly Tyr Ala Phe Asn Ala Arg Pro 145 150 155 160 27
1231 DNA Oryza sativa ORYSA-22JAN02-CLUSTER26105_1 27 tttttttttt
tttttttttt ttttttttgg gaatcagagt aaaattgcta ccattacaga 60
gagcatctat ttctcaatag tacaacacgc tagttcagga cgaaatacaa catgaatatt
120 tatgcctccc aatacagatt atatggaacc gaatgacagc caaagaccaa
ttgttaaatt 180 atcctgaata tacatacaac aacagagcta gaccacgaac
cgaaactatc ctcacgggga 240 gtaatttaca tctgagaagc agccttggct
cgacgcttcc aagcagcatc agttcctggt 300 tgacaaacat gggacctaga
ggtggtagca agttacttcc ttcactgctc accatgaggt 360 gtaggtatat
atattagcta acgactgcag caccaaataa aatccaccta gcaacagttg 420
catgaaaagg tcctatcttc agtttgagac atccccatta tggtactgag gttgcatata
480 acccattcct tgattgtatg ctgcttgttg gcccatccct tgggcacttg
aactgcttcc 540 tccatgagaa ccaagtacat cctttttcac agagccatca
ccagcctttg cagttaattt 600 actatcaccc tccatctctc tgtacttctg
caggtagacc ttgaggggct cgatgtagtc 660 ctcgaagccc agcgtggcca
tcgcccacag caagtcgtcg ccgttgatgg tcttgcgctt 720 ctccctctgg
catttatcgc tcgcctcgct ggtgatgaag gagatgaact cggagacgca 780
ctcctgcacg gtctccttgg cgtccttggc gatcttcccg ttggccggga tggccttctt
840 catgatgcgg ctgatgttgg cgatggggag gaacctgtcc tgccggacga
gtgggccccc 900 cccaccccca cctccccctc ctccccctcc ccccctcggg
ctcccgctct cgtggctccc 960 ccctcctccc cccgggctcc ccggcccatc
cgccatccca cctcccccct ccttatatag 1020 aagcgcgggc gcgcgcggag
agggcgcgac gtggagagga gagagagggg ggttgggcgc 1080 gaggtggtga
agcgaggagg agagagagag agagagagag agagagaggg ggggggagag 1140
gagagagaga ggaagcgggg gtgggaagcg gagcggaggt gaggcggaga ggcgagaggg
1200 ggagatcgga cgctggagaa gagaagcggc c 1231 28 185 PRT Oryza
sativa ORYSA-22JAN02-CLUSTER26105_1 polypeptide 28 Met Ala Asp Gly
Pro Gly Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu 1 5 10 15 Ser Gly
Ser Pro Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 20 25 30
Gly Gly Pro Leu Val Arg Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile 35
40 45 Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala
Lys 50 55 60 Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe
Ile Ser Phe 65 70 75 80 Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg
Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr 85 90 95 Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala
Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 100 105 110 Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys
Val Tyr Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met 115 120 125 Glu Gly Asp Ser Lys
Leu Thr Ala Lys Ala Gly Asp Gly Ser Val Lys 130 135 140 Lys Asp Val
Leu Gly Ser His Gly Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser Ala Gln Gly 145 150 155 160
Met Gly Gln Gln Ala Ala Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro 165
170 175 Gln Tyr His Asn Gly Asp Val Ser Asn 180 185 29 229 PRT
Oryza sativa OSC12630.C1.p5.fg polypeptide 29 Met Pro Asp Ser Asp
Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly Pro Ser Asn Ala Gly Glu 1 5 10 15 Tyr Ala Ser
Ala Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Val 20 25 30 Ser
Arg Ile Met Lys Arg Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys 35 40
45 Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe
50 55 60 Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg
Lys Thr 65 70 75 80 Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr
Leu Gly Phe Glu 85 90 95 Asp Tyr Ile Asp Pro Leu Lys Leu Tyr Leu
His Lys Phe Arg Glu Leu 100 105 110 Glu Gly Glu Lys Ala Ile Gly Ala
Ala Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ala
115 120 125 Ala Ser Ser Gly Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Ser His His
His Gln 130 135 140 Asp Ala Ser Arg Asn Asn Gly Gly Tyr Gly Met Tyr
Gly Gly Gly Gly 145 150 155 160 Gly Met Ile Met Met Met Gly Gln Pro
Met Tyr Gly Ser Pro Pro Ala 165 170 175 Ser Ser Ala Gly Tyr Ala Gln
Pro Gln Pro Pro His His His His His 180 185 190 Gln Met Val Met Gly
Gly Lys Gly Lys Val Glu Glu Val Gln Ser Lys 195 200 205 Gly Lys Ile
Arg Asp Phe Leu Gln Leu Gln Ala Ser Met Leu Glu Leu 210 215 220 Ile
Gln Gly Glu Asn 225 30 241 PRT Oryza sativa OSC1404.C1.p3.fg
polypeptide 30 Met Ser Glu Gly Phe Asp Gly Thr Glu Asn Gly Gly Gly
Gly Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Gly Val Gly Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu
Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile 20 25 30 Gly Arg Ile Met Arg Arg Ala Val Pro
Glu Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys 35 40 45 Asp Ser Lys Glu Ser Val Gln
Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe 50 55 60 Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala
Ser Asp Lys Cys Leu Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr 65 70 75 80 Ile Asn Gly
Asp Asp Leu Ile Trp Ser Met Gly Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 85 90 95 Asp
Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Leu Tyr Leu Arg Leu Tyr Arg Glu Gly 100 105
110 Asp Thr Lys Gly Ser Arg Ala Ser Glu Leu Pro Val Lys Lys Asp Val
115 120 125 Val Leu Asn Gly Asp Pro Gly Ser Ser Leu Val Asn Tyr Gly
Ala Gln 130 135 140 Arg Ala Asp Ala Asn Ala Asn His Leu Asp Leu Phe
Phe Leu Leu Arg 145 150 155 160 Lys Asn Pro Glu Ser Thr Thr Ala Asn
Cys Met Arg Glu Asp Glu Ala 165 170 175 Lys Pro Val Thr Val Lys Ile
Ile Glu Thr Val Tyr Val Glu Ala Asp 180 185 190 Thr Ala Asp Asp Phe
Lys Ser Val Val Gln Arg Leu Thr Gly Lys Asp 195 200 205 Ala Val Ala
Gly Asp Ala Pro Glu Leu Asn Ser Ala Gln Arg Phe Gly 210 215 220 Ser
Gly Arg Glu Ala Ser Arg His Gly Asp His Lys Val Arg Ile Tyr 225 230
235 240 Glu 31 297 PRT Oryza sativa OSC30077.C1.p6.fg polypeptide
31 Met Lys Ser Arg Lys Ser Tyr Gly His Leu Leu Ser Pro Val Gly Ser
1 5 10 15 Pro Pro Leu Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Glu Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala
Ala Ala 20 25 30 Gly Gly Gly Gly Cys Gly Ser Ser Ala Gly Tyr Val
Val Tyr Gly Gly 35 40 45 Gly Gly Gly Gly Asp Ser Pro Ala Lys Glu
Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro 50 55 60 Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met
Lys Arg Ser Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala 65 70 75 80 Lys Ile Ser Lys Glu Ser
Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu 85 90 95 Phe Ile Ser Phe
Val Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu 100 105 110 Lys Arg
Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr 115 120 125
Leu Gly Phe Glu Ala Tyr Val Gly Pro Leu Lys Ser Tyr Leu Asn Arg 130
135 140 Tyr Arg Glu Ala Glu Gly Glu Lys Ala Asp Val Leu Gly Gly Ala
Gly 145 150 155 160 Gly Ala Ala Ala Ala Arg His Gly Glu Gly Gly Cys
Cys Gly Gly Gly 165 170 175 Gly Gly Gly Ala Asp Gly Val Val Ile Asp
Gly His Tyr Pro Leu Ala 180 185 190 Gly Gly Leu Ser His Ser His His
Gly His Gln Gln Gln Asp Gly Gly 195 200 205 Gly Asp Val Gly Leu Met
Met Gly Gly Gly Asp Ala Gly Val Gly Tyr 210 215 220 Asn Ala Gly Ala
Gly Ser Thr Thr Thr Ala Phe Tyr Ala Pro Ala Ala 225 230 235 240 Thr
Ala Ala Ser Gly Asn Lys Ala Tyr Cys Gly Gly Asp Gly Ser Arg 245 250
255 Val Met Glu Phe Glu Gly Ile Gly Gly Glu Glu Glu Ser Gly Gly Gly
260 265 270 Gly Gly Gly Gly Glu Arg Gly Phe Ala Gly His Leu His Gly
Val Gln 275 280 285 Trp Phe Arg Leu Lys Arg Asn Thr Asn 290 295 32
285 PRT Oryza sativa OSC5489.C1.p2.fg polypeptide 32 Met Ala Asp
Ala Gly His Asp Glu Ser Gly Ser Pro Pro Arg Ser Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly
Val Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg 20 25
30 Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala
35 40 45 Lys Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe
Val Thr 50 55 60 Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg
Lys Thr Ile Asn 65 70 75 80 Gly Glu Asp Leu Leu Phe Ala Met Gly Thr
Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr 85 90 95 Val Asp Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu
His Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly 100 105 110 Asp Ser Lys Leu Ser Ser
Lys Ala Gly Asp Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp 115 120 125 Thr Ile Gly Pro
His Ser Gly Ala Ser Ser Ser Ser Ala Gln Gly Met 130 135 140 Val Gly
Ala Tyr Thr Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Ser Asn 145 150 155
160 Phe His Ile Leu Val Val Leu Gln Ser Phe Ala Phe Pro Tyr Met Tyr
165 170 175 Gln Val Ala Gln Ile Tyr Cys Asn Lys Tyr Glu Val Ser Arg
Glu Gln 180 185 190 Ile Trp Asp Thr Pro Gln Ile Met Glu Leu Ser Pro
Trp Ile Pro Tyr 195 200 205 Thr Ile Asn Arg Ile Trp Lys Glu Thr His
Gly Ser Gln Asp Ile Arg 210 215 220 Ile Gln Gly Arg Pro Arg Glu Ala
Ala Asn Ser Ala Leu Asp Trp Gln 225 230 235 240 Trp Pro Ser Lys His
Ser Ser Leu Ala Ser Asn Phe Tyr Gly Thr Arg 245 250 255 Val Val Gly
Gly His His Glu Tyr Gln Arg Ser Thr Lys Lys Asp Thr 260 265 270 Thr
His Val Asn Phe Ala Ser Gly Leu Gly Asp Leu Gly 275 280 285 33 523
DNA Zea mays LIB3732-044-Q6-K6-C4 33 cccagcgtcc gaggaaggct
acgggcacca gggccacctg ttgagccccg tgggcagccc 60 gctgtcggac
aacgagtccg gcgccgcggc agcggccggc ggcggcgggt gcgggagcag 120
cgtggggtac tgcggcggcg gcggcggtga gtcgccggcc aaggagcaag accggttcct
180 gccgatcgcc aacgtgtcgc gcatcatgaa gcgctccctg ccggcgaacg
ccaagatctc 240 caaggaggcc aaggagacgg tgcaggagtg cgtgtccgag
ttcatcagct tcgtcacggg 300 ggaggcctcc gacaagtgcc agcgcgagaa
gcgcaagacc atcaacggcg acgacctgct 360 ctgggccatg accacgctcg
gcttcgaggc ctacgtcgcc ccactcaagt cctacctcaa 420 ccgctaccgc
gaggccgagg gcgagaaggc cgccgtgcta ggcggcggcg cgcgccacgg 480
cgacggcggc ggcgcggcgg acgacgccgg cccactcgcc ggg 523 34 174 PRT Zea
mays LIB3732-044-Q6-K6-C4 polypeptide 34 Pro Ala Ser Glu Glu Gly
Tyr Gly His Gln Gly His Leu Leu Ser Pro 1 5 10 15 Val Gly Ser Pro
Leu Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala 20 25 30 Gly Gly
Gly Gly Cys Gly Ser Ser Val Gly Tyr Cys Gly Gly Gly Gly 35 40 45
Gly Glu Ser Pro Ala Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn 50
55 60 Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Arg Ser Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile
Ser 65 70 75 80 Lys Glu Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu
Phe Ile Ser 85 90 95 Phe Val Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln
Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys 100 105 110 Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp
Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe 115 120 125 Glu Ala Tyr Val Ala Pro Leu
Lys Ser Tyr Leu Asn Arg Tyr Arg Glu 130 135 140 Ala Glu Gly Glu Lys
Ala Ala Val Leu Gly Gly Gly Ala Arg His Gly 145 150 155 160 Asp Gly
Gly Gly Ala Ala Asp Asp Ala Gly Pro Leu Ala Gly 165 170 35 1199 DNA
Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_1 35 cccacccgga gcgcctcctc
ttctccagcg tccgatcccc attccccacc tctcctccct 60 ccgccgccag
ctcccgcccc cttctctccc ctcctcgcct ccccgcgcgc gcgtttttat 120
aagggtttcg gcggaggcgc ccggtcgctg gcgatggccg acgacggcgg gagccacgag
180 ggcagcggcg gcggcggagg cgtccgggag caggaccggt tcctgcccat
cgccaacatc 240 agccggatca tgaagaaggc cgtcccggcc aacggcaaga
tcgccaagga cgctaaggag 300 accctgcagg agtgcgtctc cgagttcata
tcattcgtga ccagcgaggc cagcgacaaa 360 tgccagaagg agaaacgaaa
gacaatcaac ggggacgatt tgctctgggc gatggccact 420 ttaggattcg
aggagtacgt cgagcctctc aagatttacc tacaaaagta caaagagatg 480
