U.S. patent application number 09/681315 was filed with the patent office on 2002-09-19 for automated receptor tracking to diagnostic source assembly.
Invention is credited to Boehm, Manfred David, Ni, Xianfeng, Polkus, Vincent Stanley.
Application Number | 20020131558 09/681315 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 24734751 |
Filed Date | 2002-09-19 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020131558 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Polkus, Vincent Stanley ; et
al. |
September 19, 2002 |
AUTOMATED RECEPTOR TRACKING TO DIAGNOSTIC SOURCE ASSEMBLY
Abstract
A system and method for automatically positioning an image
receptor based on the position of a manually positioned diagnostic
source assembly in an X-ray imaging device is provided. In a
preferred embodiment of the automated tracking system, an operator
manually positions a diagnostic source assembly (DSA) over the area
of a patient to be imaged. Sensors in the diagnostic source
assembly transmit the position of the DSA to a system controller.
The system controller then calculates an optimal position of an
image receptor based on the position of the DSA. Once the optimal
position is calculated, the system controller sends the optimal
position to a motor drive, which positions the image receptor in
the calculated optimal position. Position sensors in the image
receptor then send positional data of the image receptor to the
system controller, which verifies that the image receptor is in the
calculated optimal position. If the operator wishes to manually
adjust the image receptor, they may override the motor drive and do
so. The automated tracking system provides for reduced total
imaging time and increased cost effectiveness over prior X-ray
imaging systems by reducing the number of retakes required to
obtain a satisfactory X-ray image. Reducing retakes also results in
decreased exposure to radiation by the patient being imaged which
is healthier to the patient.
Inventors: |
Polkus, Vincent Stanley;
(Delafield, WI) ; Boehm, Manfred David; (Waukesha,
WI) ; Ni, Xianfeng; (Milwaukee, WI) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY, LTD
500 WEST MADISON STREET
SUITE 3400
CHICAGO
IL
60661
|
Family ID: |
24734751 |
Appl. No.: |
09/681315 |
Filed: |
March 16, 2001 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
378/205 ;
378/167; 378/189 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61B 6/4464 20130101;
A61B 6/08 20130101; A61B 6/547 20130101; A61B 6/4233 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
378/205 ;
378/189; 378/167 |
International
Class: |
A61B 006/08 |
Claims
1. A system for calculating an optimal position of an image
receptor based on the position of a diagnostic source assembly,
said system including: a system controller for receiving positional
data from said diagnostic source assembly and calculating an
optimal position for said image receptor based on said positional
data received from said diagnostic source assembly.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein said diagnostic source assembly is
manually positioned.
3. The system of claim 1 wherein the optimal position for said
image receptor is transmitted to a motor drive by said system
controller.
4. The system of claim 1 wherein positional sensors on said
diagnostic source assembly transmit said positional data from said
diagnostic source assembly to said system controller.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein said image receptor includes
positional sensors for transmitting positional data of said image
receptor to said system controller.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein said system controller includes a
microprocessor for calculating said optimal position.
7. A system for automatically positioning an image receptor in a
medical imaging system, said system including: a manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly; an automatically positioned
image receptor; a system controller for receiving positional data
from said manually positioned diagnostic source assembly,
calculating an optimal position for said automatically positioned
image receptor with respect to the position of said manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly and transmitting said optimal
position to a motor drive; and a motor drive for automatically
positioning said image receptor in response to said optimal
position.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein said manually positioned
diagnostic source assembly includes at least one position sensor
for transmitting the lateral orientation of said manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly to said system
controller.
9. The system of claim 7 wherein said manually positioned
diagnostic source assembly includes at least one position sensor
for transmitting the longitudinal orientation of said manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly to said system
controller.
10. The system of claim 7 wherein said manually positioned
diagnostic source assembly includes at least one position sensor
for transmitting the vertical orientation of said manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly to said system
controller.
11. The system of claim 7 wherein said manually positioned
diagnostic source assembly includes at least one position sensor
for transmitting the angular orientation of said manually
positioned diagnostic source assembly to said system
controller.
12. The system of claim 7 wherein said image receptor includes
position sensors for transmitting the longitudinal position of said
automatically positioned image receptor to said system
controller.
13. The system of claim 7 wherein said image receptor includes
position sensors for transmitting the height of said automatically
positioned image receptor to said system controller.
