U.S. patent application number 09/975714 was filed with the patent office on 2002-08-29 for apparatus and process for concentrating a liquid sterilant and sterilizing articles therewith.
Invention is credited to Jacobs, Paul, Lin, Suz-Min, Wang, Jenn-Hann.
Application Number | 20020119075 09/975714 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 22836677 |
Filed Date | 2002-08-29 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020119075 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Jacobs, Paul ; et
al. |
August 29, 2002 |
Apparatus and process for concentrating a liquid sterilant and
sterilizing articles therewith
Abstract
A method for sterilizing a device, includes the following steps:
contacting the device with liquid sterilant outside or inside a
sterilization chamber at a first pressure, placing the device in
the chamber before or after the contacting step, and decreasing the
pressure of the chamber to a second pressure below the vapor
pressure of the liquid sterilant. At least the decrease in pressure
below about the vapor pressure of the liquid sterilant occurs at a
pumpdown rate of less than 0.8 liters per second, calculated based
on the time required to evacuate the chamber from atmospheric
pressure to 20 torr when the chamber is empty and dry.
Inventors: |
Jacobs, Paul; (Canyon,
CA) ; Lin, Suz-Min; (Laguna Hills, CA) ; Wang,
Jenn-Hann; (Mission Viejo, CA) |
Correspondence
Address: |
AUDLEY A. CIAMPORCERO JR.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
ONE JOHNSON & JOHNSON PLAZA
NEW BRUNSWICK
NJ
08933-7003
US
|
Family ID: |
22836677 |
Appl. No.: |
09/975714 |
Filed: |
October 11, 2001 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
09975714 |
Oct 11, 2001 |
|
|
|
09223479 |
Dec 30, 1998 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
422/33 ;
422/23 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61L 2/16 20130101; A61L
2202/122 20130101; A61L 2/208 20130101; A61L 2/28 20130101; A61L
2/14 20130101; A61L 2202/24 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
422/33 ;
422/23 |
International
Class: |
A61L 002/20 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of furnishing concentrated hydrogen peroxide vapor to
an article comprising the steps of: placing the article into a
chamber containing an inner atmosphere; placing a solution
comprising hydrogen peroxide and water into fluid communication
with the chamber, said solution having a ratio of hydrogen peroxide
to water; vaporizing the solution in the inner atmosphere to form
water vapor and hydrogen peroxide vapor; selectively drawing water
vapor from the chamber to increase a ratio of hydrogen peroxide to
water in the chamber; and contacting the article with the hydrogen
peroxide vapor.
2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide vapor to water vapor after the step of selectively drawing
water vapor from the chamber exceeds the ratio of hydrogen peroxide
to water in said solution.
3. A method according to claim 1 wherein the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide to water, by weight, after the step of selectively drawing
water vapor from the chamber exceeds 3 to 1.
4. A method according to claim 3 wherein the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide to water in said solution, by weight, is less than 3 to
1.
5. A method according to claim 3 wherein the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide to water in said solution, by weight, is less than
3:2.
6. A method according to claim 3 wherein the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide to water, by weight, after the step of selectively drawing
water vapor from the chamber exceeds 4 to 1.
7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of selectively
drawing water vapor from the chamber comprises placing said
solution within a diffusion restricted environment in fluid
communication with the chamber during the step of vaporizing the
solution.
8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the diffusion restricted
environment is more diffusion restricted during the step of
selectively drawing water vapor from the chamber than during a
portion of the step of vaporizing the solution during which the
hydrogen peroxide is vaporizing at a faster rate than the
water.
9. A method according to claim 7 wherein the water vapor is drawn
from the chamber through one or more exhaust ports and wherein the
one or more exhaust ports are physically remote from the diffusion
restriction.
10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of selectively
drawing water vapor from the chamber comprises the steps of
controlling the temperature and pressure of the solution during the
step of vaporizing the solution to enhance vaporization of the
water from solution versus vaporization of hydrogen peroxide and
extracting at least a portion of the water vapor from the
chamber.
11. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of selectively
drawing water vapor from the chamber comprises the steps of
maintaining the solution at a pressure below the vapor pressure of
the water in the solution and above the vapor pressure of the
hydrogen peroxide in the solution.
