loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Pommer; Richard.The latest application filed is for "multi-layer interconnect".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Small-scale optoelectronic package Grant 6,910,812 - Pommer , et al. June 28, 2 | 2005-06-28 |
Multi-layer interconnect App 20040124534 - Pommer, Richard ;   et al. | 2004-07-01 |
Lasable bond-ply materials for high density printed wiring boards Grant 6,673,190 - Haas , et al. January 6, 2 | 2004-01-06 |
Small-scale optoelectronic package App 20030201462 - Pommer, Richard ;   et al. | 2003-10-30 |
Power conditioning substrate stiffener App 20030197256 - Pommer, Richard | 2003-10-23 |
Method of making a multi-layer interconnect Grant 6,607,939 - Pommer , et al. August 19, 2 | 2003-08-19 |
Multi-layer interconnect App 20020092159 - Pommer, Richard ;   et al. | 2002-07-18 |
Lasable bond-ply materials for high density printed wiring boards App 20020004352 - Haas, David ;   et al. | 2002-01-10 |
Multi-layer Interconnect App 20020003303 - POMMER, RICHARD ;   et al. | 2002-01-10 |
Substrate Manufacturing Plant Having Minimum Footprint Skinned Lines App 20010039715 - POMMER, RICHARD ;   et al. | 2001-11-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.