Neospora vaccines

Abstract

A Neospora caninum vaccine comprising tissue culture grown Neospora and methods of making and using said vaccines. Neospora caninum vaccines described include those containing whole Neospora tachyzoites, extracts of Neospora tachyzoites and protective antigen subunits of Neospora tachyzoites. The vaccines of this invention may be inactivated or modified live and contain adjuvants and/or stabilizers. The vaccines of this invention may be in a liquid or lyophilized form.

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] 1. Field of the Invention

[0002] The present invention relates to a vaccine for protection of mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum. More specifically, the invention relates to safe and immunogenically effective vaccines for protection of bovines and canines from abortion caused by Neospora caninum.

[0003] 2. Brief Description of the Prior Art

[0004] Neospora caninum was first reported by Dubey et al (JAVMA, Vol. 192, No. 9, May 1, 1988) as a Toxoplasmosis-like illness affecting dogs. Neospora caninum was found to be structurally distinct from Toxoplasma gondii and did not react with anti-T. gondii antiserum in an immunoperoxidase test. Dubey et al described the major lesions associated with the organism as meningoencephalomyelitis and myositis. Within the past few years, neosporosis has become recognized as a major reproductive disease in cattle (Anderson et al., 1994, Food Animal Practice, 10: 439-461) with cases reported in North and South America, Europe, Africa, the Pacific-rim countries as well as in the United States. The major clinical manifestation of bovine neosporosis is fetal abortion, with focal nonsuppurative necrotizing encephalitis, nonsuppurative myocarditis, and myositis in the fetus (Anderson et al., 1991, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 198: 241-244). According to Anderson et al., 1997 (Journal of the Veterinary Medical Association, 210: 1169-1172), retrospective studies of cattle in California indicate that neosporosis has been endemic since at least 1985. These authors state that 18 to 19% of all aborted bovine fetuses submitted to the California Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory System have Neospora sp infection. In a prospective survey of selected dairies in California, the number of abortions attributed to Neospora sp infections was even greater (42.5%).

[0005] Ho et al (J. Parasitol., 1997, 83(3)) have recently reported the successful reproduction of bovine abortion and fetal infection by infecting pregnant cows with tachyzoites of Neospora caninum. This publication suggests that there may be a correlation between serological titer as measured by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing and protection from abortion caused by Neospora caninum in cows. Cows with IFA titers of 320 and 640 did not abort after infection with tachyzoites of this organism.

[0006] As mentioned previously, neosporosis has also been reported in puppies and in dogs as old as 15 years of age. The percentage of infected dogs that show clinical signs is unknown. In dogs, Neospora caninum can infect any tissue, although it is most commonly found in the central nervous system and spinal nerve roots. The most severe infections are seen in puppies that were infected in utero. These puppies exhibit ascending paralysis. Abortion can be reproduced in experimental infection of pregnant bitches during the early stage of gestation. Sulfonamides, pyrimethamine and clindamycin have been used to treat neosporosis in dogs.

[0007] Neospora caninum can also produce a fatal infection in experimentally inoculated cats. However, the disease has not yet been reported to occur naturally in cats.

[0008] Neosporosis has been observed to cause abortion in sheep and goats but to a lesser extent than is found in cattle. Experimental infection is readily induced in sheep and goats by subcutaneous injection of tachyzoites.

[0009] Although neosporosis, especially in cattle, appears to pose an increasingly serious problem and there is certainly a long felt need to solve this problem by protecting mammals using a vaccine, there are no descriptions of vaccines, vaccine development nor suggestions of methods of preparing vaccines to protect cattle and other animals from disease caused by Neospora caninum.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0010] It is a focus of this invention to describe a vaccine composition for protection of mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum comprising tissue culture grown Neospora caninum tachyzoites as a whole culture or in an extract form or as subunit antigens obtained therefrom. In addition, it is a focus of this invention to describe a method of producing a vaccine for protection of mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum comprising the steps of: growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a cytopathic effect (CPE) is produced, harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum and formulating said harvest into a vaccine. A modified live vaccine produced in this manner can be administered to mammals without inactivating the Neospora sp. However, said non-inactivated Neospora sp would need to be attenuated by art-known techniques prior to growing it in tissue culture. Another method of producing a vaccine for protection of mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum comprises the steps of: 1) growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a CPE is produced; 2) harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; 3) inactivating said harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; and 4) adjuvanting the inactivated harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce a vaccine. Still another method of producing a vaccine for protection of mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum comprises the steps of: 1) growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a CPE is produced; 2) harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; 3) extracting protective antigens from the harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce subunits; 4) inactivating the subunits if necessary; and 5) adjuvanting the subunits to produce a vaccine. It is within the scope of this invention to inactivate the Neospora caninum prior to extraction of the protective antigen subunits

