U.S. patent application number 10/696374 was filed with the patent office on 2004-05-06 for biodegradable sorbents.
This patent application is currently assigned to Grain Processing Corporation. Invention is credited to Barresi, Frank, Hulsey, Kara, Schilling, Kevin H., Taylor, J. Steven.
Application Number | 20040086541 10/696374 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 23152279 |
Filed Date | 2004-05-06 |
United States Patent
Application |
20040086541 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Barresi, Frank ; et
al. |
May 6, 2004 |
Biodegradable sorbents
Abstract
Disclosed is a sorbent that includes spent grain germ, seed
meal, or a mixture thereof. The sorbent may be used to introduce a
material into an environment. For instance, the sorbent may be used
to introduce a control agent, such as an insecticide or larvicide,
into an environment. The sorbent also may be used to remove an
unwanted material from an environment. For instance, the sorbent
may be used to sorb oil or a hazardous chemical that has been
spilled. The disclosed sorbents are biodegradable over a wide range
of environmental conditions.
Inventors: |
Barresi, Frank; (Coralville,
IA) ; Hulsey, Kara; (Dewitt, IA) ; Taylor, J.
Steven; (Muscatine, IA) ; Schilling, Kevin H.;
(Muscatine, IA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.
TEN SOUTH WACKER DRIVE
SUITE 3000
CHICAGO
IL
60606
US
|
Assignee: |
Grain Processing
Corporation
Muscatine
IA
|
Family ID: |
23152279 |
Appl. No.: |
10/696374 |
Filed: |
October 29, 2003 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10696374 |
Oct 29, 2003 |
|
|
|
10172588 |
Jun 14, 2002 |
|
|
|
60298861 |
Jun 15, 2001 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
424/405 ;
424/750 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B01D 2259/4575 20130101;
Y02P 60/87 20151101; A01N 57/16 20130101; B01D 53/02 20130101; B01J
2220/485 20130101; A01N 37/36 20130101; C05G 5/40 20200201; Y02E
50/10 20130101; C10L 5/44 20130101; A01N 25/08 20130101; C05F 5/002
20130101; Y02E 50/343 20130101; Y02P 20/145 20151101; C10L 5/363
20130101; A23K 10/37 20160501; Y02A 40/20 20180101; Y02A 40/21
20180101; B01D 2253/304 20130101; B01D 15/00 20130101; B01J 20/22
20130101; Y02P 60/877 20151101; B01D 53/0454 20130101; Y02E 50/30
20130101; Y02T 50/678 20130101; A01N 57/16 20130101; A01N 25/08
20130101; A01N 37/36 20130101; A01N 25/08 20130101; A01N 37/36
20130101; A01N 2300/00 20130101; A01N 57/16 20130101; A01N 2300/00
20130101; C05F 5/002 20130101; C05G 5/40 20200201; C05G 3/60
20200201; C05F 5/002 20130101; C05G 5/40 20200201; C05G 3/60
20200201 |
Class at
Publication: |
424/405 ;
424/750 |
International
Class: |
A01N 025/00; A01N
065/00 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for limiting the growth of an undesired pest in an
environment, the method comprising: selecting a control agent for
said pest; introducing into said environment an amount of a control
agent composition effective to limit the growth of said pest, said
control agent composition comprising; a sorbent, said sorbent being
selected from the group consisting of spent grain germ, seed meal,
and mixtures thereof, a control agent sorbed within said sorbent,
said control agent being effective to limit the growth of said
pest.
2. A method according to claim 1, said sorbent including spent corn
germ.
3. A method according to claim 1, said control agent being present
in an amount of 0.001 to 50% by weight of said composition.
4. A method according to claim 3, said control agent being present
in an amount of 0.10 to 10% by weight of said composition.
5. A method according to claim 1, said composition being in the
form of discrete plural pellets.
6. A method according to claim 2, said control agent being a
mosquito larvicide.
7. A method according to claim 1, the method including the step of
introducing said composition into said environment by dispersing
said composition from an aircraft.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority to prior Application No.
60/298,861, filed Jun. 15, 2001. The content of this application is
incorporated by reference in its entirety.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention relates to a grain based material useful as a
general sorbent. In some embodiments, the invention relates to the
introduction of a material into an environment, the material being
sorbed within the sorbent. These embodiments are particularly
applicable to the introduction of a control agent, such as a
mosquito larvicide, into an environment. In other embodiments, the
invention relates to the removal of a material from an environment
by sorbing the material within the sorbent.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Many methods exist for removing an undesired material from
an environment. For instance, numerous products are available
commercially for removing spilled liquids from a surface. Some such
products are used to remove oil from open water, such as when an
oil spill has occurred. In this application, it is desirable to
selectively remove oil from water. For such absorbents, efforts are
sometimes made to increase the selectivity of oil over water.
[0004] Currently available products for spill control include clay,
kaolin, illite, bentonite, diatomite, hectorite, montmorillonite,
attapulgite, silica, silica sand, polypropylene, sodium
polyacrylate/polyacrylamides, vermiculite, gypsum, limestone, metal
oxides, asphalt, fiber-glass, diatomaceous earth, perlite and other
materials. Such materials, while satisfactory in function, suffer
from certain drawbacks. Many such products contain silica, which
poses a hazard to humans. In addition, most such materials are not
biodegradable, which is a factor that can limit the options for
disposal of the used sorbent material.
[0005] There are also several organic spill control products
described in the art. Examples of such materials include natural
fibers such as grass, pre-cooked cereal kernels, sawdust,
cellulose, and peat. U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,881 purports to describe a
cellulose based sorbent system, where the cellulose has been
treated with an additive to render it both hydrophobic and
oleophilic so it will selectively remove oil from water. U.S. Pat.
No. 4,969,774 purports to describe the use of pre-cooked and puffed
cereals for oil removal. Another document, U.S. Pat. No. 5,399,350,
purports to disclose a particulate milled seed material in which
the lipids have been removed through solvent extraction and wherein
the material is designed to remove and disperse oil from open water
and solid surfaces. The composition is a solvent-extracted
proteinaceous material derived from grain products having oil
sorptive properties. Also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,881 purports to
describe the use of diatomaceous earth, clay, silica, corncob,
peatmoss, perlite, polypropylene, sawdust, cellulose, polystyrene,
vermiculite, peat and cork to absorb liquids. This composition is
taught as a general absorbent; in this document, it is stated that
materials that absorb both water and oil are undesirable. U.S. Pat.
No. 5,891,937 purports to disclose the use of corn stalks, husks,
cobs, and kernels as carriers. U.S. Pat. No. 6,110,323 purports to
disclose the use of delignified waste from hulls, straw, stover,
and shells as a carrier. Other carriers are purportedly disclosed
in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,383,609 and 6,391,120. Generally, other
biodegradable materials such as peat moss, sawdust, hair, feathers,
cotton, cork, starch, bagasse, seeds, seed hulls, and other seed
components have also been proposed.
[0006] Many methods for introducing a material into an environment
also are known. In many cases, it is desired to introduce the
material in a delayed-release manner, by which is contemplated that
at least some of the material is bound up with another material or
otherwise is not immediately available to function in the
environment for its intended purpose. For instance, it is often
desired to introduce a control agent, i.e., a material that limits
the growth or spread of a living thing, into an environment. Known
control agents, such as insecticides, larvicides, rodenticides,
fungicides, and so forth may be oil-based or water-based. It is
desirable to provide a sorbent for such control agents, and in
particular, it is desirable to provide a sorbent that allows
delayed release of at least some control agents into an
environment. Further, it is highly desirable to provide a sorbent
that is useful in sorbing both oil- and water-based control
agents.
[0007] Typical control agents are provided in liquid or solid form.
There are advantages and disadvantages to each product form. Liquid
pesticides can be applied as a spray, which is advantages in some
respect. Drift control of the spray can be a challenge, however,
especially in an aerial broadcast application. Solid pesticide
products are better at targeting an area for pest control, because
there is less drift of the solid product. Pelleted or compacted
compositions are typically used in solid pesticide products. The
majority of such composition is composed of a carrier or absorbent
material, and the active ingredient is usually a small percentage
(<10%) of the pellet weight. Another advantage of a solid
control agent composition is that the weight of the composition
allows penetration into vegetative areas that are less accessible
via a liquid spray. Heavier pellets often can penetrate through a
tree canopy, whereas liquid droplets would tend to coat and
contaminate the tree canopy.
[0008] One drawback to many known solid pesticides products is that
non-biodegradable carriers often are used in such products. These
carriers can lead to contamination of the area of treatment. In
recognition of this problem, numerous biodegradable carriers have
been provided; examples include materials such as corncob, peanut
hulls, and starches. Many known biodegradable carriers are
unsatisfactory. In many cases, the resulting composition does not
perform as well as a non-biodegradable product. In addition, many
biodegradable materials such as corncob, peanut hulls, and starches
do not disperse easily when in contact with water, leaving a
contaminant residue. Corncob is especially poor in this regard,
because it has low density as well as poor dispersibility in water.
In addition, when a granular pesticide does not readily
disintegrate in an aquatic environment, the active ingredient is
not readily released and thus a less efficacious pest control
product with residual contaminant pesticide activity is
provided.
[0009] In the case of mosquito larvicides, such materials
ordinarily are released into standing or slowly moving water to
destroy larvae growing in the water. It is particularly preferred
that the carrier should release at least a portion of the larvicide
within the topmost two feet of water in a standing or slowly moving
water column, where most or all of the larvae are found. It is
further preferred that the larvae in the water column be destroyed
within 24 hours, and preferably within 8 hours of treatment.
Although the prior art has provided numerous carriers for control
agents, not all carriers allow for the preparation of a control
agent composition that meets these preferred criteria
[0010] In a first preferred embodiment of the invention, it is a
general object to provide a sorbent that is useful in conjunction
with the introduction of a material into an environment. In a
second preferred embodiment of the invention, it is a general
object to provide a sorbent that is useful in conjunction with the
removal of a material from an environment, the material being
removed by sorption of the material into the sorbent and removal of
the sorbed composition thus formed from the environment.
THE INVENTION
[0011] The invention provides a number of embodiments in which the
sorbing properties of spent grain germ and seed meal are utilized.
These organic, naturally derived sorbents, alone or in combination,
can be used to introduce material into an environment, or to remove
material from an environment. When such sorbent is used to
introduce a material into an environment, the environment
preferably is one in which the sorbent will biodegrade. In such
instances, delayed release of the sorbed material into the
environment often is possible. When the sorbent is used to remove
material from an environment, the sorbed material composition can
be allowed to biodegrade prior to ultimate disposal of the
composition. Many of the disclosures in the prior art fail to
address the fate of the sorbed composition formed upon removing a
material from an environment. Generally, the volume of sorbent
introduced into the environment is much greater than the volume of
the liquid to be removed from the environment. Where the removed
material is or contains a hazardous compound, the relatively large
quantity of sorbent having the material sorbed therewithin must
also be treated as a hazardous material, which can increase the
ultimate disposal cost considerably. The sorbents useful in
conjunction with the present invention can be biodegraded, thereby
reducing the total volume of material that must be treated as
hazardous.
[0012] In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, a
control agent composition is provided. The composition includes a
sorbent, the sorbent being selected from the group consisting of
spent grain germ, seed meal, and mixtures thereof, and a control
agent sorbed within the sorbent. Most preferably, the composition
is in the form of discrete plural pellets, by which is contemplated
the product of a pelletizing operation in a pellet mill.
[0013] In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a
method for limiting the growth of an undesired pest in an
environment is provided. The method includes selecting a control
agent for the pest, and introducing into the environment an amount
of a control agent composition effective to limit the growth of the
pest. The control agent composition includes a sorbent and control
agent as described hereinabove.
[0014] In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a
method for introducing a material into an environment is provided.
A material for which delayed release into the environment is
desirable is selected. Subsequently, a granular material
composition that includes the selected material sorbed within a
sorbent, the sorbent being spent grain germ, seed meal, or a
mixture thereof, is introduced into the environment. The timing of
the release of the material into the environment can be controlled
to an extent by adjusting the integrity of the granules, whereby
more durable granules generally will release the sorbed material
more slowly than less durable granules.
[0015] In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a
method for removing an unwanted material present in an environment
is provided. The method includes selecting a sorbent for the
material, introducing into the environment an amount of the sorbent
effective to sorb at least a portion of the material, allowing at
least some of the material to become sorbed to thereby formed a
sorbed composition, and removing at least a portion of the sorbed
composition from the environment. The sorbed material may be a
combustible material, and, in accordance with one embodiment of the
invention, a method for generating heat is provided, the method
including providing a combustible material composition and
oxidizing the combustible material composition. The combustible
material composition includes a sorbent and a combustible material
sorbed within the sorbent. Preferably, the combustible material is
present in an amount of at least 5% by weight of the
composition.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0016] The invention contemplates the use of a sorbent, by which is
contemplated a material that absorbs and/or adsorbs another
material. Generally, absorption is a term used in the art to refer
to the penetration of one substance into the inner structure of
another substance, whereas the term adsorption refer to adherence
of atoms, ions, or molecules onto the surface of another material.
It is believed that one or both phenomena occur in accordance with
the various embodiments of the invention, but it is contemplated
that the material may serve as a sorbent even if only one of the
two phenomena is present. By "sorbed within" is herein contemplated
the sorption of a material in or on the sorbent.
[0017] The sorbent used in conjunction with the invention
preferably is spent germ, which is a germ from which oil has been
expelled, for instance, by pressing or extraction with an
extracting liquid such as hexane or water. Spent grain germ
material has numerous advantages, in that it is derived from
natural, renewable resources, is biodegradable and safely
incinerable, is nontoxic and safe for the environment, and is
economical to produce and use. This material is able to sorb both
hydrophilic and lipophilic liquids. The spent germ may be washed to
render it substantially free of odor components. It is known that
washing of the germ will remove substantially odor and flavor
components, which may be an advantage in some instances. In other
embodiments, unwashed germ may be used. Germ obtained from any
suitable grain may be employed in conjunction with the invention.
Grains such as corn, wheat, soy, sorghum, barley, and the like are
particularly suitable for use in conjunction with the invention.
The preferred sorbent is expeller-extruded corn germ. Virgin germ
(i.e., germ from which oil has not been extracted) may also be
used, whereby in the manufacture of the sorbent as described herein
some or all oil present in the germ is extracted.
[0018] Alternatively, or in addition thereto, the sorbent used in
conjunction with the invention may be a seed meal. Examples of such
meals include linseed meal, soybean meal, sunflower meal,
cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, peanut meal, safflower seed meal,
and combinations thereof. By "seed" is meant to include that part
of a plant which is capable of forming a new plant upon
germination, e.g., whole grains of wheat, including the fruit or
fruit-like structure housing the seed. The seed meal comprises a
spent oil bearing seed residue, which is a seed residue from which
oil has been expelled, such as by solvent extraction or expeller
extraction. The extracted residue then is ground, by which is
contemplated the reduction of the residue to smaller particles,
preferably to a semi-course to fine powder. It is contemplated that
some seeds will include a hull that may (but need not) be removed
prior to expelling oil and grinding. Thus, the meal may comprise a
dehulled meal. The seed meal in some embodiments is washed to
substantially remove odor components therefrom.
[0019] The germ and seed meal component of the sorbent collectively
should be present in the sorbent in an amount of at least 50% by
dry basis weight of the sorbent. Preferably, the germ and meal are
present in a greater amount, such as an amount of 60%, 70%, 80% or
90% by weight of the sorbent. Most preferably, the germ and meal
collectively are present in an amount of 100% by dry basis weight
of the sorbent, that is, the sorbent includes the meal and/or germ
to the substantially or complete exclusion of other sorbents. With
respect to one another, the germ and meal can be used in any ratio
desired. For instance, expresses as a percentage, the ratio may be
100% meal, 90% meal, 80% meal, 70% meal, 60% meal, 50% meal, 40%
meal, 30% meal, 20% meal, 10% meal, or 0% meal (i.e., 100% germ).
Other sorbents, such as these described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,391,328,
optionally may be used in conjunction with the sorbents described
herein, but preferably, such other sorbents are not present.
[0020] The sorbent may be used in conjunction with the introduction
of a material into an environment. The environment can be any
place, area, or region in which the introduction of the material is
desired. Generally, the material is selected as being desirable for
use in the environment. For instance, the material may be a control
agent, by which is completed a material that limits the growth of
unwanted pests in the environment. A control agent preferably is
selected as being an agent that limits the growth of the pest, by
which is contemplated checking the spread of the pest by killing,
sterilizing, destroying eggs or otherwise limiting the growth of
the pest. Control agents generally are toxic chemicals; in
accordance with the invention, any control agent now known or
otherwise found to be suitable for use in limiting the growth of a
pest may be used. The pest may be present in the environment, or
may not be present in the environment (in other words, it is
contemplated that the environment may be treated prophylactically).
The pest can be any organism whose presence in the environment is
undesired. Any organism found in the Animalia, Protista, Fungi (in
particular non-mold fungi), Plantae, or Monera kingdoms may be
deemed a pest in particular circumstances, and the control agent
may be any agent that limits the growth of such pest in the
environment. With respect to animals, the pest may be mammal, for
instance, a rodent such as a mouse or rat, or a non-mammal, such as
a fish, bird or other animal. The invention is believed to be
particularly applicable to the control of animals in the phylum
Arthropoda, including especially the classes Insecta (representing
insects, millipedes, and centipedes), and Cheliceramorpha,
especially arachnids. The control agent in preferred embodiments
may be a rodenticide, a herbicide, an insecticide, a fungicide, or
a bactericide. Specific embodiments of the invention employ, for
instance, a larvicide, a pupicide, an ovicide, a hormone, a growth
regulator (e.g. an insect growth regulator), a biological control
agent, a microbial control agent, a toxicant, a fumigant, a
pheromone, a repellent, a chemosterilant, a miticide, an acarcide,
a molluscicide, an avicide, a predicide, an algaecide, a
nematicide, an amoebicide, a nymphicide, and the like. In preferred
embodiments, the control agent is selected from among an animal
control agent (which may be a control agent for any species in the
kingdom Animalia), a plant control agent (any species which may be
a control agent for any species in the kingdom Plantae), a non-mold
fungal control agent (which may be a control agent for any species
in the kingdom Fungi, excepting the molds), a protist control agent
(which may be a control agent for any species in the kingdom
Protista) or a monera control agent (which may be a bacterial
species or any other species in the Monera kingdom). In some
embodiments, the control agent may be a virus control agent. Two or
more agents can be combined to increase efficacy or to achieve
multifunctional performance in the same composition.
