Alkaline zinc-nickel bath

Hillebrand, Ernst-Walter

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 10/618352 was filed with the patent office on 2004-06-03 for alkaline zinc-nickel bath. Invention is credited to Hillebrand, Ernst-Walter.

Application Number20040104123 10/618352
Document ID /
Family ID7875843
Filed Date2004-06-03

United States Patent Application 20040104123
Kind Code A1
Hillebrand, Ernst-Walter June 3, 2004

Alkaline zinc-nickel bath

Abstract

The anode is separated from the alkaline electrode to avoid undesirable secondary reactions in an alkali zinc nickel electroplating bath.


Inventors: Hillebrand, Ernst-Walter; (Wickede, DE)
Correspondence Address:
    COOK, ALEX, MCFARRON, MANZO, CUMMINGS & MEHLER LTD
    SUITE 2850
    200 WEST ADAMS STREET
    CHICAGO
    IL
    60606
    US
Family ID: 7875843
Appl. No.: 10/618352
Filed: July 11, 2003

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number
10618352 Jul 11, 2003
09744706 Jan 30, 2001
6602394
09744706 Jan 30, 2001
PCT/EP99/05443 Jul 29, 1999

Current U.S. Class: 205/246
Current CPC Class: C25D 21/12 20130101; C25D 3/565 20130101
Class at Publication: 205/246
International Class: C25D 003/56

Foreign Application Data

Date Code Application Number
Jul 30, 1998 DE 198 34 353.1

Claims



1. Alkaline electroplating bath for plating zinc-nickel coatings, having an anode (2) and a cathode (3), characterized in that the anode is separated from the alkaline electrolyte by an ion exchange membrane (6).

2. Electroplating bath according to claim 1, characterized in that the cathode (3) is separated from the alkaline electrolyte (4) by a perfluorinated cation exchange membrane (6).

3. Electroplating bath according to claim 1 or 2, characterized by sulfuric acid, phosphoric acid, methanesulfonic acid, amidosulfonic acid and/or phosphonic acid as anolyte (5).

4. Electroplating bath according to one of claims 1 to 3, characterized by a platinum-coated titanium anode.
Description



[0001] The invention relates to an electroplating bath for plating zinc-nickel coatings, having an anode, a cathode and an alkaline electrolyte.

[0002] It is known to coat electrically conductive materials with zinc-nickel alloys in order to improve their resistance to corrosion. To do this, it is customary to use an acidic electrolyte bath, for example with a sulfate, chloride, fluoropromate [sic] or sulfamate electrolyte. In these processes, it is very difficult and, in practice, generally impossible, in terms of control technology, to achieve a uniform thickness of the zinc-nickel coating on the material to be coated.

[0003] For this reason, the alkaline zinc-nickel electroplating baths which are disclosed in German patent 37 12 511 have recently been used, having, for example, the following composition:

1 11.3 g/l ZnO 4.1 g/l NiSO.sub.4 * 6H.sub.2O 120 g/l NaOH 5.1 g/l polyethyleneimine.

[0004] The amines contained in the electroplating bath serve as complex formers for the nickel ions, which are otherwise insoluble in the alkaline medium. The composition of the baths varies depending on the manufacturer.

[0005] The electroplating baths are usually operated with insoluble nickel anodes. The zinc concentration is kept constant by the addition of zinc and the nickel concentration is kept constant by the addition of a nickel solution, for example a nickel sulfate solution.

[0006] However, after they have been operating for a few hours, the color of these baths changes from what was originally blue-violet to brown. After a few days or weeks, this discoloration becomes more intense and it is possible to detect a separation of the bath into two phases, the upper phase being dark brown. This phase causes considerable disruption to the coating of the workpieces, such as for example nonuniform layer thicknesses or blistering. It is therefore imperative for the bath to be continuously cleaned, i.e. for this layer to be skimmed off continuously. However, this is time-consuming and expensive.

[0007] Furthermore, after a few weeks of operation it is possible to detect cyanide in the baths. Cyanide pollution requires regular cleaning of the bath and special wastewater treatment, which has a considerable effect on the operating costs of the bath. This applies all the more so if the wastewater has a very high concentration of organics and, with a COD value of approx. 15 000 to 20 000 mg/l, makes cyanide detoxification more difficult. It is then only possible to adhere to statutory wastewater parameters (nickel 0.5 ppm and zinc 2 ppm) by the extensive addition of chemicals.

[0008] The formation of the second phase is attributable to a reaction of the amines, which in alkaline solution are converted at the nickel anodes to form nitrites (including to form cyanide). Moreover, on account of the amines being broken down, fresh complex former has to be continuously added to the bath, which increases the costs of the process.

[0009] Anodes other than nickel anodes cannot be used, since they dissolve in the alkaline electrolyte, which also has adverse effects on the quality of the coating.

[0010] In view of this background, the invention is based on the problem of providing an alkaline zinc-nickel electroplating bath which provides high-quality zinc-nickel coatings at low cost.

[0011] To solve this problem, the invention proposes separating the anode from the alkaline electrolyte by an ion exchange membrane.

[0012] This separation prevents the amines from reacting at the nickel anode, with the result that there are no undesirable secondary reactions which cause waste disposal problems or lead to a second phase of reaction products being deposited on the bath and adversely affect the quality of the zinc-nickel coating. The invention obviates the need for this layer to be skimmed off at high cost and to renew the bath. Furthermore, there is a considerable improvement in the quality of the coating.

[0013] The use of a cation exchange membrane made from a perfluorinated polymer has proven particularly advantageous, since such membranes have a negligible electrical resistance but a high chemical and mechanical resistance.

[0014] Furthermore, the cyanide poisoning of the wastewater no longer takes place, thus considerably simplifying the entire wastewater treatment. Furthermore, there is no need to top up the complex former in the electrolyte, since it is no longer broken down and its concentration in the bath remains approximately constant. As a result, the cost of the process becomes considerably less expensive.

[0015] In the solution according to the invention, the zinc-nickel bath functions as catholyte. The anolyte used may, for example, be sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid. In the electroplating cell according to the invention, customary anodes, such as for example platinum-coated titanium anodes, are suitable as anode material, since they are no longer exposed to the basic zinc-nickel bath.

[0016] The present invention is explained in more detail with reference to the exemplary embodiment illustrated in the drawing, in which:

[0017] FIG. 1 shows the diagrammatic structure of an electroplating bath according to the invention.

[0018] FIG. 1 shows an electroplating cell 1 which has an anode 2 and a cathode 3, which is the workpiece to be coated. The catholyte 4 surrounding the anode is alkaline and consists of a zinc-nickel electroplating bath of known composition, in which amines are added as complex formers for the nickel ions. The anolyte 5 surrounding the anode 2 may, for example, consist of sulfuric acid or phosphoric acid. Anolyte 5 and catholyte 4 are separated from one another by a perfluorinated cation exchange membrane 6. This membrane 6 allows unimpeded flux of current through the bath but prevents the catholyte 4, in particular the amines contained therein, from coming into contact with the anode 2, thus preventing the reactions which were extensively described in the introduction to the description, including the adverse effects of these reactions.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed