U.S. patent application number 10/857288 was filed with the patent office on 2005-01-06 for equilateral strand composite lumber and method of making same.
Invention is credited to Dagher, Habib J., Edgar, Russell A., Shaler, Stephen M..
Application Number | 20050000185 10/857288 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 33555659 |
Filed Date | 2005-01-06 |
United States Patent
Application |
20050000185 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Edgar, Russell A. ; et
al. |
January 6, 2005 |
Equilateral strand composite lumber and method of making same
Abstract
A method of forming a composite beam includes cutting an
elongated piece of wood to produce strands having cross sections
with a substantially symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape. Resin
is then applied to the strands, and the strands are formed into a
composite beam.
Inventors: |
Edgar, Russell A.; (Orono,
ME) ; Shaler, Stephen M.; (Veazie, ME) ;
Dagher, Habib J.; (Veazie, ME) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MACMILLAN SOBANSKI & TODD, LLC
ONE MARITIME PLAZA FOURTH FLOOR
720 WATER STREET
TOLEDO
OH
43604-1619
US
|
Family ID: |
33555659 |
Appl. No.: |
10/857288 |
Filed: |
May 28, 2004 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
60484068 |
Jul 1, 2003 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
52/847 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B29K 2311/10 20130101;
B29C 70/20 20130101; B29K 2711/14 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
052/737.3 |
International
Class: |
D04H 001/00; D04H
003/00; D04H 005/00; D04H 013/00 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of forming a composite beam comprising: cutting an
elongated piece of wood to produce strands having cross sections
with a substantially symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape;
applying a resin to the strands; forming the strands into a
composite beam.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the cross sections have
a side length within the range of from about 1/4 inch to about 1
inch.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the substantially
symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape is one of triangular,
square, pentagonal, hexagonal, and diamond shaped.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the elongated piece of
wood is a high density hardwood.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the resin is one of a
liquid resin and a powered resin.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of forming the
strands into a composite beam includes vibrating the strands so as
to arrange the strands longitudinally.
7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the composite beam has
transverse near-isotropic properties.
8. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of forming the
strands into a composite beam further includes: arranging the
strands into a mat; stacking a plurality of mats to define a
laid-up billet; curing the laid-up billet into a cured billet; and
cutting the cured billet to form a beam.
9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of arranging
the strands includes vibrating the strands so as to align the
strands longitudinally, thereby minimizing void space between
adjacent strands.
10. The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of arranging
the strands includes aligning the strands such that the end
surfaces of at least one end of each strand are coplanar.
11. The method according to claim 8, wherein the step of arranging
the strands includes bonding the strands to one another with
adhesive.
12. The method according to claim 8, wherein the stacking step
includes disposing a reinforcement material between layers of
mats.
13. The method according to claim 8, wherein the stacking step
includes stacking the plurality of mats in a stepped
arrangement.
14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the stacking step
includes stacking the plurality of mats in a stepped arrangement
such that each mat overlaps an adjacent mat.
15. The method according to claim 8, wherein the stacking step
includes stacking at least a first mat and a second mat, wherein
the first mat includes strands having a larger cross-sectional size
than the strands of the second mat.
16. The method according to claim 15, wherein at least one first
mat forms a top portion of the beam, at least one first mat forms a
bottom portion of the beam, and at least one second mat forms a
central portion of the beam intermediate the top and bottom
portions.
17. The method according to claim 8, wherein the arranging step
includes arranging a plurality of first strands and a plurality of
second strands, wherein the first strands have a larger
cross-sectional size than the second strands.
18. The method according to claim 17, wherein the first and second
strands are aligned longitudinally, and arranged such that the
first strands define a first outside portion and a second outside
portion of the mat, and the second strands define a central portion
of the mat intermediate the first and second outside portions.
19. The method according to claim 8, wherein the curing step
includes applying pressure and energy to the laid-up billet.
20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the energy is
provided by a source of radio frequency energy.
21. The method according to claim 8, wherein the curing step
includes applying sufficient pressure to the laid-up billet so as
to arrange the strands such that the growth rings of any one of the
wood strands are oriented in an orthogonally randomized fashion
relative to the growth rings of an adjacent wood strand.
22. A composite beam comprising: wood strands having cross sections
with a substantially symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape,
adhesively bonded together.
23. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the cross
sections have a side length within the range of from about
{fraction (1/4)} inch to about 1 inch.
24. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the
substantially symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape is one of
triangular, square, pentagonal, hexagonal, and diamond shaped.
25. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the wood
strands are formed from a high density hardwood.
26. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the composite
beam has transverse near-isotropic properties.
27. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the wood
strands are arranged such that the growth rings of any one of the
wood strands are oriented in an orthogonally randomized fashion
relative to the growth rings of an adjacent wood strand.
28. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the beam
comprises at least a first mat and a second mat, wherein the first
mat includes strands having a larger cross-sectional size than the
strands of the second mat.
29. The composite beam according to claim 28, wherein at least one
first mat forms a top portion of the beam, at least one first mat
forms a bottom portion of the beam, and at least one second mat
forms a central portion of the beam intermediate the top and bottom
portions.
30. The composite beam according to claim 22, wherein the beam
comprises a plurality of mats, each mat comprising a plurality of
first strands and a plurality of second strands, wherein the first
strands have a larger cross-sectional size than the second
strands.
31. The composite beam according to claim 30, wherein the first and
second strands are aligned longitudinally, and arranged such that
the first strands define a first outside portion and a second
outside portion of the mat, and the second strands define a central
portion of the mat intermediate the first and second outside
portions.
32. A composite beam comprising: wood strands having cross sections
with a substantially triangular shape, adhesively bonded
together.
33. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the cross
sections have a side length within the range of from about 1/4 inch
to about 1 inch.
34. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the wood
strands are formed from a high density hardwood.
35. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the composite
beam has transverse near-isotropic properties.
36. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the wood
strands are arranged such that the growth rings of any one of the
wood strands are oriented in an orthogonally randomized fashion
relative to the growth rings of an adjacent wood strand.
37. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein less than
about 10 percent of the volume of the beam is void space.
38. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the beam
comprises at least a first mat and a second mat, wherein the first
mat includes strands having a larger cross-sectional size than the
strands of the second mat.
39. The composite beam according to claim 38, wherein at least one
first mat forms a top portion of the beam, at least one first mat
forms a bottom portion of the beam, and at least one second mat
forms a central portion of the beam intermediate the top and bottom
portions.
40. The composite beam according to claim 32, wherein the beam
comprises a plurality of mats, each mat comprising a plurality of
first strands and a plurality of second strands, wherein the first
strands have a larger cross-sectional size than the second
strands.
41. The composite beam according to claim 40, wherein the first and
second strands are aligned longitudinally, and arranged such that
the first strands define a first outside portion and a second
outside portion of the mat, and the second strands define a central
portion of the mat intermediate the first and second outside
portions.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional
Application No. 60/484,068 filed Jul. 1, 2003.
[0002] Inventors: Russell A. Edgar, Stephen M. Shaler, and Habib J.
Dagher.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] This invention relates in general to composite lumber
products and in particular to an improved method of manufacturing
equilateral strand composite lumber products.
[0004] In its natural setting a tree is optimally designed to
resist the forces of nature. Its composition is a compromise to the
various vertical and horizontal forces to which it is subjected.
When taken from the forest, sawn and used as a structural building
material, however, its composition is no longer optimal. For
example, knots and cross-grain can often be found in the areas of
greatest bending stress. Density gradients within the wood can lead
to zones which are susceptible to shear failures.
[0005] Despite these undesirable characteristics, wood has been the
traditional structural building material of choice in North
America. Its advantages are many, including high strength-to-weight
ratios, workability, renewability, aesthetic value, and cost.
However, after a decades-long decline in the quality of solid-sawn
lumber, wood is in danger of losing significant market share to
non-wood products.
[0006] The response from the forest products industry was the
development of structural composite lumber (SCL). SCL is an attempt
to re-engineer the tree to best resist forces subjected to it as a
structural member. The tree is broken down into smaller components
which are rearranged and reconstituted. The result is a product
that possesses design values that are often significantly higher
than even the top grades of solid-sawn lumber. Examples of SCL
include Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL), Parallel Strand Lumber
(PSL), and Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL).
[0007] The enhanced properties and higher design values are
obtained primarily through two techniques: defect randomization and
densification of the wood fiber, both largely functions of the
size, shape, and composition (species) of the wood element. For
reasons to be explained below, certain geometries and species have
traditionally been chosen.
