loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Walton; Richard S..The latest application filed is for "medical timer apparatus".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Medical timer apparatus Grant 4,588,303 - Wirtschafter , et al. May 13, 1 | 1986-05-13 |
Digital watch Grant 4,320,478 - Daniels , et al. March 16, 1 | 1982-03-16 |
Digital watch Grant 4,245,337 - Daniels , et al. January 13, 1 | 1981-01-13 |
Liquid Crystal Display Circuit Grant 3,760,406 - Walton September 18, 1 | 1973-09-18 |
Solid State Timepiece Grant 3,707,071 - Walton December 26, 1 | 1972-12-26 |
Solid State Timepiece With Liquid Crystal Display Grant 3,701,249 - Bergey , et al. October 31, 1 | 1972-10-31 |
Electronic Watch Grant 3,676,993 - Bergey , et al. July 18, 1 | 1972-07-18 |
Solid State Watch Grant 3,672,155 - Bergey , et al. June 27, 1 | 1972-06-27 |
Electronically Controlled Timepiece Using Low Power Mos Transistor Circuitry Grant 3,664,118 - Walton * May 23, 1 | 1972-05-23 |
Piezoelectric-fluid Electromechanical Transducer Grant 3,596,116 - Walton July 27, 1 | 1971-07-27 |
Solid State Timepiece Having Electro-optical Time Display Grant 3,576,099 - Walton April 27, 1 | 1971-04-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.