[0021] Specific preferred examples of suitable control agents
include insecticides such as temephos, chlorpyfifos, methyl
isocyanate, methoprene, propaphos, DURSBAN.RTM. dimilin, malathien,
carbaryl, and diazinon; herbicides such as 2,4-D and 2,4-D ester,
ammonium sulfamate, BROMACIL.RTM., copper salts, molinate,
propanil, pyrazolate, metolachlor, and the like. Other control
agents include bioactives such as Bacillus thuringiensis and
Bacillus sphaericus; fungicides, such as fenoxanil, iprobenfos,
menopril, tricyclozole, and valdamycin, and the like. The invention
is not limited to the foregoing, and indeed any material that
functions as a control agent may be used in conjunction with the
invention. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,911,952; 4,983,390; 5,997,445;
6,159,489; 6,316,447; 6,335,027; and 6,340,656, all disclose
numerous control agents, any or all which in certain embodiments
may be deemed suitable for use in conjunction with the
invention.
[0022] The control agent or other material sorbed within the
sorbent may be a lipophilic or oleogenous material, or may be a
hydrophilic material or a combination thereof (such as an
emulsion). The material may be present in any amount with respect
to the sorbent suitable for the intended purpose of the
sorbent/material composition. In some embodiments, the material is
present in an amount of at least 5% by weight of the total
composition, more preferably at least 7% by weight, and even more
preferably, at 10% by weight. When the sorbed material is a control
agent, the sorbed material preferably is present in an amount
ranging from 0.001 to 50% by weight, more preferably, from 0.001 to
10% by weight, and even more preferably, from 0.005 to 5% by weight
of the composition. In some embodiments, the sorbed material is
present in an amount from 0.05 to 1%, or, within this range, from
0.05 to 0.5% by weight. More generally, any amount suitable for the
intended purpose may be employed in conjunction with the invention.
The composition optionally may include any other additives, which
may be present in any amounts suitable for their intended purposes
or omitted altogether. Examples of such additives include
surfactants, spreading agents, adjuvants, other carriers, binders,
deflocculating agents, dispersing agents, synergists, penetrants,
suspending agents, baits, phagostimulants, sticking agents,
stabilizers, coupling agents, foaming or antifoaming agents,
diluents, waxes, oils, superabsorbents, and more generally, any
other additives.
[0023] The sorbents described herein are not limited to the
introduction of a control agent into an environment. To the
contrary, the sorbets can be used to introduce any desirable
sorbable materials into an environment. It is contemplated that in
some cases the sorbable material may be a solid material that is
carried in or on the sorbent. In one embodiment of the invention,
the sorbable material is a fertilizer. Any suitable material or
synthetic fertilizer may be employed in conjunction with the
invention. In one embodiment, the sorbable material is an animal
nutrient, such a vitamin or mineral. These materials may be present
in any amounts suitable for their intended purpose. The selection
of specific ingredients, loading levels, and application rates may
be made by one is skilled in the art. One embodiment of the
invention encompasses a method for fertilizing an arable area by
applying a fertilizer composition as described above. In another
embodiment, the invention encompasses a method for providing
nutrients to an animal, the method including feeding the animal an
animal nutrient composition as described above. The animal may be
for instance, a horse, a cow, a pig, a sheep, a bird, or even a
human.
[0024] The composition that includes the sorbent and sorbed
material (including any additives) may be provided in any suitable
form. Most preferably, the composition is provided in the form of
discrete plural particles of a substantially uniform and homogenous
admixture of the sorbent and the sorbed materials. In accordance
with a preferred embodiment of the invention, the particles are in
a form of compressed or compacted particles, i.e., in the form of
granules. By "granules" is meant particles that are compressed or
compacted, such by a pelletizing, extrusion or similar compacting
step. Such compression or compacting of the particles is preferred,
inasmuch as the intraparticle cohesion of the particles will be
enhanced by such compacting or compressing step.
[0025] The granules may be prepared via any suitable manner.
Preferably, the material to be sorbed, if not a liquid, is
dissolved or suspended in a liquid and the liquid is applied to the
sorbent, followed by compression of the mixture to form granules.
In a highly preferred embodiment of the invention, the granules are
prepared by pelletizing the sorbent in a pellet mill. The
composition may be prepared by sorbing the material into pellets
thus formed, or alternatively may be prepared by pelletizing a
mixture of the material and the sorbent. In either case, the
pellets exiting the pellet mill may be ground or crumbled to
thereby reduce the granules of the composition to a desired granule
size. The mixture may be pelletized under any suitable conditions.
Typically, the ingredients are pre-ground and are introduced into
the pellet mill with moisture. Typical moisture content ranges from
2-30%, more preferably 5-15% by total weight of the blend. The
blend is pelleted through a die such as a {fraction (3/32)}
in.times.2 in die at any suitable temperature, preferably a
temperature ranging from 150.degree. F. to 220.degree. F., more
preferably from 180.degree. F. to 200.degree. F. Final moisture
preferably is in the range from 4-20%, more preferably from 7-12%
by total weight.
[0026] After pelleting, the pellets may be cooled and crumbled
through dry rollers to reduce the size of the granules (it is also
possible to cut the pellets from the die). The final granule size
may vary depending on the application. For an application such as
mosquito control, the granule size preferably should be between 4
and 30 mesh (U.S. standard test sieve. ASTM E-11 specification) and
more preferably should be between 6 and 20 mesh. Fines generated
during the pelletizing process may be removed by screening,
preferable on a 10-mesh screen to a level of less than 20% by
weight and ideally less than 5%. Such fines may be recycled.
[0027] In the pelletizing operation, use of a lubricity agent such
as corn oil may be necessary or helpful. Other lubricants such as
added corn oil or oils from soy, peanut, sunflower, rapeseed,
canola, coconut, or cotton, or animal fats such as tallow, yellow
grease, or white grease, may be used. Other lubricants include
lecithin, waxes, fish oils, castor oil, long-chain alkyl
sulphonates, alkyl poyglucosides, tall oil, stearates, and
silicones. The lubricant (including any oil present in the germ)
preferably is present in an amount of up to 30% by total weight of
the composition (excluding moisture) more preferably, an amount of
10-15% by weight. Pelletizing is not the only manner of forming
suitable granules. For instance, in another embodiment of the
invention, extrusion of sorbent through a dye and grinding of the
extrudate to a suitable granular size is useful in conjunction with
the preparation of the composition. Once again, the extrudate may
itself comprise a composition of a sorbent and the material to be
sorbed, or the material may be sorbed within granules of extruded
sorbent subsequent to extrusion.
[0028] The granules should be sufficiently cohesive for use for
their intended purpose. Especially when the granule is used as a
carrier for control agent, the granule must have sufficient
integrity to survive the production, transport, and application of
the product. If the granule is too durable, however, it will not
disintegrate easily, and may not be effective in releasing the
control agent in the desired manner, for instance, when the granule
is introduced into a water column. In embodiments of the invention
where a delayed release of the control agent or other sorbed
material is desired, the granules may be made more durable by
incorporating additional binder or cohesiveness agent. The binder
may comprise an extrudate of corn hulls and sodium hydroxide (as
taught is copending application Ser. No. 09/901,342, filed Jul. 9,
2001), lignin, lignosulfate, hemicelluloses, celluloses, water,
starch hydrolyzates, hydrogenated starch hydrolyzates, fatty acids,
and clay materials such as bentonite and zeolites. In such
embodiments, the binder preferably is present in an amount of about
5% by weight of the granule. In some embodiments of the invention,
the granules may include a polysaccharide cohesiveness agent to
enhance the cohesiveness of the granules. The cohesiveness agent is
believed to provide additional hydroxyl groups, which groups
enhance the bonding between grain proteins within the sorbent
granules. It is further believed that the additional hydroxyl
groups so function by enhancing the hydrogen bonding of proteins to
starch and to other proteins. When used, the polysaccharide
cohesiveness agent may be present in any amount suitable to enhance
the cohesiveness of the sorbent granules. Generally, the
cohesiveness agent may be present in a dry basis amount ranging up
to about 45% by weight of the sorbent granules, preferably, an
amount ranging from about 3% to about 35% by weight, more
preferably, an amount ranging from about 5% to about 25% by weight.
When the binder is or includes virgin germ, some or all of this may
come from starch naturally present in the virgin germ
[0029] In accordance with these embodiments of the invention, any
suitable polysaccharide may be used in conjunction with the
invention, and thus, for example, the cohesiveness agent may
comprise one or more polysaccharides such as dextrin,
maltodextrins, starches, flours, cellulosics, hemicellulosics, and
the like. Preferably, the cohesiveness agent comprises a starch,
and most preferably, the cohesiveness agent comprises a corn
starch.
[0030] When a polysaccharide cohesiveness agent is used, preferably
a supplemental cohesiveness agent also is used. In accordance with
the invention, the supplemental cohesiveness agent is an ionic
species that is believed to enhance protein-protein and/or
protein-starch interactions. Any suitable ionic salt may be used in
conjunction with the invention. For example, in accordance with
preferred embodiments of the invention, the supplemental
cohesiveness agent is selected from among the alkali and
alkaline-earth salts of common anions, such as the halide, nitrate,
nitrite, carbonate, phosphate, sulfate, and bicarbonate salts, and
the like. More preferably, the supplemental cohesiveness agent is
selected from the group consisting of sodium chloride, calcium
chloride, sodium carbonate, calcium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate
and mixtures thereof. Even more preferably, the supplemental
cohesiveness agent is selected from among sodium chloride, calcium
carbonate, and mixtures thereof. Most preferably, the supplemental
cohesiveness agent is sodium chloride. The supplemental
cohesiveness agent may be present in any amount sufficient to
assist the cohesiveness agent in enhancing the cohesion of the
granules. When used, the supplemental cohesiveness agent preferably
is present in an amount of at least about 0.05% by dry basis
weight, of the composition exclusive of the polysaccharide
cohesiveness agent. More preferably, the supplemental cohesiveness
agent is present in an amount ranging from about 0.05% to about 10%
by weight; more preferably, about 0.1% to about 8% by weight; and
most preferably, about 1.5% to about 4% by weight. In a
particularly preferred embodiment, the supplemental cohesiveness
agent is present in an amount of about 2% by weight of the
composition.
[0031] To prevent or inhibit spoilage, the sorbent composition may
include a preservative. Preferably, the sorbent composition
includes a mold inhibitor, which may be present in any amount
sufficient to inhibit the molding of the sorbent composition. Any
suitable mold inhibitor may be employed in conjunction with the
invention. The mold inhibitor preferably is selected from among the
propionate salts, and most preferably is selected from the group
consisting of sodium propionate and calcium propionate. Other
preservatives include sodium metabisulfite, citric acid, vitamin C,
vitamin E, butylated hydroyxytoluene (BHT) butylated hydroxyanisole
(BHA), and sodium benzoate. When a mold inhibitor is employed, it
preferably is present in an amount ranging from about 0.02% to
about 3.5% by weight. The mold inhibitor may function to some
extent as agent for controlling mold if the composition is
introduced into an environment; however, at the levels used herein,
the mold inhibitor is intended for the purpose of retarding mold of
the sorbent composition itself.
[0032] The composition may be introduced into an environment via
any suitable means. Where it is desired to disseminate the
composition over a large area, the composition may be disseminated
from an aircraft, such as plane, helicopter, blimp, balloon, or the
like, or may be disseminated from a watercraft. Particularly when
the control agent is a mosquito adulticide or larvicide, the
environment may be a water-containing environment, by which is
contemplated any environment containing standing or slowly moving
water. For example, the water-containing environment may be a pond,
lake, swamp, marsh, bog, area with collected rainwater, (such as a
tire) and so forth. It is contemplated that in these or other
embodiments of the invention the environment may be an indoor
environment. The composition preferably is formulated to release at
least a portion of the larvicide within the first two feet of water
column.
[0033] The sorbent composition also may be used to remove a
material from an environment. In accordance with this embodiment of
the invention, at least a portion of undesired material present in
an environment may be removed by introducing a sorbent into the
environment, allowing the sorbent to sorb at least a portion of the
material, and removing at least a portion of the sorbed composition
from the environment. The material which may be removed from the
environment is not limited to the materials described herein, but
to the contrary it is contemplated that any materials that is
sorbable by the sorbent composition may be removed form an
environment. For instance, the material may be an oleogenus or
lipophilic material, or may be a hydrophilic material. In some
embodiments, the material may be a gaseous material, such as
ammonia. Generally, the sorbent may be prepared as described
hereinabove, and may be introduced into the environment in any
suitable manner, for instance, by dispersing the sorbent from an
aircraft or watercraft as described above. The sorbent may be
introduced into the environment in any amount effective for its
intended purpose.
[0034] The sorbent used in conjunction with the invention is
incinerable. It is contemplated that the sorbed material may be a
combustible material, and in particular a hydrophilic material such
as ethanol or an oleogenous material such as oil. It is
contemplated that a combustible material composition so composed
may be oxidized, such as by incineration, to thereby generate heat.
The heat thus generated may be used in industrial applications or
may be used to generate electrical energy. The combustible material
composition may include any suitable ratio of sorbent to
combustible material. Preferably, the composition includes from
1-75%, by weight combustible material, more preferably, the
combustible material is present in an amount of at least 5% by
weight, even more preferably, the combustible material is present
in an mount from 10-75% by weight.
[0035] The sorbents useful in conjunction with the invention are
biodegradable at 25.degree. C. By "biodegradable" is contemplated
that the sorbents are susceptible to degradation via microbial
influence or other breakdown of the biological structure of the
sorbent, such as by thermal or internal chemical or biochemical
influence. It is further contemplated that the sorbent will be
biodegradable over a wide range of other temperatures. When the
sorbent is used to introduce a material into an environment, in
particular an outdoor environment, the sorbent preferably is
biodegradable in the environment. Such biodegradability prevents
long-term contamination of the environment of the sorbent, and, in
some embodiments, may effect a delayed release of the sorbed
material into the environment. In embodiments of the invention
where the sorbent is used to remove material from an environment,
the sorbent may be allowed to biodegrade after removal of the
sorbed unwanted material but before final disposal of the sorbed
material compositions. The biodegradation of the sorbent will in
some instances reduce the volume of the sorbed material
composition, thereby reducing the disposal costs (particularly in
the case of a hazardous material). The sorbed material may be
stored until the volume of the material has been reduced by a
desired amount preferably at least 10%, more preferably 15%, and
even more preferably 20% of the original volume.
[0036] The following Examples illustrate the invention, but should
not be construed as limiting the invention in scope.
EXAMPLE 1
[0037] Experiments were carried out to evaluate the ability of
spent corn germ to sorb various liquids. For each liquid evaluated,
15 grams of sorbent was mixed with 10-50 grams of the liquid to be
tested. After 2 hours, the liquid not sorbed by the germ was
drained off, and the quantity of liquid retained by the sorbent was
determined. Four commercial products were also evaluated, two of
which were claimed to be both oil and water absorbents. The
products picked up from 20 to 25% of their weight of water in the
same period of time. The oil absorptive capacities of the germ and
the commercial products are similar.
[0038] Data below is expressed for each product as % of its weight
in liquid absorbed.
1 Germ Product A Product B Product C Water 600 (after 2 hours) 26
42 32 Ethanol 72 74 74 70 Mineral oil 58 40 36 48 Diesel fuel 28 22
20 32 Product A is a silica-based commercial product. Product B is
a silica/clay-based commercial product. Product C is a silica-based
commercial product.
[0039] As seen, the germ was superior to the commercial products.
The germ was found to sorb at least 300% of its weight of water
within 5 minutes, although it is believed that the ultimate
capacity is even greater over time.
EXAMPLE 2
[0040] This example demonstrates the sorption of gaseous ammonia by
spent corn germ.
[0041] Sorption isotherms were conducted by treating air that
contained 200 ppm NH.sub.3 with different levels of ground spent
corn germ. Air test chambers each having a volume of 3717.4
cm.sup.3 were each prepared to contain a standard mass of gaseous
ammonia by placing into each chamber an open top plastic weigh boat
containing 10.00 mL of a standard ammonia solution made to contain
0.000259 g NH.sub.3 per mL. Each test chamber contained a total of
0.00259 g NH.sub.3, which at equilibrium would exist both as a free
gas and as gas dissolved in water. Directly preceding the addition
of the ammonia solutions to the test chambers, different masses of
ground spent germ of 100 g, 10 g, and 1.0 g had been added to three
different test chambers. Two additional test chambers were not
provided with grain germ but had only the weigh boats containing
the ammonia solution. After equilibration at 20.degree. C. for 23
hours, the concentrations of gaseous ammonia in the test chambers
were measured with Draeger Tubes.
[0042] The relationship between ppm and mg/m.sup.3 was calculated
according to the following equation:
ppm=molar volume.times.(mg/m.sup.3).div.molar mass
[0043] wherein molar volume is 24.1 liters, and molar mass is 17.0
grams.
[0044] Using this calculation, a concentration of 200 ppm NH.sub.3
represents 20.23% of the total NH.sub.3 added.
[0045] The two test chambers to which no spent germ had been added
were each found to contain 200 ppm NH.sub.3. Surprisingly, even the
smallest amount of germ added to the chamber was sufficient to sorb
gaseous ammonia to a level below the level of detection. The three
test chambers to which the three different amounts of ground spent
germ had been added were each found to contain 0 ppm NH.sub.3.
EXAMPLE 3
Preparation of Germ for Insecticide Usage
[0046] Unwashed spent corn germ (Grain Processing Corporation, 25
pounds (10% moisture) was fed into a California Pellet Mill. The
conditioner temperature on the mill was 44.degree. C. and a pellet
die with 0.125.times.1.25 inch openings was used. The pelleting
temperature was 67-68.degree. C. The pelletized product was
crumbled and screened across a 20-mesh screen to remove fines. The
resulting product moisture was 11.5%.
EXAMPLE 4
Pelletized Germ as a Mosquito Larvicide Carrier
[0047] The pelletized germ of Example 3, 10 pounds, is imbibed with
0.2 pounds of Altosid.RTM. liquid larvicide (5% active
(S)-methoprene). Mixing is carried out so that an even distribution
of the larvicide is achieved throughout the pellets. The larvicide
containing pellets are then used to treat an open saltwater
marsh
EXAMPLE 5
Pelletized Germ as a Mosquito Adulticide Carrier
[0048] The pelletized germ of Example 3, 10 pounds, is imbibed with
0.1 pounds of Dursban.RTM. 4E liquid insecticide (44.8% active
chlorpyrifos). Mixing is carried out so that an even distribution
of the insecticide is achieved throughout the pellets. The
insecticide containing pellets are then used to treat an open
saltwater marsh at an application rate of 0.5 pounds per acre.
EXAMPLE 6
[0049] Example 4 is repeated, except that the sorbent includes
grain germ, starch, and salt, which are present in a ratio of
78:20:2 with respect to one an other.
EXAMPLE 7
[0050] Example 4 is repeated, except the sorbent includes soy
meal.
EXAMPLE 8
[0051] Example 4 is repeated, except the sorbent includes soy meal,
starch, and salt which are present in a ratio in 78:20:2 in respect
to one another.
EXAMPLE 9
[0052] Example 4 is repeated, except the sorbent includes linseed
meal.
EXAMPLE 10
[0053] Example 4 is repeated, except the sorbent includes linseed
meal, starch, and salt which are present in a ratio 78:20:2 with
respect to one another.
EXAMPLE 11
[0054] Example 4 is repeated, except that the sorbent is sunflower
meal.
EXAMPLE 12
[0055] Example 4 is repeated, except that the sorbent is a 50:50
mixture of spent grain germ and sunflower meal.
EXAMPLE 13
[0056] Example 4 is repeated, except that the sorbent is a 50:50
mixture of sunflower and linseed meal.
EXAMPLE 14
[0057] U.S. Pat. No. 6,098,569 issued Aug. 8, 2002 to Kent et al.
is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. A sorbent is
prepared in accordance with "animal litter" set forth as example 2.
The sorbent is used to sorb oil from a cement surface.
EXAMPLES 15-48
[0058] Ground germ, virgin germ, hexane extruted germ (HEG), corn
hulls, granular starch (B200 and B700, available from Grain
Processing Corporation of Muscatine, Iowa), Biobond E310 (a
hemicellulose product available from Grain Processing Corporation),
MALTRIN.RTM. M150 (a maltodextrin available from Grain Processing
Corporation), wheat middlings, distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride
(TA-100), carboxymethyl starch extrduate (G120), distillers dried
grains (DDG) and liquid feed syrup (LFS) were provided and
fashioned into pellets. The moisture content of all of the pellets
was from 2%-10%. The fat (corn oil) level of the blends ranged from
6-15%. Protein content was 20-30% of the total blend. The
formulations in the following table were prepared (the figures in
the following table are expressed as weight ratios).
2 Unwashed Weight Rati germ Virgin Wheat Citric TA Examples: germ
HEG HULLS B200 B700 E310 M150 Midds Acid NA.sub.2CO.sub.3 100 DDG
LFS G120 15 100 16 100 3 17 100 18 100 1 19 95 5 20 95 5 5 21 90 10
10 22 90 10 10 23 90 10 20 24 90 10 5 25 90 10 5 26 90 10 0.1 0.2
27 90 10 28 90 10 20 29 90 10 30 90 10 31 90 10 3 32 90 10 33 90 10
34 85 15 35 85 15 5 36 85 15 37 85 15 10 38 85 15 1 39 75 25 40 75
25 5 41 50 50 42 50 50 5 43 20 10 70 44 10 90 45 10 90 10 46 10 90
47 100 48 90 10
[0059] With reference to Example 36, seventeen hundred pounds of
ground, unwashed, expelled germ was blended with 300 pounds of
ground virgin germ in a ribbon blender. The starting moisture of
the blend was 3.9%. Water, 78 pounds, was added to the ribbon
blender to bring the total moisture content of the blend to 7.6%.
After fifteen minutes of blending, the ground material was conveyed
to a California Pellet Mill. The die size was {fraction
(3/32)}".times.2". The pellets were cut-off at the die at about
1/2" in length. The feed screw setting was 8 (.about.3,000
lbs/hour.). The pelleting temperature was 180.degree. F. and the
mill amps were 45. The steam setting to maintain temperature was 63
psi. The overall runnability of the product was excellent and no
mill amp surges were observed.
[0060] The pellets were conveyed from the pellet die to a cooler to
allow the pellets to cool to ambient temperature. Airflow to the
cooler was minimized. The pellets were then conveyed to a dual roll
crumbler, set to obtain a granule size of 35-75% through an 8-mesh
screen. The screening consisted of a 30 seconds to one minute
manual shake on an 8 mesh screen, so actual granule of size was
smaller than measured by this in process technique. The crumbled
pellets were then conveyed over a 10-mesh screen to remove fines.
The fines were recycled back to the mill for re-pelleting. The
final granules were packaged in 50-pound poly lined bags to prevent
moisture loss.
[0061] Examples 17, 28, and 29 also were prepared in accordance
with the aforementioned procedure, but with different starting
blends.
[0062] With reference to Example 32, unwashed, ground, expelled
germ, 8.5 pounds, was blended with 1.5 pounds of ground virgin germ
and 0.5 pounds of B700 cornstarch. The resulting moisture of the
blend was 7.9%. The blend was pelleted through a {fraction
(3/32)}.times.5/8 inch die on a California Pellet Mill. The pellets
were cut at the die so that the optimal pellet size could be
achieved. The conditioner temperature was 160.degree. F. and this
temperature was maintained through the die. The feed setting was 45
and the mill amps were 3.6.
[0063] The resulting product moisture was 11.4%.
[0064] This procedure was followed for the remainder of the blends
of Examples 15-48. (except Examples 17, 28, 29, and 36).
[0065] Granule size, durability, water disintegration; and
composition were evaluated for several of the foregoing
compositions.
[0066] A) Granule Size:
[0067] Screen profiles were obtained by weighing 100 g of granules
and separating the granules on a Tyler Ro-Tap Sieve Shaker. Shaking
time was 10 minutes. The screens used were U.S.A. standard sieves
8, 10, 12, 14, 16 and 20 mesh. Any particles that passed through
the 20-mesh screen were considered fines. The screen profiles are
listed in the following table.
3 Screen Profile: % ON 8 Example: mesh 10 mesh 12 mesh 14 mesh 16
mesh 20 mesh Pan 16 1.7 13.5 19.3 24.7 16.4 15.6 8.2 17 37.6 30.7
12.7 5.9 2.9 3.0 7.3 19 32.8 31.2 15.3 10.2 5.1 3.2 2.2 22 2.8 17.3
21.1 24.6 15.6 12.7 5.6 23 51.1 23.9 7.6 6.0 4.5 4.2 2.7 26 36.8
34.7 8.9 6.5 4.3 3.8 4.9 28 22.4 26.2 20.8 12.8 6.1 4.9 6.8 29 17.8
28.3 25.2 14.1 4.9 3.8 6.0 30 2.2 18.6 19.2 20.4 13.5 14.4 11.7 35
33.1 24.2 14.6 12.5 7.3 5.2 3.1 36 25.7 39.5 19.7 6.2 2.2 1.8 4.9
44 0.2 2.5 11.3 23.5 21.8 24.1 16.1 50 16.6 24.2 17.1 15.1 10.8 9.2
7.0
[0068] B) Granule Durability
[0069] Granule durability was measured by using a Ro-Tap sieve
shaker. A 50-gram aliquot of granules that had been previously
screened to remove all fines less than 20 mesh was reapplied on a
20-mesh screen. The granules were then re-shaken on the Ro-Tap for
20 minutes. The fines were measured to give an indication of how
easy the granules broke apart. Durability analyses are shown in the
following table.
4 Fines Example: g in Pan % in Pan 14 0.4 0.8 19 0.9 1.8 23 0.6 1.2
26 2.0 4.0 28 0.6 1.2 29 0.5 1.0 35 0.5 1.0 36 0.3 0.6
[0070] C) Granule Water Disintegration
[0071] granule water disintegration test is a modification of the
U.S. Pharmacopoeia 710 tablet disintegration test. The apparatus
used was a VanKel.RTM. disintegration tester Vankel Industries,
Edison, N.J.) which is a basket-rack assembly with six open-ended
transparent tubes (7.75 cm long, 23 mm wide), of which only two
tubes were used at any given time. The tubes are held in place by
top and bottom plexiglass plates. The assembly has a woven
stainless steel wire mesh (1.8-2.2 mm apertures) attached to the
lower plate to allow for water to pass freely in and out of the
tubes. The assembly was suspended on a cantilever attached to a
motor that consistently raises and lowers the assembly at
approximately 30 cycles per minute through a distance of 5.5 cm. A
0.25 g aliquot of >20 mesh graules was placed into the
individual tubes (each sample was evaluated in duplicate). The
basket-rack assembly was then submerged into a 4L Pyrex No. 1000
beaker containing 3.5 of 27.degree. C. tap water, and the motor
turned on to initiate the movement of the basket. The number of
granules remaining in the basket was measured after 5, 10 and 15
minutes and the two values per sample were averaged. The granules
disintegrated with time so that the majority of the pellets broke
apart and fell through the mesh screen during the test. The
following results were obtained.
5 # of Pellets Example: Avg 5 min Avg 10 min Avg 15 min 14 22 12 2
17 9 1 1 19 9 3 1 22 13 8 1 23 18 9 4 26 0 0 0 (4 min) 28 9 1 0 29
7 1 1 30 8 7 4 35 8 4 2 36 5 1 0 44 19 11 7 45 1 0 0 (6 min)
[0072] D) Granule Chemical Analysis
[0073] Selected granule samples were analyzed for moisture (Ohaus
moisture balance), fats (ISCO SFE) and proteins (LECO nitrogen
analyzer). The following results were obtained.
6 Example: Moisture Fats Protein 17 7.4 7.2 25.2 19 9.0 9.8 24.4 23
7.0 NR* NR 26 10.8 NR NR 28 7.3 9.7 21.6 29 7.2 10.5 23.6 35 9.0
13.2 22.4 36 6.4 12.7 23.9 *Not Recorded
[0074] For mosquito control, Example 36 is preferred.
[0075] It is thus seen that in various embodiments the foregoing
general objects have been satisfied. The invention provides a
sorbent which is useful in conjunction with the introduction of a
material into an environment, and in conjunction with a removal of
a unwanted material from an environment.
[0076] All references, including publications, patent applications,
and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference.
[0077] The use of terms such as "a" and "an" and "the" and similar
referents in the context of describing the invention is to be
construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless
otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. All
methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order
unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted
by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language
provided herein, is intended to illuminate the invention and does
not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention. No language in
the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed
element as being essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein.
Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to
those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing
description. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications
and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims
appended hereto as permitted by applicable law.
* * * * *