OTTEN; Matthew R.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for OTTEN; Matthew R..The latest application filed is for "anti-fog film for an endoscope".
- OTTEN; Matthew R. - Cincinnati OH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Anti-fog Film For An Endoscope App 20180325368 - OTTEN; Matthew R. | 2018-11-15 |
| Anti-fog Film For An Endoscope App 20150223672 - OTTEN; Matthew R. | 2015-08-13 |
| Cervical dilator App 20040127931 - Kincaid, Geoffrey C. ; et al. | 2004-07-01 |
| Reloadable surgical instrument Grant 5,855,311 - Hamblin , et al. January 5, 1 | 1999-01-05 |
| Surgical stapling instrument with remotely articulated stapling head assembly on rotatable support shaft Grant 5,794,834 - Hamblin , et al. August 18, 1 | 1998-08-18 |
| Surgical instrument having staple head adapted for rib insertion Grant 5,605,273 - Hamblin , et al. February 25, 1 | 1997-02-25 |
| Handle actuator for surgical instrument having flexible cable Grant 5,580,067 - Hamblin , et al. December 3, 1 | 1996-12-03 |
| Handle actuator for surgical instrument having clamp lock and emergency release Grant 5,547,117 - Hamblin , et al. August 20, 1 | 1996-08-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 