PHARAOH
Pharaoh Inc.
| Research |
OneLook
Acronym Finder
|
| Serial Number | 97977919 |
| Mark Drawing Code | 4000: Illustration: Drawing with word(s)/letter(s)/number(s) in Block form |
| Attorney Name | Ritchie W. Taylor |
| Law Office Assigned | O10 |
| Employee Name | PAYABYAB, EDWARD TAN |
Timeline
| 2017-07-31 | Date of First Use |
| 2022-05-05 | Application Filed |
| 2024-02-09 | Status: Live/Pending |
| 2024-04-08 | Location: DIVISIONAL UNIT |
| 2024-04-08 | Transaction Date |
Trademark Applicants & Owners
| Owner: |  Pharaoh Inc. |
| Address | 2308 Misty Ridge Circle Hoover AL 35226 |
| Legal Entity Type | Corporation |
| Legal Entity State | AL |
Documents
Click the blue "Refresh" button to load certificates, specimines, application, and other documents.
Attorney of Record
Good, Services, and Codes
| International Codes: | 37 |
| U.S. Codes: | 100,103,106 |
| Type Code | Type |
|---|---|
| GS0371 | Installation, maintenance and repair of cell phone related hardware |
Trademark Filing History
| Description | Date | Event Coding |
|---|---|---|
| NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | 2022-05-09 | 1 NWAP I:Incoming Correspondence |
| NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | 2022-05-10 | 2 NWOS I:Incoming Correspondence |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2023-02-23 | 3 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2023-03-10 | 4 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | 2023-09-05 | 5 DOCK D:Assigned to Examiner |
| TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | 2023-09-29 | 6 PARI I:Incoming Correspondence |
| PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | 2023-09-29 | 7 AMPX O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | 2023-09-29 | 8 CNRT R:Renewal |
| CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | 2023-09-29 | 9 GRML O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | 2023-12-28 | 10 TROA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2023-12-28 | 11 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2023-12-29 | 12 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | 2024-02-09 | 13 CNFR R:Renewal |
| FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | 2024-02-09 | 14 GNFR O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | 2024-02-09 | 15 GNFN O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | 2024-02-19 | 16 ERTD I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | 2024-03-19 | 17 AITU A:Allowance for Publication |
| DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | 2024-02-19 | 18 DRRR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | 2024-04-08 | 19 DPCC D:Assigned to Examiner |
| TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | 2024-05-06 | 20 ERFR I:Incoming Correspondence |
| CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | 2024-05-06 | 21 CRFA I:Incoming Correspondence |
| TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | 2024-05-06 | 22 TEME I:Incoming Correspondence |
| APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | 2024-05-16 | 23 CNSA O:Outgoing Correspondence |
| NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | 2024-05-29 | 24 NONP E:E-Mail |
| PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | 2024-06-18 | 25 PUBO A:Allowance for Publication |
| OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | 2024-06-18 | 26 NPUB E:E-Mail |
Similar Marks
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 