gagggtgata gcaagctgtc tacaaaggct ggcgagggct ctgtaaagaa ggatgcaatt
540 agtccccatg gtggcaccag tagctcaagt aatcagttgg ttcagcatgg
agtctacaac 600 caagggatgg gctatatgca gccacaggta atctatcgta
ctgtcatttg ttagtaaaac 660 aatactgcag ctattttccg tctcactaaa
catggcagaa aatttcgatc attacattat 720 gccactaata attttctctc
tgtacgcact cagtaccaca atggggaaac ctaataaagg 780 gctaatacag
cagcaattta tggtaatatt attgctccct gaattttgtt aactaaagat 840
tctgtatcat gctatatgta tgtttccttt tttcttcttc tttgttttga caattgcttc
900 tttctctacg gtgtttatcc atcagctagg gaagtctctg cattgcttac
catgtgtatt 960 ggcagaaaac aggaggcact tacaaagggt gttaatctct
gcgatggctg cctctcaggt 1020 gtaaattggc ttcggtttag cgctgctttt
gtccgtatat ttaggatgat ttgactgttg 1080 ctacttttgg caacctttta
catttacaga tatgtattat tcagcataaa tataatatag 1140 tagtcctagg
cctaaataat ggtgattaac ataccaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaag 1199 36 166
PRT Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_1 polypeptide 36 Met Ala Asp
Asp Gly Gly Ser His Glu Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Val
Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile 20 25
30 Met Lys Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys
35 40 45 Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val
Thr Ser 50 55 60 Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys
Thr Ile Asn Gly 65 70 75 80 Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu
Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Val 85 90 95 Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Gln
Lys Tyr Lys Glu Met Glu Gly Asp 100 105 110 Ser Lys Leu Ser Thr Lys
Ala Gly Glu Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp Ala 115 120 125 Ile Ser Pro His
Gly Gly Thr Ser Ser Ser Ser Asn Gln Leu Val Gln 130 135 140 His Gly
Val Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Val Ile 145 150 155
160 Tyr Arg Thr Val Ile Cys 165 37 564 DNA Zea mays
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_10 37 gccttctctt ctccagcgtc cgatctctcc
cactcgcctt cctcaccgca gctctcccgg 60 ctcggtcgct tcgccacctc
cgtcctcccc ccgcgctcgg tcgctcgcca cctgctctcc 120 cctccctcca
cgttgctcgc gcccgcgctt atataagtgc acgaggagga gctcatggcg 180
gacgctccgg cgagccctgg gggcggaggc gggagcccca cgcagagcgg gagcccccag
240 ggccggcgga ggtggaggcg gtggcagccg tcagggagca ggacaggttc
ctgcccatcg 300 ccaacatcag tcgcatcatg aagaaggcca tcccggctaa
cgggaagatc gccaaggacg 360 ctaaggagac cgtgcaggag tgcgtctcgg
agttcatctc cttcatcact agcgaggcga 420 gtgacaagtg ccagagggag
aagcggaaga ccatcaatgg cgacgacctg ctgtgggcca 480 tggccacgct
ggggtttgag gactatattg aacccctcaa ggtgtacctg cagaagtaca 540
gagagatgga gggtgatagt aagt 564 38 188 PRT Zea mays misc_feature
(188)..(188) Xaa can be any naturally occurring amino acid 38 Leu
Leu Phe Ser Ser Val Arg Ser Leu Pro Leu Ala Phe Leu Thr Ala 1 5 10
15 Ala Leu Pro Ala Arg Ser Leu Arg His Leu Arg Pro Pro Pro Ala Leu
20 25 30 Gly Arg Ser Pro Pro Ala Leu Pro Ser Leu His Val Ala Arg
Ala Arg 35 40 45 Ala Tyr Ile Ser Ala Arg Gly Gly Ala His Gly Gly
Arg Ser Gly Glu 50 55 60 Pro Trp Gly Arg Arg Arg Glu Pro His Ala
Glu Arg Glu Pro Pro Gly 65 70 75 80 Pro Ala Glu Val Glu Ala Val Ala
Ala Val Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe 85 90 95 Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile
Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Ile Pro Ala 100 105 110 Asn Gly Lys Ile
Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val 115 120 125 Ser Glu
Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln 130 135 140
Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met 145
150 155 160 Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys Val
Tyr Leu 165 170 175 Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly Asp Ser Lys Xaa
180 185 39 1053 DNA Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_2 39
cattgggtac ctcgaggccg gccggcatcg cacccacccg gagcgcctcc tcttctccag
60 cgtccgatcc ccattcccca cctctcctcc ctccgccgcc agctcccgcc
cccttctctc 120 ccctcctcgc ctccccgcgc gcgcgttttt ataagggttt
cggcggaggc gcccggtcgc 180 tggcgatggc cgacgacggc gggagccacg
agggcagcgg cggcggcgga ggcgtccggg 240 agcaggaccg gttcctgccc
atcgccaaca tcagccggat catgaagaag gccgtcccgg 300 ccaacggcaa
gatcgccaag gacgctaagg agaccctgca ggagtgcgtc tccgagttca 360
tatcattcgt gaccagcgag gccagcgaca aatgccagaa ggagaaacga aagacaatca
420 acggggacga tttgctctgg gcgatggcca ctttaggatt cgaggagtac
gtcgagcctc 480 tcaagattta cctacaaaag tacaaagaga tggagggtga
tagcaagctg tctacaaagg 540 ctggcgaggg ctctgtaaag aaggatgcaa
ttagtcccca tggtggcacc agtagctcaa 600 gtaatcagtt ggttcagcat
ggagtctaca accaagggat gggctatatg cagccacagt 660 accacaatgg
ggaaacctaa taaagggcta atacagcagc aatttatgct agggaagtct 720
ctgcattgct taccatgtgt attggcagaa aacaggaggc acttacaaag ggtgttaatc
780 tctgcgatgg ctgcctctca ggtgtaaatt ggcttcggtt tagcgctgct
tttgtccgta 840 tatttaggat gatttgactg ttgctacttt tggcaacctt
ttacatttac agatatgtat 900 tattcagcat aaatataata tagtagtcct
aggcctaaat aatggtgatt aacataccaa 960 gtcttttatc aggctactcg
ttttctggaa caggattcat gcttagcttt ccctcctgtc 1020 tgaatgtgat
ggttgcctga atcctaattt gcc 1053 40 164 PRT Zea mays
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_2 polypeptide 40 Met Ala Asp Asp Gly Gly
Ser His Glu Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Val Arg Glu Gln
Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile 20 25 30 Met Lys
Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys 35 40 45
Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Ser 50
55 60 Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn
Gly 65 70 75 80 Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu
Glu Tyr Val 85 90 95 Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Gln Lys Tyr Lys
Glu Met Glu Gly Asp 100 105 110 Ser Lys Leu Ser Thr Lys Ala Gly Glu
Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp Ala 115 120 125 Ile Ser Pro His Gly Gly Thr
Ser Ser Ser Ser Asn Gln Leu Val Gln 130 135 140 His Gly Val Tyr Asn
Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His 145 150 155 160 Asn Gly
Glu Thr 41 1178 DNA Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_3 41
gtcgacccac gcgtccgcgc accctcccgg gccgccttct cttctccagc gtccgatctc
60 ccactcccct ccctcaccgc agctctccca cctccgccct ccccccgcac
gcgctcgcca 120 cctcgccctc ccctccacgt tgctcgcacc cgcgcttata
taagtgcagg aggagctcat 180 ggcggaagct ccggcgagcc ctggcggcgg
cggcgggagc cacgagagcg ggagccccag 240 gggaggcgga ggcggtggca
gcgtcaggga gcaggacagg ttcctgccca tcgccaacat 300 cagtcgcatc
atgaagaagg ccatcccggc taacgggaag accatcccgg ctaacgggaa 360
gatcgccaag gacgctaagg agaccgtgca ggagtgcgtc tccgagttca tctccttcat
420 cactagcgag gcgagtgaca agtgccagag ggagaagcgg aagaccatca
atggcgacga 480 cctgctgtgg gccatggcca cgctggggtt tgaggactat
attgaacccc tcaaggtgta 540 cctgcagaag tacagagaga tggagggtga
tagtaagtta acttcaaaat ccagcgatgg 600 ctccattaaa aaggatgccc
ttggtcatgt gggagcaagt agctcagctg tacaagggat 660 gggtcaacaa
ggaacataca accaaggaat gggttatatg caaccccagt accataacgg 720
agatatctcg aactaatgaa gacatggacc ttttctgcga cagctgctct tccctgaggc
780 gattttttgg tctcagttat ttactaagta agacaccttg cggtgaccat
taaagagtaa 840 ccaatcaccc tcggtaggtc cgtttttatc tgcaagaact
gatgaggccg cttggtagga 900 gtaaatcgct tttcctggga acgattgttg
gttagcgccg ctactgtatg tatattgaga 960 taccttaacg attggtcttt
tggctgccat ttggttacat gtatttgtat cgggaggcat 1020 aaatattgtg
taatttgtgt taaagactgg tgtaattgaa ctatgggaag agctgctttg 1080
gttgtaacca tattttgatg cccgtatatt aggcaaaaat agaaggctgt gggcgtgcac
1140
aacaaaaaaa aaaaggagga aaaaaaaagg gcggccgc 1178 42 185 PRT Zea mays
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_3 polypeptide 42 Met Ala Glu Ala Pro Ala
Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu 1 5 10 15 Ser Gly Ser Pro
Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Arg Glu Gln 20 25 30 Asp Arg
Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala 35 40 45
Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Thr Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys 50
55 60 Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser
Phe 65 70 75 80 Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys
Arg Lys Thr 85 90 95 Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala
Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 100 105 110 Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr
Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met 115 120 125 Glu Gly Asp Ser Lys Leu Thr
Ser Lys Ser Ser Asp Gly Ser Ile Lys 130 135 140 Lys Asp Ala Leu Gly
His Val Gly Ala Ser Ser Ser Ala Val Gln Gly 145 150 155 160 Met Gly
Gln Gln Gly Thr Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro 165 170 175
Gln Tyr His Asn Gly Asp Ile Ser Asn 180 185 43 2109 DNA Zea mays
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_4 43 ccacgcgtcc gcccacgcgt ccgggcttgc
tgagctggag ctgatggatc tagggtttgg 60 gttgcggtga tggtcctgca
gcgcaggagg agctcatggc ggaagctccg gcgagccctg 120 gcggcggcgg
cgggagccac gagagcggga gccccagggg aggcggaggc ggtggcagcg 180
tcagggagca ggacaggttc ctgcccatcg ccaacatcag tcgcatcatg aagaaggcca
240 tcccggctaa cgggaagatc gccaaggacg ctaaggagac cgtgcaggag
tgcgtctccg 300 agttcatctc cttcatcact agcgaagcga gtgacaagtg
ccagagggag aagcggaaga 360 ccatcaatgg cgacgatctg ctgtgggcca
tggccacgct ggggtttgaa gactacattg 420 aacccctcaa ggtgtaccta
cagaagtaca gagaggtgcg tacggtgttt gggaatttgg 480 gggtcaggtc
gtgcaatcgc caatctgtca cctggccgat cgtacctctg attgaactta 540
aataatcctg ttgggcatca gcacgctaat aagtgataag tgagctatcc acttcccttc
600 caatgcttcg gccacatatt tatacttctt tagttgagga cataaagaga
ccccctgttc 660 ctgtgtacta ctccagtaaa tacagctagt aaacacatta
tttttataag gtgaaccaat 720 tcgaaagcac ttttatccat ttaatactga
acagtgatcg aaacctctat ttgatgttct 780 tacatgggat tgagttagca
ctcgtgcttg gtaagatatt ataactactc acagccctat 840 gtggctgtgt
ctgttctatg atgaaaagta gatgtaatgc aaatggataa gagcggaaag 900
agctcctaca gtagtgtaat tagagcatgt tgtagtgcaa gcttttggtt gtttacacaa
960 aagatacatg aaaccattcc actgtaggtc atatacaatc ttgcttaggg
tcctgaacat 1020 atctggtgca catggttcac atattaaatt atcaccatcc
attctagatc taacgtcttt 1080 agttgtccat tctagatcta acatctttag
ttgctctgta taattgtata ttttgcaaag 1140 aaccccttcc accactactc
tctaccactt ctaccctgct ccgagggtgt tctctgcaaa 1200 aatatataga
acacccatag atgttagata taggatgaat gatggtgatc taatatgtac 1260
accatgtgca ccaaactcag tgcaccagat atattctcga gtttatttag ctgtattttt
1320 ctatacgctc ttcgtattgg ttgaataatc tgtctaatga ggtttctctt
ttggtcttat 1380 gtctggtgga tgacatcacg gattgcagat ggagggtgat
agcaagttaa ctgctaaatc 1440 tagcgatggc tcgattaaaa aggatgctct
tggtcatgtg ggagcaagta gctcagctgc 1500 agaagggatg ggccaacagg
gagcatacaa ccaaggaatg ggttatatgc aacctcagta 1560 ccataacggg
gatatctcaa actaatgaag gtatggacct tttctgcgac agctgctctt 1620
acctgaggcg attttttttg tcttagttat ttactaagac accttgcggt gaccattaaa
1680 gagtaaccaa tcgccctcaa taggtccgtt tttatctgcc agaactgatg
aggtcgctca 1740 ctaggagtaa gtcgcttccc tgggaacggt tgtcggctag
caccgctctt gtatgtatat 1800 taagagtaac ttaatgattg gtcttttggc
tgcgatttga ttatatgtat ttgtatcggg 1860 aggcataaat attgtgtaat
ttgtgttaaa gactagtgta attgaactat gggaagagct 1920 gctttggttg
taaccatatt ttgatgcccg tatattaggc aaaaacagaa ggctgtgggc 1980
