Wing; George S.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wing; George S..The latest application filed is for "extended counterbore nut".
- Wing; George S. - Redondo Beach CA
- Wing; George S. - Palos Verdes Estates CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Extended counterbore nut Grant 4,979,857 - Wing December 25, 1 | 1990-12-25 |
| Process for setting a threaded torque-limited collar and pin joint Grant 4,881,316 - Wing November 21, 1 | 1989-11-21 |
| Prevailing torque fastener assembly Grant 4,790,703 - Wing December 13, 1 | 1988-12-13 |
| Hermetically sealed flat case Grant 4,781,288 - Wing November 1, 1 | 1988-11-01 |
| Tension limiter for linkages Grant 4,624,155 - Wing November 25, 1 | 1986-11-25 |
| Safety bolt Grant 4,112,992 - Wing September 12, 1 | 1978-09-12 |
| Unitary lockable turnbuckle Grant 4,111,568 - Wing September 5, 1 | 1978-09-05 |
| Mechanism for securing a nut against loosening Grant 3,942,570 - Bochman, Jr. , et al. * March 9, 1 | 1976-03-09 |
| Internally Reactive Structural Joinder System Grant 3,868,872 - Wing March 4, 1 | 1975-03-04 |
| Mechanism For Securing A Nut Against Loosening Grant 3,851,690 - Wing , et al. December 3, 1 | 1974-12-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 