U.S. patent application number 10/695126 was filed with the patent office on 2004-05-13 for process for preparing dextrins.
This patent application is currently assigned to Grain Processing Corporation. Invention is credited to Antrim, Richard L., Lee, Clark P..
Application Number | 20040092732 10/695126 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 22681121 |
Filed Date | 2004-05-13 |
United States Patent
Application |
20040092732 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Antrim, Richard L. ; et
al. |
May 13, 2004 |
Process for preparing dextrins
Abstract
Dextrins are prepared by hydrolyzing starch with an enzyme that
consists essentially of a beta-amylase enzyme. The product prepared
thereby will include a dextrin, such as beta-limit dextrin. Upon
ultrafiltration of this product, a dextrin-rich fraction may be
recovered. If desired, the dextrin-rich fraction may be further
purified via diafiltration. Retrograded amylose may be separated
from the product of enzymatic hydrolysis.
Inventors: |
Antrim, Richard L.; (Solon,
IA) ; Lee, Clark P.; (Blue Grass, IA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
TEN SOUTH WACKER DRIVE
SUITE 3000
CHICAGO
IL
60606
US
|
Assignee: |
Grain Processing
Corporation
Muscatine
IA
|
Family ID: |
22681121 |
Appl. No.: |
10/695126 |
Filed: |
October 28, 2003 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10695126 |
Oct 28, 2003 |
|
|
|
09795996 |
Feb 28, 2001 |
|
|
|
6670155 |
|
|
|
|
60185474 |
Feb 28, 2000 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
536/123.13 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C12P 19/04 20130101;
C08B 30/18 20130101; C13K 7/00 20130101; C12P 19/22 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
536/123.13 |
International
Class: |
C13K 005/00 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for spray-drying maltose, comprising: providing a
maltose-containing product; adding to said product an amount of a
dextrin effective to enhance the susceptibility of said
maltose-containing product to be spray-dried to thereby form a
blended product; and spray-drying said blended product.
Description
RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority to prior provisional
application Serial No. 60/185,474, the entire contents of which are
hereby incorporated by reference.
TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention is in the field of oligosaccharides, and in
particular, the invention pertains to the preparation of a high
molecular weight dextrin product.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Certain enzymes, known as beta-amylase enzymes, are known to
act on starch to produce low molecular weight species, typically
maltose, and high molecular weight species, known as dextrins. With
the exception of so-called waxy (corn) or glutinous (rice)
starches, most starches found in nature are composed of a mixture
of amylopectin and amylose. Amylose is a linear molecule which is
substantially completely hydrolyzed by beta-amylase enzymes into
maltose and glucose. Amylopectin, a branched molecule, is
hydrolyzed into maltose and higher molecular weight dextrins,
because the beta-amylase enzyme is unable to hydrolyze past the
alpha 1-6- branch point in the amylodextrin molecule. If the
enzymatic hydrolysis is allowed to proceed to its fullest extent,
the remainder of the amylopectin molecule will exist as what is
known as beta-limit dextrin.
[0004] Despite the potentially numerous commercial uses for such
high molecular weight dextrins, it is believed that no such
dextrins are sold commercially in bulk quantities. Present
enzymatic processes yield a mixture of products from which it is
difficult to resolve such dextrins. The present invention seeks to
provide a process for preparing dextrins, such as beta-limit
dextrin, in which this difficulty is overcome.
THE INVENTION
[0005] It has now been found that the treatment of starch with an
enzyme that consists essentially of a beta-amylase enzyme, and
which is to the substantial exclusion or complete exclusion of
alpha-amylase enzymes and de-branching enzymes, will yield a
product mixture that includes a dextrin and one or more low
molecular weight sugars. The low molecular weight sugar or sugars
may be readily separated from the product mixture thus formed via
ultrafiltration to yield a dextrin in the retentate. If desired,
diafiltration may be used to separate substantially all of the low
molecular weight sugars from the dextrin in the retentate.
[0006] Retrograded amylose may be removed from the product mixture
prior to ultrafiltration. In accordance with another embodiment,
the invention provides a method for preparing retrograded amylose.
It is contemplated that this material is useful as "resistant"
starch, which is not as digestible as other starches and which
therefore may be used as a low- or non-caloric bulking agent.
