Method for encoding/decoding a binary signal state in a fault tolerant environment

Moller, Hanan Z. ;   et al.

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 10/026353 was filed with the patent office on 2003-06-26 for method for encoding/decoding a binary signal state in a fault tolerant environment. Invention is credited to Moller, Hanan Z., Sonnier, David P..

Application Number20030120966 10/026353
Document ID /
Family ID21831327
Filed Date2003-06-26

United States Patent Application 20030120966
Kind Code A1
Moller, Hanan Z. ;   et al. June 26, 2003

Method for encoding/decoding a binary signal state in a fault tolerant environment

Abstract

A method for use in a fault tolerant environment for assuring that devices within the environment switch between primary and back-up systems in response to remotely generated control signals. In one embodiment, the inventive system uses a binary code in the form of a pair of different frequency signals, i.e., a binary zero is represented by one frequency and a binary one is represented by another frequency. The signals may be continuous or may be sent in timed bursts. At the individual devices, such as the aforementioned line cards, a receiver is provided to detect the presence of the signals. Since the line cards already have receivers to detect the binary signal, modification to detect a frequency signal requires the addition of minimal components. The receiver also includes circuitry for reporting the status of the card and such circuitry can be used to report to the remote controller whether the signals are reaching the line card. Alternately, the signals could be sent in burst format using a single frequency in which the number of bursts could indicate a binary one or a binary zero. For example, if N bursts are received in some unit of time, that could be indicative of one binary state. If 2N burst are received in the same unit of time, that could be indicative of another binary state. In another form, the receiver could be programmed to look for N changes of frequency per unit of time to indicate one binary state and 2N changes of frequency could be indicative of another binary state.


Inventors: Moller, Hanan Z.; (Austin, TX) ; Sonnier, David P.; (Austin, TX)
Correspondence Address:
    BEUSSE, BROWNLEE, BOWDOIN & WOLTER, P. A.
    390 NORTH ORANGE AVENUE
    SUITE 2500
    ORLANDO
    FL
    32801
    US
Family ID: 21831327
Appl. No.: 10/026353
Filed: December 21, 2001

Current U.S. Class: 714/2 ; 382/165
Current CPC Class: H04L 43/0817 20130101; H04L 41/0663 20130101
Class at Publication: 714/2 ; 382/165
International Class: G06K 009/00

Claims



What is claimed is:

1. In a fault tolerant system having a primary device and at least one redundant device, and further having a remote controller for monitoring the status of the devices and providing a control signal to switch from the primary device to the redundant device upon detection of a failure in the primary device, a method of determining validity of the control signal comprising: continually sending a first signal having a predetermined varying characteristic to at least the primary device from the remote controller; and sending a second signal having a different varying characteristic to at least the primary device from the remote controller upon detection of a failure of the primary device.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the varying characteristic comprises a signal frequency.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the signal frequency is a continuous wave frequency.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein the signal frequency is a selected number of signals per unit of time.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one device includes a receiver responsive to the to the first signal for acknowledging receipt thereof to the remote controller.
Description



BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] The present invention relates to fault tolerant systems and, more particularly, to a method for confirming validity of a control signal for energizing a back-up system in a fault tolerant environment.

[0002] Numerous electronic control systems utilize multiple redundant systems to assure fault tolerance in critical applications. One example of such a system is a redundant switching fabric for a communication line card installation. Typically, such systems have two switching fabrics, a primary and a back-up. All of the line cards are connected to the outside world through the switching fabric. In the event that the primary fabric has a failure, the system has to switch to the backup fabric. In this example, the switching function resides on each line card and a remote controller provides a binary state signal to each card to let the card know when to switch to the back-up fabric.

[0003] One potential problem with such systems is that the control signal may become tied to one of the binary states and be unable to switch in response to the remote controller. For example, if a binary zero is used to maintain the line cards connected to the primary fabric and the control signal line becomes grounded, the line card will not receive a binary one signal generated by the controller when the binary one signal is used to command a change to the backup fabric. Another potential problem is that the control signal could fail into the switch state and cause one or more of the components to switch in error. In particular, a subset of the components might see the switch indication. This is particularly undesirable since it could lead to a partitioning of the system and result in a system failure. This type failure is not amenable to the test mode described below. There are solutions to this problem as well, such as running dual redundant signals and then running tests on both of them but such additional redundancy introduces more complexity. One solution to this problem is to periodically run a test mode in which a test signal is sent to each line card and a check is then made to determine if the line card responded to the test signal. While this approach may be suitable in simple systems having only a few devices that need to switch, verifying that each line card in a typical communication system has switched presents a complex problem. Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide a method for continually verifying proper operation of devices in response to control signals in a fault tolerant environment.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0004] The present invention is directed to a method for use in a fault tolerant environment for assuring that devices within the environment switch between primary and back-up systems in response to remotely generated control signals. In one embodiment, the inventive system uses a binary code in the form of a pair of different frequency signals, i.e., a binary zero is represented by one frequency and a binary one is represented by another frequency. The signals may be continuous or may be sent in timed bursts. At the individual devices, such as the aforementioned line cards, a receiver is provided to detect the presence of the signals. Since the line cards already have receivers to detect the binary signal, modification to detect a frequency signal requires the addition of minimal components. The receiver also includes circuitry for reporting the status of the card and such circuitry can be used to report to the remote controller whether the signals are reaching the line card. Alternately, the signals could be sent in burst format using a single frequency in which the number of bursts could indicate a binary one or a binary zero. For example, if N bursts are received in some unit of time, that could be indicative of one binary state. If 2N burst are received in the same unit of time, that could be indicative of another binary state. In another form, the receiver could be programmed to look for N changes of frequency per unit of time to indicate one binary state and 2N changes of frequency could be indicative of another binary state. In any of the examples, the receiver could be programmed to notify the remote controller whenever signals are being received and the absence of signal confirmation at the controller would be indicative of a loss of the control signal. In this way, the system would always know whether or not the control signal is being transmitted to the devices and thereby provide assurance that the redundancy is available.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

[0005] For a better understanding of the present invention reference may be had to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:

[0006] FIG. 1 is a simplified illustration of a phone switching system incorporating a redundant switching fabric with which the present invention may be used; and

[0007] FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating two forms of control signals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0008] Referring to FIG. 1, there is illustrated a portion of a communication switching system 10 with which the present invention may be used. The system includes a block 12 identified as a remote controller which monitors and directs data flow into a distribution network. Data entering block 12 at line 14 is directed into a data distribution block 16 which forwards the data into multiple selected paths, two of which are shown at 18 and 20 coupling the data into a pair of redundant switching fabrics 22 and 24. The switching fabrics couple data signals to and from a set of line cards 26. In the communication system, the line cards are arranged so that each card directs calls to a specific communication line. The switching fabric is essentially a back plane connecting the line cards to the communication lines. In existing systems, the remote controller monitors operation of the switching fabric and determines whether there is any failure in the fabric. In the event of a failure, the controller 12 provides a DC signal to instruct the line cards to switch their respective inputs and outputs to the back-up fabric. Both the switching fabrics 22 and 24 are arranged to couple output data through a data select block 28. The block 28 functions to pass data from either fabric to an output bus 30.

[0009] In prior art systems, the controller 12 uses a bi-level control signal on a control voltage line to indicate to the line cards 26 which of the fabrics 22 and 24 are to be used to couple data into and out of the system. For example, a signal of zero volts would indicate use of one fabric and a signal of some positive or negative voltage would indicate use of the other of the fabrics. One problem with this system is that a grounded or open control voltage line corresponds to one state of the bi-level control signal. If the controller 12 changes the state of the control signal, the grounded or open control line will prevent the control signal from changing state at the line cards and thus prevent the redundant or back-up fabric from being brought into use, or alternately causing one or more of the line cards to switch states in error, leading to a partitioned system.

[0010] The present invention overcomes the above described problem with the control line signaling by changing the format of the control signal. The bi-level control signal is replaced with a signal that has a varying characteristic. By way of example, the control signal may be a dual frequency signal such that a first frequency of the signal indicates selection of a primary fabric (or other device) and a second frequency of the signal indicates selection of a back-up fabric (or other device). FIG. 2 at 32 shows a first frequency at A and a second frequency at B. As another example, the signal could be a multipulse signal in which a first number of pulses per unit of time would indicate selection of a first device and a second number of pulses per unit of time would indicate selection of a second device. FIG. 2 at 34 indicates one form of such pulsing. Other variations of this concept could be implemented with the basic theme of a variation in the control signal per unit time being such as to assure that a loss of control signal can be recognized. All of these signals are characterized by having a varying value rather than being set at some fixed value that could be duplicated by inadvertent coupling of the control line to some fixed value.

[0011] In the illustrative example, the line cards 26 could be modified to receive the varying signal and provide a response to the controller 12 confirming receipt of the signal. In one form, the control voltage line, such as the lines 32 and 34, could be bi-directional signal lines passing through the fabrics 22 and 24 to the respective line cards 26. Each line card could be modified to return a recognizable signal to the controller to indicate to the controller that the control voltage signal was received. Various types of signal responsive circuits are known in the art for performing this function. Further, while the control signal line is shown as a hard-wired line in the drawing, it will be understood that the return signal could be a wireless transmission.

[0012] While the invention has been described in what is presently considered to be a preferred embodiment, various modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is intended therefore that the invention not be limited to the specific disclosed embodiment but be interpreted within the full spirit and scope of the appended claims.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed