CZUPRYNSKI; Blazej
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for CZUPRYNSKI; Blazej.The latest application filed is for "system, methods, device and apparatuses for preforming simultaneous localization and mapping".
- CZUPRYNSKI; Blazej - Lausanne CH
- Czuprynski; Blazej - Warsaw PL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| System, Methods, Device And Apparatuses For Preforming Simultaneous Localization And Mapping App 20220146267 - TADI; Tej ; et al. | 2022-05-12 |
| System, Methods, Device And Apparatuses For Preforming Simultaneous Localization And Mapping App 20200158517 - TADI; Tej ; et al. | 2020-05-21 |
| Eye gaze tracking method and apparatus and computer-readable recording medium Grant 9,798,384 - Strupczewski , et al. October 24, 2 | 2017-10-24 |
| Eye Gaze Tracking Method And Apparatus And Computer-readable Recording Medium App 20160026246 - STRUPCZEWSKI; Adam ; et al. | 2016-01-28 |
| Eye gaze tracking method and apparatus and computer-readable recording medium Grant 9,182,819 - Strupczewski , et al. November 10, 2 | 2015-11-10 |
| Eye Gaze Tracking Method And Apparatus And Computer-readable Recording Medium App 20150293588 - STRUPCZEWSKI; Adam ; et al. | 2015-10-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 