U.S. patent application number 09/730432 was filed with the patent office on 2001-04-05 for transcoding of a data stream.
This patent application is currently assigned to U.S. Philips Corporation. Invention is credited to Bailleul, Nicolas.
Application Number | 20010000138 09/730432 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 8235355 |
Filed Date | 2001-04-05 |
United States Patent
Application |
20010000138 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Bailleul, Nicolas |
April 5, 2001 |
Transcoding of a data stream
Abstract
A data stream (DS) comprises a time multiplex of coded data (D)
and control data (C). The data stream (DS) may be, for example, of
the MPEG type representing a sequence of pictures. The coded data
(D) is transcoded (T) so as to obtain transcoded data (DT) which
differs in size from the coded data (D). The control data (C) is
adapted for the transcoded data (DT) so as to obtain adapted
control data (CA) which does not substantially differ in size from
the control data (C). The transcoded data (DT) and the adapted
control data (CA) are written into a transcoder output buffer (TOB)
and read from the transcoder output buffer (TOB) so as to obtain a
transcoded data stream (DST). This allows an efficient use of a
transmission channel via which the transcoded data stream (DST) is
to be transmitted and, consequently, it allows a satisfactory
transcoding quality. A size adjustment of the transcoded data (DT)
on the basis of the amount of data contained in the transcoder
output buffer (TOB) and control codes (CC) contained in the data
stream (DS) further contributes to a satisfactory transcoding
quality.
Inventors: |
Bailleul, Nicolas; (Paris,
FR) |
Correspondence
Address: |
Michael E. Marion
Corporate Patent Counsel
U.S. Philips Corporation
580 White Plains Road
Tarrytown
NY
10591
US
|
Assignee: |
U.S. Philips Corporation
580 White Plains Road
Tarrytown
NY
10591
|
Family ID: |
8235355 |
Appl. No.: |
09/730432 |
Filed: |
December 5, 2000 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
|
|
09730432 |
Dec 5, 2000 |
|
|
|
09300804 |
Apr 27, 1999 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
370/527 ;
370/529; 375/E7.022; 375/E7.13; 375/E7.198; 375/E7.222;
375/E7.226 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04N 19/00 20130101;
H04N 21/23608 20130101; H04N 21/2401 20130101; H04N 21/2343
20130101; H04N 19/40 20141101; H04N 21/23406 20130101; H04N
21/234354 20130101; H04N 19/70 20141101; H04N 19/192 20141101; H04N
19/60 20141101; H04N 19/61 20141101 |
Class at
Publication: |
370/527 ;
370/529 |
International
Class: |
H04J 003/00 |
Foreign Application Data
Date |
Code |
Application Number |
Apr 30, 1998 |
EP |
98401053.8 |
Claims
Claims:
1. A method of transcoding a data stream (DS) comprising a time
multiplex of coded data (D) and control data (C), the method
comprising the step of transcoding (T) the coded data (D) so as to
obtain transcoded data (DT) which differs in size from the coded
data (D), characterized in that the method comprises the steps of:
adapting (A) the control data (C) for the transcoded data (DT) so
as to obtain adapted control data (CA) which is substantially equal
in size to the control data (C); writing the transcoded data (DT)
and the adapted control data (CA) in a transcoder output buffer
(TOB); and reading the transcoded data (DT) and the adapted control
data (CA) from the transcoder output buffer (TOB) so as to obtain a
transcoded data stream (DST).
2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the data stream (DS)
comprises control codes (CC), a control code (CC) defining a
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) for a coded data portion
(P) associated therewith, the input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib)
being the difference between an instant (Twd1) when the coded data
portion (P) is written into a decoder input buffer (DIB1) and an
instant (Trd1) when the coded data portion (P) is to be read from
the decoder input buffer (DIB1), characterized in that the method
comprises the steps of: calculating a transcoder output buffer
delay (.DELTA.Ttob) being the difference between an instant (Twt)
when a transcoded data portion (PT) obtained by transcoding the
coded data portion (P) is written into the transcoder output buffer
(TOB), and an instance (Trt) when the transcoded data portion (PT)
is read from transcoder output buffer (TOB); calculating a new
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib_new) which is substantially
equal to the sum of the decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib)
and a transcoding delay (.DELTA.Ttrans) minus the transcoder output
buffer delay (.DELTA.Ttob); and providing, for the transcoded data
portion (PT), an adapted control code (CCA) which defines the new
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib_new).
3. A method as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the method
comprises the steps of: calculating a transcoder output buffer
fullness (Ftob) being the amount of data (A-B) contained in the
transcoder output buffer at the instant (Twt) when the transcoded
data portion (PT) is written into the transcoder output buffer
(TOB); calculating a decoder input buffer fullness (Fdib) being the
amount of data (B-C) which will be contained in a decoder input
buffer receiving the transcoded data stream at an instant (Trd)
when the transcoded coded data portion (PT) is to be read from the
decoder input buffer, the decoder input buffer fullness (Fdib)
being calculated on the basis of the transcoder output buffer
fullness (Ftob), a projected bitrate (R) for the transcoded data
stream, and the sum of the decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib)
and the transcoding delay (.DELTA.Ttrans); and adjusting a
quantization parameter (QP) determining the amount of data (XPT)
which will be comprised in the transcoded data portion (PT) in
dependence on the decoder input buffer fullness (Fdib).
4. A method as claimed in claim 3, characterized in that the method
comprises the steps of: determining a target (Ttarget) for the
amount of data (XPT) to be comprised in the transcoded data portion
(PT); verifying if the target (Ttarget) exceeds the input decoder
buffer fullness (Fdib) and, if so, reducing the target (Ttarget) so
as to obtain a verified target (Ttarget_ver) which does not exceed
the decoder input buffer fullness (Fdib); adjusting the
quantization parameter (QP) on the basis of the verified target
(Ttarget).
5. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein there is a fixed time
interval (.DELTA.Tpt) between instancts when successive transcoded
data portions (PT) are to be read from a decoder input buffer
receiving the transcoded data stream, characterized in that the
method comprises the steps of: determining a target (Ttarget) for
the amount of data (XPT) to be comprised in the transcoded data
portion (PT); calculating a transcoder output buffer fullness
(Ftob) being the amount of data (A-B) contained in the transcoder
output buffer (TOB) at the instant (Twt(i)) when the transcoded
data portion (PT) is written into the transcoder output buffer
(TOB); calculating a subsequent decoder input buffer fullness
(Fdib_next) being the amount of data (B-C) which will be contained
in the decoder input buffer at an instant (Trd(i+1)-.delta.) just
before a subsequent transcoded coded data portion PT(i+1) is to be
read from the decoder input buffer, the next decoder input buffer
fullness (Fdib_next) being calculated on the basis of the target
(Ttarget), the transcoder buffer fillness (Ftob), a projected
bit-rate (R) for the transcoded data stream, and the sum of the
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib), the transcoding delay
(.DELTA.Ttrans) and the fixed time interval (Tpt); verifying if the
next decoder input buffer fullness (Fdib_next) exceeds a predefined
maximum (MAX) and, if so, increasing the target (Ttarget) so as to
obtain a verified target (Ttarget_ver) for which the next decoder
input buffer fullness (Fdib_next) does not exceed the predefined
maximum MAX; adjusting the quantization parameter (QP) determining
the amount of data (XPT) comprised in the transcoded data portion
(PT) on the basis of the verified target (Ttarget_ver).
6. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein a transcoded data
portion precedes the transcoded data portion mentioned in claim 2,
these data portions being hereinafter referred to as current
transcoded data portion (PT(i-k)) and future transcoded data
portion (PT(i)), respectively, characterized in that the method
comprises the steps of: defining a desired decoder input buffer
fullness (Fdib_des) being the amount of data (B-C) which the
decoder input buffer should preferably contain at the instant
(Trd(i)) when the future transcoded data portion (PT(i)) is to be
read from the decoder input buffer; predicting the decoder input
buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) associated with the future data portion
(PT(i-k)); calculating a desired transcoder output buffer fullness
(Ftob_des) being the amount of data (A-B) which the transcoder
buffer should preferably contain at the instant (Twt(i)) when the
future transcoded data portion (PT(i)) is to be written in the
transcoder output buffer; the desired transcoder output buffer
fullness (Ftob_des) being calculated on the basis of the projected
bit-rate (R) for the transcoded data stream and sum of the
predicted decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) and the
transcoding delay (.DELTA.Ttrans); and adjusting the quantization
parameter (QP) determining the amount of data XPT(i-k) comprised in
the current transcoded data portion (XPT(i-k)) on the basis of the
desired transcoder output buffer fullness (Ftob_des).
7. A transcoder for transcoding a data stream (DS) comprising a
time multiplex of coded data (D) and control data (C), the
transcoder comprising a transcoder circuit (TRC) for transcoding
the coded data (D) so as to obtain transcoded data (DT) which
differs in size from the coded data (D), characterized in that the
transcoder comprises: a controller (CON) for adapting the control
data (C) for the transcoded data (DT) so as to obtain adapted
control data (CA) which is substantially equal in size to the
control data (C); and a transcoder output buffer (TOB) for
providing the transcoded data (DT) and the adapted control data
(CA) in the form of a transcoded data stream (DST).
8. A transcoded data stream (DST) which has been obtained by
transcoding a data stream (DS) comprising control codes (CC) and
coded data portions (P), each control code (CC) defining a decoder
input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) for a coded data portion (P)
associated thereto, the input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) being the
difference between an instance (Trw1) at which the coded data
portion (P) is written into a decoder input buffer (DIB1) and an
instance (Trd1) at which the coded data portion (P) is to be read
from the decoder input buffer (DIB1), characterized in that the
transcoded data stream (DST) comprises an adapted control code
(CCA) which defines a new decoder input buffer delay
(.DELTA.Tdib_new).
9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the data stream (DS)
comprises control codes (CC), a control code (CC) defining a
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) for a coded data portion
(P) associated therewith, the decoder input buffer delay
(.DELTA.Tdib) being the difference between an instant (Twd1) when
the coded data portion (P) is written into a decoder input buffer
(DIB1) and an instant (Trd1) when the coded data portion (P) is to
be read from the decoder input buffer (DIB1), characterized in that
the method comprises the steps of: calculating a value for a
quantization parameter (QP) on the basis of the decoder input
buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib), the quantization parameter (QP)
determining the amount of data (XPT) which will be comprised in the
transcoded data portion (PT) obtained by transcoding the coded data
portion (P).
10. A transcoder as claimed in claim 7, wherein the data stream
(DS) comprises control codes (CC), a control code (CC) defining a
decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib) for a coded data portion
(P) associated therewith, the decoder input buffer delay
(.DELTA.Tdib) being the difference between an instant (Twd1) when
the coded data portion (P) is written into a decoder input buffer
(DIB1) and an instant (Trd1) when the coded data portion (P) is to
be read from the decoder input buffer (DIB1), characterized in that
the transcoder comprises: a controller (CON) being programmed for
calculating a value for a quantization parameter (QP) on the basis
of the decoder input buffer delay (.DELTA.Tdib), the quantization
parameter (QP) determining the amount of data (XPT) which will be
comprised in the transcoded data portion (PT) obtained by
transcoding the coded data portion (P).
11. A computer program product for use in a transcoder as claimed
in claim 7, characterized in that the computer program product
comprises a set of instructions for carrying out the method as
claimed in claim 9.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
1. The invention relates to transcoding of a data stream comprising
a time multiplex of coded data and control data. The data stream
may represent, for example, a sequence of images which have been
coded in accordance with an image-coding standard such as, for
example, defined by the Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG).
BACKGROUND ART
2. EP-A 0 690 392 describes a method of transcoding coded digital
signals corresponding to a sequence of images. The method comprises
a decoding step of the input digital signals which are associated
with each current image. The decoding step is followed by an
encoding step.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
3. It is an object of the invention to provide transcoding of a
data stream which yields a satisfactory quality. Claims 1, 7 and 8
define a method of transcoding, a transcoder, and a transcoded data
stream, respectively, in accordance with the invention.
4. The invention takes the following aspects into consideration. A
data stream may not only comprise coded data, but also control
data. In transcoding, the data stream will effectively be split up
into a coded data sub-stream and a control data sub-stream. The
coded data sub-stream is transcoded, resulting in a transcoded data
sub-stream. It may be necessary to adapt the control data for the
transcoded data. In that case, the control data sub-stream is
effectively transformed into an adapted control data sub-stream.
The transcoded data sub-stream and the adapted control data
sub-stream may be combined so as to obtain a transcoded data stream
which is a different representation of data originally contained in
the coded data stream.
5. Some coding standards, such as, for example, MPEG image-coding
standards do not fix the size of the coded data but implicitly fix
the size of the control data. In such a coding standard, coded data
may be decoded and re-coded so as to obtain transcoded data which
may differ in size from the coded data. However, it is not possible
to do the same for the control data without departing from the
coding standard. If the data stream has to be transcoded while
maintaining conformity with its coding standard, one may adapt the
content of the control data but not its size. As a result, the
transcoded data sub-stream and the adapted control data sub-stream
will have different bit rates.
6. In accordance with the invention, the transcoded data and the
adapted control data are written into a transcoder output buffer
and read from the transcoder output buffer so as to obtain a
transcoded data stream. Accordingly, any difference in bit rate
between the transcoded data sub-stream and the control data
sub-stream can be averaged out in such a way that the transcoded
data stream has a bit rate which is substantially constant or, at
least, which does not substantially depend on whether coded data or
control data is conveyed. Thus, the invention allows the bit rate
of the transcoded data stream to be continuously equal to a maximum
bit rate which a certain transmission channel can handle or, at
least, relatively close thereto. Consequently, since the invention
allows an efficient use of the transmission channel via which the
transcoded data stream is transmitted, it allows the transcoded
data to have a relatively large size. Accordingly, the invention
ensures that a maximal amount of data is preserved in the
transcoding. Thus, the invention allows transcoding with a
satisfactory quality.
7. The invention and additional features, which may be optionally
used to implement the invention to advantage, are apparent from and
will be elucidated with reference to the drawings described
hereinafter.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
8. FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram illustrating basic features of
the invention as claimed in claim 1.
9. FIGS. 2 to 6 are conceptual diagrams illustrating additional
features as claimed in claims 2 to 5, respectively.
10. FIG. 7 is a block diagram of an example of a transcoder in
accordance with the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
11. First, some remarks will be made on the use of reference signs.
Similar entities are denoted by an identical letter code throughout
the drawings. In a single drawing, various similar entities may be
shown. In that case, a numeral is added to the letter code to
distinguish similar entities from each other. The numeral will be
between parentheses if the number of similar entities is a running
parameter. In the description and the claims, any numeral in a
reference sign may be omitted if this is appropriate.
12. FIG. 1 illustrates basic features of the invention. A data
stream DS to be transcoded comprises a time multiplex of coded data
D and control data C. The coded data D is transcoded T so as to
obtain transcoded data DT. The transcoded data DT differs in size
from the coded data D. The control data C is adapted A for the
transcoded data DT so to obtain adapted control data CA. The
adapted control data CA and the control data C are substantially
equal in size. The transcoded data DT and the adapted control data
CA are written into and read from a transcoder output buffer TOB so
as to obtain a transcoded data stream DST.
13. FIG. 2 illustrates the following feature in addition to the
features which have been discussed with reference to FIG. 1. The
data stream DS comprises control codes CC. A control code defines a
decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib for a coded data portion P
associated therewith. The decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib is
the difference between an instant Twd1 when the coded data portion
P is written into a decoder input buffer DIB1 and an instant Trd1
when the coded data portion P is to be read from the decoder input
buffer DIB1. In a step S/.DELTA.Ttob, a transcoder output buffer
delay .DELTA.Ttob is calculated. The transcoder output buffer delay
.DELTA.Ttob is the difference between an instant Twt when a
transcoded data portion PT obtained by transcoding the coded data
portion P is written into the transcoder output buffer TOB and an
instant Trt when the transcoded data portion PT is read from
transcoder output buffer TOB. In a step S/.DELTA.Tdib_new, a new
decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib_new is calculated. The new
decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib_new is substantially equal
to the sum of the decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib and a
transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans minus the transcoder output buffer
delay .DELTA.Ttob. In a step S/CCA, an adapted control code CCA is
provided for the transcoded data portion PT, the adapted control
code CCA defining the new decoder input buffer delay
.DELTA.Tdib_new.
14. The following aspects have been taken into consideration with
regard to the features illustrated in FIG. 2. The control codes CC
effectively determine a time pattern in accordance with which the
data portions P will be read out from the decoder input buffer DIB1
at the decoding end receiving the data stream DS. In many
applications, it will be desirable that the transcoded data
portions PT are read out in accordance with the same time pattern
from a decoder input buffer DIB2 at the decoding end receiving the
transcoded data stream DST.
15. In principle, it is possible to simply copy the control codes
CC from the data stream DS to the transcoded data stream DST. That
is, the decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib which is used for a
data portion P can also be used for a transcoded data portion PT
obtained by transcoding the data portion P. However, if this is
done, the transcoded data portions PT will be read out in
accordance with the same time pattern as the coded data portions P
only if the following condition is satisfied. In the transcoded
data stream DST, the transcoded data portions PT should be
positioned with respect to each other in exactly the same manner as
in the coded data portions P in the data stream DS. This implies
that each transcoded data portion PT should have a specific size.
In the process of transcoding, it may be relatively difficult, and
hence costly, to guarantee that each transcoded data portion PT has
the required size, or it may even be impossible to guarantee this.
Furthermore, in order to satisfy this condition, it may happen that
one or more transcoded data portions should have a relatively small
size. Accordingly, in the process of transcoding to obtain such a
small-size transcoded data portion, a relatively large amount of
information may be lost. This may adversely affect the quality of
data obtained by decoding the transcoded data stream DST.
16. The features illustrated in FIG. 2 provide the following
advantageous effects. The new decoder input buffer delay
.DELTA.Tdib_new is the difference between an instant Twd2 when the
transcoded data portion PT is written into a decoder input buffer
DIB2 and an instant Trd2 when the transcoded data portion PT is to
be read from the decoder input buffer DIB2. Let it be assumed that
the decoder input buffer DIB2 is directly coupled to the transcoder
output buffer TOB. In that case, the difference between the instant
the coded data portion P is written into the transcoder output
buffer TOB and the instant when the transcoded data portion PT is
read from the decoder input buffer DIB will be substantially equal
to the sum of the decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib and the
fixed transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans. Consequently, the difference
between the instant when the transcoded data portion PT is read
from the decoder input memory DIB2 and the instant when the coded
data portion P is read from the decoder input memory DIB1 is
substantially equal to the fixed transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans.
Thus, the transcoded data portions PT are read out from the decoder
input buffer DIB2 in accordance with the same time pattern as the
coded data portions P are read out from the decoder input buffer
DIB1. This equally applies if the transcoded data portions PT reach
the decoder input buffer DIB a certain transmission delay
.DELTA.Ttd after they have been read from the transcoder output
buffer TOB. Thus, the features illustrated in FIG. 2 allow the
transcoded data portions PT to be read out in accordance with a
desired time pattern without constraining the transcoded data
portions PT in size, which may entail relatively high costs and
adversely affect quality as explained hereinbefore. Thus, the
features illustrated in FIG. 2 contribute to relatively
cost-efficient implementations and a satisfactory quality.
17. The following additional remarks are made with regard to the
features illustrated in FIG. 2. The transcoder output delay
.DELTA.Ttob may be calculated in various different manners. For
example, it may be calculated on the basis of the following
parameters: (a) the amount of data which is contained in the
transcoder output buffer TOB at the instant when a transcoded data
portion PT is written into this buffer, and (b) the rate at which
data will be read from this buffer. The amount of data contained in
the transcoder buffer may be determined, for example, by counting
the amount of data which has been written into the transcoder
output buffer TOB and has been read from it. The rate at which data
will be read from the transcoder output buffer TOB is the bit rate
of the transcoded data stream DST which may be, for example,
determined by a controller. The following is an example of a
calculation of the transcoder output delay .DELTA.Ttob for a
certain transcoded data portion PT. Let it be assumed that the
transcoder output buffer TOB contains 500 kbits at the instant when
the transcoded data portion PT is written into the transcoder
output buffer TOB and that the bit rate of the transcoded data
stream DST is 5 Mbits per second. It can then easily be calculated
that the transcoded data portion will be read from the transcoder
output buffer TOB after a delay of 100 ms, thus the transcoder
output buffer delay .DELTA.Ttob for the data portion is 100 mS.
However, the transcoder output delay .DELTA.Ttob may also be
calculated by measuring the instant when the transcoded data
portion PT is written into the transcoder output buffer TOB and the
instant when the transcoded data portion is read from this buffer.
In that case, the transcoded data stream DST may be additionally
delayed at the transcoding end so as to allow the control code CC
to be adapted in a retroactive manner.
18. The fixed transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans should preferably be
equal to or greater than the delay actually introduced by the
process of transcoding. The fixed transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans
involves a compromise between picture quality and the total delay
between the transmission end and the receiving end. That is, if the
fixed transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans has a relatively large value,
this will contribute to the picture quality. However, a relatively
large value may not be satisfactory if there is a live transmission
of a football match for example.
19. Further additional features which may be optionally used to
implement the invention to advantage are illustrated in FIGS. 3, 4,
5 and 6. Each of these Figures includes a graph having a horizontal
axis representing time T and a vertical axis representing the
amount of data X. Each graph comprises three curves A, B and C.
Curve A represents the amount of data which has been written into
the transcoder output buffer TOB as a function of time. Curve B
represents the amount of data which has been removed from the
decoder output buffer TOB and has subsequently been written into
the decoder input buffer DIB at the decoding end. Curve C
represents the amount of data which has been read from the decoder
input buffer TOB as a function of time. The transcoder output
buffer TOB contains an amount of data which, at any instant, is the
difference between the curves A and B at this instant. The decoder
input buffer DIB contains an amount of data which, at any instant,
is the difference between the curves B and C at this instant.
20. FIG. 3 illustrates the following feature in addition to the
features which have been discussed with reference to FIG. 2. In a
step S/Ftob, a transcoder output buffer fullness Ftob is
determined. The transcoder output buffer fullness Ftob is the
amount of data A-B contained in the transcoder output buffer TOB at
the instant Twt when the transcoded data portion PT(i) is written
into the transcoder output buffer TOB. In a step S/Fdib, a decoder
input buffer fullness Fdib is calculated. The decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib is the amount of data B-C which will be contained in
a decoder input buffer receiving the transcoded data stream DST at
an instant Trd when the transcoded coded data portion PT(i) is to
be read from decoder input buffer DIB. The decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib is determined on the basis of the transcoder output
buffer fullness Ftob, a projected bit rate R for the transcoded
data stream DST, and the sum of the decoder input buffer delay
.DELTA.Tdib and the transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans. In a step
S/QP-Fdib, a quantization parameter QP determining the amount of
data XPT(i), which will be comprised in the transcoded data portion
PT, is adjusted in dependence on the decoder input buffer fullness
Fdib.
21. With regard to the features illustrated in FIG. 3, the
following aspects have been taken into consideration. If, within a
certain period of time, the amount of data read from the decoder
input buffer DIB exceeds the amount of data written into this
buffer, there is a risk that this buffer will underflow. That is,
at an instant when a certain transcoded data portion is to be read
from the decoder input buffer DIB, the transcoded data portion may
not have been fully written into this buffer yet. Conversely, if
within a certain period of time, the amount of data written into
the decoder input buffer DIB exceeds the amount of data read from
this buffer, there is a risk that this buffer will overflow. That
is, at an instant when a certain transcoded data portion reaches
the decoder input buffer DIB, there may not be sufficient room left
in this buffer DIB for storing the transcoded data portion. In any
case, an underflow or overflow will generally entail a certain loss
of transcoded data available for the decoding process. This may
cause annoying effects at the decoding end.
22. The features illustrated in FIG. 3 provide the following
advantageous effects. The amount of data XPT(i) contained in the
transcoded data portion PT(i) will depend on the decoder buffer
fullness Fdib. That is, the amount of data XPT(i) contained in the
transcoded data portion PT(i) will depend on the amount of data
contained in the decoder input buffer DIB at the instant Trd when
the transcoded data portion PT(i) will be read from this buffer.
This prevents underflow or overflow of the decoder input buffer
DIB. For example, let it be assumed that the decoder input buffer
DIB is calculated to be relatively full. In that case, the
quantization parameter QP can be set to such a value that the
transcoded data portion PT(i) comprises a relatively large amount
of data XPT(i) in order to avoid overflow. Conversely, if the
decoder input buffer DIB is calculated to be relatively empty, the
quantization parameter QP can be set to such a value that the
transcoded data portion PT comprises a relatively small amount of
data XPT(i) in order to avoid underflow. Thus, since the features
illustrated in FIG. 3 allow countering of underflow and overflow,
these features contribute to a satisfactory quality of data
obtained at the decoding end.
23. With regard to the features illustrated in FIG. 3, the
following additional remarks are made. The decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib can be calculated in various manners. For example, it
may be calculated by first calculating which amount of data DX will
be transferred from the transcoder output buffer TOB to the decoder
input buffer DIB in a time interval which begins at the instant Twt
when the transcoded data portion PT is written into the transcoder
output buffer and has a length which is equal to the sum of the
decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib and the transcoding delay
.DELTA.Ttrans. The graph included in FIG. 4 illustrates that the
following law applies: the amount of data DX is equal to the sum of
the transcoder input buffer fullness Ftob and the decoder input
buffer Fdib. Thus, the decoder input buffer fullness Fdib is the
difference between the amount of data DX and the transcoder output
buffer fullness Ftob. Another manner of calculating the decoder
input buffer fullness Fdib is to make use of the new decoder input
buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib_new calculated as explained with reference
to FIG. 2. The decoder input buffer fullness Fdib is the amount of
data which will be transferred from the transcoder output buffer
TOB to the decoder input buffer DIB in a time interval which begins
at the instant Trt when the transcoded data portion PT will be read
from the transcoder output buffer TOB and has a length which is
equal to the new decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib_new.
24. FIG. 4 illustrates the following features in addition to the
features which have been discussed with reference to FIG. 3. In a
step S/Ttarget, a target Ttarget is determined for the amount of
data XPT(i) to be comprised in the transcoded data portion PT(i).
In a step S/Ttarget_ver, it is verified if the target Ttarget
exceeds the input decoder buffer fullness Fdib. If so, the target
Ttarget is reduced so as to obtain a verified target Ttarget_ver
which does not exceed the decoder input buffer fullness Fdib. In a
step S/QP-Ttarget_ver, the quantization parameter QP is adjusted on
the basis of the verified target Ttarget_ver.
25. With regard to the features illustrated in FIG. 4, the
following aspects have been taken into consideration. Firstly, the
following scenario should be taken into account with regard to
underflow. At the decoding end, the transcoded data portion PT(i)
is immediately removed from the decoder input buffer DIB at the
instant Trd determined by the new decoder input buffer delay
.DELTA.Tdib_new discussed hereinbefore. If Ttarget exceeds the
decoder input buffer fullness Fdib, this may result in underflow.
That is, there is a risk that the transcoded data portion PT(i),
which should be present in the decoder input buffer DIB, is only
partially present or, in the worst case, is not present at all.
26. Secondly, there may be criteria other than decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib to adjust the quantization parameter QP. For example,
the data stream to be transcoded may comprise coded data portions
which are relatively small in size and data portions which are
relatively large in size. In general, a satisfactory transcoding
quality will be obtained if the relatively large coded data
portions are also transcoded into relatively large transcoded data
portions. Relatively small coded data portions are preferably
transcoded into relatively small transcoded data portions so as to
effectively leave sufficient room for the relatively large
transcoded data portions. Thus, in order to achieve a satisfactory
transcoding result, it may be desirable to adjust the quantization
parameter QP in dependence on which the amount of data contained in
coded data portions is to be transcoded.
27. The features illustrated in FIG. 4 provide the following
advantageous effects. The quantization parameter QP is directly
influenced by the decoder input buffer fullness Fdib only if the
target Ttarget exceeds the decoder buffer input fullness Fdib. That
is, the quantization parameter QP is directly influenced by the
decoder input buffer fullness Fdib only if there is a serious risk
of underflow. However, if there is little risk of underflow, the
quantization parameter QP is adjusted on the basis of the target
Ttarget as originally defined. The target Ttarget may be defined in
such a manner that a satisfactory transcoding quality is achieved.
For example, it may be defined on the basis of the size of the
coded data portion as discussed hereinbefore. The verification of
the target Ttarget is effectively a safeguard which, in principle,
should not come into action too often. Thus by allowing the
quantization parameter QP to be primarily adjusted on the basis of
one or more parameters other than decoder input buffer fullness
Fdib while providing a safeguard against underflow, the features
illustrated in FIG. 4 contribute to a satisfactory transcoding
quality.
28. FIG. 5 illustrates the following features in addition to the
features which have been discussed with reference to FIG. 2. There
is a fixed time interval .DELTA.Tpt between instants when
successive transcoded data portions PT are to be read from a
decoder input buffer receiving the transcoded data stream. In a
step S/Ttarget, a target Ttarget is determined for the amount of
data XPT(i) to be comprised in the transcoded data portion PT(i).
In a step S/Ftob, a transcoder output buffer fullness Ftob is
determined. The transcoder output buffer fullness Ftob is the
amount of data A-B contained in the transcoder output buffer TOB at
the instant Twt(i) when the transcoded data portion PT(i) is
written into the transcoder output buffer TOB. In a step
S/Fdib_next, a subsequent decoder input buffer fullness Fdib_next
is calculated. The next decoder input buffer fullness Fdib is the
amount of data B-C which will be contained in the decoder input
buffer DIB at an instant Trd(i+1)-.delta. just before a subsequent
transcoded coded data portion PT(i+1) is to be read from the
decoder input buffer DIB. The next decoder input buffer fullness
Fdib_next is calculated on the basis of the transcoder buffer
fullness Ftob, a projected bit-rate R for the transcoded data
stream, and the sum of the decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib,
the transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans and the fixed time interval
.DELTA.Tpt. In a step S/Ttarget_ver, it is verified if the next
decoder input buffer fullness Fdib_next exceeds a predefined
maximum MAX. If so, the target Ttarget is increased so as to obtain
a verified target Ttarget_ver for which the next decoder input
buffer fullness Fdib_next does not exceed the predefined maximum
MAX. In a step S/QP-Target_ver, the quantization parameter QP is
adjusted on the basis of the verified target Ttarget_ver.