14. The system of claim 7 wherein said image receptor includes
position sensors for transmitting the axial tilt of said
automatically positioned image receptor to said system
controller.
15. A method for automatically positioning an image receptor, said
method including the steps of: calculating an optimal image
receptor position based on the position of a manually positioned
diagnostic source assembly; and automatically positioning said
image receptor based on said optimal image receptor position.
16. The method of claim 15 further including the step of verifying
the position of said image receptor at said optimal image receptor
position.
17. The method of claim 15 further including the step of manually
overriding a motor drive to manually position said image
receptor.
18. A method for calculating an optimal position of an image
receptor based on the position of a diagnostic source assembly,
said method including the steps of: receiving positional data from
said diagnostic source assembly; and calculating an optimal
position of said image receptor based on the position of said
diagnostic source assembly using a system controller.
19. The method of claim 18 further including the step of
transmitting said positional data from said diagnostic source
assembly using positional sensors.
20. The method of claim 18 further including the step of
transmitting said optimal position calculated by said system
controller to a motor drive.
21. The method of claim 18 wherein said system controller includes
a microprocessor.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention generally relates to a system and
method for controlling the position of a radiographic device. More
particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method
for automatically positioning an image receptor based on the
position of a manually positioned diagnostic source assembly in an
X-ray imaging device.
[0002] Radiographic imaging systems are used for a wide variety of
applications in the medical field. One example of a radiographic
imaging system used in medicine is an X-ray imaging system. X-ray
imaging systems are typically used for diagnostic purposes in the
medical field. Typical X-ray imaging systems operate by
transmitting X-radiation or X-rays through a patient's body using a
diagnostic source assembly ("DSA"). The DSA is typically a device
that is capable of transmitting X-rays through the body of a
patient. The position of the DSA is typically adjustable and the
DSA is generally placed over the area of a patient's body that is
being imaged. Once properly positioned, the X-rays transmitted
through the patient's body by the DSA are more absorbed by dense
structures in the body such as bones, and less absorbed by less
dense structures such as tissue and organs. The X-rays passed
through the patient's body are then typically received by an image
receptor located beneath the patient. Typically, the image receptor
is comprised of either an X-ray film or a digital solid state
detector.
[0003] In order to achieve an X-ray image with sufficient
information and contrast to provide a doctor with the diagnostic
information needed, precise alignment of the DSA and the receptor
often needs to be achieved. Typically, the DSA projects a beam of
X-rays toward the image receptor surface and through body structure
of the patient being imaged. The area of projected X-rays that is
incident on the image receptor defines the active imaging area
(AIA). Generally, the X-ray beam field or field of view (FOV),
which is the intersection of the projected beam and the image
receptor plane, must be coincident with, or lie within, the
boundaries of the image receptor surface in order to avoid loss of
image data. The FOV may be adjusted by rotating or tilting the DSA
to vary the direction of the projected X-ray beam, and also by
operating a collimator to vary the width and length dimensions of
the X-ray beam. Further adjustments may also be made by linear
translation of the DSA or the image receptor.
[0004] When the DSA is oriented so that the X-ray beam is directed
in perpendicular or orthogonal relationship to the image receptor
plane, the image receptor may be located directly below the DSA.
However, X-ray technicians or operators may need to angulate the
DSA with respect to the image receptor, that is, rotate or pivot
the DSA so that the beam is not projected perpendicular to the
image receptor. Angulation of the DSA may be desirable, for
example, to ensure that the beam passes through a specific body
structure of the patient, or to avoid imaging specific structures.
As the DSA becomes increasingly angulated, the image receptor
typically needs to be positioned at a location offset from the
position of the DSA in order to receive the X-rays. Typically, the
greater the degree of angulation the DSA is from perpendicular to
the image receptor, the greater the offset between the image
receptor and the DSA need to be. Therefore, in order to ensure the
image receptor receives the X-rays from the DSA, the operator
typically needs to precisely position the image receptor so that it
is in the X-ray beam's FOV.
[0005] In the absence of optimal or appropriate alignment of the
DSA and the image receptor, anatomical cutoff may occur during the
imaging process. That is, the bodily structures intended to be
imaged may not be completely imaged due to the incorrect offset
between the DSA and the image receptor. Anatomical cutoff may
necessitate that the imaging be repeated, which may increase
procedure cycle time, raise examination costs, and expose the
patient to higher levels of net radiation.
[0006] In typical prior art systems, efforts to attain the precise
alignment of the DSA with the image receptor desired for successful
imaging has been attempted by one of two methods. The first method
typically used to align the DSA and image receptor is through
direct alignment. That is, physically attaching the DSA to the
image receptor in the desired alignment. The second method
typically used to align the DSA and image receptor is through
indirect alignment methods. That is, positioning the DSA and the
image receptor individually when they are not attached together.
Both methods are further described below.
[0007] In typical X-ray imaging systems that utilize direct
alignment of the DSA and the image receptor, the DSA and the image
receptor are physically attached to each other by a rigid
structure. The DSA is typically attached in a perpendicular
alignment to the image receptor so that the X-ray beam transmitted
by the DSA will be transmitted directly into the flat plane of the
receptor. In direct alignment systems, the DSA and the image
receptor are typically not moveable or able to be repositioned by
an operator or X-ray technician. Because of the rigidly fixed
positioning of the DSA and the image receptor, X-ray imaging
systems that utilize direct alignment may suffer from a number of
drawbacks.
[0008] One drawback that may occur in direct aligned X-ray imaging
systems is lack of flexibility in positioning of the system by the
operator. That is, when the position of the system is fixed, the
operator may have to adjust the patient's position in order to get
an image. During imaging procedures it may be more difficult to
adjust the patient to the X-ray system than it is to adjust the
X-ray system to the patient. However, in a direct aligned system
only limited adjustment of the system is possible. Therefore, if
patients are required to hold difficult or uncomfortable positions
in order to fit into the X-ray imaging system, bad images may be
generated and frequent retakes may be required. Requiring frequent
retakes may often be time consuming and may expose the patient to
excess radiation. Additionally, with direct aligned X-ray imaging
systems, retakes may be further complicated by patient access. That
is, once a determination has been reached to retake an image, the
patient may have exited the system or may have to be re-scheduled.
Also, direct aligned X-ray imaging systems are less desirable
because the systems are typically quite complex and costly.
[0009] In order to overcome some of the drawbacks related to the
rigid inflexibility of direct aligned systems, some prior art X-ray
systems have utilized indirect alignment methods. That is, the DSA
and the image receptor are not physically attached to each other
and may be individually positioned by an operator. Individually
positioning the DSA and the image receptor may help give the
operator more flexibility and may allow for better patient comfort
than direct aligned systems. Typically positioning of the DSA and
receptor in indirect aligned systems has been achieved by one of
two methods. The first method typically used in indirect alignment
systems involves manual positioning of both the DSA and the image
receptor by an operator. The second method typically used in
indirect alignment systems is motorized positioning of both the DSA
and the image receptor.
[0010] In typical indirect alignment systems manually positioned,
an operator physically positions the DSA and the image receptor by
hand. Generally, at first, the DSA may be manually positioned by
the operator in a position appropriate for the area of the
patient's body being imaged. Next, the patient is typically
positioned so that the area of the patient's body to be imaged is
comfortably positioned with respect to the DSA. Finally, the image
receptor may be manually positioned by the operator in the proper
alignment with the DSA. The operator may use a visual light field
projected by the DSA on to the patient or receptor to judge where
the DSA should be positioned with respect to the patient and the
image receptor. Once the operator concludes that the DSA and the
image receptor have been optimally aligned, the image may be taken.
While the manual positioning of the DSA and the imaging receptor by
the operator may allow much greater flexibility to the operator
than in direct alignment systems, a number of drawbacks with manual
positioning may result.
[0011] One drawback that may occur in manually positioned indirect
alignment systems is inconsistent alignment. Because the DSA and
the image receptor are both manually positioned by the operator,
the operator must judge when the DSA and image receptor are in
optimal alignment. While the visual light field discussed above may
help aid the operator in their judgment, it still may be difficult
for the operator to precisely determine when the DSA and image
receptor is in optimal alignment. Inconsistent alignment of the DSA
and the receptor by the operator may result in poor quality images,
anatomical cutoff, or may require frequent retakes. As mentioned
above, frequent retakes may increase imaging time and expose the
patient to excess radiation.
[0012] An additional drawback which may occur in manually
positioned indirect alignment systems is the increased time
required to position the DSA and the image receptor. Because the
operator must judge and manually position both the DSA and the
image receptor, proper alignment may require some time. The
operator may have to position and then reposition the DSA, the
image receptor, or both numerous times before an optimal alignment
may be achieved. Therefore, the "trial and error" nature of
manually positioning both the DSA and the image receptor may
increase the time required to take good images. Increased time may
result in reduced throughput of the imaging department of the
medical facility, which may be busy during a typical day.
[0013] The second method typically used in indirect alignment
systems is motorized positioning of both the DSA and the image
receptor. That is, the operator uses controls to position a
motorized DSA and a motorized image receptor into proper alignment
with each other. In typical motorized positioning systems, the
operator may use the controls to position the motorized image
receptor into a position appropriate for the area of the patient's
body being imaged. Next, the patient is typically positioned so
that the area of the patient's body to be imaged is comfortably
positioned over the image receptor. Finally, the motorized DSA may
be positioned by the operator using the controls in the proper
alignment with the image receptor over the area of the patient's
body to be imaged. Once the operator concludes that the DSA and the
receptor have been optimally positioned, the image may be taken.
While the motorized positioning of the DSA and the image receptor
by the operator may allow greater precision to the operator than in
manually positioned indirect alignment systems, a number of
drawbacks with motorized positioning may result.
[0014] One drawback that may be present in motorized positioning
systems is loss of freedom of motion of the DSA and the image
receptor. That is, the range of motions available to the motorized
DSA and the motorized image receptor may be less than the range of
motion available to the manually positioned system. Having reduced
range of motion may limit the ability of the operator to quickly
and efficiently align the DSA and the image receptor. The operator
may have to adjust the patient to compensate for the reduced range
of motion that may be available to the motorized positioning
system. Having to adjust the patient and not being able to position
the DSA and the receptor in exactly the desired position may result
in poor images and the need for retakes. As described above, poor
imaging and retakes may have adverse effects on the patient and
hospital throughput.
[0015] Another disadvantage that may be present in motorized
positioning systems is the amount of time required to position the
system. Typically, positioning the DSA and the image receptor by
motorized control is slower than manually positioning the DSA and
the receptor, particularly when the displacements are large. Thus,
if multiple images from different angles or retakes are required,
the increase in imaging time due to the motorized positioning of
the DSA and the image receptor may be significant. As mentioned
above, increasing the imaging time may lead to reduced throughput
and back-ups in the imaging department of busy hospitals.
Additionally, motorized positioning systems fail to address the
various preferences or needs of an operator to move the positioning
system at a slower or faster rate, as desired. That is, motorized
positioning systems may not provide continuously variable of
proportional speed control as desired by an operator.
[0016] Thus, a need exists for a positioning control system for a
medical imaging device, such as an X-ray imaging device, that
combines the optimal alignment properties of a direct alignment
system with the flexibility of an indirect alignment system. A need
further exists for a positioning control system that allows for
quick and precise alignment of a diagnostic source assembly and an
image receptor.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0017] The preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a
system and method for automatically positioning an image receptor
based on the position of a manually positioned diagnostic source
assembly (DSA) in an X-ray imaging system.
[0018] In operation, a patient whom the X-ray imaging will be
performed on is placed on the examination table of the imaging
system. An X-ray technician or operator then manually positions the
DSA over the area of the patient's body to be imaged. Once the DSA
is manually positioned in the proper location by the X-ray
technician, position sensors in the DSA transmit the lateral,
longitudinal, vertical, and angular orientation of the DSA to a
system controller. The system controller calculates the optimal
position of the image receptor based on the position of the DSA.
The system controller then transmits the optimal position to a
motor drive that automatically positions the image receptor in the
optimal position. Once the image receptor has been positioned in
the optimal position by the motor drive, sensors in the image
receptor transmit the positional data of the image receptor to the
system controller. The system controller then verifies that the
image receptor has been positioned in the correct location. If the
system controller determines that the image receptor has been
properly positioned, the X-ray imaging may then occur. If the
system controller determines that the image receptor has not been
properly positioned, the X-ray technician may override the motor
drive and manually position the image receptor in the desired
location.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0019] FIG. 1 illustrates an automated receptor tracking system
according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
[0020] FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of an automated receptor
tracking system according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
[0021] FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart of an automated receptor
tracking system according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] FIG. 1 illustrates an automated receptor tracking system 100
according to a preferred embodiment of the present invention. The
tracking system 100 includes a diagnostic source assembly (DSA)
110, a DSA crane 120, a crane mount 130, crane mount guide bars
140, an image receptor 150, an exam table 160, and a table top
165.
[0023] The DSA is preferably attached to the lower end of the DSA
crane 120 as illustrated in FIG. 1. The upper end of the DSA crane
120 is then preferably attached to the crane mount 130. The crane
mount 130 is held in position by the crane mount guide bars 140.
The crane mount guide bars 140 are preferably attached to the
ceiling or upper wall of a medical imaging room. Located directly
beneath the crane mount guide bars 140 on the medical imaging room
floor is the exam table 160. Attached to the top of the exam table
160 is the table top 165. Located in the exam table 160 directly
beneath the table top 165 is the image receptor 150.
[0024] In a preferred embodiment of the tracking system 100, the
DSA 110 includes position sensors to preferably detect and transmit
the lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and angular orientation of the
DSA 110. The image receptor 150 also contains position sensors to
detect and transmit the image receptor height and longitudinal
position. The position data detected by the sensors in the DSA 110
and the sensors in the image receptor 150 is preferably transmitted
to a system controller (not shown). The system controller is used
to analyze the sensor data and compute an optimal alignment
position of the image receptor 150 relative to the position of the
DSA 110 prior to taking an image. In addition to the position
sensors, the image receptor 150 also includes a motor drive (not
shown) that is used to adjust the longitudinal position of the
image receptor 150. The motor drive of the image receptor 150 is
preferably controlled by the system controller. After calculating
the optimal alignment position of the image receptor 150 relative
to the position of the DSA 110, the system controller then
transmits the optimal image receptor 150 position to the motor
drive.
[0025] In operation, a patient is preferably positioned on the
table top 165 of the exam table 160. An X-ray technician or
operator then manually positions the DSA 110 to a position suitable
for imaging the desired area of the patient. The DSA 110 is
manually positioned by physically adjusting the DSA 110 to its
intended orientation. The DSA 110 is held in its desired position
by the DSA crane 120. The DSA crane 120 allows for a full range of
motion and angular orientation of the DSA 110. The DSA 110 is
preferably manually positioned correctly by using a visual light
field projected on the patient by the DSA 110 indicating the area
of the patient to be imaged at the current position of the DSA 110.
Additional longitudinal positioning may be achieved by sliding the
crane mount 1 30 along the crane mount guide bars 140 as
illustrated in FIG. 1.
[0026] Once the operator manually positions the DSA 110, the
sensors in the DSA 110 transmit the lateral, longitudinal,
vertical, and angular orientation of the DSA 110 to the system
controller. The system controller then calculates the optimal image
receptor 150 alignment and height so that the full desired area of
the patient may be imaged without anatomical cutoff. Once the
optimal image receptor 150 alignment and height is calculated by
the system controller, the system controller transmits the optimal
alignment data to the motor drive of the image receptor 150. The
motor drive then automatically positions the image receptor 150 in
the optimal alignment and height with the DSA 110 as calculated by
the system controller. The sensors in the image receptor 150
transmit the position of the image receptor 150 to the system
controller so the system controller is able to verify that the
image receptor 150 has reached the optimal position. Once the image
receptor 150 has been optimally aligned with respect to the
position of the DSA 110, the X-ray imaging may be performed. Thus,
the tracking system 100 allows the operator to "point and shoot"
the X-ray by simply aiming the DSA 110 over the desired imaging
area of the patient. The image receptor 150 is automatically
tracked to the optimal position by the system controller and motor
drive.
[0027] If for some reason the operator wants to manually adjust the
image receptor 150 as well as the DSA 110, the motor drive of the
image receptor 150 may be disengaged. When the motor drive is
disengaged, the operator may manually position the image receptor
150 in substantially the same fashion as the manually positioned
indirect alignment system described above.
[0028] FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram 200 of an automated
receptor tracking system according to a preferred embodiment of the
present invention. The block diagram 200 includes a diagnostic
source assembly (DSA) 210 with position sensors, a system
controller 220, and an image receptor 230 with a motor drive.
[0029] In operation, the sensors in the DSA 210 preferably transmit
the lateral, longitudinal, vertical, and angular orientation of the
DSA 110 to the system controller 220. As discussed above with
reference to FIG. 1, the system controller 220 receives and
analyzes the position data from the DSA 210. Based on the position
data received from the DSA 210 when the DSA 210 is manually
positioned in the desired location, the system controller 220
calculates the optimal position for the image receptor 230. Once
the optimal position for the image receptor 230 is calculated with
respect to the position of the DSA 210, the system controller 220
sends the optimal position to the motor drive of the image receptor
230. The motor drive of the image receptor 230 then automatically
moves the image receptor 230 to the calculated position. The
sensors in the image receptor 230 transmit the position of the
image receptor 230 to the system controller so the system
controller is able to verify that the image receptor 230 has
reached the optimal position. Once the image receptor 230 has been
optimally aligned with respect to the position of the DSA 210, the
X-ray imaging may be performed.
[0030] FIG. 3 illustrates a flow chart 300 of an automated receptor
tracking system according to a preferred embodiment of the present
invention. First, at step 310, an operator manually positions the
DSA in the desired location. Then, at step 320, the system
controller calculates the optimal position for the image receptor
based the position data received from the sensors in the DSA. Next,
at step 330, the image receptor is automatically positioned in the
optimal position calculated by the system controller by the motor
drive. At step 340, the system controller verifies that the image
receptor has been positioned in the calculated optimal position
from the data received from the position sensors in the image
receptor. If the position of the image receptor is verified as
being optimal, then at step 350, the X-ray imaging is performed. If
the position of the image receptor is determined to not be optimal,
at step 360, the operator may manually override the image receptor
motor drive and manually position the image receptor. If the
position of the manually repositioned image receptor is determined
to be optimal, finally, at step 370, the X-ray imaging is
performed.
[0031] In a second embodiment of the present invention, the
tracking system 100 may be modified to allow for transverse
movement of the image receptor in addition to longitudinal and
height movements. In the second embodiment, an additional position
sensor is provided in the image receptor to track the transverse
position of the image receptor. In operation, the DSA is manually
positioned in substantially the same fashion as described above
with reference to FIG. 1. However, when the system controller
calculates the optimal alignment and height of the image receptor,
transverse positioning of the image receptor is also taken into
account. Thus, when the system controller sends the optimal
calculated position to the motor drive of the image receptor, the
motor drive may position the longitudinal position, the transverse
position, and the height of the image receptor to the calculated
location. Increasing the range of motion of the image receptor to
include transverse motion may increase the ability of the tracking
system 100 to take complete and accurate images with low
attenuation or anatomical cut-off.
[0032] In a third embodiment of the present invention, the tracking
system may be modified to allow for tilting of the image receptor.
In the third embodiment, additional position sensors may be
provided in the image receptor to track the angular tilt along the
longitudinal axis, the transverse axis, or both axes, of the image
receptor. In operation, the DSA is manually positioned in
substantially the same fashion as described above with reference to
FIG. 1. However, when the system controller calculates the optimal
alignment and height of the image receptor, angular tilt of the
image receptor may also taken into account. Thus, when the system
controller sends the optimal calculated position to the motor drive
of the image receptor, the motor drive may position the
longitudinal position, the transverse position, the height, and the
angular tilt of the image receptor to the calculated location.
Increasing the range of motion of the image receptor to include
axial tilting of the image receptor may further increase the
ability of the tracking system 100 to take complete and accurate
images with low attenuation or anatomical cut-off.
[0033] Thus, the automated receptor tracking system 100 presented
in the present invention combines the optimal alignment properties
of a direct alignment system with the flexibility of an indirect
alignment system. Additionally, the present invention presents a
positioning control system that allows for quick and precise
alignment of a diagnostic source assembly and an image receptor.
Therefore, the present invention may reduce the total imaging time
and increase cost effectiveness by reducing the number of retakes
required to obtain a satisfactory X-ray image. Reducing retakes may
also result in decreased exposure to radiation by the patient being
imaged which is healthier to the patient.
[0034] Additional information regarding the present invention may
be found in the pending patent application entitled "Imaging System
with X-ray Beam Anulation Compensation," which was filed with the
USPTO on ______ and is hereby incorporated by reference in its
entirety.
[0035] While the invention has been described with reference to a
preferred embodiment, it will be understood by those skilled in the
art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be
substituted without departing from the scope of the invention. In
addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular
situation or material to the teachings of the invention without
departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the
invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed,
but that the invention will include all embodiments falling within
the scope of the appended claims.
* * * * *