U.S. patent application number 10/042904 was filed with the patent office on 2002-12-19 for liquid measuring device and method of using.
Invention is credited to Lin, Szu-Min, Zhu, Peter.
Application Number | 20020192114 10/042904 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 25204932 |
Filed Date | 2002-12-19 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020192114 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Lin, Szu-Min ; et
al. |
December 19, 2002 |
Liquid measuring device and method of using
Abstract
A liquid measuring device is described for carrying out the
assay using a gas or vapor permeable but liquid impermeable
membrane barrier to control the volume of liquid to be measured or
transferred. The membrane may be used in any instance where a fixed
volume of liquid needs to be measured.
Inventors: |
Lin, Szu-Min; (Laguna Hills,
CA) ; Zhu, Peter; (Irvine, CA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR LLP
620 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE
SIXTEENTH FLOOR
NEWPORT BEACH
CA
92660
US
|
Family ID: |
25204932 |
Appl. No.: |
10/042904 |
Filed: |
January 9, 2002 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10042904 |
Jan 9, 2002 |
|
|
|
09810875 |
Mar 16, 2001 |
|
|
|
6360595 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
422/68.1 ;
422/400; 436/128; 436/178; 436/180; 73/149; 73/290R |
Current CPC
Class: |
G01F 19/00 20130101;
Y10T 436/200833 20150115; B01L 2400/0478 20130101; G01N 35/1097
20130101; B01L 3/0217 20130101; G01N 1/14 20130101; B01L 2400/049
20130101; B01L 2200/0605 20130101; G01N 35/1016 20130101; Y10T
436/255 20150115; B01L 3/021 20130101; Y10T 436/2575 20150115; B01L
3/0206 20130101; B01L 2300/0681 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
422/68.1 ;
73/149; 73/290.00R; 422/100; 422/101; 436/128; 436/178;
436/180 |
International
Class: |
G01N 001/18 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of measuring a fixed volume of liquid comprising:
providing a gas or vapor permeable but liquid impermeable barrier
in a first barrel having a proximal end and a distal end; inserting
the distal end into a sample comprising liquid fluid; creating a
negative pressure on the proximal end; transferring the liquid
fluid from the sample into the first barrel, wherein the first
barrel comprises at least one reactant; and reacting the at least
one reactant with the sample.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first barrel comprises a
first reactant and a second reactant.
3. The method of claim 1 further comprising adjusting the position
of the barrier in the first barrel.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the barrier is part of a coupling
device and the method further comprises adapting the coupling
device to the barrel.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein said adapting comprises inserting
the coupling device into the barrel.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the barrel further comprises a
valve at the distal end and the method further comprises opening
and/or closing the valve.
7. The method of claim 1, wherein the first barrel further
comprises a needle on the distal end and the method further
comprises inserting the needle into the sample.
8. The method of claim 1 further comprising transferring the sample
from the first barrel to a second barrel, wherein said first barrel
is in fluid communication with the second barrel by means of a
valve, wherein the first barrel comprises a first reactant and the
second barrel comprises a second reactant.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein at least one reactant is selected
from the group consisting of a salt of bisulfite, a salt of
cyanide, hydrazine, hydroxylamine, an amine, and combinations
thereof.
10. A device for testing the level of an analyte comprising: a
first barrel having a proximal and distal end; a gas or vapor
permeable but liquid impermeable barrier situated in the barrel
between the proximal and distal ends; a retainer on the distal end;
and at least one chemical reactive with the analyte in the first
barrel between the retainer and the barrier.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the first barrel comprises a
first reactant and a second reactant.
12. The device of claim 10, wherein the analyte is an aldehyde.
13. The device of claim 12, wherein the aldehyde is either OPA or
glutaraldehyde.
14. The device of claim 10, further comprising a means for
adjusting the position of said barrier, whereby liquid can only be
filled up to the barrier so as to measure a fixed volume of the
liquid.
15. The device of claim 10, which further comprises a coupling
device to adapt the barrier to the testing device.
16. The device of claim 15, wherein the coupling device comprises
an insert.
17. The device of claim 16, wherein the insert is adjustable to
position the barrier.
18. The device of claim 15, further comprising a holder to position
and secure the coupling device in the testing device.
19. The device of claim 17, further comprising a screw for
adjusting the position of the insert.
20. The device of claim 10, which further comprises a second barrel
which is in fluid communication with said first barrel by means of
a valve.
21. The device of claim 10, further comprising a needle at the
distal end.
22. The device of claim 16, wherein said insert is H-shaped in
cross-sectional view.
23. The device of claim 16, wherein said insert is U-shaped in
cross-sectional view.
24. The device of claim 10, wherein said retainer comprises a
valve.
25. The device of claim 10, wherein said gas or vapor permeable but
liquid impermeable barrier comprises hydrophobic material.
26. The device of claim 10, wherein said first barrel comprises at
least one reactant selected from the group consisting of a salt of
bisulfite, a salt of cyanide, hydrazine, hydroxylamine, an amine,
and combinations thereof.
Description
RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 09/810,875, filed Mar. 16, 2001.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] The field of the invention relates to an apparatus and a
method for using the apparatus for the measurement and/or transfer
of a fixed volume of liquid sample.
[0004] 2. Description of the Related Art
[0005] General methods to determine o-phthalaldehyde (OPA) or
glutaraldehyde concentrations are mainly instrumental measurements
that could be classified into chromatographic measurement
(chromatographic, HPLC analysis) or non-chromatographic measurement
(direct spectroscopic assay). For HPLC analysis, OPA or
glutaraldehyde are measured by both a derivative method or a
non-derivative method. The most common derivative method is to
convert OPA or glutaraldehyde to 2,4-dinotrophenylhydrazones by
reacting OPA with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine. Since the UV
absorption is greatly enhanced, this method is valuable for low
level OPA or glutaraldehyde measurements especially in
environmental analysis. For measurements of high concentrations of
OPA or glutaraldehyde, such as the OPA or glutaraldehyde
disinfectants, OPA or glutaraldehyde could be measured directly
without making derivatives first. OPA or glutaraldehyde may be
analyzed easily with GC analysis. For non-chromatographic analysis,
OPA or glutaraldehyde could be measured directly with
spectrophotometric methods. However, one drawback to this method is
that there must be no interference at the specific wavelength used.
For example, OPA or glutaraldehyde could be oxidized slowly by air
and the carboxylic acid formed may interfere in such assays.
[0006] All three instrumental methods involve the preparation of
samples and use of an instrument. They are all time-consuming and
too expensive or too complicated for hospital end users. Therefore,
Albert Browne and 3M have developed a simple strip procedure for a
Pass/Fail test. In such a test, the strip was dipped into either
OPA or glutaraldehyde solutions for a certain amount of time. After
a predetermined time, the strip color was compared with some
standard colors. Their strip chemistry principles were not
released. The problems with this method are consistency and
accuracy. The strip method has the following problems (1). Good
solutions (OPA or glutaraldehyde higher than "POI", the point of
interest) often fail the test for different reasons. (2). The
soaking time and waiting time have to be controlled carefully. Any
deviation will lead to different shades of color and a false
reading. (3). Moving of the strip when soaking will lead to the
loss of chemical reagents to the OPA or glutaraldehyde solutions
leading to false reading. (4). Individual users have different
color recognition habits and often have a different opinion of the
end-color. (5). The final color is dependent on many factors and is
particularly sensitive to time.
[0007] The current invention provides another method without the
above problems. Although the chemistry principle could also be used
for the strip approach, in a preferred embodiment it is used for
the color change of a solution.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The present invention pertain to a liquid measuring device
that measures a fixed volume of liquid including a first barrel
having a proximal and distal end and a gas or vapor permeable but
liquid impermeable barrier situated in the barrel between the
proximal and distal ends, whereby the liquid can only be filled up
to the barrier. In a preferred embodiment, the volume in the barrel
up to the barrier equals the fixed volume. The liquid measuring may
further include a means to position the barrier to deliver a fixed
volume of liquid, whereby the liquid can only be filled up to the
barrier.
[0009] In a preferred embodiment, the liquid measuring device
further includes a coupling device to adapt the barrier to the
measuring device. In a more preferred embodiment, the coupling
device includes an insert. In a most preferred embodiment, the
insert is movable in the barrel. In another most preferred
embodiment, the liquid measuring device further includes a holder
to position and secure the insert in the liquid measuring device.
In an alternate preferred embodiment, the insert is moved to a
desired position by means of a screw.
[0010] In a preferred embodiment, the liquid measuring device is a
pipette or syringe.
[0011] In a preferred embodiment, the liquid measuring device
further includes a second barrel which is in fluid communication
with said first barrel by means of a valve. In a preferred
embodiment, the valve is a one-way valve. In an alternate preferred
embodiment, the valve has an on/off switch.
[0012] In a preferred embodiment, the liquid measuring device may
further include a needle at the distal end.
[0013] In a preferred embodiment, the insert of the liquid
measuring device is H-shaped in cross-sectional view. In an
alternate preferred embodiment, the insert is U-shaped in
cross-sectional view.
[0014] In a preferred embodiment, the first barrel of the liquid
measuring device includes a valve at the distal end. In a more
preferred embodiment, the valve is a one-way valve. In an alternate
more preferred embodiment, the valve is an on/off valve. In a
preferred embodiment, the gas or vapor permeable but liquid
impermeable barrier of the liquid measuring device comprises
hydrophobic material.
[0015] The present disclosure also pertains to a method of
measuring a fixed volume of liquid including the steps of:
[0016] 1) providing a gas or vapor permeable but liquid impermeable
barrier in a barrel having a proximal end and a distal end;
[0017] 2) inserting the distal end into a sample comprising liquid
fluid;
[0018] 3) creating a negative pressure on the proximal end; and
[0019] 4) transferring the liquid fluid from the sample into the
barrel, wherein the liquid fluid can only be filled up to the
barrier.
[0020] In a preferred embodiment, the method further includes
adjusting the position of the barrier in the barrel. In a preferred
embodiment, the barrier is part of a coupling device and the method
further includes adapting the coupling device to the barrel. In a
more preferred embodiment, the adapting includes inserting the
coupling device into the barrel.
[0021] In a preferred embodiment, the barrel further includes a
valve at the distal end and the method further includes opening
and/or closing the valve.
[0022] In a preferred embodiment, the method farther includes
pulling a plunger in the barrier to create a negative pressure.
[0023] For purposes of summarizing the invention and the advantages
achieved over the prior art, certain objects and advantages of the
invention have been described above. Of course, it is to be
understood that not necessarily all such objects or advantages may
be achieved in accordance with any particular embodiment of the
invention. Thus, for example, those skilled in the art will
recognize that the invention may be embodied or carried out in a
manner that achieves or optimizes one advantage or group of
advantages as taught herein without necessarily achieving other
objects or advantages as may be taught or suggested herein.
[0024] Further aspects, features and advantages of this invention
will become apparent from the detailed description of the preferred
embodiments which follow.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0025] These and other feature of this invention will now be
described with reference to the drawings of preferred embodiments
which are intended to illustrate and not to limit the
invention.
[0026] FIG. 1 shows the basic principles of the described assay.
Reaction 1 shows the reaction of aldehyde with compound X to
produce a compound with a first color. Preferably, the first color
is colorless. Reaction 2 shows the reaction of aldehyde and Y to
form a compound with a second color. Preferably, reaction 2 is
slower than Reaction 1. If the concentration of aldehyde is below
the POI (point of interest) only compound X will react and the
resulting solution will be the first color as shown in the bottom
half of the figure. In the presence of a level of aldehyde that is
equal to or more than the POI, a solution with the second color or
the combined color of the first color and the second color will be
formed.
[0027] FIG. 2 shows a pipette and two variants of a syringe with a
gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier.
[0028] FIG. 3A shows the coupling of the gas or vapor permeable
liquid impermeable barrier to the syringe or pipette. FIG. 3B
illustrates how inserts 4 at the top of the pipette or syringe
attach the gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier to the
pipette or syringe. FIG. 3C illustrates a holder 5 that holds the
inserts in place. Figure 3D shows the inserts and the coupling of
the gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier.
[0029] FIG. 4 is an expanded view of FIG. 3C which shows a gas or
vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier 1, an insert 4, and a
holder 5.
[0030] FIG. 5 shows one embodiment of the invention where the
position of the gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable membrane
is adjusted by means of a screw.
[0031] FIGS. 6A and 6B show embodiments of the liquid delivery
apparatus with all chemicals in one chamber. FIG. 6C shows a two
chambered embodiment of the liquid delivery apparatus. The test
sample may be taken into the first chamber for reaction with the
first compound such as compound X in FIG. 1. Then the sample is
moved by means of a one-way valve or a manual ON/OFF valve 8 into
the second chamber where the test sample reacts with the second
compound such as compound Y of FIG. 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0032] While the described embodiment represents the preferred
embodiment of the present invention, it is to be understood that
modifications will occur to those skilled in the art without
departing from the spirit of the invention. The scope of the
invention is therefore to be determined solely by the appended
claims.
[0033] Aldehydes react with amino-containing compounds like amino
acids or amines to form an imine or more commonly known as a
Schiff's base, which is often colored. Taking glycine as an
example: 1
Schiff's Base Formation between OPA and Glycine
[0034] Another known aldehyde reaction is the sodium bisulfite
carbonyl addition reaction. 2
Addition Reaction of Sodium Bisulfite to OPA
[0035] The sodium bisulfite addition reaction is more favorable
than that of Schiff's formation since the former reaction is fast
and hard to reverse. Thus, in the presence of both a compound
containing an amino group such as an amino acid and a reagent such
as sodium bisulfite, the aldehyde will react first with sodium
bisulfite and then with the amino acid. Therefore, it is possible
to design a color pass/fail reaction by controlling the amount of
reagents to react with aldehydes such as formaldehyde, OPA or
glutaraldehyde. The key is the amount of reagent such as sodium
bisulfite which is designed to react with the aldehyde without a
color being developed in the presence of an amino acid. Any
remaining aldehyde will then react with the amino acid to develop a
colored solution. This confirms the presence of a certain amount of
an aldehyde such as formaldehyde, OPA or glutaraldehyde in a test
solution such as a disinfectant solution. On the other hand, if no
color was developed, it confirms that the formaldehyde, OPA or
glutaraldehyde concentration is below an acceptable specification.
The specific concentration can be set to any point by adjusting the
amounts of the chemical reagents used or by using different amounts
of aldehyde (formaldehyde, OPA or glutaraldehyde) in the test
solution.
[0036] Thus, a color pass/fail reaction for determination of excess
aldehyde by control of reagents which react with aldehyde is
described. The key is the amount of reagent such as sodium
bisulfite which is designed to react with the Point of Interest
(POI) level of aldehyde without a color being developed in the
presence of a compound containing an amino group such as an amino
acid. Any "extra" aldehyde, exceeding the POI, will then react with
the compound containing an amino group, causing a color to be
developed. In a preferred embodiment, the aldehyde is either OPA or
glutaraldehyde and the compound containing the amino group is an
amino acid. This method is especially useful for quality control
where components only needed to be examined in pre-determined
ranges.
[0037] A number of reagents which are known to react quickly with
aldehydes may be used in the practice of the invention. These
include any chemicals which can oxidize or reduce the aldehyde
group and any chemicals which can react with and alter the carbonyl
functional group of the aldehyde. Examples of such reagents are
disclosed in Morrison & Boyd, "Organic Chemistry", Chapter 19,
Allyn and Bacon, 3.sup.rd edition, 1973, which is herein
incorporated by reference. Such reagents include, but are not
limited to, Ag(NH.sub.3).sub.2; KMnO.sub.4; K.sub.2Cr.sub.2O.sub.7;
H.sub.2+ Ni, Pt, or Pd; LiAlH.sub.4 or NaBH.sub.4, then H.sup.+; Zn
(Hg), conc. HCl; NH.sub.2NH.sub.2, base; Grignard reagents; salts
of cyanide and bisulfite; ammonia derivatives such as
hydroxylamine, hydrazine, phenylhydrazine, and semicarbazide;
reactions with alcohols in the presence of acid; and reactions with
acid or base such as the Cannizzaro reaction, the aldol
condensation, and the Perkin condensation. In a preferred
embodiment, the reagent which reacts with the aldehyde is a salt of
either bisulfite or cyanide.
[0038] This aspect of the invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. Both
compounds X and Y react with the aldehyde in the figure. Preferably
X reacts much faster than Y. Preferably, the reaction of X with
aldehyde results in a colorless compound whereas the reaction of Y
with aldehyde results in a colored compound. A point of interest is
chosen and the amount of X that will react with the point of
interest is determined. When the aldehyde is mixed with X and Y,
the aldehyde will react first with compound X which is kinetically
and thermodynamically favored. Any excess aldehyde will then react
with compound Y to form a colored solution. Consequently, if a
colored solution results, the concentration of aldehyde is above
the point of interest. The determination may be made visually, with
or without a color chart. Alternatively, a spectrophotometer may be
used. If the reaction between the aldehyde and compound X is not
kinetically and thermodynamically favored, then compound Y can be
added after the aldehyde reacts with compound X as shown in FIG.
1.
[0039] The theoretical amount of OPA: sodium bisulfite is 1:2.
However, it was found that less sodium bisulfite is needed to react
with OPA than the theoretical amount in order to get a good color
display.
[0040] Another aspect of the invention is a liquid-measuring
device, such as a pipette or syringe, for carrying out the assay.
This device could be used for any "fixed-volume" measurement and
transfer in chemistry, biochemistry, clinical chemistry or other
industries.
[0041] The apparatus may be a syringe or pipette with one or more
barrels and plungers and a membrane barrier with or without a
coupling device. The membrane barrier is a gas or vapor permeable
and liquid impermeable barrier. In the presence of certain pressure
differences between the two sides of the barrier, the gas or vapor
flows through the membrane but not the liquid. Any suitable gas or
vapor permeable and liquid impermeable materials can be used for
this purpose. Some examples include, but are not limited to,
nonwoven polyolefin, such as Tyvek.TM. (non-woven polyethylene), or
CSR (non-woven polypropylene central supply room), wrapping
material and any other hydrophobic filtering materials. Optionally,
the device contains an insert and a holder. The syringe or pipette
apparatus may also contain valves to control the flow of
liquid.
[0042] The membrane barrier can be thermally bound to the syringe
or pipet. It can also be attached to the syringe or pipet with an
adhesive or connected to the syringe barrel by a coupling device.
The coupling device may be connected to an insert for altering the
position of the membrane barrier. The position of the membrane
barrier can be adjusted by the length of the insert. The insert may
be secured with a holder.
[0043] The membrane barrier is a gas or vapor permeable but liquid
impermeable barrier. The membrane barrier is positioned such that
the liquid can only be filled up to the barrier. The invention has
several preferred embodiments.
[0044] In the first embodiment (FIG. 2), a gas or vapor permeable
liquid impermeable membrane 1 is fixed into the pipette 7 or
syringe 6 and held in place at the desired maximum volume by means
known in the art. The syringe includes a plunger 3. The syringe can
have a metal or plastic needle with or without a needle cap. In one
embodiment (FIGS. 3A-3D), a coupling device 2 is used which is
larger or smaller than the diameter of the pipette 7 or syringe 6.
Two parts of the pipet or syringe with different lengths can be
joined together with such a coupling device.
[0045] Coupling of the membrane barrier to the syringe or pipette
is shown in FIGS. 3A, 3B, 3C, 3D and FIG. 4. The membrane can be
inserted into the syringe or pipet from the top of the pipette or
syringe by an insert 4 which may be secured with a holder 5 and its
position varied by any means known in the art such as by a screw
(FIG. 5) or a slidable adjustment (FIG. 4). FIG. 3D shows an insert
which has a larger diameter than the pipette or syringe. By
adjusting the insert and creating a negative pressure on the upper
part of the pipette or syringe, the fluid can be loaded into the
syringe or pipette up to the barrier.
[0046] FIGS. 6A, 6B and 6C illustrate the use of the measuring
device with this invention. FIGS. 6A and 6B show a syringe with a
gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier and two
chemicals. The liquid can be filled in the syringe by inserting the
plastic needle into the sample solution, pulling the plunger to
create a negative pressure in the syringe, and loading the liquid
into the syringe. The measuring device can have a filtering
material (FIG. 6A) or valve (FIG. 6B) to retain the chemicals in
the barrel. The chemical in the syringe can be in either a liquid
or solid form. The valve can be a one-way valve or a manual ON/OFF
valve.
[0047] FIG. 6C provides another embodiment for mixing more than one
reactant successively. It has two chambers 9, 10. A fixed volume of
any solution including, but not limited to an aldehyde is drawn up
through a one-way valve or an ON/OFF valve 8 into the first chamber
9 where it mixes with the first reactant, for example sodium
bisulfite. After a predetermined time, the reactants flow through a
second one-way valve or an ON/OFF valve 8 into a second reaction
chamber 10 which might contain an amine such as lysine, for
example, to complete the reaction. Alternatively, a three-way valve
can be used instead of two one-way valves.
[0048] The invention has several advantages over the prior art
methods. First, the pass/fail conclusion is consistent and
convenient. Preferably, there is no need to guess the color. The
user's only conclusion will be "colored" or "not colored." Second,
the liquid transferring device is consistent and convenient. A
fixed volume of liquid can be taken by a simple operation. Third,
the solution color is easier to visualize than a test strip paper
since the test strip paper itself is colored, leading to false
positive results. Fourth, the color displaying time can be adjusted
by adding a base to make the reaction faster or an acid to make the
reaction slower. Fifth, the color being displayed can be adjusted
by choosing different amino acids or amines. Sixth, the darkness of
the color being displayed can be adjusted by the amount of the
amino acids or amines. Seventh, the assay is extremely easy to run
and interpret. And finally, the liquid transferring device could be
used for any "fixed-volume" transfer in chemistry, biochemistry,
clinical chemistry or other industries.
EXAMPLES
[0049] Example 1. Effect of OPA to Sodium Bisulfite mole ratio
(0.5:1 to 8:1)
[0050] Sodium bisulfite, glycine and OPA were added in sequence.
The OPA to sodium bisulfite mole ratio was adjusted from 0.5:1 to
8:1 (Table 1). Table 1 shows that the solution with a 2:1 ratio
developed a color while a 1:1 ratio did not show color in one
week.
[0051] It was found that less than the theoretical amount of sodium
bisulfite was needed to react with the OPA. This indicates the OPA
solutions in this concentration region can be differentiated by
observing the color of the solution after a specified time (as in
Vial 2 and Vial 3). Since we can control the volume of OPA in
testing, we can theoretically test an OPA solution in any
concentration range.
1 TABLE 1 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM)
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Glycine
(82 mM) 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) OPA (0.55%, 41 mM) 200 .mu.L 400 .mu.L 800 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L
3200 .mu.L (0.00820 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0328 mMole) (0.0656
mMole) (0.1312 mMole) OPA:NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 0.5:1 1:1 2:1 4:1
8:1 Time to develop color >1 week >1 week 4'45" 65" 35"
Initial color Colorless Colorless Light yel/grn yellow/grn yel/grn
Final color (after 30') Colorless Colorless Dark green Between Dark
Blck
[0052] Example 2. Effect of OPA to Sodium Bisulfite mole ratio (1:1
to 2:1).
[0053] Sodium bisulfite, glycine and OPA were added and the OPA to
sodium bisulfite mole ratio was adjusted as in Example 1. Table 2
shows three points of interest (POI). The first POI, was the 2:1
mole ratio, the second POI was the 1.75:1 mole ratio and the third
POI was the 1.5:1 mole ratio of OPA to sodium bisulfite. For the
2:1 ratio, 5 minutes were needed to display the initial color. For
the 1.75:1 ratio, 13 minutes were needed to display the initial
color. For the 1.5:1 ratio, color was not displayed for a few
days.
2 TABLE 2 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM)
200 .mu.l, 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Glycine
(82 mM) 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) OPA (0.55%, 41 mM) 400 .mu.L 500 .mu.L 600 .mu.L 700 .mu.L
800 .mu.L (0.00164 mMole) (0.0205 mMole) (0.0246 mMole) (0.0278
mMole) (0.0328 mMole) OPA:NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 1:1 1.25:1 1.5:1
1.75:1 2:1 Time to develop color Never Never Never 13' 5' Initial
color Colorless Colorless Colorless Very light Pink (Light)Yel/Grn
Final color (after 30') Colorless Colorless Colorless Green Dark
Grn
[0054] In Table 2, the reaction volume is varied by varying the
amount of OPA solution from 400 .mu.l to 800 .mu.l. The assay is
independent of volume. The OPA to sodium bisulfite mole ratio is a
key parameter of the assay.
[0055] Example 3. OPA Concentration Variation Study in the OPA to
Sodium Bisulfite Mole Ratio 1:1 to 2:1 Region. (same volume
different concentration)
[0056] Sodium bisulfite, glycine and OPA were added and the OPA to
sodium bisulfite mole ratio was adjusted as in Example 2. As shown
in Table 3, the first POI was in the range of 6'20"-7'20" range and
the time needed for color change was very consistent. However, for
the second POI, there was some variation for this time (17-24').
Without being bound by any mechanism, this may be due to the visual
limitation or it may mean that at diluted concentration, the color
development is more likely to be influenced by micro reaction
condition variations, such as temperature, pH or even the exposure
of sunlight.
3 TABLE 3 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM)
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Glycine
(82 mM) 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) OPA (%) 0.275 0.344 0.413 0.481 0.550 (20.50 mM) (25.63 mM)
(30.75 mM) (35.88 mM) (41.00 mM) ml (0.55% OPA) to dilute to 50.00
62.50 75.00 87.50 No dilution 100 ml with water OPA solution used
800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l OPA mMole 0.0164
0.0205 0.0246 0.0287 0.0328 OPA:NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 1:1 1.25:1
1.5:1 1.75:1 2:1 Time to develop color Never Never Never 17-20'
6'20"-7'20" Time to develop color, repeat #1 Never Never Never
18-21' 6'20"-7'20" Time to develop color, repeat #2 Never Never
Never 19-21' 6'20"-7'20" Time to develop color, repeat #3 Never
Never Never 21-23' 6'20"-7'20" Time to develop color, repeat #4
Never Never Never 22-24' 6'20"-7'20" Initial color Colorless
Colorless Colorless Very light pink (Light) Yel/Grn Final color
(after 2 h) Colorless Colorless Colorless Dark Grn Dark Grn
[0057] Example 4. OPA Concentration Variation Study
[0058] Sodium bisulfite, glycine and OPA were added as in Example
1. Since the POI position is controlled by the OPA to sodium
bisulfite mole ratio, by changing the OPA volume, one should be
able to switch the POI to basically any OPA concentration range.
Thus, in Table 4, the actual OPA moles taken in Vial 1, Vial 2 and
Vial 3 are equal to Vial 3, Vial 4 and Vial 5 in Table 3.
4 TABLE 4 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 NaHSO.sub.3 (82mM) 200 .mu.l 200
.mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole)
Glycine (82 mM) 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l (0.1312 mMole)
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) OPA (%, 41 mM) 0.275 0.344 0.413 ml
(0.55% OPA) to 50.00 62.50 75.00 dilute to 100 ml OPA solution used
1201 .mu.l 1119 .mu.l 1065 .mu.l (0.0246 mMole) (0.0287 mMole)
(0.0328 mMole) OPA:NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 1.5:1 1.75:1 2:1 Time to
develop color Never 16' 5' (up to 30') Initial color Colorless
(light) Yel/Grn (Light) Yel/Grn
[0059] Thus, one of the key factors for this invention is the mole
ratio of aldehyde to sodium bisulfite. Similar results were
obtained for DL-alanine, .notlessthan.-amino-n-caproic acid and
L-lysine, except that different end colors were observed.
[0060] Example 5: Further experiments with OPA for POI's in the
range of 0.35% and 0.30%.
[0061] Changes due to the type of amino acid and the mole ratio
were illustrated in the following example where DL-dopa is used as
the amino acid (also see Example 7). Sodium bisulfite, and OPA were
added as in Example 1. DL-dopa was substituted for glycine as the
amino acid.
5TABLE 5 0.35% OPA 0.30% OPA (23.09 mM) (22.37 mM) Color in Color
in Saturated 0.35% OPA 0.30% OPA (minutes and (minutes and 82 mM
NaHSO3 DL-dopa (23.09 mM) (22.37 mM) seconds) seconds) 100 .mu.l
100 .mu.l 450 .mu.l 450 .mu.l 2'20"-2'30" 3'20"-4' (0.0082 mMole)
(0.0119 mMole) (0.0101 mMole) 100 .mu.l 100 .mu.l 400 .mu.l 400
.mu.l 3'00"-3'30" 5'-10' (0.0082 mMole) (0.0106 mMole) (0.0089
mMole) 100 .mu.l 100 .mu.l 390 .mu.l 390 .mu.l 3'40"-4'10"
5'30"-11' (0.0082 mMole) (0.0103 mMole) (0.0087 mMole)
[0062] In the above example, the use of DL-dopa as the amine
resulted in an orange color. The type of amino acid, mole ratio,
and reaction time are all important to determine the formation of
color.
[0063] Example 6. Base Effect for the Color Development Time.
[0064] This example shows that added base promotes the reaction
rate so that the color displaying time can be shortened. Thus, a
certain amount of base could be added to display the color within a
desired period of time.
6 TABLE 6 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM) 200 .mu.l
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 (0.0164 (0.0164 (0.0164
mMole) mMole) mMole) mMole) Glycine (82 mM) 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l
1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l (0.1312 (0.1312 (0.1312 (0.1312 mMole) mMole)
mMole) mMole) OPA (%) 0.275 0.344 0.413 0.481 (variation conc.) ml
(0.55% OPA), 50.00 62.50 75.00 87.50 added to dilute to 100 ml OPA
(0.55%, 41 mM) 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l 800 .mu.l (initial
conc.) (0.0164 (0.0205 (0.0246 (0.0287 mMole) mMole) mMole) mMole)
OPA:NaHSO.sub.3 mole 1:1 1.25:1 1.5:1 1.75:1 ratio Time to develop
color- colorless colorless Very light color (without NaOH) less
pink (17'-24') Time to develop color 1.5 h 1 h slight 2' yellow
<2', yellow (100 .mu.L NaOH added) slight yellow yellow Time to
develop color All turned yellow in less than 1'. (200 .mu.L NaOH
added) Too fast. Too much base. Note: Sodium hydroxide was added
before OPA.
[0065] Conversely, it was found that added acid, such as citric
acid, would delay the color display. This would be useful in the
case if the color is displayed too soon (data not shown).
[0066] Example 7. Other Amino Acids with Added Base (100
.mu.L).
[0067] It was found with other amino acids that the displayed
colors were different. For example, when reacting with OPA,
DL-alanine was bright yellow and for .notlessthan.-amino-n-caproic
acid, the color was pink. Furthermore, the reaction rates were also
different. Thus both DL-alanine and .notlessthan.-amino-n-caproic
acid displayed color significantly later than glycine (data not
shown).
[0068] Example 8. Activated Cidex solution (containing 2.1%
glutaraldehyde) with Lysine
[0069] To five scintillation vials, glutaraldehyde, sodium
bisulfite and lysine were added and mixed. A yellow color developed
gradually from Vial 5. No color was observed in Vial 1. The
"between" colors were seen from Vial 2 to Vial 4 but they are so
"gradual" that they could not be distinguished visually.
7 TABLE 7 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM)
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Lysine
(82 mM) 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu. 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l 1600 .mu.l
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) Glutaraldeyde (220 mM) solution used 74.5 .mu.l 93.2 .mu.l
111.8 .mu.l 130.5 .mu.l 149.1 .mu.l (0.0614 mMole) (0.0205 mMole)
(0.0246 mMole) (0.0287 mMole) (0.0328 mMole)
Glutaraldehyde:NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 1:1 1.25:1 1.5:1 1.75:1 2:1
Color at 15 minutes Colorless Very light yellow to yellow, very
gradual. Yellow No clear-cut difference
[0070] This can be explained in light of the stabilities of the
compounds involved. First, if aldehyde-sodium bisulfite complex 5
is more stable than aldehyde-sodium bisulfite complex 6, we would
see a larger POI range from glutaraldehyde. 3
[0071] The Ranges of POI Are Related to the Stability of Compound 5
and 6.
[0072] Or in more accurate terms, the different POI ranges from OPA
and glutaraldehyde might be a result of the competence of
aldehyde-sodium bisulfite formation and the aldehyde/amino acid
Schiff s base formation both kinetically and thermodynamically.
4
[0073] In Route 1, when the three components are mixed together,
the formation of compound 5 is more favorable than the formation of
compound 7, both kinetically and thermodynamically.
[0074] This is somewhat different in the situation of Route 2.
Although the formation of 6 is still more favorable than that of 9,
the difference is much smaller than that between 7 and 5 in Route
1. Therefore if the three components (glutaraldehyde, sodium
bisulfite and lysine) are mixed, depending on the ratio, there may
be some small amount of 9 formed which results in a detectable
yellow color. However, this situation is manipulated by mixing of
compound 8 and NaHSO.sub.3 first and adding lysine last. In this
case, if there is no aldehyde left, lysine must compete with 6 to
form 9, which is not very favorable. With some combinations of
amino acid and aldehyde, the order of adding the reactants may be
important. In the following example, the amino acid was added
last.
[0075] Example 9. Amino acid was added last
[0076] To five scintillation vials, glutaraldehyde and sodium
bisulfite were added and mixed first, and lysine solution was added
last respectively. A yellow color developed gradually from Vial 5
to Vial 2 but not in Vial 1 (Table 8).
8 TABLE 8 Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaHSO.sub.3 (82 mM)
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Lysine
(82 mM) 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) Glutaraldehyde (220 mM) solution used 74.5 .mu.l 93.2 .mu.l
111.8 .mu.l 130.5 .mu.l 149.1 .mu.l (0.0614 mMole) (0.0205 mMole)
(0.0246 mMole) (0.0287 mMole) (0.0328 mMole) Glutaraldehyde:
NaHSO.sub.3 mole ratio 1:1 1.25:1 1.5:1 1.75:1 2:1 Color at 15'
Colorless light yellow yellow yellow yellow
[0077] A narrower POI range was observed for glutaraldehyde
reacting with lysine and sodium bicarbonate. Adding the amino acid
(lysine) last was the key. Table 8 shows a clear color difference
between Vial 1 (color less) and Vial 3 (yellow). Thus by allowing
the glutaraldehyde and sodium bisulfite to react first and then
adding lysine, results are similar to those observed with OPA
above.
[0078] Depending on the chemicals used, the time may vary. For
NaHSO.sub.3, the lysine can be added immediately after the aldehyde
is mixed with the NaHSO.sub.3. Thus the assay described can be
applied generally to aldehydes and amines to provide a pass/fail
type assay of aldehyde content.
[0079] Example 10
[0080] The above chemistry principle may be applied in the reaction
of aldehydes and compounds containing an amino group generally.
This example shows the reaction of glutaraldehyde and sodium
cyanide using either glycine or lysine as the amino acid. The
formation of corresponding two aldehyde cyanide addition compounds
are shown as below. 5
[0081] The Formation of Colorless Aldehyde-Cyanide Addition
Compounds 10 and 11
[0082] To each of the 5 scintillation vials, glutaraldehyde and
sodium cyanide were added and mixed first (Table 9), and lysine
solution was added last. A yellow color developed from Vial 5 but
not from the other vials. A POI was identified between Vial 4 and
Vial 5.
9TABLE 9 Glutaraldehyde: Sodium Cyanide Mole Ratio (0.125:1 to
2:1). Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaCN (82 mM) 200 .mu.l 200
.mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Glycine (82 mM) 1600
.mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L (0.1312 mMole)
(0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole)
Glutaraldehyde (220 mM) solution used 9.3 .mu.l 18.6 .mu.l 37.3
.mu.l 74.5 .mu.l 149.1 .mu.l (0.0020 mMole) (0.0041 mMole) (0.0082
mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0328 mMole) Glutaraldehyde:NaCN mole ratio
0.125:1 0.25:1 0.5:1 1:1 2:1 Final color in 7' Colorless Colorless
Colorless Colorless Yellow
[0083] Example 11
[0084] To each of the 5 scintillation vials, glutaraldehyde and
sodium cyanide were added and mixed first, and lysine solution was
added last (Table 10). A yellow color developed from Vial 2 to Vial
5 but not recognizable from Vial 1. A POI was identified between
Vial 1 and Vial 3. It is only practical with the naked eye to
differentiate the colors between Vial 1 and Vial 3. That is, it
would be challenging to distinguish the difference between Vial 1
and Vial 2 or between Vial 2 and Vial 3. Thus we may conclude that
no narrower POI could be identified unless an instrument is
employed.
10TABLE 10 Glutaraldehyde: Sodium Cyanide Mole Ratio (1:1 to 2:1).
Vial 1 Vial 2 Vial 3 Vial 4 Vial 5 NaCN (82 mM) 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l
200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l 200 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164
mMole) (0.0164 mMole) (0.0164 mMole) Glycine (82 mM) 1600 .mu.L
1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L 1600 .mu.L (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312
mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) (0.1312 mMole) Glutaraldehyde
(220 mM) solution used 74.5 .mu.l 93.2 .mu.l 111.8 .mu.l 130.5
.mu.l 149.1 .mu.l (0.0164 mMole) (0.0205 mMole) (0.0082 mMole)
(0.0164 mMole) (0.0328 mMole) Glutaraldehyde:NaCN mole ratio 1:1
1.25:1 1.5:1 1.75:1 2:1 Time to develop color Never 3' 2' 1' 1'
Color in .about.8 minutes Colorless Very light Yellow Yellow Yellow
Yellow
[0085] The aldehyde solution can be measured and transferred by
means known in the art such as by a regular pipet or syringe. In a
preferred embodiment, the aldehyde solution can be measured and
transferred using a liquid measuring device as described herein
which features a gas or vapor permeable, liquid impermeable,
membrane. The use of the liquid measuring device containing the gas
or vapor permeable, liquid impermeable membrane of the present
disclosure has the advantage that the liquid can be transferred
easily using a simple operation with consistent results.
[0086] Compound X and Compound Y (FIG. 1) may be in one vial or in
two separate vials. They may be transferred using either a pipet or
syringe. The aldehyde may be added to compound X and the resulting
mixture added to compound Y, the aldehyde may be added to compounds
X and Y together, or the aldehyde and chemical Y can be added to
the chemical X consecutively. The measuring and/or transferring of
the aldehyde test sample can be conducted with a regular pipet or
syringe. The gas or vapor permeable liquid impermeable barrier adds
many benefits as described previously.
[0087] In one embodiment, shown in FIG. 6C, the Compound X may be
in a first chamber 9. The aldehyde is drawn up through the valve 8
up to the gas or vapor permeable, liquid impermeable barrier 1.
After a predetermined time, the aldehyde and compound X are
transferred to a second chamber 10 through a valve 8 which is
either a one-way or an on/off valve, where they react with compound
Y. After a pre-determined time, the color in the second chamber is
observed and the presence or absence of excess aldehyde in the test
sample is determined.
[0088] It will be understood by those of skill in the art that
numerous and various modifications can be made without departing
from the spirit of the present invention. Therefore, it should be
clearly understood that the forms of the present invention are
illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the
present invention.
* * * * *