[0007] The dextrins thus prepared will have a number of desirable
properties, including a high solubility and a high molecular
weight, with low hazing in solution. Additionally, the dextrins
have a very low dextrose equivalent value (DE), and thus are
expected to be substantially more stable than carbohydrates of
lower molecular weight. As such, it is contemplated that such
dextrins may be used in applications such as viscosifiers or as
spray drying aids for other carbohydrates (such as maltose). In
accordance with another embodiment of the invention, the dextrin is
added to maltose in an amount sufficient to assist in spray
drying.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0008] The invention contemplates the production of dextrins, such
as beta-limit dextrin, from starch. Any suitable starch may be
employed in connection with the invention, and thus, for instance,
starches such as corn, rice, wheat, tapioca, maize, potato, barley,
oat, and, more generally, any starch suitable for enzymatic
hydrolysis may be used in connection with the invention. It is not
necessary to use a so-called waxy or glutinous starch in connection
with the invention, but to the contrary the starch can have any
suitable amylose content, such as an amylose content of 10%, 15%,
20%, 25%, or a greater amylose content. It is contemplated that the
starch may be a partially derivatized or otherwise modified starch,
or may be a starch that has been thinned or enzymatically treated.
For instance, a starch that has been lightly oxidized may be
employed.
[0009] The starch should be liquefied via heat, enzymatic, or acid
treatment prior to treatment with the beta-amylase enzyme.
Preferably, the starch is liquefied via acid treatment, although
low amylose starches may require liquefaction only with heat and
may be suitably liquefied at the operating temperature of the
enzymatic hydrolysis. As disclosed in more detail in copending
application serial no. , filed Feb. 28, 2001 by Richard L. Antrim
and Clark P. Lee and assigned attorney docket number 203946 and
hereby incorporated by reference, it is desirable to recover
maltose from the beta-amylase hydrolysis product. Thus, in general,
the starch should be liquefied to an extent such that it would
remain liquid at the operating temperature of the beta-amylase
hydrolysis, but not liquefied to an extent such that the starch is
converted to saccharides having so low a degree of polymerization
that it is difficult to separate such saccharides from maltose via
ultrafiltration. In other words, the degree of liquefaction should
be such that, upon enzymatic hydrolysis with the beta-amylase
enzyme, the combined content of glucose and oligosaccharides in the
DP 3- 10 range does not exceed about 10%, and preferably does not
exceed about 5%. It has been found acceptable to liquefy the starch
to a dextrose equivalent (DE) value of about 2, as measured via
conventional techniques. Generally, the DE of the starch should be
kept below about 1, and thus the DE should range between 0 and
about 1, although it may be difficult to measure the DE with
precision in this range. For corn starch, it is preferable that the
starch is liquefied in an aqueous solution at a liquefaction
temperature ranging from about 220.degree. F. to about 320.degree.
F., and for a time ranging from about 5 minutes to about 30
minutes.
[0010] The starch solids level preferably ranges initially from
about 5% to about 30%, more preferably, from about 15% to about
30%. While it is not intended to limit the invention to a
particular theory of operation, it is believed that a lower solids
content requires a lesser degree of liquefaction to attain the
desired viscosity range. In the case of dent corn starch, it has
been found that a viscosity window of between 25 and 45 centipoise
(Norcross Shell Cup) is optimal. In the case of waxy starches,
viscosities outside this range may be acceptable. The pH of the
starch slurry should be adjusted to a level sufficient to provide
controlled acid hydrolysis of the starch in the presence or absence
of catalyzing alpha amylase enzymes; most preferably, under a given
set of conditions, the variability of the slurry pH should be no
more than +/-0.1 pH, with the precise pH value depending upon the
starch source, the slurry solids, and the operational conditions of
the liquefaction equipment employed. As a practical matter, the pH
can vary more widely while still resulting in a satisfactory
product. Preferably, the starch liquefaction is monitored via
viscosity and adjusted accordingly.
[0011] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, the
starch is liquefied with an alpha-amylase enzyme to reduce the
molecular weight of the starch, thereby reducing the viscosity of
the starch and thereby permitting processing at a higher solids
level. Suitable commercial liquefying enzymes may be obtained from
Genencor International, Inc. or from Novozymes A/S. The dosing
level of the alpha-amylase enzyme depends upon the desired solids
level and, when maltose is recovered as a co-product, on the
desired maltose purity. Desirably, the dosing level ranges from
about 0.005% to about 0.02% of a commercial strength enzyme by dry
solids basis starch. In this embodiment, the alpha-amylase enzyme
preferably is quenched prior to saccharification via any suitable
quenching procedure. For instance, when the starch is liquefied at
a temperature less then 250.degree. F. and 5 minutes residence, the
alpha-amylase enzyme is quenched by reducing the liqefact pH to
less than 4.0 and holding at a temperature of from 180 to
190.degree. F. for at least about 15 minutes.
[0012] Upon liquefaction, the liquefact is immediately cooled and
the pH is adjusted to the optimum conditions for beta-amylase
activity. The starch then is treated with the enzyme under any
conditions suitable to result in the hydrolysis of this liquefied
starch to form dextrin, and preferably, to form beta-limit dextrin.
A preferred enzyme is OPTIMALT BBA, available from Genencor
International, Inc. The enzyme may be added in any amount
sufficient to achieve this result, but generally, the dosing of the
enzyme should be in excess of the minimum viscosity limited
conversion of approximately two Genencor OPTIMALT BBA Diastatic
Power units per kilogram of starch, the Diastatic Power units being
defined as being the amount of enzyme contained in 0.1 ml of a 5%
solution of the sample enzyme preparation that will provide
sufficient reducing power to reduce 5 ml of Fehling's solution when
the sample is incubated with 100 ml of substrate for one hour at
20.degree. C.
[0013] The enzymes should be allowed to act on the starch for any
amount of time suitable to form the desired dextrin. Under the
preferred reaction conditions discussed hereinabove, the enzymatic
action generally is 90% complete within 4 hours. The optimum
temperature and pH of the starch hydrolysis will vary depending on
the particular beta-amylase enzyme employed, but typically the
temperature will range from about 55.degree. C. to about 65.degree.
C. and the pH will range from about 5.0 to about 6.0. Optionally,
but preferably, the product mixture thus formed is clarified and
decolored by any suitable procedure, such as carbon treatment,
filtration, centrifugation, and or precipitation, before it is
further processed. If the enzyme is allowed to act under optimum
conditions for an optimum reaction time, the dextrin content may be
greater than about 20%, most of which will comprise beta-limit
dextrin. The combined content of glucose and of oligosaccharides in
the DP 3-10 range is below about 10%, and preferably is below
5%.
[0014] Retrograded amylose may be found as a by-product of the
enzymatic hydrolysis. In accordance with one embodiment of the
invention, at least some of the retrograded amylose is separated
from the product mixture. For instance, the saccharified solution
may be maintained at a temperature below about 14.degree. F. to
allow at least a portion of the retrograded amylose to crystallize.
The crystallized amylose then may be separated from the
saccharified starch mixture by any suitable technique, such as via
microfiltration, by which is contemplated separation at a
resolution sufficient to separate the retrograded amylose but not
sufficient to separate dextrins from low molecular weight sugars in
the product mixture. Alternatively, the retrograded amylose may be
separated via centrifugation, using any technique known in the art
or otherwise found to be suitable. Preferably, the solution
prepared upon enzymatic hydrolysis is centrifugated for at least 15
minutes at a relative g force of 3000. The amylose crystals will
form a pellet, and the low molecular weight sugars and limit
dextrin will remain in the clarified supernate.
[0015] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a
dextrin is separated from the product mixture. Most preferably, a
dextrin product is separated from the product mixture via
ultrafiltration of the product mixture, by which is contemplated
separation of the beta-limit dextrin from lower molecular weight
carbohydrates using a membrane or other suitable separation medium
that is effective for this purpose. Generally, a membrane having a
molecular weight cut off (MWCO) of 10,000 or less, preferably a
MWCO of 5000 or less, is suitable. Suitable commercially available
membranes are available from Syndar Filtration and from Osmonics De
Sal. Upon ultrafiltration, the retentate typically will include the
desired dextrin and some retained low molecular weight sugar
(typically maltose). If desired, the retentate may be diafiltered
to recover additional maltose by flushing the filter with excess
water.
[0016] The product thus formed has numerous desirable properties,
including a high molecular weight, for instance, a molecular weight
of at least 30,000 Daltons and ranging up to 600,000 Daltons, in
some cases higher, depending on the starch used as a starting
material. The product further has a low DE (and hence a low
reactivity and susceptibility to color change), and, surprisingly,
a high degree of solubility with very low hazing, even at high
molecular weights. Numerous commercial uses are contemplated,
including use as a viscosifier. In such applications, the limit
dextrin may be added to a product to be made more viscous, in any
amount effective for this purpose. It is further contemplated that
the dextrin prepared in accordance with the invention can be added
to a solution of maltose or of another carbohydrate, or to a dry
maltose or other carbohydrate product in an amount sufficient to
enhance spray drying of the solution or dry product. In this
embodiment, the dextrin preferably is added in an amount ranging
from about 5% to about 70% dry solids basis per dry weight of the
maltose or other carbohydrate to form a mixture. The mixture may
contain other ingredients besides the carbohydrate to be spray
dried and limit dextrin, some of which ingredients also may
function to enhance spray drying of the maltose.
[0017] Carbohydrate percentages given herein are expressed on a dry
solids basis per total carbohydrate weight.
[0018] The following examples are provided to illustrate the
invention, but should not be construed as limiting in scope.
EXAMPLE 1
[0019] This example illustrates the preparation of limit dextrin
from waxy corn starch.
[0020] Starch from waxy corn was made to an aqueous slurry
containing 12 to 15% solids and pH 6.0 to 7.0. The slurry was then
liquefied by jet cooking through a Hydro Thermal Jet (Model
#M103-030) at 300.degree. F., 60 to 65 psi with a 5 minute
residence time at 300.degree. F., 50 to 55 psi. The liquefact was
immediately cooled, the pH was adjusted to 5.5 with hydrochloric
acid, and dosed with beta-amylase. Using a commercial barley
beta-amylase enzyme (Genencor OPTIMALT BBA), dosing was 6.15 DP
units per kilogram of starch or 0.05 wt.% grams of liquid enzyme
per gram of dry starch. Saccharification was performed at
140.degree. F. for 4 to 24 hours. The solution was then separated
by ultrafiltration through a polysulfone 3000 MWCO membrane (Syndar
Filtration). The permeate, containing approximately 6% solids, was
then evaporated to 70% solids which contained not less than 90%
maltose. Beta-limit dextrin was recovered from the retentate.
EXAMPLE 2
[0021] This Example illustrates the preparation of beta-limit
dextrin from wet mill processed yellow dent corn starch under
various liquefaction conditions.
[0022] Dent corn starch was liquefied under various reaction
conditions, as given in the following Table.
1 Residence % Temp Time Example solids pH (F.) (min) 2A 15 3.5 300
5 2B 20 3.0 300 5 2C 20 2.75 300 5 2D 25 2.75 300 5 2E 25 3.0 300
20 2F 25 2.75 300 20 2G 30 3.0 300 20 2H 30 2.75 300 20 2I 30 3.0
300 20 2J 30 3.0 280 20
[0023] The pH of the starch was adjusted where necessary, and then
was saccharified with a beta-amylase enzyme as in Example 1. The
product was centrifuged to remove retrograded amylose. Sample then
were filtered through a 3000 MWCO membrane. Beta-limit dextrin was
obtained in each case.
EXAMPLE 3
[0024] This Example illustrates the liquefaction of wet mill
processed yellow dent corn starch with an alpha-amylase enzyme.
[0025] In two separate runs, starch from wet mill processed yellow
dent corn was adjusted to a solids content of 12 or 25% dry solids
basis and the pH was adjusted to pH 5.50 with hydrochloric acid.
Each starch slurry was then dosed with a liquefying alpha-amylase
enzyme (Novo TERMANYL SC) to 0.005-0.02% dry solids basis. The
slurries were then jet cooked at 230.degree. to 290.degree. F. with
a 5 to 20 minute residence. The alpha-amylase then was quenched by
reducing the liquefact pH to less than 4.0 and holding at 180and
190.degree. F. for 15 minutes. The liquefacts then were
saccharified with a beta-amylase enzyme, then filtered and
evaporated as in Example. Limit dextrin products were obtained.
EXAMPLE 4
[0026] This Example describes a scale-up pilot production of
beta-limit dextrin.
[0027] A commercial yellow dent starch available from Grain
Processing Corporationof Muscatine, Iowa (B200) was slurried to a
solids levels of 15% dsb and a pH of 3.5 with hydrochloric acid.
