Blowing agent blends

Wu, Jinhuang ;   et al.

Patent Application Summary

U.S. patent application number 09/789061 was filed with the patent office on 2001-10-25 for blowing agent blends. This patent application is currently assigned to Atofina Chemicals, Inc.. Invention is credited to Dillon, Douglas R., Wu, Jinhuang.

Application Number20010034378 09/789061
Document ID /
Family ID24094819
Filed Date2001-10-25

United States Patent Application 20010034378
Kind Code A1
Wu, Jinhuang ;   et al. October 25, 2001

Blowing agent blends

Abstract

Foam blowing agents blends of 5-50 mole % HCFC-22 and 95-50 mole % of n-pentane, i-pentane and/or cyclopentane are provided, as are polyol premixes and polyurethane foam compositi ons containing such blends.


Inventors: Wu, Jinhuang; (King of Prussia, PA) ; Dillon, Douglas R.; (Norristown, PA)
Correspondence Address:
     Atofina Chemicals, Inc.
    Patent Department, 26th Floor
    2000 Market Street
    Philadelphia
    PA
    19103-3222
    US
Assignee: Atofina Chemicals, Inc.

Family ID: 24094819
Appl. No.: 09/789061
Filed: February 16, 2001

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number
09789061 Feb 16, 2001
09525843 Mar 15, 2000

Current U.S. Class: 521/131 ; 252/182.24; 252/67; 252/69; 510/408; 510/415
Current CPC Class: C08J 2375/04 20130101; C08J 9/149 20130101; C08J 2203/14 20130101; C08J 2203/142 20130101
Class at Publication: 521/131 ; 510/408; 510/415; 252/182.24; 252/67; 252/69
International Class: C08J 009/06

Claims



1. A foam blowing agent composition comprising (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane, i-pentane and cyclopentane.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the pentane is a mixture of i-pentane and cyclopentane.

3. A foam blowing agent composition comprising (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane and i-pentane.

4. A foam premix composition comprising a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 1.

5. A foam premix composition comprising a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 2.

6. A foam premix composition comprising a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 3.

7. A polyurethane foam composition comprising an isocyanate, a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 1, said foam composition having (a) an A-side which contains the isocyanate and, optionally, a portion of the foam blowing agent composition and (b) a B-side which contains the polyol and the balance of the foam blowing agent composition.

8. A polyurethane foam composition comprising an isocyanate, a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 2, said foam composition having (a) an A-side which contains the isocyanate and, optionally, a portion of the foam blowing agent composition and (b) a B-side which contains the polyol and the balance of the foam blowing agent composition.

9. A polyurethane foam composition comprising an isocyanate, a polyol and the foam blowing agent composition of claim 3, said foam composition having (a) an A-side which contains the isocyanate and, optionally, a portion of the foam blowing agent composition and (b) a B-side which contains the polyol and the balance of the foam blowing agent composition.
Description



BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0001] This invention relates to foam blowing agent blends of (a) chlorodifluoromethane ("HCFC-22" or "22") with (b) n-pentane (n-C5), i-pentane (i-C5) and/or cyclopentane (c-C5) and to polyol premixes and polyurethane foam compositions containing such blends.

[0002] Until now, the leading polyurethane foam blowing agent has been 1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane ("141b"), in order to meet the market place requirements for energy, fire performance and cost. At the same time, however, 141b has a high ozone depletion potential ("ODP") of about 0.1. Thus, many foam manufacturers are now investigating the lower ODP pentanes as candidates to replace 141b, as noted for example in an article on "Hydrocarbon Blown Rigid Polyurethane Foam for the Boardstock Industry--A novel Approach" by R. E. Berrier et al which appeared in Polyurethanes Expo 98, Sep. 17-20, 1998. They too, however, have property shortcomings for use in foam, such as high cost and high k-factor performance in foam (thus giving foams with poor thermal insulating properties).

[0003] HCFC-22 has also been disclosed, as in U.S. Pat. No. 4,636,529) for use as a foam blowing agent agent. When used alone, it has certain disadvantages such as a high global warming potential ("GWP") of about 1700 and an ODP of about 0.055.

[0004] It would therefore be useful to provide the industry with an alternative foam blowing agent which overcomes the deficiencies of 22 or the pentanes alone in terms of properties such as ODP, GWP, cost, and k-factor performance.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0005] Foam blowing agent compositions are provided, which compositions comprise (a) about 5 to 50 mole % of chlorodifluoromethane and (b) about 95 to 50 mole % of a pentane selected from the group consisting of one or more of n-pentane, i-pentane and cyclopentane, as well as foam premix compositions, which premix compositions comprise a polyol and the foregoing blowing agent blend, and polyurethane foam compositions, which foam compositions comprise an A-side containing an isocyanate and a B-side containing a polyol and all or a portion of the foregoing blowing agent blend.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0006] It has now been found that the foregoing blends of pentanes with HCFC-22 overcomes deficiencies associated with the use of either alone. Most important, as shown below, the addition of relatively small amounts of 22 has been found to lower the k-factor (and thus enhance the thermal insulating properties) of foams made with such blends relative to the use of the pentanes alone, while still taking advantage of the low ODP (zero) and GWP properties of the pentanes (for example, cyclopentane has a GWP of 11 versus a GWP of 1700 for 22 alone). Other advantages include lowering of the cost of use of pentanes alone (especially cyclopentane), improved solubility in raw materials such as polyester polyols (especially for n-pentane and i-pentane) and less volatile organic compound ("VOC") content than pure hydrocarbon since HCFC-22 is not a VOC.

[0007] The unexpected improvement shown in the following examples in low temperature (0.degree. C.) k-factor performance is particularly significant for many foam applications such as for refrigerators, freezers and cold storage facilities.

[0008] The preferred amount of 22 in the blends varies with the particular pentane or pentane mixture, as shown by the examples below, but is generally in the 10-35 mole % range.

[0009] In the premix compositions, the blowing agent blend is typically present in a concentration range of about 2-60 weight % (preferably 5-40 weight %), based on the weight of the polyol.

[0010] In the polyurethane foam compositions, the effective concentrations of the blends are typically about 0.1-25 weight % (preferably 0.5-15%) based on the weight of the total polyurethane foam formulation.

[0011] The pentane component and/or the 22 component of the blend can be added to the A-side or the B-side or a portion thereof distributed in each side. It is also possible to add the blowing agent composition as a third stream to the foam machine, wholly apart from the A- or B-side.

[0012] The other components of the premix and foam formulations may be those which are conventionally used, which components and their proportions are well known to those skilled in the art. For example, catalysts, fire retardants and surfactants are typical components of the B-side.

[0013] The practice of the invention is illustrated in more detail in the following non-limiting examples. The formulations used (all having an Iso Index of 300) each contained 170.51 parts M-489, a polymeric methane diphenyl diisocyanate available from Bayer Corporation; 100 parts T-2541, a polyester polyol having a hydroxyl number of 240 available from Kosa; 0.19 part PC-5 and 0.33 part PC-46, which are, respectively, pentamethyldiethylenetriamine and potassium acetate in ethylene glycol, catalysts available from Air Products; 2.98 parts K-15, potassium octoate in dipropylene glycol, a catalyst available from Air Products; 2 parts B-8462, a polysiloxane-polyether copolymer surfactant available from Goldschmidt Chemical Corporation; 10 parts AB-80, a tris(1-chloro-2-propyl)phosphate fire retardant available from Albright & Wilson Americas, Inc; and about 24-25 parts blowing agents, the exact amounts of which are more particularly set forth below; all parts are by weight.

[0014] A-side premix components, containing isocyanate and 75% of the blowing agent, were mixed and cooled to 10.degree. C. B-side premix components, containing polyol, surfactant, fire retardant, and 25% of the blowing agent, were also mixed and cooled to 10.degree. C.

1TABLE I Parts of Blowing Agent in Comparative Examples with only Pentane Blowing Agent i-C5: 24.91 9.96 -- -- c-C5: -- 14.53 24.23 -- n-C5: -- -- -- 24.91

[0015]

2TABLE II Parts of Blowing Agent in Invention Examples with 10 Mole %* 22 in Blowing Agent Blend i-C5: 22.43 8.97 -- -- c-C5: -- 13.08 21.80 -- n-C5: -- -- -- 22.43 HCFC-22: 2.99 2.99 2.99 2.99 *For examples with 5, 15 and 20 mole % of HCFC-22, the proportional amount of 22 relative to the pentane content was varied

[0016] In making the foam, the A and B side premixes were mixed for 20 seconds, followed by injection of the catalyst mixture. Mixing was continued for 15 seconds (except for the i-C5/22 blend, for which the mixing continued for only 10 seconds in order to reduce frothing), after which the mixture was poured into a box.

[0017] ASTM procedures were then followed to measure (initial) k-factors (ASTM C518) of the resultant foams at ambient temperature (24.degree. C.) and at 0.degree. C. The results are shown in Tables III and IV:

3TABLE III K-factors (in BTU.in/ft.sup.2.hr..degree- . F.) at 24.degree. C. (% s in blends are in mole %) For 100% n-C5: 0.173 For 5%/95% blend 0.171 of 22/n-C5: For 10%/90% blend 0.167 of 22/n-C5: For 100% i-C5: 0.167 For 5%/95% blend 0.164 of 22/i-C5: For 10%/90% blend 0.164 of 22/i-C5: For 15%/85% blend 0.163 of 22/i-C5: For 100% c-C5: 0.161 For 10%/90% blend 0.161 of 22/i-C5: For 20%/80% blend 0.154 of 22/i-C5: For 100% of a 0.160 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: For 5%/95% blend 0.160 of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: For 10%/90% blend 0.156 of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: For 20%/80% blend 0.151 of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend:

[0018]

4TABLE IV K-factors (in BTU.in/ft.sup.2.hr..degree. F.) at 0.degree. C. (% s in blends are in mole %) For 100% n-C5: 0.192 For 5%/95% blend 0.183 of 22/n-C5: For 10%/90% blend 0.176 of 22/n-C5: For 100% i-C5: 0.177 For 5%/95% blend 0.165 of 22/i-C5: For 10%/90% blend 0.160 of 22/i-C5: For 15%/85% blend 0.157 of 22/i-C5: For 100% c-C5: 0.159 For 10%/90% blend 0.156 of 22/i-C5: For 20%/80% blend 0.147 of 22/i-C5: For 100% of a 0.167 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: For 5%/95% blend 0.166 of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: For 10%/90% blend 0.157 of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend: 0.148 For 20%/80% blend of 22 with the 60/40 c-C5/i-C5 blend:

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed