U.S. patent application number 10/960190 was filed with the patent office on 2005-03-03 for electropolishing solution and methods for its use and recovery.
Invention is credited to Green, Kevin C., Guilmette, Paul, Kim, Bang Mo, Schworm, Jeffery L., Zhu, Joseph Shoulian.
Application Number | 20050045491 10/960190 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 31989966 |
Filed Date | 2005-03-03 |
United States Patent
Application |
20050045491 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Zhu, Joseph Shoulian ; et
al. |
March 3, 2005 |
Electropolishing solution and methods for its use and recovery
Abstract
An electrolyte solution containing an alkylene glycol and a
chloride salt is useful for electropolishing metal substrates. An
electropolishing method using the electrolyte solution is effective
for polishing a varied of metals, including titanium and noble
metals. The method avoids the handling and disposal challenges
associated with previous methods using etching solutions containing
hydrofluoric acid. A method of recycling the spent electrolyte
solution is also described.
Inventors: |
Zhu, Joseph Shoulian;
(Jacksonville, FL) ; Kim, Bang Mo; (Shenectady,
NY) ; Schworm, Jeffery L.; (Delanson, NY) ;
Green, Kevin C.; (Rutland, VT) ; Guilmette, Paul;
(Rutland, VT) |
Correspondence
Address: |
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
GLOBAL RESEARCH
PATENT DOCKET RM. BLDG. K1-4A59
NISKAYUNA
NY
12309
US
|
Family ID: |
31989966 |
Appl. No.: |
10/960190 |
Filed: |
October 6, 2004 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10960190 |
Oct 6, 2004 |
|
|
|
10065057 |
Sep 13, 2002 |
|
|
|
6835300 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
205/676 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C25F 3/16 20130101; B23H
3/08 20130101; C25F 7/02 20130101; B24B 37/042 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
205/676 |
International
Class: |
B23H 003/08 |
Claims
1. An electropolishing solution, comprising: about 75 to about 99
weight percent of an alkylene glycol; and about 1 to about 25
weight percent of a chloride salt selected from the group
consisting of alkali metal chlorides, alkaline earth metal
chlorides, and combinations thereof.
2. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, wherein the alkylene
glycol is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol,
1,2-propylene glycol, 1,3-propylene glycol, glycerol, 1,3-butylene
glycol, 1,4-butylene glycol, 2,3-butylene glycol, 1,5-pentanediol,
1,6-hexanediol, 1,8-octanediol, 1,9-nonanediol, 1,10-decanediol,
neopentyl glycol, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol,
2-methyl-1,3-propanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol,
diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, triethylene glycol,
tripropylene glycol, dibutylene glycol, polyethylene glycol,
polypropylene glycol, polytetramethylene glycol, and combinations
thereof.
3. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, wherein the alkylene
glycol comprises ethylene glycol or propylene glycol.
4. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, wherein the chloride
salt is selected from the group consisting of lithium chloride,
sodium chloride, potassium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium
chloride, and combinations thereof.
5. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, wherein the chloride
salt comprises potassium chloride.
6. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, comprising less than
or equal to 5 weight percent water.
7. The electropolishing solution of claim 1, comprising less than
0.5 weight percent fluoride ion.
8. An electropolishing solution, comprising: about 75 to about 99
weight percent of ethylene glycol; and about 1 to about 25 weight
percent of potassium chloride.
9. An electropolishing solution, consisting essentially of: about
75 to about 99 weight percent of ethylene glycol; and about 1 to
about 25 weight percent of potassium chloride.
10. An electropolishing method, comprising: disposing a metallic
substrate and at least one electrode in an electrolyte solution;
wherein the electrolyte solution comprises about 75 to about 99
weight percent of an alkylene glycol; and about 1 to about 25
weight percent of a chloride salt selected from the group
consisting of alkali metal chlorides, alkaline earth metal
chlorides, and combinations thereof; and applying a current from a
power source between the at least one electrode and the metallic
substrate to remove metal from the metallic substrate.
11. The electropolishing method of claim 10, wherein the current is
applied at a voltage of about 3 to about 100 volts.
12. The electropolishing method of claim 10, wherein the current is
applied at a current density of about 0.1 to about 20 amperes per
square-centimeter.
13. The electropolishing method of claim 10, wherein the
electrolyte solution has a temperature of about 50 to about
200.degree. C.
14. The electropolishing method of claim 10, wherein metal is
removed from the metallic substrate at a rate of about 1 to 200
micrometers per minute.
15. A method of recovering an electropolishing solution,
comprising: agitating a spent electropolishing solution comprising
an alkylene glycol, a chloride salt, and a metal-containing solid;
and separating the agitated, spent electropolishing solution to
yield the metal-containing solid and a solid-depleted solution.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the spent electropolishing
solution comprises about 75 to about 98 weight percent of the
alkylene glycol.
17. The method of claim 15, wherein the spent electropolishing
solution comprises about 2 to about 25 weight percent of the
chloride salt.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the metal-containing solid
comprises a metal selected from the group consisting of aluminum,
titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel,
copper, niobium, molybdenum, silver, halfnium, tungsten, platinum,
gold, and combinations thereof.
19. The method of claim 15, wherein the metal-containing solid
comprises titanium.
20. The method of claim 15, wherein the metal-containing solid
comprises about 10 to about 25 weight percent titanium, about 5 to
about 20 weight percent carbon, and about 1 to about 5 weight
percent hydrogen, on a dry weight basis.
21. The method of claim 15, wherein the metal-containing solid has
an average particle size of less than 20 micrometers prior to
agitating.
22. The method of claim 15, wherein agitating the spent
electropolishing solution is conducted at a temperature greater
than 100.degree. C.
23. The method of claim 15, wherein agitating comprises an input of
about 10,000 to about 1,000,000 joules per kilogram of spent
electropolishing solution.
24. The method of claim 15, wherein agitating comprises sparging
with a pressurized gas having a pressure of about 0.01 kg/cm.sup.2
to about 1000 kg/cm.sup.2.
25. The method of claim 24, wherein the pressurized gas comprises
air.
26. The method of claim 24, further comprising adding water to the
spent electropolishing solution in an amount of about 0.001 to
about 5 weight percent based upon the total weight of the spent
electropolishing solution.
27. The method of claim 24, wherein the pressurized gas comprises a
water concentration effective to create a water concentration of
about 0.001 to about 5 weight percent water in the spent
electropolishing solution during agitation.
28. The method of claim 15, wherein the metal-containing solid has
an average particle size greater than 20 microns after
agitating.
29. The method of claim 15, further comprising distilling the
solid-depleted solution.
30. A method of recovering an electropolishing solution,
comprising: sparging a spent electropolishing solution with
pressurized air, wherein the spent electropolishing solution
comprises about 75 to about 98 weight percent of ethylene glycol,
about 2 to about 25 weight percent of potassium chloride, and at
least 1 weight percent of a titanium-containing solid comprising
about 10 to about 25 weight percent titanium, about 5 to about 20
weight percent carbon, and about 1 to about 5 weight percent
hydrogen, on a dry weight basis; and separating the sparged, spent
electropolishing solution to yield the titanium-containing solid
and a solid-depleted solution.
Description
BACKGROUND
[0001] The sizing, shaping, and surface finishing of metals for
complex parts such as turbine blades, impellers, vessels, and the
like has often proven to be a challenge. One commonly used method
for shaping and finishing metals and metal alloys is etching.
However, most commonly used etching solutions employ materials such
as hydrofluoric acid that are hazardous to handle and difficult and
expensive to dispose of. An alternative to etching is
electropolishing, but there is a need for electropolishing
materials and methods that achieve high surface smoothness, and are
less expensive, less corrosive, and more environmentally friendly
than current etching materials and methods.
BRIEF SUMMARY
[0002] An electropolishing solution effective for surface finishing
of metals comprises about 75 to about 99 weight percent of an
alkylene glycol; and about 1 to about 25 weight percent of a
chloride salt selected from the group consisting of alkali metal
chlorides, alkaline earth metal chlorides, and combinations
thereof.
[0003] Other embodiments, including an electropolishing method and
a method of recovering a spent electropolishing solution, are
described in detail below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0004] FIG. 1 is a simplified depiction of a system for
electropolishing a metallic substrate.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0005] One embodiment is an electropolishing solution comprises
about 75 to about 99 weight percent of an alkylene glycol; and
about 1 to about 25 weight percent of a chloride salt selected from
the group consisting of alkali metal chlorides, alkaline earth
metal chlorides, and combinations thereof.
[0006] Alkylene glycols suitable for use in the electropolishing
solution include, for example, ethylene glycol, 1,2-propylene
glycol, 1,3-propylene glycol, glycerol, 1,3-butylene glycol,
1,4-butylene glycol, 2,3-butylene glycol, 1,5-pentanediol,
1,6-hexanediol, 1,8-octanediol, 1,9-nonanediol, 1,10-decanediol,
neopentyl glycol, 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol,
2-methyl-1,3-propanediol, 2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol,
diethylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, triethylene glycol,
tripropylene glycol, dibutylene glycol, polyethylene glycol,
polypropylene glycol, polytetramethylene glycol, and the like, and
combinations thereof. A preferred alkylene glycol comprises
ethylene glycol or propylene glycol.
[0007] Chloride salts suitable for use in the electropolishing
solution include, for example, lithium chloride, sodium chloride,
potassium chloride, magnesium chloride, calcium chloride, and the
like, and combinations thereof. A preferred chloride salt comprises
potassium chloride.
[0008] It is generally desirable to maximize the purity of the
electropolishing solution by minimizing the amount of contaminants
such as fluoride ions and water present in the electropolishing
solution. Water generally retards the metal removal kinetics and
further tends to produce pitting on the finished metal surface.
Fluoride ions, particularly when present as hydrofluoric acid, may
be hazardous and require expensive disposal or recycling
techniques. It is therefore generally desirable to maintain the
concentration of fluoride ion to less than or equal to about 0.5
weight percent (wt %), preferably less than or equal to about 0.1
wt %, and more preferably less than or equal to about 0.01 wt %
based on the total weight of the electropolishing solution. In a
similar manner it is generally desirable to maintain the water in
the electropolishing solution to less than or equal to about 5 wt
%, preferably less than or equal to about 1 wt %, and more
preferably less than or equal to about 0.1 wt % based on the total
weight of the electropolishing solution.
[0009] In one embodiment, the electropolishing solution comprises
about 75 to about 99 weight percent of ethylene glycol, and about 1
to about 25 weight percent of potassium chloride.
[0010] In one embodiment, the electropolishing solution consists
essentially of about 75 to about 99 weight percent of ethylene
glycol, and about 1 to about 25 weight percent of potassium
chloride. It will be understood that in this embodiment "consists
essentially of" excludes components that substantially detract from
the electropolishing properties of the solution.
[0011] Another embodiment is an electropolishing method,
comprising: disposing a metallic substrate and at least one
electrode in an electrolyte solution; wherein the electrolyte
solution comprises about 75 to about 99 weight percent of an
alkylene glycol, and about 1 to about 25 weight percent of a
chloride salt selected from the group consisting of alkali metal
chlorides, alkaline earth metal chlorides, and combinations
thereof; and applying a current from a power source between the at
least one electrode and the metallic substrate to remove metal from
the metallic substrate.
[0012] In one embodiment of the electropolishing method, the
current is applied at a voltage of about 3 to about 100 volts.
Within this range, the voltage may preferably be at least about 8
volts, more preferably at least about 15 volts. Also within this
range, the voltage may preferably be up to about 80 volts, more
preferable up to about 65 volts.
[0013] The current may be applied at a current density of about 0.1
to about 20 amperes per square-centimeter (A/cm2), where the
denominator represents the total effective surface area of the work
piece. Within this range, the current density may preferably be at
least about 0.5 A/cm.sup.2, more preferably at least about 1.5
A/cm.sup.2. Also within this range, the current density may
preferably be up to about 10 A/cm.sup.2, more preferably up to
about 5 A/cm.sup.2.
[0014] In one embodiment of the electropolishing method, the
electrolyte solution has a temperature of about 50 to about
200.degree. C. Within this range, the solution temperature may
preferably be at least about 70.degree. C., more preferably at
least about 80.degree. C. Also within this range, the solution
temperature may preferably be up to about 170.degree. C., more
preferably up to about 135.degree. C.
[0015] In one embodiment, metal may removed from the metallic
substrate at a rate of about I to 200 micrometers per minute.
Within this range, the metal removal rate may preferably be at
least about 5 micrometers per minute, more preferably at least
about 10 micrometers per minute. Also within this range, the metal
removal rate may preferably be up to about 100 micrometers per
minute, more preferably up to about 50 micrometers per minute.
[0016] FIG. 1 is a simplified depiction of a system for
electropolishing a metallic substrate. In apparatus 10, substrate
20, which functions as an anode, and cathodes 30 are immersed in
electropolishing solution 40. Although two cathodes are shown, a
single cathode may be used, as can more than two cathodes. A power
source 50 applies a current between the cathodes and the metallic
substrate to remove metal from the metallic substrate. The cathodes
and the substrate may be translated relative to each other to
electropolish any desired surface of the substrate.
[0017] During the electropolishing of metals, the electropolishing
solution often becomes contaminated with metal-containing solid
by-products of the electrochemical reactions. For purposes of this
disclosure, the electropolishing solution contaminated with the
metal-containing solid by-products is referred to as a `spent
electropolishing solution`. The term `spent electropolishing
solution` as defined herein as an electropolishing solution
comprising greater than or equal about 0.5 weight percent (wt %)
metal-containing solids. In practice, spent electropolishing
solutions may contain greater than or equal to about 5 wt %
metal-containing solids, and even greater than or equal to about 10
wt % metal-containing solids.
[0018] The presence of these metal-containing solids in the
electropolishing solution poses a number of problems. Chief amongst
these problems is an increase in the viscosity of the
electropolishing solution that limits mass transport at the
electropolishing solution-work piece interface. This results in
changes in the electropolishing kinetics, reductions in the quality
of the surface finish and reduced efficiency of the
electropolishing cell. It is therefore desirable to separate these
metal-containing solids from the electropolishing solution.
However, these by-products are very fine particles (e.g., average
particle size <20 micrometers) of metal-containing solids and
are therefore extremely difficult to separate. It has now been
unexpectedly discovered that agitation of the spent
electropolishing solution containing the metal-containing solids
causes these solids to increase in particle size, making them
easier to separate from the electropolishing solution, which in
turn facilitates recovery and reuse of the solution.
[0019] Thus, another embodiment is a method of recovering an
electropolishing solution, comprising: agitating a spent
electropolishing solution comprising an alkylene glycol, a chloride
salt, and a metal-containing solid; and separating the agitated,
spent electropolishing solution to yield the metal-containing solid
and a solid-depleted solution.
[0020] The alkylene glycol is generally present in an amount of
about 75 to about 98 wt % based on the total weight of the spent
electropolishing solution. Within this range, it may be present in
an amount of greater than or equal to about 80, preferably greater
than or equal to about 85, and more preferably greater than or
equal to about 90 wt %. Within this range, it is also preferable to
have the alkylene glycol present in an amount of less than or equal
to about 97 wt %, more preferably present in an amount of less than
or equal to about 96 wt % and even more preferably less than or
equal to about 95 wt %.
[0021] The chloride salt is generally present in an amount of about
2 to about 25 wt % based on the total weight of the spent
electropolishing solution. Within this range it may be present in
an amount of greater than or equal to about 3, preferably greater
than or equal to about 4, and more preferably greater than or equal
to about 5 wt %. Within this range it is also preferable to have
the chloride salt present in an amount of less than or equal to
about 20 wt %, more preferably present in an amount of less than or
equal to about 15 wt % and even more preferably less than or equal
to about 10 wt %.
[0022] The electropolishing solution can be used to electropolish a
number of different metals or metallic alloys such as, for example,
those comprising aluminum, titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese,
iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, niobium, molybdenum, silver,
halfnium, tungsten, platinum, gold, and the like, and combinations
comprising at least one of the foregoing metals. Metal alloys
suitable for electropolishing include various stainless steels, as
well as the nickel-chromium alloys available commercially under the
tradename INCONEL.RTM.. As stated above, during the
electropolishing process, fine metal-containing solid by-products
are formed that cannot be easily separated from the spent
electropolishing solution. No appreciable settling of the
metal-containing solids occurs over extended periods of time. These
metal-containing solids generally exist in the electropolishing
solution in the form of a suspension. Such suspensions are also
often referred to by other standard terms of art such as colloidal
solutions, colloidal suspensions, dispersions, microphase-separated
solutions, and the like. In one embodiment, when titanium metal or
titanium-based alloys are subjected to electropolishing, the spent
electropolishing solution contains a titanium-containing solid
comprising about 10 to about 25 weight percent titanium, about 5 to
about 20 weight percent carbon, and about 1 to about 5 weight
percent hydrogen, on a dry weight basis. Within the above
compositional ranges, the titanium content may be at least about 12
weight percent or at least about 14 weight percent, and up to about
23 weight percent or up to about 21 weight percent; the carbon
content may be at least about 8 weight percent or at least about 11
weight percent, and up to about 18 weight percent or up to about 16
weight percent; and the hydrogen content may be at least about 2
weight percent or at least about 3 weight percent, and up to about
4 weight percent. Such compositions may be determined by standard
analytical techniques as described in the working examples.
[0023] In order to recover components of the spent electropolishing
solution for recycling, it is generally desirable to separate the
metal-containing solids from the spent solution. This can be
achieved by agitating the spent electropolishing solution at a
temperature preferably greater than or equal to about 100.degree.
C. and preferably in the presence of water. Atmospheric moisture,
i.e., the water present in air, may be sufficient to facilitate the
separation of the metal-containing solids. Without wishing to be
limited by any particular theory, the present inventors believe
that the water facilitates the dissolution of the metal-containing
solids and that the agitation facilitates reprecipitation and
growth or agglomeration of the metal-containing solids into larger
sized particles that are generally easier to separate from the
spent electropolishing solution.
[0024] Water may, optionally, be added to the spent
electropolishing solution in an amount of about 0.001 wt % to about
5 wt % based on the total weight of the spent electropolishing
solution after water addition. Within this range water may be added
in amounts greater than or equal to about 0.01 wt %, preferably
greater than or equal to about 0.1 wt %, and more preferably
greater than or equal to about 0.5 wt %. Within this range it may
also be desirable to add water in amounts less than or equal to
about 4 wt %, preferably less than or equal to about 3 wt %, and
more preferably less than or equal to about 2 wt %.
[0025] The use of an elevated temperature during agitation is
believed to expedite the processes of reprecipitation and growth of
the metal-containing solids into larger sized precipitates that are
generally easier to separate from the spent electropolishing
solution. The selection of an elevated temperature will depend on
the alkylene glycol employed. When the alkylene glycol comprises
ethylene glycol, it is generally desirable to agitate the spent
electropolishing solution at a temperature of about 100.degree. C.
to about 170.degree. C. Within this range, temperatures of greater
than or equal to about 110.degree. C. are preferred, with
temperatures of greater than or equal to about 115.degree. C.
especially preferred. It is also desired to maintain the elevated
temperature during agitation at less than or equal to about
160.degree. C. and more preferably at less than or equal to about
150.degree. C.
[0026] Agitation may be accomplished by batch processes or
continuous processes. Suitable agitation processes include, for
example, tumbling, rolling, mixing, ball milling, pumping,
ultrasonic stimulation, sparging, spinning, and combinations
comprising at least one of the foregoing processes. When batch
processes are utilized it may be desirable to add a small amount of
water to the spent electropolishing solution either prior to or
during agitation in order to promote the dissolution of the
metal-containing solids. When continuous processes are utilized it
may be desirable to continuously meter in the requisite quantity of
water to facilitate dissolution. In one embodiment, the amount of
agitation energy input per unit mass of spent electropolishing
solution is generally from about 10,000 to about 1,000,000
joules/kilogram (J/kg). Within this range, the agitation energy may
preferably be at least about 50,000 J/kg, more preferably at least
about 100,000 J/kg. Also within this range, the agitation energy
may preferably be up to about 800,000 J/kg, more preferably up to
about 600,000 J/kg. This input energy is the energy utilized
specifically for purposes of agitation of the spent
electropolishing solution and excludes other types of energy used
during the processes of recovery such as heating, cooling, and the
like.
[0027] The preferred method of agitation is sparging with
pressurized air. Other suitable pressurized gases such as nitrogen,
hydrogen, helium argon, oxygen, and the like, and combinations
comprising at least one of the foregoing may also be used. During
the sparging, the pressurized gas may be bubbled through a water
bath in order to increase its water content prior to coming into
contact with the spent electropolishing solution. In one
embodiment, water added to facilitate solid separation may be
removed from the solid-depleted solution so that it can be re-used
as an electropolishing solution. Water may also be present in the
solid-depleted solution because it is often used to rinse
electropolished products to remove the electropolishing solution
from the electropolished products. Water may be separated from the
solid-depleted solution by any technique effective for separating
it from the alkylene glycol. A presently preferred technique is
fractional distillation.
[0028] The pressurized gas may have a pressure of about 0.01
kg/cm.sup.2 to about 1000 kg/cm.sup.2. Within this range the
pressure may be maintained at an amount of greater than or equal to
about 0.1 kg/cm.sup.2, preferably greater than or equal to about 1
kg/cm.sup.2. Within this range it is also desirable to maintain the
pressure at less than or equal to about 500 kg/cm.sup.2, preferably
less than or equal to about 250 kg/cm.sup.2.