29. With regard to the features illustrated in FIG. 5, aspects have
been taken into consideration which are similar to those with
regard to the features illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4. Other
considerations are as follows. The transcoded data portion PT(i)
may contain an amount of data XPT(i) which is smaller than the
amount of data which will be written into the decoder input buffer
DIB during the fixed time interval .DELTA.Tpt between the instant
Trd(i) and Trd(i+1)-.delta.. In that case, the amount of data
contained in the decoder input buffer DIB will grow during that
time interval. There may be an overflow if the decoder input buffer
DIB is already filled with an appreciable amount of data and if the
transcoded data portion PT(i) contains a relatively small amount of
data XPT(i).
30. The features illustrated in FIG. 5 provide the following
advantageous effects. The next decoder input buffer fullness
Fdib_next is effectively a prediction of the amount of data which
will be contained in the decoder input buffer DIB at the instant
Trd(i+1)-.delta. just before the next transcoded data portion
PT(i+1) are read from the decoder output buffer. This prediction is
made on the basis of the target Ttarget which has initially been
determined. It is verified if the predicted amount of data in the
decoder input buffer DIB at the instant Trd(i+1)-.delta. is below
the desired maximum MAX. That is, it is verified if overflow is
likely to occur or not for the target Ttarget initially determined.
If overflow is likely to occur, the target Ttarget is sufficiently
increased so that overflow is no longer likely to occur. Thus, the
features illustrated in FIG. 5 provide a safeguard against an
overflow of the decoder input buffer which may otherwise occur.
Other advantages related to these features are similar to the
advantages mentioned hereinbefore in connection with the features
illustrated in FIGS. 3 and 4.
31. FIG. 6 illustrates the following features in addition to the
features which have been discussed with reference to FIG. 2. A
transcoded data portion PT(i-k) precedes the transcoded data
portion PT(i) discussed with reference to FIG. 2. These data
portions are hereinafter referred to as current transcoded data
portion PT(i-k) and future transcoded data portion PT(i),
respectively. In a step S/Fdib_des, a desired decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib_des is defined. The desired decoder input buffer
fullness Fdib_des is the amount of data B-C which the decoder input
buffer DIB should preferably contain at the instant Trd(i) when the
future transcoded data portion PT(i) is to be read from the decoder
input buffer DIB. In a step S/.DELTA.Tdib(i), the decoder input
buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib(i) associated with the future data portion
P(i) is predicted. In a step S/Ftob_des, a desired transcoder
output buffer fullness Ftob_des is calculated. The desired
transcoder output buffer fullness Ftob_des is the amount of data
A-B which the transcoder buffer TOB should preferably contain at
the instant Twt(i) when the future transcoded data portion is to be
written in the transcoder output buffer TOB. The desired transcoder
output buffer is calculated on the basis of the projected bitrate R
for the transcoded data stream and the predicted decoder input
buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib(i). In a step S/QP-Ftob_des, the
quantization parameter QP determining the amount of data XPT(i-k)
comprised in the current transcoded data portion PT(i-k) is
adjusted on the basis of the desired transcoder output buffer
fullness Ftob_des.
32. The following aspects have been taken into consideration with
regard to the FIG. 6 features. It has already been mentioned that a
satisfactory transcoding quality can be obtained if a coded data
portion which comprises a relatively large amount of data is
transcoded into a transcoded data portion which also comprises a
relatively large amount of data. However, as discussed in
connection with the features illustrated in FIG. 4, there is a risk
of underflow when a relatively large transcoded data portion PT is
to be read from the decoder input buffer DIB. That is, there is a
risk that the relatively large transcoded data portion has not yet
been fully written into the decoder output buffer DIB at this very
instant. This risk is reduced if the features illustrated in FIG. 4
are applied, that is, if it is tried to keep the amount of data in
the relatively large transcoded data portion below a critical value
for which underflow may occur. In that case, avoiding underflow is
the criterion for the amount of data to be comprised in the
relatively large transcoded data portion whereas, preferably, one
or more other criteria should apply such as the amount of data
contained in the coded data portion from which the transcoded data
portion in question is derived. It is thus desirable that the
amount of data contained in decoder input buffer DIB remains within
certain limits without any asfeguard coming into action like the
features illustrated in FIG. 4 or, at least, if there is a
safeguard, it does not come into action too often.
33. The features illustrated in FIG. 6 provide the following
advantageous effects. The quantization parameter QP and hence the
amount of data XPT(i-k) comprised in the current transcoded data
portion PT(i-k) are adjusted in such a way that the amount of data
contained in the decoder input buffer for the future transcoded
data portion PT(i) is at a desired level or at least sufficiently
close to it. Thus, the features illustrated in FIG. 6 provide, as
it were, a long-term strategy which prevents that, when the future
transcoded data portion PT(i) is to be transcoded, short-term
measures have to be taken, for example, in order to avoid an
underflow in the decoder input buffer DIB. The future transcoded
data portion PT(i) may be, for example, of a type which is known or
expected to comprise a relatively large amount of data. In that
case, the desired decoder input buffer fullness Fdib_des is
preferably relatively high so as to allow the future transcoded
data portion PT(i) to contain a relatively large amount of data.
Accordingly, this reduces the chance that any safeguard like the
features illustrated in FIG. 4 comes into action. The features
illustrated in FIG. 6 thus provide an element of anticipation to
the adjustment of the quantization parameter QP which contributes
to a satisfactory transcoding quality.
34. FIG. 7 illustrates an example of a transcoder in accordance
with the invention, in which any of the features discussed
hereinbefore with reference to FIGS. 1 to 6 may be implemented,
either individually or in combination. The data stream DS received
by the FIG. 7 transcoder may be of the MPEG type representing a
sequence of pictures in which each coded data portion P represents
a different picture. The transcoded data stream DST may equally be
of the MPEG type in which each transcoded data portion PT
represents the same picture as the coded data portion P from which
it was obtained. The transcoded data stream DST may have a lower
bit-rate than the data stream DS. In that case, the FIG. 7
transcoder carries out a bitrate conversion.
35. The FIG. 7 transcoder comprises the transcoder output buffer
memory TOB mentioned hereinbefore and, in addition, a transcoding
circuit TRC and a controller CON. The transcoding circuit TRC
comprises a variable-length decoder VLD, a variable-length coder
VLC, a quantizer Q two de-quantizers DQ1, DQP, a discrete-cosine
transformer DCT, an inverse discrete-cosine transformer IDCT, a
memory MEM, a motion compensator MC, and two subtracters S1, S2. A
transcoding circuit identical to the transcoding circuit TRC is
described in greater detail in EP-A 0 690 392.
36. The transcoding circuit TRC transcodes coded data portions P
into transcoded data portions PT. The amount of data comprised in a
transcoded data portion is determined by the quantization parameter
QP of the quantizer Q. Both the coded data portion P and the
transcoded data portions PT comprise quantized DCT coefficients.
The quantizer QP effectively re-quantizes DCT coefficients which
have first been quantized at a coding end and then de-quantized by
the de-quantizer DQ1. The quantization of a DCT coefficient with a
certain value of the quantization parameter QP means that the value
of the DCT coefficient is divided by the value of the quantization
parameter QP and then rounded off to the nearest possible integer.
For example, let it be assumed that a DCT coefficient may assume
any integral value between -128 and 127. In that case, 8 bits are
required to represent the DCT coefficient in a binary form. If the
quantizer Q quantizes the DCT coefficient with a quantization
parameter 4, a quantized DCT coefficient will be obtained which may
assume any integral value between -32 and 31. In that case, only 6
bits are required to represent the quantized DCT coefficient.
However, if the quantizer Q quantized the DCT coefficient with a
quantization parameter 8, a quantized DCT coefficient would be
obtained which may assume any integral value between -16 and 15. In
that case, only 5 bits are required to represent the quantized DCT
coefficient.
37. The controller CON effectively carries out the steps which have
been described in connection with any of the features illustrated
in FIGS. 1 to 6. To that end, the controller receives parameters
from the coded data stream DS such as decoder input buffer delays
.DELTA.Tdib defined by the control codes CC in the coded data
stream DS. It should be noted that the control codes CC correspond
to what is referred to as "vbv buffer delay" in MPEG standards. The
controller CON may also receive one or more parameters from the
transcoder output buffer TOB relating to the amount of data which
is comprised in this buffer or the transcoder output buffer delay
.DELTA.Ttob or both. Furthermore, the controller CON may determine
or have knowledge of the projected bitrate R of the transcoded data
stream DST. On the basis of such parameters which the controller
CON receives or are available in the controller CON, it calculates
a new decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib_new for transcoded
data portions PT. The controller CON may also adjust the
quantization parameter on the basis of one or more algorithms in
accordance with the features described in connection with FIGS. 3
to 6. The controller CON may be in the form of a suitably
programmed computer.
38. There are various manners in which the controller CON may
adjust the quantization parameter QP. One example will now be
described. For a picture which has been transcoded, the controller
CON calculates the product of (1) the quantization parameter QP it
has applied and (2) the amount of transcoded data which has been
obtained, for example in terms of number of output bits. This
product will hereinafter be referred to as the complexity of the
picture. The complexity is a measure of how difficult it is, as it
were, to code the picture. The picture can be considered difficult
to code if the quantization parameter QP has a relatively high
value, implying that the DCT coefficients are expressed using
relatively few bits and that relatively many DCT coefficients
should be rounded of to `0`, but nevertheless a relatively large
amount of transcoded data has been obtained. In that case, the
complexity, which is the product of the quantization parameter QP
and the amount of data which has been obtained, will have a
relatively high value thus indicating that the picture is difficult
to code.
39. Let is be assumed that a picture of a certain coding type I, P
or B is to be transcoded. A basic value for the quantization
parameter QP to be applied in transcoding the picture is calculated
as follows. The basic value is the complexity of the last
transcoded picture of the same coding type I, P or B, respectively,
divided by a picture target. The picture target is the amount of
data which should ideally be obtained by transcoding the picture.
It may be defined in various manners. Two examples will be given
hereinafter, one is a short-term approach, the other a long-term
approach It should be noted that the basic value for the
quantization parameter QP is, in effect, determined on the basis of
previous coding experiences based. It is assumed that the
respective complexities of two subsequent pictures will not differ
much. This assumption is correct in most cases.
40. The picture target, which is used to calculate the basic value
for the quantization parameter QP, may be defined as follows. It is
calculated what the decoder input buffer fullness will be at the
instant just before the transcoded data of the picture will be read
from the decoder input buffer. Referring to FIG. 3, with PT(i)
representing the transcoded data of the picture, the decoder input
buffer fullness Fdib is calculated on the basis of the transcoder
output buffer fullness Ftob and the projected bitrate R in the time
span between Twt and Trd, the length of this time span being
.DELTA.Tdib+.DELTA.Ttrans. It is defined what the decoder input
buffer fullness should be just after the transcoded data of the
picture will have been read from the decoder input buffer.
Referring to FIG. 3, it is defined what the difference between
curves B and C should be just after the instant Trd, this
difference being the desired decoder input buffer fullness. The
picture target is then the difference between the decoder buffer
fullness Fdib and the desired decoder buffer fullness. Such a
manner of determining the picture target may be described as
follows. Before a picture is transcoded, it is determined "where
are we?" and "where do we want to be?" in terms of decoder input
buffer fullness. The difference between these two is the picture
target.
41. It is possible to define a fixed desired decoder input buffer
fullness for each picture, whereby a distinction between coding
types I, P and B may be made, and to calculate the picture target
as described hereinbefore. This can be regarded as an approach
using a short-term target, the short term corresponding to the
duration of a picture. However, a better picture quality will
generally be obtained if an approach is used which is based on a
long-term target, the long term corresponding to a sequence of N
pictures, N being an integer. This allows flexibility in picture
targets in the sense that a higher picture target can be assigned
for a picture in the sequence of N pictures which is relatively
complex, at the expense of the picture targets for the other
pictures in the sequence. Accordingly, a more even picture quality
can be obtained.
42. The following is an example of an approach which uses a
long-term target. A desired decoder input buffer fullness is
defined for a future instant. The future instant is the instant
just after the N-th picture following the previously transcoded
picture, will have been read from the decoder input buffer. Thus,
if N were 1, the future instant would be the instant just after the
picture currently to be transcoded will have been read from the
decoder input buffer. However, if N were 1, this would correspond
to the approach using a short-term target as described
hereinbefore. The integer N preferably corresponds to the number of
pictures contained in a group of pictures such as defined in MPEG.
For example, N may be 12.
