DLC
Guangzhou Mingke Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 98547662 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 0: |
| Attorney Name | Doyle Chisholm |
| Attorney Docket Number | Icon Pulse |
Timeline
| 2024-04-29 | Date of First Use |
| 2024-05-13 | Application Filed |
| 2024-05-13 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2024-05-13 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Guangzhou Mingke Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. |
| Entity Statement | limited company (ltd.) |
| Address | Huijiang Village, Dashi St, Panyu Dist Rm 201, No. 2, Jiangli West Rd Guangzhou, Guangdo CN 511430 |
| Legal Entity Type | |
| Legal Entity State | CN |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 7 |
| U.S. Codes: | 013,019,021,023,024,031,034,035 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| DM0000 | The mark consists of the stylized wording "DLC" within the design logo of heart shaped plant roots. |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2024-05-13 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 