U.S. patent application number 10/809454 was filed with the patent office on 2004-09-16 for method and apparatus for continuous monitoring of road surface friction.
Invention is credited to Hurson, James Kevin.
Application Number | 20040177671 10/809454 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 22564310 |
Filed Date | 2004-09-16 |
United States Patent
Application |
20040177671 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Hurson, James Kevin |
September 16, 2004 |
Method and apparatus for continuous monitoring of road surface
friction
Abstract
A method and apparatus for continuously or repeatedly monitoring
road surface friction utilizes a separate test wheel attached to a
vehicle and in contact with a road surface and a device for
detecting slippage of the test wheel resulting from applying either
a braking or accelerating torque on the test wheel. A signal
corresponding to the applied braking or accelerating torque at the
moment slip is detected and used to provide an indication to the
driver of the slip condition. The method and apparatus is useful in
vehicles as well as aircraft or in other applications where it is
desired to monitor road friction. An embodiment of the invention
applies and maintains a measured vertical force to the surface of
the test wheel of the friction monitor utilizing an electromagnetic
force field under processor control. The processor can combine
signals from the vertical force torque motor circuit, and the test
wheel torque motor circuit.
Inventors: |
Hurson, James Kevin; (Orange
Beach, AL) |
Correspondence
Address: |
FOLEY AND LARDNER
SUITE 500
3000 K STREET NW
WASHINGTON
DC
20007
US
|
Family ID: |
22564310 |
Appl. No.: |
10/809454 |
Filed: |
March 26, 2004 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10809454 |
Mar 26, 2004 |
|
|
|
09931171 |
Aug 17, 2001 |
|
|
|
6711935 |
|
|
|
|
09931171 |
Aug 17, 2001 |
|
|
|
09157567 |
Sep 21, 1998 |
|
|
|
6276189 |
|
|
|
|
09157567 |
Sep 21, 1998 |
|
|
|
08843960 |
Apr 17, 1997 |
|
|
|
08843960 |
Apr 17, 1997 |
|
|
|
08403106 |
Mar 13, 1995 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
73/9 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01N 19/02 20130101;
B60T 2240/03 20130101; B60T 2210/12 20130101; B60T 8/1725
20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
073/009 |
International
Class: |
G01N 019/02; G01N
003/56 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An apparatus for use with a vehicle for repeatedly measuring
road surface conditions, comprising: a test wheel, separate from
the vehicle wheels, attached to said vehicle and positioned for
contact with a road surface, so as to rotate due to contact with
said road surface upon movement of said vehicle; means for applying
a variable electro-magnetic field torque opposing rotation of said
test wheel, so as to produce slippage of said test wheel; means for
measuring an amount of voltage utilized in said electromagnetic
field applying means and for providing a voltage measurement signal
corresponding thereto; means for measuring a rotation speed of said
test wheel and generating a test wheel rotation speed signal; a
controller connected to receive said test wheel rotation speed
signal and said voltage measurement signal, said controller
generating an output signal in response to a slip condition of said
test wheel based on said test wheel rotation speed signal and said
voltage measurement signal, and means for providing an indication
of said output signal.
2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, further comprising: means
for generating a reference signal indicative of the speed of said
vehicle, wherein said controller is connected to receive said
reference signal and generates said output signal in response to
said test wheel rotation speed signal and said reference
signal.
3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said variable
torque applying means is connected to receive said output signal
and varies the magnitude of said variable torque in response
thereto.
4. An apparatus, for use with a vehicle having wheels, for
repeatedly measuring road surface conditions, comprising: a test
wheel, separate from the vehicle wheels, attached to the vehicle
and positioned for contact with a road surface so as to rotate upon
movement of the vehicle; means for applying a variable,
electro-magnetic field, accelerative torque to produce slippage of
said test wheel; means for measuring an amount of voltage utilized
in applying said accelerative torque and for providing a voltage
measurement signal. corresponding thereto; means for measuring a
rotation speed of said test wheel and generating a test wheel
rotation speed signal; a controller connected to receive said test
wheel rotation speed signal and said voltage measurement signal,
said controller generating an output signal in response to a slip
condition of said test wheel based on said test wheel rotation
speed signal and said voltage measurement signal; and means for
providing an indication of said output signal.
5. The apparatus as claimed in claim 4, further comprising: means
for continuously producing a vertical force test signal
representative of the vertical force acting on said test wheel, and
wherein said controller is further responsive to said vertical
force test signal to produce said output signal.
6. An apparatus, for use with a vehicle having wheels, for
repeatedly measuring road surface conditions, comprising: a test
wheel, separate from the vehicle wheels, attached to the vehicle
and positioned for contact with a road surface so as to rotate upon
movement of the vehicle; means for applying a variable torque to
produce slippage of said test wheel; means for measuring a rotation
speed of said test wheel and generating a test wheel rotation speed
signal; a controller connected to receive said test wheel rotation
speed signal, said controller generating an output signal in
response to a slip condition of said test wheel; and means for
providing an indication of said output signal.
7. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying an increasing resistance to said test wheel
to resist rotation thereof; (c) detecting a first instance of slip
condition of said test wheel on said road surface; (d) generating a
signal representative of the braking torque required to produce
said incipient slip condition; and (e) providing an indication of
said slip detection signal.
8. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying an accelerative force to said test wheel to
produce slippage thereof; (c) detecting a first instance of said
slip condition of said test wheel on said road surface; (d)
generating a slip detection signal at the time of said first
instance of a slip condition, said slip detection signal
representative of a value of said torque at the first instance of a
slip condition; and (e) providing an indication of said slip
detection signal.
9. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying a variable torque to said test wheel to
produce slippage therefor; (c) detecting a first instance of slip
condition of said test wheel on said road surface; (d) generating a
slip detection signal at the time of said first instance of a slip
condition; and (e) providing an indication of said slip detection
signal.
10. A method for repeatedly testing road surface conditions,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate due to movement of said vehicle along said road surface; (b)
applying a fixed resistance to said test wheel to resist rotation
thereof; (c) generating a slip detection signal indicative of a
slip condition of said test wheel on said road surface; and (d)
providing an indication of said signal.
11. A method for repeatedly testing road surface condition,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate due to movement of said vehicle along said road surface; (b)
applying a plurality of increasing, pre-determined resistances to
said test wheel to resist rotation thereof; (c) generating a slip
detection signal indicative of a slip condition of said test wheel
on said road surface for each of said plurality of pre-determined
resistances; and (d) providing an indication of said signal for
each of the said plurality of predetermined resistances.
12. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying an increasing resistance to said test wheel
to resist rotation thereof; (c) applying an electromagnetically
controllable normal force to bias said test wheel against said road
surface; (d) detecting a first instance of slip condition of said
test wheel on said road surface; (e) generating a signal
representative of the braking torque required to produce said
incipient slip condition; and (f) providing an indication of said
slip detection signal.
13. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying an accelerative force to said test wheel to
produce slippage thereof; (c) applying an electromagnetically
controllable normal force to bias said test wheel against said road
surface; (d) detecting a first instance of said slip condition of
said test wheel on said road surface; (e) generating a slip
detection signal at the time of said first instance of a slip
condition, said slip detection signal representative of a value of
said torque at the first instance of a slip condition; and (f)
providing an indication of said slip detection signal.
14. A method for continuously monitoring road surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate freely due to movement of said vehicle along said road
surface; (b) applying a variable torque to said test wheel to
produce slippage therefor; (c) applying an electromagnetically
controllable normal force to bias said test wheel against said road
surface; (d) detecting a first instance of slip condition of said
test wheel on said road surface; (e) generating a slip detection
signal at the time of said first instance of a slip condition; and
(f) providing an indication of said slip detection signal.
15. A method for repeatedly testing road surface conditions,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate due to movement of said vehicle along said road surface; (b)
applying a fixed resistance to said test wheel to resist rotation
thereof; (c) applying an electromagnetically controllable normal
force to bias said test wheel against said road surface; (d)
generating a slip detection signal indicative of a slip condition
of said test wheel on said road surface; and (e) providing an
indication of said signal.
16. A method for repeatedly testing road surface condition,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel,
attached to a vehicle, for contact with a road surface so as to
rotate due to movement of said vehicle along said road surface; (b)
applying a plurality of increasing, pre-determined resistances to
said test wheel to resist rotation thereof; (c) applying an
electromagnetically controllable normal force to bias said test
wheel against said road surface; (d) generating a slip detection
signal indicative of a slip condition of said test wheel on said
road surface for each of said plurality of pre-determined
resistances; and (e) providing an indication of said signal for
each of the said plurality of predetermined resistances.
17. An apparatus for repeatedly measuring road surface conditions,
comprising: a test wheel, attached to a vehicle and positioned for
contact with a road surface, so as to rotate due to contact with
said road surface upon movement of said vehicle; means for applying
a variable resistance opposing rotation of said test wheel;
electromagnetic means for applying a controlled force to said test
wheel, said force normal to said surface; means for measuring a
rotation speed of said test wheel and generating a test wheel
rotation speed signal; a controller connected to receive said test
wheel rotation speed signal, said controller generating an output
signal in response to a slip condition of said test wheel; and
means for providing an indication of said output signal.
18. An apparatus for repeatedly measuring road surface conditions,
comprising: a test wheel, attached to a vehicle and positioned for
contact with a road surface, so as to rotate due to contact with
said road surface upon movement of said vehicle; means for applying
a variable accelerative torque to said test wheel; electromagnetic
means for applying a controlled force to said test wheel, said
force normal to said surface; means for measuring a rotation speed
of said test wheel and generating a test wheel rotation speed
signal; a controller connected to receive said test wheel rotation
speed signal, said controller generating an output signal in
response to a slip condition of said test wheel; and means for
providing an indication of said output signal.
19. Apparatus as recited in claim 18, further comprising means for
continuously producing a normal force test signal representative of
the normal force acting on said test wheel, and wherein said
controller is further responsive to said normal force test signal
to produce said output signal.
20. An apparatus for repeatedly measuring road surface conditions,
comprising: a test wheel, attached to a vehicle and positioned for
contact with a road surface, so as to rotate due to contact with
said road surface upon movement of said vehicle; means for applying
a variable torque to produce slippage of said wheel;
electromagnetic means for applying a controlled force to said test
wheel, said force normal to said surface; means for measuring a
rotation speed of said test wheel and generating a test wheel
rotation speed signal; a controller connected to receive said test
wheel rotation speed signal, said controller generating an output
signal in response to a slip condition of said test wheel; and
means for providing an indication of said output signal.
21. The apparatus as claimed in claim 17, further comprising: means
for generating a reference signal indicative of the speed of said
vehicle, wherein said controller is connected to receive said
reference signal and generates said output signal in response to
said test wheel rotation speed signal and said reference
signal.
22. The apparatus as claimed in claim 17, wherein said variable
resistance applying means is connected to receive said output
signal and varies the magnitude of said variable force in response
thereto.
23. A device for applying a vertical force to a surface friction
measuring test wheel comprising: (a) a test wheel moveable attached
to a fixed point of support, a slip condition of said test wheel
providing an indication of surface friction of a surface; and (b)
electromagnetic force field applying means to bias said test wheel
into contact with measured surface.
24. A method for applying a vertical force to a surface friction
measuring test wheel to measure a friction condition of said
surface comprising the steps of: (a) providing a test wheel
pivotally attached to fixed point of support; and (b)
electromagnetically controllably biasing said test wheel into
engagement with said surface to produce a controllable contact
force between said test wheel and said surface.
25. A method for continuously monitoring a surface friction,
comprising the following steps: (a) positioning a test wheel for
contact with said surface so as to rotate freely due to relative
movement of said wheel along said surface; (b) applying an
increasing resistance to said test wheel to resist rotation
thereof; (c) applying an electromagnetically controllable normal
force to bias said test wheel against said surface; (d) detecting a
first instance of slip condition of said test wheel on said
surface; (e) generating a signal representative of the braking
torque required to produce said incipient slip condition; and (f)
providing an indication of said slip detection signal.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation in part of application
Ser. No. 08/843,960 filed Apr. 17, 1997; which is a continuation of
Ser. No. 08/403,106, filed Mar. 13, 1995, now abandoned.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention relates to monitoring a road surface condition
on which a vehicle is travelling, and more particularly to a method
and apparatus for continuously determining a slip condition of a
vehicle which is directly related to the coefficient of friction of
the road surface.
[0003] The invention also relates to a method and apparatus for
applying a controlled vertical (i.e., normal) force to a test wheel
of a friction monitor and to a friction monitor using such a
vertical force monitor in combination with an electromagnetic
torque motor for producing slippage of a test wheel.
[0004] The invention further relates to a device for monitoring a
surface (e.g., road, runway, rail line etc.) condition on which a
monitor (e.g., vehicle, airplane, train etc.) is travelling, and
more particularly to a method and apparatus for determining a slip
condition of a vehicle which is directly related to the coefficient
of friction of the road surface while utilizing an
electromagnetically controlled vertical force applied to the test
wheel.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The availability of quantitative information representative
of the coeficient of friction of the road surface is very
beneficial to drivers of moving vehicles, including planes. An
exact knowledge of how slippery the surface is, continuously
provided, gives the driver significant advantages in determining
safe speeds, distances from other automobiles, acceleration and
braking patterns etc. so as to permit a safer operation of the
vehicle, plane or apparatus being driven.
[0006] Previous devices for monitoring the coefficient of friction
had significant disadvantages such as, for example: a failure to
provide continuous road friction data over long distances; the use
of complex electro-mechanical-hydraulic mechanisms with unfavorable
wear characteristics; limited, specificity, variability and
responsiveness of test wheel(s) braking force; the use of only
indirectly measured values of the force (torque) required to
produce slippage; employment of equipment which was unsuited for
continuous use close to the ground and in inclement conditions; the
use of a cumbersome test wheel suspension and carriage; employment
of equipment which produced adverse affect on normal drive
operation; and the use of relatively complex designs which produces
an expensive apparatus of only limited use.
[0007] When measuring the coefficient of friction, various means of
applying vertical force have been employed, such as: springs,
coils, rubber, compressed air bags, pistons containing air, gases,
oil. The foregoing vertical force applying devices have significant
limitations. The vertical force tends to increase as tensioning
means are compressed and decrease when decompressed. The vertical
force is difficult to measure, especially if continuous or frequent
measurements are desirable. Further, one is generally not able to
standardize the force from one system to another. The vertical
force tends to change with use/wear due to deterioration of
compressed materials/mechanisms, and to vary with change in
temperature and/or moisture.
REVIEW OF PRIOR ART
[0008] Several patents are directed to devices which do not employ
a separate test wheel but rather employ one of the usual drive or
driven wheels of the vehicle. Among these patents are U.S. Pat. No.
4,882,693 to Yopp and U.S. Pat. No. 4,545,240 to Leiber. These
devices necessarily adversely effect the driving characteristics of
the vehicle.
[0009] The Yopp patent measures forces acting on a steering column,
such as the steering angle combined with other data.
[0010] Other patents teach the use of a test wheel or probe which
is lowered into contact with the road surface to perform the
desired measurement. Among these patents are U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,098,111 and 4,212,063 to Hardmark; U.S. Pat. No. 4,958,512 to
Johnson; U.S. Pat. No. 3,893,330 to Shute; U.S. Pat. No. 4,315,426
to Brandon; U.S. Pat. No. 4,662,211 to Strong; and U.S. Pat. No.
4,909,073 to Takahashi. These patents employ complex devices which
are not adapted for continuous operation and wear and which are
bulky and complicated in their operation.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
[0011] One object of an aspect of the invention is to continuously
monitor road surface friction characteristics under a wide variety
of road conditions and vehicle velocities.
[0012] Another object of the invention is to provide a slippage
indication by simulating the actual physical circumstances of
slippage of a braked or accelerated wheel of a vehicle.
[0013] A further object of the invention is to monitor road surface
friction without interfering with the movement of the vehicle
wheels or braking system such as would affect the directional path
or speed of the vehicle, and in particular, not to affect the
freedom of the drive wheels or other wheels of the vehicle or
interfere with the braking system, thereby potentially throwing the
car off its directional path or causing acceleration or
deceleration of the vehicle.
[0014] Yet another object of an aspect of the invention is to
provide a lightweight, comparatively small monitoring device of
suitable weight and size for mounting on an automobile or plane
that operates independently of any other system in a moving
vehicle, that is comparatively inexpensive to manufacture, and that
does not require much maintenance.
[0015] Another object of an aspect of the invention is to provide a
simple, easily retractable, and easily detachable slip detection
device which does not constitute a significant obstacle to the
movement of the vehicle.
[0016] Another object of an aspect of the invention is to
continuously provide near instantaneous, widely variable, highly
specific, easily directly measurable, braking or accelerative
force; which does not vary, fade, or fail, at any vehicular
speed.
[0017] Another object of an aspect of the invention is to measure
friction conditions without utilizing cumbersome direct mechanical
friction devices with their attendant mechanical wear.
[0018] Yet another object is to provide a slip detection device
suitable for after market mounting on existing vehicles.
[0019] It is a further object of an aspect of the invention to
provide a compact suspension mechanism for applying and maintaining
a controlled, accurately measurable vertical force to the test
wheel of a friction monitor, which vertical force is unaffected by
variations in temperature, moisture, or atmospheric pressure;
remains constant as the test wheel moves up and down with reference
to its point of support due to variations in the contour of the
measured surfaces; and counters the tendency of the test wheel to
move upwards and lose contact with the measured surface. The
vertical force may be varied in a controlled manner during use.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0020] The emphasis with the present invention, in accordance with
an aspect thereof, is on the continuous determination of road
surface friction characteristics for automobile drivers or pilots,
so as to facilitate decision-making with regard to safe travelling
speed, braking distance, cornering speed, acceleration speed and
the like in various road conditions; wet (hydroplaning), snow,
slush, ice, oily surface, etc. Data on varying road coefficient of
friction characteristics is continuously presented to the driver as
a visual and/or auditory signal.
[0021] An embodiment of the present invention provides a means for
continuously evaluating the coefficient of friction of the road by
providing a relative quantification of the coefficient of friction.
The device is comparatively compact and relays to the driver a
visual and/or auditory signal indicating relative slipperiness of
the road. For example, a suitably placed, non-distracting flashing
light could be used; the flashing light can be designed to flash
more frequently and more brightly as the slipperiness of the road
increases. An audio signal can also be used to inform the driver
about road conditions: again, the frequency and intensity of the
audio signal can be increased in relation to the slipperiness of
the road.
[0022] An embodiment of the present invention mimics the strategy
commonly used by drivers to evaluate road conditions: pressing on
the brake to determine how hard they have to press (decelerative
force) in order to produce a limited skid, alternatively,
accelerating quickly, to observe how much accelerative force is
required to make the drive wheels skid. This device repeatedly and
automatically carries out this function. Drivers know that the
harder they have to press on their brakes or accelerator in order
to produce wheel slippage, the less skiddy the road is. This
concept is the basis of the present invention--the more braking
resistance or accelerative force required to produce skidding, the
greater the coefficient of friction.
[0023] The device, through the use of variable resistance or
accelerative force, creates slippage of a small test wheel and then
detects the earliest sign of skidding of this wheel and measures
the amount of force required to produce slippage of the test wheel.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, a processor can
combine signals from the circuit regulating the vertical force
torque device, with signals from any other circuits, in particular,
the circuit to control a torque motor used to produce slippage when
measuring a surface (e.g., road, runway, rail line) condition.
[0024] An embodiment of the invention utilizes an electromagnetic
force field, as distinct from direct mechanical means (springs, air
pistons, rubber . . . ) to provide the requisite vertical force
acting on the surface of the test wheel.
[0025] Information regarding this force is then relayed to the
driver. An elementary embodiment of the invention has an open loop
control system and a fixed electromagnetic field resistance to the
rotation of a test wheel. A warning signal is provided to the
driver when the test wheel skids indicating that the road surface
has reached a potentially hazardous threshold.
[0026] Another embodiment of the invention utilizes an open-loop
control system and a variable braking resistance. A series of
predetermined resistance levels are applied, and the test wheel
slip condition is conveyed to the driver at each state, providing a
more refined indication of road slipperiness.
[0027] Another embodiment of the invention utilizes a closed
feedback loop control system with variable braking resistance or
accelerative force. The test wheel is first allowed to rotate
freely as the vehicle travels. A timer initiates the test process,
and variable resistance (or accelerative force) is applied to the
test wheel using, for example, an electric motor, designed to
produce torque in the same or opposite direction (or same direction
in the case of acceleration) to the rotation of the test wheel. The
braking resistance or accelerative force is increased until the
test wheel slips. A sensor determines the rotational speed of the
test wheel and, from this test wheel rotational speed in any given
period of time, the amount of slip of the test wheel is determined.
The amount of braking resistance or accelerative force required to
generate wheel slip is measured, and this information is conveyed
to the driver by various display methods. The variable braking or
accelerative force is then decreased and the process is
repeated.
[0028] Another embodiment of the invention employs a second or
reference wheel. This reference wheel has no brake and serves
solely as a reference tachometer to facilitate determination of the
percentage slip of the braked or accelerated test wheel. Optionally
this reference wheel can power a generator, which, generator can
provide E.M.F. to the electric motor and/or battery.
[0029] A test wheel is used, as opposed to actual vehicle wheels,
to ensure that the repeated road surface monitoring does not affect
normal vehicle operation. The test wheel is designed to be easily
retractable and instantly detachable to minimize the effects of
roadway obstacles. The desire for simplicity and low cost leads to
a method that uses increasing braking resistance or accelerative
force to induce slip instead of a geared test wheel driven at a
predetermined slip, and that monitors road surface conditions to
produce a relative quantification of the actual coefficient of
friction. Similarly, variable resistance to rotation of the test
wheel is provided by an electric motor, instead of cumbersome
mechanical brakes.
[0030] Another embodiment of the invention is directed to a method
of and apparatus for applying and maintaining a vertical force,
which may be variable if desired, to a test wheel of a friction
monitor utilizing an electric torque device, such as a motor, under
control of an electronic processor such as a digital computer or
the like.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0031] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of the road surface friction
monitor;
[0032] FIG. 2 is a block diagram of an elementary embodiment of the
invention;
[0033] FIG. 3 illustrates the electric motor and rotation sensor
according to the invention;
[0034] FIG. 4 illustrates a side view of the friction monitor;
[0035] FIGS. 5A, 5B, and 5C illustrate the folding mechanism of the
friction monitor;
[0036] FIG. 6 shows a plan view of the friction monitor;
[0037] FIG. 7 shows an alternate configuration of the friction
monitor;
[0038] FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate yet another embodiment of the
invention for connecting an electric motor to a test wheel of the
invention;
[0039] FIG. 9 is a block diagram of electromagnetic vertical
(normal) force torque motor in combination with the friction
monitor;
[0040] FIG. 10 illustrates the suspension mechanism for the test
wheel, comprising a pivot with an electric torque motor adjacent to
the test wheel; and
[0041] FIG. 11 illustrates in greater detail the pivot with the
electric motor adjacent to the test wheel.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0042] The present invention is concerned with the determination of
a relative variation in the coefficient of friction within a range
affecting safe operation of a moving vehicle by use of an arbitrary
standard. This arbitrary standard refers to the pre-determined
constant downward pressure (vertical force) on the test wheel,
exerted through the suspension connecting member between the
monitoring device itself and the vehicle to which it is attached,
the standard width and contour of the test wheel, and the
standardized coefficient of friction of the test wheel surface.
Such a relative quantification provides for meaningful quantitative
differentiation of the coefficient of friction on the road surface.
Vertical force sensor (154) where indicated, continuously monitors
the vertical force, and signals from this monitor are continuously
provided to the central processor.
[0043] FIG. 1 shows an overall block diagram of the friction
monitoring system. The system comprises a test wheel 101, electric
motor 103, test wheel rotation speed sensor 105, power supply
electronics 107, controller 109, and output 113. The monitoring
device may include vertical force sensor 154 for measuring the
vertical force on the test wheel and feeding a signal indicative
thereof to the controller. The controller 109 includes a central
processor 121 (i.e., a microprocessor) and a timer 123. The test
wheel 101 is in contact with the ground and accordingly rotates in
the same direction as the wheels of the vehicle. The timer 123
(which may be a software timer configured within the central
processor 121) periodically/repeatedly initiates the test sequence.
The time interval between test sequences is variable, and is
typically milliseconds to tenths of seconds.
[0044] Energy is supplied from the power supply electronics 107,
under the periodic direction of the timer 123 and controller 109,
to the electric motor 103. The electric motor 103 is designed to
produce torque in the opposite direction from which the test wheel
101 rotates, creating a braking resistance on the test wheel 101,
or the same direction producing an accelerative thrust. The central
processor 121 increases the EMF to the electric motor 103 via the
power supply electronics 107, creating a corresponding increase in
the braking resistance or accelerative force until the central
processor 121 detects slippage of the test wheel 101, measures,
then reduces the EMF provided to the electric motor 103 via power
supply electronics 107, decreasing the braking resistance or
accelerative force, and the test wheel 101 is free to rotate in
conjunction with the surface of the road until the next test cycle
initiated by the timer 123. The rotational speed of the test wheel
101 is measured by the test wheel rotational speed sensor 105 and a
test wheel speed signal is conveyed to the central processor 121.
Signals from vertical force sensor (154) are also conveyed to the
central processor.
[0045] Optionally, a second free-wheeling wheel 111 which has the
same diameter as the test wheel and which is not impeded by an
applied resistance is used as a reference/comparison tachometer.
This reference wheel tachometer is free to rotate as the vehicle
moves, the only resistance being created by its own bearings. A
reference wheel rotational speed sensor 112 measures the speed of
the reference wheel 111, and supplies a reference speed signal to
the central processor 121. Alternatively, a signal from the vehicle
speedometer may be used to provide the reference signal.
[0046] Where a reference wheel is deployed, the rotational speed
differential between the test wheel 101 and the reference wheel 111
provides a more precise indication of the extent of slippage of the
test wheel 101, which can be expressed as a percentage, greater or
lesser, than the reference wheel and provides the basis for the
central processor 121 to detect whether the test wheel 101 has
slipped.
[0047] The central processor 121 is programmed to determine that a
slip condition (a first instance of a slip condition i.e. slippage
up to one hundred percent, greater or lesser, than a reference
wheel) is occurring, its percentage slip, greater or lesser than
the reference wheel, and continuously measures the EMF required to
produce any given percentage slip. Slip curves graphically
demonstrate coordinates of braking torque (vertical axis) and
percentage slip (horizontal axis); maximum torque in relation to
percentage slip, usually in the 10 to 20% range.
[0048] The torque, braking or accelerative, required to cause
slippage of the test wheel will vary according to the degree of
slip of the test wheel. Degree of slip can be expressed as a
percentage increase or decrease, in test wheel rotational speed,
compared to a reference tachometer wheel. A braked, totally locked,
non-rotating wheel corresponds to one hundred percent slip. For
purposes of computing representative data on the coefficient of
friction, it is valuable to determine the relationship between the
percentage slip and the torque required to produce it. If the test
wheel 101 is rotating through snow, the snow tends to slow down the
test wheel 101, and this "roll resistance" is reflected in the
amount of energy required to accelerate or brake the test wheel
101. According to the invention, varying degrees of slip, from
braking or accelerating force, can be created and correlated with
the electric power (voltage supplied to the motor 103) required to
create such varying degrees of slip, taking into account roll
resistance and other physical factors that affect braking. Braking
torque is proportional to voltage supplied to the motor 103.
Tabulations of the braking torque in known varying slip conditions,
as a function of any degree of slip, at any given test wheel speed,
may be stored in a memory of the central processor 121, which data
can be combined with EMF torque detection signal, and/or other
signals, for further refinement of friction characteristics.
