U.S. patent application number 09/939014 was filed with the patent office on 2002-01-03 for diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness, phonological processing, and reading skill testing.
Invention is credited to Maerlender, Art Carl, Wasowicz, Janet Marie.
Application Number | 20020001791 09/939014 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 23378198 |
Filed Date | 2002-01-03 |
United States Patent
Application |
20020001791 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Wasowicz, Janet Marie ; et
al. |
January 3, 2002 |
Diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness,
phonological processing, and reading skill testing
Abstract
A diagnostic system and method for evaluating one or more
phonological awareness, phonological processing and reading skills
of an individual to detect phonological awareness, phonological
processing and reading skill deficiencies in the individual so that
the risk of developing a reading deficiency is reduced and existing
reading deficiencies are remediated. The system may use graphical
games to test the individual's ability in a plurality of different
phonological awareness, phonological processing and reading skills.
The system may use speech recognition technology to interact with
the games.
Inventors: |
Wasowicz, Janet Marie;
(Evanston, IL) ; Maerlender, Art Carl; (Jericho,
VT) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Timothy W. Lohse
Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich
1755 Embarcadero Road
Palo Alto
CA
94303
US
|
Family ID: |
23378198 |
Appl. No.: |
09/939014 |
Filed: |
August 24, 2001 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
09939014 |
Aug 24, 2001 |
|
|
|
09350791 |
Jul 9, 1999 |
|
|
|
6299452 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
434/178 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G09B 17/006 20130101;
G09B 5/04 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
434/178 |
International
Class: |
G09B 017/00 |
Claims
1. A system for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: a server computer
comprising one or more tests for determining deficiencies in one or
more reading and pre-reading skills, a scorer for determining a
score for each test; and one or more client computers that may
establish a communications session with the server computer to
download the one or more tests from the server computer, each
client computer comprising means for displaying at least one of a
graphical image and audio associated with each test located on the
server, means for receiving a user response to one of the graphical
images and audio presented by each test and means for communicating
the responses for each test back to the server computer so that a
skill level for each test and each reading or pre-reading skill
being tested by the test is determined.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the server computer further
comprises a recommender for recommending, based on the scores of
the one or more tests, one or more training modules for improving a
reading or pre-reading skill of the individual as indicated by the
score of the tests.
3. The system of claim 1, wherein the server further comprises a
questionnaire having one or more questions for eliciting
information about risk factors associated with language-based
learning disabilities.
4. The system of claim 3, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein the user input device of the one
or more client computers comprise a speech recognition device for
receiving a verbal response from the user to the one or more
tests.
6. The system of claim 1, wherein the one or more tests comprise a
rhyme recognition test for testing the ability to recognize rhymes,
a rhyme generation test for testing the ability to generate rhymes,
a beginning and ending sound recognizer for testing the ability to
recognize the beginning and ending sounds of a word, a word decoder
test for testing the ability to read by sounding out a written
word, a sound blender test for testing the ability to blend sound
units together to form words, a sound segmenting test for testing
the ability to segment a sound unit into smaller sound units, a
sound manipulator test for testing the ability to manipulate sound
units to form a new unit, a sequential verbal recall test for
testing the ability to recall a sequence of spoken items, a rapid
naming test for testing the ability to rapidly name one or more
items, a letter naming and symbol/sound association test for
testing the ability to name letters and identify the association
between a symbol and an associated sound, and a fluent reader test
for testing the ability to read fluently.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme recognition test further comprising means for providing at
least two stimuli to the user and means for receiving user input in
response to the at least two stimuli to determine the user's
ability to recognize rhyming words.
8. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a test
for recognizing the beginning sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising means for generating at least one stimulus having at
least an initial phoneme and means for receiving a response to the
stimulus that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize
the initial phoneme of the stimulus.
9. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a test
for recognizing the ending sound of a stimulus, the test comprising
means for generating at least one stimulus having at least an
ending phoneme and means for receiving a response to the stimulus
that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize the ending
phoneme of the stimulus.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme generation test comprising means for generating a stimulus
and means for receiving a response from the user identifying a
sound unit that rhymes with the stimulus.
11. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound blender test comprising means for generating at least two
sound stimuli and means for receiving a user response to the at
least two sound stimuli, the response indicating an ability to
blend the at least two sound stimuli into a larger sound unit.
12. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound segmentation test comprising means for generating at least
one stimulus and means for receiving a response to the stimulus
comprising means for segmenting the stimulus into smaller units in
order to test the ability to segment the stimulus into smaller
units.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests comprise a sound
manipulation test comprising means for generating a sound stimulus
having one or more sound units and means, in response to the sound
stimulus, for manipulating the sound units of the sound stimulus to
test the ability to manipulate sound units.
14. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprises a
verbal recall test comprising means for generating at least one
sound stimulus and means, in response to the at least one sound
stimulus, for receiving a user response indicating the recalling of
the at least one sound stimulus.
15. The system of claim 6 further comprising means for speaking the
verbal response into the speech recognition device for receiving a
verbal response from the user.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprises a
naming test comprising means for generating at least one visual
stimulus and means, in response to the display of the visual
stimulus, for speaking the name of or the sound associated with the
visual stimulus using the speech recognition device.
17. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprises a
word decoder test comprising means for displaying a visual stimulus
to the user and means, in response to the visual stimulus, for
receiving a response from the user to determine the ability to read
the visual stimulus.
18. The system of claim 1, wherein the tests further comprises a
fluency test comprising means for generating a plurality of visual
stimuli and means for receiving a user's response to the visual
stimuli within a predetermined time interval to determine the
user's ability to read and understand the visual stimuli.
19. A method for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, the method comprising: presenting
one or more stimuli to the individual, each stimulus associated
with a test for testing a particular reading or pre-reading skill
of the individual, the skills indicating the risk that the
individual develops or has a language-based learning disability;
receiving a response from the individual to each stimulus; and
scoring the user's responses to each test.
20. The method of claim 19 further comprising recommending, based
on the scores of the one or more tests, one or more training
modules for improving a reading or pre-reading skill of the
individual as indicated by the score of the tests.
21. The method of claim 19 further comprises questioning the
individual to elicit information about risk factors associated with
language-based learning disabilities.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
23. The method of claim 19, wherein receiving the individual's
response comprises receiving a verbal response using a speech
recognition device for receiving a verbal response from the user to
the one or more tests.
24. The method of claim 19, wherein the one or more tests comprise
a rhyme recognition test for testing the ability to recognize
rhymes, a rhyme generation test for testing the ability to generate
rhymes, a beginning and ending sound recognizer for testing the
ability to recognize the beginning and ending sounds of a word, a
word decoder test for testing the ability to read by sounding out a
written word, a sound blender test for testing the ability to blend
sound units together to form words, a sound segmenting test for
testing the ability to segment a sound unit into smaller sound
units, a sound manipulator test for testing the ability to
manipulate sound units to form a new sound unit, a sequential
verbal recall test for testing the ability to recall a sequence of
spoken items, a rapid naming test for testing the ability to
rapidly name one or more items, a letter naming and symbol/sound
association test for testing the ability to name letters and
identify the association between a symbol and an associated sound,
and a fluent reader test for testing the ability to read
fluently.
25. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme recognition test further comprising providing at least two
stimuli to the user and receiving user input in response to the at
least two stimuli to determine the user's ability to recognize
rhyming words.
26. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the beginning sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising generating at least one stimulus having at least an
initial phoneme and receiving a response to the stimulus that
indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize the initial
phoneme of the stimulus.
27. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the ending sound of a sound stimulus, the test
comprising generating at least one stimulus having at least an
ending phoneme and receiving a response to the stimulus that
indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize the ending
phoneme of the stimulus.
28. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme generation test comprising generating a stimulus and
receiving a response from the user identifying a sound unit that
rhymes with the stimulus.
29. The method of claim 19 wherein the tests further comprise a
sound blender test comprising generating at least two sound stimuli
and receiving a user response to the at least two sound stimuli,
the response indicating an ability to blend the at least two sound
stimuli into a larger sound unit.
30. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound segmentation test comprising generating at least one stimulus
and receiving a response to the stimulus comprising means for
segmenting the stimulus into smaller units in order to test the
ability to segment the stimulus into smaller units.
31. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests comprise a sound
manipulation test comprising generating a sound stimulus having one
or more sound units and, in response to the sound stimulus,
manipulating the sound units of the sound stimulus to test the
ability to manipulate sound units.
32. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprises a
verbal recall test comprising generating at least one sound
stimulus and, in response to the at least one sound stimulus
receiving a user response from the user to test the ability to
recall the at least one sound stimulus.
33. The method of claim 24 further comprising speaking a verbal
response into the speech recognition device for receiving a verbal
response from the user.
34. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprises a
naming test comprising generating at least one visual stimulus and,
in response to the display of the visual stimulus, speaking the
name of or the sound associated with the visual stimulus using the
speech recognition device.
35. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprises a
word decoder test comprising displaying a visual stimulus to the
user and, in response to the visual stimulus, receiving a response
from the user to determine the ability to read the visual
stimulus.
36. The method of claim 19, wherein the tests further comprises a
fluency test comprising generating a plurality of visual stimuli
and receiving a user's response to the visual stimuli within a
predetermined time interval to determine the user's ability to read
and understand the visual stimuli.
37. A server for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: one or more tests for
determining deficiencies in one or more reading and pre-reading
skills; means for receiving responses from the individual to the
one or more tests; and a scorer for determining a score for each
test.
38. The server of claim 37 further comprising a recommender for
recommending, based on the scores of the one or more tests, one or
more training modules to the individual for improving a reading or
pre-reading skill of the individual as indicated by the score of
the tests.
39. The server of claim 37, wherein the server further comprises a
questionnaire having one or more questions for eliciting
information about risk factors associated with language-based
learning disabilities.
40. The server of claim 39, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
41. The server of claim 37, wherein the receiving means further
comprises means for receiving a verbal response from a speech
recognition device to the one or more tests.
42. The server of claim 37, wherein the one or more tests comprise
a rhyme recognition test for testing the ability to recognize
rhymes, a rhyme generation test for testing the ability to generate
rhymes, a beginning and ending sound recognizer for testing the
ability to recognize the beginning and ending sounds of a word, a
word decoder test for testing the ability to read by sounding out a
written word, a sound blender test for testing the ability to blend
sound units together to form words, a sound segmenting test for
testing the ability to segment a sound unit into smaller sound
units, a sound manipulator test for testing the ability to
manipulate sound units to form a new unit, a sequential verbal
recall test for testing the ability to recall a sequence of spoken
items, a rapid naming test for testing the ability to rapidly name
one or more items, a letter naming and symbol/sound association
test for testing the ability to name letters and identify the
association between a symbol and an associated sound, and a fluent
reader test for testing the ability to read fluently.
43. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests comprises a rhyme
recognition test further comprising means for providing at least
two stimuli to the user and means for receiving user input in
response to the at least two stimuli to determine the user's
ability to recognize rhyming words.
44. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the beginning sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising means for generating at least one stimulus having at
least an initial phoneme and means for receiving a response to the
stimulus that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize
the initial phoneme of the stimulus.
45. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the ending sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising means for generating at least one stimulus having at
least an ending phoneme and means for receiving a response to the
stimulus that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize
the ending phoneme of the stimulus.
46. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme generation test comprising means for generating a stimulus
and means for receiving a response from the user identifying a
sound unit that rhymes with the stimulus.
47. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound blender test comprising means for generating at least two
sound stimuli and means for receiving a user response to the at
least two sound stimuli, the response indicating an ability to
blend the at least two sound stimuli into a larger sound unit.
48. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound segmentation test comprising means for generating at least
one stimulus and means for receiving a response to the stimulus
comprising means for segmenting the stimulus into smaller units in
order to test the ability to segment the stimulus into smaller
units.
49. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests comprise a sound
manipulation test comprising means for generating a sound stimulus
having one or more sound units and means, in response to the sound
stimulus, for manipulating the sound units of the sound stimulus to
test the ability to manipulate sound units.
50. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprises a
verbal recall test comprising means for generating at least one
sound stimulus and means, in response to the at least one sound
stimulus, for receiving a user response indicating the recalling of
the at least one sound stimulus.
51. The server of claim 42 further comprising means for speaking a
verbal response into the speech recognition device for receiving a
verbal response from the user.
52. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprises a
naming test comprising means for generating at least one visual
stimulus and means, in response to the display of the visual
stimulus, for speaking the name of or the sound associated with the
visual stimulus using the speech recognition device.
53. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprises a
word decoder test comprising means for displaying a visual stimulus
to the user and means, in response to the visual stimulus, for
receiving a response from the user to determine the ability to read
the visual stimulus.
54. The server of claim 37, wherein the tests further comprises a
fluency test comprising means for generating a plurality of visual
stimuli and means for receiving a user's response to the visual
stimuli within a predetermined time interval to determine the
user's ability to read and understand the visual stimuli.
55. An apparatus for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: means for downloading
one or more tests from a server, each test determining if the
individual has a deficiency in a reading or pre-reading skill;
means for generating a response to the tests, the response being
communicated to the server computer; and means for receiving a
score for each test from the server computer.
56. The apparatus of claim 55 further comprising means for
receiving a recommendation, based on the scores of the one or more
tests, for using one or more training modules for improving a
reading or pre-reading skill of the individual as indicated by the
score of the tests to avoid or remediate language-based learning
disabilities.
57. The apparatus of claim 56 further comprising means for
downloading the one or more training modules from the server
computer to improve the skills of the individual.
58. The apparatus of claim 55 further comprises a questionnaire
having one or more questions for eliciting information about risk
factors associated with language-based learning disabilities.
59. The apparatus of claim 58, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
60. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the user input device of the
one or more client computers comprise a speech recognition device
for receiving a verbal response from the user to the one or more
tests.
61. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the one or more tests
comprise a rhyme recognition test for testing the ability to
recognize rhymes, a rhyme generation test for testing the ability
to generate rhymes, a beginning and ending sound recognizer for
testing the ability to recognize the beginning and ending sounds of
a word, a word decoder test for testing the ability to read by
sounding out a written word, a sound blender test for testing the
ability to blend sound units together to form words, a sound
segmenting test for testing the ability to segment a sound unit
into smaller sound units, a sound manipulator test for testing the
ability to manipulate sound units to form a new unit, a sequential
verbal recall test for testing the ability to recall a sequence of
spoken items, a rapid naming test for testing the ability to
rapidly name one or more items, a letter naming and symbol/sound
association test for testing the ability to name letters and
identify the association between a symbol and an associated sound,
and a fluent reader test for testing the ability to read
fluently.
62. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests comprises a rhyme
recognition test further comprising means for providing at least
two stimuli to the user and means for receiving user input in
response to the at least two stimuli to determine the user's
ability to recognize rhyming words.
63. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the beginning sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising means for generating at least one stimulus having at
least an initial phoneme and means for receiving a response to the
stimulus that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize
the initial phoneme of the stimulus.
64. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprise a
test for recognizing the ending sound of a stimulus, the test
comprising means for generating at least one stimulus having at
least an ending phoneme and means for receiving a response to the
stimulus that indicates an ability of the test taker to recognize
the ending phoneme of the stimulus.
65. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprise a
rhyme generation test comprising means for generating a stimulus
and means for receiving a response from the user identifying a
sound unit that rhymes with the stimulus.
66. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound blender test comprising means for generating at least two
sound stimuli and means for receiving a user response to the at
least two sound stimuli, the response indicating an ability to
blend the at least two sound stimuli into a larger sound unit.
67. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprise a
sound segmentation test comprising means for generating at least
one stimulus and means for receiving a response to the stimulus
comprising means for segmenting the stimulus into smaller units in
order to test the ability to segment the stimulus into smaller
units.
68. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests comprise a sound
manipulation test comprising means for generating a sound stimulus
having one or more sound units and means, in response to the sound
stimulus, for manipulating the sound units of the sound stimulus to
test the ability to manipulate sound units.
69. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprises
a verbal recall test comprising means for generating at least one
sound stimulus and means, in response to the at least one sound
stimulus, for receiving a user response indicating the recalling of
the at least one sound stimulus.
70. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the tests further comprises
means for speaking a verbal response into the speech recognition
device for receiving a verbal response from the user.
71. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprises
a naming test comprising means for generating at least one visual
stimulus and means, in response to the display of the visual
stimulus, for speaking the name of or the sound associated with the
visual stimulus using the speech recognition device.
72. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprises
a word decoder test comprising means for displaying a visual
stimulus to the user and means, in response to the visual stimulus,
for receiving a response from the user to determine the ability to
read the visual stimulus.
73. The apparatus of claim 55, wherein the tests further comprises
a fluency test comprising means for generating a plurality of
visual stimuli and means for receiving a user's response to the
visual stimuli within a predetermined time interval to determine
the user's ability to read and understand the visual stimuli.
74. The system of claim 2, wherein the server further comprises
means for downloading the recommended training module to the client
computer.
75. The method of claim 20 further comprising downloading the
recommended training module from the server to the client
computer.
76. The server of claim 38 further comprising means for downloading
the recommended training module to the client computer.
77. The apparatus of claim 56 further comprising means for
receiving a downloaded training module from the server based on the
recommended training module.
78. A system for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: a server computer
comprising one or more tests for determining deficiencies in one or
more reading and pre-reading skills, a scorer for determining a
score for each test; one or more client computers that may
establish a communications session with the server computer to
download the one or more tests from the server computer, each
client computer comprising means for displaying at least one of a
graphical image and audio associated with each test located on the
server, means for receiving a user response to one of the graphical
images and audio presented by each test and means for communicating
the responses for each test back to the server computer so that a
skill level for each test and each reading or pre-reading skill
being tested by the test is determined; and wherein the server
computer further comprises means for downloading a tool recommended
by the system to the client computer.
79. A system for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: a server computer
comprising one or more tests for determining deficiencies in one or
more reading and pre-reading skills, a scorer for determining a
score for each test; one or more client computers that may
establish a communications session with the server computer to
download the one or more tests from the server computer, each
client computer comprising means for displaying at least one of a
graphical image and audio associated with each test located on the
server, means for receiving a user response to one of the graphical
images and audio presented by each test and means for communicating
the responses for each test back to the server computer so that a
skill level for each test and each reading or pre-reading skill
being tested by the test is determined; and wherein the server
computer further comprises means for recommending a training module
to the user of the system based on the responses to the tests and
means for downloading a tool recommended by the system to the
client computer.
80. A computer implemented apparatus for testing one or more skills
associated with the reading skills of an individual, comprising:
means for presenting one or more tests to a user, each test
determining if the individual has a deficiency in one or more of a
reading, a pre-reading and spelling skill; means for receiving a
response to the tests; means for determining a score for each test;
and means for receiving a recommendation, based on the scores of
the one or more tests, for using one or more training modules for
improving a skill of the individual as indicated by the score of
the tests.
81. The apparatus of claim 80 further comprising means for
receiving a recommended training module.
82. The system of claim 1, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
83. The method of claim 19, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
84. The server of claim 37, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
85. The method of claim 55, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
90. The system of claim 78, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
91. The system of claim 79, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
92. The apparatus of claim 80, wherein the pre-reading and reading
skills further comprise spelling skills.
93. A system for testing one or more skills associated with the
reading skills of an individual, comprising: a server computer
comprising one or more tests for determining deficiencies in one or
more reading and pre-reading skills, a scorer for determining a
score for each test; and one or more client computers that may
establish a communications session with the server computer to
download the one or more tests from the server computer, each
client computer comprising means for displaying at least one of a
graphical image and audio associated with each test located on the
server, a speech recognition device for receiving and interpreting
a verbal response from the user to one of the graphical images and
audio presented by each test and means for communicating the
responses for each test back to the server computer so that a skill
level for each test and each reading or pre-reading skill being
tested by the test is determined.
94. A computer implemented method for testing one or more skills of
a user, comprising: providing computer assisted instruction,
wherein the computer assisted instruction further comprises
providing one or more computer implemented tests to the user to
test and diagnose one or more skills of the user using the computer
system; providing computer managed instruction wherein the computer
managed instruction further comprises recommending a training
module in response to the computer implemented tests.
95. The method of claim 94, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises downloading the recommended training
module.
96. The method of claim 94, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises questioning the individual to elicit
information about risk factors associated with language-based
learning disabilities.
97. The method of claim 96, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
98. The method of claim 96, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises generating a category of risk of
language-based learning disabilities for a particular user based on
the information about the risk factors and generating a
recommendation based on the category of risk.
99. The method of claim 94, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises tracking, over time, the proficiency
of the user's phonological skills and establishing the baseline
abilities of the user.
100. The method of claim 94, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the recommending further comprises recommending
the training module based on the scores of the one or more
tests.
101. The method of claim 94, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
generating a comparison of the scores of different users of the
system.
102. The method of claim 94, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
performing statistical analysis of the scores of the user.
103. The method of claim 94, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises performing a timed test.
104. A computer implemented system for testing one or more skills
of a user, comprising: a computer assisted instruction module,
wherein the computer assisted instruction module further comprises
one or more computer implemented tests provided to the user to test
and diagnose one or more skills of the user using the computer
system; a computer managed instruction module wherein the computer
managed instruction further comprises a recommender that recommends
a training module in response to the computer implemented
tests.
105. The system of claim 104, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for downloading the recommended
training module.
106. The system of claim 104, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for questioning the individual
to elicit information about risk factors associated with
language-based learning disabilities.
107. The system of claim 106, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
108. The system of claim 106, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for generating a category of
risk of language-based learning disabilities for a particular user
based on the information about the risk factors and means for
generating a recommendation based on the category of risk.
109. The system of claim 104, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for tracking, over time, the
proficiency of the user's phonological skills and establishing the
baseline abilities of the user.
110. The system of claim 104, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise means for scoring the responses
to each test and wherein the recommending further comprises means
for recommending the training module based on the scores of the one
or more tests.
111. The system of claim 104, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
means for generating a comparison of the scores of different users
of the system.
112. The system of claim 104, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise means for scoring the responses
to each test and wherein the computer managed instruction further
comprises means for performing statistical analysis of the scores
of the user.
113. The system of claim 104, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for performing a timed
test.
114. A computer implemented method for testing one or more skills
of a user, comprising: providing computer assisted instruction,
wherein the computer assisted instruction further comprises
providing one or more computer implemented tests to the user to
test and diagnose one or more skills of the user using the computer
system; and the computer assisted instruction further comprising
providing computer managed instruction wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises recommending a training module in
response to the computer implemented tests.
115. The method of claim 114, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises downloading the recommended training
module.
116. The method of claim 114, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises questioning the individual to elicit
information about risk factors associated with language-based
learning disabilities.
117. The method of claim 116, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
118. The method of claim 116, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises generating a category of risk of
language-based learning disabilities for a particular user based on
the information about the risk factors and generating a
recommendation based on the category of risk.
119. The method of claim 114, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises tracking, over time, the proficiency
of the user's phonological skills and establishing the baseline
abilities of the user.
120. The method of claim 114, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the recommending further comprises recommending
the training module based on the scores of the one or more
tests.
121. The method of claim 114, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
generating a comparison of the scores of different users of the
system.
122. The method of claim 114, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
performing statistical analysis of the scores of the user.
123. The method of claim 114, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises performing a timed test.
124. A computer implemented system for testing one or more skills
of a user, comprising: a computer assisted instruction module,
wherein the computer assisted instruction module further comprises
one or more computer implemented tests provided to the user to test
and diagnose one or more skills of the user using the computer
system; and the computer assisted instruction module further
comprising a computer managed instruction module wherein the
computer managed instruction further comprises a recommender that
recommends a training module in response to the computer
implemented tests.
125. The system of claim 124, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for downloading the recommended
training module.
126. The system of claim 124, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for questioning the individual
to elicit information about risk factors associated with
language-based learning disabilities.
127. The system of claim 126, wherein the information comprise
historical data about reading-related risk factors including one or
more of medical conditions including chronic otitis media, family
history data including history of dyslexia, environmental data
including socioeconomic status and exposure to literacy at home and
observational data about an individual's behaviors reflecting
competencies in speech sound awareness.
128. The system of claim 126, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for generating a category of
risk of language-based learning disabilities for a particular user
based on the information about the risk factors and means for
generating a recommendation based on the category of risk.
129. The system of claim 124, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for tracking, over time, the
proficiency of the user's phonological skills and establishing the
baseline abilities of the user.
130. The system of claim 124, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise means for scoring the responses
to each test and wherein the recommending further comprises means
for recommending the training module based on the scores of the one
or more tests.
131. The system of claim 124, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise scoring the responses to each
test and wherein the computer managed instruction further comprises
means for generating a comparison of the scores of different users
of the system.
132. The system of claim 124, wherein the one or more computer
implemented tests further comprise means for scoring the responses
to each test and wherein the computer managed instruction further
comprises means for performing statistical analysis of the scores
of the user.
133. The system of claim 124, wherein the computer managed
instruction further comprises means for performing a timed test.
Description
RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application is a continuation application and claims
priority under 35 USC .sctn. 120 from U.S. patent application Ser.
No. 09/350,791, filed on Jul. 9, 1999 and entitled "Diagnostic
System And Method For Phonological Awareness, Phonological
Processing, And Reading Skill Testing"
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] This invention relates generally to a diagnostic system and
method for testing one or more different areas of phonological
awareness, phonological processing, verbal short term memory, rapid
access naming, phonemic decoding and reading fluency in order to
determine if the individual being tested is at risk to having
reading problems and the areas in which the individual may need
further training.
[0003] It is well known that a relationship exists between
phonological processing abilities of an individual and the normal
acquisition of beginning reading skills. For inefficient and
disabled readers, the reading impasse exists in the perceptual and
conceptual elusiveness of phonemes. Phonemes are the smallest units
of speech that correspond to the sounds of our spoken language. Our
phonologically based language requires that students have a
sensitivity to and an explicit understanding of the phonological
structure of words. This explicit understanding of the phonological
structure of words is known as phonological awareness. Phonological
awareness skills are displayed by an individual when the individual
is able to isolate and identify individual sounds within words and
to manipulate those identified sounds. Phonological processing
refers to the use of information about the sound structure of oral
language to process oral and written information. These include
verbal short term memory and rapid access naming.
[0004] The English language has words that are comprised of sounds
in some predetermined order. From the vast number of possible
sequences of sounds, words in the English language actually use a
relatively small number of sequences and the majority of these
sequences are common to many words. A child who becomes aware of
these common sound sequences is typically more adept at mastering
these sequences when the words are presented in their printed form
(i.e., when the child is reading the words) than a child who lacks
this awareness of sounds. For example, the word "mat" has three
distinct phonemes /m/, /ae/ and /t/. The words "sat" and "bat" have
different initial phonemes, /s/ and /b/ respectively, but share the
middle and final phonemes (/ae/ and /t/, respectively) that form
the common spelling pattern "at". To a child with normal
phonological awareness, our alphabetic orthography appears to be a
sensible system for representing speech in writing. Thus, a child
may employ the strategy of sounding out unknown words or letter
sequences by analogy to known words with identical letter
sequences. For example, the child may pronounce the unknown word
"bat" by rhyming it with the known word "cat".
[0005] Phonological awareness skills are grouped into two
categories including synthesis and analysis. Phonological synthesis
refers to the awareness that separate sound units may be blended
together to form whole words. Phonological analysis refers to the
awareness that whole words may be segmented into a set of sound
units, including syllables, onset-rimes and phonemes. Both analysis
and synthesis skills have been identified as important
prerequisites for achieving the goal of early reading skill
proficiency and deficits of either and/or both of these skills are
typically present in children with reading disabilities.
[0006] In addition to these phonological awareness skills, there
are two other phonological skills that have been linked to
efficient reading ability. These skills are phonetic coding in
verbal short term memory and rapid, automatic access to
phonological information. Phonetic coding refers to the child's
ability to use a speech-sound representation system for efficient
storage of verbal information in working memory. The ability to
efficiently use phonetic codes to represent verbal information in
working memory may be measured by performance on memory span tasks
for items with verbal labels. Children with reading problems have
been found to perform poorly on memory span tasks for items with
verbal labels. Thus, phonetic coding is an important skill for a
reader, such as a beginning reader. For a beginning reader, he/she
must 1) first decode each sound in the pattern by voicing the
appropriate sound for the appropriate symbol; 2) store the
appropriate sounds in short term memory while the remainder of the
symbols are being sounded out; and 3) blend all of the sounds from
memory together to form a word. The efficient phonetic
representation in verbal short term memory permits beginning
readers to devote less cognitive energy to the storage of sound
symbol correspondence thus leaving adequate cognitive resources to
blend the sounds together to form the word.
[0007] The strong performance of a child on rapid naming skills
that requires rapid and automatic access to phonological
information that is stored in long term memory is highly predictive
on how well a child will learn fluent word identification skills. A
reading-disabled child may normally perform much more slowly on
these rapid naming tasks than a child with a normal reading skill.
The rapid access of phonological information in memory may make the
task of assembling word parts together much easier so that reading
is easier.
[0008] In addition to assessing phonological processing skills that
do not require knowledge of print, three other measures of
pre-reading and reading skills prove helpful in monitoring a
child's growth once reading instruction begins. In particular, the
child's knowledge about letters, the child's phonemic decoding
skill and the child's fluency of reading should be monitored during
the first three grades in order to identify the need for early
intervention that will prevent reading problems later on. It is
desirable to be able to test these pre-reading and reading skills
in order to further determine if a child is at risk.
[0009] Returning to the relationship between phonological
processing and reading, an individual with good phonological
processing skills and good phonological awareness tends to be
better able to learn to read. In addition, phonological processing
deficits have been identified by researchers as the most probable
cause of reading-related learning disabilities. Due to this link,
many states have started to mandate phonological awareness training
as part of regular classroom reading curricula. At the same time,
school personnel are being required to be accountable and take
responsibility for the classroom curriculum and the remedial
reading services they provide. The problem is that there is no
diagnostic tool currently available to help professionals and the
school personnel to identify children who are at-risk due to
phonological awareness deficit and to help plan, evaluate and
document the effectiveness of intervention and instructional
methods.
[0010] A number of assessment tools are presently available to
professionals to measure phonological processing and related
skills. These include the Test of Phonological Awareness (TOPA),
the Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization Test (LAC), The
Phonological Awareness Test (PAT), the Comprehensive Test of
Phonological Testing (CTOPP) and a screening measure published in
an educational textbook, Phonemic Awareness in Young Children: A
Classroom Curriculum. None of these conventional assessment tools
are software based and therefore have limitations. For example,
these conventional assessment tools must be manually administered
so that the testing is not necessarily standardized since each test
giver may give the test in a slightly different manner that reduces
the reliability of the resulting assessment. These manually
administered assessment tools also make the scoring, charting and
comparison of the test results more difficult. These conventional
assessment tests require that a skilled person administrate the
assessment test. In addition, the number of children who may be
tested at any one time is limited to one child for each test
administrator. These conventional assessment tests may also cause
test anxiety that may cause the test results to inaccurately
reflect the child's abilities. Thus, it is desirable to provide a
diagnostic system and method for phonological awareness testing
that overcomes the above problems and limitations of conventional
assessment tests and it is to this end that the present invention
is directed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0011] The diagnostic system and method for evaluating phonological
awareness and processing skills and related pre-reading and reading
skills in accordance with the invention provides a system for
identifying individuals, such as children in kindergarten through
second grade, who are likely to experience academic failure due to
phonological processing deficits and a lack of phonological
awareness. The system may also determine the relative weaknesses
and strengths of the individual or group of individuals in
different phonological awareness and processing areas or related
reading skills in order to help develop appropriate intervention
and curriculum activities to improve the weak skills and areas. The
system may also track, over time, an individual's development or a
group's development of various phonological awareness and
processing skills and relating reading skills and establish a
baseline so that the effectiveness of instructional methods may be
evaluated. The system may identify individual with weak
phonological awareness and processing skills and correct those
skills before the individual develops a reading problem. In a
preferred embodiment, the diagnostic tool may be one or more
software applications being executed on a Web server so that the
diagnostic tool may be an Internet or World Wide Web (the Web)
based tool that provides an easily accessible and affordable
screening tool to help parents determine, in the comfort of their
own home, if their child is at-risk for academic failure due to
phonological awareness and processing deficits. The system may also
suggest solutions (training modules that train a particular
phonological awareness, phonological processing skill or a related
reading or pre-reading skill) for a parent to consider in
correcting the phonological awareness and processing deficits.
[0012] In more detail, the diagnostic system in accordance with a
preferred embodiment of the invention may include one or more
software applications that may be stored on a portable media, such
as a CD or a zip disk or may be stored on a server. The diagnostic
system provides various advantages over conventional diagnostic
tools. The system permits more standardized administration of the
tests that leads to more reliable assessments. The system also
permits more efficient, accurate and reliable scoring and tracking
of an individual's phonological awareness and processing abilities
so that the individual's progress may be determined by comparing
the various test results to one another and comparing the results
of tests given at different time to each other. The system may be
administered by people who do not necessarily understand the
intricacies of phonological awareness and processing skills. In
addition, the system may be administered simultaneously to a large
number of individuals since each children may use a separate
computer to complete the tests. Finally, the engaging graphical
game format of the tests within the diagnostic system may reduce an
individual's test anxiety so that a more accurate test may be
conducted.
[0013] The diagnostic system may include one or more interactive
computer activities that permit the diagnostic system to measure
one or more different types of phonological awareness and
processing skills, knowledge of sound-symbol correspondences and
fluency of decoding and reading. The system in accordance with the
invention may also collect risk factor and other relevant data
about each individual, assess performance on activities that
measure phonological awareness and processing skill, analyze risk
factor data and performance data for individuals or groups of
individuals, and report those results. In a preferred embodiment,
the system may be used for diagnosing phonological awareness and
processing skill deficits in a young child.
[0014] Thus, in accordance with the invention, a system and method
for testing one or more skills associated with the reading skills
of an individual is provided. The method comprises presenting one
or more stimuli to the individual, each stimulus associated with a
test for testing a particular reading or pre-reading skill of the
individual, the skills indicating the risk that the individual
develops a language-based learning disability. The method further
comprises receiving a response from the individual to each
stimulus, scoring the user's responses to each test, and
recommending, based on the scores of the one or more tests, one or
more training modules for improving a reading or pre-reading skill
of the individual as indicated by the score of the tests.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0015] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating a computer-based
phonological skills diagnostic system in accordance with the
invention;
[0016] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a Web-based server computer
that may be a part of the diagnostic system of FIG. 1;
[0017] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of
the diagnostic tool of FIG. 2 in accordance with the invention
including one or more tests that are used to diagnose a reading
problem of a child;
[0018] FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating filling out a
questionnaire in accordance with the invention;
[0019] FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's recognition of rhymes;
[0020] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's rhyme recognition ability may be tested in accordance with
the invention;
[0021] FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to generate a rhyme;
[0022] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's rhyme generation ability may be tested in accordance with
the invention;
[0023] FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing the
child's ability to distinguish the beginning and ending sounds of a
word;
[0024] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to discern the beginning and ending of words may be
tested in accordance with the invention;
[0025] FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to blend sounds;
[0026] FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to blend sounds may be tested in accordance with
the invention;
[0027] FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to segment sounds;
[0028] FIG. 14 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to segment sounds may be tested in accordance with
the invention;
[0029] FIG. 15 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to manipulate sounds;
[0030] FIG. 16 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to manipulate sounds may be tested in accordance
with the invention;
[0031] FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to recall spoken items in sequential order;
[0032] FIG. 18 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to recall spoken items in sequential order may be
tested in accordance with the invention;
[0033] FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to rapidly name visually-presented items;
[0034] FIG. 20 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's ability to rapidly name visually-presented items may be
tested in accordance with the invention;
[0035] FIG. 21 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to name letters and associate sounds with
symbols;
[0036] FIG. 22 is a diagram illustrating an example of how a
child's ability to name letters and sound/symbol associations may
be tested in accordance with the invention;
[0037] FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability to decode words;
[0038] FIG. 24 is a diagram illustrating an example of how a
child's ability to decode words may be tested in accordance with
the invention;
[0039] FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating a method for testing a
child's ability for fluent reading;
[0040] FIG. 26 is a diagram illustrating an example of how a
child's ability for fluent reading may be tested in accordance with
the invention; and
[0041] FIG. 27 is a flowchart illustrating the operating of the
training module recommender in accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0042] The invention is particularly applicable to a World Wide Web
(Web) based diagnostic system for determining a child's
phonological awareness and processing skills and reading skills and
it is in this context that the invention will be described. It will
be appreciated, however, that the system and method in accordance
with the invention has greater utility since it may be implemented
on other types of computer systems, such as the Internet, a local
area network, a wide area network or any other type of computer
network. The system may also be used to test a variety of other
individuals, such as illiterate and mentally disabled people,
individuals whose native language is not English who are learning
to read, and adolescents and adults who read poorly and wish to
improve their reading skills.
[0043] FIG. 1 is a block diagram illustrating an embodiment of a
computer-based phonological skills diagnostic system 50 in
accordance with the invention. In this embodiment, the diagnostic
system 50 may include a server 52 and one or more client computers
54 (Client # 1-Client #N) connected together by a communications
network 56, that may be the Internet, the World Wide Web (the Web),
a local area network, a wide area network or any other type of
communications network. In the embodiment shown, the communications
network is the Web and a typical Web communications protocol, such
as the hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP), may be used for
communications between the server and the client computer. In
particular, the server may download one or more Web pages to each
client computer and each client computer may send responses back to
the server.
[0044] The server may further comprise a central processing unit
(CPU) 58, a memory 60, a database (DB) 62, a persistent storage
device 64 and a diagnostic tool 66. In a preferred embodiment, the
diagnostic tool may be one or more software applications (testing
different phonological awareness and processing skills or reading
skills) stored in the persistent storage of the server that may be
downloaded into the memory 60 (as shown in FIG. 1) so that the
diagnostic tool may be executed by the CPU 58 of the server. In the
preferred Web-based embodiment, the DB 62 or persistent storage
device 64 may store one or more Web pages associated with the
diagnostic tool 66. The Web pages may be downloaded to each client
computer when the client computer requests the particular Web page.
The server may also include the necessary hardware and software to
accept requests from one or more client computers. In the preferred
embodiment, the Web pages may be communicated to the one or more
client computers using the HTTP protocol and the client computers
may send data back to the server, such as test responses, using the
same protocol.
[0045] Each client computer 54 (Client # N will be described
herein, but it should be realized that each client computer is
substantially similar) may be used by an individual user, such as a
parent of a child or a test administrator, to access the diagnostic
tool stored on the server. Each client computer 54 may include a
central processing unit (CPU) 70, a memory 72, a persistent storage
device 74 such as a hard disk drive, a tape drive, an optical drive
or the like, an input device 76 such as a keyboard, a mouse, a
joystick, a speech recognition microphone or the like, and a
display 78 such as a typical cathode ray tube, a flat panel display
or the like. Each client computer may also include a browser
application 80 that may be stored in the persistent storage device
and downloaded to the memory 72 as shown in the figure. The browser
application may be executed by the CPU 70 and may permit the user
of the client computer to interact with the Web pages being
downloaded from the server 52. In this system, multiple client
computers may establish simultaneous communications sessions with
the server and each client computer may be downloading Web pages
from the server. The system 50 thus permits multiple client
computers to access the diagnostic tool 66 stored on the server so
that the user of each client computer may take advantage of the
benefits of the diagnostic tool.
[0046] As described below in more detail, the diagnostic tool may
include one or more different tools that test various phonological
awareness or processing skills as well as reading skills so that a
child's proficiency at phonological awareness and processing skills
and reading skills may be determined. The diagnostic tool 66 may
also use a child's scores on the one or more tools in order to
recommend to the user of the client computer (e.g., the parent of
the child) which training tools the parent may consider downloading
to help the child with any deficiencies. These training tools may
also be stored in the persistent storage device 64 connected to the
server so that the user may then download the training tool from
the server as well. The training tools are described in more detail
in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 09/039,194 and
60/103,354, filed Mar. 13, 1998 and Oct. 7, 1998, respectively,
that are incorporated herein by reference and owned by the same
assignee as the present application. The incorporated applications
also describe the different sounds units types, syllable types and
phoneme types that may be tested using the diagnostic system since
these types of sound units, syllables and phonemes are similar to
the types of sound units, syllables and phonemes used in the
training tools. Now, more details of the Web-based diagnostic
system will be described.
[0047] FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating the Web-based server
computer 52 that may be a part of the diagnostic system of FIG. 1.
The server 52 may include the CPU 58, the memory 60, the DB 62, the
persistent storage device 64 and the diagnostic tool 66. The
diagnostic tool may further comprise a user interface (UI) 100, a
test section 102, a scorer 104, an administrator 106 and a
recommender 108. The user interface may download the Web pages to
each client computer as the Web pages are requested and receive the
responses back from the client computers. The test section 102 may
contain links to one or more different diagnostic tests (stored in
the persistent storage or the DB) that may be used to determine a
child's proficiency at a particular phonological awareness skill or
reading skill as described in more detail below. Each test may have
the child play a graphical game in which some skill of the child is
being tested without the child knowing that a test is being
performed. This type of game-based testing may reduce the child's
anxiety about taking a test. The child may interact with each test
and respond to the test with responses. Those responses are
uploaded to the server and gathered by the scorer 104. The scorer
may accumulate the total score for each test and then store the
score in the DB 62. Since the scores from the tests are
automatically gathered and stored by the scorer into the DB, the
system helps to generate accurate scores, permits the scores from
different children to be compared to each other and permit a
child's progress to be tracked based on the changing scores of a
child over time. The scorer 104 may also include statistical
analysis mechanisms for determining various statistics about the
scores of one or more children using the diagnostic tool.
[0048] The administrator 106 may perform various administrative
actions such as monitoring the user of the diagnostic tool, billing
the users (if appropriate) and the like. The recommender 108 may
use the scores and statistical information generated by the scorer,
if requested by the user of the client computer, to recommend one
or more training tools that may be used by the child taking the
tests on the particular client computer in order to improve the
child's ability in any deficient areas. For example, the scores may
indicate that the child has weak/below average rhyme recognizing
skills and the recommender may recommend that the child play the
rhyme recognizer training tool in order to boost the child's rhyme
recognition abilities. The parent may then download the training
tool from the system. The recommender permits a parent of the
child, who has no experience or knowledge about reading disorders
or phonological awareness and processing deficits, to have their
child tested for these deficits at home and then have the system
automatically recommend a training tool that may help the child
improve in any deficient areas.
[0049] The diagnostic tool may also include speech recognition
software that permits the various tests described below, to be used
in conjunction with speech recognition technology (a microphone and
speech recognition software) on the client computer to enhance the
value of the diagnostic tests. For example, the child may see one
or more items on the computer screen in rapid succession, speak the
name of each item into a microphone that is interpreted by the
speech recognition software in the client computer, transmitted to
the server and compared to a correct response by the speech
recognition software in the server so that the scorer may determine
whether or not the child correctly identified each item. The tests
that may benefit from the speech recognition technology will be
described below. Now, a preferred embodiment of the diagnostic tool
in accordance with the invention will be described in more
detail.
[0050] FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of
the diagnostic tool 66 including one or more tests 102 that are
used to diagnose a reading problem of a child by testing various
phonological awareness and processing skills and pre-reading skills
of the child. In a preferred embodiment, the one or more tests 102
may each be a separate software application module that may include
a user interface portion 109 containing one or more Web pages..
Each test 102 may display images on the display of the client
computer that test a particular phonological awareness skill of the
child and receive responses from the child that are used to
determine a score for the child. In the preferred embodiment, the
diagnostic tool may include, for example, a questionnaire module
110, a rhyme recognizer module 112, a rhyme generator module 114, a
beginning and ending sound or sound unit recognizer module 116, a
sound blender module 120, a sound segmenter module 122, a sound
manipulator module 124, a sequential verbal recall module 126, a
rapid item naming module 128, a letter naming and sound/symbol
association module 130, a word decoder module 132 and a fluent
reader module 134. As described above, each module may embody a
test that tests a particular phonological or reading skill of the
child that may affect the child's ability to read.
[0051] The questionnaire 110 is a fill-in form that permits the
system to look for particular risk factors that may lead to reading
deficiencies as described below with reference to FIG. 4. The rhyme
recognizer module 112 determines the child's ability to recognize a
rhyme as described below with reference to FIGS. 5 and 6. The rhyme
generator module 114 determines the child's ability to make rhymes
as described below with reference to FIGS. 7 and 8. The beginning
and ending sound or sound unit recognizer module 116 determines the
child's ability the recognize the beginning and ending sounds in
one or more words as described below with reference to FIGS. 9 and
10. The sound blender module 120 determines the child's ability to
blend known sounds or sound units together to form new words as
described below with reference to FIGS. 11 and 12.
[0052] The sound segmenter module 122 determines the child's
ability to segment a word into one or more sounds as described
below with reference to FIGS. 13 and 14. The sound manipulator
module 124 determines a child's ability to manipulate the sounds in
a word as described below with reference to FIGS. 15 and 16. The
sequential verbal recall module 126 determines the child's ability
to recall a series of sequential items shown to the child as
described below with reference to FIGS. 17 and 18. The rapid naming
module 128 determines a child's ability to rapidly name one or more
items as described below with reference to FIGS. 19 and 20. The
letter naming and sound/symbol association module 130 determines
the child's ability to name the letters of the alphabet and
associate sounds with symbols as described below with reference to
FIGS. 21 and 22. The word decoding module 132 determines a child's
ability to determine words based on one or more sounds as described
below with reference to FIGS. 23 and 24. The fluent reader module
134 determines the child's fluent reading ability as described
below with reference to FIGS. 25 and 26. As described above and
below, each module may use the speech recognition technology to
enhance the testing process. Now, each of these modules will be
described in more detail starting with the questionnaire.
[0053] FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating a questionnaire process
140 in accordance with the invention. The questionnaire permits the
diagnostic system to gather information about an individual to be
tested for the purpose of calculating the individual's risk for
reading and academic failure. In particular, a variety of
historical, environmental, familial and behavioral factors that
have been closely linked with and are predictive of language-based
reading and learning disorders may be determined. For example, the
frequency of middle ear infections, a family history of dyslexia,
socioeconomic status, exposure to literacy in the home,
competencies in speech sound awareness, word retrieval, verbal
memory, speed sound perception and production and language
comprehension and expressive language may provide information about
an individual's risk for language-based reading and learning
problems.
[0054] In step 142, the questionnaire may display a first question
to the user of the client computer, such as the parent of the child
being tested. Next, the user may respond to the question using the
user input devices and the user's response may be recorded by the
questionnaire module in step 144. In step 146, the questionnaire
module determines if all of the questions have been answered and
goes to step 142 to present the next question to the user if there
are additional questions. As long as there are remaining questions,
the method will loop through steps 142-146. When the user has
answered all of the questions, the questionnaire module may analyze
the responses in step 148 to calculate a score and a risk factor
value and then display the results of the analysis (including the
responses and the recommendations of the system) to the user in
step 150. The score may be calculated as the number of items
checked as being applicable to the user. Although a single factor
does not indicate a risk, the more factors that exist for an
individual, the more likely it is that the individual may
experience difficulties.
[0055] In analyzing the results of the questionnaire, the module
may generate a category of the risk (high, medium or low) and then
provide recommendations based on the category of risk. As an
example, the questionnaire may ask if the child has a history of
middle ear infections, if anyone in the family has reading or other
learning disabilities and if the child mispronounces multi-syllabic
words. The responses to these questions may be used to determine
the category of risk of the person being tested. The category of
risk determined based on the questionnaire may then be used during
the recommendation of training tools. Now, the rhyme recognition
module will be described in more detail.
[0056] FIG. 5 is a flowchart illustrating a method 160 for testing
a child's recognition of rhymes in accordance with the invention.
The rhyme recognizer module tests the child's ability to recognize
rhyming words and, in order to determine if two words rhyme, the
child must focus on the sounds of the words rather than the
meaning. In addition, the child must focus on one part of the word
rather than the word as a whole. A sensitivity to rhyming is
typically a child's first experience shifting their attention and
focus from the content of the speech to the form of the words.
Typically, this skill for recognizing rhymes should emerge by 3-4
years of age. The module may show the child one or more different
types of rhymes (using different sound units, for example) in order
to assess the child's ability with different types of rhymes.
[0057] At step 162, the rhyme recognizing module may display two
words along with their pictures on the user's display screen as
shown in FIG. 6. For example, the module may display the picture of
a sun and a picture of a gun. In step 164, the module may display
text below the pictures asking the user if the two words rhyme. In
a preferred embodiment, the module may present a verbal prompt
asking the user if the two words rhyme since the users of the
system may not be able to read. In step 166, the user may use the
user input device, such as the keyboard, the mouse or the
microphone of the speech recognition hardware, to respond to the
question and the module may receive the response. In step 168, the
module may determine if the response is correct. If the response is
correct, the module may determine if there are other rhyme types to
test in step 170. If there are more rhyme types to test, the module
may display the word pair for the next type of rhyme in step 172
and loops back to step 164 to display the question about whether
the two words rhyme. If there are no more rhyme types to test, the
module may calculate the child's score in step 174. The score may
be calculated based on the percentage of pairs of items correctly
identified as rhyming or not. In step 176, the module may display
the score to the user and the recommender, based on the score, may
recommend one or more training tools to help the child improve his
rhyme identification skills.
[0058] Returning to step 168, if the response given by the user is
not correct, then the module may determine the number of
consecutive errors of the particular rhyme type in step 178. In
step 180, the module may compare the number calculated above to a
predetermined number and if the number of consecutive errors is
more than the predetermined number, the module go to step 170 to
determine if there are other rhyme types to be tested (assuming
that more tests for the current rhyme types are not productive
since the user has already missed more than the predetermined
number). If the number of consecutive errors is less than the
predetermined number, then the module may display the next word
pair for the same rhyme type in step 182 in order to continue
testing the child's ability with that particular type of rhyme. In
this manner, the rhyme recognizer module may test the child's
abilities with respect to a variety of rhyme types to gain a better
understanding of the child's deficiencies or abilities to recognize
rhymes. For example, the module may determine that the child only
has deficiencies with respect to certain types of rhymes. Now, an
example of the user interface for the rhyme recognition module will
be described.
[0059] FIG. 6 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's rhyme recognition may be tested in accordance with the
invention. In particular, an image 190 that may be displayed on the
user's display screen is shown. The image may include a picture of
a first item 192 and a picture of a second item 194 and the child
must determine if the names of the two items rhyme with each other.
In this example, the items are a sun and a gun that do in fact
rhyme. The image may also include displayed instructions 196 from
the module and one or more response buttons 198, 200, such as the
"Yes" button and the "No" button in this example. As described
above, the user may also respond to the query by using the keyboard
or by speaking into a speech recognition microphone. In accordance
with the invention, the rhyme recognition module may present the
rhyme recognition test as a series of colorful images that reduces
the child's test anxiety since the child may not even realize that
he/she is being tested. Now, the rhyme generation module will be
described in more detail.
[0060] FIG. 7 is a flowchart illustrating a method 210 for testing
a child's ability to generate a rhyme. The rhyme generation module
assesses a child's ability to focus on one part of a word rather
than the entire word. The ability to rhyme indicates the emergence
of phonological awareness and processing skills and is a good early
indicator of later reading ability. Typically, this skill begins to
show as the child is 3-4 years old.
[0061] In step 212, the module may generate a word sound on the
speaker of the user's computer and may display an image of the word
being spoken. The module may also display a series of other
pictures of items in step 214 and the user must determine which
item in the series rhymes with the spoken word. The module may then
ask the user to select the rhyming item in step 216, the user may
provide a response using one of the input devices (keyboard, mouse
or microphone). Instead of a series of images being displayed to
the user, the module may provide a verbal prompt asking the user to
generate a rhyming word and the user may speak the rhyming word
into the microphone of the speech recognition device. The module
may then determine if the user's response is correct in step 218.
If the user's response is not correct, then the module may
determine the number of consecutive incorrect responses in step 220
and compare the calculated number to a predetermined number, n, in
step 222. If the number of errors is less than the predetermined
number (e.g., the user should be tested more on that rhyme type),
the module may display the next image in step 224 and return to
step 214. If the number of consecutive errors is greater than the
predetermined number (e.g., it is no longer useful to continue
testing this rhyme pair because the user does not understand it) or
the user's response was correct, the module may determine if there
are more rhyme types to test in step 226. If there are more rhyme
types to test, then the module may display the items for the next
rhyme type in step 228 and return to step 214 to elicit the user's
response. If there are no other rhyme types (i.e., the user has
completed the module), the module may calculate a score in step 230
(the score is equal to the percentage of items correctly identified
as rhyming) and may display the results of the test and any
recommendations from the recommender in step 232. The
recommendations from the recommender are similar to those described
above and therefore will not be described here. Now, an example of
the rhyme generation test is described.
[0062] FIG. 8 is a diagram illustrating an example of how the
child's rhyme generation may be tested in accordance with the
invention using an image 240. The image may include an image 242 of
the spoken word that may be a "pup" in this example. The image 240
may also include one or more images of other items 244-248 (a horn,
a bed and a cup in this example) and displayed instructions 250 as
shown. During the test, the user may hear the word "pup", see the
picture of the "pup" and select the item below it that rhymes with
the pup. In this example, the user is supposed to select the
picture of the cup. As above, instead of a series of images being
displayed to the user, the module may provide a verbal prompt
asking the user to generate a rhyming word and the user may speak
the rhyming word into the microphone of the speech recognition
device. As above, the use of images to test the child's ability
reduces the child's test anxiety since the child may not even
realize that a test is being conducted. Now, more details of the
beginning and ending sound recognizer module will be described.
[0063] FIG. 9 is a flowchart illustrating a method 260 performed by
the beginning and ending sound recognizer module for testing the
child's ability to distinguish the beginning and ending sounds of a
word. In particular, the module tests a child's ability to
recognize sounds in words. Once the child establishes the skill to
recognize the beginning and ending sounds of a word, the child may
more readily learn to isolate the sounds in a word and hear them
separately. A normal kindergarten child is typically able to
identify which word in a group of three words begins with the same
first sound as the target word. Most normal first grade students
can perform the harder task of identifying the word in a group with
the same last sound.
[0064] In step 262, the module may present a spoken word naming an
item and display an image of the item to the user. In step 264, the
module may query the user about which item in a sequence of items
has the same beginning sound as the item. The module may then
receive a user's response from the user entering the response into
the input devices as described above in step 266. In step 268, the
module determines if the response is correct. If the response is
not correct, the module may determine the number of consecutive
errors for the particular beginning sound in step 270 and compare
the calculated value with a predetermined value, n, in step 272. If
the calculated value is not less than the predetermined value
(i.e., the user should be asked more questions about that
particular type of beginning sound), then the module may present
the user with another spoken word and picture in step 274 and
return to step 264 to gather the user's response.
[0065] Returning to step 268, if the response of the user is
correct, the module determines if all of the beginning sounds in
the test are completed in step 276 and either presents the next
beginning sound in step 278 and returns to step 264 if there are
other beginning sounds to test or begins testing the ending sounds.
In particular, the module may present a spoken word and a picture
of the item in step 280 and query the user about which item in a
sequence of items has a similar ending sound in step 282. In step
284, the module may gather the user's response and determine if the
response is correct in step 286. If the response is incorrect, the
module may determine the number of consecutive errors for the
particular ending sound in step 288, compare the calculated number
to a predetermined number in step 290 and display a next word in
step 292 and returns to step 282 if the calculated number is less
than the predetermined number. If the calculated number is not less
than the predetermined number or the user's response is correct,
the module may determines if the ending sounds has been completed
in step 294. If the testing of the ending sounds has not been
completed then the module may present the next word in step 296 and
return to step 282. If the ending sounds are completed, the module
may calculate a score based on the percentage of correct responses
in step 298. In step 300, the module and the recommender,
respectively, may generate a display of the score and any
recommendations about training tools that the user may use to
improve his recognition of the beginning and ending sounds of a
word. Now, an example of the user interface for testing the ability
to discern the beginning and endings of words will be
described.
[0066] FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating an example of a user
interface 310 of how the child's ability to discern the beginning
and ending of words may be tested in accordance with the invention.
In particular, the user interface may include a picture of the
current word 312 that is a leg in this example, and a series of
pictures 314 showing other items. The user must recognize the
beginning sound of the leg and then determine which picture of an
item shows an item with the same beginning sound. The user may then
select an item by clicking on the item. In this example, the
correct response is the lamp. Now, a method for testing a child's
ability to blend sounds will be described.
[0067] FIG. 11 is a flowchart illustrating a method 360 for testing
a child's ability to blend sounds. In particular, the game tests
the user's ability to blend units of sound such as syllables or
phonemes together. The blending of these units of sound together
requires a knowledge that individual sounds may be combined to form
a word, but does not require letter recognition. The blending of
sounds is an important reading skill since, when children sound out
a word, they must be able to then blend all of the sounds together
to form the whole word. Typical children normally develop the
blending skill during the early kindergarten years.
[0068] In step 362, the module may display one or more graphical
representations of items and present a spoken word, with its sound
units separated by equal intervals of time, to the user, such as
"k-ey". The module may then ask the user to identify the graphical
item referred to by the spoken word in step 364 and receive the
response from the user using one of the input devices, such as the
keyboard, mouse or microphone of the speech recognizer. In step
366, the module may determine if the response received is correct.
If the response was not correct, the module may determine the
number of consecutive errors for the current sound unit in step
368. In step 370, the module may determine if the number of
consecutive errors is less than a predetermined threshold and
present the next word with similar sound unit types in step 372 and
loop back to step 364 if the number of consecutive errors is not
less than predetermined threshold. If the number of consecutive
errors is not less than the predetermined threshold or if the prior
response was correct, the module may determine if there are other
sound unit types to test in step 374. If there are other sound unit
types, the module may present a word with sound units of the new
type in step 376 and loop back to step 364 to test the child using
the new sound unit type. If there are no more sound unit types to
test, the module may determine the user's score in step 378 based
on the percentage of correctly answered items. In step 379, the
module may display the score to the user and the recommender may
recommend one or more training tools that may help the user improve
the blending sound ability and that may be downloaded from the
diagnostic system. An example of the user interface for testing the
blending of sounds will now be described.
[0069] FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating an example of a user
interface for testing a child's ability to blend sounds 380 in
accordance with the invention. As shown, the user interface 380 may
include graphical representations 382-386 of one or more items,
such as a key, a doll and a bell in this example, that the user may
select in response to the spoken word's separated sound units. As
described above, the user may respond to the questions by clicking
on the image, pressing a key on the keyboard or speaking a name
into the microphone of the speech recognizer. In this example, the
correct response is to select the key 382. Now, a method for
testing the sound segmenting ability of a user will be
described.
[0070] FIG. 13 is a flowchart illustrating a method 390 for testing
a child's ability to segment sounds in which the user's ability to
segment a unit of sound, such as a word, into its constituent sound
units, such as syllables and phonemes, is tested. The ability to
segment phonemes is a reliable predictor of reading success and
usually is developed prior to and during kindergarten. In step 392,
a sequence of sounds units, such as a sentence, is spoken to the
user. In step 394, the user is queried about how many words the
user heard and the response from the user may be shown graphically
as shown in FIG. 14. In the example shown in FIG. 16, the sentence
"I have two brothers" was presented to the user, the user activated
an input device (clicked the mouse button, hit a key or spoke into
the microphone) four times to indicate that four words were heard,
and four items 395 are shown on the display.
[0071] Returning to FIG. 13, the accuracy of the user's response is
checked in step 396. If the response is not correct, the number of
consecutive errors is determined in step 398 and compared to a
threshold value in step 400. If the number of errors is less than
the threshold, the next sequence of sounds units is presented to
the user in step 402 and the method loops back to step 394. If the
number of errors is not less than the threshold or the prior
response of the user was correct, it is determined if there are
more tests with a different sequence of sound units in step 404. If
there are more tests, a new sequence of sound units is presented in
step 406 and the method loops back to step 394. If all of the tests
have been completed, then the user's score is determined (as a
percentage of correct responses) in step 408 and the score and any
recommendations based on the score are displayed in step 410. Now,
a method for testing a child's ability to manipulate sounds is
described.
[0072] FIG. 15 is a flowchart illustrating a method 420 for testing
a child's ability to manipulate sounds. In particular, the user's
ability to manipulate phonemes is tested since that ability is
highly correlated with reading ability through the 12.sup.th grade.
In step 422, the user is presented with a spoken word. In the
example shown in FIG. 16, the spoken word is "cake". In step 424, a
graphical representation of constituent sound units is displayed
for the user. In the example shown in FIG. 16, the graphical
representations may be one or more blocks 426 (three for the word
"cake" with the first and last blocks being the same color since
the first and last sound units of "cake" have the same sound). In
step 428, the user is asked to rearrange the blocks shown or use
the available other blocks (as shown in FIG. 16) to form a new word
and the user rearranges the blocks with an input device. In the
example, the user is asked to change "cake" to "cape". A correct
response would be to have three blocks wherein a third block 429
has a color that does not match the other two blocks indicating
that the third sounds unit is different from both the first and
second sound units. In step 430, the accuracy of the response is
determined. If the response is not correct, the number of
consecutive errors is determined in step 432 and compared to a
threshold value in step 434. If the threshold value is not exceeded
(indicating that the same type of manipulation should continue to
be tested), the next manipulation of the same type is presented in
step 436 and the method loops back to step 424. If the number of
errors exceeds the threshold (indicating that the child is having
too much trouble with the current type of manipulation) or if the
prior response was correct, it is determined if there are more
types of manipulations to test in step 438. If there are more types
to test, the next type of manipulation is presented in step 440 and
the method loops back to step 424. If there are no more types of
test, the score of the user is determined in step 442 (based on the
percentage of correct answers) and the score and any
recommendations are displayed to the user in step 444. Now, a
method for testing the ability to recall spoken words will be
described.
[0073] FIG. 17 is a flowchart illustrating a method 450 for testing
a child's ability to recall spoken items in sequential order. The
ability to recall a sequence of verbal material depends on the
ability to accurately represent the essential phonological features
of each item in working memory and phonological coding efficiency
is a primary determinant of performance of this task. Typically,
the ability to recall a list of spoken items increases with age
from about 1 digit and 2 words at 4 years old to 8 digits and 6
words at 12 years old. In step 452, a sequence of words and/or
digits is spoken with equal intervals between each word or digit
through the speaker of the computer to the user. The user then
repeats the sequence back using an input device such as a
microphone of the speech recognizer in step 454. FIG. 18
illustrates an example of a sequence of digits that are presented
to the user. In step 456, the response is checked for accuracy.
[0074] If the response is not correct, then the number of
consecutive errors is determined in step 458 and the number of
consecutive errors is compared to a threshold in step 460. If the
threshold is not exceeded, then the next sequence of words and/or
digits is presented in step 462 and the method loops back to step
454. If the threshold is exceeded or if the last response was
correct, it is determined if there are more types of sequence of
words to test in step 464 and the method presents a new type of
sequence in step 466 and loops back to step 454 if there are more
types. If all of the types of sequences have been completed, then
the user's score is determined in step 468 (as a percentage of
correct responses) and the scope and any recommendations for
training modules is displayed in step 470. Now, a method for
testing rapid naming ability will be described.
[0075] FIG. 19 is a flowchart illustrating a method 480 for testing
a child's ability to rapidly name visually-presented items. In
particular, an inability to name visual objects typically underlies
a reading disorder. In step 482, an array 484 (an example of which
is shown in FIG. 20 as a first row of a 4.times.6 array) is
displayed to the user. In step 486, a timer is started and the user
is asked to name all of the items in the array as fast as possible
in step 488 using an input device such as a microphone of a speech
recognizer. The timer may actually be started when the user makes
his/her first response. After each response, the accuracy of the
response is determined in step 490. If the response is not correct,
then the number of consecutive errors is determined in step 492 and
compared to a threshold in step 494. If the threshold is exceeded,
the test is aborted. If the threshold is not exceeded, then the
user continues to identify the items in the array. If the prior
response was correct, then it is determined if there are more items
to name in step 496 and the method loops back to step 488 if there
are more items. If all of the items have been named, then the timer
is stopped in step 498 and the score is determined in step 500
based on the total time of the responses. In step 502, the score
and any recommendations for training modules are displayed. Now, a
method for testing the ability to name letters and associate sounds
with symbols will be described.
[0076] FIG. 21 is a flowchart illustrating a method 510 for testing
a child's ability to name letters and associate a phoneme sound
with a letter. The inability to name letters may indicate a reading
problem at the kindergarten level while an inability to associate a
phoneme sound with a letter may indicate a reading problem at the
first and second grade level. In step 512, a letter's name is
spoken to the user by the computer. In step 514, the user may
identify the letter in an array of letters 516 (as example of which
is shown in FIG. 22) and select the appropriate letter using an
input device. In step 518, the response accuracy is determined and
it is determined if there are more letters. If there are more
letters, the method loops back to step 512. If all of the letters
have been completed, then a phoneme sound is generated by the
computer and heard by the user in step 520. The user may then
indicate the corresponding letter for the phoneme sound in step 522
and the accuracy of the response is checked. In step 524, it is
determined if there are more phonemes to test and the method loops
back to step 520 if there are more phonemes. If the phonemes have
been completed, then the user's score is determined in step 526 and
the score and any recommendations about training modules is
displayed in step 528. Now, a method for testing a child's ability
to decode words will be described.
[0077] FIG. 23 is a flowchart illustrating another method 530 for
testing a child's ability to decode words. In particular, the
method tests a child's ability to decode (i.e., read by sounding
out) nonsense and real words since research has shown that the best
measure of the ability to apply knowledge about grapheme -phoneme
correspondences to reading words is a test of non-word phonemic
decoding fluency.
[0078] At step 532, the module may display a set of words 533 on
the screen (an example of which is shown in FIG. 24) and then
present a spoken word. In step 534, the module asks the user to
identify the written word that was just spoken to the user. As
above, the user's response may be provided using one of the input
devices, such as the keyboard, mouse or microphone of the speech
recognizer. Instead of speaking the word to the user, the module
may present the word to the user is a visual manner. In step 536,
the module determines if the correct response was received. If the
response was not correct, then the module may determine the number
of consecutive errors for the particular syllable type in step 538
and compares that calculated value to a predetermined threshold
value in step 540 to determine if the calculated value is less than
the threshold value. If the calculated value is less than the
threshold, then the next spoken word for the same syllable type is
presented in step 542 and the method loops back to step 534 to
determine the user's response. If the number of consecutive errors
is greater than the threshold or the prior response was correct,
the module may determine if there are more syllable types to be
tested in step 544. If there are more syllable types to test, the
module presents the next word for the next syllable type in step
546 and loops back to step 532 where a new spoken word is presented
to the user. If there are no more syllable types to test, the
module may repeat the above testing (not shown in the flowchart for
clarity reasons) process for one or more nonsense words in step
548. Once the above testing process has been repeated for nonsense
words by testing if it is completed in step 550 and looping back to
step 548, the module may determine the score of the child in step
552 wherein the score is calculated as a percentage of items that
have been correctly answered. In step 554, based on the score, the
module may display the score and the recommender may recommend one
or more training tools to improve the child's decoding skills if
the score reveals a decoding deficiency. Now, a method for testing
fluent reading will be described.
[0079] FIG. 25 is a flowchart illustrating a method 560 for testing
a child's ability for fluent reading. Slow or inaccurate decoding
interferes with the ability of the child or user to extract meaning
from the text. A typical child may read and respond to 30 sentences
of the nature presented in this diagnostic tool in two minutes. The
sentences may be questions ("Is the dog red?") or statements ("The
dog has fur.") to which the user responds. In step 562, a question
564 is displayed to the user along with two answers 566 (an example
of which is shown in FIG. 26). A timer is started in step 568 as
the user makes his first response in step 570. In step 572, the
accuracy of the response is determined. If the response is not
accurate, then the number of errors made is compared to a threshold
in step 574. If the number of errors are less than the threshold,
then the method loops back to step 562 to continue testing. If the
number of errors are more than the threshold or the prior response
was correct, it is determined if the time exceeded two minutes in
step 576. If the time is less than two minutes, then the method
loops back to step 562. If the time exceeds two minutes, the total
number of correct responses is tallied and then the entire test is
repeated in step 577 and the score of the user is determined in
step 578. The total score of the user is calculated by determining
the user's score for each two minute test and then averaging the
scores from the two tests to arrive at a final score. For example,
a user may score 30 on the first test and 28 on the second test so
that the final score is 29. In step 580, the score and any
recommendations of training modules is displayed to the user. Now,
the training module recommender in accordance with the invention
will be described.
[0080] FIG. 27 is a flowchart illustrating the training recommender
method 590 in accordance with the invention. The method identifies,
recommends and makes available specific training modules based on
an individual's or a group's assessment profile based on the
results from the various tests performed by the diagnostic tool in
accordance with the invention. In particular, the recommender may
automatically recommend one or more training modules based on the
test results. In step 592, the recommender gathers the data for the
individual or group and analyzes it. In step 594, the recommender
determines the individual or group's skill in each skill area
tested by the diagnostic tool. In step 596, the recommender matches
the skill level of the individual or group in a particular skill
area with an appropriate training module. For example, the
particular score of a user, such as close to normal, on a
particular test, such as rhyme recognition, may cause the
recommender to recommend a lowest level (least amount of training)
of the rhyme recognition training tool to help the child. For a
child with more rhyme recognition deficiencies, the recommender may
recommend a higher level training tool with more rhyme recognition
training. An another example, the particular scores of a user on
the various syllable types in the rhyme recognition test may cause
the recommender to recommend no training for open rime syllable
types but to recommend training for closed rime syllable types.
[0081] In step 598, the recommender may display the recommended
training modules to the user. The user may then select the
recommended training modules in step 600 and the training modules
may be downloaded to the user's computer so that the user may use
the training modules to improve the skill areas that require it. In
this manner, the diagnostic system in accordance with the invention
not only diagnoses reading problems using the various skill tests
but also recommends training modules that may help improve a
deficient skill. Thus, the diagnostic system makes it easy for a
parent to have the child tested for deficiencies and then to
receive the tools that help correct any deficiencies.
[0082] While the foregoing has been with reference to a particular
embodiment of the invention, it will be appreciated by those
skilled in the art that changes in this embodiment may be made
without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention,
the scope of which is defined by the appended.
* * * * *