U.S. patent application number 10/199966 was filed with the patent office on 2003-06-26 for optical fiber bragg grating coating removal detection.
Invention is credited to Dunphy, James R., Ryan, James J..
Application Number | 20030118297 10/199966 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 23357759 |
Filed Date | 2003-06-26 |
United States Patent
Application |
20030118297 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Dunphy, James R. ; et
al. |
June 26, 2003 |
Optical fiber Bragg grating coating removal detection
Abstract
An optical corrosion sensor employs an optical fiber Bragg
grating 20 embedded within an optical fiber 18. The grating 20 has
a coating 40 made of a material, such as aluminum, which corrodes
or can otherwise be removed. The coating 40 exerts forces 46
radially inward around and along the grating 20 so as to cause the
wavelength bandwidth of the grating reflectivity profile to become
broader and to be shifted relative to its uncoated condition. Also,
the forces on the grating 20 are reduced when the coating corrodes,
thereby causing the wavelength bandwidth and shift of the
reflectivity profile of the grating to narrow and to return to its
uncoated condition.
Inventors: |
Dunphy, James R.; (South
Glastonbury, CT) ; Ryan, James J.; (Windsor Locks,
CT) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Timothy J. Haller
NIRO, SCAVONE, HALLER & NIRO
Suite 4600
181 West Madison Street
Chicago
IL
60602-4514
US
|
Family ID: |
23357759 |
Appl. No.: |
10/199966 |
Filed: |
July 19, 2002 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10199966 |
Jul 19, 2002 |
|
|
|
08346059 |
Nov 29, 1994 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
385/102 ;
427/163.2; 427/248.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B29K 2105/108 20130101;
G01N 33/44 20130101; G02B 6/022 20130101; G01M 11/083 20130101;
B29C 70/54 20130101; G01M 11/086 20130101; C03C 25/1063 20180101;
B29C 35/0288 20130101; G02B 6/02104 20130101; G01D 5/35316
20130101; G01B 11/18 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
385/102 ;
427/163.2; 427/248.1 |
International
Class: |
B05D 005/06; C23C
016/00; G02B 006/44 |
Claims
We claim:
1. An optical sensor, comprising: an optical fiber; a fiber grating
embedded within said optical fiber, said grating having a
reflection wavelength bandwidth of a reflectivity profile for
reflecting incident light; a coating of a material having a
predetermined thickness and being around the circumference and
along the length of said fiber grating; said coating exerting
forces radially inward around and along said grating so as to cause
said wavelength bandwidth of said reflectivity profile of said
grating to become broader than it would be without said coating;
and said forces on said grating being reduced when said coating is
at least partially removed, thereby causing the wavelength
bandwidth of said reflectivity profile of said grating to
narrow.
2. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said optical fiber comprises a
fiber core and a cladding surrounding said fiber core.
3. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said forces from said coating are
non-uniformly distributed around and along said grating and disrupt
a periodic refractive index variation of said grating, thereby
causing the broadening of said wavelength bandwidth of said
reflectivity profile.
4. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said forces from said coating also
cause a peak reflection wavelength of said grating to exhibit a
wavelength shift from a value that said peak reflection wavelength
would be at without said coating and wherein said wavelength shift
is reduced when said coating is at least partially removed.
5. The sensor of claim 4 wherein said forces from said coating
exert an overall average force around and along said grating
thereby causing said wavelength shift.
6. The sensor of claim 1 wherein said coating comprises
aluminum.
7. The sensor of claim 1 wherein the removal of said coating
comprises corrosion of said coating.
8. A method for making an optical sensor, comprising: obtaining an
optical fiber with a fiber grating embedded therein; applying a
coating to said fiber grating around the circumference of and along
the length of said grating; said coating being applied to said
grating such that said coating exerts non-uniform forces around and
along said grating; said forces causing said wavelength bandwidth
of a reflectivity profile of said grating to become broader than it
would be without said coating; and said forces on said grating
being reduced when said coating is at least partially removed,
thereby causing the wavelength bandwidth of said reflectivity
profile of said grating to narrow.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein: said coating exerts an overall
average force around and along said grating thereby causing a peak
reflection wavelength of said grating to exhibit a wavelength shift
from a value that said peak reflection wavelength would be at
without said coating and wherein said wavelength shift is reduced
when said coating is at least partially removed.
10. The method of claim 8 wherein said coating comprises
aluminum.
11. The method of claim 8 wherein said step of applying said
coating comprises vapor deposition.
12. The method of claim 8 wherein said step of applying said
coating comprises freeze coating.
13. The method of claim 8 wherein the removal of said coating
comprises corrosion of said coating.
Description
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] Copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. (UTC Docket No.
R-3869), entitled "Highly Sensitive Optical Fiber Cavity Coating
Removal Detection", filed contemporaneously herewith, contains
subject matter related to that disclosed herein.
TECHNICAL FIELD
[0002] This invention relates to smart structures and, more
particularly, to optical corrosion detection.
BACKGROUND ART
[0003] It is known in the field of optical temperature and strain
sensor technology to distribute sensors along a surface of or
within a surface of a structure. Such sensors provide information
about the stresses induced at various points on the structure,
thereby providing information regarding fatigue, lifetime, and
maintenance repair cycles of the structure. Such sensor-integrated
structures and the optics and electronics that make them functional
are known as "smart structures." One such system is described in
copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/207,993, entitled
"Embedded Optical Sensor Capable of Strain and Temperature
Measurement."
[0004] In addition to measuring stresses and temperatures at
various points in a structure, it is also desirable to ascertain
information regarding corrosion of structural components to
determine when the structure is unfit for its normal use. For
example, if corrosion occurs at critical stress points along the
fuselage or wings of an airplane, structural failure may
result.
[0005] Thus, it is desirable to obtain a sensor capable of
detecting corrosion in structural materials.
DISCLOSURE OF INVENTION
[0006] Objects of the invention include provision of an optical
sensor which detects corrosion.
[0007] According to the present invention an optical sensor,
comprises an optical fiber; a fiber grating embedded within the
fiber having a reflection wavelength bandwidth of a reflectivity
profile for reflecting incident light; a coating of a material
having a predetermined thickness and being around the perimeter and
along the length of the fiber grating; the coating exerting forces
radially inward around and along the grating so as to cause the
wavelength bandwidth of the reflectivity profile of the grating to
become broader than it would be without the coating; and the forces
on the grating being reduced when the coating is at least partially
removed, thereby causing the wavelength bandwidth of the
reflectivity profile of the grating to narrow.
[0008] According further to the present invention, the forces from
the coating also cause a peak reflection wavelength of the grating
to exhibit a wavelength shift from a value that the peak reflection
wavelength would be at without the coating and wherein the
wavelength shift is reduced when the coating is at least partially
removed.
[0009] According still further to the present invention, the
coating comprises aluminum.
[0010] The invention represents an advancement in smart structure
technology which allows for the detection of corrosion in
structures by the discovery that a grating coated with a material,
such as aluminum, causes the grating reflectivity profile to
broaden and shift. The amount of broadening and shifting which
occurs can be adjusted by the process chosen to apply the coating
to the fiber grating sensor and the material the coating is made
from. The invention is lightweight, inexpensive, and easy to
install and has high sensitivity to corrosion. Furthermore, the
sensor is easily coupled with other smart sensor technology such as
temperature and/or strain sensors which also use fiber Bragg
gratings.
[0011] The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of
the present invention will become more apparent in light of the
following detailed description of exemplary embodiments thereof as
illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0012] FIG. 1 is a diagram of a Bragg grating in an optical fiber
which is coated with an aluminum coating, in accordance with the
present invention.
[0013] FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of an optical fiber Bragg
grating showing a core, a cladding, and an aluminum coating, in
accordance with the present invention.
[0014] FIG. 3 is a graph showing the reflected optical spectrum of
a Bragg grating before and after application of the coating of FIG.
1, in accordance with the present invention.
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0015] Referring to FIG. 1, a light source 10 provides an optical
signal 12 to a beam splitter 14 which passes a predetermined amount
of light 16 into an optical fiber 18. The optical signal 16 is
incident on a Bragg grating 20 which is impressed within the core
of the optical fiber 18. A fiber Bragg grating, as is known, is a
periodic refractive index variation which reflects a narrow
wavelength band of light and passes all other wavelengths, thereby
exhibiting a narrow wavelength reflectivity profile, as is
discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,725,110 to Glenn et al.
[0016] A portion 22 of the light 16 is reflected off the grating
20, and the remaining wavelengths are passed through the grating 20
as indicated by the output light 24. The light 24 exits the fiber
18 and is incident on a detector 26, which provides an electrical
signal on a line 28 indicative of the intensity of the light 24
incident thereon. Similarly, the reflected light 22 exits the fiber
18 and is incident on the beam splitter 14 which reflects a
predetermined portion of the light 22, as indicated by a line 30,
onto a detector 32. The detector 32 provides an electrical signal
on a line 34 indicative of the intensity of the light 30 incident
thereon. Also, the fiber grating 20 is surrounded by a coating 40
made of, e.g., aluminum (methods for coating are discussed
hereinafter).
[0017] Referring now to FIG. 2, a cross-sectional view of the fiber
grating 20 includes a fiber core 42, made of germania-doped silica,
having a diameter of about 6 to 9 microns. Surrounding the core 42
is a cladding 44 made of pure silica having an outer diameter of
about 125 microns. Surrounding the cladding 44 is the outer coating
40 of aluminum having an outer diameter of about 196 microns. Other
materials and diameters for the core, cladding, and coating may be
used if desired.
[0018] Referring now to FIG. 3, we have found that when a fiber
grating is coated and placed into compression by a material such as
aluminum, two effects occur to a normal narrow reflection (or
reflectivity) profile 100 (or filter function) of a typical
uncoated grating. First, the wavelength band of the reflectivity
profile of the grating increases, i.e., becomes broader or wider,
from the uncoated narrow grating profile 100 to the coated
broadened grating profile 102. Second, the central reflection
wavelength of the reflectivity profile shifts from .lambda..sub.1
of the uncoated profile 100 to a shorter wavelength .lambda..sub.2
of the coated profile 102, for a total wavelength shift of
.DELTA..lambda.s.
[0019] The wavelength broadening effect is due to small non-uniform
changes in the refractive index of the fiber caused by pressure or
forces (also known as "microbends") exerted by the aluminum coating
40 on the cladding 44 and the core 42, as indicated by lines 46.
Such small non-uniformities can occur naturally as grain boundaries
when the aluminum is cooled on the surface of the glass fiber.
Also, such non-uniformities are due to the fact that the coating 40
(FIG. 2) is not perfectly uniform around the circumference (or
perimeter) of the cladding 44, and thus, pressure 46 exerted by the
coating 40 is not uniformly applied. Furthermore, because the
coating 40 is not perfectly uniform in thickness along the
longitudinal axis or length of the grating 20 (FIG. 1), pressure 46
(FIG. 2) exerted on the grating 20 will randomly vary along the
length of the grating 20, thereby also contributing to such
non-uniformities. The coating therefore causes a random pressure
gradient along the longitudinal axis of the grating 20 (and also
circumferentially around the grating) which causes an associated
random variation in refractive index. In particular, the microbends
disrupt the smooth sinusoidal periodic refractive index variation
which creates the narrow reflectivity profile of the typical
narrow-band Bragg grating.
[0020] Such pressure gradient and the associated refractive index
change can also reduce the reflection efficiency (i.e., the peak
reflectivity) of the grating 20 from a reflectivity R1 for an
uncoated grating to a lower reflectivity R2 for a coated grating
due to the broadening of the wavelength reflectivity profile.
[0021] Also, the wavelength shift .DELTA..lambda.s is caused by a
change in the overall force exerted on the grating from that which
exists in an uncoated grating. Thus, the greater the overall force
exerted on the grating by the coating, the larger the wavelength
shift .DELTA..lambda.s will be.
[0022] As the coating 40 around the grating 20 corrodes, pressure
exerted by the coating 40 is reduced, thereby reducing the
magnitude of the microbends as well as the overall average force on
the grating. As such, when the coating is completely removed the
grating returns to its normal narrow reflectivity profile as
indicated by the curve 100 in FIG. 3, having a central reflection
wavelength of .lambda..sub.1. If the coating is only partially
removed, i.e., the coating is merely thinned or is removed only in
some areas but not others, a corresponding change toward the
uncoated grating reflectivity profile will result. The amount of
coating removal needed before the grating will exhibit a change in
the grating reflectivity profile depends on the initial force
applied to the grating by the coating, the stiffness of coating
material, and the thickness of the coating remaining, and can be
easily determined by those skilled in the art.
[0023] As discussed hereinbefore, we have found that the wavelength
shift .DELTA..lambda.s is due to an overall average force exerted
by the coating on the grating and the bandwidth increase is caused
by the aforementioned microbends (or non-uniform forces applied to
the grating). As a result, we have found that the process used for
coating the grating and the type of coating material used,
determines the amount of wavelength shift .DELTA..lambda.s and the
amount of narrowing of the reflectivity profile which occurs.
[0024] Accordingly, if the fiber is coated with aluminum when the
fiber is at the melting temperature of aluminum, e.g., by dipping
the fiber into molten aluminum at temperature of about 650.degree.
C. then removing the fiber to facilitate cooling and adhesion of
the coating to the surface of the fiber, the large difference in
thermal expansion coefficients between fiber and aluminum cause a
large overall force to be exerted on the fiber during cooling. This
technique is known as "freeze coating." In that case, the average
wavelength shift .DELTA..lambda.s may be of the order of -4.9 nm
due to the compressive strain effect of the aluminum along the
length and around the circumference of the optical fiber after
cooling occurs. Also, the increase in the reflection bandwidth of
the grating (e.g., the full-width-half-max. value) for this
technique may be about a factor of 3 or less, e.g., an effective
increase from about 0.17 nm to 0.55 nm or less.
[0025] However, if the fiber is maintained substantially at ambient
temperature during the coating process (e.g., by sputtering or by
vapor deposition), the cooling temperature gradient for the fiber
is not as large and, thus, the overall average force exerted on the
fiber is not as large as the previously discussed dipping
technique. Accordingly, the wavelength shift .DELTA..lambda.s is
smaller. Also, when using such a process, the coating tends to be
quite smooth and uniform. As such, the non-uniform forces or
microbends are less and, thus, the change in reflection bandwidth
is less, than the aforementioned dipping technique.
[0026] Therefore, we have found that it is possible to tailor the
amount of reflection wavelength shift by adjusting the amount of
overall average force applied to the grating which is directly
related to the temperature of the fiber during coating and the
thermal expansion coefficient of the coating material. Also, we
have found that it is possible to tailor the amount of reflection
bandwidth broadening by adjusting the smoothness and uniformity of
the coating applied to the grating.
[0027] It should be understood that the source 10 may be a
broadband light source and the detector 32 may be an optical
spectrometer which provides an electrical signal 34 indicative of
the wavelength reflectivity profile, i.e., the reflected
wavelengths and the associated intensities thereof. Alternatively,
the source 10 may be a variable source as used in an active
wavelength scan/interrogation technique, such as that described in
copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/129,217, entitled
"Diagnostic System for Fiber Grating Sensors."
[0028] Any other means of analyzing the optical output signals 30
or 24 (depending on whether the device is operating in reflection
or transmission) may be used to detect the changes in the optical
output signals due to corrosion. However, the sensing technique is
not critical to the present invention. For example, an optional
fiber grating 60, which is matched to the reflectivity profile of
the grating 20 without a coating, may be placed between the
detector 32 and the beamsplitter 14, in the path of the light 30
and the grating 20 coated with the technique discussed hereinbefore
that minimizes wavelength shift. In that case, when the grating 20
is coated (and the reflectivity profile is broad), the reflected
light 22 and 30 will also be broadband. Also, because the grating
60 has a narrower reflectivity profile than the incident light 30,
a portion of the light 30 will pass through the grating 60 and be
seen at the detector 32. Conversely, when the coating is removed
from the grating 20, the reflectivity profiles of the two gratings
20,60 match and no (or minimal) light is passed to the detector
32.
[0029] Alternatively, the two gratings 20,60 may be matched and
coated, with only the grating 20 being exposed to corrosion. In
that case, light will be minimized when no corrosion exists and,
when the coating on the grating 20 corrodes, the light seen by the
detector will be maximized due to the higher reflectivity of the
uncoated fiber.
[0030] Also, it should be understood that either or both of the
effects of removal of the coating from the grating, i.e., the
change in width of the reflectivity profile and/or the central
wavelength shift, may be used to detect corrosion.
[0031] Furthermore, a material other than aluminum may be used as
the coating around the grating, provided such coating either
corrodes, evaporates, thins, or in some other way is removed
partially of completely from coating the grating so as to reduce
the forces exerted on the grating. Therefore, the invention may be
used to detect the partial or complete removal of any coating
surrounding a grating, provided a predetermined criteria of changes
in overall average force and non-uniformity of forces on the
grating are satisfied, as discussed hereinbefore.
[0032] Also, instead of applying the coating to the entire length
of the grating, a portion of the grating length may be coated.
[0033] Although the invention has been described and illustrated
with respect to the exemplary embodiments thereof, it should be
understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and
various other changes, omissions and additions may be made without
departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
* * * * *