U.S. patent application number 10/848620 was filed with the patent office on 2004-12-16 for recombinant influenza viruses expressing tumor-associated antigens as antitumor agents.
Invention is credited to Garcia-Sastre, Adolfo, Paleso, Peter, Restifo, Nicholas P..
Application Number | 20040253273 10/848620 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 33513489 |
Filed Date | 2004-12-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20040253273 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Paleso, Peter ; et
al. |
December 16, 2004 |
Recombinant influenza viruses expressing tumor-associated antigens
as antitumor agents
Abstract
The present invention relates to the engineering of recombinant
influenza viruses that express tumor-associated antigens.
Expression of tumor-associated antigens by these viruses can be
achieved by engineering specific epitopes into influenza virus
proteins, or by engineering viral genes that encode a viral protein
and the specific antigen as independent polypeptides. Tumor-bearing
patients can be immunized with the recombinant influenza viruses
alone, or in combination with another treatment, to induce an
immune response that leads to tumor reduction. The recombinant
viruses can also be used to vaccinate high risk tumor-free patients
to prevent tumor formation in vivo.
Inventors: |
Paleso, Peter; (Leonia,
NJ) ; Garcia-Sastre, Adolfo; (New York, NY) ;
Restifo, Nicholas P.; (Washington, DC) |
Correspondence
Address: |
JONES DAY
222 EAST 41ST ST
NEW YORK
NY
10017
US
|
Family ID: |
33513489 |
Appl. No.: |
10/848620 |
Filed: |
May 17, 2004 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10848620 |
May 17, 2004 |
|
|
|
09070629 |
Apr 30, 1998 |
|
|
|
60045176 |
Apr 30, 1997 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
424/209.1 ;
435/235.1; 530/350 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C07K 14/005 20130101;
A61P 37/04 20180101; C12N 2840/20 20130101; C07K 2319/00 20130101;
A61K 2039/53 20130101; C12N 2840/203 20130101; A61K 2039/5256
20130101; C12N 2760/16122 20130101; C12N 2760/16143 20130101; C12N
15/86 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
424/209.1 ;
435/235.1; 530/350 |
International
Class: |
A61K 039/12; A61K
039/145; C12N 007/00; C07K 014/11 |
Claims
1. A recombinant influenza virus the genome of which contains a
region encoding a tumor antigen or an epitope of a tumor
antigen.
2-19. (canceled).
20. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 1 in which the region
is inserted into an open reading frame of a genomic segment of the
influenza virus.
21. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 1 in which the region
is inserted into an open reading frame of a genomic segment of the
influenza virus.
22. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 20 or 21, wherein said
genomic segment is a structural gene of the influenza virus.
23. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 22, wherein said
structural gene is hemagglutinin (HA) or neuraminadase (NA).
24. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 1, wherein said tumor
antigen is a melanocyte tumor antigen, a widely shared antigen, a
mutated antigen or a nonmelanoma antigen.
25. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 24, wherein said
melanocyte tumor antigen is gp100, MART-1/MelanA, TRP-1 (gp75) or
tyrosinase.
26. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 24, wherein said
widely shared antigen is MAGE-1, MAGE-3, BAGE, GAGE-1, GAGE-2,
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-V or p15.
27. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 24, wherein said
mutated antigen is .beta.-catenin, MUM-1, or CDK4.
28. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 24, wherein said
nonmelanoma antigen is a breast, ovarian, cervical or pancreatic
antigen.
29. The recombinant influenza virus of claim 24, wherein the
nonmelanoma antigen is Her-2/neu, human papillomavirus-E7 or
MUC-1.
30. An immunogenic composition comprising an effective amount of
the recombinant influenza virus of claim 1 or 24, and a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.
31. The immunogenic composition of claim 30 in which the
recombinant influenza virus is a live virus.
32. The immunogenic composition of claim 31 in which the
recombinant influenza virus is inactivated.
33. The immunogenic composition of claim 32 further comprising an
adjuvant.
34. A method of inducing an immune response against tumor cells,
said method comprising administering to a tumor-bearing patient or
a tumor-free patient an effective amount of the immunogenic
formulation of claim 30.
35. The method of claim 34 further comprising the subsequent
administration of a booster preparation.
36. The method of claim 35, wherein the booster preparation
comprises a subunit vaccine containing the same tumor antigen or
the same epitope of the tumor antigen, or a different serotype than
the recombinant influenza virus used in the initial immunization,
or a recombinant virus other than an influenza virus engineered to
express the same tumor antigen or the same epitope of the tumor
antigen.
37. The method of claim 34 further comprising administering to said
tumor-bearing host chemotherapy, radiation therapy or a bone marrow
transplant, or conducting surgery on said tumor-bearing
patient.
38. The method of claim 34, wherein the immunogenic composition is
administered to the tumor-bearing host orally, intradermally,
intramuscularly, intraperitoneally, intravenously, subcutaneously,
intranasally, transdermally, epidurally, pulmonary, gastrically,
intestinally, rectally, vaginally, or urethrally.
39. The method of claim 34, wherein said patient is a mammal.
40. The method of claim 34, wherein said patient is a human.
41. A method for activating T lymphocytes, said method comprising
contacting T lymphocytes with the recombinant influenza virus of
claim 1.
42. A method for generating dendritic cells expressing a tumor
antigen or an epitope of a tumor antigen, said method comprising
contacting dendritic cells with the recombinant influenza virus of
claim 1.
43. A method for activating T lymphocytes, said method comprising
a) contacting isolated T lymphocytes with the recombinant influenza
virus of claim 1; and b) expanding the T lymphocytes.
44. A method for activating T lymphocytes comprising contacting the
dendritic cells produced by the method of claim 42 with T
lymphocytes.
45. A method of inducing an immune response against tumor cells,
said method comprising administering to a tumor-bearing patient or
a tumor-free patient an effective amount of the activated T
lymphocytes produced by the method of claim 43 or 44, wherein the
activated T lymphocytes are histocompatible with the patient.
46. A method of inducing an immune response against tumor cells,
said method comprising administering to a tumor-bearing patient or
a tumor-free patient an effective amount of the dendritic cells
produced by the methods of claim 42, wherein the dendritic cells
are histocompatible with the patient.
Description
[0001] This application claims priority to U.S. provisional
application Ser. No. 60/045,176, filed Apr. 30, 1997, incorporated
by reference herein, in its entirety. The work reflected in this
application was supported, in part, by a grant from the National
Institutes of Health, and the Government may have certain rights in
the invention.
1. INTRODUCTION
[0002] The present invention relates to the engineering of
recombinant influenza viruses that express tumor-associated
antigens. Expression of tumor-associated antigens by these viruses
can be achieved by engineering specific epitopes into influenza
virus proteins, or by engineering viral genes that encode a viral
protein and the specific antigen as independent polypeptides.
Tumor-bearing patients can be immunized with the recombinant
influenza viruses alone, or in combination with another treatment,
to induce an immune response that leads to tumor reduction. The
recombinant viruses can also be used to vaccinate high risk
tumor-free patients to prevent tumor formation in vivo.
2. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] A number of immunotherapeutic approaches proposed for the
treatment of tumors have had limited success. For example, the use
of exogenous antibodies or immunotoxins specific for tumor
associated antigens (TAAs) has been attempted for the targeted
killing of tumor cells. However, successful treatment has been
hampered, in part, by the relative inaccessibility of the tumor
cells to the circulating, exogenously administered antibodies.
[0004] Other approaches have been designed to elicit a host immune
response against the tumor cells. Indeed, there is strong evidence
suggesting that the stimulation of a potent and specific T-cell
response against tumor cells will result in tumor reduction.
However, although most cancer cells express tumor associated
antigens (TAAs), the presence of a tumor usually does not result in
the induction of tumor-specific immunity. Attempts to increase the
poor immunogenicity of tumor cells comprise most of the history of
cancer immunotherapy. These efforts have included physical
modification of the tumor cells (including .gamma.-irradiation),
the inoculation of mixtures of tumor cells and pathogens (viruses,
bacteria and bacterial extracts) and more recently,
gene-modification of the tumor cells with a variety of
immunomodulatory molecules.
[0005] In the case of vaccination in the treatment and/or
prevention of cancer, a potentially effective strategy for
eliciting vigorous immune responses against TAAs may involve the
insertion of the cloned genes encoding TAAs into recombinant
viruses (reviewed in Restifo, 1996, Curr. Opin. Immunol.
8:658-663). A number of recombinant expression vectors have been
shown to be useful in the prevention, and in some cases in the
treatment, of tumors in experimental animals including poxviruses
(vaccinia (Hodge, et al., 1995, Int. J. Cancer 63:231-237)),
fowlpox (Wang, et al., 1995, J. Immunol. 154:4685-4692) and canary
pox (Plotkin, et al., 1995, Dev. Biol. Stand. 84:165-170));
adenoviruses (Chen, et al., 1996, J. Immunol. 156:224-231;
Randrianarison-Jewtoukoff and Perricaudet, 1995, Biologicals
23:145-157); polioviruses (Ansardi, et al., 1994, Cancer Res.
54:6359-6364); Sindbis viruses (Johanning, et al., 1995, Nucleic
Acids Res. 23:1495-1501) and non-viral vectors including plasmid
DNA administered by injection (Conry, et al., 1995, Gene Ther.
2:59-65) and by "gene gun" (Irvine, et al., 1996, J. Immunol.
156:238-245).
[0006] However, the foregoing systems have limitations which
restrict their use in humans. For example, pre-existing immunity to
vaccinia or adenovirus precludes their use as vaccinating strains.
Moreover, the immune response induced by vaccinia or adenovirus
precludes the use of the same virus for a second immunization or
boost. In addition, the pathogenicity associated with some virus
vectors, e.g., adenoviruses, also severely limit their use in
vaccine formulations for human patients. Thus, there is a need for
the continued exploration of new vector systems for use in cancer
vaccines.
3. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] The invention relates to recombinant influenza viruses that
express TAAs, and their use to "immunize" tumor-bearing hosts in
order to generate an immune response that leads to tumor
regression. Alternatively, tumor-free subjects who have a
predisposition to develop tumors can be immunized or vaccinated
with the recombinant influenza viruses of the invention to prevent
tumor formation.
[0008] Expression of TAAs by these viruses can be achieved by
engineering specific TAA epitopes into the influenza virus
proteins, or by engineering viral genes that encode a viral protein
and the specific antigen as independent polypeptides. The methods
of the present invention permit the generation of stable
recombinant viruses expressing foreign epitopes and/or
polypeptides.
[0009] Reverse genetics techniques to engineer influenza viruses
are described. Immunization of tumor-bearing patients with such
viruses alone, or in combination with another treatment, to induce
an immune response that leads to tumor reduction is also described.
For example, the recombinant influenza viruses of the invention can
be used to immunize or "vaccinate" a tumor-bearing host in order to
generate an immune response against tumor cells. The antitumor
immune response can be enhanced by a subsequent "booster"
immunization using a subunit vaccine preparation containing the
appropriate TAA, a different viral vector (e.g., a pox virus based
vector) that expresses the TAA, or TAA expressed by an influenza
recombinant engineered using a serotype that differs from the
initial inoculant. The immunization protocol may be used alone or
in conjunction with surgical, radiation or chemotherapeutic
regimens. Alternatively, tumor-free hosts can be similarly
vaccinated to prevent tumor formation in vivo.
[0010] The invention is based, in part, on the surprising discovery
that the recombinant influenza viruses of the invention induce a
potent and specific cell-mediated immune response directed against
the tumor cells resulting in tumor reduction. The invention is also
based, in part, on the recognition that non-transmissible
attenuated strains of influenza virus could be used to engineer
vaccines for use in humans. Moreover, since influenza viruses
change their antigenic determinants very quickly, different viral
strains can be selected and engineered for use to avoid the
presence of pre-existing immunity against the virus in patients.
Strain variability permits the construction of a vast repertoire of
vaccine formulations, and obviates the problems of host
resistance.
[0011] The invention is illustrated by way of working examples
which demonstrate the invention in a murine model. Strikingly, mice
immunized with a recombinant influenza A virus vector, and boosted
with a vaccinia virus vector expressing the same antigen were able
to generate high levels of CTLs against the expressed antigen.
Treatment with the recombinant influenza virus vectors mediated
regression of an experimental established murine cancer.
3.1. Abbreviations
[0012] CTL, cytotoxic lymphocyte
[0013] .beta.-gal, .beta.-galactosidase
[0014] HA, hemagglutinin
[0015] IRES, internal ribosomal entry site
[0016] MOI, multiplicity of infection
[0017] NA, neuraminidase
[0018] PFU, plaque forming units
[0019] TAA, tumor-associated antigen
4. DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0020] FIG. 1. Schematic representation of the recombinant genes of
the transfectant influenza viruses expressing the CD8+ T-cell
.beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL.
[0021] A. MINIGAL recombinant gene. The .beta.-gal epitope is
expressed downstream of a leader peptide (characters in italics) as
an independent polypeptide from a bicistronic NA gene. Expression
of the viral NA protein in this gene is achieved via internal
initiation of translation mediated by an IRES element derived from
the BiP mRNA (Garcia-Sastre, et al., 1994, J. Virol.
68:6254-6261).
[0022] B. NAGAL. The .beta.-gal epitope is expressed as part of the
amino acid sequence of the NA protein.
[0023] C. BHAGAL. The .beta.-gal epitope is expressed as part of
the amino acid sequence of the HA protein.
[0024] The NA and HA open reading frames (ORF) are indicated. Black
boxes represent noncoding regions in the represented genes.
[0025] FIG. 2. Specific recognition of transfectant influenza A
viruses-infected cells by a .beta.-gal-specific CTL clone.
Five.times.10.sup.5 CT26.WT cells/well (24 well plate) were
incubated in RPMI, 0.1% BSA, 30 mM HEPES at pH 6.8, and they were
infected with the influenza viruses shown at an MOI of 5 for 3
hours. Specific CTLs against the .beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL were
then added at an E:T ratio of 1. After 24 hours of coincubation
cell supernatants were harvested and assayed for GM-CSF. Results
from two independent experiments are represented. WT, influenza
A/WSN/33 wild-type virus.
[0026] FIG. 3. Specific cytolytic responses induced in mice by
transfectant influenza A viruses expressing the .beta.-gal epitope
TPHPARIGL. To evaluate the function of transfectant influenza A
viruses in the priming of .beta.-gal-specific cytotoxic responses
in vivo, two mice/group were infected with the influenza A virus
shown on the abscissa. Three weeks latter, splenocytes from
immunized mice were cultured in the presence of the
L.sup.d-restricted .beta.-gal.sub.876-884 peptide for 6 days then
tested in a microcytotoxicity assay against CT26.WT, CT26.CL25 or
CT26.WT cells loaded with the .beta.-gal.sub.876-884 peptide, at
the indicated E:T ratios. Experiment was performed two additional
times with similar results.
[0027] FIG. 4. Transfectant influenza A viruses mediate treatment
of pulmonary metastases established for three days. Mice were
inoculated intravenously with 5.times.10.sup.6 CT26.CL25 tumor
cells, then vaccinated three-days later with 10.sup.6 pfu of the
transfectant influenza A virus shown. Twelve hours after the
therapeutic immunization, mice were given 100,000 Cetus units of
rIL-2 bid for 3 days. The lungs of treated mice were evaluated in a
coded, blinded manner for pulmonary metastases 12 days after the
tumor inoculation. The number of pulmonary metastases that were
enumerated after two independent experiments are shown for
individual mice.
5. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0028] The engineering of recombinant influenza viruses expressing
TAAs, and their use as immunogenic compositions or vaccines to
induce tumor regression in mammals, including humans, is described.
One drawback to the use of viruses such as vaccinia for
constructing recombinant or chimeric viruses for use in vaccines is
the lack of variation in its major epitopes. This lack of
variability in the viral strains places strict limitations on the
repeated use of chimeric vaccinia virus, in that a first
vaccination will generate host resistance to the strain so that the
same virus cannot infect the host in a second inoculation.
Inoculation of a resistant individual with chimeric vaccinia virus
will, therefore, not induce immune stimulation. The considerable
advantage of using influenza virus, a negative-strand RNA virus,
for vaccination, is that it demonstrates a wide variability of its
major epitopes. Thousands of variants of influenza virus have been
identified, each strain evolving by antigenic drift.
[0029] "Reverse genetics" techniques are used to construct
recombinant and/or chimeric influenza virus templates engineered to
direct the expression of heterologous gene products. When combined
with purified viral RNA-directed RNA polymerase, these virus
templates are infectious, replicate in hosts, and their
heterologous gene is expressed and packaged by the resulting
recombinant influenza viruses (For a description of the reverse
genetics approach see Palese et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,057 and
Palese, WO93/21306, each of which is incorporated by reference
herein in its entirety). The expression products and/or chimeric
virions obtained can be used in vaccine formulations, and the
strain variability of the influenza virus permits construction of a
vast repertoire of vaccine formulations and obviates the problem of
host resistance. Furthermore, influenza virus stimulates a vigorous
cytotoxic T cell response. Hence, the presentation of foreign
epitopes in an influenza virus background can further induce
secretory immunity and cell-mediated immunity.
5.1. Construction of the Recombinant Influenza A Virus
[0030] In accordance with the invention, recombinant influenza
viruses are engineered to express tumor-associated antigens (TAAs),
including, but not limited to, the TAAs set forth in Table 1.
1TABLE 1 Human tumor antigens recognized by T cells (Robbins and
Kawakami, 1996, Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8: 628-636) Melanocyte lineage
proteins gp100 MART-1/MelanA TRP-1 (gp75) Tyrosinase
Tumor-specific, widely shared antigens MAGE-1 MAGE-3 BAGE GAGE-1,
-2 N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase-V p15 Tumor-specific, mutated
antigens .beta.-catenin MUM-1 CDK4 Nonmelanoma antigens HER-2/neu
(breast and ovarian carcinoma) Human papillomavirus-E6, E7
(cervical carcinoma) MUC-1 (breast, ovarian and pancreatic
carcinoma)
[0031] Indeed, antigens which are identified in the future as TAAs
are included within the scope of the invention for the construction
of recombinant influenza viruses by the techniques described
herein. The selection of the TAA or its epitope will depend upon
the tumor type to be treated.
[0032] The use of reverse genetics to genetically engineer
influenza viruses, including attenuated influenza viruses, and
methods for their production, are described in Palese et al. (U.S.
Pat. No. 5,166,057) and Palese (WO93/21306). Such reverse genetics
techniques can be utilized to engineer a mutation, including but
not limited to an insertion, deletion, or substitution of an amino
acid residue(s), an antigen(s), or an epitope(s) into a coding
region of the viral genome so that altered or chimeric viral
proteins are expressed by the engineered virus. Alternatively, the
virus can be engineered to express the TAA as an independent
polypeptide.
[0033] The reverse genetics technique involves the preparation of
synthetic recombinant viral RNAs that contain the non-coding
regions of the negative strand virus which are essential for the
recognition of viral RNA by viral polymerases and for the packaging
into mature virions. The recombinant RNAs are synthesized from a
recombinant DNA template and reconstituted in vitro with purified
viral polymerase and nucleoprotein complex to form recombinant
ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) which can be used to transfect cells.
[0034] Preferably, the viral polymerase proteins are present during
in vitro transcription of the synthetic RNAs prior to transfection.
The synthetic recombinant RNPs can be rescued into infectious virus
particles. The foregoing techniques are described in Palese et al.,
U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,057, and in Enami and Palese, 1991, J. Virol.
65:2711-2713, each of which is incorporated by reference herein in
its entirety.
[0035] Such reverse genetics techniques can be used to insert a TAA
or an epitope of TAA into an influenza virus protein so that a
chimeric protein is expressed by the virus. While any of the
influenza viral proteins may be engineered in this way, the
influenza HA or NA proteins are preferred when it is desired to
engineer the expression of the TAA or epitope on the surface of the
recombinant influenza virus.
[0036] Alternatively, viral genes can be engineered to encode a
viral protein and the specific TAA as independent polypeptides. To
this end, reverse genetics can advantageously be used to engineer a
bicistronic RNA segment as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,166,057 and
in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/252,508 filed Jun. 1, 1994
(allowed), each of which is incorporated by reference in its
entirety herein; i.e., so that the engineered viral RNA species
directs the production of both the viral protein and the TAA as
independent polypeptides.
[0037] Attenuated strains of influenza may be used as the
"parental" strain to generate the influenza recombinants.
Alternatively, reverse genetics can be used to engineer both the
attenuation characteristics as well as the TAA or TAA epitope into
the recombinant influenza viruses of the invention.
[0038] In one embodiment, reverse genetics methods can be used to
construct an influenza A virus transfectant that encodes a fragment
or portion of a TAA, e.g., MART-1 or gp100 (melanoma TAAs). More
preferably, sequences encoding such epitopes or fragments thereof
are nested within an open reading frame, e.g., the hemagglutinin
(HA) or neuraminidase (NA) open reading frames.
[0039] In another embodiment, an independent minigene encoding a
fragment or portion of an epitope, e.g., a minigene encoding a TAA
or fragment thereof, is preceded by an endoplasmic reticulum
insertion signal sequence, placed in a bicistronic arrangement in
the NA RNA segment of the recombinant influenza A virus.
Preferably, a transfectant expressing such a minigene mediates the
presentation of the epitope to an anti-epitope CTL clone, and
elicits specific cytolytic responses in vivo. Most preferably, such
a transfectant, when administered in a vaccine formulation,
mediates the regression of a tumor, metastasis, or neoplastic
growth.
5.2. Vaccine Formulations Using the Recombinant Viruses
[0040] The recombinant influenza viruses can be formulated as
immunogenic compositions, which may be referred to herein as
vaccines.
[0041] Either a live recombinant viral vaccine or an inactivated
recombinant viral vaccine can be formulated. A live vaccine may be
preferred because multiplication in the host leads to a prolonged
stimulus of similar kind and magnitude to that occurring in natural
infections, and therefore, confers substantial, long-lasting
immunity. Production of such live recombinant virus vaccine
formulations maybe accomplished using conventional methods
involving propagation of the virus in cell culture or in the
allantois of the chick embryo followed by purification.
[0042] In this regard, the use of genetically engineered influenza
virus (vectors) for vaccine purposes may require the presence of
attenuation characteristics in these strains. Current live virus
vaccine candidates for use in humans are either cold adapted,
temperature sensitive, or passaged so that they derive several
(six) genes from avian viruses, which results in attenuation. The
introduction of appropriate mutations (e.g., deletions) into the
templates used for transfection may provide the novel viruses with
attenuation characteristics. For example, specific multiple
missense mutations which are associated with temperature
sensitivity or cold adaption can be made into deletion mutations
and/or multiple mutations can be introduced into individual
influenza virus genes. These mutants should be more stable than the
cold or temperature sensitive mutants containing single point
mutations and reversion frequencies should be extremely low.
[0043] Alternatively, recombinant viruses with "suicide"
characteristics may be constructed. Such viruses would go through
only one or a few rounds of replication in the host. For example,
cleavage of the hemagglutinin envelope glycoprotein (HA) is
necessary to allow for reinitiation of replication. Therefore,
changes in the HA cleavage site may produce a virus that replicates
in an appropriate cell system but not in the human host. When used
as a vaccine, the recombinant virus would go through a single
replication cycle and induce a sufficient level of immune response
but it would not go further in the human host and cause disease.
Recombinant viruses lacking one or more of the essential influenza
virus genes would not be able to undergo successive rounds of
replication. Such defective viruses can be produced by
co-transfecting reconstituted RNPs lacking a specific gene(s) into
cell lines which permanently express this gene(s). Viruses lacking
an essential gene(s) will be replicated in these cell lines but
when administered to the human host will not be able to complete a
round of replication. Such preparations may transcribe and
translate--in this abortive cycle--a sufficient number of genes to
induce an immune response. Alternatively, larger quantities of the
strains could be administered, so that these preparations serve as
inactivated (killed) virus, vaccines. For inactivated vaccines, it
is preferred that the heterologous gene product be expressed as a
viral component, so that the gene product is associated with the
virion. The advantage of such preparations is that they contain
native proteins and do not undergo inactivation by treatment with
formalin or other agents used in the manufacturing of killed virus
vaccines.
[0044] In another embodiment of this aspect of the invention,
inactivated vaccine formulations may be prepared using conventional
techniques to "kill" the recombinant viruses. Inactivated vaccines
are "dead" in the sense that their infectivity has been destroyed.
Ideally, the infectivity of the virus is destroyed without
affecting is immunogenicity. In order to prepare inactivated
vaccines, the recombinant virus may be grown in cell culture or in
the allantois of the chick embryo, purified by zonal
ultracentrifugation, inactivated by formaldehyde or
.beta.-propiolactone, and pooled. The resulting vaccine is usually
inoculated intramuscularly.
[0045] Inactivated viruses may be formulated with a suitable
adjuvant in order to enhance the immunological response. Such
adjuvants may include but are not limited to mineral gels, e.g.,
aluminum hydroxide; surface active substances such as lysolecithin,
pluronic polyols, polyanions; peptides; oil emulsions; and
potentially useful human adjuvants such as BCG and Corynebacterium
parvum.
5.3. Methods of Treatment and/or Vaccination
[0046] The recombinant influenza viruses of the invention can be
used to treat tumor-bearing mammals, including humans, to generate
an immune response against the tumor cells leading to tumor
regression in vivo. The "vaccines" of the invention can be used
either alone or in combination with other therapeutic regimens,
including but not limited to chemotherapy, radiation therapy,
surgery, bone marrow transplantation, etc. for the treatment of
tumors. For example, surgical or radiation techniques could be used
to debulk the tumor mass, after which, the vaccine formulations of
the invention can be administered to ensure the regression and
prevent the progression of remaining tumor masses or
micrometastases in the body. Alternatively, administration of the
"vaccine" can precede such surgical, radiation or chemotherapeutic
treatment.
[0047] Alternatively, the recombinant viruses of the invention can
be used to immunize or "vaccinate" tumor-free subjects to prevent
tumor formation. With the advent of genetic testing, it is now
possible to predict a subject's predisposition for cancers. Such
subjects, therefore, may be immunized using a recombinant influenza
virus expressing an appropriate tumor-associated antigen.
[0048] Many methods may be used to introduce the vaccine
formulations described above into a patient. These include, but are
not limited to, oral, intradermal, intramuscular, intraperitoneal,
intravenous, subcutaneous, intranasal, transdermal, epidural,
pulmonary, gastric, intestinal, rectal, vaginal, or urethral
routes. When the method of treatment uses a live recombinant
influenza vaccine formulation of the invention, it may be
preferable to introduce the formulation via the natural route of
infection of the influenza virus, i.e., through a mucosal membrane
or surface, such as an oral, nasal, gastric, intestinal, rectal,
vaginal or urethral route. To induce a CTL response, the mucosal
route of administration may be through an oral or nasal membrane.
Alternatively, an intramuscular or intraperitoneal route of
administration may be used. Preferably, a dose of 10.sup.6-10.sup.7
PFU (plaque forming units) of cold adapted recombinant influenza
virus is given to a human patient.
[0049] The ability of influenza virus to induce a vigorous
secretory and cellular immune response may be used advantageously.
For example, infection of the respiratory tract by recombinant
influenza viruses may induce a strong secretory immune response in
a particular tissue or organ system, for example, the urogenital
system.
[0050] Where subsequent or booster doses are required, a different
serotype of influenza can be selected as the parental virus used to
generate the recombinant. Alternatively, another virus such as
vaccinia, or a subunit preparation can be used to boost.
Immunization and/or cancer immunotherapy may be accomplished using
a combined immunization regimen, e.g., immunization with a
recombinant influenza viral vaccine of the invention and a boost of
a recombinant vaccinia viral vaccine. In such an embodiment, a
strong secondary CD8.sup.+ T cell response is induced after priming
and boosting with different viruses expressing the same epitope
(for such methods of immunization and boosting, see, e.g., Murata
et al., Cellular Immunol. 173:96-107). For example, a patient is
first primed with a vaccine formulation of the invention comprising
a recombinant influenza virus expressing an epitope, e.g., a
selected TAA or fragment thereof. The patient is then boosted,
e.g., 21 days later, with a vaccine formulation comprising a
recombinant vaccinia virus expressing the same epitope. Such
priming followed by boosting induces a strong secondary CD8.sup.+ T
cell response. Such a priming and boosting immunization regimen is
preferably used to treat a patient with a tumor, metastasis or
neoplastic growth expressing the selected TAA.
[0051] In yet another embodiment, the recombinant influenza viruses
can be used as a booster immunization subsequent to a primary
immunization with inactivated tumor cells, a subunit vaccine
containing the TAA or its epitope, or another recombinant viral
vaccine, such as vaccinia or adenovirus.
[0052] In an alternate embodiment, recombinant influenza virus
encoding a particular TAA, epitope or fragment thereof may be used
in adoptive immunotherapeutic methods for the activation of T
lymphocytes that are histocompatible with the patient and specific
for the TAA (for methods of adoptive immunotherapy, see, e.g.,
Rosenberg, U.S. Pat. No. 4,690,915, issued Sep. 1, 1987; Zarling,
et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,081,029, issued Jan. 14, 1992). Such T
lymphocytes may be isolated from the patient or a histocompatible
donor. The T lymphocytes are activated in vitro by exposure to the
recombinant influenza virus of the invention. Activated T
lymphocytes are expanded and inoculated into the patient in order
to transfer T cell immunity directed against the TAA epitope.
6. EXAMPLE: TRANSFECTANT INFLUENZA A VIRUSES AS EFFECTIVE AND SAFE
RECOMBINANT IMMUNOGENS IN THE TREATMENT OF CANCER
[0053] In the following example, reverse genetic methods were used
to construct three different influenza A virus transfectants that
encoded an L.sup.d-restricted, nine amino acid long fragment of
.beta.-galactosidase (corresponding to residues 876-884). Sequences
encoding this epitope were nested within the hemagglutinin (HA) or
neuraminidase (NA) open reading frames. Alternatively, an
independent .beta.-galactosidase (.beta.-gal) minigene, preceded by
an endoplasmic reticulum insertion signal sequence, was placed in a
bicistronic arrangement in the NA RNA segment of the virus. All
three transfectants mediated the presentation of the epitope to an
anti-.beta.-gal CTL clone. Furthermore, each of the three
transfectant viruses expressing the .beta.-gal fragment elicited
specific cytolytic responses in vivo. Most importantly, these
transfectants mediated the regression of established murine
pulmonary metastases.
[0054] The following example also demonstrates the efficacy of
transfectant influenza viruses expressing a TAA to clear tumors in
a murine cancer model. The experimental murine tumor used, CT26,
was transfected with the lacZ gene, which encodes the enzyme
.beta.-galactosidase (.beta.-gal). Hence .beta.-gal was used in
this system as the model TAA. Transfectant influenza viruses were
engineered that expressed a CTL epitope from the model .beta.-gal
antigen. Then, the ability of these viruses to induce a therapeutic
cellular immune response in mice bearing tumors expressing
.beta.-gal was determined. The results demonstrate that influenza
virus vectors may be used in cancer immunotherapy.
6.1. Materials and Methods
6.1.1. Animals and Cell Lines
[0055] Six- to eight-week old female BALB/C (H-2.sup.d) mice were
obtained from Frederick Cancer Research Center (Frederick, Md.).
CT26 is an N-nitroso-N-methylurethane induced BALB/C (H-2.sup.d)
undifferentiated colon carcinoma. The cloning of this tumor cell
line to produce CT26.WT and the subsequent transduction with lacZ
and subcloning to generate CT-26.CL25 which stably expresses
.beta.-gal, has been described previously (Wang, et al., 1995, J.
Immunol. 154:4685-4692).
[0056] These cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640, 10% heat
inactivated FCS (Biofluids, Rockville, Md.), 0.03% L-glutamine, 100
.mu.g/m, streptomycin, 100 .mu.g/ml penicillin and 50 .mu.g/ml
gentamicin sulfate (NIH Media Center). In addition, 400 or 800
.mu.g/ml G418 (GIBCO, Grand Island, N.Y.) was added to the
maintenance media of the CT26.CL25 cells. Madin-Darby bovine kidney
(MDBK) cells were used for growing wild-type influenza A/WSN/33
virus and for rescuing and growing transfectant influenza viruses.
MDBK cells were maintained in reinforced minimal essential medium
containing 10% heat inactivated FCS (GIBCO, Grand Island, N.Y.)
6.1.2. Construction and Characterization of Transfectant Influenza
A Viruses (FIG. 1)
[0057] The construction of the transfectant influenza viruses
BIP-NA, MNA and ELDKWAS which were used in control experiments has
been described (Garcia-Sastre, et al., 1994, J. Virol.
68:6254-6261; Rodrigues, et al., 1994, J. Immunol. 153:4636-4648;
Muster, et al., 1994, J. Virol. 68:4031-4034). Transfectant viruses
which express the L.sup.d-restricted .beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL
were obtained by RNP-transfection as previously described
(Garcia-Sastre and Palese, 1993, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 47:765-790).
These viruses contain one RNA segment which is derived from
genetically engineered plasmid cDNA encoding the neuraminidase (NA)
or hemagglutinin (HA) genes of influenza A/WSN/33 virus. One virus,
called MINIGAL, encodes the amino acid sequence
MRYMILGLLALAAVCSAATPHPARIGL from a minicistron followed by a
mammalian internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) element just
upstream of the NA open reading frame. Amino acid residues in front
of the .beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL are derived from the leader
peptide of the E3/19K protein (Restifo, et al., 1995, J. Immunol.
154:4414-4422). A control virus, BIPNA, contains the same IRES
sequences upstream of the NA open reading frame but lacks the
.beta.-gal minicistron (Garcia-Sastre, et al., 1994, J. Virol.
68:6254-6261). The second transfectant virus, NAGAL, encodes for
the amino acid sequence TPHPARIGL inserted in the stalk region of
the NA protein. The third transfectant influenza virus, BHAGAL,
encodes the same .beta.-gal epitope inserted into the antigenic
site B of the viral HA protein. MNA and ELDKWAS viruses, which
contain irrelevant epitope insertions in the same context as NAGAL
and BHAGAL viruses, respectively, were used as controls.
Transfectant viruses were plaque purified three times in MDBK cells
and their identities were subsequently confirmed by RT-PCR and
sequencing of gene regions containing the engineered foreign
sequences (Garcia-Sastre, et al., 1994, J. Virol.
68:6254-6261).
6.1.3. Peptides
[0058] The synthetic peptide TPHPARIGL was synthesized by Peptide
Technologies (Washington D.C.) to a purity of greater than 99% as
assessed by HPLC and amino acid analysis. This peptide represents
the naturally processed H-2 L.sup.d restricted epitope spanning
amino acids 876-884 of .beta.-gal.
6.1.4. .sup.51Chromium Release Assays
[0059] Six-hour .sup.51Cr release assays were performed as
previously described. Briefly, 2.times.10.sup.6 target cells were
incubated with 200 mCi Na.sup.51CrO.sub.4(.sup.51Cr) for ninety
minutes. Peptide pulsed CT26.WT cells were incubated with 1
.mu.g/ml of synthetic peptide during labeling. Target cells were
then mixed with effector cells for six hours at the effector to
target (E:T) ratios indicated. The amount of .sup.51Cr released was
determined by .gamma.-counting and the percentage of specific lysis
was calculated from triplicate samples as follows:
[(experimental cpm-spontaneous cpm/maximal cpm-spontaneous
cpm)].times.100.
6.1.5. In Vitro Stimulation of .beta.-Gal-Specific Cytotoxic T
Cells
[0060] 10.sup.5 CT26.WT cells/well in 96 well, U-bottom plates
(Costar,) were incubated in complete medium (RPMI, 0.1% BSA, 30 mM
HEPES at Ph 6.8) and infected with the influenza viruses shown at a
multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 20 for 3 hours. CTL.sub.X, which
are specific for the .beta.-gal epitope were then added at an E:T
of 1. After 24 hours of coincubation, supernatants were harvested
and assayed for GM-CSF.
6.1.6. In Vivo Experiments
[0061] Active treatment studies involved BALB/c mice inoculated
intravenously with 5.times.10.sup.5 CT2.CL25 cells. Three days
later, mice were randomized, then inoculated with 10.sup.6 PFU of
the indicated transfectant or wild-type influenza virus. Twelve
days after tumor injection, mice were ear tagged, randomized again,
and sacrificed. Lung metastases were enumerated in a blinded
fashion by an investigator with no knowledge of the experimental
groups.
6.1.7. Statistical Analysis
[0062] Data concerning the number of lung metastases do not follow
a nominal distribution (since all lungs that contain >250
metastases were deemed too numerous to count) and thus were
analyzed using the non-parametric two tailed Kruskal-Wallis test.
All statistical values expressed are P.sub.2 values.
6.2. Results
6.2.1. Rescue of Transfectant Influenza A Viruses Encoding a T Cell
Epitope From .beta.-Galactosidase
[0063] Recombinant viruses encoding a single CD8.sup.+ T cell
antigenic determinant of 8-10 amino acids in length can mediate the
regression of experimental tumors (Irvine, et al., 1995, J.
Immunol. 154:4651-4657; McCabe, et al., 1995, Cancer Res.
55:1741-1747; Restifo, 1996, Curr. Opin. Immunol. 8:658-663). Thus
transfectant influenza A viruses were constructed that expressed
the epitope TPHPARIGL. This determinant corresponds to amino acids
876-884 in the intact .beta.-gal protein and is presented by the
MHC class I L.sup.d-molecule on the surface of the CT26.CL25 mouse
tumor cells (Wang, et al., 1995, J. Immunol. 154:4685-4692).
[0064] Three different influenza A virus transfectants were
generated (FIG. 1). The first transfectant virus, called MINIGAL,
contained a minigene in a bicistronic arrangement within the
NA-specific viral RNA segment. mRNA derived from this segment uses
a mammalian IRES placed downstream of the minigene and upstream of
the NA gene to achieve translation of the NA protein. In addition,
the minigene is translated following the usual cap-dependent
initiation of translation in eukaryotic cells. In this transfectant
virus, the-minigene was-engineered to encode the E3/19K leader
sequence at the N-terminus of the .beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL. The
ER-insertion signal sequence has been found, in some cases, to
greatly augment the immunogenicity of the encoded epitope (Restifo,
et al., 1995, J. Immunol. 154:4414-4422). The control virus for
this construct, designated BIPNA virus, employs the same IRES
upstream of NA open reading frame but does not contain the
.beta.-gal epitope minigene (Garcia-Sastre, et al., 1994, J. Virol.
68:6254-6261). The second virus, NAGAL, encodes for the amino acid
sequence TPHPARIGL inserted in the stalk region of the NA protein.
The control for this construct is the MNA transfectant virus, which
contains the irrelevant peptide SYVPSAEQI inserted into the NA
stalk. This sequence is derived from the CS protein of P. voelii
(Rodrigues, et al., 1994, J. Immunol. 153:4636-4648). The third
virus called BHAGAL encodes the .beta.-gal epitope inserted into
the antigenic site B of the HA protein. The control for this virus
is designated ELDKWAS virus, which contains the gp4l HIV-derived
sequence ELDKWAS inserted into the same domain of the HA (Muster,
et al, 1995, J. Virol. 69:6678-6686).
[0065] Transfectant viruses MINIGAL, NAGAL and BHAGAL were rescued
following RNP transfections into helper influenza virus infected
cells. Sequence analysis of the rescued viruses confirmed the
presence of the foreign .beta.-gal-derived sequences. Viral titers
obtained in MDBK cells for the transfectant viruses expressing the
.beta.-gal-epitope were comparable to the control transfectant
viruses BIPNA, MNA and ELDKWAS and slightly lower (approximately
one log) than wild-type influenza A/WSN/33 virus.
6.2.2. Transfectant Influenza Virus-Infected Cells Are Able to
Specifically Present The .beta.-Gal-Epitope to CD8.sup.+ T
Cells
[0066] To ascertain if the .beta.-gal-epitope expressed by the
transfectant influenza viruses could be processed and presented in
the context of MHC class I molecules, CT26.WT tumor cells were
infected with the different transfectant influenza A viruses
encoding the .beta.-gal epitope TPHPARIGL, or the control viruses.
Infected cells were then co-incubated for 24 hours with a CD8.sup.+
T lymphocyte clone specific for this epitope. Supernatants were
then assayed for GM-CSF, and the results are shown in FIG. 2. Cells
that were infected with MINIGAL, NAGAL and BHAGAL viruses elicited
specific release of GM-CSF. Neither control transfectant virus- or
wild-type virus-infected cells were recognized by the
.beta.-gal-specific CTLs. Thus, the transfectant influenza A
viruses were found to mediate the expression of the
L.sup.d-restricted .beta.-gal epitope in forms that could be
processed and presented at the surface of infected cells.
6.2.3. Transfectant Influenza A Viruses Elicit a .beta.-Gal
Specific Cytolytic Response in Mice
[0067] Cytolytic responses mediated by CD8.sup.+ T lymphocytes
specific for TAA play an important role in the regression of
established tumor in both mouse and man (Greenberg, 1991, Adv.
Immunol. 49:281-355; Rao, et al., 1996, J. Immunol. 156:3357-3365;
Rosenberg, 1994, J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 86:1159-1166). To evaluate
the function of transfectant influenza A viruses in the priming of
.beta.-gal-specific cytotoxic responses in vivo, we immunized mice
with the panel of influenza A viruses. Three weeks later,
splenocytes from immunized mice were cultured in the presence of
the L.sup.d-restricted .beta.-gal.sub.876-884 peptide for 6 days
and subsequently tested in a microcytotoxicity assay. Cultured
splenocytes from mice immunized with the three transfectant
influenza A viruses expressing the .beta.-gal epitope (MINIGAL,
NAGAL and BHAGAL viruses) were capable of specific recognition of
CT26.CL25 cells or of CT26.WT cells pulsed with synthetic peptide
(FIG. 3). No specific recognition was elicited by wild-type virus,
or by the control transfectant viruses.
6.2.4. Treatment of Tumors Established for Three Days by
Vaccination With Transfectant Influenza A Viruses
[0068] Specific cytolytic responses were elicited in mice by the
transfectant influenza A viruses expressing the
.beta.-gal.sub.876-884 peptide. To evaluate whether these responses
had any impact on the growth of tumor cells, we immunized mice
bearing CT26.CL25 tumors established for three days with our panel
of recombinant immunogens. As shown in FIG. 4, treatment of mice
with MINIGAL, NAGAL or BHAGAL viruses resulted in a statistically
significant reduction of the number of lung metastases. In some
instances, treated mice did not show any macroscopic evidence of
lung tumors by day 12.
6.3. Discussion
[0069] The results demonstrate that transfectant influenza A
viruses expressing a single tumor antigen determinant can mediate
the regression of an experimental murine cancer established for
three days, thereby inducing a therapeutic antitumor response in
mice. In clinical cancer trials at the National Cancer Institute
and elsewhere, the recombinant viral vectors that are currently in
use include E1-deleted adenoviruses and two recombinant poxviruses:
vaccinia and fowlpox viruses. These virus vectors have been
engineered to express selected human TAA. It has been shown
previously that adenovirus- and poxvirus-based vectors are also
able to induce tumor clearance in experimental murine cancer models
(Wang, et al., 1995, J. Immunol. 154:4685-4692; McCabe, et al.,
1995, Cancer Res. 55:1741-1747; Chen, et al., 1996, J. Immunol.
156:224-231). However, most cancer patients encountered in clinical
settings appear to have high circulating levels of neutralizing
titers to the adenovirus vectors commonly used. The same is true
for vaccinia viruses, where the vast majority of patients have
received the virus as children during the effort by the
World-Health Organization's effort to eradicate smallpox
world-wide. Indeed, many patients can also have neutralizing
antibodies to many strains of the influenza A virus. However,
humans are susceptible to repeated bouts of influenza-mediated
upper respiratory symptoms because influenza viruses can almost
endlessly change the antigenic characteristics of their viral
coat.
[0070] Epidemiologists around the world attempt to predict which
coat will be the most evolutionarily successful in any given year.
Tumor immunotherapists must do exactly the opposite, that is, study
their target cancer-bearing cohort(s) of patients, then choose a
viral coat that has not penetrated that population either because
of unsuccessful penetration or because the cohort of patients to
receive therapeutic immunization was not yet born when penetration
occurred. The latter case would involve, for example, the use of an
influenza virus vector bearing a viral coat from 1934 and
expressing a selected TAA to treat a population that was under age
60.
[0071] In the case of fowlpox virus vectors, there are no problems
of preexisting immunity against the vector. However, poxviruses are
highly complex viruses that express many different immunosuppressor
proteins (Moss, 1996, in Virology, Fields, et al., eds.,
Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, pp. 2637-2671). This and the
nonreplicative nature of the vector in humans might contribute to
the induction of suboptimal immune responses by the vector against
their expressed TAA. Furthermore, repeated administrations of the
same vector to boost the cellular immune responses are usually not
successful. Thus, the first administration of the vector results in
the induction of neutralizing antibodies against the vector that
hamper its ability to subsequently reinfect the same patient. This
could be circumvented by combined immunizations with two different
vectors sharing the same TAA. A very promising protocol involves
the use of an influenza virus vector to prime an immune response
against the expressed TAA, followed by a poxvirus vector expressing
the same TAA for boosting. It has been shown that this protocol of
immunization is extremely efficient in mice for the induction of
powerful specific CTL responses against foreign malarial antigens
which are expressed by the vectors (Murata, et al., 1996, Cell.
Immunol. 173:96-107).
[0072] Another advantage of the use of influenza virus vectors to
express TAA is their antigenic simplicity. Influenza A virus
encodes only ten proteins, as compared to the 185 open reading
frames of vaccinia virus. Thus, the proportion of the expressed
desired antigen among other viral antigens is higher for influenza
virus than for adenovirus or poxvirus vectors. We have engineered
three influenza virus vectors expressing the same .beta.-gal
epitope in different contexts. Among these three transfectant
viruses, BHAGAL virus, which express the .beta.-gal epitope in the
context of the HA gene, is expected to express higher levels of the
epitope than the other two viruses, MINIGAL and NAGAL, which
express the .beta.-gal-epitope in the context of the NA gene. Thus,
the HA gene expression levels are approximately 5-10 times higher
than the NA gene expression levels. On the other hand, the MINIGAL
virus might more efficiently deliver the epitope to MHC class I
molecules due to the use of a leader sequence in front of the
epitope. Finally, one might also expect differences in the
efficiency of processing of the .beta.-gal epitope according to the
different flanking amino acid sequences that are present in the
three viral vectors. However, all of the three viruses were able to
induce a therapeutic immune response against tumors expressing
.beta.-gal in mice. Future experiments are needed to precisely
compare the levels of CTL activation induced by the virus vectors
against the .beta.-gal epitope.
[0073] Safety is one major concern in the use of influenza virus
vectors in humans. The use of nontransmissible, attenuated
cold-adapted influenza virus vectors provides a means to safely
administer the vector to humans. These cold-adapted strains have
been obtained by the propagation of the virus at progressively
lower temperatures, resulting in the selection and accumulation of
mutations responsible for both cold-adaptation and attenuation.
Alternatively, the administration of transfectant influenza viruses
by routes different from the respiratory route can also provide a
safe way to use these vectors in humans. Thus, influenza A viruses
are able to productively infect the respiratory epithelium, but
they do cause neither viral shedding nor disease when administered
by non respiratory routes, such as intravenously,
intraperitoneally, intramuscularly or subcutaneously, for example.
However, these routes of administration are equally effective as
the intranasal route in eliciting a cellular immune response
against expressed antigens by the influenza virus vectors (Murata,
et al., 1996, Cell. Immunol. 173:96-107). In fact, the mouse
immunizations described in this communication were done
intraperitoneally and they resulted in both an induction of CTLs
against the model TAA and in tumor regression.
[0074] The capacity of influenza A viruses to infect dendritic
cells and to express their genes at high levels is an important
one. Dendritic cells are potent activators of T
lymphocyte-dependent immune responses. They have a remarkably high
density of both MHC class I and class II on their surfaces together
with costimulatory molecules like B7-1/CD80 and B7-2/CD86, as well
as other T cell activating ligands including ICAM-1/CD54. Dendritic
cells infected with influenza viruses expressing TAA ex vivo, then
reinfused, could be used to activate anti-tumor T cells in vivo.
(In fact, the elicitation of potent anti-tumor immunity described
in this example might be mediated by the infection of dendritic
cells in vivo). One alternative scenario involves the use of
dendritic cells infected with influenza viruses encoding TAA to
generate in vitro activated anti-tumor T cells that can
subsequently be adoptively transferred. A similar strategy has been
used with considerable success by Greenberg and colleagues to
generate anti-CMV reactivities using recombinant vaccinia-virus
infected dendritic cells. However, vaccinia viruses are about 20
fold more antigenically complex and they are thus much more likely
to elicit irrelevant reactivities than an influenza A virus
vector.
[0075] These results support the use of influenza virus vectors in
cancer therapy. In our murine cancer system, the tumorigenic
properties of the cell line CT26.CL25 remain unchanged upon
expression of the model TAA .beta.-gal. This resembles the
situation in most human tumors, which express TAA but are not able
to induce an immune response against their TAA. Hence the results
suggest that influenza viruses expressing identified human TAA will
be efficacious in the treatment of human tumors. The development of
influenza virus vectors expressing human TAA will advance the field
of cancer therapy towards new therapeutic strategies to treat human
tumors and prolong survival.
[0076] The present invention is not to be limited in scope by the
specific embodiments described which are intended as single
illustrations of individual aspects of the invention, and any
constructs, viruses or enzymes which are functionally equivalent
are within the scope of this invention. Indeed, various
modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and
described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art
from the foregoing description and accompanying drawings. Such
modifications are intended to fall within the scope of the appended
claims.
[0077] Various publications are cited herein, the disclosures of
which are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Sequence CWU 1
1
3 1 9 PRT Artificial Sequence Description of Artificial Sequence
Beta-gal epitope 1 Thr Pro His Pro Ala Arg Ile Gly Leu 1 5 2 27 PRT
Artificial Sequence Description of Artificial Sequence Leader
peptide and beta-gal epitope 2 Met Arg Tyr Met Ile Leu Gly Leu Leu
Ala Leu Ala Ala Val Cys Ser 1 5 10 15 Ala Ala Thr Pro His Pro Ala
Arg Ile Gly Leu 20 25 3 7 PRT Artificial Sequence Description of
Artificial Sequence gp41 HIV-derived sequence 3 Glu Leu Asp Lys Trp
Ala Ser 1 5
* * * * *