The slurry was fed at a rate of 2 gpm through a Hydroheater jet
Series M103 AS at a pressure of 60 psi and a temperature of
300.degree. F. The post-jet residence time was 7.5 minutes
resulting in a primary liquefact of a Shell Cup viscosity (Noreross
Corp.) of 25 cp. The pH of the liquefact was continuouly adjusted
to 5.5 with soda ash and cooled through a heat exchanger to
140.degree. F. The liquefact was dosed with Spezyme BBA (Genencor
International, Inc.) at a level of 0.05% dsb and converted at
temperature through an 8-stage plug flow reactor with continuous
agitation and a total residence time of eight hours. The
saccharified product was clarified by passing the product through a
NIRO Model-C ceramic filtration unit with a 19-element Memberlox,
0.8 .mu.m ceramic bundle. The clarified permeate was them
ultrafiltered through a NIRO Model-U ultrafiltration unit
containing De Sal G-50 membranes. Beta-limit dextrin was recovered
from ultrafilter retentate in each case.
EXAMPLE 5
[0028] This Example illustrates crystallization of retrograded
amylose from the saccharified starch mixture.
[0029] The saccharified solution proir to centrifugation from
Example 2 was held at 130.degree. F. for 18 to 24 hours. This hold
time was necessary for the slow, complete formation of amylose
crystals. This saccharified mixture was then pre-filtered through a
minimal microfilter of porosity 0.1 of 0.8 micron (U.S. Filter
ceramic membranes). The filtration was performed at temperatures
not greater than 140 .degree. F. to meantain the insoluble
retrograded amylose. The filter pore size was selected to produce
maximum flux with minimum turbidity in the permeate. For a process
using 15% dry solids starch feed at pH 3.5, a 0.8 micron filter
will adequately clarify the feed material.
[0030] The retentate from the pre-filtration was enriched in the
amylose faction and the permeate contained maltose and beta-limit
dextrin. Analysis of the amylose crystals were of a size between 1
and 20 microns. The crystal size distribution appears to broaden
and decrease in size as the process increases in solids and
decreases in pH. At a 25% solids content and pH of 3.0, a 0.1
micron filter is necessary for minimal clarification.
[0031] The permeate from the microfiltration step was then
ultrafiltered as previously described, yielding beta-limit
dextrin.
EXAMPLE 6
[0032] This Example illustrates that various membranes may be used
in the separation of limit dextrin from the product formed upon
enzymatic saccharification.
[0033] Material was processed through the microfiltration steop as
described in Examples 4 and 5. Laboratory scale samples were
processed on a hollow fiber unit from A/G Technology Corp. (AGT
UFP-3-C-4A 3000 NMWC). This filter was run with a Masterflex
perisaltic pump (model 7553-70) with a Masterflex head (model 70
15-52) connected with Norprene tubing (model 6402-15).
Recirculation rates were adjusted to maintain pressures between 10
psi and 20 psi.
[0034] Large scale sample were tested on commercially available
spiral wound elements installed and operated on a NIRO Inc. Model
R16 Single Stage UF/RO Pilot Plant. Element evaluted were purchased
from Syndar Filtration (PES 3000 MWCO VT2B3838) or Osmonics De Sal
(GH/G-10, GK/G-20 and GM/G-50 3838). Operating conditions were
those specified by the membranes manufacturer, as follow:
2 Membrane MWCO Solids AGT 3000 3000 25 Syndar 3000 14 3000
DesalG10 2500 25 DeSal G20 3500 25 DeSal G50 8000 25
[0035] A beta-limit dextrin product was obtained from the retantate
in each case.
EXAMPLE 7
[0036] This Example demonstrates the ability to spray dry maltose
syrups of various compositions.
[0037] Maltose syrup was prepared as described in Example 2 using a
15% dsb starch feed. Three compositions were evaluated, including
the ultrafilter feed material that contained 65% maltose and 35%
limit dextrin (the "65/35 material"), the ultrafilter permeate
material that contained 95% maltose and 5% limit dextrin (the "95/5
material"), and a blend of these materials that contained 90%
maltose and 10% limit dextrin (the "90/10 material"). These
solutions were spray dried on a Yamoto-Ohkawara Spray Dryer DL- 41
with a 2850-SS nozzle and a 65-5 SS orifice. Operating conditions
were; drying air 0.75 m.sup.3/min, atomizing air 0.25 Mpa, feed
rate 20 ml/min, inlet temperature 300.degree. C. outlet temperature
100.degree. C. The feed solids were from 6% to 30% dsb for the
65/35 and 90/10 material. The 95/5 material melted in the receiver
line at these temperatures but was effectively dried at reduced
temperature of 200.degree. C. inlet temperature, 80.degree. C.
outlet temperature with a resulting moisture content of 2.5%.
EXAMPLE 8
[0038] This Exmaple illustrates the characterization of beta-limit
dextrin and amylose fractions.
[0039] Ultrafilter and microfilter retentates from Example 5 were
diafiltered on an ultrafilter to remove all permeable material.
Samples both the diafiltered retentates and the crude saccharified
liquor were analyzed by aqueous gel permeation chromatography using
a modification of the method taught in L.A. Bello-Parez et al., J.
Cereal Sci., 27 (1998) 267-68, which involves DMSO extraction. A
Waters 515 pump connected to a # X PL-Aquagel-OH mixed 8 .mu.m
column with a separation range of 100 to 10,000,000 Daltons was
used. Detection of separated material was done using a Viscotec
T{circumflex over ( )}Dual detector in parallel with a Water
2410127 detection. Data was analyzed with the Viscotec GPC
Trisec.TM. software.
[0040] Sample 8A was the crude non-microfiltered saccharified
material. Sample 8B was the retentate from a 0.8 .mu.m
microfiltration with subsequent diafiltration on an ultrafilter.
Sample 8C was the permeate from a 0.8 .mu.m microfiltration, with
subsequent diafiltration on a 3000 MWCO membranes.
3 Sample # Mn Mw Mz Pd 8A 171000 1671000 4822000 9.77 8B 39000
51000 65100 1.3 8C 8630 28400 55800 3.29
[0041] In Sample 8A, it is believed that the high molecular weights
results from aggregation of molecules in the concentrate.
EXMAPLE 9
[0042] The limit dextrin and retrograded amylose products prepared
in accordance with Example 2 were analyzed by gel permeation
chromatography as discussed in Example 8, giving the following
results.
4 Description Sample Mn Mw Mz Pd Amylose 2B 25300 226100 902000
8.94 pellet Amylose 2C 12400 37400 111200 3.02 pellet Amylose 2D
22000 104600 324200 4.75 pellet Amylose 2E 12500 62500 199600 5.00
pellet Amylose 2F 3730 25600 127700 6.86 pellet Amylose 2G 13500
105900 425700 7.84 pellet Amylose 2H 12400 27300 58800 2.20 pellet
Limit dextrin 2B 63300 546700 1623000 8.64 Limit dextrin 2C 19000
52300 128300 2.75 Limit dextrin 2D 25200 116700 330500 4.63 Limit
dextrin 2E 32300 130300 322700 4.03 Limit dextrin 2F 11900 39800
100100 3.34 Limit dextrin 2G 23800 97200 253300 4.08 Limit dextrin
2H 13600 36200 77900 2.66
[0043] All molecular weight and polydispersity values were
calculated by excluding the maltose fraction in the beta-limit
dextrin from the integration.
[0044] The following table summarized the effect of liquefaction on
the molecular weight of the limit dextrin/amylose fraction from a
3000 MWCO separation. It is noted that the molecular weight of both
the limit dextrin and amylose varied in accordance with the
liquefaction conditions.
5 Sample Description Mw Pd Maltose 2F Amylose pellet 25600 6.86
84.8 2H Amylose pellet 27300 2.2 84.9 2C Amylose pellet 37400 3.02
89.9 2E Amylose pellet 62500 5 89.4 2D Amylose pellet 104600 4.75
93.8 2G Amylose pellet 105900 7.84 91.6 2B Amylose pellet 226100
8.94 96 2H Limit dextrin 36200 2.66 84.9 2F Limit dextrin 39800
3.34 84.8 2C Limit dextrin 52300 2.75 89.9 2G Limit dextrin 97200
4.08 91.6 2D Limit dextrin 116700 4.63 93.8 2E Limit dextrin 130300
4.03 89.4 2B Limit dextrin 546700 8.64 96
[0045] It is thus seen that the invention provides a process for
the preparation of dextrins from starch. The process of the
invention can be simple and inexpensive to perform, and yields a
dextrin with numerous desirable properties. The dextrins can have a
high molecular weight. The dextrins are soluble and are stable to
haze formation.
[0046] While particular embodiments of the invention have been
shown, it will be understood that the invention is not limited
thereto since modification may be made by those skilled in the art,
particularly in light of the foregoing teachings. It is, therefore,
contemplated by the appended claims to cover any such modifications
as incorporate those features which constitute the essential
features of these improvements within the true spirit and scope of
the invention. All references and pending applications cited herein
are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
* * * * *