U.S. patent application number 09/897737 was filed with the patent office on 2002-03-14 for spinal surgery tools and positioning method.
This patent application is currently assigned to Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.. Invention is credited to Houfburg, Rodney L..
Application Number | 20020032448 09/897737 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 23370026 |
Filed Date | 2002-03-14 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020032448 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Houfburg, Rodney L. |
March 14, 2002 |
Spinal surgery tools and positioning method
Abstract
Instruments and methods are disclosed for positioning a spinal
implant within an intervertebral disc space between adjacent
vertebrae. The invention advantageously provides for positioning of
the implant at a predetermined location with reduced likelihood of
implant positioning which deviates from the predetermined
location.
Inventors: |
Houfburg, Rodney L.; (Prior
Lake, MN) |
Correspondence
Address: |
MERCHANT & GOULD PC
P.O. BOX 2903
MINNEAPOLIS
MN
55402-0903
US
|
Assignee: |
Sulzer Spine-Tech Inc.
Minneapolis
MN
|
Family ID: |
23370026 |
Appl. No.: |
09/897737 |
Filed: |
July 2, 2001 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
09897737 |
Jul 2, 2001 |
|
|
|
09348894 |
Jul 7, 1999 |
|
|
|
6283966 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
606/99 ;
623/17.16 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61F 2/4611 20130101;
A61F 2002/30785 20130101; A61F 2002/30593 20130101; A61F 2002/4627
20130101; A61F 2/446 20130101; A61F 2230/0069 20130101; A61B
17/1757 20130101; A61F 2002/30777 20130101; A61B 2017/0046
20130101; A61F 2002/30873 20130101; A61B 2017/0256 20130101; A61F
2002/4687 20130101; A61F 2002/3023 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
606/99 ;
623/17.16 |
International
Class: |
A61B 017/70 |
Claims
We claim:
1. A method for preparing an implant site for implanting a spinal
implant between adjacent vertebrae, the method comprising a step
of: inserting a first end of a distraction plug into an
intervertebral disc space between the adjacent vertebrae to
position a second end of the distraction plug within the
intervertebral disc space; attaching a first end of an obturator to
the second end of the distraction plug, a second end of the
obturator having an indicator arrangement at a predetermined
distance from the first end of the obturator; positioning a distal
end of a guide tube against an exterior surface of the vertebrae,
the distal end of the guide tube positioned over the intervertebral
disc space and in axial alignment with the distraction plug;
aligning a proximal end of the guide tube relative to the indicator
arrangement; removing the obturator and distraction plug; passing a
first end of an instrument for preparing the implant site through
the proximal end of the guide tube to the intervertebral disc space
and advancing the first end of the instrument into the
intervertebral disc space to prepare the implant site, advancement
of the instrument being affirmatively stopped when a second end of
the instrument contacts the proximal end of the guide tube.
2. The method according to claim 1 wherein the instrument is a
reamer.
3. The method according to claim 1 wherein the instrument is a
tap.
4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the indicator
arrangement is a mark on the obturator.
5. The method according to claim 1 wherein the mark is laser
etched.
6. The method according to claim 1 wherein the indicator
arrangement is a groove.
7. The method according to claim 1 wherein the indicator
arrangement includes a c-ring that cooperatively fits within a
groove on the second end of the obturator.
8. The method according to claim 1 wherein the indicator
arrangement is an obturator cap that mounts at the proximal end of
the obturator.
9. The method according to claim 1 wherein the distal end of the
guide tube includes paddles.
10. The method according to claim 1 wherein the distal end of the
guide tube includes teeth for penetrating the exterior surface of
the vertebrae.
11. The method according to claim 1 wherein the distraction plug is
a lordotic distraction plug.
12. The method according to claim 1 wherein the implant site is
prepared from an anterior aspect of the vertebrae.
13. A method for implanting a spinal implant at a selected
location, the method comprising a step of: establishing a first
reference point within an intervertebral disc space between
adjacent vertebrae; establishing a second reference point proximal
to the first reference point; utilizing the second reference point
to indicate a position of instruments used to prepare the implant
site; preparing an implant bore with the instruments for insertion
of the spinal implant; and inserting the spinal implant into the
prepared implant bore.
14. The method according to claim 13 wherein the instruments used
to prepare the implant site include a reamer and a tap.
15. The method according to claim 13 wherein the first reference
point is a trailing end of a distraction plug.
16. The method according to claim 13 wherein the second reference
point is an indicator arrangement located on an obturator.
17. The method according to claim 13 wherein the second reference
point provides for alignment of a proximal end of a guide tube, the
proximal end of the guide tube providing an affirmative stop to
advancement of the instruments used to prepare the implant
bore.
18. The method according to claim 17 wherein the implant is passed
through the guide tube into the prepared implant bore.
19. The method according to claim 18 wherein the implant is a
proximity implant.
20. The method according to claim 18 wherein the implant is a
lordotic implant.
21. The method according to claim 18 wherein the implant is
threaded.
22. The method according to claim 13 wherein the first reference
point is defined by the desired location of the implant when
positioned within the implant site.
23. A method for implanting a spinal implant at a selected
location, the method comprising a step of: determining a desired
position of the spinal implant within an intervertebral disc space
between adjacent first and second vertebral bodies and using the
desired position as a first reference point; correlating the first
reference point with a second reference point located on a surface
of at least one of a selected first and second vertebral body;
establishing a third reference point at a distance proximal to the
second reference point; preparing the implant bore utilizing the
third reference point to limit distal advancement of instruments
used to prepare an implant bore; and inserting the spinal implant
into the prepared implant bore.
24. The method according to claim 23 wherein the third reference
point is provided by a proximal end of a guide tube positioned
against a portion of the selected vertebral body.
25. The method according to claim 23 wherein the second reference
point is provided by at least one surface of each of the first and
second vertebral bodies.
26. The method according to claim 24 wherein the third reference
point is determined by establishing a fixed distance between the
first and third reference points.
27. A method for preparing an implant bore for implanting a spinal
implant between adjacent vertebrae, the method comprising a step
of: inserting a first end of a distraction device into an
intervertebral disc space between the adjacent vertebrae to
position a second end of the distraction device proximal to the
intervertebral disc space, the second end of the distraction device
having an indicator arrangement at a predetermined distance from
the first end of the distraction device; positioning a distal end
of a guide tube against an exterior surface of the vertebrae, the
distal end of the guide tube positioned over the intervertebral
disc space and in axial alignment with the distraction device;
aligning a proximal end of the guide tube with the indicator
arrangement at the second end of the distraction device; removing
the distraction device; passing a first end of an instrument for
preparing the implant bore through the proximal end of the guide
tube to the intervertebral disc space and advancing the first end
of the instrument into the intervertebral disc space to prepare the
implant site, advancement of the instrument being affirmatively
stopped when a second end of the instrument contacts the proximal
end of the guide tube.
28. The method according to claim 27 wherein the distraction device
comprises a distraction plug and an obturator.
29. The method according to claim 28 wherein the distraction plug
and obturator are separable.
30. A kit for implantation of a spinal implant comprising: a
distraction plug, the distraction plug having a leading end and a
trailing end; a guide tube having a proximal end, a distal end and
a lumen of sufficient size for passing the distraction plug
therethrough; and an obturator, the obturator having a distal end
for attaching to the trailing end of the distraction plug and a
proximal end including an indicator arrangement, the indicator
arrangement providing for alignment of the proximal end of the
guide tube at a predetermined distance from the trailing end of the
distraction plug.
31. The kit according to claim 30 wherein the indicator arrangement
is a mark on the obturator.
32. The kit according to claim 30 wherein the indicator arrangement
includes stop ring that cooperatively fits within a groove on the
proximal end of the obturator.
33. The kit according to claim 30 wherein the indicator arrangement
is an obturator cap that mounts at the proximal end of the
obturator.
34. The kit according to claim 30 wherein the proximal end of the
guide tube includes an adjustable affirmative stop arrangement.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention pertains to intervertebral fusion.
Specifically, the invention is directed to instrumentation and
methods for insertion of spinal implants between opposing vertebral
bodies.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Chronic back problems can cause pain and disability for a
large segment of the population. Frequently, the cause of back pain
is traceable to diseased disc material between opposing vertebrae.
When the disc material is diseased, the opposing vertebrae may be
inadequately supported, resulting in persistent pain.
[0003] Surgical techniques have been developed to remove the
diseased disc material and fuse the joint between opposing
vertebral bodies. Arthrodesis or fusion of the intervertebral joint
can reduce the pain associated with movement of an intervertebral
joint having diseased disc material. Generally, fusion techniques
involve removal of the diseased disc, distracting the
intervertebral joint space, drilling a bore for receiving the
implant and inserting the implant between the opposing vertebral
bodies.
[0004] Spinal fusion implants and related surgical instruments for
implanting a fusion device are known and disclosed in, for example,
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,741,253; 5,658,337; 5,609,636; 5,505,732;
5,489,308; 5,489,307; 5,484,437; 5,458,638; 5,055,104; 5,026,373;
5,015,247; 4,961,740 and 4,501,269. The disclosure of each of these
patents are incorporated herein by reference. Procedures for fusing
an intervertebral joint space typically include placement of at
least two cylindrical implants in parallel arrangement between the
opposing vertebrae.
[0005] Some presently available systems for intervertebral fusion
provide for preparing an implant site through a hollow tube.
Procedures for preparing an implant site through a hollow tube are
shown in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,484,437; 5,489,307 and
5,505,732. The disclosure of each of these patents are incorporated
herein by reference. In some procedures, the implants are also
inserted into the prepared site through the hollow tube. Preparing
the implant site by passing instruments through a hollow tube
advantageously provides for an isolated surgical field with reduced
chance of injury to soft tissues surrounding the surgical site.
[0006] Often times, the degenerative changes of the diseased disc
cause a collapse of the intervertebral disc space. Thus, prior to
implantation, the intervertebral disc space may be distracted to
restore the normal height of the disc space or the normal
relationship between the vertebrae to be fused. Maintaining the
restored disc space height and/or vertebral relationships
throughout preparation of the implant site is important for the
ultimate stability at the fusion site. This may be particularly
true when a lordotic implant is used to restore or establish a
particular degree of lordosis between adjacent vertebrae.
[0007] However, most presently available implant procedures do not
take into account events which can cause deviation of the final
implant position from the position selected by the surgeon during
initial implant site determination. Deviation of the final implant
position from the initially selected position can result in, for
example, reduced fusion site stability, implant migration, implant
loosening, implant subsidence and improper purchase of an anchoring
arrangement of an implant (e.g., threads, spikes, ridges, knurls,
etc.), at the fusion site. In the case of a lordotic implant,
deviation of the final implant position can also cause deviation
from the desired degree of lordosis, deviation in the amount of
distraction (i.e., disc space height), and/or deviation in the
amount of purchase of the implant anchoring arrangement into the
surrounding cortical bone.
[0008] Thus, while present procedures for implantation through a
hollow tube help to reduce the chance of iatrogenic tissue trauma
caused by the implant procedure, the overall results of the implant
may be not be optimal due to a deviation of the final placement of
the implant from the desired placement position.
[0009] Accordingly, there is a need for instrumentation and methods
which insure that the final position of a spinal implant is in the
position which was initially established by the surgeon during
distraction of the intervertebral joint space. The present
invention is directed to this need.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] Throughout the specification, guidance may be provided
through lists of examples. In each instance, the recited list
serves only as a representative group. It is not meant, however,
that the list is exclusive.
[0011] The present invention is directed to instruments and methods
for increased precision of placement of a spinal fusion implant in
the intervertebral disc space. The principles and methods disclosed
are suitable for implantation of all types of implants including,
for example, threaded implants, non-threaded implants, cylindrical
implants, non-cylindrical implants, lordotic implants, expandable
implants, etc., through an anterior, posterior or lateral
approach.
[0012] In one embodiment, a method according to the invention
includes a step of determining a desired position of the spinal
implant within an intervertebral disc space between adjacent first
and second vertebral bodies and using the desired position as a
first reference point. The first reference point is then correlated
with a second reference point located exterior to the
intervertebral space. The second reference point provides a limit
to the advancement of the instruments used to prepare an implant
bore. In some embodiments, a third reference point may also be
used.
[0013] In one embodiment, the first reference point can be
established based on the position of a distraction device, such as
a distraction plug. Alternatively, an object other than a
distraction device and/or a diagnostic image can be used to
establish a first reference point.
[0014] The invention also provides instruments and kits which are
advantageous for use according to the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] FIG. 1 illustrates a lordotic distraction plug and implant
suitable for the present invention;
[0016] FIG. 1a illustrates a preferred relative arrangement of the
distraction plug and implant when the implant has been positioned
at the selected implant site;
[0017] FIGS. 2a-c are sagittal cross-section views of adjacent
lumbar vertebrae illustrating the effect on the intervertebral disc
space height when the implant is positioned at, and outside, the
selected implant site;
[0018] FIGS. 3a-c. are sagittal cross-section views of adjacent
lumbar vertebrae illustrating the effect on the lordotic angle
between adjacent vertebrae when the implant is positioned at, and
outside, the selected implant site;
[0019] FIGS. 4a-c are sagittal cross-section views of adjacent
lumbar vertebrae illustrating the effect on the purchase depth of
an anchoring arrangement on the exterior surface of the implant
into the end plates when the implant is positioned at, and outside,
the selected implant site;
[0020] FIG. 5 is a side view one embodiment of a guide tube
suitable for the invention;
[0021] FIG. 6 is a side view of one embodiment of an obturator
suitable for the invention;
[0022] FIG. 7 is one embodiment of a reamer suitable for the
invention;
[0023] FIG. 8 is one embodiment of a tap suitable for the
invention;
[0024] FIG. 9 is one embodiment of an implant driver suitable for
the invention;
[0025] FIG. 10 illustrates the relative position of instruments
when the proximal end of the instruments are affirmatively stopped
based on a first reference point according to the principles of the
invention;
[0026] FIG. 11 is a side view of one embodiment of an obturator and
obturator cap;
[0027] FIG. 12 is perspective view of the obturator and obturator
cap illustrated in FIG. 11;
[0028] FIG. 13 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment
of an obturator cap;
[0029] FIG. 14 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment
of an obturator and distraction plug;
[0030] FIG. 15 is a perspective view of one embodiment of a stop
ring according to the invention;
[0031] FIG. 15a is a sectional view through line a-a of the stop
ring of FIG. 15;
[0032] FIG. 15b is a sectional view (rotated 90.degree. from the
view of FIG. 15a) of the stop ring of FIGS. 15 and 15a, positioned
on the proximal end of the obturator of FIG. 14;
[0033] FIG. 16 is an alternative embodiment of a stop ring
according to the invention;
[0034] FIG. 16a is a sectional view through line a-a of the stop
ring of FIG. 16; and
[0035] FIG. 16b is a sectional view (rotated 90.degree. from the
view of FIG. 16a) of the stop ring of FIGS. 16 and 16a, positioned
on the proximal end of the obturator of FIG. 14.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0036] The present invention is directed to instrumentation and
procedures for increased precision of placement of a spinal fusion
implant within the intervertebral disc space. The disclosed
instrumentation and procedures can be used for installation of most
spinal fusion implants from an anterior, lateral or posterior
approach. Examples of implants suitable for use according to the
invention include threaded implants (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos.
4,877,020, 5,015,247, 5,489,308), non-threaded implants (e.g., U.S.
Pat. Nos. 4,501,269, 4,743,256, 4,834,757, 4,878,915), cylindrical
implants (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,501,269, 4,961,740, 5,015,247,
5,026,373 and 5,489,308), non-cylindrical implants (e.g., U.S. Pat.
Nos. 4,834,757, 5,425,772, 5,609,636 and 5,658,337) lordotic
implants (e.g., U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,669,909 and 5,865,847), expandable
implants, etc. The disclosure of each of the foregoing patents are
incorporated herein by reference.
[0037] According to the present invention, an "implant site" refers
to the location of the implant between adjacent vertebrae. The
"implant bore" refers to the bore formed for insertion of the
implant between adjacent vertebrae. The implant bore can be
threaded or unthreaded depending on the type of implant to be
inserted and/or the stage of preparation of the implant bore.
Unless otherwise stated, the phrase "selected implant position"
refers to the position selected by the physician for placement of
the implant within the disc space. The selected implant position
provides the surgeon with a reference point for guiding instruments
used to prepare the implant bore to ensure final placement of the
implant at the selected implant position.
[0038] The present invention helps reduce the likelihood of
deviation of the final implant position from the position initially
selected by the surgeon. Enhancing the likelihood of positioning
the implant at the selected implant position facilitates greater
coaptation between the implant and the implant bore to provide
greater fusion stability, greater motion segment stability, faster
fusion, reduced pain, reduced chance of migration, reduced chance
of subsidence, etc. In addition, and particularly in the case of a
lordotic implant, the precision provided by the present invention
increases the consistency between the desired and actual: height of
the disc space, degree of lordosis and amount of purchase of the
implant into the cortical bone at the end plates.
[0039] Thus, the invention provides increased correlation between
an initially selected implant location and the final location of
the implanted spinal implant. In general, the invention provides
for placement of the implant at the selected position by providing
and maintaining a substantially invariable reference point for
controlling the position of instruments used to prepare the implant
bore. One problem with prior systems for spinal implant placement
is the variability in the range of movement of the instruments used
to prepare the implant bore which is discussed further below.
[0040] Throughout the specification, unless stated otherwise, the
terms "proximal" and "distal" are relative terms, the term
"proximal" referring to a location nearest the surgeon and the term
"distal" referring to a location farthest from the surgeon. So, in
the case of performing a vertebral fusion from an anterior
approach, the anterior surfaces of the vertebrae are "proximal" and
the posterior surfaces of the vertebrae are "distal" relative to
the surgeon performing the procedure. Likewise, in a posterior
approach, the posterior vertebral surfaces are proximal and the
anterior surfaces are distal.
[0041] Generally, when preparing an implant site using known
methods, the instruments used to drill or tap a bore for receiving
a threaded implant are advanced into the disc space from a proximal
to distal direction. That is, in an anterior approach the
instruments are advanced from the anterior surface (proximal)
towards the posterior surface (distal) and in a posterior approach
the instruments are advanced from the posterior surface (proximal)
towards the anterior surface (distal). Similar relative
orientations also apply for lateral approaches.
[0042] Throughout this application, the invention is described by
reference to fusion of two lumbar vertebrae through an anterior
approach. However, it will be appreciated that the methods and
instruments disclosed can also be used for fusion of vertebrae in
other regions of the spinal column through an anterior, posterior
or lateral approach.
[0043] Typically, prior to preparing the implant bore, the amount
of distraction, degree of lordosis (if any), amount of implant
purchase and appropriate implant size are estimated from survey
diagnostic images using known procedures. In some known methods, a
distraction device which provides the appropriate disc space height
and degree of lordotic distraction is inserted into the disc space.
According to this method, in an anterior approach, the leading face
of the distraction device is distally advanced into the disc space
until the trailing face is within the anterior margins of the
vertebral bodies at a position selected by the surgeon. Once the
distraction device is inserted in the disc space, a hollow guide
tube is anchored to the vertebral surfaces across the disc space
and over the distraction device. In addition to keeping nerves,
blood vessels or other tissues out the surgical field of the
implant site, the guide tube also guides the lateral position of
the instruments used to prepare the site.
[0044] Axial guidance of the instruments can be provided by the
proximal end of the guide tube acting as an affirmative stop to
distal advancement of the instruments. As used herein, "axial
guidance" refers to the ability to control the depth of distal
advancement of an instrument into the disc space. Thus, improper
positioning of the proximal end of the guide tube can result in
over drilling or under drilling the implant site relative to the
drilling depth necessary to create a bore of an appropriate depth
for positioning the implant at the selected implant position.
[0045] Often times improper positioning of the proximal end of the
guide tube is a direct result of variability which can occur when
positioning the distal end of the guide tube against the vertebral
surfaces. For example, one cause of variability of the position of
the distal end of the guide tube includes irregularities or
undulations at the surface of the vertebrae against which the
distal end of the tube is placed. In addition, or alternatively,
when teeth or other similar arrangement are present for anchoring
the distal end of the guide tube to the vertebrae, variability in
the depth of penetration of the teeth into the vertebrae directly
results in variability in the position of the proximal end of the
guide tube.
[0046] The present invention overcomes many problems caused by
variability in the position of the proximal end of the guide tube
by using a reference point for positioning the instruments that is
directly related to the selected implant position. Thus, in one
embodiment, the invention provides for axially guiding instruments
used to prepare the implant site by reference to a first reference
point located within the intervertebral disc space to be fused.
This reference point may be determined by visually establishing the
reference from, for example, a diagnostic image, or from placement
of an object, such as a distraction device, Steinman pin, or other
apparatus into the disc space, or a combination of such methods.
Once the first reference point is determined, a second reference
point can be established exterior to the disc space at a fixed
distance way from the first reference point. The second reference
point can then be used to control the depth of insertion of all
instruments used to prepare the implant bore. Controlling the depth
of advancement of the instruments used to prepare an implant bore,
relative to a reference point directly related to the selected
implant position, greatly facilitates placement of the implant at
the selected site.
[0047] The second reference point can provide axial control to the
instruments through a direct or indirect guidance arrangement. A
direct guidance arrangement can control the instrument position by,
for example, providing a visual indicator for visually indicating
when to stop advancement of the instruments. Alternatively, the
second reference point can provide indirect guidance of instrument
position by providing an indicator for positioning an affirmative
stop arrangement, such as the proximal end of a hollow guide tube.
Thus, the affirmative stop arrangement acts to limit distal
advancement into the disc space before the instruments reach a
position which would create an implant site that deviates from the
site necessary to position the implant at the selected
position.
[0048] In an alternative embodiment, the first reference point
within the intervertebral space can be used to establish a second
reference point at a location exterior to the intervertebral space,
for example at the surface of one or both of the vertebrae on
either side of the disc space. According to this embodiment, after
the second reference point is established, a third reference point
can be established at a fixed distance from the second reference
point. As described above, the fixed reference point (in this case
the third reference point) can be used to directly or indirectly
axially guide the instruments used to prepare an implant site.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT
[0049] The present invention is particularly advantageous for use
in implanting a lordotic implant from an anterior approach. For
this reason, one preferred embodiment will be described with
illustrations and explanation for implantation of a lordotic
implant. It will be appreciated, however, that the instrumentation
and procedures described can also be used with non-lordotic
implants or implantation instrumentation for implanting the implant
through an anterior, posterior or lateral approach.
I. Implantation of a Lordotic Implant Through an Anterior
Approach
[0050] In the present discussion, a distraction device is used to
distract the disc space and establish a first reference point. As
used herein, a "distraction device" includes any device which when
inserted into the disc space exerts a force against the end plates
of the vertebrae adjacent the disc space. In the presently
described embodiment, the distraction device is a distraction plug.
A distraction plug can be particularly advantageous in some
applications. However, it will be appreciated that distraction
devices, radiographs or other method or device for defining a first
reference point within the intervertebral space can be used within
the scope and principles of the present invention. Distraction
plugs, implants and instruments suitable for implanting a spinal
implant according to the present invention are disclosed in, for
example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,307 and 5,865,847. The entire
disclosure of each of these patents is incorporated herein by
reference.
[0051] A lordotic distraction plug 10 and implant 20 are shown in
FIG. 1. The distraction plug 10 has a leading end 1, a trailing end
2 and a body 3. The diameter of the distraction plug 10 is stated
by reference to the largest diameter 4 along the length "L" of body
3. The distraction plug 10 is cone shaped and has an included angle
x of about 1.degree. to 20.degree.. The included angle x in the
illustrated embodiment is about 8.degree.. The length L of tapered
plug 10 can vary. For this discussion, the length of tapered plug
11 is 26 mm, which is representative of the depth of the implant
bore to be prepared for this example.
[0052] Implant 20 is also tapered and has an included angle x'
which may be matched to correspond to the included angle of the
distraction plug. The leading end 21 and trailing end 22 include a
leading end face 23 and trailing end face 24, respectively.
[0053] In the illustrated system, when selecting the appropriate
size distraction plug 10, and when the distraction plug 10 is
inserted into the disc space through an anterior approach, the
trailing end face 5 of distraction plug 10 is preferably placed
approximately at the anterior margins of the adjacent vertebrae.
Hence, because the final position of the distraction plug can
provide the first reference point in this embodiment, positioning
the trailing end face 5 at the anterior margin will cause the
trailing end face 24 of implant 20 to be recessed posteriorly from
the anterior margin of the vertebrae by the distance D, of
distraction plug 10. In one preferred embodiment, D, is 4 mm, thus
providing for the trailing end face 24 of implant 20 to be
positioned about 4 mm posteriorly from the anterior face of the
vertebrae. If the anterior margin of the vertebral bodies is
rounded (in the transverse plane), the distraction plug 10 is
preferably positioned further posterior (distal) to ensure that the
trailing end face 24 of implant 20 will be totally contained within
the margins of the vertebral bodies.
[0054] According to the present embodiment, the position of
distraction plug 10 within the disc space provides a first
reference point for ensuring that implant 20 is positioned at the
selected implant site. When using distraction plug 10 and implant
20 of FIG. 1, the implant 20 is preferably not advanced further
posterior (distal) than the final placement of the distraction plug
within the disc space. This relationship can be particularly
critical to a lordotic system for ensuring the proper lordotic
angulation, disc space height, annular tension and purchase of the
interior surface of the implant into the vertebral endplates. FIG.
1a illustrates implant 20 overlying distraction plug 10 in a
preferred relationship of selected implant position to final
implant position.
[0055] Examples of problems associated with deviation of the final
implant location from the selected implant position are described
with reference to FIGS. 2-4. Each of FIGS. 2-4 represent a sagittal
cross-section through adjacent lumbar vertebrae L.sub.A and L.sub.B
with implant 20 located within intervertebral disc space IS. The
letters "A" and "P" refer to the anterior (A) and posterior (P)
aspects of vertebrae L.sub.A and L.sub.B.
[0056] In FIG. 2a, implant 20 is appropriately positioned within
the implant site at the selected implant position. In this
position, implant 20 provides a disc space height "x," a lordotic
angle "y" and an endplate (E.sub.A and E.sub.B) purchase depth of
"z." FIG. 2b illustrates a situation wherein implant 20 is
positioned posterior to the selected implant position. In this
situation, the disc space height between opposing end plates
E.sub.A and E.sub.B is greater than x. In FIG. 2c, implant 20 is
positioned anterior to the selected implant position causing the
disc space height to be less than x.
[0057] Referring to FIGS. 3a-3c, in FIG. 3a, implant 20 is
positioned at the selected implant location. In FIG. 3b, implant 20
is positioned anterior to the selected implant position causing the
lordotic angle to be less thany. In FIG. 3c, implant 20 is
positioned posterior to the selected implant position causing the
lordotic angle to be greater than y.
[0058] FIGS. 4a-4c illustrate the effect of improper implant
positioning on the purchase of the anchoring arrangement 30 of the
exterior surface of the implant into end plates E.sub.A and
E.sub.B. In the illustrations, anchoring arrangement 30 includes
helical threads 31. However, as discussed previously, other
anchoring arrangements (e.g., knurls, spikes, ridges, etc.) can be
provided on the exterior surface of the implant to provide purchase
into the endplates.
[0059] In FIG. 4a, implant 20 is positioned at the selected implant
location and the purchase depth of thread 31 is z. In FIG. 4b,
implant 20 is positioned posterior to the selected implant position
causing the depth of purchase of threads 31 to be greater than z.
In this situation, the purchase of implant threads 31 exceeds the
thickness of the cortical bone at the end plates E.sub.A and
E.sub.B and enter into the deeper cancellous bone. This can
increase the chance of post-operative subsidence of the implant. In
FIG. 4c, implant 20 is positioned posterior to the selected implant
location causing the depth of purchase of threads 31 to be less
than z.
[0060] It will be appreciated that while FIGS. 2-4 each illustrate
a distinct event caused by improper implant positioning, one or
more of the events described, or other event, can occur
simultaneously in any particular situation. In addition, a
particular disadvantage when performing a bilateral implantation
using lordotic implants is that positioning the second implant too
far posterior of the selected site after implantation of the first
implant can cause loosening of the first implant.
[0061] To correct the position of implant 20 if the implant 20 is
positioned anterior to the selected position, the surgeon must
remove the implant and repeat the steps for preparing the implant
site (e.g., reboring and retapping). To correct the position of
implant 20 if the implant 20 is positioned posterior to the
selected position, the surgeon must remove the implant and repeat
the steps for preparing the implant site. However, in this
situation, it is also likely that a larger diameter implant will be
needed, thus requiring removal of a greater amount of cortical
bone. The present invention reduces the need for repeating the
procedure for preparing the implant site.
[0062] Having described a few problems which can occur when the
final implant site deviates from the selected site, an embodiment
of the present invention, which reduces the likelihood of
occurrence of such problems, will now be described. Many
instruments and methods suitable for use with this embodiment are
fully described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,489,307 and 5,865,857, both
patents having been previously incorporated herein by
reference.
A. Radiographic Templating
[0063] Radiographic templates for plain x-rays or MRI or CT scans
can be used to determine the proper size distraction plug required
to restore an affected disc space to a desired height. The
appropriate amount of distraction can be determined (e.g.,
appropriate size distraction plug) from radiographs and an
appropriate size implant 20 is selected. Referring to FIG. 1, the
diameter of the implant 20 is stated by reference to the minor
diameter D.sub.M of external thread 25 at the greatest diameter 27
(D.sub.M) of implant 20. Preferably, the diameter of the implant is
at least 3 mm larger than the greatest diameter 4 of distraction
plug 10 to achieve an optimal purchase of the implant thread 25
into the vertebral end plates.
[0064] Once the size and position of implant 20 is determined from
the template, the appropriate implant length is selected.
Preferably, the length of the implant is such that when implanted,
the leading end 21 extends into the posterior one-third of the disc
space.
B. Surgical Preparation, Positioning and Exposure
[0065] For the herein described anterior approach, the patient is
placed into position and general anesthesia is administered. Known
techniques for positioning are used. Typically, when performing a
fusion procedure through an anterior approach, the patient is
placed in supine position.
C. Alignment
[0066] Once the patient is prepared, the anterior aspect of the
intervertebral disc space between the two vertebrae to be fused is
exposed. The medial-lateral position for insertion of the implants
can be determined using known procedures. In one preferred
embodiment, the medial-lateral spacing is determined using an
alignment guide such as the starter alignment guide assembly 36
illustrated in FIGS. 9 and 10 discussed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,307.
Using the starter alignment guide, appropriate landmarks for
implant placement can be created.
D. Discectomy
[0067] Disc material is then removed through the annulus. A drill
can be inserted into each of the implant landmarks created in step
C above through the annulus. Preferably, the drill is about 8 mm in
diameter and is advanced into the disc space but does not extend
beyond the posterior margin of the vertebrae. A pituitary rongeur
or small curette can be inserted into the drill hole for removal of
the nucleus material using known methods.
E. Vertebral Distraction and Annular Tension
[0068] Distraction plugs are then used to distract the vertebral
bodies and tense the annulus prior to preparing the implant site.
After ensuring that soft tissues, including nerves and vessels, are
retracted from the implant site, a lordotic distraction plug having
an 8.degree. included angle and a diameter 24 corresponding to the
implant size selected, as discussed above, is inserted into the
disc space. The distraction plug is impacted into the
intervertebral space until the anterior face 15 is approximately
even with the anterior margin of the vertebral bodies. When the
distraction plug is tight (secure) in this position, the proper
distraction plug size has been reached. After the distraction plug
has been inserted into the first side, the procedure is repeated on
the opposite side.
[0069] The annular tension created by insertion of the distraction
plug can be tested by attaching a handle to the distraction plug
and pulling straight up on the handle attached to the distraction
plug. If the distraction plug pulls out easily, distraction plugs
having an increased diameter 4 are incrementally inserted from side
to side until proper annular tension is reached. If the distraction
plug must be advanced to a point where the anterior face 15 is deep
to the anterior margin of the vertebrae to achieve appropriate
tension, it may be advantageous to remove the plug and select a
plug with a larger diameter 4. After the final placement of the
distraction plug, the position of the distraction plug can be
verified using appropriate methods including, for example,
fluoroscopy or plain x-rays.
[0070] The implant length to be used is then selected as described
above. The following chart lists the diameter D.sub.M size of
implant to be used with the corresponding diameter 4 of the
distraction plug selected.
1 TABLE 1 Implant Size* Distraction Plug Size Range 15 mm 11-12 -
mm 17 mm 13-14 mm 19 mm 15-16 mm 21 mm 17-18 mm *Implant Size is
equivalent to the minor diameter of the thread at the large
(anterior) diameter 27 of the implant.
F. Tooth Drill Tube Assembly
[0071] A hollow guide tube, such as drill tube 92 illustrated in
FIG. 3 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,307 is selected having an inside
diameter of a size sufficient to receive an implant having a
D.sub.M of that selected in step E. In addition, while the present
example is described using drill tube 92, a multi-lumen guide tube
such as described in co-pending application U.S. Ser. Nos.
08/921,001, 09/116,747 can also be used.
[0072] Referring to FIG. 5, in one embodiment, hollow guide tube 50
includes distal end 51 and a proximal end 52. The distal end 51
includes an anchoring arrangement 53 comprising teeth 54. At the
proximal end 52, guide tube 50 includes an affirmative stop
arrangement 55 such as an adjustable affirmative stop arrangement
56. As illustrated, adjustable affirmative stop arrangement 56
includes threads 57, lock nut 58 and stopping member 59. The
distance of the proximal surface 60 to any point at the distal end
of guide tube 50 can be varied by threading stopping member 59
proximally or distally along threads 57. Once the appropriate
position of proximal surface 60 is determined (discussed below),
lock nut 58 is threaded to lock against stopping member 59 to
prevent inadvertent movement. As discussed below, the proximal
surface 60 sets the distance at which distal advancement of all
instruments passed through guide tube 50 will be stopped.
[0073] Also, in some embodiments, distal end 51 can include
diametrically opposed "paddles" for insertion into the disc space.
Suitable paddles are known in the art. These paddles can provide
for distraction of the vertebrae. In some embodiments, the paddles
can have a lordotic taper to provide a selected degree of lordosis
when inserted into the disc space. The position of the paddles
within the disc space can be used to establish the first reference
point.
G. Drill Tube Placement and Depth Adjustment
[0074] Referring now to FIG. 6, obturator 100 includes a proximal
end 101 and a distal end 102 having distal mounting arrangement
(not visible) for mounting to distraction plug 10. The transverse
cross section of obturator 100 can be any shape, e.g., square,
oval, or, as illustrated, circular. In one embodiment, the distal
mounting arrangement is a threaded male end as seen in similar
devices disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,489,307. The threaded male end
can be received by a threaded bore at the proximal end of
distraction plug 10. In an alternative embodiment, the distraction
plug and obturator can be a single unit.
[0075] Near the proximal end 101, obturator 100 includes an
indicator arrangement 103 such as laser etched marks 104a and 104b.
In this embodiment, the indicator arrangement 103 can be a scribed
line, machined groove, printed line, etc. Such indicator
arrangements may partially or fully extend along the perimeter of
the obturator.
[0076] After the distraction plug 10 is positioned as discussed in
step E, the mounting arrangement at the distal end 102 of obturator
100 is mounted to the distraction plug 10 that is positioned on the
side of the vertebrae at which the first implant bore will be
prepared. After obturator 100 is mounted to distraction plug 10,
guide tube 50 is passed over obturator 100 and the proximal end 52
of the guide tube 50 is urged distally, using known methods (e.g.,
hammer, mallet, etc.), until the teeth 54 are set into the surface
of the vertebral bodies. Once the teeth 54 are set, the proximal
surface 60 of affirmative stop arrangement 55 is aligned with the
indicator arrangement 103, such as laser mark 104a. In the present
embodiment, each of laser marks 104a and 104b correspond to a
particular implant size (e.g., 104a can correspond to a 20 mm
implant length and 104b to a 24 mm implant length). It will be
appreciated that additional marks can be added for additional
implant lengths. Once the proximal surface 60 of stop arrangement
55 is aligned with the appropriate mark (104a and 104b) of
indicator arrangement 103 for the particular implant size, lock nut
58 is snugged against the affirmative stop arrangement 55 to fix
the proximal surface 60 in a desired position.
[0077] Once the drill tube 50 is secure and alignment is verified,
the obturator 100 and attached distraction plug 10 can be removed.
In the present embodiment, the distraction plug 10 can typically be
removed by rotating the obturator 100 clockwise and pulling
proximally while applying downward or distal pressure to the guide
tube 50.
H. Vertebral Reaming with Reamer
[0078] Referring now to FIG. 7, reamer 150 includes a distal end
151 having a cutting end 152 for drilling the implant bore. At the
proximal end 153, the reamer 150 includes a limiting arrangement
154 such as flange 155. After guide tube 50 is positioned, reamer
150 can be passed distally towards the disc space and the implant
bore reamed until the limiting arrangement 154 is stopped by
affirmative stop arrangement 55. If the flutes 156 at cutting end
152 become clogged prior to reaching the final reaming depth of the
implant site, reamer 150 can be removed while rotating clockwise.
After the material in the flute is removed, reaming can be
continued.
I. Bone Tapping
[0079] Referring to FIG. 8, bone tap 200 includes a distal end 201
having a tapping head 202 including threads 203. Tapping threads
203 can form female threads into the implant bore created by reamer
150. At the proximal end 205 of tap 200 is a limiting arrangement
206 such as flange 207 which prevents distal advancement of the tap
beyond a point when flange 207 abuts against proximal surface 60 of
affirmative stop arrangement 55.
J. Implanting the Implant
[0080] Referring now to FIG. 9, implant 20 can be mounted to the
distal end 251 of implant driver 250. At the proximal end 252
implant driver 250 includes a limiting arrangement 253. In the
illustrated embodiment, limiting arrangement 253 is an adjustable
limiting arrangement 254. The adjustable feature can include a
threaded locking ring 255 which can be threaded proximally or
distally to accommodate a particular implant length.
[0081] In one embodiment, a single implant driver 250 can
accommodate two different size implants. For example, distal
advancement of locking ring 255 sets the limit for a first implant
length and proximal retraction of locking ring 255 sets the limit
for a second implant length. After the limiting arrangement 253 of
the implant driver 250 is set to the appropriate implant length,
the implant 20 can be positioned on the distal end 251 of the
implant driver 250. The implant 20 can be packed with a bone graft
or other osteoconductive, osteoinductive or similar material. While
maintaining the alignment angle of guide tube 50 which was utilized
during reaming and tapping, the implant/driver assembly is inserted
into guide tube 50 and implant 20 is threaded into the implant
bore. The proper placement of the implant can be verified
radiographically by comparing to the pre-operative survey
radiographs. The preferred relationship is shown in FIGS. 2a, 3a
and 4a. After final positioning of implant 20, implant driver 250
can be removed.
[0082] FIG. 10 illustrates the relative alignment of the
instruments described in the foregoing discussion of one embodiment
of the invention. As illustrated in FIG. 10, once the proximal
surface 60 of affirmative stopping arrangement 55 is aligned with
indicator arrangement 103 of obturator 100, limiting arrangements
154, 206 and 253 of reamer 150, tap 200 and implant driver 250,
respectively, provide for the distal advancement of the instruments
only to the predetermined location. That location being determined
by the first reference point, which in the present case is provided
by distraction plug 10.
K. Placement of the Second Implant
[0083] After placement of the first implant, steps E-J are repeated
for the second implant. If necessary, prior to removal of the
second distraction plug, obturator 100 can be advanced distally to
ensure that the second distraction plug is snug within the
intervertebral disc space. The drill tube 50 can then be passed
over obturator 100 and the procedure repeated.
L. Alternative Embodiments of Indicator Arrangements
[0084] Alternative embodiments of indicator arrangements will now
be described with reference to FIGS. 11-16. Referring to the
embodiment illustrated in FIGS. 11-12, the distal end 301 of
obturator 300 includes a distal mounting arrangement 302 comprising
a threaded male end 303 for mounting to distraction plug 10. At the
proximal end 304, obturator 300 is configured to receive an
obturator cap 305 which alone, or in conjunction with an indicator
mark 306, such as mark 307, provides for positioning of the
proximal surface 60 of affirmative stopping arrangement 55 of guide
tube 50. Thus, according to this embodiment, rather than relying on
visual alignment of the proximal surface 60 of affirmative stopping
arrangement 55 with indicator mark 306, the proximal edge 308 of
obturator cap 305 provides a stop for stopping the proximal
movement of affirmative stopping arrangement 55 when proximal
surface 60 of affirmative stopping arrangement 55 abuts against
proximal edge 308 of obturator cap 305. Subsequently, locking nut
58 of guide tube 50 can be snugged against stopping member 59 to
prevent inadvertent movement of proximal surface 60. FIG. 12
illustrates that obturator cap 305 axially slides on and off of the
proximal end 304 of obturator 300.
[0085] FIG. 13 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment
of an obturator cap 320 having a C-shaped cross section. This
embodiment provides for obturator cap 320 to laterally slide on and
off the proximal end 304 of obturator 300. Either embodiment of an
obturator cap (305, 320) can have different lengths, each length
being sized for a particular implant length. These embodiments
provide alignment of proximal surface 60 of affirmative stopping
arrangement 55 without the need to rely on visual alignment.
[0086] FIGS. 14-16 illustrate an alternative indicator arrangement
which eliminates the need for visual alignment of the proximal end
of the guide tube. Referring to FIG. 14, obturator 400 includes a
distal end 401 and a proximal end 402. A distraction plug 10 can be
attached to the obturator using arrangements as previously
described. For purposes of this discussion, the distal end of
obturator 401 abuts with the proximal aspect of distraction plug 10
at junction 404. In this embodiment, indicator arrangement 403
includes a circumferential groove 405 in the shaft 406 of obturator
400. Groove 405 includes a proximal edge 407 and distal edge
408.
[0087] According to this embodiment, after distraction plug 10 and
obturator 400 are positioned in the disc space, a guide tube, such
as guide tube 50, is passed over the proximal end 402 of obturator
400. The proximal surface 60 of affirmative stopping arrangement 55
is aligned flush with edge 408 by stop ring 420. To do so, stop
ring 420 is slid onto obturator 400 in the region of groove 405. As
illustrated, rims 421 and 422 of stop ring 420 fit snugly within
edges 407 and 408 of obturator 400. FIG. 15a is a sectional view
through a-a of stop ring 420 of FIG. 15. FIG. 15b illustrates that
when stop ring 420 is positioned over groove 405, a portion of rim
422 extends beyond the diameter of shaft 406 of obturator 400 to
create a surface 425 against which proximal surface 60 can abut
against to stop precisely at the level of edge 408.
[0088] Additional stop rings, such as stop ring 430 illustrated in
FIG. 16, can also be used to align proximal surface 60 at
predetermined locations, such as mark 411, for different length
implants using obturator 400. FIG. 16a is a section view through
a-a of FIG. 16. As illustrated in FIG. 16a, stop ring 430 includes
rims 431 and 432 and shoulder 433. Rim 431 and shoulder 433 fit
within edges 407 and 408 of groove 405. As best shown in FIGS. 16a
and 16b, stop ring 430 includes an extended wall portion 434 which
extends beyond shoulder 433. Extended wall portion 434 is of an
appropriate length for stopping proximal surface 60 at mark 411.
Different stop rings 430 can be made which have different length
extended portions 434 for different length implants.
II. Implantation of an Implant Through Other Approaches
[0089] The principles, methods and instruments disclosed herein can
be used for preparation of an implant bore and insertion of many
types of fusion implants through an anterior, posterior or lateral
approach.
[0090] Having disclosed the invention in a preferred embodiment,
modifications and equivalents of the disclosed concepts may occur
to one skilled in the art. It is intended that the scope of the
present invention not be limited to the specific embodiment
disclosed, but shall include such modifications and
equivalents.
* * * * *