Accordingly, the central processor 121 is programmed to measure the
voltage going to the electric motor 103 at any given percentage
slip (coordinate on the slip curve) up to a maximum designated
percentage slip, then after measuring this voltage to decrease the
voltage to the electric motor 103, decreasing braking or
accelerative forces acting on test wheel 101 and initiating another
test cycle. Processor 121 can also be programmed to maintain
percentage slip of the test wheel 101, so as to maximize the data
available on the coefficient of friction of the road. In general,
the central processor 121 may be programmed to use any electrical
property of the torque motor to calculate the slip condition such
as voltage, phase, current, power or the like.
[0049] The measure of EMF at which slip of the test wheel 101
occurred is transferred from the central processor 121 via an EMF
torque detection signal to output block 113. The measured EMF is
related to the slipperiness of the road, and the output block 113
conveys this road surface condition information to the driver in
any number of methods, for instance as a flashing warning light 115
or audio warning signal 118 previously described herein, or as a
bar graph 116 or numeric display 117. The skilled artisan will
recognize that such information could be delivered to the driver
instantly and/or as an averaged value, for example a twenty foot
average of road conditions. When the friction monitor is used in
conjunction with aircraft, the output block 113 could be coupled to
a radio communication device 114 that directly transmits runway
surface condition information to the control tower. In such a case,
aircraft taxing down the runway or taking off or landing on the
runway can transmit a detailed road surface condition (i.e.,
coefficient of friction condition) map of the runway condition
along its route. This information can be very valuable to air
traffic controllers in controlling other aircraft in queue to land
or take off.
[0050] The output indication could also be a driver prompt (visual
and/or audible) 119 that indicates to the driver that the
coefficient of friction of the road is high enough to be above the
threshold of concern and this would prompt the driver to turn off
the system and elevate the test wheel 101.
[0051] Alternatively, or additionally according to the invention,
the information on slipperiness can be provided to a vehicle
control system 140. The vehicle control system 140 may be a
controller having a microprocessor for combining the road surface
information with data from other vehicle systems 142 to facilitate
safe vehicle operation. For instance, the vehicle systems 142 may
be a speedometer or a steering angle sensor, and the vehicle
control system 140 could operate in co-operation with an anti-lock
brake system 131 or generate warning signals such as an unsafe
stopping distance signal 132, an unsafe cornering speed signal 133,
etc. The skilled artisan will recognize that the vehicle systems
142 and safety features 131, 132, 133 are by way of example and not
by way of limitation.
[0052] FIG. 1 shows that the electric motor 103 can also function
as a generator, and that a capacitor 135 can be attached to the
motor/generator 103 to provide bursts of energy used to brake or
accelerate the test wheel 101. The electric motor/generator 103 may
also provide energy to the battery 137 so as to facilitate its
operation.
[0053] FIG. 2 shows an embodiment of the invention in its most
elementary form, consisting of test wheel 101, test wheel rotation
speed sensor 105, a fixed (i.e., constant) electromagnetic or other
resistance device 102 and controller 109a connected to output 113.
In this "open loop" embodiment, there is a no feedback from the
controller 109a to alter the strength of the resistance device 102.
An on/off function is provided, in that if the coefficient of
friction on the ground is sufficient to keep test wheel 101
rotating while fixed resistance device 102 acts to resist this
rotation, then one signal is provided to the driver of the vehicle;
conversely, if the conditions change and the coefficient of
friction beneath test wheel 101 is not sufficient to maintain its
grip on the wheel when resistance device 102 is active, and
therefore the test wheel 101 slips, then a different signal is
provided to the driver. There are no means for variable resistance
in this embodiment. The driver is provided with a statement that a
certain road surface friction threshold has been exceeded, but no
quantification beyond this level is provided. Fixed resistance
could be provided by an electric motor or permanent magnets in
place of the coils in the electric motor. As described previously
herein, a timer 123 within controller 109a periodically initiates
test cycles to provide continuous monitoring of road surface
conditions.
[0054] According to the invention, the fixed resistance of 102 can
be combined with an alternator 202 to produce energy for the
electrical system of this device, including a signalling system
represented by output 113. A small battery 204 can also be
incorporated to provide power when the generating function is
limited, such as when there is very slow movement of the vehicle.
This self-powering, more elementary system of FIG. 2 is less
expensive to produce and easier to install than the embodiment of
FIG. 1. Moreover, the embodiment of FIG. 2 is more easily
retrofitted to existing vehicles, aircrafts and the like.
[0055] This alternative embodiment of FIG. 2 is also simple and
inexpensive in that it does not utilize the reference wheel
tachometer 111 of FIG. 1. One method to detect slip uses signals
from the vehicle speedometer 144 to the controller 109a as a
reference signal. Alternatively, slip is detected by the controller
109a without such a comparison signal. The slip of the test wheel
is detected by an analysis of the number of signals in any given
period of time from the test wheel rotational speed sensor 105.
FIG. 3 shows an embodiment of the test wheel rotation speed sensor
105. Pulses 307 are generated when markers 303 on rotating shaft
301 pass in front of a scanner 305. For example, the test wheel
rotation speed sensor 105 could be a magnetic or optical detecting
device.
[0056] FIG. 3 also shows the motor 103 consisting of coils 310 and
magnets 320. The magnets are shown fixed to the rotating shaft 301
and the coils 310 are fixed to the motor housing. A variable
resistor is achieved by varying the voltage to the coils 310.
[0057] Optionally, as indicated above, the coils 310 may be
replaced by permanent magnets to provide a fixed resistance.
Incidentally, when a variable resistance is desired, as in the
embodiment of FIG. 1, the variable resistance is achieved by
varying the voltage to the coils 310 as controlled by central
processor 121.
[0058] In the embodiment of FIG. 2, the number of pulses 307 over a
given interval of time (the frequency) represent the rotational
speed of the test wheel 101. When the test wheel is accelerated or
braked, an increase or decrease in pulses 307 in a given period of
time disproportionate to vehicle speed indicates that the test
wheel 101 is slipping. For example, where the test wheel is braked,
if a frequency of pulses corresponding to a test wheel velocity of
25 mph suddenly changes to a frequency of pulses corresponding to 5
mph, and this change occurs in a time period shorter than that
needed for the vehicle to decelerate by this amount, then the test
wheel 101 has slipped. A proportional, rather than absolute,
decrease or increase (when accelerated) in test wheel velocity is
used to detect slippage. For example, assuming constant or
near-constant (i.e., slowly changing) velocities, a one-third
decrease or increase in the number of signals from the test wheel
rotational speed sensor 105 in any given fraction of a second could
be evidence of slip as distinct from deceleration or acceleration
associated with the more gradual slowing or speeding up of the
vehicle itself.
[0059] In another open-loop embodiment of the invention, variable
braking resistance from the electric motor 103 is applied to the
test wheel 101, although there is no feedback control to the
electric motor 103 from the controller 109a. The applied variable
braking resistance does not depend on the slip condition of the
test wheel 101. According to the invention, a plurality of
predetermined and increasing braking resistances are consecutively
applied to the test wheel 101, and the slip condition is measured
at each of the braking resistance levels. For example, if five
braking levels are used, the test begins with the electric motor
103 applying the first braking level and the controller 109a
detecting whether the test wheel 101 slips; then the second braking
level is applied and the presence of slip detected; then the third,
fourth, and fifth braking levels are applied in order, and the
presence of slip is detected for each braking level. Since the
system is open-looped, the five (for example) braking levels are
applied regardless of the outcome of the slip from a previous
braking level. However, the driver is alerted to the existence of
slip as soon as it is detected through output 113 and indicators as
shown in FIG. 1. Further, a quantification of the road surface
friction may be displayed, if desired, by correlating the braking
level at which slip first occurred with the braking level for wheel
lock which represents 100% slip condition. This test method
provides a finer quantification of road surface conditions than the
fixed resistance method previously described herein, while avoiding
the complexity of a closed-loop feedback system. At each fixed
level of resistance, the slip condition can be determined from a
sudden change in the number of pulses 307 inconsistent with a
vehicle deceleration condition. Similarly predetermined
accelerative torque is applied to the test wheel.
[0060] FIG. 4 shows a side view of the friction monitor. Connecting
member 402 is shown attached to rear axle 401 of an automobile.
Member 402 can be attached to any part of the vehicle, including
the body. Preferably, member 402 is attached to the underside of
the vehicle for ease of operation. The test wheel 101 rotates in
the same direction as the vehicle wheels when the vehicle is moving
forward. The test wheel 101 can, if desired, be placed close to the
track created by the wheels of the vehicle. It is in contact with
the ground while in operation and can be lifted up by rotation
about pivot 405 either manually or mechanically when not needed. A
hook or latch is fixed to the vehicle frame and used to secure the
wheel in a retracted (non-operational) position. FIG. 1 shows that
an environment sensor 151 and automatic retracting means 153 (such
as a motor) can be connected to the controller 109 to automatically
elevate the test wheel 101. The environment sensor 151 could be a
moisture sensor, a temperature sensor, a device for measuring the
reflectance of the road (used to detect ice), etc., and, when the
sensor 151 indicates there is no need for road surface friction
monitoring, the controller 109 automatically retracts the test
wheel 101.
[0061] Another feature according to the invention is a detaching
capability. The detaching means 407 allows member 403 to be
instantly detachable from member 402 if the test wheel 101 becomes
caught on an object during vehicle movement. This detaching
capability may be provided by, for instance, spring mounted
restraints 409, similar to those found in an umbrella telescoping
support arm. The power lines for electric motor 103 and signal
lines from the controller 109 are coupled through a quick
disconnect device which pulls apart when a "jerking" force above a
certain threshold is applied.
[0062] Another feature to the invention is a folding mechanism that
operates when fixed objects encounter the test wheel 101 from the
rear. As shown in FIG. 5A, an obstacle 501 may encounter the test
wheel 101 from the rear and jam the test wheel assembly. This may
occur, for instance, when the vehicle moves in "reverse" and
encounters a fixed object. As shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, the joints
at pivot 405 and knee bend 413 allow the assembly to fold upwards
and the vehicle to pass safely over the obstacle 501.
[0063] A mechanism is also provided as part of the suspension
system to allow for movement of the test wheel 101, motor 103 and
associated controls in any direction so as to minimize the
possibility of damage to the measuring unit. As an example of such
a suspension mechanism 601, FIG. 6 shows a plan view of one
possible configuration of the friction monitoring device according
to an embodiment of the invention. Mounting bracket 411 may be
placed anywhere along the rear axle 401, such that the test wheel
101 may be located near the center of the vehicle or very near to
one of the vehicle tires. Note that the reference wheel 111 is much
thinner than the test wheel 101, so that the majority of the
vertical force on the test wheel assembly rests on the test wheel
101. Furthermore, the outer perimeter of the reference wheel 111 is
made of soft material such that a greater percentage of the
vertical force on the assembly is brought to bear on the test wheel
101. Test wheel 101 can be made in such a way as to minimize its
mass in order to reduce its momentum and its effect on vehicle
stability.
[0064] A constant vertical force of the test wheel 101 against the
ground is desirable to standardize measurements of the road surface
condition, so that the same measured value means the same thing to
the driver of a truck as it does to the driver of a small car. This
near constant vertical force is provided by the suspension means
415 and members 402 and 403 of FIG. 4. The suspension means 415 can
be, for instance, a deformable elastic material such as silicone,
rubber, coil, spring, compressed air, etc., and is constructed so
that the vertical force of the test wheel 101 on the ground varies
little with upward or downward movement of the vehicle in relation
to the ground. Thus, a near uniform vertical force is maintained
when the vehicle passes over bumps or potholes in the road. The
suspension means 415 is calibrated at the time of installation of
the test wheel 101, and further standardization is achieved by
making the test wheel width, surface contour, and surface
coefficient of friction the same for all units. Furthermore, the
wear characteristics of the test wheel 101 can be designed so that
the surface of the wheel has a constant coefficient of friction. An
adjusting means 417 to alter the spring-like resistance
intermittently or continuously can also be incorporated. For
example, if compressed air is used in the suspension means, the
adjusting means 417 may increase (via a compressed air reservoir)
or decrease the pressure therein.
[0065] Spring-like suspension between the surface of the test wheel
and the point at which the friction monitor is mounted on the
vehicle can also be achieved by making the connecting members 402,
403 between the electric motor and the vehicle of flexible
spring-like material.
[0066] According to an aspect of the invention, the vertical force
sensor 154 (FIG. 1), in the form of a strain gauge 419, can be
juxtaposed with the axle of test wheel 101 to continuously measure
the vertical force on the test wheel 101 as shown in FIG. 4. Since
the coefficient of friction is a function of the vertical force on
the test wheel 101 and the amount of torque required to brake or
accelerate it, mathematical manipulation of the friction value
quantification is continuously carried out to take into account the
variations in the vertical force on the test wheel 101. By
accounting for such variations in the vertical force, the accuracy
of the monitor is increased.
[0067] FIG. 7 shows an alternative physical configuration for the
friction monitor. The electric motor 103 is placed in the hub of
the test wheel 101 to facilitate operation under inclement
conditions, such as by preventing moisture from contacting the
motor, etc. Note also that, according to the invention, the
reference wheel 111 can be placed at any location along the axle
301.
[0068] FIGS. 8A and 8B show an alternative physical configuration
for the friction monitor. The electric motor 103 is placed closer
to the point of attachment of the monitor to the vehicle and works
in co-operation with the test wheel by means such as an enclosed
belt drive 510.
[0069] The width of the surface of the test wheel can be as narrow
as a blade. A narrower surface requires less torque to cause
slippage and less vertical force to maintain representative contact
with the surface. The test wheel diameter can be a mere fraction of
what is shown.
[0070] In an alternative physical configuration for the friction
monitor, the electric motor is placed closer to the point of
attachment of the monitor to the vehicle and works in co-operation
with the test wheel by means such as an enclosed belt drive.
[0071] FIG. 9 shows an overall block diagram of the electromagnetic
suspension and the friction monitor in which a vertical force
electric torque motor 901 is controlled by central processor 121.
This embodiment is an improvement over the vertical force
structures described in relation to FIG. 4. In effect, in FIG. 9,
the electric motor 901 replaces element 415 of FIG. 4 to provide a
more controllable vertical force applying mechanism. Electric motor
901 can be used effectively even without a vertical force sensor
154 since, like the slip torque motor 103, the voltage or other
electrical characteristic of motor 901 can be used by the central
processor 121 as a measure of the vertical force and thus used in
the determination of the calculation for the road surface
condition. Of course, vertical force sensor 154 may also be used in
the embodiment of FIG. 9 for either calibration proposes or as an
added input for improved accuracy of the system. The motor 901 is
connected for applying the requisite vertical force as shown in
greater detail in FIGS. 10 and 11.
[0072] While the term "vertical" force is generally used herein, it
is understood that the coefficient of friction is calculated using
the force, or component of force, normal to the surface, so that a
more accurate term is a normal force. In most applications, the
normal force will be in the vertical direction where the surface,
such as a roadway/runway, is horizontal.
[0073] In FIG. 9, the central processor quantifies the coefficient
of friction utilizing signals representative of the vertical force
applied to the surface of the test wheel, and the torquing force
required to produce a given degree of slip of the test wheel. The
central processor can vary the vertical force applied to the test
wheel and/or torquing force to the test wheel (to produce
slippage), in any given interval, in any sequence, and at any
rotational speed of the test wheel, to maximize data on road
friction characteristics.
[0074] FIG. 10 illustrates the test wheel 101, with support member
1003 attached to the axle of the test wheel 101 and pivotally
attached to a support member 1004. The casing of torque motor of
901 is attached to a fixed point of support by member 1004 and the
armature of the torque motor is attached to support member 1003.
Pivot 1001 can advantageously be placed at the same height above
the measured surface as the axle of test wheel 101. Support member
1004 may be pivotally attached to its point of attachment with
electromagnetic solenoid attachment and detachment means, to
facilitate release. Test wheel 101 can be elevated by reversing
polarity to torque motor 101.
[0075] FIG. 11 shows the torque motor 901 with its casing attached
to support member 1004 and armature 1106 attached to or integral
with support member 1003.
[0076] While the invention has been described in terms of the
embodiments illustrated, it will be appreciate by one of skill in
the art that various modifications and improvements may be made
within the spirit of the invention as defined by the appended
claims. For example, while an electric torque motor is
advantageously deployed to produce the vertical force, it will be
appreciated by one of skill in the art, taking into account known
methods of creating electromagnetic force fields, that a solenoid
may alternatively be used instead of the torque motor, especially
where applications require only small displacements of the test
wheel.
* * * * *