gtgcacaaca tatttactgt tcaccgaaat acttgtattg atgtatttcc gcatcaatta
2040 tagtcatcgt cagcttgtaa ctacggcaat gaataaataa aaattcactg
agtaaaaaaa 2100 aaaaaaaag 2109 44 149 PRT Zea mays
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_4 polypeptide 44 Met Ala Glu Ala Pro Ala
Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu 1 5 10 15 Ser Gly Ser Pro
Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Arg Glu Gln 20 25 30 Asp Arg
Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala 35 40 45
Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln 50
55 60 Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser
Asp 65 70 75 80 Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp
Asp Leu Leu 85 90 95 Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr
Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys 100 105 110 Val Tyr Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Val
Arg Thr Val Phe Gly Asn Leu 115 120 125 Gly Val Arg Ser Cys Asn Arg
Gln Ser Val Thr Trp Pro Ile Val Pro 130 135 140 Leu Ile Glu Leu Lys
145 45 1255 DNA Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_5 45 aattcggcac
gaggcaccct cccgggccgc ccgcgcttct ccagcgtccg atctcccact 60
cccctccctc accgcagctc tcccacctcc gccctccccc cgcacgcgct cgccacctcg
120 ccctcccctc cacgttgctc gcacccgcgc ttatataagt gcaggaggag
ctcatggcgg 180 aagctccggc gagccctggc ggcggcggcg ggagccacga
gagcgggagc cccaggggag 240 gcggaggcgg tggcagcgtc agggagcagg
acaggttcct gcccatcgcc aacatcagtc 300 gcatcatgaa gaaggccatc
ccggctaacg ggaagatcgc caaggacgct aaggagaccg 360 tgcaggagtg
cgtctccgag ttcatctcct tcatcactag cgaagcgagt gacaagtgcc 420
agagggagaa gcggaagacc atcaatggcg acgatctgct gtgggccatg gccacgctgg
480 ggtttgaaga ctacattgaa cccctcaagg tgtacctgca gaagtacaga
gagatggagg 540 gtgatagcaa gttaactgca aaatctagcg atggctcaat
taaaaaggat gcccttggtc 600 atgtgggagc aagtagctca gctgcacaag
ggatgggcca acagggagca tacaaccaag 660 gaatgggtta tatgcaaccc
cagtaccata acggggatat ctcaaactaa tgaaggcatg 720 gaccttttct
gcgacagctg ctcttccccg aggcgggttt ttgtgtcgca gttatttact 780
aagtaagaca ccttgcggtg accattaaag agtaaccaat caccctgggt aggtcaattt
840 ttatctgcaa gaactgatga ggccgcttgg taggagtaaa tcgcttttcc
tgggaacgat 900 tgttggttag cgccgctact gtatgtatat tgagatacct
taacgattgg tcttttggct 960 gccatttggt tacatgtatt tgtatttgga
ggcataagta tcgtgtaatt tgtgttatga 1020 ctagtgtatt gactattgaa
ttatcagaag agctgcttta gttgtaagat cacacaaaac 1080 agcctggaaa
gtataacaag attaaaactg aaccaaaaat gggcaataaa taaattatca 1140
catttacagt gaataaaaaa atccctgaac atggggcgtt cattctaaag aatccaaatt
1200 tacttgcact gcctggcaac ttttttactc ttttatgctg aaccctaagt ttaat
1255 46 178 PRT Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER719_5 polypeptide 46
Met Ala Glu Ala Pro Ala Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu 1 5
10 15 Ser Gly Ser Pro Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Val Arg Glu
Gln 20 25 30 Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met
Lys Lys Ala 35 40 45 Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala
Lys Glu Thr Val Gln 50 55 60 Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe
Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp 65 70 75 80 Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg
Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu 85 90 95 Trp Ala Met Ala Thr
Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys 100 105 110 Val Tyr Leu
Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly Asp Ser Lys Leu Thr 115 120 125 Ala
Lys Ser Ser Asp Gly Ser Ile Lys Lys Asp Ala Leu Gly His Val 130 135
140 Gly Ala Ser Ser Ser Ala Ala Gln Gly Met Gly Gln Gln Gly Ala Tyr
145 150 155 160 Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His Asn
Gly Asp Ile 165 170 175 Ser Asn 47 1173 DNA Zea mays G3435
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER90408_1 47 cattgggtac ctcgaggccg gccgggattc
cccatctccc ttcattgctc gctcgctcgc 60 tcgttgctct tctccagcag
cagctccttc aaatgcaaat ctctttgctg ccgacgcaga 120 gactcgccaa
atttccctcc ctcctcctag ccttctcgtc gctcctgttc ttctcgcatc 180
cccagcccag gtggtgtccc ctgtcgcgtt gatgcatgct ccctcggcgg tggccttgag
240 ctgaggcggc ggagcgatgc cggactccga caacgactcc ggcgggccga
gcaacgccgg 300 gggcgagctg tcgtcgccgc gggagcagga ccggttcctg
cccatcgcca acgtgagccg 360 gatcatgaag aaggcgctcc cggccaacgc
caagatcagc aaggacgcca aggagacggt 420 gcaggagtgc gtgtccgagt
tcatctcctt catcaccggc gaggcctccg acaagtgcca 480 gcgcgagaag
cgcaagacca tcaacggcga cgacctgctg tgggccatga ccacgctcgg 540
cttcgaggac tacgtcgagc cgctcaagca ctacctgcac aagttccgcg agatcgaggg
600 cgagagggcc gccgcgtccg ccggcgcctc gggctcgcag cagcagcagc
agcagggcga 660 gctgcccaga ggcgccgcca atgccgccgg gtacgccggg
tacggcgcgc ctggctccgg 720 cggcatgatg atgatgatga tggggcagcc
catgtacggc ggctcgcagc cgcagcaaca 780 gccgccgcag cctcagccgc
cacagcagca gcagcagcaa catcaacagc atcacatggc 840 aatgggaggc
agaggaggat tcggccaaca aggcggcggc ggtggctcct cgtcgtcgtc 900
agggcttggc cggcaagaca gggcgtgagt tgcgacgata cgttcagaat cagaatcgct
960 gatactccta cgtagaatta tacctaccta attgatgaca ccgcaccgca
cctcgttgtg 1020 ctgcctgtcc ttgtacgttt actaattatt gctgcctgta
tgtaaatcaa aatctgaggc 1080 tcccatttcg aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaagc
ggccggtgaa ctactcttcc cgtttcgttt 1140 catacgagaa tcgaactcgt
tttcaattaa aaa 1173 48 223 PRT Zea mays G3435
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER90408_1 polypeptide 48 Met Pro Asp Ser Asp Asn
Asp Ser Gly Gly Pro Ser Asn Ala Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Glu Leu Ser Ser
Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn 20 25 30 Val Ser
Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser 35 40 45
Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser 50
55 60 Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg
Lys 65 70 75 80 Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr
Leu Gly Phe 85 90 95 Glu Asp Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys His Tyr Leu
His Lys Phe Arg Glu 100 105 110 Ile Glu Gly Glu Arg Ala Ala Ala Ser
Ala Gly Ala Ser Gly Ser Gln 115 120 125 Gln Gln Gln Gln Gln Gly Glu
Leu Pro Arg Gly Ala Ala Asn Ala Ala 130 135 140 Gly Tyr Ala Gly Tyr
Gly Ala Pro Gly Ser Gly Gly Met Met Met Met 145 150 155 160 Met Met
Gly Gln Pro Met Tyr Gly Gly Ser Gln Pro Gln Gln Gln Pro 165 170 175
Pro Gln Pro Gln Pro Pro Gln Gln Gln Gln Gln Gln His Gln Gln His 180
185 190 His Met Ala Met Gly Gly Arg Gly Gly Phe Gly Gln Gln Gly Gly
Gly 195 200 205 Gly Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser Ser Gly Leu Gly Arg Gln Asp
Arg Ala 210 215 220 49 1064 DNA Zea mays G3436
ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER90408_2 49 ctcagtctca aactccccgc tctcccccgc
ccgtccagct cgtgctccgc ctccgctgct 60 ctgtcctctt ccctcctctg
cgtttctcct cagagctgtt tgacttgacc ggacagtgct 120 gttcggtggc
tcggccgcga tgccggactc cgacaacgag tccggcgggc cgagcaacgc 180
ggagttctcg tcgccgcggg agcaggaccg gttcctgccg atcgcgaacg tgagccggat
240 catgaagaag gcgctcccgg ccaacgccaa gatctccaag gacgccaagg
agacggtgca 300 ggagtgcgtg tccgagttca tctccttcat caccggcgag
gcctccgaca agtgccagcg 360 cgagaagcgc aagaccatca acggcgacga
cctgctctgg gccatgacca cgctcggctt 420 cgaggactac gtcgagccgc
tcaagctcta cctgcacaag ttccgcgagc tcgagggcga 480 gaaggcggcc
acgacgagcg cctcctccgg cccgcagccg ccgctgcaca gggagacgac 540
gccgtcgtcg tcaacgcaca atggcgcggg cgggcccgtc gggggatacg gcatgtacgg
600 cggcgcgggc gggggaagcg gtatgatcat gatgatgggg cagcccatgt
acggcggctc 660 cccgccggcc gcgtcgtccg ggtcgtaccc gcaccaccag
atggccatgg gcggaaaagg 720 tggcgcctat ggctacggcg gaggctcgtc
gtcgtcgccg tcagggctcg gcaggtagga 780 caggttgtga ccgtcgccgt
ccatgcttgc atggccatgg ccatggctcg gctcccgccg 840 ccggcttctt
gcttggtgtc ggtaattagc gctggtggcc tgcgctggtt aagttaacct 900
tcggtttttc ccccttttct tttcgtggta agtaatgttg tgctgaatgg agacagtgat
960 atggttaaga tagctccata acctctcggt aattaatcct gtgatttgta
ctcccaagct 1020 gctgctaaac tgagctatga cacaatacaa atgctgccat taac
1064 50 212 PRT Zea mays G3436 ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER90408_2
polypeptide 50 Met Pro Asp Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly Pro Ser Asn
Ala Glu Phe 1 5 10 15 Ser Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro
Ile Ala Asn Val Ser 20 25 30 Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala
Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp 35 40 45 Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu
Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile 50 55 60 Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser
Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile 65 70 75 80 Asn Gly Asp
Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp 85 90 95 Tyr
Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Leu Tyr Leu His Lys Phe Arg Glu Leu Glu 100 105
110 Gly Glu Lys Ala Ala Thr Thr Ser Ala Ser Ser Gly Pro Gln Pro Pro
115 120 125 Leu His Arg Glu Thr Thr Pro Ser Ser Ser Thr His Asn Gly
Ala Gly 130 135 140 Gly Pro Val Gly Gly Tyr Gly Met Tyr Gly Gly Ala
Gly Gly Gly Ser 145 150 155 160 Gly Met Ile Met Met Met Gly Gln Pro
Met Tyr Gly Gly Ser Pro Pro 165 170 175 Ala Ala Ser Ser Gly Ser Tyr
Pro His His Gln Met Ala Met Gly Gly 180 185 190 Lys Gly Gly Ala Tyr
Gly Tyr Gly Gly Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser Pro Ser 195 200 205 Gly Leu Gly
Arg 210 51 1818 DNA Glycine max G3473 GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_4
51 tttttaaata ataaaatgtt tctttggaaa tttcttaaaa agtatgaaca
taaatttaaa 60 ttattatttt atattaaatg cacttatgtt aatttatttg
tcttgcatac acatttaatg 120 ttatccttct ttatatctat attaaactat
atatataaag aaaagatttt gaaatttgaa 180 taagataaga gtgtccaggt
cagaggcgag cacgtgccag ataccaaagc aacggtccag 240 atcatggagc
actcaccaaa tccaagggct ccaattcgtc cgtggacact cacacttatc 300
gactaacaac ggtccacaaa tcgccacgtg tcctcaagat aaagcgttat taacccttct
360 gatccaacgg atcctgctca ttatctccca aacaaacccc tccgttccgt
ttcacctttc 420 cccttcccgc cggagccgcc gtcaccggtc gctggccacc
gtatccgacc ctcccaatac 480 accctttccg agtcccacac aaaattgcac
gattctgtga tttcaatttt caggtctcga 540 ggatttcgtt tcagaagcgc
ttccatttga cgcagaacca ccgactcaaa ccgattcgcg 600 ccgagttcgt
gactcgaatt ttcaacttct cattcatatt ccaaatcgaa tttgaaactc 660
cgaagaaaaa ttcaccgaac actgaatctc agtttccaag gagcttcttc tacgaagagc
720 gcttcaattc cacgcagaac caccaagtca agccggttcg tgactcggat
tctcaattcc 780 tcgttcattc ccgaacgaat tttaaattcc gaagaaaacc
gcaccgaaca ctgaatttca 840 gattctgaac aagtttcttc cgcgaaacag
cacagcactt caatttcacg tggaacagag 900 acaaagggat tcgtggttcg
aattctcaat cgattttcaa attccgaaca gcgaacagta 960 cttcaatttc
acgtcgaact agtcaaagcg attcaaatcg atttcgcgaa ctcgtccgat 1020
attttccctg cactgactta gtgattcgtt tcatctttct cagcgcgtct tcgatttttc
1080 cgttagtcga tggcggactc cgacaacgac tccggcggcg cgcacaacgg
cggcaagggg 1140 agcgagatgt cgccgcggga gcaggaccgg tttctcccga
tcgcgaacgt gagccgcatc 1200 atgaagaagg cgctgccggc gaacgcgaag
atctcgaagg acgcgaagga gacggtgcag 1260 gagtgcgtgt cggagttcat
cagcttccat tcaccggggg gcctcgccgg tgagtgccag 1320 aaggagaaga
ggaagacgat caacggcgat gatctgctgt gggccatgac cacgctggga 1380
ttcgaggagt acgtggagcc tctcaaggtt tatctgcata agtataggga gctggaaggg
1440 gagaaaactg ctatgatggg aaggccacat gagagggatg agggttatgg
tcatgcaact 1500 cctatgatga tcatgatggg gcatcagcag cagcagcatc
agggacacgt gtatggatct 1560 ggaactacta ctggatcagc atcttctgca
agaactagat aacaggttta tgcatgtgtt 1620 atctcatctg tttaagctta
ttaagggtgg tctttttgga tggtgatttt gtttgatttt 1680 agaaacaccc
cagctccagc ttgtaattgt tgcttgaaac ttcgttgttg agagaatata 1740
gccattattg tggatggtga tgtgacatgc acagaatttt tgtattcttc tttcttccaa
1800 tggatttatc tcgggccc 1818 52 170 PRT Glycine max G3473
GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER33504_4 polypeptide 52 Met Ala Asp Ser Asp Asn
Asp Ser Gly Gly Ala His Asn Gly Gly Lys 1 5 10 15 Gly Ser Glu Met
Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala 20 25 30 Asn Val
Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile 35 40 45
Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile 50
55 60 Ser Phe His Ser Pro Gly Gly Leu Ala Gly Glu Cys Gln Lys Glu
Lys 65 70 75 80 Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met
Thr Thr Leu 85 90 95 Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Val
Tyr Leu His Lys Tyr 100 105 110 Arg Glu Leu Glu Gly Glu Lys Thr Ala
Met Met Gly Arg Pro His Glu 115 120 125 Arg Asp Glu Gly Tyr Gly His
Ala Thr Pro Met Met Ile Met Met Gly 130 135 140 His Gln Gln Gln Gln
His Gln Gly His Val Tyr Gly Ser Gly Thr Thr 145 150 155
160 Thr Gly Ser Ala Ser Ser Ala Arg Thr Arg 165 170 53 943 DNA
Oryza sativa ORYSA-22JAN02-CLUSTER119015_1 53 ctccgccccc ccccgcgcct
tcccccctct ctctcctctc ctctccgcga ctccctccac 60 ccccgcgcgc
gcgcgttttt ttttttgcgt aagggttttt ggagggcggc gcggggatgg 120
cggacgcggg gcacgacgag agcgggagcc cgccgaggag cggcggggtg agggagcagg
180 acaggttcct gcccatcgcc aacatcagcc gcatcatgaa gaaggccgtc
ccggcgaacg 240 gcaagatcgc caaggacgcc aaggagaccc tgcaggagtg
cgtctcggag ttcatctcct 300 tcgtcaccag cgaggcgagc gacaaatgtc
agaaggagaa gcgcaagacc atcaacgggg 360 aagatctcct ctttgcgatg
ggtacgcttg gctttgagga gtacgttgat ccgttgaaga 420 tctatttaca
caagtacaga gagatggagg gtgatagtaa gctgtcctca aaggctggtg 480
atggttcagt aaagaaggat acaattggtc cgcacagtgg cgctagtagc tcaagtgcgc
540 aagggatggt tggggcttac acccaaggga tgggttatat gcaacctcag
tatcataatg 600 gggacaccta aagatgagga cagtgaaaat tttcagtaac
tggtgtcctc tgtgagttat 660 tatccatctg ttaaggaaga acccacatta
gggccatatt tattagtaga agactaaagc 720 acttgaaggg tgttggttta
gaaagggtgt taacagttgg ctgtggcgat tgcttcacag 780 atgtaaattg
cttcataagt ggtttaatgc ttgtttttgc ctgtatattc agagcaattt 840
tcacatattg gtagttctgc aatcttttgc attcccatac atgtatcagg tggcacaaat
900 ctattgcaag taccctagca ttgaataatg ctggttaaca tat 943 54 164 PRT
Oryza sativa ORYSA-22JAN02-CLUSTER119015_1 polypeptide 54 Met Ala
Asp Ala Gly His Asp Glu Ser Gly Ser Pro Pro Arg Ser Gly 1 5 10 15
Gly Val Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg 20
25 30 Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp
Ala 35 40 45 Lys Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser
Phe Val Thr 50 55 60 Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys
Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn 65 70 75 80 Gly Glu Asp Leu Leu Phe Ala Met Gly
Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr 85 90 95 Val Asp Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr
Leu His Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly 100 105 110 Asp Ser Lys Leu Ser
Ser Lys Ala Gly Asp Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp 115 120 125 Thr Ile Gly
Pro His Ser Gly Ala Ser Ser Ser Ser Ala Gln Gly Met 130 135 140 Val
Gly Ala Tyr Thr Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His 145 150
155 160 Asn Gly Asp Thr 55 870 DNA Zea mays Zm_S11418173 55
gaattccgga taagcgcagg aggagctcat ggcggaagct ccggcgagcc ctggcggcgg
60 cggcgggagc cacgagagcg ggagccccag gggaggcgga ggcggtggca
gcgtcaggga 120 gcaggacagg ttcctgccca tcgccaacat cagtcgcatc
atgaagaagg ccatcccggc 180 taacgggaag atcgccaagg acgctaagga
gaccgtgcag gagtgcgtct ccgagttcat 240 ctccttcatc actagcgaag
cgagtgacaa gtgccagagg gagaagcgga agaccatcaa 300 tggcgacgat
ctgctgtggg ccatggccac gctggggttt gaagactaca ttgaacccct 360
caaggtgtac ctacagaagt acagagagat ggagggtgat agcaagttaa ctgctaaatc
420 tagcgatggc tcgattaaaa aggatgctct tggtcatgtg ggagcaagta
gctcagctgc 480 agaagggatg ggccaacagg gagcatacaa ccaaggaatg
ggttatatgc aacctcagta 540 ccataacggg gatatctcaa actaatgaag
gtatggacct tttctgcgac agctgctctt 600 acctgaggcg attttttttg
tcttagttat ttactaagac accttgcggt gaccattaaa 660 gagtaaccaa
tcgccctcaa taggtccgtt tttatctgcc agaactgatg aggtcgctca 720
ctaggagtaa gtcgcttccc tgggaacggt tgtcggctag caccgctctt gtatgtatat
780 taagagtaac ttaatgattg gtcttttggc tgcgatttga tttgattata
tgtatttgta 840 tcgggaggca taaatattgt gtaattgtgt 870 56 183 PRT Zea
mays Zm_S11418173 polypeptide 56 Ala Gln Glu Glu Leu Met Ala Glu
Ala Pro Ala Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Gly Ser His Glu Ser
Gly Ser Pro Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 20 25 30 Ser Val Arg Glu
Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg 35 40 45 Ile Met
Lys Lys Ala Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala 50 55 60
Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr 65
70 75 80 Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr
Ile Asn 85 90 95 Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly
Phe Glu Asp Tyr 100 105 110 Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu Gln Lys
Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly 115 120 125 Asp Ser Lys Leu Thr Ala Lys Ser
Ser Asp Gly Ser Ile Lys Lys Asp 130 135 140 Ala Leu Gly His Val Gly
Ala Ser Ser Ser Ala Ala Glu Gly Met Gly 145 150 155 160 Gln Gln Gly
Ala Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr 165 170 175 His
Asn Gly Asp Ile Ser Asn 180 57 734 DNA Zea mays misc_feature
(712)..(712) n is a, c, g, or t 57 tttttttttt ttttttaatc accattattt
aggcctagga ctactatatt atatttatgc 60 tgaataatac atatctgtaa
atgtaaaagg ttgccaaaag tagcaacagt caaatcatcc 120 taaatatacg
gacaaaagca gcgctaaacc gaagccaatt tacacctgag aggcagccat 180
cgcagagatt aacacccttt gtaagtgcct cctgttttct gccaatacac atggtaagca
240 atgcagagac ttccctagca taaattgctg ctgtattagc cctttattag
gtttccccat 300 tgtggtactg tggctgcata tagcccatcc cttggttgta
gactccatgc tgaaccaact 360 gattacttga gctactggtg ccaccatggg
gactaattgc atccttcttt acagagccct 420 cgccagcctt tgtagacagc
ttgctatcac cctccatctc tttgtacttt tgtaggtaaa 480 tcttgagagg
ctcgacgtac tcctcgaatc ctaaagtggc catcgcccag agcaaatcgt 540
ccccgttgat tgtctttcgt ttctccttct ggcatttgtc gctggcctcg ctggtcacga
600 atgatatgaa ctcggagacg cactcctgca gggtctcctt agcgtccttg
gcgatcttgc 660 cgttggccgg gacggccttc ttcatgatcc ggctgatgtt
ggcgatgggc angaaccggt 720 cctgctcccg gacg 734 58 148 PRT Zea mays
misc_feature (8)..(8) Xaa can be any naturally occurring amino acid
58 Val Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Xaa Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile
1 5 10 15 Met Lys Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp
Ala Lys 20 25 30 Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser
Phe Val Thr Ser 35 40 45 Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys
Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly 50 55 60 Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala
Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Val 65 70 75 80 Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr
Leu Gln Lys Tyr Lys Glu Met Glu Gly Asp 85 90 95 Ser Lys Leu Ser
Thr Lys Ala Gly Glu Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp Ala 100 105 110 Ile Ser
Pro His Gly Gly Thr Ser Ser Ser Ser Asn Gln Leu Val Gln 115 120 125
His Gly Val Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His 130
135 140 Asn Gly Glu Thr 145 59 720 DNA Triticum aestivum
misc_feature (2)..(2) n is a, c, g, or t 59 cnccccccan aannagtttg
attacccctg ctcgaaatta accctcacta aagggaacaa 60 aagctggagc
tccaccgcgg tggcggccgc tctagaacta gtggatcccc cgggctgcag 120
gaattcggca ccagccacca ccttccctcc ctccacgcgc ccgtctatat aaggaggagg
180 gccggatgtc ggacgcgccg gcgagccccc cgggcggcgg cggcggcgga
ggaggcggcg 240 gcagcgacga cggcggcggc ggcggcggct tcggcggcgt
cagggagcag gacaggttcc 300 tgcccatcgc caacatcagc cgcatcatga
agaaggccat cccggccaac ggcaagatcg 360 ccaaggacgc caaggagacc
gtgcaggagt gcgtctccga gttcatctcc ttcatcacca 420 gcgaggcgag
cgacaagtgc cagagggaga agcgcaagac catcaacggc gacgacctgc 480
tctgggcgat ggcgacgctg ggcttcgagg agtacatcga gcccctcaag gtttatctgc
540 agaagtacag agagacggag ggtgatagta agctagctgg aaagtctggt
gaagtctctg 600 ttaaaaagga tgcacttggt cctcatggag gagcaagtgg
cacaagtgcg caagggatgg 660 gccaacaagt acatacaatc caagaatggn
ttatatgcaa cctcagtacc ataatggggg 720 60 179 PRT Triticum aestivum
misc_feature (169)..(169) Xaa can be any naturally occurring amino
acid 60 Met Ser Asp Ala Pro Ala Ser Pro Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly
Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Gly Gly Ser Asp Asp Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Phe
Gly Gly Val 20 25 30 Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn
Ile Ser Arg Ile Met 35 40 45 Lys Lys Ala Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys
Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu 50 55 60 Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser
Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu 65 70 75 80 Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys
Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp 85 90 95 Asp Leu Leu
Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Ile Glu 100 105 110 Pro
Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Thr Glu Gly Asp Ser 115 120
125 Lys Leu Ala Gly Lys Ser Gly Glu Val Ser Val Lys Lys Asp Ala Leu
130 135 140 Gly Pro His Gly Gly Ala Ser Gly Thr Ser Ala Gln Gly Met
Gly Gln 145 150 155 160 Gln Val His Thr Ile Gln Glu Trp Xaa Ile Cys
Asn Leu Ser Thr Ile 165 170 175 Met Gly Xaa 61 924 DNA Triticum
aestivum misc_feature (285)..(285) n is a, c, g, or t 61 ggcacgagca
cagatcgagg aggaggagga gccatgccgg agtcggacaa cgactccggc 60
gggccgagca acaccggcgg ggagggggag ctgtcatcgc cgcgggagca ggaccgcttc
120 ctgcccatcg ccaatgtcag ccggatcatg aagaaggcgc tcccggccaa
cgccaagatc 180 agcaaggacg ccaaggagac ggtgcaggag tgcgtctccg
agttcatctc cttcatcacc 240 ggcgaggcct ccgacaagtg ccagcgcgag
aagcgcaaga ccatnaacgg cgacgacctg 300 ctctgggcca tgaccaccct
cggcttcgag gactatgtcg acccgctcaa gcactacctn 360 cacaagttcc
gcgagatcga gggcnagagg gccgccgcca catcaacatc aaccacgccc 420
gacatgccaa gaaacaacaa caacaatgcc cgccggttac cccgacgccc cgggaggcat
480 gatgatgatg gggcagccca tgtaccggtt ngccggccgc accacaagga
gcangnaccc 540 aacatnaaaa ttgcaatggg gaggggagaa gcgggctttt
nctattttgg aggcgggggn 600 gggtcntcgt natcctnnng ggttttgacc
gaaaaaanng ganacctttt cctttttctt 660 ttcttttctt tttggannct
gaccnnaagg ggaggggntt ttcaaacttn tgttncttct 720 ttttgggtga
aaaccctnct tgtnanctta aaattctttt cnnccccagg ggnggggaan 780
atnttntttt ttccccncgt tgnttgaaaa cctttttttt ttaaantttt ncgnttnttc
840 ccctgcnaaa aaaanttttt ttttttttna aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaat
tngaggnttt 900 tttaagnggg gcggggcccn annt 924 62 268 PRT Triticum
aestivum misc_feature (95)..(95) Xaa can be any naturally occurring
amino acid 62 Gly Thr Ser Thr Asp Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Ala Met Pro
Glu Ser Asp 1 5 10 15 Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly Pro Ser Asn Thr Gly Gly
Glu Gly Glu Leu Ser 20 25 30 Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu
Pro Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg 35 40 45 Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro
Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp Ala 50 55 60 Lys Glu Thr Val Gln
Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr 65 70 75 80 Gly Glu Ala
Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Xaa Asn 85 90 95 Gly
Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr 100 105
110 Val Asp Pro Leu Lys His Tyr Xaa His Lys Phe Arg Glu Ile Glu Gly
115 120 125 Xaa Arg Ala Ala Ala Thr Ser Thr Ser Thr Thr Pro Asp Met
Pro Arg 130 135 140 Asn Asn Asn Asn Asn Ala Arg Arg Leu Pro Arg Arg
Pro Gly Arg His 145 150 155 160 Asp Asp Asp Gly Ala Ala His Val Pro
Val Xaa Arg Pro His His Lys 165 170 175 Glu Xaa Xaa Pro Asn Xaa Lys
Ile Ala Met Gly Arg Gly Glu Ala Gly 180 185 190 Phe Xaa Tyr Phe Gly
Gly Gly Xaa Gly Xaa Ser Xaa Ser Xaa Xaa Val 195 200 205 Leu Thr Glu
Lys Xaa Gly Xaa Leu Phe Leu Phe Leu Phe Phe Ser Phe 210 215 220 Trp
Xaa Leu Thr Xaa Arg Gly Gly Xaa Phe Gln Thr Xaa Val Xaa Ser 225 230
235 240 Phe Trp Val Lys Thr Xaa Leu Xaa Xaa Leu Lys Phe Phe Xaa Xaa
Pro 245 250 255 Gly Xaa Gly Xaa Xaa Xaa Phe Phe Pro Xaa Val Xaa 260
265 63 935 DNA Lycopersicon esculentum SGN-UNIGENE-46859 63
agagaaaaga gattcttttt atatatagtt ataaaaaaat ttcagagttt tctttgtaaa
60 acgaacggtg ttgatagggc aaaatccaaa actctgcctc atctcagtcg
tctccctttc 120 tcccttcttc tccaacgtcc gatcttccag ttccctccat
ccccagtatg gcggatggtc 180 aaggttcgtc taggtcaccg gcgagtccaa
acggaggtgg tagtcatgag agtggtgggg 240 accagagtcc gaggtctaat
gtacgtgaac aggacaggtt tttaccaata gctaatatta 300 gtagaatcat
gaagaaggca cttcctgcta atggaaaaat tgcgaaggat gctaaggaga 360
ctgttcagga atgtgtttct gagttcatca gcttcattac tagcgaggca agtgacaagt
420 gccagagaga gaaaaggaag actattaatg gtgacgattt gctatgggca
atggcaactc 480 ttgggtttga agattatatt gaaccactca aggtgtatct
tgctcgatac agagagatgg 540 agggaacgtc aaaggctgct gatggctcta
ctaaaagaga tgggatgcaa cctggtccta 600 attcacagct tgcacatcag
ggttcatact cacaaggaat gaattatggg aattctcagg 660 gtcagcatat
gatggtcccg atgcaaggaa ctgagtaaaa atccgatctt cgtcctgttt 720
gagaagacgg gtggagttga aaacatatta tatatataga tggttcttct gctgtaacct
780 ctgtaacatg gtttattaat tctagtgctc tctagtgagt gccatgtcat
atttaaagtt 840 tgtaaattga ggagatgttt taagaaatat tatagacatg
attgtttgta gtaataatga 900 aaaccattac ctagtaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaa
935 64 176 PRT Lycopersicon esculentum SGN-UNIGENE-46859
polypeptide 64 Met Ala Asp Gly Gln Gly Ser Ser Arg Ser Pro Ala Ser
Pro Asn Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Gly Ser His Glu Ser Gly Gly Asp Gln Ser
Pro Arg Ser Asn Val 20 25 30 Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile
Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met 35 40 45 Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn
Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu 50 55 60 Thr Val Gln Glu Cys
Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu 65 70 75 80 Ala Ser Asp
Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp 85 90 95 Asp
Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu 100 105
110 Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu Ala Arg Tyr Arg Glu Met Glu Gly Thr Ser
115 120 125 Lys Ala Ala Asp Gly Ser Thr Lys Arg Asp Gly Met Gln Pro
Gly Pro 130 135 140 Asn Ser Gln Leu Ala His Gln Gly Ser Tyr Ser Gln
Gly Met Asn Tyr 145 150 155 160 Gly Asn Ser Gln Gly Gln His Met Met
Val Pro Met Gln Gly Thr Glu 165 170 175 65 1004 DNA Lycopersicon
esculentum SGN-UNIGENE-47447 65 agtgcttcaa catttttctc cctgacatat
tgtttattat tagtttcata aaaaaaatta 60 taaaaatttt ctccattttc
ttgttcttaa agcttgtgta ctatcatagg caaatacaag 120 actgcgtata
catcaatgtc ttcggacttt actcgtagaa ttacatttac gacagaataa 180
agttgtgcat atcgtaccac ttgtgagatt actccgggta atttctcttt tgtattgatc
240 ggaacagaat ttaggcgatt tcgatggcgg attcggataa tgaatcagga
ggacatagag 300 ataacagtaa cattgagagt tccctaagag aacaagacag
gttccttccc atagcaaatg 360 taagcagaat catgaagaaa gctttaccag
ctaacgcgaa aatctcaaaa gatgctaagg 420 aggtagttca agaatgtgtt
tctgaattca taagtttcat cacaggggaa gcatcagata 480 agtgtcaaag
agaaaagaga aagacaatca atggtgatga tctgttgtgg gcaatgacaa 540
ctcttggttt tgaagaatac attgagccac tcaagattta tttgcagagg tttagggatt
600 tggaagggca aaaaagtggt gtctctggag agaaggatca tagtggatca
gtgggttatg 660 ttgaggacta ccatggcatg atgatgatgg ggagtcaaca
tcatcaagga cgcgggtatg 720 gcaccggtgt atacaatcat catacggggg
agaatgctgc aggggttggt acaggagggt 780 cgcggtttcc tgacgttggg
aggcaaaggt gaagctgtga catccgcgga ctacaaagat 840 gtatcaggac
gcgatgtatc aactgtcaac aggttgaagt atggacactg aaagacagga 900
acagactttg tagtttgtat tctacagaga tgtaaattgg taaacatgtg tgtacattac
960 aatgtgggtg taaacatgga ttgtaattgt ctattaaaaa aaaa 1004 66 182
PRT Lycopersicon esculentum SGN-UNIGENE-47447 polypeptide 66 Met
Ala Asp Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly His Arg Asp Asn Ser Asn 1 5 10
15 Ile Glu Ser Ser Leu Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn
20 25 30 Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys
Ile Ser 35 40 45 Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Val Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser
Glu Phe Ile Ser 50 55 60 Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys
Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys 65 70 75 80 Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu
Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe 85 90 95 Glu Glu Tyr Ile Glu Pro
Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Gln Arg Phe Arg Asp 100 105 110 Leu Glu Gly Gln
Lys Ser Gly Val Ser Gly Glu Lys Asp His Ser Gly 115 120 125 Ser Val
Gly Tyr Val Glu Asp Tyr His Gly Met Met Met Met Gly Ser 130 135 140
Gln His His Gln Gly Arg Gly Tyr Gly Thr Gly Val Tyr Asn His His 145
150 155
160 Thr Gly Glu Asn Ala Ala Gly Val Gly Thr Gly Gly Ser Arg Phe Pro
165 170 175 Asp Val Gly Arg Gln Arg 180 67 609 DNA Arabidopsis
thaliana G1820 67 atggctgaga acaacaacaa caacggcgac aacatgaaca
acgacaacca ccagcaacca 60 ccgtcgtact cgcagctgcc gccgatggca
tcatccaacc ctcagttacg taattactgg 120 attgagcaga tggaaaccgt
ctcggatttc aaaaaccgtc agcttccatt ggctcgaatt 180 aagaagatca
tgaaggctga tccagatgtg cacatggtct ccgcagaggc tccgatcatc 240
ttcgcaaagg cttgcgaaat gttcatcgtt gatctcacga tgcggtcgtg gctcaaagcc
300 gaggagaaca aacgccacac gcttcagaaa tcggatatct ccaacgcagt
ggctagctct 360 ttcacctacg atttccttct tgatgttgtc cctaaggacg
agtctatcgc caccgctgat 420 cctggctttg tggctatgcc acatcctgac
ggtggaggag taccgcaata ttattatcca 480 ccgggagtgg tgatgggaac
tcctatggtt ggtagtggaa tgtacgcgcc atcgcaggcg 540 tggccagcag
cggctggtga cggggaggat gatgctgagg ataatggagg aaacggcggc 600
ggaaattga 609 68 202 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana G1820 polypeptide 68
Met Ala Glu Asn Asn Asn Asn Asn Gly Asp Asn Met Asn Asn Asp Asn 1 5
10 15 His Gln Gln Pro Pro Ser Tyr Ser Gln Leu Pro Pro Met Ala Ser
Ser 20 25 30 Asn Pro Gln Leu Arg Asn Tyr Trp Ile Glu Gln Met Glu
Thr Val Ser 35 40 45 Asp Phe Lys Asn Arg Gln Leu Pro Leu Ala Arg
Ile Lys Lys Ile Met 50 55 60 Lys Ala Asp Pro Asp Val His Met Val
Ser Ala Glu Ala Pro Ile Ile 65 70 75 80 Phe Ala Lys Ala Cys Glu Met
Phe Ile Val Asp Leu Thr Met Arg Ser 85 90 95 Trp Leu Lys Ala Glu
Glu Asn Lys Arg His Thr Leu Gln Lys Ser Asp 100 105 110 Ile Ser Asn
Ala Val Ala Ser Ser Phe Thr Tyr Asp Phe Leu Leu Asp 115 120 125 Val
Val Pro Lys Asp Glu Ser Ile Ala Thr Ala Asp Pro Gly Phe Val 130 135
140 Ala Met Pro His Pro Asp Gly Gly Gly Val Pro Gln Tyr Tyr Tyr Pro
145 150 155 160 Pro Gly Val Val Met Gly Thr Pro Met Val Gly Ser Gly
Met Tyr Ala 165 170 175 Pro Ser Gln Ala Trp Pro Ala Ala Ala Gly Asp
Gly Glu Asp Asp Ala 180 185 190 Glu Asp Asn Gly Gly Asn Gly Gly Gly
Asn 195 200 69 483 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G1248 69 atggcgggga
attatcattc gttccaaaat ccaatccctc gataccagaa ttacaacttc 60
gggagcagct catctaatca tcaacatgaa catgatgggt tagtggtggt ggtggaggat
120 caacagcaag aagaaagcat gatggtaaaa gaacaagaca ggctacttcc
gatagcaaac 180 gtaggaagga tcatgaagaa catcctccca gcaaacgcaa
aggtctctaa agaagccaaa 240 gagactatgc aagaatgtgt gtccgagttc
attagcttcg tcacgggaga agcatccgat 300 aaatgccaca aggagaagcg
aaagaccgtt aatggagacg atatctgttg ggctatggct 360 aatctagggt
ttgatgatta cgccgcccag ctcaagaagt acttacatcg ttaccgagtt 420
ctcgaaggtg agaaacctaa tcatcacggc aaaggaggac ctaaatcctc gccagataat
480 taa 483 70 160 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana G1248 polypeptide 70
Met Ala Gly Asn Tyr His Ser Phe Gln Asn Pro Ile Pro Arg Tyr Gln 1 5
10 15 Asn Tyr Asn Phe Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser Asn His Gln His Glu His
Asp 20 25 30 Gly Leu Val Val Val Val Glu Asp Gln Gln Gln Glu Glu
Ser Met Met 35 40 45 Val Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg Leu Leu Pro Ile Ala
Asn Val Gly Arg Ile 50 55 60 Met Lys Asn Ile Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala
Lys Val Ser Lys Glu Ala Lys 65 70 75 80 Glu Thr Met Gln Glu Cys Val
Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Gly 85 90 95 Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys
Cys His Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Val Asn Gly 100 105 110 Asp Asp Ile
Cys Trp Ala Met Ala Asn Leu Gly Phe Asp Asp Tyr Ala 115 120 125 Ala
Gln Leu Lys Lys Tyr Leu His Arg Tyr Arg Val Leu Glu Gly Glu 130 135
140 Lys Pro Asn His His Gly Lys Gly Gly Pro Lys Ser Ser Pro Asp Asn
145 150 155 160 71 757 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana G1781 71 cgtcgaccag
attgatcaca tgtggttaac atcaatcaaa aaaaaaaaca aagagataga 60
gatatgactg aggagagccc agaagaagat catgggtctc ctggagtagc tgaaacaaat
120 ccaggaagcc cttcttcaaa gaccaacaac aacaacaaca acaacaaaga
acaagaccgg 180 tttcttccca ttgcgaatgt cggaaggatc atgaaaaaag
ttcttcccgg taacggtaag 240 atctcaaaag acgctaaaga aaccgttcaa
gaatgtgtct cggagttcat tagtttcgtc 300 actggtgaag cttctgacaa
gtgtcaaaga gaaaagagga agaccatcaa tggagatgat 360 atcatttggg
ctatcacaac tctcggtttc gaagactacg tggctccatt aaaggtctac 420
ctctgcaaat atagagacac cgaaggagag aaagttaaca gcccaaaaca acaacaacaa
480 agacaacaac aacagcagat tcaacaacag aatcatcata attatcagtt
tcaagaacaa 540 gaccaaaaca ataacaacat gtcatgtact agttacatct
ctcatcatca tccttctcca 600 ttcctaccag tggatcatca accttttccc
aatattgctt tctctcctaa atcattgcag 660 aaacagttcc cgcagcagca
tgataataac attgattcaa ttcactggtg agagagacat 720 ttgcttgcgg
gccgctctag gcgggaaaag cccgaat 757 72 215 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana
G1781 polypeptide 72 Met Thr Glu Glu Ser Pro Glu Glu Asp His Gly
Ser Pro Gly Val Ala 1 5 10 15 Glu Thr Asn Pro Gly Ser Pro Ser Ser
Lys Thr Asn Asn Asn Asn Asn 20 25 30 Asn Asn Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg
Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Val Gly Arg 35 40 45 Ile Met Lys Lys Val
Leu Pro Gly Asn Gly Lys Ile Ser Lys Asp Ala 50 55 60 Lys Glu Thr
Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr 65 70 75 80 Gly
Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn 85 90
95 Gly Asp Asp Ile Ile Trp Ala Ile Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr
100 105 110 Val Ala Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu Cys Lys Tyr Arg Asp Thr
Glu Gly 115 120 125 Glu Lys Val Asn Ser Pro Lys Gln Gln Gln Gln Arg
Gln Gln Gln Gln 130 135 140 Gln Ile Gln Gln Gln Asn His His Asn Tyr
Gln Phe Gln Glu Gln Asp 145 150 155 160 Gln Asn Asn Asn Asn Met Ser
Cys Thr Ser Tyr Ile Ser His His His 165 170 175 Pro Ser Pro Phe Leu
Pro Val Asp His Gln Pro Phe Pro Asn Ile Ala 180 185 190 Phe Ser Pro
Lys Ser Leu Gln Lys Gln Phe Pro Gln Gln His Asp Asn 195 200 205 Asn
Ile Asp Ser Ile His Trp 210 215 73 610 DNA Oryza sativa G3395 73
tggatctagg gtttttggag ggcggcgcgg ggatggcgga cgcggggcac gacgagagcg
60 ggagcccgcc gaggagcggc ggggtgaggg agcaggacag gttcctgccc
atcgccaaca 120 tcagccgcat catgaagaag gccgtcccgg cgaacggcaa
gatcgccaag gacgccaagg 180 agaccctgca ggagtgcgtc tcggagttca
tctccttcgt caccagcgag gcgagcgaca 240 aatgtcagaa ggagaagcgc
aagaccatca acggggaaga tctcctcttt gcgatgggta 300 cgcttggctt
tgaggagtac gttgatccgt tgaagatcta tttacacaag tacagagaga 360
tggagggtga tagtaagctg tcctcaaagg ctggtgatgg ttcagtaaag aaggatacaa
420 ttggtccgca cagtggcgct agtagctcaa gtgcgcaagg gatggttggg
gcttacaccc 480 aagggatggg ttatatgcaa cctcagtatc ataatgggga
cacctaaaga tgaggatagt 540 gaaaattttc agtaactggt gtcctctgtg
agttattatc catctgttaa ggaagaaccc 600 acattagggc 610 74 164 PRT
Oryza sativa G3395 polypeptide 74 Met Ala Asp Ala Gly His Asp Glu
Ser Gly Ser Pro Pro Arg Ser Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Val Arg Glu Gln Asp
Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg 20 25 30 Ile Met Lys Lys
Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala 35 40 45 Lys Glu
Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr 50 55 60
Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn 65
70 75 80 Gly Glu Asp Leu Leu Phe Ala Met Gly Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu
Glu Tyr 85 90 95 Val Asp Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu His Lys Tyr Arg
Glu Met Glu Gly 100 105 110 Asp Ser Lys Leu Ser Ser Lys Ala Gly Asp
Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp 115 120 125 Thr Ile Gly Pro His Ser Gly Ala
Ser Ser Ser Ser Ala Gln Gly Met 130 135 140 Val Gly Ala Tyr Thr Gln
Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His 145 150 155 160 Asn Gly Asp
Thr 75 761 DNA Oryza sativa G3398 AP005193 75 cctctcctct tcgtcttcct
cctcgccttc gcttcgactg cttcgatcga gggagatcga 60 ggttgcgatg
ccggattcgg acaacgagtc aggggggccg agcaacgcgg gggagtacgc 120
gtcggcgagg gagcaggaca ggttcctgcc gatcgcgaac gtgagcagga tcatgaagag
180 ggcgctcccg gcgaacgcca agatcagcaa ggacgccaag gagacggtgc
aggagtgcgt 240 ctcggagttc atctccttca tcaccggcga ggcctccgac
aagtgccagc gggagaagcg 300 caagaccatc aacggcgacg acctcctctg
ggcgatgacc acgctcggct tcgaggacta 360 catcgacccg ctcaagctct
acctccacaa gttccgcgag ctcgagggcg agaaggccat 420 cggcgccgcc
ggcagcggcg gcggtggcgc cgcctcctcc ggcggctccg gctccggctc 480
cggctcgcac caccaccagg atgcttcccg gaacaatggc ggatacggca tgtacggcgg
540 cggcggcggc atgatcatga tgatgggaca gcctatgtac ggctcgccgc
cggcgtcgtc 600 agctgggtac gcgcagccgc cgccgcccca ccaccaccac
caccagatgg tgatgggagg 660 gaaaggtgcg tatggccatg gcggcggcgg
cggcggcggg ccctccccgt cgtcgggata 720 cggccggcaa gacaggctat
gagcttgctt tcttggttgg t 761 76 224 PRT Oryza sativa G3398 AP005193
polypeptide 76 Met Pro Asp Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly Pro Ser Asn
Ala Gly Glu 1 5 10 15 Tyr Ala Ser Ala Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu
Pro Ile Ala Asn Val 20 25 30 Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Arg Ala Leu Pro
Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile Ser Lys 35 40 45 Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln
Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe 50 55 60 Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala
Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr 65 70 75 80 Ile Asn Gly
Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 85 90 95 Asp
Tyr Ile Asp Pro Leu Lys Leu Tyr Leu His Lys Phe Arg Glu Leu 100 105
110 Glu Gly Glu Lys Ala Ile Gly Ala Ala Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Ala
115 120 125 Ala Ser Ser Gly Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Ser Gly Ser His His
His Gln 130 135 140 Asp Ala Ser Arg Asn Asn Gly Gly Tyr Gly Met Tyr
Gly Gly Gly Gly 145 150 155 160 Gly Met Ile Met Met Met Gly Gln Pro
Met Tyr Gly Ser Pro Pro Ala 165 170 175 Ser Ser Ala Gly Tyr Ala Gln
Pro Pro Pro Pro His His His His His 180 185 190 Gln Met Val Met Gly
Gly Lys Gly Ala Tyr Gly His Gly Gly Gly Gly 195 200 205 Gly Gly Gly
Pro Ser Pro Ser Ser Gly Tyr Gly Arg Gln Asp Arg Leu 210 215 220 77
856 DNA Zea mays G3434 77 ctcccgcccc cttctctccc ctcctcgcct
ccccgcgcgc gcgtttttat aagggttgcg 60 gcggaggcgc ccggtcgctg
gcgatggccg acgacggcgg gagccacgag ggcagcggcg 120 gcggcggagg
cgtccgggag caggaccggt tcctgcccat cgccaacatc agccggatca 180
tgaagaaggc cgtcccggcc aacggcaaga tcgccaagga cgctaaggag accctgcagg
240 agtgcgtctc cgagttcata tcattcgtga ccagcgaggc cagcgacaaa
tgccagaagg 300 agaaacgaaa gacaatcaac ggggacgatt tgctctgggc
gatggccact ttaggattcg 360 aggagtacgt cgagcctctc aagatttacc
tacaaaagta caaagagatg gagggtgata 420 gcaagctgtc tacaaaggct
ggcgagggct ctgtaaagaa ggatgcaatt agtccccatg 480 gtggcaccag
tagctcaagt aatcagttgg ttcagcatgg agtctacaac caagggatgg 540
gctatatgca gccacagtac cacaatgggg aaacctaata aagggctaat acagcagcaa
600 tttatgctag ggaagtctct gcattgctta ccatgtgtat tggcagaaaa
caggaggcac 660 ttacaaaggg tgttaatctc tgcgatggct gcctctcagg
tgtaaattgg cttcggttta 720 gcgctgcttt tgtccgtata tttaggatga
tttgactgtt gctacttttg gcaacctttt 780 acatttacag atatgtatta
ttcagcataa atataatata gtagtcctag gcctaaataa 840 tggtgattaa aaaaaa
856 78 164 PRT Zea mays G3434 polypeptide 78 Met Ala Asp Asp Gly
Gly Ser His Glu Gly Ser Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 1 5 10 15 Val Arg Glu
Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile 20 25 30 Met
Lys Lys Ala Val Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys 35 40
45 Glu Thr Leu Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Val Thr Ser
50 55 60 Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile
Asn Gly 65 70 75 80 Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe
Glu Glu Tyr Val 85 90 95 Glu Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu Gln Lys Tyr
Lys Glu Met Glu Gly Asp 100 105 110 Ser Lys Leu Ser Thr Lys Ala Gly
Glu Gly Ser Val Lys Lys Asp Ala 115 120 125 Ile Ser Pro His Gly Gly
Thr Ser Ser Ser Ser Asn Gln Leu Val Gln 130 135 140 His Gly Val Tyr
Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro Gln Tyr His 145 150 155 160 Asn
Gly Glu Thr 79 772 DNA Glycine max G3472 79 agactttagc tttacacaac
atattattgt aaggctagct agctagccat ggctgagtcg 60 gacaacgagt
ccggaggtca cacggggaac gcaagcggaa gcaacgaatt ctccggttgc 120
agggagcaag acaggttcct tccgatagcg aacgtgagca ggatcatgaa gaaggcgttg
180 ccggcgaacg cgaagatctc gaaggaggcg aaggagacgg tgcaggagtg
cgtgtcggag 240 ttcatcagct tcataacagg agaagcgtcc gataagtgcc
agaaggagaa gaggaagacg 300 atcaacggcg atgatctgct gtgggccatg
accacgctgg gattcgagga gtacgtggag 360 cctctcaagg tttatctgca
taagtatagg gagctggaag gggagaaaac tgctatgatg 420 ggaaggccac
atgagaggga tgagggttat ggtcatgcaa ctcctatgat gatcatgatg 480
gggcatcaac agcagcagca tcagggacac gtgtatggat ctggaactac tactggatca
540 gcatcttctg caagaactag ataacaggtt tatgcatgtg ttatctcatc
tgtttaagct 600 tattaattga ttactataag gatggtgata tttgatttat
attctgtttg attttagaaa 660 cacacccgct ccagcttgta attgttgctt
gaaacttcgt tgttgagaga atatagacat 720 tattgtggat ggtgatgtga
catgcacaga atttttgtat tcttctttct tt 772 80 171 PRT Glycine max
G3472 polypeptide 80 Met Ala Glu Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly His
Thr Gly Asn Ala Ser 1 5 10 15 Gly Ser Asn Glu Phe Ser Gly Cys Arg
Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro 20 25 30 Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg Ile
Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala 35 40 45 Lys Ile Ser Lys Glu
Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu 50 55 60 Phe Ile Ser
Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu 65 70 75 80 Lys
Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr 85 90
95 Leu Gly Phe Glu Glu Tyr Val Glu Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu His Lys
100 105 110 Tyr Arg Glu Leu Glu Gly Glu Lys Thr Ala Met Met Gly Arg
Pro His 115 120 125 Glu Arg Asp Glu Gly Tyr Gly His Ala Thr Pro Met
Met Ile Met Met 130 135 140 Gly His Gln Gln Gln Gln His Gln Gly His
Val Tyr Gly Ser Gly Thr 145 150 155 160 Thr Thr Gly Ser Ala Ser Ser
Ala Arg Thr Arg 165 170 81 1000 DNA Glycine max G3474 81 taataaggtt
gtatatggtt tggtgggatg gctcgagagt ctttagaaaa gatatccatg 60
gctgagtccg acaacgagtc aggaggtcac acggggaacg cgagcgggag caacgagttg
120 tccggttgca gggagcaaga caggttcctc ccaatagcaa acgtgagcag
gatcatgaag 180 aaggcgttgc cggcgaacgc gaagatatcg aaggaggcga
aggagacggt gcaggagtgc 240 gtgtcggagt tcatcagctt cataacagga
gaggcttccg ataagtgcca gaaggagaag 300 aggaagacga tcaacggcga
cgatcttctc tgggccatga ctaccctggg cttcgaggac 360 tacgtggatc
ctctcaagat ttacctgcac aagtataggg agatggaggg ggagaaaacc 420
gctatgatgg gaaggccaca tgagagggat gagggttatg gccatggcca tggtcatgca
480 actcctatga tgacgatgat gatggggcat cagccccagc accagcacca
gcaccagcac 540 cagcaccagc accagggaca cgtgtatgga tctggatcag
catcttctgc aagaactaga 600 tagcatgtgt catctgttta agcttaattg
attttattat gaggatgata tgatataaga 660 tttatattcg tatatgtttg
gttttagaaa tacaccagct ccagcttgta attgcttgaa 720 acttccttgt
tgagagaata tagacattat tgtggatggt gatgtggcat atgtggcata 780
cacagaattt ttgtattctt ctttctctct atggattttt gtgtaagggc aggactatgg
840 ctttgtttgc tgatcgtata gctagtatgg tgctatctag gttcggattt
ttttcttttt 900 catgtataat gaaaaattaa cggaggaaat tactcttacg
ttactttgaa attaattaac 960 taaatcccgc ttctgccttt ttttttttct
cctttctgag 1000 82 181 PRT Glycine max G3474 polypeptide 82 Met Ala
Glu Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Gly His Thr Gly Asn Ala Ser 1 5 10 15
Gly Ser Asn Glu Leu Ser Gly Cys Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro 20
25 30 Ile Ala Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu
Pro Ala Asn Ala 35 40 45 Lys Ile Ser Lys Glu Ala Lys Glu Thr Val
Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu 50 55 60 Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu
Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Lys Glu 65 70 75 80 Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn
Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr 85 90 95 Leu Gly Phe Glu
Asp Tyr Val Asp Pro Leu Lys Ile Tyr Leu His Lys 100 105 110 Tyr Arg
Glu Met Glu Gly Glu Lys Thr Ala Met Met Gly Arg Pro His 115 120 125
Glu Arg Asp Glu Gly Tyr Gly His Gly His Gly His Ala Thr Pro Met 130
135 140 Met Thr Met Met Met Gly His Gln Pro Gln His Gln His Gln His
Gln 145 150 155 160 His Gln His Gln His Gln Gly His Val Tyr Gly Ser
Gly Ser Ala Ser 165 170 175 Ser Ala Arg Thr Arg 180 83 967 DNA
Glycine max G3477 83 tcccctcaat ttttttcact tccctctcat ctcccataat
acatgtttct tctataaaca 60 tcatcatcaa caacaaacaa aggtgcattg
gtggttggtt tgtgagaaat cagaaatatt 120 ttgtattgta atttgtaggg
tttgtgagat gtcggatgca ccggcgagtc cgagtcacga 180 gagtggtggc
gagcagagcc ctcgcggctc gttgtccggc gcggctagag agcaggaccg 240
gtaccttccc attgccaaca tcagccgcat catgaagaag gctctgcctc ccaatggcaa
300 gattgcgaag gatgcaaaag acacaatgca agaatgcgtt tctgaattca
tcagcttcat 360 taccagcgag gcgagtgaga aatgccagaa ggagaagaga
aagacaatca atggagacga 420 tttactatgg gccatggcaa ctttagggtt
tgaagactac attgagccgc ttaaggtgta 480 cctggctagg tacagagagg
cggagggtga cactaaagga tctgctagaa gtggtgatgg 540 atctgctaca
ccagatcaag ttggccttgc aggtcaaaat tctcagcttg ttcatcaggg 600
ttcgctgaac tatattggtt tgcaggtgca accacaacat ctggttatgc cttcaatgca
660 aagccatgaa tagtttagat gcttctacgc atcttattta tttcccttta
atgcttgtac 720 gcatggcatg ggtggaaaca attgtctggt gatttaatat
ttaggttctc gtgtagaagg 780 gtgtcagaat tttgttacgg tactaatgta
gatttttatt aatacatgtc ttatttagct 840 ttgtaatacc tactcaaggg
agagatgtgt ttagggttat gctagtgatt cgccatgtag 900 cttgtcaggg
tgagaagcac ttgcttttag agttttcttt agattattat ataatatata 960 atatttg
967 84 174 PRT Glycine max G3477 polypeptide 84 Met Ser Asp Ala Pro
Ala Ser Pro Ser His Glu Ser Gly Gly Glu Gln 1 5 10 15 Ser Pro Arg
Gly Ser Leu Ser Gly Ala Ala Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Tyr 20 25 30 Leu
Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Pro 35 40
45 Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys Asp Ala Lys Asp Thr Met Gln Glu Cys Val
50 55 60 Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Glu Lys
Cys Gln 65 70 75 80 Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu
Leu Trp Ala Met 85 90 95 Ala Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu Asp Tyr Ile Glu
Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr Leu 100 105 110 Ala Arg Tyr Arg Glu Ala Glu Gly
Asp Thr Lys Gly Ser Ala Arg Ser 115 120 125 Gly Asp Gly Ser Ala Thr
Pro Asp Gln Val Gly Leu Ala Gly Gln Asn 130 135 140 Ser Gln Leu Val
His Gln Gly Ser Leu Asn Tyr Ile Gly Leu Gln Val 145 150 155 160 Gln
Pro Gln His Leu Val Met Pro Ser Met Gln Ser His Glu 165 170 85 864
DNA Glycine max G3478 85 gattcaaatc gatttcgcga actcgtccga
tattttccct gcactgactt agtgattcgt 60 ttcatctttc tcagcgcgtc
ttcgattttt ccgttagtcg atggcggact ccgacaacga 120 ctccggcggc
gcgcacaacg gcggcaaggg gagcgagatg tcgccgcggg agcaggaccg 180
gtttctcccg atcgcgaacg tgagccgcat catgaagaag gcgctgccgg cgaacgcgaa
240 gatctcgaag gacgcgaagg agacggtgca ggagtgcgtg tcagagttca
tcagcttcat 300 caccggcgag gcctccgaca agtgccagcg cgagaagcgc
aagacgatca acggcgacga 360 cctgctctgg gcgatgacca ctctgggctt
cgaggactac gtggagcctc tcaaaggcta 420 cctccagcgc ttccgagaaa
tggaaggaga gaagaccgtg gcggcgcgtg acaaggacgc 480 gcctcctctt
acgaatgcta ccaacagtgc ctacgagagt gctaattatg ctgctgctgc 540
tgctgttcct ggtggaatca tgatgcatca gggacacgtg tacggttctg ccggcttcca
600 tcaagtggct ggcggggcta taaagggtgg gcctgcttat cctgggcctg
gatccaatgc 660 cggtaggccc agataaatga gcctattatt attagtagta
agttaaaaag aaaaatgtga 720 tatagtggtg attagactga actagtttca
acaaggtcta atttgattgg taaagaatga 780 tgcatcacct cttcatctct
attcgattct tattgataaa aaaaaaatta gagtgaacta 840 gtataataat
tctgagagag ttgg 864 86 191 PRT Glycine max G3478 polypeptide 86 Met
Ala Asp Ser Asp Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly Ala His Asn Gly Gly Lys 1 5 10
15 Gly Ser Glu Met Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala
20 25 30 Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala
Lys Ile 35 40 45 Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val
Ser Glu Phe Ile 50 55 60 Ser Phe Ile Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys
Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg 65 70 75 80 Lys Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu
Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly 85 90 95 Phe Glu Asp Tyr Val Glu
Pro Leu Lys Gly Tyr Leu Gln Arg Phe Arg 100 105 110 Glu Met Glu Gly
Glu Lys Thr Val Ala Ala Arg Asp Lys Asp Ala Pro 115 120 125 Pro Leu
Thr Asn Ala Thr Asn Ser Ala Tyr Glu Ser Ala Asn Tyr Ala 130 135 140
Ala Ala Ala Ala Val Pro Gly Gly Ile Met Met His Gln Gly His Val 145
150 155 160 Tyr Gly Ser Ala Gly Phe His Gln Val Ala Gly Gly Ala Ile
Lys Gly 165 170 175 Gly Pro Ala Tyr Pro Gly Pro Gly Ser Asn Ala Gly
Arg Pro Arg 180 185 190 87 1231 DNA Oryza sativa G3394 Cl26105_1 87
ggccgcttct cttctccagc gtccgatctc cccctctcgc ctctccgcct cacctccgct
60 ccgcttccca cccccgcttc ctctctctct cctctccccc cccctctctc
tctctctctc 120 tctctctctc tcctcctcgc ttcaccacct cgcgcccaac
ccccctctct ctcctctcca 180 cgtcgcgccc tctccgcgcg cgcccgcgct
tctatataag gaggggggag gtgggatggc 240 ggatgggccg gggagcccgg
ggggaggagg ggggagccac gagagcggga gcccgagggg 300 gggaggggga
ggagggggag gtgggggtgg ggggggccca ctcgtccggc aggacaggtt 360
cctccccatc gccaacatca gccgcatcat gaagaaggcc atcccggcca acgggaagat
420 cgccaaggac gccaaggaga ccgtgcagga gtgcgtctcc gagttcatct
ccttcatcac 480 cagcgaggcg agcgataaat gccagaggga gaagcgcaag
accatcaacg gcgacgactt 540 gctgtgggcg atggccacgc tgggcttcga
ggactacatc gagcccctca aggtctacct 600 gcagaagtac agagagatgg
agggtgatag taaattaact gcaaaggctg gtgatggctc 660 tgtgaaaaag
gatgtacttg gttctcatgg aggaagcagt tcaagtgccc aagggatggg 720
ccaacaagca gcatacaatc aaggaatggg ttatatgcaa cctcagtacc ataatgggga
780 tgtctcaaac tgaagatagg accttttcat gcaactgttg ctaggtggat
tttatttggt 840 gctgcagtcg ttagctaata tatataccta cacctcatgg
tgagcagtga aggaagtaac 900 ttgctaccac ctctaggtcc catgtttgtc
aaccaggaac tgatgctgct tggaagcgtc 960 gagccaaggc tgcttctcag
atgtaaatta ctccccgtga ggatagtttc ggttcgtggt 1020 ctagctctgt
tgttgtatgt atattcagga taatttaaca attggtcttt ggctgtcatt 1080
cggttccata taatctgtat tgggaggcat aaatattcat gttgtatttc gtcctgaact
1140 agcgtgttgt actattgaga aatagatgct ctctgtaatg gtagcaattt
tactctgatt 1200 cccaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa aaaaaaaaaa a 1231 88 185 PRT
Oryza sativa G3394 Cl26105_1 polypeptide 88 Met Ala Asp Gly Pro Gly
Ser Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser His Glu 1 5 10 15 Ser Gly Ser Pro
Arg Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 20 25 30 Gly Gly
Pro Leu Val Arg Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn Ile 35 40 45
Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Lys Ala Ile Pro Ala Asn Gly Lys Ile Ala Lys 50
55 60 Asp Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile Ser
Phe 65 70 75 80 Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys
Arg Lys Thr 85 90 95 Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Ala
Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 100 105 110 Asp Tyr Ile Glu Pro Leu Lys Val Tyr
Leu Gln Lys Tyr Arg Glu Met 115 120 125 Glu Gly Asp Ser Lys Leu Thr
Ala Lys Ala Gly Asp Gly Ser Val Lys 130 135 140 Lys Asp Val Leu Gly
Ser His Gly Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser Ala Gln Gly 145 150 155 160 Met Gly
Gln Gln Ala Ala Tyr Asn Gln Gly Met Gly Tyr Met Gln Pro 165 170 175
Gln Tyr His Asn Gly Asp Val Ser Asn 180 185 89 837 DNA Oryza sativa
G3396 89 gtcgagatcc ggcggccggt ggcgtcctcc tccctctccc tcctccccaa
ccaacggcgc 60 tgatcccctc cgccatctcc gtccatctcc gcctaaaaaa
actaagcgat gtcggagggg 120 ttcgacggga cggagaacgg cggcggcggc
ggcggaggcg gagtagggaa ggagcaggac 180 cggttcctgc cgatcgccaa
catcggccgc atcatgcgcc gggccgtgcc ggagaacggc 240 aagatcgcca
aggactccaa ggagtccgtc caggagtgcg tctccgagtt catcagcttc 300
atcaccagcg aagcaagcga caagtgcctc aaggagaagc gcaagaccat caatggggac
360 gacctgatct ggtcaatggg cacgctcgga ttcgaggact atgtcgagcc
tctcaagctc 420 tacctcaggc tctaccggga gacggagggt gacacaaagg
gttcaagagc ttctgaactg 480 ccagtaaaga aagatgttgt acttaatgga
gatcctggat catcgtttga aggcatgtag 540 gacgaggagt gtgatagcat
ctaggaagga gaaccatcgt ttttagggaa agaacgctcc 600 agcatcctgt
tatgttgtaa gcaggatgct tctaaagttc caataccttg ttaccacgaa 660
tgttagtcgt cgttcttttt gaaatgttct tgtgttagcc aggatgtcca aatttgttgt
720 aggttctagt tcagtcgtgt gttgtgtggt tgtgtctaac catatttggc
cgtttccggc 780 tgtcctgcat atgctaaatt cagaggggta aagagatcta
agaaaaaaaa aaaaaaa 837 90 143 PRT Oryza sativa G3396 polypeptide 90
Met Ser Glu Gly Phe Asp Gly Thr Glu Asn Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly 1 5
10 15 Gly Gly Val Gly Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn
Ile 20 25 30 Gly Arg Ile Met Arg Arg Ala Val Pro Glu Asn Gly Lys
Ile Ala Lys 35 40 45 Asp Ser Lys Glu Ser Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser
Glu Phe Ile Ser Phe 50 55 60 Ile Thr Ser Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys
Leu Lys Glu Lys Arg Lys Thr 65 70 75 80 Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Ile
Trp Ser Met Gly Thr Leu Gly Phe Glu 85 90 95 Asp Tyr Val Glu Pro
Leu Lys Leu Tyr Leu Arg Leu Tyr Arg Glu Thr 100 105 110 Glu Gly Asp
Thr Lys Gly Ser Arg Ala Ser Glu Leu Pro Val Lys Lys 115 120 125 Asp
Val Val Leu Asn Gly Asp Pro Gly Ser Ser Phe Glu Gly Met 130 135 140
91 720 DNA Oryza sativa G3397 AC120529 91 gcgtctgatt tgctgaagag
gaggaggagg atgccggact cggacaacga ctccggcggg 60 ccgagcaact
acgcgggagg ggagctgtcg tcgccgcggg agcaggacag gttcctgccg 120
atcgcgaacg tgagcaggat catgaagaag gcgctgccgg cgaacgccaa gatcagcaag
180 gacgccaagg agacggtgca ggagtgcgtc tccgagttca tctccttcat
caccggcgag 240 gcctccgaca agtgccagcg cgagaagcgc aagaccatca
acggcgacga cctgctctgg 300 gccatgacca ccctcggctt cgaggactac
gtcgaccccc tcaagcacta cctccacaag 360 ttccgcgaga tcgagggcga
gcgcgccgcc gcctccacca ccggcgccgg caccagcgcc 420 gcctccacca
cgccgccgca gcagcagcac accgccaatg ccgccggcgg ctacgccggg 480
tacgccgccc cgggagccgg ccccggcggc atgatgatga tgatggggca gcccatgtac
540 ggctcgccgc caccgccgcc acagcagcag cagcagcaac accaccacat
ggcaatggga 600 ggaagaggcg gcttcggtca tcatcccggc ggcggcggcg
gcgggtcgtc gtcgtcgtcg 660 gggcacggtc ggcaaaacag gggcgcttga
catcgctccg agacgagtag catgcaccat 720 92 219 PRT Oryza sativa G3397
AC120529 polypeptide 92 Met Pro Asp Ser Asp Asn Asp Ser Gly Gly Pro
Ser Asn Tyr Ala Gly 1 5 10 15 Gly Glu Leu Ser Ser Pro Arg Glu Gln
Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala 20 25 30 Asn Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys
Lys Ala Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile 35 40 45 Ser Lys Asp Ala Lys
Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu Phe Ile 50 55 60 Ser Phe Ile
Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln Arg Glu Lys Arg 65 70 75 80 Lys
Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly 85 90
95 Phe Glu Asp Tyr Val Asp Pro Leu Lys His Tyr Leu His Lys Phe Arg
100 105 110 Glu Ile Glu Gly Glu Arg Ala Ala Ala Ser Thr Thr Gly Ala
Gly Thr 115 120 125 Ser Ala Ala Ser Thr Thr Pro Pro Gln Gln Gln His
Thr Ala Asn Ala 130 135 140 Ala Gly Gly Tyr Ala Gly Tyr Ala Ala Pro
Gly Ala Gly Pro Gly Gly 145 150 155 160 Met Met Met Met Met Gly Gln
Pro Met Tyr Gly Ser Pro Pro Pro Pro 165 170 175 Pro Gln Gln Gln Gln
Gln Gln His His His Met Ala Met Gly Gly Arg 180 185 190 Gly Gly Phe
Gly His His Pro Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Gly Ser Ser Ser 195 200 205 Ser
Ser Gly His Gly Arg Gln Asn Arg Gly Ala 210 215 93 1322 DNA Zea
mays G3437 93 tattgtctat gagggaagca gatcctctac gctgcaattg
ggccactgac atgtgggacc 60 aggtctagat tggacccaca catcaatgac
cgaaatgcag aagagggtct cgttgccact 120 gtaagctatc tcctagagtt
cagagcaggg caagaatctt gcaatgctca catgaacata 180 atataatcgt
tgtgttagct atgcgtcggc atcactaccg tcctcccact ggcatctccc 240
gtctactatt ttgggacgaa cagaacagag acactagcta actagcttat tagcttgctc
300 ccctccttcc tttcaagctt taaaaggaga ccatctcttg caccacctct
tcatccatcc 360 ggccaagcaa ggggcatgaa gaacaggaag ggctacgggc
accagggcca cctgctgagc 420 cccgtgggca gcccgctgtc ggacaacgag
tccggcgccg cggcagcggc cggcggcggc 480 gggtgcggga gcagcgtggg
gtactgcggc ggcggcggcg gtgagtcgcc ggccaaggag 540 caagaccggt
tcctgccgat cgccaacgtg tcgcgcatca tgaagcgctc cctgccggcg 600
aacgccaaga tctccaagga ggccaaggag acggtgcagg agtgcgtgtc cgagttcatc
660 agcttcgtca cgggggaggc ctccgacaag tgccagcgcg agaagcgcaa
gaccatcaac 720 ggcgacgacc tgctctgggc catgaccacg ctcggcttcg
aggcctacgt cgccccgctc 780 aagtcctacc tcaaccgcta ccgcgaggcc
gagggcgaga aggccgccgt gctcggcggc 840 ggcgcgcgcc acggcgacgg
cgcggcgcgg cggacgacgc cggcccactc gccgcgcaat 900 ggcgcgggcg
ggcccgtcgg gggatacggc atgtacggcg gcgcgggcgg gggaagcggt 960
atgatcatga tgatggggca gcccatgtac ggcggctccc cgccggccgc gtcgtccggg
1020 tcgtacccgc accaccagat ggccatgggc ggaaaaggtg gcgcctatgg
ctacggcgga 1080 ggctcgtcgt cgtcgccgtc agggctcggc aggtaggcca
ggttgtgacc gtcgccgtcc 1140 atgcttgcat ggccatggca tggctcagtc
ccgccgccgg cttcttgctt ggtgtcggta 1200 attagcgctg gttaagttaa
ccttcggttt ttcccccctt ttcttttcgt ggtaagtaat 1260 gttgtgctga
atggagccag tgatatggtt aagatagctc cataacctct cggtaaaaaa 1320 aa 1322
94 246 PRT Zea mays G3437 polypeptide 94 Met Lys Asn Arg Lys Gly
Tyr Gly His Gln Gly His Leu Leu Ser Pro 1 5 10 15 Val Gly Ser Pro
Leu Ser Asp Asn Glu Ser Gly Ala Ala Ala Ala Ala 20 25 30 Gly Gly
Gly Gly Cys Gly Ser Ser Val Gly Tyr Cys Gly Gly Gly Gly 35 40 45
Gly Glu Ser Pro Ala Lys Glu Gln Asp Arg Phe Leu Pro Ile Ala Asn 50
55 60 Val Ser Arg Ile Met Lys Arg Ser Leu Pro Ala Asn Ala Lys Ile
Ser 65 70 75 80 Lys Glu Ala Lys Glu Thr Val Gln Glu Cys Val Ser Glu
Phe Ile Ser 85 90 95 Phe Val Thr Gly Glu Ala Ser Asp Lys Cys Gln
Arg Glu Lys Arg Lys 100 105 110 Thr Ile Asn Gly Asp Asp Leu Leu Trp
Ala Met Thr Thr Leu Gly Phe 115 120 125 Glu Ala Tyr Val Ala Pro Leu
Lys Ser Tyr Leu Asn Arg Tyr Arg Glu 130 135 140 Ala Glu Gly Glu Lys
Ala Ala Val Leu Gly Gly Gly Ala Arg His Gly 145 150 155 160 Asp Gly
Ala Ala Arg Arg Thr Thr Pro Ala His Ser Pro Arg Asn Gly 165 170 175
Ala Gly Gly Pro Val Gly Gly Tyr Gly Met Tyr Gly Gly Ala Gly Gly 180
185 190 Gly Ser Gly Met Ile Met Met Met Gly Gln Pro Met Tyr Gly Gly
Ser 195 200 205 Pro Pro Ala Ala Ser Ser Gly Ser Tyr Pro His His Gln
Met Ala Met 210 215 220 Gly Gly Lys Gly Gly Ala Tyr Gly Tyr Gly Gly
Gly Ser Ser Ser Ser 225 230 235 240 Pro Ser Gly Leu Gly Arg 245 95
929 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 95 cttgaaaaag aatctacctg
aaaagaaaaa aaagagagag agatataaat agctttacca 60 agacagatat
actatctttt attaatccaa aaagactgag aactctagta actacgtact 120
acttaaacct tatccagttt cttgaaacag agtactctga tcaatgaact cattttcagc
180 tttttctgaa atgtttggct ccgattacga gcctcaaggc ggagattatt
gtccgacgtt 240 ggccacgagt tgtccgaaga aaccggcggg ccgtaagaag
tttcgtgaga ctcgtcaccc 300 aatttacaga ggagttcgtc aaagaaactc
cggtaagtgg gtttctgaag tgagagagcc 360 aaacaagaaa accaggattt
ggctcgggac tttccaaacc gctgagatgg cagctcgtgc 420 tcacgacgtc
gctgcattag ccctccgtgg ccgatcagca tgtctcaact tcgctgactc
480 ggcttggcgg ctacgaatcc cggagtcaac atgcgccaag gatatccaaa
aagcggctgc 540 tgaagcggcg ttggcttttc aagatgagac gtgtgatacg
acgaccacga atcatggcct 600 ggacatggag gagacgatgg tggaagctat
ttatacaccg gaacagagcg aaggtgcgtt 660 ttatatggat gaggagacaa
tgtttgggat gccgactttg ttggataata tggctgaagg 720 catgctttta
ccgccgccgt ctgttcaatg gaatcataat tatgacggcg aaggagatgg 780
tgacgtgtcg ctttggagtt actaatattc gatagtcgtt tccatttttg tactatagtt
840 tgaaaatatt ctagttcctt tttttagaat ggttccttca ttttatttta
ttttattgtt 900 gtagaaacga gtggaaaata attcaatac 929 96 213 PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana CBF1 polypeptide 96 Met Asn Ser Phe Ser Ala
Phe Ser Glu Met Phe Gly Ser Asp Tyr Glu 1 5 10 15 Pro Gln Gly Gly
Asp Tyr Cys Pro Thr Leu Ala Thr Ser Cys Pro Lys 20 25 30 Lys Pro
Ala Gly Arg Lys Lys Phe Arg Glu Thr Arg His Pro Ile Tyr 35 40 45
Arg Gly Val Arg Gln Arg Asn Ser Gly Lys Trp Val Ser Glu Val Arg 50
55 60 Glu Pro Asn Lys Lys Thr Arg Ile Trp Leu Gly Thr Phe Gln Thr
Ala 65 70 75 80 Glu Met Ala Ala Arg Ala His Asp Val Ala Ala Leu Ala
Leu Arg Gly 85 90 95 Arg Ser Ala Cys Leu Asn Phe Ala Asp Ser Ala
Trp Arg Leu Arg Ile 100 105 110 Pro Glu Ser Thr Cys Ala Lys Asp Ile
Gln Lys Ala Ala Ala Glu Ala 115 120 125 Ala Leu Ala Phe Gln Asp Glu
Thr Cys Asp Thr Thr Thr Thr Asn His 130 135 140 Gly Leu Asp Met Glu
Glu Thr Met Val Glu Ala Ile Tyr Thr Pro Glu 145 150 155 160 Gln Ser
Glu Gly Ala Phe Tyr Met Asp Glu Glu Thr Met Phe Gly Met 165 170 175
Pro Thr Leu Leu Asp Asn Met Ala Glu Gly Met Leu Leu Pro Pro Pro 180
185 190 Ser Val Gln Trp Asn His Asn Tyr Asp Gly Glu Gly Asp Gly Asp
Val 195 200 205 Ser Leu Trp Ser Tyr 210 97 803 DNA Arabidopsis
thaliana CBF2 97 ctgatcaatg aactcatttt ctgccttttc tgaaatgttt
ggctccgatt acgagtctcc 60 ggtttcctca ggcggtgatt acagtccgaa
gcttgccacg agctgcccca agaaaccagc 120 gggaaggaag aagtttcgtg
agactcgtca cccaatttac agaggagttc gtcaaagaaa 180 ctccggtaag
tgggtgtgtg agttgagaga gccaaacaag aaaacgagga tttggctcgg 240
gactttccaa accgctgaga tggcagctcg tgctcacgac gtcgccgcca tagctctccg
300 tggcagatct gcctgtctca atttcgctga ctcggcttgg cggctacgaa
tcccggaatc 360 aacctgtgcc aaggaaatcc aaaaggcggc ggctgaagcc
gcgttgaatt ttcaagatga 420 gatgtgtcat atgacgacgg atgctcatgg
tcttgacatg gaggagacct tggtggaggc 480 tatttatacg ccggaacaga
gccaagatgc gttttatatg gatgaagagg cgatgttggg 540 gatgtctagt
ttgttggata acatggccga agggatgctt ttaccgtcgc cgtcggttca 600
atggaactat aattttgatg tcgagggaga tgatgacgtg tccttatgga gctattaaaa
660 ttcgattttt atttccattt ttggtattat agctttttat acatttgatc
cttttttaga 720 atggatcttc ttcttttttt ggttgtgaga aacgaatgta
aatggtaaaa gttgttgtca 780 aatgcaaatg tttttgagtg cag 803 98 207 PRT
Arabidopsis thaliana CBF2 polypeptide 98 Met Phe Gly Ser Asp Tyr
Glu Ser Pro Val Ser Ser Gly Gly Asp Tyr 1 5 10 15 Ser Pro Lys Leu
Ala Thr Ser Cys Pro Lys Lys Pro Ala Gly Arg Lys 20 25 30 Lys Phe
Arg Glu Thr Arg His Pro Ile Tyr Arg Gly Val Arg Gln Arg 35 40 45
Asn Ser Gly Lys Trp Val Cys Glu Leu Arg Glu Pro Asn Lys Lys Thr 50
55 60 Arg Ile Trp Leu Gly Thr Phe Gln Thr Ala Glu Met Ala Ala Arg
Ala 65 70 75 80 His Asp Val Ala Ala Ile Ala Leu Arg Gly Arg Ser Ala
Cys Leu Asn 85 90 95 Phe Ala Asp Ser Ala Trp Arg Leu Arg Ile Pro
Glu Ser Thr Cys Ala 100 105 110 Lys Glu Ile Gln Lys Ala Ala Ala Glu
Ala Ala Leu Asn Phe Gln Asp 115 120 125 Glu Met Cys His Met Thr Thr
Asp Ala His Gly Leu Asp Met Glu Glu 130 135 140 Thr Leu Val Glu Ala
Ile Tyr Thr Pro Glu Gln Ser Gln Asp Ala Phe 145 150 155 160 Tyr Met
Asp Glu Glu Ala Met Leu Gly Met Ser Ser Leu Leu Asp Asn 165 170 175
Met Ala Glu Gly Met Leu Leu Pro Ser Pro Ser Val Gln Trp Asn Tyr 180
185 190 Asn Phe Asp Val Glu Gly Asp Asp Asp Val Ser Leu Trp Ser Tyr
195 200 205 99 908 DNA Arabidopsis thaliana misc_feature
(851)..(851) n is a, c, g, or t 99 cctgaactag aacagaaaga gagagaaact
attatttcag caaaccatac caacaaaaaa 60 gacagagatc ttttagttac
cttatccagt ttcttgaaac agagtactct tctgatcaat 120 gaactcattt
tctgcttttt ctgaaatgtt tggctccgat tacgagtctt cggtttcctc 180
aggcggtgat tatattccga cgcttgcgag cagctgcccc aagaaaccgg cgggtcgtaa
240 gaagtttcgt gagactcgtc acccaatata cagaggagtt cgtcggagaa
actccggtaa 300 gtgggtttgt gaggttagag aaccaaacaa gaaaacaagg
atttggctcg gaacatttca 360 aaccgctgag atggcagctc gagctcacga
cgttgccgct ttagcccttc gtggccgatc 420 agcctgtctc aatttcgctg
actcggcttg gagactccga atcccggaat caacttgcgc 480 taaggacatc
caaaaggcgg cggctgaagc tgcgttggcg tttcaggatg agatgtgtga 540
tgcgacgacg gatcatggct tcgacatgga ggagacgttg gtggaggcta tttacacggc
600 ggaacagagc gaaaatgcgt tttatatgca cgatgaggcg atgtttgaga
tgccgagttt 660 gttggctaat atggcagaag ggatgctttt gccgcttccg
tccgtacagt ggaatcataa 720 tcatgaagtc gacggcgatg atgacgacgt
atcgttatgg agttattaaa actcagatta 780 ttatttccat ttttagtacg
atacttttta ttttattatt atttttagat ccttttttag 840 aatggaatct
ncattatgtt tgtaaaactg agaaacgagt gtaaattaaa ttgattcagt 900 ttcagtat
908 100 216 PRT Arabidopsis thaliana CBF3 polypeptide 100 Met Asn
Ser Phe Ser Ala Phe Ser Glu Met Phe Gly Ser Asp Tyr Glu 1 5 10 15
Ser Ser Val Ser Ser Gly Gly Asp Tyr Ile Pro Thr Leu Ala Ser Ser 20
25 30 Cys Pro Lys Lys Pro Ala Gly Arg Lys Lys Phe Arg Glu Thr Arg
His 35 40 45 Pro Ile Tyr Arg Gly Val Arg Arg Arg Asn Ser Gly Lys
Trp Val Cys 50 55 60 Glu Val Arg Glu Pro Asn Lys Lys Thr Arg Ile
Trp Leu Gly Thr Phe 65 70 75 80 Gln Thr Ala Glu Met Ala Ala Arg Ala
His Asp Val Ala Ala Leu Ala 85 90 95 Leu Arg Gly Arg Ser Ala Cys
Leu Asn Phe Ala Asp Ser Ala Trp Arg 100 105 110 Leu Arg Ile Pro Glu
Ser Thr Cys Ala Lys Asp Ile Gln Lys Ala Ala 115 120 125 Ala Glu Ala
Ala Leu Ala Phe Gln Asp Glu Met Cys Asp Ala Thr Thr 130 135 140 Asp
His Gly Phe Asp Met Glu Glu Thr Leu Val Glu Ala Ile Tyr Thr 145 150
155 160 Ala Glu Gln Ser Glu Asn Ala Phe Tyr Met His Asp Glu Ala Met
Phe 165 170 175 Glu Met Pro Ser Leu Leu Ala Asn Met Ala Glu Gly Met
Leu Leu Pro 180 185 190 Leu Pro Ser Val Gln Trp Asn His Asn His Glu
Val Asp Gly Asp Asp 195 200 205 Asp Asp Val Ser Leu Trp Ser Tyr 210
215 101 632 DNA Brassica napus bnCBF1 101 cacccgatat accggggagt
tcgtctgaga aagtcaggta agtgggtgtg tgaagtgagg 60 gaaccaaaca
agaaatctag aatttggctt ggaactttca aaacagctga gatggcagct 120
cgtgctcacg acgtcgctgc cctagccctc cgtggaagag gcgcctgcct caattatgcg
180 gactcggctt ggcggctccg catcccggag acaacctgcc acaaggatat
ccagaaggct 240 gctgctgaag ccgcattggc ttttgaggct gagaaaagtg
atgtgacgat gcaaaatggc 300 cagaacatgg aggagacgac ggcggtggct
tctcaggctg aagtgaatga cacgacgaca 360 gaacatggca tgaacatgga
ggaggcaacg gcagtggctt ctcaggctga ggtgaatgac 420 acgacgacgg
atcatggcgt agacatggag gagacaatgg tggaggctgt ttttactggg 480
gaacaaagtg aagggtttaa catggcgaag gagtcgacgg tggaggctgc tgttgttacg
540 gaggaaccga gcaaaggatc ttacatggac gaggagtgga tgctcgagat
gccgaccttg 600 ttggctgata tggcagaagg gatgctcctg cc 632 102 208 PRT
Brassica napus bnCBF1 polypeptide 102 His Pro Ile Tyr Arg Gly Val
Arg Leu Arg Lys Ser Gly Lys Trp Val 1 5 10 15 Cys Glu Val Arg Glu
Pro Asn Lys Lys Ser Arg Ile Trp Leu Gly Thr 20 25 30 Phe Lys Thr
Ala Glu Met Ala Ala Arg Ala His Asp Val Ala Ala Leu 35 40 45 Ala
Leu Arg Gly Arg Gly Ala Cys Leu Asn Tyr Ala Asp Ser Ala Trp 50 55
60 Arg Leu Arg Ile Pro Glu Thr Thr Cys His Lys Asp Ile Gln Lys Ala
65 70 75 80 Ala Ala Glu Ala Ala Leu Ala Phe Glu Ala Glu Lys Ser Asp
Val Thr 85 90 95 Met Gln Asn Gly Gln Asn Met Glu Glu Thr Thr Ala
Val Ala Ser Gln 100 105 110 Ala Glu Val Asn Asp Thr Thr Thr Glu His
Gly Met Asn Met Glu Glu 115 120 125 Ala Thr Ala Val Ala Ser Gln Ala
Glu Val Asn Asp Thr Thr Thr Asp 130 135 140 His Gly Val Asp Met Glu
Glu Thr Met Val Glu Ala Val Phe Thr Gly 145 150 155 160 Glu Gln Ser
Glu Gly Phe Asn Met Ala Lys Glu Ser Thr Val Glu Ala 165 170 175 Ala
Val Val Thr Glu Glu Pro Ser Lys Gly Ser Tyr Met Asp Glu Glu 180 185
190 Trp Met Leu Glu Met Pro Thr Leu Leu Ala Asp Met Ala Glu Gly Met
195 200 205 103 20 DNA artificial sequence Artificial sequence 103
cayccnatht aymgnggngt 20 104 21 DNA artificial sequence Artificial
sequence 104 ggnarnarca tnccytcngc c 21
* * * * *