The mark consists of the stylized word "SAMSUNG" surrounded by an oval.
Mark For: SAMSUNG™ trademark registration is intended to cover the categories of automobile timepieces; clocks; clock cases being parts of clocks; watch bands; watch springs; chronometers; watches; watch glasses; watch cases; parts for all the aforesaid goods.
Status
2022-11-17 UTC
LIVE APPLICATION Awaiting Examination
The trademark application has been accepted by the Office (has met the minimum filing requirements) and has not yet been assigned to an examiner.
(Jewelry) Precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, not included in other classes; jewelry, precious stones; horological and chronometric instruments.
Filed Use
No
Current Use
No
Intent To Use
No
Filed ITU
No
44D Filed
No
44E Current
Yes
66A Current
No
Current Basis
No
No Basis
No
Attorney Name
Daniel I. Schloss
Attorney Docket Number
085697017400
Timeline
1995-08-29
Trademark Registered
2022-11-14
Application Filed
2022-11-17
Location: NEW APPLICATION PROCESSING
2022-11-17
Status: Live/Pending
2022-11-17
Status: New application awaiting assignment to an examining attorney. See current trademark processing wait times for more information.
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.