12. A method according to claim 1 wherein the solution is vaporized
by pumping a portion of the atmosphere out of the chamber to lower
the pressure of the chamber at a rate selected to control removal
of the water and hydrogen peroxide from the solution so as to
concentrate the hydrogen peroxide remaining in the chamber.
13. A method according to claim 1 wherein the temperature of the
solution during the vaporizing step is held below the temperature
of the atmosphere in the chamber whereby to increase the vapor
pressure of the water in the solution relative to the hydrogen
peroxide in the solution whereby to enhance vaporization of the
water from the solution in preference to vaporizing the hydrogen
peroxide from the solution.
14. A method according to claim 10 wherein the temperature of the
atmosphere in the chamber is above room temperature and the
temperature of the solution during the vaporizing step is at least
10.degree. C. below the temperature of the atmosphere in the
chamber.
15. A method according to claim 13 wherein the solution is
vaporized in a vaporizer which is in fluid communication with the
chamber and wherein the vaporizer is thermally isolated from the
chamber.
16. A method according to claim 1 and further comprising the steps
of controlling the temperature and pressure of the solution during
a least a first portion of the vaporizing step so as to selectively
vaporize water from the solution and concentrate hydrogen peroxide
therein to form a concentrated solution and during a second portion
of the vaporizing step raising the temperature of the concentrated
solution and vaporizing the concentrated solution.
17. A method according to claim 1 and further comprising the steps
of controlling the temperature and pressure of the solution during
a least a first portion of the vaporizing step so as to selectively
vaporize water from the solution and concentrate hydrogen peroxide
therein to form a concentrated solution and during a second portion
of the vaporizing step not withdrawing atmosphere from the
chamber.
18. A method according to claim 1 and further comprising the step
of drying the chamber prior to the step of vaporizing the
solution.
19. A method according to claim 12 wherein the step of drying the
chamber comprises pumping a portion of the atmosphere out of the
chamber.
20. A method according to claim 12 wherein the step of drying the
chamber comprises applying energy to excite molecules of liquid
water within the chamber into the gaseous or plasma state of matter
and pumping a portion of the atmosphere out of the chamber.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a process for sterilization
of medical instruments using a liquid sterilant. More particularly,
the invention relates to a process in which sterilization is
achieved by concentrating a liquid sterilant such as hydrogen
peroxide solution inside of a sterilization chamber and sterilizing
articles therewith.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Medical instruments have traditionally been sterilized using
either heat, such as is provided by steam, or a chemical, such as
formaldehyde or ethylene oxide in the gas or vapor state. Each of
these methods has its drawbacks. Many medical devices such as
fiberoptic devices, endoscopes, power tools, etc., are sensitive to
heat, moisture or both. Formaldehyde and ethylene oxide are both
toxic gases that pose a potential hazard to healthcare workers.
Problems with ethylene oxide are particularly severe, because its
use requires long aeration times to remove the gas from articles
that have been sterilized. This lengthens the sterilization cycle
time undesirably.
[0003] Sterilization using liquid hydrogen peroxide solution has
been found to require high concentrations of sterilant, extended
exposure time and/or elevated temperatures. However, sterilization
using hydrogen peroxide vapor has been shown to have some
advantages over other chemical sterilization processes (see, e.g.,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,169,123 and 4,169,124 which are incorporated
herein by reference). The combination of hydrogen peroxide with a
plasma provides certain additional advantages, as disclosed in U.S.
Pat. No. 4,643,876 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Commercially available sterilization devices, such as the
STERRAD.RTM. sterilization systems sold by Advanced Sterilization
Systems division of Ethicon, Inc. automate the process of injecting
a solution of hydrogen peroxide into a sterilization chamber,
vaporizing the solution to provide a hydrogen peroxide vapor,
contacting articles to be sterilized with the vapor, and exciting
the vapor into the plasma stage. The hydrogen peroxide for each
sterilization cycle is shipped to the location of the sterilization
system, generally by air or ground transportation. Preferably, as
in the case with the STERRAD.RTM. brand systems, premeasured
amounts of a hydrogen peroxide and water solution are provided in
sealed enclosure, such as a capsule inside of a cassette housing
which can be automatically opened by the system to reduce contact
between the system user and the hydrogen peroxide solution. Such
cassettes are described more fully in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,817,800 and
4,899,519 incorporated herein by reference.
[0004] The sterilization of articles containing
diffusion-restricted areas, such as long narrow lumens, presents a
special challenge. Methods that use hydrogen peroxide vapor that
has been generated from an aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide
have certain disadvantages. One disadvantage is that because water
has a higher vapor pressure than hydrogen peroxide, it will
vaporize faster. Another disadvantage is that because of its lower
molecular weight, water will diffuse faster than hydrogen peroxide
in the vapor state. Because of these physical properties, when an
aqueous solution of hydrogen peroxide is vaporized in the area
surrounding the items to be sterilized, the water reaches the items
first and in higher concentration. The water vapor inhibits
penetration of hydrogen peroxide vapor into diffusion-restricted
areas, such as small crevices and long narrow lumens. Simply
employing a more concentrated solution of hydrogen peroxide fails
to adequately address the problem due to the difficulty in handling
highly concentrated hydrogen peroxide solutions. Transportation of
such solutions can be particularly difficult. In general, such
solutions are limited to concentrations of less than 60% hydrogen
peroxide, however, regulations and the like regarding such
concentrations may of course be modified in the future. In any
event, shipping and handling of highly concentrated solutions
remains impractical.
[0005] U.S. Pat. No. 4,952,370 discloses a sterilization process in
which aqueous hydrogen peroxide vapor is first condensed on the
article to be sterilized, followed by application of a vacuum to
the sterilization chamber to remove the water and hydrogen peroxide
from the article. This method is suitable for surface
sterilization, but not for sterilization of diffusion-restricted
areas such as long narrow lumens because it depends on the
diffusion of hydrogen peroxide vapor into the lumen to effect
sterilization.
[0006] U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,414 discloses a process in which a
vessel containing a small amount of a vaporizable liquid sterilant
solution is attached to a lumen, and the sterilant vaporizes and
flows directly into the lumen of the article as the pressure is
reduced during the sterilization cycle. This system has the
advantage that the water and hydrogen peroxide vapor are pulled
through the lumen by the existing pressure differential, increasing
the sterilization rate for lumens, but has the disadvantage that
the vessel needs to be attached to each lumen to be sterilized. In
addition, water is vaporized faster and precedes the hydrogen
peroxide vapor into the lumen.
[0007] In U.S. Pat. No. 5,492,672, there is disclosed a process for
sterilizing narrow lumens. This process uses a multicomponent
sterilant vapor and requires successive alternating periods of flow
of sterilant vapor and discontinuance of such flow. A complex
apparatus is used to accomplish the method. Because flow through of
vapor is used, closed end lumens are not readily sterilized in the
process.
[0008] U.S. Pat. No. 4,744,951 to Cummings attempts to address this
problem by providing a separate prechamber connected to the
sterilization chamber. Hydrogen peroxide is first admitted to the
prechamber where it is concentrated in a distillation procedure
employing the differing vapor pressures of hydrogen peroxide and
water. Water's higher vapor pressure allows one to select a
vaporization pressure which selectively vaporizes water from a
hydrogen peroxide solution, thus concentrating the solution.
Cummings pumps air out of the prechamber and lowers its pressure to
a level at which the the water preferentially vaporizes from the
hydrogen peroxide solution. The pump which is evacuating the
prechamber draws out the water vapor thus released from solution to
concentrate the remaining solution. To prevent the water vapor from
traveling into the narrow spaces such as endoscope lumens, Cummings
carries out the concentration process in the prechamber. This adds
complexity be requiring additional chambers, pumps and valves.
[0009] Those of skill in the art, both in Cummings day, and now,
would not think to employ such a concentration process in the same
chamber as the sterilization occurs due to the problem of water
vapor rushing to occlude the narrow lumens. In fact, the theory
predicts that such a process would sterilize lumens less well than
by simply vaporizing all of the hydrogen peroxide solution at once,
because the slow vaporization would more efficiently block the
lumen with water vapor. However, the present inventors have
suprisingly found that concentrating the hydrogen peroxide vapor
within the sterilization chamber greatly increases the ability to
sterilize long narrow lumens over the convential process of
essentially vaporizing all of the hydrogen peroxide at once.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a chamber and accessories
suitable for use in the hydrogen peroxide sterilization process of
the invention.
[0011] FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a chamber, pump and
throttle valve for use in the hydrogen peroxide sterilization
process of the invention.
[0012] FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a system with one pump and
two valves, one valve having a larger pump vacuum line for quicker
pumpdown and one having a smaller vacuum line for slower
pumpdown.
[0013] FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a single valve
sterilization system having two pumps, one for slower pumpdown and
one for quicker pumpdown.
[0014] FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a system with two pumps and
two valves, one pump for slower pumpdown and one for quicker
pumpdown.
[0015] FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of a system with a
vaporizer.
[0016] FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a system with an
alternative vaporizer.
[0017] FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a system with a further
alternative vaporizer.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0018] Sterilizing the inside of lumened devices has always posed a
challenge to sterilization systems. Copending U.S. application No.
08/628,965, the entire contents of which are hereby incorporated by
reference, discloses a method of hydrogen peroxide vapor
sterilization of diffusion-restricted environments, such as long
narrow lumens, at pressures less than the vapor pressure of
hydrogen peroxide by pretreating the article to be sterilized with
a dilute solution of hydrogen peroxide prior to exposure to a
vacuum. U.S. Pat. No. 5,851,485, incorporated herein by reference,
controls the pumpdown rate.
[0019] An apparatus useful in the process of the present invention
is shown schematically in FIGS. 1 and 2 and comprises a chamber 2,
a throttle valve 4 and a pump 6. In FIG. 2, the chamber 2 is
attached to the pump 6 by the throttle valve 4. The valve 4 can be
controlled either automatically or manually to maintain the
pressure. In the automatic mode of operation, the throttle valve 4
opens based on the pressure in the chamber via a pressure
transducer and valve controller. Such valves are commercially
available from, for example, MKS (Andover, Md.).
[0020] Hydrogen peroxide can be introduced into the system in any
fashion. In one emobdiment, a dilute, aqueous solution of hydrogen
peroxide is placed in wells 8 as shown in FIG. 1. The aqueous
solution of hydrogen peroxide can also be placed within the lumen
of long narrow objects to be sterilized. As the pressure in the
sterilization chamber 2 is reduced, the hydrogen peroxide vaporizes
and contacts the surface to be sterilized (i.e., colonoscope 10 in
FIG. 1) which is placed on metal grid 12 which rests on tray 14. In
a preferred embodiment, the tray can be configured with a plurality
of wells designed to retain a known volume of liquid sterilant. In
one embodiment, the volume of sterilization chamber 2 is about 18.5
liters and its dimensions are about 22" (55.9 cm).times.4.25" (10.8
cm).times.12" (30.5 cm).
[0021] FIG. 3 illustrates a parallel two-valve arrangement for use
in the sterilization process of the invention. In this embodiment,
the chamber 2 is in fluid communication with the pump 6 via valves
16 and 18. Valve 16 mediates the initial rapid evacuation, the
first step of a two step evacuation process. Valve 18 mediates slow
evacuation, the second step of the process, which ensures maximal
contact of the article to be sterilized with the vaporized aqueous
hydrogen peroxide. The pumpdown rate can be controlled by the
pumping speed and/or the percent opening of the valve. Either valve
can be used to maintain the pressure. In practice, controlling the
process so that all of the water evaporates before any of the
hydrogen peroxide evaporates is very difficult, yet the
preferential evaporation and elimination of water vapor from the
system effectively concentrates the hydrogen peroxide therein
without the attendant complexity of shipping and handling
concentrated hydrogen peroxide solutions prior to vaporization.
[0022] As the water evaporates from solution its voume greatly
increases thus raising the pressure in the system and requiring
additional pumping to extract the water vapor to maintain the
pressure between the two vapor pressures. Also, the vapor pressures
change with changing conditions within the chamber.
[0023] FIG. 4 illustrates a sterilization apparatus having two
pumps 20 and 22, and one valve 4. Pump 20 allows quicker pumpdown
of the chamber 2, while pump 22 allows slower pumpdown. FIG. 5
illustrates an alternate configuration having two valves 24 and 26
in fluid communication with the pumps 20 and 22, respectively.
[0024] Regardless of which configuration is used, hydrogen peroxide
can be introduced into the chamber as a liquid. In one preferred
embodiment, hydrogen peroxide is introduced as a vapor and the
chamber parameters are changed so that the vapor condenses as a
liquid on the surface of interior of an article to be sterilized.
Such changes include increasing the pressure.
[0025] The aqueous solutions of hydrogen peroxide can be relatively
dilute, e.g. as low as 1-6% peroxide by weight, since sterilization
is not achieved through contact with the hydrogen peroxide
solution, but rather is achieved at low temperatures (preferably
15.degree.-80.degree. C., more preferably 20.degree.-60.degree. C.,
still more preferably 40.degree.-55.degree. C.) and in short
periods of time (preferably less than one hour, and more preferably
less than one-half hour) upon exposure to hydrogen peroxide under
vacuum. The method of the present invention is particularly
effective with articles having inaccessible or hard-to-reach
places. Such articles include long, narrow lumens, hinges and other
articles having spaces where diffusion of vapors is restricted.
Although hydrogen peroxide is used in the examples described
herein, the use of other liquid sterilants which have vapor
pressures lower than the vapor pressure of the solvent in which
they are provided are also contemplated. Such sterilants include,
for example, aqueous peracetic acid solution and aqueous
glutaraldehyde solution.
[0026] Preferably, the article to be sterilized is contacted with
sterilant prior to the vaporization step to localize at least some
of the vaporization in the diffusion restricted areas. Such
contacting can be accomplished either directly or indirectly.
Direct contacting includes methods such as static soaking, flow
through, aerosol spray, condensation of a vapor. Any other methods
involving physically contacting the articles to be sterilized with
sterilant would be considered direct contacting. Indirect
contacting includes those methods in which sterilant is introduced
into the chamber, but not directly on or in the articles to be
sterilized.
[0027] At the end of the process, deep vacuum can be used to remove
residual sterilant. A plasma can also be used to both enhance
sterilization efficacy and to remove residual sterilant.
[0028] The pumps shown schematically in the figures can be any
commercially available pump. Two preferred pumps are from Leybold
Vacuum Products, Inc. (Export, Pa.) (Model D16A, pump rate=400
liters/min) and KNF Neuberger, Inc. (Trenton, N.J., Model N740,
pump rate=45 liters/min). The Leybold pump can reach a pressure of
less than 0.1 torr and the KNF pump can reach a pressure of less
than 10 torr.
[0029] For certain substrates being sterilized, such as nylon or
polyurethane, excess hydrogen peroxide in the system may leave a
residual which is difficult to remove. In order to avoid an excess
residual, the vapor concentration of hydrogen peroxide is
preferably kept below 30 mg/l, more preferably less than 20 mg/l,
and more preferably still less than 15 mg/l. If higher vapor
concentrations of hydrogen peroxide are desired, excess residual
can be removed using a gas plasma. When using substrates such as
stainless steel, polyethylene or polypropylene, which do not retain
a residual, there is no reason to limit to the amount of peroxide
which can be present in the vapor phase in the system during
sterilization.
[0030] To further reduce water within the system, the chamber 2 may
be dried prior to the introduction of hydrogen peroxide. Many means
may be employed to drive water out of the chamber. Primarily, this
is accomplished by vaporizing the water and pumping it out of the
chamber. The vaporization can be accomplished with heat, plasma
induction, vacuum or the like, either alone or in combination.
Merely drawing a vacuum prior to introducing the hydrogen peroxide
accomplishes a benficial drying of the chamber 2. If the chamber 2
is heated during this process and if a high energy electromagnetic
field is applied to urge the water into the plasma stage the drying
is enhanced. U.S. Pat. No. 5,656,238 issued on Aug. 12, 1997 to
Spencer at al. and incorporated herein by reference teaches such
techniques in more detail.
[0031] Vaporization of the hydrogen peroxide can be achieved using
well known methods as described above; FIGS. 6 to 8 show several
new preferred methods. In FIG. 6, a chamber 30 is evacuated by a
pump 32 separated from the chamber 30 by a throttle valve 34. A
vaporizer 36 comprises a housing 38 in fluid communication with the
chamber 30 and into which extends a liquid feeding nozzle 40 from
outside of the chamber 32. A cup 42 within the housing 38 receives
hydrogen peroxide from the nozzle 40. The hydrogen peroxide can be
vaporized as it exits the nozzle 40, or more preferably in a
controlled fashion from the cup 42 by controlling the temperature
of the cup 42 and the pressure in the chamber 30. Temperature
control of the cup 42 can be as simple as thermally isolating it
from the chamber 30, or a more active control system can be
employed such a cooling coil or the like to maintain the cup 42 at
a desired low temperature. Preferably, the entire vaporizer 36 is
thermally isolated from the chamber 30 or temperature controlled in
some fashion. Lower temperatures of vaporization enhance the
preferential vaporization of water by exploiting the larger
difference between the vapor pressures of water and hydrogen
peroxide at lower temperatures. Creating a diffusion restriction 44
between the vaporizer 36 and chamber 30 enhances the preferential
extraction of water vapor from the chamber as water vapor will more
easily traverse the diffusion restriction and be pumped out of the
chamber during the vaporization process. The diffusion restriction
44 may be simply reducing the clearance between the cup 42 and
housing 38 through with the vapor must travel to reach the chamber
30.
[0032] FIG. 7 shows a similar chamber 50, pump 52 and valve 54 with
modified vaporizer 56. The vaporizer 56 comprises a chamber 58
separated from the chamber 50 by a diffusion restriction 60, such
as a permeable membrane. Liquid hydrogen peroxide solution enters
the chamber 58 through a valve 62. FIG. 8 illustrates a similar
arrangement with a chamber 70, pump 72, valve 74, and vaporizer 76
with a chamber 78 and valved hydrogen peroxide solution inlet 80.
Restriction of the diffusion between the vaporizer chamber 78 and
main chamber 70 is variable. During initial vaporization when
primarily water is vaporizing the vapors pass through a tight
diffusion restriction 82. After the concentration of the hydrogen
peroxide solution reaches a given level a valve 84 may be opened to
speed the vaporization and diffusion of the concentrated hydrogen
peroxide solution.
[0033] Preferably, the temperature in the chamber is no less than
5.degree. C. nor more than 150.degree. C., with the range of 50 to
65.degree. C. being preferred, and the pressure should be no less
than 0.01 torr, nor typically greater than atmosphere during the
process, with the lowest vacuum being typically 0.4 torr and the
diffusion pressure preferably being between 2 and 10 torr, although
other conditions within the spirit of the invention will be
apparent to those of skill in the art. During the concentration
stage, the pressure should not fall below 0.5 torr. Shorter overall
cycles are preferred for convenience, with 5 minutes being a
desirable goal, but longer times upwards of 6 hours or more may be
warranted in some circumstances.
[0034] Tables 1 and 2 illustrate the effectiveness of the present
invention. The experiments were run on a chamber of 73 liters at
45.degree. C. with 1780 mg of hydrogen peroxide 59% solution. The
diffuser is separated from the chamber by 12 2 mm diameter holes to
effect diffusion restriction.
1 TABLE 1 Test Conditions Normal Process New Process Step Test A
Test B Test C Test D Test E 1 Open valve Open valve Open valve Open
valve Open valve 2 Vacuum to Inject H.sub.2O.sub.2 at 1 Vacuum to
30 torr Vacuum to 0.3 Vacuum to 0.3 0.3 torr atm torr torr 3 Close
valve vaporization & Inject H.sub.2O.sub.2 at 30 Inject
H.sub.2O.sub.2 at Close valve diffusion torr 0.3 torr 4 Inject
H.sub.2O.sub.2 at Vacuum to about Vaporization & Vaporization
& Inject H2O2 at 0.3 torr 2 torr diffusion diffusion 0.3 torr 5
Vaporization Close valve Vacuum to about 2 Vacuum to Vaporization
& & diffusion torr about 2 torr diffusion 6 Vent to 1 atm
Vaporization & Close valve Close valve Open valve diffusion 7
Vent to 1 atm Vaporization & Vaporization & Vacuum to
diffusion diffusion about 2 torr 8 Vent to 1 atm Vent to 1 atm
Close valve Vaporization & diffusion 9 Vent to 1 atm
[0035]
2 TABLE 2 Sterility test results (positives/samples) Normal Process
New Process Lumen size Test A Test B Test C Test D Test E 1 .times.
400 mm 2/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 1 .times. 350 mm 2/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 1
.times. 300 mm 2/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 0/2 1 .times. 250 mm 2/2 0/2 0/2 0/2
0/2
[0036] Monitoring of the temperature, pressure and hydrogen
peroxide conditions within the chamber 30 (FIG. 6) allows the
process to be controlled more precisely. Preferably, an automated
control system, preferably employing a computer processer, recieves
inputs of the temperature, pressure and perhaps also the hydrogen
peroxide concentration and calculates the optimal pressure at which
to maintain the chamber to remove the water from the hydrogen
peroxide solution and from the chamber 30. It can also determine
when the solution is sufficiently concentrated. For instance, it
may be desired to only concentrate the solution to a certain degree
so as to minimize the loss of hydrogen peroxide from the chamber,
thereby minimizing hydrogen peroxide emissions from the chamber.
While preferentially vaporizing the water from the solution, some
hydrogen peroxide will also vaporize. Accordingly, one may wish to
balance the efficient use of the quantity of hydrogen peroxide
within the solution against the goal of eliminating all water from
the solution and the chamber. By monitoring the ratio of water and
peroxide the vapor phase, the valve 34 can be controlled to remove
the vapor until the desired ratio is achieved. The ratio can be
determined using a hydrogen peroxide monitor and a moisture
monitor, or by using a hydrogen peroxide monitor and a pressure
sensor and then calculating the water using the PVRT equation and
making the assumption that water and peroxide are essentially the
only gases within the chamber 34.
[0037] It is known that certain spectra of light passing through
the chamber can be measured to determine the hydrogen peroxide
concentration. One particular method is disclosed in co-pending
U.S. application No. 08/970,925 filed Nov. 14, 1997, incorporated
herein by reference.
[0038] Table 3 illustrates the effects of the ratio of hydrogen
peroxide vapor to water vapor in the chamber 30 on the ability to
sterilize long narrow lumens or other diffusion restricted
environments. Water vapor was first introduced into the system and
then essentially pure hydrogen peroxide vapor was introduced by
liberation from a solid form. The lower concentrations of water
show no failures, whereas with the higher ratio in the last column
the efficacy decreased and in one test 3 out of 3 samples failed.
Table 4 shows similar results by comparing a sterilization process
in which the concentration of hydrogen peroxide is not increased
according to the present invention with a process in which it is
increased. Table 5 shows the degree of concentration achieved
according to the present invention. By monitoring the concentration
(i.e. the ratio of hydrogen peroxide to water) during the
sterilization cycle it should be possible to achieve the long
sought goal of parametric release. One could be assured that if the
proper concentration was maintained for a sufficient period of time
that a particular load of instruments placed within the chamber 30
and sterilized according to the present invention then the process
would be sufficiently predictable so as to allow the load to be
released for use without further checking with a biological
indicator. Typically, such processes always employ a biological
indicator in the load, such as with a test load of microorganisms,
which is then checked to ensure that sufficient sterilization has
been achieved to kill all of the test microorganisms. With
parametric release the time consuming process of biological
indicators can be skipped.
3TABLE 3 Effect of water to peroxide ratio on efficacy Efficacy
with Bacllius subtilis var. niger on SS blade in 3 mm .times. 500
mm LTU in 173 L chamber Sterility results (positives/samples)
Diffusion time 0.653 mg/L H.sub.2O 3.266 mg/L H.sub.2O 6.532 mg/L
H.sub.2O (minutes) 6 mg/L H.sub.2O.sub.2 6 mg/L H.sub.2O.sub.2 6
mg/L H.sub.2O.sub.2 5 0/3 0/3 3/3 10 0/3 0/3 2/3 15 0/3 0/3 0/3 30
0/3 0/3 0/3
[0039]
4TABLE 4 (A) Effect of water to peroxide ratio on efficacy 59%
solution Sterility results positives/samples Without concentrating
process With concentrating process Lumen Dimension 8.43 mg/L
H.sub.2O 1.49 mg/L H.sub.2O (Diameter) .times. (length) 12 mg/L
H.sub.2O.sub.2 7.3 mg/L H.sub.2O.sub.2 1 .times. 400 mm 2/2 0/2 1
.times. 350 mm 2/2 0/2 1 .times. 300 mm 2/2 0/2 1 .times. 250 mm
2/2 0/2
[0040]
5TABLE 5 Concentrating the 59% peroxide solution Ratio of peroxide
to water After all Before Right after peroxide concentrating
concentrating vaporize Vaporization in vaporizer 1.4:1 19:1 none
Vaporization in chamber <1.4:1 0.85:1 4.9:1
[0041] The process may be further enhanced by admitting sufficient
hydrogen peroxide into the system so as to force some of the
vaporized solution to condense upon the instruments being
sterilized within the system. As described above, the solution can
be vaporized by admitting it into the system at any pressure above
the vapor pressures of water and hydrogen peroxide in the solution
and then vaporized by reducing the pressure, or by admitting the
solution at a pressure substantially below these vapor pressures
whereupon it will start to vaporize thus releasing gas and
increasing the pressure. In the second scenario if the pressure is
then further reduced by pumping the concentration of the hydrogen
peroxide in the system can be increased. This is especially true if
the pressure rises to a level at least above the vapor pressure of
hydrogen peroxide thereby limiting further vaporization of hydrogen
peroxide from solution and perhaps encouraging some of the hydrogen
peroxide to condense upon objects such as instruments within the
system. Some of the water vapor would likely also condense in such
event. By controlling the pressure excess water vapor would be
exhausted from the system and then the condensed solution would
re-vaporize. To the extent that such solution had condensed within
diffusion restricted areas the re-vaporization therein would
further increase the concentration in the those areas to enhance
the sterilization efficacy therein. The quantity of solution
admitted will primarily determine the pressure rise to initiate
such condensaation. The process is described in more detail in our
co-pending application entitled "Sterilization of
Diffusion-Restricted Area by Re-Vaporizing the Condensed Vapor"
filed contemporaneously herewith.
[0042] A typical cycle might comprise placing a load of instruments
(not shown) within a CSR wrapped tray within the chamber 30 and
then drawing a vacuum on the chamber 30 with the pump 32 down to
below 1 torr or about 0.4 torr. An electromagnetic field applied to
the chamber 30 at such time tends to drive any remaining water into
the vapor or plasma stage so that it can be removed by the pump 32.
The pump 32 can be cycled or merely run continuously with the valve
34 controlling the vacuum process. Fresh dry air may be admitted to
the chamber 30 including raising of the pressure back to
atmosphere. Preferably the hydrogen peroxide solution, preferably a
59% hydrogen peroxide solution, is admitted to the vaporizer 36 at
atmospheric pressure and then the pump 32 exhausts the chamber 30
to a level at which the solution begins to vaporize. A monitor 100
for hydrogen peroxide vapor and monitor 102 (see FIG. 6) for water
vapor in connection with an automated control system 104 can be
employed to optimize the pressure conditions to enhance the initial
vaporization and exhaust of water vapor. After the solution is
sufficiently concentrated the pressure in the chamber 30 can be
further lowered to vaporize the remaining solution. The valve 32 is
closed to isolate the chamber 30, and the vaporized hydrogen
peroxide solution is allowed to diffuse throughout the chamber to
contact the instruments. Additional dry air or other gas can be
admitted at this time to help push the sterizing vapors into
diffusion restricted areas, with the chamber 30 then further
exhausted to resume a vacuum in the range of 2 to 10 torr.
Additional admissions of air and vacuum can be employed, especially
in connection with additional admission and concentration of
hydrogen peroxide solutions. After the hydrogen peroxide vapors
have diffused throughout the chamber for a sufficient time aan
electromagnetic field may be applied to drive the vapor into the
plasma stage and effect further steilization. When the field is
removed the ions formed from the hydrogen peroxide recombine as
water and oxygen, leaving little residual hydrogen peroxide. The
chamber can be raised to atmospheric pressure and the load
removed.
[0043] It should be noted that the present invention is not limited
to only those embodiments described in the Detailed Description.
Any embodiment which retains the spirit of the present invention
should be considered to be within its scope. However, the invention
is only limited by the scope of the following claims.
* * * * *