[0029] The pressurized gas may contain an amount of water effective
to produce a water concentration of about 0.001 wt % to about 5 wt
% in the spent electropolishing solution during agitation.
[0030] The metal-containing solid after agitation may have an
average particle size greater than or equal to about 20
micrometers, preferably greater than or equal to about 50
micrometers, and more preferably greater than about 100
micrometers. This increase in the size of the metal-containing
solid particles during agitation facilitates the ability to
separate the metal-containing solid from the spent electropolishing
solution and thus improves the efficiency of recovery of the
electropolishing solution. In one embodiment, agitation of the
spent electropolishing solution results in an increase of the
average particle size of the metal-containing solid of at least
50%, preferably at least 100%, more preferably at least 200%.
[0031] The method comprises separating the agitated, spent
electropolishing solution to yield the metal-containing solid and a
solid-depleted solution. This separation may be conducted any time
after the start of agitation or, if desired, after the agitation
has been completed. The recovery may be accomplished by separation
processes such as, for example, filtration, decantation, magnetic
separation, centrifugation, hydrocyclonation, gravitational
separation, membrane separation, and the like, and combinations
thereof. The separation process should generally be capable of
recovering a solid-depleted solution having a weight of at least
about 1 wt %, preferably at least about 10 wt %, more preferably at
least about 20 wt %, and most preferably at least about 50 wt % of
the weight of the spent electropolishing solution.
[0032] In one embodiment, a method of recovering an
electropolishing solution comprises: sparging a spent
electropolishing solution with pressurized air, wherein the spent
electropolishing solution comprises about 75 to about 98 weight
percent of ethylene glycol, about 2 to about 25 weight percent of
potassium chloride, and at least 1 weight percent of a
titanium-containing solid comprising about 10 to about 25 weight
percent titanium, about 5 to about 20 weight percent carbon, and
about 1 to about 5 weight percent hydrogen, on a dry weight basis;
and separating the sparged, spent electropolishing solution to
yield the titanium-containing solid and a solid-depleted
solution.
[0033] In another embodiment, the spent electropolishing solution
is maintained at a temperature greater than about 100IC and is
agitated by sparging with compressed air for a suitable period of
time. After the sparging is completed, the sparged solution is then
allowed to settle for about 1 to about 5 hours, during which some
of the larger particles formed during the sparging begin to settle
to the bottom of the solution. The spent electropolishing solution
is then subjected to filtration in a filter press wherein an
appropriate filter material such as diatomaceous earth (e.g.,
CELITE.RTM. commercially available from World Minerals, Santa
Barbara, Calif.) is used.
[0034] The invention is further illustrated by the following
non-limiting examples.
EXAMPLES 1-8
[0035] All of the substrates described below were electropolished
in an electrolyte comprising about 95 wt % ethylene glycol, about 5
wt % potassium chloride, and a water content of less than 0.01 wt
%. The temperature was 115.degree. C. and the current density was 2
A/cm2 with a voltage was about 30-60V. The electropolishing time
was two minutes. The cathodes were 6 centimeter by 6 centimeter by
0.158 centimeter stainless steel 304 plates. The surface roughness
was measured with a profilometer.
[0036] For Example 1, the substrate was a titanium 6-4 coupon
(titanium 64 is an alloy containing about 6 weight percent
aluminum, about 4 weight percent vanadium, and the balance
titanium). After electropolishing at a maximum metal removal rate
of 0.00125 inches per minute, a smooth and shining surface was
obtained. The surface roughnesses before and after electropolishing
were 50 and 15 microinches, respectively.
[0037] For Example 2, the substrate was a titanium 6-4 engine
blade. After electropolishing at a maximum metal removal rate of
0.001 inches per minute, a smooth and shining surface was obtained.
The surface roughnesses before and after electropolishing were 37
and 18 microinches, respectively.
[0038] For Example 3, the substrate was a stainless steel 316
coupon (stainless steel 316 is an alloy containing about 17 weight
percent chromium, 12 weight percent nickel, 2.5 weight percent
molybdenum, 2 weight percent manganese, 1 weight percent silicon,
0.045 weight percent phosphorus, 0.03 weight percent sulfur, and
the balance iron). After electropolishing, a smooth and shining
surface was obtained.
[0039] For Example 4, the substrate was a stainless steel engine
blade. After electropolishing a smooth and shining surface was
obtained.
[0040] For Example 5, the substrate was an INCONEL.RTM. coupon.
After electropolishing a smooth and shining surface was
obtained.
[0041] For Example 6, the substrate was an INCONEL.RTM. engine
blade. After electropolishing a smooth and shining surface was
obtained.
[0042] For Example 7, the substrate was a gold wire. After
electropolishing a smooth and shining surface was obtained.
[0043] For example 8, the substrate was a platinum wire. After
electropolishing a smooth and shining surface was obtained.
EXAMPLE 9
[0044] 65 milliliters (ml) spent electropolishing solution
comprising ethylene glycol and potassium chloride in a 95:5 ratio
by weight and 35 wt % titanium-containing solid was heated to an
elevated temperature of 115.degree. C. in a glass beaker. While at
the elevated temperature, the spent electropolishing solution was
sparged with compressed air for one hour. Following sparging, the
metal-containing solid particles began to settle. After about 20
minutes it was observed that about 20 ml of clear electropolishing
solution was formed in the beaker while about 45 ml of a sediment
bed remained at the bottom of the beaker.
EXAMPLE 10
[0045] In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of recovered
electropolishing solution, spent electropolishing solution
containing about 35 wt % titanium-containing solid, ethylene glycol
and potassium chloride (in a weight ratio of 95:5, respectively)
was mixed with water. The spent electropolishing solution to water
ratio was maintained at 10:90 by weight. After distillation, the
recovered electropolishing solution was reused to electropolish
titanium metal and no changes in the electropolishing behavior were
observed.
EXAMPLES 11-13
[0046] Three metal-containing solids were prepared and analyzed for
titanium, carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen contents. An
electropolishing solution containing 95 weight percent ethylene
glycol and 5 weight percent potassium chloride was used to
electropolish a titanium surface, producing a spent
electropolishing solution with a fine, suspended solid. The spent
electropolishing solution was treated three ways. For Example 11,
it was filtered on 1 micron filter paper, dried, and analyzed
without agitation. For Example 12, it was agitated with pressurized
air for about 60 minutes at 115.degree. C., then filtered, dried,
and analyzed. For Example 13, it was agitated with pressurized air
for about 5 minutes at 150.degree. C., then filtered, dried, and
analyzed. Before analysis, samples were dried in a vacuum oven at
about 50.degree. C. to remove residual ethylene glycol. For each
dried sample, carbon/hydrogen/nitrogen analyses were conducted with
a Carlo Erba EA1108 Analyzer, which uses a quantitative flash
combustion of the sample at 1020.degree. C. in an oxygen-enriched
atmosphere to form CO.sub.2, H.sub.2O, and NO.sub.x from carbon,
hydrogen, and nitrogen, respectively; the combustion gases are
passed through heated elemental copper to reduce all forms of
NO.sub.x to N.sub.2 and then carried through a chromatographic
column where they are separated and quantitatively detected by a
thermal conductivity detector. For titanium analyses, samples were
digested in a 9:1 weight ratio of nitric and perchloric acids, and
the residue was dissolved in 20 ml of a 1:1 mixture of hydrofluoric
and hydrochloric acids and diluted to 50 mL with deionized water.
The solutions were then diluted an additional 20-fold for analysis
by solution nebulization ICP-AES on a Varian Liberty II instrument.
Elemental analysis results are presented in Table 1. Ranges
represent the highest and lowest values determined for multiple
portions of each sample.
1TABLE 1 Element Concentrations in Weight Percent Example 11
Example 12 Example 13 Hydrogen 3.40-3.50 3.45-3.48 3.51-3.78 Carbon
11.61-12.14 11.50-11.85 12.58-14.01 Nitrogen <0.5 <0.5
<0.5 Titanium 20.3-20.7 18.9 15.9-16.7
[0047] In summary, an economical, environmentally friendly
electropolishing solution and method has been provided, as well as
a solution recovery methods that facilitates solution re-use and
further reduces electropolishing costs and environmental
impact.
[0048] While the invention has been described with reference to
exemplary embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in
the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be
substituted for elements thereof without departing from the scope
of the invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to
adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the
invention without departing from the essential scope thereof.
Therefore, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the
particular embodiment disclosed as the best mode contemplated for
carrying out this invention, but that the invention will include
all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended
claims.
[0049] All cited patents, patent applications, and other references
are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
* * * * *