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION

[0011] As set forth above, the present invention is directed to vaccine compositions comprising a modified live Neospora caninum grown in a susceptible tissue culture or an inactivated, adjuvanted Neospora caninum grown in a susceptible tissue culture or subunits derived from Neospora caninum. The method of producing the above vaccine compositions comprises growing Neospora caninum under artificial conditions, in tissue culture, for the purpose of obtaining parasite antigens for use in vaccines. The Neospora caninum can be obtained from any source. It is preferred that a vaccine for bovines contain a Neospora caninum isolated from an aborted bovine fetus. Additionally, it is preferred that a vaccine intended for canines contain a Neospora caninum isolated from a canine. Illustratively, the brain of an infected fetus is harvested, homogenized in a growth medium such as Minimal Essential Media (MEM) or in a diluent such as phosphate buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with antibiotics to minimize the potential for contamination. Such a homogenate is centrifuged to remove the large particulate matter and the supernate is inoculated onto various tissue cultures and passaged in tissue cultures, if necessary, until a cytopathic effect (CPE) is produced on at least one tissue culture. The tissue culture is preferably a cell line in which the parasite grows to a high titer so that a Master Seed can be prepared. A high titer means that the parasite tachyzoites grow to produce a count, as visualized under a microscope, or a titer when placed back into tissue culture of at least 1.times.10.sup.4 tissue culture infective dose.sub.50/mL (TCID.sub.50/mL). Preferably, 1.times.10.sup.5 TCID.sub.50/mL are produced and more preferably, 1.times.10.sup.6 TCID.sub.50/mL are produced. A Master Seed means that the tissue culture grown Neospora sp is grown to a high titer, aliquoted into equivalent volumes in freezing vials and frozen, after which it is tested for freedom from contaminants (bacteria, fungi and viruses) and then used to prepare Working Seeds and Production Seeds. Working Seeds and Production Seeds mean further passage of the Master Seed in a susceptible tissue culture, aliquoting, freezing and repeat testing so that vaccines can be produced from the Production Seeds instead of using the Master Seed and all vaccine is prepared from the same origin material. A susceptible tissue culture means a tissue culture that, when inoculated with Neospora sp, is able to grow the parasite tachyzoites and produce CPE.

[0012] At least three types of vaccines can be made according to this invention, a modified live vaccine, an inactivated vaccine or a subunit vaccine. If a modified live vaccine is to be made, the Neospora sp must be mutated or genetically modified so that the parasite loses its virulence, by art-known techniques including but not limited to chemical mutagenesis and genetic engineering, prior to making the Master Seed. Once the non-virulent (avirulent) mutant is prepared, a Master Seed is made by growing the mutated Neospora sp in a susceptible tissue culture and frozen as described above. Preparation of a modified live vaccine comprises the steps of growing the mutated Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until CPE is produced, harvesting the tissue culture grown Neospora sp and formulating said harvest into a vaccine. Formulation may include addition of stabilizers and/or adjuvants or immunomodulators. The vaccine may remain in a liquid form or may be lyophilized.

[0013] The method for preparation of an inactivated Neospora caninum vaccine requires that the organism be grown to higher titer and comprises the steps of growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a CPE is produced, harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum, inactivating said harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; and adjuvanting the inactivated harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce a vaccine.

[0014] The method for preparation of a subunit Neospora caninum vaccine comprises the steps of growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a CPE is produced, harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum, extracting protective antigens from the harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce protective antigen subunits, inactivating the subunits if necessary; and adjuvanting the subunits to produce a vaccine. It is within the scope of this invention to inactivate the Neospora caninum prior to extraction of the protective antigen subunits in order to prepare a subunit vaccine.

[0015] Inactivating agents may be selected from the group consisting of formalin, beta-propiolactone (BPL), heat, binary ethylenimine (BEI), detergents and freeze/thaw with the preferred inactivating agents being BEI and BPL.

[0016] Adjuvants used to increase the immunogenicity of the Neospora vaccines of this invention may be selected from the group consisting of polymers such as Carbopol, HAVLOGEN.RTM. and POLYGEN.RTM., oil in water such as EMULSIGEN.RTM. and EMULSIGEN PLUS.RTM., water-in-oil-in-water, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, immuno-modulators such as BAYPAMUN.RTM., lipid based adjuvants such as Bay R-1005 and liposomes and combinations thereof.

[0017] The inactivated Neospora vaccines of this invention may include stabilizers which are added before or after adjuvanting in order to maintain the antigen content over long periods of time and under adverse conditions of high or low temperatures. Stabilizers are selected from the group consisting of protease inhibitors, sugars such as sucrose and glycerol, encapsulating polymers, chelating agents such as ethylene-diaminetetracetic acid (EDTA), proteins and polypeptides such as gelatin and polyglycine and combinations thereof.

[0018] The examples to follow represent compositions of Neospora caninum vaccines and describe their methods of production including growing the tachyzoites of this organism in such diverse cell lines as an Equine Dermal cell line (ATCC No.CCL-57), a Vero cell line and an African Green Monkey kidney cell line (BIOWHITTAKER No. 75-104) which was cloned at Bayer Corporation to produce a cell line designated MA 104 Clone B as well as describing their use in vaccinating bovines to produce protective indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) titers.

[0019] The invention is further illustrated but is not intended to be limited by the following examples in which all parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

[0020] In order to determine whether Neospora caninum vaccines can produce protection against abortion in pregnant cows in a model known in the art (Ho et al., 1997), the inventors produced Neospora caninum vaccines by growing the Neospora caninum on a Vero cell line in 850 cm.sup.2 roller bottles. A vial of Working Cells of the Vero cell line was removed from liquid nitrogen storage, thawed rapidly, diluted and placed into 850 cm.sup.2 roller bottles containing 250 mL of DMEM (high glucose), hereinafter designated DMEMH, at a rate of 4.times.10.sup.7 cells per roller. The medium was supplemented with Neomycin Sulfate at 1 mL/L and Horse Serum at 5% v/v. Cells were incubated at 36 to 38.degree. C. for 5 to 7 days until the cells were between 95 and 100% confluent. The Working Cells were removed from the roller bottles by rinsing the cell sheet with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and then adding 10 mL of a Trypsin-Ethylene-diaminetetracetic acid disodium salt (EDTA) solution (2.5 g/L of Trypsin+1 g/L EDTA) to each roller bottle, agitating the bottles gently for at least 10 minutes until the cells slough from the surface and then rinsing the bottle surface with DMEMH and pooling the contents of all of the bottles. The cells from these bottles (Production Cells) were re-inoculated into new 850cm.sup.2 roller bottles at 4.5.times.10.sup.7 cells per roller bottle. The Production Cells were incubated for 24 hours at 36 to 38.degree. C. after which they were infected with freshly-passaged Neospora caninum tachyzoites of Strain BPA-1 (3.times.10.sup.8 to 4.5.times.10.sup.8/850 cm.sup.2 roller bottle). At the time of infection, the production cells were at least 50% confluent. Infected roller bottles were incubated at 36 to 38.degree. C. for 120 to 168 hours on rotating roller racks set at between 0.2 and 0.4 rpm. At that time, the cell sheet was displaying typical CPE affecting at least 80% of the cell sheet. At the end of the incubation period the Neospora fluids were harvested by pooling the contents from all of the roller bottles into a sterile vessel and a sample was removed for live Neospora titration. Acceptable harvest fluids must have a titer of at least 3.times.10.sup.5/mL. The harvest titer for the present batch was 3.times.10.sup.50/mL. The harvest fluids were frozen and thawed twice by holding the harvest fluids at -70.degree. C. and thawing them rapidly at temperatures no higher than 37.degree. C. After this treatment, the harvest fluids were inactivated for a period of 48 hours at 4.degree. C. with 0.2 M Binary Ethylenimine (BEI). After inactivation, the BEI was neutralized with 3.16 M sodium thiosulfate. The inactivated harvest fluids were concentrated by centrifugation at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes and the pellet was re-suspended in PBS to a concentration of 3.0.times.10.sup.7 based on a microscopic count. Aliquots of these inactivated and concentrated harvest fluids were adjuvanted with two different types of adjuvants in order to prepare two different vaccine formulations. One half of the inactivated and concentrated harvest fluids was adjuvanted with 10% (v/v) HAVLOGEN.RTM. while the remainder of the inactivated concentrated harvest fluid was adjuvanted with 15% (v/v) of EMULSIGEN.RTM.. HAVLOGEN.RTM. is a polymer based adjuvant containing Carbopol while EMULSIGEN.RTM. is an oil-in-water based adjuvant.

[0021] The two vaccine formulations were used to vaccinate heifers ranging in age from two to two and one-half years of age. All heifers were bred and when pregnancy was confirmed at 30.+-.5 days, these animals were divided into four groups which were treated as follows:

[0022] Group 1 heifers (No. 21, 30, 39 and 20) were injected subcutaneously two times at 4 week intervals with a Neospora vaccine containing 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM. adjuvant.

[0023] Group 2 heifers (No. 18, 37, 40 and 431) were injected subcutaneously two times at 4 week intervals with a Neospora vaccine containing 15% EMULSIGEN.RTM..

[0024] Group 3 heifers (No. 429, 25, 28 and 2) served as controls and were injected subcutaneously two times at 4 week intervals with a control preparation containing only uninfected Vero cell cultures containing 15% EMULSIGEN.RTM..

[0025] Group 4 heifers (No. 19, 10, 4, and 14) served as contact controls and were neither vaccinated nor challenged.

[0026] Serum samples from all heifers were taken at least one week prior to vaccination (P.V.), on the day of first vaccination (day 0) and on Weeks 5, 6 and 7 post vaccination, on the day of booster (boost), the day of challenge (between Week 11 and 12, and weekly thereafter through Week 16 post vaccination. All heifers started the study as seronegative. Only the titers measured on the day of challenge are listed in Table 1 as these are the most titers for this study.

[0027] Heifers from Groups 1-3 were challenged with 8.times.10.sup.7 virulent Neospora caninum tachyzoites of strain BPA-1 grown in Vero cells. Challenge occurred at 85.+-.5 days of gestation. Fetuses were removed by caesarian section from the heifers at 40.+-.6 days (114 to 120 days) of gestation and evaluated by gross examination. The presence of dead fetuses were interpreted to indicate that the vaccine did not protect the fetuses and would have resulted in abortion of the fetuses. The presence of live fetuses was interpreted as demonstrating protection of the fetuses and that abortion should not have occurred.

[0028] Table 1 shows the results of the fetal evaluation and lists the serological titers of the heifers on the day of challenge. The results shown in this table indicate that the heifers in Group 1 contained two live fetuses and two dead fetuses suggesting that the HAVLOGEN.RTM. adjuvanted Neospora vaccine produced 50% protection from abortion. It should be noted that the two protected heifers had titers at challenge of 320 and 640 respectively. The heifers in Group 2 vaccinated with EMULSIGEN.RTM. adjuvanted Neospora vaccine contained one live fetus from a heifer with a serological titer of 320. The remaining heifers in this vaccine group had dead fetuses and titers lower than 320 at challenge. The first two heifers in Group 3 (Control Group receiving adjuvanted Vero cells without Neospora) had dead fetuses and titers <80. The remaining two heifers in this group were challenged at a later time than all of the other heifers and it is proposed that they did not receive a high enough challenge dose and, therefore, had live fetuses. Their titers were <80 on the day of challenge and at a later histological examination it was shown that these heifers were not infected. Group 4 heifers did not develop antibody titers during the study indicating that the other groups did not shed Neospora organisms. This latter group was not challenged since they only served as contact controls.

[0029] This experiment supports the inventor's interpretation of the Ho et al data wherein the inventors proposed that a 320 IFA titer might be indicative of protection from fetal abortion.

1TABLE 1 Results of Fetal Evaluation Post Challenge with Virulent Neospora BPA-1 Gestational Age at Appearance Titer of Removal of Fetus Heifer at Group Heifer No. of Fetus at Removal Challenge 1 HAV 21 119 days LIVE 320 1 HAV 30 119 days DEAD 160 1 HAV 39 114 days LIVE 640 1 HAV 20 120 days DEAD 160 2 EMUL 18 119 days DEAD 160 2 EMUL 37 119 days DEAD 160 2 EMUL 40 118 days LIVE 320 2 EMUL 431 111 days DEAD 160 Controls 429 118 days DEAD <80 25 114 days DEAD <80 Controls 28 120 days LIVE/NI* <80 2 120 days LIVE/NI* <80 Contact 19 121 days LIVE <80 Controls 10 121 days LIVE <80 Contact 4 120 days LIVE <80 Controls 14 120 days LIVE <80 HAV = HAVLOGEN .RTM. EMUL = EMULSIGEN .RTM. *NI = Not Infected as determined by later histopathology

Example 2

[0030] This experiment was conducted in order to determine whether a Neospora caninum organism could be grown in another tissue culture cell line, inactivated and formulated to prepare a vaccine which could produce antibody titers in cattle which would be similar to those observed in EXAMPLE 1 with Neospora vaccines produced on a Vero cell line.

[0031] An Equine Dermal Cell Line, Master Cell Passage 11, derived from ATCC No. CCL-57 was diluted to a cell count of 2.times.10.sup.7 cells per roller bottle in a Dulbecco's Modified Eagles Medium (DMEM) containing 10% Horse Serum and inoculated into 850 cm.sup.2 roller bottles at a volume of 250 mL per roller bottle. The cells were grown to confluency after which they were infected with 2.4.times.10.sup.7 Neospora caninum tachyzoites in 14.1 mL of DMEM. Each roller bottle contained 264 mL of DMEM plus 10% Horse Serum. The neospora-infected tissue cultures were incubated at 37.degree. C. until at least 50% of the cells demonstrated CPE (approximately 7 to 9 days). Fluids were harvested and tachyzoites were centrifuged for 30 minutes at 3500 rpm in order to concentrate the harvested antigen. The pelleted concentrated Neospora caninum antigen was re-suspended in 200 mL of decanted DMEM supernatant from the centrifuged tachyzoites. This concentrated preparation containing 8.times.10.sup.6 tachyzoites per mL was frozen for 16 hours at -70.degree. C. and then thawed at room temperature. The preparation was then inactivated using 0.05 M binary ethylenimine (BEI) incubated at 4.degree. C. for 48 hours. The inactivated preparation was neutralized using 3.16 M sodium thiosulfate. Two equal aliquots of the inactivated, neutralized Neospora caninum antigen preparation were then adjuvanted with different adjuvants as in EXAMPLE 1. One half of the preparation was adjuvanted with HAVLOGEN.RTM., a Carbopol-based polymer adjuvant, by adding adjuvant to a 10% concentration (v/v). The other half of the preparation was adjuvanted with EMULSIGEN.RTM., an oil-based adjuvant, by adding adjuvant to a 15% concentration (v/v).

[0032] The adjuvanted Neospora caninum vaccines produced on Equine Dermal Cells were injected subcutaneously into calves ranging in age from 9 to 12 months. One calf (#954) received a 5.0 mL dose of the HAVLOGEN.RTM. adjuvanted vaccine while a second calf (#955) received a 5.0 mL dose of EMULSIGEN.RTM. adjuvanted vaccine. Each calf was boostered with the homologous vaccine 10 days later. Calves were bled at each vaccination and 10 days post booster vaccination. Serum was analyzed for titer using an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test. Serological titers of these calves are shown in Table 2. These results indicate that the EMULSIGEN.RTM. adjuvanted Neospora vaccine produced protective titers while the HAVLOGEN.RTM. adjuvanted Neospora vaccine produced a lower titer which was close to protective.

2TABLE 2 Antibody Titers of Calves Vaccinated with inactivated adjuvanted Neospora caninum vaccines grown in Equine Dermal Cells VACCINE SERUM ANTIBODY TITER (IFA) ADJUVANT DAY 0 DAY 14 DAY 24 HAVLOGEN .RTM. <80 80 160 EMULSIGEN .RTM. <80 80 2580

Example 3

[0033] After noting from EXAMPLES 1 and 2 that a Neospora caninum vaccine produced in a continuous cell line could produce protective antibody titers in cattle which correlated to protection from abortion, it was the object of this experiment to evaluate the effect of growing the Neospora caninum in a totally different cloned cell line derived from African Green Monkey Kidneys (MA-104 Clone B) and evaluating the effects of several different types of adjuvants on production of antibody titers in cattle.

[0034] A Neospora caninum vaccine was produced as follows. A vial of Working Cells (MA-104 Clone B horse serum) was removed from liquid nitrogen storage, thawed rapidly, diluted and inoculated into 850 cm.sup.2 roller bottles containing 250 mL of DMEM (high glucose), hereinafter designated DMEMH, at a concentration of 4.times.10.sup.7 cells per roller. The medium was supplemented with Neomycin Sulfate at 1 mL/L and Horse Serum at 5% v/v. Cells were incubated at 36 to 38.degree. C. for 5 to 7 days until the cells were between 95 and 100% confluent. The Working Cells were removed from the roller bottles by rinsing the cell sheet with Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) and then adding 10 mL of a Trypsin-EDTA) solution (2.5 g/L of Trypsin+1 g/L EDTA) to each roller bottle, agitating the bottles gently for at least 10 minutes until the cells slough from the surface and then rinsing the bottle surface with DMEMH and pooling the contents of all of the bottles. The cells from these bottles (Production Cells) were re-inoculated into new 850 cm.sup.2 roller bottles at 4.5.times.10.sup.7 cells per roller bottle. The Production Cells were incubated for 24 hours at 36 to 38.degree. C. after which they were infected with freshly-passaged Neospora caninum tachyzoites (1.2.times.10.sup.7/850 cm.sup.2 roller bottle). At the time of infection, the production cells were at least 50% confluent. Infected roller bottles were incubated at 36-38.degree. C. for 120 to 168 hours on rotating roller racks set at between 0.2 and 0.4 rpm. At that time, the cell sheet was displaying typical CPE affecting at least 50% of the cell sheet. At the end of the incubation period, the Neospora fluids were harvested by pooling the contents from all of the roller bottles into a sterile vessel from which a sample was removed for live Neospora tachyzoite titration. Acceptable harvest fluids must have a titer of at least 3.times.10.sup.5/mL. The harvest titer for the present batch was 2.3.times.10.sup.6. In this case the harvest fluids were concentrated by centrifugation in order to obtain 2.4.times.10.sup.7 tachyzoites/mL. Other concentration methods include but are not limited to ultrafiltration and column chromatography. The harvest fluids were inactivated by addition of 0.2 M binary ethylenimine (BEI) to a final concentration of 0.01 M and incubation at 2 to 7.degree. C. for at least 96 hours. After this incubation, the BEI was neutralized by addition of 3.16 M sodium thiosulfate.

[0035] After inactivation and neutralization, the fluids were divided into four aliquots. Each aliquot was adjuvanted with a different adjuvant as follows:

[0036] Formula A: 1.0 mL of inactivated harvest fluids plus 3.5 mL of PBS plus 0.5 mL of a Carbopol-based polymer adjuvant designated HAVLOGEN.RTM..

[0037] Formula B: 1.0 mL of inactivated harvest fluids plus 3.25 mL PBS plus 0.75 mL of a polymer-based adjuvant designated POLYGEN.RTM..

[0038] Formula C: 1.0 mL of inactivated harvest fluids plus 0.5 mL of HAVLOGEN.RTM. plus 3.5 mL of lipid-based adjuvant designated Bay R-1005.

[0039] Formula D: 1.0 mL of inactivated harvest fluids plus 0.5 mL of PBS plus 3.5 mL of MONTANIDE.RTM. 773.

[0040] Eighteen heifers ranging in age from 1.5 to 2.0 years of age were randomly separated into six groups. Group 1 heifers (No. U148, S85 and A184) did not receive a Neospora caninum vaccine. They served as contact controls and received uninfected MA104 Clone B cells. Group 2 heifers (No. A29, 13 and Z55) served as positive controls and received live Neospora tachyzoites (3.times.10.sup.7 intravenously and 8.times.10.sup.7 intramuscularly). Group 3 heifers (No. 40, 1851, and A71) were vaccinated with three 5.0 mL doses of Formula A, administered subcutaneously at 4 week intervals. Group 4 heifers (No. 237, Y21, and U93) were vaccinated with three 5.0 mL doses of Formula B, administered subcutaneously at 4 week intervals. Group 5 heifers (No. Y6, X7, and 800) were vaccinated with three 5.0 mL doses of Formula C, administered subcutaneously at 4 week intervals. Group 6 heifers (No. A144, S74, and 5212) were vaccinated with three 5.0 mL doses of Formula D administered subcutaneously at 4 week intervals. All animals were bled at day 0 and bi-weekly thereafter.

[0041] Serum samples were analyzed for conversion to Neospora specific titers by use of an indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test. Table 3 shows the serological results. All of the vaccine preparations produced protective titer levels (>320) in the heifers. However, the polymer-based adjuvants appear to produce a better titer response than the oil-based adjuvant formulations. Since the contact control cattle remained serologically negative (within the test variation) for the duration of the experiment, it is clear that the titers produced in the vaccinated animals were not produced by shedding from the heifers injected with live Neospora tachyzoites but were a result of the vaccination.

3TABLE 3 IFA Titers of heifers vaccinated with Neospora caninum Vaccine Containing Four Different Adjuvants Weeks Post Vaccination Week 0 Week 4 Week 8 Treatment (Vacc) Week 2 (Vacc) Week 6 (Vacc) Week 10 Week 12 Formula A <80 320 160 160 160 320 320 <80 160 80 160 160 640 320 <80 320 80 160 320 640 160 GMT <80 254 101 160 202 508 254 Formula B <80 320 320 2560 1280 1280 1280 <80 160 80 640 640 1280 640 <80 320 160 640 640 1280 640 GMT <80 254 160 1016 806 1280 806 Formula C 80 640 160 1280 2560 2560 1280 80 320 160 1280 1280 2560 2560 <80 160 160 2560 1280 1280 1280 GMT 19 320 160 1613 1613 2032 1613 Formula D <80 80 80 160 160 640 1280 <80 80 160 160 320 1280 2560 <80 80 160 640 640 1280 1280 GMT <80 80 127 254 320 1016 1613 Live Tachys <80 2560 5120 10240 5120 2560 1280 <80 1280 20480 20480 20480 20480 20480 <80 20480 20480 20480 20480 20480 5120 GMT <80 4064 12902 16255 12902 10240 5120 Contact <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 Controls <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 <80 80 80 160 <80 80 <80 GMT <80 4 4 5 <80 4 <80 GMT = Geometric Mean Titer Vacc = Vaccination

Example 4

[0042] This experiment was conducted in order to determine the impact of Neospora caninum antigen quantity in the vaccines, and to evaluate a Neospora vaccine comprising subunit antigens. Also incorporated in this vaccine production process was the use of a "soft kill" technique which is defined as an inactivation process utilizing reduced quantities of inactivating agents and lower incubation temperatures and shorter inactivation times. For this experiment, the Neospora caninum was grown and processed in a manner similar to that described in EXAMPLE 3. The inactivation process was modified as follows. Binary ethylenimine was added to the harvested Neospora caninum to a final concentration of 0.01 M but was incubated at room temperature for only 24 hours after which it was neutralized by addition of sodium thiosulfate to a final concentration of 0.01 M. Subunits were obtained by removing aliquots of the inactivated tachyzoite fluids, centrifuging them at 3500 rpm for 15 minutes and decanting off the supernatant fluids. The Neospora tachyzoite pellets were re-suspended in Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS) to produce a subunit vaccine containing only the tachyzoite antigens and not the exoantigens which are excreted by the tachyzoites into the medium. A second Neospora vaccine was prepared by re-suspending the Neospora tachyzoite pellet in the supernatant fluids which had been removed and saved. Three batches of subunit DPBS re-suspended Neospora caninum were formulated to contain 1.2.times.10.sup.7, 2.4.times.10.sup.7 and 3.6.times.10.sup.7 tachyzoites per dose, respectively. Three batches of supernatant re-suspended Neospora caninum were formulated to contain equivalent numbers of tachyzoites (1.2.times.10.sup.7, 2.4.times.10.sup.7 and 3.6.times.10.sup.7) per dose. All formulations were adjuvanted with HAVLOGEN.RTM. and brought to a final 5.0 mL/dose concentration by addition of DPBS (to subunit vaccine) or supernatant fluid respectively.

[0043] These formulations were administered to Neospora seronegative heifers between the ages of 7 and 9 months of age. Six vaccine groups were comprised of five heifers each (n=5) and two control groups were comprised of three heifers each (n=3). Heifers in the experimental vaccine groups were each injected subcutaneously (SC) with 5.0 mL of one of the Neospora tachyzoite vaccine preparations and revaccinated four weeks later. Vaccine groups received the following vaccines:

[0044] Group 1 Subunit Neospora vaccine containing 1.2.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM..

[0045] Group 2 Subunit Neospora vaccine containing 2.4.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM..

[0046] Group 3 Subunit Neospora vaccine containing 3.6.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM..

[0047] Group 4 Neospora vaccine containing 1.2.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM. and supernatant diluent.

[0048] Group 5 Neospora vaccine containing 2.4.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM. and supernatant diluent.

[0049] Group 6 Neospora vaccine containing 3.6.times.10.sup.7 Neospora tachyzoites with 10% HAVLOGEN.RTM. and supernatant diluent.

[0050] Group 7 Contact Controls--These heifers received no vaccine.

[0051] Group 8 Positive Controls--These heifers received a challenge containing 5.times.10.sup.6 live Neospora tachyzoites administered intravenously in a 5.0 mL dose and 3.times.10.sup.6 live Neospora tachyzoites administered intramuscularly in a 5.0 mL dose.

[0052] All heifers were housed in the same lot, bled weekly for 7 weeks and all serum samples were tested for antibody titer specific for Neospora caninum using IFA. Additionally, the vaccines were evaluated for local reactivity by observing the sites of vaccination. Any local reactions were measured and recorded in centimeters. The serological titer responses of the heifers are shown in Table 4.

[0053] The results listed in Table 4 indicate that the vaccines containing the supernatant fluids added back to the Neospora pellet produce a slightly higher antibody response than the Neospora subunit vaccines. The antibody responses produced by the Neospora caninum vaccines containing the added-back supernatant also produced antibody responses which appear to be somewhat dose related. However, all of the vaccines were effective in producing protective levels of antibody in cattle.

[0054] None of the vaccines produced significant local reactions post vaccination. Therefore, all of the formulations could be considered acceptable commercial vaccine candidates.

4TABLE 4 Geometric Mean IFA Titers of Heifers Vaccinated with Different Types of Neospora Vaccines Containing Increasing Concentrations of Neospora Tachyzoites Days Post Vaccination Group 0 7 14 21 28* 35 42 49 56 64 1 <40 <80 80 320 160 2560 2560 2560 2560 1280 <40 <80 320 320 320 2560 2560 2560 640 640 <40 320 640 640 320 1280 2560 640 320 1280 80 320 640 640 640 640 1280 640 640 640 40 <80 160 80 80 320 2560 640 320 320 GMT 5 10 279 320 243 1114 2229 1114 640 735 2 <40 <80 160 160 160 320 5120 1280 320 320 <40 80 80 640 320 1280 5120 2560 2560 640 80 160 640 320 320 640 640 320 320 320 40 80 160 320 320 1280 1280 1280 1280 640 <40 <80 320 160 160 320 320 320 160 320 GMT 5 16 211 279 243 640 1470 844 557 422 3 <40 160 320 320 160 1280 1280 640 640 640 <40 <80 640 160 160 640 1280 1280 320 1280 40 320 1280 1280 640 2560 1280 1280 1280 320 40 <80 <80 80 80 320 2560 640 <80 640 80 160 320 160 160 2560 5120 2560 640 320 GMT 11 24 153 243 184 114 1940 1114 176 557 4 40 320 1280 640 80 640 2560 2560 320 320 <40 160 320 640 160 2560 5120 5120 2560 640 80 160 640 320 80 1280 1280 1280 640 640 80 320 1280 1280 1280 2560 5120 2560 2560 1280 <40 <80 160 160 160 1280 5120 1280 640 320 GMT 12 77 557 485 184 1470 3379 2229 970 557 5 <40 <80 160 320 160 1280 2560 2560 1280 1280 <40 160 160 640 160 2560 5120 1280 320 1280 <40 <80 640 320 160 640 2560 1280 640 640 <40 160 640 160 320 2560 5120 1280 1280 1280 <40 <80 160 80 80 160 1280 1280 640 160 GMT <40 7 279 243 160 970 2941 931 735 735 GMT = Geometric Mean Titer Vacc = Vaccination

[0055] Although the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing for the purpose of illustration, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention except as it may be limited by the claim.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A Neospora caninum vaccine comprising tissue culture grown Neospora.

2. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 1 wherein the tissue culture grown Neospora comprises an antigen selected from the group consisting of a whole culture of Neospora tachyzoites, an inactivated tissue culture of Neospora tachyzoites, a modified live tissue culture Neospora tachyzoites, an extract from Neospora tachyzoites and one or more subunits obtained from Neospora tachyzoites.

3. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 1 further comprising an inactivating agent and an adjuvant.

4. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 3 wherein the inactivating agent is selected from the group consisting of formalin, beta-propiolactone, heat, binary ethylenimine, detergents and means for freezing/thawing.

5. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 3 wherein the adjuvant is selected from the group consisting of polymers, oil in water, water-in-oil-in-water, lipids, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, aluminum sulfate, immunomodulators and combinations thereof.

6. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 5 wherein the polymer adjuvant is selected from the group consisting of Carbopol, HAVLOGEN.RTM. and POLYGEN.RTM..

7. The Neospora caninum vaccine according to claim 5 wherein the oil-in-water adjuvant is selected from the group consisting of EMULSIGEN.RTM. and EMULSIGEN PLUS.RTM..

8. The Neospora vaccine according to claim 1 wherein the Neospora is modified live.

9. A method for growing a Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture to an amount sufficient to protect mammals against infection or abortion caused by said Neospora caninum, comprising inoculating the Neospora caninum onto said tissue culture and harvesting the replicated Neospora caninum.

10. A method of producing a Neospora vaccine comprising the steps of: a. growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a cytopathic effect is produced; b. harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; and c. formulating said harvest into a vaccine.

11. A method of producing a Neospora vaccine comprising the steps of: a. growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a cytopathic effect is produced; b. harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; c. inactivating said harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; and d. adjuvanting the inactivated harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce a vaccine.

12. A method of producing a Neospora subunit vaccine comprising the steps of: a. growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a cytopathic effect is produced; b. harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; c. extracting one or more protective antigens from the harvested tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce a subunit; d. inactivating the subunit(s), optionally; and e. adjuvanting the subunit(s) to produce a vaccine.

13. A method of producing a Neospora subunit vaccine comprising the steps of: a. growing Neospora caninum in a susceptible tissue culture until a cytopathic effect is produced; b. harvesting said tissue culture grown Neospora caninum; c. inactivating the Neospora caninum harvest; d. extracting one or more protective antigens from the harvested, inactivated tissue culture grown Neospora caninum to produce a subunit(s); and e. adjuvanting the subunit(s) to produce a vaccine.

14. A method of protecting mammals from disease caused by Neospora caninum comprising, administering to said mammals the vaccine according to claims 1-8.