U.S. patent application number 10/073532 was filed with the patent office on 2002-09-26 for frontal push putter. Invention is credited to Rifkin, David S..
Application Number | 20020137573 10/073532 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 26754579 |
Filed Date | 2002-09-26 |
United States Patent Application | 20020137573 |
Kind Code | A1 |
Rifkin, David S. | September 26, 2002 |
Current state of the art putters all use the same basic methodology such as holding the traditional putter with 2 hands and addressing the ball sideways. the advantage of the Frontal Push Putter will be to enhance the accuracy of putting by using my methodology as well as design,
Inventors: | Rifkin, David S.; (Old Bridge, NJ) |
Correspondence Address: |
DAVID S. RIFKIN 38 Cymbeline Drive Old Bridge NJ 08857 US |
Family ID: | 26754579 |
Appl. No.: | 10/073532 |
Filed: | February 11, 2002 |
Application Number | Filing Date | Patent Number | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
60269742 | Feb 20, 2001 | |||
Current U.S. Class: | 473/293 ; 473/313; 473/328; 473/330 |
Current CPC Class: | A63B 53/0487 20130101; A63B 53/007 20130101; A63B 53/0433 20200801 |
Class at Publication: | 473/293 ; 473/313; 473/330; 473/328 |
International Class: | A63B 053/04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.