U.S. patent application number 10/156374 was filed with the patent office on 2002-10-10 for cushioning shoe insole with plural, differentiated surface-tension cushioning.
Invention is credited to Dennis, Michael R., Monk, Russell A..
Application Number | 20020144433 10/156374 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 26671352 |
Filed Date | 2002-10-10 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020144433 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Dennis, Michael R. ; et
al. |
October 10, 2002 |
Cushioning shoe insole with plural, differentiated surface-tension
cushioning
Abstract
A shoe insole structure which includes a singular (or plural)
acceleration-rate-sensitive, differentiated-softness, bonded
viscoelastic cushioning layer(s), joined to the upper surface of
which is a low-surface-friction, moisture-wicking fabric overlayer.
The overall insole presents to a foot an effective upwardly facing
support surface which has an effective surface tension which is
lower than (differentiated from) that of the underside of the
foot.
Inventors: |
Dennis, Michael R.;
(Scappoose, OR) ; Monk, Russell A.; (Salem,
OR) |
Correspondence
Address: |
ROBERT D. VARITZ, P.C.
2007 S.E. Grant Street
Portland
OR
97201
US
|
Family ID: |
26671352 |
Appl. No.: |
10/156374 |
Filed: |
May 27, 2002 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
10156374 |
May 27, 2002 |
|
|
|
10003122 |
Nov 14, 2001 |
|
|
|
60281604 |
Apr 4, 2001 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
36/44 ;
36/28 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A43B 7/02 20130101; A43B
7/081 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
36/44 ;
36/28 |
International
Class: |
A43B 013/18 |
Claims
We claim:
1. A cushioning insole structure for a shoe, which structure
presents to a foot an effective support surface having a surface
tension which is less than that of the underside of the foot, said
insole structure comprising a cushioning layer structure having
upward and lower surfaces, and formed of a material which,
following deformation, tends to return naturally to an undeformed
condition at a rate which is slower than the rate at which it was
deformed, and a low-surface-friction, foot-engaging,
moisture-wicking layer joined to the upper surface of said
cushioning layer structure, said cushioning layer structure and
said moisture-wicking layer collectively presenting to the
underside of a foot a support surface which exhibits effectively a
lower surface-tension characteristic then that of the foot
underside.
2. The insole structure of claim 1, wherein said cushioning layer
structure is formed from a non-springy,
acceleration-rate-sensitive, cushioning and shock-absorbing
material.
3. The insole structure of claim 2, wherein said
acceleration-rate-sensiti- ve material is a viscoelastic
material.
4. The insole structure of claim 1, wherein said cushioning layer
structure is characterized by a structural deformation cushioning
nature which varies from softer toward firmer progressing
downwardly through the layer structure from its said upper surface
toward its said lower surface.
5. The insole structure of claim 4, wherein said cushioning layer
structure is formed by at least a pair of differentiated-softness,
structural cushioning materials disposed one (upper) above the
other (lower), and bonded to each other, with the upper cushioning
material being softer than the lower cushioning material.
6. The insole structure of claim 5, wherein each of said materials
within said cushioning layer structure is formed from a
non-springy, acceleration-rate-sensitive, cushioning and
shock-absorbing material.
7. The insole structure of claim 6, wherein said shock-absorbing
material is a viscoelastic material.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation from regular U.S. patent
application Ser. No. 10/003,122, filed Nov. 14,2001 for "Cushioning
Shoe Insole", which application, as does this continuation
application also, claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application
Serial No. 60/281,604, filed Apr. 4, 2001 for "Cushioning Shoe
Insole". Both of these predecessor and serially copending patent
applications are hereby incorporated into this application by
reference.
BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates to a new and advantageous shoe
insole, and in particular to an insole which is usable in a
medically-related environment as, for example, where shoewear is
prescribed or recommended for various medical conditions requiring
special uniform and highly topographically conformal cushioning to
minimize singular high-pressure points applied to the underside of
the foot. Especially, the invention proposes an insole structure
that provides (a) superior shock-absorbing qualities, (b) reliable,
intimate thermo-conformation (spatial conformation) to the
topography of the underside of the foot, (c) efficient moisture
wicking and related cooling, and (d) avoidance of uncomfortable,
"hard landing" "bottoming out" of the foot within a shoe during
walking.
[0003] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, these
important performance behaviors are achieved in an insole structure
which preferably is layered in nature, and which includes a
cushioning layer structure that carries a bonded overlayer of a
low-surface-friction, moisture-wicking fabric material, which
material, collectively with the cushioning layer structure,
presents to the underside of the foot an effective support surface
which exhibits an effective surface tension which is less that the
surface tension of the underside of the foot. Such a differentiated
surface-tension condition has the important effect of promoting
close, topographic, cushioning conformation to the underside of the
foot, with the important result of offering a high level of
cushioning (softness) comfort. Additionally, where, as is
especially proposed by the present invention, the cushioning layer
structure therein is formed of an acceleration-rate-sensitive
material which is slow to restore itself from a deformed condition,
under-foot topographic conformation is significantly enhanced.
[0004] There are a number of different ways in which an appropriate
and successful cushioning layer can be constructed and implemented.
One such successful way involves a single cushioning layer formed
of a uniformly characterized acceleration-rate-sensitive material
with one softness behavior nature appropriately surface-covered at
the surface intend for foot engagement with a low-surface-tension
moisture-wicking fabric.
[0005] Another way involves the use of plural, stacked cushioning
layers of such acceleration rate-sensitive materials, each having a
different softness behavior, and stacked in a softness-progression
manner whereby, as between two vertically adjacent layers, the
softer one of the two is the upper layer. Here, too, an overlayer
of moisture-wicking fabric is employed.
[0006] Still another approach involves employing a single such
cushioning layer which is prepared with an internally varying
softness, with the softer regions disposed in the layer above the
firmer regions. A moisture-wicking ovelayer is also employed in
this version of an insole constructed in accordance with the
invention.
[0007] In all embodiments and versions of the invention, the
effective surface tension of the uppermost surface region of the
insole is preferably less than that of the underside of the usual
human foot.
[0008] The various features and advantages that are offered by the
insole construction proposed by this invention will become more
fully apparent as the description which now follows is read in
conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] FIG. 1 is a simplified top plan view illustrating an
isolated, left-foot, cushioning shoe insole which is constructed in
accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
[0010] FIG. 2 is an enlarged, fragmentary side elevation taken
generally along the line 2-2 in FIG. 1.
[0011] FIG. 3 is a view somewhat like that presented in FIG. 2,
generally illustrating how the insole of FIGS. 1 and 2 provides
anti-spring-like, differentiated-softness, cushioning and shock
absorbing in accordance with the present invention.
[0012] FIG. 4 is a view much like FIG. 2, except that FIG. 4 shows
a modified form of the invention in which the cushioning layer
structure includes plural layers, and specifically two layers.
[0013] FIG. 5 is an enlarged, fragmentary cross-section taken
generally along the line 5-5 in FIG. 4.
[0014] FIG. 6 is a view which is very similar to that presented in
FIG. 5, except that here what is shown is a modified form of the
invention in which the shoe insole of this invention possesses a
unidirectional, lateral taper defining a high lateral side and a
low lateral side.
[0015] It should be understood that components illustrated in the
insole of this invention in FIGS. 1-6 inclusive are not necessarily
represented therein to scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] Turning now to the drawing figures, one of the embodiments
of the proposed insole structure of this invention is indicated
generally at 10. For the purpose of convenience herein, insole 10
is pictured and described in a form wherein it is employable as a
free insert for an already constructed shoe. It should be
understood, however, that the insole of this invention could easily
be incorporated as a part of initial shoe construction.
[0017] Insole 10 includes a heat-flowable, anti-spring-back,
acceleration-rate-sensitive cushioning layer structure 12 formed
preferably of a material such as the microcdellular, viscoelastic,
urethane material known as PORON.RTM. 400 Performance Urethane,
Series 90, Formulation #94, manufactured by Rogers Corporation in
Woodstock, Ct.
[0018] Layer structure 12, formed as just described, has a
shock-cushioning behavior whereby (a) it deforms in an
acceleration-rate-sensitive manner (the greater the acceleration,
the slower the responsive deflection), and (b) returns slowly from
such a deformation toward an undeformed condition without
exhibiting any appreciable spring-like mannerisms. By the way of
contrast, an undesirable spring-action response to a deflection
occurs where a material effectively reacts to, and tends to return
from, a force impact deflection condition with a felt return force,
and in a time-frame, that generally match those of the event which
has produced the subject deflection. A non-spring-like response,
which is characteristic of layer structure 12, takes the form of a
return (from a shock-force/impact deflection) that is retarded over
time, and characterized by a lowered, overall-felt, return-force
behavior. In a sense, a material behaving in a non-spring-like
manner tends to "creep" back toward an undeformed condition. This
is how layer structure 12 behaves in insole 10.
[0019] Another important advantage which is offered by layer
structure 12, formed with materials like those mentioned above, is
that it tends to flow (at a creep) with heat and compression, and
thus tends to deform gradually to create an upwardly facing,
topographically-conforming, foot-support surface which tends to
complement and "follow" the configuration of the underside of a
supported foot.
[0020] Suitably surface-bonded (as by an appropriate hot-melt
adhesive) to the upper surface of layer 12 is a thin, fabric,
moisture-wicking, low-surface-friction and abrasion-wear layer
structure, or layer, 14. Preferably, layer 14 is formed of a
woven-fibre fabric material, such as that material known as
HEATERSTONE.RTM., made by Lee Fashion Fabrics, in Gloversville,
N.Y. Fabric layer 14 herein has a thickness preferably of about
{fraction (1/64)}-inches, and includes elongate, stretch-resistant
fibres (see 14a in the figures) that function as tension-active,
load-distributing components in the fabric.
[0021] Layer 14 plays several important roles (i.e., cooperative
with layer structure 12) in insole 10. One of these involves
furnishing a wear surface to protect the longevity of the
underlying cushioning layer, and to do so without appreciably
diminishing the cushioning and shock-absorbing capabilities of that
layer. Another involves furnishing a surface which has a low
coefficient of sliding friction, so as to minimize friction heat
which develops around the foot of a user during normal shoe use. A
third important function for this layer is that it wicks moisture
which typically develops in a shoe, and caries this moisture
efficiently to the side edges (perimeter) of the insole, where that
moisture can quickly evaporate, and in so doing, provide cooling
within a shoe. A fourth significant function of layer 14 is that
its fibres act as elongate load-distributing elements that aid in
spreading localized load events to a broader area within insole
10.
[0022] Layers 12, 14 collectively present to the underside of a
foot a surface tension characteristic which is less than that of
the undersurface of a foot, whether or not the foot is covered by a
sock.
[0023] As was pointed out above, the materials which make up
cushioning layer structure 12 respond to shock-force/impact loading
in such a fashion that this structure has a tendency to return from
a deformation (produced by such loading) in a retarded, slow and
low-return-force (non-springy) fashion. This "low return-force"
behavior is evidenced by the material returning toward an
undeformed (unshockdeformed) condition without displaying anywhere
near the same level of local return force or pressure which
characterizes the initial loading per se.
[0024] FIG. 3 is presented to highlight this important performance
of layer structure 12 in insole 10. In solid lines in this figure,
structures 12, 14 are shown representationally shock-deflected to
produce the combined deformation generally indicated as a
depression at D. Dash-double-dot lines show the undeformed "prior"
dispositions of the local upper surfaces of these two layer
structures.
[0025] Short, solid downwardly-pointing arrow Ti, and long, shaded,
downwardly-pointing arrow Fi represent related time-span and
applied-force characteristics respectively, of the shock event
which has produced deformation D. Long, solid, upwardly-pointing
arrow T2, and short, shaded, upwardly-pointing arrow F2, represent
the related time-span and return-force characteristics,
respectively, of how layer structure 12, in cooperation with layer
structure 14, will try to return from the shock-deformed state. As
can be seen, T2 is greater in length than is T1, and F1 is greater
in length than is F2. These comparative and differentiated
"lengths" represent the differentiated time-span and force-level
behavior characteristics which characterize the kind of
non-spring-factor cushioning response that produces, respectively,
the remarkable shoe-cushioning performance offered by the present
invention. Fibres 14a, as indicated by reverse arrows in FIG. 3,
cooperatively act to distribute and spread load laterally in the
insole.
[0026] The several outwardly pointing arrows which radiate from the
letter M in FIG. 1 represent how moisture is wicked by layer 14 to
the lateral (perimetral) edges of insole 10--the perimeter of the
insole. At the perimeter of the insole such wicked moisture readily
evaporates, and introduces effective and noticeable cooling in a
shoe equipped with the insole.
[0027] Turning attention now to FIG. 4, here there is shown at 20 a
modified form of insole which is made in accordance with the
present invention. Insole 20 includes a heat-flowable,
anti-spring-back, shock (acceleration)-rate-sensitive cushioning
underlayer structure (or layer structure) 22, including upper and
lower, suitably bonded-together, material layers 22a, 22b,
respectively. Each of layers 22a, 22b is formed preferably of a
material like that employed for previously described layer
structure 12. Upper layer 22a is softer than layer 22b, and
preferably is also thicker than layer 22b.
[0028] In insole 20, layer 22a is specifically formed of PORON.RTM.
product number SRS-15188-47-54U-RR, and layer 22b of PORON.RTM.
product number SRVF-15118-42-54U-RR. Also, and while different
relative dimensions can be employed for these two layers, in the
embodiment pictured in FIG. 4, layers 22a, 22b have uniform, though
different, distributed thicknesses (see also FIG. 5). The thickness
of layer 22a, the upper, softer layer, is about 4-mm, and that of
lower, firmer layer 22b is about 3-mm. Thus the overall cushioning
layer structure 22 herein can be thought of as having, from top
surface to bottom surface, a spatially varied softness
characteristic which progresses from softer toward firmer
downwardly through this layer structure. It will become apparent to
those skilled in the art that different useful structural
approaches can be employed to create such a varied
softness/firmness layer structure.
[0029] Mentioning some of these useful ways in which variations in
this cushioning layer structure can be made, layer 22a could be the
same thickness as, or thinner than, layer 22b. The absolute, and
relative, softnesses of these layers could be varied. Further,
layer structure 22 could include more than two viscoelastic layers,
or perhaps it could be infinitely graded.
[0030] Bonding between layers 22a, 22b, preferably created by any
suitable contact adhesive, produces a certain level of interfacial
telegraphy of the individual properties of each layer to the other,
and this bonding contributes to the overall performance of the
insole.
[0031] Suitably joined to the upper surface of layer structure 22
is a fabric, moisture-wicking layer 24 which is like previously
described layer 14. Layer 24 has strands 24a which are like strands
14a.
[0032] Turning attention now to FIGS. 5 and 6, FIG. 5 helps to
illustrate the uniform thicknesses of layers 22a, 22b, and 24. FIG.
5 pictures a modified construction for insole 10 wherein the
thickness of layers 22a, 22b are laterally tapered. Such tapering
can be beneficial in certain instances, and can be made to "slant"
in different degrees and directions, if desired.
[0033] Not specifically shown in a drawing herein is another
modification of the invention wherein a single cushioning layer,
like previously discussed layer 12, is formed with a varying
softness characteristic which graduates from softer toward firmer
progressing downwardly through the layer
[0034] The insole thus proposed by the present invention offers
some very special advantages in relation to conventional insoles.
Its construction is quite simple, and it lends itself readily to
initial incorporation, and even retrofitting, in many otherwise
conventional shoe designs.
[0035] Heating of layer structures 12, 22 during normal use causes
the upper surfaces of these layers to form-fit the underside of a
user's foot. This is a very important feature of the invention
where insoles 10, 20 are employed in a medical situation. The
described behavior, strongly contributed to by the fact that the
effective surface tension of the upper engagement surface of the
insole is less than that of the underside of the usual foot, causes
these insoles to form-fit very closely to the underside of the
foot, and this performance minimizes high-pressure points of
contact with the foot. Accordingly, the insole of this invention
promotes good blood circulation.
[0036] Wicking of moisture by layers 14, 24 promotes cooling, and
this is important in various medical situations, such as in a
diabetes situation.
[0037] Acceleration-rate-sensitivity in layer structures 12, 22
leads to significant anti-springback behavior, and contributes to a
remarkable ability of the insole of the invention to cushion shock
loads. Also fabric layers 14, 24 act as low-friction,
abrasion-resistant upper surfaces in the insoles, protecting layer
structures 12, 22 from undue early wear, and minimizing
friction-induced heat build-up as the foot naturally moves around
in a shoe.
[0038] Accordingly, while preferred embodiments and certain
modifications have been illustrated and/or described herein, other
variations and modifications may be made within the scope of the
invention.
* * * * *