Forged article with prealloyed powder

Ilia, Edmond

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 09/919426 was filed with the patent office on 2003-02-20 for forged article with prealloyed powder. Invention is credited to Ilia, Edmond.

Application Number20030033904 09/919426
Document ID /
Family ID25442060
Filed Date2003-02-20

United States Patent Application 20030033904
Kind Code A1
Ilia, Edmond February 20, 2003

Forged article with prealloyed powder

Abstract

These connecting rods are made from prealloyed manganese, sulfur, ferrous based powder. The prealloyed powder then is mixed with copper and carbon. The copper content is at higher than normal copper contents. The resulting forged connecting rods had an improvement in tensile strength and an improvement in fatigue strength.


Inventors: Ilia, Edmond; (Ridgway, PA)
Correspondence Address:
    EMCH, SCHAFFER, SCHAUB & PORCELLO CO
    P O BOX 916
    ONE SEAGATE SUITE 1980
    TOLEDO
    OH
    43697
Family ID: 25442060
Appl. No.: 09/919426
Filed: July 31, 2001

Current U.S. Class: 75/252 ; 420/76
Current CPC Class: B22F 2998/00 20130101; B22F 2998/00 20130101; F16C 7/023 20130101; B22F 3/17 20130101; B22F 5/10 20130101; C22C 33/0207 20130101
Class at Publication: 75/252 ; 420/76
International Class: C22C 038/60

Claims



I claim:

1. A powder useful for producing forged articles comprising a mixture of the prealloyed manganese, sulfur, ferrous based powder, copper and carbon wherein the mixture has a copper content higher than standard copper contents.

2. A powder according to claim 1 comprising by weight percent:

5 Component Weight Percent copper (Cu) 2.0 to 5.0 carbon (C) 0.2 to 1.0 prealloyed Mn S ferrous based powder balance

3. A powder according to claim 1 comprising:

6 Component Weight Percent Cu 2.5 to 4.5 C 0.2 to 0.7 prealloyed Mn S ferrous based powder balance

4. A powder according to claim 1 comprising:

7 Component Weight Percent Cu 3.0 to 4.0 C 0.4 to 0.7 prealloyed Mn S ferrous based powder balance

5. A forged article produced from the prealloyed powder of claim 1.

6. A forged connecting rod produced from the prealloyed powder of claim 1.
Description



TECHNICAL FIELD

[0001] This invention relates to forged articles made from ferrous powder prealloyed with manganese and sulfur. More specifically, the forged articles are forged engine connecting rods.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0002] The connecting rod manufacturing process involves pressure molding metal particles in a closed mold under significant pressure to produce a green compact form of the rod. Next, the green compact is heated in a furnace sufficiently to form a sintered preform in which metal particles are bonded. Next, the sintered preform is hot forged to final rod shape which increases the rod's density and strength. The automobile industry continues to challenge connecting rod manufacturers to increase the fatigue strength of these articles. As a result, higher performance materials are needed for forged connecting rods. The goal is to engineer a powder metal blend to manufacture connecting rods with the following characteristics: high strength; good machinability; reasonable cost, good weight and dimensional control. Our research included materials considerations; metallurgical and microstructure evaluation; dimensional change measurements; tensile strength; fatigue strength and machinability tests.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The forged articles or connecting rods of this invention are made from ferrous based powder prealloyed with manganese and sulfur. The prealloyed powder then is admixed with copper at higher than normal copper contents. Materials considered were as follows. In a first approach, I thought that increasing Cu content from 2% to 3% or even 4% would improve the strength of connecting rods for the following reasons: Cu strengthens the ferrite, Cu hardens the ferrite, and Cu hinders grain growth after forging. In a second approach I thought that using prealloyed MnS base powder, instead of admixed MnS base powder, would improve the strength of connecting rods for the following reasons: smaller inclusion (MnS) size, uniform inclusion (MnS) distribution, and higher Mn content.

[0004] As a result, I used a commercially available prealloyed manganese, sulfur, ferrous based powder for producing the forged article. The prealloyed powder then is mixed with copper and carbon to produce a mix comprising by weight percent:

1 Component Weight Percent copper (Cu) < 2.0 to 5.0 carbon (C) 0.2 to 1.0 prealloyed MnS powder balance

[0005] The resulting forged connecting rods had an improvement in tensile strength and an improvement in fatigue strength.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0006] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a forged connecting rod.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0007] The methods for preparing the prealloyed powder may vary widely. Typically, the powder is prepared by atomization of a molten metal stream of iron, manganese and sulfur. The resulting particles usually have an irregular spherical shape. To facilitate compaction, the atomized particles can be collected after solidification and subjected to annealing at 1700.degree. F. for about 11/2 hours, followed by grinding to break up particle cakes, and then passed through an 80 mesh sieve.

[0008] The prealloyed ferrous powder then is mixed with copper and graphite at room temperature. The copper powder generally has a purity of 99%. The copper powder and carbon (graphite flake powder), however, are commercial grade materials. The copper powder is mixed in a range of 2.0 to 5.0% by weight of the mixture. The graphite powder is added to yield a final carbon content in the product ranging from 0.2 to 1.0 weight percent.

[0009] FIG. 1 illustrates forged connecting rod 10. Rod 10 has an elongated configuration extending along longitudinal axis A-A. Rod 10 includes midportion 12; small end portion 14; and large end portion 16. Bore 18 is formed through small end portion 14 adapted to receive a wrist or piston pin (not shown) as is well known in the engine art. Aperture 20 is formed through large diameter end 16 and is adapted to receive a journal of a crankshaft (not shown) as is well known in the engine art. Large end portion 16 has a side thrust face 22. Rod 10 includes large end portion 16 having a pair of oppositely facing edges or end surfaces 24. In the particular design of the connecting rod shown in FIG. 1, side thrust face 22 is in a raised plane with respect to the remaining side surface 26. Side thrust face 22 also includes a pair of radially outwardly extending portions 28, 30 located to either side of aperture 20. Portions 28, 30 extend radially outward from aperture 20 and terminate at end of edges 24.

[0010] FIG. 1 also shows a pair of slits or creases 32, 34 formed in the side thrust face including extensions 28, 30. Each crease 32,34 is arranged to one side of aperture 20 and they are substantially aligned across aperture 20. Creases 32, 34 extend inwardly from surfaces 28, to a considerable depth as is evident by examination of leftward end 24 and the cylindrical surface which forms the bore 20.

[0011] The manufacturing processes for making the connecting rod may vary widely. For example, a green compact is made in the form of the rod by molding powder metal particles in a closed mold under great pressure, typically about 80,000 psi. This pressure molding causes the particles to mechanically interlock and form a stable, relatively weak part but strong enough for handling. Next, the green compact is heated in a furnace at temperatures higher than 2000 degrees F. for a period of time sufficient to cause the metal particles to bond. After sintering, the preform has the same configuration as the green compact but is much stronger.

[0012] The preform then is hot forged to achieve the shape and increase density and strength as required for a connecting rod. Typically, it is hot forged in a press at a pressure of about 60,000 psi and at a temperature of about 1800 degrees F.

2 Component Weight Percent Preferably, the mixture of this invention comprises: Cu 2.5 to 4.5 C 0.2 to 0.7 prealloyed MnS powder balance More preferably, the mixture is: Cu 3.0 to 4.0 C 0.4 to 0.7

[0013] prealloyed MnS powder balance

[0014] The mixed powder of this invention may be used to forge articles other than connecting rods. Other automotive uses include piston rings and valve seats for internal combustion engines. Other parts include clutch races, differential gears and similar parts.

[0015] The following Examples further illustrates the composition of this invention.

EXAMPLE I

Prior Art

[0016] The following shows average tensile results for standard production powders with varying amounts of copper. Results for a standard manganese sulfur admixture (rather than the prealloyed powder of this invention) also are shown. The average is based on 6 runs.

3 TENSILE RESULTS Commercial Grade Prealloyed Mn S Standard Production Powder Powder 2% Cu 3% Cu 4% Cu 2% Cu (psi) (psi) (psi) (psi) Avg. 124,534 144,788 145,046 120,268 StDev 3,641 2,771 3,805 1,755

EXAMPLE II

Prior Art

[0017] The following shows fatigue results for standard production powders with varying amounts of copper. Results for a standard prealloyed manganese sulfur powder also are shown.

4 FATIGUE RESULTS Commercial Grade Standard Prealloyed production powder Mn S Powder 2% Cu 3% Cu 4% Cu 2% Cu (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) (ksi) Endurance Limit @ 50% 45.21 52.63 52.64 50.77 Scatter 1.07 2.18 2.10 1.88 Standard deviation (s) 0.28 0.49 0.49 0.43

EXAMPLE III

[0018] Tensile Results for the prealloyed Mn S ferrous powder of this invention with 3% Cu show an improvement of approximately 5% in tensile strength compared to standard production.

EXAMPLE IV

[0019] Fatigue results for the prealloyed Mn S ferrous based powders of this invention with 3% Cu show an improvement of 19% in fatigue strength compared to standard production.

[0020] In addition to these embodiments, persons skilled in the art can see that numerous modifications and changes may be made to the above invention without departing from the intended spirit and scope thereof.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed