Neonode, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Neonode, Inc.. Neonode, Inc. has 39 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ZFORCE DRIVE"
- Company Aliases
- Neonode Inc.
- Neonode, Inc.
- Neonode Inc. - San Jose CA US
| State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 2880 Zanker Road, Suite 362 San Jose, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 95134 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| OPTICAL TOUCH SENSOR 20220100313 - 17/487195 Holmgren; Stefan Johannes | 2022-03-31 |
| MOTORIST USER INTERFACE SENSOR 20220035477 - 17/296252 Holmgren; Stefan Johannes ; et al. | 2022-02-03 |
| OPTICAL PROXIMITY SENSORS 20210349569 - 17/385260 Holmgren; Stefan Johannes ; et al. | 2021-11-11 |
| MULTI-PLANE REFLECTIVE SENSOR 20210223906 - 17/198273 Eriksson; Thomas ; et al. | 2021-07-22 |
| USER INTERFACE 20210181891 - 17/176033 Eriksson; Bjorn Thomas ; et al. | 2021-06-17 |
| NCAGE Code | 862K1 | NEONODE INC. |
| CAGE Code | 862K1 | NEONODE INC. |
| S.A.M. Registration | 862K1 [808188275] | NEONODE INC. |
| SEC | 0001385777 | Neonode Inc |
| SEC | 0000087050 | Neonode Inc. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 