[0008] Typically, SCL manufacturers have used thin (defined herein
as having a thickness less than about 0.25 inches) elements having
a generally rectangular cross section, and produced from either
moderate density softwoods or low-density hardwoods. Higher density
hardwood species (e.g. maple, birch and beech) have typically not
been used, as they require higher pressures to adequately densify
and consolidate the wood fiber. These higher required pressures can
result in an undesirable increase in manufacturing costs, damage to
the wood fiber, problems with dimensional instability, and/or a
product that is too dense, and therefore heavy and unreceptive to
common mechanical fastening techniques. Additionally, the
rectangular strand cross section, as well as method of layup,
creates a product with differential properties in the two
transverse directions. It would therefore be advantageous if there
could be provided an improved SCL product that possessed isotropic
behavior in the transverse directions, while also allowing for use
of higher density species.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] This invention relates to an improved method of forming a
composite beam. The method includes cutting an elongated piece of
wood to produce strands having cross sections with a substantially
symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape. Resin is then applied to
the strands, and the strands are formed into a composite beam.
[0010] In another embodiment of the invention, a composite beam
includes wood strands having cross sections with a substantially
symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape, adhesively bonded
together.
[0011] In another embodiment of the invention, a composite beam
includes wood strands having cross sections with a substantially
triangular shape, adhesively bonded together.
[0012] Other advantages of this invention will become apparent to
those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of
the invention, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013] FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a first portion of
composite lumber manufacturing operation capable of making
composite beams of the invention.
[0014] FIG. 1A is an enlarged cross-sectional elevational view of a
portion of the composite lumber manufacturing operation illustrated
in FIG. 1.
[0015] FIG. 2 is a schematic elevational view of a second portion
of composite lumber manufacturing operation capable of making
composite beams of the invention.
[0016] FIG. 3 is a is a schematic perspective view of a first
embodiment of a strand manufactured according to the method
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0017] FIG. 4 is a is a schematic perspective view of a second
embodiment of a strand manufactured according to the method
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0018] FIG. 5 is a is a schematic perspective view of a third
embodiment of a strand manufactured according to the method
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0019] FIG. 6 is a is a schematic perspective view of a fourth
embodiment of a strand manufactured according to the method
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0020] FIG. 7 is a is a schematic perspective view of a fifth
embodiment of a strand manufactured according to the method
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0021] FIG. 8 is a schematic elevational view of a second
embodiment of a laid-up billet formed in accordance with the method
of the invention.
[0022] FIG. 9 is a partial schematic view in elevation showing a
strand having one scarfed surface.
[0023] FIG. 10 is a partial schematic view in elevation showing a
strand having two scarfed surfaces.
[0024] FIG. 11 is a schematic elevational view of a third
embodiment of a laid-up billet formed in accordance with the method
of the invention.
[0025] FIG. 12 is a partial schematic cross-sectional view of a
beam formed in accordance with the method of the invention
illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2.
[0026] FIG. 13 is a schematic perspective view of a beam having the
cross section illustrated in FIG. 12.
[0027] FIG. 14 is a schematic perspective view of a prior art
strand.
[0028] FIG. 15 is a schematic perspective view of a prior art beam
formed with the strands illustrated in FIG. 14.
[0029] FIG. 16A is a schematic plan view of a first alternate
embodiment of the mat illustrated in FIG. 1.
[0030] FIG. 16B is a schematic perspective view of a beam formed
with the mat illustrated in FIG. 16A.
[0031] FIG. 17A is a schematic plan view of a second alternate
embodiment of the mat illustrated in FIG. 1.
[0032] FIG. 17B is a schematic plan view of a third alternate
embodiment of the mat illustrated in FIG. 1.
[0033] FIG. 17C is a schematic perspective view of a beam formed
with the mats illustrated in FIGS. 17A and 17B.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0034] As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, an apparatus for making composite
beams according to the process of the invention is indicated
generally at 10. A log 12, preferably a high density hardwood, such
as a wood having a specific gravity greater than about 0.55, is
placed on a conveyor 14. Examples of suitable high density hardwood
include, but are not limited to, maple, such as red maple and sugar
maple, beech, such as American beech, and birch, such as yellow
birch. The log 12 moves in the machine direction, indicated by an
arrow 15.
[0035] The log 12 is then canted by a canting apparatus 16. The use
of a canting apparatus 16 to cant logs 12 is well known in the art.
The canted logs or cant 18 is then cut, such as by a plurality of
saw blades 20, to produce a flitch or stack 22 of cut boards 24.
Preferably, the boards 24 are within the range of from about
{fraction (1/4)} inch to about 1 inch thick. More preferably, the
boards 24 are within the range of from about {fraction (3/8)} inch
to about {fraction (7/16)} inch thick. It will be understood
however, that the boards 24 can be cut to any desired thickness,
such as for example, less than {fraction (1/4)} inch or greater
than 1 inch.
[0036] Subsequent to cutting the cant 18 into a stack 22 of cut
boards 24, the boards 24 are un-stacked and each board 24 is then
separated into strands 26 in a stranding machine 28. Preferably,
the stranding machine 28 includes a plurality of saw blades,
however any other desired means of separating the boards 24 into
strands 26 can be used. Other such means for separating the boards
24 into stands include, for example, clipping, such as with a
guillotine, or slicing.
[0037] The strands 26 have a symmetrical and substantially
equilateral polygonal cross-sectional shape. As used herein
regarding strands 26 separated by the stranding machine 28 and
otherwise unmodified, substantially equilateral is defined as all
sides of the cross-sectional shape having equal length.
Substantially equilateral also includes equilateral cross-sectional
shapes and slight deviations therefrom which are due to slight
variations caused in the separating process, such as by the
stranding machine 28. Such slight variations can include strands
having cross-sectional shapes wherein one side length is slightly
smaller or slightly larger than a desired side length. For example,
a substantially equilateral cross-sectional shape can include one
side length which is within the range of from about 0.7 to about
1.3 times the desired side length. Preferably, the cross-sectional
shape of the strands 26 is that of an equilateral triangle, as best
shown in FIG. 3. Strands having other symmetrical and equilateral
polygonal cross-sectional shapes can also be formed, such as for
example, strands having square 26', pentagonal 26", hexagonal 26'",
and diamond 26.sup.iv cross-sectional shapes, as shown in FIGS. 4
through 7, inclusive.
[0038] Regardless of the symmetrical and equilateral polygonal
cross-sectional shape of the strands 26, a side length S1 of the
cross section of each strand 26 is preferably within the range of
from about 1/4 inch to about 1 inch.
[0039] As shown in FIG. 3, the strands 26 have any desired length
L1, and therefore the strands 26 can be formed from logs 12 of any
desired length. Preferably, the strands 26 have a length within the
range of from about 2 feet to about 12 feet. More preferably, the
strands 26 have a length of about 4 feet. If desired, one or more
boards 24 can be joined together lengthwise to form boards of
increased length. The boards 24 can be joined together by any
desired method, such as for example, with a finger joint. Once
joined together, strands 26 can be formed from the finger jointed
boards as described above.
[0040] Preferably, the strands 26 have a slenderness or
length-to-depth ratio within the range of from about 100 to about
300. As used in the context of a length to depth ratio, the term
depth is defined as the side length S1 of the cross section of the
strand 26. For example, a strand 26 having triangular
cross-section, a side length S1 of {fraction (1/4)} inch, and a
length of 48 inches, has a length to depth ratio of 192. As would
be known to one skilled in the art, length-to-depth ratios are
positively correlated with bending strength and stiffness, up to a
maximum length-to-depth ratio above which little or no increase in
bending strength and stiffness can be observed. For example, in the
strand composite product known as waferboard, one study indicated
that bending strength and stiffness increase for length-to-depth
ratios within the range of from about 120 to about 300. Known
strand composite products commonly have length-to-depth ratios
within the range of from about 100 to about 400.
[0041] After the strands 26 are formed, they are preferably dried
in a dryer 30 to reduce moisture content to a desired level, such
as below about 10 percent. The use of a dryer 30 for drying strands
26 of wood is well known in the art.
[0042] After drying, a plurality of strands 26 is then laid-up or
arranged to define a mat 32. The strands 26 are arranged
substantially parallel to one another, such that each strand 26 is
in contact, or near contact with an adjacent strand 26. The number
of strands 26 arranged to define the mat 32 depends on the desired
final product density, preferably within the range of from about 39
to about 47 lbs/ft.sup.3.
[0043] As best shown in FIG. 1, the method of forming the mat 32
includes arranging a plurality of strands 26 of substantially equal
length side-by-side on a surface 34, such as a forming surface or
the conveyor 14. The strands 26 are placed side-by-side such that
first ends 36 of each strand 26 are substantially linearly aligned
with one another, and such that the end surfaces of the first ends
36 of each strand 26 are substantially coplanar.
[0044] Once the plurality of strands 26 are arranged, at least one
bead of adhesive 38, such as a hot-melt type adhesive, can be
applied transversely across the arranged strands 26, thereby
adhering the strands 26 to one another and defining the mat 32.
Such a bead of hot-melt type adhesive 38 allows the mat 32 to be
easily handled and moved. It will be understood that the hot-melt
type adhesive 38 will melt early in the curing process, as will be
described below, thereby allowing the strands 26 to move relative
to one another and nest.
[0045] If desired, vibration means 40 can be applied to the surface
34 prior to applying the bead of adhesive 38. Such vibration means
40 will vibrate the strands 26 such that adjacent strands 26 do not
overlap, and that each strand 26 is arranged substantially parallel
to, and in contact with, an adjacent strand 26. It has been
demonstrated through experimentation that strands 26 having
substantially equilateral polygonal cross-sectional shapes, such as
triangular, respond advantageously to such vibration. The vibration
causes the strands 26 to become longitudinally aligned such that
each strand 26 is substantially parallel to, and in contact with,
an adjacent strand 26.
[0046] Although not illustrated, it will be understood that the
strands 26 can be formed into a laid-up billet, such as the laid-up
billet 48, without first forming a mat 32. For example, strands of
equal or varying length can be randomly dropped (i.e. allowed to
drop or fall), to a surface, such as a forming surface or the
conveyor 14.
[0047] After applying at least one bead of adhesive 38 to the
arranged strands 26, resin 42 is then applied to the mat 32 to
define a resin-coated mat 43. Preferably liquid resin, such as
phenol-formaldehyde resin is sprayed on a major surface 32A of the
mat 32 by a sprayer 44. More preferably, liquid resin is sprayed on
both major surfaces 32A of the mat 32 by a plurality of sprayers
44. Although spraying is shown in the exemplary embodiment
illustrated in FIG. 1, it will be understood that any other desired
method of applying the liquid resin 42 to the mat 32 can also be
used. Further, reference is made to using liquid resin 42, although
it will be understood that powdered resin can be applied to one or
both of the major surfaces 32A of the mat 32. It will be further
understood that any other desired resin can be used, such as for
example, diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI).
[0048] A plurality of resin-coated mats 43 are then stacked to
define a laid-up billet 48. As used herein, laid-up billet is
defined as the billet prior to being cured, as described herein
below. A first embodiment of a laid-up billet 48 is illustrated in
FIG. 1. Preferably, the resin-coated mats 43 are stacked in a
stepped arrangement such that a first end 50 of any mat 43 overlaps
a second end 52 of the adjacent lower mat 43, thereby defining a
lap-joint 54. Preferably, first end 50 overlaps the second end 52
by about two inches. The resin-coated mats 43 are further stacked
such that the first end 52 of any mat 43 overlaps the end 50 of the
adjacent lower mat 43, thereby defining an overlap region 56.
Although 14 mats 43 are shown in the exemplary embodiment of the
laid-up billet 48 illustrated in FIG. 1, it will be understood that
any other desired number of mats 43 can be stacked to define the
laid-up billet 48. The lay-up method, as described above, is well
known in the art.
[0049] If desired, a layer of reinforcement material 59 can be
disposed between layers of mats 43 adjacent the lap-joint 54, as
best shown in FIG. 1A. The layer of reinforcement material 59 can
also be disposed adjacent the overlap region 56. Any desired
reinforcement material can be used, such as for example a woven
fiberglass fabric.
[0050] A second embodiment of laid-up billet 48' is illustrated in
FIG. 8. The laid-up billet 48' is substantially identical to the
laid up billet 48, and includes a plurality of the mats 43. In the
laid-up billet 48' however, the first and second ends 50 and 52,
respectively, of the mats 43 do not overlap, but abut one another.
This practice is well known in the art.
[0051] If desired at least one surface 33A of at least one end of
the mats 32 can be beveled or scarfed, as best shown in FIG. 9. The
practice of scarfing is well known in the art. Alternately, two
surfaces 33B and 33C, respectively, of at least one end of the mats
32 can be scarfed, as best shown in FIG. 10. Such scarfing
minimizes void space which can occur after curing at either or both
of the lap joints 54 and the overlap regions 56. The scarfing
further minimizes the potential density profile of the cured billet
66 at the lap-joints 54 and the overlap regions 56; i.e. scarfing
increases density of the cured billet at the lap-joints 54 and the
overlap regions 56. It will be understood that the strands 26 can
also be scarfed prior to forming mat 32.
[0052] A third embodiment of laid-up billet 48" is illustrated in
FIG. 11. The laid-up billet 48" includes a plurality the mats 43.
The mats 43 are preferably stacked such that the first ends 50 of
the mats 43 are vertically aligned.
[0053] If desired, a laid-up billet can include stands having a
plurality of sizes. For example, strands having equilateral
triangle cross-sections and side lengths S1 of about {fraction
(1/4)} inch and about {fraction (7/16)} inch can be used to form a
laid-up billet. It is believed that once cured, billets having
strands with a plurality of sizes will be stronger than billets
made with strands of only one size. It has been shown, for example,
that composite beams made from triangular cross-sectional strands
having a side length of about 1/4 inch have a higher shear strength
than composite beams made from strands having a side length of
about {fraction (7/16)} inch. Additionally, composite beams made
from strands having a side length of about {fraction (7/16)} inch
have a higher bending strength than composite beams made from
strands having a side length of about {fraction (1/4)} inch.
Accordingly, for a bending member it would be advantageous to use
{fraction (1/4)} inch strands in the core of the beam (where the
shear stress is highest) and {fraction (7/16)} inch strands on the
top and bottom of the beam (where bending stress is highest).
[0054] For example, for a beam intended for use as a bending
member, such as a girder, the mats can be formed from strands
having at least two different side lengths. As shown in FIG. 16A, a
mat 110 can be formed from strands having a larger side length 112
on the sides or outside portion of the mat 110, and strands having
a smaller side length 114 centrally disposed in the mat 110 (i.e.,
the strands having a smaller side length 114 define a central
portion of the mat 110). A plurality of mats 110 are then stacked,
cured, and cut to a desired width and length as described herein,
thereby forming a beam 116. When the beam 116 is rotated 90 degrees
such that the strands having a larger side length 112 define the
top and bottom layers of the beam 116, as shown in FIG. 16B, the
beam 116 thereby defines a bending member believed to have improved
bending strength. Although illustrated schematically, it will be
understood that the strands 112 and 114 can have any of the
substantially symmetrical polygonal cross-sectional shapes
described herein, such as triangular.
[0055] For a beam intended for use as a plank, such as in
scaffolding, at least two different mats can be formed. A first mat
118 can be formed from the strands having a larger side length 112,
as shown in FIG. 17A, and a second mat 120 can be formed from the
strands having a smaller side length 114, as shown in FIG. 17B. A
plurality of the first and second mats 118 and 120 are then stacked
to form a laid-up billet such that the first mats 118 are disposed
on the top and bottom of the laid-up billet, and the second mats
120 are disposed intermediate the first mats 118. The laid-up
billet comprising the plurality of stacked mats 118 and 120 is then
cured, and cut to a desired width and length as described herein,
thereby forming a beam 122 having improved strength, as shown in
FIG. 17C.
[0056] The laid-up billet, such as the first and second embodiments
of the laid-up billets 48 and 48', respectively, is then cured with
a combination of pressure and energy. For purposes of illustration,
only the laid-up billet 48 is shown in FIG. 2. The method described
herein however, also applies to other laid-up billets, such as the
laid-up billet 48'. Pressure can be applied to the laid-up billet
48 by any desired means, such as a plurality of rollers 60.
Preferably, pressure can be applied to the laid-up billet 48 in a
continuous press operation, as best shown at 62 in FIG. 2. In such
a continuous press operation 62, the laid-up billets 48 are moved
by the conveyor 14, such that the plurality of rollers 60 and/or
plates (not shown) exerts a force on at least one surface 48A of
the laid-up billet 48, thereby compressing the mats 43.
[0057] Although not illustrated, it will be understood that
pressure can be applied to the laid-up billet, such as the third
embodiment of the laid-up billet 48', in a batch process, wherein a
predetermined length of the laid-up billet 48' is disposed between
two platens of a press. The platens are then moved toward one
another, thereby compressing the mats.
[0058] Preferably, energy is applied to the laid-up billet 48
during the pressing step to heat, and therefore cure, the laid-up
billet 48. Preferably, the energy is applied by an electromagnetic
heating operation, such as with radio frequency energy, as
schematically illustrated at 64 in FIG. 2. Use of electromagnetic
heating in the manufacture of wood composites is well known in the
art. Advantageously, electromagnetic heating provides relatively
fast and uniform heating throughout the laid-up billet 48. With the
application of such uniform heating, plasticization and
densification of the wood is substantially constant throughout the
laid-up billet 48. The combination of pressure and energy thereby
cures the laid-up billet 48 and forms a cured billet 66.
[0059] It will be understood however, that any other desired method
of applying energy to the laid-up billet 48 can be used. Examples
of such other methods include applying energy by microwave,
electrical resistance and/or steam injection techniques.
[0060] As best shown in FIG. 12, even after curing, the strands 26
retain a substantially equilateral cross-sectional shape. It will
be understood that as used herein regarding compressed strands 26,
substantially equilateral includes equilateral cross-sectional
shapes and slight deviations therefrom which are due to distortions
caused in the pressing process. Such slight deviations can include
strands having cross-sectional wherein one side length is slightly
smaller or slightly larger than its original side length S1. For
example, a substantially equilateral cross-sectional shape can
include one side length which is within the range of from about 0.5
to about 1.5 times the original side length S1.
[0061] Referring again to FIG. 2, once the laid-up billet 48 is
cured, a cutter 68 then cuts the cured billet 66 to any desired
length, thereby defining a composite beam 70. It will be understood
however, that the cured billet 66 can be cut in any desired
direction, including longitudinally and transversely, so as to
define a beam 70 having any desired length L2, height H, and width
W, as best shown in FIG. 13.
[0062] The method of the invention is shown as a continuous process
occurring on a continuously moving conveyor 14. It will be
understood however, that each step of the method can also be
satisfactorily performed at one or more independent
workstations.
[0063] As would be understood by one skilled in the art, known
strand composite products commonly use thin, generally
rectangularly shaped wood pieces, often with a thickness less than
0.25 inches. Although use of such thin strands often beneficially
provides for considerable distribution of defects and can minimize
void space, using thin strands reduces the natural strength of the
wood in the direction of the grain.
[0064] Further, such known strands 80 are often cut tangentially
from a log 82, as shown in prior art FIG. 14. The strands 80 are
then stacked to form a beam 84 such that the growth rings 86 of
adjacent strands 80 are substantially aligned in the same plane P,
as best shown in prior art FIG. 15. Such a beam 84 has anisotropic
properties, wherein the mechanical response to a transverse force
in the direction of an arrow x1 is thereby substantially different
to the mechanical response to a transverse force in the direction
of an arrow y1. Such a difference in mechanical response or
strength provides a beam that is substantially stronger when
subjected to a force in the direction of one of the x1 and the y1
arrows than when subjected to a force in the direction of the other
of the x1 and the y1 arrows.
[0065] When strands 26 having symmetrical equilateral polygonal
shapes, such as the triangles shown in FIGS. 3 and 13 are used, the
growth rings 90 within each strand 26 become oriented in an
orthogonally randomized fashion relative to the growth rings 90 in
adjacent strands 26, as best shown in the beam 70 illustrated in
FIG. 13. Accordingly, one advantage of the invention is that the
use of strands 26 having cross sections with a substantially
symmetrical equilateral polygonal shape provides a beam, such as
the beam 70, having transverse near-isotropic properties, i.e., a
beam wherein its strength or mechanical response is independent of
the direction of the force applied. The press-induced density
profiles which also cause anisotropic behavior are minimized with
the use of electromagnetic curing as described above. It is
believed that such orthogonal randomization of the growth rings 90
within a composite beam will produce a beam, such as the beam 70,
having transverse near-isotropic properties. Near-isotropic, as
used herein, is defined as the effect wherein the mechanical
response to a force in the direction of the arrow x2 is
substantially identical to the mechanical response to a force in
the direction of the arrow y2.
[0066] Another advantage of the invention is that beams having such
transverse isotropic properties, such as the beam 70 shown in FIG.
13, can be manufactured without regard to the orientation of the
mats 32 which comprise the beam 70. Further, the beam 70 can be
used without regard to the orientation of the mats 32 within the
beam 70.
[0067] It is believed that an advantage of the invention is that
the stands are relatively thicker, i.e. the strands 26 have a side
length S1 within the range of from about {fraction (1/4)} inch to
about 1 inch. Such a thicker strand 26 allows each strand 26 to
maintain the wood's natural strength in the direction of the
grain.
[0068] Another advantage of the invention is that strands 26 having
a triangular cross-sectional shape become substantially
longitudinally aligned during the arranging step shown in FIG. 1,
such that at least one face of each strand 26 is in contact with a
face of an adjacent strand 26. After the billet 48 is cured, the
strands 26 are nested or arranged such that undesirable void spaces
between adjacent strands 26 are minimized, as best shown in FIGS. 1
and 13.
[0069] Known strand composite products have generally been produced
using either moderate density softwoods (having a specific gravity
within the range of from about 0.4 to about 0.55), or low density
hardwoods (having a specific gravity less than about 0.4). Higher
density hardwood species (having a specific gravity greater than
about 0.55) have been avoided, as they require higher pressures to
adequately densify and consolidate the wood. As used herein,
specific gravity is defined as oven dry weight/volume at 12 percent
moisture content. The higher pressures required to process higher
density hardwood can lead to increased manufacturing costs, damage
to the wood fiber, problems with dimensional stability and/or a
product that is too dense, making it heavy and unreceptive to
common mechanical fastening techniques.
[0070] It is further desirable to provide composite beams having a
low compaction ratio (as used herein compaction ratio is defined as
product density/parent wood species density). Products with higher
compaction ratios are often susceptible to undesirable levels of
springback, especially upon exposure to moisture, and springback
can contribute to undesirable nail pops in drywall and
sub-flooring. As used herein, springback refers to the permanent
residual thickness swelling which occurs on release of the
compressive stress with absorption. Known composite products
generally have a compaction ratio greater than about 1.35.
Advantageously, composite beams formed according to the present
invention have been shown to have a relatively lower compaction
ratio. For example, in a beam formed with equilateral triangular
stands of red maple, the compaction ratio is 1.26 (wherein the
product density is 43 lbs/ft.sup.3 and the red maple density is 34
lbs/ft.sup.3).
[0071] Another advantage of the invention is that the strands of
the invention can be formed from small to medium diameter trees,
which are currently not used in many strand composite products,
thereby providing a lower cost source of wood.
[0072] As best shown in FIG. 12, a further advantage of the
invention is that in circumstances wherein adjacent strands 26 are
not perfectly aligned, the application of pressure causes an edge,
such as the edges 26A, 26B, and 26C of the strands 26 to become
embedded or wedged into an adjacent strand 26. Such wedging further
reduces void spaces between adjacent strands 26, and increases
densification, thereby increasing the strength of the beam relative
to a beam having a greater volume of void space. It is believed
that the occurrence of such wedging increases when higher density
wood is used.
[0073] Another advantage of the invention is that beams
manufactured according to the methods of the invention have
demonstrated desirable strength and performance values. For
example, Table 1 illustrates the strength and performance values
for beams formed with strands having equilateral triangle
cross-sections and side lengths S1 of about 1/4 inch and about
{fraction (7/16)} inch. The performance values shown in Table 1
include modulus of elasticity (MOE), modulus of rupture (MOR),
allowable bending stress (Fb), and allowable shear stress
(F.sub.v), wherein n is the number of samples. It will be known by
those skilled in the art that an increase in product density is
known to be positively correlated with most mechanical properties.
The values shown in Table 1 are those of the lowest probable
product density. A substantial increase in these properties is
likely to be achieved with an increase in product density.
1TABLE 1 Property Units N S1 = 7/16 inch S1 = 1/4 inch Void Volume
% 12 7.5 3.1 Volumetric Shrinkage % 12 12.0 11.5 MOE
(apparent).sup.a psi 12 1,750,000 1,618,000 MOE (true).sup.a psi 12
2,046,000 1,870,000 MOR.sup.a psi 12 8,520 8,999 F.sub.b.sup.b psi
12 2,730 2,765 Shear.sup.a psi 12 1,150 1,295 F.sub.v.sup.c psi 12
260 345 .sup.aValues adjusted to the average density (39.3
lbs/ft.sup.3) and a moisture content (9.88%) of all beams.
.sup.bBased on the volume adjusted minimum MOR divided by a safety
factor of 2.1. .sup.cBased on the minimum shear strength divided by
a safety factor of 3.15.
[0074] Although the method of the invention has been described in
the context of producing a structural member, it will be understood
that the method of the invention can also be applied to the
production of non-structural wood composite products.
[0075] The principle and mode of operation of this invention have
been described in its preferred embodiments. However, it should be
noted that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as
specifically illustrated and described without departing from its
scope.
* * * * *