U.S. patent application number 09/752256 was filed with the patent office on 2002-07-04 for distributed real time catalog-based annotation and documentation system for cardiology procedures.
Invention is credited to Kiser, Ewin Michael, Stoycos, Stephen T..
Application Number | 20020087092 09/752256 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 25025548 |
Filed Date | 2002-07-04 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020087092 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Stoycos, Stephen T. ; et
al. |
July 4, 2002 |
Distributed real time catalog-based annotation and documentation
system for cardiology procedures
Abstract
A distributed multi-user system for real time data access during
cardiology procedures. The system includes an interactive computer
network which can be used to simultaneously display and manipulate
data from a cardiology procedure on a plurality of devices and at a
plurality of locations. The study can be displayed and annotated at
any of the plurality of locations, which may be local or remote,
during the procedure. A catalog, including a list of studies, may
be selected by a client workstation. Once a study is selected from
the catalog, the client workstation is dynamically directed to the
study. The study can be displayed and annotated at any of the
plurality of locations, which may be local or remote, during the
procedure. Annotations made at one of the plurality of locations
will be passed back to the acquisition station and may be accessed
by at any of the plurality of locations.
Inventors: |
Stoycos, Stephen T.;
(Sugarland, TX) ; Kiser, Ewin Michael; (Katy,
TX) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Patrick S. Yoder
Fletcher, Yoder & Van Someren
P.O. Box 692289
Houston
TX
77269-2289
US
|
Family ID: |
25025548 |
Appl. No.: |
09/752256 |
Filed: |
December 29, 2000 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
600/523 ;
600/510 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61B 5/24 20210101; A61B
5/002 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
600/523 ;
600/510 |
International
Class: |
A61B 005/04 |
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of annotating a study record during a cardiac
catheterization procedure, the procedure being conducted in a
cardiac catheterization lab, the cardiac catheterization lab
including one or more acquisition workstations configured to
acquire study data from the heart of a patient, comprising the acts
of: (a) acquiring study data from the heart of a patient; (b)
separating the study data into waveform data and file data; (c)
storing the waveform data in an acquisition storage device and a
first server storage device; (d) storing the file data in an
acquisition database and a first server database, wherein a pointer
is maintained in the acquisition database, corresponding to the
waveform data file path; (e) cataloging the study data collected by
the acquisition workstation in an acquisition workstation catalog;
(f) cataloging the study data stored in the first server storage
device in a first server storage device catalog; (g) concurrently
editing the study data by selecting a study from the first server
catalog; (h) accessing the file data in the acquisition database
from a client workstation; (i) accessing the waveform data in the
first server acquisition storage device from the client
workstation; (j) annotating the file data at the client workstation
to produce annotated file data; (k) transmitting the annotated file
data from the client workstation to the acquisition database; and
(l) overwriting the file data with the annotated file data.
2. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the catheterization
procedure comprises a electrophysiology procedure.
3. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the catheterization
procedure comprises an ablation procedure.
4. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the first server
storage device is located locally with respect to the cardiac
catheterization lab.
5. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the client
workstation comprises a monitor configured to display digital
data.
6. The method, as set forth in claim 1, wherein the act of storing
the waveform data in the first server storage device takes place
via a low priority background thread.
7. The method, as set forth in claim 1, further comprising
simultaneously displaying the data on the plurality of client
workstations.
8. The method, as set forth in claim 7, wherein the act comprises
simultaneously displaying the data on the plurality of client
workstations during the cardiac catheterization procedure.
9. The method, as set forth in claim 8, wherein at least one of the
plurality of client workstations is located remotely with respect
to the cardiac catheterization lab.
10. The method, as set forth in claim 8, wherein the act of
simultaneously displaying the data on the plurality of client
workstations occurs in real time.
11. A method of dynamically directing a client workstation to an
acquisition database, comprising the acts of: (a) selecting a
catalog comprising a list of studies, the studies being obtained
during a catheterization procedure; (b) selecting a study from the
catalog; and (c) dynamically linking the client workstation to the
database corresponding to the selected study.
12. The method, as set forth in claim 11, wherein the client
workstation comprises a remote client workstation.
13. The method, as set forth in claim 11, wherein the client
workstation comprises a local client workstation.
14. The method, as set forth in claim 11, further comprising the
act of annotating the selected study.
15. The method, as set forth in claim 11, wherein the method of
dynamically directing a client workstation to an acquisition
database occurs during the catheterization procedure in which the
selected study is obtained.
16. A system comprising: a device configured to perform an
electrophysiology procedure and further configured to produce data
as a result of the electrophysiology procedure; one or more data
acquisition workstations coupled to the device and configured to
acquire data produced during the electrophysiology procedure; a
first server storage device coupled to the one or more data
acquisition workstations; one or more client workstations coupled
to the first server storage device and configured to annotate the
data produced during the electrophysiology procedure; and a catalog
stored on the first server storage device, the catalog comprising a
list of studies obtained during an electrophysiology procedure and
configured such that selection of a study from the list by the one
or more client workstations dynamically links the client
workstation to the selected study.
17. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein at least one of
the one or more client workstations is located remotely with
respect to the cardiac catheterization lab.
18. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein each of the one
or more client workstations comprises a monitor configured to
display digital data.
19. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the studies are
stored on the one ore more data acquisition workstations.
20. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the catalog
comprises a filepath associated with each of the studies, each
filepath providing the storage location of an associated study.
21. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the one or more
client workstations are configured to annotate the data during the
electrophysiology procedure.
22. The system, as set forth in claim 21, wherein the annotated
data is accessible to each of the one or more client workstations
immediately subsequent to the annotation of the data.
23. The system, as set forth in claim 16, wherein the fist server
storage device is located locally with respect to the one or more
acquisition workstations.
24. The system, as set forth in claim 16, further comprising a
second storage device coupled to the first server storage device
and configured to store study data after the electrophysiology
procedure and annotation of the data has been completed.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] 1. Field Of The Invention
[0002] The present invention relates generally to a distributed
multi-user system for real time data access during cardiology
procedures and, more particularly, to an interactive computer
network which can be used to simultaneously display and annotate
data from a cardiology procedure on a plurality of devices and at a
plurality of locations during a cardiology procedure.
[0003] 2. Background Of The Related Art
[0004] State of the art test and treatment facilities are essential
to providing accurate monitoring, diagnoses, and treatment of heart
disease. Medical facilities are often equipped to monitor and
diagnose both mechanical and electrical defects in the heart. The
present system relates to the monitoring of the heart's electrical
activity.
[0005] The heart is a muscle and, like other muscles, it contracts
when it is electrically stimulated. Unlike other muscles, however,
the heart has its own electrical system which can generate
electrical impulses to stimulate the contraction of the muscle and
thus keep the heart beating in rhythmic sequence so blood is
continually pumped throughout the body.
[0006] An electrophysiology study (EPS) is an invasive test
involving the monitoring of the electrical signals in the heart.
When defects in the heart tissue interfere with the normal
formation or conduction of the heart's electrical activity,
abnormal heart rhythms, known as cardiac arrhythmias, may develop.
Cardiac arrhythmias may be caused by congenital defects, tissue
damage due to heart attacks, or diseases such as arteriosclerosis
(the deposition of fatty substances in the inner layer of the
arteries) for instance, which accelerate, delay, or redirect the
transmission of electrical activity, thereby disrupting the normal
rhythmic contractions of the chambers of the heart. The
electrophysiology study is used to assist in evaluating cardiac
arrhythmias.
[0007] The basic electrophysiology procedure involves the recording
and pacing of electrical signals within localized areas of the
heart. During this study, catheters are placed near critical areas
of the heart to record the heart's electrical signals. The heart is
paced in various ways to study the speed and location of the flow
of electricity within the heart. Typically, the study is used to
determine if the heart has a tendency to pump faster or slower than
normal and if the rhythm is dangerously irregular and thus requires
treatment. Therapies for various rhythm disorders include
medication, catheter ablation of the pathway, pacemakers, and
defibrillators.
[0008] Tachycardia is an arrythmia characterized by an abnormally
fast heart rate (more than one-hundred beats per minute).
Tachycardia falls into two categories, ventricular tachycardia (VT)
and supra-ventricular tachycardia (SVT). VT is tachycardia that
originates in the ventricles of the heart. SVT originates in the
atria or at the junction between the atria and the ventricles of
the heart. VT is a potentially life-threatening condition caused by
either abnormally rapid impulse formation or by slow ventricular
conduction which interferes with the heart's normal electrical
activity and causes abnormally frequent contractions in the
ventricles. Rapid ventricular contractions often result in
significantly reduced cardiac output due to the inefficient pumping
of the blood from the heart. As a result, the body receives an
inadequate supply of oxygen which may cause dizziness,
unconsciousness, cardiac arrest, or death.
[0009] Patients suspected of suffering from VT are initially
screened by a cardiologist (doctor specializing in the heart) by
means of external cardiac monitoring, typically in the form of an
electrocardiogram. An electrocardiogram captures electrical
activity from surface leads placed on the patient's chest for
twenty-four hours. When further testing is warranted, the patient
is referred to a cardiac electrophysiologist (cardiologist who
specializes in the electrical functioning of the heart) for an
EPS.
[0010] An EPS evaluates the electrical integrity of the heart by
stimulating multiple intra-cardiac sites and recording the
electrical response. During an EPS, a patient's clinical
tachycardia is induced in a controlled setting to diagnose the
tachycardia and select an appropriate treatment or combination of
treatments. EP studies using currently available technology are
often lengthy and tedious procedures which include probing the
interior of two or more chambers of the heart with single point
contact catheters which may cause significant discomfort for the
patient. However, single point contact catheters have limited
utility in diagnosing complex tachycardia. The limited data
produced in point by point mapping often fails to provide the
electrophysiologist with sufficient diagnostic power for a complete
understanding of the tachycardia.
[0011] One form of treatment of VT and SVT type arrhythmias which
is becoming increasingly popular is catheter ablation. During the
ablation (or "elimination") procedure which is similar to the
procedure used in the EPS, a special catheter is inserted into the
patient to deliver energy, such as radio frequency (RF) energy, to
the precise areas of the heart which have been identified to cause
the abnormal heartbeat. The tip of the catheter is heated to
facilitate the destruction of the surrounding tissue thereby
correcting the anomalous circuit within the heart which is causing
the abnormal electrical activity. Catheter ablation is a
potentially curative treatment which is continually being
developed.
[0012] To perform procedures such as the EPS or catheter ablation,
a cardiac catheterization lab is provided in which multiple
clinicians can diagnose and treat heart conditions. It is desirable
to provide the clinicians with a means to interact with,
manipulate, and document observations on the clinical data in a
study record. It would be advantageous for clinicians to be able to
interact with the clinical data and document observations
simultaneously during an EP procedure. Such clinicians may include
a primary physician, nurse, anesthesiologist, cardiovascular
technician, radiology technician, consulting physician, and so
forth. For example, it may be necessary for the primary physician
or cardiovascular technician to make measurements on intracardiac,
hemodynamic, or imaging data, while the nurse or anesthesiologist
documents the status of the patient for a report or a consulting
physician makes measurements at a remote location on a network
system. It would be advantageous for several clinicians to be able
to simultaneously view the data during the EP procedure and to be
able to annotate and document the reports as necessary. The
annotations should be available to all clinicians presently viewing
a particular study. Current techniques to accommodate the complex
workflow in a cardiac catheterization lab are insufficient to meet
these needs.
[0013] One current technique used in a cardiac catheterization lab
employs disparate systems which provide copies of studies which may
be separately annotated and later integrated. Different clinicians
document their clinical observations into different systems which
are later integrated into an overall clinical information system.
This approach has several disadvantages. First, clinicians do not
have the advantage of seeing the dynamic relationship among data
entered by other clinicians during the study which especially
limits the potential contribution of a consulting physician who may
be stationed at a remote facility. Second, the detail and context
of the clinical data may be diluted during the integration. Third,
report generation is often delayed while the integration process is
performed, which often takes several days to complete. Fourth,
having multiple systems creates more costs and requires more
training for clinical personnel. Further, additional time and
effort by clinicians is required to perform the integration
process.
[0014] A second method which may be currently employed in a cardiac
catheterization lab is toggling control of data entry among
terminals using a keyboard switch. Multiple terminals in a single
lab may have a keyboard, mouse, and monitor coupled to a single
computer with a commonly available keyboard switch. To enter data
at one terminal, a clinician executes a keystroke to gain control
of the computer and enters the desired records to be annotated.
Disadvantageously, only one clinician can take control of a record
at a given time. Thus, if a nurse is documenting a medication, but
a cardiovascular technician is tasked with changing the display for
the physician, the technician must wait for the nurse to complete
her documentation so that the technician can take control of the
record. Further, interaction with clinical data is limited to
terminals physically located within the proximity of the keyboard
switches which generally means terminals located within the
procedure room of the lab. This effectively eliminates the
interaction with a consulting physician at a remote facility.
Currently, the simultaneous viewing and annotation of an EPS is not
possible since the review and annotation is a static process which
only provides for a study to exist in one place at a time.
[0015] The present technique may address one or more of the
problems set forth above.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] The present technique provides a distributed multi-user
system for real time data access and annotation during cardiology
procedures. The system includes an interactive computer network
which can be used to simultaneously display and annotate data from
a cardiology procedure on a plurality of devices and at a plurality
of locations.. In one implementation of the present technique, a
catalog, including a list of studies, may be selected by a client
workstation. A study may be selected from the catalog and the
client workstation is dynamically directed to the study. The study
can be displayed and annotated at any of the plurality of
locations, which may be local or remote, during the procedure.
Annotations made at one of the plurality of locations will be
passed back to the acquisition station.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0017] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an exemplary system including a
cardiac catheterization lab and local and remote client
workstations;
[0018] FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating an exemplary
implementation of the present technique;
[0019] FIG. 3 is a block diagram illustrating a more detailed
embodiment of an exemplary implementation of the present
technique;
[0020] FIG. 4 is a block diagram illustrating an archival scheme
for permanently storing study data in accordance with the present
technique; and
[0021] FIG. 5 is a block diagram illustrating a messaging technique
in accordance with the present technique.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0022] As previously discussed, a cardiac catheterization lab may
be used by multiple clinicians to perform procedures such as an EPS
or catheter ablation. FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a
catheterization lab 10. The catheterization lab 10 generally
includes a procedure room 12 and a control room 14. The procedure
room 12 is generally the room in which the physical catheterization
procedure takes place. The control room 14 is generally the room in
which the control of the data gathering and display takes place.
The procedure room 12 may include a bed 16 in which a patient 18 is
placed during a cardiac catheterization procedure such as an EPS
procedure or catheter ablation. An intravenous (IV) line 20 may be
placed in the arm of the patient 18 to provide a means of
dispensing medication during the procedure. Catheters 22 may be
inserted through the femoral vein in the groin of the patient 18.
An x-ray imaging system (not shown) may be used to guide the
catheter 22 into the appropriate region of the patient's heart. The
patient 18 is also connected to an acquisition workstation 24 which
includes display monitors to provide data such as signal or imaging
data during the procedure and a means of annotating the data, such
as a keyboard. Further, the lab 10 may also include one or more
workstations 25 and 26 with display monitors to provide additional
support during a procedure, as discussed below.
[0023] The catheterization lab 10 may also include a glass
partition 27, such as lead glass which separates the procedure room
12 from the control room 14. The control room 14 also includes a
workstation 28 with display monitors which may be similar to the
display monitors contained in the procedure room 12.
[0024] A team of clinicians generally conducts an EPS procedure.
The team may include a doctor 30 to perform the procedure, a nurse
31 to maintain the patient's vital signs, a scrub nurse 32 to
assist the doctor 30 with the procedure, a monitoring technician 33
who is responsible for providing the doctor 30 with the information
and data that the doctor 30 needs to see during the procedure and
other clinicians 34 and 35 who assist in monitoring and/or
annotation of a particular procedure, for example. The monitoring
technician 33 is generally stationed in the control room 14. The
monitoring technician 33 is in communication with the doctor 30
during the EPS procedure through an intercom system, for example,
and provides information in response to requests from the doctor 30
while the procedure is being conducted.
[0025] During the procedure, the doctor 30 stimulates the patient's
heart with small electrical signals delivered through the catheter
22 to make the heart beat at various rates. The electrical signals
are delivered from a stimulator 38 which may be a separate device
from the acquisition workstation 24. Because the monitoring
technician 33 responds to requests from the doctor 30 to control
the data viewed on the display monitors associated with the
acquisition workstation 24 in the procedure room 12, the display
monitors associated with the workstation 28 in the control room 14
preferably display identical information. Likewise, other display
monitors, such as those associated with workstations 25 and 26,
preferably display the information gathered during the procedure.
Further, workstations including display monitors may advantageously
be installed in other areas within the same facility but outside
the catheterization lab 10, such as a local diagnosis area 40. The
local diagnosis area 40 may include a workstation 42 with display
monitors from which to view a study during or after a
procedure.
[0026] Similarly, a facility 44 which may be located remotely with
respect to the lab 10, may include a workstation 46 with display
monitors to be used by a remote specialist 48. The remote
specialist 48 may participate during the procedure to provide
critical insight into the study which may not be available through
the clinicians available locally. For instance, a remote specialist
48 whose office facility is equipped with display monitors
associated with workstation 46, can observe a procedure being
performed in the catheterization lab 10 without being present
during the procedure. As the remote specialist 48 observes the
study, he can advise the local clinicians in real time while the
procedure is being performed.
[0027] To optimize the treatment of the patient 18, it may be
desirable to provide each set of display monitors associated with
workstations 24, 25, 26, 28, 42 and 46 with identical information
simultaneously during the procedure. Further, it may be desirable
to provide annotation capabilities at the various display monitors
to annotate the data during the procedure. In one embodiment of the
present technique, a plurality of local areas and remote areas will
advantageously include display monitors which will allow annotation
and real-time updating of the data in response to the annotation
and in response to changes implemented during the procedure. The
technique employed by the present embodiment is a dynamic technique
which provides interactive reviewing of the EPS during the
procedure. While a prior technique allowed only end of study
transfers, the present technique provides for the transfer of
information during the EPS study.
[0028] A general block diagram of the present scheme is indicated
in FIG. 2. For simplicity new reference numerals are used to
describe FIG. 2. However, it should be evident that some of the
elements in FIG. 2 were previously described in FIG. 1 using
different reference numerals. A more detailed description of
specific embodiments of the present scheme are described herein
with reference to FIGS. 3-5.
[0029] Referring initially to FIG. 2, a cardiac catheterization lab
comprising a procedure room 50 and a control room 52 is generally
illustrated by block 54. As previously discussed, the lab 54
facilitates the acquisition of data received during an EPS
procedure. An acquisition database 56 and a controller 58 may
reside in the control room 52 to store data taken during a
procedure. The data is initially taken from a patient (not shown in
FIG. 2) in the procedure room 50 and delivered to the control room
52 via a dedicated connection, for instance, to be stored in the
acquisition database 56.
[0030] In one implementation of the present technique, the
controller 58 in the control room 52 serves as the "publisher" to a
"local client" 60. A "local client" refers to any user workstation
located proximate to the control room 52, such as those
workstations within the procedure room 50 or within a hospital in
which the lab 54 is housed. The "publisher" is responsible for the
real-time processing of the data. Local clients, such as local
client 60, can access the acquisition database 56 directly from a
user workstation 62 during the EPS procedure without going through
a client server. In this topology, the local client 60 is coupled
to the lab 40 via a local area network, for example. The local
client 60 can communicate directly with the controller 58, and can
exchange data with the acquisition database 56. The controller 58
will "publish" the EPS data to the requesting workstation 62.
[0031] Annotation to the study made by clinicians are transmitted
to the acquisition database 56 for storage and use by other local
clients positioned at similar workstations residing locally with
respect to the cardiac catheterization lab 54. Each time a local
client 60 annotates a study, the annotated data is sent back to the
publisher (here controller 58). The publisher stores the annotated
study in the acquisition database 56 and notifies other local
clients that are currently viewing a study that the study has been
annotated. This notification may take place through a messaging
system such as the messaging system described with reference to
FIG. 5. The controller 58 the replicates the study and distributes
it to the local clients in real-time. This facilitates the
real-time processing of the annotation and provides a means of
displaying updates during an EPS procedure for local clients, such
as local client 60. As compared to previous techniques, the
real-time annotation also preserves information, comments,
concerns, and the like, which may be formulated during the
procedure and which are often difficult to reconstruct or associate
with examination data after the fact.
[0032] As discussed above, to facilitate the updating of studies to
include annotations made by various clinicians viewing a study at
various workstations, the publisher, controller 58 manages the
updates and the dataflow. Each time a study is changed, the
information is fed to the acquisition database 56. The data is then
replicated and sent to all other subscribers who are currently
viewing the present study. One typical mechanism for implementing
this and other topologies is by implementing a merge replication
architecture.
[0033] Merge replication can be viewed as a mechanism for
implementing the present embodiments. Prior techniques of
decentralizing study data by publishing from a central location,
such as a server, to multiple locations residing within the cardiac
catheterization labs or throughout a medical institution only
provide for the instances when all data is entered at the central
sites. Conversely, the present technique of using merge replication
allows the system to utilize the present topology in a modified
way. In this topology, a subscriber can process a transaction and
have it propagated to the publisher. This replication topology
functions significantly different from prior systems. As can be
appreciated by one skilled in the art, merge replication is the
most robust and manageable replication topology used in the
industry. The replication procedure can be implemented using
commercially available software, such as applications available
commercially from Microsoft Corporation of Redmond, Washington or
Oracle Corporation of Redwood City, Calif., for example.
[0034] Advantageously, by serving as the publisher for local
clients, the controller 58 ensures that failure in the server
operation will not disable the use of the study for local clients.
Regardless of whether a server which may be associated with the
acquisition database 56 is functioning, local clients will be able
to access the acquisition database 56 and will be able to view and
annotate any EPS being conducted.
[0035] However, in certain instances, it may be desirable to have
local clients receive study data through a server. A second
topology generally includes a segment server 66 and a segment
server database 68, as illustrated in FIG. 2. The segment server 66
may be responsible for coordinating and universally updating
changes made during an EPS procedure regardless of where the
updates are being delivered. Each time a change to an EPS is made,
the data is sent from the controller 58 to the segment server 66
and stored in the segment server database 68. The segment server 66
delivers a message to all clients currently subscribing to the
system indicating that a change to the study has been made and that
the data should be refreshed. This process may actually be
invisible to a user and the client system may automatically update
the study when the segment server 66 indicates that changes have
been made. Each local client 60 having a user workstation 62 and
any remote client 70 having a user workstation 70 that has the
current EPS open receives the updated information from the segment
server 66. This procedure is accomplished by replicating the
segment server database 68 upon synchronization of the clinical
data from the control room 52.
[0036] In this topology, the "publisher" is the controller 58
generally residing in the control room 52. The "subscriber" is
generally the segment server 66 and the segment server database 68.
It should be understood however that the subscriber may also
perform as a publisher if the data in the EPS study is edited and a
client, such as a local client 60 or a remote client 72, is working
through the segment server 66. For example, certain parameters may
be entered at a nurses station. This data advantageously flows
back, in real-time, to all other local clients 60 and remote
clients 72 viewing that particular study. The segment server 66,
thus, subscribes to the updates from the controller 58 and then
publishes the updated study to the local and remote clients 60 and
72. Thus, in this topology, the data is transmitted from the
control room 52 to a segment server 66. The segment server 66
ultimately serves as the central publisher. The acquisition
database 56 as well as subscriber workstations (located at
facilities of the local and remote clients 60 and 72) replicate
their data to a single segment server 66 which distributes the
updated data to any subscribers viewing the current EPS
procedure.
[0037] It may be advantageous to provide a central server 74,
including a central server database 76, coupled to the segment
server 66. As the number of clients and cardiac catheterization
labs which provide data to the segment server 66 increases, it may
be advantageous to periodically transfer data from the segment
server database 68 to a central server database 76 for permanent
storage.
[0038] Generally, FIG. 3 illustrates a more detailed embodiment of
one implementation of the present scheme, depicting the
simultaneous acquisition of study data in two catheterization labs.
Up to this point and to simplify the general description,
references to study data have been presented as a unified set of
information which may be viewed and annotated. However, it may be
advantageous to divide the study data into different types of data.
In a present implementation, study data may be comprised of two
data types: waveform data and file data. The advantages of
separating data types will become evident in the description of
FIG. 3, below.
[0039] Specifically, FIG. 3 illustrates two acquisition
workstations 80 and 82. The acquisition workstations 80 and 82 may
be located in the same catheterization lab or in two different
catheterization labs. The acquisition workstations 80 and 82 are
used to acquire and store study data taken during an EPS. The
acquisition workstation 80 collects both types of study data,
waveform data 86 and file data 88. The waveform data 86 comprises
the graphical illustrations and information taken during the study.
The file data 88 comprises the text accompanying the waveform data
86, as well as any annotations made by clinicians or clients. The
file data 88 is stored in an acquisition database 90, which may be
included in an acquisition storage unit 92, such as a hard drive.
The waveform data 86 is stored in the acquisition storage unit 92.
For each set of file data 88, a pointer is maintained in the
acquisition database 90 to provide the corresponding waveform file
path. The catalog 94 in the acquisition workstation 80 is a file
that lists the studies located on that particular acquisition
workstation 80.
[0040] Similarly, the acquisition workstation 82 collects both
waveform data 98 and file data 100. The file data 100 is stored in
an acquisition database 102, which may be included in an
acquisition storage unit 104. The waveform data 98 is stored in the
acquisition storage unit 104. For each set of file data 100, a
pointer is maintained in the acquisition database 102 to provide
the corresponding waveform file path. The catalog 106 in the
acquisition workstation 82 is a file that lists the studies located
in the acquisition workstation 82.
[0041] Each acquisition workstation 80 and 82 is coupled to a
segment server 108. The segment server 108 includes a segment
server storage unit 110 which may comprise a segment server
database 112. Aside from storing waveform data 86 and 98 in their
respective acquisition storage units (92 and 104), the acquisition
workstation 80 and 82 stores the waveform data 86 and 98 in the
segment server storage unit 110. The waveform data 86 and 98 is
written to the segment server 108 via a low priority background
thread. If the connection between the segment server 108 and one of
the acquisition workstations 80 and 82 is interrupted, the
acquisition workstations 80 and 82 are not compromised. Finally,
the segment server catalog 114 is a file that lists the studies on
all acquisition workstations which are attached to the segment
server 108 (here acquisition workstations 80 and 82) and identifies
on which workstation each study resides. The segment server catalog
114 is updated by replication of selected database information from
each acquisition database (90 and 102).
[0042] A client, such as local client 116, may wish to view the
study record which is currently being produced by the workstation
84. While the present embodiment describes the client as a local
client 116, the client may also be located remotely with respect to
the catheterization lab. The local client 116 has a workstation 118
and a client storage unit 119, including a local client database
120. The local client 116 may concurrently review and edit study
data by selecting a particular study from the replicated copy of
the segment server catalog 114 which may be accessed from the local
client 116. The segment server catalog 114 lists all of the studies
from any of the acquisition stations which are linked to the
segment server 108. A non-annotatable copy of the segment server
catalog 114 which is accessed by the local workstation 116 is
generally illustrated by reference numeral 114a. The application
stored on the client workstation 118 is then redirected by the file
path stored in the segment server catalog 114 to the acquisition
database 90. The local client 116 is then essentially linked to the
file data 88 stored in the acquisition database 90 by a link such
as a local area network. The local client 116 receives the file
data 88 directly from the acquisition database 90. The local client
may view and annotate any of the file data 88 on the local client
workstation 118. The file data 88 is returned to the acquisition
database 90 with any annotations stored in the file.
[0043] While the file data 88 residing in the acquisition database
90 can generally be accessed and annotated directly by a local
client 116, the waveform data 86 is not directly accessible by the
local client 116. Instead, the local client 116 receives the
replicated waveform data 86a from the segment server 108. One
reason for this particular scheme is to prevent a local client 116
from altering the waveform data 86. Since the waveform data is a
representation of the raw test results from an EPS study, it may be
important to safeguard the integrity of the data by providing
access to only the replicated waveform data 86a as described in the
present embodiment.
[0044] Finally, it may be advantageous to provide a central server
122 to permanently store (archive) study data once a study has been
completed. The central server 122 may include a central server
storage unit 124 to store waveform data and a central server
database 126 to store file data. Further, the central server 122
may include a central server catalog 128 which lists the studies on
all segment servers, such as segment server 108, which are coupled
to the central server 122. Since each segment server 108 includes a
catalog 114 listing all study records contained on any of the
acquisition workstations which are coupled to the segment server
108, such as acquisition workstations 80 and 82, the central server
catalog 128 provides a path to any study contained on any of the
acquisition workstations throughout the network. The archival
scheme is further discussed with reference to FIG. 4.
[0045] FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of an archival scheme for
permanently storing study data once a study is complete. The
Archival Generator (AG) software application selects study data
older than a user selected number of days from short-term storage
in an acquisition database 90 and 102. All selected study records
in the acquisition database 90 and 102, including both the file
data 88 and 100 and the waveform data 86 and 98, are copied to the
central server 122. Once copied, the data may be tested for data
integrity by comparing the study record to the study record stored
in the segment server 108. Once integrity is verified, the study
records can be deleted from the acquisition databases 90 and 102,
as well as the segment server database 108. The central server
catalog 128, the segment server catalog 114 and the acquisition
station catalogs 94 and 101 are updated appropriately.
[0046] It should be evident that to provide real-time updates of
the study data while a client is reviewing a study which is
currently being conducted, a messaging system may be implemented to
insure that updates are sent to clients viewing the particular
study. FIG. 5 illustrates one implementation of a messaging
technique corresponding to the present system. When the file data
88 is inserted into the acquisition database 90, a message record
may be added to a socket table in the acquisition database 90. A
messaging application, such as NetMsgSender, sends all message
records located in the socket table through an output port of the
acquisition workstation 80, such as TCP/IP Port 50,000, to all
systems, such as local workstation 118, which are configured to
receive data from the acquisition workstation 80. The message
records may be sent at a user-configurable interval. All
acquisition workstations 80 and 82 listen on the output port. If a
message is received on a particular workstation, such as
workstation 80, the workstation 80 reads the message and determines
whether the message pertains to an active study. If it does, the
workstation 80 determines which event is affected and refreshes the
view of the appropriate study data accordingly.
[0047] While the present embodiment discloses a technique using
data taken during an EPS, it should be evident to one skilled in
the art that the technique described herein can be applied to other
cardiology procedures performed in a catheterization lab in which
electrical and/or hemodynamic data may be obtained.
[0048] While the invention may be susceptible to various
modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments have been
shown by way of example in the drawings and have been described in
detail herein. However, it should be understood that the invention
is not intended to be limited to the particular forms disclosed.
Rather, the invention is to cover all modifications, equivalents,
and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the
invention as defined by the following appended claims.
* * * * *