43. The aforementioned future instant can be calculated on the
basis of the decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib as defined by
the "vbv buffer delay" associated to the picture currently to be
transcoded. Let it be assumed that "now" is the instant just before
the picture currently to be transcoded is written into the
transcoder output buffer. Referring to FIG. 3, with PT(i) being the
picture currently to be transcoded, "now" is the instant Twt. The
future instant is the end of a time span which starts at "now", the
time span having a length which is the sum of decoder input buffer
delay .DELTA.Tdib and the transcoding delay .DELTA.Trans plus N-1
picture periods. Thus, the future instant is "now" plus .DELTA.Tdib
plus .DELTA.Trans plus N-1 times .DELTA.Tpt, .DELTA.Tpt being the
picture period. The sum of decoder input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib
and the transcoding delay .DELTA.Ttrans marks the instant when the
first picture of the N pictures is read from the decoder input
buffer. Consequently, since a picture is read from the decoder
input buffer each picture period, the Nth picture will be read N-1
picture periods after the first picture is read.
44. A group target for the N subsequent pictures to be transcoded
is calculated on the basis of the aforementioned time span, the
projected bitrate for the transcoded data stream during this time
span, the actual transcoder output buffer fullness and the desired
decoder input buffer fullness at the aforementioned future instant.
The group target represents the amount of data which should ideally
be obtained by transcoding the subsequent N pictures. That is, if
the group target were met, the decoder input buffer fullness would
be the desired decoder input buffer fullness at the future
instant.
45. The group target is calculated as follows. The amount of data
which will be transferred from the transcoder output buffer to the
decoder input buffer during the aforementioned time span, is
calculated on the basis of the projected bitrate. The group target
is the aforementioned amount of data minus the actual transcoder
output buffer fullness and minus the desired decoder input buffer
fullness. For example, let it be assumed that the bitrate in the
time span concerned will be constant and equal to R. Then, the
amount of data which will be transferred from the transcoder output
buffer to the decoder input buffer during the time span, is R times
the length of the time span. Thus, the group target is R times the
length of the time span minus the actual transcoder output buffer
fullness and minus the desired decoder input buffer fullness.
46. The picture target for the picture to be transcoded is
calculated on the basis of the aforementioned group target in the
following manner. A sum of the complexities of the last N
transcoded pictures is calculated first. The picture target is the
complexity of the last transcoded picture having the same coding
type as the picture to be transcoded, multiplied by the group
target and divided by the sum of complexities. Thus, if a recent
transcoded picture was relatively complex, meaning that its
complexity has a high value, a subsequent picture to be transcoded
having the same coding type will have a relatively high picture
target.
47. It should be noted that the picture target presented several
paragraphs before, does not take into account picture complexity
but is directly derived from an actual buffer fullness and a
desired buffer fullness within a short term, i.e. the next picture.
Thus, this short-term based picture target is, as it were, rigid
compared with the long-term based picture target presented in the
preceding paragraph. The long-term based picture target presented
in the preceding paragraph takes into account, as it were, that
some pictures may be more complex than others and, consequently,
that they should be allowed to produce more bits when transcoded at
the expense of other pictures. Accordingly, it can be prevented
that the quantization parameter QP suffers from relatively large
short-term fluctuations which is not beneficial to the picture
quality.
48. Advantageously, the long-term based picture target is verified
to be sure that the decoder input buffer will neither underflow nor
overflow if the amount of data obtained by transcoding the picture
were indeed equal to this picture target. FIGS. 4 and 5 illustrate
verification methods for overflow and underflow, respectively. If
the picture target were to cause underflow, it is decreased in
order to prevent underflow. Conversely, if the picture target were
to cause overflow, it is increased in order to prevent underflow.
The basic value for the quantization parameter QP is obtained by
dividing the complexity of the last transcoded picture of the same
coding type by the picture target which has been verified.
49. The basic value of the quantization parameter QP may be applied
for each macroblock in the picture to be transcoded. However, it
will generally be advantageous in terms of picture quality to
adjust the quantization parameter's value macroblock by macroblock.
This can be done in the following manner. The MPEG data stream
comprises control codes indicating, for each macro block, the value
of the quantization parameter which was used for encoding the
macroblock. This value, which will hereinafter be referred to as
the original value, is used for deriving a correction coefficient.
Thus, a correction coefficient is derived for each macroblock. The
value of the quantization parameter QP to be applied for
transcoding a macroblock, is the basic value of the quantization
parameter QP times the correction coefficient for the
macroblock.
50. The correction coefficient may be calculated in the following
manner. Each original value is divided by a weighing factor
depending on the coding type of the macroblock concerned so as to
obtain weighed original values. The mean of the weighed original
values of the last transcoded picture is calculated so as to obtain
a mean original value. The correction coefficient is the ratio of
twice the current original value plus the mean original value and
the current original value plus twice the mean original value.
51. The various aspects of determining a value for the quantization
parameter QP described hereinbefore and with reference to FIGS.
3-7, have the following feature in common. The decoder input buffer
delay .DELTA.Tdib associated with a data portion PT to be
transcoded, is used to determine the quantization parameter QP for
transcoding that data portion PT. Thus, in transcoding an MPEG data
stream, the vbv buffer delay associated with a coded picture is
used to determine the quantization parameter QP for transcoding
that picture. The reason for doing so can be understood from FIG. 3
for example. The larger the input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib, the
fuller the decoder input buffer will be (Fdib larger) just before
the data portion concerned is read from the decoder input buffer
and vice versa. Since the input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib is used to
determine the quantization parameter QP, it can thus be prevented
that the decoder input buffer will exceed an upper limit (overflow)
or will be below a lower limit (underflow). Furthermore, in a
long-term approach aiming at a desired decoder buffer fullness when
an N-th subsequent data portion will be read from the decoder input
buffer, the input buffer delay .DELTA.Tdib can be used to calculate
a desired amount of transcoded data to be obtained in coding the N
subsequent data portions. An appropriate value for the quantization
parameter QP can be derived from that desired amount of data.
52. The drawings and their description hereinbefore illustrate
rather than limit the invention. It will be evident that there are
numerous alternatives which fall within the scope of the appended
claims. In this respect, the following closing remarks are
made.
53. There are numerous ways of physically spreading functions or
functional elements over various units. In this respect, the
drawings are very diagrammatic, each representing only one possible
embodiment of the invention. Thus, although a drawing shows
different functional elements as different blocks, this by no means
excludes the implementation of some functional elements or all
functional elements as a single physical unit.
54. In the claims, any reference sign between parentheses shall not
be construed as limiting the claim concerned.
* * * * *